NC0020800_Renewal Application_20170315

NPDES DOCYNENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0020800
Andrews WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Renewal Application
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
March 15, 2017
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the rezrerse side

..,CILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
FORM
2A NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow z 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
C Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name ANDREWS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Mailing Address PO BOX 1210
ANDREWS, NC 28901
Contact Person NANCY CURTIS TIM WOOD
Title MAYOR WWTP ORC
Telephone Number [phone] [phone]
Facility Address 464 REAGAN AVE.
(not P.O. Box) ANDREWS, NC 28901
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name TOWN OF ANDREWS
Mailing Address PO BOX 1210
ANDREWS, NC 28901
Contact Person NANCY CURTIS
Title MAYOR
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
® owner ❑ operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
❑ facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NC0020800 PSD
UIC Other
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Town of Andrews 1500 Separate Municipal
Total population served
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 2 of 22

51
Ir'ACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes ®No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each years data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12th month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 1.5 mgd
Two Years Aqo
b. Annual average daily flow rate 0.616 (2014)
c. Maximum daily flow rate
1.850 (10/15/14)
Last Year This Year
0.713 (2015) 0.570 (2016)
2.143 (12/31115) 1.961 (2/25/16)
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer 100
0 Combined storm and sanitary sewer %
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes 0 No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
1
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent None
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
v. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
N/A
N/A
N/A
® No
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s) mgd
Is discharge 0 continuous or 0 intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater? 0 Yes ® No
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site: mgd
Is land application 0 continuous or
0 intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
❑Yes ®No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 3 of 22

IiACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NCOO2O8OO
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility. mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.B. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection):
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
❑ Yes ® No
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method 0 continuous or 0 intermittent?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 4 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location VALLEY RIVER, ANDREWS. NC. 28901
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
CHEROKEE
(County)
NC
(State)
35°11'51' 83°50'46'
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) N/A ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) N/A ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 0.633 mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes ® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge: mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? 0 Yes ® No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water VALLEY RIVER
b. Name of watershed (if known) HIWASSEE RIVER WATERSHED
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): _ mg/I of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary
❑ Advanced 0 Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 85 %
Design SS removal 85 %
Design P removal %
Design N removal
Other %
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
CHLORINATION
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ❑ Yes ® No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QAIQC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QAIQC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number: 001
PARAMETER
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
5.8
s.u.
ipH
(Maximum)
7.4
s.u.
0.684
MGD
1460
Flow Rate
2.685
MGD
Temperature (Winter)
16.1
°C
11.35
°C
92
Temperature (Summer)
25.1
°C
21.5
°C
92
• For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLJMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (Report one)
BOD5
74.8
MG/L
23.3
MG/L
1460
SM5210B
2.0
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
>9000
#/100ML
62
#I100ML
1460
SM9222D
1/100m1
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
95.6
MG/L
19.7
MG/L
1460
SM2540D
5.0
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 6 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate z 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day
100,000 gpd
that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
Collection Dept.
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
Ongoing identification and repair of problem areas by Sewer
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within'/4 mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
8.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g..
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? El Yes 0 No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name: Earth Environmental Services
Mailing Address: 75 Bison Ln.
Murphy, NC. 28906
Telephone Number: [phone]
Responsibilities of Contractor: Laboratory Analysis/Sampling
B.S. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question 8.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
001
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
c. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
N/A
d. Provide dates imposed
applicable. For improvements
applicable. Indicate
Implementation Stage
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational
e. Have appropriate
Describe briefly:
by any compliance schedule
planned independently
dates as accurately as possible.
Level
permits/clearances concerning other
or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed
of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion
Schedule Actual Completion
MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
below, as
dates, as
0 No
04/30/2017
(Tentative Date)
(Tentative Date)
/
/ /
12/31/2017
/ /
/
/ /
/ / / /
Federal/State requirements been obtained? ® Yes
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must
effluent testing required by the permitting authority
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be
Outfall Number: 001
ONLY).
provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide
for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include
the indicated
information
conducted
other appropriate
data must be
reported must be based on data collected through analysis
must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing
no more than four and on -half years old.
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Conc,
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
OTHER
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
I'2pc: 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WVVTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
...(].1^- 1. *•� i. :7� 9-i -,�:J •y' ,v :..+ ?. �. h! L, Y •- w.'
BASIC AP LICA.TION;I VFORMeATIO,�V— `- = t ' �'' Y .;
kf . ,. 4. ,0. Y �:+'i`.►?ts.. i. r �•'1... L:,-.. .`.•'-^rc.[:S T-, _ .� "' A. ...., =;- :k s.x.. tt.' _ i ' • -- [ ... _
..,,,,..C.4p =A sqb..] :•rF!'O , [ 'Gti 1r.-.Y✓Sz-1.'Ya �r µ1.- •-Y , . - _-•
PART C:•. CERTIEiCATION� I:e �, q '� _,, *g { ,•
'� ..s Sr... nC 2 �7
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
® Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
® Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
0 Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
)5..4:_ 4.: + .N Lz�`:-ii•1c�. f '- -s •-•1-.` ti.•` . „,- � t5-..i 'c- lads-. .. '4,f� e.', M'c7`. r ..'•?•� - . _ r
ALL APPLICANTS MUST`COMPLETE, THE FOLLOWINGCERTIF.ICATION ''. �. k
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Mayor Nancy Curtis
-740Signature
��e
Telephone number [phone] -
Date signed 3 / , 5 )17
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR! DWR
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE,
PHENOLS,
AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
0.010
Mg/I
0.010
Mg/I
3
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
0.001
Mg/I
0.001
Mg/I
3
CHROMIUM
0.005
Mg/I
0.005
Mg/I
3
COPPER
0.067
Mg/I
0.033
Mg/I
3
LEAD
0.005
Mg/I
0.005
Mg/I
3
MERCURY
0.0002
Mg/I
0.0002
Mg/I
3
NICKEL
0.010
Mg/I
0.010
Mg/I
3
SELENIUM
0.010
Mg/I
0.010
Mg/I
3
SILVER
0.005
Mg/I
0.005
Mg/I
3
THALLIUM
ZINC
0.080
Mg/I
0.044
Mg/I
3
CYANIDE
0.042
Mg/I
0.010
Mg/I
3
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 10 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1, 2, 2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
1,1,1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4,6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 12 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL) ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-93). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfa I discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
1,2,4-
TR ICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information
on
other base -neutral compounds
requested
by the permit
writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g , pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 & 7550-22.
Page 14 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent
0 chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the
column per test (where each species
* POLLUTANT ANALYSIS SCAN RESULTS ATTACHED
toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
constitutes a test). Copy this page
Test number:
if
more than three tests are being reported.
Test number:
Test number:
a. Test information.
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 15 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
•-��4•yy�I.yu�y say %
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
LC50
95% C.I.
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 16 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
Chronic:
NOEC
IC25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
/ /
! /
/ /
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (CIUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
®Yes ID No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 0
b. Number of ClUs. 1
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: TEAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
Mailing Address: 3750 AIRPORT RD.
ANDREWS, NC. 28901
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
METAL FINISHING, ELECTROPLATING, AND ANCILLARY PROCESSES
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): GEAR CASES
Raw material(s): ALUMINUM AND OTHER MATERIALSIMETALS
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
*90,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent) *PERMITTED
the collection system in gallons per
FLOW
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
25,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes 0 No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ANDREWS WWTP, NC0020800
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENEWAL
RIVER BASIN:
HIWASSEE
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes EI No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
0 Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

Name and Address of Facility:
Town of Andrews WWTP
P.O. Box 1210
Andrews.N.C. 28901
Long Term Monitoring Plan Samples -Effluent
Earth EnviroNet8I Services
Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
Madison County Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
Date: 3/10/2015
Sample Collector.
Date and Time Sample Received:
Date and Time Sample Collected:
Date and Time Sample Analyzed:
MB
2/17-20/15 See
2/16-20/15 C.O.C.
< MHT
Test
2116-17/15
2/17-18/15
2/18-19/15
2/19-20/15
Report Limit
Method
Units
BOD
35.1
19.2
13.6
17.3
2.0
SM5210B
mg/L
TOTAL SUSPENDED RESIDUE
25.0
22.8
16.3
18.3
1.0
SM2540D
mg!L
pH
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.3
0-14
SM4500H+
units
AMMONIA NITROGEN
4.1
2.6
2.8
2.4
0.1
SM4500NH3F
mg/L
TEMPERATURE
9.4
8.2
6.4
6.3
0.1
SM2550B
deg C
CYANIDE TOTAL
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.005
SCA-SMas00 CN E
mg!L
CADMIUM
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.0010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
CHROMIUM
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.005
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
COPPER
0.008
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.001
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
LEAD
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.005
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg!L
NICKEL
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
ZINC
0.042
0.032
0.032 -
0.033
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
SILVER
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.005
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
ARSENIC
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mglL
SELENIUM
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mglL
MOLYBDENUM .
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mglL
MERCURY
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
0.00020
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg!L
OIL & GREASE
5.1
< 5.0
< 5.0
< 5.0
5.0
SCA-EPA1664A
mg/L
N.C. Laboratory ID# 352
Analyzed By:
Note: pH and Temperature performed as Field Analyses by EES
Lab Supervisor. Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville Certified By:
MB
/naud te,,ta

Earth EflviroRentaI Serices
Name and Address of Facility:
Town of Andrews WWTP
P.O. Box 1210
Andrews.N.C. 28901
Long Term Monitoring Plan Samples -Effluent
Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
Madison County Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
Date: 6/16/2014
Sample Collector:
Date and Time Sample Received:
Date and Time Sample Collected:
Date and Time Sample Analyzed:
MB
5/20-23/14 See
5/19-23/14 C.O.C.
< MHT
Test
5/19-20/14
5/20-21/14
5/21-22/14
5/22-23/14
Report Limit
Method
Units
BOD
23.1
16.6
16.9
15.4
2.0
SM5210B
mg/L
TOTAL SUSPENDED RESIDUE
14.3
8.1
8.5
8
1.0
SM2540D
mg/L
..pH
6.6
6.1
6.1
6.0
0-14
SM4500H+
units
'AMMONIA NITROGEN
5.1
3.2
2.8
2.2
0.1
SM4500NH3F
mg/L
TEMPERATURE
17.8
16.5
17.2
18.2
0.1
SM2550B
deg C
CYANIDE TOTAL
0.006
0.006
0.015
0.023
0.005
SCA-SM4500 CN E
mglL
CADMIUM
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.0010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
CHROMIUM
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.005
SCA-EPA 200.7
mglL
COPPER
0.067
0.007
0.007
0.008
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
LEAD
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.005
SCA-EPA 200.7
mglL
NICKEL
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
ZINC
0.037
0.037
0.036
0.043
0.030
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
SILVER
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.005
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
ARSENIC
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
SELENIUM
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
MOLYBDENUM
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
MERCURY
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
0.00020
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
OIL & GREASE
< 5.0
< 5.0
< 5.0
< 5.0
5.0
SCA-EPA1664A
mg/L
N.C. Laboratory ID# 352 Analyzed By:
Note: pH and Temperature performed as Field Analyses by EES
Lab Supervisor. Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville Certified By:
MB

Earth Environifiental Services
Name and Address of Facility:
Town of Andrews WWTP
P.O. Box 1210
Andrews. N.C. 28901
Long Term Monitoring Plan Samples -Effluent
Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
Madison County Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
Date: 3/4/2013
Sample Collector
Date and Time Sample Received:
Date and Time Sample Collected:
Date and Time Sample Analyzed:
MB
2/5-8/13 See
2/4-8/13 C.O.C.
< MHT
Test
2/4-5/13
2/5-6/13
2/6-7/13
2/7-8/13
Report Limit
Method
Units
BOD
21.8
35.6
25.1
11.5
2.0
SM5210B
mg/L
TOTAL SUSPENDED RESIDUE
7.0
21.0
14.5
< 5.0
1.0
SM2540D
mglL
pH
6.5
6.7
6.4
6.2
0-14
SM4500H+
units
AMMONIA NITROGEN
1.4
2.1
1.6
0.9
0.1
SM4500NH3F
mg/L
TEMPERATURE
11.5
11.0
10.7
11.7
0.1
SM2550B
deg C
CYANIDE TOTAL
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
0.0050
SCA-SM4500 CN E
mglL
CADMIUM
< 0.0010
< 0.0010
< 0.0010
< 0.0010
0.0010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
CHROMIUM
< 0.0050
0.012
0.0055
< 0.0050
0.0050
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
COPPER
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
LEAD
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
0.0050
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
NICKEL
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
ZINC
< 0.030
0.042
< 0.030*
< 0.030
0.030
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
SILVER
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
0.0050
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
ARSENIC
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mglL
SELENIUM
< 0.010
0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
MOLYBDENUM
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.010
0.010
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
MERCURY
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
< 0.00020
0.00020
SCA-EPA 200.7
mg/L
,OIL & GREASE
< 5.0
< 5.0
< 5.0
< 5.0
5.0
SCA-EPA1664A
' mg/L
N.C. Laboratory lD# 352
Analyzed By:
Note: pH and Temperature performed as Field Analyses by EES
Lab Supervisor. Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville
Certified By:
MB

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
March 25, 2016
Mr. Michael Ladd
Earth Environmental Services
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 11291
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Andrews WWTP received by
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. March 08 through March 10, 2016.
Parameter Test Procedure EPA Method Final
Code Number Result
TGP3B
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent
Toxicity Procedure
(Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
EPA-821-R-02-013 PASS
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter a
P on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
March 08, 2016 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
April 30, 2016.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
I1I11 Limner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced. except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

.:4+ Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: March 25.2016
Facility: Earth Environmental Services
Andrews W VTP
NPDES #: NC- 0020800 Pipe #: 001 County: Cherokee
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
Project: 11291
Samples: 160308.15,160310.13
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO,):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µmhoslcm):
Total residual chlorine (rng/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt CC):
Control Organisms
Sample t
Sample 2
Control
03-07-16
03-09-16
24.25-h
25-h
30,31,32
45,42.37
251
243
149. 152. 156
< 0.10
<0.10
1.1
0.9
Organism Number
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SO):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (tng/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
Start date:
03-09-16
End date:
03-16-16
Start time:
1348
End time:
0625
Sian
Rcacnal 1
Rcncnal 2
Stan
Rcncnal t
Katmai 2
13%
13%
13%
Control
Control
Control
7.38
7.17
7.08
7.51
7.31
7.08
7.16
7.13
7.10
7.16
7.14
7.05
7.6
7.6
8.0
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.8
25.0
25.3
24.8
24.8
24.8
24.9
25.1
25.1
25.1
25.1
24.9
25.0
Number of Young Produced
29
30
29
31
27
28 31 29
27 29 26 30
28.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
LLL
LLLL
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 2 Organisms
2
Number of Young Produced
32 35 36 35
34 34 35 33
33 34 36
34.1
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
LLLL
LLLL
_32
LLLL
-18.2
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 3 Organisms
% Reduction
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lI 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 4 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
t. Reduction
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 mean
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 5 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Il 12 clean
Adult Survival: (L)ivc, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 6 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
'.: Reduction
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Il 12 Mean
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >13% NOEC: 13% ChV:
>13%
Reduction
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.5
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
12
1WC:
0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No concentration
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>13%
Reproduction NOEC:
13%
Overall Method:
Homoscedastic t
,Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro-Wilk's
Statistic:
0.950
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F-Test
Statistic:
1.323
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
.
Effluent %
Rank Stun
Critical Sum
13%
MVO form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

