20140586 Ver 1_Application_20140610

Wainwright, David
From: Wainwright, David
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 7:25. AM
To: King, Art C
Subject: - Moore Co. Bridge 73 & Richmond Co. Bridge 13
Art,
I have reviewed your application submittals for both Bridge No. 73 in Moore County (dated received June 3, 2014) and
Bridge No. 13 in Richmond County (dated received June 10, 2014). Both application were applied for as a USACE NW 3,
which corresponds to NCDWR General Certification Number 3883. Based on the impacts and information provided in
the application package, both projects are below impact thresholds requiring written authorization from the NCDWR.
Please review our General Certification 3883 to make sure that proposed impacts are below stated thresholds on page
one and that all other listed conditions can be met. If you find this is the case, no further action is required from us at
this time. If you find that they cannot be met, or thresholds do exceed those stated, either now or in the future, please
contact me so we can discuss further.
Thank you for notifying us of the project. Should you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
David Wainwright
NCDENR, Division of Water Resources
Transportation Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
David.Wainwnght @ncdenr.gov
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email

11
0 icJ►
0F W ATE
0
?014 QNR. A1A QOSgNDsiO, q q-r
2 0 1 40 5 8 6
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
]Pre- Constr>lac MicNotification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit F] Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been,verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Richmond Bridge #13 BD- 51 08AA
2b. County:
Richmond
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Hamlet
2d. Subdivision name:
2e..NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
BD- 5108AA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
NCDOT
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible,Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
902 North Sandhill Blvd.
3e. City, state, zip:
Aberdeen NC 28315
3f. Telephone no.:
910- 944 -2344
3g. Fax no.:
910- 944 -5623
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Division Engineer
4b. Name:
Robert W. Stone II
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
NCDOT Highway Div. 8
4d. Street address:
902 North Sandhill Blvd.
4e. City, state, zip:
Aberdeen NC 28315
4f. Telephone no.:
910 - 944 -2344
4g. Fax no.:
910 - 944 -5623
4h. Email address:
robstone @ncdot.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Art King
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
NCDOT Highway Div. 8
5c. Street address:
902 North Sandhill Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Aberdeen NC 28315
5e. Telephone no.:
910- 944 -2344
5f. Fax no.:
910 - 944 -5623
5g. Email address:
acking @ncdot.gov
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.86216 Longitude: - 79.65264
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Joes Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;Sw
2c. River basin:
Lumber
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Rural forested, agricultural.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
.03
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60'
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a deficient outdated bridge with a new structure
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Remove existing bridge and replace in place with a modern structure. Machines used: Crane , trackhoe , dumptruck
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
®Yes ❑ No El Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company: SEPI
I Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ®P ❑ T
fill
riverine
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.03
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.03
2h. Comments: fill to widen shoulder for gard rail installation
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted. '
3a.
3b. I
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
NA
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1'.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number-
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
NA
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Pi
NA
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes,'then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
im act
required?
61 ❑ P ❑ T
NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Project designed to meet minimum requirements for roadway widening standards.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
33%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater will be managed with material and devices as specified in the current NCDOT BMP manual for stormwater
management..
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9of10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDOT SDV ArcView layer. NCDOT staff site visits.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
USF &W Critical Habitat Mapper.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
FE] Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
IL
Applicant/ gent's inted Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's `gnature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization-Ieterfrom the applicant
is provided.
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site, BD5108AA City /County: Richmond /Scotland, NC Sampling Date, 12/04/2013
Applicant/Owner: State- NC Sampling Point: UL
Investigator(s), Chris Flowers, Helen Anthony Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.)- Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA). Lat Long. Datum.
Soil Map Unit Name. NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F No n (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation n, Soil n, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes n No _ 0
Are Vegetation n, Soil EJ , or Hydrology — naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F1 No __Q_ Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes _� No L FV1
within a Wetland? Yes � No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No _Q_
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (613)
Q
High Water Table (A2)
iEl
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Saturation (A3)
1L--If
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (B1)
11""f
L�Jf Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
a
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
a
Iron Deposits (65)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (67)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Q
Water - Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No ✓� Depth (inches).
Water Table Present?
Yes �_ No J=L Depth (inches).
Saturation Present?
Yes= No _Z_ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _� No ❑�
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available.
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 25'
1 Pinus taeda
)
2 Carya
Number of Dominant Species
3
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
4.
5.
Total Number of Dominant
6.
Species Across All Strata. (B)
7
Percent of Dominant Species
8.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. (A/B)
50% of total cover,
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 25' )
1 Persea borbonia
2 Quercus laurifolia
3 Ilex glabra
90% = Total Cover
4.
FACW species x 2 =
5.
6
FAC species x 3 =
7
FACU species x 4 =
8
UPL species x 5 =
Herb Stratum (Plot size
1
50% of total cover:
)
2
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
5
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
6.
3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
7
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
8
9.
10
11.
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size.
1 Smilax rotundifolia
50% of total cover,
25' )
2 Vitis rotundifolia
3.
4
5.
50% of total cover,
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptatic
Sampling Point: UL
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
65 yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
25
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata. (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by.
OBL species x 1 =
90% = Total Cover
FACW species x 2 =
20% of total cover
_
FAC species x 3 =
35 FACW
FACU species x 4 =
1 FACW
UPL species x 5 =
50 yes FACW
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
86% = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
20% of total cover.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
10 FAC
30 FAC
Hydrophytic
40% = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 -6 2.5 Y 4/3 Loamy Sand
6 -14+ 3.5 Y 6/4
'Type. C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
E] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type,
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sandy Loam
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑- 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T
1-12 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
LJ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
��1
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
u I Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ❑✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site. BD5108AA City /County. Richmond /Scotland, NC Sampling Date: 12/04/2013
Applicant/Owner- State: NC Sampling Point- WL
Investigator(s): Chris Flowers, Helen Anthony Section, Township, Range,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA). Lat Long- Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name. NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
within a Wetland? Yes ✓� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑-f Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Q
High Water Table (A2)
1
1'T Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
�IIf
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
E] Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (B3)
tL��f
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑✓_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
✓Q
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
✓❑
❑ Depth
Surface Water Present? Yes
Table Present? Yes=
No (inches).
Nog Depth
Water
Saturation Present9 Yes 1
(inches)
No M Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓� No ❑
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks-
Water in soil sample core at 5 inches.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

