NC0086169_Permit (Issuance)_20040331

NPDES DOCUHENT !;CANNIN` COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0086169
Corning / Midland facility
Document Type:
Permit Issuance --'
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Report
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental
Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
March 31, 2004
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the re -sr -erne side

March 31, 2004
Mr. Michael D. Hannan, Site Manager
Corning Incorporated
P.O. Box 1700
Concord, North Carolina 28026-1700
Dear. Mr. Hannan:
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit NC0086169
Midland Facility
Cabarrus County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the
subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached final NPDES discharge permit.
This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
Compliance with all terms and conditions of the attached permit is the responsibility
of the Permittee. Please note that T15A 08G .0204 of the North Carolina Administrative Code
has been interpreted to mean that the Operator in Responsible Charge is responsible for
operation of water pollution control systems.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this
permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this permit shall be final
and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. This permit does not affect the
legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water
Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act,
or any other Federal or Local governmental permits which may be required.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact Mark McIntire of my staff at [phone], extension 508.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Mark McIntire
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Central Files
NPDES Unit Files
Mooresville Regional Office
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 - TELEPHONE [phone]/FAX [phone]
VISIT US ON THE WEB AT http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES

NC0086169
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Corning Incorporated
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater and stormwater from a facility located at
Corning Incorporated
U.S. Highway 601
Midland
Cabarrus County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Muddy Creek (outfall 001), an unnamed
tributary to Clear Creek (outfall 002) and the Rocky River (outfall 003) in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth
in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof.
The permit shall become effective May 1, 2004.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 31, 2008.
Signed this day March 31, 2004.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Mark McIntire
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

NC0086169
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer
effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the
permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein.
CORNING INCORPORATED IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO:
1. Continue operation of a 0.107 MGD wastewater treatment facility (outfall 003) located at the
Corning Incorporated Midland Plant off U.S. Highway 601 near Midland in Cabarrus County. The
wastewater treatment facility consists of the following treatment units:
• Equalization tank
• Off -spec tank
• Two Lamella clarifier
• Two neutralization tanks
• Neutralization transfer tank
• Chloride stabilization tank
• Surge blend tank
2. After receiving Authorization to Construct from the Division of Water Quality, construct and
operate facilities for the discharge of up to 0.142 MGD through outfall 003; and
3. Discharge stormwater, boiler blowdown, and non -contact cooling water from a wet detention pond
into an unnamed tributary of Clear Creek (outfall 002); discharge stormwater from a wet retention
pond into an unnamed tributary of Muddy Creek (Outfall 001 - See A. (8.) Stormwater Monitoring,
Controls and Limitations for Permitted Discharges, for monitoring requirements); and discharge
process wastewater, cooling tower blowdown, and carbon filter backwash from the above
referenced treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into the Rocky River
(Outfall 003). All receiving streams are classified C waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin.

4L'
�r
Outfall 001
Latitude: 35° 13'02"
Longitude: 80°31'15"
Outfall 003
Latitude: 35° 12' 10"
Longitude: 80°29'49"
I _i , o
C 01;
(� )
i
1 � � �n f n
Corning Incorporated - NC0086169
USGS Quad Name: Waco
Receiving Stream: See above
Stream Class: C
Subbasin: Yadkin - 030712
North
Receiving Streams
001 - UT to Muddy Creek
002 - UT to Clear Creek
003 - Rocky River
Not to SCALE

NC0086169
Part I. Section A
1. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (002)
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until permit expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall serial number 002 — Stormwater and Humidification
Boiler Blowdown. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
: ,1�; "!F.,,t� FF �/�^� 4
ti�. !}� ��` _K1F
mac7421- �- . z ( ..2,{p ...d ak, Z"� r''s1-'y fr;- t41,4
� - l,r4xl , -4 `11 i t i t Le 'i•'+:r, .. �11• .'t. 7., }ice
'
W 1 '!-•%.,., ,. .J/��]��(�� ti f.,�� ri.
T/ 1-r?' -�^i, � i� r�. 4 �}` ..�
y I tr • �C
rea; 7 � : r '�`�i.:. •�.
►. �' � f F
r. t ..a' .. � ♦ 5
6 1 n r� >r
t
i.. t' r ,4 o":6- w f+ * .
` �-{� � 3...a `r ��'+ ' .it: y
- �"•�'�x�, ..'Zlu,�,.7KFy.,
.. .:. > . ,.,. .... .r:t irT . ti ..... •'. ..1U
iir
:.1 1+ .. 5,-. r s{ f4 . • r� i !.
� ,�,. _ r rYa_. •4• �'•�e��xt , �. ' k'rs
�i; �SSt..e�,��r•i,-i-"�. ,.:zz.:` ,"p. �: :�,- M
. '�. Y a,... ..s.' .
A(s..:
♦ �. _�
t tiff ?..e "if, „1v `h t. J � ry
.i�F'Y# 5 .r.
�t �,
} 1 • t "`' 1'w.. ,✓•
vhyge .Se . <
Orr ' r.Yf ram; Y . 1 .: v
z2 d4 D`- f
',r :9^t.._—�� .Y t ..-.K... , ..3�..,
cu�.s. a„7
d . Z� {I er
bi } Mp
ffM 1 i " ..:-0S'hk1•tt
:s.v'.r.3M�+.a
1 1 d
1 $ Y. :... 'tza r!, !Y f:li n .[.. .';.wl
StS 1 &A .
..:.x'....�,l�
i' ,t"tC.
SC v 'r'
" Yt 1 'F
ll�A
-0wr fir:
i e.F
1 t , s+. `3`" L�� . �
YrW.' s. . �ri"l _:1�,ti7•
.q+d .' r.•.: �x.T.$.. .,.
+�:.3u'r4-� P>��=�.�aa++^.;acxia'� r•--._;;yG�
�
'4'�''�`` _+e
Y.S :-�
t `
'. �u`f.
.. ., w., ♦ r
:'r9 c ^
�' " i F..
"FFA...
} y �iY:..
�ra,.�
r ;�(, p 'r SS
JS. r. 46 La � yK ..
, L•+f
.r,f; t'�' jtou4 i;:w.. �u»i;.
_ ..ter
,�.?.SWs. ' ': `Y s
;.....
'�e.. v.(y4..
s"+' • _ T ..7
`�+` . ice. '�f V'1'�iCii`
Flow
Semi-annually
Estimate
Effluent
Temperature2
Semi-annually
Grab
Effluent
Total residual chlorine
Semi-annually
Grab
Effluent
pH
Between 6.0 and 9.0 Standard Units
Effluent
Notes:
• The effluent for this outfall shall mean a point upstream of the mixing point with stormwater.
2. The temperature of the effluent will be regulated so that the temperature of the receiving stream
does not increase more than 2.8°C above the natural water temperature. Receiving water
temperature will not exceed a maximum of 32°C.
There shall be no chromium, zinc or copper added to the treatment system except as pre -approved
additives to biocidal compounds.
The permittee shall obtain authorization from the Division prior to the use of biocide in the cooling
water. The permittee shall notify the Director in writing at least ninety (90) days prior to instituting
use of any additional biocide in the treatment system which may be toxic to aquatic life (other than
biocides previously reported to the Division). Such notification shall include completion of Biocide
Worksheet 101 and a map indicating the discharge point and receiving stream.
Conditions related to the stormwater portion of this outfall can be found in A. (8.) Stormwater
Monitoring, Controls and Limitations for Permitted Discharges.
SEE SPECIAL CONDITION A. (9.) ANNUAL SHUTDOWN PROCEDURES CONDITION.
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE AMOUNTS.

