20061692 Ver 2_Application_20070904

~ :
~3
M
4~
~'
I,
C
L
T
0
c~

MIC~IAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTENTION: Mr. David Baker
NCDOT Coordinator
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
~~ iCQ~a v, a-
SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit 23, 33 and 13 Application for the replacement of
Bridge No. 211 over Richland Creek on SR 1519 in Haywood County.
Division 14, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1519(2), State Project No.
8.2942601, WBS Element 33493.1.1, TIP No. B-4144.
Dear Sir:
Please see the enclosed Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), permit drawings, design plans and
Categorical Exclusion (CE), for the above referenced project. The North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the 71-foot, two-span Bridge No. 211 with a new
160-foot, two-span, steel girder bridge over Richland Creek. The existing bridge will be replaced in
anew location, downstream of the current structure and traffic will be maintained on the existing
structure during construction. There will be 25 linear feet of permanent stream impacts and 0.04
acre of temporary stream impacts to Richland Creek. There are no jurisdictional wetlands located
within the project area.
~ °-~'
~ SFp
- ~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SA^'nsr~~,wAr~~; ~~
DEPARTIV~NT OF 'I~ANSPORTATION ~~~~h
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
General Description:
The single water resource impacted for project B-4144 is Richland Creek. Richland Creek is
located in the French Broad River Basin (Division of Water Quality (DWQ) subbasin 04-03-OS) and
is approximately 35 feet wide and 3 feet deep within the project area. The DWQ Index number for
this section of Richland Creek is 5-16-(16) and the Hydrological Cataloguing Unit is 06010106.
The DWQ classifies Richland Creek as "C". Within the project area, Richland Creek is not listed as
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
August 23, 2007
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING,
2728 CAPITAL BLVD.
RALEIGH NC 27604

a 303(d) water. There are no 303(d) waters within a mile downstream of the project area. No High
Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or WSII), or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW)
occur within one mile of the project study area. Marla Chambers of the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission stated via phone and a-mail on September 1, 2006 that a trout moratorium for this
project will not be required.
Permanent Impacts:
There will be 25 linear feet of permanent stream impacts to Richland Creek resulting from bank
stabilization with riprap at the output end of a new ditch. There will be an additional <0.01 acre of
permanent impacts to Richland Creek due to the proposed piers for the new bridge.
Temporary Impacts:
There will be a total of 0.04 acre of temporary impacts to Richland Creek resulting from the
installation of two temporary rock causeways. One of the causeways will be installed at the current
bridge crossing, resulting in 0.02 acre of temporary impacts. This causeway is necessary to remove
the existing bridge deck and timber abutment and to saw off the existing interior bent. The second
causeway will be installed at the proposed bridge crossing, resulting in the remaining 0.02 acre of
temporary impacts. This causeway is necessary to install the new interior bents in Richland Creek.
Utility Impacts:
There will be no jurisdictional impacts associated with relocation of utilities for this project.
Schedule:
The project schedule calls for a January 15, 2008 LET date and a review date of November 27,
2007. The date of availability for construction is on February 26, 2008.
BRIDGE DEMOLITION
The existing bridge's superstructure consists of a timber floor on I-beans with an asphalt wearing
surface and timber railing. The substructure consists of an end bent, abutment and one interior bent.
The end bent consists of a timber cap with timber piles and sheeting. The abutment consists of
Yount masonry. The interior bent consists of a timber cap on timber piles with concrete sills. The
superstructure and substructure elements listed above can be cut and removed without any
temporary fill falling into Richland Creek during demolition. All guidelines for bridge demolition
and removal will be followed in addition to Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the Protection
of Surface Waters and BMPs for Bridge Demolition and Removal.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED. SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of May 10, 2007, the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists nine federally protected species for Haywood
County (Table 1). The biological conclusion for eight of the nine listed species is "No Effect" due
to lack of habitat. While there is habitat for the remaining species, small-whorled pogonia, no
plants were found during a survey in May 2004. Therefore, it can be determined that this project
will have no effect on small-whorled pogonia.
2

Table 1. Federallv Protected Suecies for Haywood County
Common Name Scientific Name Status Survey Notes Biological
Conclusion
Bo turtle Clemm s muhlenber ii T(S/A) Not Re uired N/A
Carolina northern flying
s uirrel Glaucomys sabrinus
coloratus E No Habitat No Effect
Eastern cou ar Puma concolor couguar E No Habitat No Effect
Gray bat M otis risescens E No Habitat No Effect
Indiana bat M otis sodalis E No Habitat No Effect
A alachian elktoe Alasmidonta raveneliana E No Habitat No Effect
S ruce-fir moss s ider Microhexura montiva a E No Habitat No Effect
Small whorled o onia Isotria medeoloides T Habitat No Effect
Rock ome lichen G mnoderma lineare E No Habitat No Effect
AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION
Avoidance and Minimization:
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to "Waters of
the United States." The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable
design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional stages; minimization measures were
incorporated as part of the project design. The use of best management practices for construction
should reduce impacts to plant communities.
Traffic will be maintained on the existing structure during construction. This eliminates the
need for construction of a temporary on-site detour.
Water will not be directly discharged into Richland Creek via deck drains.
In addition, Best Management Practices will be followed as outlined in "NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities".
Miti ag tion:
NCDOT proposes no mitigation for the 25 linear feet and of permanent impacts to Richland Creek
because the permanent impacts total less than 150 linear feet. In addition, the 25 linear feet of
permanent impacts from bank stabilization will not have an adverse effect or result in loss of waters
of the United States.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit:
It is anticipated that the temporary impacts to Richland Creek will be authorized under Section 404
Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary Construction Access and Dewatering). We are, therefore,
requesting the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 33. NCDOT will make use of a Nationwide Permit
13 for permanent impacts relating to bank stabilization. All other aspects of this project are being
processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with
23 CFR § 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a Nationwide
Permit 23 (FR number 10, pages 2020-2095; January 15, 2002).
3

Section 401 Permit:
We anticipate 401 General Certification numbers 3634, 3626 and 3632 will apply to this project. In
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0501(a) we are providing two copies of this application to the
North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality,
for their records.
Comments from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) will be required
prior to authorization by the Corps of Engineers. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT
hereby requests NCWRC review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the
Corps of Engineers and the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of receipt of this application.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Erin Schubert at ekschubert(~dot.state.nc.us or [phone].
Sincerely,
~~ •
~O/ Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc:
W/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (2 Copies)
Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Mr. Harold Draper, TVA
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Mark Davis, DEO
W/o attachment
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Joseph Miller, P.E., PDEA Project Planning Engineer
4

Office Use Only' Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to thts protect, please enter "Not appucanie° or ' ivies°.~
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 23, 33 and 13
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Telephone Number: (919733-3141 Fax Number:~919) 733-9794
E-mail Address: ekschubert(c~dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge No. 211 over Richland Creek on SR 1519 (Old Crabtree Rd.)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4144
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Haywood Nearest Town: Clyde
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°32'50.84" °N -82°56'43.44" °W
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Pigeon River
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The land uses surrounding and within the project area are
primarily agricultural and woodland with scattered residential homes.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Standard construction equipment will be used (backhoes, bulldozers, cranes and/or other
heave machinerx)
Page 2 of 8

t
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to replace a
functionally and structurally obsolete structure (sufficiency rating 43.4 out of 100) to obtain
safer and more efficient traffic operations.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Previously applied for (10/23/06) and obtained (12/27/06 a~ NW 6
permit for survey activities to determine the best location for the new piers. USACE Action ID#
SAW-2006-41325-344, expiration 3/18/07
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Permanent: 25 linear feet of impacts
to Richland Creek due to bank stabilization with riprap and <0.01 acre of impacts due to new
piers. Temporary: 142 linear feet (0.04 acre of impacts to Richland Creek associated with
the installation of two temporary rock causeways.
Page 3 of 8

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se arately list im acts due to both structure and floodin .
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,

herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within

100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to

Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of

Impact
(acres)
No Wetlands

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43.560_
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
New bridge piers Richland Creek Permanent Perennial 35 ft. N/A <0.01
Site 1 Richland Creek Temporary Perennial 35 ft. 70 0.02
Site 2 Richland Creek Temporary Perennial 35 ft 72 0.02
Site 3 Richland Creek Permanent Perennial 35 ft 25 <0.01

Total Permanent Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 25 <0.01
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred 'n ,floodin , draina e, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of

Impact
(acres
No open water
impacts

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Page 4 of 8

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.04 (temporary)
<0.01 ermanent
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): ~ 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.04 (temporary)
<0.01 ermanent)
Total Stream Impact: 142 linear feet (temporary)
251inear feet (permanent - riprap)
< 0.01 acre ( ermanent - iers)
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Traffic will be maintained on
the existing bridge during construction. No deck drains will be used and NCDOT's Best
Management Practices will be followed.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 5 of 8

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is proposed for this project as the permanent impacts total less than 150
linear feet.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 6 of 8

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA ~or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multi liens.
Zone* ,_ ~pa~t_,~ Multiplier Required
1 I I 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
Page 7 of 8

XI.
XII.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious surfaces will not si~ificantly
increase as a result of this project. There will be no deck drains installed.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The new bride will be constructed near the location of the old bridge.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
f.

P~c~ 8 -z~ d~
A~iplica~/Agent's Signature ~ .. / ~ Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

~ r
1VORTH CAROLINA
P/G~OPN
~---
0
E
c
U
g
2
I N
O
9
•~_
Lak
Jun s a
.~ --~
.~
1513 ''
1 19
~'
~~ / 7 4
~,
~ ~ Clyde
1 9 ~ ~~
23
7 4 ^`
. ~ //
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HAYWOOD COUNTY
PROJECT.• 33493.1.1 (8-4144)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.211
OVER RICHI.AND CREEK
O ~

WETLAND PERMIT DRAWING
VICINITY MAP
B-4144

. 1'1 ~ rt~~ ~ ~ ~ \ l o .- ~ ~ ,_ f 7 _J-. ~ r I ~ ~~ ~~ ~.. s L~) ~i ~J ~; I 1
I .•
t I ,~ _ 1
~~ v n ' _ ` ~ ~ _ A ~i / 1~cY ~C ob
?~1 ~~~-; . Stevenson ~. ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ' '~ ~. ~,~~0 1 ,',~
\~I 8^~ ~ C°~c ~al ..~ .: '~~ ~ _ .~ /~~, `~ } ~~._'~ / n- J /,, ~_ 6 i GaP1 ~ ~_~ ~~ ~ ~'= P e~~
_ ffff ~ '.
Y f ,°~
_\t /~~ ~~ / ~ ~ C ~G ~ > I'o :'1 `\\~;,. ` ,!\` ~ s ~ ~A \.:~/ ~ /- A~, I..__~.; /~ 117r i -r ~%-~J~ i~
~,~ i ~_~, ~ V~ i _ ~, i,; L 111 . ~ ~ 1~ jX~ _~ r _.,, ~/~/
~S' ~~ !~~~:.~ -- ' '~ rl ~ _ -_.~Z ~ ~'`^ ",vex.? .r "` °~ .. %~~~~'~-(I~~ _ ' . "~
aT ~ I •~ $ 1 :.tl ~ ~ ~ /~ ~ ~ /I ° :-+.~ H• 1 RO~~G T! ~~-T~ ~ •' 4 t~,
P / ` .,! ~~ f S~~y~O r / ~, ~~~ -. \ ~ \ Ito • ~ ~~_ {~~3 r ~\c;
~EPIAt-EMEdfi vF 6g• 21 ~ ~:
Y ~ - / i _ t~ f' l /~ ~ F/tyr i ~ / 01
~" -. r ,1ti i~; }• :.. •~JHed nr _~• r .,./// f/r~'. ,/. iL~ /may^/ ~`~r'~~VF.d ~~. QN t'~q~'
^ ~~._~, ~ .~•~~ t ~~~ "~ 94i 'o r/ ,•j.: ~o d /~. tr_( tires/ t.• ro_ t~'._ ./~ ~. '~, Y J_.,'•'r ,.
~'_\` ,:, ~ ~- ; -~. HAS wooD ~n~~rir. ~ I_-
~ZOV11 / t , , t -/ i / ~°,~ • - y ? 91 \//' o i. iLw^ yi ~ _ ~ \ -i l i~ I ~ _ _
\, , ~- J
%r f, := ~~1~~T~4 'S _s ~ 4°/; ~j~~~-.i '" . - 1~ ~ J .~f I ~~ ,'`I ~11Q;~)• j~ll ,k U ,'1'rl~ (, (fi~: c~
:.7' rJ~ / If i ~ ') !% ~ ~r r _' , ~ .l I ~ t : i .ti ~ 1, ,... f ~)I ( , ~ t ;~' '/ / PI '
z/ °~ j'
`ttil ~ ~`7`,..~ t. r - _ ~ /r~Jr _/ /: ._ c jl .~~5.'~_~-,o~ ar //C/' ~r ~ / a~'"1i ; •~,\ '_
ti r 5r /
'tb ~ 't:i-jjL.~~ ti'1 i`t - (:// 1~ ` ~ r.! / ~t/:!f ''i. ,/~~/ •'"`~ / 1~/1. ~`C ~~ I..i ~l (rr `r ~_
/ i~ ^."` ~~1 I! Cr-:_-_ll , ~ ( ~."~ _ ~ ~ _ ~' [ ~~ .~ 3,~~ ~ "/ I ''l.~f/~f'' 1(~ - , / ~ , ~ ,`, r ~i ~ •~`•
~yl ~ /J~ 1~1(- 3 - ` f1r ~ / fiJ, '~ '~' 1 ~ ~ ~~ 4 I ~`d1{ ,x.11 ~+ ~ r ~ k :. ~ ' r~
X11 ~(1(( ~\*;.~i '1 } ,l / r'" _ ~ •!'~ I ! t l ~~ "'~••>r; ' Zl~>,,~w~ 1P~ / ~, j i r
~rl. /rJr)~t ("~ ';;~ , r r t r-' G' ~, { :, w J I jj ~ : .rig,- v f+~ / ~ v. / 1 . -/ l ~ ° ,~U `
_,~i ._„\ `, ~` =~r u ¢ ~ Y '„t-..:I ~ Irl ,~~ t ~ ~ ~ wYL w5~ e ~P '~~,'~- ~• t• r ~orsoo L ~ alp J. ~ ~I .i"X( E~%'> Q ~~.
t :. f. µj ~-..J It .:'7 •~ ~T ~'I ~~ ~, !., r-.. -.t i~ ~n .f - /~i-~_ ~ll;~,'(
-. .3~t~ Rai: ~ ,, ~` ~1~~~.~.- ,~_ ~ ~~.,~;,,: ~ ~ ~,.n;,L~. ,.~~'
/ rr r - 4e _ r ~ e~cf I ~ I u i I ~ y . ~~ , (- "1 I r 1 - ~•° ~. Swat ne EA..o ~ / i Cr 1
``~! ~r I /rr .: CF ~ ~ } t O _ J T _ ~ ~",. ~-~~ yl =« 7 ~ d'r4 / ~ , /' f~E ~Ir(., . ~1~ A ~ /
\l,:r~ \'~\ ~se°°'--•- l~y y~ + ~,-.o yep ~ /w~.~ I ~`~ - 1 .~I' 1~~ ~ d ' ~ `~w r / ~ <r '~a ~ r ~~.
A ~;~'~~, 4 ^.r' y ~ ~ ` ~' I , , #S• ~,.~ ~ -~ ti Sr 4 ~~ ~•1 C•h r ! - ' ~ ! tee.
(J:~lCI`~_, r ir' / `~. ~ \`r~ / Mfr ~ \;~r T i~ ~y~- >~ ~ ~ ` ; ~, r ~t~1 `:s ~Y `~
j ~~>1 (I/ ~ •' c~ I <.. t~P~a~r~w ~yy .,,~ ~ `•`' "j- ..~ uis ~~ i ws I i._~ •• ~~
7fY• _~ W = •, ~° - \Jyi~ ch. , < _;yS t. ,X` Illiidd~'/ f 1:. ~~y ~- ~~
of ,1 ~ ~ y m°h cen Bwalas ~ c• C' ~ / `1 ~., .. f{. a.~, '...r. ~:. ~ ;•.~~/~ + ~~~ - 1 I'f?~'~
~~~` ~ ~,z~<,~ ~,.~Sxnabsak° eHN' - ~~iu`a nx~ ~ 11/', I )Lit: e i ~ ~I ~^/ 1 _ ~ r_.
'~ R3 ELEV 2562 2i8 ~~ ~., _ ..;! ~ ~ - ~~111. ~ ~.,~ii/i ~~ t"~ ~ '>~i "~,. ., I ~i .' ~ ~ `. ~ Wa~~eki .. y~ -'" 'f
/+° \ q~t - ~ .ark ,". , _ -. Y FFF~~'..' .
•,QyF~!1~ti ; ~ ~~-,y ~:I~ky~~W~rlan a.:,-4r~~~ ~- I`j~~('r'~,/~r.1e f~ ~~/f 1, is ~_~t~
/- V . i,, 5 ~I + -•~ ~- .`,~.r / :;~t,M . err ~~~/,. ' i ~(c- t i-- i r
~~~ y.Y i '' ,J3~~•fn**m a' \--, Ir)/ ~~/: i1 ,/F ~~ ~=l• ~^\_. C.~, il/ ~/~I~~-,.` ~~•
x.-- ~ ' h) ~ i ,~~' Goll ~ / ~j t' ~~ ~~.7~~s a, t, s~•e%".-. _ ( ~`\ r I '' ~ ~'~ I ~ r`/r; ~ }~~ ~ .~ ~~1 _ ^Cr~i1 .~ n ! ~..~C_Ll / e'
•K~3 F" .br ~ tmra• ..1~, ti`+ ! ~i ,• rt==, r ~° X04 I _ ~~'lr~~ ~i ~ ".~ 1r ~`' ~f I' % j"~ / '~~j trl ;= _ -?,$ ; //C.
'~ +C.std HJ A _,1 s ~ .ad \ 1 '~ ~- r '~ S ~ 1~ •,\~Jj %' ~/ ~i~1~ ~ ~ Xr~ ~ ,
4~„ 1.sn.. j c a. ~ . ~~/ , e"•'' r i I r d~ _ Krfob I t f ~-- ~ f ~; ` >'~ ~ ~~1 ~
~,A' rl ~ ,` ~ `r . __ ( ~ '~. _ / /~1) , ~ ~ I ` h ( ~~ , ; ~ X 41.-3.- ~ ~>a ~ ! t 9, SC'
~ f C
~° ~ ~ i!G*"x L .~~~ ,, nZ ~ 8 i f.3 _ S ~ : )~ b p'' t4- _ -~/ 'i~`.tir \ ti.~~~~ `~~~0~"1..~ ~~ I 5 r, ~,;~' ~ ~.i4 ~ D ~ '
i f k: ~ L• oc H f~ o SCM, ~ '"ACC t- ~-, " ~~,J r „ " ,,~r i°~ ~ "~` r l -~ 1 v )~ ~' ~ ""`'"; .
7~d ' 'r ';•~> `b ~ is '~ i•~ !,1" a ~ ""`~•. I.
`I t ~;r • _~ C~~ * ~ ~ t,' ~'' I, _ "IA ~~ '- `~,~-'117Jr ~' ~ ~~ f/ i1 , , Q~~~ I r ~•
/~ i l ,~, y ~ ` , _ ~ tf f `r I T i .!`' w`'"---"\l( `\ \ ~~ f . b ~P . ~ ~ ~ ' i ~ n ^h~r ~~ ("~,
~{ nre , s•', ~;"' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~= lt~~ !' ~,•a ,~.`~t~' v.,r Y l1 ~~~ ~ ~~ , ~^~r•'~~.~'~~ . 1` ~~i' =i. ?t/ ~ ~ ! ~ ~~ ~/~I ~ ,... ~0 9 • J~()~ ,
s /• ~.. ~ ~ `, 1. ~ l c y - , ~ y J° -~ G6 •, r ti~ • ' // ~WYJf ' 4~ t ~ 1'Li
.- I .~ . f ,~ a s ar"' pad '~~- ad ~ l~~ . .~ ~ I ( 1 - 7 , .(.'
, 4aar ~. .A t .'sr A i%1 r7: ` cif r ~'• ~`"1 ~ 1 ( .mot ,I ~!-Jr1% I~ L(% \~~~ ~
w ~ +<~ _ ~ 1J ~ J ~
_ --~~yl \t~~ ~1
Name: CLYDE Location: 035° 32' 46.9" N 082° 56'_45.1" W
- _ _ __- _.
Date: 1/10/2007 Caption: Project: 33493.1.1 (B-4144)
Scale: 1 inch equals 3333 feet ~ Replacement of Bridge No. 211 ~ffr1~ (~fBW~f~
Over Richland Cr. on SR 1519 $r1AA1T ~ _ a
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.

