20211423 Ver 1_Great Meadow change from Prospectus_20220614

From: Davis, Erin B
To: Baker, Caroline D
Subject: FW: [External] FW: Great Meadow change from Prospectus
Date: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 3:15:21 PM
Attachments: Fio8 Concept Map Option 1 postIRT notes 10June2022.pdf
FW Wildlands Tar Pam 01 UMBI - Great Meadows Stream and Wetland Mitiaation Site Draft Prospectus
Review. mso
Laserfiche Upload: Email & Attachment
DWR#: 20211423 v.l
Doc Type: Mitigation Information
-----Original Message -----
From: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 11:46 AM
To: Davis, Erin B <erin.davis(0ncdenr.gov>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<Casey.M.Haywood(ousace.army.mil>; Wilson, Travis W.<travis.wilson(oncwildlife.org>;
kathryn [e-mail]; Bowers, Todd <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] FW: Great Meadow change from Prospectus
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to Report Spam. <mailto:report.spam(cr_)nc. go
Folks,
We spoke with Chris yesterday about the Wildlands Great Meadows bank. In a nutshell, two of the landowners do
not want to do the project so they cannot obtain a clear deed to the parcel, so the bottom portions of Fisher Branch
and Shard Branch will not be included in the easement. They will allow them to tie into the channels that connect
with Swift Creek, but they won't allow any restoration or enhancement work, or an easement. They have agreed to
fence the cattle out of those areas, but that's it. It looks like it's about 10% of the project that will be omitted.
Wildlands wants to know if this will affect the IRT s acceptance of this bank, or if they're good to move on with
developing the draft mitigation plan. Todd already issued the Initial Evaluation letter March 7, 2022, based on the
entire project being included in the easement.
Please let me and Sam know if you are OK with Wildlands moving forward with draft mit plan development
without the lower sections of Fisher and Shard Branches (see attached map).
Thanks
Kim
Kim (Browning) Isenhour
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1 919.946.5107
-----Original Message -----
From: Chris Roessler <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2022 2:14 PM
To: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Kimberly.D.Browning(ousace.army.mil>
Cc: John Hutton <[e-mail]>; Jeff Keaton <[e-mail]>
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Great Meadow change from Prospectus
Hi Kim-> We wanted to communicate that a part of the Great Meadow project will have to be dropped because we
cannot get clear title on the parcel owned by the Boy Scouts.
The parcel was deeded to the Boy Scouts in the 1930s and the deed included a number of restrictions. The

restrictions will need to be released by the grantors' heirs in order to gain clear title.
I talked to all six of the heirs and four are fine with releasing the restrictions but two are not.
I thought maybe we could get there but their lack of willingness to communicate about the matter makes it
impossible to proceed.
So we'd like to schedule a call with you to see what effect this change might have on the project. Would you be
available sometime next week for a brief call? Thanks very much, Chris
Chris Roessler I Senior Scientist/Project Manager
0: 919.851.9986, x I I I M: 919.624.0905
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. <Blockedhttp://www.wildlandseng.com/>
312 W. Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609

From: Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
To: Kim Brownina
Subject: FW: Wildlands Tar Pam 01 UMBI - Great Meadows Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Draft Prospectus Review
Date: Monday, June 13, 2022 3:06:36 PM
Attachments: Tar Pam 01 UMB Draft Prospectus - EPA Comments.pdf
Tar Pam 01 UMB Draft Prospectus - USFWS Comments.pdf
Great Meadow IRT Site Visit Summarv.pdf
Great Meadows Field Visit- Prospectus 20OCT21.pdf
Just from our talk earlier so you don't have to go digging. Hope you're enjoying a cool drink right now.
Casey
-----Original Message -----
From: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 12:20 PM
To: Chris Roessler <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Samantha.J.Dailey(ousace.army.mil>; Haywood, Casey
M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY
CESAW (USA) <Kimberly.D.Browning(ousace.army.mil>; Davis, Erin B <erin.davis(a��ncdenr.gov>; Wilson,
Travis W. <[e-mail]>; Bowers, Todd <[e-mail]>; Kathryn Matthews
<Kathryn [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Wildlands Tar Pam 01 UMBI - Great Meadows Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Draft Prospectus
Review
Chris,
I've attached the comments we received from the IRT based on the Draft Prospectus for the Wildlands Tar Pam 01
UMB - Great Meadows Site (AID SAW-2021-01714). I've also attached the minutes from our October 20, 2021
site review. With regard to the minutes, please note the following comments:
1. Fisher Branch: If the wetland creation area is pursued it will be important to document soil type and have proper
well placement. Could collect soil profiles during monitoring to show soils are trending toward having wetland
hydrology. In general, soil borings should be obtained at all wetland gauges.
2. Shard Brach: RI If a braided channel is constructed, there is a possibility it could trend towards becoming more
of a wetland. Recommend discussing in the adaptive management section.
3. Gideon Swamp: Noted some fescue- recommend treating if this is anticipated to be problematic.
4. Please note that final credit ratios will be agreed to during the review and approval of the Mitigation Plan for the
site. All credit ratios noted in the site meeting minutes are preliminary based on incomplete information and are
subject to revision.
Please consider all of these comments as you move forward with development of the Final Prospectus for the site.
Once we receive a the Final Prospectus, we will review for completeness and send out a Public Notice.
Thanks and let me know if you have any questions.
Todd Tugwell
Mitigation Project Manager
Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
[phone]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey
is located at: https://urldefense.com/v3/_https://re,gulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-
survey/_: ! ! HYmSToo I cW-

