20140407 Ver 1_Public Notice_20140514

Issue Date: May 9, 2014
Comment Deadline. June 9, 2014
Corps Action ID Number: SAW- 2014 -00828
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received an application from Mr. Josh
Blackson of Elevation Church seeking Department of the Army authorization to impact 85 linear
feet of stream channel, 0.24 acre of wetlands and 2 27 acres of open water, associated with a
mixed use commercial and residential development in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans.
This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site
at http. / /www.saw.usace.anny mil / Missions /RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx
Applicant: Mr. Josh Blackson
Elevation Church
11416 East Independence Blvd., Suite N
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
AGENT: Mr. Leonard S. Rindner
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
Authority
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny
the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory Authorities:
® Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)
❑ Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33
U.S.C. 1413)
Location
Directions to Site: The site is located on the south side of Lancaster Highway, immediately west
of its intersection with Johnston Road (US Hwy 521), in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina. This site is located in the Lower Catawba Watershed of the Santee River Basin (8 -Digit
MAY 1 4 2014

A#
Cataloging Unit 03050103). From Interstate 485, drive south on Johnston Road (US Hwy 521)
for approximately 2.6 miles. Turn right on Lancaster Highway and the project area is located
immediately west of Lancaster Highway (See Figure 1, 2 & 3).
Project Area (acres): 58 Nearest Town: Charlotte
Nearest Waterway: Clems Branch River Basin: Santee
Latitude and Longitude: 35.03180 N, - 80.85563 W
Existing Site Conditions
The site is approximately 58 acres in size and is comprised of a mosaic open mowed
lawns /landscaping, fragmented slopes and drainage areas covered with disturbed mixed /pine
hardwoods. There are several buildings on the site including residential homes, livestock barns,
and storage sheds The land immediately surrounding the site is mixed use residential and
commercial developments.
The mostly flat, open, turf grass lawn is comprised of cultivated Fescue (Festuca sp.) with typical
shrub /small tree planting beds, and widely scattered larger trees. The wooded areas contain some
mature trees with moderate sub - canopy strata. Canopy trees present include Shortleaf Pine
(Pmus echinata), White Oak (Quercus alba), Red Oak (Q rubra), Sweetgum (Liquidambar
styrac flua), Yellow Poplar (Lrrrodendron tubperifa), Southern Red Oak, (Q falcate), Willow
Oak (Q phellos), Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa), and Red Cedar (Jumperus virgmrana).
The sub - canopy is composed of Flowering Dogwood (Corpus florrda), American Holly (Ilex
opaca), Black Cherry (Prunus serotina), and Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica). The shrub layer
includes Chinese Privet (Ligustrum srpense), Blueberry (Vaccrmum sp.) and Russian Olive
(Elaeagnus umbellate).
There are several soil types on the site to include Enon sandy loam (EnB and EnD), Helena
sandy loam (HeB), Monacan loam (MO), Vance sandy loam (VaB) and Wilkes loam (WkE). Of
these soil types, Monacan loam is considered hydric and located in the floodplain of Clems
Branch.
The project area contains several jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to include stream channels,
wetlands, and open water ponds. The jurisdictional areas were confirmed by USACE Corps
representatives, Messrs. William Elliot and Steve Kichefski on April 16, 2013. The jurisdictional
features are summarized in the table below. The features listed below are only those located
in/near proposed impact areas that have been delineated.
Table 1: Summary of Jurisdictional Features
Jurisdictional Feature Type
Classification
Label
Size (linear foot/acreage)
Stream
Seasonal RPW
Il
266 If
Stream
Seasonal RPW
B1
3071f
Total
573 if
Wetland
Forested/ alustrine
Al
0 01 ac
Wetland
Forested/ alustrine
C/D
0.07 ac
Wetland . _ w , _ _
Emergent/palustrine
E
0.23 ac
�,;. 2-
a
_ , e

