20190495 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2022_20220617

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20190495
Version* 1
Select Reviewer: *
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 06/20/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/17/2022
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Lindsay Crocker
Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:*
20190495
Existing ID#
Version:* 1
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Cowford
County: Onslow
Document Information
...................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Cowfo rd_100900_MY0_2022. pdf
Existing Version
46.79MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Lindsay Crocker
.66ree

As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
FINAL
COWFORD PROJECT
NCDMS Project#100095 (Contract#0007746)
USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-00487
DWR Project#2019-0495
Onslow County,North Carolina
White Oak River Basin
HUC 03030001
j
11
..1.,:f-644,0,!. ..3,,.4 it ,44,
4 G ::
•
'
-�cY ,r`� _ h i
-iZ'• m U
/ . .
tilik'lkY):1” k •O_
Provided by:
Ores
Resource Environmental Solutions,LLC
for Environmental Banc&Exchange,LLC
Provided for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
May 2022

MEMORANDUM res
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 919.770.5573 tel.[phone] fax
TO: Division of Mitigation Services
FROM: Matt Butler— RES
DATE: May 31, 2022
RE: DMS Comments on the Draft Mitigation Plan
Cowford, Project ID #100095, DMS Contract#0007746
Comments:
1. Update contract number on cover pages.
Done.
2. Check that project objectives match the Mitigation Plan. Even though the changes may be
only minor differences, the baseline report is not an appropriate time to expound on or
modify project objectives.
Done.
3. Mitigation plan requests a fixed photo point at Kinston Highway and pictures of all culverted
crossings. Add this photo to the report.
Done.
4. Please add the IRT requested soil profiles at all groundwater gage locations to the report.
Done.
5. There was suggestion to add woody debris to the depressional areas for habitat and it
appears to be done to some extent. Suggest adding this to as-built narrative if this wood
was added.
Woody debris was not added to the depressional areas.
6. Add construction and as-built drawings to back of report.
Done.
7. Confirm with surveyor that points 20-22 on the plat were installed and are marked.
Points 20-22 have been confirmed and are marked.
Electronic Comments:
1. Re-submit x-sections with full complement of monitoring stations with the monitoring station
name attributed;there are 15 cross sections identified on Figure 2 of the Draft MYO report and
eight cross sections submitted in digital data x section file.
Done.
2. Resubmit the vegetation monitoring plots, the draft submission included only random plots.

Done.
3. Resubmit the stream structures with complete list of structures installed; Figure 2 indicates
cross vanes were installed and the visual assessment tables indicate that multiple grad control
structures were installed as part of this mitigation project.
Done.
4. Resubmit the As-built centerline or thalweg with reach brakes as indicated in Figure 2 and the
Mitigation Assets and Components Table and include restoration or re-establishment to the
wetland assets attribute table.
Done.
5. Submit the final recorded easement boundary to ensure that most up to date recorded
easement is being used during monitoring phase of the project.
Done.
6. Submit visual assessment photo points with labels or numbers to enable spatial and visual
reference.
Done.

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary 1
1.1 Project Location and Description 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 1
1.3 Project Success Criteria 2
Stream Restoration Success Criteria 3
Headwater Stream Restoration Success Criteria 3
Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria 3
Vegetation Success Criteria 4
1.4 Project Components 4
1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach 4
Streams 4
Wetlands 5
1.6 Construction and As-Built Conditions 6
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MYO) 6
Vegetation 6
Stream Geomorphology 6
Stream Hydrology 7
Wetland Hydrology 7
Headwater Valley 7
Visual Assessment 7
2.0 Methods 7
3.0 References 8
Appendix A: Background Tables
Table 1. Project Mitigation Components
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Background Information Table
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5.Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6.Vegetation Condition Assessment
Vegetation Plot Photos
Monitoring Device Photos
General Site Photos
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Planted Species Summary
Table 8.Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 9. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 10.Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Cross Section Overlay Plots
Appendix E: Record Drawings
Sealed Record Drawings

Appendix F: Soil Profile and Hydrology Data
Soil Profile Sampling Forms
Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
1.0 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Cowford Project (Project) is located within a rural watershed in Onslow County, North Carolina
approximately three and half miles northwest of Richlands, North Carolina. The Project lies within the
White Oak River Basin,North Carolina United States Geological Survey(USGS)8-digit Cataloguing Unit
03030001 and 14-digit hydrologic unit code(HUC)03030001010010,a Targeted Local Watershed(TLW)
and the Division of Water Resources(NCDWR)sub-basin 03-05-02(Figure 1).The Project provides 3,337
linear feet (LF) of stream as well as re-establish 2.991 acres of wetland that will provide water quality
benefit for 238 acres of drainage area.
The Project area is comprised of a 17.20-acre easement involving one unnamed tributary within an
entrenched channel between agricultural fields,totaling 2,988 existing LF,that drains into Cowford Branch,
which eventually drains to the New River. The Project is accessible from U.S. route NC-258. Coordinates
for the Project areas are approximately 34.9233,-77.5917,at the crossing in the middle of the project.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream Functions
Pyramid Framework and conclusions based on a Site Hydric Soils Detailed Study,the Project will realize
specific,attainable goals and objectives.These goals clearly address the degraded water quality and nutrient
input from agricultural practices that were identified as major watershed stressors in the 2010 White Oak
RBRP. The Project will address outlined RBRP Goal one and two of the TLW specific goals (listed in
Section 2).
The Project goals are:
• Re-establish hydrology to a historical stream/wetland complex that has been impacted by historic
channel realignment,channel entrenchment,field ditching,and field drain tiling;
• To transport water in a stable, non-erosive manner and maintain a stable water table in riparian
floodplain wetlands that will also contribute to stream baseflow;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbank flows and
connection to the floodplain;
• Create diverse bedforms and stable channels that achieve healthy dynamic equilibrium and provide
suitable in-stream habitat for aquatic organisms;
• Limit sediment and nutrient inputs into stream system;
• Re-establish wetland;
• Restore native wetland and riparian vegetation;
• Indirectly support the goals of the 2010 White Oak RBRP to improve water quality and to reduce
sediment and nutrient loads; and
• To support the life histories of aquatic and riparian plants and animals through stream restoration
activities.
Functional uplift,benefits,and improvements within the Project area,as based on the Function Based
Framework are outlined in the table below.
Cowford Site 1 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Project#100095 May 2022

Functional Benefits and Improvements Table.
Level Function Goal Objective Measurement Method
Convert the land-use of
to transport water from the streams and their Percent Project drainage
Hydrology° watersheds from cropland area converted to
watershed to the channel in a
Transport of water into riparian forest riparian forest(indirect
1 from the watershed to non-erosive manner and measurement)
the channel maintain a stable water table in Maintain appropriate
the riparian wetland hydroperiod for Muckalee Groundwater wells
soil series
Improve flood bank Cross sections
connectivity by reducing
Hydraulic bank height ratios and Stage Recorders
Transport of water in increasing entrenchment
2 the channel,on the to transport water in a stable ratios Bank Height Ratio
floodplain,and non-erosive manner
through the sediments Maintain regular,seasonal Entrenchment Ratio
flow in restored,
intermittent streams Flow gauge
Limit erosion rates and
increase channel stability
to reference reach As-built stream profile
Geomorphology to create a diverse bedform and a conditions
Transport of wood and Cross sections
stable channel that achieves
3 sediment to create healthy dynamic equilibrium and Improve bedform diversity
diverse bedforms and provides suitable habitat for life (Pool spacing,percent Visual monitoring
dynamic equilibrium riffles,etc.)
Vegetation plots
Increase buffer width to at
least 50 feet
Establish native hardwood
riparian buffer to provide
Indirectly support the goals of canopy shade and absorb
the 2010 White Oak RBRP to nutrients
Physicochemical° achieve appropriate levels for
Temperature and water temperature,dissolved Install in-stream structures
4 oxygen regulation; oxygen concentration,and other to created aeration zones
important nutrients including but
processing of organic not limited to Nitrogen and Promote sediment
matter and nutrients Phosphorus through filtration,nutrient cycling,
buffer/wetland planting and and organic accumulation
wetland hydrologic restoration through natural wetland
biogeochemical processes
Biology° Improve aquatic habitat by
Biodiversity and life to achieve functionality in levels installing habitat features,
5 histories of aquatic life 1-4 to support the life histories of constructing pools of
histories and riparian aquatic and riparian plants and varying depths,and
life animals through instream planting the riparian
buffer and wetlands
°These are benefits that are presumed and will not be measured by the monitoring
1.3 Project Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Project will follow the 2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update, the Cowford Site Final Mitigation Plan, and subsequent agency
guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below. Cross section and vegetation plot
monitoring takes place in Years 0, 1,2, 3,5,and 7.Hydrology and visual monitoring takes place annually.
Specific success criteria components are presented below.
Cowford Site 2 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Project#100095 May 2022

Stream Restoration Success Criteria
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years.
There should be minor change in as-built cross sections.If changes do take place,they should be evaluated
to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example downcutting or
erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative
changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified
using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should fall within the
quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed
1.2,and the entrenchment ratio shall be above 2.2 within restored riffle cross sections(for C and E streams).
Digital images are used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation,bank erosion, success
of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should not
indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth.Lateral
images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time.A series of
images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Stream restoration reaches will be monitored to document intermittent or seasonal surface flow. This will
be accomplished through direct observation and the use of hydraulic pressure transducers with data loggers.
Reaches must demonstrate a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow. One flow gauge was installed on
KJ1-A and one stage recorder was installed on KJ1-C.
Headwater Stream Restoration Success Criteria
Continuous surface water flow must be documented every year for at least 30 days.Channel formation must
be documented through consistent indicators. Monitoring years 1-4 require evidence of scour, sediment
deposition, sediment sorting,multiple observed flow events,destruction of terrestrial vegetation,presence
of litter and debris,wracking,vegetation matted down or bet,and leaf litter disturbed.Monitoring years 5-
7,the headwater valley reach must meet the previous requirements as well as demonstrate bed and banks,
natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, water staining, change in plant community and changes in
character of soil.
Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has a current WETs table (1990-2019) for Onslow
County upon which to base a normal rainfall amount and average growing season.The closest comparable
data station was determined to be the WETS station for New River MCAF,NC. The growing season for
Onslow County is 269 days long,extending from March 10 to December 4,and is based on a daily minimum
temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten years.
Based upon field observation across the site the NRCS mapping units show a good correlation to actual site
conditions in areas of the site.Mitigation guidance for soils in the Coastal Plain suggests a hydroperiod for
the Muckalee soil of 12-16 percent of the growing season. The hydrology success criterion for the Site is
to restore the water table so that it will remain continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for 12-16
percent of the growing season (approximately 33 days) at each groundwater gauge location. Due to the
Cowford Site 3 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Project#100095 May 2022