~
w
~ ~ ® --
~ ~ z --

~ ~ ~

~
~~~
F~~
~
~

`~
®
A
® M
®
®
`~
M
~
x ~
® z
~ w
~ ~ a U W

® ~ ~ ~
W
d ~
o
w
m
a
w
~.~ ~
\
-~_
~
M

- ~ a~
~ .T U a
p
Q
~ p
~ ~
W 1`'7 N Q
O
~
Q ~'
~
~ O
U ~ i~
~ ~
(n
W ~ Q to
_ ~ p
~ ~ U
a - ~
~
N
~
C
_
~_ W J In f-

W N
U Q N
O W J ~
BS' ~ °~°'
I ~
>-Q W
F- W ~. +-
~ O p
~ ~ Q~
~ ~ ~ E
a

w

N~

Q }

~ ~ (~
D N ~ ~ Q W
W i -
Q -
O / UN
o I
N ,
` Y~,
~
m N ~
Q, , I ~a
OJ
?' ~U
O
W N I
ii O
~ >i
' J
~
O W
d J
O W
d N
l
z

r~
~
^,
~ ~ ~
®
-
~ ~ " z
.
3 e ~ w
F
'~
~~a

~
~
~ ~~
~
z
~
°
0 ~~ ~-
~
~ ® A ® ®M®~ ~ ~
°
v-
~
~ ® a ~ w ~ ®
o w
a
~ ? ~ ~ U ~
® ~ ~ ~ a 9
~.
w
C~ a
d o
.~ m
~ 5

a
T w
T
N r,~

~
"-' N ~ ~
-p ~ a
>-
a T U
p ~o
W ~
~ N Q
O
N
Z ~~ ~
W O
Q
~ a ~~
~ ~ ~

w w a ~
~ p
~ ~ U
a = n-
~_ ~ ~ ~
~
N N O
a

W N ~
J ~
W
O U Q i,•l
W ~ tD
~
~ O
- W
~ W ~- '{"
~ O p
~
/~S ~
Q ~ Q E
O ~
%
~Q
~ c0
~ Q W
a~ O
Y
U ~
WW
W (V ~~
~ i Q.

C7
D OBI ~ YN

U
~
[D N i
v J
~U
~
O I
cV
~~ O
J
Z ~
i L~

N
~ JI

X W
W N
I
Z

Z
O
F ~

~ 3 ~ m
z ~ z
c7 ~
~ ~
~
~
x
p
Q
~
O rn
O
O
v
3 M
w o
V) ¢ F
~
U
~
Q
O
~
0.
U
z

C

G

Q'
~
N
O N N
~`') ~ ...
~ ~
W m d
~ ~ N
.Q m -p
m
W to
0 o rn
c
a a
0 0
n ~ 'x
p U W
N i >
7 N O
~
E
C
U ~ ~
~ U ~
~ 0 0

r N
°'

G
3 3
~
~
N
(
!1
7 7
d U U e

°
z
z
f-
~ ~ C
f0 .~ .--
•
7 N ~ .~
Z ~ ~
fA ~~ C U n^ N
' O N
U xs EH
Q WU-
a
~ ~
C
C
~
W C V
~~ c m N ~ ~ to
~ ,_ f6 n F ~ N N
LL CJ ~ ~

W
U
Q m
U
d~ N N ~7
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O
~ ~

~ ~
~ _
~ >
~ > ~ U
~ O
o
N n
~ Ev v
F- ~
a ~ o
_ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' a
--
~
U
~
W
a
~
N C ~

O ^
C 'L - V
z L ~ y m
U~...
~ ~
U ~
~ ~ ~
~ fC0 U
~ C
~ :~
g W >
1
-
>
> ~
C
p _ ~
^
~ (Vp
~ LL ^ .~
C fQ
C
l6 = fC0 ~
~LLj~•
d >
C
N
~- N Y
~
~ T
l6
l0 C
~
~
~
~ N N w W
~ ~ U U m

~ ~
c o
o t ~
+ o rn

.~ ~
r
v
+
r +

~
~
J

r
~ r
~
J
i J
i

J
~ ~
(~ Z r N (7 H
Q

OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS
l0 Terrell, Joe E. 202 Terrell Rd.
Clyde, NC 2872!
2O McCracken (Heirsl,AlbertJ. PO Box 463
Waynesville, NC 28786
O Ross, Steven Wayne l88 Ridgeda/e Rd.
Clyde, NC 2872/

O
Loakkonen,Erkki J. 9259 Fifth Line RR "3
Georgetown, Ontario,Canado
LTG 456
O Angel, Goy l29 Crestview Dr.
Waynesville, NC 28786
6O Best, Ricky 1047 Richland Creek Rd.
Clyde, NC 28721
7O Bryonl, Edward E. PO Box 1426
Loke Junalusko, NC 28745
8O County, Hoywood Haywood County Courthouse
Waynesville, NC 28786
O
9
McCracken, Tommy PO Box 453
Clyde, NC 28721
l0 Stetzel, Barbora PO Box 1606
Lake Junalusko,NC 28745

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HAYWOOD COUNTY
S
0
PROPERTY OW11~ER
11lAME A111D ADDRESS
PROJECT: 3349311 (8-X1144)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.211
OVER RICIILe4ND CREEx
ON SR 1519
Pemnit Drawing
ShO~t ~I ,,._ of _j.j_,

i
B/l0/20'0'6 R:~O/K)36/2I~RoadwoyWioJ~B-414410yJShdyn
C011lTRACT:
o o Z
~ p u. w ~ O
T ~ ~
m ° f1
-o
S ~
n O
N
O Q O O
D ~ OjOv

_. ~, go.
o ~
~ /m~ D
, f
y
C
Z
vg '{
m0
vZ~
-ice
b may
~'zm
~~Z =wo ~ gy
.
~~~ <-IV <o~l ~ m
Z~
+ ~ ~
C II II II If II II ',Z Z

=~
v rn
~ c°DC
a Ow~
~ b
~
T 3
"~ OpO y
S
z vo

~
D m
G1 m
G7
r
r ~
= ~
_
m
~
O
O
_ ~
7° O
D
O C D ~
~

~ ~°
m
-~

~ ~

~
.i
2 r
o
m ~
v -~
~ n
y y~
~ ~o
p O ~ 0 ~

A ~ ~ Z
y

II

~ A

A
A
Z =
~
O

W
°~ II

o it

° ~

~ O
`

r
m o ~' m
_2
Z
N

N

H
N
Z
C m
n m
~~

, ~~
~~
~
o
a
~I ~ c
~ '~ x ~,
bb b
~oo
ao S
b
H ~ .s ~
ti ~' ~
,~ °
~'n
~ ~ C O
0 -~I
o
~~ ~ o ~
~ y O m ~
H m
~
^ 3

~" N
m
~
^
•~

~ b
~
~ ~
g g~
t~ ~ 3
~ H

m
~ ~ ~ ~ °
. ~ ~
~ 3

~
o
~

~ O
~
_

n
n
x
~

~ Ie R~~
$

y SF
y~
#7
'd
y
[~1
~i
~ x g ~~
~~
~
"'

QgS Y
~~
S
~
~ ~r
~~ ~

y ~
'e ~
titic ~
'90 ~~~
S
TIP PROJECT: B-4144
~ ~
3~

N
m ~y \ ~
MN+
Afnb
~`t
i N

Ib IY

.D

~ ~2 ~(~ ~i
` ~ A OO OG~
2
m yn yN
y
~ y
:GRID m
D 8395
O
Z
~O
V
ro SAKE ~ ~ ~
.K/NAIUSKA
-_~ ~'J vl
!6'' ~ x
~ O
N
~~
l~
s ~~
b~
y
b
~~~
"~c•
~n
y
b ~
y
n
C
''C
O
b
n
0
~.
~~
~~
mrn
fIx x
~I y ~.=
~n
~, o t ..
(~
O 2 <_~s
m m rT~;
t ~1
~.; ..
~2
~~
~~
Z
G

®~
u~u
1~
~~
C1n ~

A A A
W ~
t
i> W
Ai Ai ~

~
N N N

~O ~O ~O
N N N

~ ~ m
-C
~ F

rj`h
-~;..
I
~_-
--J,
..~~,

ainvcwo
~ ~ VI
~ 'Op G .,
0 3 u
y ~ ~
~s~
~ s
O
c
T
o
~• c ~,
~ ~
m =
a rt
m

~
~

N
°
O
~ °b
3 ~!

~
5' 0
o
$ ~
1O
"
~ p°
~ °
~ o O
~
'
3 ~ Z o ."C
Q. o
W
a,~~~1
mll
L~
O S n OCD ~ D p y c y ~
3$ o a m o a 3°- ~~~ C
S ~ o O o 3 c
~ rt ? ~. v '~
o m
rt
o a
~~
o b
O
c
C
R (~
I ~•F I }. -~ ~ ~ ~o ~^O O
X• X ~ ITI 'V '0 'O 17f ~ ~ ~ T ~ 7O (~ -~ (~ y
rt, x X o x 1o O
7• 7 7• O ~• O O O 7 ~ p A 7• m Z ~ N
m m 2 ~+ ~ ~ ~ O C°
0 o s m o° o o ~ m~ 3' 'o o
> > > < o o c o ~ ~ ~ C~
1~p p n p~ a~ 3~ c m 3~ 9 0 ~
C. a ~ OD O ~ ~ ~ O C ~ ~!
a ~+ c
~ D c ? ~ m' 3
~ o a~ ~ o 0 0 ~!
a c W
~ b
~ a
I
I
I
I I I

I I ,

i
t ~
[~ @O
vo ~
~ i
I l l l i x ~ I I
O ~ 2 to to c ~ ~ ~++ ~ ~ n ~ ~ v S" ~n ~,! -v •v ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ o ~ ~ y ~° y
~~ o o ~• ~ 'o o' c o 0 0 o 'o 'o o o 'o o' o ~. o
n < C a ~ in a a a a N
O S O O_ 10 1p ~p C ~ ~ 'O = ~ 'O ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ 'O 'fl 'O ~ 'O ~ ('~'O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p -- _y 7
~ c a m~~ ,(~ o~ 0 0 0 0 o g' o~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>> ~ ~~ ~- c.
O N ~ ~ 3 NNo ~ N ~ N N N ~ ~ N N N N ~ N ~ ~ N ~ H ~ ~ ~ "~i' N ~G C
~- a. r S ~ ~ .00. N a n ~ ~ ~ d ~. ~ f7 m ~ d ~ ~ ~ m d ~ ~ ~ .y d ~ 70 ~ O C d o a
~ 2~ y 70 '~ n o O~ c~ H H c m v v -~ ~° f7 O o h ~• ?° Ze ~c m e ~ o ~ O ~
O' O 3 O S C D '~ O O a' O m ~ m O O O + tG• i0 tC S T - O O
o o c a 3~ ~' '° ~ n o~ ~ 3 3~ 3 w 'o ° 3~ 3 3 0 0 ~f a ~- v m
~y ro c m ~ c o~ m, a ~. ~, o
:~i ~ ~ C a G ~ ('1 ~ y ~ ~ O O O O •~ ~ ~. ~ -Oi+ n .0+., -Oi. ~ ~ y ~ ~ W
0
a ~ -~ p ~! (1 O - ~• ~ O ~ ~ C a r r 7 p
'o m tc ~ m ~
°-• ~ 3 c o o 's T
~ m
3 ~ ~• 3 3 ,°~
~ ~ 3 3
~ II'
~' I I I I I } ~
~: II~~ ~~~II
N ~ H ~ a ~ W O W 10 ~ ~ ~
~ a~ a~ a -+ T S S S N
a°• o. ~ a o > > > > a m O
o -~ Z
a a a '0 4 m° O~~ rn
~ o a c ~ ~ s
T ~ ~1 ~ ~ O ~i O ~ S S ~
T p- ~-1 -1 [1 O ~ O ~ O
O ~ ~ '00 ~ ~ ~ ~ O O y
O .o T .o T m .9 0
w m m m
~ O C1 0 n a
c n ; n ~
°pA- ~ n. ~ °~ o
c r; o 0
O ~ N
N N C
m m R.
l i l i I
i ~ ~ ; - ®~e©®~ f
I
~II~I
~ o ~? ~ o 0 0 ~ x ~ ~n ~
N n O O m O ~ =' ~ rt m
7 a "p ~ ~ ~ N 7• N ~ 7C
C ~ p O -1 _r, ~ a~ a~
~ O ~ O O S O 3 ~ O
~ ° ~ ~
m ~ o
C ~ m ~ ' m .o O Ip
~ m e y O to
o ce
~ r d O
r ~
m o_
N W
m
.+
~
0 rt
o 'O 0
g a
o 7
~ 1 ~
-$'
o ~ W
z ~.
O W
~.
3 ~ a m c ,~
,v ~ m
S o :
~ o m ~
W O ~ x m
a
o
O
o A
* o
A
~
O_
° s
g° _
o ~
c
C
g .
° a.

~ o
a
(~j
W m
7
a
Q

I
~ Y
I I
I v
~--~
~ ~

m
O

~~~ C

~ C

7 C C C
3
y ~

O ~

O D~

~ y

O y

O D

z D

S i

W p

O G1

O
y~
G7 y
O i/! ~

O 7O

A C

A ~

O
C
S

~

~

~
D
[T

~

m
A

C

~

d (
~
('~
N
A
O
7
~
O
N
A .
N
N
N
A
M
A
411
O
N• ~ .
w > > c ~ 0 0 0 ~ ° a G1 3 ~ ~ ~ G1 ~ $ ~ < 3 a ~ ~ 7 o m °- G~ ~. a = c ~
~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~° . o o y o a • ° m ~ ° n ~' 'o ~ ~ ~' ~ o
o ~ n ~ a m
O a y
~' ~ ~
~ ~ y
" 3 ~ ~ o. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ °
D
m ~ ~ O
o f to a f
.: C y
y T d y ~
~ ~ ~
,,, O- ~ T CS CS p v o
°
' (~ '~ l0
~ O N p ' 7 ?' O S y T O y p f1 3 A ~ ~ 4' T 4/ ~ _ ? `
7 a ^
C V, ^
V+ ~ C ~
(0 ~
N ~
~ O
Q O
w -~ m
~ O
O O
N .n
N a T
g O
~ ~
n O
Q S,
4 G G
m
m o
v o 0
x ~ o ~
A r
m n 0 . "-
O O