Wetland
Forested /palustrine
G
0.02 ac
Wetland
Forested/ alustrine
J
0.03 ac
Total
0 36 acre
Pond L
0.36 acres
Pond
Open Water
L
0.34 ac
Pond
Open Water
K
1.57 ac
Pond
Open Water
F
0.36 ac
Total
2.27 acres
The open water ponds are man -made and constructed in high ground with earthen berms. The
stream channels are small, headwater intermittent channels. Wetland E was formerly an open
water pond excavated in high ground that has since been drained and now classifies as a wetland.
There are also other jurisdictional features located on the property but they were not
delineated /surveyed since they were outside the boundaries of the project area and they are being
avoided. Clems Branch is a perennial stream that is located along the northern property line.
Another unnamed perennial stream (Hl) is located along the western property boundary and
drains into Clems Branch. There are also wetlands (AA, AB, AC, and AD) located adjacent to
Clems Branch in the flood zone.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The basic purpose of the project is to construct a mixed -use residential and commercial
development
Project Description
The site plan has been designed utilizing critical design criteria while taking into consideration
the location of jurisdictional waters on the property. Most of the development on the site will
occur in uplands and no development will occur in the flood zone of Clems Branch. However,
due to the location and extent of jurisdictional waters on the property, not all of these features
could be avoided. In order to construct the development as needed, approximately 85 linear feet
of stream channel, 0.24 acre of wetlands, and 2.27 acres of open water pond will be
filled /impacted as a result of this project. The table below provides a summary of proposed
impacts.
Table 2: Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Feature
Impact (linear feet or acreage)
Stream B 1
851f
Total Stream Impact
851f
Pond K
1.57 acre
Pond F
0 36 acre
Pond L
0.34 acre
Total Open Water Impact
2.27 acres
Wetland A
0.01 acre
Wetland E
0.23
Total Wetland Impact
0.24 acre
-3-

Impacts are associated with placement of fill for road crossings, parking areas, residential
building construction, and stormwater treatment facilities. Specifically, 85 linear feet of Stream
B1 and 0.01 acre of Wetland A will be filled in order to construct a main access road to traverse
and connect the site. Pond L will be filled in order to construct the required parking for the
church office and worship center. Impacts to Pond K, Pond F, and Wetland E are associated with
the construction of the residential units and the required storm water treatment facility There are
no direct impacts to Stream 11 proposed as a result of the project. However, a small portion of
the buffer will be disturbed associated with grading an adequate slope for parking /road access.
This buffer will be replanted with native species. A small portion of the buffer of Stream B1 will
also be disturbed downstream of the impact area which will also be replanted as well. To avoid
any secondary /indirect impacts to Wetland C, D, and G that may result from draining the ponds
and re- directing surface water, steps will be taken to direct water back into these wetlands from
the discharge of the storm water facility. These wetlands will also be connected back to flow of
Stream B1 which appear to have been previously severed when the ponds were constructed.
Maintaining and re- establishing hydrology through Wetlands C, D, and G will be accomplished
by excavating a small channel from the terminal point of Wetland C & D to Wetland G. Coir
fiber logs and log step structures will be installed to direct water to Wetland G which will then
flow into Clems Branch. The disturbed area will be stabilized with wetland seed mix.
Avoidance and Minimization
The applicant provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and /or minimize
impacts to the aquatic environment: The applicant has been able to avoid and minimize impacts
to a substantial portion of the jurisdictional features on the site.-However, there are several
critical design criteria required for this project that precluded the applicant from completely
avoiding all impacts to jurisdictional features on the site. Specifically, the design criteria
included the requirements to have parking slopes at 2% max for ADA spaces and 5% max for all
other spaces, required road and parking connectivity throughout the site to be ADA compliant,
and the requirement to maintain fire access to all portions of the buildings. Other constraints that
limit site plan configurations are required tree save areas, required open space areas, required
buffers, and required storm water treatment facilities.
Given these constraints and design criteria, the project will only impact 14% of stream channels
and 67% of wetlands within the project area. However, when taking into consideration the
stream and wetland features located on the property that were not delineated because they were
outside the project area, the applicant has avoided an even greater percentage of jurisdictional
waters on the site. Wetland A and a portion of Stream B 1 could not be completely avoided as it
transects the central portion of the property and is located within the road corridor alignment
needed to connect to an existing intersection/driveway point on Lancaster Highway. Impacts to
stream channels were even further minimized by utilizing an existing road crossing on Stream
B1.
All of the open water ponds located on the site will be filled as a result of this project. Due to
their location on the property (in a high ground setting and adjacent to the Lancaster Highway),
these ponds could not be avoided while still meeting the project purpose. Given their man -made
nature and lower value as aquatic resources in relation to natural stream channels and wetlands
-4-