It
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
1
1
1
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test, Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0) - Control Bench Sheet
Control #: ( Date: 03-09-16
Test Grouping Information:
Facility
Project #
6
5 'Tlu-1 Un t j\..) -P
)1?A0
4 gelt*Linuil�i�P
1I7g2
112661
t 1 A I
3 1.mi0t.to kuu) fP
2 A net N.04 UJu.) -P
1- Control
Daily Renewal Information:
Test Organism Information:
Page 1 of 1
Organism Source:
In-house Culture
Age:
< 24-hours old 1
Source (culture board):
03-0%-tb PS I
,O, it €
Replicate #
1
4
5
6
7 8
9
10
11
12
Culture board cup #
Z
Z'i
:II:01 Bb
11
li
440 t
'{
A
to
tl
Date and time organisms were
born between:
0b.Ch.1b 0Oa- i Vb0 .—
Average transfer volume:
0.0121 mL
Transfer bowl information:
pH (S.U.): -VW
Temperature (°C): -,A 1
Day
Date
Test Initiation, renewal, feeding or
termination
-
SSW Batch
Selenastrum
Batch
YWT
Batch
Location
Incubator/Shelf
Randomizing
Template
Time
Analyst
0
03-09-16
initial` d'g
y�
a \
O3^i3•)6A
O1:-L%-i o
(rt25.iio
Z-GZ
eel)
1
03-10-16
Feeding
.
2
��16
03Qdi2
Renews /Fe d" g
n
6 4.. 6
as.6.166
3
03-12-16
Feeding
bk.'
4
03-13-16
Feeding
(i30a' -
N
5
03-14-16
Renewal.5O 2/FeedingOk
u3 oar it.
6
03-15-16
Feed_i��.+g�O _
,
7
03-16-16
Termination
°G�LS
Chemical Analyses:
Initiation
Renewal One
Renewal Two
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Concentration
Analyst
)IV
WO
N6
NG
Control, SSW
•Analyst identified for each
pH (S.U.)
1
1;51
1.1 to
1.' i
7./ /
7. Og
'Zar
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
'.,8
1, ?)
-�.1
7,9
-7, g
7 d
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
(� Q
"; .
1 5'2.
! 51
`Alkalinity (mg/1 CaCO3)
30
3(
32.
*Hardness (mg/LCaCO3)
L
Lib
LiZ
-
31•
'Temperature (°C)
da erformed i.t A........1.....1 •
-14, 8
$ 1
IA. q
1.4•6k
2 -ek
1
IS . 0
y, p p . oxygen and cunuuctrvny meal irements only temperatures performed at the tune of test initiation. renewal or termination by
the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table Alkalinity and hardness performed by the analysts indentitied on the test bench sheets and transcribed to this bench sheet
Survival and Reproduction Data:
Day
Observations
Replicate number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2
Renewal One
Adult mortality
(L = live, D = dead)
�
L--
L
1✓
5
Renewal Two
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
1 S
Li
1 1V
Li
1.%
L
is
L
)
Li.,
1'1
L
lam{
11
11-.
15
L
12
Li
it.,
Adult mortality
= Live, D = dead)
L
�
\-
x-
L-(L
7
Final
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
1 L
16
L
: `4
L
Ito
LL
no
�
13
t`1
L i
11
a
a
L
S
Lii
IA
1q
l
Total young produced
Z
V
Zk
Z.�
Z�
3t
1R
Z1
Q
Z `
lia
10
Final adult mortality
(L=Live,0=dead)
�
�
1,—
t
L-
L_
�
l_
`—
X for 3rd Broods
X
)
X
x
x
ontrol Acceptance Criteria:
of Male Adults (< 20%)
Adults having 3rd Broods (? 80%)
ton
Mean Offspring/Female
(>_ 15 offspring/surviving female)
0.31811.
fJ�
2ae
% Mortality (< 20%)
U
% CV (< 40%)
567
SOP AT12 • Exhibit AT12.3 revision tt.nt.tat

Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test, Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0) - Test Bench Sheet
Paired with Control # I Date: 0343.W,,
Client Earth Environmental Services
Facility Andrews WWTP
Project # IZ..C%
Test Concentration (Chronic Limit) 13.0%
Samples were not aerated or treated unless otherwise noted on this form. Control, dilution water
and test renewal information are included on the Control Bench Sheet indicated above.
NPDES # NC0020800
Outfall 001
County Cherokee
Dilution
preparation:
mL
Sample
mL
Dilution water,
Total volume
mL
39
261
300
Chemical Analyses:
Initiation
Renewal One
Renewal Two
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
•Final
Concentration
Analyst
50
citt,6
i
ti6
Test
Concentration
pH (S.U.)
7. 3Ii5
1' l to
- M l i
7, /3
.O.6
7.0a
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
7-to�-
9.
1- (p
7, -L
i,49
7.4
Conductivity (µmhos/crn)
17 0
f ,
:.:
I ae
' ` '
%,
` ti
;
*Temperature (°c)
1S-0
'IS •‘
A-5•5
IS.\
'L'1• f
"LS.
•
100%°
pH (S.U.)
1. 7-to1.O1
. - '
V • :`
• t `,
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
'i.1
..
(
; ..
_. .. _, ..
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
251
21+3
i
.. '',.---
s
*Total residual chlorine (mg/L)
40.10
,
-
LO• 10
. _
' ` :- '
Sample number
Sample 1 tte o3ot, ,s
Sample 2 l to a 1 a, t3•
Analyst tdenufied for each day, performed pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity measurements only. Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by
the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located on the Control Bench Sheet. Total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the Total Residual
Chlorine Bench Sheet and transcribed to this bench sheet.
Survival and Reproduction Data (performed at test concentration) :
Da y
Observations
Replicate number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2
Renewal One
Adult mortality
(L = Live, D =dead)
�
�--
L
L.
L.
L.
`-
5
Renewal Two
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
L
t S
'Lt.-
t Occ�
La-
'
L
tl
cL
La
L
Iek
tl•
.
t t
L
t
L
IS
L
IA
IA
Adult mortality
(L = Live, D = dead)
L
'-
V-
L
L
V_
L
7
Final
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
a
t-i
Li.
11
L
i
L
t
L
I
L
IL
�ilkl
L►
S
L
1
L
(1
L
S
L
Lp
1
Total young produced
-b L
3S
36
3S
sA
3%-.
3S
b-S
33
31_
's`t
ND
Final adult mortality
(L = Live, D = dead)
,L.-
L.
L
L.
L.-
-
L
V-
L
Sample 2 was used for Renewals one (day 2) and Two (day 5). Samples were diluted to the test concentration prior to use with soft synthetic water
and warmed to 25.0 i 1.0°C in a warm water bath.
Comments:
Test Results and Statistical Analyses:
Test results
% Mortality
,
Mean offspring
per female
341
% Reduction
from control
,18,21
'
Statistics
t-Stat or
RankSum
r gvsli
1-Tailed
Critical
2 , 8
PASS or FAIL
10k55
SOP AT12 - Exhibit AT12.2, revision 11-01-14

Ceriodaphnia (labia Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013, Method 1000.0 - North Carolina Modification
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Client:
Test dates:
Project number:
Reveiwed by:
Andrews WW'1'P
March 09 - 16, 2016
11291
Concentration
(%)
Day
Number of young produced by replicate number
Survival
("A.)
Average
reproduction
(offspring/female)
Coefficient of
variation
(%)
Percent reduction
from control CA)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Control
5
13
16
13
15
14
14
14
17
12
15
12
16
100
28.8
5.5
Not applicable
7
16
14
16
16
13
14
17
12
15
14
14
14
Total
29
30
29
31
27
28
31
29
27
29
26
30
13%
5
15
18
17
17
18
19
16
18
15
15
19
17
100
34.1
4.0
-18.2
7
17
17
19
18
16
15
19
15
18
17
15
19
Total
32
35
36
35
34
34
35
33
33
32
34
36
Dunnett's NISI) value:
P%ISD:
1.522
5.3
MSD = Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD = Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure of test precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can be declared
statistically significant in a whole effluent toxicity test.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (10`h percentile) = 13%.
Upper PMSD bound determined by USEPA (90`h percentile) = 47%.
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the 10th and 90th percentile. respectively, of PMSD data from EPA's WET
Interlaboratory Variability Study (USEPA, 2001a: USEPA, 2001b).
USEPA. 2001a. 2001b. Final Report: Interlaboratory Variability Study of EPA Short-term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods, Volumes 1 and 2-Appendix. EPA-821-B-01-004 and EPA-821-B-01-005.
US Environmental Protection Agency. Cincinnati. OH.
Andrews 03-09-14

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Start Date: 3/9/2016
End Date: 3/16/2016
Sample Date:
Comments:
Ceriodaphnia Survival and Reproduction Test -Reproduction
Test ID: CdPFCRNC Sample JD: Andrews VVWTP
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type: DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species: CD-Ceriodaphnia dubia
Conc% `:.-1..-..2 3 4 5 6 •:
-9 10,
D-Control 29.000 30.000 29.000 31.000 27.000 28.000 31.000 29.000 27.000 29.000
D-Control 26.000 30.000
13 32.000 35.000 36.000 35.000 34.000 34.000 35.000 33.000 33.000 32.000
13 34.000 36.000
Transform: Untransformed . 1-Tailed
Conc% Mean N-Mean Mean Min Max.::; ,CV%.., ::N.. t-Stat .Critical;'. MSD
D-Control 28.833 1.0000 28.833 26.000 31.000 5.500
12
13 34.083 1.1821 34.083 32.000 36.000 4.046 12 -8.654 2.508 1.522
Auxiliary Tests - Statistic Critical
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.94975 0.884
F-Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.65) 1.32271 5.31963
Hypothesis Test (1-tail, 0.01)
Homoscedastic t Test indicates no significant differences
Treatments vs D-Control
Skew Kurt
-0.2526 -0.8427
MSDu _ MSDp MSB MSE F-Prob df
1.52174 0.05278 165.375 2.20833 1.6E-08 1, 22
Andrews 03-09-16

f44,
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Facility: Earth Environmental Services, Inc. NPDES #: NC0020800 Pipe II: 001 County: Cherokee
Andrews WWTP
Species: Ceriodaphnia (labia
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 13%
Parameter code: TGP3B
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date:
End date:
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled, specify temperature:
Sample location: f &.&I A 4- 64
Time: e 4 3 .A Volume collected for testing: / %i tz-ef'
Time: , i :tom Number of containers filled for testing:
le s
i
5i.lep,L Method of transport to laboratory:
Comments:
7
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
1)11A1A+1
Print
Relinquished by:
Print
Relinquished by:
Signature
Date and time
Signature
Date and lime
Prins
Signature Date and time
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS y:
/Yh
L
Print Signature Date and time
Custody seals intact?:
Yes
No
Samples received in good condition?:
Tracking number:
Not used
Yes
No
Received by:
b PL(i(v.0
Print
Received by:
Signature Date and time
Print
Received at ETS by:
Signature Date and time
Print
Signature
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD PrescnccAbsense Indicator. MI)L - U.10 tng'L)
Project number: 11211 Sample number: I1O03C9 LtS
Q3, ts8.l)o
lt,12%1
Date and time
1,1'4--
Present
Absent
Comments:

+fir
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
, Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility: Earth Environmental Services, Inc.
Andrews WWTP
Species: Ceriodaplinia dubia
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic
NPDES #: NC0020800 Pipe #: 001 County: Cherokee
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 13%
Parameter code: TGP3B
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date:
End date:
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled, specify temperature:
Time:
Time:
P teiv
0 Sample location: Rv
0
OEMs A
S
Volume collected for testing:
g10 eat A-01,6
1 it led
Number of containers filled for testing:
cat. Method of transport to laboratory:
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling.
E`er
Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sam le collected by:
3/(6lr(,),
Signature Date ar d time
Print
Relinquished by:
L
L
Print
Relinquished by:
Signature
Date and time
Print
Signature
Date and time
Received by:
Print
Received by:
Signature
Date and time
Print Signature Date and time
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished t ETS b
o
At CA'
L te-
dv
(32s
Print
Custody seals intact?:
Signature
Ycs
No
Samples received in good condition?:
Tracking number:
Not used
Yes
Date and time
No
Received at ETS by:
figa_
Ulm
Print
Signature
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Prescttec:Absense Indicator, MDI. - 0.It) mg'l.)
Project number: `t 1 Sample number: 14)0310,13
03•io►Fi
(32C
Date and time
O.q•c,
Present
Absent
Comments:

7-day IC25 (g/L NaCI)
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1.14
1.12
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.04
1.02
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.0
0.9
0.8 a A a a 5 5 5 5 S b b b b
0_"\ 0..\ 0�.\ Oti"\ \. A 0�,\ t_A 0.. t 09"\ \A,s o�As \, 0, 0_As 0_As \ti,\ 09� 00,\ 0a�
\0" \0" \\" \ti" " Oti" 0�" 0,, 05" 0.. " " Oq" \0 \\" \ti" o Oti" tvi 0.s"
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
USEPA Control Limits (± 2 Standard Deviations)
1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75th and 90th Percentile CVs)
• •- +-
•----
. --0---•--•—•—•---•- a
•— -• • —• • -••
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (101h and 251t' Percentile CVs)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Test date
7-day IC25 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of sodium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Ceriodaphnia reproduction for the test population.
Central Tendency (mean IC25)
Warning Limits (mean IC25 ± SA 10 or SA 75)
Control Limits (mean IC25 ± Sn 25, SA 90, or 2 Standard Deviations)
aJnie.ea.e
a.mwea by
mmmn

Q)
'dy;
_:t
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
June 27, 2016
Mr. Michael Ladd
Earth Environmental Services
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 11545
Dear Mr. Ladd:
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Andrews WWTP received by
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. June 14 through June 16, 2016.
Parameter Test Procedure EPA Method Final
Code Number Result
TGP3B
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent
Toxicity Procedure
(Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
EPA-821-R-02-013 PASS
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter a
P on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
June 14, 2016 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
July 31, 2016.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