extensive drainage efforts,it may take at least a year for the site to become completely saturated and reach
the target hydroperiods.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project will
follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the survival of at
least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 five-year old trees at seven feet in
height at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria will be 210 trees per acre with an
average height of ten feet at the end of Year 7.Volunteer trees that are listed on the approved planting list
will be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, and if established for
two or more years,may be counted towards the success criteria of total planted stems.Moreover,any single
species can only account for up to 50 percent of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot.
Any stems more than 50 percent will be shown in the monitoring table but will not be used to demonstrate
success.
1.4 Project Components
The streams and wetlands provided for restoration have been significantly impacted by ditching, drain
tiling, and other agricultural practices for over 50 years. Provided improvements to the Project will help
address impacts specifically discussed as priorities in in the 2010 White Oak River Basin Restoration
Priorities(RBRP).
Through stream restoration, headwater valley (HWV) restoration, and wetland restoration, the Project
presents 3,347 LF of provided stream, generating 3,538.67 Warm Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) and
2.991 acres of provided wetland,generating 2.991 Wetland Mitigation Units(WMU).
Cowford Project Components Summary (Mitigation Plan)
Stream Mitigation
Mitigation Approach Linear Feet Ratio Warm SMU
Restoration(HWV) 923 1:1 913.000*
Restoration 2,424 1:1 2,424.000
Total 3,347 3,337
Non-standard Buffer Width Adjustment 201.670
Total Adjusted SMU's 3,538.67
Wetland Mitigation
Mitigation Approach Area(acres) Ratio WMU
Re-establishment 2.991 1:1 2.991
Total 2.991 2.991
*Headwater valley credits are calculated from valley length,not included in NSBW calculations.
**Credit adjustment for Non-standard Buffer Width calculation using the Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit
Calculator issued by the USACE in January 2021. See Section 6.6 for further information
1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach
Streams
The Project includes stream and headwater valley restoration.Stream restoration will incorporate the design
of a single-thread,meandering channel,with parameters based on data taken from reference site,published
empirical relationships,regional curves developed from existing project streams,and NC Regional Curves.
Cowford Site 4 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Project#100095 May 2022

Analytical design techniques will also be a crucial element of the project and will be used to determine the
design discharge and to verify the design. Based on soil type, valley slope, and drainage area headwater
valley restoration was incorporated in the design. Headwater valley restoration includes the design of a
vegetated diffuse flow system that will allow for the passive development of a headwater stream.
The Project has been broken into the following design reaches:
Reach KJ1-A(HWV)
A headwater valley restoration approach is provided for this reach to address historic ditching and buffer
impacts. Restoration activities includes:
• Grading a headwater valley,
• Installing wood structures to provide grade control and habitat,
• Installing live stakes to stabilize the bed and banks,
• Riparian planting.
Reach KJ1-B
An offline restoration approach is provided for this reach to address historic ditching and buffer impacts.
Restoration activities includes:
• Grading a new, single-thread channel in the existing floodplain(Priority I Restoration),
• Installing log structures to provide grade control and habitat,
• Establishing a riffle-pool sequence throughout the new channel,
• Installing toe protection on meander bends,
• Installing live stakes to stabilize the banks and provide channel shading,
• Filling and grading the existing channel to create wetland habitat,
• Riparian planting.
Reach KJ1-C
An inline, P2 restoration approach is provided for this reach to address historic ditching, channelization,
and buffer impacts. Restoration activities includes:
• Grading a new, single-thread channel in an excavated floodplain,
• Installing rock and log structures to provide grade control and habitat,
• Establishing a riffle-pool sequence throughout the new channel,
• Installing toe protection on meander bends,
• Installing live stakes to stabilize the banks and provide channel shading,
• Filling the existing channel,
• Riparian planting,and
• Invasive vegetation treatment.
Wetlands
The Cowford Project offers a total ecosystem restoration opportunity. As such,the wetland restoration is
closely tied to the stream restoration and drain tile interruption.The Project provides 2.991 WMUs through
wetland re-establishment. Wetland re-establishment is only provided in areas that have been determined
appropriate for wetland restoration by a licensed soil scientist due to the presence of hydric soils and
potential hydrology. Re-establishment activities includes a successful restoration that raises the local
groundwater elevation, allows frequent flooding, the plugging of ditches, removing all drain tiles within
the easement,and creating shallow depression features in the wetland.
Cowford Site 5 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Project#100095 May 2022

A 2D model of the provided stream restoration was run in HEC-RAS to evaluate the effectiveness of the
design at increasing wetland flooding.Inundation maps from this model of the 1-and 10-year design storms
demonstrate that the provided design will function in this capacity. These activities help to raise the local
groundwater and have a more natural hydrologic cycle in the riparian zone. Surface roughening through
shallow soil ripping improves infiltration and slow runoff through the floodplain. Surface roughening also
create microtopography and shallow depressional areas, re-establishing more natural conditions and
establishing habitat diversity. Historic land-use impacts will be addressed through the planting of a native
hardwood wetland community.
1.6 Construction and As Built Conditions
Site construction was completed on July 30th,2021,and planting was completed on March 8th,2022. The
Cowford Site was overall built to design plans and guidelines,as-built stream and wetland areas were only
slightly different than proposed. Wetland Depressions were designed to be 0.3-0.5 feet deep but As-Built
Wetland Depressions were found to be slightly deeper than proposed ranging from 0.5-1.0 feet deep.During
construction additional drain tiles were found, which were then interrupted at the easement boundary.
Additionally, extra t-posts were installed around the boundary of the easement in 100-foot intervals to
reduce concerns of encroachment by farming practices. The record drawings are included in Appendix E.
Minor monitoring device location changes were made during as-built installation,however,the quantities
remained as proposed in the Mitigation Plan.
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MY0)
The Cowford Baseline Monitoring activities were performed in January and March 2022. All Baseline
Monitoring data is present below and in the appendices.The Site is on track to meeting vegetation,wetland,
and stream interim success criteria.
Vegetation
Setup and monitoring of the nine permanent vegetation plots and five random vegetation plots were
completed after planting and stream construction on March 16th,2021.Vegetation data are in Appendix C,
associated photos are in Appendix B,and plot locations are in Appendix B.MYO monitoring data indicates
that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre.Planted stem densities
ranged from 567 to 1,012 planted stems per acre with a mean of 749 planted stems per acre across all plots.
A total of ten species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline
monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years.The average stem height in the vegetation plots
was 1.5 feet.Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous
vegetation is becoming well established throughout the project.
Stream Geomorphology
Cross section setup and geomorphology data collection for MYO was collected on January 19th, 2021.
Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix D. Overall the baseline cross sections and profile
relatively match the proposed design. The as-built conditions show that shear stress and velocities have
been reduced for all restoration/enhancement reaches.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation.
Cowford Site 6 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Project#100095 May 2022

Stream Hydrology
One stage recorder on KJ1-C,was installed on January 19th,2022.One flow gauge,on KJ1-A,was installed
on January 19th,2022. The stage recorder is in place to document bankfull events,while the flow gauge is
in place to track frequency and duration of stream flow events. Stream hydrology data will be included in
the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and in the appendices.Gauge locations can be found on Figure
2 and photos are in Appendix B.
Wetland Hydrology
A total of five groundwater wells with automatic recording pressure transducers were installed throughout
the wetland areas on November 2nd, 2021, and April 28th, 2022. These will record water table depths at a
frequency of twice per day. Preconstruction wetland hydrology data for 2020 and 2021 can be found in
Appendix F.Furthermore,soil profiles have been taken at each groundwater well on November 2nd,2021,
or March 27th,2022,and can be found in Appendix F.
Headwater Valley
Setup of cross sections 1, 2, and 3 in the headwater valley took place on January 19th, 2022. Continuous
surface water flow must be documented every year for at least 30 days. Channel formation must be
documented through consistent indicators. In year 1 through 4 RES will be looking for evidence that
demonstrates a concentration of flow indicative of channel formation within the topographic low point of
the valley or crenulation. During monitoring years 5 through 7, the stream must successfully meet the
requirements for year 1 through 4 and the preponderance of evidence must demonstrate the development
of stream bed and banks.The indicators are still being established and in years to follow will be documented
with a visual assessment and digital images.
Visual Assessment
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation,bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Digital images will also
capture the headwater valley,boundaries,and culverts of the site,located in Appendix B.
2.0 Methods
Stream monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates
associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200).
Morphological data were collected at 15 cross-sections. Survey data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®,
and Microsoft Excel®for data processing and analysis. The stage recorders include an automatic pressure
transducer placed in PVC casing in a pool. The elevation of the bed and top of bank at each stage recorder
are used to detect bankfull events.
Vegetation success is being monitored at nine permanent vegetation plots and five random vegetation plots.
Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation,version 4.2
(Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data are
processed using the CVS data entry tool.In the field,the four corners of each plot were permanently marked
with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the
origin each monitoring year.The random plots are to be collected in locations where there are no permanent
vegetation plots. Random plots are collected in the form of 100 square meter belt transects with variable
Cowford Site 7 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Project#100095 May 2022

dimensions.Tree species and height will be recorded for each planted stem and the transects will be mapped
and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years.
Wetland hydrology is monitored to document success in wetland restoration areas where hydrology was
affected. This is accomplished with three automatic pressure transducer gauges (located in groundwater
wells) that record daily groundwater levels. Three have been installed within the wetland restoration
crediting area and one within the adjacent upland area to document the wetland boundary. One automatic
pressure transducer is installed above ground for use as a barometric reference. Gauges are downloaded
quarterly and wetland hydroperiods are calculated during the growing season. Gauge installation followed
current regulatory guidance. Visual observations of primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators
are also recorded during quarterly site visits.
3.0 References
Griffith, G.E., J.M.Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H.McNab, D.R.Lenat, T.F.MacPherson,
J.B.Glover,and V.B. Shelburne.(2002). Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina,(color
Poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S.
Geological Survey(map scale 1:1,500,000).
Lee Michael T.,Peet Robert K.,Roberts Steven D.,and Wentworth Thomas R.,2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level.Version 4.2
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Resource Environmental Solutions(2021). Cowford Site Final Mitigation Plan.
Schafale,M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks,and Recreation,NCDENR, Raleigh,
NC.
USACE. (2016). Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. NC:
Interagency Review Team (IRT).
Cowford Site 8 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Project#100095 May 2022

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Cowford (100095) - Mitigation Assets and Components
Project Segment
Existing
Footage
or
Acreage
M itigation
Plan
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation
Category
Restoration
Level
Priority
Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Mitigation
Plan
Credits
As -Built
Footage or
Acreage
Comments
KJ1-A*
923
913
Warm
Restoration
HWV
1.00000
913.000
935
Headwater valley restoration, riparian planting
KJ1-B
647
852
Warm
Restoration
P1
1.00000
852.000
852
Channel restoration, riparian planting
KJ1-C
1,428
1,572
Warm
Restoration
P2
1.00000
1572.000
1,574
Channel restoration, riparian planting
WA
0
2.991
RR
Re-establishment
1.00000
I 2.991
I
I 2.969
Stream restoration, drain tile interruption, native planting
*Headwater valley credits are calculated from valley length, not included in NSBW calculations.
Project Credits
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Rip
Wetland
Coastal
Marsh
Warm
Cool
Cold
Restoration
3337.000
Re-establishment
2.991
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Creation
Preservation
NSBW Adjustment
201.670
Total
3538.670
2.991