NC0086169
2. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (003 AT 0.107)
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expansion beyond
0.107 MGD or permit expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall serial number
003 — Industrial Process Wastewater, Non -contact Cooling Water, and Carbon Filter Backwash. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Sh'• e7 .`L!:lx'lvlc' S'� �,c
*�, .i r� gri i; a i7i
Vie'
r.• Mi:iiliis t:
' i j� ���f� �it.�.`. }� 3 ��}�y�...�����-" t r •J
t f• i-. ; 3 EY'
1,,
l,. x. , .. L4 1. ..1 .W.;di
q•1x.{{<•§:.:..•t"I�_"..w. 't J�!}ILvA.T....
PP
.VL. "!4 fJ r'
i' x.r �
> °r i ::f.J:.•5.
i.. t I`
!°°t�ra x... fia i
^Y X ti +a• •�r.f ` i.,.
.A' r !
aY t
:: Ns- 7 r ). .X �lv`h ip
s x ! }3
.x� i<.-.f J.:.;./••.° .. 'v: 'has` ..... f '� i i :Y�:•.t"�dtl
i:��.,.,k .. .,, > :... .. ✓.,t._:',.io+ 7 `a •:J �3.r. �lPa..:;Fv'.:ia-k
. eA, .�. .,...J-�i:.. , ' tL.., le neF::'.„ +4, -',
• �� . •"' � i �� ...,_ tCY
rz•ik E 1. ,x.a.t^':e f ..:. l.. `' .:�'. Ih...n..
14•° t.3A3e. V�l.a 4x ^� i�:• '1.'Jx�•�i3`T !J i
.;.: i ti ;�R.•S L",•' ,'yy�,�!'�5 :,",Mary„ ,'.d;:f !.-. i,...l..
l,...' e.lf,: ,. .y xT� p-. i„,, f .J-4 e:.� 'Nx1
a .ef
'".FZi rPh,.i'l;i'�..M.-... "f� z ��... d:.scE=uxc ss2: rt' a•>is
j�� v ;�
xT.a
l .. -
t d .¢
•'2i 1.3.yv�sY� 1 Jr7 yf �r f
#F,�7y� �'�kll r t
F
'4 k� .A_.•�35 .-tl:i:.fl....-/:`i;.:,SS �d..J..sF
i'+1 f ,
k k1.3.
.d.::Cy9 i - .""�
4
'`I
,.�"jth-
it"i2'7 •�'
m3.l, ,y'S
l
L:.....
S ' Fy �•%: ..
..� '�D' • �•c'1 `s
ia"�•
;,
..=1.
Flow
0.107 MGD
Continuous
Estimate
Effluent'
Total Residual Chlorine
28 µg/L
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Chloride
2/Week
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Temperature2
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
pH
Between 6.0 and 9.0 Standard Units
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Cadmium
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity3
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Pollutant Analysis
See A.(6) of this permit
Effluent
Notes:
1. The compliance point for flow shall be upstream of the non -contact cooling water and boiler
blowdown internal outfall. The compliance point for all other parameters shall be at the Rocky
River discharge location.
2. The temperature of the effluent will be regulated so that the temperature of the receiving stream
does not increase more than 2.8°C above the natural water temperature. Receiving water
temperature will not exceed a maximum of 32°C.
3. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 1.0%; January, April, July and October (see A. (4.)).
SEE SPECIAL CONDITION A. (9°) ANNUAL SHUTDOWN PROCEDURES CONDITION
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE AMOUNTS.

NC0086169
3. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (003 AT 0.142)
During the period beginning upon expansion beyond 0.107 MGD and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall serial number 003 — Industrial Process Wastewater,
Non -contact Cooling Water, and Carbon Filter Backwash. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
`r - 4•cY% ,. 7 Ya
i'
A. i°nj
Y limw-
'
ip--s Yih1 aae,
civ�-:i? .—'xiitW:
4;
_-�.J `.
C
r
yWW4yfi M�T..r Ai! - , Ch5ex 4 tl,-' 2+.F,F- '1 Ct::,' 'r 'i A Y.'..pp
, i ]
Y
��n31rt'''? -5»- �
:t-t� T.fa .�:s
r i��F�{_ a
.AS
'
t�t i,.....
i�1
1.-.. -atMt'7-YRr ...�..-,t`a?a:SJt;i2±.. Yt1t*i:.ii-rti:.rirss!x'`-.s E L-e.,,..�} l.s�Y•:s_i.a'T! t
ia$"J f
ww
:
1b-nvi S. ..,e:'_'4-ahLc .T
P!'
yxa
;'
�_ "�m
,1^tu e
i.--
_,,Ft ii��7f�?;4
!Sditc
i
720.
'..-1 V �-,. �4.
9; �,
Y ,'A a
,
A!
Flow
0.142 MGD
Continuous
Estimate
Effluent'
Total Residual Chlorine
28 µg/L
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Chloride
2/Week
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Temperature2
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
pH
Between 6.0 and 9.0 Standard Units
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Cadmium
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity3
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Pollutant Analysis
See A.(6) of this permit
Effluent
Notes:
The compliance point for flow shall be upstream of the non -contact cooling water and boiler
blowdown internal outfall. The compliance point for all other parameters shall be at the Rocky
River discharge location.
2. The temperature of the effluent will be regulated so that the temperature of the receiving stream
does not increase more than 2.8°C above the natural water temperature. Receiving water
temperature will not exceed a maximum of 32°C.
3. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 1.7%; January, April, July and October (see A. (5.)).
SEE SPECIAL CONDITION A. (9.) ANNUAL SHUTDOWN PROCEDURES CONDITION
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE AMOUNTS.

NC0086169
4. CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY TEST AT 0.107 MGD)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 1.0%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, auarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or
"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent
versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July, October. Effluent sampling for this
testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit
limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months
as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998)
or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does
have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase Il Chronic
Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the
pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the
following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the
facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No
Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at
the addresscited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be
required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an
invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month
following the month of the initial monitoring.

NC0086169
5. CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY TEST AT 0.142 MGD)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 1.7%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, auarteriu monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or
"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent
versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July, October. Effluent sampling for this
testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit
limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months
as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998)
or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does
have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic
Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the
pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWg Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the
following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the
facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No
Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at
the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be
required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an
invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month
following the month of the initial monitoring.

