20140600 Ver 1_401 Application_20140614

a
Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite IN, Raleigh, NC 37615 • Phone [phone](X)
sandec com
June 5, 2014
S &EC Project ## 11980
To N C Division of Water Resources
Surface Water Protection Section (SWPS)
Ann Karen,Higgins, &,Chem Smith
Archdale Building — 9'h Floor
512 North Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604
From Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A
Re: Park Corner Retail, Carpenter Fire Station Road, Cary, Wake County, NC
On'behalf of the applicant, RKM Development Corporation, Inc., please find attached a complete application and
supplemental informauon requesting written concurrenceFfrom the N C ,Division of Water Resources (DWR) that the
activities proposed below may proceed under General Water Quality Certification 3890 (NPW 18) Please contact me
at (919) 846 -5900 if you have any questions or require additional informauon
,PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
PARK CORNER RETAIL
Project Type
Retail Shopping Center
_ Owner./ Applicant
RKM Development Corporation, Inc (applicant)
County
Wake
Nearest Town
Cary
Waterbody Name
Moms Branch
River Basin
Cape Fear / Jordan Lake
Index Number
1641- 1- 17 -3 -1
Class
_ WS -IV, NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit
03030002
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres)
0 0007 ac
Wetland Impact (acres)
0
Open Water Impact (acres)
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U S (acres)
0 0007 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet)
22 If
NOTE Towmof Cary will review and approve the proposed Jordan,Lake,Buffer Impacts pendmg,approval of these
stream impacts, application has been submitted Stream impacts only required to be requeste&for written approval
under GC3890 given the buffer impacts administered by the Town are classified as "allowable" USACE has already
confirmed the activity may proceed under NWP18 without their written approval
Attachments Complete PCN application & package
DWR Application Fee $240 00

