WI0400345_Staff Report for Permit Modification_20220622

Permit No. WI0400345
Date: June 22, 2022 County: Randolph
To: Michael Rogers Permittee/Applicant: ERM, Inc
Central Office Reviewer: Michael Rogers Facility Name: Energizer Manufacturing
I, GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that apply): ❑ New ❑ Renewal
❑ Minor Modification ® Major Modification
a. Date of Inspection: June 14, 2022
b. Person contacted and contact information: Alan Martin, PG; Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
c. Site visit conducted by: Jim Gonsiewski.
d. Inspection Report Printed from BIMS attached: ® Yes ❑ No.
e. Physical Address of Site including zip code: 419 Art Bryan Drive Asheboro NC 27203
f. Driving Directions if rural site and/or no physical address:
g. Latitude: 35°46'8.25"N Longitude:79°49'4.04"W
Source of Lat/Long & accuracy (i.e., Google Earth, GPS, etc.): Google Earth
II. DESCRIPTION OF INJECTION WELL(S) AND FACILITY
1. Type of injection system:
❑ Geothermal Heating/Cooling Water Return
® In situ Groundwater Remediation
❑ Non -Discharge Groundwater Remediation
❑ Other (Specify: )
2. For Geothermal Water Return Well(s) only
a. For existing geothermal system only:
Were samples collected from Influent/Effluent sampling ports? ❑ Yes ❑ No.
Provide well construction information from well tag:
b. Does existing or proposed system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If No, please provide source/supply well construction info (i.e., depth, date drilled, well contractor,
etc.) and attached map and sketch location of supply well in relation to injection well and any other
features in Section IV of this Staff Report.
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ® Yes ❑ No
What is/are the pollution source(s)? On -Site operations/previously identified groundwater
contamination
What is the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution source(s) 50 feet
4. What is the minitnum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? 30 ft
5. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good ® Adequate ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: 0 Low ® Moderate ❑ High

7. For Groundwater Injection Remediation Systems only, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring
program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ® Yes ❑ No.
If No, attach map of existing monitoring well network if applicable and recommend any changes to the
groundwater -monitoring program.
8. Does the map included in the Application reasonably represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface
drainage)? ® Yes ❑ No. If No, or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries,
buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
9. For Non -Discharge Groundwater Remediation systems only (i.e., permits with WQ prefix):
a. Are the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? n Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A.
If No, please explain:
b. Are the site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with what was reported by
the soil scientist and/or Professional Engineer? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
HI. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If Yes, explain.
2. List any items that you would like WQROS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
Item
Reason
3. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition
Reason
4. Recommendation
❑ Deny. If Deny, please state reasons:
❑ Hold pending receipt and review of additional information by Regional Office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue

5. Signature of Report Preparer(s):
Signature of WQROS Regional Supervisor:
Date:
6/22/2022
FP
DocuSlgned by:
619711beFiII bRIeeueloned by:
1. JMJU'
`-145849E225C94EA...
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS/ATTACHMENTS (Optional/If Needed)

View looking north of the waste storage area.

��a
•t
View looking east of the tank farm enclosure. Note the air sparging and soil vapor extraction wells between the
berm and the wall of the enclosure.

View looking south along the west side of the facility. The tank farm is to the immediate left.

View looking south along the east side of the tank farm. Note the air sparging well near the bottom center of the
photograph.

View of an observation well at the southeast corner of the tank farm. The ISCO injection pilot test was conducted
in this area.

View of the soil vapor extraction system in the interior of the facility. This system is currently not operating.

Permit: WI0400345
SOC:
County: Randolph
Region: Winston-Salem
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 09/27/19
Effective:
Contact Person: Scott Boyle
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Expiration: 08/30/24
Expiration:
Title:
Inspection Date: 06/14/2022 Entry Time 08:35AM
Primary Inspector: Jim J Gonsiewski
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Other
Certification:
Owner : Energizer Manufacturing Inc
Facility: Energizer Manufacturing Inc.
419 Art Bryan Dr
Asheboro NC 272033089
Exit Time: 09:50AM
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Reconnaissance
Permit Inspection Type: Injection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
IIII Wells System Operations
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: WI0400345 Owner - Facility: Energizer Manufacturing Inc
Inspection Date: 06/14/2022 Inspection Type : Reconnaissance
Reason for Visit: Other
Inspection Summary:
On June 14, 2022, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office (DWR) performed
a reconaissance inspection of the subject facility in conjunction with a UIC permit modification application review. This
inspection was conducted by DWR staff person Jim Gonsiewski. The inspection concentrated in the areas that will be part
of the planned expansion of the injection system. The facility is very well maintained. No problems with the proposed
modification were noted.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: WI0400345 Owner - Facility: Energizer Manufacturing Inc
Inspection Qate: 06/14/2022 Inspection Type : Reconnaissance
Reason for Visit: Other
System Operation
Is same well used as source well and injection well?
Is injection well capable of assimilating injected fluid?
Injection flow rate at time of inspection (gpm)
Has system owner/operator noticed any abnormalities (turbidity, air in system, poor heating/cooling, etc) in
system operation?
Comment on system operation
Is system operation and construction consistent with that described in application?
Describe inconsistencies between application and observed operation/construction
The system was not in operation. The areas were well maintained. Do not anticipate any problems with the
modifications to the system
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
■ ❑❑❑
0
❑•❑ ❑
■ ❑❑❑
■ ❑❑❑
Page 3 of 3