Environmental Testing Solutions, inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase 11 Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: June 27, 2016
Facility: Earth Environmental Services
NPDES #: NC- 0020800 Pipe #: 001 County: Cherokee
Andrews WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: l
Comments:
Project: 11545
Samples: 160614.07, 160616.07
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO)):
Hardness (mg►L CaCO,):
Conductivity (Itmhoslcm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C):
Control Organisms
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
06-13-16
06-15-16
24-h
24.5-h
'
30
40
260
234
151.155.156
<0.10
<0.10
1.2
0.7
Organism Number
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
Initial DO (tng/L):
Final DO
Initial Temp. ("C):
Final Temp. ("C):
9 10 11 12 atesn
Start date:
End date: •
Start time:
End time:
06-15-16
06-22-16
1230
0703
Stan
RetenalI
Rcncnsl2
Sun
RetcaalI
Renewzl2
13%
13%
13%
Control
Control
Control
7.55
7.67
7.50
7.67
7.75
7.81
7.70
7.77
7.61
7.71
7.86
7.56
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.9
7.7
7.9
8.0
7.8
7.9
8.0
7.9
24.9
25.0
24.8
24.8
24.7
24.7
25.2
25.1
25.0
24.7
24.7
24.7
Number of Young Produced
26
25
25
29
25
26
26
27
28
26
27
26.6
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
_29
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
,
L
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 2 Organisms
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 me.
Number of Young Produced
32
29
29 30 27
29
30
28
28
27
29
29
28.9
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
L
L
LLL
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
-8.8
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 3 Organisms
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
'/. Reduction
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
1111
Treatment 4 Organisms
1
': Reduction
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ntan
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (Clive. (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 5 Organisms
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
s: Reduction
Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 6 Organisms
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reduction
Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
°,» R W,,niou
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >13% NOEC: 13% ChV: >13%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
5.4
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
12
MC:
0
of
1,
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No concentration
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>13%
Reproduction NOEC:
13%
Overall Method:
Homosccdastic t
Nonnal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro-Witk's
Statistic:
0.938
Critical Value
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F-Test
Statistic:
1.096
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
.
Effluent %
Rank Stun
Critical Sum
13%
DWQ form AT--3 (8/91) Rei: 11/95

Test Grouping Information:
Facility
Project #
6 •a•-tr.•o.
't
%ksA-z-
5 tom sew tu..e,
4 Fr A IQ
%ksab
I (S4 a
3 $ 0 2.t•1Sv tt-Le.
2 Amoces
mAS
r•' =r; �;1•�•°:-:
i.'ir;�'4. .� p."
1- Control
Daily Renewal Information:
Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test, Species: Ceriodaphnia dubla
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0) - Control Bench Sheet
Control #: ! Date: 06-15-16
Test Organism Information:
Day
0
1
2
Date
06-15-16
06-16-16
06-17-16
3
06-18-16
4
5
6
06-19-16
06-20-16
06-21-16
7
06-22-16
Test Initiation, renewal, feeding or
termination
Time
Initiation/Feeding
Fee
Rene gi ing
'sent,
r
Analyst
Organism Source:
in-house Culture
Age:
< 24-hours old
Source (culture board):
014-01-00 A
Replicate #
11.1 2
3 4 5 6 7
II1
8 10
11
12
Culture board cup #
S
�wI
. �lb t tS11.9
�I
U. -11
Date and time organisms were
born between:
04-tS4lo oW E To +z..tO
Average transfer volume:
0.0121 ml
Transfer bowl information:
pH (S.U.): 1, Dtl
Temperature rC): - Ls.
SSW Batch
S.•t24b
Ob•ttab
Seienastnsm
Batch
Ywr
Batch
os-A-1b
Location
Incubator/Shelf
Randomizing
Template
Sity
Feed0tng_,
feG
Renewal 2/Feeding
3S
Feed
Temdnauon
a'io.5
aW
Ob•11•lb
116
Chemical Analyses:
Concentration
Initiation
Initial
Final
Renewal One
Initial
Final
Control, SSW
Analyst
pH (S.U.)
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
*Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3)
`Hardness (mg/LCaCO3)
*Temperature (°C)
d`
N6
Renewal Two
Initial
1.41
-1. e
1St
3
go
7,7/
7,8
-•75-
7.1
od• ti
•
5-t7
1%1.1
451
Io
DINcai
Final
/t
7.5(
7.q
rig
4.
'Analyst identified for each day, performed pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity measurements only. Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation,ILk rwa ortermination by
the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table. Alkalinity and hardness performed by the analysts indentified on the test bench sheets and transcribed to this bench sheet.
Survival and Reproduction Da
Day
Observations
Replicate number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2
Renewal One
Adult mortality
(L. Live, D z dead)
L
L
1✓
L
L
L
L.
5
Renewal Two
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
L,
lZ-
L
l3
L
1 i,
I i.
It
I,
L
Lk'
l._
i
l l
f 3
t Z
i,z
IS
Lk_
12_
Liz._
i S
Ig
1 b
Adult mortality
(L a live, 0 e dead)
L.
—IL
L
L.
L
V_
L..L
L
L_
7
Final
Number of broods present
of young produced
t't
I t
t
a•
l a
l.
t`-1
L'
lb
Li
t"?
L
1
11
I
IL
L
11:Number
li
Total young produced
b
Z-
7-c%
'Ls
�-5
-Zel
�-S
-2!o
-2-6
Z"�
le
�
Z1
Final adult mortality
(L'Live,Dodead)
L..X
L.
L.
L
L
�
L.
�
L
for 3rd Broods
x
?
X-
)<
X
y
/�
)
)(
$.
x
X
r.,.,rr.,r A.....,.-«,-.-__-..r._--__
%of Male Adults (5 20%)
% Adults having 3rd Broods (a 80%)
% Mortality (5 20%)
f
100.
61,
Mean Offspring/Female
(k 15 offspring/surviving female)
21640
% CV (< 40%)
6.42
SOP AT12 - Exhibit AT12.3, revision 11-01-14

ti.
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Ceriodaphrria dubia Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013, Method 1000.0 - North Carolina Modification
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Client:
Test dales:
Project number:
Revciwed by:
Andrews WWTP
June 15-22,2016
11545
Concentration
(%)
Day
Number of young produced by replicate number
Survival
(%)
Average
reproduction
(offspring/fcmnle)
Coefficient of
variation
(%)
Percent reduction
from control (%)
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Control
5
12
13
lI
11
13
12
11
12
15
12
13
13
100
26.6
5.4
Not applicable
7
14
I6
14
14
16
13
15
14
12
16
13
14
Total
26
29
25
25
29
25
26
26
27
28
26
27
13%
5
16
15
12
15
11
II
15
13
12
12
12
15
100
28.9
4.8
-8.8
7
16
14
17
15
16
18
15
15
16
15
17
14
Total
32
29
29
30
27
29
30
28
28
27
29
29
Dunnctt's f 1SD value:
PMSD:
1.445
5.4
MSD = Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD = Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure oftest precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can be declared
statistically significant in a whole elpuent toxicity test.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (I0th percentile) = 13%.
Upper PMSD bound determined by USEPA (9011' percentile) = 47%.
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the 10th and 90th percentile, respectively, of PMSD data from EPA's WET
Interlaboratory Variability Study (USEPA, 200Ia: USEPA, 2001b).
USEPA. 200I a, 200lb. Final Report: Interlaboratory Variability Study ol'EPA Short-term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods, Volumes I and 2-Appendix. EPA-821-0-01-004 and EPA-821-13-01-005.
US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati. 011.
rlrrditcuw 06-15-16

i }
t�
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Start Date: 6/15/2016
End Date: 6/22/2016
Sample Date:
Comments:
Ceriodaphnla Survival and Reproduction Test: Reproduction
Test ID: CdPFCRNC Sample ID: Andrews VWVTP
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type: DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species: CD-Ceriodaphnia dubia
Conc % 1 2. 3 4 5- 6 7 < 8 9 10'
D-Control 26.000 29.000 25.000 25.000 29.000 25.000 26.000 26.000 27.000 28.000
D-Control 26.000 27.000
13 32.000 29.000 29.000 30.000 27.000 29.000 30.000 28.000 28.000 27.000
13 29.000 29.000
Transform: Untransformed ' 1-Wed
Conc-% Mean N-Mean Mean MIn Max CV% . N t-Stat- Critical MSD
0-Control 26.583 1.0000 26.583 25.000 29.000 5.430 12
13 28.917 1.0878 28.917 27.000 32.000 4.769 12 -4.049 2.508 1.445
Auxiliary Tests Statistic . Critical
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.93804 0.884
F-Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.88) 1.09562 5.31963
Skew Kurt
0.62647 -0.1212
Hypothesis Test (1-tail,-0.01)
Horn oscedastic t Test indicates no significant differences
Treatments vs D-Control
MSDu MSDp MSB MSE F-Prob df
1.44544 0.05437 32.6687 1.99242 5.4E-04 1, 22
Andrews 06-15-16

L
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Facility: Earth Environmental Services, Inc.
Andrews WWTP
Species: Ceriodapltnia dubia
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic
NPDES #: NC0020800 Pipe If: 001 County: Cherokee
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 13%
Parameter code: TGP3B
it
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled, specify temperature:
—.— _ ._ems-..._._ .--�-:--�------ --�� �_..
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Sample location:
eft-1 -0 'L 4•f
Start date: la (r -4/ C Time: �S .l: ti Volume collected for testing:
End date: (/ ( Cc-iL[.'O Time: i 801- P/
1 S a rv� / .I S0� �� f-' Method of transport to laboratory:
Number of containers filled for testing: 7
S Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
rgnatttrc
Relinquished by:
Mk and time
Print
Relinquished by:
Signature
Date and tune
Print
Signature Mtn and time
1
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
i4'M't c-Ifx
.t
(01(4( 0
150S
Print Signature
Custody seals intact?:
)'es
Date and time
No Not used
Samples received in good condition?: J
Tracking number:
Yes
Received by:
1 ><C k Vef
Prim
Received by:
Si nnture
I
L
co(Iw i
s
r
Date and titan
K
Print
Received at ETS by:
Siittattac
Date and time
v %Neal,
Print Sienaturc
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
`o Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presence/Absensc Indicator. MDL s 0.10 tng'L)
‘e-t`l•lb
tS(
Date and time
Present
Absent
Project number:IMIc Sample number: 10 Oita
Comments:

351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility: Earth Environmental Services, Inc. NPDES #: NC0020800 Pipe #: 001 County: Cherokee
Andrews WWTP Purchase order:
Species: Cerlodaphizia (labia Effluent dilution: 13%
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic
Parameter code: TGP3S
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
1
it
Sample location A ,' ` t tJ 0:4 `% �'t�l 1 i is ,. ; e.. �t
Start date: a` J( .S f ((J Time: 080 Volume collected for testing: / 1' < 7
End date: (Oft /[ V Time: . o831 1"v Number of containers filled for testing:
Number of samples per hour: /S (LI, (e/ 3 o V 0 5 a,L
Chilled during collection? 2S Comments:
If chilled, specify temperature: / )
Method of transport to laboratory: Per e
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
!YllGht..tf
er'yt-cdJ4 G
Print Signature
Relinquished by:
(Midi
3IA;
Date and time
Received by:
Print
Relinquished by:
Signature Due and time Print Signature Date and tine
Received bv:
Print
Signature Date and time
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
�i G(
die-tha
('te(r-6
�• 'i
Print
Custody scats intact?:
Ycs
No
Samples received in good condition?:
Tracking number:
No: used
Vex
Ps
Date and time
N.
Print
Signature Date and time
Received at ETS by:
06.1L' I o
-5,.) Maell-
i343
#
Print
Signature
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presencer,\bseose Indicator. NIDL = 0.10 mg/L.)
Date and tune
Pram
Absent
Project number: %Lig Sample number: I I O(o 114.0',-
Comments:

7-day IC25 (g/I., NaC1)
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1.I4
I.12
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.04
1.02
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I i I I I I I
USEPA Control Limits (± 2 Standard Deviations)
...• ...........................................................................
I I I
I I I I I I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75rt' and 906 Percentile CVs)
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (10`f' and 25th Percentile CVs)
I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I
0.8 ,. AS 0.3AS . AS 1 S NS •5 N5 N.y • �`' �`' ♦5 �5 �5 �6 �b �b .b 6
0 OZ 01Oa 0=' Os�. OO 09. 01 -�,. O� pq'x' `4 or`�A�' `'LAB 0.." 0,� 09. O.L 0' 03 0`-' 0 — O 0''�0 0
0 0 1 Nb
Test date
---c— 7-day IC,5 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of sodium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Ceriodaphnia reproduction for the test population.
-- — • Central Tendency (mean IC25)
— — - Warning Limits (mean IC,5 f SA 10 or SA 75)
Control Limits (mean IC25 ± SA 25, SA.90, or 2 Standard Deviations)
• LnS.red.nd
am Swann