M 910
y
<
PAID
20 1 4 0 6 0 0
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
1.
Applicant Information
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
© Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
­
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)*
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ❑ Non404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
® Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ®No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project:
PARK CORNER RETAIL
2b
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality f town
Cary
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T_I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Cleo D. & Rory D. Meacham & Sonya Burton (by will D
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
B 8161 / P 560
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
n/a JUN U 62014
3d.
Street address:
7640 Carpenter Fire Station Road ILL
Cary, NC 27519 slorrnw
' call Agent
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no..
' fax Agent
3h.
Email address:
` email Agent
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is:,
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Contract Purchaser
4b. Name
Bob Brett
4c
Business name
(Wepplicable).
RKM Development Corporation, Inc
4d_
Street address
147 2nd Avenue South, Suite 400
4e
City, state, zip.
St. Petersburg, Florida,33701
4f
Telephone no
727 -835 -2150
4g
Fax no
727- 821 -5461
4h
Email address.
bb @ricmdev.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (N applicable)
5a
Name
Bob Zarzecki
5b
Business name
if applicable)
Soil &.Environmental Consultants, PA (S &EC)
5c
Street address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
5d. -City, state, zip.
Raleigh, NC 27614
5e
Telephone no_.
919 - 846 -5900 (direct line 919 - 256 -4517)
5f
Fax no. -:
919- 846 -9467
59. Email address-
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B, Project Information and'Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
to Property Identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
0725 -94 -2781 (or Parcel ID 0046545)
1b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
I Latitude 35.8258 Longitude -78.9002
tc Property size
1444 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water, to proposed project
Morris Branch (Index No. 16- 41- 1- 17 -3 -1)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; NSW
2c River basin:
Cape Fear / Jordan Lake / Haw Watershed 03030002
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in'the vicinity of the project at the time ot'this
application.
The she Is primarily forested and is zoned 'MXD' (mixed use), and has a single family reeldence and storage building. Upland portions of the site
have been cleared and fill stockplled under a Town approved graduig permit. The surrounding land uses Include a residential townhome development
(Cemden'Park) to the east, retal4shopping center to the south, vacant rural'Iand to the west (Zoned R40) and vacant land (MMUjor) to the north
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c List the totaf estimated °linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 855
3d Explain the purpose,of the proposed project;
The purpose of the project is to install a gravity sewer line to ronneot to am exlsting,sewer manhole to provide sewer to the commercial development
3e. Describe the overall project'in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
Install by open cut with heavy equipment a sewer line across a Town administered Jordan Lake buffer and intermittent stream impacts are temporary
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional'wedand or stream'deterimnations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property !
project (includina all prior phases ),in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
_
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
® Preliminary ❑ Final
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)* Jan Patterson / Bob Zerzecki
Agency /Consultant Company.
Other: Town of Cary / S&EC
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Carolina Ecosystems & later S&EC dellneated'the property in 2011. and 2014 The Town of Gary who Is responsible for the Jordan Buffer noes
performed an onsde determination on September 2, 2011, (letter attached)
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" Instructions.
6. Future Project`Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (checKall that`apply).
❑ Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this quesbon,for each wetland area Impacted.
2a.
Wetland Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of Impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10),or
DWQ (401, other)
21.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yea/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
_
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
29. Total
Wetiend Impacts:
0
"2h. Comments-
3. Stream Impacts
If there are peirenrnal or Intermittent stream Impacts (including temporary, impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites Impacted
3a
Stream Impact
number
Permanent (P), or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type of impact
3c
Stream name
3d:
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)7
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T
Sanitary Sewer Install
UT to Morris Branch
INT
Corps
14
22
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
85
Choose one
_
S6
Choose one
_
3h. Total stream and tributary
impacts
22
31. Comments -
The proposed stream crossing is perpendicular All conditions of NWP18 & GC3880 The Town of, Cary will'review and approve buffer impacta.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries. tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other openmater of
the U S then indiv ually list alLopen water irff acts below
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b
Name of waterbody
(d applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose,one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
o
4g Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the rncomplete the chart below
Se.
Pond ID number
5b,
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
acres
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total:
5g Comments -
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
—^
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k. Method:of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will Impact a protected ripanen buffer, then complete the chart below. ifyes, then Individually list all buffer Impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation. then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a Project is in which, protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other Cape Fear
6b
Buffer Impact
number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
8
i Yes/No
B2
; Yes /No
83 -
-�
Yes/No
-
B4 -
' --
-�-
YesJNo
65
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
61 Comments' Town of Cary will review and approve the proposed Jordan Lake buffer impacts, pending the 401 approval
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and,Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken,to avoid or °minimize the proposed.Iimpects in designing project.
The eanftery sewer line has been designed to cross at 90 degrees to minimize Impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize °the proposediimpacts,through construction techniques.
Erosion control measures will be'matalled prior to any construction activity Silt fence �and tree protection fence will be installed along the construction
