20220829 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220617

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
5/16/2022
BIMS # Assigned *
20220829
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
® $240.00
0 $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
la. Name of project:
Peach Orchard Subdivision
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
6/17/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Cedar Creek
Basin
Tar -Pamlico
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
..........................................................................
Latitude:
36.0516
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-78.4048
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Franklin
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
O Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0Yes ®No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Op Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
0Yes ONo
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
0 Owner 22 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Lumpkin and Lumpkin LLC/River Pointe, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 1257, PG 974
2c. Contact Person:
David Williams
2d. Address
Street Address
P.O. Box 1855
Address Line 2
City
Wake Forest
Postal / Zip Code
27588
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
David Williams
3b. Business Name:
Lumpkin and Lumpkin LLC/River Pointe, LLC
3c. Address
Street Address
P.O. Box 1855
Address Line 2
City
Wake Forest
Postal / Zip Code
27588
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Nikki Thomson
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Peach Orchard Subdivision
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Louisburg
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
1873-58-8261
2b. Property size:
45.82

2c. Project Address
Street Address
Peach Orchard Road
Address Line 2
City
Louisburg
Postal / Zip Code
27549
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Cedar Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C:NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar -Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030201010401
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The Site is comprised of a single parcel (originally two parcels that were recombined). The Site is undeveloped and primarily used for agricultural. The drainages on the property are
comprised of mature pines and hardwoods. The topography of the Site ranges from a high point of +/- 380 feet above mean sea level (msl) on the westem property boundary of the Site, to
a low point of +/- 330 feet msl in the northern portion where the drainage exits the Site (see attached Figure 3). Surrounding area land use is a mix of agricultural lands, woodlands, and
scattered residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes O No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
648 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential development to help meet the housing need in the area.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The project is to construct a residential subdivision with necessary internal roads. There is one stream crossing to access the
useable upland portions of the property. Streams are not crossed multiple times by roads. The remaining jurisdictional resources on the Site are avoided. Utilities for the proposed project
will connect to existing utility lines adjacent to the Site. Heavy equipment typically used for residential construction (e.g. backhoes, bulldozers, etc.) will be utilized.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
,)Yes ONo
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
0 Preliminary 0 Approved ,) Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-02721 (PJD requested but not yet issued)
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
6a. Is this a phased project?*
0 Yes O No
0 Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
O Wetlands
0 Open Waters
3. Stream Impacts
I✓'. Streams -tributaries
iJ Pond Construction
OO Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (7)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(7)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
si
Impact 1 Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream SA
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
124
(linear feet)
S2
Impact 1 Road Crossing
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Stream SA
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
6
(linear feet)
S3
Impact 1 Road Crossing
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream SA
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
14
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
130
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
144
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
14
3j. Comments:
Stream SA bisects the majority of the property and therefore, necessitates the need for the single road crossing. Of the 144 LF of stream impact, 124 LF
is associated with the culvert and channel realignment at the outlet. The remaining impacts are for a countersunk rip rap outlet dissipator pad
(permanent impact, but not permanent loss) and the temporary impacts necessary for diking the channel to conduct the culvert installation in the dry.
The temporary dewatering of the channel will be done concurrently with the culvert installation.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
O Neuse
O Catawba
0 Goose Creek
O Other
Tar -Pamlico
0 Randleman
0 Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Impact 1 - Road Crossing
P
Stream SA
No
6,228
2,862
Impact 1 - Road Crossing
T
Stream SA
No
1,834
1,372
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Zone 1
1,834.00
Zone 1
6,228.00
Zone 1
Total combined buffer impacts: 8,062.00
Zone 2
1,372.00
Zone 2
2,862.00
Zone 2
4,234.00
6i. Comments:
Per the Tar -Pamlico riparian buffer rules, Table of Uses [15A NCAC 026.0734 (11)] perpendicular road crossings which impact less than 1/3rd acre of
riparian buffer impact are "Allowable upon Authorization".
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization

la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
There is one pond and two streams on the property, one of which mostly bisects the Site. There is only one, intermittent stream crossing proposed to
access the useable upland portions of the property. Streams are not crossed multiple times by roads. All other jurisdictional features on the Site have
been avoided. Lots were positioned to avoid additional fill and/or impact to streams. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor
and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from stormwater runoff.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing
and sediment basins will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into stream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes O No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Total impacts to streams and riparian buffers are below typical mitigation thresholds.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes O No
What type of SCM are you providing?
111 Level Spreader
O Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
O Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes •; No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
•' Yes 0No
Comments:
A preliminary stormwater application has been submitted to the County for the proposed development, but the subdivision is exempt from stormwater requirements. The development is
within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin and does not propose to increase the impervious surface to 15% of the total site area and therefore, no peak flow attenuation requirements between
pre -development and post -development are needed. The nutrient loading for the proposed land cover does not exceed the loading goals for the Tar -Pamlico River Basin and therefore, no
BMPs are required.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes O No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes •) No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
O Yes O No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Per the NC DWQ April 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale residential development projects have a "low potential for cumulative
impact" since the project already in a developed landscape (i.e. existing residences and development in the vicinity) and the area already contains the
necessary infrastructure (i.e. electricity, etc.). The project drains to Cedar Creek, which is Class C; Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW), (i.e. not HQW or
ORW). We anticipate the NCDWR will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
® Yes 0 No 0 N/A