1.4
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
September 23, 2016
Mr. Michael Ladd
Earth Environmental Services
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 11720
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Andrews WWTP received by
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. September 06 through September 08, 2016.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method Final
Number Result
TGP3B
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent
Toxicity Procedure
(Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
EPA-821-R-02-013 PASS
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter a
P on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
September 06, 2016 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
October 31, 2016.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
umner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
Sottth Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Date: September 23, 2016
Facility: Earth Environmental Services
Andrews W1VTP
NPDES #: NC- 0020800 Pipe #: 001 County: Cherokee
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: ,.
Comments:
Project: 11720
Samples: 160906.06, 160908.07
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO3):
Conductivity (µlnhos/cm):
Total residual chlorine (mg/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt ("C):
Control Organisms
1
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
09.05-16
09-07-16
24.5-h
24.5-h
34
40
530
385
161.
t60.
I.$9
<0.10
<0.10
4.5
0.9
Organism Number
2 3 4
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial pH (SU):
Final pH (SU):
initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. ("C):
Final Temp. ("C):
Start date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
09-07-16
09-14-16
1010
0802
Stan
Renaeal 1
Rama! 2
Stan
Rc enal1
Rencnel 2
13%
13%
13%
Control
Control
Control
7.67
7.50
7.59
7.52
7.49
7.53
7.78
7.69
7.63
7.63
7.81
7.64
7.9
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.9
7.9
8.0
7.9
7.9
8.0
7.9
24.9
24.7
24.9
24.8
24.9
24.8
25.0
24.9
25.1
24.8
24.8
25.0
Number of Young Produced
30
26
27
28 28 29
28
27
27
29
29
30
28.2
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
LLL
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage
13%
Treatment 2 Organisms
1
•t
Number of Young Produced
32
29
26
28
28
27
29
27_
29
27
26
30
28.2
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
I.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
0.0
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 3 Organisms
Reduction
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 wan
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 4 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
% Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Atcan
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 5 Organisms
Number of Young Produced
Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 Mean
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 6 Organisms
1
% Reduction
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Nlean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >13% NOEC: 13% ChV:
Reduction
>13%
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
4.5
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
12
MC.0
of
12
Sitnificant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No concentration
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>13%
Reproduction NOEC:
13%
Overall Method:
Homosccdastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro -Wick's
Statistic:
0.933
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F-Test
Statistic:
1.906
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Stun
13%
.
D IVO form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test, Species: Ceriodaphnio dubia
Test Grouping Information:
Facility
Project #
6 1!a pc4 WeSv K.L.e
11i 1to
5 VgAt4Alta
t\TZj
WW1
WW1/4
4 CC1VM111e.
3 eVtt av1'4 L.
2 f1/41314P 44
11"1? O
1- Control
MOON
Daily Renewal Information:
Page 1 of 1
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0) - Control Bench Sheet
Control #: Date: 09-07-16
Test Organism Information:
Organism Source:
Age:
In-house Culture
Source (culture board):
< 24-hours old
Replicate #
Culture board cup #
Date and time organisms were
born between:
o8.3q-Ib A
1 2 I 3 I 4 5 6 78 9101112
S to t1 2 I zt 18
O \•fl AD cei --o r000
S$
Average transfer volume:
Transfer bowl information:
0.03 mL
pH (S.U.): '1. %3
Temperature (°C): 14.1
Day
Date
Test Initiation, renewal, feeding or
termination
SSW Batch
Selenastrum
Batch
YWT
Batch
Location
Incubator/Shelf
Randomizing
Template
Time
Analyst
0
09-07-16
initlation/Feeding
toto
4k tfev.
01.30-k9
ot•ti•tte.
7-CM
r r.
&LAX.
C
�t Ky a
1
09-08-16
Feeding
-/
-•.e.:U =
:.-.,sue 4v141.
; 12''' t
2
09-09-16
Renewal l/Feeding
eat o o
Y� Vc• II.,II.,-t
,�
�'' -
.'i• • t - y. .f -
`
r r .'•y z•t .
Y
i i i 'n. t f.
3
09-10-16
Feeding
ri
: a ,
t i Sh.
is - Y y+,
- 3.a! }
,�x ! 'thy
Y �-,-
t (V d t 3.t
4
09-11-16
Feeding
C.
., r
.
,- <
w SS
► !�l! ,•
C it -: >.
,
5
09-1z-16
Rene 12/Feedin
0" 20 g
Idk
t oMo�S-i1o',-.7',
t.
' t �
E
•'ly S t Ct r
t 4
r 3.1�ti F
t
' f [ .,
6
09-13-16
�fy,(�fr sj
Fe`�6n+i V
At
'" s_.
_
,
1
1
r _
7
09-14-16
Tenni�natjon
8 O
r a
.. Y :, r
tiy,
7 �;a r` _<
i s
s
•
Chemical Analyses:
Initiation
Renewal One
Renewal Two
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Concentration
Analyst
AlG
44
� A
Control, SSW
*Analyst
pH (S.U.)
7
7.5")
7.
e
7 (ta
ti
7.g-9.
7-- %y
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
7.1
7. ej
47.'
',GI
7. Q
?i
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
H ._
�� %
p }}�;;a
atn:If
�
.;� , ,,,
``, w
*Alkalinity (mg/L CaCo3)
3
314
'}? t
Mar
G
0 10l b
1
'ES " ` '.
\ t e:�
'
*Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)
`,�
i
--a..
'!:,
*Temperature (°C)
-2.4i t
'?A. f-
14 • �
1A. i
75.0
identified for each day, performed pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity measurements only. Temperatures performed at the time of test
initiation renewal
.,.......,;...s.- b
ormatton table. Alkalinity and hardness performed by the analysts indentified on the test bench sheets and transcribed to this bench sheet
Survival and Reproduction Data:
Day
2
Renewal One
5
Renewal Two
7
Final
A
Observations
Adult mortality
(t = Uve, D = dead)
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
Adult mortality
(L=Live, D=dead)
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
Total young produced
Final adult mortality
it. .live, D = dead)
1
tta
L
30
2
L
lZ
to
LL
t1
2(0
L
3
iS
1.
L
4
11
Li
t1
L
X for 3rd Broods
Control Acceptance Criteria:
% of Male Adults (s 20%)
% Adults having 3rd Broods (>_ 80%)
Replicate number .
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
L.
L,
L
LLLJL
it.
15
IZ.
no
t 3
is
li
L
L...
L-
1--.
L
l_
L
. L
03
L!
i3
a
l5
L,
it
l~
110
tt{
L!
i.
Z.i.
`2. Q
2.1
Z.1
1.9
lei
3D
L✓
L
L✓
-
L
L
‘Ixxx>4xx
Mean Offspring/Female
(2 15 offspring/surviving female)
2e2
r
% Mortality (< 20%)
•
% CV (< 40%)
�*57.
SOP AT12 - Exhibit AT12,3. revision 11-01-14

ma�cc
Tc
Page 1of1
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test, Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0) - Test Bench Sheet
Paired with Control # 1 Date: Oct- U%I'o
Client Earth Environmental Services
Facility Andrews WWTP
Project # 1 MO
Test Concentration (Chronic Limit) 13.0%
Samples were not aerated or treated unless otherwise noted on this form. Control, dilution water
and test renewal information are Included on the Control Bench Sheet indicated above.
NPDES # NC0020800
Outfall 001
county Cherokee
Dilution
preparation:
mt.
Sample
ml
Dilution water
Total volume
ml
39
261
300
Chemical Analyses:
a
Initiation
Renewal One
Renewal Two
Initial
Final
initial
Final
Initial
Final
Concentration
Analyst
Hi
445
N6
/14,
II/4
, 44
Test
Concentration
pH (S.U.)
-
-#•.4'
7, 72
7, co
r741
7�s-
-•63
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
7, f
%s ,.
7
d d:Q
?
7. 4
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
'
1,
= .
*Temperature (°C)
'TA. 4\
-IS • 0
1,,�4-1
-1..A A
1't A
is .1:
100%
pH (S.U.)
1. 98
,, `
7.34
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
-
-7.. q
l
.
7
��
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
5
53 Q
`
38s
4 t••,'
.f
-. a
-
� �� =4 _
*Total residual chlorine (mg/L)
a 0 . IQ
-
- r . -
Sample number
Sample 1
lb0°10b.0b
Sample 2 1to00t 0�0'1
, ,
*Analyst identified for each day, performed pH. dissolved oxygen and conductivity measurements only. Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation renewal or terrain ••
t'^.. �
t
the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located on the Control Bench Sheet. Total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the Total Residual
Chlorine Bench Sheet and transcribed to this bench sheet.
Survival and Reproduction Data (performed at test con
Day
p se or
Observations
Replicate number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2
Renewal One
Adult mortality
O. = live, 0 = dead)
L"
L
L.
L
L
L
L.
L
L
L
L.
L
5
Renewal Two
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
L
lb
1:1
1S
L,
1'
L
IL
L.
11..
L
12,
L
1a
L
i S
L
1
L
13
L
15
L
l b
Adult mortality
(L=Uve,D=dead)
L,
'-
'
'
L
'
L
L
L.
L-
L
L
Li
i I t
7
Final
Test was initiated using
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
L
04)
L
1"
Li
Is
L
11_
it.
a
IS
Li
1S
L
12.
L
11,0
L
% %A
Li
11
Total young produced
3L
25
2.4.
2.g
2 8
21
-2.4i
21
25
2.1
2(
30
Final adult mortality
(L = Live, 0 = dead)
Sample 1 Sam le 2 was .......1f I
R
1.
d
L
L
L
k.,.
L
L
L
L.
L.
L
enewa s One ( ay 2) and Two (day 5). Samples were diluted to the test concentration prior to use with soft synthetic water
and warmed to 25.0 ± 1.0°C in a warm water bath.
Comments:
Test Results and Statistical Analyses:
Test results
% Mortality
67,
Mean offspring
per female
�6.2
% Reduction
from control
Statistics
t-Stator
Rank Sum
o •oro
1-Tailed
Critical
2.9)8
PASS or FAIL
Figs.3
SOP AT12 - Exhibit ATI2.2, revision 11-01-14

Ceriodaphnia dubia Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013, Method 1000.0 - North Carolina Modification
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Client:
Test dates:
Project number:
Reveiwed by:
Andrews WWTP
September 07 - 14, 2016
11720
Concentration
(%)
Day
Number of young produced by replicate number
Survival
(%)
Average
reproduction
(offspring/female)
Coefficient of
variation
(%)
Percent reduction
from control (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Control
5
16
14
15
17
14
16
15
12
16
13
15
17
100
28.2
4.5
Not applicable
7
I4
12
12
11
14
13
13
15
II
16
14
13
Total
30
26
27
28
28
29
28
27
27
29
29
30
13%
•
5
16
15
11
16
12
12
14
15
13
13
15
16
100
28.2
6.2
0.0
7
16
14
15
12
16
15
15
12
16
14
II
14
Total
32
29
26
28
28
27
29
27
29
27
26
30
Dunnett's MSD value:
PMSD:
1.564
5.6
MSD = Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD = Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure of tcst precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can be declared
statistically significant in a whole effluent toxicity test.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (10° percentile) = 13%.
Upper PMSD bound determined by USEPA (90`'' percentile) = 47%.
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the 10th and 90th percentile, respectively, of PMSD data from EPA's WET
Interlaboratory Variability Study (USEPA, 200Ia: USEPA, 200 Ib).
USEPA. 200Ia, 200lb. Final Report: Interlaboratory Variability Study of EPA Short-term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods, Volumes 1 and 2-Appendix. EPA-821-13-01-004 and EPA-821-13-01-005.
US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, 01-1.
,lndrews 09-07-14

Environmental Testing Solutions, inc.
Start Date: 9/7/2016
End Date: 9/14/2016
Sample Date:
Comments:
Ceriodaphnia Survival and Reproduction Test -Reproduction:,
Test ID: CdPFCRNC Sample ID: Andrew WWTP
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type: DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species: CD-Ceriodaphnia dubia
Cone%" _ .1 2 3 _ 4 g : 6 7 8 9 10
0-Control 30.000 26.000 27.000 28.000 28.000 29.000 28.000 27.000 27.000 29.000
D-Control 29.000 30.000
13 32.000 29.000 26.000 28.000 28.000 27.000 29.000 27.000 29.000 27.000
13 26.000 30.000
Transform: Untransformed 1-Tailed
Conc-% Mean =, '.N-Mean Mean Min Max CV% N t-Stat ' Critical MSD
0-Control 28.167 1.0000 28.167 26.000 30.000 4.499 12
13 28.167 1.0000 28.167 26.000 32.000 6.211 12 0.000 2.508 1.564
Auxiliary Tests Statistic • Critical Skew Kurt
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.93258 0.884 0.54371 0.305
F-Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.30) 1.90566 5.31963
Hypothesis Test (1-tali, 0.01) MSDu MSDp . MSB MSE F-Prob df
Homoscedastic tTest indicates no significant differences 1.56421 0.05553 0 2.33333 1 1. 22
Treatments vs D-Control
Andrews 09-07-16

35 I Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility: Earth Environmental Services, Inc.
Andrews WWTP
Species: Ceriodapli:nia dubia
Test type: Pass/FaiI Chronic
NPDES II: NC0020800 Pipe I: 001 County: Cherokee
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 13%
Parameter code: TGP3B
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample: Start date: f) .5) (k Time:
End date: ) h )( Time:
.S
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled, specify temperature:
Sample location: (
41 Volume collected for testing: f It 1--e e"
roc
{- Number of containers filled for testing: I
Method of transport to laboratory:
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Simple custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
LaAA
Print
Relinquished by:
Signature
Date and time
Print
Relinquished by:
Signature Dale and lime
Received by:
L
Signature nv: ao l umc
Received by:
Print
Signature Date and time
Prins
z_...=sxxc.;acesr_avCl.«,1.7 .r.-ac-T— ws---^
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
Print
Custody seals intact?:
tL Received at ETS by:
act' 14
Signature Date and time MM,,
l�
Not used
Samples received in good condition?:
Tracking number:
Yes
MIN
No
Signature Dam and time
3-Sql-va-e)A,
1,114
AIL•
tint
Signature
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presence/Abscnsc Indicator, MDI. = 0.10 mg4.)
Project number: i fl W Sam 1ile number: b CP106,0Lo
DI, col row
y .S C-
Prescnl
Absent
Comments:

K i Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc,
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Facility: Earth Environmental Services, Inc.
Andrews WWTP
Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
NPDES #: NC0020800 Pipe #: 001 County: Cherokee
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 13%
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic Parameter code: TGP3B
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date:
End date:
CfJsj(
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled, specify temperature:
Sample location: f=-,,tcl� KCY t-,
Time: t e'''"k Volume collected for testing:
Time: IsNumber of containers filled for testing: 1
I Say:\ Method of transport to laboratory: c J
/ f'
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
/:Ili C .\� {& 1
Lac1cA
Print
Relinquished by:
cow( )c
s
iimauuc Date and lime
i'—
Print
Relinquished by:
Signature Doc and time
Print
I
Signature Date and time
•
Received bv:
Print
Received by:
Signature
Dale and time
—
Print
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
1,681
";
''_r�
Custody seals intact?:
tgnalrre
Ell
No Na used
Samples received in good condition?: J
Yea
Tracking number:
Date and Hine
No
ts
Received at EIS by:
Signature
Dale and lime
Pnrd Stgmalurc
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPI) Presence/Absense Indicator, MDL = 0.10 ntg'L)
09-o�-i�•
1yZt-j
Project numher: 1(-}t1,40 Sample number: 1\409 - o -
Comments:

}'a
'1� +
7-day IC25 (g/L NaCI)
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1.14
1.12
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.04
1.02
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.0
0.9
0.8
Cerio daphnia dubia
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
I I 1 I
I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
USEPA Control Limits (± 2 Standard Deviations)
•
ill I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (7511' and 90th Percentile CVs)
• • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • •
I I I I I I I I t I I I I I ! I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (101i' and 25th Percentile CVs)
Oa.01,N0 �5.\06p9.'No1,a.'No$01- %, `' `O0� `��,\`�p�.\% `�0��.0�9.�0�0- %No5�0NpS.�Q`�.0001- %1 `,1; 0���0�` -fib
Test date
• 7-day IC,5 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of sodium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in C'eriocicrphnia reproduction for the test population.
Central Tendency (mean IC,5)
Warning Limits (mean IC25 ± SA.10 or SA.75)
Control Limits (mean IC,5 f SA 25' SA 90, or 2 Standard Deviations)

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
January 03, 2017
Mr. Michael Ladd
Earth Environmental Services
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 11962
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Andrews WWTP received by
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. December 06 through December 08, 2016.
Parameter Test Procedure EPA Method Final
Code
Number Result
TGP3B
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent
Toxicity Procedure
(Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
EPA-821-R-02-013 PASS
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter a
P on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
December 06, 2016 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
January 31, 2017.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jim Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced. except in its entirety. without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia Date: January 03, 2017
Facility: Earth Environmental Services
Andrews WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor:
NPDES #: NC- 0020800 Pipe #: 001 County: Cherokee
Comments:
Project: 11962
Samples: 161206.16, 161208.18
Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Sample Information
Collection start date:
Grab:
Composite duration:
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3):
Hardness (mg/L CaCO;):
Conductivity (Iunhos/cm ):
Total residual chlorine (rng/L):
Sample Temp. at Receipt ("C)
Control Organisms
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
12-05-16
12-07-16
•
24-h
24-h
32,31,31
40, 40, 42
313
323
155.158.165
< 0.10
<0.10
1.3
0.5
'
Organism Number
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Test Information
Treatment:
Initial p11(SU):
Final pH (SU): •
Initial DO (mg/L):
Final DO (mg/L):
Initial Temp. (°C):
Final Temp. (°C):
9 10 11 12 ht.
Stan date:
End date:
Start time:
End time:
12-07-16
12-14-16
1230
0700
Stan
Rcnenal 1
Rcncncal 2
Start
Rcncral I
Reno.' 2
13%
13%
13%
Control
Control
Control
7.27
7.47
7.41
7.22
7.52
7.54
7.53
7.41
7.30
7.47
7.42
7.28
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.9
7.8
7.8
24.8
24.8
24.7
24.8
24 6
24.7
25.1
24.8
25.1
24.9
25.1
25.2
Number of Young Produced
27
30
25
26 28 29 29
26
27
30
27
29
27.8
Adult Survival: (L)ive. (D)ead
L
L
L
LLLL
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent Percentage' 13%]
Treatment 2 Organisms
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
28
29
26
28
25
29
31
32
28
28
32
32
29.0
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
-4.5
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 3 Organisms
1
% Reduction
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)cad
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 4 Organisms
': Reduction
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 5 Organisms
%Reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 6 Organisms
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reduction
Mean
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, (D)ead
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >13% NOEC: 13% ChV:
`» Reduction
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality (%):
0.0
%Control with 3rd Broods:
100
Control Reproduction CV:
6.0
48 Hour Mortality
Control:
0
of
12
IWC:
0
of
12
Significant?:
No
Final Mortality Significant at:
No concentration
Reproduction Analyses
Reproduction LOEC:
>131/.
Reproduction NOEC:
13%
Overall Method:
Ilumoscedastic t
Normal Distribution:
Yes
Method:
Shapiro-Wilk's
Statistic:
0.952
Critical Value:
0.884
Equal Variances:
Yes
Method:
F-Test
Statistic:
1983
Critical Value:
5.320
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
.
Emuent °;a
Rank Sun
Critical Sum
13%
.
>13%
DN'Q form AT-3 (8/91) Ret'. 11/95