corridor. The project staging area will be located outside of the - buffer area.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts, to,Waters�of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Watersaof the U S or'Waterstof,the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in-Ifeu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitl ation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank-
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type. Choose one
Type- Choose one
Type. Choose one
Quantity.
Quantity-
Quantity.
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to in -lleu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature.
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested.
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g ,Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested •
acres
4h Comments
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible, mitigation plan „provide,a description of the,proposed mitigation, plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DW61
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
'6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
V6
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments,
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan.(required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a Does,the project include or Is1 adjacent to protected riparian, buffers1 identified
❑' Yes ® No
vothin one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b If yes, then isra diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
To :,n of Cary will review and approve the SMP for the project which will include an appropriate BMP to
❑ Yes ❑ No
remove nutriente,with e'direct outlet through the buffer.
2. Stormwater Mans ement Plan
2a Whafis the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
68.13%
2b. Does this project uire,&Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief. narrative description of the plan.
The SMP will reviewed by the Town of,Cary. A whet detention pond Is proposed at,this time and the project will comply with Town ordinances on
Jordan Lake nutrient reduction rules The plan will be provided once approved
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Cary
3. Certified Local Govemment Stormwater Review
13a In.which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Cary
® Phase II
3b. Which of the,following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
®NSW
apply (check all that apply)•
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other-
3c Has the,approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
[3 Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management program&apply
ORW
(check all that apply)
®Session Law 2006 -246
[]Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management "P,lan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
S. _ DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropnate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an.expenddure of public (federaUstate/local)lfunds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation ofan
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carohna),Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Cleanng House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or'Ripanan Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b. Is this an after4he- factfpermit application?
Oyes ®No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWO)Requimment)
3a Will this projects(based'on past and reasonably anbcipated'future'impacts) result in
OYes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b., If you answered "yes " "to the above, submit a qualitative onquantitative cumulative,impact,analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered 'no," provide a short narrative description.
No other director indirect, impacts are anticipated The majority of iha surrounding area Is already development Commercial retell developments
such,as the one,proposed,are typically located in existing developed, urban areas.
4. Sewage LArlposssf (Dtiii'O Require -Mrmt)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. i
The development wastewater will discharge to the existing Town of Cary sanitary sewer system The Town,wdl ensure adequate capacity and I
permitting
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur, in or near an area with federally protected,species,or
❑ Yes 0 N
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
(� Yes No
impacts?
5c If yes, indlcate'the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d, What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered or Designated Critical
„Species
Habitat?
NHP Website and records,
S. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a WIII this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habdat?
❑ Yes ® No
,6b What data sources,did you`use to determine whether your site would impact Essential;Fish Habitat ?'
NOAA EFH website The project to in the piedmont region of NC where no EFH-exists
T. Historic or'Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in:or near an area that1he state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes, No
status (e.g_, National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North,Carolina history and�archaeology)?
7b What data sources did ,you use to determine whether your site would Impact histofic�oir,archeological resources?
SHPO- HPOWMwebsite. Yates House (WA0971) & Wilson House(WS -0970) were located down Carpenter Fire Station Road weatof Green Level
Church Road (well off property), but both are "gone” now.
6. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project'occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes. explain how project meets FEMA requirements.
The only�portron of the project located within the floodplain is the sanitary sewer line, which will be excavated -below existing grades wip no above
grade fill. The Town of Cary will work with the project engineer.and developer to ensure compliance with FEMA requirements.
8c What source(s) did you use to make the tioodplain determination?
NC Flood website
S &EC, PA
Bob Zarzecki
�effis
June.5, 2014
Applicent/Agent's Printed Name
Sig ature
;g.0
Date
re Is valid only If an authorization
etter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
September 6, 2011
Phil May
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc
3040 NC 42 West
Clayton, NC 27520
Subject Jordan Lake Watershed
Urban Transition Buffer Rules
Meacham Property (Real` ID 0046545)
7640 Carpenter Fire Station
TCRB 11 -007
Dear Mr May
The site location map and other information that was provided, allowed a determination to be made as
to whether or not the referenced site would require compliance with The Town of Cary Urban Transition
Buffer (UTB) Rules Thi's project is referenced by the Town of Cary as TCRB 11 -007 and includes two
channels as depicted on the attached map Morris Branch appears on the USGS mapping and is
subject to -a 100 ft wide buffer on each side of the stream A second stream feature is indicated on the
Wake County Sod Survey In the site visit on September 2, 2011, Town staff determined that this
feature is subject to the UTB beginning at the flag referenced as SA1 which would require a 50 ft
buffer on each side of the channel This determination is valid until Decembef 31, 2016 in accordance
with The General Assembly's Session Law 2010 -177 (House Bill 683). This letter only addresses the
Town of Cary Urban Transition Buffer Rules
'Please do not hesitate to contact Us if this office can be of any further assistance
Sincerely,
Jan Patterson
Town of Cary Engineering Department
cc, TCRB11007 doc
TOWN Of CARY
318 North Academy Street -Cary, NC 21513•PO Box 8005•Cary, NC
te1919- 469 -4030 • fax [phone]• www.townofcary.org