4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Individual onsite septic systems.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
O Yes O No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes O No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
O Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0Yes ®No
O No 0 Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0 Yes ® No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
OYes 0No
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0Yes ONo
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
No federally threatened or endangered species are listed to occur within 1 mile of the Project according to the NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
Database (see attached report dated June 17, 2022). The proposed stream impacts will occur on an intermittent stream which does not contain suitable
habitat for federally listed threatened or endangered species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
0 Yes e± No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The proposed project is in Franklin County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat which would support EFH (i.e., salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
OYes *No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The Site itself is not listed as a historic property. There are ten historic properties located within 1.0 mile of the Site based on a query of the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO) database however none are adjacent to the Site. Seven are listed as "Surveyed Only", two are
listed as "Study List Property" and one is listed as "National Register Property". Figure 4 depicts the locations of these properties in relation to the Site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes 1!i No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA online FIRM maps Panel No. 3720186200J, effective 1/16/2004
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or dreg and drop files here to attach document
Peach Orchard Subdivision Supplemental Application Documents; Sage Project No. 2021.146.pdf 8.2MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature U
i By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:

• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Nicole J. Thomson
Signature
Date
6/17/2022

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
E5
.21116
June 17, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regulatory Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. April Norton Attn: Ms. Colleen Cohn
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105 512 N. Salisbury St.
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Peach Orchard Subdivision
Request for NWP 29, GC 4256 Authorization & Riparian Buffer Authorization
Sage Project #2021.146
On behalf of Mr. David Williams and Lumpkin and Lumpkin LLC/River Pointe, LLC (owner), please find attached
a complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) that the activities associated with the proposed development of the Peach Orchard
Subdivision (Project) may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 and General Certification 4256 (GC 4256).
Project Purpose and Location
The Project includes the construction of a single-family residential subdivision proposed to meet demand for
housing in the area. The +/- 68-acre Site is located on Peach Orchard Road approximately 4-miles south of the
intersection of Peach Orchard Road and NC Highway 56 in Louisburg, Franklin County, NC. The coordinates of
36.0516°N, 78.4048°W generally correspond to the center of the Site.
Project Detail
The proposed Project consists of the construction of a residential development with associated utilities and roads.
Homes will be on individual septic systems and shared wells.
Access to the Site will be provided via Peach Orchard Road to the south. Heavy equipment typically used for
development projects (e.g., backhoes, bulldozers, etc.) will be utilized.
No federally threatened or endangered species are listed to occur on or within 1 mile of the Site according to the
NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Database. (see attached report dated June 17, 2022). The proposed
stream impacts will occur on an intermittent stream which does not contain suitable habitat for federally listed
threatened or endangered species.
The Site itself is not listed as a historic property. There are ten historic properties located within 1.0 mile of the
Site based on a query of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO) database however
none of these are adjacent to the Site. Seven are listed as "Surveyed Only", two are listed as "Study List Property"
and one is listed as "National Register Property". Figure 4 depicts the locations of these properties in relation to
the Site.
Project History
The Site is comprised of a single parcel (originally two parcels that were recombined). The Site is undeveloped
and primarily used for agricultural. The drainages on the property are comprised of mature pines and hardwoods.
The topography of the Site ranges from a high point of +/- 380 feet above mean sea level (msl) on the western
property boundary of the Site, to a low point of +/- 330 feet msl in the northern portion where the drainage exits
the Site (see attached Figure 3). Surrounding area land use is a mix of agricultural lands, woodlands, and
scattered residential.
Peach Orchard Subdivision Page 1 of 2

Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed stream crossing is aligned to cross the channel as perpendicularly as possible. Streams are not
crossed multiple times by roads. Lots were positioned to avoid additional fill in wetlands and streams.
Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional
impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from stormwater runoff. General techniques
include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional
impacts. Silt fencing and sediment basins will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream and wetland
areas.
Protect Impacts
Impact 1 is a proposed road crossing and will result in 124 linear feet (0.0085 ac) of permanent stream impact
associated with a culvert, 6 linear feet (0.0011 ace) of countersunk rip rap pad and 14 linear feet (0.0009 acre)
of temporary impact. Permanent riparian buffer impacts total 6,228 square feet in Zone 1 and 2,862 square feet
in Zone 2. Temporary riparian buffer impacts total 1,834 square feet in Zone 1 and 1,372 square feet in Zone 2.
No other impacts are proposed.
Mitigation
Proposed stream and riparian buffer impacts are below typical mitigation thresholds. Proposed Buffer impacts
are considered "Allowable Upon Authorization" per the Table of Uses.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Respectfully submitted:
can Clark a4t
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 - USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — Wetland Sketch Map
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
NCNHP Database Report
IPaC report
Impact Maps
USACE ORM Spreadsheet
DWR Buffer Determination Letter TPBRRO #21-426
PreFiling email
Nicole J. Thomson, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Peach Orchard Subdivision Page 2 of 2