5LRfvOKe9SmjlorHcjGufFX90wACKjUcaigef5 SoVzRhOIgxEE15yELLgfCicLtmkSCgqefDQsHvQRhN5d2Ht-
x6kKzO6"f Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
-----Original Message -----
From: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 2:00 PM
To: Davis, Erin B <erin.davis&cdenr.gov>; Wilson, Travis W. <[e-mail]>; Bowers, Todd
<[e-mail]>; Kathryn Matthews <Kathryn [e-mail]>
Cc: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Samantha.J.Dailey(ousace.army.mil>; Haywood, Casey
M CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<Kimberly.D.Browning(ousace.army.mil>; Chris Roessler <[e-mail]>
Subject: Wildlands Tar Pam 01 UMBI - Great Meadows Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Draft Prospectus
Review
IRT Members,
Wildlands Engineering has provided us with a Draft Prospectus of a new Umbrella Mitigation Bank in the Tar
Pamlico 01 HUCT. The Great Meadows Stream and Wetland Site is included in the submittal as the first site for the
bank. The Draft Prospectus has been uploaded to RIBITS, and we are initiating the 30-day review of the Draft
Prospectus with this email. Information about the proposed bank is below:
Umbrella Bank Name: Wildlands Tar Pamlico UMB
Sponsor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Contact: Chris Roessler)
Location: 36.1288,-77.9508 Nash county, 03020101 HUC
USACE Action ID: SAW-2021-01714
USACE Bank PM: Todd Tugwell
Deadline for comments on the Draft Prospectus: Oct. 27, 2021
I would also like to go ahead and schedule a time for a review of the site - Oct. 20th is the next available open IRT
meeting day, so please reserve the morning of the 20th for the meeting and I will provide more information as we
get closer. In the meantime, please let me know if you need a hard copy of the Draft Prospectus and I will arrange
to have a copy delivered. As note that this is still the Draft stage, so the project has not been put on Public Notice as
of yet. Also, because the site meeting is more than 30 days out, I have set the deadline for comments as one week
after the site meeting (Oct. 27th) .
Thanks,
Todd Tugwell

Mitigation Project Manager
Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
[phone]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey
is located at: https://urldefense.com/v3/ https://regulator,Lps.usace.army.mil/customer-service-
survey/_: I I HYmSToo 1 c W-
5LRfvOKe9Smj IorHcj GufFX90wACKjUcaigef5_SoVzRhOIgxEE 15yELL dfCicLtmkSCcgefDOsHvORhN5d2Ht-
x6kKzO60ii$<htips://urldefense.com/v3/_htips://regulatory.ol2s.usace.army.mil/customer-service-
survey/_: ! ! HYmSToo! c W -
5LRfvOKe9Smj IorHcj GufFX90wACKjUcaigef5_SoVzRhOIgxEE 15yELLgfCicLtmkSCcgefDOsHvORhN5d2Ht-
x6kKzO60ii$ > Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.

Figure 8. Concept Map
Great Meadow Mitigation Site
W W I L D L A N D S 0 350 700 Feet Tar Pamlico River Basin (03020101)
ENGINEERING I I I I I Nosh County NC