PON
Al twin
mown
ON
NMI
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Meacham Property
Cary, NC
CAROUNA 3040 NIC 42 West, Clayton NC 27520
ECOSYSTEMS. INC. 0:919-606-1065; F:919_585-5570

I A.
■ ti
owl
■
r
1, f1fla
et
0
SITE
ffs]
%'-V
f
%J
Figure 2: USGS Map
Meacham Property
Cary, NC
CAROLINA 3040 NC 42 West, Clayton NC 2752
ECOSYSTEMS, INC. O: 919 - 606 -1065; F: 919 -585 -5570
01

.i_
I
1
A
10(v
u:% vt -L-4
i*

Legend
0
0%W Perennial Stream ti W E
�o Intermittent Stream
u
- Streets (Wake GIS)
! s j Site Parcel i r
Contours, 2 -Foot Interval
SCARLET PETAL!
Stream Form 2
;1
Al Start Channel ?
Stream Form 1 o it
i
s
BLOSSOM GROVE DR
J-4-NIT t
t
` s-- CAgpENTER FIRE BTATIOM RD
S&
EC

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of'Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
Stream A upstream of flag Al Start Channel
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Aoorox. 50' reach evaluated.
Date: 2014 -04 -09
Project/Site: Meacham Site
Latitude: 35.824885
Evaluator: David Cooper (S &EC)
County: Wake
Longitude: - 78,900608
Total Points:
Stream, Determination (circle, one)
Other Green Level
Stream is at leastintermdtent 17
EPHEMERAL ntennittent Perennial
e Quad'Name:
if a 19 or Perennial if 2 30'
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 9 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1e Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 _
3
3
2 ,Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
3
3' In- channel structure ex nffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
0
_ 1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate _
0
Lj
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
3 _
6 Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7 RecenValluvial deposits
24 Amphibians
1
2 _
3.
8 Headcuts _
0
13
2
3
9 Grade control,
05
1
15
10 Natural valley
-. 0 _
05,
1
11 Second or greater order channel
Notes. Less than 24 hours after rain event
o.= 01
Yes = 3
" artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydroloqy (Subtotal = 3 )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
®
3
13 Iron oxidizing'bactena
M
1
2 _
3
14 Leaf litter
T5_
1
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
15 Sediment on plants, or debris
2
05
_ 1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
1051
1
_ 15
17 Sod -based ewdence,of high water tables
i 1 EIO'7—,-"
05
Yes = 3
G. Biology (Subtotal= 4 5
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
_
1
2
3
21 Aquatic, Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
05
1
1'_5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
15
25 Algae
0
0,5
1
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL�= 15
Uther =
Verennial, streams may also beidentfied using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes. Less than 24 hours after rain event
Sketch.
41

NC Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
Stream A downstream of flag Al Start Channel
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Annrox_ 100' reach avaluatad.
Date: 2014 -04 -09
ProjecUSite' Meacham Site
Latitude: 35 825416
Evaluator: David Cooper,(SBEC)
County: Wake
Longitude: -78 900362
Total Points:
Stream Determination circle one)
Other Green Level
Stream �s at least intermittent 25 5
Ephemeral =ENT Perennial
e g Quad Name:
if 2 19 or, renniat if a 30'
0
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 ,Continuity of channel bed,and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel alongAhalweg
0
1
0
3
3 In- channel structure ex nffle -pool, step -pool,
n le- ool sequence
0
05
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
05
2
3
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
Ljj
6 DepositionaNbars or benches
0
1
1
1 5
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
15
2
3
8 Headcuts
_
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0111
05
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
11 Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = _ 55_
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
1
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
T5_
1
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
21 Aquatic Mollusks
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
3
15
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
05
=
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal= 5 5
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
M
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
_
1
2
3
22 Fish
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
0. 5
1
15
25 Algae
0
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5
93ther =
.perennial, streams may4so be identified using other m_ e_thods Seep 35 of manual
Notes-'Less than 24 hours after rain event
Sketch:
41

i
.f
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Prolect/Sde Meacham City /County Wake Co Sampling Date2014 -04 -09
ApplicanVOwner 'The,Site Group; PLLC State INC Sampling Point Data Form 1
Investigator(s) David Cooper, S&EC Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc) Slope above floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none) Convex Slope ( %) 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)SouthemPiedmont Let 35.825930 Long "78.900131 Datum NAD83
Soil Map[Urnt Name WoA Wehadkee /Bibb 0 - 6% NWI classification N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical,for this time of year? Yes YeS No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are VegetabonYes Sod Yes or Hydrology Yes significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No No
Are Vegetation No Sod NO— , or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophyhc Vegetation Present? Yes Yes No
Hydnc SodiPresent? Yes No No Is the Sampled Area No
within a Wetland? Yes No
'Wetland Hydrology'Present? Yes No _ No
Remarks Datapoint taken below stormwater outfall in previously (but not very recently) disturbed area Riprap
present below surface in most of area St_ormwater from apartment,corrplex, road /parking areas. Data
taken less than 24 hours since rainfall
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reduired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check,all that aooly) _
Surface Sod Cracks,(B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _
Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rtnzospheres on,Living Roots (C3) _
Moss Tnm Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of`Reduced Irom(C4) _
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Sediment
Dnft Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain imRemarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_
Geomorphic'Posdion (132)
_ Inundation .Visible omAenal Imagery (87)
_
Shallow Aqudard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic ,Fauna (B13)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface.Water Present? YesrNO No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes . �o No
Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? YesNo No
Depth (inches)
Wetlanditdrology Present? Yes No No
includes capillary fringe)
_
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, morntonng,well, aenal,photos, previous, inspections), if available
Remarks
Data point taken below stormwater outfall less than 24 hours since rainfall
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version,2 0