NC0086169
6. POLLUTANT ANALYSIS CONDITION
The Permittee shall conduct a test for pollutants once per permit cycle at the effluent from the treatment plant.
The discharge shall be evaluated as follows:
1) A pollutant analysis of the effluent must be completed using EPA approved methods for the following analytic
fractions:
(a) purgeables (i.e., volatile organic compounds);
(b) acid extractables;
(c) base/neutral extractables;
(d) organochlorine pesticides and PCBs;
(e) herbicides; and
(I) metals and other inorganics.
The Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement Reporting Form A and accompanying memo
describes the sampling and analysis requirements and lists chemicals to be included in the pollutant
analysis. This monitoring requirement is to be referred to as the "Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement"
(PAM).
2) Other significant levels of organic chemicals must be identified and approximately quantified. For the
purpose of implementing this requirement, the largest 10 GC/MS peaks in the purgeable, base/neutral
extractable, and acid extractable fractions (or fewer than 10 if less than 10 unidentified peaks occur) for
chemicals other than those specified on the APA Requirement Reporting Form A should be identified and
approximately quantified as stated in the APAM Reporting Form A instructions. This part (item 2) of the
APAM requirement is to be referred to as the "10 significant peaks rule").
7. BIOLOGICAL MONITORING CONDITION
After completion of the expansion to 0.142 MGD, the Permittee shall conduct an upstream and downstream
benthic macroinvertebrate survey. This survey should be conducted between the months of June and September.
A report of the survey's findings shall be included with the next permit renewal application after the expansion is
completed.
For technical assistance regarding this permit requirement, please contact the Division's Biological Assessment
Unit at [phone].
8. STORMWATER MONITORING, CONTROLS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED DISCHARGES
FINAL LIMITATIONS AND CONTROLS FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the permittee is
authorized to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity from outfalls 001 and 002. Such
discharges shall be controlled, limited and monitored as specified below.
1. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
The permittee shall develop and continue to update a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, herein after
referred to as the Plan. The Plan shall be considered public information in accordance with Part III, Standard
Conditions, Section E.10. of this permit. The Plan shall include, at a minimum, the following items:
a. Site Plan: The site plan shall provide a description of the physical facility and the potential pollutant
sources which may be expected to contribute to contamination of regulated stormwater discharges. The
site plan shall contain the following:

NC0086169
(1) A general location map (USGS quadrangle map, or appropriately drafted equivalent map),
showing the facility's location in relation to transportation routes and surface waters, and the
name of the receiving water(s) to which the stormwater outfall(s) discharges. If the discharge is to
a municipal separate storm sewer system, the name of the municipality and the ultimate
receiving waters, and accurate latitude and longitude of the point(s) of discharge must be shown.
(2) A narrative description of storage practices, loading and unloading activities, outdoor process
areas, dust or particulate generating or control processes, and waste disposal practices.
(3) A site map (or series of maps) drawn to scale with the distance legend indicating location of
industrial activities (including storage of materials, disposal areas, process areas, and loading
and unloading areas), drainage structures, drainage areas for each outfall and activities occurring
in the drainage area, building locations and impervious surfaces, the percentage of each drainage
area that is impervious. For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants which
could be expected to be present in the regulated stormwater discharge.
(4) A list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred at the facility during the 3
previous years and any corrective actions taken to mitigate spill impacts.
(5) Certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater
discharges. The certification statement will be signed in accordance with the requirements found
in Part III, Standard Conditions, Section B.11.
b. Stormwater Management Plan: The stormwater management plan shall contain a narrative description of
the materials management practices employed which control or minimize the exposure of significant
materials to stormwater, including structural and non-structural measures. The stormwater
management plan, at a minimum, shall incorporate the following:
(1) A study addressing the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of operations
and/or storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and processes to
stormwater. Wherever practicable the permittee should consider covering storage areas, material
handling operations, manufacturing or fueling operations to prevent materials exposure to
stormwater. In areas where elimination of exposure is not practicable, the stormwater
management plan shall document the feasibility of diverting the stormwater runoff away from
areas of potential contamination.
(2) A schedule to provide secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials, storage of
Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) water
priority chemicals, or storage of haardous materials to prevent leaks and spills from
contaminating stormwater runoff. If the secondary containment devices are connected directly to
stormwater conveyance systems, the connection shall be controlled by manually activated valves
or other similar devices [which shall be secured with a locking mechanism] and any stormwater
that accumulates in the containment area shall be at a minimum visually observed prior to
release of the accumulated stormwater. Accumulated stormwater shall be released if found to be
uncontaminated. Records documenting the individual making the observation, the description of
the accumulated stormwater and the date and time of the release shall be kept for a period of five
years.
(3) A narrative description of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be considered such as, but not
limited to, oil and grease separation, debris control, vegetative filter strips, infiltration and
stormwater detention or retention, where necessary. The need for structural BMPs shall be based
on the assessment of potential of sources contributing significant quantities of pollutants to
stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater discharges.
(4) Inspection schedules of stormwater conveyances and controls and measures to be taken to limit
or prevent erosion associated with the stormwater systems.

NC0086169
c. Spill Prevention and Response Plan: The Spill Prevention and Response Plan shall incorporate a risk
assessment of potential pollutant sources based on a materials inventory of the facility. Facility personnel
(or team) responsible for implementing the plan shall be identified in the plan. A responsible person shall
be on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff
through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations.
d. Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program: A preventative maintenance program shall
be developed. The program shall document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities of
stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. Inspection of material handling areas and
regular cleaning schedules of these areas shall be incorporated into the program.
e. Training schedules shall be developed and training provided at a minimum on an annual basis on proper
spill response and cleanup procedures and preventative maintenance activities for all personnel involved
in any of the facility's operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff. Facility
personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the training shall be identified in the plan.
f. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall identify a specific position(s) responsible for the overall
coordination, development, implementation, and revision to the Plan. Responsibilities for all components
of the Plan shall be documented and position(s) assignments provided.
g-
Plan Amendment: The permittee shall amend the Plan whenever there is a change in design,
construction, operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect on the potential for the discharge
of pollutants via a point source to surface waters. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be
reviewed and updated on an annual basis.
The Director may notify the permittee when the Plan does not meet one or more of the minimum
requirements of the permit. Within 30 days of such notice, the permittee shall submit a time schedule to
the Director for modifying the Plan to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide
certification in writing (in accordance with Part III, Standard Conditions, Section B.11.) to the Director
that the changes have been made.
h. Facility Inspections: Inspections of the facility and all stormwater systems shall occur at a
minimum on a semiannual schedule, once in the fall (September - November) and once during
the spring (April - June). The inspection and any subsequent maintenance activities performed
shall be documented, recording date and time of inspection, individual(s) making the
inspection and a narrative description of the facility's stormwater control systems, plant
equipment and systems. Records of these inspections shall be incorporated into the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Visual monitoring as required in Part II, Section A.2.
shall be performed in addition to facility inspections.
i. Implementation: Implementation of the Plan shall include documentation of all monitoring,
measurements, inspections, maintenance activities and training provided to employees, including the log
of the sampling data. Activities taken to implement BMPs associated with the industrial activities,
including vehicle maintenance activities, must also be recorded. All required documentation shall be kept
on -site for a period of five years and made available to the Director or his authorized representative
immediately upon request.
2. Visual Monitoring
Visual monitoring requires a qualitative visual inspection of each stormwater outfall, regardless of
representative outfall status, for the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan and assessing new sources of stormwater pollution. No analytical tests are required. Visual
monitoring of stormwater outfalls does not need to be performed during a representative storm event.

