20140285 Ver 1_Email_20140610

Wainwright, David
From: Wainwright, David
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:56 AM
To: Price, Gregory W
Cc: Sarah.E.Hair @usace.army.mil
Subject: RE: R-0623 401 Draft Conditions
G reg,
Thanks for the response. You are good with what I permitted. If you need anything further, please let me know.
David Wainwright
From: Price, Gregory W
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:50 AM
To: Wainwright, David
Cc: Sarah.E.Hair @usace.army.mil
Subject: FW: R-0623 401 Draft Conditions
David,
Below are responses to your comments that you sent earlier. Please let me know if your comments have been
adequately addressed. Thanks.
G reg
From: Dan Duffield [mailto:dduffieldCa)mulkeyinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:41 AM
To: Price, Gregory W
Cc: Zerman, William S
Subject: RE: R-0623 401 Draft Conditions
G reg,
Station 84+00 looks like Site 5C,which includes wetlands associated with a drained pond. The 4C minutes indicate that
the pond wetlands would be a total take, and that appears to be the case in the permit drawings. Also,the cross-
sectional drawings submitted with the permit show 4:1 slopes at that station. Based on this, 4:1 side slopes were
approved at site 84+00. (If this information is incorrect, please advise). Yes this is correct.
Station 152+00 looks like Site 10. There are no cross sections provided for Station 152+00 in the application that I
see. That is correct we are only required to show one cross section sheet per wetland site, the cross section sheet for
site 10 shows station 149+50 to 151+00 since this is the majority of the impacted cross sections.
Neither the 4B or 4C minutes mention that slopes will be 4:1. Is 4:1 different then what was proposed in the application,
even though this slope was not directly stated? If so, have impacts increased as a result of this change?The impacts
would not change if the side slopes were 3:1 as opposed to 4:1 given the location of the proposed ditch and the fact the
wetland is a total take due to its location with regard to the roadway fill.
1

`y
T
N
I
N
lrG,�'-Jl I i1�1G G I��Illli, �„1111
Raleigh Group Manager
From: Price, Gregory W [mai Ito:gwpriceCa)ncdot.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:17 AM
To: Zerman, William S; Dan Duffield
Subject: FW: R-0623 401 Draft Conditions
Could you advise for Station 152 comment below regarding 4:1 slopes. Thanks.
G reg
From: Wainwright, David
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 8:54 AM
To: Price, Gregory W
Cc: Sarah.E.Hair(a)usace.army.mil
Subject: RE: R-0623 401 Draft Conditions
G reg,
2

Station 84+00 looks like Site 5C,which includes wetlands associated with a drained pond. The 4C minutes indicate that
the pond wetlands would be total take, and that appears to be the case in the permit drawings. Also,the cross-
sectional drawings submitted with the permit show 4:1 slopes at that station. Based on this, 4:1 side slopes were
approved at site 84+OO. (if this information is incorrect, please advise>.
Station 152+00 looks like Site 10. There are no cross sections provided for Station 152+00 in the application that I
see. Neither the 4B or 4C minutes mention that slopes will be 4:1. Is 4:1 different then what was proposed in the
application, even though this slope was not directly stated? If so, have impacts increased as a result ofthis change?
Thanks,
David Wainwright
NCDENR,Division of Water Resources
Transportation Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699'1617
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]O
Email correspondence to and from this address/ssubject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may uedisclosed
to third parties unless the content/s exempt uv statute o,other regulation.
���
��
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Price, Gregory VV
Sent: Tuesday, ]une1O, 2O1411:]6AM
To: Wainwright, David
Cm: Sarah.E.Hair(a)usace.army.mil
Subjemt: FVV: R-O62] 4O1 Draft Conditions
David,
Please review NCDOT's comment regarding Condition 31 page 6 belowjustifying a 4:1 vs 3:1 slope for wetland
fill. Thanks.
G reg
From: Brew, Gregory
Sent: Monday, ]une 09, 2014 11:28 AM
To: Price, Gregory
Cc: Ynunis, ImadT; Zerman, William S
Subject: RE: R-O62] 4O1 Draft Conditions
Greg P,
Sorry |'m late with our response. Our comments are asfollows:
Condition 31page 6, states that all fill slopes in jurisdictional wetland shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1 unless
otherwise approved, VVe are proposing 4:1 fill slopes in wetland area along L- line near Station 84+OO+/- Rt. & 152+OO
3

Lt . Steeping the fill slopes to 3:1 will not avoid the wetlands due to the proposed lateral base ditches (see attached
files).
If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact me or Imad Younis.
Thanks
Greg Brew
From: Price, Gregory W
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 10:32 AM
To: Bowen, Kevin G; Davis, Vickie G; Garris, Randy A; King, Art C; Koch, Thomas K; Olinger, John R; Scott, Darren R;
Staley, Mark K; Stone, Rob; Sykes, Dewayne L; Thomas, Roger D; Twisdale, John W; Brew, Gregory E; Zerman, William
S; AI-Sharawneh, Ahmad A
Subject: R-0623 401 Draft Conditions
Attached to this email are the Section 401 Permit Conditions for project R-0623 (Troy Bypass, Montgomery
County). Please review the attachment to ensure NCDOT can comply with the conditions for this project. The
404 conditions will also be distributed, if necessary, once the permit is received. Please reply with any
comments by June 6, 2014. If you have no comment, please return an email indicating No Comment. Thanks.
Greg Price
Central Region Environmental Specialist
NCDOT Natural Environment Section
Direct: 919-707-6148
gwprice @ncdot.gov
rnall aurrc,aluoindoinco Co and frorn'U°iiu sander is oulnjoaJ�o dh o IN C I::"ulnlia tcaon:Ju I..aw and may Inc divaluoad�o U'li'd luartie,a,
4