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST. 2016
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Representative
Name: David Williams - Lumpkin and Lumpkin LLC/River Pointe, LLC
Address: P.O. Box 1855
Wake Forest, NC 27588
Phone: [phone]
Email: david(a)focusdesignbuilders.com
Project Name/Description: Peach Orchard Road
Sage Project # 2021.146
Date: 12-6-21
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
P.O. BOX 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Wilmington District
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site.
BY: David Williams
Print Name of Landowner or
Legal Representative
BY: l�
Signature of Landowner or
Legal Representative

Map Location
Vance Warren
Halifax
Granville
Franklin
Nash
Wake
Wilson
Feature A
aProject Study Area
USGS Topo Map Figure 1
Peach Orchard Road
Sage Project # 2021.146
N
Franklinton, NC Quadrangle
USGS Topo Mapserver 2021
Map Generated by K. Hamlin
June 17, 2022 Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
0 500 1,000 Cell:919-559-1537
Feet

� r
IR
+� r
rip WQ
105
•� Vim +r f� ? f � � .. ' i" ��
..�
1 S *r
10a
Feature C
+� # Pond 1 woo
Feature Z ' y
�fIP�C w •
1114
Lql
Feature A
f4 .
7.
T
WWI
Jr. T'• 'li
op" y -
' a Project Study Area
Map Location
Vance Warren
Halifax
Granville
Franklin
Nash
Wake
Wilson
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Peach Orchard Road
Sage Project # 2021.146
N
Franklin County Soil Survey, 2004
Sheet #9 (Franklinton)
Map Generated by K. Hamlin
June 17, 2022
0 500 1,000
Feet
Figure 2
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

`-: -. °a' `•.., �;� NOTE: Features de icted herein must be
�;? ; ,� �_ ) -- field verified by the USAGE and /or
a .'� f ` / ti *� .: — NCDWR, or its delegated authority
.�� � I � y!�r'���'�/� k � �11� � _ before being valid. Location, shape and
size of depicted features on the
vo\4\\ � :t57\\),,,,;\\:\,; e evaluated site are approximate and
,,----. should be surveyed by a licensed NC
,. ,.., ,,,,,i‘. - `' \ .,?/„..-..., i, ii
,,„::,„:„,97/ ", , 6/ti> i /7 ,/,.,,,27,, - \ � surveyor for final site planning.
4
,\ '',,;,1,,... i I( /a -, , I . , , „ ..., _. , „ ....
y11 i /./ /7 /(.......,\/(1L---_,,,-"-------\\.1"\.11:4((r--„,.--"/„/ , ‘ ( \\ul ki,&.,,,ow , .„,_,,
( \\ 4-..'''''''..... — 1 ii$4,. r..___ ,-__ - . _ f.7---- - ----_—,c---
N.____
-...•_,3 '41... ;..,, :,..1u,i'7",7,:' ', , r ' '1'4''''
,. - u fjl 'el
\\\ :,:., ,„,. ',4, ,,‘,:6,4,,t,tj R.,.. ..'';',' '4' 4-ii'.."
4' i:ltri•tii „s;','". ' -' '''' :1 li, , ,'',,', ,,e,J., f,- '.
, ) ' _ „_ ' " - Aft
R'
, iri-2), ' ' < ,A /g
Po nd y�.... -1 f-- --1.--- "
^
'
1 ...- - iiiiikis7
se
_/�
Ripari�a - �SA•1001 4� xaf%e
/7 ' � J i'ell �IN /
i0-' g
t J
, — oPmlecl
a ,�x•0009
l
ie � �'„ � 4 � - ®Wetland-Juns�chonal Waters of the US
.. - y .y.
,,. � a. i � Pon6-Junseiclional Walersof Ore US,buffered
I :TsarR Rp R flerit f f ty RerR'"` ', /','f: " � I � i l
-),\
fi, Y • USAGE Data Point Location
. '' , /A
�' s, '� a �v . NGOWR Sl am Form Local on
k1F ,
Map Location Wetland Sketch Map Figure 3
WARREN Peach Orchard Road
VANCE HALIFAX Sage Project# 2021.146 �
GRANVILLE Map Generated by P. Beach N SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
FRANKLIN November 4, 2021 SERVICES
ESEST. 2016
DURHAM NASH
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
WAKE EDGECOMBE
0 250 500 Office: 919-335-6757
Feet
N—
WILSON Cell: 919-559-1537
JOHNSTO

er,aarorv; .
xi
0
Thomlinson House
FK0836
Perry-Mitchiner House
FK0436 \
Rock Pr
qC
o
O
� Vloi� Ln
m
g
n
n C°Ca•A � n
arsf {n Pia
rad °
n�a9a�"�S House (Gone)
FK0369
Herbert Landis Preddy House
^sbo��o FK0832
0
c _
Harris -Frazier House a
z FK0831 �� �pruinz WA, � 3
oMe Or
_ s
G `t,
Winston House
FK0474
House
FK0994
vy�
�Qo
>r�
r
Q� Tvr­ nr
IV142P LVGQIIVII
Vance Warren
Halifax
Granville
Franklin
Viyr7CC-�
Nash
VUlson
r RR
Wiggins Rd
NC SHPO Map
Peach Orchard Road
Sage Project # 2021.146
N
Data Source: NCSHPO GIS Shapefiles
Downloaded: May 2022
hftps://www.ncdcr.gov
Map Generated by K. Hamlin
June 17, 2022
0 2,000 4,000
Feet
\1
House
FK0837
Cooke House
�a FK0003
jy Y
P`V �
Amy xi �'� Shemuel Kearney House
°y� (Curre qt site)
�Ra FK0810
rmberfaf`Q RLf
aProject Study Area
a1-Mile Project Buffer
O National Register Property
Study List Property
O Surveyed Only Property
0 Surveyed Only Property - Gone
Figure 4
log
Sage Ecological Services, Inc
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
June 17. 2022
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Peach Orchard Rd Property; 2021.146
Dear Kim Hamlin:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
IR \�70IdDTMN A
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