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Cowford Mitigation Site
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 9 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 1 month
Number of reporting Years : 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
26-Mar-21
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
03-May-21
Stream Construction
NA
30-Jul-21
Site Planting
NA
08-Mar-22
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Jan/March 2022
Apr-22
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
= The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Cowford Mitigation Site
Designer
Primary project design POC
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Benton Carroll, PE
Construction Contractor
Construction POC
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Andrew Dimmette
Survey Contractor
Survey POC
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Brian Hockett
Planting Contractor
Planting contractor POC
Shenandoah Habitats
David Coleman
Monitoring Performers
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Monitoring POC
Hannah Gadai

Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name
Cowford Project
County
Onslow
Project Area (acres)
17.20
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
34.92293, -77.5917
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
16.35
Project Watershed Summary Information
Level IV Ecoregion
63h - Carolina Flatwoods
River Basin
White Oak
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
I 3020302
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
I 30203020102
DWR Sub -basin
03-05-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
238 ac (.37 sqmi)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach KJ1-A
Reach KJ1-B
Reach KJ1-C
Length of reach (linear feet)
935
852
1574
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Unconfined
Unconfined
Moderately
confined
Drainage area (Acres and Square Miles)
115
181
238
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Intermittent
Intermittent
Intermittent
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
None
None
None
Stream Classification (existing)
G5
G5
G5 to E5
Stream Classification (proposed)
N/A
E5 / C5
E4 / C4
Evolutionary trend (Simon)
III
III
III -IV
FEMA classification
Zone X (Minimal Risk)
Zone X (Minimal
Risk)
Zone X (Minimal
Risk)
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
WA
Size of Wetland (acres)
2.969
Wetland Type
RR
Mapped Soil Series
Muckalee loam
Drainage Class
Poorly
Soil Hydric Status
Yes (LESS)
Source of Hydrology
GW, OL, SF
Restoration or enhancement method
H, V

o
rey B1vd
=Med&UrFirsgt ent CPrimarary e
• © Carolina Inn
1'
�cU-Haul
Neighborhood Dealer
A&K Tires9
r�E
0 500 1,000
Feet
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Cowford Mitigation Site
Onslow County, North Carolina
Legend
Easement
TLW-03030001010010
1 White Oak River Basin - 03030001
Date: 2/17/2022
Drawn by: HRG
Checked by: JRM
1 inch = 1,000 feet
fires

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Invasive Species
fires
0 150 300
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions
Plan View
MY0 2022
Cowford
Mitigation Project
Onslow County, NC
Date: 6/14/2022
Drawn by: HRG
Lat: 35.671107
Long: -82.669235
LEGEND
Easement - 17.20
Wetland Re-establishment
® Wetland
EZZI
Fixed Plot
Random Plot
Cross
Stream Restoration
HWV Restoration
Top of
* Engineered Sediment
Drain Tile Outlet
• Flow
• Stage Recorder
• Wetland
© Photo Point
© Existing Ag Ditch
Vegetation Condition Assessment
Target Community
Absent
Present
Present Marginal Absent
No Fill
II

Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach JK1-A
Assessed Stream Length
Assessed Bank Length
925
1850
Ma'or Channel Cate o
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Metric Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Foota a
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
0
o
100/o
and/or surface scour
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
Totals
0
100%
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
8
8
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
3
3
100%
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)

Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach JK1-B
Assessed Stream Length
Assessed Bank Length
850
1700
Ma'or Channel Cate o
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Metric Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Foota a
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
0
o
100/o
and/or surface scour
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
Totals
0
100%
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
7
7
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
16
16
100%
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)

Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach JK1-C
Assessed Stream Length
Assessed Bank Length
1572
3144
Ma'or Channel Cate o
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Metric Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Amount of
Unstable
Foota a
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Bank
Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
0
o
100/o
and/or surface scour
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0
100%
Bank Failure
Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse
Totals
0
100%
0
100%
Structure
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
17
17
100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
28
28
100%
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)

Table 6
Planted Acreage'
Vegetation Condition Assessment
16.4
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1 acres
Red Simple
Hatch
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
0.1 acres
Orange Simple
Simple Hatch
0.00
0.0%
Total
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.25 acres
Orange Simple
Simple Hatch
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
0.0%
Easement Acreaae2
17.2
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
PP g
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern"
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Yellow
Crosshatch
0
0.00
0.0
5. Easement Encroachment Areas3
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Red Simple
Hatch
0
0.00
0.0
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or
any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the
associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those
with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are
slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if
in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by
EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but
potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Iikley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of
ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat
level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that
was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be
symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.

Cowford MVO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (3/16/2022)
Vegetation Plot 3 (3/16/2022)
Vegetation Plot 2 (3/16/2022)
Vegetation Plot 4 (3/16/2022)

Vegetation Plot 5 (3/16/2022)
Vegetation Plot 7 (3/16/2022)
Vegetation Plot 6 (3/16/2022)
Vegetation Plot 8 (3/16/2022)

Vegetation Plot 9 (3/16/2022)

Cowford MVO Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photo
Random Vegetation Plot 1 (3/16/2022)
C LE
- Arr � .�..✓h x � � �� k
Random Vegetation Plot 3 (3/16/2022)
Random Vegetation Plot 2 (3/16/2022)
Random Vegetation Plot 4 (3/16/2022)

Random Vegetation Plot 5 (3/16/2022)

Cowford Monitoring Device Photos MY0 2022
Stage Recorder KJ1-C (1/19/2022)
Wetland Gauge 1 (3/8/2022)
Flow Gauge KJ1-A (1/19/2022)
Wetland Gauge 2 (3/8/2022)

Wetland Gauge 3 (3/8/2022)
Wetland Gauge 5 (3/8/2022)
Wetland Gauge 4 (3/8/2022)

Cowford General Site Photos MY0 2022
Culvert at the top of KJl-C (3/8/2022)
Culvert at edge of Wetland (4/28/2022)
Culvert at the bottom of KJ1-B (3/8/2022)
Culvert at Kinston Highway (4/28/2022)

ESP & Treatment Pool (3/16/2022)
Headwater Valley (3/16/2022)
Haybale brush toe in BJl-B (3/16/2022)
Headwater Valley (3/16/2022)

Headwater Valley (4/28/2022)
Easement Marker (3/8/2022)

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Planted Species Summary
Bare Root Planting Tree Species
Common Name
Scientific Name
Mit Plan %
As -Built %
Total Stems Planted
River Birch
Betula nigra
15
15
2,000
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
15
15
2,000
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
10
10
1,300
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
10
10
1,300
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
10
10
1,300
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
10
10
1,300
Swamp Tupelo
Nyssa biflora
10
10
1,300
American sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
10
10
1,300
Southern red oak
Quercus falcata
5
5
700
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
5
700
Total
13,200
Planted Area
16.35
As -built Planted Stems/Acre
807
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Wetland/Stream Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted
Stem Height
(ft)
1
971
0
971
Yes
1.5
2
971
0
971
Yes
1.4
3
769
0
769
Yes
1.6
4
567
0
567
Yes
1.7
5
931
0
931
Yes
1.3
6
688
0
688
Yes
1.5
7
607
0
607
Yes
1.7
8
850
0
850
Yes
1.4
9
728
0
728
Yes
1.7
R1
1012
0
1012
Yes
1.4
R2
567
0
567
Yes
1.5
R3
607
0
607
Yes
1.4
R4
647
0
647
Yes
1.4
R5
567
0
567
Yes
1.8
Project Avg
749
0
749
Yes
1.5

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
EEP Project Code 100095. Project Name: Cowford
Current Plot Data (MYO 2021)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
100043-01-0001
100043-01-0002
100043-01-0003
100043-01-0004
100043-01-0005
100043-01-0006
100043-01-0007
100043-01-0008
100043-01-0009
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
10
10
10
3
3
3
8
8
8
4
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
6
6
6
4
4
4
7
7
7
1
1
1
4
4
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
6
6
6
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
5
5
5
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
6
6
6
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
24
24
24
24
24
24
19
19
19
14
14
14
23
23
23
17
17
17
15
15
15
21
21
21
18
18
18
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
8
8
8
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
8
8
8
5
5
5
9
9
9
9
9
9
971
971
971
971
971
971
769
769
769
567
567
567
931
931
931
688
688
688
607
607
607
850
850
850
728
728
728
Current Plot Data (MYO 2021)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
100043-01-R1
100043-01-R2
100043-01-R3
100043-01-R4
100043-01-R5
MYO (2021)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
7
7
7
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
47
47
47
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
19
19
19
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
13
13
13
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
5
5
5
41
41
41
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
32
32
32
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
19
19
19
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
14
14
14
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13
13
13
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
1
1
1
33
33
33
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
7
7
7
28
28
28
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
25
25
25
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
259
259
259
1
1
1
1
1
14
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.35
10
10
10
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
10
10
10
1012
1012
1012
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
567
567
567
749
749
749