- O O
IP
- ~
O
' ~
7 y 0 r m 0 ~
~ ~
n S
l0 4 O
4 p
O r
~• 0
c ~ ~ ~
O ~,
C n ~
S _
H
7
O A m C
~ ° C
m C
7o w fC ~ T
^
O
~- N
C
VI •
m
I ~ Y
~
I I
( I
m I I ( x l ~ I I I I ~ I
I
~ I I I I I
I ~ ; ~ I
II
oa
~~
~~
~'
00
I--~1
c~
®®
®~
-~
~~
~ H
~-1
S
~~
~~
~r
O
ti.
O
~0
n
0
z
m
Z
1
O
z
D
r
s
Z
rn
rn
t/1
3
ao
O
r
to

~ _
~-• m
r = Z N
m o r
r' o0 0
Z ~ n ~ ~ N n
< .Z
~ d O ~ Z S ° N
n n c~
o .aA.~--ism nz°zo
= c-~
mm c~ivr^~c-~m°o=o
~N Nozo~~,D~mo~
C7ON i =Ap~'' W p-Nj~
nz-~ oo zca
r'N o N~ m Nan Z
o ,N r• o° N n~ m~
n ~ cn --~ o ~ o c~ cn -~ z ~ ^'
C m ~ O Z O~~~ m C r- N
~ro~,~~°°-+-~mzN
o -a z m ~
I -T1 n
mom ~~v,~mm~o~
NO -I n
°N --ICD O(nG7~~m
cn° ~°a~o ~-•m
O m C Z ° -la Z r
no~z~~cCOOr^~~c»°
° N `O n ~ ~ O ao ~ N N °
000 +z ~zNO~r,..~m
ooz ~mn-r~OZOCno
a o~"~WnNa~
~ a~ cn~'m oo-~
_o mcn ~~
°
N N~ ~7 Opo O S N
n ~ ^, m v ~
z m -+ 0
n ~ ~--- o ~
m ~ -< m
N n
0
C
N

m
r
m
0
G~
O
y
y
O

~b~
~o
~~~
~G~O
~o~
Oh`'~N
y
~ ~ ~C
~z~
'y
tx~b
Cry
~~~
z~
~~~
OC
y~
ebb
~~~
t~r~
y ''C
icyc
~~z
~Oy
bN
~Z
~~
01 (Jl ~ W N ~--~
W
r r r r r r
mcn~wN•-~
V/ (~ V1 V/
v .i v v v ~l
00 00 ~l J O O
~A^ @ Ul CTl @ N
W N W ~ (~ ~".
N -f~ O @ ~--
N~~oo-A.i
wpm@._..-.
m @ @ v m v
@ m @ @ @ @
maowaooow
N N N N N N
cnmmmmm
OD N O W W .D
.@oaNOCncnv~
~W~~~.~
~~.~~@w
~ N Ul O W W
@.~@@@@
N N N N N N
~A .A U1 U1 UI UI
.D .D B @ N W
00 00 U1 .D W N
O v V W N W
cow.Dwwao
0 o co
c c -~
~-~~.~.~.cn
w w w ~ o ~-.
0
oo~oomm
mmwca,o
v ~ m w m ~
~~aow,oo
O O ~
~ ~ m
n ~ ~
-a ~
~'
.~ ~. ~ ..o ~- -I
~ ci cn ,D w cn
.o@~
00 V ~
~ ~ r
--~ ~ -I
~ O
r
~ p
.~
-Z-1
1
1
1 O
W
i
1 Z
1 O
1

m
D
,~
r -~
m
r
~ ~
~ D
O
z

r
w
D
o
z
~o
~ ~
~~
~m

`J
v,
y

~~~
~n u
~~v
~~o
~„~o
N ~
CJI ~
O N
~ i
1~~ ~1
~\
~~
~\~~
,'~-
-~
O
n
y
x
» faorzco "
» .-. 3 "
" r ~ W O A "
" ~ Z
" (7 D 40 "
» S ~-+ ~l
" m cn o w
" z1~Z
" ~ r ~ m
» m ao r
" -~ r-,i "
" ~ ~ ~ ~ "
» mmcnmD
" m -~ ~
w
" ~ @ N O
" zvcnz
« ~ m
" ~ ~ " M
" D r v "
" (n m N "
" m m cn "
" o ~ m
M
" ~ M
" W N "
" ~ M
M "
M 1--1 M
" Z "
" ~ M
» _ »
M "
M "
r~
Ob
y
N QI
~~zb~ ~ ~ IIy
II II '~Z ~ ~ 1
c"~~n~ y
o~Wyy n~
~~~n~ O as ~
`°"'oOZ ~ n'1 a
~~, ~b~
~ti n%tl+m
r
~~ ~~ p <
~ no•
~ x y N o0
~ ~ ~~
O `-'''
00
rz

~O
'y
N
~~zbz
~nu~
~
II ~~~~
~w~y~ ~
~ c
v~~o
~ N~
~ CJ1 ~
a b ,-'~ °o

~o SR 1519 cam-
iI N
~ ~ RICHLAND I ~
rm CREEK I.
5 4t'05'40" E
~ 510.43'
M D3 00 (fi r Z CO "
3 "
" ~ H ~1.~
" rzm~.~
" _ ~ fa "
" -I (n ~--~ O U1 "
» c m ~ z
~ ~ N N m
» m .i @ r "
" m M
» ~ N W < M
" m N m D "
" --I --~ "
" _m oo~ "
" Z O Z "
"
-~ 1--1 (n 4 M
O (n V "
» ~ ~ N "
" U7 "
" O ? "
" 'T7 W "
" y
" ."• v M
" UI W @ "
" @ M
M H "
» ZZ ~ "
" • / ~ M
" N
M »
»
» ~ M
~O "
nb
0
'`]
~~
~~zb~
II II ~ Z
II ~~~~
~v ~
~o~ya
~ ~ N n ti
~~oo°~
b
~~
a~
~~
~i
~ ~
`~~ 02 "~ '" ~ t=i y O
x~z~' m ~~~ ~~ ~~I~~ b~
b ~ b < }~ .~'~'' ~ c~ to ~ . n
pan ~~ oo Zy bo
Z ~~ 0 y b~ 0 0 y
v, u' try o ~, b x
Cbb ~ ° ~~'\`\ r~ ~ ~ n 1~ '~ y Oh
~ ~~ ob o~ yo cOtnb
ti~ + ~o~ ~~ n0 np ~O ~ ~ C 'y ~
~ y ~ v z ~ 'y
Ong ~~ '~ Zx yb y~
x y °o ~ ~~ ~~ N~ ~ ~ Z ~
~ ~~~~ p ~~~b~ ~~~br~ b ~ ~ c~ ;~
~ ~ ~~7 ~11 II~~~II II',pb~t O ~"
oy -~~ II tav°v[=J~ II ~~~~ ~ ~ ~y
~~7 ~~Nyy ~o°'o~~y C y O ~Oj
V lz1
W~~~~' Wo~~taOti C~/1 ~
°p~o00 ~°wo~i00 C O
~~ OZ ~ ~ ~ y
~~ b~ y O ~ ~
~~ ~
~~ ~~
~3
O
y
N ~
O
`~.~ y
`~` ~ O
y
y
O
h
1
~C
a
0
°o
oo m r z o "
" C ~-+ US 01 W »
m z ~ v
r n D ~
m=-aao
" ~ ~ O W "
_ '0 Z
H H
-+ r. ~. m
m m @ r »
m "
" O (n N <
" D m ~ m D
" ~ --i H "
M I-+ ~ M
" --~ ~-+ OD N O "
~7 Z O Z "
m r w "
moomcn
D m @ »
(n -~ N
m cn
M @
O
» v M
" CS1 CO "
" N "
" "
M ^Z
» ` ' M
" = N
M
M "
" "
M "
" fcorzoo "
" .-+ 3 "
" r~-.cnmN "
" rz-i~ »
" O C7 D ~l
" ~ ~ O W "
" ~ ~ Z M
~m
m ~ .- m
" m ~ r "
" m "
m ~ m ~
M -~ ~'{ "
» N 00 ~-, »
" ~ ~ N O "
» z @ m z "
" ~ M
M W ~ v • "
to G7 O N "
m = cn "
" ~ @ M
M O ~ »
" m "
" CTI »
» tP V "
" @ M
M "
M H "
" Z ^
" ~ M
M »
"
M "
N
M "
r~
O Cj
00
'9
N Rf
N~~b~
II II ~ Z
o ~,
~~~ya
W ~ n ti
w~'~~~
b ~CI
~~
~~

6/Ib/~fX)Ei
a
N
o
,ti ~"
vi L
n
i
i
s
i
r
W
N
U1
NO
n
w
ii I1
RADII03617Ntoodw~PmJ1 B,4/441dY~YAd9~

'~
D
r
N o
ti
'~'+
O TL
Z
Z
O
N
D
~~
~~
~o
i
~~
~~
I~
i
1~
~m
I~
I
1
1
I
/ 1
1 1
I 1
1 !
1 1
nn
~ro
~~
~o
0
z~
~~
m~
0
~rn
n°
m2
~~
m
~ ~
r ~ w~.~
~ _ ~ ~
~~ = i 1
m ~
b ~ e ' /~
~ ~ i
i ~ l j
~ $i it i
m `; ~
O ~ ! // ~
i I j ro
" ~~ ,i '
~ '~
~~ 8x
~~
~~
~
r
~ ' o
N
y
n ~
n
w
00 r -,
-

~
o
rn ~
~ ~ _

~~
O y
Z
-+A
Q
-
D
~ r-
N
~o
,) g~
:~
0
a2
~~ r~~z
i~~~ o~tiZ
~~ ~ncnx
rn~~
~ a ~~~c;, j~N ~
~~~~
~~ ~hZ
° +C~ I~ o
~rn
m~ ~p
o~~ ~cn
`~'~ =gym
~~g
im ,x mo

os ~
o ~ ?~
~
~ ~ ~~
o~
~ _ ~~
~
~ ~ y
2
L` y ~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~ n
m m v x~ ~ x~ ~ 2 m v ~
~ ~ ~ ~$~ ~~ ~>a~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ $~
b ~ o ~~~ ~~ ~~$ ~~ ~~$ ~~ ~~
~ ~ m ~n ~m~ ~$ ~m~ m~ ~m~ m~ ~~
z ~ '~ ~ fin= m~ ym= ~ gym= m~ ~~ ~
~ ~ o~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ _~~ ~ ~~ z
m ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~m ~~ y
~ m m m ~ m
m
ao m z (/~
m ~A~ P~ ~pm Q~ ~Q~ i~ 9~
~~~ ~ i~Q Q ~~^~ ~m m ~
~-~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ r
~_~ m ~i~ ~ ~x~ ~~ ~ n1
Ty - Zo ~ =oM ~ ~.o~ rgM
~~ ~ ~~ ~ Z~b ~~
~$ $ ~m m ~m~ ;n
~~ ~ _~~ ~ ~
~ ~

1
~ r
cn
to
'o ~ ~
$..
n
~~ _ 11
8~
~g
~~

i
8/IO/200G Re~Op03612N7ooalvay~ProJ\B,41441dyJypdpn

gg

~~ =wo
~
~
~ ~

u n ii u n u u Z n n ~

1A
ti
~1
c ~~o.°wA

g b
a ~ '- ~
3
oo
T
v a ~ y
~ Q
~ N
~
~
o o
~
~ r~
~ Z Q ~ ~ N
o
Z
O ~

W

' m

rn

o ~~
~ ~ ~
C1 ~
~ ~-r-~
m ~ r

~
~
~ ~ ~
~
Z ~, D
r ~ ~
~
Z ~ ~ `
o ~ ~
QQ
~ ~d 2
~
N
Z Q
~ ~
O

V1~p2
n ~ ~
m ~nv12
~
rn~rn
z
m~
N rn
Frn~~
_ rn~o
~~ iorn
y~ n~C
nz rn~rn
0
mrn

~~ ~
~~~
~
rn ~
~~
!~
~ ~ ~
~~
z
~~
0
^
Z~
u~

~ c ~ ,, o N
~
~ ~
~
m m ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
m
~ ~ Z ~
~ r ~
~
~
~
~ N ~
~~
rn

e/ro/zao6 R~~1036121~Raodwoy~ProJ~6M44~dy~umdpn
/ ~
m
.. m
~ ~
A~~~
Q
~Z~g ~ -~
1\ , ~ Z
>°A F=I
Z~
~~" C C~
~ m ~
~ZN ® `~
~~'o y
Fez L~
m~~ ~ ~C
ownr n O
p QT N
T !~
1~v ~vCD
~~~ y y ~ ~
oy~ ~ ~4
O
CZnZi
~O~
N A
~O~
~`
1' ~
S~ ^~~
~~s~, ~
~~ ZW -~
'~ ~ g _
~,~ ~ W
~C"~ ~ i~
~g
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ m g
e O ~ ~ f ~ ~ > > Z > Z ~
N 5e yl O

NN l
~ll N
y N
y O p
8 ~ ~ p
$
4 ~
Q 0
~ ~ ~ Q
N ~ Q
~ D
Z
~ + ~ a
2 S ~
~
g 8 8

C
v
g a a
a a
u a
t°ll ~ w
a o o >
m
v

m e
~ o
m ~
P Q
~` c
N m
N ~
N +
~

w
w
w
w q
+
S
8 0 `I w w ~ a a N N p
P
0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~

7/24/2007 Rr~ON036/2AftoadwoyWro/~B-41441dy_psMpn

~ ~- ~ coo < 7-
I I ~i n z
m
O J-
' }
~
~ p
H rt p Qi O
O VIO ~I NOT
v " { + O it ° O.O
_
N O7~ VI ~ m7{
' }
~ _°,
.
~ O
r ~ v }
'^ -h ~
~ o a OP
~ o ~
O'
u n 6'nm
8 {
p.~+ ^i
g
m

,,
SSA o ~ a. €~ m ~ m °: °' ~ v v ~~ ~ +~~ ~ ,.~tiz~v ~ ~o
1.U
+
~yooa
r o I ~~ _D
~' n r
~ _n ~n { -ai ~
° O m D o~
vd n_ o one
° H~
~ +
+ 1 1 a"I
p~D
r'
+ ~-i
~nD
s
~
Cl~
„•;;r ~ _-~ ~, ~ ~ z r
~ U ~ a o~w
s 8 a ~ s g ir=
°
- gg~-
i:b+`V~ ~
N `~ ~ ° as
m
O 0 '~ 5B ° _
~ '= C .~ °~IV
O Z O
~ ,; S°--
~ -i

~ 3Q
~ ° ~* rno~ ° u n o
S
~ O T
~
~ m
p nOD~
m ^
T~
~ 07~
+ +

;
2
i
-~
~ ~
~ z3ti<
I
1
m ''
m r
I ~"1 I n
1
~ ~ m~
~ ~ 47 G)
2 2 I
f ~ ~` ~ ~ I, „
~X
` am ~g
~5
~ ~

;; t

:' m
i ,' ~
: z~~~ ~~

~~md

° ~ ~

x
n ~
~
~,..f , .. ~ amm
c~ 1 r~ ~ r ~ m-icm
aip
s
c~c~c~~~O
om
NN 1
~
m
~ ti
. Q
' e
~ f~

Wo
'
` ~
'
~
4
'. i,
° :.' Aa ~,~
~
~ mom NCO a
Nf 8 O
71-
1
1 a
z •_ I -1 na .Ap {~ m~ -~ fl
~ i ~ ,
>: ~ 5
`
V11T1 n1
z~ u
J

r s
~
i ~, n, /
~

~ I 4.
~~ ~ ~ r r 7 :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r>
~ r T ~ ~ `1 ~
~ N y r Dui i Y~~ '~~ r ~i 2~ '.\
~ /'
,, I
~ ~ `' ~ ~ ~ $ ~ k ~ IurrrooD counrr
• ~. a w~-I~oDv tn~ti~Op~o
Irn I > ~
~ II , I ,. ii.:;~' • ,1 ~' ~h1 N 11 " N u V1 ~m N N N N N !A
:V y / \~/i ~ ~ ~RI p II II q N Vl ~ (Q~VI
`~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
?n U
;~~' t'1'-~ '.y;~ ,~'~ ww-- 1p UI M M M fl M hIl N M 4 N II H
y. ~~~' yr ~{/ ;'_'~ ~ ~-rC ~ u h _V tl~y O N NNj ~!~i??~p~ C}
v t't~eMti%y~/ / /1 ~O8' ADO `I ~~4~4~~`4~~1 ~QS "'~~'`~p~
~.. i'~/;r' ~ -y~, ~~R to O i
~2• ~$V ~~
~ ,~~~~ ~~ ~l ~ ~
\ ~~ /! i'

p N
Z
N
G
N
s~
0
a

~y~op~ N
'
n n ° u nvr
W o
°
~~~~N
a
~ w+e+
`~~
7
~
~ ~~ ^

'~ a
~x
~

ZW
W
g
,~
,1
a ~ ^

~~ ~`~ ~
~~
$$ ~
~ O
~ro
z
r
._ ~0 ~

SDATES sFILEs

7123/2007 R:\011036/2/\Roodway\Pro/\B-9/44_rdy_cousewoy.dgn
O i
, >
I
O
- ~ ~
$ y
> O QO
m~ ~
>> 1
O
7;
~ 1/~pm
~ n p
~ ,
p n 0

