20190922 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20220218

1111.111.11111M11.11 —
•
MONITORING YEAR 1 YADKIN VALLEY UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE
ANNUAL REPORT Wilkes County, NC
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
NCDWR#20190922 v1
Data Collection Period: March—December 2021
Draft Submission Date: February 18, 2022
PREPARED FOR:
North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT)
Project Manager: Mr. Steve Kichefski
US Army Corps of Engineers—Wilmington District
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28806-5006

MONITORING YEAR 1 ANNUAL REPORT
YADKIN VALLEY UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE
Wilkes County, NC
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
NCDWR#20190922 v1
PREPARED BY:
04/161
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

WILD LANDS
ENGINEERING
February 18, 2022
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Attention: Steve Kichefski
Subject: Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Wildlands Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank—Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Third Credit Release (Monitoring Year 1 Completion)
Dear Mr. Kichefski:
This correspondence is in reference to the Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site, part of the Wildlands Yadkin Valley
Umbrella Mitigation Bank.The 72.46-acre site is in the Upper Yadkin Watershed of the Upper Pee Dee River
Basin (03040101) and is located 7 miles east of Wilkesboro in southeast Wilkes County, North Carolina.The
purpose of this letter is to request the third release of credits (Year 1 Monitoring Complete) for this mitigation
site.
Monitoring year 1 (MY1) site assessments were conducted between March 2021 and December 2021. Overall,
the Site has met the required stream,vegetation, and hydrology success criteria for MY1.The project streams
are in good condition and functioning as intended. Per IRT request, several areas of stream work were
completed during MY1 as well as the retrofit of select internal culvert crossings. The work performed is detailed
in Section 1.2 of the MY1 report. At least one bankfull event has been documented on 25%of the project
reaches since the completion of construction. Vegetation assessments indicated an average planted stem
density of 450 stems per acre and the Site is on track to meet the MY3 requirement of 320 stems per acre.While
over 99%of the Site is free of invasive species, a few small populations of invasive plant species were identified
in 2021 and will continue to be monitored and treated as needed in MY2. Localized easement encroachments
were identified in spring of 2021 and resolved in summer and fall of 2021.
Pursuant to the Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument and the site-specific Critcher Brothers Final Mitigation
Plan, successful completion of monitoring year 1 activities and demonstration that interim performance
standards are being met for all parcels within the bank grants ten percent (10%) of the mitigation site's total
stream restoration and enhancement credits be available for sale. There was one small change in restoration
level approved by the IRT since the MVO credit release. Per IRT request, 50 feet of Magnolia Tributary was
changed from Preservation to Enhancement II. With those changes accounted for,we are requesting 2,009.54
stream mitigation units (SMUs) be released. With this release 40%of the total stream restoration and
enhancement credits and 100%of the total stream preservation credits will have been released.
Please contact us at 704-332-7754 if you have any questions.
Thank you, cy a
akcIA
Andrea Eckardt Emily Reinicker, PE, CFM
Bank Manager Project Manager
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. • phone [phone] South Mint Street Suite 104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule
Project Name: Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank:Critcher Brothers Site County: Wilkes County
Sponsor Name: Wildlands Holdings IV,LLC 8-Digit HUC: 03040101
USACE Action ID: SAW-2017-01913 Year Project Instituted: 10/17/2019
NCDWQ Action ID: 20190922 vl Date Prepared: 2/18/2022
Total Potential Credits
Stream Credits Forested Wetland Credits Non-Forested
Wetland Credits
Credit Classification Riparian
Warm Cold
Cool Water Riparian Riverine Non- Non-Riparian Coastal
Water Water
Riverine
Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan 20,762.00
Potential Credits from As-Built Survey 20,591.73
Current and Future Credit Releases
Stream Credits Forested Wetland Credits Non-Forested Projected Actual
Wetland Credits
Credit Release Milestone Release Release
Scheduled Warm Cold Riparian Riparian Scheduled
Releases Water Cool Water Water Scheduled Releases Riverine Non-Riverine Non-Riparian Releases Coastal Date Date
1(Bank/Site Establishment)''' 15% 3,548.65 15% 15% Feb-20 2/19/2020
2(Year 0/As-Built)3 15% 2,972.26 15% 15% May-21 5/21/2021
3(Year 1 Monitoring) 10% 2,009.54 10% 10% Mar-22
4(Year 2 Monitoring) 10% 2,010.21 10% 15% Mar-23
5(Year 3 Monitoring) 10% 2,010.21 15% 20% Mar-24
6(Year 4 Monitoring) 5% 1,005.11 5% 10% Mar-25
7(Year S Monitoring) 10% 2,010.21 15% 15% Mar-27
8(Year 6 Monitoring) 5% 1,005.11 5% NA NA Mar-28
9(Year 7 Monitoring) 10% 2,010.21 10% NA NA Mar-29
Stream Bankfull Standard 10% 2,010.21 NA NA NA NA NA NA Varies"
Total Credits Release to Date I I 6,520.910
Contingencies(if any):Original As Built Credit Total was 20,578.40 Cool Water Credits.100 feet changed from Preservation to Enhancement II after the MYO was approved.The new total
stream credits is above(20,591.73).Credit release 3 includes all adjustments needed from the previous two credit released. Projected Credit Releases 4-9 are based on the final credit total
20,591.73.
Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release Date
1-The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan.
2-The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank,which includes the following criteria:
1)Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USAGE;
2)Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3)Mitigation bank site must be secured;
4)Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5)Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6)404 permit verification for construction of the site,if required.
3-The second credit release is based on the credit totals from the as-built survey,and may differ slightly from the credit totals stated in the mitigation plan.
4-A 15%reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.

Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument: Critcher Brothers Site
Stream Credit Ledger
River Bas:n HUC -2 03040101
Yadkin VLayst
Date Last Updated: 02-18-2022
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Total Credits Released To Date: 6,520.910
HOLDINGS
W I LD LA N D S \,IV
Type
Jurisdiction
Date
Permittee
Credits
Permits
(SAW #)
Credit
Classification
Impact
HUC
Impact
Quantity
Total
Withdrawn
Available
Comments
SMU
2/19/2020
3,548.650
SAW-2017-01913
Cool stream
03040101
3,548.650
Initial release - Site establishment (15% restoration and enhancement credits and
100% preservation credits)
SMU
5/21/2021
2,972.260
SAW-2017-01913
Cool stream
03040101
6,520.910
As -built credit release (15% of restoration and enhancement credits)
6,520.910

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) implemented the Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site (Site) as part
of the Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank.The Site is located in Wilkes County, North Carolina
within the Yadkin River Basin Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040101.The Site was selected to provide
stream mitigation credits to compensate for permitted impacts to Waters of the United States within
the Yadkin River Basin 03040101 (Yadkin 01) service area.The project includes the restoration,
enhancement, and preservation of 27,938 linear feet(LF) of stream on South Fork Fishing Creek, West
Fork Fishing Creek, and 22 tributaries. At the time of as-built,the Site was determined to generate
20,578.400 cool stream mitigation units (SMUs). With additional enhancement II work completed on
Magnolia Tributary at the IRT's request,the net credits have increased by 13.333 SMU to a total of
20,591.733 SMU.The Site is protected by a 72-acre conservation easement spanning three parcels.
Cattle farming,timber harvesting and other agricultural activity in the Yadkin River Valley has negatively
impacted stream function throughout the basin. Major stream stressors to the Site included
concentrated agricultural runoff inputs, degraded instream habitat, active stream incision, bank erosion
and failure, and a lack of stabilizing streamside vegetation and bedform diversity.The effects of these
stressors resulted in degraded water quality and habitat throughout the Site compared to reference
conditions.The project approach focused on evaluating the existing functional condition, potential for
recovery, and need for intervention.
The project goals defined in the Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2019) were established with careful
consideration of 2009 Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration Priorities(RBRP)goals and objectives to
address stressors identified in the watershed.The established project goals included:
• Reducing pollutant inputs to streams including fecal coliform, nitrogen, and phosphorus;
• Reducing inputs of sediment into streams from eroding stream banks;
• Returning networks of streams to a stable form that is capable of supporting hydrologic,
biologic, and water quality functions;
• Raising local groundwater elevations and allow for more frequent overbank flows to reduce
shear stress on channels during larger flow events;
• Improving aquatic habitat in project streams;
• Creating and improving riparian habitats to provide a canopy to shade streams and reduce
thermal loadings,to create a source of woody inputs for streams,to reduce flood flow velocities
on the floodplain, and to improve long-term lateral stability of streams; and
• Ensuring that development and agricultural uses that would damage the site or reduce the
benefits of project are prevented.
The Site construction and as-built surveys were completed between April 2020 and February 2021.
Planting and baseline vegetation data collection occurred during February 2021. Monitoring Year(MY) 1
assessments and site visits were completed between October and December 2021 to assess the
conditions of the project.
Overall,the Site has met the required stream,vegetation, and hydrology success criteria for MY1.The
overall average planted stem density for the Site is 450 stems per acre and is on track to meet the MY3
requirement of 320 stems per acre. Geomorphic surveys indicate that cross-section bankfull dimensions
closely match the baseline monitoring with some minor adjustments, and streams are functioning as
intended. At least one bankfull event was documented on 25%of project reaches since the completion
of construction.The MY1 visual assessment identified a few areas of concern including small
populations of invasive plant species, isolated areas of low stem density and bank/floodplain scour.
WCritcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT

Adaptive management will be implemented as necessary throughout the seven-year monitoring period
to benefit the ecological health of the Site.
WCritcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT ii

CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND,AND ATTRIBUTES 1-1
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives 1-1
1.2 Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment 1-2
1.2.1 Vegetation Assessment 1-3
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern and Management Activity 1-3
1.2.3 Stream Assessment 1-4
1.2.4 Stream Hydrology Assessment 1-5
1.2.5 Stream Areas of Concern and Management Activity 1-5
1.3 Monitoring Year 1 Summary 1-6
Section 2: REFERENCES 2-1
WCritcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT iii

APPENDICES
Appendix 1 General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Project Component Map
Table 1 Mitigation Assets and Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contact Table
Table 4a-b Project Information and Attributes
Table 5a-f Monitoring Component Summary
Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data
Figures 3.0—3.7 Current Condition Plan View Maps (Key—Sheet 7)
Table 6A-GG Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 7 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Internal Crossing Culvert Photographs
Permanent and Mobile Vegetation Plot Photographs
Shaded Vegetation Plot Photograph
Areas of Concern Photographs
Resolved Easement Encroachment Photographs
Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table
Table 9a-c Planted,Total and Shaded Stem Counts
Appendix 4 Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a—10e Morphology and Hydraulic Summary(Dimensional Parameters-Cross-Section)
Cross-Section Plots
Reachwide Pebble Count Plots
Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data and Plots
Table 11 Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 12 Verification of Consecutive Flow Days
Crest Gage Plots
Stream Gage Plots
Monthly Rainfall Data
Appendix 6 Pebble Count Requirements
DMS Technical Workgroup Memo
IRT Project Manager Correspondence
Appendix 7 Agency Correspondence
As-Built/MY0 Credit Release Letter—May 21, 2021
IRT As-Built Site Walk Meeting Notes—March 23, 2021
IRT Action Item List Comment Response
Action Item List Photographs
MI' Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT iv

Section 1: PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES
The Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank(Bank) sites are located in Wilkes, Watauga, and Surry
Counties.The site described in this Annual Monitoring Report is the Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
(Site)which is located approximately 7 miles east of the Town of Wilkesboro in Wilkes County in the
Yadkin River Basin 14-digit hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03040101060060 and the North Carolina Division
of Water Resources (NCDWR) Sub-basin 03-07-01 (Figure 1).The Site is protected by a 72-acre
conservation easement spanning three parcels.
The main stem of the project, South Fork(SF) Fishing Creek,flows generally northwest through the
center of the Site and drains 3,942 acres of surrounding land. SF Fishing Creek has a gently sloped
alluvial valley that ranges from unconfined to moderately confined. Critcher Tributary,Antioch
Tributary, Chicken Tributary 1, Robin Hill Tributary, and Oak Tributary each have steep, confined valleys
that widen at the downstream end as the streams enter the floodplain of SF Fishing Creek. West Fork
(WF) Fishing Creek has a gently sloped alluvial valley with an unconfined floodplain. Magnolia Tributary,
Ironwood Tributary,Shew Ridge Tributary, and Timber Tributary have steep confined valleys that widen
as they enter the flatter receiving floodplain of WF Fishing Creek. WF Fishing Creek joins SF Fishing Creek
towards the downstream limits of the Site. Located within the Inner Piedmont lithotectonic belt of the
Piedmont physiographic province,the Site topography and relief are typical for the region (NCGS, 1985).
Generally,the project watershed is dominated by agricultural and forested land.
Prior to construction activities,the Site was used for livestock grazing, crop production, and maintained
as managed herbaceous cover or forested lands.Vegetation in project reaches with partially wooded
riparian buffers was largely overwhelmed by invasive species and cattle impacts. Cattle farming and lack
of well-established riparian buffers, associated with current and historical agricultural use, contributed
to major stream impairments across the Site including bank erosion,stream incision, excess fine
sediment and nutrient loading, and poor in-stream habitat. Pre-construction conditions are outlined in
Table 4 of Appendix 1.
The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team
(NC IRT) in July 2019. Construction activities were completed in February 2021 by Wildlands
Construction and Land Mechanic Designs. Kee Mapping and Surveying PA completed the as-built survey
in February 2021. Planting was completed in February 2021 by Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. Refer to
Appendix 1 for detailed project activity, history, contact information, and watershed/site background
information.
Directions and a map of the Site are provided in Figure 1 and project components are illustrated for the
Site in Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The Site is providing numerous ecological benefits within the Yadkin River Basin.The project goals were
established with careful consideration to address stressors that were identified in the RBRP (EEP, 2009).
Improvements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined below as project goals and
objectives.
MI' Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 1-1

Goals Objectives
Exclude cattle from streams and buffers by installing fencing around
Reduce pollutant inputs to streams conservation easements adjacent to cattle pastures and providing
including fecal coliform, nitrogen,and alternative water sources as necessary, or by removing cattle from
phosphorous. sites. Remove riparian buffer areas within conservation easement
from agricultural production.
Reconstruct stream channels with stable dimensions.Add bank
Reduce inputs of sediment into streams revetments and instream structures to protect restored/enhance
from eroding stream banks. streams.Capture agricultural erosion in BMP basins.Stabilize
eroding gully features.
Return networks of streams to a stable Construct stream channels that will maintain a stable pattern and
form that can support hydrologic, biologic, profile considering the hydrologic and sediment inputs to the
and water quality functions. system,the landscape setting,and the watershed conditions.
Raise local groundwater elevations and
allow for more frequent overbank flows. Reconstruct stream channels with appropriate bankfull dimensions
Reduce shear stress on channels during and depth relative to the existing floodplain.
larger flow events.
Improve aquatic habitat in project Install habitat features such as constructed riffles, cover logs,and
brush toe into restored/enhanced streams.Add woody materials to
streams.
channel beds.Construct pools of varying depth.
Create and improve riparian habitats.
Provide a canopy to shade streams and
reduce thermal loadings.Create a source
of woody inputs for streams. Reduce flood Plant native tree and understory species in riparian zone.
flow velocities on the floodplain and
improve long-term lateral stability of
streams.
Ensure that development and agricultural
uses that would damage the Site or Establish conservation easements on the Site.
reduce the benefits of project are
prevented.
1.2 Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring for MY1 was conducted between October and December 2021 to assess the
condition of the project.The stream,vegetation, and hydrologic success criteria for the Site follows the
approved success criteria presented in the Critcher Brothers Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2019).
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 1-2

1.2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Vegetation plot monitoring is being conducted in post-construction monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Permanent plots are monitored in accordance with the guidelines and procedures developed by the
Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008) and the 2016 USACE Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Guidance to assess the vegetation success.A total of 15 permanent vegetation plots
were established within the easement. All permanent plots were established as either a 10-meter by 10-
meter square plot or 5-meter by 20-meter rectangular plot. In addition, 10 mobile vegetation plots were
established in MY1 throughout the planted area to evaluate the random vegetation performance for the
Site. Mobile plots will be evaluated at varying locations in monitoring years 2, 3, 5, and 7. Mobile
vegetation plot assessments will document stem count, species, and height using a circular or 100-meter
square/rectangular plot.
The final vegetative performance standard will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the
planted riparian areas at the end of the required seven-year monitoring period.The interim measure of
vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of
MY3 and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of MYS. It should be noted that no single planted or
volunteer species shall comprise more than 50%of the total stem density within any plot at year three,
five, or seven. In NC mountain counties, planted trees must average 6 feet in height in each plot at the
end of MY5 and 8 feet in height at MY7. For both permanent and random plots, all woody stems,
including exotic and invasive species, should be counted. Supplemental plantings and volunteer plants
must be present for at least two growing seasons before counting toward performance standards for
monitoring years five and seven. Exotic/invasive species will not count toward success of performance
standards.
The MY1 vegetation survey was completed in October 2021, resulting in an average planted stem
density of 450 stems per acre for all monitored permanent and mobile vegetation plots.The Site is on
track to meet the interim MY3 requirement of 320 planted stems per acre, with 22 of 25 plots (88%)
individually exceeding this requirement with densities ranging from 40 to 769 stems per acre. Refer to
section 1.2.2 for further discussion about areas of low stem density represented by the vegetation plots
that are not meeting MY3 density requirements.
Per IRT request, an additional vegetation monitoring transect was established in a shaded area of SF
Fishing Reach 9.Visual assessment of this area resulted in 526 stems per acre. Survival rate of monitored
stems was approximately 97% in the permanent vegetation plots with tulip poplar(Liriodendron
tulipifera) and black cherry (Prunus serotina) exhibiting the highest mortality rates among planted
stems. Stems in permanent vegetation plots are thriving, with 80%of stems scoring a vigor of 3 or
greater indicating robust overall health and minimal stem damage.Approximately 3%of stems scored a
vigor of 2, indicating moderate damage is present. Roughly 14%of stems scored a vigor of 1 and may
not survive.This low vigor rating is likely due to suffocation from dense herbaceous vegetation, poor soil
conditions, storm damage, or other unknown factors. Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot
photographs and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern and Management Activity
MY1 visual assessments indicate that over 99%of the Site is free of invasive species. However, several
invasive populations of Chinese privet(Ligustrum sinense), tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), and
princess tree (Paulownia tomentosa) are still present within the conservation easement. Chinese privet
was the most prevalent and widespread invasive species seen on Site,with small, scattered patches
found in existing woody buffers on Robin Hill Tributary, West Fork Fishing Reaches 4, 5 and Timber
Tributary Reach 1. Occurrences of other invasive species on Site are localized,totaling less than 0.04
acres.Targeted invasive species treatments occurred four times in August and once in December of
Mile Monitoring
Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 1-3

2021, effectively treating multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) and forsythia (Forsythia intermedia) on Site.
These areas will continue to be monitored for re-sprouts in MY2.Any additional areas of invasive species
will be treated throughout the post-construction monitoring period as needed.
Several areas of low stem density,totaling 0.09 acres,were documented during the MY1 vegetation
data collection and visual assessment. Areas of low stem density are located along WF Fishing Creek
Reach 1, Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2, and Robin Hill Tributary Reach and are represented by mobile
vegetation plots 1, 2, and 5. Currently,these plots are not meeting interim MY3 density criteria and lack
volunteers of desired woody stem species. Dense herbaceous cover, particularly the cocklebur plant
(Xanthium strumarium), has outcompeted planted stems. Other areas of low stem density were
observed in isolated areas on SF Fishing Reach 3 and Reach 11 where storms stripped the floodplain of
topsoil. Since these areas of low stem density are small and isolated, bare root supplemental planting is
not warranted at this time. Poor soil conditions and moderate slopes on Critcher Tributary Reach 3 have
hindered the successful establishment of vegetation, resulting in persistent bare areas along this reach.
However, no gullies or rills have formed in these areas.Adaptive management activities, including bare
root supplemental planting and reseeding will occur in MY2 to address these bare areas.
During the MY1 visual assessment, Wildlands noted localized easement encroachments on Site. In the
spring of 2021, logging occurred directly outside the easement which left several large brush piles near
the easement boundary west of SF Fishing Reach 9 and 10, south of WF Fishing Reach 4 and 5, and north
of Robin Hill Tributaries. Wildlands resolved these issues in the summer and fall of 2021 by moving
debris piles, installing silt fencing to help with erosion control, and installing additional signposts and
flagging to clarify easement boundaries.These areas will continue to be monitored closely in MY2.
Vegetation areas of concern are documented on Table 7 and shown on the Current Condition Plan View
(CCPV) Figures 3.0—3.7 in Appendix 2.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Riffle cross-sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area and width-to-depth ratio. Per NC IRT guidance, bank height ratios shall not exceed 1.2 and
entrenchment ratios shall be at least 1.4 for restored B-type channels and 2.2 for restored C-type
channels to be considered stable. All riffle cross-sections should fall within the parameters defined for
channels of the appropriate stream type. If any changes do occur,these changes will be evaluated to
assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a
vertically incising thalweg or eroding channel banks. Changes in the channel that indicate a movement
toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width-to-depth ratio in meandering
channels or an increase in pool depth. Remedial action would not be taken if channel changes indicate a
movement toward stability.
Morphological surveys for MY1 were conducted in December 2021. Cross-section survey results indicate
that channel dimensions are stable and functioning as designed on all restoration and enhancement I
reaches with minimal adjustments. All 49 cross-sections are stable,with bank height ratios at or near
1.0. Changes occurring within some cross-sections include slight variations in cross-sectional areas and
bankfull widths due to natural channel processes, such as vegetation growth along the banks.
Cross-section 17, located on Critcher Tributary Reach 3, exhibited an increase in pool depth. While this
increase in depth is just outside design parameters, increases in pool depth are beneficial for aquatic
habitat and are not indicative of instability.
Riffle cross-section 22 and pool cross-section 24 located on Critcher Tributary C and A respectively, both
exhibited a slight reduction in depth. Cross-section 22 has maintained other dimensions similar to
WCritcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 1-4

as-built.The max depth for pool cross-section 24 is shallower than design parameters for Critcher
Tributary A, but we expect the aggradational sediment to be mobilized in subsequent storms.
On Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2, cross-sections 47 and 48 exhibited a narrowing of riffles and a
decrease in max pool depth, however dimensions for both cross-sections are still within design
parameters for this reach. Some narrowing and reductions in depth are expected as sediment naturally
drops out at the valley break where the steep channel enters the flatter receiving floodplain of WF
Fishing Creek.
Riffle cross-section 12 along SF Fishing Creek Reach 10 exhibited isolated left bank scour resulting in a
moderate increase in width-to-depth ratio from as-built. Wildlands will continue to monitor this cross-
section for signs of accelerated instability. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual stability assessment tables,
CCPV Figures 3.0—3.3, and reference photographs, and Appendix 4 for the morphological tables and
plots.
Based on a DMS Technical Workgroup memo from 10/19/21 and concurrence received on 1/31/2022
from the IRT project manager for Critcher, pebble count collection is no longer required for the project
from MY1—MY7. Therefore, pebble counts will not be conducted during the remaining monitoring
years unless requested by the IRT or deemed necessary based on best professional judgement. A copy of
the DMS Technical Workgroup Memo and IRT project manager correspondence is located in Appendix 6.
1.2.4 Stream Hydrology Assessment
Twenty automated pressure transducers were installed on restoration and enhancement reaches across
the Site and are used to document stream hydrology throughout the seven-year monitoring period.
Sixteen gages are only documenting bankfull events and are referred to as "crest gages" (CG).The
remaining four gages document both baseflow and bankfull events and are referred to as "stream
gages" (SG).
Bankfull Events
At the end of the seven-year monitoring period,four or more bankfull flow events must have occurred
in separate years within the restoration and enhancement level I reaches. In MY1, at least 1 bankfull
event was recorded on 5 of 19 (26%) monitored project reaches.Therefore,the performance standard
for bankfull events has been partially met for 5 reaches (SF Fishing Creek Reach 10, Critcher Tributary C,
Critcher Tributary D, Robin Hill Tributary A, and Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2).
Baseflow Monitoring
During the seven-year monitoring period, consistent baseflow must be documented every year for at
least 30 consecutive days in low flow/intermittent channels that receive restoration or enhancement I
level approaches.Automated SGs were installed on the upper third of Critcher Tributary Reach 1,
Critcher Tributaries C and D, and Robin Hill Tributary A. In MY1, all low flow reaches exceeded the
success criteria for baseflow monitoring with streams ranging from 61 to 318 days of consecutive of
stream flow. Refer to Appendix 5 for hydrology summary data and plots.
1.2.5 Stream Areas of Concern and Management Activity
The MY1 visual assessment revealed that all reaches are stable and performing as intended with only
minor areas of concern along Antioch Tributary Reach 4, Robin Hill Tributary Reach 2,WF Fishing Reach
5, and SF Fishing Reaches 10 and 11. While depth and flow are still present, minor in-stream vegetation
was observed on SF Fishing Reach 9 causing some localized aggradation. However, overall channel form
and sediment conveyance have not been affected. Minor floodplain scour was observed on SF Fishing
Reach 11 (station 178+75) and Antioch Tributary Reach 4 (station 313+25) where stabilizing herbaceous
MI' Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 1-5

cover has not yet become established. On WF Fishing Reach 5 (station 727+50) and SF Fishing Reach 10
(at XS12),two isolated segments of bank scour received live stakes during MY1. On Robin Hill Tributary
Reach 2, one riffle at station 505+75 is experiencing some minor bed scour. Wildlands will continue to
monitor all areas of concern for signs of accelerated instability. If accelerated instability is observed,the
area will be addressed and evaluated for effectiveness in the MY2 report. Refer to Appendix 2 for
stream stability tables, area of concern photos, and CCPV Figures 3.0—3.7.
Per IRT request, several areas of stream work were completed during MY1. In May 2021,the last log sill
along Ironwood Tributary Reach 1 at station 1006+70 was replaced with a boulder sill for long term
stability. Additionally, bank grading was completed on approximately 75 feet of stream bank and privet
was treated on SF Fishing Creek just downstream of the culvert at the Reach 8/9 transition. Work
consisted of laying back the banks, seeding, and adding live stake fascines to the floodplain to stabilize
the bank and floodplain. On Magnolia Tributary, enhancement II level work was completed on the
downstream section of stream that was originally slated for preservation. Approximately 50 feet of
additional stream work and planting was completed to stabilize this segment of stream. Wildlands is
seeking additional credit for 50 feet of enhancement II level stream restoration at a 2.5:1 ratio totaling a
net credit gain of 13.333 credits. Refer to Table 1 in Appendix 1 for updated credit totals.
Per IRT request, several internal culvert crossings on Site were retrofitted to improve aquatic organism
passage. In May 2021 at the culverts located on Chicken Tributary Reach 2 and Antioch Tributary Reach
4, substrate was placed in the pipe bottoms and sills were set at the downstream end of the pipes to
maintain water and substrate within the culverts.The triple barrel culvert on WF Fishing Reach 4 was
replaced with a ford crossing to facilitate safe and sustainable aquatic organism passage.A photo log of
internal culvert crossings has been added to Appendix 2. Refer to Appendix 7 for documentation of the
IRT Action Item List and photographs of stream and culvert action items.
1.3 Monitoring Year 1 Summary
Overall,the Site has met the required stream,vegetation, and hydrology success criteria for MY1.The
overall average planted stem density for the Site is 450 stems per acre and is on track to meet the MY3
requirement of 320 stems per acre. Geomorphic surveys indicate that cross-section bankfull dimensions
closely match the baseline monitoring with some minor adjustments, and streams are functioning as
intended. At least one bankfull event was documented on 25%of project reaches since the completion
of construction.The MY1 visual assessment identified a few areas of concern including small
populations of invasive plant species, isolated areas of low stem density and bank/floodplain scour.
Adaptive management will be implemented as necessary throughout the seven-year monitoring period
to benefit the ecological health of the Site.
Mile Monitoring
Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 1-6

Section 2: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley,J., Harman, W.A.,Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, Cheryl C; Rawlins, C.L.; Potyondy,John P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites:An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen.Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D.,Wentworth,Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.2. Retrieved from: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
2.pdf
North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database (NCCRONOS).
2021. State Climate Office of North Carolina.Version 2.7.2. Station ID North Wilkesboro 5.5 SE, NC.
Accessed December 2021.
North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database (NCCRONOS).
2020. State Climate Office of North Carolina.Version 2.7.2. WETS Station ID North Wilkesboro, NC.
WETS Data Years 1991—2021.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR), 2015. Surface Water Classifications.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2009. Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Geological Survey(NCGS), 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina: North Carolina Survey,
General Geologic Map, scale 1:500,000. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc4
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996.Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wild land Hydrology Books.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-03: Minimum
Monitoring Requirements for Compensatory Mitigation Projects Involving the Restoration,
Establishment, and/or Enhancement of Aquatic Resources. Retrieved from
https://www.usace.army.mil/missions/civil-works/regulatory-program-and-permits/guidanceletters/
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), October 2016. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE,
NCDENR-DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc., 2019. Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. Charlotte, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc., 2021. Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Document and
As-Built Baseline Report. Charlotte, NC
Wildlands Engineering, Inc., 2021. Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site IRT As-Built Site Walk Meeting
Notes. Charlotte, NC.
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 2-1

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 2-2

cover has not yet become established. On WF Fishing Reach 5 (station 727+50) and SF Fishing Reach 10
(at XS12),two isolated segments of bank scour received live stakes during MY1. On Robin Hill Tributary
Reach 2, one riffle at station 505+75 is experiencing some minor bed scour. Wildlands will continue to
monitor all areas of concern for signs of accelerated instability. If accelerated instability is observed,the
area will be addressed and evaluated for effectiveness in the MY2 report. Refer to Appendix 2 for
stream stability tables, area of concern photos, and CCPV Figures 3.0—3.7.
Per IRT request, several areas of stream work were completed during MY1. In May 2021,the last log sill
along Ironwood Tributary Reach 1 at station 1006+70 was replaced with a boulder sill for long term
stability. Additionally, bank grading was completed on approximately 75 feet of stream bank and privet
was treated on SF Fishing Creek just downstream of the culvert at the Reach 8/9 transition. Work
consisted of laying back the banks, seeding, and adding live stake fascines to the floodplain to stabilize
the bank and floodplain. On Magnolia Tributary, enhancement II level work was completed on the
downstream section of stream that was originally slated for preservation. Approximately 50 feet of
additional stream work and planting was completed to stabilize this segment of stream. Wildlands is
seeking additional credit for 50 feet of enhancement II level stream restoration at a 2.5:1 ratio totaling a
net credit gain of 13.333 credits. Refer to Table 1 in Appendix 1 for updated credit totals.
Per IRT request, several internal culvert crossings on Site were retrofitted to improve aquatic organism
passage. In May 2021 at the culverts located on Chicken Tributary Reach 2 and Antioch Tributary Reach
4, substrate was placed in the pipe bottoms and sills were set at the downstream end of the pipes to
maintain water and substrate within the culverts.The triple barrel culvert on WF Fishing Reach 4 was
replaced with a ford crossing to facilitate safe and sustainable aquatic organism passage.A photo log of
internal culvert crossings has been added to Appendix 2. Refer to Appendix 7 for documentation of the
IRT Action Item List and photographs of stream and culvert action items.
1.3 Monitoring Year 1 Summary
Overall,the Site has met the required stream,vegetation, and hydrology success criteria for MY1.The
overall average planted stem density for the Site is 450 stems per acre and is on track to meet the MY3
requirement of 320 stems per acre. Geomorphic surveys indicate that cross-section bankfull dimensions
closely match the baseline monitoring with some minor adjustments, and streams are functioning as
intended. At least one bankfull event was documented on 25%of project reaches since the completion
of construction.The MY1 visual assessment identified a few areas of concern including small
populations of invasive plant species, isolated areas of low stem density and bank/floodplain scour.
Adaptive management will be implemented as necessary throughout the seven-year monitoring period
to benefit the ecological health of the Site.
Mile Monitoring
Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 1-6

Section 2: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley,J., Harman, W.A.,Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, Cheryl C; Rawlins, C.L.; Potyondy,John P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites:An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen.Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D.,Wentworth,Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.2. Retrieved from: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
2.pdf
North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database (NCCRONOS).
2021. State Climate Office of North Carolina.Version 2.7.2. Station ID North Wilkesboro 5.5 SE, NC.
Accessed December 2021.
North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database (NCCRONOS).
2020. State Climate Office of North Carolina.Version 2.7.2. WETS Station ID North Wilkesboro, NC.
WETS Data Years 1991—2021.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR), 2015. Surface Water Classifications.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2009. Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Geological Survey(NCGS), 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina: North Carolina Survey,
General Geologic Map, scale 1:500,000. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc4
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996.Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wild land Hydrology Books.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-03: Minimum
Monitoring Requirements for Compensatory Mitigation Projects Involving the Restoration,
Establishment, and/or Enhancement of Aquatic Resources. Retrieved from
https://www.usace.army.mil/missions/civil-works/regulatory-program-and-permits/guidanceletters/
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), October 2016. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE,
NCDENR-DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc., 2019. Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. Charlotte, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc., 2021. Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Document and
As-Built Baseline Report. Charlotte, NC
Wildlands Engineering, Inc., 2021. Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site IRT As-Built Site Walk Meeting
Notes. Charlotte, NC.
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report-DRAFT 2-1

APPENDIX 1. General Figures and Tables

J
.F.-
i / f
03040,.-_,.........---
f .,,mi,r. ,70,_.... :,,..-•-•-•-._.........,.•—r--- .---)
101050,10\
' .• I /I
sdx • -'--- --...0' #.' • ..i'''.
I J./ .• k.
F.) ,,,,,. ••
..../ •
( ._,,F./ •
/
\ \) 03040101060040 x,:s o \ 0. , Grosie eg,ptiskc'.
k I
• 1 cDtt,, 1 ,---
r • ......t. 4.------. ) • .---
•-.. —•.. \
-.' 9
1
"IS, .412144a .'-. II \
03040101 060050
N .-\
= Project Location
Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
/ ...., ......."'•"=".-,i
,.. /
• )
( 7/* • •..., (
I
1,1n q
••
.0.C'''P:'
4:1".••
I .,
-..*-- 1!
0304001060070
Briep
k
-...-_...., / ..
( .
••,,,::
1
i I
t
) \
t k1\ ...: ore
XI - nk,
•
03040101070010
•
:10304010 1 04-
)
•
• \\03040101 070040
1/
03040101060060
Speedway Fd
4spi„
lomek ,
./
...... •
I 1
•
/ •,— ,••*% /
l \ ./ \--i
I/
.1860 ft
ree
• ‘..
• •
)
/
• I ..-."-*
\ 03040102 003G
.-..„, •
.....,-,-,
.. ,.
Be, gt 00th
03040102020010 r „
•
Directions to Site:
From Charlotte: Head north on Interstate 77, take exit 73B to merge onto US-421 toward Wilkesboro.
Take exit 277 for Windy Gap Road/Speedway Road. Turn right to Speedway Road and continue for 0.2 miles.
Turn right onto Antioch Church Road and continue for approximately 0.8 miles.
Turn left onto the Site's farm road to arrive at the Site.
kikv"WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
0
1
2 Mile
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Wilkes County, NC

2018 Aerial Ph'
,WILDLANDS
\� ENGINEERING
0
i Conservation Easement
Project Parcels
Internal Crossing
Existing Wetlands
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Non -Project Stream
Not For Credit Stream
Reach Break
i . ,i ♦
I I K
sz-,. ,\i
♦ 1 t
1
1
O�
• •
•
1 ► YO — —• ---•-- Q ...i
► •i / \ .
e O ♦ 1 1
i i ♦ N,
o
600 1,200 Feet
,v/4
Figure 2 Project Component Map
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Wilkes County, NC