CO
e
s 2
s
s
3
/
/
Z
Z
CO/
\
�
t
eCO
3 /
CO e
9
/
%
g/
%
E
s
/
«
0
cn
\ \
\
2
s CO
/ s
E
\
\
x
E
%
0
\
\
/ 0
CO/
e a
y
\ a
y
4
6
\
(
\
/
a
O
u
-0o /
3 u
O
e=s »
e®&\/
\ / \ \ ƒ
\
x26&®
g
CO w\
e%
%
e
\/\\/
\\\\\
\
\
0 /
\
\
COLn
/
u
\
0
-uc
$
\ ®
c
e
2
3
»
»
2
CO
Z
e
0 E
0
0
2
\
§ /
0
©
0
©
e
/
/
_
?
?
/
\
2 0
3
3
x
» »
%
%
D-
u
E
\ /
CO
\
D-
/
\
0
/
./
ƒ
ƒ
H
s e
0
0
\
\ (
/
/
\
\
(D U
/
/
U /
e
y y
a
a
0 g
2
my
\
\
o
/
E.±
CO
CO
E \
_
Fj
/ U-)
/ \
CO
)
o
a
g
o
y
a
y
\ H
\
\
\
\
m
m \
E
\ ( D-
co E \
co E
\ n
/ \ \
\ \
\
\ \ CO
a
CO
4
\
�
\
0
\
CO
E
§
/
CO
\
ƒ
\
\
E
0
0
CO
\
\
\
\
0
§
\
c

a
CL
0
L-
a_
_0
Ld_
L
U
L-
0
U
m
Q)
n
N
C'7
co
r
i
w
Z
U
Z
PC N
d
�Land4ilV Rd
Ln
0
4 y 00
l
�O CV
eye
o
0 4�A
a
a
S`mnerlan �i
P�
Hobs°n
as
a
c.,sso13 s.S e yV
cn
5
arcl
w C
Q� m
4 m
7 �
ru d
"p C
Q � 7
O
co
W
OIm
m
�p D
r
M
O
M
N
a

INC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/FJBN5DYRXRDZRC2MRQ...
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust
resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project
area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project
may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -
specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the
defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS
Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Franklin County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Servicesr
o
[phone]-
l(
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
1 of 8 6/17/2022, 9:50 AM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/FJBN5DYRXRDZRC2MRQ...
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence
(AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected
by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may
indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can
change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects
to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species
which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted,
permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement
can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or
from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official speci
list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species! and their critical habitats are managed by the Eco o ical Services Program of the U. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries?).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 14
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or
proposed, for listing. See the Listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Amphi
NAME STATUS
Neuse River erdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME
STATUS
2 of 8 6/17/2022, 9:50 AM

INC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/FJBN5DYRXRDZRC2MRQ...
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
hops://ecos.fws.goy/e_CpLspeci es/784
Tar River Spinymussel Parvaspina steinstansana
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/speci es/1392
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Endangered
Endangered
Threatened
of
STATUS
ate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
}fps://ecos.fws.gov/ec p15p e ci es/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxiiApEbLa Endangered
Wherever found -.00
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gc)v/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATIOP
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird TreatyAct! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats
should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov//program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-
3 of 8 6/17/2022, 9:50 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/FJBN5DYRXRDZRC2MRQ...
incidental -take -migratory -birds
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-
conservation-measures.p-lf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and
how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every
bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds
in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data map iinng tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on
your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and
abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important
information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory
birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to
be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON (IF A BREEDING SEASON
IS INDICATED FOR BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA
SOMETIME WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME
SPECIFIED WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH THE
BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT THE
BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA.)
...
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because
of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Nftw-1
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska
Wood Thrus ylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This
information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you
read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular
week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and
4 of 8 6/17/2022, 9:50 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/FJBN5DYRXRDZRC2MRQ...
the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability
of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of
any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values
fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no
yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the
10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—) X4
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is
areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since d in tVse areas is currently much
more sparse.
SPECIES JAN
Bald Eagle "'�
Non -BCC Vulnerable (This
is not a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention
because ofthe Eagle Act
or for potential
susceptibilities in
offshore areas from
certain types of
development or
activities.)
Prairie Warbler,
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a%ird of
Conservation Concer
(BCC) throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Prothonotary Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
FEB MAR APR MAY
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
JUN UL AUG
V A IIII IIII
+--- -++- - - - - --+- III IIII IIII IIII
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
SEP JJ OCT NOV DEC
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the
area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are
5 of 8 6/17/2022, 9:50 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/FJBN5DYRXRDZRC2MRQ...
most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable
depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC). and other species that may warrant special attention in
your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a
growing collection of survey, banding and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the
10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may
occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology. Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This
data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability
of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these
graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating oryear-roun , you may refer to the
following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the
Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird
does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the
bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the followingdistinctcategories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concerti (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including
Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for
eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy
development or longline fishing).
�r
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the
birds on this IisS„especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help
avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area
off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may
be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA
NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf
project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on
survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotae
studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your
list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the
migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort
(indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If
6 of 8 6/17/2022, 9:50 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/FJBN5DYRXRDZRC2MRQ...
the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar
means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying
what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might
be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures
to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit
the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird
trust resources page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources Sy em (CBRS) maybe subject to the restrictions on federal
expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). For more information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA Consultations website.
The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help determine whether consultation is required and a template to
facilitate the consultation process.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN COASTAL BARRIERS AT THIS LOCATIOI
Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted on the official CBRS maps. The boundaries
depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary (i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone" that
appears as a hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do not clearly intersect a unit, you
may contact the Service for an official determination by following the instructions here: httt s://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-'barrier-resources-system-
property-documentation
Data exclusions 4!
NXwe
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location of the unit). The true seaward extent of the
units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the offshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas
projects) may be subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Facilities } ��
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination'
conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATIOI`
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventoi
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or
other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We
recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
7 of 8 6/17/2022, 9:50 AM