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cowford Mitigation Site - Reach KJ1-B
Parameter
Gauge2
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SDb
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SDb
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
4.9
---
---
1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
8.0
---
9.5
10.4
10.4
11.3
1.3
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
7.3
---
---
1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
>50
---
48.7
49.0
49.0
49.3
0.4
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
0.9
---
---
1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.6
---
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.1
2
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
---
---
1.3
---
---
1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.0
---
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
0.1
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
---
---
---
---
---
4.5
---
---
1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
5.0
---
6.4
6.9
6.9
7.3
0.6
2
Width/Depth Ratio
---
---
5.3
---
---
1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
12.8
---
17.2
17.3
17.3
17.4
0.1
2
Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
1.5
---
---
1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
>2.2
---
4.3
4.8
4.8
5.2
0.6
2
'Bank Height Ratio
---
---
3.9
---
---
1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.0
---
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
5
---
27
---
---
---
---
---
---
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
9
---
30
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
20
---
53
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
4
---
27
4
---
---
27
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
10
---
14
10
---
---
14
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.3
---
1.8
1.3
---
---
1.8
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
33
---
61
33
---
---
61
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
4.1
---
7.6
4.1
---
---
7.6
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
---
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
---
---
--
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5
---
E5/C5
E4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
---
---
--
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
---
---
---
--
Valley length (ft)
680
---
602
601
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
688
---
852
850
Sinuosity (ft)
1.01
---
1.42
1.41
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
---
---
--
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.007
---
0.002
0.002
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
---
---
--
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
---
---
Biological or Other
---
---
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 =Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cowford Mitigation Site - Reach KJ1-C
Parameter
Gauge2
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SDb
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SDb
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
6.6
6.7
6.7
6.7
---
2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
8.0
---
8.6
11.0
9.7
16.1
3.4
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
12.5
13.4
13.4
14.3
---
2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
>50
---
46.00
47.8
47.9
49.4
1.4
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
---
2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.6
---
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.0
4
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.7
---
2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.0
---
0.8
1
1.1
1.1
0.1
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
---
---
---
6.5
7.4
7.4
8.2
---
2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
5.0
---
4.5
5.6
5.1
7.8
1.5
4
Width/Depth Ratio
5.4
6.1
6.1
6.8
---
2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
12.8
---
16.4
21.7
18.7
33.1
7.7
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.1
---
2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
>2.2
---
3.1
4.6
4.9
5.3
1.0
4
'Bank Height Ratio
1.8
3.0
3.0
4.2
---
2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.0
---
1.00
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
8
---
32
---
---
---
---
---
---
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
9
---
30
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
20
---
49
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
7
---
23
7
---
---
23
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
11
---
24
11
---
---
24
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.4
---
3
1.4
---
---
3
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
38
---
77
38
---
---
77
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
4.8
---
9.6
4.8
---
---
9.6
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
---
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
---
---
--
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G5 to E5
---
E4/C4
E4/C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
---
---
--
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
---
---
---
--
Valley length (ft)
1395
---
1392
1392
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1429
---
1572
1572
Sinuosity (ft)
1.02
---
1.13
1.13
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
---
---
--
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.007
---
0.003
0.003
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
---
---
--
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
---
---
Biological or Other
---
---
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 =Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix D. Table 9 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Cowford
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA'
(Headway Valley Restoration)
No Morphological Parameters were determined for HWV
Reach A
(Headway Valley Restoration)
No Morphological Parameters were determined for HWV
Reach A
(Headway Valley Restoration)
No Morphological Parameters were determined for HWV
Reach A
65.6
65.8
Bankfull Width (ft)1
11.0
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)1
-
49
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.5
1.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
65.6
65.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
8.6
7.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
-
4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
-
1.0
Cross Section 6 (Riffle)
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA'
65.1
65.0
61.0
60.8
57.9
Bankfull Width (ft)'
9.5
8.2
11.1
9.5
9.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1
49.3
-
-
48.1
48
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.0
1.5
1.6
1.1
1.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
65.1
65.0
61.0
60.8
57.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
5.3
6.4
6.6
4.8
5.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
5.2
-
-
5.0
4.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
-
-
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 11 (Pool)
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Cross Section 13 (Pool)
Cross Section 14
(Riffle)
Cross Section 15 (Pool)
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA'
57.9
54.6
54.7
48.0
47.6
Bankfull Width (ft)1
11.8
8.6
10.3
16.1
9.1
Floodprone Width (ft)1
-
46.0
-
49.4
-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.6
0.8
1.9
1.1
3.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
57.9
54.6
54.7
48.0
47.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
8.4
4.5
9.3
7.8
12.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
-
5.3
-
3.1
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
-
1.0
-
1.0
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

r Wrk�y� '� ?k
•
s y 3
Upstream Downstream
Cowford -Reach KJ1-A-Cross Section 1 -Pool -HWV Restoration
72
71
70
166036912151821242730333639424548
Distance(ft)
MVO 2022
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
MY0 I MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA'
Bankfull Width(ft)'
Floodprone Width(ft)'
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)Z (Headway Valley Restoration)
Low Bank Elevation(ft) No Morphological Parameters were determined for HWV Reach A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ftt)2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

dd 3
_ .` .i.
14,
w�
/B,
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-A-Cross Section 2-Riffle -HWV Restoration
72
71
70
2 69
w 68
67
66
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MY0 2022 3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 2(Riffle)
MY0 I MY1 I MY2 I MY3 I MY5 I MY7 I MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA1
Bankfull Width(f01
Floodprone Width(ft)1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 (Headway Valley Restoration)
Low Bank Elevation(ft) No Morphological Parameters were determined for HWV Reach A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1 -Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Z Yu':Cti P ate_
•
•
•
Upstream Downstream
Cowford -Reach KJ1-A-Cross Section 3-Riffle-HWV Restoration
70
69
68
° 67
m
66
65
64
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MY0 2022
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 3(Riffle)
MYO I MY1 I MY2 I MY3 I MY5 I MY7 I MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA'
Bankfull Width(ft)'
Floodprone Width(ft)'
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 (Headway Valley Restoration)
Low Bank Elevation(ft) No Morphological Parameters were determined for HWV Reach A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

,,
,k, ✓ .''° rd 'y `'u`7 ' '* 1 -/',t'01,.';.,11,1,4%'4'.:' 'i" x O_ s } r 4 _., i a+." ` •*„.
.-''."',-!',',-",'.;''":.S';•J-_:'7,,:'',':,.1'1--v..4'..-:;,,'-,
�k SLf i t z * 'k; 4,. J', 6 < n t. . yr , `r
t T
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-B -Cross Section 4-Pool -Restoration
68
67
66
c
0 65
fi
w 64
63
62 1
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MYO 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 4(Pool)
IIIII MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA' 65.63
Bankfull Width(ft)t 11.0
Floodprone Width(ft)t -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 1.5
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 65.63
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 8-6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' -
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years Bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years Bankfull elevation

±:['
.,l - ti 4 +„"" s1,, ' -'1.'''''-'1*,, .: F .rf. 'aa--3 C s ,,e-,0.1,kp. F e _
'.+,�.' 1 m - iy a '? s
a art •? y..„ wu +, " - ? : t .,-� ham, i tiM '7F c_
1
i,2a°. '. / 1,. 4 .` a11 ",ter �,.i�f. i k�..�
, H ,0-4, 9 ��! ,wy 'fib 1,n
Upstream Downstream
69 Cowford -Reach KJ1-B -Cross Section 5-Riffle-Restoration
68
67
x
0 66
w 65
64
63
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 2III1TI1TI
Distance(ft)
MY0 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 5(Riffle)
MY0 MYI MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSAI 65.76
Bankfull Width(ft)1 11.3
Floodprone Width(ft)1 49
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 1.2
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 65.76
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 7-3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios 4-3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratios 1-0
1 -Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

M q $
•
� X
. mint:.'he• - � Sx- •
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-B -Cross Section 6-Riffle-Restoration
68
67
66
TTTITTTTIIITIIIT
Distance(ft)
MVO 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 6(Riffle)
MY0 MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY—
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSAI 65.06
Bankfull Width(ft)1 9.5
Floodprone Width(ft)1 49.3
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 1.0
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 65.06
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 5.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' 5.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' 1.0
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

i ern „ .r w,* r 4 , ad ase*by
y ,ems sex'" 'sac `gyp {, ^ v'^ , , l' ;
f 3 t f x�.£ 5
fi :d xt .� f rA, l -,1. am{�,w
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-B -Cross Section 7-Pool -Restoration
68
67
66
' :T :9
: TTET : : :
Distance(ft)
MYO 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 7(Pool)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA' 64.99
Bankfull Width(ft)' 8-2
Floodprone Width(ft)' -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 1.5
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 64.99
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 6.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' -
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

_ s+rwK•a +,.,..a6._.u•--rJ =kt - ..
•
xikA
ra �g
V 4 �
0f A6,o A £ sx at +
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-C -Cross Section 8-Pool - Restoration
65
64
63
° 62
60
59
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MYO 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull -----Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 8(Pool)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA' 60.97
Bankfull Width(ft)' 11.1
Floodprone Width(ft)1 -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 1.6
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 60.97
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 6.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' -
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

ry 3 �y � Yu� y
+ `'A,',$_ �i a ,
•-tt.^5`eir;:1,t17,,,,,''''./.**;,,,4`:i:-.--,- "I.• ' ' `-'
_ Q �L 'Xr 3�.
Upstream Downstream
Cowford -Reach KJ1-C-Cross Section 9-Riffle-Restoration
64
63
62
i
c
° 61
m
u' 60
59
58
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
ii.MYO 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 9(Riffle)
MY0 MY MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Ili
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA' 60.82
Bankfull Width(ft)' 9.5
Floodprone Width(ft)' 48.1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 1.1
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 60.82
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 4.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' 5.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' 1.0
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

r }
#1-1. fF .
? .100$0.44 .�gaa3:^i
a
- x r
', It' f.L.3 x s✓"`-`.,� - i.+i[''S+W €s3.'�r,. 3 ,•.,r''1 �0 ?
qqA' dam. 1. :� Z. f. t„.Ei-A P,:
3740,x,
4F 7 . i Y, aa a,r
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-C -Cross Section 10-Riffle -Restoration
61
60
59
c �
m
57
56
55
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MY0 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation 3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
MYO MYI MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA1 57-93
Bankfull Width(ft)' 9-9
Floodprone Width(ft)' 48
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 1.0
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 57.93
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 5-3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' 4.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' 1.0
1 -Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

,
e4 � t'" 14-14
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-C -Cross Section 11 -Pool -Restoration
61
60
59
m
t" 57
56
55
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MVO 2022 — — -Approx.Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 11 (Pool)
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA1 57.92
Bankfull Width(ft)' 11.8
Floodprone Width(ft)' -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 1.6
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 57.92
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 8.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' -
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

W �
ab
.4-414
z �'.;
Upstream Downstream
Cowford -Reach KJ1-C-Cross Section 12-Riffle-Restoration
58
57
56
° 55
m
t" 54
53
52
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MYO 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA1 54.58
Bankfull Width(ft)' 8.6
Floodprone Width(ft)' 46.0
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 0.8
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 54.58
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 4.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' 5.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' 1.0
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

.`fi rtti'v, ;ANC���`� �'� « al,� �, � •
•
s;
7
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-C-Cross Section 13 -Pool -Restoration
58
57
56
° 55
m
w 54
53
52
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MVO 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 13(Pool)
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA' 54.70
Bankfull Width(ft)' 10.3
Floodprone Width(ft)' -
Bank ull Max Depth(ft)2 1.9
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 54.70
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 9.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' -
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

s
•
•
.;.. P / y
%
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-C -Cross Section 14-Riffle-Restoration
51
50
49
I : 1
7
46
45 10 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MYO 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cmss Section 14(Riffle)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA' 48.03
Bankfull Width(ft)' 16.1
Floodprone Width(ft)' 49.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 1.1
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 48.03
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 7.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' 3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' 1.0
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years Bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years Bankfull elevation

i
( 1�
4 A i -fA*Ti.•rfsr-rt q n`�.'+3;',_
' e 4
Upstream Downstream
Cowford-Reach KJ1-C-Cross Section 15-Pool -Restoration
50
49
48
c
o 47
m
" 46
45
44
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance(ft)
MVO 2022 — — —Approx.Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 15(Pool)
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-XSA' 47.59
Bankfull Width(ft)' 9-1
Floodprone Width(ft)' -
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)2 3-4
Low Bank Elevation(ft) 47.59
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)2 12.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' -
1-Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2-Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Appendix E
Record Drawings