Table 1. Mitigation Assets and Components
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Project
Components
Project Area/Reach
Existing Footage
(LF) or Acreage
Mitigation Plan
Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Category
Restoration Level
Priority Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
As -Built Footage/
Acreage
Comments
SF Fishing Creek Reach 1
8,625
597
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
2.5
597
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 2
829
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
829
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 3
854
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
854
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 4
298
Cool
Enhancement 11
N/A
5.0
298
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 5
952
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
952
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 6
526
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
526
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 7
679
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
679
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 8
819
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
819
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 9
527
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
2.5
527
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 10
346
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
346
N/A
SF Fishing Creek Reach 11
1,092
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
1,092
N/A
Critcher Tributary Reach 1
2,099
207
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
207
N/A
Critcher Tributary Reach 2
266
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
266
N/A
Critcher Tributary Reach 3
1,155
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
1,155
N/A
Critcher Tributary Reach 4
424
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
424
N/A
CritcherTributaryA
817
886
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
886
N/A
CritcherTributaryC
120
117
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
117
N/A
Critcher Tributary D
106
132
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
132
N/A
Antioch Tributary Reach 1
1,738
185
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
2.5
185
N/A
Antioch Tributary Reach 2
518
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
518
N/A
Antioch Tributary Reach 3
606
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
606
N/A
Antioch Tributary Reach 4
385
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
385
N/A
Antioch Tributary A Reach 1
943
730
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
2.5
730
N/A
Antioch Tributary A Reach 2
136
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
101
N/A
Antioch Tributary Al
177
178
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
2.5
178
N/A
Antioch Tributary B Reach 1
867
448
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
2.5
448
N/A
Antioch Tributary B Reach 2
390
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
400
N/A
Antioch Tributary 131
440
443
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
2.5
443
N/A
Antioch Tributary C
113
122
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
2.5
122
N/A
Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 1
1,591
681
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
5.0
680
N/A
Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2
735
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
735
N/A
Chicken Tributary 1A
1,076
1,055
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
3.0
1,055
N/A
Robin Hill Tributary Reach 1
1,183
705
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
705
N/A
Robin Hill Tributary Reach 2
451
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
451
N/A
Robin Hill Tributary A
158
155
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
155
N/A
Robin Hill Tributary B
259
235
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
235
N/A
Oak Tributary
493
583
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
583
N/A
WF Fishing Creek Reach 1
3,443
723
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
723
N/A
WF Fishing Creek Reach 2
281
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
281
N/A
WF Fishing Creek Reach 3
600
Cool
Enhancement'
P1
1.5
600
N/A
WF Fishing Creek Reach 4
650
Cool
Enhancement'
P1
1.5
650
N/A
WF Fishing Creek Reach 5
695
Cool
Enhancement'
P1
1.5
695
N/A
Magnolia Tributary Reach 1
910
910
Cool
Preservation
N/A
7.5
758
MYO: Reach 1 was shortened by 102 LF.
Magnolia Tributary Reach 2
414
Cool
Enhancement II
N/A
2.5
315
MYO: Reach 2 was shortened by 149 LF and approach changed from El to Ell.
MY1: 50 LF of stream was changed from Preservation to Enhancement II.
Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 1
1,175
893
Cool
Preservation
N/A
7.5
893
N/A
Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2
310
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
310
N/A
Shew Ridge Tributary A
446
411
Cool
Preservation
N/A
7.5
345
N/A
Ironwood Tributary Reach 1
769
522
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
516
N/A
Ironwood Tributary Reach 2
210
Cool
Preservation
N/A
7.5
210
N/A
Timber Tributary Reach 1
2,184
1,296
Cool
Preservation
N/A
7.5
1,296
N/A
Timber Tributary Reach 2
821
Cool
Restoration
P1
1.0
821
N/A
Timber Tributary A
106
104
Cool
Preservation
N/A
7.5
104
N/A
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian
Wetland
Coastal Marsh
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riverine
Non-Riv
Restoration
N/A
16,840.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Re-establishment
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Rehabilitation
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement I
N/A
1,296.667
N/A
Enhancement II
N/A
1,965.467
N/A
Creation
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Preservation
N/A
489.600
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
N/A
20,591.733
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Activity or Report
Data Collection Complete
Com . letion or Delivery
404 Permit
October 2019
October 2019
Mitigation Plan
October 2017 - December 2018
July 2019
Final Design - Construction Plans
November 2019
November 2019
Construction
February 2021
February 2021
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project areal
February 2021
February 2021
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments
February 2021
February 2021
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
February 2021
February 2021
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
February 2021
March 2021
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey
December 2021
February 2022
Vegetation Survey
October 2021
Stream and Crossing Repairs
Summer 2021
Invasive Species Treatment
August, December 2021
Year 2 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 4 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 6 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 7 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Designers
Emily G. Reinicker, PE
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
704.332.7754
Construction Contractors
Wildlands Construction, LLC
312 West Millbrook Road
Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Land Mechanics Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
919.639.6132
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
PO Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resources
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Bare Roots
Live Stakes
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Herbaceous Plugs
Wetland Plants, Inc.
Monitoring Performers
Monitoring POC
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Kristi Suggs
704.332.7754 Ext. 110

Table 4a. Project Information and Attributes
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Project Information
Project Name
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Wilkes County
Project Area (acres)
72.46
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
36° 9' 52.70" N, 81° 2' 11.45" W
Planted Acrea:e (acres of wood stems slanted)'
59.2
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03040101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03040101060060
NCDWR Sub -basin
03-07-01
Project Drainage Area (acres)
3,942
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
2.3%
2011 NLCD Land Use Classification
60% forested, 35% managed herbaceous, 2% shrubland, <1% unmanaged herbaceous, 3% cultivated
Regulator Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
USACE Action ID SAW-2017-01913
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR # 19-0922 vl
Division of Land Quality (Erosion and Sediment Control)
Yes
Yes
NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit NCG010000
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Categorical Exclusion Document in Mitigation Plan
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Categorical Exclusion Document in Mitigation Plan
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
Wilkes County Floodplain Development Permit
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
1 Includes both open and shaded supplemental planting areas

Table 4b. Project Information and Attributes
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
SF Fishing Creek
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
R11
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
597
829
854
298
952
526
679
819
527
346
1,092
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Unconfined to moderately confined
Drainage area (acres)
947 1 1,082 I 1,178 I 1,632 I 1,651 I 1,690 I 1,734 1 3,942
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
P
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Class C
Morphological Description (stream type) - Pre -Restoration
-
C4
C4
-
F4
-
-
-
-
F4
F4
Morphological Description (stream type) - Post -Restoration
-
C4
C4
-
C4
C4
C4
C4
-
C4
C4
FEMA classification
Zone AE
Parameters
Critcher Tributary
Critcher Trib A
Critcher Trib C
Critcher Trib D
Antioch Tributary
R1
R2
R3
R4
R1
R2
R3
R4
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
207
266
1,155
424
886
117
132
185
518
606
385
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Confined
Confined to
unconfined
Confined to
unconfined
Confined
Confined
Confined
Confined to
unconfined
Drainage area (acres)
13
19 I 45
106
59
2
5
13 I 45
66
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
1
1 P
P
P
I
I I P
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Class C
Morphological Description (stream type) - Pre -Restoration
-
-
G4
G4
F4
F4
G4
-
-
F4
F4
Morphological Description (stream type) - Post -Restoration
A4
B4
B4c
C4
B4c
B3c
A3
-
A4
B4
C4
FEMA classification
None
Parameters
Antioch Trib A
Antioch Trib
Al
Antioch Trib B
Antioch Trib
81
Antioch Trib C
Chicken Tributary 1
Chicken
Tributary 1A
Oak Trib
R1
R2
R1
R2
R1
R2
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
730
101
178
448
400
443
122
680
735
1,055
583
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Confined
Confined
Confined
Confined
Confined
Confined
Confined
Moderately
confined
Confined
Confined to
unconfined
Drainage area (acres)
20
7
24
5
1
444
19
24
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
P
I, P
P
P
I
P
I, P
P
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Class C
Morphological Description (stream type) - Pre -Restoration
-
G4
-
-
F4b
-
-
-
B4c
-
-
Morphological Description (stream type) - Post -Restoration
-
B4
-
-
C4
-
-
-
C4
-
A4
FEMA classification
None
Parameters
Robin Hil Tributary
Robin Hill Trib
A
Robin Hill Trib
B
WF Fishing Creek
Magnolia Tributary
R1
R2
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R1
R2
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
705
451
155
235
723
281
600
650
695
808
265
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Confined
Confined to
unconfined
Confined
Confined
Unconfined
Confined
Moderately
confined
Drainage area (acres)
19
24
4
3
1,997 I 2,074 I 2,080 I 2,106 1 2,167
202
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
P
I, P
P
P
P
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Class C
Morphological Description (stream type) - Pre -Restoration
G4
G4
G4
G4
F4
F4
F4
F4
F4
-
G4
Morphological Description (stream type) - Post -Restoration
A4
C4
A3
A3
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
-
-
FEMA classification
None
Parameters
Shew Ridge Tributary
Shew Ridge
Trib A
Ironwood Tributary
Timber Tributary
Timber Trib A
R1
R2
R1
R2
R1
R2
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
893
310
345
516
210
1,296
821
104
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Confined
Confined to
unconfined
Confined
Confined
Confined
Confined
Confined to
unconfined
Confined
Drainage area (acres)
69
15
19
49
4
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
P
P
I,P P
P
1
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Class C
Morphological Description (stream type) - Pre -Restoration
-
G4
-
G4
-
-
G4
-
Morphological Description (stream type) - Post -Restoration
-
C4
-
B4
-
-
B4c/C4
-
FEMA classification
None

Table 5a. Monitoring Component Summary
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Parameter
Monitoring Feature
Quantity / Length by Reach
Frequency
Notes
SF Fishing Creek
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Reach 5
Reach 6
Reach 7
Reach 8
Reach 9
Reach 10
Reach 11
Dimension
Riffle Cross -Section
N/A
1
1
N/A
2
1
1
1
N/A
1
1
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
1
Pool Cross -Section
N/A
1
1
N/A
1
0
1
0
N/A
0
1
Pattern
Pattern
N/A
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Year 0
2
Profile
Longitudinal Profile
N/A
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Year 0
Substrate
Reach Wide (RW)
Pebble Count
N/A
1 RW
1 RW
N/A
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
N/A
1 RW
1 RW
Year 0
3
Hydrology
Crest Gage (CG) and
or/Stream Gage (SG)
N/A
1 CG
N/A
1 CG
N/A
1 CG
Semi -Annual
4
Vegetation
CVS Level 2/Mobile
plots
16 permanent plots, 10 mobile plots (Total for the Site)
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
5
Visual Assessment
Yes
Semi -Annual
Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation
Semi -Annual
6
Project Boundary
Semi -Annual
7
Reference Photos
Photographs
19
Annual
Notes:
1. Cross -sections were permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile was collected during as -built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate widespread lack of vertical stability (greater
than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling were collected during the baseline monitoring only. Pebble counts will not be conducted during the remaining monitoring years unless requested by the IRT or deemed necessary based on best
professional judgement.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be inspected and dowloaded quarlerly or semi-anually, evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible. Transducers, if used, will be set to record stage once every 2
hours. The transducer will be inspected and downloaded semi-annually.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted. 2% of the open planted acreage will be monitored with permanent plots and mobile plots. Permanent
vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document number of planted stems, height, and species using a circular or 100 meter square/rectangular
plot. Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

Table 5b. Monitoring Component Summary
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Parameter
Monitoring Feature
Quantity / Length by Reach
Frequency
Notes
Critcher Tributary
Critcher
Trib A
Critcher
Trib C
Critcher
Trib D
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Dimension
Riffle Cross -Section
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
1
Pool Cross -Section
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
Pattern
Pattern
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Year 0
2
Profile
Longitudinal Profile
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Year 0
Substrate
Reach Wide (RW)
Pebble Count
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
Year 0
3
Hydrology
Crest Gage (CG) and
or/Stream Gage (SG)
1 SG
1 CG
1 CG
1 SG
1SG
Semi -Annual
4
Vegetation
CVS Level 2/Mobile
plots
16 permanent plots, 10 mobile plots (Total fo the Site)
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
5
Visual Assessment
Yes
Semi -Annual
Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation
Semi -Annual
6
Project Boundary
Semi -Annual
7
Reference Photos
Photographs
12
Annual
Notes:
1. Cross -sections were permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile was collected during as -built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate
widespread lack of vertical stability (greater than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling were collected during the baseline monitoring only. Pebble counts will not be conducted during the remaining monitoring years unless requested by
the IRT or deemed necessary based on best professional judgement.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be inspected and dowloaded quarlerly or semi-anually, evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible. Transducers, if
used, will be set to record stage once every 2 hours. The transducer will be inspected and downloaded semi-annually.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted. 2% of the open planted acreage will be monitored with
permanent plots and mobile plots. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document
number of planted stems, height, and species using a circular or 100 meter square/rectangular plot. Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

Table 5c. Monitoring Component Summary
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Parameter
Monitoring Feature
Quantity / Length by Reach
Frequency
Notes
Antioch Tributary
Antioch Trib A
Antioch
Trib Al
Antioch Trib B
Antioch
Trib B1
Antioch
Trib C
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Dimension
Riffle Cross -Section
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
1
Pool Cross -Section
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
Pattern
Pattern
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
N/A
N/A
Yes
N/A
N/A
Year 0
2
Profile
Longitudinal Profile
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
N/A
N/A
Yes
N/A
N/A
Year 0
Substrate
Reach Wide (RW)
Pebble Count
N/A
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
N/A
1 RW
N/A
N/A
1 RW
N/A
N/A
Year 0
3
Hydrology
Crest Gage (CG) and
or/Stream Gage (SG)
N/A
1 CG
N/A
1 CG
N/A
N/A
1 CG
N/A
N/A
Semi -Annual
4
Vegetation
CVS Level 2/Mobile
plots
16 permanent plots, 10 mobile plots (Total for the Site)
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
5
Visual Assessment
Yes
Semi -Annual
Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation
Semi -Annual
6
Project Boundary
Semi -Annual
7
Reference Photos
Photographs
11
Annual
Notes:
1. Cross -sections were permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile was collected during as -built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate widespread lack of vertical stability (greater
than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling were collected during the baseline monitoring only. Pebble counts will not be conducted during the remaining monitoring years unless requested by the IRT or deemed necessary based on best
professional judgement.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be inspected and dowloaded quarlerly or semi-anually, evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible. Transducers, if used, will be set to record stage once every 2
hours. The transducer will be inspected and downloaded semi-annually.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted. 2% of the open planted acreage will be monitored with permanent plots and mobile plots. Permanent
vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document number of planted stems, height, and species using a circular or 100 meter square/rectangular
plot. Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

Table 5d. Monitoring Component Summary
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Parameter
Monitoring Feature
Quantity / Length by Reach
Frequency
Notes
Chicken Trib 1
Chicken
Trib 1A
Robin Hill Trib
Robin Hill
Trib A
Robin Hill
Trib B
Oak Trib
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Dimension
Riffle Cross -Section
N/A
2
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
1
Pool Cross -Section
N/A
1
N/A
1
0
0
0
0
Pattern
Pattern
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Year 0
2
Profile
Longitudinal Profile
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Year 0
Substrate
Reach Wide (RW)
Pebble Count
N/A
1 RW
N/A
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
Year 0
3
Hydrology
Crest Gage (CG) and
or/Stream Gage (SG)
N/A
1 CG
N/A
1 CG
1 SG
1 CG
1 CG
Semi -Annual
4
Vegetation
CVS Level 2/Mobile
plots
16 permanent plots, 10 mobile plots (Total for the S te)
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
5
Visual Assessment
Yes
Semi -Annual
Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation
Semi -Annual
6
Project Boundary
Semi -Annual
7
Reference Photos
Photographs
11
Annual
Notes:
1. Cross -sections were permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile was collected during as -built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate
widespread lack of vertical stability (greater than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling were collected during the baseline monitoring only. Pebble counts will not be conducted during the remaining monitoring years unless requested by the IRT or
deemed necessary based on best professional judgement.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be inspected and dowloaded quarlerly or semi-anually, evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible. Transducers, if used, will
be set to record stage once every 2 hours. The transducer will be inspected and downloaded semi-annually.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted. 2% of the open planted acreage will be monitored with permanent
plots and mobile plots. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document number of planted stems,
height, and species using a circular or 100 meter square/rectangular plot. Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

Table 5e. Monitoring Component Summary
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Parameter
Monitoring Feature
Quantity / Length by Reach
Frequency
Notes
WF Fishing Creek
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Reach 5
Dimension
Riffle Cross -Section
1
1
1
1
1
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
1
Pool Cross -Section
1
0
0
0
0
Pattern
Pattern
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Year 0
2
Profile
Longitudinal Profile
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Year 0
Substrate
Reach Wide (RW)
Pebble Count
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
Year 0
3
Hydrology
Crest Gage (CG) and
or/Stream Gage (SG)
1 CG
Semi -Annual
4
Vegetation
CVS Level 2/Mobile
plots
16 permanent plots, 10 mobile plots (Total for the Site)
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
5
Visual Assessment
Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation
Yes
Semi -Annual
Semi -Annual
Semi -Annual
Annual
6
7
Project Boundary
Reference Photos
Photographs
9
Notes:
1. Cross -sections were permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile was collected during as -built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate widespread lack of vertical
stability (greater than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling were collected during the baseline monitoring only. Pebble counts will not be conducted during the remaining monitoring years unless requested by the IRT or deemed necessary
based on best professional judgement.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be inspected and dowloaded quarlerly or semi-anually, evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible. Transducers, if used, will be set to record
stage once every 2 hours. The transducer will be inspected and downloaded semi-annually.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted. 2% of the open planted acreage will be monitored with permanent plots and mobile
plots. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document number of planted stems, height, and species using a circular
or 100 meter square/rectangular plot. Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

Table 5f. Monitoring Component Summary
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Parameter
Monitoring Feature
Quantity / Length by Reach
Frequency
Notes
Magnolia Trib
Shew Ridge Trib
Shew Ridge
Trib A
Ironwood Trib
Timber Trib
Timber
Trib A
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Dimension
Riffle Cross -Section
N/A
( N/A
N/A
1
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
1
N/A
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
1
Pool Cross -Section
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
1
N/A
Pattern
Pattern
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
N/A
N/A
Yes
N/A
Year 0
2
Profile
Longitudinal Profile
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
N/A
N/A
Yes
N/A
Year 0
Substrate
Reach Wide (RW)
Pebble Count
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 RW
N/A
1 RW
N/A
N/A
1 RW
N/A
Year 0
3
Hydrology
Crest Gage (CG) and
or/Stream Gage (SG)
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 CG
N/A
1 CG
N/A
N/A
1 CG
N/A
Semi -Annual
4
Vegetation
CVS Level 2/Mobile
plots
15 permanent plots, 10 mobile plots (Total for the Site)
Year 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
5
Visual Assessment
Yes
Semi -Annual
Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation
Semi -Annual
6
Project Boundary
Semi -Annual
7
Reference Photos
Photographs
13
Annual
Notes:
1. Cross -sections were permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile was collected during as -built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate widespread lack of vertical stability
(greater than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling were collected during the baseline monitoring only. Pebble counts will not be conducted during the remaining monitoring years unless requested by the IRT or deemed necessary based
on best professional judgement.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be inspected and dowloaded quarlerly or semi-anually, evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible. Transducers, if used, will be set to record stage once
every 2 hours. The transducer will be inspected and downloaded semi-annually.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted. 2% of the open planted acreage will be monitored with permanent plots and mobile plots.
Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document number of planted stems, height, and species using a circular or 100 meter
square/rectangular plot. Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

r6''i .a:
:Ms � � ::'` ; , __ , Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing x'
Existing Wetlands
Stream Restorationii,
Stream Enhancement I
• `I Stream Enhancement II
} I 1
re --. R. e; _ Stream Preservation
SD - rib ;fib tC11 9 Non-Project Stream
•
�b " II , �. Not For Credit Stream
, -:; i i/ Reach`1.. .. . .- 1 ! •„.•4 '� ,l. ' F ; + .,,r:_
BM P
1 O Reach Break
u i '` z ; I _ _. . .. , , ± Barotroll (BT)
Ii a �� • ._ Reach 2% Crest Gage(CG)
iReach 2 jO�
-1- .01t3IIIP° Stream Gage(SG)
1 ►
- 1
O' Reach 2. - 1 F i Photo Points(PP)
p Imo..
f9 ! ,
�.. % • u s - Cross-Section (XS)
�3 I `., Reach a __ .-, ;
y 1 `� �` - -�d' 3' !iQ �` e�,; jiiiii Vegetation Plot Conditions MY1
i�QI Q I a-Y''<`. O1 it •,� �e Criteria Met(Permanent)
1 p l / I 4;5 ` • I �r CG , n,
Q`- / .� b� '.' ,� 5r+ ;, j;� ;,4 C.� Criteria Met(Mobile)
Ghtfillg ! 1 a Reach 2 ;�'eP� r- >i�� •��.� - Criteria Not Met(Mobile)
1 o . . - , z Ste,.- 127321 99 ,
.
�,Q y o ♦ Q 9 ,Q; 1230490 ; -hot
'fie - . .A�� p ',,o
ANS
y
1 ` Aar• . ,
-. 4. . . . . :�� Rea h 2 ! \ / sheet-.
°; ,
/ .
/ I .•1 V I
o. . P >..
> tir, , , Q 9
/---• . / \; ,al Antioch r►b',: ♦•M } ntroc
.3 Gliell S / \./,,4 ', z.,,,
- - - -•-•`tea, ' �a '' �/ i Reach/3 .,,,* ,?.
�: ; ; era ��
�,d c n 1a
s
1 n e
-Spee -- •Sheet3; %Is Itt 'I 0 % 1"a::--.Gt
tlwa'y Rq ,eDco X i0 d♦ ? ,.
- 1 Reach 3 - 0
N - ? '
10
Dscell 9 i• ;
, ,' ' I%la Tr%` ••,'
i I s ; d
i
..I
a
z
c
ca
'018 Aerial • 2
Figure 3.0 Current Condition Plan View Map(Key)
Oki!Irv' W I L D L A N D S Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 600 1,200 Feet d41
I I I I USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Wilkes County, NC

r z, ' •, I-- i Conservation Easement
�:. � N Internal Crossing
-
' 1"`" , '' ' ' //� Existing Wetlands
=, Stream Restoration
• - — Stream Enhancement II
Non-Project Stream
' Not For Credit Stream
'',i PP20 . BMP
r `,1 ---- Top of Bank
s- PP26 _;' , \
5 C' Structure
'�'• 122CIAII a
Cross-Section(XS)
' _f a f Reach Break
4.,
GgS9
+ Barotroll(BT)
s'r + Crest Gage(CG)
`"; 4- Stream Gage(SG)
`Ile, Photo Points(PP)
o SG3 . L,
Vegetation Plot Conditions-MY1
gu r
I ] Criteria Met(Permanent)
Cr. ,:• I O Criteria Met(Mobile)
e, Vegetation Areas of Concern-MY1
Bare Area/Poor Herbaceous Cover
l
1WI
to
nl
it, ..
1,
li„.*j,
,
,),,,-,, , ,.,
@ }
a'
I� 11
1y
If
4
A.
iffe-
p p
fie.
.. _,
k
tip-- ',, PP29
•
0
111XS2O
*01 ,i PEAT)
(,--kiri, . . .
-' ," .,^ P1 �� FPS
I
---- • •''---0,•'‘ x ,_,,,,,
.i: . .-0.
I
cot
•
•
�i o
JP12 � °o
218+00 p0
. 2 + \ • 202+00 201+00 1�0
_ \ \ \ 00+170E 203+00 �,Yu
a
ks3 a ,
y. 2018 Aerial Photo p '
Figure 3.1 Current Condition Plan View Map(Sheet 1)
04 WI I L D L A N D S Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 150 300 Feet
I I I USACE Action ID No.SAW 2017 01913
I IMonitoring Year 1-2021
Wilkes County, NC

Reach_1.•
U
PP30 • • x t
�
J
Q
• S
PP36
k 7 _`
PP31 '.
.2 �' �`(� PP35
` bO
-
a' ` Antioch Trib B1
• G39 ,
, 4tir ' .
r., /4 -
' 'ems ' r-
p_ Conservation Easement
0 i i %
r�' Internal Crossing
,k; fit 'liei`xok
qh�i �XS? Existing Wetlands
rib 47 ;. - Stream Restoration
,` \ : Stream Enhancement II
PP32 Not For Credit Stream
ii):
Non-Project Stream
•V‘
' a,Q ' --- Design Alignment Deviation
-
* ~ ---- Top of Bank
" ( O Structure
I \. PP404
„Al; Q Cross-Section(XS)
Map-1Xsyd— ' •
Q Reach Break
/ U Crest Gage(CG)
l2202M P8 ,50 Photo Point(PP)
_, - • Vegetation Plot Conditions-MY1
,, G 4 , I-7 Criteria Met(Permanent)
,) C__� Criteria Met(Mobile)
Vegetation Areas of Concern-MY1
v, Low Stem Density i
/
Stream Areas of Concern-MY1
a 't • t .
PP7 p Q4 Erosion/Scour
1 `% * • I ,
Se
e;. .:, . , -
r, G3Q l; 1: 4
, „ .
_ .
lh 1 , � ,
VP
ik4, ‘:‘ .. g5 , ,
i P1 ....
_�
PP8 / ��
" ® 'kW �� �•`` PP4
x
,
Alt', P9; jgi
t�i
G3f3
PP9 "�
3 � •
t
Reach 6 ''
1.••::, 0 „ , •
•
PP10
Reach 2
0..
., i.53� 2018 Aerial Photography
Figure 3.2 Current Condition Plan View Map(Sheet 2)
iVely/W I L D L A N D S Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 175 350 Feet
i I USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Wilkes County, NC

I", - i
♦ 1 ' r
�; 4. •. �4PP13
CO'err
��7�.J' i3 i ( H0
1 ( i,
V 1
,.�������y8,p , �'- PP50 , 1
ti-�+�'- 1
s 6 ,1�'„ .•• XS10
,• ,X- - '� • , 1
alai] .. N( ,.' PP12:
• s •, 1 1t: '
1
A ,• • , 1
Robb ', '' •i y 1
V , %,, I
•` LZ
` — -�.M. `q.T % 1 is
LL
k ' 1 CO
its1
►
1
1 . ,.
....\,
r •j Conservation Easement ` 0`...�..
1 Y. � 'i
Internal Crossing I �`, ,•
V 7) Existing Wetlands • - _ '
- Stream Restoration `'S ' '' P6 `�
Stream Enhancement II • ' `
Non-Project Stream ' ' `�-, •• /` %,
Not For Credit Stream - • .',; PP10
•
- BMP r
1 ` ` 13
---• Top of Bank .,e j i �• �I '' ►
•
Structure i d i'.` '' ►
`— Cross-Section(XS) Yr. ; � ` % `..'.
- --r. I Reach Break ` / r
1 d
1 1 : e
+ Crest Gage(CG) 1, , , ,.. r '
K 1 E -
,
4, Stream Gage(SG) 1 a, 1 .•.
a, I I '•PP45
0 Photo Point(PP) :;. 1
1
Vegetation Plot Conditions-MY1 1 1
�� Criteria Met(Permanent) 1 ' 1
1 , 1
1
0 Criteria Met(Mobile) j 1
- Criteria Not Met(Mobile) 1
1 1
1
Vegetation Areas of Concern-MY1 `�" 1 le I1 �S
iiChinese Privet ' 1
1 : : Princess Tree _ '
;-; Low Stem Density ( et :'. 1
® Tree of Heaven .,�_:�--^ _ _ - \
Stream Areas of Concern-MY1 ' �P �,Xi
,,f,
- Erosion/Scour _, //' I`'
I ' ,),- „1 f�, ..-_
• r 1
Trib 1A �� i • ,
•i Chicken -. -?,c - 1
•
�1. '30+o0-; I
4zs+oo, 1
PP41 427+00, ..s
1„-. R23koo 1 1
1 `
1 1 1
., 1 1
1 1
i g 1
1 1
1 1
1
1 i
1 1
1
1 1
i ►
1 1
1 ►
1 , 1
1 , 1
;#41- i •
T,
- ' ? 201 , 11a1 Photograp,
Figure 3.3 Current Condition Plan View Map(Sheet 3)
W I L D L A N D S Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 175 350 Feet
L I I I I USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Wilkes County, NC

--' I
•'1 1
1 -s'- ,
1 '-.- i
1 -- I
1 - 1
--'' ,,
--•
--
•% 1
t
. •
. ,
k
_s,
•
I
•
•'h�� ,`•• III ' ''' ♦♦♦♦
� ; , , VI ♦♦`
•
♦ I ,
• •
,s,6�'9 , •.�E3 , %</— • 9
c •
�6. `. x� • - •
' / , --- ___ P fee
-
ifiiiii,,
. -
.,.....,„,.•- ..". ,04 ,
*. , • -
`.-- ,k,,,
' II
. .
. ...
..
..
„4:4
, . ,
. .T....,7 ,
..
• PP17, fa,. ♦♦
I i •. . ., 4* '® • ♦'I
I ,
,e'/gaol - -- ♦' ;___i Conservation Easement
Ghenll 90 /
,N ._ ... _ -- - -
y- eG7
_ - --- p qq Internal Crossing
P16 --- V/A Existing Wetlands
, I , . :-. ' - % Stream Restoration
i , I
, ' 1 Stream Enhancement I
1
, I 16 I 1 Stream Enhancement II
1 I I 1
1 ',® i
1 Non-Project Stream
I I
1 1
1 1 Not For Credit Stream
1 i
1 1 ---- Top of Bank
1 1
1 i
1 1 Structure
1 1
I I Cross-Section (XS)
i 1
i PP15 Q Reach Break
1 i
1 1 Crest Gage(CG)
1
G3fl1 1
i RTh Photo Point(PP)
1 1 • Shaded Vegetation Plot
1 , 1, i ,
1 , i
Vegetation Plot Conditions-MY1
I , 1
I
1 1 Criteria Met(Permanent)
1 , \1 O
`• Criteria Met(Mobile)
, 1
1 1
• 1 Vegetation Areas of Concern-MY1
. 1
.
1. Chinese Privet
.• 1
•
` Low Stem Density
�. •
Resolved CE Encroachment
i
i • Stream Areas of Concern-MY1
i
' •�` ` Erosion/Scour
• 1
— Aggradation
i
i' e �'
I',,' , •,
, .
PP14, ' 7 -
i 3C ' ' '`• ' ' I ,
i . - �C pek t,
i * %
.• ` ;• _ tom_ •` o i
i
i i -I
I G0 ti,p� ,A
r
y
I1 ,
I T
i• ' PP13 i - .r
i
,
' 2018 Aerial Photography
Figure 3.4 Current Condition Plan View Map(Sheet 4)
�/,W I L D L A N D S Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
\� ENGINEERING 0 125 250 Feet ,�/V��
I i I I I USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Wilkes County, NC

•
. • Q9
•.. co
i‘1 .:y,PP65
4,1
N ir�:' Q,: -_ - PP54 `
- ."'%14:1.• .,.;vr,„,c-• -"' is ,,.
i _ '
•
%
1 I -
•
1 1 1 ; rYF•`• '• mot.• `� `� '�•
I:fry g
•
x1, 1 1 n .,
• 1 y ! • , ..'
-At LI2m13)9 , , . s. V44. 1---:\ : ,- do"'',''. /,
1 1
• 1 N.
�, 1� 1 PP56 40 1
1 oh' 1 1 PP68
1 :1!\ ,,, 1 1 ' 11 1 1 1
1 :CG11 1 1 - ��
1
I E I4I3
1 1 ` 1 ChEklb g3 1 • 1
r, 1 1
`• ,' PP52/
5
,` ,, ' a I 1 1' 1
1?°' % 1 c • -• ° 1
1 I
.' 1el I
1
1 12 9
:1
11 ; 1 , 1 1
1 1 1 V9,�
1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 ! ' 1
1 1 1
1 !.4 1
1 /
1•
I
PP62 •
% laiiiIi
1 , 1 •. r
1 ..S 1
1 1
_ 1
1 ;_ • ' Conservation Easement it c 1/
1 i /
,1 . r . Internal Crossing '1 S.
1 "- o ��� Existing Wetlands �• wQ�� `•/
• s
�I Xoo -. , ,'. Stream Restoration •`•� ` ♦
/• o
i• 4`/ ' Stream Enhancement I �'
r,
o • A Stream Enhancement II
! `S% csp Stream Preservation
•
.. 44.. Non-Project Stream
•
•
•
• .l Not For Credit Stream
•
% i • ;. B M P
i ♦ },,t.
i' ; , b. �,, ., ---- Top of Bank
?' Structure
9 ---• Design Alignment Deviation
i '
/ I1
Cross-Section (XS)
1 1 0 Reach Break
1 1
'I . + Crest Gage(CG)
1
0 Photo Point(PP)
1 .
• ► Vegetation Plot Conditions-MY1
Criteria Met(Permanent) •
• - Criteria Not Met(Mobile)
up
o 0 Vegetation Areas of Concern-MY1
,
o- ►�!-"4 Chinese Privet ,,ff� ' -i fi„ ,
'' o ys.
0 1����� Low Stem Density Yy'jd, � h' ' '! r�/ ,��A ��
2018 Aerial Phography . " / ' "y; • '�
Figure 3.5 Monitoring Plan View Map(Sheet 5)
01111111111,11
WI LD LAND S Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
401ENGINEERING 0 125 250 Feet
4O1 I I i I USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Wilkes County, NC

N.
,„ -7,.._
• ♦
`_ _I Conservation Easement >> `. 1 ♦♦
#/ Internal Crossing ♦'•♦ ' ♦♦
1 u I
•
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I ,,• �/ ' •♦•♦
1
Stream Preservation `.• •
Not For Credit Stream `♦` _
---- TopofBank %♦
Structure ` c•
Cross Section(XS) ••• - --
•
Q Reach Break
99 �•! `, N,y
111
+ Crest Gage(CG)
Photo Point(PP) ! j�
Vegetation Plot Conditions-MY1 ti- .
! i
,* i
�� Criteria Met(Permanent) Y; ► ►
CD Criteria Met(Mobile) ' .` � ti ►
Vegetation Areas of Concern-MY1 • • .-` ''V' h .ti c, { t£ ty` �'� i 5 i
a ' 1 1•�Si11 4 ♦� 1 : ial 1 1
Chinese Privet �, 1 » ` •," ' \ I .. ) ,, �+�� •,f,-,, ` x ! PP60 v ,
•
�-1 Resolved CE Encroachment ›'Y3;+'` ,�� `�,_• ' - is-'IS • 11 ,z,. rI
Stream • ;
Erosion/Scour , we .V tp k ; s" + ► ; ' •
,�,'� . ' Qua 1 -. G) .,
'tt4st• - : •Z`t.'• - '‘' ";,N. ' --- . ,K• .: s .e)!'"k‘.-,:'-',,"'i 4, - .; ',,Pi. i A •,t,,2 '. .'.:.I ,t
„,4.;,,
•
=-* 4 ...,F id ► 1 ,r
;s it . _c' `•v- 't, ', .eT 1 AO
1 ��:�'
9
I
I
.. ry
��� 1e. } A, 1144174; I
ii1 I
' / I
.� I
f�•r:. PP59 I
el
0
•
tr
;: TT air- , , \`
--- 11,. bar rib ♦♦` �; ♦`•♦
-. c ` '. 0 '.'vii,,. •GEW.
. % 4 7::,'.*:/:1 6,:, ..L
•♦ 1 I
♦ 1 1
♦ I n , ♦
♦ 1 Y.,. ' ♦•
♦ I 1 ♦
♦ ♦
♦ ♦ •♦
Q 4 ♦ . '
♦ r
•
•♦♦ . I I
41 IIIII1111...
♦ v�,l
•
♦ -
♦ '. '
♦
♦ .
♦ `♦ ,
Reach 3 • ♦ .
r ♦♦ .
''018Aerial Photography
Figure 3.6 Current Condition Plan View Map(Sheet 6)
bikeNliy/W I L D L A N D S Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 100 200 Feet USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
I I I I I
Monitoring Year 1 2021
Wilkes County, NC

% ...�F - 7112+ 0.
113+0°rrtibelt' .t I �000X
6 oT -
i t
17 ' PP69 III cPO 109+00a v10+00 \111+p0
\. r
II� \ 1 0O Or
��IIIII tt:
0:2021g
Conservation Easement
r/Z1 Existing Wetlands
Stream Restoration
Stream Preservation
Non-Project Stream
Not For Credit Stream
---- Top of Bank
Structure
0 Reach Break k
Photo Point(PP)
G1 9
PP630,,
E3 ' ezt.
h
s� 904+ 9e rrib 1
G 00 t
00 '9 )? a . 00xs 3
• XFS6 OM 06
g54+00 0 0). 0oX —909+0�
0
X 906 PP64 -
000..
r
...
2018 Aerial Photography y \
Figure 3.7 Current Condition Plan View Map(Sheet 7)
A W I L D L A N D S Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 125 250 Feet
I I
I i I �\ USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Wilkes County, NC

Table 6A-B. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
SF Fishing Creek Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as As -built Footage
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
829
Assessed Bank Length
1,658
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
3
3
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
4
4
100%
SF Fishing Creek Reach 3
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
ajor Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
854
Assessed Bank Length
1,708
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
5
5
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%

Table 6C-D. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
SF Fishing Creek Reach 5
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
_.1__.1_As-built �ootage
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
l
952
Assessed Bank Length
1,904
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
3
3
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%
SF Fishing Creek Reach 6
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Number Stable, Total Number Amount of
ajor Channel Category ric in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
ME
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
526
Assessed Bank Length
1,052
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
1
1
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
4
4
100%

Table 6E-F. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
SF Fishing Creek Reach 7
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Number I total Number
Major Channel Category Stable, in
Performing as
As built
Intended �
Assessed
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
• % Stable,
Performing as
Intended
679
Stream Length
Assessed Bank Length
1,358
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
4
4
100%
SF Fishing Creek Reach 8
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
As -built Jii. Footage
Intended
ji
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
i.
819
Assessed Bank Length
1,638
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
5
5
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%

Table 6G-H. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
SF Fishing Creek Reach 10
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number
Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
rforming as As -built Footage
Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
346
Assessed Bank Length
692
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
6
99%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
6
99%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
1
1
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
2
2
100%
SF Fishing Creek Reach 11
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
ajor Chan el Catego
Number Total Number Amount of
tric Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
1,092
Assessed Bank Length
2,184
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
5
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
5
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
6
6
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%

Table 6I-J. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Critcher Tributary Reach 1
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number Amount of
in Unstable
As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
207
Assessed Bank Length
414
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
12
12
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
3
3
100%
Critcher Tributary Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
ajor Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable,
Metric in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
266
Assessed Bank Length
532
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
9
9
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
4
4
100%

Table 6K-L. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Critcher Tributary Reach 3
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Number Total Number
Major Channel Category Stable, in
Performing as
Intended As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footageill
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
1,155
Assessed Bank Length
2,310
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
29
29
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
18
18
100%
Critcher Tributary Reach 4
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
e nc
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable,
in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As-builtd `Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
424
Assessed Bank Length
848
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
5
5
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
5
5
100%

Table 6M-N. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Critcher Tributary A
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
886
Assessed Bank Length
1,772
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
18
18
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
13
13
100%
Critcher Tributary C
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
ajor Channel Categor
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
117
Assessed Bank Length
234
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
6
6
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
0
0
N/A

