20200024 Ver 2_More Info Received_20220621

Strickland, Bev
From: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 5:51 PM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Homewood, Sue
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Clarification needed for 401 application for Quarry Hills, Alamance
County DWR#20200024 v2
Attachments: Overall Site Plan From_QUARRY HILLS PHASE 1 EAST IMPACT MAPS.pdf; 4748.1
_Quarry Hills_Rev Wet Flag Map (Verif)_12.02.19.pdf; 4748.6 Quarry Hills Phase 2
_PCN_6.21.22.pdf; Rock Outcrop_Quarry Hills Phase 2 Stream Crossing.jpg
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Good Afternoon Chris and Sue,
On behalf of the applicant, please find the below responses and attachments. Please let me know if you require
additional information. Thank you.
USACE Comment 1) The previous permit verification authorized the loss of 0.247 acre of Waters of the United States
(combined stream (0.004 ac) and wetland (.243 ac) loss). In addition to the temporary/permanent stream crossing(s)
requested, stream impacts are show underlying future home sites. Please clarify why mitigation for stream impacts is
not proposed? A conceptual build -out exhibit with future impacts estimated would be helpful.
Applicant Response: The attached overall site plan for future phases was conceptually designed to the Town of
Swepsonville development ordinance requirements to obtain zoning approval in 2019 and for NWP Verification for
Phase I impacts in 2020. Impacts to streams, outside of those proposed within this application, are not conceptually
proposed for future phases compared to the USACE concurred stream/wetland delineation (attached). It is the
applicant's understanding that the Town of Swepsonville is considering updates to their residential development
ordinance, specifically as it relates to the implementation of residential cluster development, which is currently
prohibited. Currently, the development ordinance will allow for 8,000 square foot residential lot minimums, whereas
typical residential cluster development ordinances in similar localities can allow minimums of 5,000 square foot
residential lots. If the Town of Swepsonville updates their development ordinance to allow for cluster development or
smaller residential lots prior to the developer proceeding with future phases, then proposed future phases will be re-
designed to avoid conceptual designed impacts to Pond PF and Wetland WF, thus allowing for the overall project to
meet the current permitting requirements of Nationwide thresholds. If the Town of Swepsonville does not update their
current planning regulations for residential developments to allow for smaller residential lot footprints prior to the
developer moving forward with future phases, then the applicant has alternative options to utilize green space/common
elements to the south of future phases not currently being shown as developed (i.e. green space immediately south of
conceptually designed lots 190-220). This alternative option would also allow the re-design/re-location of lots to avoid
conceptual impact to Pond PF and Wetland WF, such that the overall project could be permitted under current
Nationwide Permitting thresholds. The applicant is committed to exhausting all development and design options as
described above to meet the necessary number of residential lots for the overall project to be financially viable while
avoiding an Individual Permit and/or potential mitigation thresholds for streams. The applicant has designed the
cumulative net loss impact to streams from the first two phases below Nationwide Permitting stream mitigation
thresholds and has conceptually demonstrated there will not be additional impact to wetlands that would exceed the
current Nationwide Permitting mitigation threshold. Therefore, stream mitigation is not proposed.