Page 1 of 1
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test, Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0) - Control Bench Sheet
Control #: 1 Date: 12-07-16
Test Grouping Information:
Facility
Project
-
{#
6
13.44,4i:
ttava
5 COVAMWS
4 Ca.,. l FP51b2.
11i0%s-1
ttcwo
3 so& 1 J -.-e.
2 pwoiteuiS
t 1.1,6L
1- Control:
:`r ±:Y
Daily Renewal Information:
Test Organism Information:
Organism Source:
In-house Culture
Age:
< 24-hours old
Source (culture board):
tV-19 -'t' P
Replicate #
_
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Culture board cup #
L
`
1
8
►1
it
It
3
2e
no
7.1
30
Date and time organisms were
born between:
12•61•'b CMS S 113 t.120
Ave'ra'ge transfer volume:
0.03 mL
Transfer bowl information:
pH (S.U.): 1-$sg
Temperature (°C): i.4,S
Day
Date
Test Initiation, renewal, feeding or
termination
Time
Analyst
SSW Batch
Selenastrum
Batch
YWT
Batch
Location
Incubator/Shelf
Randomizing
Template
0
1
2
3
12-07-16
12-08-16
12-09-16
12-10-16
Initiation/Feeding
r't3D
Fe o2g35-
4
12-11-16
Renewal 1(Ftcding
1 y
Feeding
t>io.f:
5
6
12-12-16
12-13-16
Feeding
Oro!
NG
RC
Re -
t\ Z1-041
1 %-So•t o C.
'LC.Z
Renewal 2/Feeding
vVZ�
Feeding
t'L-oB441►
7
12-14-16
Termination
Chemical Analyses:
Initiation
Renewal One
Renewal Two
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Concentration
Control, SSW
Analyst
u6
Final
tyC
pH (S.U.)
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
-I .8
1SS
7Y7
7.1
162.
I66
*Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3)
3Z
31
•
l LDS
It
7.9
*Hardness (mg/L CaCO3)
*Temperature (°C)
0
410
1.`1•l�
z5.1
r4 At--;
*Analyst identified for each day, performed pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity measurements only Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by
the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table Alkalinity and hardness performed by the analysts indentified on the test bench sheets and transcribed to this bench sheet
•
)UrVFVUI Ur1U f1CfRvucrc.crvu
Day
aiar.u.
Observations
Replicate number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2
Renewal One
Adult mortality
(L = Live, D = dead)
L
L_
L.
L.
L
L
L-
L
L
L
L
L--
5
Renewal Two
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
,
iZ-
L
IS
X.iZ
1L
L
a
U..
t'
L3'
lb
1�
L
12
is
1..7
16
Ii
I -I
Adult mortality
(L = Live, 0 = dead)
L
L
L_
L
L
L
L
L
L-
L
7
Final
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
Li.
6i
IL
L
12-
II
1t.k
� 1.
i kc
[. ,
t S
a
1 `2�
EL
1
eL-
IS
a
11
1 1
Li
1 S
Total young produced
Z\
-LS
Zlo
2.,C
la
Z \
It.
-2:1
a
Z41
Final adult mortality
= Live, 0 =dead)
...
L
L_
L.
L.
L
t�
L L
�•-
L
L.-
t�
✓
X�
for 3rd Broods
�
X
/
/�[`"
X
/X' >(
?C
)(
X.
)�
Control Acceptance Criteria:
% of Male Adults (5 20%)
m
% Adults having 3rd Broods (? 80%)
tOcs%.
Mean Offspring/Female
(>_ 15 offspring/surviving female)
21-8
% Mortality (5 20%)
% CV (< 40%)
to.0•
SOP AT12 - Exhibit AT12.3. revision 11-01-14

North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test, Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0, NC Modification — December 2010, Version 3.0) - Test Bench Sheet
Client Earth Environmental Services
Page 1 of 1
Paired with Control # l Date: l"t• O"1'ik,
Facility Andrews WWTP
Project # l Nol,_
Test Concentration (Chronic Limit) 13.0%
Samples were not aerated or treated unless otherwise noted on this form. Control, dilution water
and test renewal information are included on the Control Bench Sheet indicated above.
NPDES # NC0020800
Outfall 001
County
Dilution
preparation:
Cherokee
ml
Sample
ml
Dilution water
Total volume
mL
39
261
300
Chemical Analyses:
Initiation
Renewal One
Renewal Two
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Initial
Final
Concentration
Analyst
/
h/6
gv6
j`-
llu
01/6
Test
Concentration
pH (S.U.)
3•27.
7..3
`. 91
0..t-11
7. .?O
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
7. g
7'
7. 7
1LV
1.1
7.7
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
p
'I
S I-
'
`
*Temperature (°C)
1,I *8
1.5- k
-A. 8
NA. 4
'yt - 1
'ZS • X
1009%o
pH (S.U.)
7.28
.i '
7 .�
.- .
t'
+ ,
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
-7 et7
r
$•
, �
-
4
Conductivity (µmhos/cm)
313
s. ''s,-
3J
' ,
;`
. '
° *.tA'
*Total residual chlorine (mg/L)
4 0.‘1)
-
'
Sample number
Sample 1 1V1.06. tI.
Sample 2 1
611.0 0 . tQ
'Analyst identified for each day, performed pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity measurements only. Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation, renewal or termination by
the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located on the Control Bench Sheet. Total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the Total Residual
Chlorine Bench Sheet and transcribed to this bench sheet.
Survival and Reproduction Data (performed at test concentration) :
Day
Observations
Replicate number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2
Renewal One
Adult mortality
(L = Live, D = dead)
L
k....
L
L
'—
L
L._
L
..
5
Renewal Two
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
�'Y-
VA
12..
1S
L
la
L
f 3
1
t'
L
Ti
La._
(S
, L
IS
L
L L
L
1'
La
t 1.
L
18
Adult mortality
(L = Live, D =dead}
`-
`'
`
L
L.
`"
\_
L
L
L..-
,./4
'34 Final
Number of broods present
Number of young produced
L
14
a
14
iL
‘1.-1
L l
S
.
12.
L
1 Z
L
l ko
L
l'1
LL
IL
L
1b
Li
IS
L
i%k
Total young produced
Zf
„
114
Q C
,�S
'Li
31
32.
'It
,Z&
•sZ
3,Z
Final adult mortality
(L = Live, D = dead)
k-
L
L._
L
,L.
Test was initiated using Sample 1. Sample 2 was used for Renewals One (day 2 and Two (days). Samples were diluted to the test concentration prior to use with soft synthetic water
and warmed to 25.0 ± 1.0°C in a warm water bath.
Comments:
Test Results and Statistical Analyses:
Test results
% Mortality
01.
Mean offspring
per female
263'o
% Reduction
from control
' L.i•S")-
Statistics
t-Stator
Rank Sum
. I.51Z
1-Tailed
Critical
Z+�
PASS or FAIL
piss
SOP AT12 • Exhibit AT12.2, revision 11-01-14

Ceriodaphrtia dubia Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013, Method 1000.0 - North Carolina Modification
Quality Control
Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Client:
Test dates:
Project number:
Reveiwed by:
Andrews W WTP
December 07- 14, 2016
11962
Concentration
(%)
Day
Number of young produced by replicate number
Survival
(%)
Average
reproduction
(offspring/female)
Coefficient of
variation
(%)
l'ercent reduction
from control (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
5
12
15
13
12
12
14
16
13
12
13
16
14
100
•
27.8
6.0
Not applicable
Control
7
15
15
12
14
16
15
13
13
15
17
11
15
Total
27
30
25
26
28
29
29
26
27
30
27
29
13%
5
14
15
14
13
13
17
15
15
12
15
17
18
100
29.0
8.1
-4.5
7
14
14
12
15
12
12
16
17
16
13
15
14
Total
28
29
26
28
25
29
31
32
28
28
32
32
Dunnett's MSD value:
Pi1SD:
2.074
7.5
MSD = Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD = Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure of test precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can be declared
statistically significant in a whole effluent toxicity test.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (10th percentile) = 13%.
Upper PMSD bound determined by USEPA (90`h percentile) = 47%.
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the 10th and 90th percentile, respectively, of PMSD data from EPA's WET
Interlaboratory Variability Study (USEPA, 2001a; USEPA, 2001b).
USEPA. 200Ia. 200lb. Final Report: Interlaboratory Variability Study of EPA Short-term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods, Volumes I and 2-Appendix. EPA-821-13-01-004 and EPA-821-B-01-005.
US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, 01-1.
elsulri we 12-07-16

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Ceriodaphnia Survival and Reproduction Test -Reproduction
Start Date: 12/7/2016
End Date: 12/14/2016
Sample Date:
Comments:
Test ID: CdPFCRNC Sample ID:
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type:
Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species:
Andrews VVVVTP
DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
CD-Ceriodaphnia dubia
Conc% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
D-Control 27.000 30.000 25.000 26.000 28.000 29.000 29.000 26.000 27.000 30.000
D-Control 27.000 29.000
13 28.000 29.000 26.000 28.000 25.000 29.000 31.000 32.000 28.000 28.000
13 32.000 32.000
Transform: Untransformed 1-Tailed
Conc% Mean N-Mean Mean Min Max CV% N t-Stat Critical MSD
0-Control 27.750 1.0000 27.750 25.000 30.000 5.976 12
13 29.000 1.0450 29.000 25.000 32.000 8.053 12 -1.512 2.508 2.074
Auxiliary Tests Statistic Critical
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.952 0.884
F-Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.27) 1.98347 5.31963
Hypothesis Test (1-tail, 0.01)
Homoscedastic t Test indicates no significant differences
Treatments vs D-Control
Skew Kurt
-0.0618 -0.7378
MSDu MSDp MSB MSE F-Prob df
2.07405 0.07474 9.375 4.10227 0.14484 1,22
indretrs 12-07-16

351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Facility: Earth Environmental Services, Inc.
Andrews WWTP
Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic
NPDES #: NC0020800 Pipe #: 001 County: Cherokee
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 13%
Parameter code: TGP3B
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date:
End date: ! l b l'
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled. specify temperature:
Time:
Time:
Y {�
Sample location:(—tA ._(-S- 1Jeryi Ac kt�K
Volume collected for testing: rl (i
I
Number of containers filled for testing:
Method of transport to laboratory:
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be <6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
S'smple custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
PIA-21.C. I1I.6/
ite-agt,
Rid Ki13,A4
Print
Relinquished by:
Signature
Date and time
Print
Relinquished by:
T
Signature Date and III!
Print
Signature Date and time
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
La. r �---
/
(3 3P
Print Signature Date and bare
Custody seals intact?:
YiN
Samples received in good condition?:
'tracking number:
\o nut used
I ...\1I
Yes
s
Received by:
/�
744
/ yt /
Pnnt
Iteceired by:
Print
Recciveti t ETS bv:
Signature
Signature
/at-v..
1
/4,
f2 O'° t
1—-A
(/-
133 e
Pint
Signature
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS CC):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presence:Absense Indicator. MDL = 0.10 mg'L)
ale and trnK
r.3c,
Present
✓I
Al.sent
Project number: I (a1(/Z Sample number: l "PIZU(a.I(p
Comments:

ri
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
�e -
r�(.7-`��
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Facility: Earth Environmental Services, Inc.
Andrews WWTP
Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic
NPDES #: NC0020800 Pipe #: 001 County: Cherokee
Purchase order:
Effluent dilution: 13%
Parameter code: TGP3B
wenzetawrar
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample:
Start date:
tafk.("'
End date: i .. -/ Q'
Number of samples per hour:
Chilled during collection?
If chilled, specify temperature:
Time: �S.es4i�QvL,
Time:Cg'
Sample location'! !t f C-41v
Volume collected for testing: / I)
Number of containers filled for testing: /
�lFz� Method of transport to laboratory:
Comments:
Eg S
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
11��PKl' fimirL6/
Print
Relinquished by:
Signature
/.2/n'I/4;
Date and time
Prim
Relinquished by:
Signature
Date and time
Print
Signaturc
Dale and time
Received by:
Print Signature
Received by:
Date and tines
Print
Signature
Dale and once
Esc+.._. sv.,.� �sissa.vs-+ov1s.�.nrn.r..s._c.rrn-unawurmmx.�rars�v..-asav,..msww+exnwaw+
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by:
0'1'rc.6tc-
Print
Custody seals intact?:
Signature
Yes
Nu
Samples received in good condition?:
Tracking number:
/-1///
,,Z5 3 "
Nut used
Date and time
Received at ETS be:
Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C):
Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DIM Presence'Absensc Indicator. MDL = 0.10 mg I.I
ate and lime
0.5L
Present
Absent
Project number: ! \"110 - Sample number: r'44012_ 4 Cr
Comments:

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1.14
1.12
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.04
1.02
2.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
Ceriodaphtzia dubia
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
I I I
•
I i I I I I I I II I I I I I
USEPA Control Limits (± 2 Standard Deviations)
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75t11 and 90th Percentile CVs)
•— —• • • • --• --•
• • • •-- •--•--• -• — • - • - --•
I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (10th and 2517 Percentile CVs)
•—•—•_-_•_•_•
•
0.8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
A \�' ,os•5 \5 0', \5 \5 \� \� 9 \6 \b 5 \6 5 \b 0 \b 10 L \6 1,0 3 \b \ 0 \ 0 b 0
0�,\ 0� ' 00.\ ' \0 0 ' \\ 0�" \ti0a" 0\.\ti' OZ 09' Oti 0 ' O.s. "OVA " 0\A ' Oq.\ ' Ob 0 ' 0,\ ' OaA ' Oq,\ \0 0 \\ 0 \ti.0
Test date
•
7-day IC,{ = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of sodium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Ceriodaphnia reproduction for the test population.
Central Tendency (mean IC,5)
Warning Limits (mean IC25 ± SA to or SA 75)
Control Limits (mean IC25 ± SA 25, SAA, or 2 Standard Deviations)
.( merte.ee
■.r ewM by
Ilm Sumn

