710033_Waste Utilization Plan_20220617

PRODUCER:
LOCATION:
TELEPHONE:
TYPE OPERATION:
NUMBER OF ANIMALS:
(Design Capacity)
SLUDGE APPLICATION PLAN
Dean Lanier Facility 71-33
Pender County
Feeder - Finish
N/A
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1

Guide Std. 633)
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of sludge(gallons)
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1,680,000 gallons x 15 Ib.s PAN/1000 gallons 25,200 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Tech
25,200 Total
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Tract
Field
No.
Soil
Tvpe
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
Per Acre
Utilized Application
0
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
0.00
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of
North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [see
Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil
# No. Type
Crop
Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
Per Acre* Utilized Application
* See footnote for Table 1.
Total
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Total
Amount of N Produced
Surplus or Deficit
109.77
25,326
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
25,200
(126)
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type
No.
Crop Application Application
Rate Amount (In.)
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE
NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
. Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of operation:
acres shown on Table 1.
SB515 setbacks apply. They are as follows:
1. 100' from water supply well
2. 200' from residence
3. 75' from a residential property line
4. 50' from public ROW.
5. 75' from residential property line not owned by the producer or lessor.
6. 75' from blue -line stream
Actual sludge analysis should be used for all recordkeeping. Records should be kept on SLD2
forms after applications documenting volumes applied.
Gallons to be removed and lbs N11000 gals are both estimates.
Page 4

1
2
3
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has
an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the
producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide
a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of
the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in
the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre
per year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See
FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5
6
7
8
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during
a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause
drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or
flies.
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
Page 5

9
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held
to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11
12
13
14
Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property
boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal.
Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter
Strips).
Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
15 discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist'.
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16
Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on ail disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18
If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
21 temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
22 at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23
Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Coastal Farms
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. 1 (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the
farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Dean Lanier
(Please print)
Signature:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Date: - ! 7 - Z2-
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) Toni W. King
Affiliation: Murphy Brown, LLC
Address (Agency): PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
[phone]
Page 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System on acres
of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also
understand that the use of waste will reduce my needed for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative: Date:
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: , 19 to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2)
Page 9
, 20

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop
# No. Type
Lbs. N Acres
Per Acre*
Lbs. N
Utilized
Month of
Application
6938
100
NoA
Bermuda (H)
299
8.37
2,502.63
Mar -Sept
6938
101
AuB
Bermuda (H)
270
13.40
3,618.00
Mar -Sept
6938
102
AuB
Sorghum Grain
78
6.00
468.00
Mar 15-Aug
8093
104
GoA
Millet (H)
281
8.00
2,248.00
April -Sept 15
8093
105
GoA
Millet (H)
281
12.60
3,540.60
April -Sept 15
8093
106
Ra
Bermuda (G)
145.1
11.50
1,668.65
Mar -Sept
8093
107
GoA
Bermuda (G)
224.25
9.00
2,018.25
Mar -Sept
8093
108
AuB
Bermuda (G)
202.12
io.00
2,021.20
Mar -Sept
8093
109
AuB
Bermuda (G)
202.12
8.30
1,677.60
Mar -Sept
Mar -Sept
8093
110
NoA
Bermuda (H)
299
6.00
1,794.00
8093
112
NoA
Millet (H)
281
12.60
3,540.60
April -Sept 15
8093
113
PaA
Sorghum Grain
57
4.00
228.00
Mar 15-Aug
TOTAL
109.8
25325.5
Page 10

NUP Page 10 b
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
No. Type Per Acre* Utilized Application
TOTAL 0.0 0.0
Page 11