USACE Comment 2) Impact locations aren't clear on the exhibits provided. It appears the temporary and permanent
stream crossings would occur in the same location; please confirm. The upstream invert elevation of the temporary
pipe is more than a foot higher than the upstream invert of the permanent pipe, so if these would be in the same
footprint it is confusing.
Applicant Response: The attached PCN and impact drawings have been updated to reflect that the applicant no longer
proposes the use of a temporary stream crossing.
USACE Comment 3) The total stream impact of the currently proposed project, 41 linear feet (Stream Impact Table),
doesn't match other information shared. Can you please confirm this is correct?
Applicant Response: The attached PCN has been updated to reflect proposed stream impact amounts.
USACE Comment 4) The application states that the temporary crossing would be used for six to nine months and
removed prior to installation of the permanent culvert. Temporary discharges cannot be placed in waters for more than
six months without specific written permission from the Corps. It's conceivable that timelines or availabilities may factor
into the reasoning, but can you elaborate on the need for this approach? What duration of time is anticipated between
removal of the temporary pipe, and installation of the permanent one?
Applicant Response: The attached PCN and impact drawings have been updated to reflect that the applicant no longer
proposes the use of a temporary stream crossing.
USACE Comment 5) We appreciate the consideration of not burying the culvert due to slope and bedrock, but the
proposal doesn't meet the condition referenced in your response to NCDWR ("Culvert burial is not required for
structures less than 72-inch diameter/width, where the slope of the culvert will be greater than 2.5%, provided that all
alternative options for flattening the slope have been investigated and aquatic life movement/connectivity has been
provided when possible (e.g., rock ladders, cross vanes, sills, baffles etc). Culvert burial is not required when bedrock is
present in culvert locations.").
The slope is less than 2.5% and dual 66-inch culverts aren't consistent with the 72-inch threshold. If a
photograph or supporting design information is available to document our approval based on bedrock it
would be helpful. What considerations were made to provide for aquatic life passage?
Applicant Response: See attached photograph documenting exposed rock within the proposed permanent stream
crossing location. Therefore, we request written waiver of NWP 29, condition 9, a.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 11:47 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Clarification needed for 401 application for Quarry Hills, Alamance County DWR#20200024 v2
2

Thanks for the application and additional information provided below. I've got a few follow-up requests to aid in our
review.
1) The previous permit verification authorized the loss of 0.247 acre of Waters of the United States (combined
stream (0.004 ac) and wetland (.243 ac) loss). In addition to the temporary/permanent stream crossing(s)
requested, stream impacts are show underlying future home sites. Please clarify why mitigation for stream
impacts is not proposed? A conceptual build -out exhibit with future impacts estimated would be helpful.
2) Impact locations aren't clear on the exhibits provided. It appears the temporary and permanent stream
crossings would occur in the same location; please confirm. The upstream invert elevation of the temporary
pipe is more than a foot higher than the upstream invert of the permanent pipe, so if these would be in the
same footprint it is confusing.
3) The total stream impact of the currently proposed project, 41 linear feet (Stream Impact Table), doesn't match
other information shared. Can you please confirm this is correct?
4) The application states that the temporary crossing would be used for six to nine months and removed prior to
installation of the permanent culvert. Temporary discharges cannot be placed in waters for more than six
months without specific written permission from the Corps. It's conceivable that timelines or availabilities may
factor into the reasoning, but can you elaborate on the need for this approach? What duration of time is
anticipated between removal of the temporary pipe, and installation of the permanent one?
5) We appreciate the consideration of not burying the culvert due to slope and bedrock, but the proposal doesn't
meet the condition referenced in your response to NCDWR ("Culvert burial is not required for structures less
than 72-inch diameter/width, where the slope of the culvert will be greater than 2.5%, provided that all
alternative options for flattening the slope have been investigated and aquatic life movement/connectivity has
been provided when possible (e.g., rock ladders, cross vanes, sills, baffles etc). Culvert burial is not required
when bedrock is present in culvert locations.").
The slope is less than 2.5% and dual 66-inch culverts aren't consistent with the 72-inch threshold. If a
photograph or supporting design information is available to document our approval based on bedrock it
would be helpful. What considerations were made to provide for aquatic life passage?
Please see below and let me know if there are questions or concerns.
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
0: [phone], Ext. 35
M: [phone]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey can
be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and
complete the survey.
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 1:21 PM
To: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
3

Cc: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [URL Verdict: Unknown][Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: Clarification needed for 401 application for Quarry
Hills, Alamance County DWR#20200024 v2
Thanks for doing the math for me Brad.
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
[e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
From: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 1:07 PM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Cc: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Clarification needed for 401 application for Quarry Hills, Alamance County DWR#20200024 v2
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Sue —based on the scaled cross section (Impact Drawings 4 of 4, Page 19 of PCN), the culvert slope is at or near 2.5%.
The proposed culvert was designed to meet NCDWR GC 4256 Condition 11, paragraph 3 in addition to NWP 29,
condition 9, a.
Also noteworthy, based on our field visits and familiarity with the site, there are exposed rock outcrops at grade within
the proposed culvert footprint.
Please let me know if you require additional information. Thanks.
4

n 4748.6 Quarry Hills Phase 2_PCN 4.19.22.pdf - Adobe Acrobat Pro
File Edit View Window Help
F') Open
Create •••
Ix/
19
•59
33.9%
LJ
Signed and all signatures are valid.
Page Thumbnails
.;714.4.;17141.
.5." -m •
16
litvit
....,....:
.0„...0 ....0
kik —a. &Alt
17
18
19
2D
V
PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT
FROM KEYED IN
RIP RAP
52 LEI 180 SF
540
530
520
DC
TIZ=ANI
CYUT =
INVERT
523
.66
NOTE: RIM R
LOW -ER T
WI-MRE TIHT
BOLT OM F
1-1
I
5