NC0086169
�tlryynN � ,/(L!fp i:.;.j� ✓p its-S
1liaterri4 } iso.R.{ t harac e � s tiY tI`
��ii s�� ,
'v.`s2.__.>x=' �sb %, rcN iu `v� wt t..., :�...__..,s,.�:-^, �',}:_;..a;s4t%.
141t �y4
i�.'T f 1
5.,.���., y,.; .::x:
iFtt ir> 4y��jt,.
P .J
Fts f
���Y'��wu'+. a�•Y..4 . rrg
}�['1• /�i�j�
i�'i..
'.: e .
Aiiiii
i.� . :a .w:?4
flip!�`
Color
Semi-annual
Visual
SDO
Odor
Semi-annual
Observation
SDO
Clarity
Semi-annual
Visual
SDO
Floating Solids
Semi-annual
Visual
SDO
Suspended Solids
Semi-annual
Visual
SDO
Foam
Semi-annual
Visual
SDO
Oil Sheen
Semi-annual
Visual
SDO
Other obvious indicators of stormwater pollution
Semi-annual
Visual
SDO
1 Frequency: The first visual monitoring event during the term of the permit must be performed
during the initial analytical monitoring event. All subsequent visual monitoring will be
performed twice per year, once in the spring and once in the fall.
2 Monitoring Type: Monitoring requires a qualitative observation of each stormwater outfall. No
analytical testing or sampling is required.
3 Sample Location: Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO - effluent at outfalls 001 and 002).
STORMWATER DEFINITIONS
1. Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management
practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the United States. BMPs also include treatment
requirements, operation procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or
waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage.
2. Bulk Storage of Liquid Products
Liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above ground
storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground storage
containers having a total storage capacity of greater than 1,320 gallons.
3. Point Source Discharge
Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance, including but specifically not limited to, any pipe,
ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, or concentrated animal
feeding operation from which pollutants are or may be discharged to waters of the state.
4. Runoff Coefficient
The fraction of total rainfall that is not infiltrated into or otherwise retained by the soil, concrete, asphalt
or other surface upon which it falls that will appear at the conveyance as runoff.
5. Secondary Containment
Spill containment for the contents of the single largest tank within the containment structure plus
sufficient freeboard to allow for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event.

NC0086169
6. Section 313 Water Priority Chemical
A chemical or chemical category which:
a. Is listed in 40 CFR 372.65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -
Know Act of 1986;
b. Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA title III, Section 313 reporting
requirements; and
c. That meet at least one of the following criteria:
(1) Is listed in appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on either Table II (organic priority pollutants),
Table III (certain metals, cyanides, and phenols) or Table IV (certain toxic pollutants and
hazardous substances);
(2) Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40 CFR
116.4; or
(3) Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria.
7. Significant Materials
Includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic
pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food processing or production;
hazardous substances designated under section 101(14) of CERCLA; any chemical the facility is required
to report pursuant to section 313 of Title III of SARA; fertilizers; pesticides; and waste products such as
ashes, slag and sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater discharges.
8. Significant Spills
Includes, but is not limited to: releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities
under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.10 and CFR 117.21) or section 102 of
CERCLA (Ref: 40 CFR 302.4).
9. Stormwater Runoff
The flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall or as a
result of snowmelt.
10. Total Flow
The flow corresponding to the time period over which the sample collection occurs. The total flow
calculated based on the size of the area draining to the outfall, the amount of the built -upon (impervious)
surfaces within the drainage area, and the total amount of rainfall occurring during the sampling period.
11. Visible Sedimentation
Solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water, air,
gravity, or ice from its site of origin, which can be seen with the unaided eye.
9. ANNUAL SHUTDOWN PROCEDURES CONDITION
On an annual basis, the permittee is permitted to discharge up to 250,000 gallons of non -contact cooling water
and flush water, from the two cooling tower basins, through Outfall 002. The semi-annual monitoring associated
with outfall 002 shall coincide with this event. Corning Incorporated shall develop a HVAC Cooling Tower
Shutdown Procedure consistent with Betz -Dearborn recommendations. The HVAC Cooling Tower Shutdown
Procedure should include the condition that both cooling towers will not be flushed at the same time. This
procedure shall be kept on site and available for review by Division staff upon request. Additionally, the time and
duration for the discharge of non -contact cooling water through outfall 002 shall be recorded in the operations log
by the Operator in Responsible Charge and available for review by the Division upon request.

North Carolina ) ss
Mecklenburg County)
The Knight Publishing Co., Inc.
Charlotte. NC
Affidavit of Publication
THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER
NCDENR/DWO/BUDGET OFFICE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1617
REFERENCE: 30019881
5049368 Public Notice -NC
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly authorized to administer
oaths affirmations, etc., personally appeared,
being duly sworn or affirmed according to law,
doth depose and say that he/she is a
representative of the Knight Publishing Company a
corporation organized and doing business under the
laws of the State of Delaware, and publishing a
newspaper known as The Charlotte Observer in the
city of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg and State
of North Carolina and that as such he/she is
familiar with the books, records, files and
business of said Corporation and by reference to
the files of
the attached
following is
files of the
Publication.
said publication
advertisement was inserted. The
correctly copied from the books and
aforesaid Corporation and
PUBLISHED ON: 02/09
AD SPACE: 120 LINE
FILED ON: 02/13/04
NAME:
In Testimony Whereof
I have hereunto
TITLE:
DATE:
F E 8 1 8 2004
Public Notice
State of North Carolina
Environmental Management Commleslon/NP ES Unit
1617 Mall Service Cenfly
Notlilcation Of InRaleigh,
ent To asbe A NC N DES Wastewater Permit
On the basis of thorough staff review:and application/ of NC General
Statute 143.21, Public law 92-500 and other lawful starida:di and reg-
ulations, tho North Carolina Environmental Management Cortimisslbn
proposes to issue a National PO4utanl Discharge:Elim4lation System
(NPDES) wastewater discharge permit to the,person(s) listed below
effective 45 days from the publish date.ot this nonce. .
Written comments regarding ere proposed permit will be accepted urn
cif 30 days after the publish date of this nohce.,Alf cons Ra4s roceWed
prior to that date arc consideiedNn the final detemvnations regarding
the ptoposed permit. The Director of the NC Division of Water qualny
May decide to hold a public meting foryfe proposed ise(met shduld
the Divlslon receive a significant degree of publlc.lnferest.
Copies of the draft pendtt and other supportkig information on fife yised
to detamina con unions prnsont In the draft peJllik areaVatl(ble tr6O9
'request and payment of the coils of reProdugti5h. Mail comments
and/or requests for Information to the NC Division of Wate;{ (NMI), at
the above address Of call Ms. Valery Ste9liens'al (919) 733.50e3, ex-
tension 520. Please include the NPDES perrrtd tturrttier. (a1t8ch d). itt
any communication. Interested persona Mtyy. also visit the Ofvisicrrof
' Water OUality at 512 N. Salisbury Street; Raleigh, NC 27604-1148 bet
!worn the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 phi. to revterr (nformakon
on Ilia. -
•
NPDF§ Pormlt Number NC0064734 Carolina Water Sery�.Bndfiefd
Farms WWTP, Cebartus County, has applied for renewal of tts pontiff
• :fora facility discharging treated wastewater to McKee Creek lri theYad.
Mn River Bashi. Currently BOD5, ammonia, dissolved &inert fecal co=
Norm, and total residual chlorine ere water quaktylfralleCkThis discharge
may affect future aibdations in ttlis poof the reg0Ning.sv83ni..•
Corning• tncorpedratehes applied
rtion for renerial of the NPDES Permit for
ifs Concord Fadilty (NC0086169) in Cabarhis County. Thts:faciktycite.
charges stormwater to an unnalired tributary to Muddy Creek «101),
stonmwater, boiler.blowdawn; and non -contact cootkg watej.to an urn
named tributary to Clear Creek (002)r.and'pprrocess wagtewater,'coo(•
Ing tower blowdovri, end carbon filter backwash to. tfiaRol48y Rover
(D03). All receiving streams are classified as C wafers lit the. Yadkin Rio-
er Basin- Curren0y, no parameters are JloweterquJGty limited, thougll tnts
discharge may impact future acation of thre.sourcb '
n i EnergyUnited Water Corporation Stohy'Poktt, Nd has applied for'rii;
' newel of NPDES permit NC0084042 for its Colonel R.L. Tatum Water
Treatment Plant in Alexander Codnty, This permitted facility discharges
filter backwash water in the Yadkin -Pee Doe Rtver Basin. Cu/rangy; to -
tat residual chlorine is water quartty limited. This discharge may affect
future allocations In this portion et the watershed.. Union Carey Public Works, Greasy Branch W WTF has applied for re-
' newel of its NPDES petmk No. NC0085812, discharging to.Crooked
Creek in the Yadldn-Pee Dee River I3as1. BOO and Ammonia are wa-
ter quality Gntited parameters.
Lpsoasaas
set my hand and affixed my seal, the
day a year aforesaid.
Notary:
My Commission Expires: /_/ coTT mission Expires May 17, 2006