> V M
~ + O m
-1. O O. O N 7
~' W 7 J
i
ogm V
V ~
! i, o
o ~
In ~ ~ ++
wu r Q
~
~ ~~
zmp
o +
g ~ a
m ~
g l
v
~', Ny~
' ( O ~ I '~ ~~m ~ i W ~ ~ ~ v0 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ tio~p ti ?
~ i~~
m o
s ~ s
+ o" o D
~ fTl
a
~
o + D
v OC 2 0 /-
m
~ T ~> O o
rm
l
vv
cJ Coln
-+ i
o v
~' tir
%'~ ^
o
m \ + .
y -{
o _D
m e
++
v~ N
m f
N-i
n a
+ -
l
~mD
o w
+ ~
o'n
'l
~ y ~ o ~ r g off
'~ C
l
i
~ % ~ c+
Z
a of s
~ Z a ?
d~ >
s s OOm
w i ~ ~ ~
o N ~ c; a o-
` 7
~ a N m D xg a,~ ~o ~<,
' Z xl n 0 ~ C C y Z Cl 2 S
v a4 x
a -
m~
~
nm
i 2Oam o00
O77
~ -
Q ~n
d O~
l ~ Z
-1-m
p p p > ~ mxmm z
, ~ i ° a~ L
O Z ° ~ I ~ °x/AN m0lmm~
~ ~
r ~ ' V ~a ~ ~ i azo on~os vvl
,, z ^
(- m nNi nNi a^. m m
A i ~• ~ a x m mr -~
.,V ~ I i 3 S ma ac
m N v~ ry
i mm ,
~ , V ~'t ~ . f ~ ~ ! = 80' TAPER 120:0
~, N U +
'. H ~ Il - PROP R/W n n
+,
,
,.
N ,i m , « ,
,,,, m
£;,, Y .
,«
A \ ~ 'a ~, ~ ~, .,. ~ _.,~
,
I
.~ . ,
`; ~__ ,:
~~ ~ i. .. .,~ .. ~ _ ~_. moo f. .. ..,
+. ~ / i.
.~~jj~... ..
W p ~ - ~ ~ O
I fi ~__ ~ .Z ~ .~
~ ~r
i f~- m f

~ ~
~ '~ i a0
a ~ i~:~_
: ~ cm v.
~^

i
c~a Ir,

~ , `
~ mo
fm

a m
N
~°
W^ _
..~, a

> Z
..... ,. ,. -
_

, ~
~
"f ._...
i
v. ,

";o ,

"~
..
., /r
,.~. ...
;t

:~ .. ', ~'
to ,
,
,
~ mvlvlr-
r
x)
S. _
r.i~
~
m ~n xm ;~a~0°sa

O
y W
Z ~

O

~ N
~rnm
~rn~
by
~ ~ ~ ~
n
y~~ ~
A ~ ~ ti
y~r 2
a' I
700
;~~
N
2 ti
_ ~Dt
`,~
Z
41
. ~,
D
~ ~
~~
s
Z ~

K ° .15fpp
F~
_ ~
ti''
\:'` __ I I nln~ "I G7 ~N~ I ID
rmmm^r2-itn Z-a-~
rnl
a In cj
y=
O-
~~
^
N
i
v
I Zy-Ia O ~ OIW VI I ~ r
-
-i -1Ny
]]
~
Iy
Q
K
~ ~ m

•.9
4
c'P ~ NyA
,
2
[~x~l pp
~
jR~
~~ 2
i r70~ ~"~ ~1NA
n
mN
~
~ ~t
yN <Z
v
~1 ~O
y
bb
Y~ ~ O
A + ~~
~

..
'P '.. ,~.. ~,~ \ O ~ O
T E ~ a vo
z
\ ~~ O~ m~
\
m
p
` ~ ~
~
ll I+
i
y
1„
OTa
` rS
ply N
~yL
~,
'P ~9 ~"^~
~ w X0-1 1+1
~ o m
°° m

,~i~
~1
~''
\\ ~ zo
,~~~' N m
~ ~ \ e z
~ a
~
O
vmi lmilm°~ ~ ~ ~ A'PO m

NNE r ~ ~ `.2~ ~
mNr C ~7~
~m
oa
~~
rn"
~~
2~
-a
C~
y
2
I ~ ~ W : ~ ~ .. ,.
o~xm ~r61` I '. 1
N P
tea=°y 1
w ~"Ov
vao v,~N
o~oll.li ^mi~~ ~ ~ ~
mx v
n
KDAO ~~C
ylnay EI`~ .
O^ stn mm^o
W Smx C I~ Q N1nrC '~', I ~ ~.
^Z ° NdNy ClZ-1 1 ( 1
~ O Ny- xlym y ~. ' ff~I~
~za Kiva o°m ~ (~ !~I 1 II ~
~1 x1-1 yx1V1 I .:
1°i d zan f.,S , _~ 2~t~
nm ~ oz i 1, r~
ms
~1N ,•
m
,.
,;
_. , ~ . „ .~
. ; ~;. '
~,.i % '
%a, a a $ (y... ~.
f y~y Nat K , 5"ti
C ~ ~ '\
W ~~ m \ "Y
~ NNE .; c
a m '1 ~~k ~~',..
'OZ NC ~, ~ N~ B g
Dp CR7 V ~> io "
I I ';, C7 ~ ~Z
j p ~ Z I ~ I ~ ~ ~ Nm D~ ~m ~ ~
r~ r~ ~ N ~ nm , ~~ + mr ^
~~ n~ i i ~ ~ zm m~ ,'''~~ ~ g
ro
i ~~ N '
r
~Qw ~ ~ rri ,~ ; g ~ ` m A
'~, Z ,; I ' S .r. ~ ~ d
~, ~ ~r _~~
~,~ z ~ ~ B
~ ~Q a
~ ,~ ,. .,
W m .. - '~
,:,..
r ,
~.
~ ,
.. ., , i
.~ :: .' ..
'G
,.
,,.
Y~ ., ~ .!
V . ~ .. ..

7/23/2007
I R:\011036121\Roodway\ProJ\B-9149_rdy_causeway.dgn
~`4
I 1
~
~
~
~(
l~
K~
V ~
l O
~

1f
a
~
C i
~
a
O
mJ
»
O ,
7;
~
Ov0
~ VIO ~1
X00

~
O •
~
~
+
OP m
~ Q
D.O
N V n
OJ+ a
r m J]
*
m
~
7 +
~ pA O -1
m ~ .p
U M
r ~
ry
•• N+
O ~- 1
~ O N
..m
OftO +
H
~ S
m
~ +
p V1
~
00'
mms
~ p r
3 Z
3a O fT1
~
7 m
1 °•' 0
~
m O vO
\ yy~
pC , ~r -f yy
v ~''~ ~'D
O -~
~ < zn
~
uNi Nis
'y ~ m ' 'o D . w
in + a m n o o~D To To *s tTl p
*ra-m
~
~
a
~~
~

,' 1

~ .~
o ~
n ~mr
n S
a
~ o D
m ++
~d ~
N Nti
o W +
.o
o omD
~-
r +
y o ~ ofTD
c-
c
i
u
;
V -i ~ c g'+ to m
~ n a r u~ n 4° ~ Nr g n ~r
-' ~ 7
~ ''a,VZ m m ~d ~'~ n si Oh~~S ~ a Q~N '~ ~? ao-
N
o A h Cl Z ry ~ y
D ;
} ` Z ~1 a G ; C C ti l p

,
,
~~ ~ yyN~~
QQ~Si p
~ ~ ~ - J O. O 2 O C [ RAJ
~. '~ m S~ * * NOT ~ ii Q O N

p + ... N
a `
N
` 'A
? NO
a r1
O~Zf
Zmo; ~ -
y
71
s O ` m A ~ ...

m
n

- ~
~
n m
K Z-i~
..:my;m
m
m
m
~ _ .
o1 t i
~O p
!
m
I, _ -
-~ ~-~
~ -I ~
3 ~
~ ~
p Ohm L
,
O 2
ti
~'. 4i~
S
`~~ ~
~" l I
f
'~ -
.
~ a-i
;,
O
mm -,".
: y C~
~ 2Z WWI
Jy~IJ;
wwmm0
....._..
.-... ..
~ ` '
~
~ti ~ i ~ m n C1G131

I
~ ~ tia_ ~
':mom ~ o
o~m
-~im~m~ O~
icmi in
m~.

}
yO
, I
~
~ xlap
yONIOZ
D ,
py

~ . ~

.
~; mfm

~
vir
mr ~,
~
-
'-

.. _
~-
'
., n -...:
~ - ,
i I
i
~ I
' ~
~ ~
N mn
om a~
ry
i „ .__. .. ....... ...
_.. -
` ~
~
~~ to ~ ~ i y~ -O '~ I :: . ..... ....
I ~ I
~' ~.~ ~r ~ aar eR rzo:~~ I

1
I'
N _ +
...

, ,~,

~ ~

-
8
~

-

; ~,
_•

-•

~
~ _,
~
~
.~
.
'
_
,

- N ~ - '
~
,
:
~
~ ~ti~

~

, ~ ~

~
".
.
`
~

...i,n ,~

y
ti
_.
..,.
,, a

I ~ -. ~
,, c

O . mt ~,!

~

.-
I r
~ - ~ rY / ~ m
m -
-

O ~ ' ~ ' ~lY '} '
Q
' ~ m ~
~ ~ ~ ..
.. ~.
w
t .
s
-.
~ N
.. ,.

;_ cis
A
'~ ~ '" ~
~_ ,.
~~
~
- p

,mm O
a Z
..
..

v.,
. .'
D
', ~ "•. .. ~ .. ~ ~ ~I
` .,. ,p, o ~m .
i ~ ~ _ OO
.,
~ ~ :- ~ ~NVint+ra, ~ ~.~y r ~ ~ y~ I mvmi~ I CD ~~ 2~
m .gc, Nmfj ;' -/' ~~ ~ I ~~~~ 12~~ Z ~~vni rn ng ~-NiaCN ~~
ya o~v-~.n.~a- \~ rx OS~T VI mwN I GT
nn m~ .av ~ ~la '~~ \ I C7~~vai V1 AI o0_ W ~ G~
m r
ago z _
~ V m y~ ,. rrN ~r~i `~ u ~'~ \ _. ~oNN D~~~ ~~~j ~ZV D~ N~ izp°~ ~~
~'' ~ oA ~ v ' n .. D ;^''._~ .ti CS ~N)] to in no ti~
y nN v /5,~~ -~ 9 (JlOTN~ i- ~ ~ ,~~ p Am C~
pp O ~
~'~ 'P ~ Sa'E ~ pln ~ ~m ~ -
\ T moy N
..1 /`.'.. '} ~ Omn by y
~., ~ ~. `+, p°zO a z
'1 N m 3 ~
z
' -'av+ ~ 1 • ~0~~w ~ m
Ntnm-v t '~i O+
y Nya n
~r
"i ~^v?~m
N
O ~~'zo
In w "v ~€iN
g s o ~+}
x i
~~~ ~NO~~am ~~~~ ~., 1 ,~r i; ',
al w=mx C n O ~-+n~ -i ~ ~.
C ~ ~ ~SeOti N NdNy ClZ-i ~. ~I I L 4 ,
I ~~ ~ A <ow ~~~ ,.. i 1 I '3
zn zv~ m ~ I. I ~ l~ ~.
Z mNA~ yaN i ~ ~ I~ ~, I ~ ~ ,
~(Oxi7~ ~ °~ v~ o°n 1 i I; I ., `I I i ~ it -
~ ~~ Z amoo .. I I i t ~~~
x)00 D ~~O Z=
~ ~m ~r
C ~ ~ ° ~ '
O I I O n / ~
c~~ 2 mN ~'
i
m
_. _ .._ ,°
~ ~ -__. v.- _ _ i ~ ~ ,
rn~~
~~~
r
~~~ N ~
..
~A ~:, ~~
`~~ ~ ~ mm~ I I `~ ~
~- a u~ I I ~,~
~ K N QI ,~ ~ ~ , '.
!~ ~ [i n o m i f ~~ ~(~
W V • NmN ' f ' ~ K :~, ~O C~
vi ~ Ci' a an -~
7C din , ~ /
_ ~ ... ca _ a ~S ~
D ~ ° °?.>
, €
4
z~
~ m
w -c
NO r
S ~
~ ~ ~, i ,: o ~z l ~m
Z js ' ~--I Ito ~ I ~~ ~. ;'` ~ ^
I nl I fT'I D -1 ,a m
'n r r I fA I (D N N C~ ITI ~ m r
I O I p I,n, rrn mN +~ m
Gl D~ D~ h, N D3~ i' } ~
D ~ 02 ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ..
^` V1 Z
m y ~ ~ ~ ', 1 i6z
S_ ~ m hl :G/~ i ~l ~ ~ C
p ~ _ ~ ~''
N
~r ~~
~ 2~ Z~

I ', I I ~ ~ ~
i I 1 I ~ ~ i L...~.... I I I ~.
;. '.
I i ~ ,
j '~~ ~ ~ r I i ~~' 1 1 I ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ }_ I~ r...., ~.
.I .. ~ I. ~ ., .. I ~ .I... i. ... i I I ~ i .L.. j ~ t .;
~. I. ~ I I
4
I ~..
_. I .. { ....... __ } I
......I h I .. ..._ ~... ~.....
I I I
.,
_;. L._ , ~. _ I I ~,..
I i ~ ~ I~ ,
~~
a
0
V
" N r~r__
~J
A~~ y~x~
`'"00
'~ wb~~
x ~ 'rp~0
~~~y
~~ ~
~ ~~~
O ... ~
ti
I \
i ~ I I
~ I ' ; I ~ ~I ( I I I ~ ~O ~ I ~~ O
~ rn~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z i ~ i ~ ~ -~O~
I -~, i i
L i it l I I '~ L ~I _ O ~~~`1 ,
i~ I I I I ~' ~ ~! _~~~i~ I I ~I' ~~ j I I I _ I_ i ~ ~
I
I
_ ~
~~
I- ! ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n1 c ~~~ O
I
~ ,~
I -~ i ~ ~ ''
~~r h I ~ ~ I' \ ~
I
III ~I!- i ~ LI , I ~ ~~.~ O~
Ii
_ I ~ ; ' ; 1 ~_ ~;
~_ k
~ ~ ~I~~
I I I I I ~ '
I ~ I ~ ~ \
;
I '
' _i
I ~ ~~i