Table 60. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Critcher Tributary D
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
IIII Number Total Number Amount of
Major Channel Category Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
III
132
Assessed Bank Length
264
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
12
12
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
4
4
100%

Table 6P-Q. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Antioch Tributary Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number
Stable,
Performing
Intended
Total Number
in
As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
_
Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
518
Assessed
Assessed Bank Length
1,036
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
16
16
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
7
7
100%
Antioch Tributary Reach 3
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable,
ajor Channel Category -tric in Unstable
Performing
Intended As -built Footage
m
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
606
Assessed Bank Length
1,212
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
11
11
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%

Table 6R-S. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Antioch Tributary Reach 4
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing
` As -built Footage
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
385
Assessed Bank Length
770
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
6
99%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
6
99%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%
Antioch Tributary A Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
. r
Chan el Catego
is
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, 1 in Unstable
Performing
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable
Performing a
Intended
101
Assessed Bank Length
202
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
3
3
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
1
1
100%

Table 6T-U. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Antioch Tributary B Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number Amount of
in Unstable
As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
400
Assessed Bank Length
800
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
6
6
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%
Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category Metric Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
% Stable,
Performing as
Assessed Stream Length
735
Assessed Bank Length
1,470
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
2
2
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
9
9
100%

Table 6V-W. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Robin Hill Tributary Reach 1
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
705
Major Channel Category
Assessed Bank Length
1,410
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
17
17
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
0
0
N/A
Robin Hill Tributary Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
irNumber Stable, Total Number Amount of
Major Channel Category , e ric in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
erforming as
Intended
451
Assessed Bank Length
902
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
3
3
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%

Table 6X-Y. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Robin Hill Tributary A
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Number Total Number Amount of
Major Channel Category Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
155
Assessed Bank Length
310
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
0
0
N/A
Robin Hill Tributary B
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Number Total Number Amount of
ajor Channel Category Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
235
Assessed Bank Length
470
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
8
8
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
0
0
N/A

Table 6Z. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Oak Tributary
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
ajor annel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as As -built Footage
Intended
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
583
Assessed Bank Length
1,166
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
17
17
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
2
2
100%

Table 6AA-BB. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
WF Fishing Creek Reach 1
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
723
Assessed Bank Length
1,446
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
1
1
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%
WF Fishing Creek Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
ajor Chan el Catego
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
281
Assessed Bank Length
562
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
3
3
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
3
3
100%

Table 6CC-DD. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
WF Fishing Creek Reach 3
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
600
Assessed Bank Length
1,200
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
3
3
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
4
4
100%
WF Fishing Creek Reach 4
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
ajor Chan el Catego
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
650
Assessed Bank Length
1,300
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
2
2
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%

Table 6EE-FF. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
WF Fishing Creek Reach 5
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Major Channel Category
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
695
Assessed Bank Length
1,390
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
27
98%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
27
98%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
1
1
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
3
3
100%
Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
ajor Chan el Catego
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
310
Assessed Bank Length
620
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
5
5
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
2
2
100%

Table 6GG-HH. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Ironwood Tributary Reach 1
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Number Total Number Amount of
Major Channel Category Stable, in Unstable
Performing as
Intended As -built Footage
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
516
Assessed Bank Length
1,032
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
23
23
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
5
5
100%
Timber Tributary Reach 2
Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
Number Total Number Amount of
Stable, in Unstable
Assessed Stream Length
% Stable,
Performing as
821
Assessed Bank Length
1,642
Bank
Surface Scour/
Bare Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or surface scour.
0
100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping,
calving, or collapse.
0
100%
Totals:
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
11
11
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
does not exceed 15%.
6
6
100%

Table 7. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Planted Acreage
etation Category
Bare Areas
59.20
Definitions
Very limited cover of both woody and
herbaceous material.
Date of Assessment:
Mapping
Threshold (
0.10
12/15/2021
ombined
Acreage
0.35
% of Planted Acreage
1%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target
levels based on current MY stem count
criteria.
0.10
0.09
0%
Total
0.4
1%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates
Planted areas where average height is not
meeting current MY Performance Standard.
0.10
0
0%
Cumulative Total
0.4
1%
Easement Acreage
72.60 Date of Assessment: 12/15/2021
getation Category
Definitio
Invasives may occur outside of planted
areas and within the easement and will
therefore be calculated against the total
easement acreage. Include species with the
potential to directly outcompete native,
young, woody stems in the short-term or
community structure for existing
communities. Invasive species included in
summation above should be identified in
report summary.
Mappin=
Threshold (
% of Easement
Acreage
0%
• m • ine •
,crease
0.13
Invasive Areas of Concern
0.10
Easement Encroachment
Areas
Encroachment may be point, line, or
polygon. Encroachment to be mapped
consists of any violation of restrictions
specified in the conservation easement.
Common encroachments are mowing,
cattle access, vehicular access.
Encroachment has no threshold value as
will need to be addressed regardless of
impact area.
none
0 Encroachments Noted

Stream Photographs
MY1

`" f C ti +.. < x r 9 \ y•'t r;�;� F- 3� �T
,..;;;,4.744 , ...:. ,;,:.,, ,,v.t......_
C
t.,,.. F� ,,eric..,
i ,,, sC ,..s.
1 t,, .;it.,.
''' :ilk, :....,....,,,me ', , ....,....7.cww, ,....:
- RY l IM1 1''4. § _.-, _..-1'... h4 83' A1- sj. ��1 _ t
J' env R M Re. 4
rr � # x
Photo Point 1—SFFC Reach 1,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 1—SFFC Reach 1,view downstream (10/15/2021)
�, ,, ,.
;`. ,.
. .. ..
*" ` -
3 L.4. L e+ •rt"."` 11 ,i �3' , y47{ `
•
•
4..9."-4T , , Y , w9 i, - T .c^{si * ,:__ . - t x" 4 l a i•Z4 i" + -7.`+ , v A',,'r ,'r1' ` fird' �UC^ a - 1 � t
j .,a ;,, dq ,"modi a K' ,., `Fg;.
+ ti.. .
Photo Point 2—SFFC Reach 2,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 2—SFFC Reach 2,view downstream (10/15/2021)
z'ie'Y - -_ -'r`x+�... �1 - mil- ',.' .
Ilit
.'ma � '',^ a , ,".'. ,ey$- 1s <• ,€ - F Y •
rr
. trt r 1.-, xy3 y 4 .:t' a;4,4 x ' totv
_ aY- ",,„ .1 7 3� ,:t 1 ,
'-' $k ! A„ .f - .r AS ,, *a`'n Y` 1. =m' !- .F,,J' o _ '.
lt
%
o- "_.,1;.,:::.,,,:,..„. 7 f �' q . .i' e G+ ,.1,$:'> � i a Ik: oFx . .r� _
r. - - o ,t ,,, . - a g`'"�- � 'mot^"- y ear y::, is { ai,-
*Kj v a .��� �� Abe 4wsir Pu
r.
r x r74-1.4,-J.: d _ ._ p� ,dyad�•',15. .'{'�,E �,;r a 1,,.---. " Y . Sf d "1} s& 'YirF �1 vl ; _ r ,� �r-�, � fir' .�`. - : �.
3v / /n t 1 .,..1"."-,.
> 1.
I� ,r{ "`y ` �- - df - , h pt 'F. f �'i: L,. ` a Red
s., �-<„R'� fi�$' a. �'wxC� �. 'r:� -. L_. `+A. ' r, kE � .� .�ql�� xts� , -
Photo Point 3—SFFC Reach 2,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 3—SFFC Reach 2,view downstream (10/15/2021)

y,�,._. f �+
... �',x � "kac �� �� fin.n„af mrzeP
A-,4'7i!_*„.--Z.,.:-00„3,,.t,01-.A1::-„„4:„--...-'..v,.,'.1':-_,.V-..:,.I...
- ji YT..i-.q:4-''4''.',.,,.:'„.:.i.,..t2•'..._',„.,
, 4 yx,'i. ' 14 k r %-, r.` t " F. �»' ,'
pY ' V °� 'd _ -YZ� "�s-�'^R'+i,� ax',y�"� a ,�' te - r r Gi
,.Ai4'''-'
x': i =•-Vf',k' M i• 'S ' - I . i1' Y im%+. fK'yk„ • . ;'g v¢A- '.
Photo Point 4—SFFC Reach 3,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 4—SFFC Reach 3,view downstream (10/15/2021)
.` .: >
.d3 . 1 ; l� f'.fy$ 5 4, Y.` 43a�- - i ',� T r,�r.+ . . i "
f" 1 it ' a? ': q 1.
+]
-, 1-��.!.k f . +t- Fes_ , °'#;,y • :.:;,...pi
' r
:..4111
'' "1. r ;'Z
" d _ r`i "�-,- 5 u .1 ° a ryY t _ 'fi t,
Y •
4 Y $' 1 ,,,$, - - t icaG. a
k - 'Z - 4 e CY .
::` , °' `°' 4
i ,..r"* "; -. 'TA�G '. � �� � r ��� . i' (IIw"� � fi L fiN 5.r
4M5' "' .SL ^ P-- cp4`f`�,'-•'4 , t1 i , a§n, to i:,:t.4 � Yi4r I ,1
f
Photo Point 5—SFFC Reach 3,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 5—SFFC Reach 3,view downstream (10/15/2021)
- .. , . I ,"..-..,,,,;;'-:-.t 4, %I lif-P . .o4Trf• -'. ' '/- ,--
?" s i ' s ¢ �, '..; iti g- I z Y I: t10 !8+ 1 'a., i,. m-0. a ' s vpy14i b, y I !! ' z
"�� ,G$. 1Yl�C� 'n' 4 '� "}' iA{� 1��YY� FD M 4�'"4
- Y A k •
_., d I Ml5' f* �`,.
.�V. � � i-. Y.'6 �1 pi 1.9, y �\ • S,`Y (�{. ,$ ST
�f bl � k� • Ns^L,r.
a 1 \ ter '
K " � �� 4s�
_ fa !f i a2F,, - . T r^ �
r 1 n
_ '+y
%
`�� 9. I�RxfRxF «
ryc !ij:
- F•+4�rT a" "f •+. i
. -c..--_.',.:-,.-. ••.--.'.•-_,..7,1--.i._7:41,-..,-..-.,,, 4,;;;:t. 4 1 '.,. -. ,,..-:, ..,.„:7,:„..„..ro-,,,,,,e..-,,
Photo Point 6—SFFC Reach 4,view upstream (12/08/2021) Photo Point 6—SFFC Reach 4,view upstream(12/08/2021)

..,, -.,,,,:',-.',i',4-- 'mor
�' �°ak tk - a 5
ti �� � ts1 ' aid° 14, • ..
hrli "a' rs
• n
Photo Point 7 SFFC Reach15,view upstream(12/13/2021) Photo Point 7—SFFC Reach 5,view downstream (10/15/2021)
1 of T ,3 -rin { ,
, "'"'� ^w 1, ° -k---,4:. .,\- L Al tf770k c
� bti
"46, '''..'i.4:, :44:47to;--N:,f..,,- l',--, i.,,:::--- - -7,.;,.,',`-,4.,' '1
Se.i ro 1 h'. 4.- a�.l a. 1
Photo Point 7—Antioch Tributary R4,view upstream (12/13/202 )
kN
,
„;
� �, . .___pp„::_ ,„...,.....,,,, _..,.....z........7..,.,,,, _. „ . -}
4
r"z,, ra t10 � i "-
''
XY
r '�
Photo Point 8—SFFC Reach 5,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 8—SFFC Reach 5,view downstream (10/15/2021)

„ ,„.. .
0 illb j11111.11111111111 . Ill.
_ --lir- In
. —. .
, _
• , ,..
i ,” _
—
Photo Point 9—SFFC Reach 5,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 9—SFFC Reach 5,view downstream (10/15/2021)
3c y s2 '' a` [.' 'Y q,r
z A Bit $ S C
4 0h 'L� ky'�1 •+did ®11 �F 9
14111.
�'
is . F 4 , �yr "e f ip ? ,, :? -9-1Y
"'w { Vfli"- :♦ r' w1,i ,.'+urr ;::' .-` '. - _
y."R,'^'x � �4 �a`.dq '� `' a - � •-� � � � - _- ''�'` r, _ w +tr r�,.1 ‘
tiet
=-z- �Yc�+, Yy>, -, !!y -4 x*k '3n 4" _4, ,.'Iv
\ r .ram, e,,, y y.�` ; z
' t '� ham`• 4^' '� `3 3' ti � cr.,'1
. �' +,.r a.�2- �� yr*^:,..�. a ,,,r,� y'�- ��_.�`- �e,r'� � .,. 7 �.:., �. r�t�- � ... ��te"'s.�6+^. _ � ��, ,
Photo Point 10—SFFC Reach 6,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 10—SFFC Reach 6,view downstream (10/15/2021)
5 1W...: -- -:
. 4,+1, ,nr: 1� .','•,i ,.. '- 'ems -'s A. ie' `,: 4: ,,. Y'.
.: ,
^ ,- - .
Photo Point 11—SFFC Reach 7,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 11—SFFC Reach 7,view downstream (10/15/2021)

.ks.
,�'�l,�ram � � - - -~' w .��:,� �A fit. ,•4
Cii• 1nY''71!�L�-B, -`YA' 4h 1S'3i �, 1�• Y6�. `
�p r' (. ..� i•ice' , �r `Z
'�� , e,? _ • .\ , �` __yam^ .'�•ti' }a;4i'�• 3 Y }., ... \ �.
Photo Point 12—SFFC Reach 7,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 12—SFFC Reach 7,view downstream (10/15/2021)
-"' ' `,f►�
•'' z 8 a s .. t "'r 1
„ h ku,, . 5,i .,,, 'Ft,'R.' 's c ° ° - ,F3 . , • ,, -4 rY
p
'' - 4 ��k - 36 { �s;� �S,�,1�4, z Fey �r.s$Z 't`� '�- _-- �'- 'i ��L'�,' :�• a r"�`���_��+'
s•.�q d �,"S�' . .ff i�r' , t ,• it ;-i: f'•• soy
y1 •• .*`4Cl ( - .'l Rc !. k _ w. � y 4^ v'�ed � "'{ "4 fLfi,�. �"f.mw.r - - �-y t�a:F.'Y'.y,�r �_. �,� � ..,
l�Yf��r r5 -fi -s!,- ate' - .k�. - a �
'S �F .3+ 1 _ _
� J - PJ�klt�, Y v V -1 N.f�f .h
Photo Point 13—SFFC Reach 8,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 13—SFFC Reach 8,view downstream (10/15/2021)
4
**,;:,,,_,,, -'' --•'',., ,,,,--..... ,_ ,,"ill'1'; ',e, ' i a """-t--;_-1'',''E,4 t" ":•,,,• .•=T.'
k
d�k wp�f . - 6PW.. ^3,ve !tr Y� r.L '�- sue'. tiF*Y .r� - { � � f
,ter ` ,-„, �e-' �� �' ,4 : ° 4
x -Ilk/ r i f t kph" - `ll T� ,.
Photo Point 14—SFFC Reach 8,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 14—SFFC Reach 8,view downstream (10/15/2021)

rM� -e;;ate' ..y . ...?��y�.: .
11;
:." ;: : ' .:^ i' �: i;. S r -- , •,:.':-ate§-.. :,.�r ,.i'•.,a' " >w:a %,,.'^ s-.'a
` . f�
:
3.+.. -F,.t :eat n' :_... - i- . _ _�pn� ::f‘.
n•
it
rt6
xA � ~.
.S
max.. .•1.t.•• - - _.. i! gip` hA ti
"4 s f ,
' -meµ _
itA.
k
f �s
, ... .,,....,„„ ...._,,,,........ t7.''-
w .: �� ..,..„..„.„....8.,.,,,,...„.,...,.„ ,„,..
*0
.. _ - r` `�ti•, ',;l:. a '.-k:t.:,,:� �,�,wa�..5._ ^T-"'��'�Z: r ~Ts�'
A .
:• _ }
iM1le. } 'Z'.:z.,-`
r .iv
-
Photo Point 15—SFFC Reach 9,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 15—SFFC Reach 9,view d7:wwnstream (10/15/2021)
r .li.:^ � I: E".F-<YY, ,, .. "„' :•+ts:f.q-,q,- - .> a3T]f ',1
-', .. . >� ?�;:.:':.t ?.1i:�.z:• ,��� :z,^, �,:,ate '��°' >�
.. as E '.,.•.;,, -
A
x'.
1., ��
-rya.
M1i.-+. ,.. ,,:.._ erg@,, ` "'•xdi�:� kFE"R.`
Lg't..
.. ;,:. ,..e ., fig '".: . c.:;, 4i3dm kR ...;
'k:;fi'r,:y r.>-;.t'.:,. ... 1, f - '{=gi, _ §'-
w r: :- : . ...
.. -_
� .. 3 :
- 4
.' r:..:. ;-
r /`•e`e: n- .,i, �- "I , ,•^' �.a: ::mrt -TM�;r - F('*. s 3 ,: {.§.�Y :`! Sz• •s. ]ram v sS 1 . :fC .,,yit :! � ^ ;=. _.� i, A. n v s �'v=ram .a . : ym fix:y!.- 1f f
.i
• •
.I
„;.'g'4%-*4;i4.ii§,,-,-,,,,,,,-Arib,--.44s, . *:•`.4<itilatk.t- fts,f2,..- ',.----;.t.;..., --:-,
\t4.
:.- Y ,:. ...,,:,. •'Nis..:' _ t"'; 'i
Photo Point 16—SFFC Reach 10,view upstream (10/15/202,1) Photo Point 16—SFFC Reach 10,view downstream (10/15/2021)
";fin: L • .
L :
a ...
�".,. �._'I .'�. ...-: ESA'.:: :' . tag. �. `7-=�t':) - -
,9
y-.
' yyam�..,,:..
., r fi}r, ,. 'i. -
qq t �.
a` `
ti
... _e!. V,xr.` ..ts•R 5�' � 'w?:y)'n4 a. i �..��y,�� ,,.,�'.•.,•t3
I.
•
r � - :�". :_ :,xv,... ... ...y� :='�'t.a.. may, � '�""',$'f:, i.r'!� �:�.a _.w,r.
m. .$:: ''^£., eery""� .;::
a•-,.rs.,.,..,... :-`-ia3kx,A..'�' a*,., sf::- a,..,2. '&�" ti'�.r�� •"k �'� - -M���:'t" �F +�G'.. r_r;.: vim.
�. 4> ,�+Wy`..: �s, .� fie'.� ::'�€�" R:3,:�Y':1;t'_ ?ytx5>Y ..' ,. .M:ry _- .�. i'S_,y. ��v''' 3 �"..c.
y..." r,:'+ '$�; ,Y� .tii.. - att�_ ,aa ,'J •.. a kf'ti-•. "- G"'','..s.ka'� ..Y,:, 1 .,, .."7.
=^ :•
• r." :.-; .F. .L .- F... ::x �.':X+Y' R'•: y '--r" yes.
ice 'n"`,�' :;: ;�a. ,i -'�,.' ..-fir,:'� ,�v. - z�'; iq,.
..: _ »a::, x:' ti :: { :. , <:-,.. n
a -
� � Y J :.:
:+y. ;' ;Y.YIy':3, ':R x"zi?x5 M `4 R:`d�. :," :kf"N - F$:F :. 'huh ..L'
,z
• z•
•
.::Y; .. d y:lR'P;k �8 e'�`', :�,::�'t;is" 'I;.. :i">,w,:t" "^ . -,i4r.,
_'� �?< .4~3��.�"'` :v`4tF•',� 11°��.i �:rns'ti:. .' a i� � d P. r C:Y.�K';'S"'F.
.x^ -fi„ ..nan
.�',,4., S �' ., - h :b.... v' r' /k'Y''li'v K' -"I`,.T.. _�`?!. r .,. ^z :". 7`4
.1''•- .7 a . ..- `: r�:_'':v A. ' .v.,.._ tip4. .�' &_-:
t i' rye, r,�'''�" ..,.4>: a" :.4 q r...: � - - t$:" :.",wi� ''�a.
Y
Photo Point 17—SFFC Reach 10,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 17—SFFC Reach 11,view downstream (10/15/2021)

q /
cF_, s wi�i� 1, '� Fad
7,t-4--- -e-O'r 4,q1177,,*_..z.:1&:ir77fr.t- .,:`'',.-•?..'.. .i.:-::"'.,49,t5ii*-451.' •Irtc,,,,*.: .
.. py a- fY- „p 'a-,` .=u!4- xr a' ra 3 "'- ..d w:
Photo Point 17—WFFC Reach 5,view upstream (10/15/2021)
Y y .� ti=4..,- ei, .0.41,t, t A ? "' .?ckn,` :' _a,; Fes- • r _ ,., �•
rsfr
-'r...,,.,-„,:-.:-A.,..-- ,1,,7i,. 2.gkick,, ,t. -,!,,.!ovn.i.,-'
& r
Af.
° cfi � ��b� < ., , a y, ��'d ' "g' e`' Yf 'a ( n, `� +' #c, } :� !o t ,3 ,. '1
1R0
' :r "� • -Afx{ $. pv 4/4' s $"' -� AI
� i%s -/sp. Fyi'ra�' r 1' 3'�ar '�` �'v, � _ - _..- _ _ :WA, 25�
Photo Point 18—SFFC Reach 11,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 18—SFFC Reach 11,view downstream (10/15/2021)
ww''
•
•
r' 3. s�", Il ''y', £ k3' "Y '3' + '' r - n• +am ., � ••°,4 a
•
# y j*ia - n :.r x. ,r,, s 3" :. 4 a `r 'k'4 ' y L - 4 fi a wa ..
•
•
. 4 r A4 A n t t k tom,• i fE , 7, , X.,.....„„....,.y,,,
a'
+. its , -�k 5 4` x "4' _ pf''� t ae' , Yt4
4v }*a ni ?4.& �h`2v YJA:1'.1 . J!t tyre u t -
ry
Photo Point 19—SFFC Reach 11,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 19—SFFC Reach 11,view downstream (10/15/2021)

1r "Al;
,:��^x7•$�s.9w';��;�..�.r x..,�,.��- ,,.f.r
.$,
`.<.r �n:,y._ " , ,: :<;fi 1 ,",,,,,A
t; "ai [�:vS¢.4^�y ;;Ft1,.:tr � ..�� ::� 8''. :a v , -" : : K" ''''
-' :-: � .. r... .� _ f.'�e. _ :sti2.'. �: '�y� x.,!F".':z: ..�.
s:a •
,.h• ,}. ;i-
•
rN i e ., ,, aasl. 1-�. ri
i -' +c ' : 4 _U. _ / fo ` .rk;r.: . r
JiNV(''''':•••""` 111S1t1N?.'4c",..?"''.2':• 1 ••j ',i•,-'-'' ' .''" -
'k,.
t+' ,I<, .z xF .!. -'.r. Imo. +',; `, -
Photo Point 20—Critcher Trib R1,view upstream (02/15/2021) Photo Point 20—Critcher Trib R1,view downstream (02/15/2021J
:L' h'2'vaL., _.��•'-�1•n�.:s _ �;��"'•:. F'IR. �:�.:. 4 '.�. ;,�r:Y`.S_ •,�a v',.•, _ e?'!;'r:', syi;
xk, -..:._.t:si'. .fir,:7i°',:: ,'t;:', :J ,, �'v _
�.. .4 .:ff,: -.•a• 1�s�"�:,,1aT^x. Il>ti 'a •s ? - :i :�:.
'.:, y�_, „�; ,� 1'• .ova
s t�:,.s
g, n• y
� w, t ;"- t �'�'�ir 3t`�` a: ..5.'��,,: ;4:�� ,u �._ r�,r-' •-v?:�; ^.� �g�":��r.': t..
p '�"a
*:',��; h'= � , ���". .���� - ._fives. ��+ �•t$':• E °gr ;�
d. 4 :11 t�' ;,tie : '`�i;' "`�, :,Sid:J"G�W n;�"'Y ..� '"fid'`3.,-+'t+°. ��`T
.
el ,:dt'.xx4, n'..,.�- .:,::-� '-... ;n,.:}.. _ �, �#' :'i. •e.T.'.d .' ":3� :;;�, s .r�..�e ;�,,_ ;r.,.,,-: +.� �•� ipp_`
qd�f:.w... , . > . /':�� + ... ,':`r'.a B", ..M3 ?, •'4`.-�:A� •nb" rk z:i>f'�F.t:c' " .��
- ':."1-• 3q L!:t' - l '�E',.`r. r:.'l''`J `' .t r:..':d 'e..
uY� �-�f - lf �'z+�: �y t:r� W�";.: r-•s�: -y.: ...�,r�fID• fin' �i.:_::1 ..� Y,ia.-
s'R,I. .I '.� �^�. :.# :� _ tl': i'+' phi':
.-. "BRA 6..
a y
�x :.-. ,.:' Ltt t--,1';'.'-Q4
ar
_: .::,a!V• a'�-..�"'.-t' ____,_..,11,.._.......6.... _,„,t,,04,•,....4,—.,r...- .,_.___. ...,.-
- Vic'..;{. •.I .: - �'k�I,. - "' e�'',>,:";..�Y(. �
•
-: '�Ni'> :,;a. ,: 4 _ << '7 .> '�` "- _: "r +.:pr .,v.: ..-' F.
Photo Point 21—Critcher Trib R2,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 21—Critcher Trib R2,view downstream (10/15/2021)
�;�, . .ai : :` , ...4?
. .
iii, ,,. ,
s
g �+ n."-^4., -7-,„ ..,+:.e,+^ -1 „.
4>, ,a ,�+
s'
�.:,��;S.nA--:_?�„ {'ri j�� :.h fix �.,:.•,r.�•t .t,k �ii. J,.;��•, ' � >,:,-a` ��r -��s,r'FE::/-:,' '.:. ._,:��.
y..
,T
�' r rid t -�` .- 6' �:'�:,
a.,, �t. 3isr: .: _. ;.ire
r a.
�a: t.. ; �-'- ,: :. !s'� r' 1. �'�s>b'.�� Via, �.,M :��:: :s r-• <-M s�' :�'k..;�:'� '�':r. '�� ,,.sr> .�'%• .�, f ''=1 �, _ f > f•�rF?!..«. J. H ._*'. .�.` - ta" aP^
.,; n.§, ."�.t.. �.. �fs;;:a..YaL:a�..a 6i "J .. .i.:r J=} - _ , •:` ''',"-, r .' _.:�''' ��•�, .r Y:.":.01�,� .s y„�,y, d "1 Wit: '�.:.: i �'"4'. �.x,,#.�.>r. ,�'�;i '
,k.'
•
�k. �" �p y. '� ���r•� :k' 4"'iE�=;�;^�y�' .�sj,'. �' s:£. 'tr'4� .��Y
r1 .,.- li '.'574 ...0 .. -...-..;..s tea .. - 'r _ { �4t 1 :�
.. .. .� _: �:.. '':. ;i---,�. " �:`' rl _ ` - �:.a.;?; ;a-fir: - µme .t'��".�"-,'
.�;9.. � :: ,a r :.. "- `�ay"y 3.�'k yh'Y k I V. `y�.vk, n•
Y
- �..,.. ��� Fy r .,._ �:'`.';r;t� „�`�''F'� '-.�✓,ec, nc�•. .:.�.sv� ,;y, _ - :,,,1ia r ''i� �'`.�.,, �" ?!.�r�-
_' i.V 1:_-u....:y,=--,�'a r '£ ,..:�/. > : :: '\'z .{ :{r. :t_ >rw. .t} ;_. '` n: �. "� i ''r,l�r.bx>=" `t r ;:,';• .:'::r:•a.. _7
' � �:._......�'}-'a�.-. _.. .. Yi�',f._ ... `��-" .i� .. `:.F`• :i',',� ._ �.{: �:::!.w'.;. �i.^:�5fi.;__ ..er �.tf.:, .
Photo Point 22—Critcher Trib R3,view upstream (12/08/2021) Photo Point 22—Critcher Trib R3,view downstream (12/08/2021)

T?F.� �Y -•C. d' • is d A ,j �'. p r,
r'
::.M{'. MH y! _ '; .'': .f.f'4 lr. .k 'k rwi` .:1 ir,s:.a.'r`.rZ {': ::'1 irks' d�,1 '-'t/.e.:
a.q:
-
•; a
.d 1 if T.C. �1.. I.-
n s r,
v. y y
r'
yy } ,
,y
F x .a -
•
.3.., x• a .sr.r�,,,. ��,,..: .� �. _ -
�' �°.^ as '�r ::4 - :F-'�' 's.' '.`a'"?+ j�i1. .?`:.
�ti
�E'r
1 u • ,`
.... � „� a- -. W
','�'�. �4i . ,�.. :c, - e�-Y'-,CY..: -r.'M• ma,,,,, �,W':::. �i.'r14")
v�i'�a � �� i'! :r - , s\" - , - r v':,v �''�?:. .w.�` r,:, .sssc•
�'!9 J,PAR•i S.. L1� 'ly•t.. ���M — •'� - -_�_-':�. 'h �: ' �,J \•�.�'.a'' � i�:'--
Y1. L�
i:'
P!� s"a�w� � .a
I -�
Photo Point 23—Critcher Trib R3,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 23—Critcher
Trib R3,view downstream (10/15/2021)
• m y
n
�t
n �,,�
r
i+:: . wa y� 2,� .
y.
� .,,. z • ., . '..{L''«� ( '•rr"':4rS : . ^dam
r:.
< ,w ,
.x:: >--'f:" _ ,,r ; e;l:;.-` ,'f::rs',:.x. tk�]ftr_: r:' .',,Ni-, r `:a
,,rt q
i,�.,.s,,�`j: y'. . ".:�H 1..: dts� - -• :.�.y..� _:T:�:b �°tip.,,}4 q.t t e '.i . , � t�i .d.
„y • r
II. i -
�s 3 I.
Id'
,y a. F�,,�
M� ="s '� - 'yak''�•
t't�� ��' s. - - '. • � ��: � ma's. �y gy ;.Y
.e
:
,g '�4, ,�rye„ • .+„. ;{ 1<, y� '�•
r�
1
ir
,.
::4 Vie:-:^- d r';� ,,.,1..i,..c.,4:_.,-,. .4•./.. p.,, ,:.:—:. ... - .?'_4`:'.:,s.w a r .. ,-+ ;
i +rF -�,�:,•:'a'-�1�• 4 '�( ..:`� .j,e - .k.'�r,.§'xt!� r :�4 !�„r .,,,-_.�� ':�:� 'u.x.':..:,�''°: ..�:; �p";�¢. ,ia._
%,
. .4-:.,. .yr".'. .xr.:+ _.. !^`". �` `., -- - X,r - ... r "tiir--"'.' u 1A` ". `� .4r't�x ',
.,,,,,Alitz4,:y4,...,,,,74,.,.::.
1,1.:4k,1,.r..,,,,.,,,....,4,,* _.,,;:__. : ;.,..-,_.,.i.ilii..,.,...,.,,,,., ,__.__._;_i...,,...,,..,....7 ...v.,y,:;1,:.?„._,t....,...,,
n,;.,,,.,„,,.rt,„f_,..,:„;c,,..7,?.__i..,,_._ _,.,..10,,, ,,..zt,,,.
.,,,,,..„_. .,:.$51'.14'7, 1...,,-' - , .,••'.;f.,.-`,...,.'!I.,:.;";4•7.
j
( r,�,y'a' ;��' kx'�.,� .a - - �' �.yl, _ .^f1.as,. t�,...f
Y
, :..' 4.::. 'l:t :\,t'I - - .. ` , r 'i' 11'r .�",� ,_ , e �!' ,J - "�: .:»'7&>..
i8 '�` - �sy�.,.r�,..�y . .. . \ !+ .,r .- rC. .- • ,..:•�s7 .,< ._,'�3�F -1.gr�tl5a{Jv+ '� -"t`.:
I
Photo Point 24—Critcher Trib R3,view upstream (12/08/2021J Photo Point 24—Critcher Trib R3,view downstream (12/08/2021)
y
l^ ..°i.i � .�. : r::Gyy`b - ,a�:-_ :" �^":aka
•
- ;��" :E� .S': -r�., I:A iE,,.;�' ..�•;N�.',�., .�d,�'r2 r - IMg
�4. `1 =:iy.; -:h-may.}.� � .k - M-�'':�'.'" :k ', ,r;.
`fin, ��! �� .f.,
,:.,a.'?;i .e'. i : :.:'.-. k-_, _ F`x'::. . .ia'r ,,Y vsd4,144.2 % ,'
1 h''"- .E k' H�F. '14 �'� .'"3i`.... -
ft-t t,� ,a.� �1 rs, `fi:,. •'�. .„+.bk•. .rc"4.-.1.•S;iq .
,�� s:ya.: .f,(. • � if^ �s;' �,.�`� ,A �G ,f"Vry,a:s 9.,,..,"}'u', p,+n1 ,.�-��
,r
• ]} :k� .»' ��� •g � ,.�°f.� . 4•rs fir. :r, _
:d �] !y>u e
.•..a _
• �
ram .. .,.: .. : '�i "�' -
M •
r>
3
.
.,' te . `r.'.._ �..
I
•
rt` "-ram
a ''. ,
Q�
Photo Point 25—Critcher Trib R4,view upstream (12/08/2021J Photo Point 25—Critcher Trib R4,view downstream (12/08/2021)

ea.*".:.; wr:`F,';. ,I GI F, ° ' - :{t'a• r.= :, '-..i.
I.
' ts
i''' ".:;s.,�:. "§'a 14•s,' 1 -yll i,tFk:,: oG' -as'=; al. `y:. '' "
r
} f t�'` :w'
1 j �fd3 L '1) '' h ` :[:�:`: � •' .:a t.`
t.
1 �,
y� I
�``-.' • f Svc
,
,-r r
a
,. .. ..� 4 _ v:. - e.mot
•:',1 ',II-. ! i'i�� �'.l.<'.:: .vY'. .�i' LL ��. ," y,�.:;u }: ,,yfi> e"l'.,i.: :&'�?�?�°fie
. -g.„;-:‘. 40;(4p;t::',N;..4 4,
...•. ..1. '�;.f�...,�- f' I . :k S.r:{N}�� .`.. T/�:41%J -:', _I. .. .t _ s!�.:.. ��d%.; �� 1 .,I, .�:
I yy / Ib
r
= t'
,.. ...�. : , ; ,�r. .�.: , �:rya.• 'r '-� e. ..'!' �.'.
r
y.'
:::r..;,y.:.�`..:..ri±fir' ��� :. , pp
�sA �i3g �7d f,t' .{ 1 IM •:7,`. .b - _ - - :£ ', ..y` ,._ - ,�:
•
,5.. s fir ' ,I •.f[^. rv-, ,s,;• �,�' E
.I's dl ��, tot _ :�";�� ,5: ' `�l
1 ;
G `
s'
F
ajf Y. '
I'}.:,1.: f•*. ,��1'- \.I,a'�. - ;`�.._ _/ - • - €4 ,fit�� �_
t:
-'� _.max; ._. ':! '.,.. ,.; ".'.
r.
y--
w� c I .:.
Photo Point 26—Critcher Trib D,view upstream (12/08/2021) Photo Point 26—Critcher Trib D,view downstream(12/08/2021)
i4 ; , A 1 , ,•____ _ . , ,,,,,,.<_,_,. ,... . _,-,,.,..„..,
.n., ::‘,..:: . . _
..,,,,,...,..„ _ ,_._—
,,,,, ._,
,. _. e'er' - - -
a
::fi�tt,,,, e�
:
w
r' 1� a�
5
t..!'
,
l ;sw
., r .. ... .d. ,fir n.r,t ',�' .'ix..��"".: .;� 7 £, .fir" IS• - -
P
N
rl i
,
r}
`l..
of., :. v... ... .._.. , . � .. . ... .. r. -
r..
��. >...: . ..-. ":x.,.. .. �. s� �:fit r: ` ,
fie. ..�_ ! - _ ,�.
�* J d';
...;� , � ,� _. �t^i;,: -s-,.� z , `rry .:7 Sa(�s,ia,...,�. a. ..
A` r,
,.. ..�..,., .. , ,r. : � . .: -'. .'�` _ �„,- � Ate..: .^�.... : 'la:' -- naxp nr;.
•
fi l �r.A 1'_ `a,;^ .'- i. - ,.`'8 T�.:_..�� '.xr, ,fir �;tir�.t"°�4.y. - ..•�.
<\ I
r: ... ka". ...., „>i.,s:x si.., ':�. 'tiro� '' >•:- .:i<•. :- �: '._=— `.! - s'-'
t:a }�>" - iy ., _ h..v ' Yj' °s'�t C.`+e:..i_y ,,� ..Y -+..r. �+�.i - - "e - -
s n, .4 J 1;�, ., . -— 1.:..a=-... �"*N1, �'i:'��'f.'pIDk.k�''.-..- _ ra P_:.. _ .. �1 r
Photo Point 27—Critcher Trib C,view upstream(12/08/2021) Photo Point 27—Critcher Trib C,view downstream(12/08/2021,)
R ; rj
i�
'fie" :•ix irk � ;, A
. � r
.•
.'.:.:
d.
iin,
'•; - p y . .,, R< F r �@ C1 , N 7,fi : - 1`^ , k,;.; - tz:h".-R. 3�� Ltl , Tt ''''''-',::AP � - :. E ,-;,' . a : - w* � ." T•ry .r. _.-,.. :5ti:a .a"< re "a 'F , t«-;s^�_ ` .T -.F; .. _ f .:. , " . , � ' '�S� -���" " :" : < »;�rr. , :�,; -r� • :vrO. * ` fi .:�i. -,,es-',a'°:1 MY�^ - 9 l ,:t � p. - �. }ak_ -
,.-
' — li 1,, i � •' 4' ' s . � : - -,�', _ ....,- ...-_..r. .,.,--21 , .,,/,-,--_44.,.,,i;_,;,,,,,,vski-A-1,,-•,-;!,. . --;-•,,,_-.,-,.,..--!--,,!-,.---t-.-ionty,;
41• .t. ,a' `y y :t}: . "" : i',i :x 1 ,z= _ :-!' _ 1_ ,h , ., _,i .
.--F.,'" 1
A r
Photo Point 28—Critcher Trib A,view upstream(12/08/2021) Photo Point 28—Critcher Trib A,view downstream(12/08/2021)