INC: Explore Location resources
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/FJBN5DYRXRDZRC2MRQ...
FRESHWATER POND
Palustrine
RIVERINE
Riverine
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of
these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and
geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of
the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the
collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon
boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used
to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries
and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These
habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. J
Data precautions
-
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in
this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state,
or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning
specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
00,0 , 0\'
\%NO
8 of 8 6/17/2022, 9:50 AM

0z:
w o
o
w G 2
co
t w o a o z Y Y
o — O U Y >
2 ¢ Z z s z
U
w
a
s•,
p�oJ
Q
z
_N
m
oao�as oar
i
mom,
i
a3
&3
oo \\�
z z o d
�i a - m o�S
LwwwiwwwLLLwwwwao
III I
L III I
a ,
z
o w I
\\ m
�S-'74
�w -- -
o I 'I
--� "--
Ip� ______________
I
I___________I
I o�
n� j
oo
_ -_----___-__I
"I
�aSNo�9a3sodoad)
a�Gd.old
x
w arc
?zm
0 U N
� O
O _ U � o
FUo
< K
_w_
m
U

d' - Qzo
L1J o
ll.l
W
O Y >
w
a LL
V \o
e
m
m _
i__ — —
i
°w �
am m
a
m
9 M
a� i o� m,
a qM
As
° a _
'o ,g o o�
aJ �
o _ o oo v�
otie
\ � o
EE
a=
I m
n °
°
Ili o _ \
o
o
o � _ Kati
------
-��----
— —�o16091
o
o
Q-
o -
-00
= o -o
u) - o w
&_ - n o a
ml
�
�n�m
�oSFF
o
a�
o
=aaEE
a9