• • t
A6
opt. �.r_:
r 2:b
740
r
r • 1
Quad: Andrews, N.C.
Subbasin: 040502
Latitude: 35°11'51"
Longitude: 83°50'46"
Receiving Stream: Valley River
Stream Class: C-Trout HUC#: 06020002
NC0020800
Town of Andrews WWTP
I
\ ` .
t t r 1�
.
SCALE 1:24000

EN:SING YA*KYE
TOP 11�! 171%9+'
IN14:11T ELEV. 1707.7v'
(.1
rtr
s•
P
8" I:KA�111' VC.)
EXISTING SLUDGE DRYING arcs
•
CONC.
' EX/STING •
SWDGE DRYING BEDS EXISflNC u/UINCIC
_•< 1 TOP EL 1716.29'
• - DIP INV EL 171169'•
Y
N
r •
PVC. 7t trCIP
a+sTlN UANP. t,e .«. 1
TCs, EL 171404' I
r to-
+NT. Et. 1712.11J'
r
12' C. V.
aN I BOX
COOING YANI•al
TOP EL, 1717.91'
ON CL 1712.81' (('f'1
•T
<
\`
E3ISTiNG
HE, V CF S
c �
.o`
/ 61.
0
ASPriALT
PAVING
------'..N

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. K.4-001.0
Outfall )
Month kK-✓
Year �a_i` j L{L{
Facility Name: Town of Andrews WWTP ORC: Michael Ladd
Date of sampling: 9/12/2014 Phone: [phone]
Analytical Laboratory: Earth Environmental Services, Environmental Testing Solutions, Rogers and Callcott
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number
samples
Ammonia as NI
Composite
SM4500NH3F
0.1
6.8
mg/I
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
SM4500-0 G
0.1
7.4
mg/I
Nitrate/ Nitrite
Composite
SM4500NO3-H
0.20
1.72
mg/ 1
Total Kjeidahl nitrogen
Composite
351.2
0.20
9.34
mg/I
Total Phosphorus
Composite
200.7
0.020
2.6
mg/I
Total dissolved solids
Composite
SM2540 C
1.0
323.0
Hardness
Composite
SM2340 B
0.66
77
mg/I
Chlorine (total residual. TRC)
Grab
SM 4500 Cl G
0.010
0.011
mg/I
Oil and grease
Grab
1664 A
5.0
ND
mg/I
Antimony
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/ 1
Arsenic
Composite
200.8
10.0
ND
ug/1
Beryllium
Composite
200.8
1.0
ND
ug/1
(:ndmium
Composite
200.8
1.0
ND
ug/ 1
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Composite
Composite
200.8
200.8
5.0
1.0
ND
9.0
ug/1
ugh
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ugh
Mercu n
Composite
200.8
0.2
ND
ug/I
Nickel
Composite
200.8
10.0
ND
ug/1
Selenium
Composite
200.8
10.0
ND
ug/1
Silver
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/ I
Thallium
Composite
200.8
0.5
ND
ug/I
Zinc
Composite
200.8
10.0
46
ug/I
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
Grab
SM4500 CN E
420.1
0.005
0.005
ND
0.009
mg/ 1
mg/1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
624
5.0
ND
ug/1
Acrvlonitrile
Grab
624
5.0
ND
ug/1
Benzene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
Bromoform
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
624
2,0
ND
ug/1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/I
Chlorocthanc
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/l
2-chlorocthylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Grab
Grab
624
624
5.0
2.0
ND
2.7
ugh l
ug/ 1
Dich lorohromomcthanc
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/ I
1.1-dichloror.thane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1 .2-dichloroetbane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
Trans- 1 .2-die hloroet hylenc
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ugh 1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. i1 C V ti 1C $ C
Outfall 0 0
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitatlon
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number c
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1.1-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/l
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1,3-dichloropropylcne
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/I
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethanc
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Toluene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1,1,1-trichloroethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ugh
1
1.1.2-trichloroethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
l
Trichloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
_ 1
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-crcao
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2-chlnrophenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2.4-dichlnmphenol
Grab
625
5.0U
ND
ug/1
1
2,4-dimethylphanal
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
2,4-d niu•ophenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2-niu-ophenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
4-nitrophenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Pentuehloruphenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
1
Phenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
2,4,6-trichloruphenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Accnaphthcne
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Accnaphthylcnc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Anthracenc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Bcnzidine
Grab
625
80.0
ND
ug/1
1
Bcnzotalanthraccnc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
lienzola►pyrene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
1
3,4 benzotluoranthene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Benzoighi)perylene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxyl methane
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Bis 12-cthylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
28.7
ug/1
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Butyl henry' phthalate
Grub
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2-chloronaphthalenc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1 t•
1
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 2

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. DJC DOJCD u
Outfall D l:
Month S1"ylwl (Ire
Year 1 (-f
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Unite of
-Measurement.
Number p
samples
Base -neutral compounds (cont.)
Chtysene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Di-n-octvl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Dibenzola.h)anthracene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1.2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1.4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidinc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2.6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1.2-diphenylhydrazine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
1
Fluorenc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pcntadicnc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexachloruethanc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Isophoronc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Naphthalene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
N-nitrosucii-n-pmpylamine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
N-nitrosudimethylaminc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
N-nttrosodiphenylamine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
1
Phenanthrene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Pyrenc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1.2.4,-lnchfur obenzene
Grab
02P
a.0U
ND
ug/I
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there arc significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations. t -I
Authorized. pres tativelime kt
Signature
CPPLI
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 3

Permit No. A'1LU%
Outfall 0 01
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Facility Name: Town of Andrews WWTP
Date of sampling: 12/8/2015
ORC: Tim Wood
Phone: [phone]
Month � C -C? 04 1x-✓
Year J C (-
Analytical Laboratory: Earth Environmental Services, Environmental Testing Solutions, Rogers and Cancan
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Unita of
Measurement
Number u
samplea
Ammonia las NI
Composite
SM4500NH3F
0.1
3.0
mg/1
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
SM4500-0 G
0.1
7.8
mg/1
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
SM4500NO3-H
0.10
1.18
mg/1
1
Total Kjcldahl nitrogen
Composite
351.2
0.10
6.74
mg/1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
200.7
0.010
1.0
mg/I
1
Total dissolved solids
Composite
SM2540 C
1.0
170.0
mg/1
1
Hardness
Composite
SM2340 B
1.0
76
mg/1
1
Chlorine (total residual. TRC)
Grab
SM4500CLG
0,010
ND
mg/1
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664 A
5.0
ND
mg/1
1
Antimony
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Arsenic
Composite
200.8
10.0
NO
ug/I
1
Beryllium
Composite
200.8
1.0
ND
ug/1
1
Cadmium
Composite
200.8
1.0
ND
ug/1
1
Chromium
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Copper
Composite
200.8
2.0
5.0
ugh
1
Lead
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/l
I.
Mercury
Composite
245.1
0.2
ND
ugh
1
Nickel
Composite
200.8
10.0
ND
ug/1
1
Selenium
Composite
200.8
10.0
ND
ug/1
1
Silver
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Thallium
Composite.
200.8
0.5
ND
ug/1
1
Zinc
Composite
200.8
10.0
32
ug/1
1
Cyanide
Grab
sM4snn C.N.F.
0.005
0.005
mg/1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
420.1
0.005
ND
mg/1
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
624
5.0
ND
ug/1
I
Acrylonitrile
Grab
624
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Benzene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/I
1
Bromoforrr.
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/I
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/I
1
Chlorobrozene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Chloroethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
624
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Chloroform
Grab
624
2.0
2.5
ug/1
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1.1-dichloroethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/I
1
1.2-dichloroethanc
Grab
624
2,0
ND
ug/1 ,
1
Trans-1.2-diehloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. hJCGG �LSSiiv
Outfall t1C
Month el"��e�'
Year
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number c
samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ugh
1
1.3-dichloropropylene
Grab
624
1.0
ND
ug/1
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/I
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
I ,1,2,2-trtrachlorocthanc
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ugh l
1
Tetrachlornethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Toluene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1.1,1-trichloroethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1.1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
, ugh
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ugh!
I
Acid -extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/l
1
2-chlorophenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
tig/1
1
2,4-dimerhylphcnol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2.4-dinitrophenol
Grab
625
20.0
ND
ug/1
1
2-nitrophenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
4-nitrophcnol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Pentachloruphenol
Grab
625
10.0
ND
ug/1
1
Phenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Acenaphthylenc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Anthracene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Benzidine
Grab
625
80.0
ND
ug/1
1
Benzo(alanthracene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Benzo(a)pyrcne
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
3,4 henzofluoranthene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/l
1
Benzo(ghi)perylcnc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
Benau(k)fluoranthcne
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroethyll ether
, Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Bis (2-chloroisoprupyl) ether
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
6.88
ug/l
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
Butyl bcnzyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/l
1
2-chloronaphthalene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1 l
1
4-chlnrophcnyl phenyl ether
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 2

�,� Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No.
Outfall L' .i
Month AA? C -a „t4 ba/.
Year 2:
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number t
sample)
Base -neutral compounds 1cont.)
Chrvsenc
Grab
625
5,00
ND
ug/1
1
Di-n-butvl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
I
Dibenzola.hlanthracene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1.3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1.4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Dimcthyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2.4-diniuotoluenc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2,6-dinttrotoluene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
l.2-diphcnylhydrazine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
- ugh
1
Fluoranthcnc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Fluorene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hcxachlorobutadiene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexuchlurocyclo-pentadiene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexachlorocthanc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Indenn11.2.3-cdlpyrcnc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/l
1
lsophurunc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Naphthalene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylaminr
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
N-nitrosxlimethylamine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodiphcny-lamine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Phenanthrene
(:rnh
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Pvrene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1,2,4,-trtchlorobenzene
Grab
625
J.UU
Ni)
ugh)
I
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persona directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Tun wood
Authorized Representative name
Si ature
Date
r.
Page 3

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No. % JC.GGav
Outfall G " I
Month /''
Year C 1 ‘to
Facility Name: Town of Andrews WWTP ORC: Tim Wood
Date of sampling: 3/8/2016 Phone: [phone]
Analytical Laboratory: Earth Environmental Services, Environmental Testing Solutions, Rogers and Callcott
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number t
sample.
Ammonia las N)
Composite
SM4500NH3F
0.1
3.7
mg/I
1
Dissolved oxygen
Composite
SM4500-0G
0.1
7.7
mg/I
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
SM4500NO3-H
0.10
3.02
mg/I
1
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Composite
351.2
0.10
4.90
mg/1
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
200.7
0.050
1.6
mg/1
I
Total dissolved solids
Composite
SM2540 C
1.0
167.0
mg/1
1
Hardness
Composite
SM2340 C
1.0
73
mg/I
I
Chlorine (total residual. TRCI
Grab
SM 4500 CL G
0.010
ND
mg/1
1
Oil and grease
Grab
1664 A
5.0
ND
mg/I
1
•
Antimony
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Arsenic
Composite
200.8
10.0
ND
ug/1
1
Beryllium
Composite
200.8
1.0
ND
ug/l
1
Cadmium
Composite
200.8
1.0
ND
ug/1
1
Chromium
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Copper
Composite
200.8
2.0
5.0
ug/1
1
Lead
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Mercury
Composite
245.1
0.2
ND
ug/1
1
Nickel
Composite
200.8
10.0
ND
ug/l
1
Selenium
Composite
200.8
10.0
ND
ug/1
1
Silver
Composite
200.8
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Thallium
Composite
200.8
0.5
ND
ug/1
1
Zinc
Composite
200.8
10.0
24
ug/1
1
Cyanide
Grab
SM4500 Cti E
0.005
0.005
mg/1
1
Total phenolic compounds
Grab
420.1
0.005
ND
mg/1
1
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
624
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Acrvlonitrilc
Grab
624
5.0
ND
ughl
1
Benzene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Bromoform
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/I
1
Chlorocthane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
624
5.0
ND
ug/1
1
Chloroform
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
I)inhlnrohromomcthane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ugh
1
1,1-dichlornethanc
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1.2-dichloroethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1 r.
1
Trans-l.2-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1 `'
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1

/J G G G �Gg 0 C Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No.
Outfall G O I
Month 1► arC-1
Year -Z0 l
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quaantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Numbet,
gyp*
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/I
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1,3-dichloropropylene
Grab
624
1.0
ND
ug/1
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ugh!
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Methyl chloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Methylene chloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
1,1,2,2-tetrachlorocthanc
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Toluene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ugh
1
1.1,1-trichloroethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ugh!
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Vinyl chloride
Grab
624
2.0
ND
ug/1
1
Acid-eatraatable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dichlorophenol
Grab
Grab
Grab
625
625
625
5.00
5.00
5.00
ND
ND
ND
ug/1
ug/1
ug/ I
2,4-dimethylphenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-d i n itrophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
625
625
625
625
625
5.00
5.00
20.0
5.00
5.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/1
ug/ I
ug/I
ug/1
ug/1
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-trich torophenol
Grab
Grab
Grab
625
625
625
10.0
5.00
5.00
ND
ND
ND
ug/I
ug/I
ug/1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
Acenaphthylene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Grab
Grab
Grab
625
625
625
5.00
80.0
5.00
ND
ND
ND
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
Benzola►pyrcne
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/ 1
3.4 benzofluoranthenc
Benzolghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Grab
Grab
Grab
625
625
625
5.00
5.00
5.00
ND
ND
ND
ug/1
ugh 1
ug/I
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
Bis 12-chloroethyl) ether
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
Bis (2-ethythexyl) phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
5.11
ug/1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl bcnzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalcnc
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
625
625
625
625
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1 ^
ug/ I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Page 2

C GCS C� Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No.
Outfall 0 u
Month n��"C•
11
Year )
Parameter
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number
sample
Rase -neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Dibenzo(a.hlanthracene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1.4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
3,3-dichiurobenzidine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/I
1
Diethyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh'
1
1,2-dipherwlhvdrazine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Fluoranthene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
Fluorene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
Hexachlorobutadienc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexachlorocvclo-pcntadiene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Hexachloroethane
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
lndcnol1.2.3-cd)pyrene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
lsophorone
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/l
1
Naphthaiene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Nitrobenzene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ugh
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/l
1
N-mtrosodiphcnylamine
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/l
l
Phenanthrcnc
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
Pvrene
Grab
625
5.00
ND
ug/1
1
1,2,4,-tricniorobenzene
Grab
b2b
b.f./0
NU
ugh
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified perdonnel properly
gather and evaluat the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
information submitted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Form - DMR- PPA-1
tam wooa
Authorized Representative name
Signature
1/ /1U
Date
Page 3

