HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0078115_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220603ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Shannon Becker
Aqua North Carolina, INC
202 Mackenan Court
Cary, NC 27511
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 23, 2022
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Greystone Subdivision WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0078115
Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Becker,
On May 19, 2022, Gary Hudson of this office met with Morgan Turner, Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC), to perform a Compliance Evaluation Inspection at the above
referenced wastewater treatment plant. This type of inspection consists of two basic
parts: an in -office file review and an on -site inspection of the treatment facility. The
attached EPA inspection form details the areas that were evaluated during this inspection.
The inspection of the facility was satisfactory. If you have any questions regarding the
inspection or this report, please contact Gary Hudson or me at (336) 776-9800 or by email
at gary.hudson@ncdenr.gov or lon.snider@ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
I DocuSigned b<y:
Jn,lAts'
— 145B49E225C94EA..
Lon Snider
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources
Attachments: EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
cc: WSRO
GDE
NORTH CAROLINA '
omm mr� ep..of o�.i
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800
United States Environmental Protection Agency
E PA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction
1
21IIIIII
Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
IN I 2 LI 3 I NC0078115 111 121 22/05/19 117
Type
1810I
IIIIIIIIIII
Inspector Fac Type
19I S I 2011
IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII I IIIIII
P6
Inspection
671
Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
I 70I I 711 172 I N I 731 1 74 71
I I
I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES Dermit Number)
Greystone Subdivision WWTP
Lot 74 Creek Bed Rd
Kernersville NC 27284
Entry Time/Date
09:OOAM 22/05/19
Permit Effective Date
17/06/01
Exit Time/Date
09:30AM 22/05/19
Permit Expiration Date
22/02/28
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Morgan Lee Turner/ORC/336-996-2841/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Dustin K Metreveon,NCSR 1802 Salisbury NC 28144//704-788-9497/7047886006
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenar Records/Reports
Facility Site Review
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Gary Hudson DWR/Division of Water Quality/336-776-9694/
Signature
of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
FDocuSigned by:
L—o, —r. Stiac>_ 6/22/2022
145B49E225C94EA...
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1
sI
NPDES yr/mo/day
N C0078115 111 121 22/05/19
I17
Inspection Type
18 [j
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
*The permit expired on February 28, 2022. A permit renewal application has been submitted.
*The WWTP appeared to be well operated and maintained. No discrepancies were noted during the
inspection.
*Mr. Turner does a very good job with regards to keeping records.
*The aeration basin appeared to be operating properly.
*The secondary clarifier appeared to be working properly. The effluent leaving the clarifier was very
clear on the day of the inspection.
Page# 2
Permit: NC0078115
Inspection Date: 05/19/2022
Owner - Facility: Greystone Subdivision WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new MODE
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? El • El El
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The permit expired on February 28, 2022. A permit renewal application has been
submitted.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable MODE
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The WWTP appeared to be well operated and maintained. No discrepancies were
noted during the inspection.
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • El El El
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? • El El El
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? • ❑ El El
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • El El El
Is the chain -of -custody complete? • El El El
Dates, times and location of sampling •
Name of individual performing the sampling •
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis ■
Name of person performing analyses •
Transported COCs •
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? • El El El
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? El El • El
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified El El • El
operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • El El El
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • El El El
Page# 3
Permit: NC0078115
Inspection Date: 05/19/2022
Owner - Facility: Greystone Subdivision WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility
classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment: Mr. Turner does a very good job with regards to keeping records.
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext. Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the diffusers operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ •
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) ❑ ❑ ❑ •
Comment: The aeration basin appeared to be operating properly.
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? • El ❑ ❑
Are weirs level? • El El El
Is the site free of weir blockage? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is scum removal adequate? ■ El ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? • El El El
Is the drive unit operational? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? ■ El ❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth) El El El •
Comment: The secondary clarifier appeared to be working properly. The effluent leaving the
clarifier was very clear on the day of the inspection.
Page# 4