NC Current Rate Schedules I NC DE4 X NC 401 & Buffer Permitting Statutes X
NC General Certifications I NC DEQ X
C
edocs.deq, nc.govjWaterResources/DocView.aspx?id=165O593&d bid=0&repo=WaterResourcE
Apps • NC HUES
43 Soil Surveys by Stat...
Search in document
Q
GC4256 for NW29_signed with effective date
t 4, 112
6
7
9
IPaC_5.13.22.pdf
k 18 in Ck ID 0 Fit width " 6 $ View plain text
Placement of culverts and other structures in strc
streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diam
the culvert diameter for culverts having a diamete
low flow passage of water and aquatic life. If the
or scour hole and designed to provide for aquatic
streambed is not required.
For structures less than 72" in diameter/width, an
slopes of greater than 2.5% culvert burial is not re
options for flattening the slope have been investiE
movement/connectivity has been provided when
sills, baffles etc.). Notification, including supportir
map of the culvert, culvert profile drawings, and sl
DWR 30 calendar days prior to the installation of t
When bedrock is present in culvert locations, culvi
there is sufficient documentation of the presence
supporting documentation such as a location map
photographs, etc. shall be provided to DWR a mini
installation of the culvert. if bedrock is discoverec
notified by phone or email within 24 hours of disci
Installation of culverts in wetlands shall ensure co
U.
•
6

NWP29_3.15,21.pdf - Adobe Acrobat Pro
File Edit View Window Help
J Open
Create
M
1
31
/ 37
I
oc+�
73.3%
U.
Sincerely,
compensa . ry rn ig ion is regw
adverse effect on the aquatic err
8. Riprap. For all NWPs that alk
the following conditions shall be
a. Filter cloth must be placed urr
use in North Carolina waters. Th
will be pushed or `keyed" into the
specifications in this Regional Cr
b. Riprap shall be placed only or
the stream bed, the finished top
original stream bed.
9. Culvert Placement. For all N'
conditions shall be applied:
a For all IVWPs that involve the
included in the constructionlinste
other aquatic organisms
Placement of culverts and other
streambed by one foot for all cut
of the culvert diameter for culver
the culvert outlet is submerged v
aquatic passage, then culvert bu
Culvert burial is not required for :
slope of the culvert will be greats
flattening the slope have been in
been provided when possible (e.
burial is not required when bedre
Installation of culverts in wetland
designed to adequately accomm
causeways, or other fill projects
wetlands, openings such as culv
hydrology of the system as well
in destabilization of streams or IA
62.
7

Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www. -. .com
bluckey@ .com
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 11:30 AM
To: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Cc: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: Clarification needed for 401 application for Quarry Hills, Alamance County DWR#20200024 v2
Brad,
It appears that the permanent culvert is proposed to be installed at grade rather than buried but I don't see where a
justification was given or a slope provided on the plan sheet so I could make that assumption. Can you please either
provide a plan sheet that revises that to show culvert burial, or provide a justification for not providing burial.
Thank you
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
[e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
8

1
of$$$%1111121111111uvv,,
.
ft•11111116%•0/7
:•...
•
a 4
( ®
PHASES ,�%
FUTURE PHASES ARE
CONCEPTUALLY DESIGNED
® • ML�i s_
n JI� 3� IMM��� o
•
HASE 1
WEST
a
VICINITY MAP
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
DESCO GC INVEST, LLC
600 MARKET STREET, SUITE 600
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516
PHONE: [phone]
CONTACT: ERIC DISCHINGER
[e-mail]
SHEET 1 OF 4
OVERALL SITE IMPACT MAP
FOR
QUARRY HILLS PHASE I EAST
ALAMANCE COUNTY
SWEPSONVILLE—NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 16, 2019
500 0 250 500
1000
1 inch=500ft.
vans
ngineeming9 Inc.
—Since 1974
Engineers Surveyors Planners
4609 Dundas Drive
Greensbor©,
North Carolina 2,74©7
Fax [phone]
Phone [phone]
Finn T.icense No.: C-0168
[PROJECT:
320-31 ]-[H: \DRAWINGS\QUARRY HILLS GOLF COURSE\QUARRY HILLS
BASE-AMY 11-14-19.DWG]

WETLAND FLAGS=
STREAM FLAGS=
Stream Flags = 26
Wetland Flags = 84
Total Flags = 110
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP WERE VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID BAILEY WITH
4 MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDEO-DWR ON Nak 6. 7019. THEY HAVE NOT RFFN St
1 3/
Drawing 5
Satellite Imagery from ESRI
and Pilot Field Notes
Scale: 1" = 350'
Date: 5.21.19; Revised 12.2.19
Culvert
• a •��
THE USACE ON NOVEMBER 21, 2019 AND
JRVEYFD OR G OLOCATED.
:•'umr.L7 It al
Wetland Map
George Bason Road
Approximate 147-Acre Tract
Swepsonville, Alamance County, NC
Pilot Project 4748.1

�
~
/
�
��.
200Feet���v
|
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WETLAND FLAGS
STREAM FLAGS ~
Stream Flags ~8
Wetland Flags ~36
Total Flags ~44
�
^- ^
^, ~
`
mm1-13
` '
SA 1-5
� op-1 0)
Site Boundary
Pond
Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
Wetland
Flag Number
Data Point
Culvert
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP WERE VERIFIED BY MR. DAV0 BAILEY WITH THE USA[E ON NOVEMBER 21, 2019
AND MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDEQ-DWR ON NOVEMBER 26, 2019. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED OR GEOLOCATED.
Drawing 5.1
Satellite Imagery from ESR|
and Pilot Field Notes
Scale: 1"= 100'
Date:5.Z1.19
Revised 12.2.19
"'`"` ^°~'^"°°'"`^`,'°`
/
Wetland Map
George 8asonRoad
Approximate 147-AoreTract
Fvvepaonvi||e,A|arnanoeCounty, NC
Pilot Project 4748.1

LEGEND
BB
SA 1-5
DP-1 O
•
Site Boundary
Pond
Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
Wetland
Flag Number
Data Point
Culvert
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WETLAND FLAGS =
STREAM FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 2
Wetland Flags = 20
Total Flags = 22
V////////
V //////21
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP WERE VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID BAILEY WITH THE USACE ON NOVEMBER 21, 2019
AND MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDEQ-DWR ON NOVEMBER 26, 2019. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED OR GEOLOCATED.
Drawing 5.2
Satellite Imagery from ESRI
and Pilot Field Notes
Scale: 1" = 100'
Date: 5.21.19
Revised 12.2.19
PILOT E N V I R O \ M E N" A L, I N C
Wetland Map
George Bason Road
Approximate 147-Acre Tract
Swepsonville, Alamance County, NC
Pilot Project 4748.1

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Bradley Luckey, Pilot Environmental, Inc.
Post Office Box 128, Kernersville, North Carolina 27285
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, Quarry Hills, SAW 2019-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The site is a former golf course located north of
George Bason Road in Swepsonville, Alamance County, NC. The site is proposed for residential development.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Alamance City: Swepsonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 36.031457° Long.: -79.360108°
Universal Transverse Mercator: WGS 84
Name of nearest waterbody: Haw River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non -resource
wetland waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
"may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
ISF
36.032940
-79.355084
75 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Intermittent Stream)
Section 404
ISH1
36.031819
-79.358052
35 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Intermittent Stream)
Section 404
ISH2
36.031347
-79.357563
40 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Intermittent Stream)
Section 404
SA1
36.033992
-79.352659
45 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Intermittent Stream)
Section 404
SA2
36.034758
-79.353917
85 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Intermittent Stream)
Section 404
Haw River
36.033807
-79.366289
2,680 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)
Section 404
SB
36.035031
-79.355749
320 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)
Section 404
SC
36.033996
-79.357864
100 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)
Section 404
SD1
36.034208
-79.363899
10 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)
Section 404
SD2
36.033873
-79.364245
270 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)
Section 404
SD3
36.033717
-79.364968
120 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)
Section 404

SD4
36.033740
-79.365492
145 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)
Section 404
SE
36.032603
-79.365399
700 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)
Section 404
SH
36.033039
-79.359377
90 LF
Non Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)
Section 404
PC
36.034084
-79.360678
9.49 ac.
Non Wetland Water
(Pond)
Section 404
PF
36.031564
-79.364256
0.37 ac.
Non Wetland Water
(Pond)
Section 404
PG
36.030792
-79.366180
2.4 ac.
Non Wetland Water
(Pond)
Section 404
WD 1-13/
WDA 1-12
36.033780
-79.364286
0.315 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
WD 14-18/
WDA 13-18
36.033710
-79.364980
0.072 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
WF 1-15
36.031225
-79.364073
0.059 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
WH 1-7
36.032040
-79.358525
0.023 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
WP 1-3
36.034125
-79.358391
0.037 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
WP 4-6
36.033994
-79.358192
0.021 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
WPA 1-20
36.034501
-79.353435
0.505 ac.
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AID) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD fmds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name• Drawing 1/1"=2,000'/Burlington, NC (1980) and
Mebane, NC (1969)
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Drawing 2/Web Soil Map & Drawing
2A/Published Soil Map
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name • Drawing 3/NWI Map
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: Drawing 4/FEMA FIRM
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Drawing 5/Wetland Map (2018)
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
/-7
December 2, 2019
Signaturand date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
10 Permit
a Section 404 Permit ❑ Section
lb. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes a No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
I1 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes I1 No
❑ Yes a No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
a Yes ❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer lh
below.
❑ Yes a No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Quarry Hills
2b. County:
Alamance
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Swepsonville
2d. Subdivision name:
Quarry Hills
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Quandry Lake, LP
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3588-167
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Eric Dischinger
3d. Street address:
600 Market Street, Suite 200
3e. City, state, zip:
Chapel HIII, NC 27516
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent // Other, specify: Developer
4b. Name:
Mr. Eric Dischinger
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Desco GC Invest, LLC
4d. Street address:
600 Market Street, Suite 200
4e. City, state, zip:
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8893312052
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.03146 Longitude: 79.36010
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
lc. Property size:
147 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Haw River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of an adbandoned golf course and Phase I of Quarry Hills subdivision. The remainder of the site
contains wooded land, overgrown fairways and fields. Residential and commercial development is located on nearby
properties.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland = 0.75 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams = 4,715 LF. Ponds = 9.86 ac
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct Phase II of the Quarry Hills single family residential neighborhood.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project includes the construction of Phase II of the Quarry Hills single-family residential neighborhood. In
order to provide access to the sub -division, it is necessary to have a stream crossing. To facilitate the construction of the
access road and development of the site, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and
other heavy equipment will be used during grading and construction of the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: SAW-2019-02210
0 Yes ❑ No Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
0 Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Michael Brame/Bradley Luckey
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW-2019*02210
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
SAW-2019-02210 dated 2.21.20 and NCDWR 202000024 401 WQC Dated 4.13.20 for Phase I of Quarry Hills
subdivision resulted in the net loss of 0.243 ac of wetlands and 41 linear feet (164 SF) of permanent stream impact.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
SAW-2019-02210 dated 2.21.20 and NCDWR 202000024 401 WQC Dated 4.13.20 for Phase I of Quarry Hills
subdivision resulted in the net loss of 0.243 ac of wetlands and 41 linear feet (164 SF) of permanent stream impact. The
cumulative impact analysis for future phases remains consistent with applicant provided information dated January 22,
2020.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections
❑ Wetlands
❑ Open Waters
were completed below
for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Buffers
Construction
0 Streams - tributaries
❑ Pond
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non-404, other)
2f.
Area of impact
(acres)
W1 ❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
Corps
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
Corps
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
Corps
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
Yes
❑ No
Corps❑
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
Yes
❑ No
Corps❑
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
Yes
❑ No
Corps❑
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Wetland Impacts are not proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non-404,
other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
Road Fill/Rip-0PER
Rap/De-watering
Unnamed
0Corps
Variable
86/52/8
S1 O P O T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
0 PER
0 Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑P❑T
PER
❑ INT
Corps
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
PER
❑ INT
Corps❑
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑P❑T
PER
❑ INT
Corps
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑P❑T
PER
❑ INT
Corps
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
86/52/8
3i. Comments: Impact 1 consists of the permanent impact to 86 linear feet (412SF) of stream channel associated with
road/culvert/wall fill and the permanent impact to 52 linear feet (180 SF) of stream channel associated with rip -rap energy
dissipaters. The rip -rap dissipaters are proposed to be keyed into preconstruction stream bed elevations to not result in net
loss impact. Additionally, it is necessary to temporarily impact 8 linear feet of stream channel associated with de -watering.
Temporary impacts to the stream channel will be restored to similar pre -construction grade for bed and banks, matted with
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

natural fiber materials and stabilized with native herbaceous seed mix.
Stream mitigation is not proposed for impacts to streams.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 P T
03 ❑P❑T
04 P T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
a Other: Jordan
6b.
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason
for
impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
RoaB1
C ossidng
Unnamed
Nos
4,454
1,700
a ❑ T
B2 ❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
4,454
1,700
6i. Comments: Impact 1 will permanently impact 4,454 SF of Zone 1 buffer and 1,700 SF of Zone 2 buffer from the road
crossing.
Buffer mitigation is not proposed for impacts to buffers.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the remaining portions of Phase II to avoid other impacts to streams and wetlands. The stream
crossing is located in an area of an existing culvert that previously impacted 12 linear feet (67SF) of stream channel. The
proposed stream crossing has been designed to cross the stream in a relative straight area that is free of meanders and
absent of wetlands.
There are approximately 4,674 linear feet of stream channel, 0.50 acres of wetlands and 12.26 acres of ponds located on the
site. The ponds, wetlands and remaining 4,536 linear feet of stream channel are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and sediment erosion control devices will be used. Temporary coffer dams will be installed
upgradient of the proposed road crossings. During construction, water will be pumped around the construction footprints.
Appropriate stream bank protection will be provided in the channel during road construction and all excess excavated material
will be immediately removed from the stream bank/road crossing area. Upon completion of the culvert installation, the
temporary sand bag coffer dam will be removed and flow will be diverted through the culvert. Following culvert installation,
disturbed banks will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions, matted and seeded/live staked.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes
// No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments: Mitigaiton is not proposed.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Buffer mitigation is not proposed.
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
a Yes ❑ No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The site has been designed in accordance with Swepsonville
stormwater requirements.
❑ Yes a No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
cyo
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
a Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The site has been designed in accordance with Swepsonville stormwater requirements.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
// Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Swepsonville
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
// Phase II
a NSW
❑ USMP
a Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes 0 No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes 4 No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
Yes // No
lb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑ Yes 0 No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑ Yes /1 No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes /1 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes 0 No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from the proposed subdivision will be discharged into existing sanitary sewer lines near the site.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
Yes
// No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
Yes
/1 No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
IPaC does not identify potential federal protected species within the assumed Project Area. A copy of the IPaC is
included as an attachment Therefore, we have made the determination the proposed project will have no effect to
federally protected species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. The
stream that is being impacted is intermittent and was dry during our site visits. Fish habitat is not present. Best management
practices will prevent sediment from entering down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes //
No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) to identify historic and/or archaeological resources of the site.
The map does not identify eligible for listing properties at the site or on properties in immediate vicinity of the site. A copy
of the map is included as an attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes 0 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM (Drawing 4, previously provided)
a
Bradley S. Luckey
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Digitally signed by Bradley Luckey
DN: cn=Bradley Luckey, o=Pilot
Bradley
Enviromental, Inc., ou,
email=[e-mail],
Luckey Date:12022.06.21 17:48:52-04'00'
6.21.22
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page llof11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

VICINITY MAP
PROJECT PRE:
QUARRY HILLS SUBD. PH. 2
2220 GEORGE BASON ROAD
SWEPSONVILLE, ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DEVELOPER: DESCO V C INVEST, LLC
DESCO
MARKET STREET, SUITE 206
CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA 27516
CONTACT: ERIC DISCHINGER
CELL PHONE: [phone]
vans
ngineering, Inc.
-Suvuce 1974 -
6mglmeeP. Suave,. Maulers
4605 Ommdm. mmuve OTeemdFmc, NC 27407
09mwe 336.S54S877 Fax 336.S54.8876
PROJECT:33n.,P 'DESIGN BD ADE DRAWN BD DNS
NG
v
SHEET DESCRIPTION
OVERALL SITE
IMPACT MAP
SCALE: 4"=100'
APRIIE 44, PAOPP
REVISIONS: MAY 25, 2022
SHEEP NO.:
1
3

\ ��
V �`
-- \�� �\ v�� V A� \� \)))\I �� ��� vim_— - —— '\ �� ���
61.
\ / / % i\ V A_ —� O' CAI E / V A ora lY
..\____/ / /\ / / 12 \ l A ti-5ao j EASEMENT P.B. 21 P 29 1 \ \V�1
/ r, / 7 ,_
„. - ,______, ___ \ , , \ ,A \ y \ \ ___ NV o.�
_ Z7 /� \ 1� \�
1_EMPORARY &
20' U ILITY — —
-ASEMENT B. 21 PG. 29
\ V / \ V I'1
PERMANENT STREAM
& BUFFER IMPACTS
i �� U...
�/ ��
'
— — / Q,p� v
/ % �\ / V / j
Y �/ / l /
-------
J /� ��
A /.\ \
-A
�\
_
\ \ I r
��� �
\ \ /� s� 526.73' / �V /�
V v 524n1
- — -- k•-,:i)-(` 77- [ I // /
P 8 71 PG MS 86
\ \ \ / SJ \ / I
-2,7. .....M......... -,,,, \,, --__ .7 / )
`��1��� L� ���� —�\
•
V \
•
\< N N \
\ / , C\ /---- 01-- — '- \ ZZ \
N ( ----/ /1— 133\ t.'-11 N 11-1' .1', \
/ I 1 / \ \ \ \ 9 N
c. \
PROJECT PRE:
QUARRY HILLS SUBD. PH. 2
2220 GEORGE BASON ROAD
SWEPSONVILLE, ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1,,,,,,
DEVELOPER: DESCO GC INVEST, LLC
600 MARKET STREET, SUITE 206
CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA 27516
CONTACT: ERIC DISCHINGER
CELL PHONE: [phone]
,",l,
I�
A �% C Q r
-HE vans
•��
� , !4 1•
♦ q
• •
= : E A L = GRAPHIC SCALE
+ nngnnneerennng, Inc.
—Sowce 1974 —
��a•�Ve �eewm.Nc37�7
Marne 336.54 S877 Fax 336.54F8876
: 19773 c
'
ioEe,��aPAo� ioaAaP
05/25/22 c o0 o so 00 00 400
-9 \ F "�•
2SO ""..GI N « c��.O�
SHEET DESCRIPTION:
VERAMAP LL
PH IMPACTPHASE
,,**s
uozz
IID. %* ( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
RE'1SIONS:MAY 25, 2022
Soft TNm
2
3

PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT
FROM KEYED IN
RIP RAP
52LF/180SF
540
530
520
all AV m
r'
m rn;,It I
CLASS II RIP RAP
THICKNESS = 18" f
d50 = 12" , A \
D
OW
NS I
INV
REAM INVERT
OU
T=5
23.66
411
a
2
h.
h.
FD
66,A
T gC@� � o
UPSTREAM INVERT
INV IN=5
NOTE: RIP RAP TO BE INSTA ED 1'
LOWER THAN STREAM BED AND NOT
WHERE THERE IS EXISTING ROCK IN
BOTTOM OF THE CHANNEL
26.10
TO
THE
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
98 LF/ 479 SF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
MINUS 12 LF/67SF OF PREVIOUS STREAM
IMPACT = 86 LF/412 SF STREAM IMPACT
(EX. CMP TO BE REMOVED)
PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACTS:
ZONE 2 IMPACT = 1700 SF
ZONE 1 IMPACT = 4454 SF
TOTAL PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACTS = 6,154 SF
EX. CULVERT TO
BE REMOVED
12 LF/67 SF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT FOR CULVERT PUMP AROUND: 8 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT
SAND BAGS, #57 STONE &
HOSE FOR CULVERT
PUMP AROUND
(CHANNEL MUST BE
RESTORED TO EX.
CONDITION UPON
COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION)
=8 LF, 43 SF
INDICATES ZONE 1
BUFFER IMPACTS
INDICATES ZONE 2
BUFFER IMPACTS
II on I
///
mei
I I
■111�I
-40001
*mi
' /•40//
• ®10®//0®
�®®tWOOile00.
PIPE
PROPOS 0 PUMP
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
STREAM CROSSIN
RIP RAP
STONE
AROUND
PIPE INLET
STREA
ROW
SAND BAGS
PROPOSED
SILT FENCE
(TYR.)
TO
PUMP
OW -
PROPOSED
SILT FENCE
(TV.)
CLASS
RIP RAP
DISTURBANCE UNITS
PLAN
TOP OF
enrvK
MN. PUMP
PUMP
STREAM
FLOW
EX. INV. /I
CREEK
REMOVE ENOUGH SANDBAGS TO ALLOW FLOW
THROUGH WHEN NOT PUMPING AROUND.
TEMPORARY
STONE DAM
POLTEIH ENE FABRIC ON
FACE (8 ML. THICK)
SECTION A —A
TEMPORARY "CULVERT CROSSING — PUMP AROUND"
FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
MOWS.
1) EROSION STONE TO BE "CLASS I' RIP —RAP UNLESS DESIGNATED DIFFERENTLY ON
CONSTRUCTION PLAN.
2) PUMP AND UNE SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR USING THE BASE FLOW
SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS
3) MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
SANDBAGS: SANDBAGS SHALL CONSIST OF MATERIALS WHICH ARE RESISTANT TO
ULTRAMOLET RADIATION, TEARING AND PUNCTURE, AND WOVEN TIGHTLY ENOUGH TO
PREVENT LEAKAGE OF FILL MATERIAL (i.e. SAND, FINE GRAVEL, ETC.)
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR CULVERT CROSSING —PUMP AROUND
I) INSTALL PUMP AND UNE TO PUMP FLOW FROM AREA UPSTREAM OF TEMPORARY
STREAM CROSSING TO AREA DOWNSTREAM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. BEGIN PUMPING AND
CONTINUING PUMPING WHILE WORKING WITHIN THE STREAM.
2) INSTALL DOWNSTREAM TEMPORARY STONE DAM AND FILTER FABRIC TO PREVENT
BACKFLOW INTO CONSTRUCTION AREA.
3) INSTALL PROPOSED SILT FENCE ALONG TOP OF BANK EACH SIDE OF THE
CONSTRUCTION AREA.
4) UPON CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION, REMOVE TEMPORARY DAMS, FILTER FABRIC.
DEPRESS TEMPORARY DAM BOTTOMS INTO STREAM BED UNTIL TOP OF RIP RAP IS LEVEL
WITH STREAM BOTTOM.
5) UPON STABIUZATION OF CLEARED AREAS, REMOVE TEMPORARY EARTH BERM, SEDIMENT
TRAP, AND DEWATERING BASIN.
BLOWUP SCALE: 1"=10'
t'I' 11111►,4
q
QEAL :
\\
\05/25/22 '
V ,
CA
0
20 40
B0
1 inch =40ft.
PROJECT TITLE:
QUARRY HILLS SUBD. PH. 2
2220 GEORGE BASON ROAD
SWEPSONVILLE, ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DEVELOPER: DESCO V C INVEST, LLC
600 MARKET STREET, SUITE 206
CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA 27516
CONTACT: ERIC DISCHINGER
CELL PHONE: [phone]
vans
ngineering, Inc.
-Sauce 4974 -
Eu®ueevs Suave,cu's Maulers
4609 Ommuilms N4tive OTeemthmc, NC P7407
ft% 336.S54S877 Fax 336.S54.8876
PRO,ECT:330,50 'DESIGN BY. At DRAWN BY: JIAR
NG
SHEET DESCRIPTION:
PERMANENT STREAM AND
BUFFER IMPACT MAP
SCALE: 4"=40' ARIR00. 44, POPP
REVISIONS:MAY 25, 2022
SHEEP NO.:
3
3

• .y
' l .
•
fit" I t' .
4
42)1
y