on the site, the design team determined that impacting these features were preferable to
impacting stream channels and wetlands on the site. Wetland E, which is the largest wetland
impact (0.23 acre), will be impacted in order to construct a required storm water treatment
facility. Due to the fact that this wetland was created by draining a pond excavated in high
ground, the design team determined that locating a stone water treatment facility here was
preferable to impacting required tree save /open space and buffer areas. The applicant was also
able to further minimize impacts to Wetlands C, D, and G by ensuring that the hydrology is
restored to these areas from the discharge of the storm water facility and Stream B 1 as described
above.
Compensatory Mitigation
The applicant offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable
functional loss to the aquatic environment: The applicant is proposing to offset impacts
associated with this project by making payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
(NCEEP) In Lieu Fee Program for 0.23 acre of wetland impact at a 1:1 ratio. NCEEP has agreed
to accept this mitigation by letter dated February 17, 2014, in the expanded service area of the
Lower Catawba Basin (HUC 03050103).
Essential Fish Habitat
Pursuant to the Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public
Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The Corps' initial
determination is that the proposed project would not effect EFH or associated fisheries managed
by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of 33
CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C, the
District Engineer consulted district files and records and the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places and initially determines that:
No historic properties, nor properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; therefore, there will be no historic properties
affected. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
The District Engineer's final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon coordination
with the SHPO and /or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to
the proposed undertaking's potential direct and indirect effects on historic properties within the
Corps- indenti fied permit area.
-5-

Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area, examined
all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural
Heritage Database. Based on available information-
The Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or
their critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA) within the project area. The Corps will make a final determination on the effects of
the proposed project upon additional review of the project and completion of any
necessary biological assessment and /or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and /or National Marine Fisheries Service.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State
agencies for review.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources ( NCDWR): The Corps will generally not make a
final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92 -500). The receipt of the application and
this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office
in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be
deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of
receipt of a complete application. Additional information regarding the 401 Certification may be
reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury
Street, Raleigh; North Carolina 27604 -2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding
the application for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by June 9, 2014 to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention- Ms. Karen Higgins, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
(LISPS mailing address): 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Or,
(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):
The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies with and would
be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina Coastal Zone
Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2 (b)(2) the Corps cannot issue a Department of
Army (DA) permit for the proposed work until the applicant submits such a certification to the
Corps and the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the applicant's
consistency certification. As the application did not include the consistency certification, the
Corps will request, upon receipt„ concurrence or objection from the NCDCM.
KIM

Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts
including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit
which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its
reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife
values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies
and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to
determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water
quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above.
Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the
overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be
granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to the
proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm, June 9, 2014. Comments should be submitted to
Steve Kichefski, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208,
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006, at (828) 271 -7980 ext. 234.
-7-

'Ic .1 t
ELEVATION CHURCH
k RAII
P"a
JI�A 'ARK POA0 4
3
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands &Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 - 2277
LEN RINDNER PWSC&grnaiI corn
ELEVATION CHURCH SHEET
CHARLOTTE, NC DRAWN REVIEWED
BY JAL By LSR
VICINITY MAP DATE PAGE/
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION 06/05113
P PERQULEN
WHOIOAK
6 A�l r
Ftdz-'
Vajvvs
Pro.,
f
,Pmvt6i, cc
C*:
P OSS I ry G
ip W
xk
SC NC
-------------
FIGURE NO. LEONARD S RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands &Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 - 2277
LEN RINDNER PWSC&grnaiI corn
ELEVATION CHURCH SHEET
CHARLOTTE, NC DRAWN REVIEWED
BY JAL By LSR
VICINITY MAP DATE PAGE/
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION 06/05113