Corning Incorporated PO Box i7oo
Optical Fiber Concord, NC 28o26-17oo
t 704 569 600o www.corning.com
March 3, 2004
NC Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Ir.' ) jsL. Uy
Cc:
NPDES Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Section (draft permit, fact sheet)
Aquatic Toxicology (draft permit)
919 N Main Street
Mooresville NC 28115
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Draft
CORNING Permit NC0086169
Discovering Beyond Imagination
Dear Mr. McIntire:
MAR 5 2004
This memo is to confirm that we have received the Draft renewal NPDES
Permit NC0086169 for the Corning Inc. Midland NC facility. After review, we
do not have any issues or comments regarding the conditions defined in the draft
or the actual permit requirements.
In addition I would like to thank you for your help and support during this
mothball period, and for taking the time to answer my questions regarding
changes to the draft permit. Thanks for confirming that there are no differences
in the operating parameters as defined in the new draft. In addition, a Corning
Inc. representative will notify you and all other appropriate agencies before
resuming any discharges through our permitted outfalls if/when plant operations
resume. Thank you for your continued support and commitment to this facility
and our mothball operations.
Respectfully submitted,
William P. Myhalyk
Concord Facilities Supervisor
Corning Inc.
T 704-569-7164

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0086169
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Corning, Incorporated — Midland Facility
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 1700, Concord, NC 28026-1700
Facility Address:
14556 Highway 601 South
Permitted Flow
0.107 MGD and 0.142 MGD
Type of Waste:
100% Industrial
Facility/Permit Status:
Renewal
County:
Cabarrus
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
UT Muddy Creek
(001), UT Clear
Creek (002),
Rocky River (003)
Regional Office:
Mooresville
Stream Classification:
C
USGS Topo Quad:
G 16NE/G 17NW
303(d) Listed?:
No
Permit Writer:
Mark McIntire
Sub -basin:
03-07-12
Date:
February 3, 2004
Drainage Area (mi2):
NA
0
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
30
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
NA
Average Flow (cfs):
NA
IWC (%):
1.8 (at 0.142
MGD)
Primary SIC Code:
3229
THIS FACILITY HAS BEEN MOTHBALLED. AS SUCH, THIS PERMIT RENEWAL IS A
SIMPLE ROLLOVER OF THE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENTLY
ISSUED MODIFICATIONS.
SUMMARY OF FACILITY AND WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Corning Incorporated manufactures optical fibers at its Midland facility in Cabarrus County. The facility
originally received its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit in 1998. Startup
began late that year. The facility was issued a renewed NPDES permit on April 14, 2001, which included
an expanded flow to 0.107 MGD. On December 19, 2000, the Division of Water Quality received a
request for modification to the NPDES Permit, specifically, the facility requested a flow expansion from
0.107 MGD to 0.142 MGD.
Wastewater generated includes sanitary wastewater, non -contact cooling wastewater, process wastewater,
stormwater, filter backwash water and boiler blowdown. Currently, sanitary wastewater is treated off -site
at the Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. Wastewaters other than sanitary are treated and
discharge through one of three outfalls as summarized below.
Outfall 001
This discharge is comprised of 100% stormwater. collected in a stormwater retention pond. The receiving
stream is an unnamed tributary of Muddy Creek. Currently, no effluent limitations and monitoring page
is contained within the permit for this outfall, though stormwater controls are required. Part I, Section A,
Number 8 of the permit addresses stormwater discharges and applicable monitoring requirements.
Outfall 002
This discharge is comprised of stormwater, non -contact cooling water, and humidification boiler
blowdown. Wastewater is collected in a wet detention pond prior to discharge into an unnamed tributary
of Clear Creek. Effluent limitations and monitoring have been applied and stormwater controls are
required.
Outfall 003
This discharge is comprised of industrial process wastewater, non -contact cooling water, and carbon filter
backwash water. These wastewaters are neutralized and treated using a solids removal unit prior
discharge into the Rocky River.
Corning Fact Shut
NPDES Renewal
Page 1

TOXICITY TESTING:
Current Requirement:
Proposed Requirement:
Chronic P/F @ 1.0% at 0.107 MGD using Ceriodaphnia
Chronic P/F @ 1.7% at 0.142 MGD using Ceriodaphnia
The above IWCs were calculated using a flow equal to the sum of the permitted flow at outfall 003 and the
non -contact cooling water contribution.
This facility has passed all toxicity tests since startup.
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY:
The facility has been in compliance with its NPDES Permit.
INSTREAM MONITORING:
A benthic macroinvertebrate study was required in the original permit. That permit required the facility to
complete a benthic survey during the summer of 1999. The study was completed in August and
submitted to the Division for review. Dave Lenat of the Environmental Sciences Branch reviewed the
study and provided the writer with comments. His conclusions were in agreement with the study results,
which indicated no biological impact from this discharge. As the discharge will be expanding, the benthic
survey requirement will be included with this renewal, and should be completed upon completion of
expansion, should such expansion take place.
PROPOSED CHANGES:
None
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: February 11, 2004
Permit Scheduled to Issue: March 29, 2004
STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Mark
McIntire at [phone] ext. 508.
NAME: DATE:
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT:
NAME: DATE:
Corning Fact Sheet
NPDES Rene ai
Page