r
Haywood County
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
.~ ~~~
RE~~~~ED
.II IN ~ 200b
t - - „~,
POEA-OFFiL~V:~ '~"IYiRONMENT
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Bridge No. 211 on SR 1519 over Richland Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1519(2)
State Project 8.2942601
WBS # 33493.1.1
TIP Project No. B-4144
APPROVED:
bZ- of 05 ~ ~ `~~c~~~~~~
DA E Gregory J. Thorp , h.D.,
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental
Analysis Branch, NCDOT
~~~;~o~
DATE
~, ~ .
~Q John F. Sullivan III, P.E.,
1" _ _ Division Administrator, FHWA

•- ,
r
•
Haywood County
Bridge No. 211 on SR 1519 over Richland Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1519(2)
State Project 8.2942601
WBS # 33493.1.1
TIP Project No. B-4144
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
January 2005
Document Prepared by:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
onal G. Hairr
Project Manager
Russell H. Dalton, P.E.
Project Engineer
For the North Carolina Department of Transportation
~ ~ ~,~
aled Al-Akhdar
Project Manager
Consultant Engineering Unit

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Haywood County
Bridge No. 211 on SR 1519 over Richland Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1519(2)
State Project 8.2942601
WBS # 33493.1.1
TIP Project No. B-4144
In addition to the standard Nationwide Permit No. 23 Conditions, the General Nationwide
Permit Conditions, Section 404 Only Conditions, Regional Conditions, State Consistency
Conditions, NCDOT's Guidelines for Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters, General Certification Conditions, and Section 401 Conditions of
Certification, the following special commitments have been agreed to by NCDOT:
Project Developme~zt and Environnze~Ttat Analysis Branch:
Approval under Section 26a of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Act will be
required. A copy of the approved Categorical Exclusion (CE) will be provided to the
TVA.
A jurisdictional determination for Richland Creek will be required prior to permitting.
Division Construction/Project Services Uriit:
There will be an in-stream and 25-foot buffer work moratorium from October 15 to
April 15.
The "Guidelines for Construction of Highway Improvements Adjacent to or Crossing
Trout Waters in North Carolina" (October 27, 1992) will be adhered to throughout design
and construction of this project.
NCDOT will implement Sedimentation and Erosion Control Guidelines for Sensitive
Watersheds (15A NCAC 4B .0024) prior to any ground disturbing activities and follow
the stormwater rules (15A NCAC 2b.0216 (3) (G)). Richland Creek is listed on the
303(d) list of impaired surface waters in the project area.
-U
Green Sheet
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion
January 2005
Page 1 of 1

Haywood County
Bridge No. 211 on SR 1519 over Richland Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1519(2)
State Project 8.29426Q1
WBS # 33493.1.1
TIP Project No. B-4144
INTRODUCTION: The replacement of Bridge No. 211 is included in the 2004-2010
North Carolina. Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) and the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement Program. The location is shown
in Figure 1. No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is
classified as a Federal "Categorical Exclusion."
I. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 43.4 out
of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered functionally obsolete and
structurally deficient. The replacement of an inadequate structure will result in safer and
more efficient traffic operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Bridge No. 211 is located on SR 1519 (Old Crabtree Road) in Haywood County. SR
1519 is classified as a rural local route in the Statewide Functional Classification System.
Land use in the project area is woodland, farmland and residential. A private residence
and maintained yard is located in the southeast quadrant. SR 1519 is a two-lane roadway,
with 16 feet of total pavement width and four-foot grass shoulders on both sides. The
bridge is located in the jurisdiction of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) oversight.
Haywood County is designated as a trout county by the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission.
There is underground cable and utilities that run along the south side of the bridge.
Aerial power lines are also located to the south of the bridge and can be seen in the
attached photographs (Figure 4). Utility impacts are expected to be moderate.
Bridge No. 211 was constructed in 1958. The existing structure is 71 feet in length and
consists of two spans. The longest span is 35.8 feet in length. The clear roadway width
is 19.2 feet, providing two 9.6-foot travel lanes with no effective shoulder width. The
existing right of way width is 60 feet. The superstructure of Bridge No. 211 consists of a
timber floor on I-beams with an asphalt wearing surface and timber railing. The
substructure of the bridge consists of end bents and one interior bent. End bent 1 consists
of a timber cap with timber piles and sheeting. Abutment 2 consists of Yount Masonry.
The interior bent consists of a timber cap on timber piles with concrete sills. The bed to
crown height is 18.4 feet. The normal depth of flow is 2.8 feet. The posted weight limit
is 15 tons for single vehicles and 19 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailers.
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion

Alternative 2 (Preferred -Figure 2B) replaces the existing structure with a bridge
on new alignment. It is anticipated that the bridge length will be approximately
130 feet. The final bridge length will be determined during fmal design. This
struch~re is 280 feet downstream. The proposed bridge will consist of two 12-foot
travel lanes with 8-foot shoulders. Wider shoulders are proposed to provide
additional sight distance on the bridge and for driveways in the vicinity of the
curved bridge. Traffic will be maintained on the existing structure during
construction.
C. Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study
The "Do-Nothing" Alternative will eventually necessitate removal of the bridge.
This is not desirable due to the traffic service provided by SR 1519.
Investigation of the existing structure by the Bridge Maintenance Unit indicates
rehabilitation of the old bridge is not feasible due to its age and deteriorated
condition.
Alternative 3 replaces the existing structure with a bridge on new alignment. The
bridge will be in a curve, shifting the west end approximately 10 feet upstream
and shifting the east end approximately 30 feet downstream. It is anticipated that
the bridge length will be approximately 110 feet with a severely skewed vertical
abutment 12 feet behind the existing abutment on the east side and a sloping
abutment on the west side. The proposed bridge will consist of two 12-foot travel
lanes with 8-foot shoulders. Traffic will be maintained with anoff--site detour.
Alternative 3 was eliminated from further study because the bridge hydraulic
opening would be decreased and the low steel would be lowered below the FEMA
50-year event water surface elevation.
D. Preferred Alternative
Alternative 2 was selected as the preferred alternative because it provides
improved roadway geometry and hydraulic efficiency, and does not require an
off-site detour.
The Division Engineer concurs with Alternative 2 as the preferred alternative.
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 3

Approximate boundaries of plant communities were mapped in the field utilizing
aerial photography of the project study area. Dominant plant species were
identified in each strata for each plant community. Plant conmmunity descriptions
are based on the classifications utilized by Schafale and Weakly (1990). Plant
names follow the nomenclature found in Radford et al. (1968).
Wildlife occurrences were determined through visual field observations,
evaluation of habitat-types within the project study area, secondary indicators of
species (tracks, scat, and burrows), as well as a review of supporting literature
(Coe, 1994, Martof, et al, 1980, and Webster, 1985). Field observations and
literature reviews (Bogan, 2002, Jenkins and Burkhead, 1993, Voshell, Jr., 2002)
were utilized to assess aquatic life.
Information concerning the potential occurrence of federal and state protected
species within the project study area and project vicinity was obtained from the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of protected species (updated
February 24, 2003 -current update as of January 25, 2005) and the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database of rare species and unique
habitats (updated January 2004 -current update as of January 25, 2005). Field
evaluations of the project study area were conducted to identify suitable habitat
for protected species. If suitable habitat was identified, field surveys were
conducted for Federally listed endangered or threatened species.
Jurisdictional wetlands were identified and delineated based on the methodology
outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual
(Environmental Laboratory, 1987). Wetland systems were classified based on the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater
Habitats of the United States (Cowardin, et al., 1979). Wetland boundaries were
located in the field using GPS methods with sub-meter accuracy.
B. Physiography and Soils
Haywood County is situated in the southwestern portion of the Mountain
physiographic province in North Carolina. The geography of the county consists
predominantly of very steep uplands, with gentler slopes in the major river
valleys. Bridge No. 211 is located in the central portion of the county. Narrow,
nearly level floodplains are along most of the streams in the region; however,
steep gorges are not uncommon. Elevations in the project study area range from
approximately 2,500 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL) to 2,530 feet above MSL
as depicted on the Clyde, North Carolina, USGS topographic quadrangle map
(Figure 1). The land uses surrounding and within the project study area is mainly
agricultural and woodland with scattered residential homes.
The geologic features underlying the project study area are associated with the
Blue Ridge Belt, specifically, muscovite-biotite gneiss which is sulfidic and
interlayered with mica schist, minor amphibolite, and hornblende gneiss rock
(North Carolina Division of Land Resources, 1985). The project study area is
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 5

NCDWQ classifies surface waters of the state based on their intended best
uses. Richland Creek from the Lake Junaluska Dam to the Pigeon River is
classified as "C" waters. Class C denotes waters suitable for all general
uses including aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife,
primary recreation, and agriculture. Richland Creek is not designated as
essential fish habitat and does not contain anadromous and warm water
fish species.
Several tributaries of Richland Creek upstream of the Lake Junaluska Dam
are classified as water supply (WS-I) waters. WS-I waters represent water
supplies in natural and undeveloped watersheds, in which no point source
discharges are allowed. No other Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW),
HQW, or Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-II) occur within Richland Creek
watershed in the project vicinity.
North Carolina's 303(d) report is a comprehensive public accounting of all
impaired water bodies in the state. Richland Creek is listed on the DWQ
2004 Draft 303(d) list of impaired waters for impaired biological integrity.
Special measures for sediment control will be required by NCDWQ during
construction.
The Ambient Monitoring System (AMS) determines the "use support"
status of waterbodies, meaning how well a waterbody supports its
designated uses. The waters in the project study area are currently rated as
Partially Supporting.
While the upper portions of Richland Creek show water quality impacts
from agriculture and urban development, only the section below the Lake
Junaluska Dam is currently rated Partially Supporting and has shown
signs of improving water quality in recent years.
2. Water Resource Characteristics
Richland Creek is a perennial stream that flows northeast to west-
northwest. The top of bank width is approximately 45 feet wide with a
wetted width of 25 to 35 feet. One to two feet of moderately flowing
water was observed within the channel during the site visit. Richland
Creek has a bankfull depth of 3 feet throughout the project study area.
The 3 to 6 feet tall stream banks appeared stable. The substrate consists of
sand and gravel with cobble and boulder riffle sections. The water was
clear with moderate sediment deposition. Excellent habitat conditions
exist within the channel for numerous aquatic species. The stream
received a NCDWQ stream classification of 53.25.
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 7

guidelines will be strictly enforced during the construction stages
of the project.
4. Impacts Related to Bridge Demolition and Removal
The superstructure of Bridge No. 211 consists of a timber floor on I-beams
with an asphalt wearing surface and timber railing. The substructure of the
bridge consists of end bents and one interior bent. End bent 1 consists of a
timber cap with timber piles and sheeting. Abutment 2 consists of Yount
Masonry. The interior bent consists of a timber cap on tirnber piles with
concrete sills. The bridge has 2 equal spans that tota171 feet in length.
It should be possible for the superstructure and substructure elements to be
removed without resulting in any temporary fill in "Waters of the United
States" during demolition and removal. The superstructure and
substructure elements noted above can be cut and removed without any
temporary fill falling into Richland Creek during demolition.
D. Biotic Resources
This section describes the existing vegetation and associated wildlife that occur
within the project study area. The project study area is composed of three
different vegetative communities based on topography, soils, hydrology, and
disturbance. Scientific nomenclature and common name (when applicable) are
provided for each plant and animal species listed. Subsequent references to the
same organism only include the common name.
1. Plant Communities
Three plant communities were observed in the project study area: montane
alluvial forest, montane oak-hickory forest, and maintained-disturbed land.
a) Montane Alluvial Forest
Montane alluvial forests are found within stream and river
floodplains at moderate to high elevations. Vegetation within
this community is dependent upon occasional flooding. This
community is found within the project study area as a strip
approximately 20 feet wide along Richland Creek.
The canopy is dominated by a diverse mix of black walnut
(Juglans nigra), yellow buckeye (Aesculus octandra), black
cherry (Prunus serotina), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
shingle oak (Quercus imbricaria), red maple (Ater rubrum),
river birch (Betula nigra), yellow birch (Betula lutea), and
yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). The sub-canopy and
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion
9

Vegetation within the maintained-disturbed area includes various
grasses (Poaceae), Fescue (Fescue sp.), Johnson grass (Sorghum
halepense), nightshade (Solarium sp.), poison ivy, clover
(Trifolium spp.), goldenrod (Solidago spp.), bamboo
(Pliyllostachys aurea), privet (Ligustrum sinense), phlox (Phlox
spp.), daisy fleabane (Erigeron spp.), nvmosa (Albizia
julibrissin), sassafras (Sassafras albidum) and blackberry.
2. Terrestrial Wildlife
The alluvial forest community in conjunction with open agricultural lands
and other disturbed areas offer high plant diversity and water availability;
thus providing high quality wildlife habitat. These conununities provide a
variety of habitat for amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals.
The maintained roadsides, lawns, and agricultural areas provide rich
ecotones for foraging, while the Montane Alluvial Forest and Montane
Oak-Hickory Forest provide foraging and cover. White-tailed deer
(Odocoileus virginianus) and raccoon (Procyon lotor) tracks were
observed along Richland Creek. Beaver (Castor canadensis) activity was
observed in the alluvial forest. Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus jloridanus}
scat was also observed along the field edge. Wildlife accustomed to
human activity was sighted such as the American crow (Corvus
brachyrhynchos), northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), and blue jay
(Cyanocitta cristata).
Common mammals, which could be expected to utilize the project study
area habitat, include Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), smoky
shrew (Sorex fumeus), eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), woodchuck
(Marmota monax), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), eastern harvest
mouse (Reithrodontomys humulis), muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), coyote
(Canis latrans), and mink (Mustela vison).
Common birds, which could be expected to utilize the project study area
habitat, include hairy woodpecker (Picoides villosus), downy woodpecker
(P. pubescens), eastern wood-pewee (Contopus vireos), eastern phoebe
(Sayornis phoebe), barn swallow (Hirundo rustica), Carolina chickadee
(Parus carolinensis), tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor), white-breasted
nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis), American robin (Turdus migratorius),
yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia), and brown-headed cowbird
(Molothrus ater). Game species such as woodcock (Scolopax minor) and
wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) may also be present. Predatory birds
such asred-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), and eastern screech owl
(Otus asio) are also likely to be found in the project vicinity.
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 11

4. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities
a) Terrestrial Communities
Table 1 describes the acreage of plant communities within the
proposed construction limits that would be impacted by each
alternative. Impacts to plant communities associated with
construction activities include the removal of vegetation, soil
compaction, damaging and/or exposing root systems, as well as
potential impacts associated with petroleum spills.
TABLE 1
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS TO PLANT COMMUNITIES
Percentage
Alternative 1 Percentage of Alternative 2 of
Community Type Impact Alternative Impact Acres Alternative
Acres Area Area
Montane Alluvial 0.04 21 % 0.12 10%
Forest
Montane Oak-Hickory N/A N/A 0.02 2%
Forest
Maintained-Disturbed 0.17 79% 1.01 88%
Land
Due to the minimal disturbance of plant communities anticipated
as a result of the bridge replacement, substantial impacts to
terrestrial wildlife populations are not expected. The proposed
right of way width is 60 feet.
b) Aquatic Communities
Aquatic organisms are acutely sensitive to changes in their
environment, and environmental impacts from construction
activities may result in long term or irreversible effects. Impacts
usually associated with in-stream construction include alterations
to the substrate and impacts adjacent streamside vegetation.
Such disturbances within the substrate lead to increased siltation,
which can clog the gills and/or feeding mechanisms of benthic
organisms, fish, and amphibian species. Siltation may also cover
benthic macroinvertebrates with excessive amounts of sediment
that inhibit their ability to obtain oxygen.
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 13

USACE under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). No
jurisdictional wetlands were identified within the project study area.
2. Permits (as applicable)
a) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
Impacts to "Waters of the United States" come under the
jurisdiction of the USACE. Permits will be required for highway
encroachment into jurisdictional wetlands and streams. The
Nationwide Permit 23 should cover the impacts to jurisdictional
wetlands and streams in the project study area. Nationwide
Permit 33 maybe needed for temporary construction access.
b) Section 401 Water Quality Certification
A Section 401 General Water Quality Certification is also
required for any activity which may result in a discharge into
"Waters of the United States" or for which an issuance of a
federal permit is required. The issuance of a required Section
401 certification is a prerequisite to the issuance of a Section 404
permit.
Final determination of permit applicability lies with USACE.
NCDOT will coordinate with the USACE to obtain the necessary
permits.
c) TVA
Richland Creek is located in the Tennessee Valley Authority's
(TVA) land management district. Approval pursuant to Section
26a of the TVA Act is required for all construction and
development involving stream or floodplains in the Tennessee
River drainage basin.
3. Mitigation
The USACE has adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ), a mitigation policy which embraces the concepts of "no net loss of
wetlands" and project sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore
and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of "Waters of
the United States," specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland impacts
has been defined by the CEQ to include: avoidance of impacts (to
wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over
time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 15

mile of the project study area. Table 3 shows that six federally protected species
are listed as endangered and three federally protected species are listed as
threatened for Haywood County (NCNHP, January 2004 -current update as of
January 25, 2005).
TABLE 3
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES FOR I3AYWOOD COUNTY
Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status Conclusion
Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonta Endangered No Effect
raveneliana
Bog turtle Clemmys Threatened (Similarity of N/A*
muhlenbergii Appearance)
Carolina northern Glaucomys sabrinus Endangered No Effect
flying squirrel coloratus
Bald eagle Haliaeetus Threatened(Proposed for No Effect
leucoce halus delistin )
Gray bat Myotis grisescens Endangered No Effect
Eastern cougar Puma concolor Endangered No Effect
cou ar
Spruce-fir moss Microhexura Endangered No Effect
spider montivaga
Small whorled Isotria medeoloides Threatened No Effect
pogonia
Rock gnome lichen Gymnoderma lineare Endangered No Effect
*Species not biologically endangered or threatened and is not subject to ~ectlon ~ consuttanon.
The species does not require a biological conclusion due to similarity of appearance.
Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta ravelneliana)
The Appalachian elktoe is akidney-shaped freshwater mussel endemic to the
upper Tennessee River system in western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee.
The adult shell reaches 3.5 inches (9 cm) in length and is usually dark brown with
prominent to obscure greenish rays. This mussel inhabits relatively shallow
medium-sized creeks and rivers with moderate to fast flowing water. It is
generally found in gravelly substrates mixed with cobbles and boulders or
occasionally in silt-free, coarse sandy substrates. Reproduction is similar to that
of other freshwater mussels, and the banded sculpin (Cottus carolinea) has been
identified as a host species for developing glochidia. Historically, this mussel was
found in the French Broad River system, including French Broad main stem and
the Little River in Transylvania County. Surveys conducted in the French Broad
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion
l7

Carolina northern flying squirrel (Glauco~zzys sabriizus coloratus)
The northern flying squirrel is a small nocturnal mammal that inhabits the high
elevation ecotone between coniferous and northern hardwood forest. This high
elevation habitat usually occurs above 5,500 feet above MSL. These squirrels are
10 to 12 inches long and weigh 3 to 5 ounces. Adults are gray with alight brown
to reddish cast on their backs and light gray to white or buff undersides. The
broad tails and folds of skin between the wrist and ankles form wing-like surfaces
that enable these animals to glide downward from tree to tree or tree to ground.
These mammals eat a wide variety of foods such as lichens, mushroom, seeds,
nuts, insects, and fruits. These squirrels nest in tree cavities such as woodpecker
holes and usually produce one litter in the early spring (USFWS 2004).
Suitable habitat for the Carolina northern flying squirrel, consisting of nvxed
deciduous/coniferous forests located above 5,500 feet above MSL, does not exist
within the project area. Review of NCNHP maps indicated no known populations