ELEVATION CHURCH
4rq °
;/z
'j,
�x y�
SITE .
�. I �r- "i� ,� s° , /;�"'E.J7 s s,s- „''-xa)`°",3�e � � y`�s ” " 's y�j �°i� "r �` _ i'. _'t;-..,� °— >�•... ,. '- -_F�
1
< ��-
_
} 4
X X40 { ,,_✓�°`�'� _�``..� --�_� - _-,- - w ' L`t� 'i. �.�
. - r
LOCATION
stfvet Run LATITUDE LONGITUDE
SCALE -'�" rt - 35 0301 N 80 8587 W
1400 700 0 1400(Feet) ,� t*.s �'� - `�„ 1N HUC 03050103
Lower Catawta
FIGURE NO.
LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
ELEVATION CHURCH
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
SHEET
DRAWN JAL
REVIEWED LSR
3714 Spokeshave Lane
av
BY
Matthews, NC 28105
USGS LOCATION MAP
DATE
PAGE
Harr
(714) 904 — 2277
LEN RINDNER.PWS @gmail corn
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
&
\\
WEDDINGTON NC -SC QUADRANGLE
4rq °
;/z
'j,
�x y�
SITE .
�. I �r- "i� ,� s° , /;�"'E.J7 s s,s- „''-xa)`°",3�e � � y`�s ” " 's y�j �°i� "r �` _ i'. _'t;-..,� °— >�•... ,. '- -_F�
1
< ��-
_
} 4
X X40 { ,,_✓�°`�'� _�``..� --�_� - _-,- - w ' L`t� 'i. �.�
. - r
LOCATION
stfvet Run LATITUDE LONGITUDE
SCALE -'�" rt - 35 0301 N 80 8587 W
1400 700 0 1400(Feet) ,� t*.s �'� - `�„ 1N HUC 03050103
Lower Catawta
FIGURE NO.
LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
ELEVATION CHURCH
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
SHEET
DRAWN JAL
REVIEWED LSR
3714 Spokeshave Lane
av
BY
Matthews, NC 28105
USGS LOCATION MAP
DATE
PAGE
\
(714) 904 — 2277
LEN RINDNER.PWS @gmail corn
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
06105/13
],
\\
WEDDINGTON NC -SC QUADRANGLE
1968 Revised 1984

ELEVATION CHURCH
FIGURE NO.
LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 — 2277
LEN RINDNER PWS @gmall com
ELEVATION CHURCH
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
AERIAL MAP
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
SHEET
DRAWN JAL REVIEWED LSR
BY BY
DATE PAGE
05106113

Y
/x
i
mc`
�?� -mi3
=�
O p
r Z Z
�'''� / 'moo'
..yyy
MO
r
TO
/
m `-
m c
yf CX?i
�y m8
LAM
D p 4 to
mC7
O N
x >i.,' % -_tlC �` m
" "rO
�'
yQ
A z�
D�
r�
ff
NSro
-
t 6
"�� -
TO Q�
oz Dz
r
v0
z
gD
o
D
a r
mr
��
`
c
may`,
m `c
zN
C
to D C�1
�
4
1 =4n=sue
�r
• 8
of M
f
; � =_c��.
_
r
3 - � a
/, i. �` ,'
-
- -
Zp t
a
C
fp C C m e
krtr
DO
1 mA
o ry �y s 1 r2N m m
T.mn
AO
H�
mmn
,, y 10 a� --
" mD0 �D-ni
Op
5
�p
,�.v ao
a p0 v p0
p
0 D
2 m Z -
r r m
ELEVATION CHURCH
Z
+wva arcs m
V 7p
nG
i' n '�n0
Z 1
mt
fi
IS�j,
m
`zc
o�
f
Q2 I
Z mz