FILE NAME: R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\100900_AB_COVER.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
Corner
Iiargetts
C•ossi•rrods
jarn-F,ntown
-54
Haan B•r.a h
Huf marrtown
2SA
6regory Forks
PROJECT LOCATION
Ric li lands
Brocks
C,o mfc rt
Gym- P-
3
VICINITY MAP
NTS
PROJECT DIRECTORY
OWNER:
LI N DSAY CROCKER
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
2 1 7 WEST JON ES ST., SUITE 3000A
RALEIGH, NC 27603
DESIGNED BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 1 00
RALEIGH, NC 27612
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 1 00
RALEIGH, NC 27612
DMS PROJECT #:
CONTRACT #:
USACE ACTION ID #:
RFP #:
DWR #:
NOTES:
100095
7746
SAW-20 1 9-00487
1 6-007577
201 9-0495
• ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMENTS
IN U.S. SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
• HORIZONTAL DATUM IS NAD83(20 1 1 ); VERTICAL DATUM I S
NAVD 88
• THIS MAP IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION, SALES OR
CONVEYANCES
• THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP AND AS -BUILT DRAWING IS TO
ILLUSTRATE THE POST- CONSTRUCTION "AS -BUILT
CONDITIONS" OF THE STREAM RESTORATION AND MAY NOT
SHOW ALL IMPROVEMENTS OR UTILITIES.
• NO PROPERTY LINES WERE SURVEYED, ALL BOUNDARY AND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINES WERE REFERENCED FROM
RECORDED PLATS
• STATE PLANE COORDINATES AND ELEVATIONS WERE DERIVED
FROM EXISTING ONSITE CONTROL SURVEY PREPARED AND
ESTABLISHED BY WSP USA INC.
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHITE OAK RIVER BASIN: HUC 03030001
APRIL 2022
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
SITE MAP
NTS
I, BRIAN S. hOCKETT CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT THIS GROUND SURVEY WAS PERFORMED AT THE
90% CONFIDENCE LEVEL TO MEET FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA
COMMITTEE STANDARDS; THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET
THE REQUIIREMENTS FOR A TOPOGRAPHIC/PLANIMETRIC SURVEY TO THE
ACCURACY OF CLASS "A" AND VERTICAL ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE
TO THE CLASS "A" STANDARD, AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS
OBTAINED ON JUNE 24th 202 I ; THAT THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON
MARCH 22nd 2022; THAT CONTOURS SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES MAY
NOT MEET THE STATED STANDARD; AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED
ON NAD83 (20 I I) AND ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 (GEOID 18)
I . CLASS OF SURVEY: CLASS A
2. POSITIONAL ACCURACY: 0.08'
3. TYPE OF GPS FIELD PROCEDURE: RT 7VRS
4. DATES OF SURVEY: 6-24-202 I - 3-22-2022
5. GEOID MODEL: 18
6. UNITS: U.S. SURVEY FEET
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER AND SEAL
THIS I3`'' DAY OF A, ;, 2022, A.D.
BRIAN S. HOCKETT
Sheet
List Table
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
--
COVER
S1
REACH KJ1
S2
REACH KJ 1
S3
REACH KJ 1
S4
REACH KJ 1
S5
REACH KJ 1
S6
REACH KJ 1
S7
SWALE A
S8
SWALE B
J
i .,
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
100
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
\so\\ I I I I I l 1 l//////,�
� p%..FESS/O••./y
:a SEAL �`
L-5165
= .%.9y gf r3/aa,,o.:
c..• .-.
�j
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/13/2022
RELEASED FOR:
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:

FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\100900_AB_Design.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
LGE
0„00
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
_ TB'
LGE
TB —
T6�
g31
2+50
X5 I
7
7
t LCE
\tCE
vvv
\ \
\
— TB---- \VA 2.'
— TB— `—__ _-- BB-
- BB— ——
TB' �g8�
O
3+00 \� 3+50- BB----- BB
BB
\` BB
LCE
BB -- — —— BB-----
— — — — TB-----
g91
X5 2
B
— TB —
TB---
REACH KJ I -A
HEADWATER VALLEY RESTORATION
STA I +42 TO I 0+65
X5 2
g31
— — TB TB —
TB-- -- TB_ — TB-
+50 5+00 ---
— — — TB — — — —
5+50 G+
— BB--= -- BB
— BB----- BB —
— TB----- TB--
g91
00
LCE
— BB
g31
0
0
� N
A
0
88
80
75
70
65
GO
AS -BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS -BUILT
TOP OF BANK
0+00 0+50
I +00 I +50 2+00 2+50
3+00
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
3+50
4+00
4+50
5+00
80
75
70
65
GO
5+50 6+00
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK
TREELINE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
WETLAND DEPRESSION —
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
HAYBALE TOE PROTECTION
ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
LOG STRUCTURE
ROCK STRUCTURE
BRUSH BED SILL
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
LCE
TB
f23
0
0
VP#
J
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
100
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
,\\\\11I l I l i i i,,,/,j/
:a SEAL r"
-5165
S \
ii,i,nn nio
%...,a7 — '''.1....„-'4.11%..4
3
1 "=30
60
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2" = FULL SCALE
1' 1 " = HALF SCALE 1'
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/13/2022
RELEASED FOR:
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
SI

\ABRL\100900 AB Design.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
ILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowfo
TB —
— — I [J
5+50 6+
— — BB
— — — BB
BB—
BB —
— TB—
;31
LCE
00
— — BB —
_-- TB —- —
TB
LCE
X5 3
� Q D
LCE
REACH KJ I -A
HEADWATER VALLEY RESTORATION
STA I +42 TO I 0+65
— TB — —
— TB
7+50
— BB----- Bg
I
— — TB —
--- BB----- BB—_
6 — TB --
— TB--0
X5 3
-c6
;31
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
LCE,
\ \\
/ z\\ \\
\\\ \
9+50 \\ \\\
g QO
BB BB 1� -- BB —--- - —' � \I\� \gym
BB_
— TB — —
;31
LCE
-- BB—
88----- BB--
;31
— BB
;rn
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
es \� /O
ee, -SD k00 1\ /
r
ee\\� -mod ems\ s���!� ��� \ \ XS /i
V �--_�� \Vr\ --\'0
Tee \ i! T.(51.cP
\
\ \\ \
\ \\\ \
\ \\ A
\�T\ .\
\ao \
\ \� \
\ \\ \
\\\ \
\ m�
\
\\
\ \\
\ \ \44-
REACH KJI-13 \\\\\\\
RESTORATION \ vA \
STA IO+65TO 19+17 A \\\
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
00 1\ /
�eJ l I / /"%`
0 /
\\\/ / xv) — — r //// x
<---.-,,,,Q,
\ `\ 13 + O(
), B BB
XS 5
80
75
80
70 -
65 -
60 -
AS -BUILT
TOP OF BANK
AS -BUILT
CHANNEL BED
+00 6+50 7+00 7+50
+00
8+50 9+00
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
9+50
I0+00
I0+50 II+00
75
70
65
60
11+50 12+00
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK
TREELINE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
WETLAND DEPRESSION
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
HAYBALE TOE PROTECTION
ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
LOG STRUCTURE
ROCK STRUCTURE
BRUSH BED SILL
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46
LCE
TB
BB
f23
0J
0
0
V P#
J
3600
1
res
Glenwood Ave, Suite
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
100
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
��,�\\\ \ i i 1 l 1 u i ///�,,1
\, %.••FEssio•./
:a SEAL
L-5165
0
it
1 "=30
60
FULL SCALE:
30
2' FULL SCALE
1 " = HALF SCALE
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/13/2022
RELEASED FOR:
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
S2

\ABRL\100900 AB Design.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
ILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowfo
\\
\9 \ee\ Te\
\ \\ N
' \ e\ eN
\ 6,\ \\
\ 8 \e6 T6
\\
\\ N
NN N
\\ \
6> xge\ Te\
\\ \N\
\ 9
T
e \
N
N.
\ �.5\ \ _ _I 0+50
\ \ _- TB
— BB
80
75
70
65
60
W
L
H
&LI 2 00
.l\\
r r:/� \ _�� �/co
_I._5
0
XO ��/7 Te
/
4\
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
REACH KJ I -B
RESTORATION
STA 1 0+65 TO 1 9+ 17
X5 5
AN T 4\
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
/N
4\
\O
4\
4\
4\
'
4
SWALE A
4\
OO x�0
-03 —e,a
4\
4\
4\
4\
4\
\ O GW-3
4\
4\
4\
\I
4\
`\'I it \1
XS 6/7 I I /I 0
O
Gw I / l CO 6,
.
\\
' I 'I
:-
4\
4\
4\
4\
4\
4\
6S�
4\
4\
1�4-00
4\
\4\ /
\\ 17+50y
4\
4\
4\
4\
00
L
1 8 00
-5
S -BUILT
CHANNEL BED
AS -BUILT
TOP OF BANK
13+00
13+50
14+50
15+00
15+50
17+00
17+50
80
75
70
65
GO
15+00
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK
TREELINE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
50
46
WETLAND DEPRESSION —
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
HAYBALE TOE PROTECTION
ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
LOG STRUCTURE
ROCK STRUCTURE
BRUSH BED SILL
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
LC E
TB
BB
0
.,
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
100
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
% ,a„..%-1-4) 13)0\`'.:,,,.
1"= 30
60
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2" = FULL SCALE
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/13/2022
RELEASED FOR:
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
S3

FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\100900_AB_Design.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
1
-A
-A
\\
I); //\
1,XS Te 8
-A
0 GW-5
rn
-A
co
\\\ G4
\\ \
\ I\\
11ml
I I I REACH KJ 1 -B
1 W 1 1 RESTORATION
IIIII STAI0+65To19+17
Col 11 1
Illll
111E81
I'll
I WI 1
1;/I
�111
1jlII'
I1AI
I►1�
/
0
rn
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
SCE
INSTALLED 56 LF
OF 66" X 5 I " CMPA
INV. IN: 61.201
INV. OUT: G I .04'
AL) 8
20+00 -
SCE
X5 8/9
re
XS 9
00 ,s�i/�
LCE
64—
X50 0
Lc
REACH KJ 1 -C
RESTORATION
STA 1 9+85 To 35+57
—TB se �_ �\ • Z L
Te_�
g91
Te O
62
.g37
\\23+00
�`TB-
7
LCE
23+50-'—
\\
LC
TB 6 \e\
NN
•
xTB B�
Y
66
xs I
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK
TREELINE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
WETLAND DEPRESSION
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
HAYBALE TOE PROTECTION
ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
LOG STRUCTURE
ROCK STRUCTURE
BRUSH BED SILL
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46
LC E
TB
BB
f23
0J
0
0
C
V P#
70
65
60
55
50
18
AIN—
\
AS -BUILT
/
TOP
OF
BANK
—
—
—
—
ll
1
/----\
,
INSTALLED
\J
"
�
66" x 5
I CMPA
��
CHANNEL
AS BUILT
BED
R
CONSERVATION
+
m
EASEMENT
BREAK
m
Q
H
Q
H
+00 18+50 19+00 1 9+50 20+00 20+50 2 I +00
2 I +50
22+00
22+50
23+00
23+50
24+1
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
70
65
60
55
50
0
3600 Glenwood Ave,
Raleigh, NC
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
re__..„,...s
1
Suite
27612
100
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
0\\\I I I I I I I1/,,,
:a SEAL
L-5165
/ vim`•'- '''I'I I III
GK��I:3--->-6)41P//./.4...4;.:°,it
�`
\\\ \
1 "=30
60
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/13/2022
RELEASED FOR:
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
S4

FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\100900_AB_Design.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
i
kO
0
7/ 7
LCE
k5 / 7/ TB a\`
—� /
LC
-57
- Ts
24+50
= J
/
LCE
XS 10/1 1
0
J //R'
<0X // ��-
// / //
/
_X5 IQ
LCE
REACH KJ I -C
RESTORATION
STA 19+85 To 35+57
BB
- X5 11
TREATMENT POOL
2c0 27+00
/�
B-23731
T@
SWAL
grn
v
N \
m
03
INSTALLED ENGINEERED
SEDIMENT PACK
T.@ @� BB/
9 /-00
Stage Recorder]
Go
O
O
co
XS 12
XS 1 2/1 3
XS 13
P
O
Xs
O
Lc
3 1 +00
B_— -
-- \
--� 6,
70
G5
GO
55
50
24
I 1
I I
4-
/N__��
AS
TOP
-BUILT
OF BANK
/
AS
-BUILT
BED
-
CHANNEL
1
+00
24+50
25+00
I 1 1
25+50
1
26+00
1 1 1
26+50
1 1
27+00
1 1 1
27+50
1
1 1
28+00
1 1
28+50
1 1 1
29+00
29+50
1
30+
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
70
G5
GO
55
50
0
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK
TREELINE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
WETLAND DEPRESSION —
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
HAYBALE TOE PROTECTION
ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
LOG STRUCTURE
ROCK STRUCTURE
BRUSH BED SILL
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
O
LC E
TB
f23
0
0
0.
VP#
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
100
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
��,0111111II1/l//,j/
\No-.••F• ESsi....
_ : - SEAL
L-5165
6) "a° SU/R.`'
'// H
// nil
/y
�
•'`ti
• , .
0\
_
1 "=30
60
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2" = FULL SCALE
I` 1 " = HALF SCALE 1'
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/13/2022
RELEASED FOR:
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
S5

FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\100900_AB_Design.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
Stage RecorcPr7
n k-'
\� .e—� \ • Tg9\ `)O
\\<9•\ 0
\\ N T
Tee 8
LCE
3 ► +OO
BB— B
_7 \\ \\\\
yvy
— 6e \'°
6\
•
eg
i
LCE
]DI
LCt
i
\ T6 88 a33
REACH KJ I -C
RESTORATION
5TA 19+85 To 35+57
]DI
33 S0
/ //
]DI
LCE
X5 14
k 00 / x�0
3 �
LCt
X5 1 5
OP
--/
= TB
;9"\
rc\5
TB
36+00
36+5036�i1
I
GO
55
50
45
40
3
AS -BUILT
TOP
OF BANK
CHANNEL
AS -BUILT
BED
V
/
�___
lr
1
11
„ „
+00 30+50
3
1 +00
1 I
3 I +50
I I I
32+00
1 1 1 I I I I I I I I
32+50 33+00 33+50
1 1 1 I I
34+00
I I I I I I I I I I „ „
34+50 35+00 35+50 36+
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
GO
55
50
45
40
0
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK
TREELINE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
WETLAND DEPRESSION —
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
HAYBALE TOE PROTECTION
ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
LOG STRUCTURE
ROCK STRUCTURE
BRUSH BED SILL
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
LCE
TB
f23
0J
0
0
VP#
/
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
\\,0\11111 I I Ill////
\, x-o -.••• FEssio••../
: - SEAL �`
:. L-5165
ipi.. SURD ..
illill"_\_\--\_.\_\_\—\
kii://1/1
A
'1..7''k''''...•
"."-A
/ 1••.-A
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2' FULL SCALE
1' 1 " = HALF SCALE 1'
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/13/2022
RELEASED FOR:
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
S6

\ABRL\100900 AB Design.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
ILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowfo
2�00
3A.00
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
75
70
65
60
55
3+
U
J
U
J
\�
1 - Ak0O
TB
—Ts-
TB.� ' BB BB
--
� S�
TREATMENT POOL
W-2
1
LCE
LCE
_ — -—= XS F
—tee
x / . 8
7 1\\ \\N'
6./ \ as
VP 4
REACH KJ I -B
7
+0
SWALE A
(RESTORATION)
X5 r \\s9\
,/
F///// i
o.,
N
X5�
W-I b\
r
LCE
T /
6
F
17/
F
I L I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
1
AS -BUILT
TOP OF BA
K
EASEMENT
AS -BUILT
CHANNEL
BED
■
1 1
-
- -
-
-
- -
-
I -
- - 1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1 1
-
-
- -
1 1 1
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
•• ,•• .•• .40
•••40•60•40•40 041
40 40 *IMO
%$...$11110A
ARAO. tati
OGW-4
0
75
70
65
60
55
\\
17 ,) i
//
7//
.�/
//
//// /,_BB
11
II
1 �I
F
— SS
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK
TREELINE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
WETLAND DEPRESSION
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
HAYBALE TOE PROTECTION
ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
LOG STRUCTURE
ROCK STRUCTURE
BRUSH BED SILL
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
50
46
LCE
TB
BB
O©
0
0.
V P#
/
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
100
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
\\,\\\\Unuliiiii//
:a SEAL
:. L-5165 ,
ip U R
rein illiwo‘(
i
60
1 "=30
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2" = FULL SCALE
1 " = HALF SCALE
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/13/2022
RELEASED FOR:
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
SWALE A
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
S7

FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\100900_AB_Design.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
ox
0
0+50
70
G5
GO
55
SWALE B
TREATMENT POOL
�O
)I::I
Sta e Rece //
\\ co\
1\ \
m
0)/ /;/
192
I
/
O/
x 4:/
co
Xv
— I — \:- 2+50 sL ��/ �m
I—
8,----f#/ \s\-
�� m) r
,al_- 1 I \
/ /%/
\ 1 /,/
/7/
/%
I(
N
88
8J.
INSTALLED ENGINEERED
SEDIMENT PACK
/
1
/
,
MN •
MENNEMENNEd
MENNEMENEWI
MiliMENEW
MEKTIE
=NM
NEWAIELEME
MENIMMEIFILIE
"%EMMEN=
im
=MENNEN
MN =MENNEN
MN MN =MENNEN
14111
AS -BUILT
CHANNEL BED
I +00
I +50
2+00
2+50
SCALE: I10R I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
3+00
70
G5
GO
55
3+50
fl
rn
rn
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK
TREELINE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
WETLAND DEPRESSION —
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
HAYBALE TOE PROTECTION
ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
LOG STRUCTURE
ROCK STRUCTURE
LC E
TB
f23
0J
BRUSH BED SILL ;/%0
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER 0
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
VP#
J
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
100
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
\\\\\U I I I l 11 /11///
_. * 9 ,
_ :a SEAL
, L-5165
.•.-1tiy'/13J _ :
_
(lig
flitim
ttIIIIII//1'
/4
1 "=30
60
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2" = FULL SCALE
I` 1 " = HALF SCALE 1'
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/13/2022
RELEASED FOR:
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
SWALE B
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
TRS
SHEET NUMBER:
S8

FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\Record Drawings\100900_RD_COVER.dwg SAVED BY: Bcarroll
Corner
Hargett
Crocsro3ds
armor to Wn
Huffman -town
WW1 arantsd
z: goyy Forks
PROJECT LOCATION
Brocks
Richland s
Comfort
Gum l3
■' 114.-mameti
® 2021 Microsoft oration C 2021 TomTom el
VICINITY MAP
NTS
PROJECT DIRECTORY
OWNER:
LINDSAY CROCKER
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
2 17 WEST JONES ST., SUITE 3000A
RALEIGH, NC 27603
DESIGNED BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 276 12
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 276 12
DMS PROJECT #:
CONTRACT #:
USACE ACTION ID #:
RFP #:
DWR #:
100095
7746
SAW-20 19-00487
6-007577
20 19-0495
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE AS -BUILT SURVEY SEALED BY
BRIAN S. HOCKETT, PLS (L-5 165) ON APRIL 13, 2022.
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHITE OAK RIVER BASIN: HUC 03030001
APRIL 2022
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
SITE MAP
NTS
Sheet
List
Table
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
--
COVER
S 1
REACH KJ 1
S2
REACH KJ 1
S3
REACH KJ 1
S4
REACH KJ 1
S5
REACH KJ 1
S6
REACH KJ 1
S7
SWALE A
S8
SWALE B
1
, ,
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
'JI/)�
r;.
es
SEAL
-z.
!�
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/14/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:

FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\Record Drawings\100900_RD_DESIGN.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
0
80
75
70
G5
GO
0
°goo
LCE
L/
O
g91
7(
LCE
XS I
BB--
g31
ADDITIONAL DRAIN TILE LOCATED
DURING CONSTRUCTION. DRAIN TILE
OUTLET W/MATTED SWALE ADDED.
LCE
TZ
LCE
6S
i
z — �s
XS 2
—BB---BB �—
— BB----- Bg-
REACH KJ I -A
HEADWATER VALLEY RESTORATION
0'
-
BB
XS 2
LCE
--- TB---
-- TB_
— — — BB +1 — BB—
B
B
— BB----- BB—
i— -
N
69
— BB----- B
— BB — —
-- - TR—
LCE
-‘g
68
—
PROPOSED
TOP
OF BANK
5-BUILT
OF5
-OP
NK
Il
CHANNEL
P,S-BUILT
BED
PROPOSED
CHANNEL
BED
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
0
0
k
� N
z�
U
80
75
70
G5
GO
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
TOP OF BANK
BOTTOM OF BANK
TREELI NE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED HAYBALE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH BED SILL
PROPOSED ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT HAYBALE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT BRUSH BED SILL
50
46
— — — — TB
— — — — BB
LCE
■...........■
V/zil
0
0
0 /
r
c5:5)
AS -BUILT ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
9
0
0
VP#
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
1
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
o\ki•�Ayt tClA Roi/i4/•
L
"9'
`` ,c ) c_SS/04,
SEAL
0�5$0
its ;ii►lko
3
1 "=30
60
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2" = FULL SCALE
1` 1" = HALF SCALE 1\
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/14/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
SI