[nvironmontalTesting Solutions Inc.
PO Box 7565
Ache it lc. NC 28802
I'hanc: (8281350-9361
nix: (8281350-9368
L-maii:.iinrei'etsnclab corn
1)4aTc Au ens,. 20.2018
EI'lltrent Aquatic Tozicits Rtport Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
racilitg: Andrews WWTP NPDES NC- 0020800 Pipes • 001 Count%: Cherokee
I .ulxtratan Pet lest Environmental ['or ft )' clutu n;5.. Ijnc
s Ignature operator in Responsible Charge ,tcP „/"� � �` _ir)Q/
• immune of I.ab rattxt Super%icor / ^
( ommcnts
:'tote.-7- I:991
Samples' 10680(701. I A )8Cifi ? . 11.11) 10.:5
•
Mail Original To: North t.'arclma Deparanent of Environment and Natui ti Rootlet:::
DWQ, f?m it mmcrrtal Sciences Branch
162 i Mail Sin ice (.shier
Rsletph. NC 27699-1621
Control
Orpanisnis
% Effluent
Effluent
Replicate number
1 2 3
4
SumvinsE rumher of laresc
10
10
10
10
Ullcmal cnmt er of la • a:
10
I 0
10
10
Weleht 0ri:ritnl111ta larvae)
0.691
0.650
0.620
0.626
St'Ti4i:tp numhe: oflzr ae.
10
10
to
10
ulr,•atal number
10
10
10
10
uaahronfooaleoi =star)
0.666
0.663
0.653
0748
5I44\6iu_ m_rher of I:Ir.:4.
10
10
10
10
_ _ ra` •• :u- per of Inr.:
10
70
10
ICI
0 706
0 770
0.542
0.666
I7f(l aerll •.u.... ..• r .'(::.. .s•.a
I5.
:a.-.ar
111
111
10
10
0.6_ 8.
IC
0.630
10
0 683
In
0.677
% Effluent - I .. • - r.::,tr: of Ixsoe
10
10
In
26
"'a Effluent
IEEE
I uul n.ur.:er er Ian ae
10
ld
10
U e i:ht ongineI 1 wig 1aj, ne)
0.670
0695
0 •
t'.775
5a: t i , i;:4 number of Ian w
10
10
10
10
Origilctl turn]:1 •,11a,ae
10
10
10
10
acl rl,,,''.r-1 m iris
0.703
0690
0.701
0.646
V. ate, Qunli Data
Control
} •L:Li
,▪ 74
ICDuren
- t...:9 t 1.
Steal (lair:
Fnd 447
Stet tune
OS. I4.IS
01159
S.u: na7 .°°,
'•tern°r wr Itng�
A. cap; w:
st'.I%it ttIC'rr:
Sun i,
t •. e. a• c t.; I,r:E1
Sur, a. I •-r
Sirn-itnl 1't1
1t errMc ur (Ing
4unnal 1,0
\t KTr,�T ff:lgI
100.0
0.647
t1.617
100.0
0_683
100.(I
0.686
100.0
6.65-
100.0
0.720
100.0
0.(185
Teat Organisms
S Ii&e:C
117,1 , x Coln :re
trcc:n I:m;h
rad 1.4 cil
1S.06.IS 171I.
Ox-07-:S r : r
list o
real'
Dal I
Irli:a r %vial
DRY
retrial 1 $l
Da), 3
Lllual Erna!
Dar 4
Initial I Final
Day 5
banal
Das 6
t:,nu a real
-I
7 50
768
7.43
1.61
7 -.
--
4:•
7 71
--' f . -•
-.S -t;'
'i
't`
`
-
-
.i
-•S
,--'
.i7
: -
-
-
4-1
_
sl
. x»
-.a'
7 28
_I
- _.
s
SI
5G
Si
68
5:
-I
Ft
c-,
24.9
21 1
?4 S
24 0
15 C
24.7
_` n
_
_ •
_4 r
24.9
_-
tiample Inforutation
C,.., dal: stardare
Citall
Cpi: x:ae dlrrt• -.•
iliainin un,T
Ilardt•e$I
Tn:nl _•lr::nr_
SamTlr Ter10 a: Fte:al.: ; •
S2::1Ph 1 Sample 2 Stvnplr 3 L. _ c ,l
08-0i-18
05.09-Ir
tell
Overall Analysis:
Result. PASS I-OLt_. NO[(. ;:11..; i'il`'.
5_^nai
'leas}:
�te5
1
% 1 wisi Imp
,Ir vieal
1::... ;:
' tfrita.o;
( rural
Cakulatcl
-cal
Ca..utnred
-'- °
- -•
.-0
•
•
D IS'() fair, .4 7'- 5 0.'03)

P() Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
August 20, 2018
Ms. Wanda i.add
Earth Environmental Services
75 Bison Lane
Murphy. NC 28906
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 13491
Dear Ms. Wanda Ladd:
Lnclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Andrews WWTP received by
Ent ironnlcatal Testing Solutions. Inc. August 06 through August 10. 2018.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Num her
Final Result
TliP(iC' Fathead Minnow (Pirnephales promelcts) Larval EPA-821-R-02-01; C'h\ >52%
Survival and Growth, Test Method 1000.0
(.:hv = Chronic Value. A numeric % iluc rcprc entire the geometric rncart of the highest concentration having nu
d, ,,:table impairment of survival or growth and the lowest roncentrtrtion that does have a detectable impairment of survival or
nr,ntitlr.
If this test was performed as an NPUES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the
Chit value >52% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
August 06, 2018 using the parameter code TIIP6C.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original i)WQ Aquatic Tu\ieitr Form (AT-5) by
September30, 2018.
If you have any questions concerning these results. please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely.
Jiin Sumner
Laboratory Director
fhis report should not be reproduced. except in its ctttiret. ciithout the urine') consent oflimironmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
'Ihe results in this report relate only.to the samples submitted for anal sis.
North Carolina Certificate :t'rtntherc_ Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water.. 37786, Wastewater: 600
South f'aroiirra Certificate Manner: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (828) i50-9368
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
October 22. 2018
Ms. Wanda I, add
Earth Environmental Services
75 Bison Lane
Murphy. NC 28906
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 13632
Dear Ms. Wanda Ladd:
Enclosed are toxicity test results fir samples from the Andress WWTP received by
Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc. October 08 through October 12. 2018.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
N umber
Final Result
1.�,6C, Fathead Minnow (1'unepJiale. pronrelas) l.arval EI'A-821-I2-02-0 I ChV >52"/0
Survival and Growth. Test Method 1000.0
.Vote: ChV = Chronic Vnlue. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration ha%ing no
detectable impair writ or sun ital or growth and the lowest concentration that dues ha%c a detectable impairment of survival or
growth.
th.
If this test was perlormed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter. please enter the
ChV value >52% on the L•'fllucnt Discharge Monitoring Form (MR -I) for the collection date
October 08, 2018 using the parameter code TI IP6C.
Additionally. please sign and submit the original 1)\VQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (A l -5) by
November 30, 2018.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
r rWl6M�—�
Jim Sumner
Laboratory Director
this report should not be reproduced. c..:ept in its cntirct'. without the written consent of l..m ironntenlat I rating Solutions. Inc.
foie results in this repm relate to the s unplrs submitted for annul sis.
North Carolina Certificate .Vurnher•s: Biological Analyses: 37. Drinking Water: 37786. Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Cent] icon! Vunher: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

' Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc.
PO Ito, 7565
Asiwillc. \i 288(12
Phc?nc: [phone]
Fay 18281350-9368
1:-mail: Jim i±etsnclah.cnnl
Dale' (tctob2r 22.2018
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Fai ili1) %ndresis 1'11�TP
NC 0020800 Nips is 001 Counts: f'hrrokcr
Laboratory Performing Test. Environmental Testin} Su lion.
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
C(Intmenls•
Proj&t. 13622
Sample 18010a 01, 181010.30.18101222
flail Original To: North Carolina Department of I-ns-ironmcnt and Natural Resources
I)10x Environmental Scicnocs Branch
I62I Mail Service (-enter
Raleigh. N(' 27699-1621
Control
Organisms
"/a F.mucnt
OMB
Replicate number
1
Seeming number of lame
10
10
1 ft
10
otigirsl masher Alarm
10
10
10
10
11 enrhr nnlmml (rngjler.aeY
(1.700
0.799
0.894
0.926
% Effluent
6.51f.
% Effluent
I 1
% Effluent
EMI
°6 Effluent
Su1unag mmitlxrof(nrrn:
t0
ill
10
10
(}.lnnnal number of fan tw
10
10
10
10
Wc10111,0npi1tnl (16S, 111nx1
(1.89(i
0.899
1.016
0.942
-, . I'. :.euit117 of larvae
10 --
10
10
10
Ca.;'nrtl final,/ orlanae
10
10
Ir1
10
A'eiiph(v3irnrml lmgianart
0 9_ 7
0.916
0.833
0.833
Sw.'rvins, nnm1R-r of lsa.
1,1
I O 10
10
t)n_1ir-'1 mnnkm,rttat,a.
10 1:'
I
!o
Pe ,�¢ram.'x,
u 3
0.i,2' '1 -41
0890
Nemfnng nwnb.t of !au ar
10
10
10
111
Onitinalnum4.-1oftatcae
IQ
10
ID
1(.1
Heigh* inilmwl tap larcnel
0.863
0.892
0.933
0.916
Slrvtvtni wake! of Ianae
10
10
III
10
Orir:itul mother et 0f lannr
10
111
10
10
\tcivil' ocletrul(mplena:l
0.829
0S79
0.834
0.884
\' liter Qualiy Data
Control
if(ISU 1.
Uu tuts 11:
Tpnp I C'
IIigl1 (:lln(cn
Start &me
IU-UY-I5(
Stln ivtt r'•. I
lc'cra,t wtlnit: I
cra:Y 1,1;
Astaire WI Ir1 •
StA,Ival l'..
: vest'[ w7 In,•:
S11niv h",1
111 Crar.0 N{ I111i 1
1-rd rune'
10tt..IR
1(10.0
0.846
0.846
100.0
0.938
100.0
0.880
11111.11
0.855
111(I.0
0.901
100.0
0.8S7
Stan tune:
OS37
fest Organisms
S(ru�1:
End hme I
0714
In-house Cullarc I
fiesta; hatch
I.rld hat-.11
111-O8-18 I625
10-09-18 U60U
pity 0
(final 1 Final
Day I
tar •1 1-•um1
Dab 2
hnrwl I { rind
Dar 3
Intnal I Final
t):IV 4
1rR:1.1 I16n1
Dm5
lni ai final
Dap 6
Irma! I Final
751
-
71R
;
•
i.74
7i3
4R9
7.3:
26
'1+
(i97
727
6Ri
-;'
C^
h -
7S
-i-
8.0
'C
:
.4
24 '.
21
i
-.
_ I
.1
.,
_
'1 :
'4 -
2; t
_ I t•
:'1 -.
711
t.9:
.I -
,.,
- 'I
!
.,,
-1'
-
> .
7.1'
77
'R
Si
-'
.
s.1
-.
--
._
'11'
'15
240
24.4
2I9
2-2
'4S
..
21X
'J:
24:'
J
r,
Sample Information
(.dlect, m start dal,.
Grit•
Cuuip,',]t. duraaon
.•Ul5luun 'mu 1 C•nl'1),.
I Ixtlnr.•.1 I - C 3' I .
'1! .,.1.I.Kt.:LI.
S:cui....::q• :: nece•r•; C
Sample 1
IIMM Santi
('0111In1
1011748
10-09.1%
10 list
[ 1
21 25-b
. :-It
24 "2-h
I-----1
16
..•
ii
10-:0
21
4
$I
?6-Ill
2V7
'su
IIII 1i'
•:010
11
1II)
-
14
r.
()serail Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >52% NOEC: 52% C'hV':
-ltial).e.
mina&
H,_ m.
\(s(-(-
•
J'1
St:.c"cai
Cirnwth
S cn
yes
'Cc*
'Sea.
72".
.
.ill.
..2"t
.chi.
`.'1..1.d Insr,
Ihamctt'.,
• .. _I
...:.::11
(akhlarei
,trod)
Cpjii 1 a
Calculated
. _:
21IU
•2_601
' - :ail
'Iy4'1
>52 u/n
Dff Q form .-1T-5 (8473)

PO 13ox 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone],1
Fax: [phone]
EnvironmentalTesting Solutions, Inc.
November 30. 2018
Ms. Wanda Ladd
Earth Environmental Services
75 Bison Lane
Murphy. NC 28906
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 13728
Dear Ms. Wanda Ladd:
Enclosed are toxicity test results fir samples from the Andrews WWTP recck cd by
Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc. November 05 through November 09. 2018.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
THP6C fathead Minnow (Pinrep/rales promelac) Laval EPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >52%
Survival and Growth, Test Method 1000.0
1 nIe: (:hV` = Chronic Value. A numeric Falur representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration lun ing no
detectable intpairrnent of sun h al or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of sun ival or
growth.
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative letter, please enter the
CIN value >52% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR -I) for the collection date
November 05, 2018 using the parameter code THP6C.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-5) by
December 31, 2018.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please fccl free to contact me.
Sincerer.
4.441441404`.—
t -I Sumner
Laboratory Director
this report should not be reproduced. except in its entirct,. without the written certsrttt of umvironntental resting Solutions. hie.
I he results in this report relate old:, to the samples submitted tor anal%;i..
Yorth Carolina Certificate Azumbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786. tl'astewatcr: 600
South Carolina ('errilkale Vt,nrher Clean Water Act: 99053-001