o
✓;: o Z
N
010— Ou
Z ONO 'J M .
i rn
rn
-no-
rn
(11 co
o
iJr1` O �n(J ; f"
OAZ (mid c
f O W
` r ntl
C:'>
�r " l
hV
m ,
0
Q
t !llttt p �
a a�_. =��
OoX - !
mom—, ,
'l iJ�• ' Z
rm5; ;u i,! I
I�n i OZ0,
o
ti4
' 7 p
ON
rr X % r- , W D
Fl
l OO,p
OHO r moo
�Q,-u PZ ONZ ONR�t /_``\
OI-O Z.� j .�� ;. �CO�;_- -ND; 'v��
" `
im o'N wpm 0Nz 2 -j 10 n0 -0 n�Q D ly
Z M M �,Z rn n
a
A z
F > A
(1
o
ELEVATION CHURCH
W
o
z
N
° o
CHARLOTTE, NC
a 7 Q
A
a
"
—{ Z
°
MPV PROPERTIES
0
O C)
521 EAST MOREHEAD STREET, STE 400
N
CHAPLOTTE, NC
`��-
m
�<o
5

so
m�
c
N pp
ld Q
S O
m o
c
o�
o
o a
3 m
O 3
a
D
S 3'
as
o�
N O
m o-
00
3w'
n0
�a
o �
0
N A
93 m
a
mY
a0
f o.
50
c c
:r N
` p n
c �
?c
ap
N
a
0
3 a
m
m
m
0
m
w
Q
m
g
n
0
c
P
a
p
a
a
a
n
N
0
0
0
S
V)
o
Ln 0
J D
0
O
0
J.RR7i
iC� G � - I � •• 4 J V�YL
0vZ
1 f <O`z
D m
0
m z
m 0
� r-
�tw 1
• ' 0
•t�sj i
F• y «.
J >
Z w ZA
O 1J1 �" i r-- a' 0 D
o2,
- _ C
X-0 / X00
ill mu,v 22 cnmL
aDD ODD O� mN�m oA
nM C D0 o< -� -z
-a 0 D C) m �O Z m --q
m Z W Z --1 p 0 4
m
D0 mm
Z a -
LT, fTl
m'
Ago
N
OZ
- �Z�`
j
N
N
°a
m
N
L��
s
0�
L7r0�
'stn
Z
c40
OX
rn X
OmZ s
>
Z--
� �
/ S /
z X
m rn
J.RR7i
iC� G � - I � •• 4 J V�YL
0vZ
1 f <O`z
D m
0
m z
m 0
� r-
�tw 1
• ' 0
•t�sj i
F• y «.
J >
Z w ZA
O 1J1 �" i r-- a' 0 D
o2,
- _ C
X-0 / X00
ill mu,v 22 cnmL
aDD ODD O� mN�m oA
nM C D0 o< -� -z
-a 0 D C) m �O Z m --q
m Z W Z --1 p 0 4
m
D0 mm
Z a -
i
w
0
Ago
j
N
N
°a
m
N
L��
0�
L7r0�
Oq
Oz
Q -Ax
-
c40
p0Q
mmDW
rn X
OmZ s
� D
0
.
D
m
D
Z
m
Z
�
SZ 1 EAST MOREHFAD STREET, 5TE 400
J.RR7i
iC� G � - I � •• 4 J V�YL
0vZ
1 f <O`z
D m
0
m z
m 0
� r-
�tw 1
• ' 0
•t�sj i
F• y «.
J >
Z w ZA
O 1J1 �" i r-- a' 0 D
o2,
- _ C
X-0 / X00
ill mu,v 22 cnmL
aDD ODD O� mN�m oA
nM C D0 o< -� -z
-a 0 D C) m �O Z m --q
m Z W Z --1 p 0 4
m
D0 mm
Z a -
O
'a
3 ? 1
R A
t �
O
°o C
i
Ago
j
°a
m
ELEVATION CHURCH
„
o
m°o
S
CHARLOTTE NC
--
MPV PROPERTIES
D
v
0
Z
�
SZ 1 EAST MOREHFAD STREET, 5TE 400
CHARLOTTE, NC
O
'a
3 ? 1
R A
t �
O
°o C