n, N p90 i �x 4
!,;,�� ! #Y Kit l v e 'I e�,1; 1.0
eta 77f y hsr a 1pkt f1a r rr ., it
+ i •e ,x. A . N s;A$t + "•�' iMn. As �- ! t• x
_ +t -• •,Y �j 'd E K- r c ti'.F �. z { k,e' ., cx+'S
,' T � yy M b�`4. � Y � S `S l ''{{..,, .{ ik ��'?Si{� � � I
r,_ ;.' ; & 1 A X t�A Y - 1 �- ,, 7 yY £ B]; r '� b �
s of - w, . q>' i. �)t ;14 s � K is ' r
bqi r 9 }°dt � .ae. �;r;S, 3�+ _ : s 'yz 4.4 i
'.(: ', x. 4�. �x � ::,,-, � �.� t t . '� s c P'`
a� '�'' # fie} 7y' tilt
A' # E_ _ r {�
It t ns { i' {ii. s n+ er T
i q 4 v R, car c i • x •`l .`. „Zt, A '" a. d F '-'N'Arf.,, "J , i �1,k r t I �I 'L,
ti ''s': ' �� t.'n rA v .,
�x ! � � �ham, r a �
Photo Point 29—Critcher Trib A,view upstream (12/08/2021J Photo Point 29—Critcher Trib A,view downstream(12/08/2021)
c r�
ky t,�s`�y {j f1 »r�}s „,4`&'� x`,;F y ,'c _ �L -x , ;�i
°-ek' „d,4"` F'' s ''�: ', y F Ef _ -.-- !� S �r'N' ` _ 5 ., @e�}.'- a _
'� - x S?f �Tp fie' '6 - s •�. �1p2�.-r ,�� ' +�f
a4 n 9 ,P t. J,--
. _ •. _ r dam_ -f �• nir4 it',
_ �
sae ,L'` •-a1r��+s+-v`�_�`s �Ss - --� -. + 'r.ty,�. �'r'f j "�s�_. '
yr Fr i FY�r se
' " d`• ki Ems, R -.. _''". �. +
Photo Point 30—Antiorzi ch Trib R1,view upstream(10/15/2021J Photo Point 30—Antioch Trib R1,view downstream (10/15/2021)
c _ , , r
+'ar ; S p l4"+:. - Itshy' '7 '* A. r. - .. i Ii
ha ,t '�+'� v�fi1 ,� .
A s+ x ,`u�^y k . y i'I��a `a r d 2 k 5 � y ^x: y
h> i
!lV"'N':'t'�� i47R ,P, tx ae.. Noa+e.4.. 7 �1 'jtl1 -,t
Photo Point 31—Antioch Trib R2,view upstream(10/15/2021J Photo Point 31—Antioch Trib R2,view downstream (10/15/2021)

a�, 1w<arN'^c»x v t Sir 's. -` ! } f ...p.
o- al
b4r E'�v1,1 31°. - t _ r ya'.,� �ti'a r y''" bS.
'N. .� ,:s Fhb i4V -!:;-, Y - � w , �,y eFT•ry A � �`t .p�
`r' •.""c' h'Rw �' 'v .`C"S w �s 3k. v 4y i 'j 1 Fk q�,� 'r- s„ �g 5 iY ` „. °"`� £ ,
.p f l� ,; r.�,� � � Y{jf �� �1; I, � � �&°'�', .�¢ ,4"� S'�nx�'* y .C� �s'� ��� ,s'n�i� �.
., .;.- ..F.-_ ',ry 's ' t f"t �* t}'fie k _ xr '' .;., - a- "'', .:
°C :a+ '1 � _ w j t . .� - -e - t R �.---.j� 7 fir,
•
I
ra v�.;,,xpb ?',a � �. wk x# a wd" �; ^,. y,' 1. k, --
w � � i �M ��'4 t � �l '(� s��14 is �,6M$� J N ; � :; ��, t � `+F 1RY`>' --s - -i;��,,-
u ri` - x ,..;• t' �. -*, ,'pQ _ 3,t, - qt'. .-.. 'fit.-�h
Photo Point 32—Antioch Trib R3,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 32—Antioch Trib R3,view downstream (10/15/2021)
fin,. �,p
w x s
•
a` .f'. - ti
Lir • .
---t `4'4' 1 ,i ,o,.� _ .; -,8. -%fr47�.pr S,-: _
-I, 4,,,,4.,,,...,4, , ,, ,,,,,,,A,1*sckt;",..,'--,,,,-.4,- ,,,,,,,,,,,„.., ' ,', -.,., , ,,,...._ ,
t
r "
d,
- 't -'3'"'" '�'x' 7 Va t`p( y Ll f1 , k• `.I - f 44[ I i
Photo Point 33—Antioch Trib R4,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 33—Antioch Trib R4,view downstream!10/15/2021)
•
•
}y d ' ,, A: '-.40.t `5 .-,. -1- --.
{
Ate' -i y, - -
✓.R.
e.
•
•
wr y _
r
,-
5 '
-,, >
Photo Point 34—Antioch Trib C,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 34—Antioch Trib C,view downstream(10/15/2021)

i '
'
,?,, i a � 1" , � i jn , t•K - '�''xs . -9 a f ,f y �ri :
,, ,„
• r
' ,• ,r, a •r K "� ems` , -.` w,
-,4r. - -4
:a- " T. �.: , fit+-. - _
•* "•,'-tex4--,..3 -IX-t4l...--',.-,--cr,..,7,; ':---.,;,.. 41 • 4.),04.„,,,_.- ..-,
, _ ..-.r.;.,,,
--4v4,. .. ,,,
....,- ,„ -_,_,,,1-4A , _:.. ...4,0t,,,, -,-...
.,,,. -,,-4
-•, ..,,,-,,,..'frIti,.. ,-, ...j-s„---t..:IA.' 7::?•-2":#*.f•'._ -.•-...4,.:=,,Z.1'.,,.;*'.,':,*;,-iti'L',,V•--.'.:- ---'"'qe-v ,.'„ _-- .-':-,0•-•..t,
•
e "-- p - ' ice- -. -' ,. -1'_r• -• i r
--t:,...=•-',!-, -,, -$2,,x„*„.,_._,.„,,,,,, .„ _, , .,...,
._ . ..... . _
„ . .4,!..,,, ,,,.A , . ,
, 4
, ,
imi„,,,.._t_ 44,:,,,,katA,1 vc„, _ ..,_ , _. ,,A '-•-N___,,-...., -. 4, •<, '
Photo yPoint 35-Antioch Trib B1,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 35-Antioch Trib B1,view downstream (10/15/2021)
'a"' I W' :. x :'$ -i ';-;,•" •r _ �Fp"' , �' ._ .. as --ue
`'Z �f:.` ',k`S'+Jh.fi . ? t'' -^-x n- �.'°,''` :`_- A,. ," T,`, P M 's .. ^�' •s_�.,-- ram,` li.,
3 9. L-
• - -� b s'S.v-�, � , . '. ,r s�c. _ .may �t u�- .,� i - ._
.. P a" x .^. ',- ,: ,'��,.!♦ .aye ,} f^ 'x
70i-,fir �x ;� 6
's k i"a7 • u a - +e ms '.,-•b . - 1-- - yn? r -a` ` -, ,
114
,�r.-':e°1? yf '�� e i" y et , ' = �' , '' -``� x' w 5a�a s"' � ���
r? 'y, -4 -;1 ,gyp r` '"- 'rA „ ,s:.
t.
4
Photo Point 36-Antioch Trib B R1,view upstream (12/08/2021) Photo Point 36-Antioch Trib B R1,view downstream (12/08/2021)
.1,' /"..,, ,'. , . ,. ,,,,, --; - , _
� - -yam wr� - - � yet -`
. bat Ali
- P 3 A^' m 7 Tyayr--k• �; , { - , Y, t 34' -
` � � g���gx 23 8 dr s:„�9 r r�P4 -sti si � i l � F�i✓ ? f���� d ,.a�rw r£",r ��Z.:� f�
Y-%` 'Y'' 4, s ' Y -i,' , ,, 4., w 4, ; `{ r. rt „,, e3v34 ti •�rt
k? L 4
'% 1 x- by � .;s H
Photo Point 37-Antioch Trib B R2,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 37-Antioch Trib B R2,view downstream (10/15/2021)

4� Ufa i-t'- j,5... -,�, aea �«s� E? .. -k-fix,. ` ' v '1� �''!! ''° tia"�i , 1 —•*"5 �,. \-`
y ppII,,
f1 ,}�% dk y. S �;9k ' 4, '� ,` Yv 6 A -sr:' r � 'f, ;z f .$ i t w 1 �
n {' 'J.n i It i� s a x , (f�f dS�r - 4Ft v 3- , s. YJ ,y 10 S
•
1' : :,), •, '41;',...\A
d r 6i - ryes •L5 K.,, * S ;u, un:^ i� / s (, ,_
e� ° °x .7 E i 0 '4 ,- £ � 4 , �,t �y _ � +#n yh . ' F • p a h ,
-, ,-fi•-1°
Ei t• '� 3''d+ s t r _ S'^.- .> � . "d f ..I y �Stl-r' k `a'7i A_�°c /� 7
,. �� T$F� Fri � 9 P f. #, �Y M' f- v`�,z s +` ^�`� } �, '�, .
v ..�;�of .,Y i.`�' I r4 — '- g�" � - -i •!,- 1'-' 4 s V R 3 e-: * t''
.\-t � x�: `� i 3, r,�q. �, �.F �r r�- �'- �'+. - -w, �^^ @'! "-St TS e 5 {�il +' .�,x
k 4a°'k +`"�:i,' - 3 eL•
✓' r k. r: .�- 'z"i y',° F ,` ° Rrn .-.d �,0 %.
,. 8 ,, : ' ,-... 4 I..- -,,Zp#20:4 °'1,1 - - .._,-...„...„......„0:w >,fir" -�, °- -k i f -? s .,, f t r7
,,,, „...., .
- sti.- '
R
I
-� fix' _ r ' .k - r LF L�dPFy t �:h
„.., .„...._,...,..,..„,...,„.„47,,, , ,,,...,..,-,...„.„,..-..,..„....„.,...„..,,,,,._ _ ..t,,k,.
.. _ , 4:' ''''Ci-"..,''' '-' "'-,-..—.--4,--,r,,,v40-:,),
( ' tea" r e- s -rY� i ` '.;6 ;�3 i
' dun .- :' ^,h / . -' Ll" .` .
Photo Point 38—Antioch Trib Al,view upstream(10/1.5/2021) Photo Point 38—Antioch Trib Al,view downstream (10/15/2021)
e►,,
, red:. i .K '',s y, -, '4. w r A S 4 S- '. ' f �.
it.
} , ✓ .4 f N ti --
- N� fit ��-C� �q� s.T - � -
Y ' \. -.
Photo Point 39—Antioch Trib A 81,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point:tir.9?„.—,....:.,, tio:c..,
nh Trib A R1,view downstream (10/15/2021)
ar - - sera°
��` -tr r ,
� i{ # $
M -e. ir +l +,liM. .3`left 1 ',Yrk ?,
Photo Point 39—Antioch Trib Al,view upstream (10/15/2021)

4 'wry 2 t' -r �k ' # - FI P -4
," ".5.. ,y .-' I_ 1- 7-
! 7 y
to,
$" ', "gyp i st "ti ..* ,` AyK .. A.° A ,
s •:. 'r,l-:., bra' P-.- ,-. ."'- t }V T!. " b -' -' ¢ti.
f . i k; f E` 3, T, y. ;-. w1,... 'K,,,, Mn" _-.i °Y i,`. ,' .7 fY`
M'
1 r4 jeit
e ; /El -v, k�r4 �; ha m ;. -Cj,- �.T: vd - .-k:44. - ...
�,"^i:4 4? '& ��, r' 2'zk � -x, ' '3�'.,vr t �' - k�- Vie;
*, •K -"*-5'
�R��r,'a;,.�.. ,�,'�a;;,,.�'x� .x_•'x� v",x'.-�rt+�' r�.�..�� x�;�. � .x. �'�-�$1:�,-',�i= �?�. ��� ,.is,. .�> '' ---
Photo Point 40—Antioch Trib A R2,view upstream (12/08/2021J Photo Point 40—Antioch Trib A R2,view downstream (12/08/2021)
08,
,...,.., . r,„. •,;,4'.',", c,...41.4.=:::',';';',71.--,:-''"?:,i'..4.\ ,.....''' : .fp%
:,..--.-., •,i'. -- . r-,,,,,,,c.; - -
c„
? "- to..4, Lo:.i, .
E ' `i i � 3 '13 t Ct ���;. !y }�* ' • ^p! �+
�'M '},Y� `u,Gyp 4� v� 4 1_,-. '- a'. '_ ��11/. r �gy • .,.
. . .
,,,,,:i=„5,..,..„,,,,..::._,,,,,I,_.,_.,,,,..itc,,,,r,,,,,,,.„. „,, ..,4,,,„,......4;,,i,....„, 1,_A. _.r.. ..,_-.
4
¢ .=.y-; 14,
+4.,, am' - • .r y,. _ .�
- •s. f1/41 1 z a ""` .6`
# + h " y ` �S
:.. ': - 3s �, Jw �, -.. - '"z
Photo Point 41—Chicken Trib 1A,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 41—Chicken Trib 1A,view downstream(10/15/2021J
�' � - s ':"`�` A � ,r�7 e� ''r _r . q5 F. °'fir i .. r, '' .
-, �� ' ` �i ' r's 4 y:) � «, Qy �`°1� Sv -'" _a n .M „ � 5 � '"w 3T£z` iA. s" & y , fir I" �^ 4 fib„ f 4 , .. T+� 1A -'_ t - 5
- - .
•
� ca -, x - tea.s .
vii„
•
rikk•
" � t � " ".,. #r d . Td9�v i s+ - •, `� i� i x', ' ' F -r - , � -. . , ' L- r } 'yam e�. ^ e N - , -' �,4,- � ' ,. \ • \\ r y\ iF X { Yy - M+� 4r4 o � _ N' Y` Y
::::::*:::-":::'74:11:1,.;;;.: ::—___11'._177",!::::---
4
,I,,,..2...., .._,H__,_„,-.-_,. . ,,,,,. .,. ...%,,,.__.,,,..,
, ...
Photo Point 42—Chicken Trib 1A,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 42—Chicken Trib 1A,view downstream(10/15/2021)

it r,� `,;, ,"'x„R s, < r
gg,� ,, { ,' - r'"'`iv, -- ;� ° - f � �'� .� • 'Y gyp' ! ,y• Ear Y' ;Er 1
1� � t i `
,;ۥ: ,2,, S r -i'-'4 sue._' .. !` - - -
•
(� 3 fi yam^ {
4.
az, �" - "
t ,,,,,, zi....,
.....c
` ram r4"
Photo Point 43-Chicken Trib 1 R1,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 43-Chicken Trib 1 R1,view downstream(10/15/2021)
' — 466,-:,.:'..:::',.'''1:.. ''r-r: '.r..- ilt--,_,--.,,,-„,,, ..,____
,„Ti::,-.:„...-,. ciii:.:,...r.. z.:::,,,,c ,:.„:::., :tz...
� �� ! ' v �l � fit,'4. ; x ,9 ri x a - !t r t
4.
•
'kNF+• _
'fV � t � �*a-mil 1{ €� .i s '. ce" wg A
4
da
y+'#x`." , "`. :'�7-Ste `- Vr,ak 'ti ` 'S._ --'.EI 'e • _
Y7xb r -1 ms r S 'l+ !
•
' 3' �'�' s am- '� .. S` s''''�%a.' , `�
Photo Point 44-Chicken Trib 1 R2,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 44-Chicken Trib 1 R2,view downstream(10/15/2021),
•
•. -
-
0 y�� uF mil' I� :twin.-
i5• •
* - i Anr y VW Ra 0. ''f h" •S btar6 ,:K` ^" yY 1
' ''',' " " " ":''''' --' ''4,".:'Aik,FaS-'k... -'- • - - :-.,,--:.4,51k-';'.7::" cy4?",,,-./.7,-.t :.,.- .,.--•-,,.--,---- •
! °° rc ` `kfir, r P �' lr
Photo Point 45-Chicken Trib 1 R2,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 45-Chicken Trib 1 R2,view downstream(10/15/2021)

-
fir. '' `'�r m.7 - _ _ �I 'a t 0'V�,y`� q -: , q ,,7.4 xt $'. ( . V� ..' r-=t ter ;
" ^'4; 4 -,� b '& i�'u„ �1 1 . . . • 54. Z t �` Y �,s�"I ,�, £ � r� }• ".sa fi_
�x ;tea A a S :
�!t '�, y � x a.�.h �{, 3 'I •
tit- "r"� ,4.7.
�. _ , 'h :";,".'`,a° psi - . ?-, ,c,,,cs k,. �' ,,"s; -w ' -'� .a'
�,>,, , � �Ja��� � �:�v" � _- r � �'�, �: � sri`£'�x7 � 'k. a F � � ���' 3,.-_ k
r.
4.
' `-ix, .. a.+^ _ -+ sfl �k wry - _ a s 'q,z t r ,� t,�� w' ki,',1 zx Sf
,.,,F , ". z e. 3 awe'' aa�s,- ',' '4x -ar 7 'F.,
- '- "' T1,� k + __ , 1 o > 4k'v , ; is - af. - - ,.?�}fir
�'� gw raw.4 �� 's s ' .�+ p s* � y- �.s� � r,� F k ,,..d' a �_ p _ .� � X'
y�Y,, i,-;t , � .,u 5� �'. ,�. J u,, re1 a . "._ _ • yi xq �v.. x 'r1. .,,. ,. 4
. ,..' x., ; .,y�fa_ `�,''t3,F,,: , �j•�_it, � x spy r ,..� a v -i -t" ---..
f"c.dr e r, '` { k .. kv. .a. I' "F 3 ' w z�w °_ . .• _ .'S"•`r
Photo Point 46—Robin Hill Trib B,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 46—Robin Hill Trib B,view downstream(10/15/2021)
1, ill.i ,. tH., . ,
)11. 3
gy
M a .i a h4x1
_ _ p Y,*'E, -ass a.�a
3 i F
' .�� t - `-�R _ _ �� •• f�p -� Y � \ 'Y'p" '�, i��\�\$�SSS',,��
Photo Point 47—Robin Hill Trib A,view upstream (12/09/2021) Photo Point 47—Robin Hill Trib A,view downstream(12/09/2021)
. . :-,- ''..tr'i:„lkrri.Vr„;'f'',14..'';`3,:;':. ',''.; '' '''''--,37:•-•,*;,',-.441"-04`":
o to i� � � � •a a
•
S ! x x a • `� r h', N f fW .,,- p, - a,F6 s'. >v-1.s
s+ 4 SV? ,Y� 1 .. ',• 4 ,, y f's.e; Y _1 N` $ a'.
�� � � ,�` � �� ! 2 �>l -$ � � ����-TY .� ; _7x i� � � h�f,a� �� r�1 `a '.' �
�.w.z rays, xz; "s _ g * ss ae'� "-_ • °a.„ ' t .4- 1 • _
r } -- -a 'Xa� - +$°c ''r nd ,4.,1..?' ,';. �� i sn't ,, i '.
to
r '' y`' 1 i. > ,c -.,:. 's „„ ,., e, „1- •fit
•
Photo Point 48—Robin Hill Trib R1,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 48—Robin Hill Trib R1,view downstream(10/15/2021)

�; s�.`l.p`' '•ter :'d:�' ;.' iftC�:4 .:•:"� . ,fix.: - i� ;.r, ,3-.,a,.,�, :r _ :.+;F... '� .
t.
r i
ik
- O,
�'as y 4. hk w .u.. •. . j5 �a, a�': A .� �� �_:: ., ', Y. , 1"�i> . , .
,: , ,
.44„ ,..,:_,.,...,„....„,,,,,:,,,.....„.,,„ .:,......r.7.....;:',..*Nitt*,. :','Pr. ' .''• 4:' '''„:,..4;i ''-;-I'.',.'''
e
A.
,, . • . ,»,V ,_- ,'', , .. . . fir: ' �.* ' .. .°'"
.: a.. k. .>r ..." -.>.,e.r_„•-:., F:Sx fir,, .p r. g;`% :,;°. '•: '.�, . i, :
...,- 4..4. m::.r , .h`.- -7�_' ' �s' :•gyp.•?: ':ai 4
u
Y
•;
-� -'.--:._.:i.. ..:"...•.-:.'xr,'.' .�. ..'' . e:._. ..�
_.'.
"5 r � :...y., ' :,�°'� "r.:"S �.-
Y %u, elez .� � <•!' AS;y
C?'.zc :ti n - k k:: q , Cx 4 ,.a �r:>�,.,_ ;ch' ty•:> Aii ..: ; . . .r ^ s„, y 0 ' um ;'4 :,a„: '4' • ?�. i c ; .4 - '.:' R . . Si - b" '&- .7'" i_ ';#` *' r >E.: .*;1:?:F -� . ;, .: ' : iT;- a" . tr : `: - •mow _ • r . " far;�+i'" ,,.. v:. q� E�� _
• i_ ^_ . 5f -KSa : Li•' . ,:t :; _ rt: _ I > ' ��' e.` � ,;Y , a ayr . .x�. ' :';•..;. -�'ice -.:, ai . .
•
..�
.-. 'c - w .ra �t: � _� 't vd^ - K_ �4
>, " �";i ; ':maF' �:i . , . ., a i,�'}_"k§�'hi:"4ir _ '�� .-' x _ ' m * a 7 V•._ ;b ._ ^i - - ,.' � *+ , .!,J -'. s":' " ya � .z :,j "y . : - ,1.':df 1 . s� ,�:••u: 1 ':r- ri.x , . „ -
Photo Point 49—Robin Hill Trib R1,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 49—Robin Hill Trib R1,view downstream(10/15/2021)
V. >,�. :.: ''�I�t�r i'Sk .,�". � `: Tr' 31i Robin,,
>f
'� �► :�;.. 'i',�i - i.�, ° .�': . ;. „ . , ' ; �� -. ,.
.-4..'-r: .4 vit. , !i 0 11 ill ,
r,.'.":':,;%:.t'..,;,. :. _ax• ::f:a y.is _ . :. �'.�I: - ,
r-.
i�'��:3r: ..� SJit� ".. :. .: �j /'T:. �` ? '.,.'� r�i': i?° .: a::. _�� j
:�r :_..n,.r. ..'ai:.?5�: , .. a' .f x: /.... ,#'
,
`
�<
' �':a �:'Y''• '' t:r'' ::" :k . ". _ f.. t. ,.i. r �°tl'.� "r' .+s,f:,'.',�...":b.' ': ,r.:r.-.a",a,°h`:
r.
.,.. .r, ., i.i,_.. f:fi ll)' i - "' - •.°'°:�' ,k�''.
y` #!e
wR
ti 'F.:.f' .
• ft
I ..,.. : • .... � - Yid- :':�:�::
1 ,�. _... .� : F. .. �' - '`\ i'' art: . `z3, :i'' C,`'° -
•
_ a. ';,:: :,..''�:'' ... .. Via' �>�.. .,, r ,x ..
P •d=
:
;�, . a,,.,;'3''. .QS. ,A: ..�� ,�Y r,a'� ::"C',t.`'�: �:'Ex -
Vr ::
sty,.
_.. a.�,.,` .-.::.•:..,i�
;
'•. ! . ,�,. .,..:. _>�: k` j-L _ _- 41
4
•1 " o
_ /i '�- ": :fi — { - / -,`0..
x - - - - ma' ' x.1 _ •`:c.• n- .Y,r.� _ � ., fs ",t_.. -,-•-f _,—
•
•
,p" Y+ F' � , ,:.. , _ _iir, . " .ns
Photo Point 50—Robin Hill Trib R2,view upstream(12/13/2021) Photo Point 50—Robin Hill Trib R2,view downstream(12/13/2021)
Y,
c,• All i go j l A it is
r` i;
{K_ , .;.f ,. . . .., ., . ,. . .,
�fr
-.f. '�'.''-' .'i' III
r
. ,... . , _.
, ,
'
/ r�.
r K
.,.. ...
� .. � :`1e'� a i,om.: ,., 0n y r:'fa
I', ,. . .• : s . ,� _. . i ry ' `°fix q f r as �sv rir.' �?i YN y�! AL' :=�Y • .v1', - iu.- 3 : _
f �,
�i4 ::. Sys ...
iire
7.
:.4,:. ; � r:•� °:,..'. ! 1 -
•' --, ---- �.sR,a,'`,..
I -
Photo Point 51—Oak Trib,view upstream(12/13/2021) Photo Point 51—Oak Trib,view downstream(12/13/2021)

'•,„ - 2 x a€" �, sue, r' P ' " ,3`a
,r 1
•
i.
11:
'� ', } t s ue, �''aT 'y r - L s P4``
x y ass ✓P- - s�, c F. c ,{ 1 , Q $. f
.r ,'sue' .r e, s" ' wc 'is r'^''a',.,� 4 a' - - C fi. 4 F"
�`yA,'t' �"Y�. - ::? 4'§'hL 1., ac -;'$ r'q "C�9r s„ *� s, t _^ rs v
�_s k i a .a"W 4F 3 F`- `5: q
J
i" �, s, � "� �, �� v"q- s} � 4 � '9 w. 5 as
•
:_;; 'fir .r y r " - ;� a ��`t°, - y yR '` q; '` q`
p •
_ . - .(, 9>. if' r'3'. &. . .:"'!� Y1Csyi -.t .e
Photo Point 52—WFFC Reach 1,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photos Point 52—WFFC Reach 1,view downstream(10/15/2021)
. ,at,... ,f-,
Ma v ] ems
r
��' � - � 4 tip' Y� _ ,� j . w C`aF r � ,
4
•
A' .. yr° _ �5 ' q-a •y,c ,� .1 `�i, .. , S e
"'wm' }p31pr"f.YYV - ;k �. '3b.i, S y �pF . y -.'�-• _ • G
C
Y - - 1qF '-. -r U' ,L y 4. "gu h s�iW r x��f.a G gym+ S1 ':1
/� L Y i
_ _ -, ' _
�:- ••`y - -v a'a t-: � �;.. �h� - a�a� x�� ��"t�4� {"'-a .w'��. 2t� "y' r'� �" rF �� �
♦ p
'- ;" � �a : - 4 r`� rr. „k �'x- is ,
.. .�'a.. -. _ti rib- ,' .. s"'ii, R1,Gk e '", :• - ..'.N:f.� b � tik., e:- x
Photo Point 53—WFFC Reach 1,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 53—WFFC Reach 1,view downstream(10/15/2021)
�fi! �+fin I.' I
•
•
t.
- , `' ` Y 3Sf ; J . l -a ' t.3- ' � 1i s ' M� S k Y� Z a : ,+ - ,S NP T5>yF '' . . 'm "ems' ++y 7 ;� v w t ..
A.
•
fi ' L.Y t x �4 � 3 tT ,
':$ ?' „_ z a t . � - 4i „ui be' �°4-714 e r.,. r4x ,4a a r � dy te aA ! ' 1 ,y -.
--
- - -
^x! ... r.=� � a Z1 ' p . ,.._ e 4- s 0 F .k;d w +..k+t:� _ i5 s..i � RrG .A "� ' i, r ,*-
Photo Point 54—WFFC Reach 2,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 54—WFFC Reach 2,view downstream(10/15/2021)

e y f.t..4 Y. ,, w m^ 5.^'
lI < It n3°v 3er - -
T, XXX
piii,
a'e r' ' fig?.
f;A f: 7; 4 ". � • - - Yob .v- f.
, Y, _ 'v' s - i d am - , s -
-i� e . J am
•
•
Photo Point 55—WFFC Reach 3,view upstream(10/1d5/2021) Photo Point 55—WFFC Reach 3,view downstream(10/15/2021)
sae ', ,i- , _ : .. p -
_ �.Y` rya _ i b: x. f r- ri f- .
s4,
"fi 1¢S a
it :
A '� h ��},fva �ky orr1t� �Ct 1` _ a `.� ��"Yy k��3s a� .'
�'•S-�j d 4e.,i)AN,,..., Y ) ., i. �. i,BfS.'n -- .K:''' 1 f' �-'4= -
:Ls
•
4 A
- 7r ttri a ,. ,t. ''fib - , � - F- -z - ,.. t S ."--. g�.." i ,
` x„ - e� `?' :a ,kh N' ' '' �x- r'L- �;7-. fr a 4n•s,'h4 f r,
_ T `� . LY _ .F.50 •- ♦ a. 41- �*`Y Y ems4 X° jvc ! 5 0
•
r v � -� --` �c x q .ram�s �'k� �, I �.A., ." � »� yz:t �',� y �� • -_ - '
i lt^ t .Ys 17-- n '-'' �`' ` _• xs` •g'S- f, pR• i v I--, . ,v`�r
ff' -'1/4,� � F ". _ '-t� '• - 4, .1,, 5, °a`l'`$ i ,. fI.W A ''�. t ` ,.i`d' $ .:d k' -Ka, _ .. ``_ ..3- ''L 1
Photo Point 56—WFFC Reach 3,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 56—WFFC Reach 3,view downstream(10/15/2021)
`� Y K t Y di N" D . 3'.„ , P ''
-mkt 'w '#Aa ,Q{. e �., t�J `?'
£J�"'€p ' to rtt � fir ! fi;
fit, i�� M $ k:
r
sa
ek
*"e, :;;.°,,.z* ,-e$,.,.L - - .� �d"'94 1 .P J':¢C M.t Y d . 'y, _ �C
` -''',,,A- ;' , 'w. yr' 4,P f r _ k�9 r -y''i P
- 1 r 5 -;?t * k r gfn -Aap t .� .,,: r. f .
i .' e +n ",` a -tv - seat. .+a °,<d d',ate fi-
Photo Point 57—WFFC Reach 4,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 57—WFFC Reach 4,view downstream(10/15/2021)

'74'a* IA .k.44,,t A.,- '...',.,'• r,; '.."-
1.
. � , -,s� -" K , "`SYE. .� .-.& ' i ti
. k �. y 'f"af " 'al r 'is : a n
it
Photo Point 58—WFFC Reach 4,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 58—WFFC Reach 4,view. downstream(10/15/2021)
d Y r ts• -i! ,yF ': ',1_ ,. b -: s r n c�`�i,C,,,, :1 a.: �3'i ,ax'' ,,,;
sf 4' �i' a ���` . y - r-'.x. � (� n 'a.�+,y � { r��i �e�Y rr'", ^.!y..<+da" I � ;,�> P
ti• � sf{_- •y, :.af\�,'-' e£x.'s 4..r ., - rf i r d-, 1 '+r a� '' b 4, ',x,
k` `' t s.��yy+,..--� 'n �!S - �^t�s" ,y'3• V S 'x�a sa k- �i v
tl� - q S't�e 3y Ti'.." • "•• ,� 6, 'IV
< r '''i: `{-fir ✓ - _ ley - '
c � �.: d"" 0 5 � gxat \''�-���y�S3 {J §a- y,�,�,4"g'"��a,��'�*`,i �?I r � "9" fi?i � r,
'�i �� ` KM: y' ,'ra`if l ,`1 i 'G' i '^ ;3e ,7- .h 3 ! �' may ':� 'tea
--'•4 r,Z-is W�. -,,,;.:4,?:‘
,,;.: _ •v, b„ty w� r4 r� $ . a5-.•,.;��', s i'' r r 'S- .•, :"' -ass'
z TS x err.. - : , '. ;* - . s - fia' K u. s_
�✓- _ ,,,,, =i� - s� •kr fat, ',' r�-� '
„sti
rY z ' a s -`, ,,,- . pGf •. ys� ''_
rs ! u Fx 2 ,w �i� —
fY.t xr . w r -i,, te r „
• f '-'
Photo Point 59—WFFC Reach 5,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 59,—WFFC R7,,c,,,,h:,5,..,view downstream(10/15/2021)
A `�- i ar+I I � ,�,, .. ems" '_ 'w
:rIpt''4.4'..'N.r,:.R 4).,"41044;=, '" L-ii i . '
�;v' - �' •`^ s�"wry t ',.. i - d- a ' _
o y�n , b k ,iF i, y a'. ,"T r 4 rcx a .t m,
`
. t' -
� a1.i.
y
Photo Point 60—WFFC Reach 5,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 60—WFFC Reach 5,view downstream(10/15/2021)

•
ial
r��J� t`sa'S a•- vk i rs � " s. It,�' --£`.i n . t-T a ' � s 1.r
tAt
,--;f:!_ -I',,,,h_14,,,,o,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,tit,v,,,,*,,,,-..,....,,,,,# ir ,,,„,4,.._. :: ...4„..
:_,51'-Nri‘.,t;Asi*,-AASk:'4J;tit :/:Ni -':.Tz'"...`,if,A WM Afft.ii4iNvoLL '.- 1,4r. :.'
- '�-'°a*- - _ -s=f¢,'� d a.,.ss sd��p P r' 0" .-,� "_ -- Ili
aE - +- F "' ' y r "` _ "I �i:
•
�,, a _y,. y - ,tii=.I - - TE� �- a -..,,: m x+,9'%r-*', f y.. �. "'` yam r
� -, `^ -- ,�- :'�` u "� .,' a '� Cr -,-may.. $ 'a J ,
c_. >:..a:» _ - 5 is • Y .§, A- .x s ��- ,�
�, ' ,s v. -- „ w ;, e � '- of ue'"" F - -E x-
;1,-.,—IM*0_,:left , .., *._,_,,- .-:,-,4-i.„7": „w„=-;-:i' -",,i461&.,„-it,--77-t-:,-
,- ^'v � _ 'gig , 5"., - -, .� ,? r Y IW :
ilt•
ti,
.17:
V "
��Z'f`"" 'iY: Y�'ip _.._ � '�y+"" `'', ' .u�;
� ��'`'^ � °i..-' �' fin' �e e✓..= �' ����'.. .�'
Photo Point 61—Magnolia R1,view upstream (10/15/2021J Photo Point 61—Magnolia R1,view downstream (10/15/2021)
'dam - W �:
o.
f _ : a
iit•g ,• �` -•..!tin,. ,, -m ,'e� fr r i "". -l.. f'; K ' _? f t E y F `v i8t r •
�,,� �. � r � tr ;�— "- i as �
�z'�. Txi ' "a £ t F'�}, +, � Y, o�+�'4 'S -,1 e' `k ,t • fi ,' °tr
i'r' � `.✓r* y F n '"lam
+ `�t5�� 4kt ". z nd ;......r,„:
a-aL'x.»a, ",�'l 5 q'.4\ A
,,,
_ ", Ash ���R� �
f € 8 q� 6�� 3 x�'r,." • '*s''•e'yt mow",'.A--.. .@ y :. y I?sp j' t-
4� �w, x a �':Yy� � �' „r ku 4 t>�' . a .,a=r.+ ' ,�'. ..,4 1 `.�e a-.1..S' ,e, , f�3^
Photo Point 62—Magnolia R2,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 62—Magnolia R2,view downstream (10/15/2021J
` 'ei: yr ^ts T _', - <x - �! - �„y '.- • 1
��i r �k .`` O.n u - a * +max s' -€' F� 1
" ��- 8 ca yr s +'t
Y- y S,
i s '�t i x i' x _ ➢q-a r f
' '� - ... Fyd,, § , S F *,
Q P €! 'fir "� ..
y
rtk�'y d;: & #F +„ � ,�, i �t' "w. �,. '�'� �+. ,3€; .. c � � c•�°y' - _
I. • :, • s �
xa� � , am, ppJJII� y yyv � � -- g� 1 j - �r-i- ;'a iii1i
� ,:Ati
..,,,,,,. .7 VW:2,t—{.1',-,.
xz yea z i_ .4
Photo Point 63—Shew Ridge Trib A,view upstream (10/15/2021J Photo Point 63—Shew Ridge Trib A,view downstream(10/15/2021)

I .
,:,Z.,,i ce i '-i. ��$'f{ -
-@ _
'kfi - o-" 'a`� Sp`E a' . „` s��' ' -ts. ,� '+ ' c a.� �'��` __:
'1.717
y , ... x - Gam,rt ",,x'+ . �. - „• �€' m_: ". � y.,�+r,,. s.: - 'y �
'�.s...,-4:x'..'-g".ri�t.� , _ ^^ .-' nN, t s`."h` ' Tkc7F s3' _ x ` •€ ,, , f �i -
g'x 4,•� {_ 'r : a'. SS § , - ' t
p y
T ys;,, '" ,i' yr. 11-4 v 1¢pspY p `�'c ,t+`� >4'F" 'v f -' 1 �a =,,' ,� �-
7,=£f v ."` A. r :e o 'is 4'
IT
Photo Point 64—Shew Ridge Trib R1,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 64—Shew Ridge Trib R1,view downstream(10/15/2021)
',1 } „-,fi4 i 1�fif1 "(.p jrr4x'r�F�,is(f_-Y r ' / I! V • s ifob
1 •'
•
i
I
` '+M i M 6 .
i,x Pk ' -� Et eb a t dxi } F rd` i +r w �' < �y
•
•
2
Photo Point 65—Shew Ridge Trib R2,view upstream (12/13/2021) Photo Point 65—Shew Ridge Trib R2,view downstream(12/13/2021)
rf• '..
w 1 ,
" e tig !+ yx x - _v ` ae, "' yy,Myq.4 ay��p. h '� �9' -',,,..,, ? k
'FiY.'F. 'M "'2^ x A.Mi N�t�' d 't' 1� & ] r�.'W.' 1 -'L�yV¢
•
4.
r
„{.
A a p. y�
Photo Point 66—Ironwood Trib R1,view upstream(12/13/2021) Photo Point 66—Ironwood Trib R1,view downstream (12/13/2021)