OMBIL Regulatory Module (ORM)
Project Upload Template
Version Date: 15-May-2022
The zip archive of upload template documents must first be downloaded and saved to
your local disk.
The template file(s) must then be extracted from the zip archive and also saved to your
local disk before using them.
If the template file is not first saved to your local disk, the data validation macros will
not function.
Please be aware: if older versions of Microsoft Office or Excel are utilized with this template, the user
may experience issues with the functionality and features of this template.
Reminder: When using copy/paste to transfer data from one template to another, you must not use the
regular paste functionality. This will cause formatting issues. Instead, use the "paste values"
functionality.
Change Log
15-May-2022 Current version
• Took off Red warning fill on waters name column on Impacts worksheet
• Added yellow fill warning to Name column on Impacts worksheet
25-Feb-22
• Added NWP 29 as a selectable NWP_ID
• Bypassed all 3rd Party Mitigation checks when Closure Method = "Denied without Prejudice"
30.1an-22
• At least one Mitigation-Permittee Responsible must exist when any Perm itSheet.Mitigation_Perm ittee_Responsib = "All"
• At least one Mit-PermitteeResp row AND at least one MB_ILF row must exist WHEN a Perm itSheet.Mitigation_Perm ittee_Responsib = "Some"
• At least one MitBank/ILF row must exist WHEN a Perm itSheet.Com pensatory_Mitigation_Regd = "YES"AND Perm itSheet.Mitigation_Perm ittee_Responsib = "None"
• Mit-PermitteeResp.Waters_Name must NOT exist WHEN a Perm itSheet.Corn pensatory_Mitigation_Regd ='YES"AND Perm itSheet.Mitigation_Perm ittee_Responsib = "None"
• MitBank/ILF row must NOT exist when a Perm itSheet.Corn pensatory_Mitigation_Regd ='YES" AND Perm itSheet.Mitigation_Perm ittee_Responsib = "All"
• MitigationSheet.Waters_Name must NOT exist when a Perm itSheet.Corn pensatory_Mitigation_Regd = "NO"
• When Perm itSheet.Com pensatory_Mitigation_Regd = "NO", Perm itSheet.Mitigation_Perm ittee_Responsib MUST be "None"
• Removed "Not verified by the Corps- 401 process only" from Closure Method list
24-Nov-21
• Workbook contains digitally signed data validation macros
17-Oct-21
• Ensure that the value in the Worksheet column on the Validation worksheet displays "Request Details" instead of "RGP_PGP" when Impact and Mitigation data exists but there is no Permit data.
• Makes waters name column header on the Rapanos_JD worksheet green.
• Change tooltip text on Waters name on Rapanos_JD worksheet.
• Throw message, "Finalize Not Specified for RGP_PGP sheet," if Finalize - YES.
• Do not throw message, "info required to finalize," if end date is blank on the RGP_PGP worksheet.
• If Load = YES and Finalize - YES on Request Details don't throw this message: "Finalize Not Specified for AgResources sheet."
• Throw message if Load = YES but no data exists on corresponding worksheet.
• Only compare waters names between (among) worksheets if Load = YES for both of them.
• If Load = YES but Finalize = NO (or is null), then throw user-friendly warning message asking user if they need to finalize or not.
• If Finalize = NO (or is null), then there is no need to verify that finalize fields are populated (function VerifyFinalizeFieldsPopulated) or throw a validation message.
• Remove "Date Permit Expires" from RGP_PGP worksheet and any references to it in the VBA code.
• Throw message reminding user to validate if they make a change(s).
• Change (correct) closure method value in dropdown on Rapanos_JD worksheet.
• Remove Critical_Habitat_lmpacted from NWP and RGP_PGP worksheets and references to it in VBA code.
• Fix logic that prompts user to enter in an action id.
12-Mar-21
• When Closure Method is "Not verified by the Corps- 401 process only", bypass validating:
Compensatory Mitigation Required
Impact must exist
Mitigation Must Exist
Issued By (only for RGP_PGP)
Worktype_1
Date Permit Expires (only for RGP_PGP)
Mitigation Permittee Responsible
WRDA 214 Funded Corps
C D_Date_App_Fi rst_Received
CD_Rcpt_Fed_Complete App
CD_Determ ined_Com plete_by_PM
Permit Name Number (for RGP_PGP)
NWP_ID (only for NWP)
Evaluation Checklist
All columns beginning with "EVALCKLST_"
• When Closure Method is "Denied Without Prejudice", bypass validating:
Impact must exist
Mitigation Must Exist
Issued By (only for RGP_PGP)
Worktype_1