m W n
Z z
z �
Q
O
z
n
S
m
C
r
m
a
■
n
2
2 $ A
-O
x
N
a
-a cn
�'
mW
ELEVATION CHURCH
� f
Q a
m
3
C
p m
m;Q
w
w
n 7o
°
dn>m
v
o
w
z
C
J
p p
C) 'o
MPV PROPERTIES
0 1�
A
D
Ln
r
521 EAST MOREHEAD STREET, STE 400
m
Ln
Z C
C
C
C
�_
z
p
w
p
p D
m;Q
�vooZO
;a
;a
r
z
LnZ
-4
D
O
m
to
D
C
�,
G)
m
z 00
G) C
0
v
-i
-i n
O
r
O
T
D
g
z
ZE
z
C -Tn
m
Z
m
z
m
^�
T'
n
70
Gl
N X
N
to
D
z
m
Ln
D
n
-1
m
W
,�
N
N
A
N
ns
O
O
D
m
m
m
0
0
0
.z
m
D
N
Ln
N�
-{
N
►-�
N
z
o
0
0
O
D
:;o
o
-I
t^
O
in
<n
cn
-i
N
T1
-n
Ln
rT
m
D
=
K
K
D
>
-0
>
n
0O
D
X
X
rr-
m
m
;o
C�
n
OC
O
O
cmi�
m
m
r
O
C
=
D
m
N
A
z=
n
>
CO
0
D
_�
O
C
0
m
_{
z
-°
O
N
z�
D
v,
m
-Tn
cn
O
--I
to
z
n
m�'
Z
m
m
O
co
C
-NI
;Q
-ia
m
O
J
W
0
0
�G
D
z
w
A
0
0
0
p
G)
A
to
cn
Ln
Ln
D
N
D
D D
D
D
n
m
m
iA
m
vmi
Ln
a
■
tee
G
2
2 $ A
-O
N
a
�'
mW
ELEVATION CHURCH
� f
Q a
m
3
C
W
CHARLOTTE, NC
°
dn>m
@
o
z
s
J
O
MPV PROPERTIES
5 tO
A
m
521 EAST MOREHEAD STREET, STE 400
Ln
CHARLOTTE, NC
°
3 ie
w

m v
C �
m vm _
m o
O
A $
m a
Z9
o�
am
vv
o c
3
� O
G
m CL
00
30-
as
�a
wo
o �
0
rn �
v3
v
0
c�
�a
s
w 3
f 3
r. y
n
C
C
O T
N
w
0 N
i c
m
s
m
v
V
0
N
.o
z
m
0
m
0
c
V
CaL
n
m
s
m
0
n
Q
of
o
rm
r D z
04 r /Q� �: l !/ / OX
D
m
m D
t 00
>\ m 0
4y Q
"_A
Ln
N
i
l `
SQ .
w
n m
1 m Z
M
618 /' ,_ '' Y '" :;r7�j•~ © / , '
ELEVATION CHURCH
CHARLOTTE, NC
a
MPV PROPERTIES
521 EAST MOREHEAD STREET, STE 400
CHARLOTTE, NC
%A
N
n
o
0 0
w
c
�
o
�
_
D
�nw
v
�
W
0
0
;0
°o
ELEVATION CHURCH
CHARLOTTE, NC
a
MPV PROPERTIES
521 EAST MOREHEAD STREET, STE 400
CHARLOTTE, NC
%A
a
w
c
�
m
�
_
� c
�
W o
0
0

S o
ev
O
� N `
S O '
0
Q �
o �
CL
n � �
o.�
g /
_ o
0
02
O G
C
s�
00
w�
'o \
m \
o /
0 11
N
J
M /
m
m I
nl \
0
m
m
o.
n
4
m
o /
■
N
1n
O
A
t
w
00
C> m
i 0OD
co m
m / -
m O ��\\
< Z
�M o\\
o -
I\
Ox`
M 4S
mr`
C
Or-
Gm`
B
i
fl
■
CL
=
ELEVATION CHURCH
D�
w
o o
CHARLOTTE, NC
w'> > m a O
D
0
MPV PROPERTIES
l
10
V 3 m 0
3
°
521 EAST MOREHEAD STREET, STE 400
n'c `o 3
D
4o
CHARLOTTE, NC
t(D
W n 0 m 0