To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Mark McIntire
SO(' PRIORITY PROJECT: No
Date: June 18, 2003
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County: Cabarrus
NPDES Permit No.: NC0086169
MRO No.: 03-013
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and address: Corning, Inc.
Post Office Box 1700
Concord, N.C. 28026-1700
007, t WIC`
2. Date of investigation: June 17, 2003
3. Report prepared by: Michael L. Parker, Environmental Engineer II
4. Person contacted and telephone number: Michael Hannan, [phone].
5. Directions to site: From the jct. of Hwy. 601 and Hwy. 24-27 in the Town of Midland in
southern Cabarrus County, travel south on Hwy. 601 2.65 miles. The Corning plant is
located on the right (west) side of Hwy. 601.
6. Discharge point(s), list for all discharge points: -
outfall 001 outfall 002 outfall 003
Latitude: 35° 13' 02" Latitude: 35° 12' 34" Latitude: 35° 12' 30"
Longitude: 80° 31' 15" Longitude: 80° 31' 31" Longitude: 80° 29' 49"
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: G 16 NE
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application: Yes. There is sufficient area
available for the construction of any additional treatment units, if necessary.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Relatively flat, 2-4% slopes. The plant site
is not located in a flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: Approx. 500+ feet from the WWTP site.

Page Two
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: U.T. to Muddy Creek (outfall 001), U.T. to
Clear Creek (outfall 002), Rocky River (outfall 003).
a. Classification: C (for all outfalls)
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin 030712
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: A small amount of
flow was noted at the discharge locations for outfalls 001 and 002, which typically is
a dry ditch. Excellent flow observed in the Rocky River at discharge outfall 003.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater in MG per operating day: 0.191520 MGD (outfalls 001 &
002) 0.141120 MGD (outfall 003)
b. What is the current permitted capacity: N/A
c. Actual treatment capacity of current facility (current design capacity): N/A
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous ATCs issued in the previous
two years: N/A
e. Description of existing or substantially constructed WWT facilities: The existing
WWT facilities consist of pH adjustment and flocculation
f. Description of proposed WWT facilities: There are no WWT facilities proposed at
this time.
g.
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: A biocide is added to the waste stream at
outfall 003 (Spectrus OX107). Chlorides are also present in the waste stream at
outfall 003.
2. Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Residuals disposal, if necessary, will be
accomplished by placing the residuals (after neutralization) in metal containers and
transporting them as non -hazardous waste to a private landfill.
3. Treatment Plant Classification: Class I (no change from previous rating)
4. SIC Code(s): 3229 Wastewater Code(s): 78 MTU Code(s): 510102
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved (municipals only)? No.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: None pending receipt of the
WLA.

Page Three
3. Important SOC/JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: N/A
4. Alternative analysis evaluation
a. Spray Irrigation: Generally poor soils in the vicinity of the plant site. Insufficient area
available for the construction of a spray irrigation WWT system.
b. Connect to regional sewer system: Corning discharges all domestic wastewater into
the Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County's Muddy Creek WWTP. There is,
however, insufficient capacity at the Muddy Creek WWTP to accept all of Corning's
waste streams.
c. Subsurface: Insufficient area, poor soils.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Corning, Inc. requests the reissuance of an NPDES Permit for the discharge of both process
water and non -contact cooling water from a facility located southern Cabarrus County. The Corning
facility is currently closed (mothballed) as a result of poor economic conditions. There is no
timetable as to when the facility might reopen.
The process water discharge (outfall 003) contains the following sources of wastewater:
1. Blowdown from pollution abatement equipment.
2. Water softener from area floor drains.
3. Water softener blowdown.
4. Cooling tower blowdown.
5. Some stormwater.
The two (2) cooling water outfalls (001 & 002) leave the site only after passing through a
wet detention basin. During periods of infrequent rainfall these basins may hold little, if any water.
However, during wet -weather, these basins may hold substantial quantities of water, which will be
made up primarily of stormwater. Most of the site's stormwater has been channeled around the
detention basins, however, there will still be a considerable quantity of that enters the basins either
directly or indirectly.
Pending receipt and approval of the WLA, it is recommended that the NPDES Permit be
reissued as requested.
Signature of Report repo parer
•1
Water Qual' ' - gional Supervisor Date
Date
h:ldsr\dsr031corning2.dsr
(..die

CORNING
Discovering Beyond Imagination
Corning Incorporated
Optical Fiber
February 3, 2003
PO Box i7oo
Concord, NC 28026-17oo
t 704 569 6000
Dave Goodrich
NC Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
www.corning.com
FEB - 5 2003
As required, Corning, Inc. is submitting a NPDES permit renewal
application. Our current permit expires in October 2003. We understand
that upon receipt of this renewal by your office, we are allowed to operate
under our current permit until such time as we receive a new one.
Please note the information we have requested to be held confidential is
marked in red. This information is of a proprietary nature and would
allow a detailed understanding of our process technology and cost position
that would provide an unfair advantage to our competition in the
marketplace.
I will be available for questions until February 28, 2003. At that time,
your point of contact at the Concord Plant will be Michael D. Hannan,
[phone]. Please feel free to contact Mr. Hannan or me if you have
any questions concerning the information contained in the documents.
Sincerely,
Christy L. Hannan
Sr. Environmental Control Engineer
Enclosures: 1 (3 copies)

Corning Inc.
PO Box 1700
Concord NC 28026-1700
April 3, 2003
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
& Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Permit NC0086169
Fiber Optic Facility
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr. Mark McIntire:
This memo is intended to confirm the outcome of our telephone conservation on April 1, 2003
regarding the request from NCDENR's Ms. Valery Stephens, Point Source Branch, dated
February 28, 2003, requesting a Sludge Management Plan in order to facilitate the Renewal
Application of our NPDES Permit.
As we discussed and agreed, the design and operation of our Corning Concord Manufacturing
and Process Waste Water treatment process does not generate waste sludge. Based on your
knowledge and experience of this facility, it is understood and agreed that a Sludge Management
Plan is not required to renew the application and Permit NC0086169. It is our understanding that
you will clarify this with Ms. Stephens so as to permit the timely processing of the subject NPDES
Permit Renewal Application.
Thank you for your help and support with this permit renewal process.
Respectfully submitted,
William P. Myhalyk
Concord Facilities Supervisor
Optical Fiber
Corning, Inc.
T 704-569-7164