•
••
.3 Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Atic\'i11e.NC28802
Phonc: [phone]
Fax: (828) 35U--9368
-mail; Jim ii;ctsnclab.com
Date. Not ember 3u, 211I8
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Fmclh;\ \ndrens 11'111TP
NPDFS 0020800 Pipe #: 00I County: Cherokee
I aborator Pcltonning Test. 1.mimnmcntal Tcstiu luhl
Sitglatute of Operator in Responsible Charge.
Signature of I ahnrat4n Supnkix,r.
('ommcnts:
Ikupc�r 13728
Samples- 181 105 05. 1811
]Sail Original To: North Caolina I)epllnmcnt of Ur%honntcut and Mutual Remiurcc;
DWQ. I-.n.. ironmental Sciences Branch
I621 Mail Sets Center
!taleieh. NC 27699-16?1
Control
l hrganisms
% Effluent
Kftlnertt
EMI
% Effluent
EMI
% Effluent
IF=
a Effluent
Replicate number
I 2 3
4
Srr.+n inp numl) 1 of far, a.
1(1
10
1(1
10
Diii:inal amnia./ of Isvae
10
10
10
10
1\citht•onglnatlme.'brear)
0.675
0.708
11,7411
0 (173
Slrrci+ILIA, itunJbl.t of l_i.ae
10
10
10
11)
Ucuind manlier of lame
10
10
10
ill
1\ esghr •mptnal r ntp1ana;.)
0.665
0.692
I) (fi3
0 613
S n i, ug nunlur or Can nr
10
10
10
III
i h initial samit.a7 :.ar,.:3
III.
10
! 0
III
11aaht'Wua:n.r:imi: ar'..::I
0655
0.694
0-7f16
11.7011
Su..r :n•. n:nn r, of Ii, •.,-
II
1(1
10
111
(lnrtnnl mmth;t of la,J:
I I
110
ID
1(1
Wrinh:ptiyeittaluul lat+ael
I:t,'.:
i•13
'+.648 _
0.704
Sus%, ale menherofIan ar
10
10
10
1(1
()n_ttnal lumber of lawn. .
10
1(1
I 0
10
A'elpin original (nu.l.c.ax1
0.627
0.660
0.653
0.690
S44,uutc auutb.i of lanae
10
10
10
_ 10
Otigirul number of lama:
10
10
111
10
Weightoriginal fine Iat,ee,
0.758
f) 717
0.726
0.787
11 titter Qualify Data
Control
n11011
110in;•II
lamp r
High Conceit
pi! is.' I'
r,n ow. Li.
Temp I C,
Stun dst;
tfal U.
Start time'
rod lime
I I d.,6-11
11.13-11t
OS 7
08-10
Sins nal(".n
t+entre'm 111121
A, faze Mt
- xi. n ng imgi
A, eta¢. ,,.
Stu I :‘,,I...
Su,
xcage ni only)
Su, n al 1' .1
:\Coale (I tnla•1
1011.0
0.699
0.699
100.0
0.6511
100.0
0.689
11111.1)
11.66'1
1011.11
0.658
100.(I
0.753
Test Ori ani.nis
S,+tacc:
16.811 tse ('tilnre ,
$:gits loath_
I:ud kW,
II-05-1S 1700
114)&18 0515
Mv0
h.ittal Maul
Day 1
Imnnt I Final
My
Initial I final
eta. 3
Irattal1 final
(meal I Final
My
luau! ) term
Da. 6
In.bnl I litt:.l
7 06
7.1)2
7.1.1
6 97
- .
- 1. -
1
f, ':S
- .
7.22
6 9:
'.17
6 96
`'
79
't
''
-.
3;!
21'
'2.4
249
;L,.
..
-4-
2.I'.
-
..
'JR
73.6
21'
:IS
F1
'S
8.1
7.7
8.2
-.
--
-,
-.
8(I
H
, .
7.9
250
74:
>>r
245
249
'41
,_S
21.7
-..
7,46
_ .
2I.1
246
Sample Informal'
l .:..;
15,a)
t .rnp'nulu
.1lta dims, n pl (..3
Ilarch.y:Ict,1 Cal. '
t ,Kaitutnm nunh„unrr
'rat residual .IJurr,z iu:x
Smnpte Temp ar Re:r,r• •
_::.pfc I
Sample 7
Sample "
r -an?
1-1 -1,.
11 •rot• 1:
I 1-08-IS
i.
58
61
:r..a
267
2G7
-..
-'(111)
'I10
,.0 :C.
I3
1.1
I'
Overall Anal, sis:
Result: PASS 1°F.C: >52% NOE(': 52% CIA':
nal}Sc.
u•:i,c.1
Gr.».tn
Y,-t
,I bop.
Duraait's
,.It.',.I
Grovib
• --I:I.-.
i -r-:
,,.,
. 1..al
...-.:laled
._
- I 19
' r i l l
_ 1
YJ
.,
"IS
AD'Q fom,.l7=i (X 17.71

Pt) Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
August 20, 2018
Ms. Wanda Ladd
Earth Environmental Services
75 Bison Lane
Murphy. NC 28906
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 13491
Dear Ms. Wanda l.add:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Andrews WWTP received by
Environmental Testing Solutions. Inc. August 06 through August 10. 2018.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
TI1P6(: Fathead Minnow (Pimephales pry» nelas) I.arval l; PA 82I It-02-013 Chi' >52`%
Survival and Growth. rest Method 1000.0
Note• CM' = Chronic Value. A numeric value repr. scnting the geometric mean oldie highest concentration having rx)
detectable impairment of survival or growth and the lowest concentration that does hay e a detectable impairment of survival or
grov.
il'this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter. please enter the
ChV value >52% on the Lfuent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR -I) for the collection date
August 06, 2018 using the parameter code THP6C.
Additionally. please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-51 h)
September 30, 2018.
Ii you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely.
Jiro Sumner
Laboratory Director
This rep on should nut he reproduced. except in its cntirct. w ithout the'. riucn consent of Ern i/mum- tal I esting Solutions. Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for aual� sic.
:North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37. i)rinking Water; 37786. Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate A'umuber: Clean Water Act: 9905 3-001

E nvtronmental Testing Solutions. Inc
Effluent Aquatic '1 oxicit} Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow
PO F3nx. 7.56i
i1sil. t it Ir. NC 2S80
Phone: [phone]
I-rtv (8281 : j11-9368
rr Inaii: Jim•a etsnclab cam
I)3ra .iueuit2u _i IS
\ 1 ulti-Concentration Test
ra;ilitt. Audi -cm ' vrp
NPDES = `.0 I►U20800 Pipc y 0h1
Sign turn Pct fOpforming 1rt 1 nsiEnsble Chartal Cc,t:ne;ti; iuu a Ala/
Sir afore nC Operator an Responsible Charrc•1
Sienaturc cf Lab.iratun Supm ianr
C.l,mmcros-
Protn-t 11,4 )1
Samples* I8ISL* OI. IFOROR ).. I IID810.=U
Mail Orizinal To: North Carolina Department ut i-.^ti in:mino a1 , `,n:w tl Re,otircr.
I)l1'Q ratiionnterns! Scl nccs Brandt
1631 Mail Srr. . ice ("cnrcr
Raleigh \(" 270:•99 1621
C'ontrnl
Organisms
% Effluent
3.23%
4•o Effluent
Fftinent
l is: 1
% Effluent
EMI
"b Effluent
51.,.
Replicate number
t 3 3 i
iu:, nita numb= of lar.ac
100
10
10
10
fhtcmal nonslx or let, a:
10
10
10
10
tlnph:0ririrulutt`Fetid
0.691
1.'.650
0.620
0.626
Sim i.ino number ofisnoe
10
i0
10
1(1
CR:•anai :alu lba of inns.
10
10
10
10
tt.acnt errioiryl r,r=,:la.ac)
0 (00
0 663
0.653
0.748
_ number oflanne
10
:i..
(f)
10
- _ r.,. -amber p`Far.a:
10
1(,
10
• . ...' nn::Itr.a.<1
0 706
0 779
f}_n.l'
0.66%.
al., .... f::..: ::,ax
III
jf
I1
ICI
... -: I :-.ae
10
Ii
1.1
Iri
,. --.art
061S
0030
0683
il.6--
munbcrof!fully
1:41,Tizoi rllatnber ;!flame
ttbrcla'anginaf S no: If a1:S
10
10
0.670
10
IC
06455
10
(I ':4
I f:
S.i.i,n:u:arntre etlam ne
10
10
iI
'1
41:-;11,a1nwn cr.•:lance
10
I(1
11
‘.tacit m!4rrl1.11To. lrr:,a,I
0.70.4
11 (iW.,
r.1.
-.
« ater Dale
Control
-iI `I'1
Iligh Concentration
•
yJ rzr_ 1.r
Stet date
OS-07-IR
Frei dare
OF F4-IS
Sian tune re•'. r�
(Ixs.J :I,r
"I hnni
100.0
0.647
0.617
100.0
0.683
100.0
100.0
0.657
100.0
0.720
100.0
0.685
Teat Organisms
C.yutt
b-hnre,e '. •11• "c
tSec:- Its;4
rn3r:axL
f.S _IG 1-'II
OS.; -.
Wyo
Dad 1
Da!
Da. 3
Day 4
Day;
lnm;li Final
bu::a r Ir.- al I F • :1
I:nuxi renal
in r i•i1.11
Inc: Final
tninal 1"-,_:1
Dash
.'a
:?
:G,p
- I1
-c:
4]
77i
-'c
':R
'
7
_y
_.L
-
S-
--
.5
__
7 ,
..�
.•.
x1
- _
-� - I
-
'.4:
-�;
-_�
'-
- •
o
bO
--
sl
-.
71
56'
6v
S,
_=.'•
=1 I
?SA
246
. . - - .
-
- V
`4'
-4!1
2.: 7
7.5.•;.
Semple Information
...ar
. r:1.1 I-' -I•
Uv era ll Analysis:
:.rtpie 1 Sample 2 S.
6a•li3.13 os.07-IS <l •"
24 2l-FI
SE
:R
Analyses
.1 n'ar
•
.
'..:talrlp.
rh.nr_KF
Su. -.:gal
Gt:rn::
. EEwen!
C'rtn.-13
Cal<ular"1
• 7 ,:.,I
Ce.:1 ._
. .
eia
17.%
•
-
-0 : .
2rj''..
•
ReSL.l: PASS I.OEC. '52% NOEC "n i II\' :.52%
DUD foruf.-11' (8'.0j

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
August 20, 2018
Ms. Wanda Ladd
Earth Environmental Services
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 13491
Dear Ms. Wanda I.add:
Lnclosed arc toxicity test results for samples from the Andrews WWTP rci ci' cd b
Lin ironntental Testing Solutions. Inc. August 06 through August 10. 2018.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
EPA Method
Number
Final Result
Ti1<P6C Fathead Minnow (Pinrephates promela5) Larval CPA-821-R-02-013 ChV >52%
Survival and Growth. Test Method 1000.0
Vote- ChV = Chronic Value. A numeric value rcprctenting the geometric rnean of the highest concentration having no
detectable impairment of sun i%al or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survival or
grcoth.
If this test was performed as an NPl)ES requirement or by Administrative l .etter, please enter the
ChV value >52%, on the F.liluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
August 06, 2018 using the parameter code THP6C.
:'Additionally, please sign and submit the original l)WQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-5) by
September 30, 2018.
If you have an) questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely.
Jinn Sumner
Laboratory Director
[his report should not be reproduced, . cept in its entirety. k%iUwut the %%ritten consent of Environmental Testing_ Solutions. Inc.
I he result: in this report relate only to the samples .submitted for analysis.
•Vorrh Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37' 6. Wastewater: 600
South Carolina ('t'rtif leare Vionht'r: Clean Water Act: 9905 3-t:u)1

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone] I
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
August 20, 2018
Ms. Wanda Ladd
Earth Environmental Services
75 Rison Lane
Murphy. NC 28906
RE: F.TS PRO.JF('T NUMBER: 13491
Dear Ms. Wanda Ladd:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for"samples from the Andrews WWTP received by
Enx ironmental testing Solutions. Inc. August 06 through August 10. 2018.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
El'A Method
Number
Final Result
THP6C Fathead Minnow IPim/Tlurlrs promelas) Larva) FPA-82 I-R-02-013 ChV >52%,
Survival and Growth. lest Method 1000.0
Vote: CtiV = Chronic Value. A numeric value reprinting the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no
detectable impairment of sun i'i al or gru\\ th and the l00%est concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survil al or
er n tli,
If this test was performed as an NPI)hS requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the
ChV value >52°A, on the F.Illuent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) For the collection date
August 06, 2018 using the parameter code THP6C.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-5) by
September 30, 2018.
lt' you have any questions concerning these results. please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely.
Jim Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should nut he reproduced. except in it• rrrriieq. vsitho tt the %%ritten consent of Environmental Jesting Solutions. Inc.
the results in this rclxan relate onl} to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37. Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
Sande ('ca'uline: ('era ic:fi .A umber: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

Environmental lusting Solutions. Inc.
PO Box'565
Ashen ille. \C 28802
Phony 8281 350.9364
Fax. l$211) 350-9368
F-mail: Jim•n etsnc[ab.c m
Date. August '6. 2111$
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
acrh:s Andress %t'tv'1'P
NPDES NC- 0020800 Pipe + . 001 C buns • Cherokee
Laburatvr', Performing T(,t. Environmental Tcstina Soluilirtl, Inc:
Signaulrc ci Operator in Responsihlc Charge j t�t�
Si_nanue n1.1 stxiatorr Supurs Nor
Comment'
Ittlxa 11491
Sam;$ 18f18',t. J!. 181.l8016.23 1S0S10'6
mail Original I n: North Carolina Department co 'rrs 1rnnntt n+ +r+J s:at Dal Rea urco
LWCl. kncironmc•nial Sctcnccs 0ratich
16? I Mal Sett icc (•cnter
R:rleiph. NC ?7699. 1621
Control
Organisms
% Effluent
Lllluent
16.5'::
Effluent
l'ffluenl
EMI
° I.tllucnt
Replicate number
1 2 3
4
5ur%uil r fium1,0 of tame
10
10
10
10
Chiginal number of lama.
10
10
10
Ill
welpItt ptigi nal Fang lame;
0.691
0.650
D 620
0.626
Sunning ntun1'-r ul Iryae
10
10
10
10
Ongiral , b i of larvae
10
10
10
l0
steiehr:nri;, ar47anx1
0.666
(1.663
0 653
0 74S
Scti, arc: n.arhtr.af Iann:
10
10
II)
10
hnr:rrt ruma;t v1Ianae
10
10
I
U,�
(r.6;;6
Aen'-;,:I rl::arIanir.
0_•06
(i-24
0.6.12
1r.?. •:: r.::•0•.: e-
Jr.
1:'
0 .:.•ra:::.crr:• f
IC
1.)
:II
1.:1., ..r .g.-,
I '
_ 11
0.68.1
6.477
SW. It rn; nuir hz at Ilmae
10
10
10
10
Onsinal nwnio cr Ianac
I O
iC)
10
10
Weight ;,14inal frog. Ian ae,
0.670
n 695
0 739
0.7 T
Statirrne nunber-ofla.. a:
10
10 10
i11
C;yri_ilral nr:•mbcr of lam;.-
10
10 10
r
10
sLtg:un;tn uaIrna.itlnacr
(I703
0690 0.701
0.646
t\:tterQuali s Data
Control
i+,51. t
lera.o I nay)
I 1 i .. ...Inal I Furs
tray 2
Intnal F
nay 3
Start Cate'
Frd t)at
Slit time:
1_•,
t18.07.18
n8 14-1S
0859
ral +'°)
.l ensf`e w11m�7
1.r mpg WI
ten Intl •:n :
Sun
::craft %urilr�
tier.1. • .
S;rttti•. at i"rI
1: emir: ‚Sil n, u.
Sta...41 1 `.'I
5'aa1c utItnu
100.0
n.61-
0.6.1-
100.0
0.683
100.0
0.686
100.0
11.657
100.0
0.720
I01i.0
0.685
nay 4
Test Organisms
tree
Imlloute ['Aire
La:: I '13.07.15
Days
r rIal 1 Final Irma; 7 r.a: Imta. " I-:'
3.0
79
a7
IIiab. Concentration
_�:
---
".I I
-.-
...1,-_
---
I:
-.-
--
t1
1 R
: --
...
5.3
SI
`1
3"'
2:9
'4-
_IS y.,
..
_:U
_
256
:.I�
•.
_i_
:r.
'
'Sotnplc Information
:. Jtrc
5e;rp;c i S.tip!r
88-I::48 ns-6i-t8
! "•-1,
59
81
• I
9r :t5i
10rrarg
Overall Analysis;
Rt_5,1lt' PASS r (EC. =>52",. NOLC. 52% ChV:
:tnalvarc
Item
r
Su .:.A
°.L•tllrmru
Cr:ricat
Calwlatr:I
Cn;::.-1
:.;t: •.;a
I: r
_
5,2'
WO 4T-; j$.'031