of this species within one mile of the project area. This species will not be
impacted as a result of project construction.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucoceplzalus)
The mature bald eagle (usually 4-plus years in age) can be identified by its large
white head and short white tail. The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate-
brown in color. Bald eagles can easily be distinguished from other birds by their
flat wing soar. They are primarily associated with large bodies of water where
food is plentiful. Eagle nests are found in close proximity to water (usually
within 0.5 mile) with a clear flight path to the water, in the largest living tree in an
area, with an open view of the surrounding land. Human disturbance can cause
nest abandonment. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in December
and January. Fish are the major food source, although forage items include coots,
herons, wounded ducks, and carrion (USFWS 2004).
As of July 6, 1999, this species is currently under consideration by the USFWS
for a proposed de-listing of their threatened status. However, this raptor will still
be protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act, and populations will continue to be monitored for at least another
five years under provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Suitable habitat for the bald eagle consisting of large bodies of water is present
within the project area. Subsequently, a survey for the presence of any bald eagle
nests was conducted within the study area in July 2001. No bald eagles or their
nests were observed within study area; this is likely due to the moderate amount
of human activity and disturbance within and around the project area.
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 19

.-
or more square miles, and females from 5 to 20 square miles. Sightings have
been reported in three North Carolina areas including the Nantahala National
Forest, the northern portion of the Uwharrie National Forest, and North Carolina's
southeastern counties. The remaining population of this species is extremely
small, with exact numbers unknown (USFWS 2004).
Suitable habitat would be available in the project study area because of the close
proximity to the Nantahala National Forest's large expanse of relatively
undeveloped lands. However, cougars are not likely in the project area due to the
frequency of human activity within the study area and localized development near
the study area. The NCNHP has no records of any known populations of the
eastern cougar within aone-mile radius of the project area. This species will not
be impacted as a result of project construction.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Spruce-fir moss spider (Microhexura montivaga)
It is one of the smallest members of the primitive suborder of spiders that are
often popularly referred to as "tarantulas." Adults of this species measure only
0.10 to 0.15 inches with ayellow-brown to a darker reddish brown color. The
most reliable field identification characteristics for the spruce-fir moss spider are
chelicerae that project forward well beyond the anterior edge of the carapace, a
pair of very long posterior spinnerets, and the presence of a second pair of book
lungs, which appear as light patches posterior to the genital furrow.
The spruce-fir moss spider is known from only Fraser fir (Abies fi~aseri) and red
spruce (Picea rubens) forests on the highest mountain peaks, located at and above
5,400 feet above MSL in the southern Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina
and Tennessee. The typical habitat of this spider is found in damp, but well-
drained, moss mats growing on rock outcrops and boulders in well-shaded
situations within these forests. The moss mats cannot be too dry (the species is
very sensitive to desiccation) or too wet (large drops of water can also pose a
threat to the spider). The spider constructs tube-shaped webs in the interface
between the moss mat and rock surface. The abundant springtails in the moss
mats provide the most likely source of food for the spider. Populations of the
spruce-fir moss spider have declined, due in large part to the declining numbers of
stands of Fraser fir and red spruce forests (CTSFWS 2004).
According to the Federal Register on July 6, 2001, critical habitat for the spruce-
fir moss spider has been designated in portions of Avery, Caldwell, Mitchell,
Swain, and Watauga counties in North Carolina and became effective on August
6, 2001. These designated critical habitats include areas within the Great Smoky
Mountains National Park, the Pisgah National Forest, the Cherokee National
Forest, and Grandfather Mountain (managed by The Nature Conservancy). None
of these locations are within the project vicinity.
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 21

~.
The study area lacks suitable Habitat for the rock gno>ne lichen consisting of high
humidity envirorunents such as deep river gorges or other seepy wet rock faces.
The highest elevation in the study area is approximately 3,050 feet above MSL,
well below the elevations (> 5,000 feet above MSL) preferred by this species.
Review of NCNHP maps indicated no known populations of this species within
one mile of the project area. This species will not be impacted as a result of
project construction.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
There are 31 federal species of concern listed by the USFWS for Haywood
County (Table 4) as noted in the February 24, 2003 list (current update as of
January 25, 2005). Federal species of concern (FSC) are not afforded federal
protection under the Endangered Species Act and are not subject to any of its
provisions, including Section 7. NCNHP records indicated no recorded
occurrences of FSC within one mile of the project study area.
TABLE 4
FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR HAYWOOD COUNTY
Scientific Common State Habitat Requirement Habitat Present
Name Name Status
Southern egOlius T spruce-fir forests or mixed hardwood/spruce forests ].jo
Appalachian acadicus (for nesting)
saw-whet owl
Cerulean Dendroica SR mature hardwood forests; steep slopes and coves in ].lo
warbler cerulea mountains
Olive-sided COntopus SC montane conifer forests (mainly spruce-fir) with No
flycatcher borealis openings or dead trees
Hellbender Cryptobranchus SC large and clear fast-flowing streams Yes
alleganiensis
preferably spruce-fir No
SC coniferous forests
i
,
a
Southern Oz
Appalachian curvirostra
red crossbill
Southern rock Microtus SC rocky areas at high elevations, forests or fields No
vole chrotorrhinus
carolinensis
Southern eotoma SC rocky places in deciduous or mixed forests Yes
Appalachian oridana
woodrat haematoreia
Alleghany eotoma SC rocky places and abandoned buildings in deciduous or Yes
woodrat magister mixed forests in the northern mountains and adjacent
Piedmont
Southern
Appalachian Poecile
atricapillus SC high elevation forests, mainly spruce-fir [breeding
season only] ].lo
black-capped racticus
chickadee
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion
23

VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and implemented by the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified
as 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires Federal agencies to take into account
the effect of their undertakings (federally-funded, licensed, or permitted} on
properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places and to afford the Advisory Council a reasonable opportunity to comment
on such undertakings.
B. Historic Architecture
A field survey of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for Bridge No. 211 was
conducted on June 7, 2002. All structures within the APE were photographed,
and later an NCDOT staff architectural historian reviewed these photos. There
were two structures within the APE over fifty years of age, Bridge No. 211 and
Property #2 -House, and both were determined to be ineligible for the National
register of Historic Places by the NCDOT staff architectural historian. The
photographs were shown to the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) in a
meeting on July 8, 2003. At that meeting, HPO staff concurred that neither
Bridge No. 211 nor Property #2 was eligible for the National Register and a form
was signed that reflects these findings. Therefore, there are no National Register-
listed or National Register-eligible properties within the APE for this project.
Copies of all aforementioned correspondence are included in the Appendix.
C. Archaeology
An archaeological survey was conducted in the project APE and the findings were
transmitted in a letter dated September 17, 2003. No archaeological deposits
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places were identified
within the boundaries of the proposed APE, and no further archaeological work is
recommended unless design plans change prior to construction. In a
memorandum dated October 17, 2003, the State Historic Preservation Officer
concurs with the recommendation that no further archaeological investigation be
conducted in connection with this project. A copy of the memorandum is
included in the Appendix. Copies of all aforementioned correspondence are
included in the Appendix.
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 25

_'
15 NCAC 2D.0520. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway
traffic noise (23 CFR Part 772) and for air quality (1990 CAAA and NEPA) and no
additional reports are required.
A field reconnaissance survey was conducted in the vicinity of the project and based on
the survey, there are no anticipated underground storage tank (LJST) impacts with this
project. Research shows that no regulated or unregulated landfills or dumpsites occur
within the project limits, and no superfund sites were identified in the vicinity of the
project.
Haywood County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program. The project
site on Richland Creek is included in a Detailed FEMA Study area. A copy of the Flood
Insurance Rate Map is shown in Figure 5. The project is not anticipated to increase the
level or extent of the upstream flood hazard and no practical alternatives exist to crossing
the flood plain. All reasonable measures will be taken to minimize harm to the flood
plain.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no significant adverse
environmental effects will result from implementation of the project.
VIII. AGENCY COMl~~NTS
Efforts were undertaken early in the planning process (January 2003) to contact local
officials to involve them in the project development with scoping letters. Please refer to
Project Commitments. No additional project specific continents have been identified.
B-4144 Categorical Exclusion 27

~ _ _ _ `~ N
"~ _ '\
i ~~
.81 ~~~ 1513 '•
--~_ 1653 , ~ . ~ (•04) ~'~
~'v~e• `\'~ 1854 '~~
`, ~ ,`
Ra \
~o~q ~~, G 1519 1533 •02
(.Ofi)
'`'O
1647 ~
\ ~dow 1848-~+•
208 10 ~~ r ~D,
Ratl'~°~/
~ ~- ~ 20
1520 ~
'~a
a tees zeaoFSaT
® au ase xrLO~rErER
f ~ _ ,~ ; , ,
~, ~~ ~~ r `a aT 'U w r~ ~ f,'c, ~ 'x~
;,~ ~. q
~• '~" JI' nAT. MRa 3 B U
N. .. ~• M
Q ' , a«o i.
N au,,,. '• mow s ~.
r ~~
w Y MM
r ~-~ ,~,
~ ~~ "~" ~
~ ~: ~ x~ ~ ^ * y fit;' ~ .
~ , , ..
r xoRTa c~ROrnv~
I18PARTM~GVf' ~ 71G!]ffSP(~TATlQ1V
PROJECT ~Bi'ELfAPAlEAII' ~
~~In~IQtQXMENTilL .lNALY8I3 BRANCH
AAYWOOD COUNTY
BRIDGE NO 211 OX SR 1519
OT~'R RICHIAND CREEK
TIP MU B-4144
ti''ICINIfY MAP
FIGURE 1

~ o V
Fb~ a
H
a ..,
~g~,~ ~
I- S N~ ~ ~ ~04~ U O ~ M
Q ~ ~ ~ ~ W~ ~ o~~ N o
z
-p Q d' ~, o O O U ~ ti
N N QO ~ ~ Q~ ~ Qa~° ~ W~ ~ ~
S O O N ~ o C'7 ~3;
V QO~~ ~~n ~ ~WJ
Z "~`+ O
.J -~ W
(~ QUA ~ ~
ZOcnQQ~. ~o,
W ~~ZQQ ~ o ~ ~
UQJ~~O'J N Wes'
ZdcnOMQ
I=i~ONNO ti~
o Q
0 0
~° 4 Ott
o, ~
O ~~
~' O =
o ~~ ~- F-
V Z ~
~ -~ o, ~Q V
~a
o~ ~~ ~-~
Q 0 uV, p
~Q N W
o-O J O
~~ ~~
~~
~ ~-
ti
=z
O
~, 1
W~

E' ~ Q1
o
~

~ a,
o

.. ~
~ 1~.
a. ~ ~* ~. t
:;;,
1C~l.JftF 4 -C'~L(?R PF{{JT{~C:r~APt-
8-41 ~4 H<~ywaod C"r}unty
13rid~c Itic,. ? 11 c~t~ 5R 1 ~ 1 ~~ c~vcr
12ieh1~nd Cr~~;k
Larakin~ ~rsuChcst Alc~n~ SR 1.51.9
1~c~ward Brcle 1yc~. 211
1.oc~kin~ 1~lorth~~~st Alotl~ SR 151 ~) can
E3ricl~:~ . ~ ~. 211
I~oaking Southeast Alan R 1519
Toward Srid~;e Na. 21.1.
C~oal~izt~ Southeast Alor~~ SR 1519 can
Bride l~c~. 211.

FIGURE 5
FIAODPLAIN b7AP
_-.~
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOODWAY
FLOOD BOUNDARY AND
FLOODWAY MAP
I~O~'I'~-I C~D~~P~
~urr~rcoxpoRa~n s3
LEGEND
ZONE C -500 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY
ZONE~B _ ~IpO YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY
LJNE A5-\•~ _ ~-FLOODWAY FP.INGE
o ` FLOODWAY
--~---~
ONE AB
E FLOOD ELEVATION ~ CROSS SECTION
(100 YEAR FLOOD) ZONE BREAK
-E~~I SHEEi 13 OF 21
_ '• ~~ CO!~1~All>'IITY-SHEET i`~U~~1R~R
570120 0013
NOTES -'
A THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR USE IN DEE1rJIPo:i•rL80D~VA:'
• AND FLOOD :'BOUNDARIES. ZONE AND• i>,AS~-F600D
ELEVATION (8F~) DATA MAY NOT BE CORt?EGT InS}J.QVIiN.
REFER TO THE SEPARATELY PRINTEG FLOOD IA($~,I.RANCE ,_,.
' •R~ATE MAP.:~FO'R` CORRECT ZONE ArJL• 8Fc DATA. •••
B• • REFER TO THE_ FLOOD INSURANCE RAT°_ M:+P•• FGR
.;1 DESCRIPTION OF ELEVATIOtJ REFERENCE MARKS.
C T~IIS MAP MAY •NOT •SHOW ALL FLOCD 9JlIN0ARIES.
REFER TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE ti•AP FOR
;,~ ADDITIONAL FLOOD BOUNDARIES.
;~~ D. WHERE THE 100 & 560 YEAR FLOODS a;3E CIO.i'c
TOGETHER. ONLY THE 100 YEAR. FLOOD IS SHQ+NN.
.•I - .
-' _ _
.i_
.. ~ gFF~CTI~E ~~1T~•
JULY 1.5_L_,1,934
I ~I Federal Eme~ency l~~arage;z~len t :~ genc
i
.. S i.-r4,_t
/ uf'r.. L A
r ...3 .. s Z ~•f .r"r
• - ; ..

• - _ '~ -~" - ' ; = /., ~ ~ _ FLOODPLAIN MA.P
t ~ ! ~- ~ 1'`
~ - ~ ..
I - ~ ~[`
~~ E t~~ ~Y ~~ r ~' 'f 1
3 ~~, ~ ~ ~ i fl/ ~ ~~ ~ p
1
`t\ '`~~
,` ~ ~
~~ ~ Rtr4- 42
~ ,~ SR~D~, ~ ~
No. 211 ~ G~ ~
~ ~~ _
,,
~~ ' ~~P ~/
l / ~ ~ ~~
B f
~ l .
l 1 I { ~' ~ j
jjj ~~ \\ ( ----
.~ ~ ~ trt - 0.5
~~
` 1 B t~ ~~ ~~~ ~
\ ~,
2507 - _ ~1 ~ ~ ®. ~'
~~ C , ~ ~ ~ ~
25\2 ~\ Z~ ~. ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~
. ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ / / ~
.~ ~`r~1 ~
f~i-1. @6J ~~
Q~ ' •.
=,~;~ .. ,

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
151 PATTON AVENUE
ROOM 208
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-5006
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
Regulatory Division May 31, 2002
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mr. William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1548
Subject: Review of Natural Systems Technical Reports for bridge replacement projects
scheduled for construction in CFY 2005; Distribution Group 2
Deaz Mr. Goodwin:
Reference your letters February 18, 2002, Mazch 1, 2002, Mazch 18, 2002, and
Apri124, 2002 regarding our scoping comments on the following proposed bridge
replacement projects:
'~ 1. TIP Project No. B-2988, Bridge No. 13 on SR 1890 over East Fork Pigeon
River, Haywood County.
2. TlP Project No. B-4067, Bridge No. 47 on SR 1325 over Shuler Creek,
Cherokee County.
3. TIP Project No. B-4123, Bridge No. 117 on SR 1123 over West Buffalo Creek,
Graham County.
~ 4. TIP Project No. B-4144, Bridge No. 211 on SR 1519 over Richland Creek,
Haywood County.
5. TIP Project No. B-4161, Bridge No. 211 on SR 1132 over West Fork
TuckasegeeRiver, Jackson County.
6. TIP Project No. B- 4179, Bridge No. 65 on SR 1513 over Rabbit Creek, Macon
Couaty.
7. TIP Project No. B-4180, Bridge No. 323 on SR 1611over Cleaz Creek, Macon
County.
Although it does not appeaz that any of these proposed bridge replacement projects
will impact jurisdictional wetlands, Department of the Army (DA) permit authorization,
pursuant to Section 404 of the C1ean.Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for
the discharge of excavated or fill material in waters (and wetlands, if applicable) of the

United States, including disposal of construction debris. Specific permit requirements will
depend on design of the projects, extent of fill work within the waters of the United States,
construction methods, and other factors.
Although these projects may qualify as a Categorical Exclusion, to qualify for
nationwide permit authorization under Nationwide Permit #23, the project planning
report should contain sufficient information to document that the proposed activity does
not have more than a minimal individual or cumulative impact on the aquatic
environment. All activities, including temporary construction, access, and dewatering
activities, should be included in the project planning report. Our experience has shown
that replacing bridges with culverts often results in sufficient adverse impacts to consider
the work as having more than minunal impacts on the aquatic environment. Accordingly,
the following items need to be addressed in the project planning report:
a The report should contain the amount of permanent and temporary impacts to
waters and wetlands as well as a description of the type of habitat that will be affected by
the proposed project.
b. Off-site detours are generally preferable to on-site (temporary) detours which
impact waters or wetlands. If an on-site detour is the recommended action, justification
should be provided that demonstrates that alternatives with lesser impacts are not
practicable. Please note that an onsite detour constructed on a spanning structure can
potentially avoid permanent impacts to waters or wetlands and should be considered
whenever an on-site detour is the recommended action. For projects where a spanning
structure is not feasible, the NCDOT should investigate the existence of previous onsite
detours at the site that were used in previous construction activities. These azeas should
be utilized for onsite detours whenever possible to minimize impacts.
For proposed projects and associated on-site detours that cause minimal losses of
waters or wetlands, an approved restoration and monitoring plan will be required prior to
issuance of a DA nationwide or Regional general permit. For proposed projects and
associated on-site detours that cause more than minimal losses of waters or wetlands, an
individual DA permit and a compensatory nutigation proposal for the unavoidable
impacts maybe required.
c. Project commitments should include the removal of all temporary fills
from waters and wetlands and "time-of--year" restrictions on in-stream
work if recommended by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
d. All restored areas should be planted with endemic vegetation including trees,.if
appropriate. For projects proposing a temporary onsite detour, the entire detour area,
including any previous detour from past construction activities, should be removed in its

entirety.
e. The report should provide an estimate of the linear feet of new impacts to
streams resulting from construction of the project.
. d. If a bridge is proposed to be replaced with a culvert, NCDOT must demonstrate
that the work will not result in more than minimal impacts to the aquatic environment,
specifically addressing the passage of aquatic life including anadromous fish. The work
must also not alter the stream hydraulics and create flooding of adjacent properties or
result in unstable stream banks.
g. The report should discuss and recommend bridge demolition~methods and shall
include the impacts of bridge demolition and debris removal in addition to the impacts of
constructing the bridge. The report should also incorporate the bridge demolition policy
recommendations pursuant to the NCDOT. policy entitled `Bridge Demolition and
Removal in. Waters of the United States" dated September 20, 1999.
h. Lengthening existing bridges can often benefit the ecological and hydrological
functions of the associated wetlands and streams. In some cases bridge approaches aze
connected to earthen causeways that were built over wetlands and streams. Replacing
these causeways with longer bridges would allow previously impacted waters, wetlands
and floodplains to be restored. In an effort to encourage this type of work, mitigation
credit for wetland restoration activities can be provided to offset the added costs of
lengthening an existing bridge.
i. Based on the information provided and the recent field investigations of the
referenced project sites, the replacement of the subject bridges, most over high quality,
mountain trout waters, has the potential for significant adverse impacts to those aquatic
resources. Also, the presence/status of at least one federally listed species identified in
the natural systems report for each project remains unresolved, and will require further
study before an effect determination can be made.
j. You have requested that the referenced projects be given a designation of
"Red", "Green" or "Yellow" as explained in your letters. At this time, all the projects
listed above would receive a "Yellow" designation by our office for the reasons specified
in the preceding paragraph.

Should you have any questions please call Mr. John W. Hendrix in the Asheville
Regulatory Field Office at 828-271-7980, ext. 7.
Sincerely;
~-w ~- ~r
John W. Hendrix
Project Manager
4

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
151 PATTON AVENUE
ROOM 208
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLWA 28801-5006
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
Regulatory Division January 27, 2003
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mr. John Wadsworth, PE
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1548
Subject: Comments on Bridge Replacement Projects B-2988, B-4144, and B-4291
Dear Mr. Wadsworth:
Reference your letter under signature of Gregory J. Thorpe, dated January 6, 2003,
regarding a request for comments on the following proposed bridge replacement projects:
~ 1. TIP Project No. B-2988, Bridge No. 13 over East Fork Pigeon River, Haywood
County.
~ 2. TIP Project No. B-4144, Bridge No. 211 over Richland Creek, Haywood
County.
3. TIP Project No. B-4291, Bridge No. 193 over Davidson River, Transylvania
County.
Department of the Army (DA) permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated or
fill material in waters (and wetlands, if applicable) of the United States, including disposal
of construction debris: Specific permit requirements will depend on design of the projects,
extent of fill work within the waters of the United States, construction methods, and other
factors.
Additional comments were provided on these projects to Mr. William T: Goodwin,
of the Bridge Replacement Planning Unit on May 20 and 31, 2002. Copies of those
comments are attached and constitute the extent of comments which the Corps can
provide based on the information available to' date.
Should you have any questions please call Mr. John W. Hendrix in the Asheville
Regulatory Field Office at 828-271-7980, ext. 7.

Sincerely,
John W. Hendrix
Project Manager
Attachments

~~ P`~EMi O! Ih
lr ~y
W ~~
O w.
s
O
~ ~
~~~
IN REPLY RFFER TO
L7619
PIN 1280
United States Department of the Interior
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Blue Ridge Parkway
199 Hemphill Knob Road
Asheville, North Carolina 28803
February 11, 2003
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D.
Environmental Management Director
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development ac Environment~ii tiliill}`si5 Br~c'~
1548 Mail Service Center-
Raleigh, North Carolina 37699-1548
~yC ElI/~
.~ Ott? 2 ~ ~.~.,~
;a
. ° l~cs r~
`~ f~~`'if10•PlI~~S
"ti .+~1JAL{S~
Subject: Request for comments on Bridge I2ep[acement Projects B-4032, B-4036, B-403'x,
B-4258, B-4261, B-2988, B-4144, B-4291
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced projects. Parkway staff
reviewed the scoping document and the potential impacts of the proposed project on resource
values that may be present on National Pazk Service (NPS) lands and have the following
comments:
The proposed projects should have no impact to park natural resources.
In reference to Bridge Number 262, over south Hominy Creek on SR 3452 connecting to State
Route ISI: SR ISI is an important connecting road to the Blue Ridge Parkway. Would this
bridge construction in any way delay SR 1 SI traffic or reroute vehicular traff c on the Blue
Ridge Parkway from SR 1 SI ? If so what would be the delay duration? We would want to review
detour sign planning, if applicable. Otherwise, we have no visual impact concerns to the Blue
Ridge Parkway, as this bridge is located out of the park viewshed area.
3 X88 In reference to Bridge Number 13, on SR 1890 and near SR 276, crossing over the East Fork of
the Pigeon River: SR 276 is an important connecting road to the Blue Ridge Parkway. Would
this bridge construction in any way delay SR 276 traffic or reroute vehicular traffic on the Blue
Ridge Parkway from SR 276? If so what would be the delay duration? We would tivant to
review detour sign planning, if applicable. Otherwise, we have no visual impact concerns to the
Blue Ridge Parkway, as this bridge is located out of the park viewshed area.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on these important bridge
replacement projects. If you have any questions, please contact Suzette Moiling, Environmental
Protection Specialist, at 828/271-4779 ext. 219.

