20140548 Ver 1_More Info Received_20140616

McGill
A S S O C I A T E S
June 13, 2014
US Army Corps of Engineers
Ashville Regulatory Field Office
151 Paton Ave., Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 -5006
Dear Sir or Madam:
20 1405 48
RE: Meadowood Sewer Replacement
Pre- Construction Notification, NWP #12
City of Lenoir, North Carolina
On behalf of the City of Lenoir, please find enclosed an addendum to the PCN
application for the above referenced project sent on May 30, 2014. The original package
included a check for $240.00 to cover the 401 permit fee. The project was placed on hold
pending submittal of additional information. The addendum is providing all requested
additional information and making clarifications to the original application. The purpose
of the project is to replace an aging sewerline in Caldwell County, NC set along Little
Gunpowder Creek. All proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters will be temporary. This
PCN application is being provided to the NCDENR, Division of Water Resources and
NC Wildlife Resource Commission. Please let us know if you have any questions or
comments.
Sincerely,
McGill Associates, P.A.
C Y V (/ ilas
Director of Environmental Services
Cc: Central Office, NCDWR
Doug Besler, NCWRC
W. Land Bailey, City of Lenoir
Radford Thomas, City of Lenoir
Environmental e Planning e Finance
,ilcGill Associates. P.A. - 3764 Rominger Road, Banner Elk, North Carolina 33604
Office: 333- 297 -6946 - Far: 333- 297 -1931

i:N::l
20 1405 48
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment, into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Meadowood Sewer Replacement
2b. County:
Caldwell
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
City of Lenoir
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
City of Lenoir
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
NA sewer easements
;
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
W. Lane Bailey, City Manager, City of Lenoir
i
3d. Street address:
840 West Ave NW
r 8fafl-Li
3e. City, state, zip:
Lenoir, NC 28645
3f. Telephone no.:
828 - 757 -2200
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
(bailey @ci.nc.state.us

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
1c. Property size:
4f. Telephone no.:
2. Surface Waters
4g. Fax no.:
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
4h. Email address:
proposed project:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if, applicable)
5a. Name:
Joel A. Whitford, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
McGill Associates, PA
5c. Street address:
1240 19th Street Lane NW
5d. City, state, zip:
Hickory, NC 28601
5e. Telephone no.:
(828) 328 -2024
5f. Fax no.:
828 - 328 -3870
5g. Email address:
Joel .whitford @mcgillengineers.com
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple parcels along sewerline easement
corridor, see plans and map
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.837 Longitude: - 81.486
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
Approx. 8000 foot -long corridor roughly 25 feet -wide
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Little Gunpowder Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C, WS -Iv
2c. River basin: map is available at
Catawba
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the -general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Project site is an approximate 8000 foot -long corridor parallel to Little Gunpowder Creek in Caldwell County, NC.
The project begins just east of Hudson Cajah Mtn. Road and ends at an existing pump station at the end of Meadowood
Road (see project location map and plans). This is a sewerline replacement/upgrade project and as such will be
constructed roughly parallel to an existing sewerine. The corridor passes through an area of mixed use with industrial,
residential and forested open space. Two transportation corridors are crossed in the eastern third of the project, the
Southern RR and Business (Alt.) Hwy 321. In addition to Little Gunpowder Creek, the corridor contains 6- unnamed
tributaries to Little Gunpowder Ck. and 11- wetland units.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
7.38 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
The corridor parallels about 8000 linear feet of Little Gunpowder Ck. and crosses 6 tributaries.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to replace an aging 12" gravity sewerine with identified infiltration and inflow issues in close
proximity to streams and wetlands. The old pipe will be replaced with 12" ductile iron sewer pipe.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will involve installation of about 8000 linear feet of 12" ductile iron sewer pipe parallel to an existing
line that will be abandoned in place at the completion of the project. The existing line will remain in service during
construction. The project will involve 6- temporary stream impacts and 6- temporary wetland impacts. The proposed
alignment has been shifted in 5 locations in order to eliminate or reduce impacts to regulated waters of the US. Creek
crossings will involve 12" ductile iron pipe installed below the streambed, installation will involve trenching through the
streambed. A pump -a -round will be used so all in- channel work will be performed in the dry. Typical construction
equipment will be used including track excavators, loaders, backhoes, and dump trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: McGill Associates, Environmental Services has
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
delineated the stream and wetland boundaries along this
corridor. Find attached delineation map, forms, and JD
materials.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Wetland Impacts
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill
in wetland 1 -W
Riparian marsh
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.006
W2 ❑ P ®T
T
Temporary fill
.
Riparian meadow
El Yes
® Corps
0.007
wetland 3 -W
® No
® DWQ
W3 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill
Riparian meadow
® Yes
® Corps
0.02
in wetland 4 -W
❑ No
® DWQ
W4 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill
Riparian marsh
® Yes
® Corps
0.006
in wetland G -W
❑ No
® DWQ
W5 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill
Riparian marsh
® Yes
® Corps
0.008
in wetland D -W
❑ No
® DWQ
W6 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill
in wetland B -W
Riparian meadow
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.013
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.06
2h. Comments:
2. Stream Impacts
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) ) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill and
UT -1 -S - Little
® PER
® Corps
5
20
excavation
Gunpowder Ck
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill and
UT -2 -S - Little
® PER
® Corps
5
20
excavation
Gunpowder Ck
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill and
UT -4 -S - Little
® PER
® Corps
5
20
excavation
Gunpowder Ck
❑ INT
® DWQ
S4 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill and
UT -G -S - Little
❑ PER
® Corps
4
20
excavation
Gunpowder Ck
® INT
® DWQ
S5 ❑ P ®T
Temporary fill and
UT -D -S - Little
❑ PER
® Corps
4
20
excavation
Gunpowder Ck
® INT
® DWQ
S6 ❑ PST
Temporary fill and
UT -B -S - Little
❑ PER
® Corps
5
20
excavation
Gunpowder Ck
® INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
120
3i. Comments: Temporary impacts include area of trenching for new sewer pipe, temporary fill for pump -a -round diversion,
and temporary disturbance from equipment crossing and access. All disturbed stream banks will be restored in accordance
with the details provided in the plans.

3. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
4. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
6f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
61 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
132 ❑P ❑T
F1 Yes
❑ No
133 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
A stream and wetland delineation was performed during planning phase, the alignment for the new seweriine was shifted
in 5 locations in order to avoid and/or minimize the impact to streams and wetlands. Even where the new line will be close
to the old line, the new line is located further away from Little Gunpowder Creek. The proiect in general will result in
improved water quality by eliminating infiltration and related overflows, and by reducing seepage and maintenance repairs
along this section.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Disturbed areas in the vicinity of streams or wetlands will be restored to 2:1 maximum slope and seeded with temporary
and native seed mixes and covered with biodegradable mats. Rip rap will be used to stabilize stream banks if necessary;
The Contractor will use mats when working in wetlands, material will be sidecast away from streams and returned to
trench as backfill. All stream crossings will be performed in the dry: the Contractor will use a pump -a -round or pipe
diversion (see plans) at each crossing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No,
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ ro Payment to in -lieu fee ram
y p g
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments: No Banks available in HU
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — Please
contact the State for more information.
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes [D No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑Yes E] No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
NA
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Stormwater rules are not applicable to a sewerline replacement project (NWP -12)
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Caldwell County
❑ Phase 11
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HOW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sewer system project, NA
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Firm maps
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS.conceming Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
City of Lenoir, North Carolina
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
hftp://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/Cntylist/caldwell.html
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://www.habitat.noaa.goy/protection/efh/habitatmapper.htmi
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did You use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb/
8. Flood-Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 1 00-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project is `like for like" replacement of existing pipe
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Firm maps
W. Lane Bailey, City Manager
�, .._
City of Lenoir, North Carolina
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authoh2ation letter
from the applicant is pr Yi d -y "

k j
$ 7
\
■
k
e
m
k
) (
tu
\ u- \ )
$ } } j W, it § } /
Av
a
R
§ �
% Ej
�
�
=
.
.
�
°
=
e
t q
:
�

i; r Meadowood Sewerline Replacement
PCN Application
` Tax Map
�o June 2014
X
00
u Y.
✓ `\ z
z w
60L£8£99LZ:NIdJN�' ,
iad ;
Yd�,, 00
� z 00
a. on
�,...zr.
a
-�b
_ u
z
09661 I99bZ :NIdDN
LSOL8I99LZ :NIdJN
U
9£I98199-LZ :MdJN I ;�
q - - --___ VLIZ8I99LZ:MdDN
6ti0�6 99LZ :NMD �__
„
S1 I I6I99LZ :NIdaN
I9Z660994Z:NIdDN 3
�` on
,
to I1
f G4�Flo
U
I
Z
�, a'I Con