1. pplicant-and facility producing discharge
A. Name Corning Incorporated
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C
For manufacturing or commercial facilities with a discharge <1 MGD (or WTPs)
,LJp3 N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
C 0 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
k\ \\\
North. Carolina NPDES Permit Number NC0086169
Please print or type
B. Mailing address of applicant:
Street address PO Box 1700
City Concord
County Cabarrus
State North Carolina Zip Code 28026-1700
Telephone Number
Fax Number
e-mail address
( 704 )569-6000
( 704 )569-6275
[e-mail]
C. Location of facility:
Contact Person Michael D. Hannan
Street 14556 Highway 601 South
City Midland
State North Carolina
Telephone Number (704 )569-7531
County Cabarrus
Zip Code 28107
2. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code(s):3229
3. Number of employees: 650
4. Principal product(s) produced: Optical Fiber
Principal raw material(s) consumed: Silica and Halides
5. Principal process(es): Chemical Vapor Deposition
6. Amount of principal product produced (or raw material consumed)
List specific amounts consumed and/or units of pro
Product Produced or Raw Material Consumed
(AVERAGE)
Product Produced or Raw Material Consumed
(PEAK)
per Day
CONFIDENTIAL SEE ATTACHMENT
CONFIDENTIAL SEE ATTACHMENT
per Month
CONFIDENTIAL SEE ATTACHMENT
CONFIDENTIAL SEE ATTACHMENT
per Year
CONFIDENTIAL SEE ATTACHMENT
CONFIDENTIAL SEE ATTACHMENT
7. Check here if discharge occurs all year X or
Circle the month(s) in which discharge occurs:
January February March April
May June July August September October November December
Page 1 of 2
Version -11/2000

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C
For manufacturing or commercial facilities with a discharge <1 MGD (or WTPs)
Days per week discharge occurs: 7
NOTE: If the facility has separate discharge points (outfalls) or multiple industrial processes, include a schematic diagram
of wastewater flow at the facility.
8. Types of wastewater discharged to surface waters only (check as applicable).
Discharge per operating day
Flow
(GALLONS PER OPERATING DAY)
Volume treated before discharging
(PERCENT)
Sanitary - daily average
44,640
0%
Cooling water, etc. - daily average
191,520
0%
Process water - daily average
141,120
100%
Maximum per operating day for
total discharge (all types)
377,280
37%
9. If any of the types of wastewater identified in item 8 (either treated or untreated) are discharged to places
other than surface waters, record the amount(s) discharged below:
A. Municipal sewer system 44.640 gpd
B. Underground well 0 gpd
C. Septic tank 0 gpd
D. Evaporation lagoon or pond 191,520 gpd
E. Other, specify N/A gpd
10. Number of separate discharge points: 3
11. Name of receiving stream(s): Outfall 001 — tributary Muddy Creek. Outfall 002 — tributary Clear Creek.
Ouffall 003 — Rocky River
12. Does your discharge contain or is it possible for your discharge to contain one or more of the following
substances added as a result of your operations, activities, or processes? Circle all that apply:
aluminum ammonia beryllium
copper cyanide lead
phenols selenium zinc
cadmium chromium chlorine (residual)
mercury nickel oil and grease
None of the above
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
W. M. Kenan
Printed name of Person Signing
Plant Manger
Title
WiVk 7'J �
Signature of A licant
9 PP Date
North Carolina General Statute 143.215.6E (7 provides that Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any application, record,
report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, or
who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or
regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $10,000, or by
imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both.
Page 2 of 2
Version —11/2000

CITY WATER
FIRE WATER FOR
riEKKEIST USES CULT
pSTORW WATER
•
FRESTE
Partnering o11o.1n.
oaacRvtlol
SOFTDER
SYSTEM
POTABLESTS EM TER
IUIOIFICATIOM
BOILER
INAC [DOLING
TOYER
ECWS COOLING
TOYER
ICLICl2
SCRUBBER SYSTEMS
SISTERS
lISCELLAREOUS
SCRUBBER SYSTEMS
CD ISO.NATIOM
SCRUBBER SYSTEMS
PCLL
ABATTFlTENT
AREA UTILITIES
SAIITARY SEWER
amccipila
DITFALL 0941112
BLDYOOH!!J
OgbTE :I)t> .%L C;"rkolN4tl4t,t,'`5-1/41u5,
6FF�e.-r►v6 Feb. Ldv3/ CoOL%L c
owl-k.. T3Low�owV wI�,LLr
of
SCm1QG L To b UT FALL ob 2 ,
IEU RA 1�TIOR
SPRAY COOLERS
STEM
BLOW00ml
SCUDS N.
TEM
i
i
$TEAM
EYAP(IOATIml
EYE
EYAPCRaTI
PROCESS WASTEWATER
TO OUTFALL C MiO
EYA CRATEp1`
EYAPOMTIO I
fl�TIOi.
ctsr.t iv!
OUTFALL OSMBI?
CORNING
CORNING 1NCORPGRATED
OPTICAL FIBER DIVISION
PROPRIETARY
0 Washington
CommaKO :w ..
Contract 79960.031
ocuwl Ir1 JOE UPCIPPICH
_�,ppA1a1 ITl TL a0009
SIGNATURE DED213 re.
DRAW ENO TITLE
SCHEMATIC OF WATEF
FLOW
CORNING INCORPORATE
CABARRUS COUNTY
,rrinrca rn
SWUM tiri
cart IR•IMM Isms POK ORAit F4JlaaER
cao FILL I . us.wr 17211- SK-168 -A
CONCORD III PROJECT.
CONCORD, N.C.
•
Ra1.E.OW RCA PIT Arr;10;1T10I
110131CN
X5CAIPTIOI
DEANER M7t'0#111oTt,
OATE

CORNING
Discovering Beyond Imagination
(;;€/« 5Mi4)
P
LPL , V�
Cer71 {.Gt7 fri.
Corning Incorporated
Optical Fiber
January 6, 2003
PO Box i7oo t 704 569 6000
Concord, NC 28026-i7oo
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Dave Goodrich
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, NPDES Permit Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
www.corning.com
JAJAN — 9 2^"
RE: Corning Incorporated, Concord Facility N G 008 G I ro 9
NPDES Permit No. NCG010000
Minor Modification Request
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
As discussed previously in our modification request, Corning Inc. has
decided to "mothball" the Concord Plant. "Mothball" means that there will
be no optical fiber manufactured on site and the site will be "chemical
free". There will be no process chemicals required for optical fiber
manufacturing and all systems (equipment and piping) will be purged. As
a condition of the mothballing, Corning Inc. has decided to maintain the
facility in a state such that it can produce fiber within 6 months if the
business conditions change (within the next 4 years).
With this directive, it will be necessary to maintain HVAC capability to
condition the building to minimized deterioration of equipment and
systems. Therefore, the current HVAC system (cooling towers) will need
to operate during "mothball" status. The Concord Plant is currently
permitted to discharge non -contact cooling tower blowdown to Outfall 003
with our pollution abatement process water. During shutdown, the
pollution abatement system will not be needed. Therefore, there will be no
need to operate the current wastewater treatment system and no discharge
through Outfall 003. However, we intend to continue to keep the currently
required records and submit the appropriate reports to maintain our permit
as is.
Our permit modification, dated December 13, 2002, allows non -contact
cooling tower blowdown generated during the "mothball" status to be
discharged through Outfall 002 untreated.
Based on this modification and that our current wastewater treatment
system will be shutdown (locked out and tagged out) until such time as we

restart the fiber making process, we are requesting that our current facility
classification, Grade II Chemical/Physical, be modified to a Class "0" or
unrated. An unrated facility does not require an Operator in Responsible
Charge. We are asking that the Permitting Section and the Regional
Office provide written agreement with this request such that we can
formally make the request of the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning the
information presented. I can be reached at [phone].
Sincerely,
C_Lcipti
Christy Hannan
Environmental Control Engineer
Concord Plant
Coming, Inc.
Enclosures
Cc: Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, NCDENR
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit, DWQ, NCDENR
Blake Manuel, Corning Inc., Corporate Environmental Control