n �
`°n
N -n
g-V
@3 D
m • 3i
w ow
m v
0 y. n
O N r,
� O
o w
3 -n
a
-o
o
FriN
• c a
N
^ N N
w 3
—
m 3_
N a
N w m
3 N ^
or
a D
N a O
o w
N O
N 0_
N
O ff
(p C 3
�a
94. • N w
O C 3
• 0) O
O 0 m
1
0
w 3 m
• N•
m w
A c
m m n
w
- D
o m c
o n rn
C `C K
$
w
N
g
O
� w
m
N N
L5 a 0
m o g
O N. N
n .7
o
N
tea,
w
a m
o
• 0
nd_
m a
O 14
an
C
N 0
p13
m °^
nx a
• (D
Q 0
0-I
� N n
w K
N
o
f9
�
w.a
�v
= n
3 n
0o 0)
m n
3 = O0
• n
a n
st
Z�
C▪ r)
Q
w 3
N
o2
N
N 3
m �
a �
v n
n
'w
a
N
r (1 • r
0xrrn a
3 -.
N CL
co cb
o@0_2
rn j m C
471'
C = ▪ 0 0
0 7 a. :
o' m ^
• C a
• QY
O
ozo
FJ
0 3 0
W n i
O o Q
C -0
Q
Cl) ▪ CL
l!un puej uoufuio3
OZOZ u! umou aa(e1 a6ew! asea
Map Created November 01, 2021
SaJOE 94 LL :leTol pue!doa3 aced
W
N
0
r
C
Q
Ui
A
N
{li
Ch
CO
N
N
O
A
N
N
Y
m
r
C
2
m
r
2
m
1
z
m
r
z
m
r
z
m
Z z z
O 0 0
O 0 n
0 0 D
w w m
Q 0. Q
n
4
Jest weJfioad ZZOZ
euijoae3 y}aoN `f}uno3 aapued
8 69}ae.1l
86ZS uuaeJ

2 0 C
m n U
A a
a N r
m N D
� n3
Tw m
m m w
a N m
O N r
o m a
n D a FA
N N p
c
v� • Ol
w 3
D,
CD
N N a
3 N r
v o
n,3
o
rn v
N O. �
n
n N'"
m 3
m m w
J 3 O
w_ N y
o C
(0 O
a V,
Ta
� w m
m 3 m
a) v)
m
n
m
D —
O 0 C
CC K
O N O
N
WI 1p n
a ^ •-1
3 N
®
3 N
s-0 O
O N. W.
➢
o �
v C
m 0
fl O
• n
g N N
4_ 3
D
n N
a1 2 a
a = a
v 3
o
fy3°
'
01p o
a00.
0 a
smck
c m
n � a
� N
m
n N a
C
N
ry O S
� O
O (3 O
4 C
r' C
oar
0 6
^2.
n o
m 3
o �
z • z
n)
°0
0 m
N
a`
�
co 3
0
o 0
w m
v
3
N
a
Z
0
W n
0 a
C
m Q a
OZOZ U! umog _Wei a5eWI asee
Map Created November 01, 2021
co
V
m
(T
CO
N
0
r
C
N
rn
V
0
A
0
0)
Cn
0
W
A
A
CO
co
rn
A
W
N
0
W
O
V
0
z
m
r
m
r
C
m
r
z
z
m
r
z
m
r
z
m
r
z
m
r
z
z
m
r
z
a
rn
r
z
z
m
r
x
f11
r
Z Z Z
O 0 0
7 3 7
n 0 n
a a a
0 -0 "0
m as m
7 3
a o_ a
Jea,k we-160Jd ZZOZ
£608 4oeJl
>DC
(am 0
n m
C •a a
E. 3 co
21
0
0 0
Pender County, North Carolina
S099 WJeJ

3
N_.
Q N
m 3
m °ro
3 � o
w m w
2 o C
�
O 0
:a;
" w m
m w 3.
N co
m � m
o m c
`0 31 G
0 K `roC
O N O
C ry
• 3
m n
Q,.
�: o G1
� r, �
w
a % o
FA.
O `, ro
6
Yo
O w
w c
N
m0-
� d
Q 0 Q
p, 3 ro
0 N 0
O ro
ro
3 m
4 0
-0 ^, o
1
o m
ro 3 g
v�v
a2,o
o
0 c m
v n a
N 0) chi
w
na 3
Nm
a�3
ro
� 0
� w �
.�
� o
O N N
N
• j • a •
m n (0 o m 3 co
-0 —
z:ro �.-0 o.�',
As> m 'D
2 N 0 O y- 3
fl 3 V 7
C 6' ro V l' N
Jj9.
1.71
m"
3
;!un puei uowuia0
OZOZ u! umog Ja/Se] a6ewl asea
6ZOZ'G0 JagwanoN pawaao deal
sane 91'LL :1eTo1_ pueldwo a6ed
0
01
W
N
0
r
0
01
cr
CD
03
iV
N
Cn
6
0
CD
u,
c
m
r
C
m
r
C
S
m
r
Z
rn
r
Z
S
m
r
S
r
Z Z Z
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
a
SD CD N
0 0 0
Q_ Q_ 0_
13
0
O
Jea,, Wea6oJd ZZOZ
Pender County, North Carolina
8E69 ;° -'1
86 ZS WJ J

/
\
\
/ \
7 7
@_ o --A:::c \ %
k' /.
_ &
\ co
k a;\
/j
) j in§ \ m
e
.E $\
2 a 3 m
\) 7ƒ
\� F\
0 { 4 /
\7 2®
/\ /\
0. \ ƒ
§\ E�
op
\\ 0_
§a -i\
/ \ \ \
\ § § \
\7 \/
ƒ/ ]/.
= gc .
w in . \ R. P
3
2

Test Results [units - WIV in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meg/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
1.31 1.05 4.3 60 1.7 5.3 24 18 44 14 53 3 19 8 8 12 0.1 2
Sample ID: 204
Lime History:6 o
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.36 1.16 2.1 39 1.2 5.2 136 32 25 7 40 35 38 38 23 23 24 0.0
Sample ID: 203
Lime History:
Test Results [units - WIV in g1cm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-A11 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.22 1.19 2.3 58 1.0 5.4 131 20 37 17 28 24 31 6 6 14 0.1 4
r cn
d al
3
m a
2 m
o
N
O
N
5
Y1'
Dean Lanier Page 2 of 6
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomil Report No. FY22-SL035382
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K 0 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Millet, pearl 0.9 140-180 90 150 0 0 $ $ 2 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.7 180-220 0 160 25 0 0 $ $ 0
2 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0 160 $ 0 0 $ $ 0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 Kz0 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Sudan/Sorghum past. 0.5 140-180 0 160 0 0 0 S $ 0
2 - 0.0
More
Information
Note: 3 Note: $
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $
Note: 12 Note: $
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $

Test Results [units - WIV in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-Al Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.46 1.21 2.7 62 1.0 5.6 80 27 42 14 29 17 27 27 45 45 40 0.1 4
Sample ID: 207
Lime History: GoP
Test Results [units - W/V in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
1.14 1.12 4.0 63 1.5 5.6 116 47 41 15 39 8 22 22 30 30 35 0.1 3
Sample ID: 206
Lime History:
i
Test Results [units - WIV in glcrrf ; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm31: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-A11 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.71 1.05 3.9 72 1.1 5.8 27 30 45 23 34 6 21 6 6 14 0.1 3
Sample ID: 205
Lime History:
Dean Lanier Page 3 of 6
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomil Report No. FY22-SL035382
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Bermuda hay/past., M 0.4 180-220 0 170 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0 170 0 0 0 0 0 0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O6 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.6 180-220 0 120 0 0 $ 0 0 0
2-Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0 120 0 0 $ 0 0 0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Millet, pearl 0.3 140-180 80 120 0 0 $ $ 2 0
2 - 0.0
More
Information
Note: 12
Note: 12
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $
Note: 12 Note: $
More
Information
Note: 3 Note: $

Test Results [units - W1V in glcm ; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.32 1.13 2.1 61 0.8 5.4 83 26 42 12 20 9 22 22 19 19 27 0.1 5
Sample ID: 210
Lime History:
Test Results [units - W/V in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.46 1.22 2.4 47 1.3 5.3 273 22 34 8 21 47 45 45 82 82 64 0.0
Sample ID: 209
Lime History:
Test Results [units - WIV in glcm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.56 1.13 3.2 67 1.1 5.8 179 46 45 15 27 30 35 35 70 70 54 0.1 3
Sample ID: 208
Lime History: N
Dean Lanier Page 4 of 6
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomil Report No. FY22-SL035382
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.4 180-220 0 170 0 20 $ $ 0 0
2 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0 170 0 20 $ $ 0 0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Bermuda hay/past., M 0.7 180-220 0 180 25 20 0 0 0 0
2-Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0 180 $ 20 0 0 0 0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.3 180-220 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0
2-Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $
Note: 12 Note: $
More
Information
Note: 12
Note: 12 Note: $
More
Information
Note: 12
Note: 12

Test Results [units - WIV in glcm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.36 1.03 2.5 32 1.7 4.9 94 22 20 8 36 54 49 22 22 12 0.0
Sample ID: 213
Lime History: �`
Test Results [units - WN in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.60 1.15 3.2 71 0.9 5.9 73 17 53 16 18 12 24 42 42 24 0.1 3
Sample ID: 212
Lime History: `0
Test Results [units - WIV in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-1 Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.60 1.26 2.5 44 1.4 5.1 253 29 30 8 25 19 28 28 56 56 37 0.1 4
Sample ID: 211
Lime History:
Dean Lanier Page 5 of 6
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomi! Report No. FY22-SL035382
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Iblacre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Sudan/Sorghum past. 1.1 140-180 0 160 25 0 0 $ $ 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Iblacre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 _Millet, pearl 0.0 140-180 10 150 0 20 $ 0 2 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.8 180-220 0 160 25 20 0 0 0 0
2- Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0 160 $ 20 0 0 0 0
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $
More
Information
Note: 3 Note: $
More
Information
Note: 12
Note: 12 Note: $

siinsaj ;sa j
3 S 7] 0 7 0 --n O o o x
4) co O �j (OD O 0 D. 0O
`< 0 0 `o Q m x a 0 0 0
0 0 3 o o 0 0 g 0 0 n cD 3
C
�, (D W Da' (D (D O o 0 co
CO N -0 7 'a (D 7
0 Q c8 o a Q o rr p (n a
C Z
0 v o7 a CO 0 � 0 (D (n v
3 ca p O n u) 3t E S O p O.
9 N 3 0 lfl N tO (D N
w 0 en y' ID 0 3 co J_ g U' ",
O Ch N 7 (D
3 n N 3= O_ (D 00 0 ro O 0
O - — n N N) (D 00D R
v 3 m 3 m v (a o 0 0 -,
w 3 a o V) 3 o-0
F. _ o 0 6 3 o co_ (n
Q C Q O (D = O
CD (D &I (p co 0
Cpi ' 7 (D ,Z7 't
oSt
a)) O a y O (A 6 (3 0 (3 3 (D
N o y <- 0 3 CD a) can c 3
0 Tj a) O C Co
O N O cD - - 0 co c.0 Q- (D
(D Q �,
5. —" N -a o co (�D co - OO N
O (Q O Do a_ v' Z N
A (0 z, N 7 C_=
us C (D W
co O) a. 0 clam
fCD Q- Q.
(3 n m N y 0 3 cod 3 N
m n -0
0_ • co Q Q0 0-0-{D•E_
N O _ 7 0 N CD
v' 0 C O
0Q 3'a0 C 03000
c z
m
�' _ 3
O N' 0 aO (D 0 0
O (l ] 3 , a- C
0-9 O Qo.
_ ma) mcD0 y = (QD = = O
•< Q p - S 0 0
cncs. 3 2 NrvQ� a
US N) 0-(3 co
m 2 0 m m 0
3 v c (D ' Cn a C
cb 0 o o wE� C y
o N (� - o
1.' Da O N co N
m r-. O.
ID
(D
N
CD
Nla)
o ro
7 m
co C
Q N
0 0
co a
d
3 0
N0
3
a. 3
Q
m 0-
CR3
o
co •
N
co
7 O
(D 0
Q 0
O_ 0
C -p
CD
0 N
0 m
9
0, 3.
=.
• m
3'
0
m
3
(D
co
co
cn
X'
3
O
J
5-
5
(D
cam'
0
(D
SD
0)
3'
(0
3
Q
3
0
-0
1.
0
0
0
0
S
(D
0
O
N
7
Q
(D
Q
(D
()
0
co
0-
0
cr
co
3'
O
(D
co
r
3
m
suogepuauauwooaA
N N (n (n 11 vO z z z g g g g 3 3 3 x x x m n 0 n x ran
7 7 C (n O_ x 73 O m O 3 3 z (a O_ g G7 c m (n r'
n a o -0 0
N
N
5 Li
Q 3 CD
(D 0 (O
x C
a
sr)m
C
C
a
co
(D
xepui hiss aignios
0� a c 3, 0 ?. 3 a,,, 3 0 0 0 0 x a w° o X
C t0!' 0 D 3 — (�D Cu A' [n m Uri a' fOD 63' (�{' ) m m 3 v
e
o n 3 3 cu. m" D m 2 7- E. co 0 0 cQ
m m c o 0 "" o CD v m co o 0 3 3 ro ,CD o a m
x _ -0 0 la v �" m o_ 3 cr x v 1) 0 o-
a=v 0 n Q w ro ro ca o,g, m
m m v' a x cu
3 0 co a o. o
0 x m m a ' n) 6 6 a
x x 'C (DE -O K ' _
o o— 3 - 3 so 6 `C
SD 0, CO v
(fin 0 0 (0 0 .< C), N,
c�
-o0 cp. m 3 0
v
3
N
suoge!AeJgqv ioda2{
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Jaiue1 ueea
uo!sinia 31iuouoJ6V SOVICI N
SS9Z-£EL (61.6) :auogd
Q
cn
c
Inuou0a6e,n06•J6e3u•n NINt
a
z
a
Zg£0£01S-ZZ.Id

Test Results [units - WN in glcni3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dn13]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO
0.04 1.12 4.0 39 2.4 4.5 45 24 24 11 61 7 21 10 10 8 0.1 3
Sample ID: 102
Lime History:
Test Results [units - WN in glcrrr3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dn' J: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn All Mn-Al2 Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO
0.04 1.14 3.2 33 2.1 4.6 7 25 18 11 63 2 18 6 6 4 0.0
Sample ID: 101
Lime History:
s_
9
r'
Test Results [units - WN in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldrrt3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO
0.22 1.11 4.4 49 2.2 4.9 80 39 29 16 71 7 21 15 15 9 0.1 2
Sample ID: 100
Lime History:
Dean Lanier I Q-- Page 2 of 6
,NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone; [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomil Report No. FY22-SL03087
Recommendations: Lime _ Nutrients (lblacre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 1.7 180-220 30 180 0 0 $ $ $ 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 1.5 180-220 130 180. 0 0 $ $ $ 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 1.4 180-220 0 140 0 0 $ $ $ 0
2- 0.0
1�-, o
i=; o o
. o co
a
More
Information
More
Information

Test Results [units - WN in g/cnt3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dnm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH Pd K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn Al Cud Na ESP SS -I NO3-
0.13 1.18 3.9 71 1.1 5.4 16 31 44 23 57 5 20 13 13 13 0.1 3
Sample ID: 105
Lime History:
Test Results [units - WN in glcrrt3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dnt3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn Ai Cu-I Na ESP SS4 NO3-
0.22 1.19 4.0 51 1.9 4.7 18 23 34 15 147 4 19 11 11 15 0.1 3
Sample ID: 104
Lime History:
Test Results [units - WN in g/crn3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-1 Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn AI Cud Na ESP SS4 NO3-I
0.09 1.15 2.9 48 1.5 4.7 70 31 29 13 40 14 25 14 14 12 0.1 3
Sample ID: 103
Lime History:
Dean Lanier Page 3 of 6
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY22-SL030876
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Sudan/Sorghum past. 0.6 140-180 100 140 0 0 $ $ $ 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Sudan/Sorghum past. 1.3 140-180 100 160 0 0 $ $ $ 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 - Bermuda hay/past., M 1.0 180-220 0 160 0 0 $ $ $ 0
2 - 0.0
More
Information
io_ie__-;2 f_ioLe.
More
Information
Noi. .
_-I,
0
i
_-A7 0
'iv o to
M

Test Results [units - WN in glcm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P4 K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-1 Mn All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.09 1.24 3.9 66 1.3 4.9 37 59 37 21 54 24 31 16 16 12 0.1 3
Sample ID: 108
Lime History:
Test Results [units - WN in glcirr3; CEC and Na in megl100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldn13]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P4 K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NOS-N
0.18 1.19 2.6 63 1.0 5.1 34 31 41 16 35 13 25 13 13 12 0.1 4
Sample ID: 107
Lime History:
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/drn3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-Al Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0,09 1.17 4.5 60 1.8 4.8 66 47 37 18 73 6 21 31 31 24 0.1 2
Sample ID: 106
Lime History:
Dean Lanier Page 4 of 6
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomi/ Report No. FY22-SL030876
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.8 180-220 50 90 0 0 0 $ $ 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 1(2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.6 180-220 60 160 0 0 $ $ $ 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre) More
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B Information
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 1.2 180-220 0 120 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 ; loLe 1 J No c:
3
�•5
6
6_E
C° 3 3
icHl 3 E
.- 3
I- j
r

Test Results [units - WN in g/cnr3; CEC and Na in megl100 cm3; NOs-N in mgldnt3): Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-1 Mn All Mn-Al2 Zn-1 Zn Ai Cu-1 Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.09 1.23 4.2 78 0.9 5.6 45 47 50 22 23 19 28 19 19 15 0.1 2
Sample ID: 109
Lime History:
Dean Lanier Page 5 of 6
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomil Report No. FY22-SL030876
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 - Bermuda hay/past., M 0.4 180-220 30 120 0 20 0 $ $ 0
2 - 0.0
More
Information

Test Results [units - WN in glcrrt3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-1 Zn Al Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.09 1.19 3.6 58 1.5 4.8 68 40 35 18 44 10 23 33 33 21 0.0
Sample ID: 111
Lime History:
Test Results [units - WN in glcrri3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-1 Mn A11 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.09 1.03 5.5 64 2.0 4.8 17 43 41 19 138 67 57 27 27 28 0.1 2
Sample ID: 110
Lime History:
7.- Client: Dean Lanier Advisor:
' Predictive
- `•;R yti 9265 Old River Rd
1=-L
'rn ': ' Burgaw, NC 28425
1I1�1 =�I� Mehlich-3 Ex#rac#ion}� Soil Report- :•� Sampled County , Pender
-/' � f. W--.LL_ ` pfu 1.1. - --- Client ID: 263093 Advisor ID:
Sampled: 04/12/2022 Received: 04/13/2022 Completed: 04/22/2022 Farm: 2744
[NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomi/ Report No. FY22-SL031673
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1-Bermuda hay/past., M 1.0 180-220 0 140 0 0 $ 0 $ 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Bermuda hay/past, M 1.3 180-220 100 130 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
\ o
\/al
More
Information
�•Jpi4_,—�-
y =

Test Results [units - WN in glcnt3; CEC and Na in meq!100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm31: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-1 Mn A11 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-Ai Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.41 1.15 4.9 49 2.5 4.8 68 42 27 17 36 19 28 13 13 14 0,0
Sample ID: 113
Lime History:
Test Results [units - WN in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
1.80 1.18 4.4 56 1.9 5.1 13 23 38 15 21 4 19 9 9 10 0.0
Sample ID: 112
Lime History:
Dean Lanier Page 2 of 3
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website; www.ncagr.govlagronomi/ Report No. FY22-SL031673
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Millet, pearl 1.7 140-180 20 100 0 0 0 $ 2 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Millet, pearl 1.1 140-180 120 140 0 20 $ $ 2 0
2 - 0.0
Mor
Informat
3
:, S 3
::) to 0
0 ro
4 a

Test Results [units - WN in glcnr3; CEC and Na in meg1100 crn3; NO3-N in mg/dm31: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-I
0.60 1.15 4.7 72 1.3 5.6 71 120 43 16 36 27 33 26 26 39 0.2 4
Sample ID: 02
Lime History: c:,, Q \ �.
Test Results [units - WN in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-Ai1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-I
0.36 1.25 4.1 69 1.3 5.5 77 118 37 17 28 35 38 45 45 53 0.1 2
Sample ID: 01 Recommendations: \ Lime _
r Crop (tons/acre)
Lime History: Sly 1 - Bermuda hay/past., M 0.6
2 - 0.0
/
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomil Report No. FY22-SL030876
!'.IN Client: Dean Lanier Advisor:
< :�;� Predictive 9265 Old River Rd
w::F.y°=s,-=" Burgaw, NC 28425
1,1 °` t " ' ` .- II soil Report Mennen-3 Extraction
\;+/ Sampled County : Pender
-_� — — --- Client ID: 263093 Advisor ID:
Sampled:04/05/2022 Received: 04/06/2022 Completed: 04/13/2022 Farm: 2744
R
<
a
{
d
:
Nutrients (lb/acre)
N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
§
Nutrients (Iblacre)
N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
\
More
Information
More
Information

NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Pender 6/16/2022 11:08:38 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
County: Pender
Producer Identifier: 71-33
Tract Number: 6938
Field Number: 102
Soil Series: AuB: Autryville fine sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes
Crop: Hybrid Bermudagrass (Pasture) .
Fertilizers: Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 21.15 1000 gal
Lb P205: 49.67 lb
Application Method: All other surface applications
Soil Loss: 0.035 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 0-9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 131
WV_Factor (USER) 1.19
Soil Test 28" - 32" 45
WV_Factor (USER) 1.12
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P = 24
SOURCE P = 11
TOTAL P RATING = 37 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Pender
6/16/2022 11:08:47 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
Fertilizers:
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Eactor (USER)
Soil Test 28" - 32"
WV_Factor (USER)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P = 36
SOURCE P = 11
INPUTS
Pender
71-33
6938
103
AuB: Autryville fine sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Pasture) .
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount:
Lb P205:
Application Method:
0.035 t/ac/yr
0-9 ft
136
1.16
70
1.15
000D
OUTPUTS
TOTAL P RATING - 49 (HIGH)
21.15 1000 gal
49.67 lb
All other surface applications

NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Pender 6/16/2022 11:08:58 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
County: Fender
Producer Identifier: 71-33
Tract Number: 8093
Field Number: 108
Soil Series: AuB: Autryville fine sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes
Crop: Hybrid Bermudagrass (Pasture) .
Fertilizers: Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 21.15 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 49.67 lb
Application Method: All other surface applications
Soil Loss: 0.035 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 0-9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 179
WV_Factor (USER) 1.13
Soil Test 28" - 32" 37
WV_Factor (USER) 1.24
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 3
LEACHATE P = 17
SOURCE P = 11
TOTAL P RATING = 31 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Pender
6/16/2022 11:09:14 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
Fertilizers:
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Factor (USER)
Soil Test 28" - 32"
WV_Factor (USER)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 5
LEACHATE P = 21
SOURCE P = 11
INPUTS
Pender
71-33
8093
109
AuB: Autryville fine sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes
Hybrid Bermudagrass (Pasture)
Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount:
Lb P205:
Application Method:
0.035 t/ac/yr
0-9 ft
273
1.22
45
1.23
GOOD
OUTPUTS
TOTAL P RATING = 37 (MEDIUM)
21.15 1000 gal
49.67 lb
All other surface applications

NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Pender 6/16/2022 10:58:52 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
County: Pender
Producer Identifier: 71-33
Tract Number: 8093
Field Number: 111
Soil Series: GoA: Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Crop: Hybrid Bermudagrass (Pasture) .
Fertilizers: Swine -Lagoon sludge
Yearly Applied Amount: 21.15 1000 gal
Lb P205: 49.67 lb
Application Method: All other surface applications
Soil Loss: 0.035 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 0-9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 253
WV_Factor (USER) 1.26
Soil Test 28" - 32" 68
WV Factor (USER) 1.19
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 10
LEACHATE P = 31
SOURCE P = 57
TOTAL P RATING = 98 (HIGH)