\tvY �1
ozzL _ : Yi � \�_
1 r i1
1 �
} i i
%
!I
r
\ ! 1
! A1VA AV l j 1
\
t it tomAVAAA1A A
/
i�
i
V ` -- ✓ li 1 J /
Qj U
1
1
I( L)
/
11111 11 1!r —/ t\1t IfI
7• —��_• � j,111 X11 1 \1 � lji� jail --! 1
f 1,
�,1f1j 11 ,! 11 1111111 It �: j,
iq
I
r�1
i
- -" ,j
f
111
\' a
1t
m
3z�
30�
O 2
fib
0
N
0
c
E
yes � s B
➢fig #agee��F ��E£E
— Jai ---.� J
, \\ i \•
{ l
lip
,1 i,F,
ii' rr%
r
\ ! 1
! A1VA AV l j 1
\
t it tomAVAAA1A A
/
i�
i
V ` -- ✓ li 1 J /
Qj U
1
1
I( L)
/
11111 11 1!r —/ t\1t IfI
7• —��_• � j,111 X11 1 \1 � lji� jail --! 1
f 1,
�,1f1j 11 ,! 11 1111111 It �: j,
iq
I
r�1
i
- -" ,j
f
111
\' a
1t
m
3z�
30�
O 2
fib
0
N
0
c
E
yes � s B
➢fig #agee��F ��E£E

13
.11
n
LL
.11
n

Meadowood Sewer Replacement
PCN Application
Impact Photo Sheet
June 2014
EV
CI'
O
w3
v,Cd
O
.,.
CA
N
�
'
�
rn
U
U
`t
o
o a�
...�
O
a�
i
..i
.k
,yyy
1�
�D
CV
O
�1 rl
a 3
��
�w <4

9VWU (gU) ea wM3N'neMMVH IMMOM vOIME
OOIA2IHS'IVJNa NOMAN3
S a iL V I D O S S V
VNIIObIVO HI2ION `AiNnoo ll3Molb0
d` V4 NOliV3Nil3a GNVlM
13
H I O N 3 1 =10 All 3
bIOZ aunt
GNV SNOIIIGNOO ONIISIX3
1N3W30V1d3b U3M3S
dOOMOGV3W
n+Ri�
_ � � L_1 V�...� N
N .-. O .-• O� O N O eF l� '�i' N
rte.- .nNMC¢ W C,.iQwwC7
N y
f
l
1
r
b�
�
O O
�
b
�e� -
o
�
•� i ❑�y
qy� �
A ,� 1
O •>
p o 'c n
�
^d
p
v
0.5
E w
cH cU
N
/
ca
:)
y
Nu
z
E o o
� b
I`
O
¢ a
au v m o
c^pd p
0. u
w u
may.
�
�
� W ✓� v, W cs: cG
o
�
� '�
'ro
5ctl.
m
Q•••
O
U CIO
QC7U
/
/

._
� r � � «.�, . ,
� \ �, � ,:< :� �.�:
�� &7. f � »`�`_ - �/ ��� ©K °~ :
� . � �� �� � � % \ :� � <� �»' �
,* © � ., . .®
. � _�
5 � _� \ <) , . : ` , . ±�, . »
. � • � � � � t ` � �'
. : . a ._
� : \ \������ � © < \ \��^ � � .', � a -■ .'� \� <
mm �
� � .
<�« + >� ��\ <� ^: . .
- j�^ �. » 3 ^ °� � �� � �.- �� �� ��`
..c , . � 2�� �
.� » : .� � ., �� »
t 2/� -� � ��^ �� � v
� y \ 2 \.� � d y.
`'A � » . :, � . : ��§� � �� \� � �
dr.\ § �» ` \�) 6- �� a � 2� \.'��� � \ �� �/� �
�—

Nr DWf1 CtrPam Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: (� 3 (c�
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator.
County: COA114
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 3
Stream Determination (circle )
Ephemeral Intermittent P
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2:19 or rennial if Z 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg
0
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = I
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continu'ity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
0j
2. Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg
0
1
0.5
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
t3y
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
M
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11.- Second or greater order channel
No =.0
Yes. 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
8_ Hvdroloav (Subtotal= 1 J 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3'
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
Q
2
3
14. Leaf litter
COD
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
3
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0
0.5
3
1:5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
t3y
C_ Bioloov. !Subtotal = to. S 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
-4r-
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
a
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
Op
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
Other
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