Date Permit Expires (only for RGP_PGP)
Mitigation Permittee Responsible
• Removed "Oil _Gas _Ind" column (from NWP)
November 9, 2020
• Rapanos_JD Worksheet - Added two new JD Closure Methods to the Closure Method list of values
• NWP, RGP_PGP Worksheets- Removed "Provisional Verification" Closure Method from the list of values
23-Dec-2019 Version
• Removed TNWRPW from the Waters Type list on the Ref Help worksheet
28-Apr-2019 Version
• NWP and RGP_PGP Worksheets - Added validation: Begin_Date must be before CD_Rcpt_Fed_Complete _App, CD_Rcpt_Fed_Complete _App must be before End_Date
• Aq Resources Worksheet - If Aquatic Resources shapefile specified, Latitude / Longitude not required
• Request Details Worksheet -Added validation: If Impacts or Mit-PermitteResp and MitBank_IF Worksheets contain data, NWP data or RGP_PGP data or a Permit Action ID must be provided
• Request Details Worksheet -Added validation: a DA# must be provided
10-13-2018 Version
• NWP and RGP_PGP Worksheets- Replaced EVALCKLST_Historic_Properties column with EVALCKLST_5106_NHPA
• VBA Code -Added validation of new EVALCKLST_5106_NHPA list selections
• Finalize Worksheet - Replaced tab with new 'Request Details'. Made requisite VBA code changes to enforce entry of Load and Finalize columns
• Mitigation Worksheet -Added validation to ensure that the Proposed and Required amounts are entered.
19-Sep-2018 Current Version
• VBA Code - Corrected Validation VBA code throwing "Object variable or With block variable not set"
• Aq Resources worksheet - Removed Waters Type'TNWRPW' from the Waters Type dropdown menu.
22-May-18
• NWP worksheet - Added 'CD_Date_App_First_Received'
• PGP/RGP worksheet - Added 'CD_Date_App_First_Received'
11.1an-2018 Version
• NWP worksheet - Updated Closure Method column values
• RGP_PGP worksheet - Updated Closure Method column values and removed cascading dependency upon the Permit Type column
• Format worksheet - Consolidated the Closure_ Method_ NWP, Closure_Method_RGP, and Closure_Method_PGP columns into a single Closure_ Method_ GP column and updated the list of values
• Format worksheet - Updated the Closure_ Method_ JD column values
• VBA- Updated VerifyValues calls in ValidateNWPU and ValidateRGP_PGPQ to reference the new Closure_Method_GP list of values
30-OCT-2017 Version
• Mitigation worksheet -Added check to allow"0"s in Proposed_ Amount and Required_ Amount
20-APR-2017 Version
• Aq Resources worksheet - Limited list of Cowardin Code options to second and third tiers only
• Impacts worksheet - Added Length and Width columns for Initially Proposed, Proposed and Authorized
• Impacts worksheet - Removed Linear columns
• Impacts worksheet - Changed "Area" labels to "Amount"
• Impacts worksheet - Updated Amount Type to include Fill Volume and Removal Volume
• Impacts worksheet - Updated Amount_Units to include Cubic Yards (volume)
• Impacts worksheet -Added check to ensure Amount_ Units is specified ifAmount is provided
• Impacts worksheet -Added check to ensure either LengthAtVidth are provided OR Amount is provided but not both
• Impacts worksheet -Added check to ensure that if Length is provided, Width must also be provided (and vice versa)
• Impacts worksheet -Added check to ensure that if Amount Type is Volume, then Amount must be entered, not Length and Width
• Impacts worksheet -Added check to ensure that if a value is provided for any Stage (IP/P/A), then a value must be provided for all Stages
• Mit-PermitteeResp worksheet -Added Length and Width columns for Proposed and Required
• Mit-PermitteeResp worksheet - Removed linear columns
• Mit-PermitteeResp worksheet - Changed "Area" labels to "Amount"
• Mit-PermitteeResp worksheet -Added check to ensure Amount_Units is specified if Amount is provided
• Mit-PermitteeResp worksheet -Added check to ensure either LengthAtVidth are provided OR Amount is provided but not both
• Mit-PermitteeResp worksheet -Added check to ensure that if Length is provided, Width must also be provided (and vice versa)
• M it- Perm itteeResp worksheet - Added check to ensure that if a value is provided for either Proposed or Required, then a value must be provided for both Stages
• NWP worksheet - Updated NWP_ID list and associated Permit_ Authority list with the 2017 data
• NWP worksheet - Moved the Permit_ Authority column to the left of the NWP_ID column
• NWP worksheet -The NWP_ID values displayed are now dependent upon the selected Permit_ Authority value
02-JUN-2016 Version
• Mit-PermitteeResp worksheet - waters that exist on the Mit-PermitteeResp worksheet must also appear on either the NWP worksheet or on the PGP/RGP worksheet
• MitBank_ILF worksheet - waters that exist on the MitBank_ILF worksheet must also appear on either the NWP worksheet or on the PGP/RGP worksheet
• added a validation to check for garbage characters in the Waters Name column values of all worksheets
21-APR-2016 Version
• removed 100K blank rows of data from the Aquatic Resources worksheet of the Consolidated Rapanos template, reducing its size from 9M to 180K.
31-MAR-2016 Version
• added a Version worksheet
• General - removed the dropdowns from the header cells on all user input worksheets
• General - standardized user functionality across all user input worksheets
• Aq Resources worksheet - changed the format of columns I (Latitude) and J (Longitude) to be decimal formatted numers with 8 significant digits of precision
• Aq Resources worksheet - added a Validation check to ensure Amount > zero
• Aq Resources worksheet - add validation check requiring Water Type of Upland (Rapanos)/Dry Land (CWR) when Cowardin Code = U
• NWP worksheet - the Validation process will now verify whether Mitigations are present in the Mit-PermitteeResp or MitBank_ILF worksheets if cells in column S (Compensatory_ Mitigation_Regd) of the NWP worksheet are
set to a value of YES
• RGP_PGP worksheet - the Validation process will now verify whether Mitigations are present in the Mit-PermitteeResp or MitBank_ILF worksheets if cells in columns U (Compensatory_Mitigation_Regd) of the RGP_PGP
worksheet are set to a value of YES

PROJECT UPLOAD REQUEST DETAILS
DA #
So that the ORM team may accurately understand the requirements for this project upload, please provide the details of how the included data is to be loaded.
Specify clearly which data needs to be uploaded to ORM, and which is to be finalized. Provide Required Additional Information as described in the explanation below.
Load
I Finalize
Required Additional Information
Aquatic Resources
Loaded at District?
Impacts
Permit Action ID?
Mitigation-Permittee Responsible
Permit Action ID?
Mitigation Bank / ILF
Permit Action ID?
NWP
JD ID? Reasons for Delay?
Rapanos_JD
RGP / PGP
I JD ID? Reasons for Delay?
Required Additional Information explanation:
Loaded at District? For ARs lease indicate whether the data has been already loaded by the District Administrators.
Permit Action ID? When Impact and/or Mitigation are provided, but not loading a Permit, you must provide the ACTION ID of one unfinalized Permit to which the data is to be tied.
JD ID? For NWP or RGP/PGP: if the permit is to be tied to a JD, but the JD information is not included for upload, please provide the ID of the JD to which the uploaded permits should be
associated.
(The id can be viewed by hovering over the specific JD in the JD lists.) Also consider including the Begin and End dates for the JD.
Reasons For Delay? For NWP or RGP/PGP, if the Permit End Date is more than 60 days past the Date Received, then please specifiy the Delay Reason information. (Multiple Delay Reasons may
be provided.)
SHAPEFILE UPLOAD REQUEST DETAILS **
Specify the Filenames that contain geometry data for the ARs and/or Project Location to be loaded into ORM.
Filename(s) Notes
Aquatic Resources
Project Boundary
"The zip archive of upload template documents must first be downloaded and saved to your local disk.
The template file(s) must then be extracted from the zip archive and also saved to your local disk before using them.
If the template file is not first saved to your local disk, the data validation macros will not function.
Please be aware that the .shp, .shx, AV, and .prj files at a minimum must be received in order to be a complete submission.
or Aquatic Resources, ORM must receive both an AR worksheet and a shapefile in the submission.
In the Shapefile, each geometry must include an attribute for WatersName and each WatersName MUST be unique within and across all files.
Furthermore, there must be a one to one relationship between the WaterName in the AR Worksheet and the WatersName in the Shapefile.
When uploading Aquatic Resources via shapefile, the Latitude / Longitude in the Aq Resources worksheet is not required.
Project Boundary, the submitted file must contain only one Geometry.