s
VEGETATION (Four °Strata) – Use scientific names,of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) % Cover Species? Status
1 Nn large trPPC present in PvaivafPd area
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 -- -
= Total 'Cover
Saohna /Shrub,Stratum (Plot size
1 Pinus taeda 20 Y FAC
2 Salix nlgra 2 OBL
3 Llquidambar styraclflua 2 FAC+
4 _ accharis halimifolia 10 FAC
5
6
7
8
9
10
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1 .lunrus Pffusus - 40 _�LFACW+
2 Claytonia virginica 2 FACU-
3 Carex sp 10 unk:
4 Rubus sp. 8 unk.
5 Eupatodum capillifolium 70 Y FACU
6 Isynnc lum sp. �— un cT<
7 Viola'sp. 2 unk.
8
Allium sp —� unk.
9
10
11 _
12
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 Lonlcera iaponlca 30 Y FAC -
2 Vicia sp. 2 unk.
3
4
5
6
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers
`Sampling Point-Data Form i
Number of Dominant Species 3
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A)
Total Number of'Dominant
4
Species Across AII,$trata
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
75
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
- -
(A/B)
Prevalence,lndex worksheet:
Total %Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species -
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x,5 =
Column'Totals
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ f,- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dommance'Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic, Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Tree — ,Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody - plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in ,DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 It (1
m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of,size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
vine — All,woody vines greater than 3 28 It in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes
Present? Yes No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

1
SOIL
Data Form 1
Sampling Point
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz _ Texture _ _Remarks _
Q -7 1QYR 4/4 Q_ 1QYR 518 5 Loamy GJay
7 -13 10YR 4/4 80 %, 10YR 4/1 10 %, 10YR 5/8 10% Loamy Clay
13+ 10YR 4/1 100% 'Loam
'Tvoe C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Linino. M =Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain'Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3lndicators of,hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (172 1) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
No
Depth (inches)
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

,i
1
M
`--, - -
z
LLJ
-
N 0 \
CL CL 9L
\ �PNo7
www
1_20 m22
-H
U.
LLJ
_ 0 � N v / �/f // N I N P J (n
W L �y WW
—0 N" W / �� / I Z Zv r v,0
LLI
NW IUll�aN
d I
cr
i
7'
N
N, Z
1_ I O
t I'
U) n
I i I I
/ I WZ
CL IL
o I I III s'l'y N LLJ P 2
P
I N `� I I I I' I Q I I I ./ , �� / o W (I�L
I W I t 1 ,06 I I` 1 p $ z —J�
I�I/ (/ N N'®
N (Z 3NOZ) ,OZ I I I / /
I I0 3 OZ) ,0� 11 � �/ /! / // o Z
I I 3�uled 'WdILL S L 9 VLOZ /£Z /S '64 dS- 3SV83 6M0\:)l9W )Ib \s;:)afOJd \dnoig 3115 a41\ H
�xo
w�
g'33
m
d; a gag
J
W
is
a
W F
Zc
o 9
U �
z
m
'E
11.2
vomoi, g
mNW
�Krmmv_
K C X0,0
V 20,
a -
o
�8x 0w
�KOI�W

5 ERR VNnoavo N1aON `Aavo
L I
'ON ` MVaodHOD 1N3MId0'3A3a IINa °Z
¢
jig
a
-'s i4 a31N33 1Id13a 6
ali, a a
9f ga JC k9 K
• ,i ap
r/
l j j
/I
r
y
t
WQ W�
j t
/ y
L
I
ICY it
M
I
o
N
0
Z
—i
2 �
hbG
pqp
y��
Fq
a
kh
Ir
W
17 ry
1519
.9 19
• ,i ap
r/
l j j
/I
r
y
t
WQ W�
j t
/ y
L
I
ICY it
M
I
o
N
0
Z
—i
2 �
hbG
pqp
y��
Fq
a
kh
Ir
W
17 ry
• ,i ap
r/
l j j
/I
r
y
t
WQ W�
j t
/ y
L
I
ICY it
M
I
o
N
0
Z
—i
i
� 1
0
o s
.1111M mom
o�a
r
y
._.
♦ `r
g,
G
r
-- - !000 a
IF
atl
y
�t� A
a �
PIN
I ,-.
fu
QO
Q.
L
X m
lU 06
U �
EvJ
Y
• y
0
a
kh
i
� 1
0
o s
.1111M mom
o�a
r
y
._.
♦ `r
g,
G
r
-- - !000 a
IF
atl
y
�t� A
a �
PIN
I ,-.
fu
QO
Q.
L
X m
lU 06
U �
EvJ
Y
• y
0