r
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 25' )
1 Acer rubrum
A
30
2 Nyssa sylvatica
30
3 Quercus nigra
20
4
5
6.
7.
8
50% of total cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 25' )
1 Acer rubrum
80
15
2 Vaccinium sp.
1
3 Cyrilla racemiflora
5
q Clethra alnifolia
20
5 Persea borbonia
5
6.
7
8.
50% of total cover-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25' )
1 Osmunda annamomea
46
15
2 Woodwardia areolata
1
3.
4
5
6.
7
8
9.
10.
11
12.
—
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size- )
1 Smilax launfolia
16
10
2 Vitis rotundifolia
5
3.
4.
5
—
Sampling Point: WL
bsolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover Species? Status Number of D*
ominant Species t
FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. (A)
FAC
FAC Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of. Multiply by-
% = Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
20% of total cover: FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FAC FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
FACW Column Totals: (A) J(B)
FACW Prevalence Index = B/A =
FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53 0'
% = Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover•
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb –All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
FACW
FAC
15% = Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover:
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
9
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydrophytic.
Vegetation
Present? Yes LZI No ❑
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2 0
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
FACW
FAC
15% = Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover:
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
9
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydrophytic.
Vegetation
Present? Yes LZI No ❑
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
.0 -12+ 10 YR 2/1 Mucky Sawy Loam Water at 5"
'Type- C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
U Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Q✓ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches),
Remarks:
`Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrx
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
E
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
El Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
(F7)
Redox Depressions
T❑
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
(F8)
'D Remarks)
Marl (1710) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in
Depleted Ochrnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 1_
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