�?- k>i 9rr$ I ti s ,', 1 ic 3 .t- ''."N
' ( '
e a is i, '
may; - I .7 0P,,'' - s• - ss`` - Y::' �s . : ' g•
t'
w y Mz �`�4� a.- ;�`s �€i i",l� 1 r . o rk ' `
s s� '•w� �6 a ck�"� � it z s� _f ,�?<'�h � � h _ '��
3> '-n , t r r' '
+ 4 �k. a ,a e
,1 S ,y.,+ s. r 4. ' -+. -r,.a:�,, - �'; 3 • -. - - -Six a ' yr
��4? x'� , m s: ;9 v r'47'r° fir .) iAa s - !,,, al .ti ~ '
vk� :-,- p, t- -tl� ray r i
�.: I ry 7}� 0-a � � � '� 3j�Si,.` ��.1f a,r�y� 'a-�i1� �° � °:�'�i,�� ,��. 4'*� u' ss ---
x,. _ .� "_E"4 ' a c a a" M r�1 e iG. 6. p s6 .. r: x. 1•,ta rat. t 4-
Photo Point 67—Ironwood Trib R1,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 67—Ironwood Trib R1,view downstream (10/15/2021)
rJu- 3�- '^•tiar "�+si s 1`r � ) �yY0 � sii+2s'�, �"
-'-*--'-i,..:.*:.;`:::'14,:-::: ::4-2,Ja‘-'''.4--..:4;!4.-',--„L-,..f.-2:-,:ii..-,:0,:,,,,-,,..„-'24j,..,„:.,.,:.??t. p.,N.,rr ::',=4,-,,;,--_,..---,* i„, •_. ,..: . ,,44.W=q-=,?:6,..,.,;. , ,.••:„.,!4:.,s,,_,y4,!:, ;:::L.-,-7 ^ ..,,,...,f•J
`°.',d_' :^<° ...:iiv.'
'a -s..` '- $;g. n -gar ,, -'r' d k_ x>3yy 'h '.�µ v's:._
i� � � 0, 2q s +r4s�4 rn
.:1..,:-.1:7t!-;Vi:.1 k--.,t..':.4z:t:.Y,.-,,-.,.L.,',:,,,2','4Z,#,,--,.,.'1.4.::a.'---.i-`*,:-..;.'„.b--,-...,--:.;.I-te=:
p ...4 tY M .p 5 F,ten ljti�a^I- dh `C"7-1* '* '" - S. : .4. Y 4i 'Y mi}'L ' i" - IN ',,k'4 '
dray a ' t '' 3 + 4,. tis-Iv,-
' : ;_" d *aY 44_s' f;
t
.4%ii.
6 "^mot -p ky1. s.: a +' y sk, ,, 3` �, ! ' � _
14
tom..- "-- :. .e y + •,
...',--.4 Li"
•
,1- - ,,k �.;k =: - -a., -T .-a" - '- `.' 3' i.,t f _s r k_ ., 4r E ,w�S
- z q . 0..; A'' &.ems, _.,..,•. ,S i :4/ ?.-►,�- ., , `$,..- ,--,-.-.. .a+
Photo Point 68—Ironwood Trib R2,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 68—Ironwood Trib R2,view downstream (10/15/2021)
� •i' e a k}"�f �'�: a1. ,a 3 1 r. a-.� 'M!- - it „---,-.-.-:-‘,*--,-A-..-'E - - 4
4$. !1 r r ¢', ' Our, v N.
ss I 3 d V r - o, x #a, sa.
iii
.3.„�,.,. Jt ji w s, ,-: ,t +f 4, r_ h#,,, i t_ c �:' s's -`r..
It:
4�i k' T2, a �''. >�b �.
!irk E t r s - -1,4- -.a lista `•f = -§ � '�€ -w '.; _--�r a r
1.
• a& ,kf•F,a"�: .'cs' `'��� s � �,-�` e �rt.�, ��'CA�.1d:- «: ws---- �.a rt �,� 1��qe tY � �;i er
a_` ,_, .r, .. ;$a 5 r - T s1F vti. ,.� ' _ § v - i _ "f"r: - l"
. i - `5 -• ir-.- a. z•s;f" a' ° x,, a 7-`, a-- `a• . /' -,Jw e
,R
'4 r'•' 'E, . .r,~ �.' .art-''' . """- — � ' :x !'
Photo Point 69—Timber Trib A,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 69—Timber Trib A,view downstream(10/15/2021)

A 4 +r� �' # sty,' �� ��,, ` � �' �, •,, +i' x ;y _ ,,„g p'_
ti,, .
7` �'at :,-1 r x 'cam 'F 'r .Ta ya - X -
s ,,....4
ty r+; �' ^>< �� 'r• _ -S _ E ��{. �` 'C
� 4 --';' � '' $ �' '- ::: K ' '.'fir �- _`3 �r as' '� �5'j" .e. r
-' s`, � r '� :.St,,,., dfi "� •—• r''', ac-� , ''fr! �; �`
'age ay,,� :. h - i c�� g ��, f..
,42_ f =�`A, -I 1 ':- mod; >
i "GI -`a t- 3 i,*a€ \ �Sli f, 0A` 1 y,,E ; -. 4 't.
"� ''4`..�r
-.',.:- ";N'"4.•.'7":?1•410-*: .-'- ''._,., Ag-7:-.`''.. 7,-ir, : ,'.,,:;,.,, ,-.,.,;.::r4i,---,:;-,42.„--':.;
-411(4 ),
T4�- (lie yp „ d c -• Y - 'f. 11 7.,, ��.0,�-,i$ y� 'y 7, � �, -
.(
t a ''pi 3 t • R d - }Y} mow'•"
Photo Point 70-Timber Trib Ri,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 70-Timber Trib R1,view downstream(10/15/2021)
A t b,, t 31- s j ¢u t 1 +Eo` , -.,�t `'- a P.r'-d I ^��- £ y5 : T` - wiV +, `
V. € y g
" �i 9 5 [ 41,. + �' 3 ` 4 1. .. ': +s y� a -'•. �. 9 V'?,Fc � Y- '- v.
_ � . ,"' , � -may ,
te
.;1:„rf.U4,'4A,-.`"I'M4*-14-t:t.;."Itli ''''''Wl'' '''-'",-,
-,-7.----;-.,....;:..f..:;'-.,, .„-i:,,, : ' °-",, ...5'.:-,,-.." ....'.*••'...;":•;,-,; ,••::,•- -- •4,-:. •4'4:47,-... e...-4.1--.44.V40"...,-.A.Off7.4:14.,k."'7-- ••,5•'-:-A:40..".1:.-f-'"::•,t'::''•-' -.1-fai" q
00-
- 4; 4 0A �•a � i ' '4 >fi p4 � f [ 'q.e s y S'-
Photo Point 71-Timber Trib R1,view upstream (10/15/2021) Photo Point 71-Timber Trib R1,view downstream (10/15/2021)
�,z.r. ' ll- a.d., ,,,,,,..4
� r° 'f" 3 1 x"'-`r "� ,},: 4 r as�a i`'fr-, ..,ate{' - � ' �f-'i"�K
t° - •� _
Ayer r•,. ,F ,-. .,S , - ^n-
Y
� 411117
y
•
,;.-;:-1•.,. ---/,Y,f4-4,,,, ,A4,14.4t7i,...14.,;,••• 7.,:v+Val.z,..4 •-,:',- Nottv-,,'-,-'‘, ...• , ' ..
lii
_ �. - -. ti a� r 7 t.1 ' X{��� ., r,7 s"fi`Y 4 t'a ` f .,5�';r� " �r n
sic.I �Y�G� - ...} H�°� 1H. E r x N- .C;e SL - :�
Photo Point 72-Timber Trib R2,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 72-Timber Trib R2,view downstream(10/15/2021)

i5er}�,.,,tk,. _ `-`•ty'u:',;,, :±s, ., ,: .. .� E'�'3.1T''_:,Y: e `z' ,<:. i .'a '. :',a - .''+'�,.:tr" ; c: _ r:�.
Iry 4 �;. ;?' { ;^�, S, ,' 1:, ,s 7= t�yy,
;,§'tip,' '{ y _ r d„Ek.•: i.`fT'' - 3, - �5 _'x.' ` - !�, a 'i. tic r •
3��,' A.,r .I�. ;.rtar": 1.',N�':':Y,r'; s �t. `�.> S" �.i,:: 2"�'"t q- T.i x .,
1' ..i:: t� =d .•' '� �t`';" '3, Yr-b. �. ' »� ^:S.a w::.F^y. 9:
•
�...�{F1.e, :.F' aP': n„^ _. M{' i�. ',i'�,4-/-.. ,:L '� A'hl. .Rh.:e.^'�,jsb. ...}z�.,_.�. ..' t y' ..
�. : ..,`�' .�'v' y- .:,� ;.,4.t sr V� ���'-..' :: Ex;Ceai;�^ pq .� � �.'1..5
.,sk. v ;.M "S dF '3 •'k�:.W' -�, -.,k, - - •
•�:.-.-•
Y.,^'„4-.i,:.:.::� .. . Y ',,,,..<a..,. r±.. x: 'a:T,,.C.. ,« c��t ..:yl: - A - _ aRtii:_
•
.:,r<.,...,_., ," � . .,E�; '*¢t�'•"y' , ;5::.
' :ate`.
: wl'
.2311 iY* „, ,.. :., w <r %,::•'' -,�`!'z'' ' ,,-5.''�'tea.",
: •-'fir', .. _ ,+•: c.ya,'.,k}-u-..:„r ;.t,;'" {;,. gg - ` y ,..;7,t. .':I„-'.-;
-S'c"�. .4{ �,«,^,.l ,.`y'." a�}.....,1mt+.... ....3+ -e„4,',�'vt .''fi°:., ��.�5,i,-w.7.�� W�� �i9•:..'.
..w ,F4 t' 'Yntn�v�"",:l,,y�=:,:' 'R .4i� r}..:;e KM tiYc'xiE' r�:'3`'�.`."''I v=:," ,N r"
�-�' - y ,.C' i:�. ;>5'�A's�i.s'��}„frr "r �JG sF�;`i� _'�e,..N",.'li:k..,f.'.':�,.'_ IM1.
ya::- • ::,: ..l,F'q i 'Za.. _:"`F? ",}n' niIs N 0. y.Y,q, � C"
':'[I a.C^' : . :ilr,f � .� ..ter `� q..'"�c, ���t,.c:.,' ,Q„ A •rCM��,�,'�y
�y - :.�. } :':'iMY` AI�:�,� "'y:t36'i: .)::A�•:��-'t �'Fi �8,: `� �'i�
4it
`� y
1144
t see"._:i C`3' w`�✓'L<f 3T-k' � .'` .'.{,`.tz _ .�"� F .� b,: .�s !
_
e
tr
�:�'." .�. ,.�, .. � "r ,5. •r :: ���,' ' �. ..ig: rt, • "' : �;+ �r
,;, ,'•; a' _ fig,,.,,
',�.. .,'t,�, ..,� .1`'. " �x. .,s'Ss.y:,' r Air .:1: _ -•/'t{ p_ �'� �
��4�- t�'i:..:, p�t�;+��>•' �� F$; A' -''s' �` 'fir.z v - �F� k,-
i
..tz- o'i' 4,y'5 "', +'5., �' .,;,.::::.� ,-:. ,=sa- .r x-w' r :. `�.
, ,�Y
:
t.
i,'."..'41413:;:fW*I' ''
,;� A Y �,.,` 4. ''k.. ..,P'.� ^1"44 • Yr C- :r�'., _ -( :.3t ^�� �Y.'� �`�ir .-V_.
•
e.
0.400 ,g
`' ..i..,,,,,,,,,,. .., b.a :L! -y{:: "h v' & 5, m'G:t r- .J: �>�. - '>}.+„i{
..,� r.: 6'�'"��� ,� ���.c __�«.� �: �� _: ^`fir„ ,;� :� "'.�, � ,_ � ' .a'�>:�_ . � ._��- '�:wJ..,r_ , ��.��. ,� .w
Photo Point 73—Timber Trib R2,view upstream(10/15/2021) Photo Point 73—Timber Trib R2,view downstream (10/15/2021)
vy V J' b '�' `B'ck '1;
't ril': 1:"rl .y3'' - ,'I°',';f f .: ::,. ..Wiz:<'kUt^':
pi
•• F, ii
.. ., .5�17;.. ." � :. � : .. :•....:...:. ,.RN �1•'! .xf� 'C��, ,,;�:� rr 2 :N 1'
-
jsK..
' ' '� ' :f 1: ,� ;„tom, '� .,
_ tl
E Xy;g'�+�
y"
.' 1�
s
.'�j 'rt'' 'y7 }'
it
�,�• + ,b,,; '�'f.,n. �. 'Eta., .,� z::'. �} t>'.:"
- %el,
._ ;..,�"w"r.; n ",S� r, :r 3z, ;.J 1,'r'_ ?:- �,-i'- s^ :'a`rx o:'a :t''. :s
'41
r': Tl- .'y::i.P: ' ,�C V-0.'.‘,..,:„.....41
�.. ..�r.4':: � '':� _ ,' �" :'%. •
I' ,'?4,., L' ,;'";c a ."a'A.; , :,A,,' "°^ -' `` ;;:.'J t,� .�;jPi1Pi.¢Y,? `i, t c ^ ; tiqewe , ''$ a' ,Yi�Yt ],. ,,.. '` T• ,.-�^,.. .: :�. 7-4- ,`tg ,+ -� �n A Pn .t ?" 6i� Aa7> t:v" i? :�j.a A� �.��"��...
,x �t +a
411-'
,ii>r .:> r. = i ,]:. .,,.d•_ ,.:, s.�?.e:- .�,x..:tr -.+�..=i.;.«;� "' - '.: - , »'�. JC'',>.� lr`-"�:a-
� ' s f`' 't �..., ��`):a.'ZJP �pn^ n..:�9: (;'t. S� '�"n . 4y� {-, \� '',°•s'''-,k`'_
... .,,Zr r— ,in 1' ,r "!'}' `' Pf ,T;"- y, �.. •` .:.
• •
' : ..:4, i1, 's; _)fir" � 1:i - - •
."� -
4 j .. k' ::.t,� a'.g', -= ,.7:t _ram l'. i q 1 a.,c ':.:.. 'o
�- f '..'� ,.art��a..s4 � ►' ' 'its. ,.�u�svn .Y^:
Photo Point 74—Critcher Trib BMP, left floodplain (12/21/2021) Photo Point 74—Critcher Trib BMP, left floodplain (12/21/2021)
,..fd,.,$..,:,, ,'ifjrk, .,, „4,
AA r ,,.- 'Y� .';r,' .';:a+ i cite ,;- '�, i;�i:-!'ri ; :` -s°. p s. ..� ,r„`)0)r.x.��'.:''.n';:.'`v _,
y » fi .a:ter.-' - ";'''' .' >,_,' - i"'':. .s .t:.: r..: �: ` :.,�', ,„ '"'
.�/� ..•�. ;,,• .,. ,. :'.,°,��''r~p"-� ,fin ':i" r Ssj_' °. ,.x;�. .: �.: :r..r ��� ..a, £a. ?f%,:.�:;:�-
'}•�yh. ..,.:. ." 'm:� � `:: �-�:� �'+ :'� � � ��ti::^:`r.�l:;.:: :":r :m:.." '.t'�.�: dk`;,''l�-f � f.�„ '.t
.�':."a ',. ..I r.;�e, ��f? L� rr: ��4�"F��r�' .`h: „3Y q. t';�', 'kati.
• q'
L '� ,h ''('°'"^: :.,?' f:: ?1'7 �k s.l.: ;I .4-:t '3- '4� Y.�r',-•.�, r a�'�',:.
- K "?� "',' f-.' »'s("r ,',.,r .� .'�_ ry.�i`: � ^s',4.. �•s}.r_'� �:: i .�3'�:
a � x'�I - A� '�1, 1 y_Sh ; � > :� � .,� ":�', trf.,,�. 'r tr�'ems, - • '�� '��.
Y»F�'.,, .. ,1 ..,,,. ,.,, N'r� ,� •,ui- .: '.h{ s " I;:'.. y.4:, :,'.. -; Yx B !.
:::,,4,1„ .___„,..... ..,,..,,„.
y
1. .�,. _:{; ,k;Lf� -^.3a. ! 1, �,.' . ..3t, �':fi'i3,:;,,".Ya"` `�; , �.�.,4-,.
>� .'. .� ti--ter":. L r; ;;.. ���;��= ' >-.a��-:,� ;. .;': '.
fi:... ->y r' . .. I.y' '1 ^ayE' ,. <, ,.�.ci ro t�,;. FF' �:t �-N_... _: :'Yi ,'��
:l » 41-41p;.4-,.,iitv,..,...-_-.TA,,, ,s..-•:-,. *;,..,1
,ate. .#i; j l `, 't� �q .i+:k4 " ;` 'i,. ? zti;" '' 4,,,,,.' ,•
- �. :,-�. .,� .yl � • wary'' ...d'�' .4a� a»;%s;�� a::
aid; ¢ >ti ' ::-'-.'. �._r;i z.�,nZ
tze*P--, ,,i4: k'-.-,;.':' ,';,tv -'-'-':',1;.: ,..-,
:
k �`
.yC
r
:
ax t ,«R e
� a
yt,
It
4,...„...-„,„:.,,...,..,,,...,,,..„.„.
,
f , a'
..,., .. ., --. . , „...,,,,,. .•
'�"i' 's (::iv, :J-.`s�- -a-.'.., . _ _ .X. F�.�:f�'+ , �`,`--• � F •
:-� ,�'_ 'ram,
•
Fr: • .
-kT.. .N- .y.*.
.• ,. i.��f.i1. a Y.� 11R.: = `s .f �i.-v ,' Y£ ?' :..�.r�W-R,.�'r cA.q..X'e:T;.Y
Photo Point 75—Critcher Trib BMP,right floodplain(12/21/2021) Photo Point 75—Critcher Trib BMP,right floodplain (12/21/2021)

Internal Crossing Culvert Photographs
MY1

_ ;r'^'" �� m - _�' ,,$, tO . yam :ti
'P`^ R1° - 5 a � - .E , " r Paz z �. :yt1g , ; 'qa -Y",
;,,o �, 1.',"t:,�K`; _ a.t ` z ,� k �n ,l r • R • s $F. 'y' 7 'r 'a`' 'r
{• k'' �( 9�r - ' ,•? R .-'" "'�T �` — 4 ' :�; _ 'ftFn s 4d .0 "+".? v A ,; �° -_ �' .�
4 rig-
,.,„
, ,,w-_, ‘.
,,,,,,+...,_ .. - . ,.1 1 1,,••., ',,-,,„1%,.,..'
- \ i
Culvert Photo—Chicken Trib 1 Reach 2,outlet(10/15/2021) Culvert Photo—Chicken Trib Reach 2,inlet(10/15/2021)
1,7„...„,
4 z '� r 49�,,r .{a ci�y y`rk ^ i x.a e ,"� a„r -' r,
v 'F 1 ', I $�g Y "4,;i-- ,,t � ; z: "w -. i .R f `' j.4M F14T,o-:
P C , cl! iS S �"^f u _ f. C , #, N,- 'M' �'FF-11' -S'
c,
- —u__ man.:."" '.-- - _ . n z— _ , '�r.a,. �.. "i .-.}
yr 4:Z ---, -r. .sF "
g
ram .
Culvert Photo—SF Fishing Reach 9,outlet(10/15/2021) Culvert Photo—SF Fishing Reach 9,inlet(10/15/2021)
z 1 S5 1 4
� 3 s �, . ,moo �'"�f a ��,� � +- � "'�yy �,� �'"
•
"S
Culvert Photo—WF Fishing R4, inlet—Pre-removal(10/15/2021) Culvert Photo—WF Fishing R4, inlet—Post-removal (10/15/2021)

` .
i i A .
# f— s • `�..�.r t T�y'rz;= -F c - - "Si - �'s�S d* --- f
'...4---- ,_. .ram y-' � F+ F - • - - r
d T' ' .,� 4 '!�Ck- ., �' - . --. •
.�T 4...? ,4_ e P ; .A —•ram'-x`.$F�'
' r ..,;, h -�.{.�rc' ,y ,'cep-- ,T,,
x r ,rt, g x r n, Z4`, *I' { s.1 '4' e v�'' �' z �?�.c. K �
Crossing Photo—WF Fishing Reach 4,view NW(10/15/2021) Crossing Photo—WF Fishing Reach 4,view SE(10/15/2021)
• is RA! Iff
14-
'.° _-_- -_ - „'-". nae ..3y..„ - -t4 A. -, x _� ri F •• .-" _,4 pia
•
b,' --, :'�- �- - � .224- ,4-. --ai , „♦ -'-•r ('' , . ~ -
-� - "x' ., , -'; - c..W.Y`3 •-• i, . ..n ;ii-
is ,, h. - f :. Vi.✓' - _ ��,..n*r'., ' +.�
e -. /_.
Crossing Photo—WF Fishing R4,view upstream(10/15/2021) Crossing Photo—WF Fishing R4,view downstream(10/15/2021)
R P, p
I 4 ,..44,,E ire , ,
!
rY 1,a r _4 t ,ar ,fa- i.:47 �.e Y'i�v 4?-
, `� '�r -' �= r ^.ht'l / .f y skfi�4 r.-
+s 4'i . - DBE
�,K 1:k' j�'
1 '3 6° .rt 1 }. - `er, .Tk �` `;ti �y Via'% '. x,'' . - Ic z.. -:_ .�'<l �_ry �� 4
._:':1::::\,..444A.IlrHi:v:IL
Culvert Photo—Timber Trib Reach 2,outlet(10/15/2021) Culvert Photo—Timber Trib Reach 2,inlet(10/15/2021)

.. .,,i ,L, ._._,
, ,
,.. „ , --..-„,71
y. p 1 .‘'''i z, _T• ,;,7.--.,,,,t 0.1._._t, ,7,,,� cAi; }y *�' AP.. �5 > - i rr"
.,,,,,.. . .._,.../..., ....„..,,,._ .
^ : 'fir
-r
= Yet i' "-4, z , '_.is • e.- 67 - tia .�� " i..'
•
• �",, �x a, ` `E r`
�'a� ��� �',� ^�`�"b�L �ia''a4 ac r aa, w, - - -t� '. -,, . ',,, r 9 • ' f�tfe- �_
q k 4 k F
lvt Photo—Antioch Trib A Reach 1,outlet(10/15/2021) Culvert Photo—Antioch Cuer Trib A Reach 1,inlet(10/15/2021)

Permanent Vegetation Plot Photographs
MY1

Ig a P ,
`p A
s„ � F M ��� FXs4!-R,�i a a .. 'r'- rjhp-, y „
Y
,.-7_4.4.!-,.,••,._i_: ,x,,,, •,.:..„*.,•,,,„,,,,,,,..,-.,..,:-.:.,,,,,,,—".!",;,:.-.,,W41:. '':Vio-„,
:77.1-.. <-4::..,, -.J.,:,. .;.-.-,..NA-N.4.-...-..s?„-tA--.-11..;.,:it_ 7.'..,-,.3„A .., ,, ,-tc&f:f..,;4„,,'-v.;.* •",t'.--•-.A9V,,..,6"i•---, ':',.'3""•••..!-. .".,,43,''''..
il, 're,A••-..• ;'.. '' Gt.' .' :1''''.-; ..• .''''':1': 'f:'.'',-,,,f r '•/'---*':'-i-.1'7:-::.....4,7" .--.'';'••":7=':';. 17:5-'...4(......-;,i.',...'gr-g- c''....i.r`'..-.4.:4(:.;;I:''''. ',A.,1f.'"'''''''' '.1-'• .,,',•::: .' —.....".._.
•_..Z.. 4 ' - -.,.-. '.--; ..„.: 1.-1, 1.„,.. --(tie4':"..'.,•i ..:•ki':-.:-. ...V.:T.: , .- -. . .09116r. -;','
•
F. d N.�xi ¢ "� ;�s,r'i v .•t k+#'P, • .3 3. i - • c s° r. '�. '.
. -�' �'f- ', k9md' _ r i Yvr. sr r -• �.k �'' • ";lb a ,y'� .ifs z
,.. �-4- 5i. -'i"Y .y 'h p' r ,-# t' •r� 1 ' c Rn
N� y'f7, - -f^ s i tF.4 - 04- -` ' 9 fGfG..a..�, "fia••' s t r x •=�i.
d ° a d fie ' '.a _F � a,,}
•
: h' ' r k � a -xz r 4 tt #�Y `��, 1 t, ., v 3 t r#€
x -> 'f S - i4 a iFt . I a z w s, 3>''I Y •,.°- 2 » y r
., e - �S ° taV�-• �� r- , yY +k a g,• �lw i ' : ak • r• �,t y`Y`�"` E' vs- §
p A' ' - j :, �„r? ik 7.' '1L { ..,,,--. a2 , ,ra ;,, , nr� , i G+."'!" e-_:
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 1(10/14/2021) PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 2(10/14/2021)
i4a,
•
•
v
•
K9 �)_ �j `2 . J h ryn�
* hPiI
4 • , R;;; .,:,,,.,,„,„..,._.-.,,,4A M , .1
•
ak s' xFa R ,' '�r Ism, .'fy $ i '4 �v .. �, '
. ,:',7,', ...._:i..::4,,17.:'-' -.4-..-:::,„.-;,„Tic-- .:°-.:;',''.',„27'..:••: • • • •.,-. ._
1 PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 3(10/14/2021J PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 4(10/14/2021)
d:.
•
•
n.
�
f '. •;. a
iE,;. - ° y
•
k 4 yT y♦y(<"-4z 1 0 T is a :.41 `RV . i i •; � i r.' 'PA r x .
.a k ° K � - -. f ,j s j w5�a7.. p F i�
'
tilY
i. � ., ;X: - ,rd:.' a'. s E _ a y a b : Wi i - ° /� .1 a : s rott•- y_,1 r l " � ..„2 .:1-' F K .'. . '-c '. . ?41
, It
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 5(10/14/2021) PERMANET VEGETATION PLOT 6(10/14/2021)

--i s , 1:1 r ; '"' t _ I
--ik 3wi'., lfi v"+c . `.' a —Yam i .' i� � I i t� s"�'.,7 Ya�.�-. � � ai - k ps. ,,t r &^ + d#y - ''
4.
0 '.....',-,,,.:',...7..Vi. w.gt,..,,A,s4eti-...-„•-•.,..-...,..,,.q.=• .-..,-,••.•.'• ;,:-fatzioi,,x,J4,....4.10'..„,-S.V.01.in.,..--i.-,,,,•-•,,r*,
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 7(10/14/2021) PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 8(10/14/2021)
- 9."- • ,- '
.
•
_ ,�„ � {•ter :•-�- •
( P�-a
•
Xu`{e-d. 4 •••�4 #)" L - fib.-,+: 'F.,:
54r -y's ',°d 'h w-
.. '� " '`yam �''� �.
' gg
•
.»:4ai,ti f s?m�i ' ;'r'\ v `. � '. 1 3 f.ZAt:N xs. .* �i C q. .. :1:.z-,, --d_,•.:, ',�.n_ ,. ..P —
ERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 9(10/14/2021) PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 10(10/14/2021)
,
. . ...
•
1 3" 'se°! ° F,�..e� ,,�,,++ z' 7 *''e�,�. Iz ' 'ham'
•
_ `', 4 f f• - y - L :'J. .. �w 1 '' JY - f . Y'%ate �' i � ? 4
a ateit r v '�
Y.tr.
�: ^"" r t { O« ' 'Cs cv ,5�.+ t.. r�` c4` a -n r ,�'r a'' ..
&` 4 + W .wtf"` #',e 3' .. w4°h ""r �,'ai,� y` 3`,w, _ rw } .'rr r `3` .& s+�' -
X�J' ���� +�f4 R YC�i � -P� 4,� �3�,-,�.1J���jl� ,�,- .Y }ii 14�� J 1Nb� '. � �'0 § � �§r.a t�yb3,.0 5;'l}t^ 't F , � u�`.a3'
E,Sy r`i, se a,Y- �e'5� ,,^I -t :�' `,,yu •4rF,, bl .11., s- �f>� ',,,;,`_ .x'.- -•`�y`. ,1t . " ,s ad: w' TM
.. tyse r i 'b- , .t. a ,i'« 1 Q , 3 i, s '� a . . v
'f A i ,A,,,, -1, - y
- #>�' • Hy"'.
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 11(10/14/2021) PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 12(10/14/2021)

,t �f 1�r `;z - J$p `,- te' • `
• w�
I e r ,- *f.: as 5 j, --,,,,,...,,-,,...,.,,.„,, ,it:..-...-.
{ t,^` ��, ' s
4 +8�'. Y �`F f �' lz $ q tit I
ik � r % yr � 4 sad �l �.
Ft - ,,ww,�� t �, a 41x ,. _ 6-',a ,-c�.^ " ,yba " �`� --. i
'T�,%'"y r-?;:.,.O�'- 6 f u, e.:� 3. 1. L . t h. ' '�' .' A.:.,,y'' , 5 '3 .F.: i .,
� ? � ���to 1�,��;Elil:?:.'1.1
t fi, i 4 s�w�® lam 3°� � '4 kai. � lf' � 4
.,.Y• ,,...e Ar Y }�..3� T' F, i id �S y'"+*t _"�K _-� y\A -` '"' ,
i _� ;h `I*� _. �'". �;._ � 'PkF✓;mr ',;. k � 4P ,r'� "'w�',. � ;� � aq �.:.PERMANENT VEON PLOT 13(10/14/2021J PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 14(10/14/2021)
y,
iF
r1
a
, . __*1,i..,14,1i-,1,44r-7.7 .,,4,r4.'''..',...4-,':.,;....k..'L..'11,....
PERMANENT VEGETATION PLOT 15(10/14/2021)

Shaded Vegetation Plot
MY1

- rj i Pi B k ff r,,1 1�� ^ � _' l 'hrif�° ' _
SFFC Reach 9—SHADED VEGETATION PLOT(12/15/2021)

Mobile Vegetation Plot Photographs
MY1

s -
¢
•
•
iy - 4' `mot- f ':.P'l 5* Vy! - y _ 7' S - •,_
4.
d„ # --b Y1 Ma 4- i • _ y
•
`T �k .Q' fir e %�C d•�,, ,r.,* -- y. +., •• ,t z3{ —s a '`": �„c
45F-
•
it
y, t R L ' 4 • -i
•
.;,..i...,.:„..m4,‘ , .;.......,4„.„,,, ,,*... ....,...:5,5.'
ii ` f ryArya.
_..r• �., _ s � , .1. ?I .ditl
.
MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 1 (10/14/2021) MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 2(10/14/2021)
aup -we it*,
Art
•
f `�� •p 4y rr,S '�r y�.�. k. ., +& ` o�.,r`•04f7. dRw • g .! ,.r
rF.h
-:.t . } 44 h ma a7 > 4 i A _— `x fi. ..' ; a . e + ' t'w ` � � t-, , e Y , f'\
'/.r' 41^4 � x , 1- � u ' - � �. 0:: ♦. Ai -¢ 'S - j h Tx1 t� ' .. �m.. ,i`ry y , e s' r� - f: .Y -' + ' So`y p • w'. toV rk : : - h.� . ,: q! ,`( s.G'�4' - V. c,.yr''k .. _- ••
MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 3 (10/14/2021) MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 4(10/14/2021). , ., ,:.:
,..,,.,_.s.:,4:r.
05,7
,_,,....,......:....:0,,.,.._.,
,,...mit
. •. 1
•
••
1 •
w`' t
,.,.',.,..:,,,„..4t..„•,.. 1•.,:.,t4.4 4r,Ir••;.t,...,„iTiltlgt,,,,N4 t,V..,,,:t..•.10,1.:.,,,,,I.:.cr,..•„7..i-74.,,,..,.„,,,,,.,,.,.„...,,- .- . . . ..• : , , , ,.. ..,,, , , .:tiV
t.• 7 Est } " _ a - 1 r?� A ' s a �" '41 t s ' ` r `` i t
,,,, .., '''.' ' ' ' ''''
» l 'tea,?4 -,q '1•"'-i x°' �? u �. 'sl rt -* F-,' .-
q q, 5 1 �j {t � �- " t'�.- . l'�' � t - � r � 'r `i?h. �'{l .�t' - - � h
1 i t yS� Y.A y 7i. "�!.
' •
.` l: F', r y lx, a ac '
C ., fa e A r x �- k
1
MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 5 (10/14/2021) MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 6(10/14/2021)

l Sg _��, 31� / Yt
.
•
•
µ Pl
3.7:e...r.,....,,,..., itz, ,,,„01,_",..,..:,•,: :_,_._,:T..„k.:E,,=•:.;•T‘•T.,.,..,_r_.,-..,,,:•,..-;:•,..._,, ,..,••:....t
f
a its �., 1 �,i0.. �- i'�c C1'ti- -•• ! , f-` €1 I f k 1 -..4 "• • EI J 1•"'
t p * 8 q &`
E N s t �d q r k�-k r_� '�: 4 6 a Y'°:�_ w L �•= �,� � �� J 'i�� ,a.L
< k � 4
Ns
�h '�'} 4w n� �y,� 1 y i��Fg �� i h Y',ffi: z���555,,,��� S��"; rF,-' � ,"°�'`a p ', x f�,s.�:a y k i �. per } ` � �y��
/40,,,
ark w3fir '�r.-:'.'',••04-1;;.• ", �i , y �1`:. :,04k7t,.=, .i:.:,..:,„:43,,i..: 'sF y '¢ 1
$`;'t•
E, k. bx� 1 fir`• 5-, -� (S, .i T • Y ' •1L�h I .P�ll ..� -
'"y< . . i,. �,9� �.', b` '` 3 Fa d "�1r�` 5x„'' wr .1i.a S. �r _ '.".v wz,.. � .,4,, �R "� a,,' u .
MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 7 (10/14/2021J MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 8(10/14/2021J
..,....4,.;,, ,,,,i,,,,,.,.- • ... :',,,: :..':.i.$41.4bl''.i.40:,-3N:0 +':4 l''''',V.' . -..'f-, ..., .•... ..--`,';411,,Y.'0'4:41;.V.19:4.! 1.
e ,. _ < �,
•
.-.M-- :.,.,....-?4,,._.,::...:.7..-i;:..,-;, ,.;) °.,:.°Ti.,"4';,:;%.g.,.::;.i.ti". '..!;.li".,:',..:,,fi'-;
r 1 mi,..mignor-
h'
¢ ) , $ c
•
] y9 9� I
� ,,-.:..,:,:,••••:.::::.;,!,:::-..-:'„,,,,-,,,.-:: :-..;',. :.:••••:•!:„.(i-::,,,,-41,,...44,:,..,,,k,,,,-,,.:::,.:..-:-. .-.J.,. \
r� ors
MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 9 (10/14/2021J MOBILE VEGETATION PLOT 10(10/14/2021)

Areas of Concern Photographs
MY1

F,
sr .`�� to " , - ;v�r _ ° .. f° F ': d ` it r�
kop.
s s f : { ..k�et a,dd 5 ,!a J 5 + 9 j, ,--'' 5
ej`L,-, }S-•§ , t Y s. �t* � � i L a S` - i F +k� 8S .F F , '� ,
, f.^-z '1 ',,,, A, r , 1 I 7 ems. ���
y .is v�� "„h",.f ,y ; y,�'` ', c, sz - S e 'Y,' - t� '.i s . �,- may` 4 .i.
L r974.° )s''€m •§4 c Y S "�a'' ' .�,v"i t ,i r �� S.s$ 'i: - d s
S P _ '-.s �^�' 'sP 'S 1¢ ri t, �F i r r -% ate.-'',' I .m -, S F
til
•
��'4wW t 'Y tt L .. 1y t, tir �. ,*"� r s< :,- -
�5S! {k �"i� •.,���` t�" 1'� 3 �� ,e.m si' " `� 1 r t s ��; Z`,E='� x�",.,:
r x ?f ''! .!Arrr. ht. iT ,'+py .i
Critcher Trib,station 213+50—Bare area(12/15/2021) Critcher Trib,station 210+00—Bare area(12/15/2021)
y 8
.....e.-1-A., ' ‘'''' tr' '40 ,1,, -• -...'lliii;'' ..)/40--_,.4. -F,,---21,04,:f N'''," '
. f
—
a ,
Critcher Trib,station 214+00—Bare area (12/15/2021) Robin Hill R1,station 505+75—Channel Incision(12/16/2021)
, , .,— .r.„, 5,•.' ' i , if il,
a, �. ,A C if itf p
1 ': 9i
_.'t'h • ,s cccT
id Z ! ;:* . -ki .- y, -; ,ji -,
Antioch Trib R4,station 313+50—Floodplain scour(12/15/2021) SFFC Reach 9,station 164+70—Aggradation(12/15/2021)