Sincerely,
,,/
G~ .
Daniel W. Brown
Superintendent
cc: Park Resident Landscape Architect, BLRI
Chief, Branch of Resource Management, BLRI
Highlands District Ranger, BLRI
Highlands District Resource Management Specialist, BLRI

State of Norm Laroilna
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael Easley, Governor
Bill Ross, Secretary
Alan Klimek, Director
June 3, 2002
AA
w 1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Memorandum To: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, Unit Head
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
~~
Through: John Dorne
NC Division f Wat r Q ality, 401~Unit
From: Robert Ridings ~~,~~,,~
NC Division of Water Quality, 401 Un
Subject: Review of Natural Systems Technical Reports for bridge
replacement projects scheduled for construction in CFY 2005:
"Yellow Light" Projects: B-2988, B-4032, B-4038, B-4039,
B-4044, B-4045, B-4180, B-4179, B11161, B~ B-4123,
B-4067, B-4047.
In future reports, an Executive Summary Paragraph would be helpful. This should include brief
description of the work intended (i.e., replace bridge with another bridge or with a culvert), the
amount of impact to wetlands and streams, and types of possible permits needed.
On all projects, use of proper sediment and erosion control will be needed. Sediment and erosion
control measures should not be placed in wetlands. Sediment should be removed from any water
pumped from behind a cofferdam before the water is returned to the stream. Sedimentation and
Erosion Control Guidelines for Sensitive Watersheds (15A NCAC 4B .0024) must be
implemented prior to any ground-disturbing activities to minimize impacts to downstream
aquatic resources. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation must be planted on all bare
soil within 10 days of ground-disturbing activities to provide long term erosion control.
This office would prefer bridges to be replaced with new bridges. However if the bridge must be
replaced by a culvert and 150 linear feet or more of stream is impacted, a stream mitigation plan
will be needed prior to the issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification. While the NCDWQ
realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects requiring
mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification.
Any proposed culverts shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profile is not
altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed).
Wetlands/401 Unit 2321 Crabtrce Blvd. Suite 250 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]

Existing stream dimensions are to be maintained above and below locations of culvert
extensions.
For permitting, any project that fa[Is under the Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permits 23 or 33
do not require written concurrence by the NC Division of Water Quality. Notification and
courtesy copies of materials sent to the Corps, including mitigation plans, are required. For
projects that fall under the Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 14 or Regional General Bridge
Permit 31, the formal 401 application process will be required including appropriate fees and
mitigation plans.
Do not use any machinery in the stream channels unless absolutely necessary. Additionally,
vegetation should not be removed from the stream bank unless it is absolutely necessary.
NCDOT should especially avoid removing large trees and undercut banks. If large, undercut
trees must be removed, then the trunks should be cut and the stumps and root systems left in
place to minimize damage to stream banks.
Use of rip-rap for bank stabilization must be minimized; rather, native vegetation should be
planted when practical. If necessary, rip-rap must be limited to the stream bank below the high
water mark, and vegetation must be used for stabilization above high water.
Rules regarding stormwater as described in (15A NCAC 2b.0216 (3) (G)) shall be followed for
these projects. These activities shall minimize built-upon surface area, divert runoff away from
surface waters and maximize utilization of BMPs. Existing vegetated buffers shall not be mowed
in order to allow it to be most effectively utilized for storm water sheet flow.
Special Note on project B-4144: these waters are classified as 303(d) waters. Special measures .
for sediment control will be needed.
Also note that projects B-2988, B-4032, B-4038, B-4180, B-4179, B-4161, B-4144, B-4123, and
B-4067 occur in Trout waters. Any trout-specific conditions that would be determined by the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, to protect the egg and fry stages of trout from
sedimentation during construction, would be required on any 401 certifications.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401
Water Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water
quality standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost.

~.-. Vi`i' Q
j,~, . f ~ a....
~ North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R Full~~ood, Executive Director
J
MEMORANDUM ~. ~`
t ~-...
TO: William T. Goodwin, P.E., Unit Head ~ .~•~..
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit ~ _ ~~
Project Development and Environmental Anal sis Branch; NCDOT
~c~+~
FROM: Owen F. Anderson, Motintain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: June 24, 2002
SUBJECT: Scoping and Natural Resources Technical Report, Replace Bridge No. 211 on SR
1519 Over Richland Creek, Haywood County, TIP No. B-4144
Fish and Wildlife Project Status: GREEN to YELLOW
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission familiar with the
project area have reviewed the technical report for the subject project to assess the potential for
adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The proposed work involves the replacement of bridge number 211 on SR 1519 over
Richland Creek. Construction impacts on fish and wildlife resources will depend on the extent of
disturbance in the streambed and surrounding floodplain areas. A narrow riparian corridor within
the project area is characterized mostly as montane alluvial forest. The surrounding land outside
of the riparian corridor is primarily disturbed agricultural land. The forested riparian area should
be considered as good quality wildlife habitat that provides a travel comdor for wildlife.
The Division of Water Quality classifies this reach of Richland Creek as C. This reach is
not designated as trout water by the NCWRC. This reach is somewhat transitional water and may
or may not support some trout. We are of the opinion that this project could result in adverse
impacts to trout.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 2 7699-1 72 1
Telephone: (9]9) 733-3633 ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]

Tip No B-4144, Bridge 211 on SR 1519 2 June 24, 2002
Haywood County, Richland Creek
According to the technical report suitable habitat exists for the Appalachian elktoe
(Alasmidonta raveneliana), a state and federally listed species. The Appalachian elktoe is known
to occur in the West Fork Pigeon River and the Pigeon River. An aquatic survey is proposed for
the project area. The findings of this survey will need to be considered in the alternatives analysis
and design of the project.
A survey will also be done during the flowering season for the small whorled pogonia
(Isotria medeoloides). The results of this survey also will need to be considered in the
alternatives analysis and design of the project.
We prefer bridge designs that do not alter the natural stream morphology or impede fish
passage. Efforts should be made during design to place bridge supports outside of the bankfull
channel. Bridge designs should also include provisions for the deck drainage to flow through a
vegetated upland buffer prior to reaching the subject surface waters. Correction of altered stream
morphology at the road crossing should be considered during design.
Streams and riparian zones provide connectivity of the landscape; and thus, are natural
movement comdors for terrestrial wildlife species. Bridge designs should consider leaving
sufficient corridors under the bridge to encourage movement of wildlife under the bridge rather
than across the highway. The movement of animals, especially larger animals (e.g., deer and
bear), under the bridge may reduce automobile crashes involving wildlife. Where feasible,
increasing the riparian corridor width under the bridge is recommended.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing stream
banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed and the
approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain.~ Approach fills should be removed down to
the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with native herbaceous species and
planted with native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT
should restore the area to wetlands. If successful, the site maybe used as wetland mitigation for
the subject projec~..or other projects in the watershed.
Listed below are our standard recommendations on this project. Because the Corps of
Engineers (COE) recognizes the project county as a "trout water county", the NCWRC will
review any nationwide or general 404 permits for the proposed projects and will likely request the
following as conditions of the 404 permit.
1. This bridge should be replaced with another spanning structure.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
Water that has inadvertently come in contact with live concrete should not be
discharged to surface waters but should be disposed in an upland area.

Tip No B-4144, Bridge 211 on SR 1519 3 June 24, 2002
Haywood County, Richland Creek
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should be
planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
9. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
10. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into surface waters.
11. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed:
12. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and maintained
to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic
fluids, or other toxic materials.
13. Wastewater from drilling operations should not be discharged to surface waters but
should be pumped to upland areas.
14. If surveys indicate usage by trout, instream construction and construction within
the 25-foot buffer is prohibited during the trout-spawning period of October 15
to April 15 for brook and brown and/or January 1-April 15 for rainbow to
minimize impacts on trout reproduction.

Tip No B-4144, Bridge 211 on SR 1519 4 June 24, 2002
Haywood County, Richland Creek
15. Discharge of materials into surface waters from demolition of the old bridge should be
avoided as much as practicable. Any materials that inadvertently reach surface waters
should be removed.
16. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in
or adjacent to surface waters is strictly prohibited.
17. Suitable mussel habitat exists at this project site and rare mussels are known from this
drainage; therefore the project area should be surveyed for fish and freshwater
mussels. NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim Savidge should be notified. If survey results
reveal the presence of listed species, special measures to protect these sensitive species
may be required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment during the early stages of these
projects. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at (828) 452-
2546.
cc: Mr. John Hendrix, NCDOT Coordinator, COE, Asheville
Ms. Marella Buncick, Biologist, USFWS Asheville
Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele, Highway Coordinator, Division of Water Quality

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: John Wadsworth, Project Planning Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
FROM: Marla Chambers, Highway Projects Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program, NCWRC
DATE: March 21, 2003
SUBJECT: Scoping review of NCDOT's proposed bridge replacement projects B-4032, B-
4036, B-4037, B-4258, B-4261, B-2988, B-4144, B-4291 in Buncombe,
Rutherford, Haywood and Transylvania Counties.
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has requested comments from
the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) regarding impacts to fish and
wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. Staff biologists have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments. These comments are
provided in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C.
661-667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require work
within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal and
vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage beneath
the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by canoeists and
boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: ~ [phone] ext. 281 Fax: [phone]

Bridge Scopings Page 2 March 21, 2003
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should be
planted with,a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws,
mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat
intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the steam
underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of requesting
additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can recommend that the
project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, Mr. Hal Bain with the NCDOT
- ONE should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for information
on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled "Stream
Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources must
be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within
15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants
into streams.

" Bridge Scopings Page 3 March 21, 2003
' 15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and should
be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and maintained to
prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids,
or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels other
than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or floodplain
bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be reconnected to
floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by utilizing sills on the
upstream end to restrict or divert flow to the base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be
filled with sediment so as not to cause noxious or mosquito breeding conditions.
Sufficient water depth should be provided in the base flow barrel during low flows to
accommodate fish movement. If culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or
notched baffles should be installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This
should enhance aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by
maintaining channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish
and other aquatic organisms. In essence, the base flow barrel(s) should provide a
continuum of water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of
velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to remain
dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water
velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts
aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a
manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should
be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. )f road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed

Bridge Scopings Page 4 March 21, 2003 ~ '
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. Tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas. If the area that is reclaimed
was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may
be used as wetland mitigation for the subject project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-4032, Buncombe Co., Bridge No. 130 over the Broad River. The Broad River is
classified as C-Tr and rainbow trout are present. An in-stream and 25-foot buffer work
moratorium from January 1 to April 15 should apply.
2. B-4036, Buncombe Co., Bridge No. 220 over Reems Creek. Reems Creek is classified as
C-Tr and is hatchery supported trout water. An in-stream and 25-foot buffer work
moratorium from October 15 to April 15 should apply.
3. B-4037, Buncombe Co., Bridge No. 262 over South Hominy Creek. South Hominy
Creek is classified as C-Tr and rainbow and brown trout are present. An in-stream and
25-foot buffer work moratorium from October 15 to April 15 should apply.
4. B-4258, Rutherford Co., Bridge No. 7 over the Broad River. The Broad River flows into
Lake Lure just downstream of this bridge and is classified as B-Tr and C-Tr in the project
vicinity. The site is downstream of Hatchery Supported Trout Water and an in-stream
and 25-foot buffer work moratorium for rainbow trout, from January 1 to April 15, is
most appropriate for this project.
5. B-4261, Rutherford Co., Bridge Nos. 39 and 37 over Fork of Cathey's Creek. The Santee
chub (Cyprinella zanema), a state listed significantly rare fish species, occurs both
upstream and downstream of the project. An in-stream work moratorium to protect
smallmouth bass and redbreast sunfish, from May 1 to July 15, is most appropriate for
this project.
6. B-2988, Haywood Co., Bridge No. 13 over the East Fork of the Pigeon River. The East
Fork of the Pigeon River is classified as WS-III Tr in the project area and rainbow and
brown trout are present. Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana), a federal and
state listed endangered mussel species and the olive darter (Percina squamata), a state
listed special concern fish species, are present in the Pigeon River downstream of the
East Fork Pigeon River confluence. An in-stream and 25-foot buffer work moratorium
from October 15 to April 15 should apply. Special precautions should be taken to
prevent sedimentation downstream.
7. B-4144, Haywood Co., Bridge No. Zl 1 over Richland Creek. Trout are present in
Richland Creek, class B waters, which joins the Pigeon River not far downstream of the
project site. Longear sunfish (Lepomis megalotis), a state significantly rare fish species,
has been observed in Richland Creek upstream of the project. An in-stream and 25-foot
buffer work moratorium from October 15 to April 15 should apply.