SA NORTH CAROLINA R4 RIVERINE Linear 510 FOOT RP W 36.0507°N 78.4055°W Cedar Creek
SZ NORTH CAROLINA R4 RIVERINE Linear 138 FOOT RPW 36.0512°N 78.4026°W Cedar Creek
Pond NORTH CAROL INA L1OW LACUSTRINF Area 1.63 ACRE IMPNDMNT 36.0517°N 78.4036°W Cedar Creek

i:11:-Te'rZrar,
"t'grse'rrntnZuM'sel V%strl'I 'ZnsiJenl"fe°rT1'1"trr-1"=-1 De.. I
Acres 0 009 124 3 0 009
DischarL of fill material River/Stream NO Perrrenent Fill Area Acres fi 3 0 0004 fi 3 0 0004
Discharge of fill material River/Stream NO Tenor,' Fill Area Acres 14 3 0 001 14 3 0 001
Notes

DocuSign Envelope ID: 694F4B13-E6D0-4BC1-82DC-E2B787F37D03
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretory
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
River Pointe LLC
PO Box 1855
Wake Forest, NC 27588
dr' S7ATF a
k
�4 ouw+d�
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
January 12t', 2022
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
TPBRRO #21-426
Franklin Countv
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
❑ Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0714)
® Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0734)
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
buffer ordinances apply)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
Project Name:
Address/Location:
Peach Orchard Road
Peach Orchard Rd.
Stream(s): Cedar Creek
Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office {3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
rH �
o� /'Q 919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 694F4B13-E6DO-4BC1-82DC-E2B787F37D03
Peach Orchard Road Property
Franklin County
1/12/2022
Page 2 of 3
Determination Date: 1/6/2022
Staff: Josh Brigham
Stream
Feature
EXPO)
Not (2)
Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
Flag SA100 at
approximately
Pond 1
36.050543,
-78.405751
A
X
X
X
Pond 1
Feature A
Flag SZO1 at
approximately
Pond 2
36.051210,
-78.402758
Z
X
X
X
Pond I
Feature A
C
NP
X
X
Pond 1
X
X
X
Pond 2
X
X
(1) E = Ephemeral, I = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP = Not Present, NE = Not Evaluated
(2) Refers to State riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The stream(s)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Franklin County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1: 24,000 scale.
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be an intermittent stream, perennial stream, a
pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined not to be present. Stream features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be subject to the buffer
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above and are
therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However, if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject to
all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B and
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Paul Wojoski; DWR
— 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources I Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive 11628 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 694F41313-E6D0-4BC1-8213C-E26787371303
Peach Orchard Road Property
Franklin County
1/12/2022
Page 3 of 3
service (UPS, FedEx, etc): Paul Wojoski; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 N. Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Josh Brigham at [phone].
Sincerely,
Docu3ipned by:
�/a1n t,SSa f. A'lalnivU
B2918E8A832144F...
for Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office, Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Laserfiche
Consultant via email, Sean Clark, Sage Ecological Services, SClark ,sa eg ecological.com
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources I Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive 11628 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 694F4B13-E6D0-4BC1-82DC-E2B787F37D03
Peach Orchard Road Property
Franklin County, NC-DWR Project # 21-426
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 9
Base map provided by Sage
Franklin Co., NC 2004
d�astAtgq
�
i
Ecological
Legend:
_
:: Locations are approximate
-project boundary Q
and are provided for refer-
nn
F .� ,
aw Ka'
ence only ::
W

DocuSign Envelope ID: 694F4B13-E6D0-4BC1-82DC-E2B787F37D03
Peach Orchard Road Property
Franklin County, NC-DWR Project # 21-426
Feature A, Subject
Pond 1, Subject
Pond 2, Subject
Feature Z, Subject
LISGS Topographical Map
1,a5TA7Fo
Base map provided by Sage
Franklinton Quadrangle 2019
e "wxiy'
,�
g� i
Ecological
Legend: g
Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
-Project boundary���,
enceonly::

From:
Nikki Thomson
To:
401 PreFi le
Cc:
Sean Clark
Subject:
Intent to submit permit application for Peach Orchard Subdivision
Date:
Monday, May 16, 2022 5:57:00 PM
To whom it may concern
Please accept this email as our notice of our intent to submit a permit application for the above
named residential development.
Thank you,
Nikki
Nicole Thomson, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
[e-mail]
[phone]