'i o' �15} 31 i'i: .•` .5 x ..,d'�C• -� fi�yE 4, �
ry �:z r sue a gp ss & 7 4, -!
•i:' ,c4-,..--,,,wi.. r.....4, r"„" '",,i'1.-,..'rrt-r, '',,,,r4''' 4 -","'''. •,'' -'`.., , -•••;. -'1'•'-''
j,.
r 3i
w
`�° cam;�� + * 'A s f ¢� �s
� ^i q, "� *r _ - �, q� �y4�Y�� i � �{S'x»�r���n��s
/�:`"' } x. =i"" -,IFS L- } '
it 10,
` .
it n
_ a: x n1. � y
SFFC R10 X512,station 167+30—Minor left bank scour(12/21/2021) SFFC R11,station 178+50—Minor right bank scour(12/15/2021)
�� > • 42 � �b�f 'It'''
m� ,� „ �,, q t Y4 �t'.
,. '. ��tit';-,,,
�� k .�'�f�i ,f *��' ,a�1 *T f '-.,,, j 7`• i,,.
o w�` r..w. _—r::. �u3.,;�.. a. fr `aC -.G'-ice�-�
.44
'. r k ',';' �A4r..."R '' $ � z �y 1.�r i H' � ` <`a AY /
4 1 m
ate' r ��. - �c� �
f.
=1.k.4....,,,,,,„..,.1....„ .,
. _ .... ;I.,c1'1 0,/,L,,''?W':._rt,rP,,,q-7.'.I,,-4.,' :,,..,.4,,,-r,,'',.,,,.A,,„-.I.r4.p.,..,,r,,,.;,-,-i.'•7„-i-,'c,.., -,•,. .-,.., .-...„1.,_-,„_1.,4',.7,-',',-iif,. ,1'4 4,.,*A-,'--s,-r i.1I'-,,Y,r.'..,-- - -t-.,N-*.\.-,1,,,,:%,.,,,'-;-'
c 4
.-.'.14‘',-„1-..''-%-,--1,j,4..'..
SFFC R11,station 176+00—Low stem density(12/15/2021) WFFC R4,station 727+50—Moderate right bank scour(12/15/2021)

Resolved Easement Encroachment Photographs
MY1

t le
4ry
x� � y�� a. , .. 1 •• Irl 1 IS '" - p tl
-�a � r` .0 "'G`'a,* '� }4, -.w.".�I ,l�` �s, , .Y 1 4.
y ,
`� ' - 1. /. i r-�r
y 1F J{1 !!Y _. fox' 1� k .•"R�# r y 6. ' $ +' } y f, - i f
d _
y 4 .'9 Byy �`t . ^`` ''Y3.'b ybfi sl • 7 Yk
' � "'i* . "; :''''t'. °` s n Y ,� "' x w �p s ' .,." 'kr� \ \ •�i
•
WFFC Reach 4—Brush pile removed from easement;additional WFFC Reach 4 Brush pile removed from easement;silt fencing
signage installed (12/15/2021J installed(12/15/2021J
•
9 r )S1xg411 �r� J � tA�P
61A,
yy C l Yg•
I r j� '��y i) i! +
j .. I * PS
A .-y: , �l�i i it �q,a III ''{ �t ? f+ y,Jitj [,i ! tl` {
I
c< d a �p If: i t to S e R 41: , ,1 t •u
t \ •• gyp%} l: ;r J P '`i I '. plI !..s . '.,i1,
1 I 1 t, • .� ,fir."
a
",*,.SS k7 R r
=bf M 1'th y y y, t i . ,fe j.: � t ^. s�dp;,a�, y� f: t,F`' ? '.c, �,
.:1‘4.,,,,.2-.44‘0,...., -g:i.,,,,,,,5,,,,..,,,a,,,,,, • ,-.....,ck• -,- -' .- -
':,', .-. �' !" 74: G!ri Y; ,S Ph -' , '� ry: r icy �,
,..
..N Jt • 8 ..r .�' i •,,e S rp '1/G. +� .e "`r " .x
:,"; J'1� ,J' r' Y• 1f J �' ;T �a FFF'^, s j�R,•yr 7
•
.,.t.,--..„,„eflsre;....,:,..,...,„_.:,1s.1, ,:i.„,,....„4„,.,„_. ,,.._,
te
„• �`� x fY y rl ,.= �it f'1 1 f c,.;,�y " J Ir � C , ` i'\'YZ 2' .-I �,L . 4 - .'-,2 4_.'.f ,-
.5; J r T� --\ ,',' Y Pt l F • qt: ''�'�,y. .:w� .o e'•
I' ' • .; `?..• 'r„z- •; `00, •</ ' �Yn i aK �'''y i -�j '� \�• •1 t+ ,�Y[,�t ,1p
•
SFFC Reach 8—Resolved easement encroachment;additional signage SFFC Reach 8—Resolved easement encroachment;additional signage
installed(12/21/2021J installed(12/21/2021)

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 8. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Permanent Vegetation Plot
MY3 Success Criteria Met (Y/N)
Tract Mean
Overall Mean
1
Y
100%
88%
2
Y
3
Y
4
Y
5
Y
6
Y
7
Y
8
Y
9
Y
10
Y
11
Y
12
Y
13
Y
14
Y
15
Y
Mobile Vegetation Plot
MY3 Success Criteria Met (Y/N)
1
N
70%
2
N
3
Y
4
Y
5
N
6
Y
7
Y
8
Y
9
Y
10
Y

Table 9a. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Current Permanent
Vegetation
Plot Data (MY120211
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Permanent Plot 1
Permanent Plot 2
Permanent Plot 3
Permanent Plot 4
Permanent Plot 5
Permanent Plot 6
Permanent Plot 7
Permanent Plot 8
Permanent Plot 9
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Acer negundo
Boxelder Maple
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
1
1
1
Asimina triloba
Common Pawpaw
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
American Persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
Tree
Morus rubs
Red Mulberry
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
2
2
2
5
5
5
4
4
4
2
2
19
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
14
4
4
4
Prunus serotina
Black Cherry
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus falcata
Southern Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ulmus rubra
Slippery Elm
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
Stem count
12
12
12
18
18
18
16
16
17
12
12
29
12
12
12
13
13
19
13
13
13
12
12
23
13
13
13
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
10
8
Stems per ACRE
4861
486
486414
7 8
7 8
647
688
486
486
1 4
486
486
486
526
526
769
526
526
486
486
931
526
526
Current Permanent Vegetation
Plot Data (MY1 2021)
Annual
Mean
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Permanent Plot 10
Permanent Plot 11
Permanent Plot 12
Permanent Plot 13
Permanent Plot 14
Permanent Plot 15
MY1 (10/2021)
MVO (02/2021)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Acer negundo
Boxelder Maple
Tree
2
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
11
19
12
12
12
Asimina triloba
Common Pawpaw
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
10
10
10
11
11
11
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
29
29
29
30
30
30
Diospyros virginiana
American Persimmon
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
21
21
21
21
21
21
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
Tree
24
Morus rubra
Red Mulberry
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
12
12
12
12
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Shrub
3
3
16
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
40
40
81
42
42
42
Prunus serotina
Black Cherry
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
18
18
18
23
23
23
Quercus albs
White Oak
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
9
9
9
10
10
10
Quercusfalcata
Southern Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
13
13
13
13
13
13
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
22
22
22
23
23
23
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
11
11
11
11
11
11
Ulmus rubra
Slippery Elm
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
12
12
12
12
Stem count
15
15
53
15
15
15
12
12
12
11
11
11
15
15
15
19
19
19
208
208
257
220
220
220
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
16
15
size (ACRES)
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.3707
0.3707
Species count
9
9
10
5
5
5
9
9
9
8
8
8
9 9
9
10
10
10
12 12
12
12
12
12
Stems per ACRE
607
607
2145
607
607
607
486
486
486
445
445
445
607
607
769
769
769
561
693
594
594
594
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of planted stems excluding live st kes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total stems

Table 9b. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Current Mobile Vegetation
Plot Data (MY1
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Mobile Plot 1
Mobile Plot 2
Mobile Plot 3
Mobile Plot 4
Mobile Plot 5
Mobile Plot 6
Mobile Plot 7
Mobile Plot 8
PnoLS
PnoLS
PnoLS
PnoLS
PnoLS
PnoLS
PnoLS
PnoLS
Acer negundo
Boxelder Maple
Tree
2
3
1
Asimina triloba
Common Pawpaw
Shrub Tree
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
2
1
2
1
2
Diospyros virginiana
American Persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
Tree
1
Morus rubra
Red Mulberry
Tree
1
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
3
4
1
4
2
2
Prunus serotina
Black Cherry
Shrub Tree
1
1
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
2
1
1
Quercus falcata
Southern Red Oak
Tree
1
3
5
2
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree
Ulmus rubra
Slippery Elm
Tree
2
4
Stem count
5
4
11
10
1
12
9
7
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
3
2
7
4 1
5
6
3
Stems per ACRE
=
i
445
40.1 MIL 40
Tl
Current Mobileill
Annual
Mean
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Mobile Plot 9
Mobile Plot 10
MY1 (10/2021)
MYO (02/2021)
PnoLS
PnoLS
PnoLS
PnoLS
Acer negundo
Boxelder Maple
Tree
1
1
8
12
Asimina triloba
Common Pawpaw
Tree
7
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
2
10
24
Diospyros virginiana
American Persimmon
Shrub
1
4
17
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
Tree
1
2
Morus rubra
Red Mulberry
Tree
1
3
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Shrub
2
2
20
27
Prunusserotina
Black Cherry
Tree
1
3
7
Quercus alba
White Oak
Shrub
2
6
6
Quercusfalcata
Southern Red Oak
Tree
4
2
17
11
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1
19
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree
8
Ulmus rubra
Slippery Elm
Tree
2
10
8
Stem count
9
11
81
151
size (ares)
1
1
10
10
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.25
0.25
Species count
5
6
11
13
Stems per ACRE
364
•
328
6
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of planted stems excluding live st kes
P-all: Number of planted sterns including live stak s
T: Total stems
Overall Site Annual Mean
MYO (02/2021)
19
10
39
25
1
13
60
21
15
30
23
11
22
289
25
0.64
24
18
54
38
2
15
69
30
16
24
42
19
20
371
25
0.62
13
13
450

Table 9C. Shaded Vegetation Plot Stem Counts
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Shaded Vegetation Plot
PnoLS
P-all
T
Acer negundo
Boxelder Maple
Tree
1
1
1
Asimina triloba
Common Pawpaw
Shrub Tree
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
American Persimmon
Tree
2
2
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
Tree
2
2
2
Morus rubra
Red Mulberry
Tree
3
3
3
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
1
1
1
Prunus serotina
Black Cherry
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus falcata
Southern Red Oak
Tree
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree
Ulmus rubra
Slippery Elm
Tree
1
1
1
Stem count
13
13
13
size (ares)
1
size (ACRES)
0.0247
Species count
9
9
9
Stems per ACRE
526
526
526

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 10a. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Section)
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Dimension and Substrate
SF
Base
Fishing
MY1
Creek Reach
MY2
2
MY3
Cross -Section
MY4
1
MY5
Pool
MY6
MY7
SF
Base
Fishing Creek
MY1
Reach
MY2
2 Cross
MY3
-Section
MY4
2,
MY5
Riffle
MY6
MY7
SF
Base
Fishing
MY1
Creek Reach
MY2
3
MY3
Cross -Section
MY4
3,
MY5
Riffle
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1025.34
1025.11
1025.22
1025.44
1023.15
1022.81
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1025.34
1025.11
1025.22
1025.25
1023.15
1022.74
Bankfull Width (ft)
30.0
33.5
19.4
18.0
19.1
22.7
Floodprone Width (ft)'
---
---
96
96
93
86
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.3
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
5.1
4.0
2.3
2.2
2.3
2.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftt)
68.5
41.5
26.2
22.6
27.0
25.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.2
27.0
14.4
14.2
13.5
20.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
4.9
5.3
4.9
3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
---
---
1.0
<1.0
1.0
1.0
SF
Fishing
Creek Reach
3
Cross -Section
4
P.
SF
Fishing Creek
Reach
5 Cross
-Section
5,
Riffle
SF
Fishing
Creek Reach
5
Cross -Section
6,
Pool
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1021.91
1021.94
1008.13
1008.09
1007.83
1007.92
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1021.91
1021.94
1008.13
1008.14
1007.83
1007.92
Bankfull Width (ft)
27.9
28.3
28.0
28.5
41.0
41.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
118
118
---
--
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.1
1.9
1.4
1.5
2.4
2.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
4.7
4.4
2.5
2.7
5.2
4.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftt)
59.2
52.7
40.4
41.8
98.6
83.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.1
15.2
19.4
19.5
17.1
21.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
4.2
4.1
---
---
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
---
---
1.0
1.0
---
---
SF
Fishing Creek
Reach
5 Cross
-Section
7,
Riffle
SF
Fishing Creek
Reach
6 Cross
-Section
8,
Riffle
i
SF
Fishing
Creek Reach
7
Cross -Section
9,
Riffle
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1007.37
1007.46
1003.42
1003.39
1000.42
1000.54
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1007.37
1007.34
1003.42
1003.41
1000.42
1000.42
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.1
23.4
32.3
31.4
31.8
30.6
Floodprone Width (ft)'
118
118
109
108
98
98
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.3
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.8
2.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftt)
37.0
33.8
51.8
52.2
57.1
53.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.6
16.2
20.1
18.8
17.7
17.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.9
5.0
3.4
3.4
3.1
3.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
<1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
SF
Fishing Creek
Reach
7 Cross
-Section
10,
Pool
SF
Fishing Creek
Reach
8 Cross
-Section
11,
Riffle
SF
Fishing Creek
Reach
10
Cross -Section
12,
Riffle
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
999.88
1000.02
997.87
997.99
991.83
991.43
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
999.88
1000.02
997.87
997.92
991.83
991.31
Bankfull Width (ft)
33.9
35.8
27.6
27.5
27.1
30.4
Floodprone Width (ft)'
---
---
98
97
102
90
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.9
2.9
1.5
1.4
2.0
1.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
5.0
5.8
2.6
2.5
3.3
3.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft5)
99.5
103.7
41.0
38.9
54.4
50.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.5
12.4
18.5
19.4
13.5
18.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
3.5
3.5
3.7
3.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
---
---
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Bankfull elevation for riffles are based on the MYO cross -sectional area. MY1-MY7 Bank Height Ratio is cal ulated based on the As -built (MYO) cross -sectional area as described in he Standard Measuremen of the BHR Monitoring Parameter document provided by the NCIRT and
NCDMS (9/2018). The remainder of the cross section dimension parameters we e calculated based on the current low bank height.
' Floodprone width is calculated from the width of cross-section but valley width may extend further.
3 Entrenchment ratio for the baseline/monitoring parameters is based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.

Table 10b. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Section)
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Dimension and Substrate
SF
Base
Fishing Creek
MY1
Reach
MY2
11
MY3
Cross -Section
MY4
)3,
MY5
Pool
MY6
MY7
SF
Base
Fishing Creek
MY1
Reach
MY2
11
MY3
Cross -Section
MY4
14,
MY5
Riffle
MY6
MY7
Critcher
Base
Tributary
MY1
MY2
Reach 1
MY3
Cross -Section
MY4
MY5
15, Riffle
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
990.12
989.68
990.07
990.18
1070.40
1070.42
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
990.12
989.68
990.07
990.26
1070.40
1070.40
Bankfull Width (ft)
49.4
37.8
33.9
34.7
11.0
11.0
Floodprone Width (ft)'
---
---
117
116
46
47
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
3.5
3.3
2.3
2.3
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
7.2
5.1
4.0
4.3
1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftZ)
174.3
123.9
78.8
81.3
8.1
7.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.0
11.6
14.6
14.8
14.9
15.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
---
---
3.5
3.4
4.2
4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
---
---
1.0
1.0
itcher Tributary
Reach 3
Cross -Section
17, Pool
1.0
Critcher
1.0
Tributary
Reach 3
Cross -Section
18, Riffle
Critcher
Tributary
Reach
2
Cross -Section
16,
Riffle
C
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1059.11
1059.20
1054.58
1054.57
1054.02
1054.07
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1059.11
1059.02
1054.58
1054.57
1054.02
1054.00
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.9
7.8
9.4
8.4
6.8
5.6
Floodprone Width (ft)'
53
46
---
---
33
31
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.5
0.6
1.1
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
0.9
1.4
2.5
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftZ)
5.6
4.0
6.1
8.9
2.8
2.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.1
15.3
14.7
8.0
16.6
13.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
6.0
5.9
---
---
4.8
5.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
<1.0
---
---
1.0
<1.0
L Critcher
Tributary
Reach
3
Cross -Section
19,
Riffle
;
Critcher
Tributary
Reach 4
Cross -Section
20, Riffle
;
Critcher
Tributary
D Cross
-Section
21,
Riffle
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1048.93
1048.93
1026.81
1026.93
1067.04
1067.13
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1048.93
1048.91
1026.81
1026.81
1067.04
1067.18
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.7
9.1
11.7
11.5
10.4
11.0
Floodprone Width (ft)'
56
55
60
59
28
24
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft5)
4.4
4.2
8.9
7.4
6.4
6.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
17.0
19.4
15.3
17.9
16.8
17.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
6.5
6.0
5.2
5.1
2.7
2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
1.0
1.0
Critcher
Tributary
C Cross
-Section
22, Riffle
Critcher
Tributary
A Cross
-Section
23,
Riffle
Critcher
Tributary
A Cross
-Section
24,
Pool
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1056.16
1056.25
1035.91
1036.01
1035.42
1035.66
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1056.16
1056.19
1035.91
1036.02
1035.42
1035.66
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.5
5.8
9.4
9.8
11.1
11.9
Floodprone Width (ft)'
38
31
57
57
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.2
0.7
0.7
1.2
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
0.5
1.3
1.4
2.4
1.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft5)
1.7
1.3
6.5
6.5
12.9
7.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
18.4
25.3
13.5
14.8
9.6
18.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
6.8
5.2
6.1
5.8
---
---
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
<1.0
1.0
1.0
---
---
Bankfull elevation for riffles are based on the MVO cross -sectional area. MY1-MY7 Bank Height Ratio is calculated based on he As -built (MVO) cross -sectional area as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter document provided by the NCIRT and
NCDMS (9/2018). The remainder of the cross section dimension parameters were calculated based on the current low bank height.
Floodprone width is calculated from the width of cross-section but valley width may extend further.
3 Entrenchment ratio for the baseline/monitoring parameters is based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.

Table 10c. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Section)
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Antioch
Tributary
Reach
2
Cross -Section
25, Riffle
Antioch
Tributary
Reach
3
Cross -Section
26, Riffle
Antioch
Tributary
Reach 4
Cross -Section
27, Riffle
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1037.06
1037.16
1025.72
1025.91
1014.35
1014.42
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1037.06
1037.09
1025.72
1025.57
1014.35
1014.34
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.4
6.2
7.6
7.4
10.7
10.4
Floodprone Width (ft)a
26
23
48
46
63
63
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.7
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
0.8
1.8
1.3
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft')
3.4
2.9
8.1
5.3
8.6
7.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.0
13.2
7.1
10.3
13.2
14.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
4.0
3.6
6.4
6.2
5.9
6.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ration
1.0
<1.0
1.0
<1.0
1.0
Chicken
<1.0
Tributary
1
Reach
2 Cross -Section
30, Riffle
-
Antioch
Tributary
B Cross
-Section
28,
Rif"-
egtioch
Tributary
A Cross
-Sect
on 29,
Riffle
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1031.15
1031.12
1016.57
1016.56
1009.67
1009.78
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1031.15
1031.07
1016.57
1016.61
1009.67
1009.66
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.9
8.1
8.2
8.7
16.6
15.9
Floodprone Width (ft)a
40
38
34
35
98
98
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.9
1.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (fta)
4.7
4.2
4.3
4.7
19.7
17.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.1
15.4
15.8
16.1
14.1
14.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
5.1
4.8
4.1
4.0
5.9
6.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ration
1.0
Chicken
Base
<1.0
Tributary
MY1
1
MY2
Reach
MY3
2 Cross
MY4
Section
MY5
31, Pool
MY6
;
MY7
1.0
Chicken
Base
1.0
Tributary
MY1
1
MY2
Reach
MY3
2 Cross -Section
MY4
MY5
32, Riffle
MY6
;
MY7
1.0
Robin
Base
<1.0
Hill Tributary
MY1
MY2
Reach
MY3
1 Cross -Section
MY4
33, Riffle
MY7
Dimension and Substrate
MY5
MY6
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1009.28
1009.20
1006.37
1006.38
1024.47
1024.56
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1009.28
1009.20
1006.37
1006.45
1024.47
1024.52
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.7
15.6
16.2
16.6
4.6
4.7
Floodprone Width (ft)a
---
---
54
54
15
15
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.0
1.1
0.5
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.0
2.8
1.7
1.8
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft')
27.0
22.5
16.9
17.9
2.3
2.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.3
10.8
15.5
15.4
9.3
10.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
---
---
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ration
---
---
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
Robin
Hill T
ibutary
Reach
1 Cross
Section
34, Pool
Robin
Hill Tributary
Reach
2 Cross -Section
35, Riffle
Robin Hill
Tributary
B Cross
-Section
36
Riffle
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1023.92
1023.77
1000.90
1001.09
1034.71
1034.74
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1023.92
1023.77
1000.90
1000.88
1034.71
1034.67
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.1
7.0
9.4
8.5
3.7
3.5
Floodprone Width (ft)a
---
---
73
73
11
9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.0
1.3
1.1
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft')
5.5
3.0
7.4
5.5
1.7
1.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.8
16.0
11.8
13.1
7.9
8.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
---
---
7.8
8.6
2.9
2.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ration
---
---
1.0
<1.0
1.0
<1.0
Bankfull elevation for riffles are based on the MVO cross -sectional area. MY1 MY7 Bank Height Ratio is calculated based on the As-buil (MVO) cross -sectional area as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter documen provided by the NCIRT
and NCDMS (9/2018). The remainder of the cross-section dimension parameters were calculated based on the current low bank height.
' Floodprone width is calculated from the width of cross-section but valley width may extend further.
3 Entrenchment ratio for the baseline/monitoring parameters is based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.

Table 10d. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Section)
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Dimension and Substrate
Base
Robin Hill
MY1
Tributary
MY2
A Cross
MY3
-Section
MY4
37,
MY5
Rifffle
MY6
MY7
Base
Oak Tributary
MY1
MY2
Cross -Section
MY3
MY4
38, Riffle
MY5
MY6
MY7
WF
Base
Fishing
MY1
Creek Reach
MY2
1 Cross
MY3
-Section
MY4
39,
MY5
Riffle
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1008.52
1008.61
1003.12
1003.19
1004.58
1004.68
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1008.52
1008.52
1003.12
1003.13
1004.58
1004.57
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.1
5.2
8.4
8.4
28.1
27.4
Floodprone Width (ft)'
40
40
26
30
83
82
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.5
2.2
2.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
1.0
1.0
3.8
3.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftZ)
2.2
1.7
5.0
4.4
61.3
58.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.6
15.6
14.3
15.9
12.8
13.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
7.9
7.6
3.0
3.5
2.9
3.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
<1.0
1.0
<1.0
1.0
1.0
WF
Fishing
Creek Reach
1
Cross -Section
40,
Pool
WF
Fishing
Creek Reach
2
Cross -Section
41,
Riffle
WF
Fishing
Creek Reach
3 Cross
-Section
42,
Riffle
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1003.67
1003.85
1002.81
1002.97
1000.07
1000.15
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1003.67
1003.85
1002.81
1002.82
1000.07
1000.14
Bankfull Width (ft)
30.0
29.7
26.7
26.5
26.9
27.1
Floodprone Width (ft)'
---
---
93
93
81
82
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.5
2.7
2.2
2.1
2.3
2.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
5.1
5.5
3.8
3.9
3.8
3.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftZ)
75.1
80.4
59.7
55.8
60.8
60.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.0
11.0
11.9
12.6
11.9
12.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
---
---
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
---
---
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
WF
Fishing
Creek Reach
4
Cross -Section
43,
Riffle
; WF
Fishing
Creek Reach
5
Cross -Section
44,
Riffle
j
Shew
Ridge
Trib Reach
2 Cross
-Section
47,
Riffle
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
996.05
996.00
992.88
993.02
1003.72
1004.04
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
996.05
995.94
992.88
992.98
1003.72
1003.96
Bankfull Width (ft)
25.5
24.6
33.8
33.8
9.3
8.1
Floodprone Width (ft)'
77
74
88
85
56
55
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
1.9
2.3
2.3
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.0
3.0
3.8
3.4
0.9
1.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft5)
48.0
46.3
77.8
76.7
5.1
4.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.5
13.1
14.7
14.9
17.1
14.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
3.0
3.0
2.6
2.5
6.0
6.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
Shew
Ridge
Trib Reach
2 Cross
-Section
48,
Pool
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1003.45
1003.60
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1003.45
1003.60
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.9
11.1
Floodprone Width (ft)'
---
--
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
1.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft5)
12.7
7.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.3
16.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
---
---
Bankfull elevation for riffles are based on the MYO cross sectional area. MY1-MY7 Bank Height Ratio is ca culated based on he As -built (MYO) cross -sectional area as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter document provided by the NCIRT and
NCDMS (9/2018). The remainder of the cross section dimension parameters were calculated based on the current low bank height.
Floodprone width is calculated from the width of cross-section but valley width may extend further.
3 Entrenchment ratio for the baseline/monitoring parameters is based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.

Table 10e. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Section)
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Ironwood
Trib Reach
1 Cross
-Section
49
Riffle
Timber Trib Reach
2 Cross
-Section
50,
Pool
Timber Trib
Reach
2 Cross
-Section
51,
Riffle
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6
MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6
MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
1029.24
1029.25
1005.88
1005.82
1004.79
1004.77
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
1029.24
1029.19
1005.88
1005.82
1004.79
1004.80
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.9
7.9
12.1
10.8
8.3
8.4
Floodprone Width (ft)2
23
22
---
---
42
43
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.5
1.1
1.0
0.6
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
2.1
2.0
1.0
1.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
4.3
3.8
13.5
11.1
5.3
5.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.7
16.8
10.9
10.6
13.2
12.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio3
2.9
2.8
---
---
5.0
5.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
<1.0
---
---
1.0
1.0
Bankfull elevation for riffles are based on the MYO cross -sectional area.MY1-MY7 Bank Height Ratio is calculated based on the As -built (MYO) cross -sectional area as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter document provided by the NCIRT and
NCDMS (9/2018). The remainder of the cross-section dimension parameters were calculated based on the current low bank height.
' Floodprone width is calculated from the width of cross-section but valley width may extend further.
3 Entrenchment ratio for the baseline/monitoring parameters is based on the width of the cross-section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 1-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 2
112+93 Pool
1029 —
1027
1025
4
ru
1023
v
w
1021
1019
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width(ft)
—MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
41.5 x-section area(ft.sq.)
33.5 width(ft)
1.2 mean depth(ft)
4.0 max depth(ft)
36.0 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.2 hydraulic radius(ft)
27.0 width-depth ratio r
Survey Date: 12/2021 l c
Field Crew: Midlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
CritcherCE Brothers Mitigation Site
USA Action ID No.SAW1
2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-202
Cross Section 2 South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 2
113+45 Riffle
1028
1027
1026
N*- 44\ btabY.. --
" 1025
0
w 1024
1023
1022
20 30 40 50 60 70
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on(MVO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
22.6 x section area(ft.sq.)
18.0 width(ft)
11
1.3 mean depth(ft) �.. . '
,t� y
2.2 max depth(ft) "f d ��
18.7 wetted perimeter(ft) a � ;� w
1.2 hydraulic radius(ft) �. t ,, - . .
14.2 width-depth ratio � � �'�
95.8 W flood prone area(ft) ktc7 , -` `� �'.-
5.3 entrenchment ratio ` , rt.�
<1.0 low bank height ratio * ,
r
Survey Date: 12/2021 > _ ..
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering ,
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 3-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 3
118+98 Riffle
1026
1025 -
1024 -
O 1023 -
r.
w• 1022 - N1P‘
1021 -
1020
20 30 40 50 60 70
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions �,t a x�� fly` € ' �s'
25.4 x-section area(ft.sq.) �" � �4 �
22.7 width(ft) '
1.1 mean depth(ft)
(
2.1 max depth(ft) r
23.4 wetted perimeter(ft) �.
1.1 hydraulic radius(ft) it �1' i't ��
20.3 width-depth ratio " ` _� �� '' ��
86.0 W flood prone area(ft) ri
3.8 entrenchment ratio ,` �'�' ;`
1.0 low bank height ratio -� t. '
\ +
Survey Date: 12/2021
s k �:
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
4
�:. "L�.
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 4-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 3
119+51 Pool
1024
1022 _� ,�
c 1020 - LP '411.1°1.'
ra
w 1018
1016
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions i, j ' 'ii `
52.7 x-section area(ft.sq.) "+� �' Y %
28.3 width(ft) `' �i
1.9 mean depth(ft) - .f �, r e '
� �-.. i . , ter°
4.4 max depth(ft) ,
31.8 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.7 hydraulic radius(ft) ,
t
15.2 width-depth ratio �� � � ��
,
- __ _ ,a e
Survey Date: 12/2021 � f --
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering �
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 5-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 5
131+62 Riffle
1011
1009 -
w 1007
1005
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width(ft)
MYO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions - -
41.8 x-section area(ft.sq.)
28.5 width(ft)
1.5 mean depth(ft)
2.7 max depth(ft)
29.5 wetted perimeter(ft) f ¢
1.4 hydraulic radius(ft)
19.5 width-depth ratio
117.9 W flood prone area(ft)
4.1 entrenchment ratio -
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 12/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 6-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 5
132+34 Pool
1012
1010 -
iEE '
-
1002 -
1000 1
15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95
Width(ft)
MVO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
83.4 x section area(ft.sq.) _
41.9 width(ft)  �-
2.0 mean depth(ft) �1
4.8 max depth(ft) .,
44.5 wetted perimeter(ft) .� - ,�.
1.9 hydraulic radius(ft) A,_,_±.....:
21.0 width-depth ratio _ s ' ' `"
x
Y
Survey Date: 12/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 7-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 5
132+88 Riffle
1012
1010 - —
0
loos — —
r
- N.. ± .. ..• .&
w
1006 -
1004 , I —
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width(ft)
MYO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
33.8 x-section area(ft.sq.) _
23.4 width(ft) - a ��
1.4 mean depth(ft) x Y 7 , 74.
2.3 max depth(ft)
24.1 wetted perimeter(ft) 4 � p' tar � s F
1.4 hydraulic radius(ft) - , "- t` i,- rs� �
16.2 width depth ratio , . ?, , ;� P `_ ;fig"
,fix�t r
118.1 W flood prone area(ft) Q. �� .r
5.0 entrenchment ratio ..4 - °�
<1.0 low bank height ratio - •*
-,
Survey Date: 12/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering , , ;
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 8-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 6
141+25 Riffle
1008
1006 -
c 1004 1
ro
v
w
1002 -
1000 i
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width(ft)
MY0(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MY0 Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions ial ; 4 ''- ) $ ' '.0 ';��
d0, ttiy� ,: t-
52.2 x-section area(ft.sq.) ! iEf fi is
31.4 width(ft) i ii° i;tis �� te` _,
1.7 mean depth(ft) 1 ) iv 4;4 r� y ,
��� s '�,� ram'
2.7 max depth(ft) ,i �A R '�;av .ktit
32.1 wetted perimeter(ft) j , , :0�
1.6 hydraulic radius(ft) .,`° -. ,
€ r•.
18.8 width-depth ratio 'f '
107.7 W flood prone area(ft) r
3.4 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio F
Survey Date: 12/2021 .� ovar "` _
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering -4111111
' a --
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 9-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 7
149+20 Riffle
1005
1003 -
0 1001 - — �� -��
v
w
999 -
997 i -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width(ft)
MVO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
53.2 x section area(ft.sq.) x
30.6 width(ft) i � 3 • �� a _�r1 7;,:lA,
1.7 mean depth(ft) €� � {} .,'� c� !
2.7 max depth(ft) w a , ) '�' �' (rii ��
31.8 wetted perimeter(ft) �;, yet ;;,
1.7 hydraulic radius(ft)
17.7 width depth ratio , ,y _ �;5� y
98.2 W flood prone area(ft) �. ?s
3.2 entrenchment ratio ,1_ ' - _« „�. _ ,-
1.0 low bank height ratio M''-*` "' _ k
•
Survey Date: 12/2021 { ._
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering '
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 10-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 7
149+93 Pool
1003
1001 - - —
— -• --,,..................... itff ...----em
999 -
c
0
997 -
v
w
995 -
993
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width(ft)
— MVO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) 713,ankfull
Bankfull Dimensions '
103.7 x-section area(ft.sq.)
t F;.
35.8 width(ft)
2.9 mean depth(ft)
5.8 max depth(ft) ' ' '= a '
39.5 wetted perimeter(ft)
_r
2.6 hydraulic radius(ft) ,.,: '?
12.4 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 12/2021 -
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
. ' - , a
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 11-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 8
154+38 Riffle
1002
1000 -
s.
.N\ p,,*44tersol47
c 998 ---- - - - -
0
v
w
996 -
994 , — —
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width(ft)
MYO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions ', -, l-�. '' )1 � ` '
38.9 x section area(ft.sq.) -,�,N �, I"
r
27.5 width(ft) t ,� � s sj1 1.4 mean depth(ft) ^ € 'o�� ,� 1\:i f, ,„,::„ , <
i�
2.5 max depth(ft) , 4 � ', -� 0
t
28.6 wetted perimeter(ft) F 4 �,-,
1.4 hydraulic radius(ft)
19.4 width-depth ratio `'
96.8 W flood prone area(ft)
3.5 entrenchment ratio4. _ -
1.0 low bank height ratio , ,
Survey Date: 12/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering 'i. �.
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 12-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 10
167+25 Riffle
995
993 -
o 991 — —
ro
v
989 -
987
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width(ft)
MY0(01/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MY0 Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions mot ,
50.7 x-section area(ft.sq.) i;
30.4 width(ft) r, � •f .
1.7 mean depth(ft)
3.3 max depth(ft)
32.2 wetted perimeter(ft) i
1.6 hydraulic radius(ft) �' ,a
18.2 width-depth ratio
lT
89.7 W flood prone area(ft) �' � �a "�`��
3.0 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
�'
Survey Date: 12/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering n � @L\'
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 13-South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 11
173+22 Pool
994 -
992 -
990
988 I
984 -
982 -
980
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width(ft)
— MVO(01/2021) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions �,-
123.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) )
37.8 width(ft) 3
3.3 mean depth(ft)
5.1 max depth(ft) ,- r, _
42.0 wetted perimeter(ft) ,ac 4i
3.0 hydraulic radius(ft)
11.6 width-depth ratio '
Survey Date: 12/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering _.
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 14 Sout h Fork Fishing Creek Reach 11
174+01 Riffle
996
994
992
c E ' '
ci
984
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width(ft)
MVO(01/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
81.3 x section area(ft.sq.) t •
34.7 width(ft) ' a '' a +t.
2.3 mean depth(ft) { �i' "�'„ ` °
x ` << �a,',',r
4.3 max depth(ft) t � A ,; F
36.3 wetted perimeter(ft)
2.2 hydraulic radius(ft) �= y � ' >
14.8 width depth ratio : 3.
116.3 W flood prone area(ft) -_ -
3.4 entrenchment ratio " ; mo t�
, , '-
1.0 low bank height ratio `' H
,'",k1-,-•...41-'-',4.1.',.. ,__7 ,-er.,...., -
Survey Date: 12/2021 ,
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering ;--,` -= � .-
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 15-Critcher Tributary Reach 1
200+72 Riffle
1072
1071
I
1069 -
1068 — —
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions = ,� �to
7.9 x section area(ft.sq.) 3
11.0 width(ft) '
0.7 mean depth(ft) �� �� ��
1.5 max depth(ft) � �
11.5 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft) s '
15.4 width depth ratio _k
47.2 W flood prone area(ft) �.
4.3 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 12/2021 << • _ � `1
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering _ � � ' r ,
mer-- ` $-�
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 16-Critcher Tributary Reach 2
203+66 Riffle
1061
1060
c 1059 �.
o
v
w
1058 -
1057 - — —
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MY0(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MY0 Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
4.0 x-section area(ft.sq.)
7.8 width(ft) � }
0.5 mean depthl(ft) t
� `� �t5 tPa m 'fk
0.9 max depth(ft) •
�
8.1 wetted perimeter(ft) •
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft) lam;`
15.3 width-depth ratio
45.9 W flood prone area(ft) ` •
gw �
5.9 entrenchment ratio
<1.0 low bank height ratio -11 '��
Survey Date: 12/2021 • ; 1,1 ,j1)
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
"� 14:
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 17-Critcher Tributary Reach 3
205+17 Pool
1057
1056
1055
c 1054
0
1053
1052 -
1051
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
— MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
8.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) ,
8.4 width(ft)
1.1 mean depth(ft)
A'
•
2.5 max depth(ft)
11.1 wetted perimeter(ft) ‘141-
0.8 hydraulic radius(ft)
8.0 width-depth ratio a fir' k 4
Survey Date: 12/2021 �� " .
1
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering /� ; �� '� �
��� � �✓ � -� � .4" _ .i Q�' �,ELT 2,y - '�G 5
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 18-Critcher Tributary Reach 3
205+33 Riffle
1056 -
1055 -
c 1054 —
0
v
w
1053 -
1052 - —
20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MY0(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MY0 Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions ', 1' a
2.4 x-section area(ft.sq.) ;�o- p � 1
5.6 width(ft) z� " '','''r y A I .a r 1 w c
0.4 mean depth(ft) : - , T,1 , ' .P1� R *
�' / t S lay Ik '� `" ' '...
0.7 max depth(ft) a�' i ' 7� ,
6.0 wetted perimeter(ft) ' is , �� f '
1
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft) 5 C 7'id'd 1 ' , 3` '' „
13.1 width-depth ratio }!, �' ✓, may > ;,
31.1 W flood prone area(ft) a ',P`-'-...g.,: ::;;'';:',:,•1*.
l 'J 1'1' 1 f1, i /11 x' ` J' -
5.6 entrenchment ratio �' i', l I' u, �
<1.0 low bank height ratio ' 11I S
` %llll li r4ll1 .', � „, ',.'"sr. 1
t-z-t-..b.?1--_;-, -.
Survey Date: 12/2021 . ,, ,, i i ,/.�j,,/ v'
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering �� /���j � '' � ,
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 19-Critcher Tributary Reach 3
207+58 Riffle
1051
1050
i
1048 -
1047 - — —
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions ••:•
4.2 x-section area(ft.sq.) t.,: -
9.1 width(ft) ` 2
}: ' fi
0.5 mean depth(ft) ;•
0.9 max depth(ft) •i. rr,/ 4. 4a 'r''• �. '
9.3 wetted perimeter ft , = '�'•
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft) r .}.` s'.c jc
19.4 width-depth ratio
54.7 W flood prone area(ft) ..t .
6.0 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio e , !
• 1.
Survey Date: 12/2021 - .- -
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering = `:ih'. `
i r .
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 20-Critcher Tributary Reach 4
218+60 Riffle
1029 - —
c 1027 ti _
1025
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions ;. '
•
7.4 x-section area(ft.sq.) . ;•.
11.5 width(ft) r . '' .r .. "r
0.6 mean depth(ft) ' W,.i y- ,:1.2 max depth(ft) , Ite •; es. it'•
12.0 wetted perimeter(ft) � �� •. .• � -. .,_ -.
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) x' ' .. ;: � 4 ;5 .' f ;, .;, ...�
17.9 width-depth ratio y;.:.
58.7 W flood prone area(ft) - : `-
5.1 entrenchment ratio r: •
<1.0 low bank height ratio xh • _ r.Y .
g '
Survey Date: 12/2021 - x-';u '' • }
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering ,a n': yh
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW 2017 01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross Section 21 Critcher Tributary D
260+74 Riffle
1069
1068 -
- I /i
c 1067 -
o
r.
w 1066 _-
1065 -
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions �� �� r "I�
6.9 x-section area(ftsq.) �� 3 �_ 3*'
11.0 width(ft) �• - -
0.6 mean depth(ft) 4~, �-
1.2 max depth(ft) � + x , �� ;
11.3 wetted perimeter(ft) , ��; � <�I
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) _ - - . �� ,
17.4 width depth ratio ''- `'� ` -
24.4 W flood prone area(ft) - - -'�
L
2.2 entrenchment ratio -
�* w -a
1.0 low bank height ratios
Survey Date: 12/2021 �'� '
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering = ' / /
� , , , , '
•
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 22-Critcher Tributary C
270+80 Riffle
1058
1057 -
o �_
io — —
w• 1056 -
1055
25 30 35 40 45
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
"*` •
1.3 x section area(ft.sq.) a
rat • .- - � ';
5.8 width(ft) 5 ru
0.2 mean depth(ft) � X n
0.5 max depth(ft) ? � ` � .
6.0 wetted perimeter(ft) • � �
0.2 hydraulic radius(ft) v �
25.3 width depth ratio - ',- � s f
30.5 W flood prone area(ft) ' ' y
L
5.2 entrenchment ratio ;"
'" �''<1.0 low bank height ratio ` '.=s�� k� Y,. ;
.r
i
Survey Date: 12/2021 � r '� — '
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering �'3
t
n �,r�o
, ' " , �" x
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 23-Critcher Tributary A
243+90 Riffle
1038
1037 -
I :::: '
-
1034 — —
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MVO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
6.5 x-section area(ft.sq.)
9.8 width(ft)
0.7 mean depth(ft) �; �� ��
1.4 max depth(ft) f r • * " '
10.5 wetted perimeter(ft) . r R ti ,�e s " ° - ;. x ,*"' # � ''`
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) *�°� �'Ke r ` " Av
14.8 width-depth ratio . � "
56.9 W flood prone area(ft) X.r" � i ' �s
5.8 entrenchment ratio j' �' ' ( . o � ,'Z
1.0 low bank height ratio k -
Survey Date: 12/2021
�
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering '` i� .,4,t,,:-,,,,,„,:3,....,...:3.4.,-,
��
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 24 Critcher Tributary A
244+13 Pool
1037
1036 - a—
1035 I
1033 -
1032
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
7.7 x-section area(ft.sq.)
11.9 width(ft) ` , .
0.6 mean depth(ft) 1 r t� _ �� 1 x'' ' m a
1.3 max depth(It) �,�� «r+ h N. 34tj„1, �, ��j
13.1 wetted perimeter(ft) ti;v, ' :Y '' i44y pr a v
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) i
18.4 width depth ratio A} 3"� �' � r '
.xY� y
__ q
Survey Date: 12/2021i r
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering �. . . �
•
View Downstream