' Bridge Scopings Page 5 March 21, 2003
' 8. B-4291, Transylvania Co., Bridge No. 193 over the Davidson River. Rainbow and brown
trout are present in the project area of Davidson River, class C waters, which joins the
French Broad River not far downstream of the project site. The creeper (Strophitus
undulatus), a state listed threatened mussel species, is present in the French Broad River
immediately downstream of the confluence of the Davidson River. Two amphibian
species, the common mudpuppy (necturus maculosus), state special concern, and the
hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis), federal species of concern and state special
concern, have been found in the Davidson River upstream of the project site. An in-
stream and 25-foot buffer work moratorium from October 15 to April 15 should apply.
Special precautions should be taken to prevent sedimentation downstream. In addition, a
public access area should be incorporated into the plans for this project.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
cc: Cynthia Van Der Wiele, DWQ
Marella Buncick, USFWS
Sarah Kopplin, NHP

HISTORIC ARCHITECTURESFCTION
North Carolina Department oJTransportation
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Wadsworth, Project Planning Engineer
FROM: Richard Silverman, Office of Human Environment
SUBJECT: B-~114~, Haywood County
DATE: August 11, 2003
CC: Project File
Attached is a signed concurrence form which states that NCDOT and SHPO, agree that:
^ There are properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effects, but based on
the historical information available and the photographs of each property, none is considered
eligible for the National Register and no further evaluation of them is necessary.
^ There are no National Register-listed properties within the project's area of potential effects.
^ The bridge itself is not eligible for the National Register.
Since there are no historical properties affected by the proposed project, compliance with Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act is complete. Please notify us in writing if the scope of this project
changes. A change in scope may necessitate a new survey of the APE.

.,
Federal Aid # B:RZ-1+19(2) TIP# B-4144 County: H.avwood
~• CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 211 on SR 1519, Haywood County
On July 8, 2003 representatives ofthe
® North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
® Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
® North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
^ Other
Reviewed the subject project at
^ Scoping meeting
® Historic architectural resources photograph review session/consultation
^ Other
All parties present agreed
^ There are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effects.
® There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G within the
project's area of potential effects.
® _ There are properties over fifty years old within the project's Area of Potential Effects (APE), but based on the
historical information available and the photographs of each property, the property/ies identified as # 1 - Bridge No.
211: #2 -House is/are considered not eligible for the National Register and no further evaluation of it/them is/are
necessary.
® There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of potential effects.
® All properties greater than 50 years of age located in the APE have been considered at this consultation, and based
upon the above concurrence, all compliance for historic architecture with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project
® There are no historic properties affected by this project. (Attach.any notes or documents as needed)
[Richland Mill outside of A.P.E.J
Signed:
. g`.T c~
epresentative, NCDOT Date
I~ ~!~ ~ ~
FHWA, fo the Division dministrator, or o Federal Agency ate
--._.1 d
Representative, HPO Date
~.~ /G ~
State Historic Preservation Officer Date
if a survey report is prepan:d, a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included.

~•
~ .r ,~
'oa..~•
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David 4 S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
t.isbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
Office of Archives and History
January 29, 2002
MEMORANDUM
Division of Historical Resources
David 1.Olson, Director
TO: William D. Gilmore, Ivfanager
NCDOT, Division of Highways
FROM: David Brook z/ ~,~
SUBJECT: Replace Bridge 21 on SR 1519, Haywood County, ER 02-8513 ~~ ~~~'
Thank you for your letter of September 25, 2001, regarding the above project The proposed undertaking is at
or in close proximity to preciously recorded archaeological sites 31HW65 and 31HW10.
We recommend that a comprehensive survey be conducted by an archaeologist to identify and evaluate the
significance of archaeological remains that may be damaged or destroyed by the project Potential effects on
unknown resources must be assessed prior to the initiation of construction activities.
Two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as well as one copy of the appropriate site forms,
should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as they are available and well in advance of any
construction activities.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at w~~~v.arch.dcr.state.nc.us/consults. The archaeologists listed, or any other archaeologist,
may be contacted to: conduct the recommended survey.
We have conducted a search of our maps and files and have located the following structures of historical or
architectural importance within the general area of the project:
Richland Mill, north side of SR 1519, just east of NC 209
An architectural historian for the Department of Transportation should inventory and evaluate this property
and any others, that are fifty years old or older and located within the area of potential effect
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of National Historic Preservation Act and Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, ~ -

contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. in all future _
.
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number. ~~
cc: Mary Pope Furr
NCDO ~":
t=:
, ,
Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT _ ~ :-.~-~t~
.tf« J~.n~Ji
iF
^ ~.
.
Location Mailing Addreu Tdep6oodFu -
~
Administntion 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699~d617 [phone] •733-8653 ~w~
Restontbn 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh , NC 4613 Mail Smice Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801 =`'~'
~_.
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699618 [phone] •715-4801

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
Division of Historical Resources
David J. Olson, Director
October 17, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation fi
FROM: David Brook ~= 1-
SUBJECT: Bridge No. 211 on SR 1519, TTP B-4144, Haywood County, ER 02-8513
Thank you for pour letter of September 17, 2003, transmitting the archaeological survey report by
Paul Mohler for the above project
During the course of the survey, one site was located within the project area. Mr. Mohler has
recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this
project We concur with this recommendation since the project will not involve significant
archaeological resources.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106
codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-
4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking
number.
~cc: Paul Mohler, NCDOT
www.huo.dcr.state.nc.us
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] •733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh NC 4613 Mail 5avice Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4613 (9I9) 733-6547 •715-4801
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh NC 4618 Mail Service Crntcr, Raleigh NC 27699618 [phone] •715801

~E~.OCATt4N REPORT
~ ~ ~ 0
Farms 0 `.:VALUE OF a4YELLtNG
_ ` DSS DIAfE
0
0 0 Owners Ten
t

Non-Proftt 0 an
s For Sale
0 0 0
ANSWER ALL
l
UE o-2oM 0 i o-~50 0 ~ o-2oM
:
1
STIQNS
Yes No Explain a/! "YES' answers 20~OM 0 150-250 0 20-40i~1
,

x • 1. Will special relocation servi
b 40-70M
0
25000
0
4o-7oa
ces
e necessary?
x 2
Will schools o
h
h 7o-10oM 0 40o•soo 0 70-1ooiN

.
r c
urc
es be affected by
~:
_ displacement?
X 3. Will business services still be available after
100 ur
TOTAL
0
600 uP 0

~ ~
REIkAAQIft ~OOQn
100 uP

`
e~f~fA ~.-. ~.

..:r:]
project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
_ indicate size, type, estimated number of
_ "' ._~ ..;: employees, minorities, etc.
x 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
-_- - ~ ~t1~:~ 6. Source for available housing (list).
na 7. Will additional housing programs be needed?
na 8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
na 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
= '.~'~~ ~~ families?
na 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
na 11. Is public housing available?
na 12.
- Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
available during relocation period?
na . 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
_ = financial means?
na 14. Are suitable business sites available (lisii
-- ~ source).
_ - - 15.
_ ~. s . Number months estimated to complete
' !'~ ~ _ - RELOCATION? 0 Months ,--;
.._ .,,::
,LflJG AVIULABLE.: . :.
For R ent
0 S o-~so p
p 150,250 p
p 260~0o p
0 400~0o p
0 soo uP p
This project was inspected and no displacees appear to be
involved. Therefore it is considered a negative study.
.5 ~/° U
Rel n A ent Date
Forth 15.4 Revised d
S ~~o-v3
Cf5-D -u,
Date
& 1 Copy: State Relocation
~ r.,,,,., e~ Qe~ti~,

~. REiOCATIOM REPORT- '

^X E.I.S. ~ CORRIDOR ~ DESIGN
North Carolina Deparhnent of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFIC.-
PROJECT: couNTY Ha od Alternate 2 of 2 Alternat
I.D. No.: 8-4144 F.A. PROJECT 8.2942601
DESCRIPTION of PROJECT: Replace Bridge No. 211 on SR 1519 Richland Creek Rd. Over Richland
Creek

:.: -- - -
ESTIMATI`© i3tSPLl~C~ES ~ iNGOME LI_VEL

Type of - - -

(
-

l
~
-
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Businesses O O O O ; .VALUE of DtNF1LWG :: D$S:
-: DthIELUNG AVI41LA6LE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For S ale For R ent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2oM p s o-~so p o-2oM p S o-~so
aNS Au Qt~snaus ;
20~OM
p 150-2110
p
20~OM
p 150-250
'
Yes No Explain all "YES' answers. 40 70M p 260400 p 40 TOM p 25000 L-
x ~ 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 7o-100M p 400.600 p 70-1o0M p 40000

x 2. - --
Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP p 500 uP p 100 uP p 600 uP ~ ~

'' ~- - -
displacement? ~ TOTAL ~ - '.~~ ~ ~y~~ ~.~~ ~~ ~~..~ -
r.~,._._~...
x 3.
_:.
Will business services still be available after REMARKS ReS find b Numbed
__ .
~
P
K 1 ~ =
-
-
_
_ -
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so, This project was inspected and no displacees appear to be
indicate size, type, estimated number of involved. Therefore it is considered a negative study.
employees, minorities, etc.
x 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
~a'' 6. Source for available housing (list).
na 7. Will additional housing programs be needed?
na 8• Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
na 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
""- :::_;~'
- _. families?
na 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
na 11. Is public housing available?
na 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
- available during relocation period?
na 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
- ~~ ;~ financial means?
na 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
A
~.~_~~
Ra.ocAnoiu? 0 Months ~` "'
~'l,l,r~ 5-3~ -0 3
-- -- -
----- ------
_
~ ~ x~ r,Gng ',
~.~cC~~'
~ 6
elocation A ant Date = roved b Date
Form ~o~swsea o~ a Original & f Copy: State Relocation Agent
7 l:nnv Onu Rnlrrat•inn f1/firo

Haywood County School
Rodney Bullock Telephone [phone]
Transportation Direcfor Fax 828~45G-2~2
Transportation Department
401 Farmview Drive
Waynesville, NC 28786
June 18, 2001
Mr. Davis Moore
NC Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environment Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Moore:
This letter is in reference to the Bridge Replacement Projects in Haywood County. I
would like to take this opportunity to explain the impact replacing this bridge would have
on our school bus transportation .
1. Bridge 329 on SR 1369 at Fox Run Road over Jonathan Creek (TIP 3854).
We have 2 school buses that crosses that bridge twice a day.
2. Bridge 211 on SR 1 ~ 19 over Richland Creek (TIP B-4144).
We have 2 buses that cross that bridgetwice a day.
3. Bridge 13 on SR 1890 over East Fork Pigeon River (TIP B-2988).
We have 1 bus that crosses that bridge twice a day.
If these bridges are closed to traffic the parents would have to bring their children to a
designated bus stop. This would cause a tremendous inconvenience for the parents to be
at a bus stop at approximately 7:15 a.m. in the morning and 3:45 p.m. in the afternoon.
Please consider doing this bridge project during the months of June through August
when school is out for the summer.
Si~tcerely, -
~Rodne ullock
Transportation Director

rR ~ y •
To: Davis Moore, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
s
From: Greg Shuping, Haywood County Emergency Services Director
RE: The proposed project to replace Bridge No. 211 on SR 1519
I have naceived your letter in reference to the Bridge Project on Richland Cn~ek. In review of the traffic
in that area and alternative routes I believe we could easily accommodate the traffic problems that will
arise during this project. Thank You for contacting us prior to beginning! If you have any questions,
please feel free to contact me at the numbers below.
Sincerely,
C
G uprn
Office: 828-4
Pager. 8281125-0022
Fax [phone]

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
r~ ~
'roject Name B-4144 River Basin French Broad River County Haywood Evaluator DNW
~WQ Prj Nearest

~urrtber
Stream Richland Creek Latitude Signature ~
date 10/9/2003 QUAD Clyde, NC Longitude Location n ge no. I 1 on
e.,,, ,,,.,,._ .... .... ....._ ,._ ,.,._.,.. , .... SR 1519
_ _- _-.___ ...._. __e. __ ..._...._,,,,„.,. „ ,., „ ,,,u.,-,,.....c uss,,r,, r,rcrr u.>c ~~ uru ~urirs rs nog necessary. Ruo, 7l m me nest projess7ona[
udgemenl of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used'
... .
111~1![~! "1'IGILL 111LL1~.dlV1 J - ,•%- ~" 7~ `'"r 4 ~ J-~
.: .. .... .:. :. •..~ ~ .a...:' ~... Y f A_},., •~~L.'~' ~h..l.:,f~
I. Geomor holo Absent Weak Moderate Stron Score
1) Is There ARiffle-Poo] Se uence?
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed Different From Surrounding
Terrain? 0
0 1
I 2
2 3 ,
3 S'
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4 Is The Channel Sinuous?
5 Is There An Active Or Relic) Flood lain Present? 0
0 1
1 2
2 3 ~,:.,

3 ~ ~• " ~ ' •
6) Is The Channel Braided?
7) Are Recent Alluvial D osits Present? 0 1 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3 ~
~~~"~

9 Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present?
0
1
2 .
. ,
3
(°IVOFE;~ Beddc:BdiaECduaedB'"~Uchtn ",lnd'WITHOUT'Siriuos .37ier%Se"ort~0.~): ;,"•.~' r_ '~`~; ~,;~, s ,,. .~. ~~ ,c,

10) Is A 2 Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated On Topo Map yes 3 No
And/Or In Field Present? ,,e .,.a,, ;a,, ~x'h~;;
v _r ....a .,,...i
0
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS
II. H drolo Absent Weak Moderate 5tron
1) Is There A Groundwater F]ow/Discharge Present? 0 1 2 3 ':~-.
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: ~:
III. Biolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
I) Are Fibrous Roots Present l.n Streambed? 3 2 1 0 -'
2 Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3 IS Peri h on Present? 0 1 2 3 '~"'
4) Are iva ves resent. 0 1 2 3 -
PRIMARYBIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
SPCtinda ~Field..Iridicators:> iYVr EA^ K .~ ~-f AY N § ~NJ 1!. ~~ s.-d Try. , t~ ~ i5• 3•y ~}(w~ S~,~yT' ~n ,'-3°`y!,~y^~y4 ~ y ~. Y ~-C`(i.~
/+.[_.j3 :-.~:.'5.,- -[~r.k'. ~:.'FVY.~ 7~~~. I~+r f_P_~n ,i:...~. ~~~~•`^~.'9k _D.
f+~s~YCr~1L'.,e
I. Geomo holo Absent Weak Moderate .
Stron
1 Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 O.i 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0.5 1 1.5
3) Does To gra by Indicate A Natural Draina a Way? 0 0.5 1 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOCYINDICATOR POINTS:
II. H drolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1 Is This Year's Or Last's Leaflitter Present In Streambed? 1.5 1 O.S 0
2) Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present? ~ 0 0.5 ] 1.3
3 Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 I 1.5

4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since Last Known Rain? (•NOTE:
If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #S Below*)
0
0.5
1 _
I.5
S) Is Them: Water In Channel During Dry Conditions Or In Growing
Season ? 0 0.5 1 l.5
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut ? Yes 1 S No 0 '^5
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
III. Biolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
I) Are Fish Present? 0 0.5 l I.5

2 Are Am hibians Present?
0
0.5
1 _ _
1.5

3 Are A vatic Turtles Present?
0
0.5
1 _
1.5
.
4 Are Cra tsh Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5 """"
S) Arc Macrobenthos Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizin Bacteria/Fun Present? 0 0.5 1 I .S '
'~
7) Is Filamentous AI ae Present? 0 0.5 1 IS ~ •.
8) Are Weiland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly
FACU/UPL
2 i 0.75 0.5
:~'rvor~:~~ro-airi~~:~4n,~tarurnse„~ma~.w~xor~~iao,~:,F;r~y:r~asst~.~ntr~ss~iyp„~•au; ~F,~,~rrl"F ~~,:....r ~. 0 '~
°. ~ ~.:.~.~ ~~
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
TOTAL POINTS (Primary+Secondarv) rea er an r qua o oln a eam s eas
Intermittent
53.25

USACE AIDS D~,i/Q >r Site R (indicate on attached map)
R
' ;,,,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET r~r ;., .
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: N~~o ~ 3-`i144 2. Evaluator's name: h)• W c~sk~
3. Date of evaluation: l o~oq ~0 3 4. Time of evaluation: `i : oo a~..~
5. Name of stream: ~i~~nl4.~.c1 Clcc)C.. 6. River basin: F~c.~.c.L~ t~ ~o~rl Qiyev
7. Approximate drainage area: Soo + ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 300 ~
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
8. Stream order: 3 +
10. County:__ 1'~'K"1~ood
12, Subdivision name (if any): tv /t4
Latitude (cx. 34.872312): 3 S SS o o Longitude (ex. -77.556611):. ~ 1 .9 33 3
Method location determined (circle): GPS To Sh ,Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
13 ~ ; d ~ c rw . 2I 1 0,~ SiL I S 15 r S o•1• =h~-t..r s ~~1-c yy
14. Proposed channel. work (if any):- pri dy ~ r e~Cgc.e.+ntiw"-t
15. Recent weather conditions: OverCr..i •~, olr+itl.e
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Dvircc~s~- drtzzl~
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 • -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? [~ NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: t_.o.kc ~i.cha~~.~ska
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? . 'E NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? 'ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 40 % Residential ~% Commercial _% Industrial 30 % Agricultural
~5 % Forested _% Cleared /'I:ogged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 7s ~ 23. Bank:height (from bed to top of bank): ~ ~B ~
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ?C Flat (O to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends X Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each. characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description ~of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest),.the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in'
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

__ ~ .~
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

~J ., ~ ~ ~
~.~^~
a°
e=~
~~~ 6~
__.._ '.
^ ~~; - -..

~~ r.
~~
~'

<_
~,P.~,~
~ K ~+~
Y~-i` ''W ~ "1
V '.~
~.
Fk"N,
°:... ...abut

_ ~.