i
$$$$$$SYSTIME$$$$$
$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$DGN$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$USERNAME$$$$
CONTRACT: PROJECT: BD- 510oAA
C) m m
� � y
r Z I
r
zt
= I C
n C
��rn n
o c)
Di o m ~ y
65
n o y
� o
0
N
0
Un
0
a
C
W y
a
;Q°
0
n
m
7
0
�
O
p
N
N
o b
N
isi
y o p m �8
z
o m
o
V1
r
0
fib,,
m
m
=
n
or
ti
n
x
m
O
z
m
o
x
m
n
N
o 0
o
H
0
a
O
z
N
N
m
z
b
A
n
0
41
0
0
X
m
-n • <
D
m
c
Z h u u
n -+
b
Crl
A
n
�
oN
m
A
"
n
Gl
N
cc
II = `
N
b
m
v
o
a
a
oc
D
m
(7 r
D
r o
C) m m
� � y
r Z I
r
zt
= I C
n C
��rn n
o c)
Di o m ~ y
65
n o y
� o
n
T
n
N
m
m
V
O
c
X
X
O
c
I
m
O
n
Lq
i
r
I0 p
0
o
c-
j�1 N z v
\I N r a a
rn 0
Lq
Lrl
r
r i
l,f ,
1 Lq A �
+r CVO 4� O /
A Op S Mm Rd r 1
r ory
A
F /
/ Z
S i - aft
0
-
�A
b
Q,
a
C')
h
a
� Z
b
U,
b C)
bPm
� o
x�o
atfl�
a bhn
rrrCCC^ � Mir
i
n b
y �
lei
Z /
� C
/ y O
O
9
mrnrn
1 O 1
C o 4
< C k
N
Q
Cb
�C�
P A A
�WW
f A
v
Ln
00
o
la� �77
T
a
C
W y
a
;Q°
0
N Cxj
p
m n$i
�
A�
o b
yx
isi
y o p m �8
V1
r
i c ai
Ohm
z
O
m o <
y N mm
y np'Ai °,
e n
n
or
z nO
in
mz M�
n D A
�=
m
o
x
m
�c
am
x
a
N
n
z
b
z
n
n
T
n
N
m
m
V
O
c
X
X
O
c
I
m
O
n
Lq
i
r
I0 p
0
o
c-
j�1 N z v
\I N r a a
rn 0
Lq
Lrl
r
r i
l,f ,
1 Lq A �
+r CVO 4� O /
A Op S Mm Rd r 1
r ory
A
F /
/ Z
S i - aft
0
-
�A
b
Q,
a
C')
h
a
� Z
b
U,
b C)
bPm
� o
x�o
atfl�
a bhn
rrrCCC^ � Mir
i
n b
y �
lei
Z /
� C
/ y O
O
9
mrnrn
1 O 1
C o 4
< C k
N
Q
Cb
�C�
P A A
�WW
f A
v
Ln
00
o
la� �77

C-DD
q F-
:-jj
_ JS.
O
(J�
DO
,I---
1-12
D
I
N,
CID
,I---
1-12
D
,��f�l
,I---
eloo�
O� o -
FTJ
•
-J m
eloo�
O� o -
FTJ

11 va 1
I
249
I J
I
n�
I
C
�
I
N
L
I ,
D
co
11 va 1
�,, --z
v
inn
w
r
Z
v
T
r
r
CIA
a -
�\ C N 1
I �
I I
y�
N
Z
n
Z a
9
d 2
� m
= n n
o n °
I
I J
I
n�
�,, --z
v
inn
w
r
Z
v
T
r
r
CIA
a -
�\ C N 1
I �
I I
y�
N
Z
n
Z a
9
d 2
� m
= n n
o n °

$$
5/14/99
'0
----------
F-T-1
r4
P�l
-Tj
V A \1
-- --------
( 7
—7C)
hL
\ \ z
z o
0

O
o cn
D
m
r
w
N
Cb
O
O
O
+
W
._.
W
r
@
cn
cn
O
N
n
CD
Q
CD
ca
CD
C
C
O
O
(=D = 3
O
O
v 11) = DJ
W
W
Q Z3
CD
cn 7
<
CD
.-. (p -n CD
O
n 7 -O
C
Q
cn
m
m
o
0
v
z
0
C)
<
0) v
cn °
cn
m
�CD
=
D
p
.-.BCD
a) a)
0
Z
C
M. =
:3
o
=3
Q
m
.-. CD CD
o
C)
�.
`. =3 =3 cl
0 cQ
D
n
CD
�- (n3
o
:*C
to
C)
C
N =
D
cn
o
�-0 Cnm
3
��
o
C)
o v
0 _0
D
m
m cam*
3 =r ?-<.
o
O
3 v <n
sll v =
0
.. i
m
7 D O
CD c�n CD cQ
;o
3 x
D
o
3 v
C)
a =3
cn m co
Cnw
o
m C --
6 v c
C)