Ti
8
FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\Record Drawings\100900_RD_DESIGN.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
i
- LCE
I----- _---- -TB--
;31
LCE
88
--
BB —
BB —
LCE
X5 3
00— — — BB
—' ee
Bs —
T�
X5 3
gal
LC E
gal
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
LCE
-- BB----- BB -
- BB----- BB—
TB---=BT�
= BB
sB
REACH KJ I -A
HEADWATER
VALLEY RESTORATION
;31
BB —
----- -BB
���
;91
REMOVED DRAIN TILE AND INSTALLED
DRAIN TILE OUTLET W/ MATTED SWALE
\G-
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
<53
\\ \
\
67
46)
,01
G'?
207
— — TB
g
-/\
co
<9Ij /7 \
-, � / / I / / /,
\ \(3
4
//
XS 5
80
75
70
65
60
6
1
1
PROPOSED
TOP
OF BANK
BANK
AS
TOP
-BUILT
OF
1
-BUILT
A
C-IAN
EL BED
PROPOSED
CHANNEL
BED
I
1 1
1 1 1
1 1
I
1
1
SCALE: hIOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
80
75
70
65
60
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
50
46
TOP OF BANK — — — — — TB
BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — — BB
TREELI NE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED HAYBALE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
54
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH BED SILL
PROPOSED ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
A5-BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT HAYBALE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT BRUSH BED SILL
AS -BUILT ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
LCE
■...........■
0
9
r
9
c5:5)
0
0
VP#
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
•�Ayt t�lA RDi®''''•,
St-
SEAL
04 58,0
ON�
1 "=30
60
i It
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2" = FULL SCALE
1\ 1" = HALF SCALE 1\
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/14/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S2

>ioo48 :A8 GEMS 6MP'NJISEa as 006001\s6uinnma paooet:\1U8V\
FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Co
75
70
65
GO
55
12
ADDITIONAL DRAIN TILE LOCATED
DURING CONSTRUCTION. DRAIN TILE
OUTLET W/MATTED SWALE ADDED.
REACH KJ I -B
RESTORATION
T �
PROPOSED WETLAND DEPRESSIONS
1 O GW-3
4\ 1
INSTALLED DRAIN TILE OUTLET
W/ MATTED SWALE
1
1
PROPOSED
TOP
OF BANK
AS -BUILT
TOP
OF BANK
PROPOSED
CHANNEL
-A
CHANNEL
AS -BUILT
BED
BED
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
75
70
G5
GO
55
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
50
46
TOP OF BANK — — — — — TB
BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — — BB
TREELI NE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED HAYBALE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH BED SILL
PROPOSED ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT HAYBALE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT BRUSH BED SILL
AS -BUILT ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
LCE
Uk92952s
■...........■
••••
9
r
°
c5:5)
9
0
0
0
VP#
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
\°sty tClA RDA®''''•,
. ,OSL OFESS/p,Y/'t11
SEAL
0450
GINE-C-.
1 "=30
60
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2' FULL SCALE
1` 1" = HALF SCALE 1`
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/14/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S3

FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\Record Drawings\100900_RD_DESIGN.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
\
It
cDr
l/I
IlL
O
co
co
cig
co
O GW-5
0
PROPOSED 56 LF
OF GG" x 5 I " CMPA
INV. IN. G I .0' G I .20'
INV. OUT. 60.8' 61.04'
20+00
z:z -to
AGE
LCE
XS 8 _ —
006,66
XS 8/9
REACh KJ I -C
RESTORATION
-
//
BB%
LCE
+00
BB
rn
G4
0
rn
SCE
-.1::k1k.)4k..
st♦•!.�•♦•�wpb •�
wiplo
Or�w..ilt:,...ito
,Y'� ���S�j�% !->
kibribilii- Nip.. •ftw.,„,
ppy:414 .1, iii %Ariel a
0 • ♦ •a 1
Vi�I.� �./
�♦• � Ill. •♦ % 1
♦•%' •� 1.
�,•♦•�' •.I1
0
rn
i
REMOVED DRAIN TILE AND INSTALLED
DRAIN TILE OUTLET W/ MATTED SWALE
g37
SCE
\\ __ ,Rram\ \
\\ / i/ V7—b T`
.,! \�cP
7
0
0
CV
W Ln
(1)
z
LCE
\ B ice— TB�\e\0
\e\ r +Q
BB
TB
GI
Y
G5
(4(
X5 10
70
G5
GO
55
50
18
�1
I
-
-
-
PPOPQSED
T
P OF
BANK
---
----
---
-
AS -BUILT
TOP
OF BANK
----------��
-
INSTALLED
I
_
_11
-
--
-
--
- ----
GG"x 5
"CMPA
\�
�\
\/
�
Tillr\
/
I
CHANNEL
AS -BUILT
BED
PROPOSED
CH1NNEL
BED
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BREAK
E
+
r
co
+
m
Q
m
I-
n
cn
1 1 1 1 1
+00 18+50
i i 1 i i 1 1 I I I I I I I I
1 9+00 1 9+50 20+00 20+50 2 1 +00
1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1
2 1 +50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+
SCALE: hOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
70
G5
GO
55
50
0
a
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
50
4G
W W W
W W W
TOP OF BANK — — — — — TB
BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — — BB
TREELI NE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED HAYBALE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH BED SILL
PROPOSED ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT HAYBALE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT BRUSH BED SILL
AS -BUILT ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
LCE
■...........■
••••
/
r
o 9
c5:5)
9
0
0
VP#
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
•�Ayt t�lA RDi®'''//,
Z
i
SEAL
0450
iV IN6#
1 "=30
60
``
ir
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2" = FULL SCALE
1\ 1" = HALF SCALE 1\
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/14/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S4

>ioo48 :A8 GEMS 6MP'NJISEa as 006001\s6uinnma paooet:\1U8V\
FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Co
SCE
0/�e
eat �?)/
3
70
65
GO
55
50
24
SCE
(P _
/ �' / Ts 696
/—13'Be�T
gal
SCE
SCE
XS 1 0/ 1 I
//7- �> 0
XS I
�C5TII _
—
---
—
gpl
REACH KJ I -C
RESTORATION
g31
6Th
BB —_ ww� x0
\T�s,--J/ /
gal
59
SWALE B
g31
,.rea+��ca,•,, ` v
Stvca \Pecorder
U
\\<
0
'P\ 0
XS 12
XS 12/13
1
PROPOSED
TOP
OF BANK
--
—
--
_�
---�
AS -BUILT
TOP
OF BANK
A41,—
AS-BUILT
CHANNEL
BED
PROPOSED
CHANNEL
BED
+00
24+50
1 1 i 1
25+00
1 1
25+50
1 1
26+00
1
26+50
1 1 1 1
27+00
1
27+50
28+00
28+50
29+00
29+50
30+
SCALE: IOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
70
G5
GO
55
50
0
59
XS 13
\\\\\- 3 I +00
.
Lc
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
50
46
W W W
W W W
TOP OF BANK — — — — — TB
BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — — BB
TREELI NE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED HAYBALE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH BED SILL
PROPOSED ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT HAYBALE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT BRUSH BED SILL
AS -BUILT ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
LCE
fmk92952s
■...........■
\
9
r
c5:5)
9
0
0
VP#
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
oki°�k� tClA RDi® iiiiiio
\
'''�•,
es
SEAL
0�5�0
tz
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1\ 1" = HALF SCALE 1`
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/14/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S5

>ioo48 :A8 GEMS 6MP'NJISEa as 006001\s6uinnma paooet:\1U8V\
0
FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Co
,
29�
— rg" \\
St�c\ "Recorder
\
TB -
XS 12/13
X5 13
LCE
31+00'
2
\
Be
64
-62—/
REACH KJ I -C
RESTORATION
Tg?X Q g3�
• yz
e ��
55-
-57
•
XS 14
LCt-
XS 15
/
/---
i
—56----
53
— TB __ _
/ /
— —56
g91
3G
00
60
55
50
45
40
30
1
�—
—
-
----
—
PROPOSED
TOP
OF
BANK
—
—
—
IL
f—'-�
/
\
1
AS
TOP
-BUILT
OF
BANK
CHANNEL
AS
-BUILT
BED
1
—
/
J
—
\
/
PROPOSED
CHANNEL
BED
_
/
I
�
I
+00
30+50
1 1 1
3
1
+00
3
1
+50
32+00
32+50
1
33+00
33+50
34+00
34+50
35+00
35+50
36+
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
60
55
50
45
40
0
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
50
46
W W W
W W W
TOP OF BANK — — — — — TB
BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — — BB
TREELI NE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED HAYBALE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH BED SILL
PROPOSED ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT HAYBALE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT BRUSH BED SILL
AS -BUILT ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
LCE
■...........■
\
• 9
r
c5:5)
0
0
VP#
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
1
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
..
\°�\y tClA RDA®'",
rSEAT\E
Z�v,
yifs
GINE�'-�
;
�
per;`.
Al
L.7
m "
7..M•lh..
a . . =I:='
,
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1` 1" = HALF SCALE 1`
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/14/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH KJ 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S6

>ioo48 :A8 GEMS 6MP'NJISEa as 006001\s6uinnma paooet:\1U8V\
FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Co
7
7
i
/
1
°POSED G4
RCP
INV. : _4.46'
OUT: 64.
Not Installed During Project
Construction
Crossing To Be Installed By 0
Landowner At Later Date 3k0
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
/
REMOVED DRAIN TILE AND INSTALLED
DRAIN TILE OUTLET W/ MATTED SWALE
7
U
J
00
U
J
LL1� TB /
saw\,
lam ---el
ease TR
91
N F N
5 4- 00
Iy—el
,�'` ���\ .may i��q.
, :N. - ---- - - -- --- - )
SWALE A
RESTORATION
/
W-2,
/
N
I 66 REACH IQ I
N
N
//
/7
x v` vv 7+00 \
v�� ���_ --- vN
.. \\,....--- _7-7— --... - N..\ \
I�N N of \ \\
LCE
N F
N N
F
/
6
e
i N
N
r•
G
N
OWG W-4
N
N
LCE
N N
N N N
7 N N
0
N N F
N N
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND
DEPRESSIONS
F
75
70
65
60
55
2
-
/
/
/
/
\.
\
\
\
1
AS
TOP
-BUILT
OF
BANK
PRC-CONSTRUCTION
GRADE
`
/
---_*____„,________,___________
/
AS
CHANNEL
-BUILT
BED
—PROPOSED
CHANNEL
BED
1/4T10I
SCALE: hOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
75
70
65
60
55
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
50
40
TOP OF BANK — — — — — TB
BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — — BB
TREELI NE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED HAYBALE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH BED SILL
PROPOSED ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT HAYBALE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT BRUSH BED SILL
AS -BUILT ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
LCE
fmk92952s
■...........■
r
c5:5)
°
0
0
VP#
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
1
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
oki\°\y tClA RDA./////,
,„,r,sesio,,,,s
SEAL
040
0
/9-I
liz'
1 "=30
e
60
FULL SCALE:
30
2" = FULL SCALE
1` 1" = HALF SCALE 1`
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/14/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
SWALE A
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S7

FILE NAME:R:\Rescad\Projects\100900-Cowford\ABRL\Record Drawings\100900_RD_DESIGN.dwg SAVED BY: Bhockett
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ //r /
.. ///�
,`b-
- / Stage Recopder
\ \\ //
°-A\\\v/
',..\\
J)
I i)/
/
0x / // /
0
I + 00— pi :--__ /
/ � 2-4-00
ae � \ � 4 / ,// 00J
N
\ /
E.
/ '\\ \c't \,,,,
� ~)I\
�� Ili/
i //�/
/ /
/ % /./ ' /
/// / /
/ /
cn Im / /
/
0
REACH KJ I / Co /
/
v Avvv / / / /
'\ / /
u� Al /
/ / -•II y1 2 / / / // /
/ / // / / / / / /
I/ �// / / /
\ / / ,;.r, / / / / /
TREATMENT POOL
/
/ / / / °/ / / / / /
/ r (f / / \ I .JI\� / / / / / /
�I I A \ / / / / / /
\ /\\ /I///
rn
/
70
G5
GO
55
I
BANK
AS
TO'
-BUILT
OF
PROPOSED
CHANNEL
-
- -
-
BED
��
\lr
1
1
1
7
�/
\__r-
\
i
CHANNEL
AS
-DUI
BiD
T
PRE -CONSTRUCTION
GRADE
\
-
I
1 1 1 1
1 1 1
+
+
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
+
+
70
G5
GO
55
LEGEND
CONTOUR MAJOR
CONTOUR MINOR
WETLAND
50
46
W W W
W W W
TOP OF BANK — — — — — TB
BOTTOM OF BANK — — — — — BB
TREELI NE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
PROPOSED HAYBALE PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH BED SILL
PROPOSED ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT HAYBALE PROTECTION
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT BRUSH BED SILL
LCE
■...........■
0
0
0 9
r
9
c5:5)
AS -BUILT ENGINEERED SEDIMENT PACK
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
9
0
0
VP#
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
•�\°\.\� tClA ROi//4.1'
oiC
SEAL
04 5�
%F` FHGINE-C--
., CV'''‘-
ii Hum
(et'
qfpft
Wit adir
91,4
, a go ,
1 "=30
60
FULL SCALE:
0 30
2' FULL SCALE
1\ 1" = HALF SCALE 1\
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
4/14/2022
RELEASED FOR:
RECORD DRAWINGS
PROJECT NAME:
COWFORD MITIGATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING TITLE:
SWALE B
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
100900
MGB
BRC
BSH
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S8
\. J

Appendix F
Soil Profile

Cowford Mitigation Project Soil Profile Sampling
Soil Sample ID: GW1 Staff: Hannah Gadai Date: April 28, 2022
Horizon (in.) Color Redox Redox Percent Texture Structure Consistency Notes
0-16 10YR Yes 5% Silt loam Granular
2/2
16-24 10YR No Clay Sub-angular
3/1 loam blocky
24-28 10YR No Clay Blocky
6/3
Soil Profile:
,!-.,v-vr,*. \\\,;;-, '„if -4 As-4 Ivro..e.- - r.... .,,,':-„,ic. .. . „„a
.6... 4,1.56.,.., ,,. .. ...,k.. ,„„..„..., 1 4' .°Tr .-"re.,00, 11:37 ti,,,
'
x r . .
• ,.._
= . ,,,:,
� -r 7:30,,, r-� ., , - ��_. i i - k"oa .- . . n. .-°+ ' V '-'
.,.. ,. ..r #
- -I'r44 - - 1-,-4.- -__', 1 , ' tb‘Y'''Yc, .A4
Wi l rI
tI�(
1, -
it
. .t., ,,,,I W.,. .arr40%,, ,,,,,,. ...,
..
t
, ef
�, fa' �'
7.1.'t•:.,,A, '1,, ‘. .,,, , ' ' / ,,,e,,,'4/0''',, \'1!-,
- -r or- &•.. �, x yr�>d �,?- I°
,;4" _irt,tA -, - ''k ,,
4AR, >7, , 4.°1.,' .1.44' s\'' ;-
vir ° `
�, t % �.
x2tA,1 ' .4 4 4s:'

Cowford Mitigation Project Soil Profile Sampling
Soil Sample ID: GW2 Staff: Ryan Medric and Heath Hidlay Date: November 2, 2021
Horizon (in.) Color Redox Redox Texture Structure Consistency Notes
Percent
0-6 10YR No Silt Granular
3/2 loam
6-20 10YR Yes 50% Clay Sub- Conc. 7YR 5/8
6/4 Concentrations/ loam angular Dep. 10YR 7/1
depletions blocky
20+ 10YR Yes 5% Clay Blocky Conc. 10YR 7/6
6/1 Concentrations
Soil Profile:
�\ 1 -•! . '• b 4 :t `{' may'.
j. ,S M1i ,,,, r r"-v .J .5- ye-x - ,, -' \ i;.,L -
x
-„,;--.,,,--,,y
1 i, A -y1 " ( o ,Vq-- ii 4l -r p
',4,NA"&',,:•'CIPIt-, it•,:" "" -.'!'4'.'.i. ---\A 1(,,.',- 4,_`'',f,'-W,'''. •
r r
p. ^ ' 1, ,' fr C I ;14-- °FB
►` 4 Win �ist rf . ' v ' ,'�,
lk
„ f ,,V:;:-, ,,,,/I,,,_ .;',,,4 -,I s "i
,. i ,,,, % .,;,...rk.._.: ,,...... .,,,
-41'4
J,� F ��1.,.7-•11: ,
/11,....---
— L _--'''et--- .4.. j P` 1 _ .T,,'. l� , -
i•,--; 7.1r,,:lir L__ALA._ , r. ' i!.. ,6' . ,-----'°,
a.
ii
,,..
, ,,r. .... , ..,, „
1. 'r ,„von' Tg n -,
1 y IlEN k 1 "
d i.

Cowford Mitigation Project Soil Profile Sampling
Soil Sample ID: GW3 Staff: Ryan Medric and Heath Hidlay Date: November 2, 2021
Horizon (in.) Color Redox Redox Texture Structure Consistency Notes
Percent
0-12 10YR No Silt Granular
3/2 loam
12-20 10YR Yes 5% Silty Sub Conc. 10YR 8/6
7/2 Concentrations clay angular
loam blocky
20+ 10YR Yes 10% Clay Sub Conc. 10YR 7/8
6/2 Concentrations loam angular
Blocky
Soil Profile:
j/C# ',f 4. t 1 1 rT�f 2
u'
*Ni.
A
33 7
uVoio<
4.
I:I: �
' .\ \., I �....
r � I,
fff��� 4 �: :r p
ift�I ,/'j r a t av a si .. .
— 1 \�, t. ' 3,. N . `�Y' ?'sign., a a,
3 , 1 o ..T. -r i y !j
�\ - h
gg g
et
A
/ ,
- �IY � r

Cowford Mitigation Project Soil Profile Sampling
Soil Sample ID: GW4 Staff: Ryan Medric and Heath Hidlay Date: November 2, 2021
Horizon (in.) Color Redox Redox Texture Structure Consistency Notes
Percent
0-9 10YR No Silt Granular
3/2 loam
9-21 10YR Yes 15% Clay Sub Conc. 10YR 6/8
6/4 Concentrations/ loam angular Dep. 10YR 7/1
depletions blocky
21+
6/1 Concentrations 10YR Yes 30% Clay Blocky Conc. 10YR 5/8
loam
Soil Profile:
'1y`'a ylk lax �$. - �l 5 . . �' . / `.
""-',Pt;:-.
�A. 1 ✓ y s F`� raja O".j.7 7'' r
" it. 1 `E..--:,`::!-Tate
.,y.rc,� 1 F - yea C;vd'3"+$� 'Z,�...
'-:.', '.' .-- -,;.z..-- -73.-1-,-,-,,,A, !.,-37:.-3.-...zr 4.'1.„4.,. iit. r -.'., •---',, .-',, , - -Tv'-,:;=*"0:-.17a-.:,,v,,,ir...e,:t-
.... .. .._—7 ---.Lf--."::--..i=...,. _ - , : - .- _,`J '-~ --% - • - .-,- 1,4Fiig.,4,----4,,'`...,-,..;._ '-1--4-,.1,--i-Alw,
I - � p, ik tyR k _ 3
•
'€ - cw s. -1 1 f x � T ti �� s , t f r �!-, A ,'r � zm " t '�+^ ' r � o rc} jf \N R 6w. � , , ,M,Al. .'\i,
� I / - F aT
• xJ .x el. ,,.f v ., t r .h r "' ' . Ss
,--- - - . foir - 1,-
40, 4,. ..
-rt
`1 - ` s.. #.. p � tz .�
" s
ati z--v;
Kio
`vit
¢ x� *E v d° L4� %-f s 'v . - .` .' ` iY a v a L_ w S1 k , „.a 4e .; s 5 ra y . K' v
•
✓ , r cl 1 da
4
. t- - . _ �1, '' ' g •yti #it-/ -'r ..14 d �r '3r ' s �e`r .:. � rr1!. ,
, at �A�� r , �� � r i_ii... ,. t� ! -'$y' +� A w

Cowford Mitigation Project Soil Profile Sampling
Soil Sample ID: GW5 Staff: Ryan Medric and Heath Hidlay Date: November 2, 2021
Horizon (in.) Color Redox Redox Texture Structure Consistency Notes
Percent
0-9 10YR No Silt Granular
3/2 loam
9-15 10YR No Silty Sub-
5/2 clay angular
loam blocky
15-20 10YR Yes 10% Silty Sub- Conc. 10YR 8/6
4/3 Concentrations/ clay angular Dep. 10YR 7/2
Depletions loam blocky
20+ 10YR Yes 25% Clay Blocky Conc. 10YR 7/6
6/1 Concentrations Loam
Soil Profile:
� ;- r�
F i - y. _
1 , " .fit F ram, +`by �
p 3 A
a z, - . -." ,..4% s. ,:‘,.. 4„, - .. ,,
... .
. _ ,.„,,t,,f,000..,,x- ,, _ „,-,,,,,;„ 4
. __..---,- - , ..: . ..,„, ,- . ,,„,„.„....„,
s_. fit.. Y., } y „�=,. ., . .
. ...„.„ ..,,,,,, w
..,
,_ . ,
._ , ,
vp • -i ,' F kM'4; �y �GiJ
'
:!\.• .;4." -,..!':',.,:t41' ' 1,-::-•4:14=-:1,c.t. - -4.,,.:, ,;.-..-- 2,-_ _,N
..
,, _ . ,_ ..,,,,, ,_,..„.,,,,,„..„,r .,,,,, v,„,„,„:„.,,„:,,,.....„---, . .. .
,....,,,,, , ,,,,... --__ „,,47.,- .'QCrtC64W"{,21.".' '-‘ ' "' ''
« " i -A ,� I -
't :,,,,r2.4,...f:-.'
•
I.
_ I '
,410
/4
. \�y s sad-:
fr
�.� „ a „ % .1
. r a Vim_

Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Cowford
Well ID
Wetland
ID
Ground
Elevation (ft)
Hydroperiod (%)
Pre Con
(2020)
Pre Con
(2021)
Year 1
(2022)
Year 2
(2023)
Year 3
(2024)
Year 4
(2025)
Year 5
(2026)
Year 6
(2027)
Year 7
(2028)
GW1
WA
62.30
1.00
0.00
GW2
WA
GW3
WA
GW4
WA
GW5
WA