Cross-Se
ross Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW 2017 01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 25 Antioch Tributary Reach 2
304+59 Riffle
1039 -\ ,,,,,..... ...............___
1038•
c 1037
0
v
w
1036
1035 — —
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions t #" (r ,I-, ,'
2.9 x section area(ft.sq.) d, 4 l 1 ,14,! � ! r 6.2 width(ft) '4 1 r� 1Il1iy 1, r r , '4
Ii k
0.5 mean depth(ft) ;' „ r* re '
0.8 max depth(ft) 4rr,�`��
6.6 wetted perimeter(ft) e r
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft) "1 4'
13.2 width depth ratio 9 - r r _ d
22.5 W flood prone area(ft) F -.,b 7'
3.6 entrenchment ratio
<1.0 low bank hei ht ratio c ,,, ,. , :. Y
; `s ,, a
Survey Date: 12/2021 �.. r °_
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering 'h7. t ,`
View Downstream

Cross-Section n Site 13
Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigatio
USACE Action ID No.SAW 2017 019
Monitoring Year 1-2021
tary Reach 3
Cross-Section 26 Antioch Tribu
308+25 Riffle
1028
1027 -
1026 -�_- —
I
1025 -
1024 -
1023 -
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions) �A i
•
5.3 x section area(ft.sq.) 111 16 _
7.4 width(ft) ""
0.7 mean depth(ft) N "
1.3 max depth(ft) a,
8.2 wetted perimeter(ft) '
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft) � _m at
10.3 width-depth ratio
45.9 W flood prone area(ft)
6.2 entrenchment ratio —'
<1.0 low bank height ratio 1 + /
Survey Date: 12/2021 +7�
Field Crew: wild
Engineering � ¢
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 27-Antioch Tributary Reach 4
314+39 Riffle
1016
1015 -
,� `i \
c 1014 /
-
0
ro
0
w 1013 - V► —
1012 — —
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) ::i Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
7.7 x section area(ft.sq.) _�- l
10.4 width(ft) ra ` a# ., �
0.7 mean depth(ft) r 0 .� 4
1.4 max depth ft w4 _`" �,` �
11.2 wetted perimeter(ft) .,,� ,
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft)
^k � tea* a =� 1 �-r�_ '
14.1 width-depth ratio
62.5 W flood prone area(ft) � �t ,e
6.0 entrenchment ratio ,v ,1, I �' ,
<1.0 low bank height ratio rk � �
Survey Date: 12/20217 } ' *"rR
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering , , ,; ' ,„, �., � i
ar% r� c=` ,s
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 28-Antioch Tributary B Reach 2
356+75 Riffle
1033
1032 -
c 1031 -
0
0
v
w
1030 -
1029 — —
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions �',:: l ,; .r ��
4.2 x section area(ft.sq.) �,, • ` ,
8.1 width(ft) ! - i ) f', I' -.
0.5 mean depth(ft) 441 ' il •� --
0.9 max depth(ft) =� 'a
I„ 'r. tr n'a' a- .r
8.6 wetted perimeter(ft) �;. � yy
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft) ;�
15.4 width-depth ratio
38.4 W flood prone area(ft) °
4.8 entrenchment ratio �- �' '- a �
�.
<1.0 low bank height ratio = N }
. tea- �1
,� 1. - ... .ate >-x u
Survey Date: 12/2021 ,
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering � - ' 4. �� �
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 29-Antioch Tributary A Reach 2
348+45 Riffle
1018
/_
/
1017 -
o Ala,
\
r.
> /
w 1016 -
1015 ,
10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MVO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions ?°N O� i
..461,,L ,
4.7 x-section area(ft.sq.) ( k rl. ,tr ,
8.7 width(ft)
0.5 mean depth(ft) �`
1.1 max depth(ft)
�° ^� ¢
9.1 wetted perimeter(ft)
+:,. .7 .
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft) ��� "� , - n £ -.
16.1 width-depth ratio ,, i' f� ,- .-� W
34.9 W flood prone area(ft)
4.0 entrenchment ratio ' '�
1.0 low bank height ratio y�.�� y
i : ' :
Survey Date: 12/2021 H re'44.p"-i4 , ';`'.,.'•'.
�� S,
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering i `, � .
_ nay
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 30-Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2
410+75 Riffle
1014 -
1012 - — -
--...... s‘i„..............00=av
I ::::
-
1006 , -
20 30 40 50 60 70
Width(ft)
MYO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions -
17.8 x section area(ft.sq.) %'
15.9 width(ft)
1.1 mean depth(ft)
1.9 max depth(ft) .. K �� �� )
16.6 wetted perimeter(ft) .,At �� -:
1.1 hydraulic radius(ft) _ � �`:
�;
14.1 width-depth rati •o y ��
97.6 W flood prone area(ft) ilY' -
6.2 entrenchment ratio
<1.0 low bank height ratio -,-' �''" '" �
1
Survey Date: 12/2021 _ y '`
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
/
n1
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW 2017 01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 31-Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2
411+14 Pool
1013
1011 -
_ ____„.............,,,,,,,,,,froor
,___
..,
___,_
c 1009 -
0
0
v
w
1007 -
1005 ,
20 30 40 50 60 70
Width(ft)
MVO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bmo
22.5ankfull Di x ensisectionns)area(ft.sq.) ,.„1 A
f
15.6 width(fti., „..
� [
9 q fl�;h K
,.,,r,... ..,.„. ;:,...,,,,,,,. ,.. ,_,
1.4 mean
2.8 max depth
depth(ft)(ft) F " -
17.3 wetted perimeter(ft) s
1.3 hydraulic radius(ft)
10.8 width-depth ratio ' a w
:k
'''',---V.,',`•-7',:"iFS$5;5:.:;.,
Survey Date: 12/2021 � '
� s
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering " r '� {,'k4;4
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 32-Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2
413+85 Riffle
1010
1008
c
0
w 1006 -
1004 , ,
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MY0(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MY0 Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions 3, _ _
17.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) `
16.6 width(ft) -1,4; ,t„ f
1.1 mean depth(ft) hry� ":—
1.8 max depth(ft) .. �,
17.3 wetted perimeter(ft) '' ' -& ,"
1.0 hydraulic radius(ft) AM % i.
,,,> ,
15.4 width depth ratio • ` � '
54.4 W flood prone area(ft) ,.. .. .. * s .'2.
3.3 entrenchment ratio -, 7` w-- .
1.0 low bank height ratio � ) '- �
e
Survey Date: 12/2021 V�, ,a.'
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering '' . - 1� vim,
a
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross Section 33-Robin Hill Tributary Reach 1
501+85 Riffle
1027
1026
c \ =_�
c 1025
0
o
1024
r
1023 i
5 10 15 20 25
Width(ft)
MVO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions ��ki `` ,
2.1 x section area(ft.sq.) n' . .
4.7 width(ft) _
0.4 mean depth(ft)
� =
� �
0.7 max depth(ft) , . f' �,
5.2 wetted perimeter(ft) - r
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft) e "": . 1 P r
10.8 width depth ratio y - '^ '
15.1 W flood prone area(ft)
3.2 entrenchment ratio % -
<1.0 low bank height ratio ` , �- �_ vt. 44i. ' ya
F tr F
711,
r, d •
e '� Vtt:
,.
Survey Date: 12/2021 �a� � , { � ;�
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering P ' 1 `>
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 34-Robin Hill Tributary Reach 1
502+00 Pool
1028
1026 -
L.
0 1024 �� _—
m I�
v
w
1022 -
1020 - — —,
10 15 20 25 30
Width(ft)
MVO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions " -. '� k(� 1v i ,u 3'0 4k.4.
3.0 x section area(ft.sq.) 1.r �. , ,' � x--
7.0 width(ft) , g � .; � �
0.4 mean depth(ft)
1.0 max depth(ft) - ,l �'
7.4 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.4 hydraulic radius.(ft) _ J 4 -, �4
16.0 width depth rato - 7, a�
a fir .. 'h,� '
` t:
r
,7 a xl
Survey Date: 12/2021 e' , �ti
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering ' ,'' ‘ � '
-i *i -'�-4 asses _w.
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 35-Robin Hill Tributary Reach 2
509+83 Riffle
1004
1002
0
r
w 1000 -
998
15 25 35 45
Width(ft)
MY0(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MVO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.5 x-section area(ft.sq.)
8.5 width(ft) i a s a i i f
0.6 mean depth(ft) ��a � � r xFg
,,,,,,!:
1.1 max depth(ft) �
8.9 wetted perimeter(ft) �, , � ��
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft)
#
13.1 width-depth ratio � , ;,? n�
73.4 W flood prone area(ft) ' =,�
8.6 entrenchment ratio
�
<1.0 low bank height ratio � �_' ''"� `" � � � `
Survey Date: 12/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering -_ ,-'
z �'
V-- \ = 5
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 36-Robin Hill Tributary B
576+95 Riffle
1038
1037 -
1036 - /
c _
0
r> 1035 - `.--
a) •
w 1034 '�
1033 i
5 10 15 20
Width(ft)
MVO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MVO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions 4 =em ` ` " ` '# s :.''-`
1.5 x-section area(ft.sq.) °. "�
3.5 width(ft) � � �� �
0.4 mean depth(ft) ' � fi 4�
x
0.7 max depth(ft)
3.8 wetted perimeter(ft) zp. z -
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft) � ; <:
8.2 width depth ratio _ ;
` '�'
9.1 W flood prone area(ft) g ',_ ' � u.- _
2.6 entrenchment ratio '` `;- a
<1.0 low bank height ratio w
Survey Date: 12/2021 �.r � t '4
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering `"� _'' � k
r S, r !r
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 37-Robin Hill Tributary A
551+75 Riffle
1009 -
c / —.•—
0
ro
v
w
1007 ,
15 20 25 30 35
Width(ft)
MVO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions � k�. f "" "
1.7 x-section area(ft.sq.)
5.2 width(ft) r` r : ` 'z 1 �'
0.3 mean depth(ft)
� �
0.6 max depth(ft) � �- `N �, �I
5.4 wetted perimeter(ft)
s
0.3 hydraulic radius(ft) _ � �'
15.6 width depth ratio '�y '- V
39.5 W flood prone area(ft) r
„ � � ar
7.6 entrenchment ratio � : �� ��w r �
<1.0 low bank height ratio " � ,� ;l'' 4.'..,-,/,'''N': R
it 7,lr 1 f f�' A
Survey Date: 12/2021 r.t �gl i - %d -
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering h � ��
•
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers ion Site
USAGE Action ID No.SAMitigatW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 38-Oak Tributary
603+86 Riffle
1007
1005 -
0
r
w 1003
1001 ,
10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(02/2021) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions 4tt, z
4.4 x section area(ft.sq.) °',te+ ,' �` A z erg
8.4 width(ft)
0.5 mean depth(ft) .�'
1.0 max depth(ft) ' t
8.7 wetted perimeter(ft) ""'=" a r 1,
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft) �' g s'a z ' 'z ` :�
15.9 width depth ratio .
29.8 W flood prone area(ft) , ^, - `
3.5 entrenchment ratio � ; �, ,,
<1.0 low bank hei ht ratio + � 4
g �;
r
Survey Date: 12/2021 � �
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
4r-'
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 39-West Fork Fishing Creek Reach 1
704+66 Riffle
1010
1008 -
1006 -
1004 -
w
1002 -
1000
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width(ft)
MY0(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions .;� „ :3"1. i 1 �k
58.1 x section area(ft.sq.) *a` # �i s lir 4-y}
27.4 width(ft) . i ' 4, +, d " -., t1� At .-
�Zr�� �i4 atna �� �� 4�
2.1 mean depth(ft)
3.8 max depth(ft)
29.2 wetted perimeter(ft) �a }
2.0. hydraulic radius(ft) , s s ''
13.0 width-depth ratio , ( y� x ' �, ;. a�`
•'Yp�' 43 i�5i 1" dZ }` I f-Y- '6� c'&Nri F_t3i
82.4 W flood prone area(ft) i �
3.0 entrenchment ratio w " rKb }
1.0 low bank height ratio °
�' �ty\ — 'fink
Survey Date: 12/2021 ring
-
Field Crew: Wildlands En ineerin ��'- '
� 5
Y � ` c
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 40-West Fork Fishing Creek Reach 1
705+32 Pool
1006
ice __
1004 - �—
0 1002 \
r.
w
1000
alirr,
998 ,
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width(ft)
!.,-
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions ,of v�! � � , � - 'per
80.4 x section area(ft.sq.) ° ' t ' 44 ''i, = , :r
29.7 width(ft) � °'i, - x
e. . .
2.7. mean depth(ft) t x , f
5.5 max depth(ft) " xM
32.5 wettedperimeter ft
( )
2.5 hydraulic radius(ft) .' x - ti
11.0 width depth ratio „ M;
- 3%
zyx - +� —_ '�"' -7,-
ya
Survey Date: 12/2021 -. . Ii 4.
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering ` „ _
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW 2017t-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 41-West Fork Fishing Creek Reach 2
709+87 Riffle
1008
1006 -
1004 -
0
1002 -
v
w
1000 -
998 ,
20 30 40 50 60 70
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions '� Ja
55.8 x section area(ft.sq.) r )E ai
i
26.5 width(ft) ! �- ' Cl
2.1 mean depth(ft) i =)'Ir: " �'
3.9 max depth(ft) -r ,„.
9ry a PF fi; ,�v
28.1 wetted perimeter(ft) � �� ,. ..
2.0 hydraulic radius(ft) a �x
12.6 width depth ratio :" .
93.2 W flood prone area(ft) --. �� w
3.5 entrenchment ratios �' E
1.0 low bank height ratio4. ' -
i
Survey Date: 12/2021 _ - ,
--
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering 4
�- ' i
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 42-West Fork Fishing Creek Reach 3
716+40 Riffle
1005
1003
1001
0
999
—46411-a-4.......4,4117P#
w
997
995 —
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
60.7 x-section area(ft.sq.) 1, ��
�,�," �
27.1 width(ft) '�. 4e;T e
2.2 mean depth(ft) ! '
'3.9 max depth(ft) x
28.8 wetted perimeter(ft) »� £ T
2.1 hydraulic radius(ft) a .� `f , .�,,
12.1 width depth ratio „ ;.
81.5 W flood prone area(ft) `"
3.0 entrenchment ratio ,
1.0 low bank height ratio -}��., �}
Survey Date: 12/2021 -a = �
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
_..-! j. ': . ce.
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
CritcherUSAGE BrothersActionIDNo.MitigationSAW-2017 Site
-
Monitoring Year 1-2021 01913
Cross-Section 43-West Fork Fishing Creek Reach 4
720+33 Riffle
loon
1
998 -
c 996 - �� - $ ` -
0
_ro,=;vedy.7
r.
v
w
994 -
992 - -
20 30 40 50 60 70
Width(ft)
MY0(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MVO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions E F ;,
46.3 x section area(ft.sq.) � tu`� ,, al t:' .
1.9 width(ft) � ®� y'4 .R
1.9 mean depth(ft) • ), '�,v j '; . ; �'i. €. ,:
3.0 max depth(ft) t 1 S1 .-1 i`
25.6 wetted perimeter(ft) tip. v
1.8 hydraulic radius(ft) � " "' � a.a
13.1 width depth ratio W.-
74.4 W flood prone area(ft)
3.0 entrenchment ratio . 1, 1, '- - ,'▪ ,
1.0 low bank height ratio § =� '
� . �
3'
Survey Date: 12/2021 rati
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering $ " y ▪ #
4" '
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
CritcMonitoringher Brothers Mitigation Site
USAGE ActionYear ID No.
1-2021SAW-2017-01913
Cross-Section 44-West Fork Fishing Creek Reach 5
729+14 Riffle
998
996
994
o fr ,
992
•vdth•dwwww4044/
v
w
990 -
988 •
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions ` ` '' ��' T ,, t• 5 "q4
76.7 x-section area(ft.sq.) Erse
33.8 width(ft) � � Jr��� � � �� � � '�0 h
•
2.3 mean depth(ft) + t F 7iT)1 �''.
3.4 max depth ftM \
)
35.0 wetted perimeter(ft)
2.2 hydraulic radius(ft) y fi - }x
14.9 width depth ratio �� "; �
85.3 W flood prone area(ft) 4,
A .,,,,,, �r, a
:,,,
2.5 entrenchment rati o `
1.0 low bank height ratio '" .ew.,..„.._ ..::. _:,-_. „„-.--_,A,„ �
Survey Date: 12/2021 ,, � • a "-
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
*'' "
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 47-Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2
912+19 Riffle
1005
1004 - ♦ ——— --——
c
0
w 1003 -
1002 i
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions •�` qfi m ,t+ ) yg�/
4.4 x section area(ft.sq.)
' r 'Y4 ! ) .( 4ir '' 6''
8.1 width(ft) s ';; x�;r ` 3 �r ,� � /
0.5 mean depth(ft) i* ^� j� � , ;
1.0 max depth(ft) fie, ,� ��� „ a { f i P
8.5 wetted perimeter(ft) , ° '' �s '- g
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft) A. z � j m - t
14.8 width-depth ratio • • �
54.9 W flood prone area(ft) 1,w 4., �,
6.8 entrenchment ratio ' ; Y �i t "
<1.0 low bank height ratio r
a
'�" 7 a . ru ZS: .p f
Survey Date: 12/2021 � ���" hs °_
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineeringi. 4
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USAGE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 48-Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2
912+65 Pool
1005
1004
I
1003 -
1002 -
1001
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
7.3 x section area(ft.sq.) -, .
11.1 width(ft)
0.7 mean depth(ft) _ � �€ # X
1.3 max depth(ft)
'
11.9 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) , r
Vi. s' '�,
16.8 width-depth ratio
=t- �
' = ,, z t 3
cat
Survey Date: 12/2021 z. ` 'O } ` �'�'
k'��: Y ° .a ;.
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering -``� , � lr
Y
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 49-Ironwood Tributary Reach 1
1004+38 Riffle
1031
1030
'-\ �_
o
r.
LT, 1029 - --"*".%N.N..
1028
10 15 20 25 30
Width(ft)
MYO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull --- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
kiiBankfull Dimensions
3.8 x-section area(ft.sq.) '4 �
7.9 width(ft) '' .- t `,!
0.5 mean depth ft 7s , s •u� A�at
1.0 max depth(ft)
8.3 wetted perimeter(ft) A
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft) * ..„...,,,;?,:is-, , `= ' 4
q^n 6 rT d '. d c� y� :"
16.8 width depth ratio * - -- :" ,°
22.0 W flood prone area(ft) .max .0`
2.8 entrenchment ratio - w� - "
<1.0 low bank height ratio ' ' A a a °
� � � � Z Iwo t� � �� 5
Survey Date: 12/2021 4 ^ ,
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering _— ��r i - a 00=
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
hiti Critc gation Site-01913 USAGEer ActionBrothers ID No.SAW-2017
Monitoring Year 1 M-2021
Cross-Section 50-Timber Tributary Reach 2
1116+47 Pool
1007
1006 -
s
c 1005 -
0
0
v
w
1004 U. —.
1003 -,
10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions a
11.1 x section area(ft.sq.) .t .,- `
10.8 width(ft) k — 7 '
A,- 1:
1.0 mean depth(ft) ''�� .�Y �'° €'
2.0 max depth(ft) _ t `� "* -
12.0 wetted perimeter(ft) — �� � ° � 1
0.9 hydraulic radius(ft) e�
10.6 width depth ratio
s
Survey Date: 12/2021 �+ i )`
' `� S' E
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering F y
. . . - 3 7.4? 1 °e
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plo
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross Section 51-Timber Tributary Reach 2
1116+80 Riffle
1007
1006
.111111"
.4/c 1005 -
4 •
4141.41110- 7
w 1004 -
1003
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MVO(10/2020) MY1(12/2021) Bankfull ——— Bankfull(Based on MY
O Area) Floodprone Area
xrt
Bankfull Dimensions • ! � -
5.5 x section area(ft.sq.) x �
8.4 width(ft) ,:ma '��
0.7 mean depth(ft) -, , s wT i ,
1.2 max depth(ft) r. 41- � �
8.9 wetted perimeter(ft) - ':�r �� �
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) s -
12.6 width depth ratio A,47 ,:a., . '� f —- '?..
43.3 W flood prone area(ft) `� �.�..K=
. = --
ti.
5.2 entrenchment ratio 5N ' `
1.0 low bank height ratio Y « .R
�� yet
Survey Date: 12/20215 � �� t ` �'
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering -, ` ,
y
View Downstream

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

Table 11. Verification of Bankfull Events
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Reach Date of Occurren . Date of Data Collection Metho
SF Fishing Reach 2 - CG3
SF Fishing Reach 6 - CG14
SF Fishing Reach 10 - CG7
Critcher Trib Reach 3 - CG1
Critcher Trib A - CG2
Critcher Trib C - SG3
Critcher Trib D - SG1
Antioch Trib Reach 2 - CG5
Antioch Trib A Reach 2 - CG4
Antioch Trib B Reach 2 - CG6
Chicken 1 Reach 2 - CG13
Robin Hill Trib Reach 1- CG17
Robin Hill Trib A - SG4
Robin Hill Trib B - CG16
Oak Trib - CG15
WF Fishing Reach 1 - CG11
Shew Ridge Trib Reach 2 - CG12
Ironwood Trib Reach 1 - CG9
Timber Trib Reach 2 - CG8
MY1
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
8/18/2021
8/18/2021
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
8/16/2021
8/16/2021
8/17/2021
8/17/2021
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
8/17/2021
8/17/2021
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
8/18/2021
8/18/2021
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
No bankfull events recorded
Automated
Crest/Stream
Gage
Table 12. Verification of Consecutive Flow Days
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Reach MY Dates of Occurrence Maximum Consecutive Days of Method
Stream Flow
Critcher Trib D - SG1
Critcher Trib Reach 1- SG2
Critcher Trib C - SG3
Robin Hill Trib A - SG4
MY1
2/17/2021 - 12/31/2021
318 days
5/23/2021 - 7/23/2021
61 days
4/3/2021 - 12/31/2021
273 days
5/7/2021 - 12/31/2021
238 days
Automated
Stream Gage

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
0
w
W
Crest Gage #1 - Critcher Trib Reach 3
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
1050.0
1049.5
10
-9
1049.0
- 8
- 7
c
o
1048.5
J W A V
Precipita
I
�
1048.0
‘-r---
1047.5
2
1047.0
J
'
IJJI
ILJ
_i I
Ili'--
. L11 .
al IN J
. I
a
1 - •
- _t
.
i I •
J ..
0
l 1 1 1
C >. C on Q_ +"� > U
f6 Q f6 U
u_ g Q 5 Q v1 O Z 0
Daily Level Bankfull Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • • 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Crest Gage #2 - Critcher Trib A
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
10
1037.0
1036.5
1036.0
- 8
1035.5
- 7
r.
6 c
c
\
c
o
"
1035.0
J W A U
Precipita
m
v
1034.5
1034.0
1033.5
J
1033.0
'
IJ J
F
J
_I .
I i , .__ Ir LLL
aL u
. I lik
I _ . _
.
Lh _
1
-
I 1 1 I {
ug Q 5 Q In O z 0
Daily Level Bankfull Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • • 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Crest Gage #3 - SF Fishing Reach 2
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
1027.0 -
1026.5
10
1026.0
9
1025.5
-
7
E 1025.0
6
c
\
0
2
1024.5
a
T S m
1
Q
2
u+ 1024.0
~
4
4
a
1023.5
1023.0
1022.5
rj
1022.0
li
F _�
L�
_1
I I .._ Wl 11
.l IN 1
. I
r
..
_�
.
Lr _
i
J . �,
1 I 1
C >. C to 0. �"� > 0
ro f0 Q co U
�' g a 5 < V) 0 z° o
Daily Level Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • -Bankfull 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Crest Gage #4 - Antioch Trib A Reach 2
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
1017.0 10
1016.5
-9
1016.0
r
-8
- 7
c
o
ro 1015.5
ra
.a.
I I
V
u.i4
~
v
a
1015.0
1014.5
1014.0
IJJ
F _
LJ
.1.
��._
k.Lli l
.Lme 1
. Ia
1 ..
- _
I. I •
J ..
-
I Ii 1 1
a)a 5 LL a' N o z° o
Daily Precipitation Water Level Thalweg Bankfull 30 Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile
— — — •
-- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021
-- Irregularity in the water level data on 12/23/2021. Not included in recorded bankfull events.

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1038.0
1037.5
1037.0
1036.0
1035.5
1035.0
Crest Gage #5 - Antioch Trib Reach 2
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Daily Precipitation
Water Level — — Thalweg — • •Bankfull
30 Day Rolling Precip Total
30th & 70th Percentile
Precipitation (in)
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1032.0
1031.5
1031.0
1030.5
v
W
1030.0
1029.5
1029.0
Crest Gage #6 - Antioch Trib B Reach 2
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
IJ
CD
LL
Q
� a
Ii„ juki
a
5
al. IN
m
O
h— I
10
-9
- 7
- 6
o a",
z o
5
4
- 2
- 1
'1 0
Daily Precipitation Water Level — — Thalweg — • • Bankfull 30 Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile
Precipitation (in)
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Crest Gage #7 - SF Fishing Creek Reach 10
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
993 10
- 9
992
991
- 8
_
!
` 6 E.
c 990
.�-�....-.. _
c
`
0
to
ti
5 :°
.
f
I I
a
989
W
u
4
`
o.
988
-\[-IV--
987
- 2
986
I
I, J
1 _� _
_I .
I it 1.._ lid LLL
iL Hi
. I
a
I, - -
I _�
.
it _ I •
1
J . +
0
c .- >> c to Q +-' > 0
0
fa a) couQ 5 Q In 0 0 n
Daily Level Bankfull Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • • 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Crest Gage #8 - Timber Trib Reach 2
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1006.0 10
-
- 9
1005.5
-8
1005.0
1004.5
_
6 `c
c
c
o
°1004.0as
J W A U1
Precipital
>
1003.5
i
i
I
\
1003.0
I I
I
I
1002.5
- 2
IJ J
F _..
_1 .
I i ..._ L . LLL k .
ai .■
. I
ILIL
I - - - -.
.
LF _ I • -
J • -
1002.0 I , 1 0
c i T c ba Q +-' > V
ra uQ 5 —' Q N O Z 0
Daily Level Bankfull Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • - 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
1030.0
1029.5
1029.0
..
c
1028.5
m
w
W
1028.0
1027.5
1027.0
Crest Gage #9 - Ironwood Trib Reach 1
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Daily Precipitation
Water Level — — Thalweg — • •Bankfull
30 Day Rolling Precip Total
30th & 70th Percentile
Precipitation (in)
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Crest Gage #11 - WF Fishing Creek Reach 1
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
1006 10
- 9
1005 -
1004
- 7
- 6
c1003
o
ti
- 5 co
d 1002
'a
iTJ
`
-4 E
a.
3
1001
I
I
1000
- 2
999
I
I�J
F _�
LJ
J .
I 11. ..._ i.Ili L
al. Hi J
. Ia
1 ..
- _�
.
I_ I . -
1 i
J .-
0
c i >. C to Q +-' > U
ug Q 5 —' Q vM 0 z 0
Daily Level Bankfull Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • • 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1006
1005
;, 1004
w
0
m
v
w 1003
1002
1001
Crest Gage #12 - Shew Ridge Trib Reach 2
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Daily Precipitation
Water Level — — Thalweg — • •Bankfull
30 Day Rolling Precip Total
30th & 70th Percentile
Precipitation (in)
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1010.0
1009.5
1009.0
1008.5
w
c
1008.0
c
1007.5
1007.0
1006.5
Crest Gage #13 - Chicken 1 Reach 2
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
10
8
- 7
ArL,
1006.0 1 I
c
ea
u_
_1 .
alma
Q
a)
- - - - _I- - - - t
5
4
3
•i 0
Daily Precipitation Water Level — — Thalweg — • • Bankfull
30 Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile
Precipitation (in)
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Crest Gage #14 - SF Fishing Creek Reach 6
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1005 10
—
- 9
1004
1003
7
c
/II
6
cI
c
CO
5 0
w1001
41
4 2
0.
3
1000
I
I
2
999
I
998
' IJJI1i]LJI.I
II_ it ill h
iL u J
I
a
I_-
1 1.
c _o > c on a > u
U
ucu
Q 5 Q to O z 0
Daily Level Bankfull Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • . 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Crest Gage #15 - Oak Trib
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
1005.0 10
-
1004.5
1004.0
1�
L
8
-
1003.5
- 7
r '�
1003.0
m
J w A u
Precipita
W
1002.5
1002.0
1001.5
I� J
IF -11-
-I •
( 1 1'._ I
al u
d
1 - - -�
.
L I •
s---j
ram-
J ..
1
1001.0 I I I 1._ { 0
c _a a c on a +� > V
LL a 5 a vi O z in
Daily Level Bankfull Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • • 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1036.0
1035.5
1035.0
1034.5
w
c
1034.0
m
v
W
1033.5
1033.0
1032.5
1032.0
Crest Gage #16 - Robin Hill Trib B
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
c
CO
_I .
>-
m
5
1
c
7
alma
, Ai 1 .
on a
7 N
a in
Daily Precipitation
Water Level — — Thalweg — • • Bankfull
30 Day Rolling Precip Total
30th & 70th Percentile
10
- 9
- 8
- 7
6
5
4
3
- 2
Precipitation (in)
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Crest Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
1025.0
1024.5
1024.0
IF
c
1023.5 -
m
v
W
1023.0
1022.5
1022.0
Crest Gage #17 - Robin Hill Trib Reach 1
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
7".it:14..virmlrhinalirwratiP61"Awwolor
II1. .111.1 _I . 11i ,.._ .111 1
c i T c
LL Q 5
al IA� I ..
7 N
Q N
0
10
- 9
- 8
- 7
- 6
5
4
Daily Precipitation Water Level — — Thalweg — • • Bankfull
30 Day Rolling Precip Total
30th & 70th Percentile
- 2
Precipitation (in)
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Stream Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Stream Gage #1 Critcher Trib D
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1071.0 10
1070.5
-
318 days of consecutive stream flow
•
- g
1070.0
-8
1069.5
- 7
•�
�
6 c
c
\
o
•1069.0
rts
5 Y
'a
>
a,
_
1068.5
4 2
o.
\
3
1068.0
I I
I
1067.5
rt.-
hi 1
IF _I. .
L J
J .
I i , .__ 1.111 1
■L... 1
. I
a
1 - • - -�
.
Lf _ ' • -
• +
1067.0 I + I 0
c i >- c ba •Q +-' >cu c) U
co cu
—,0
uQ 5 — Q N 0 z 0
Daily Level Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • -Bankfull 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Stream Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Stream Gage #2 Critcher Trib Reach 1
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1V/L.0 —
1071.5 6 1days of consecutive stream
1V
- 9
1071.0
:flow
•
8
1070.5
—.— — — —.
,Il
7
V
6 c
:.
c
\
o
}, 1070.0
ms
ai
J W A V
Precipita
W
1069.5
ti
i
I
\
1069.0
I I
I
I
1068.5
- 2
1068.0
I
IJ 1
F _�L
L J
_i .
I i i I .._ I. ill I+
1L a
I. I
ILL
1-- I _�
.
LI _ I .
I
J ..
c '- >• c bp Q +' > U
al —, uQ 5 Q v1 0 z in
Daily Level Bankfull Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • . 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Stream Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1058.0
1057.5
1057.0
1056.5
1056.0
v
1055.5
1055.0
1054.5
1054.0
Stream Gage #3 Critcher Trib C
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
273 days of consecutive stream flow
10
- 8
- 7
6
wMp""'
5
I.1 i+•Lu
c �
Q
ul
O
O
Z
N
0
Daily Precipitation Water Level — — Thalweg — • • Bankfull 30 Day Rolling Precip Total 30th & 70th Percentile
4
Precipitation (in)
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Stream Gage Plots
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
w
c
0
W
Stream Gage #4 Robin Hill Trib A
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
1012.0 10
1011.5
238 days of consecutive stream flow
1
- g
1011.0
l
- 8
1010.5
- 7
- 6 c
c
1010.0
J W A V
Precipita
1009.5
\
1009.0
I I
I
1008.5
- 2
1008.0
IJJ
IF _ICJ
_1 .
I i 1.._ I.WI. 1
■u
. Ia
1 --
-�
.Lr_
I -
..
I + I 0
c i T c ba Q +-' > U
ra ug Q 5 —,Q vrf O z 0
Daily Level Day &
Precipitation Water — — Thalweg — • -Bankfull 30 Rolling Precip Total 30th 70th Percentile
- Gage installed and started collecting data on 2/16/2021

Monthly Rainfall Data
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
c
is
Q
2
O.
Critcher Brothers 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2021
12
10
8
6
/
2
1•
Jan-21
Feb-21
Mar-21 Apr-21
May-21
Jun-21
Date
1
Jul-21
Percentile
Aug-21
Sep-21
Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21
Percentile
North Wilkesboro 5.5 SE
-30th
-70th
2021 rainfall collected by NC CRONOS Station, North Wilkesboro 5.5 SE, NC
30th and 70th percentile rainfall data collected from WETS station North Wilkesboro, NC

APPENDIX 6. Pebble Count Requirements

Environmental
Quality
To: DMS Technical Workgroup, DMS operations staff
From: Periann Russell, Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
RE: Pebble count data requirements
Date: October 19, 2021
The DMS Technical Work Group met September 29, 2021 to discuss Interagency Review Team (IRT) and
DMS requirements for collecting pebble count data as part of monitoring (MYO-MYx). Agreement was
reached between all attending parties that pebble count data will not be required during the monitoring
period for all future projects.
Sediment data and particle distribution will still be required for the mitigation plan as part of the
proposed design explanation and justification.
Pebble counts and/or particle distributions currently being conducted by providers for annual
monitoring may be discontinued at the discretion of the DMS project manager. If particle distribution
was listed as a performance standard in the project mitigation plan, the provider is required to
communicate the intent to cease data collection with the DMS project manager. The absence of pebble
count data in future monitoring reports where pebble count data was listed as part of monitoring in the
mitigation plan must be documented in the monitoring report. The September 29, 2021 Technical Work
Group meeting may be cited as the source of the new policy.
The IRT reserves the right to request pebble count data/particle distributions if deemed necessary
during the monitoring period.