N!` TWA Ctrdharn iripn+11fleatlnn Fnrm Vprcinn 4 -11
Date: 3 (
Project site- Re °r J 00,4 � cS _
Latitude:
Evaluator. :5,rv` ° %
County: Ccj.`. &coe.L
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (ci
Other s
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2:19 or perennial if a 30`
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_iL5 j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
/
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
No = 0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
3
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
a
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R HvrimInnu tCnhtntal = 'i. S 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
2
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
67
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
t3
r` Rinlnnv /QuhMtol = (-I 91Z }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
43
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
L3_
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0)
1
2
3
22. Fish
M
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
(0-45,:)-
.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW - .75; OBL =1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:`
.11

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3 N
Project/Site: (A�da,,oa
Latitude:
Evaluator.
County. CC AAOet�
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination{cione)
Other 05
Stream is at least intermittent
if 2:19 or erennial if a 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
� 2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate,
0
1
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
No = 0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
is
2
3
8. Headcuts
1.5
1
2
1 3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Ul
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No - 0 )
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
F3_ Hvdroloav (Subtotal = U • S 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris fines or piles
0
C5.501
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
e - 3
Yes(-t'
C_ Hinlnav 15uhtntai = � / 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Q)
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1:5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
®
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
_COD
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6131,q
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator. S Ail __V
County: C���.W
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent aC/t
Stream Determination (cne )
Ephemeral Intermittent l
Other ItS
e. Quad Name:
if 2:19 or erennial if 2 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
g.
I
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =_JL2.j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
W
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
No = 0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
_Ff
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
V
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = q .S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
fy
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0
1
1.5-
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
tV
G. Siologv (Subtotal= Y�.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
C
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0'
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = .075; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

m mr• nvarn c+-- -- TA_"+!Aina1Hnn Fnrm Vpreinn A -11
1 \4 L ♦• yaa VYaaa a
Date: 3 I
� -� -�- - - --
Project/Site: (Vierlic'X i S
Latitude:
Evaluator.
County: C.6tIOA L..
Longitude:
Total Points:
etennination (circle one)
Stre�
Other SS
Stream is at least intermittent
O 7 5
E ere l Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 or erennial if Z 30' r
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 3
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
©
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. in- channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodpiain
cn
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
CO)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
U031
11
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N =Ti
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
Q LJvr7rnlnnv /G.h+n+ol = Ll 1
Y. z NZ
12. Presence of Beseflow
3
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
3
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0S
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5-
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ye = 31
r+ 0*1 i v ray ek +n +�! - S_ 1 Z 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
23
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW - 0.75;
OBL =1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

TA_- a:L3__a:_.a y_...aa A 11
1'4%- L YY V IJl[ CQlll
Date: �j
ProjectiSite: MP Who ��
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County: C - C�C�.�Til
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determi ' n (circle one)
Other a S
Stream is at least intermittent ��
Ephemeral I rm ent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if a !g or erennial if a 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18- Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
1
2
3
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
UV
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
03
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
No-20
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0.5
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
a
2
3
9. Grade control
0
25. Algae
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No (_P
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manuai
D. rl ul UIVgy kQU&JLVL01 -
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1 -
2
3
14. Leaf litter
'1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
03
1
1.5
E16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No-20
1
Yes
1.5
- 3
V. L71VIN VYVILW G- - r
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
M
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OB
= 1.5 Other =
0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
PrjecSite: � o` c"'J
Latitude:
Evaluator. yvt � "
County: ,�+
t_.. G-�..t� WOU
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Detenn!J n (circle one)
Other S
Stream is at least intermittent 'L2
Ephemeral I rmi nt Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if 219 or emnnial ►fa 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =_-1 � 5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1e' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
ct>
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
nX,
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
A
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
M
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1.5
1
i 1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1,5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
d
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
(a
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
a
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
2
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes �
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
a
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: (� 3 (`�
Project/Site: oWav
1a.>as ce.
Latitude:
Evaluator. 5m
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Dete ' 'on (circle one)
Other (SS
Stream is at least intermittent , , 25
if 219 or perennial if 2 30*
Ephemeral letermitt9t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =-L �
Absent
Weals
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
6
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
OJ
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
2
3
S. Active /reict floodpiain
No = 0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1.5
1
2
3
9. Grade control
1
in
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
65
Q
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = `1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
OD
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
3
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
2
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes -
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= 5 1.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3j
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =
0.75VOBL =1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: