HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0004512_Staff Report_20220419;s State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: WQ0004512
Attn: CORD ANTHONY Facility name: DORIS KING SFT
From: Robert Tankard
Washington Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facilily staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit gpplications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 4/12/2022
b. Site visit conducted by: Victoria Herdt and Robert Tankard
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Doris King and their contact information: 252 244 - 2577 ext.
e. Driving directions: Residence is located on the west side of NC Hwy. 43, just north of Vanceboro. Heading
north on 43, the King residence is 1.18 miles from the intersection of Hwy. 118 and Hwy. 43. Driveway is
directly across from large fish pond.
II. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate 4:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: WWTP consists of a 1000 gallon septic tank, two constructed wetland cells in
parallel consisting of a 300 cubic foot cell and a 600 cubic cell, a flow level control structure to serve the wetland
cells, a tablet tube chlorinator, 1500 gallon pump tank with a 24 gpm pump, high water alarms, 0.49 spray
irrigation area with 12 sprinklers (spray diameter of 50 ft.)
Proposed flow: 360 gpd
Current permitted flow: 360 gpd
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.) General maintenance needs to be performed.
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 4
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
o
o
o
o
o
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes® No ❑ N/A
If yes, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 4
III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
none
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
none
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
none
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
6
Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date: 4/19/2022
ROW T"
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
No additional comments.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 4
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 4