Sara Thompson
From: Kristi Suggs
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 11:33 AM
To: Brandon Romeo; Ed Blevins; Ella Wickliff; Freddy Ortega; Ian Eckardt; Jeff Turner; Jessica
Waller; Mimi Caddell; Sara Thompson; Stephanie Erickson
Cc: Jordan Hessler
Subject: Bank Projects and Pebble Counts
Attachments: TWG Meeting sept29_2021 PebbleCountMemo.docx
Hello Everyone,
I just spoke with Steve Kitchefski (1/31/2022) with the USACE about doing pebble counts during the monitoring. He was
okay with us removing pebble counts from post -construction monitoring on banks overseen by the Asheville USACE
Office. He wants to confirm with other IRT members and make sure that they are also on board. As for now, we will
refrain from collecting pebble count data in MY1 — MY7 unless we hear otherwise. Please make sure to follow the DMS
Technical Workgroup guidelines. See attached. Thanks
-ks
Kristi Suggs I Senior Environmental Scientist
0: 704.332.7754 x110 M: 704.579.4828
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
1

APPENDIX 7. Agency Correspondence

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
151 PATTON AVENUE
ROOM 208
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-5006
May 21, 2021
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
Re: As-Built/MYO credit release of the Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument
— Critcher Brothers Site
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Attention: Mr. Shawn Wilkerson
[e-mail]
Dear Mr. Wilkerson:
This correspondence is in reference to your March 9, 2021 request for the As-Built/MYO
credit release for the Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site, part of the Yadkin Valley Umbrella
Mitigation Bank. The 72.46-acre site is located 7 miles east of Wilkesboro in southeast Wilkes
County, North Carolina. The original project included 28,281 linear feet of stream restoration,
enhancement and preservation generating 20,762 cool stream mitigation units (SMU's) along
South Fork Fishing Creek, West Fork Fishing Creek and their tributaries in the Upper Yadkin
Watershed of the Upper Pee Dee River Basin (03040101). The As -Built survey reduced the
potential stream credit by 183 SMU's to a new total of 20,578.4 SMU's. The purpose of this
letter is to confirm the As-Built/MYO release of credits for this mitigation site.
Pursuant to the Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) entitled, Agreement to Establish
the Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank, approved October 17, 2019; and the site -specific
Critcher Brothers Final Mitigation Plan dated July 8, 2019, fifteen percent (15%) of the
mitigation site's total restoration and enhancement credits shall be available for sale immediately
upon completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made pursuant to the
Mitigation Plan.
By copy of this correspondence, we confirm that you have satisfied the above
requirements for the second credit release for all parcels within the bank; and 2,972.26 stream
mitigation units (SMU's), constituting 15% of the mitigation site's total restoration and
enhancement credits are now available for sale.
During the NCIRT review of the As-Built/MYO report and the March 23, 2021 IRT field
visit, agency representatives communicated several concerns with site conditions. Many of these

concerns were noted in the meeting notes emailed to the IRT on March 30, 2021 (attached).
Wildlands Engineering Inc. committed to addressing several actions and documenting them
within the MY1 report including:
1. Throughout the site invasive species were present and it was unclear if they had
been treated yet. Make sure invasive treatment is completed soon and documented
within the MY 1 report. For future projects, document dates of invasive treatment
within the As-Built/Monitoring reports.
2. Several areas of sparse vegetative cover were found throughout the site which
should be addressed (Critcher Tributary, Ironwood, etc.).
3. Several areas of trash or debris, including old barrels, trash and fencing were
noted within the CE that should be removed.
4. Additional photo points were requested in some locations to better assess IRT
concerns throughout monitoring. These include looking upstream at culvert
outlets and the Critcher Tributary BMP.
5. The IRT expressed concern for the long-term integrity of the last log sill of the
Ironwood BMP as it transitions into Ironwood Reach 1. This log sill has a large
drop which meant the log was exposed to the air most of the time resulting in a
likely faster rate of decomposition. Please resolve this issue and update the IRT in
the MY1 report. Potential solutions discussed included splitting the drop over
multiple structures and/or converting to a rock structure(s).
6. The IRT was concerned with the integrity and function of the newly installed
West Fork Fishing Creek triple barrel culvert crossing. Improvements to this
crossing are needed. Converting it to a ford crossing was also an acceptable
alternative discussed with the IRT.
7. Due to the withdrawal of an adjacent property owner, work on Magnolia Trib
Reach 2 was modified since the plan submittal. The IRT requested additional
stream work to stabilize and replant an additional approximately 50-75 feet and to
remove the segment of old fencing in this area. Additional credit (EII) can be
sought for this work.
8. While much of South Fork Fishing Creek looked good, the IRT asked that
deposition downstream of WF Fishing confluence be watched due to development
of midchannel bars.
9. A vegetation monitoring transect was requested on the shaded planting area of
South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 9 in order to assess the performance of planting
in these conditions. Include this with the MY1 report. Abundant sediment
deposition was noted in this reach as well.
10. Additional work is needed on South Fork Fishing Creek for approximately 75 feet
just downstream of the culvert at the Reach 8/9 transition (especially the right
bank). Bank stabilization and invasive treatment utilized should be documented
within the MY1 report.
11. The IRT requested the replacement of all synthetic matting along the Robin Hill
Tributary restoration reach and modification of the rip rap gully in order to catch
more sediment entering the restored stream reach from this gully and the pasture
to the south. The Robin Hill Trib A BMP is helping to stabilize and reduce
sediment in the downstream restored reach, however additional attention should

be paid sediment load in this reach due to the amount of eroded gully still upslope
of the BMP.
12. Concern was expressed by the IRT over several of the newly installed culvert
crossings including Antioch Tributary Reach 4 and Chicken Tributary Reach 2.
At the time of the visit no substrate was seen in the culverts and asked WEI for
options to ensure they are buried properly, maintaining substrate and meeting
aquatic life passage requirements.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact
Steve Kichefski at [phone] extension 4234.
Sincerely,
KICHEFSKI.STEV ,P.,Isg1WRIYL.1386908539
for N . L. 1 386908539 Date: 2021.05.21 17:53:38 -04'00'
Scott Jones, Chief
Asheville and Charlotte Regulatory Field Offices
Electronic Copies Furnished:
Erin Davis (NCDWR)
Andrea Leslie (NCWRC)
Travis Wilson (NCWRC)
Holland Youngman (USFWS)
Todd Bowers (USEPA)
Renee Gledhill -Earley (NCSHPO)
Todd Tugwell (USACE)
Kim Browning (USACE)
Casey Haywood (USACE)
Scott Jones (USACE)

WI LD LAND S
ENGINEERING
MEETING NOTES
MEETING:
IRT As -Built Site Walk
CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin 03040101; Wilkes County, NC
Wildlands Project No. 005-45005
DATE: Tuesday, March 23, 2021
LOCATION: Robin Hill Road
Roaring Springs, NC
Attendees
Todd Tugwell, USACE
Andrea Leslie, USFWS
Erin Davis, NCDWR
Steve Kichefski, USACE
Emily Reinicker, Wildlands
Christine Blackwelder, Wildlands
Mimi Caddell, Wildlands
Materials
• Wildlands Engineering Critcher Brothers Site As -Built Plans (03-08-2021)
• Wildlands Engineering Critcher Brothers Site Mitigation Plan
• Critcher IRT Walk Meeting Minutes (12-04-2017)
Meeting Notes
The meeting began at 8:30 am. Emily presented a brief overview of the project at the parking location. From
there, the group proceeded to walk the entire site in the following general order:
Ironwood Tributary, WF Fishing Creek, Shew Ridge Tributary, Magnolia Tributary, Timber Tributary, SF Fishing
Creek, Oak Tributary, Robin Hill Tributaries, Antioch Tributaries, Critcher Tributaries, and Chicken Tributary 1A.
At the end of the walk, the IRT had several items they would like follow-up on. These are presented in a bullet
point list at the end of these minutes. IRT discussed that, given the scale of the project and the small percentage
of areas that require follow up, they agree to a full as -built credit release at this time. Credit adjustments for
additional credits proposed for additional E2 work on Magnolia to be presented in the Monitoring Year 1 (MY1)
report. Todd requested email communication only if action items discussed were not going to be accomplished
before MY1 report submittal.
In general, the group noted that the project had turned out well and had varied habitats. The preserved
floodplain wetlands and sloughs on WF Fishing and the constructed floodplain pools were favorite habitats. The
group appreciated the BMPs and the consensus was that the Ironwood BMP, which provided sediment storage
between steps, was the favorite. Fences were well constructed, and signage correctly installed. Steve noted
that, after reading the as -built plan, he was concerned the site would be too armored, but did not feel that way

after the site walk. Erin noted several wet areas throughout the site and suggested different vegetation species
may be needed in these areas. If supplemental planting becomes necessary to add different vegetation species
to these areas due to low performance of original plantings, Wildlands will communicate this to the IRT in the
annual monitoring reports.
On future projects, the IRT would like to see: single barrel culverts (no HDPE pipes), buffers wider than 30 feet in
the mountain counties particularly on larger systems, and buffer above the upstream terminus on project
reaches.
The meeting concluded at 4:00 PM.
For organizational purposes, the meeting notes are arranged by stream reach, from upstream to downstream,
east to west.
1. South Fork Fishing Creek
• Reach 1— Enhancement II
o Not field reviewed.
• Reach 2/3 — Restoration
o Overall looks very nice.
o Group reviewed, some discussion over BMP in right hand floodplain. Outlet was shifted during
construction. BMP was intended to capture runoff from eroding gully further up valley.
Functionally, gully drainage spays onto vegetated floodplain before BMP captures runoff.
Vegetated floodplain interception of gully runoff is serving intended purpose.
• Reach 4 — Enhancement II
o Trout lilies and bloodroots in bloom along this reach.
• Reaches 5 - 8 - Restoration
o Overall looks very nice.
o Large storms during construction in fall 2020 resulted in some deposition in some reaches (SF
Reach 9-11) and stripped topsoil from SF Reaches 6-7 where grass was not yet established. 10-
year-old chicken litter from old onsite chicken houses applied on portions of SF Fishing Reaches 6
and 7 floodplain to amend the soil.
o Boulder toe bank viewed (first curve downstream of steel bridge), Todd said armoring like this is
acceptable when limited, like in this instance. Diversity of bank treatments desired and
acceptable.
o Group liked the log vane structure where Chicken Trib joins SF Fishing— deep pool habitat
provided. Chicken Tributary flows into SF Fishing over log structure.
• Reach 9 — Enhancement II
o Culvert crossing (existing) at the upstream end of this reach was reviewed. IRT would like right
bank scour repaired here and the large privets on the left bank mechanically removed.
o This reach has a lot of sand on its bed. Emily stated that she thinks this material will flush out over
time. IRT asked that this area be watched. A photo point (PP15) was installed along the right
WWildlands Engineering, Inc.
CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE- Yadkin Valley UMB
March 23, 2021 IRT As -Built Site Walk Meeting Notes
page 2

bank of this reach at as -built and will be taken once a year to visually document stability during
the seven-year monitoring period.
o As IRT requested in 2017, the farm road was removed and a floodplain bench was constructed.
Erin asked for a vegetation monitoring transect in this bench area to document shaded planting
species survival, separate from the vegetation plot success criteria. Please add short discussion in
monitoring report about how shaded planting is performing over the years.
• Reach 10-11- Restoration
o Emily stated a higher riffle width to depth ratio was chosen on this section to minimize bank
erosion risk and to provide sediment storage/deposition zones. Point bar slopes in pools were
also designed with a lower slope.
o IRT asked that deposition downstream of WF Fishing confluence be watched to see if a mid -
channel bar develops.
2. Critcher Tributary Watershed
• Critcher Tributary, Critcher Tributary C, Critcher Tributary D — Restoration
o Wetland areas establishing in old pond bed. IRT noted that after observing wetlands developing
on several areas in the floodplain throughout the project, wetland credits can be requested after -
the -fact at creation mitigation ratio (3:1). Wildlands could review grading model and request
credits in areas with less than 12" of cut or fill. Groundwater gages would need to be installed.
Emily said she will consider this back in the office and follow up further if makes sense for
Wildlands to pursue.
o The BMP joining from the right bank is entirely silted in. IRT asked if Wildlands could maintain this
one more time (scoop out accumulated sediment from step pools) before vegetation fully
establishes.
o Bare areas on right hand floodplain need to be amended/reseeded to get ground cover vegetation
established.
• Critcher Tributary A - Restoration
o Not reviewed beyond the downstream -most 100 LF due to a nesting killdeer along the reach.
3. Antioch Tributary Watershed
o IRT asked Wildlands to watch deposition in Tributary B at the valley slope change. Silted in during
large storm events before floodplain was vegetated after construction, but Emily believes the slug
of sediment may wash through over time.
o IRT had concern over Antioch Tributary culvert and aquatic organism passage. Wildlands will work
on crossing retrofit.
4. Chicken Tributary Watershed
• Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 1 and Chicken Tributary 1A — Enhancement II
o Left fence line of Chicken Tributary 1A was walked. IRT felt that stream was in worse condition
than in 2017. Steve noted additional buffer around the terminus would have improved the reach.
WWildlands Engineering, Inc.
CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE- Yadkin Valley UMB
March 23, 2021 IRT As -Built Site Walk Meeting Notes
page 3

• Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2- Restoration
o Andrea/Erin stated that culvert crossings, as constructed, were potential aquatic species migration
barriers due to slick bottoms and no rock material in the bed of the culverts.
• Chicken Tributary 2- Restoration (no credit)
o Group appreciated this work. Noted low flow despite jurisdictional status.
5. Robin Hill Tributary Watershed
• Robin Hill Tributary, Robin Hill Tributary A, and Robin Hill Tributary B— Restoration
o Streams vastly improved from existing condition.
o WRC and DWR did not approve of plastic net matting used on the left valley wall and require its
removal. Erin and Andrea disliked the amount of quarry riprap used on this reach. Steve
commented that this reach seemed to have a lot of armoring field changes. Emily acknowledged
that the slope was a concern during construction, so more rock was added during construction.
Logs were minimally used due to rotting concerns.
o Gully stabilization on the right side of Robin Hill functions like a riprap lined ditch. Steve asked
that this area be reworked to increase storage in a series of check dams or step pools, since this
area intercepts sediment from the upstream pasture.
o Slope drain discussed. Inlet is outside the easement and, due to elevation change on the hillside,
was one of the few options for minimizing hillside erosion in this area.
6. Oak Tributary
o Reviewed briefly, looks good, no comments.
7. West Fork Fishing Creek
• Reaches 1 and 2 - Restoration
o Emily highlighted the brush sills in the floodplain to provide roughness.
• Reach 3, 4, 5, and 6 — Enhancement I
o Emily highlighted areas where the existing channel was used as requested during the initial IRT
site walk, and features such as backwater sloughs were preserved. The IRT appreciated these
habitat features.
o Extended discussion on the 3-barrel culvert crossing, which is located in an internal easement
break. IRT unsure of stability of armored spillway. Andrea and Erin expressed concern with
species passage through HDPE pipe. Steve and Andrea discussed disadvantages with having all
three culverts at the same elevation and suggested a design alternative would be to raise the two
side culverts (i.e., "Mickey Mouse ears"). Emily stated that the HDPE was a landowner
requirement and that Wildlands thought goals was consistent water flow in the culvert pipe to
provide passage. Andrea stated that a 48" culvert should have 12" of material in the bottom of
the pipe to be considered partially buried, and smooth HDPE is too difficult for many species to
navigate.
WWildlands Engineering, Inc.
CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE- Yadkin Valley UMB
March 23, 2021 IRT As -Built Site Walk Meeting Notes
page 4

o Lots of sand deposition noted in the floodplain. Andrea pointed out existing sycamore and tulip
poplar. Andrea pointed out invasives were present in the undisturbed right bank riparian area.
Trout lilies also noted.
o At downstream end of West Fork, Steve asked for a rough estimation from Emily of what
percentage of the Enhancement I reaches were worked on and to what extent. Offhand, Emily
roughly estimated 70% was restoration, 20% light touch, and 10% relatively untouched.
8. Magnolia Tributary
• Reach 1— Preservation
o IRT would like the enhancement work to extent approximately 50 more feet upstream to the
existing right bank boulder to address the right bank erosion. Andrea did not like the day lilies
present in the floodplain. Existing fence in this area is within the CE and needs to be removed.
IRT said they would approve additional E2 credits (2.5:1) in this area. Wildlands will complete this
work and request credits in the MY1 report.
• Reach 2 — Enhancement II
o Adjacent landowner backed out of project after the mitigation plan was approved, and an
approximate 130 LF length of stream that was shown in the mitigation plan was excluded from the
project. Reach 2 was originally designed with an enhancement I approach but was changed to
enhancement II. Change is recorded in the as -built and captured in the credit release memo.
1. Emily asked if this should have been presented as a mitigation plan
modification. Todd said that since the project is 26,000 LF, a 130 LF change
does not warrant a modification. An email/memo may be appropriate in the
future on similar changes. 5% of project length or greater decrease in work is an
informal rule of thumb threshold for a mitigation plan modification. Any
increase in work that includes a request for credits needs to be submitted as a
modification. Steve asked that items like this be brought to the IRTs attention
during the easement review stage in the future.
9. Shew Ridge Tributary Watershed
• Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 1 and Shew Ridge Tributary A — Preservation
o Group walked a portion of this reach and noted the adjacent landowner had recently logged.
Steve noted a barrel that needs to be removed.
• Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2 - Restoration
o Emily noted the floodplain pool, which the group appreciated. Floodplain pool is expected to dry
out in summer and it was dry during July 2020 after this area's construction.
o Emily discussed some tie-in changes that were made. Todd commented on where Shew Ridge ties
into West Fork Fishing's alignment at the end of a meander was interesting and probably the best
solution given the valley orientation.
10. Ironwood Tributary
• Reach 1— Restoration
o BMP upstream of Reach 1 was well liked by IRT.
WWildlands Engineering, Inc.
CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE- Yadkin Valley UMB
March 23, 2021 IRT As -Built Site Walk Meeting Notes
page 5

o Group noted poor vegetative growth in right floodplain. A rill from roadside runoff is forming due
to lack of grass cover. Wildlands to install a coir log across the rill and reseed the area.
o At the downstream end of Reach 1, the IRT had concerns about the log sill installed and whether it
would remain stable in the long term after transfer to land steward to prevent a headcut from
forming and migrating upstream. Wildlands to retrofit last log sill structure- either by spreading
drop over two logs, replacing with rock sill, or adding rock stabilization at this location.
• Reach 2 - Preservation
o Multiflora rose and forsythia noted in this area — needs treatment. Emily stated initial treatment
was made, but follow ups needed.
o Todd mentioned that, if invasive treatment is not performed, project construction (as -built) may
be considered incomplete for credit release. For future projects, please document initial invasive
treatments in as -built monitoring report.
11. Timber Tributary Watershed
• Timber Tributary Reach 1 and Timber Tributary A— Preservation
o Group reviewed a short portion of the downstream extent of Reach 1. Emily mentioned that
Wildlands used a reference reach from this watershed.
• Timber Tributary Reach 2 - Restoration
o The culvert crossing was reviewed, good material accumulated in the culvert and should provide
aquatic passage.
Action Item List
I Undisturbed Buffer Throughout Site — Treat invasives. Present information on this in MY1 report.
I Bare Areas Within Buffer — Spot areas throughout buffer with poor vegetative cover — of note on
Critcher Tributary.
I Remaining Barrels/Trash/Existing Fence in Easement - The IRT noted existing fence within the
easement that had not been removed on Magnolia and downstream end of WF Fishing, as well as piles
of fence debris along Magnolia. Several barrels were noted on Shew and Timber.
I Additional Photo Points — Please establish downstream looking upstream photo points at all culvert
crossings. Please establish an additional photo point at the Critcher Trib BMP.
I Ironwood Tributary — Replace last log sill on restoration reach with rock structure due to concerns of log
rot. IRT recommends splitting drop over two log structures or replacing with one or two rock structures.
I West Fork Fishing Creek Culvert Crossing— Wildlands to review the potential future plans for the solar
farm, which may necessitate upgrading the triple barrel culvert, and communicate this back to the IRT.
One solution may be to replace this crossing with a ford crossing, which the IRT was open to for a
temporary condition (few years), in tandem with potential retrofits to the culvert to make it more
conducive to aquatic species passage. Wildlands to install retrofit feature(s) that address concern for
embedment and roughness in culvert bottom.
I Magnolia —Extend stream bank work approximately 50 LF upstream, stabilize and replant disturbed
areas. Remove old fence inside easement. Submit for E2 credit in MY1 report.
WWildlands Engineering, Inc.
CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE- Yadkin Valley UMB
March 23, 2021 IRT As -Built Site Walk Meeting Notes
page 6

I South Fork Fishing Creek Reach 9 (E2) — Conduct a vegetation monitoring transect on the shaded
planting in MY1.
I South Fork Fishing Creek Culvert at Reach 8/Reach 9 Break — Repair erosion on right bank downstream
of the single barrel culvert. Mechanically remove privet on the left bank.
I Robin Hill
o Remove all synthetic matting along left valley wall.
o Adjust gully from right bank, currently a rip rap ditch, replace with check dams to provide
sediment storage.
IF Antioch Tributary Reach 4 — Wildlands to review IRT concerns with aquatic species passage on the
culvert crossing and install retrofit feature(s) that address concern for embedment and roughness in
culvert bottom.
I Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2 Culvert- Wildlands to review IRT concerns with aquatic species passage on
the double barrel culvert crossing and install retrofit feature(s) that address concern for embedment
and roughness in culvert bottom.
These meeting minutes were prepared by Christine Blackwelder March 25, 2021 and reviewed by Emily Reinicker and Mimi
Caddell on March 26, 2021, and represent the authors' interpretation of events.
WWildlands Engineering, Inc.
CRITCHER BROTHERS MITIGATION SITE- Yadkin Valley UMB
March 23, 2021 IRT As -Built Site Walk Meeting Notes
page 7

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
February 18, 2022
Project Manager: Mr. Steve Kichefski
US Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28806-5006
Subject: IRT As -Built Site Walk
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Wilkes County, Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913
NCDWR #20190922 v1
Dear Mr. Kichefski:
Thank you for your May 21, 2021 comment letter for the Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Monitoring
Year 0 report. Wildlands addressed several concerns expressed by the IRT at the IRT As -Built Site Walk
conducted on March 23, 2021. IRT comments and Wildlands Responses have been summarized below.
IRT Comment: Throughout the site invasive species were present and it was unclear if they had been
treated yet. Make sure invasive treatment is completed soon and documented within the MY1 report.
For future projects, document dates of invasive treatment within the As-Built/Monitoring reports.
All pre -construction invasive treatments occurred in November 2019. Chinese privet was treated on SF
Fishing Creek, Oak Tributary, WF Fishing Creek Reach 1, Robin Hill Tributary, and Timber Tributary Reach
1. Tree of heaven was treated on Chicken Tributary 1 and Robin Hill Tributary, and princess tree was
treated on Chicken Tributary 1. Refer to section 1.2.2 of the MY1 report for details about invasive
treatment activities in MY1. The remaining invasive species are documented on Table 7 and shown on
the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Figures 3.0 — 3.7 in Appendix 2. Treatment dates are
documented on Table 2 in Appendix 1.
IRT Comment: Several areas of sparse vegetative cover were found throughout the site which should
be addressed (Critcher Tributary, Ironwood, etc.).
Wildlands will continue to address areas of poor vegetative cover throughout the monitoring period.
Refer to section 1.2.2 of the MY1 report for details about bare/poor vegetative cover areas. Bare areas
are documented on Table 7 and shown on the CCPV Figures 3.0 — 3.7 in Appendix 2.
IRT Comment: Several areas of trash or debris, including old barrels, trash and fencing were noted
within the CE that should be removed.
Wildlands completed this trash removal in May 2021.
IRT Comment: Additional photo points were requested in some locations to better assess IRT concerns
throughout monitoring. These include looking upstream at culvert outlets and the Critcher Tributary
BMP.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 1430 S. Mint Street, # 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

Additional photo points (PP74 and PP75) have been established at the Critcher BMPs. A separate photo
log has been created to document the internal culvert crossings and photos will be retaken annually.
Refer to Appendix 2 in the MY1 report for additional photos of culverts and Critcher Trib BMPs.
IRT Comment: The IRT expressed concern for the long-term integrity of the last log sill of the Ironwood
BMP as it transitions into Ironwood Reach 1. This log sill has a large drop which meant the log was
exposed to the air most of the time resulting in a likely faster rate of decomposition. Please resolve
this issue and update the IRT in the MY1 report. Potential solutions discussed included splitting the
drop over multiple structures and/or converting to a rock structure(s).
The last log sill along the restoration reach of Ironwood tributary was replaced with a boulder sill in May
2021. Refer to section 1.2.3 of the MY1 report for description of repairs. Refer to Appendix 7 for
structure repair photographs.
IRT Comment: The IRT was concerned with the integrity and function of the newly installed West Fork
Fishing Creek triple barrel culvert crossing. Improvements to this crossing are needed. Converting it to
a ford crossing was also an acceptable alternative discussed with the IRT.
The triple barrel culvert crossing along WF Fishing Creek was replaced with a ford crossing. Refer to
section 1.2.3 of the MY1 report for description of repairs. Refer to Appendix 7 for culvert replacement
photographs.
IRT Comment: Due to the withdrawal of an adjacent property owner, work on Magnolia Trib Reach 2
was modified since the plan submittal. The IRT requested additional stream work to stabilize and
replant an additional approximately 50-75 feet and to remove the segment of old fencing in this area.
Additional credit (Ell) can be sought for this work in the MY1 submittal.
Work was completed along the right bank of the downstream 50 linear feet of Magnolia Reach 1 in May
2021. Refer to section 1.2.3 of the MY1 report for description of repairs. Refer to Appendix 7 for stream
repair photographs.
IRT Comment: While much of South Fork Fishing Creek looked good, the IRT asked that deposition
downstream of WF Fishing confluence be watched due to development of midchannel bars.
Wildlands continues to monitor the formation of midchannel bars at the WF Fishing and SF Fishing Creek
confluence. Refer to Appendix 2 for stream photographs (PP17).
IRT Comment: A vegetation monitoring transect was requested on the shaded planting area of South
Fork Fishing Creek Reach 9 in order to assess the performance of planting in these conditions. Include
this with the MY1 report. Abundant sediment deposition was noted in this reach as well.
An additional vegetation monitoring transect was completed in the shaded area along SF Fishing Creek
Reach 9. Refer to section 1.2.1 of the MY1 report for vegetation monitoring results. Refer to Appendix 2
for vegetation plot photographs and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
IRT Comment: Additional work is needed on South Fork Fishing Creek for approximately 75 feet just
downstream of the culvert at the Reach 8/9 transition (especially the right bank). Bank stabilization
and invasive treatment utilized should be documented within the MY1 report.
Bank stabilization and privet treatment was completed downstream of the SF Fishing Creek Culvert at
the Reach 8/Reach 9 break in May 2021. Refer to section 1.2.3 of the MY1 report for description of
repairs. Refer to Appendix 7 for stream repair photographs.
IRT Comment: The IRT requested the replacement of all synthetic matting along the Robin Hill
Tributary restoration reach and modification of the rip rap gully in order or catch more sediment
entering the restored stream reach from this gully and the pasture to the south. The Robin Hill Trib A
BMP is helping stabilize and reduce sediment in the downstream restored reach, however additional
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site —Yadkin Valley UMB

attention should be paid sediment load in this reach due to the amount of eroded gully still upslope of
the BMP.
Synthetic matting was removed, and the rip rap ditch was replaced with check dams in May 2021. Refer
to Appendix 7 in the MY1 report for updated photographs.
IRT Comment: Concern was expressed by the IRT over several of the newly installed culvert crossings
including Antioch Tributary Reach 4 and Chicken Tributary Reach 2. At the time of the visit no
substrate was seen in the culverts and asked WEI for options to ensure they are buried properly and,
maintaining substrate and meeting aquatic organism passage requirements.
The culverts along Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2 and Antioch Tributary Reach 4 were retrofitted to
address concerns with aquatic organism passage in May 2021. Refer to section 1.2.3 of the MY1 report
for description of repairs. Refer to Appendix 7 for culvert retrofit photographs.
Please contact me at 704-965-7834 extension 106 if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Emily G. Reinicker, PE, CFM
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site —Yadkin Valley UMB

IRT Action Item Photographs
MY1

".,••,'ia:". •,,
y,\' -K.3 .,4' "air ',,✓ g:. a� „.` _ •
yaM� d, • _
; - '"" y y., '• is Tf
fir- ', �' _ j - _ si T +€g X� AMP rse y- � '- - -
F` �'y _ { _ vM',, Y C^S^ R- _{�' ;E NT-„fir "' 4. 3 •$, -, •E ^ —
}
_ 4.)?. _ fir --. ,f j ,� -.`
fir , 5 — V sT-
-� 5_.IS'�•,. .. � � _. .0 ♦�,. �3ITrti ,�."ric .,i�:i �'�- - a"��'.�16t "4
Ironwood Tributary R2,station 1006+70—Boulder sill substituted to M7.sno_olia Reach 2,station 810+50—Stream bank stabilization and
replace log sill(5/24/2021) planting(10/15/2021)
- -' a .u" -,fie X _- T c �f�yqq ' fr +k-: s'. a..b -' w .' cd - ro � ,' u,GJ s. w - '' 1r`,�'E q"'
�r 1, ,� E - H - / ei
''yy 66��x�
r., \J 3:�:., YYaf rA cy ,� i' Ig= Ya .F
gyp.:- �k" a 3.v- . uec" r-
kss } i' --. d d
-, -.e[' r • a ,fir ,{-' `y �x�
` . �: '1#
gg,, .
'47,-- -�� a�' pia ''" � ¢ .�"+,-- " fi '.�,
, --- ,-,� -k F a+ a- �+yd`,' -0 M' , ,r x,,.e '4,1',' ` s �4 z rT v,,,'it ,r�s k
•
4 M _ , • �4s. ,, ., t Y2E r� u' -r''z '>:f Y 4, �} `s.
s .1f •':e ,y . r _ ,�2.6- - .e .z+`�•w�L J• a-_ . 1- :i�:` "`. ..-._
SFFC Reach 9,station 160+00—Stream bankSC stabilization and SFFC Reach 9,station 161+50—Vegetation plot established in shade
seeding(10/15/2021) area of right floodplain(10/15/2021)

i Q, -,'.fix i ' �, 'C "� ,�, � ' e e V n
a J Z 1°
; 3 j �z 1 .w a r 'ii,
_:2 4' _�r5. a �"- .bs .4. � •• a j, ' iv. ,..,ia .r r„ r • x .v' .�. ,s y '1_ ,1stk "1 z 5 ,.. rY { `ate - - s y ,r "y-as ' - i- <
Robin Hill Tributary Reach 1,station 503+00—Synthetic matting Robin Hill Tributary A,station 550+00—Gully on right bank
removed from left valley wall (10/15/2021) retrofitted with check dams(5/24/2021)
.,,,kt. „,..,,,t., L ,a.''''-
"C) F.�., ,: _ y '.6 g 1 •*i., E, "'rC^Lv, • .,S x'r,,' t�` ''i,
r '''''.'a; E h1*'- x I rt 4 4i�t .� i•a• ,d` _• "vz` . - ,, arc +* ' ✓; -� :y .�, p- --
{+` � n Q om's RR 2. 4,p.
� e
- §.,t �,l#sst rj -.r� �,. r} s.=x y 'emu,
ram r £�_ � ti' � - �- _ .
WFFC Reach 4,station 718+00—Culvert crossing pre-removal WFFC Reach 4,station 718+00—Culvert crossing removed and
(10/15/2021) replaced with ford crossing(12/16/2021)

yr 9 r r / a .k { �" g 1 .4 !� ,F�`
�F f '�w t .w7 ,S'>li t Y �W,�' 3 "t"'i v-�y ,t�d l ,,n
r # a 5+; i„ r w t ,^
a a - F yn .4. t .. Fes, �rf' !� 'kgro ���k 'r `T S'-,�s?
�', ✓' t � N. w. �� a r a- 2• 1 a 'k, �°i t�}4 F "vie.,
t' -g w r,
.'IL, i L"`X .d s" '' l,a`,,, d'.1,,ram✓-. ' � . vic ;N`f"' ' �, 8 .,,,
a Ar r.
OlVn'ttATf.354'''.-vf4i-kr' :-::;,.::".1,i;'.-:;‘,'. t.,._.-5'''_...:,4 :T74:1/4.7.,,Ze":1:1444 :. ,V7, '' -.. -.• .. • !•...•-:$,.--•
a ��� '7 . p y _ 5 .);-,-,':::.''',".4.'�cart, .. +hy, 3.�`;,..: ;' ,y�,1
.i"Sr-rp _ r�( 5 '++f .1.4 74h .¢s'`'
s �� . -
,,...i, :,) ; `� � � 9 , ' ram-
�, " . ' ' 4
A
,_ , ..„ ._._; ,,,_ ,,i,-,-4,i-,,..,,i:&e,,,,,- ••••, - ,
� + .�j �Y - `fit`„ ? . y�`':�
Y
� `}� `� g' �' +f i yi r t s fi xifiN "1 �_
Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2,station 413+00—Retrofitted culvert Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2,station 413+00—Retrofitted culvert
outlet(10/18/2021) inlet(10/18/2021)
'�� !� g yr' 4 y.,ypfrfr Y dl' 5 ` r .b_ h• _ ^ 4,�
$ * "k� c u p '°� 5 r 4 1 i $ ''',ill"-,x B ,
g� i qb rs ''t 14, O yl a '`t',,a1`. 4431 4 s' " i"
�! ►6 ✓ t t e �y f-it '+ae44 a � i
} s
KC•VFgS! ff � •,V .,-.. -- '''., li,'II,,,,‘S S, 1
1R
'Il
TrAlt,i14,141.-N
'I r
,', !,07414 ...,,f„.,. ,..2 .: , ......., ,,,.,
,.„.,,,,,,
fif."46.t
i ?
f » 14 ¢i t 1 (, J.
V C r er P- ' )/l/ 1.. r ; '^ x ��. 4,-r) '"'. :� 1:k; Q Ir"�I a43. ,,
or it Ni
1 '. ,“V ,',- ..sr ...4 e5. , - .,!,...7,•',. _
r r xa r°'s7jL6 '� .fI 1J�r -_�,' � k°t; l j dI
r{�tr rr; x ® g �s� 4pr r'
tR t{'S 40.T ! ``r 154,444d� p e r .' :,# �o t ).• 5
ttvi' ®+a3 `mom- "6\1'a`' ��`.;.F ' •,14-y-• t ".a F Qi.il a,..nr�
vo,A
—44-orpr:,,,;_.-.---- t.,:2 4,c---'r,,,,. wor ,..,,,utitz„,,,,,,t,
R�o='$ii�"dP� 3i" 1 i 1 y. .��9,rB i, i 4s ' X x . , 9 � T�
�'� � "+ q ? p�k Cyr.... ® '" �9t, t+� �i.-41,-•� "_
r,6 7:1 Bash i ri ►� eA�Y t37 �*o'�:44 r�• / ' ,
bY^' �e 7PY .. 4C s�"t �¢ ' wP ~����", is-
��G,,c.- z+S vow' mac."' i ) /�F
A.
R7j;;� �cl; � �o _, ..i Nirip d,I /�: :tat,- a�a-r tle�r�'` i�` ,� i%.. a ,�/�I
jr.ai J ,e` r� ,P e !'RA• YYa�,, '� R 1`tl� R g[t� v !
Antioch Tributary Reach 4,station 316+00—Retrofitted culvert inlet 1 Antioch Tributary Reach 4,station 316+00—Retrofitted culvert
(10/18/2021) outlet(10/18/2021)