Also, can you look at BOC's non -contact cooling water discharge permit. They discharge downstream of
our Outfall 001 into the same "dry" ditch we would discharge to.
> From: Mark Mcintire[SMTP:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:40 PM
> To: Hannan, Christy L
> Subject: Re: Questions for Christy/State guy
> Coming from the office in Downtown Raleigh.
> "Hannan, Christy L" wrote:
> > Will you be coming from the office or your home? If your home, where is it at?
» >
> > > From: Mark Mcintire[SMTP:[e-mail]]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:22 PM
> > > To: Hannan, Christy L
> > > Subject: Re: Questions for Christy/State guy
» >
> > > Thanks...send me directions.
» »
> > > "Hannan, Christy L" wrote:
» »
»»>
> > > > > From: Corbett, Patrick T
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:10 PM
> > > > > To: Hannan, Christy L
> > > > > Cc: Smith, Sheila B; Carr, Tracy M; Turner, Beverly S
> > > > > Subject: FW: Questions for Christy/State guy
»»>
»»>
»»>
> > > > > Original Message
> > > » > From: Corbett, Patrick T
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:09 PM
> > > > > To: Carr, Tracy M; Turner, Beverly S
> > > > > Subject: RE: Questions for Christy/State guy
»»>
> > > » > CT - Is 002 the only discharge point? Outfalls 001, 002 and 003 are all options.
> > > » > CT - Is it okay to go through the storm -drain to get there on a continuous basis? That is an
option. Any monitoring required by DWQ would have to occur prior to the discharge reaching the storm
water system.
> > > > > Re-Qual - Lab status Lab certification will depend on what monitoring requirements are required
by DWQ, based on the discharge option we choose.
> > > > > Permit - calibrations if no discharge through lift station I recommend that all instrumentation be
up to date on calibrations and a memo to file be written regarding last calibration, last day of operation and
need for recalibration prior to start up. I will verify this with DWQ.
> > > > > Permit - Renewal/change back I recommend we maintain our current permit to discharge PA
water. This would mean renewing the NPDES permit next year. The reason for this is that to meet the 6-9
month restart requirement, we need an active permit. A new permit will take at least 180 days (has been
longer the last 2 times we requested a modification) and new regulations/regulators would make it difficult
to receive a permit as flexible as the one we have. (Corp Env. has concurred with this.)
> > > > > Storm water restrictions - if no chemicals or production, can dikes overflow or go automatically
to ground? If no chemicals are stored/used in the dike area, documentation should be kept as to the date the

chemicals were removed (and lines flushed). Then rainwater in the dikes can be automatically sent to the
ground.
> > > » > Permit - If zero process flow, what about sampling requirements? DWQ will have to provide
these requirements based on the discharge options we adopt.
> > > > > Permit - What about testing requirements, like toxicity? See above.
> > > > > CT - Is it okay to bypass filters? What types of changes would there need to be? - THIS MAY
BE A FACILITIES QUESTION OR A QUESTION WE DONT WANT TO ANSWER. See above.
> > > » > Permit - How long would it be until the final requirements(after the permit change) would be
known? Modifications could take as long as 180 days. We are working closely with DWQ to achieve a
workable solution as quickly as possible.
> > > > > Can we use CT for irrigation? Would landscaping be maintained during mothball? Corp.
Environmental policy is "no" discharge of any kind to the ground.
> > > > > If an ORC is required, what grade is necessary? See permit comments above.>
»»>
> > > > > Original Message
> > > > > From: Carr, Tracy M
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:33 AM
> > > > > To: Corbett, Patrick T; Turner, Beverly S
> > > > > Subject: RE: Questions for Christy/State guy
»»>
» » > Beverly,
»»>
> > > > > Here are a few questions that I have:
»»>
> > > > > * Will the annual scrubber maintenance still be required even though there are no
emissions? 2002 control device inspections and maintenance will be required per our existing permit and
the manufacturers' requirements. Documentation will be required to indicate the last inspection (2002) and
the last day of operation of the control devices. All control devices should be inspected prior to start up.>
> > > > > * Will the stack emissions still need to be read on the same frequency even though there
are no emissions? Stack visible emissions should be documented as no emissions, no production on the
existing frequency. As with the NPDES permit, I recommend we maintain the existing Title V permit and
the requirements there in. It could be difficult to get as agreeable a permit as we now have if there is a
change in regulations (non -attainment, new control device technology) or regulators. Again, the 6-9 month
start up has to be considered.>
> > > > > * Will an ORC be required to be on site every day (M-F) if we are not discharging via the
Lift Station? This will depend on the option we choose and the requirements of DWQ.
> > > > > * Will cooling tower blowdown be able to be discharged to the retention ponds? This is a
viable option, however, we will have to discuss with DWQ and review their monitoring/reporting
requirements for this option.>
»»>
> > > > > I'm sure that both of you have thought of these and many others. Please make sure that any
questions that affect the long-term mothball state are answered as clearly as possible. These answers will
affect the things we do to get to the mothball state. Thanks.
»»>
» » > Tracy Carr
> > > > > Chemical Technology Line Leader
> > > > > Phone: [phone]
> > > > > Pager: [phone]
> > > > > Fax: [phone]
»»>
»»>
> > > > > From: Turner, Beverly S
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 8:05 AM
> > > > > To: Corbett, Patrick T; Carr, Tracy M
> > > > > Subject: Questions for Christy/State guy
»»>

> > > » > I forgot Friday to gather together the questions for Christy and the permit guy. Can you
email me the questions and I will forward them on to Christy. Thanks.
»»>
» » > Beverly S. Turner
> > > > > Chemical Technology Maintenance Team Leader
> > > > > Corning, Inc.
» » > Midland, NC
» » > [phone]
> > > > > [phone] - pager
> > > > > [phone] - fax
»»>
»»>
»»>
» >
»>--
> > > Mark D. McIntire, P.E.
> > > Environmental Engineer
> > > NPDES Unit - Division of Water Quality
> > > 1617 Mail Service Center
> > > Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
> > > Phone: [phone], extension 508
> > > Fax: [phone]
» »
» >
>
> --
> Mark D. McIntire, P.E.
> Environmental Engineer
> NPDES Unit - Division of Water Quality
> 1617 Mail Service Center
> Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
> Phone: [phone], extension 508
> Fax: [phone]
>
>

C Lun. i es fft,v-a
J
,v `14 C4141
(et (.,, 11
1
2,257 C-"Y"er-4
J J
I f-r
.7