WQ0007026_Staff Report_20220624

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F5A9F49-9A6E-4DA9-A43A-B97C4C15601 F
Environmental
Quality
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Leah Parente
From: Cassidy Kurtz
Raleigh Regional Office
Application No.: WQ0007026
Facility Name: Sanford Health &
Rehabilitation
County: Lee
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or n No
a. Date of site visit: June 15, 2022
b. Site visit conducted by: Cassidy Kurtz
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Randall Jarrell, ORC and their contact information: (919) 210 - 2500 ext.
e. Driving directions:
2. Discharge Point(s): N/A
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: N/A
Classification:
River Basin and Sub basin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Arc the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ['Yes or ❑ No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted reports? n Yes n No n N/A
If no, plcasc explain:
1. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adcquatc? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, plcasc explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F5A9F49-9A6E-4DA9-A43A-B97C4C15601 F
6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? Yes No N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Arc thcrc any sctback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? n Yes or n No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ['Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Randall Jarrell Certificate #: SI/23925 Backup ORC: Chad Leinbach Certificate #:SI/23928
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or n No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: a grease trap; 4 septic tanks; an influent flow meter; a 4,560 ft2 sand filter; a 30-
day storage pond; a chemical feed chlorinator; a 2,000-gallon chlorine contact tank; duplex irrigation pumps with
an automatic irrigation timer; an 8 acre spray irrigation field; and all associated piping, valves, controls, and
appurtenances
Proposed flow: 15, 720 gpd
Current permitted flow: 15, 720 gpd (no change)
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? n Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? Z Yes or n No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ® Yes ❑ No n N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ['Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or n No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F5A9F49-9A6E-4DA9-A43A-B97C4C15601 F
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
See renewal application for monitorinwell coordinates.
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
O
I
If
0
l
II
O
I
If
0
l
II
O
I
If
0
l
II
O
I
//
0
I
II
O
I
//
0
/
II
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
❑ No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
® Notice(s) of violation n Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.): Ponding
observed on sand filter during inspection; see attached inspection letter/NOV and report.
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain.
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F5A9F49-9A6E-4DA9-A43A-B97C4C15601F
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item
Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
n Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
n Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
n Deny (Please state reasons: ) r—DocuSigned by:
6. Signature of report preparer: DocuSigned by:
Signature of regional supervisor: tU SSA. f. Atia.In,a
Date:
6/24/2022 B2916E6AB32144F
raSSt7'j
L—FE353E770E7A43B...
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14
Page 4 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8F5A9F49-9A6E-4DA9-A43A-B97C4C15601F
V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 5