ELEVATION CHURCH ENHANCEMENT
Charlotte, NC
STABILIZATION _. ; �, '�
SEED MIX WETLAND ARE=A °G" -�
1 U 0213 AC TO REMAIN
WETLAND AREA ".E..
EXISTING f�
WETLAND l j j / l° 0 2787 AC TO BE REMOVED
PRESERVED �
i
PIPE t OPEII(VATER POND "F"
0 3 586 AC TO BE REMOVED
Ji OPEN
/1 572
FLOW ; j` WETLAND
PATTERN��` (f SEED MIX,ft� %r,
DOUBLE
LOG STEPS
WETLANDS AREA "C &D - ,- ±�Y}�t�t
0-0675 AC TO REMAIN ,, t
_ � COIR FIBER EXISTING
LOGS >'1 WETLAND ^a
PRESERVED
t rY STREAM "131'
222 LF TO REMAIN
T ,,1` STREAM "B1 �-
� 85 LF TO BE REMOVED
Figure No.
LEONARD S RINDNER PLLC
Page.
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
ENHANCEMENT
:Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 — 2277
LEN RINDNER PW S @gmail com
Sheet.
Page.
ELEVATION CHURCH
ENHANCEMENT
Drawn
Reviewed
by NRN
by. LSR
SKETCH MAP
Date
*A roximate Boundary
pp rY
2 -14 -14
/

ELEVATION CHURCH ENHANCEMENT
VEGETATION PLAN
2 -14 -14
The enhancement area has three general areas which are depicted by the different native seed
mixes; Stabilization, Wetland, and Preserved Wetlands. The stabilization area is a more
intermittent with primary flow occurring around peak rain events. The wetland area is
predominately wet year round with additional flow input during peak rain events. Preserved
wetlands are not to receive any seeding. Native seed mixes are listed below. Coir fiber logs are
to be installed to help maintain stable flow during peak events as well as to prevent any
undesirable erosion surrounding the enhancement area The coir fiber logs will receive live
stakes to help stabilize the enhancement area. Live stake species list are listed below. Log
steps are to be installed in one location to ensure the peak water flow follows the prescribed
course. Log steps can be constructed from live trees found onsite. To ensure that the flow
follows the prescribed course a shallow (3 "- 4" deep) ditch is to be dug. The entire
enhancement area is to be mated with coir fiber erosion fabric.
Native Stabilization Seed Mix (20 -25 Ibs. per acre):
Elymus virginicus (Virginia wild rye), Tripsacum dactyloides (Eastern gammagrass), Panicum
virgatum (Switchgrass), Agrostis scabra (Rough bentgrass), Carex vulpinoidea (Fox sedge),
Tridens flavus (Purple top), Schizachyrium scoporium (Little bluestem), Coreopsis lanceolota
(Lance leaf tickseed), Sorghastrum nutons (Indian grass), Elymus hystnx (Bottlebrush grass)
Festuca ovina var. duriuscalo (Hard Fescue), Rudbeckia hirta (Blackeyed Susan)
Native Wetland Seed Mix (20 -25 Ibs. per acre):
Elymus rrparius (Riverbank wild rye), Agrostis stolonifera (Creeping bentgrass), Carex
vulpinoidea (Fox sedge), Panicum virgatum (Switchgrass), Poo polustris (Fowl bluegrass),
Dichanthehum clandestinum (Deer tongue), Bidens aristosa ( Bidens), luncus effusus (Soft rush),
Sagittaria latifolia (Duck Potato), Saururus cernuus (Lizard Tail)
Live Stake Species (3' on center):
Corpus amomum (Silky Dogwood), Solixcarohniono (Carolina Willow), Solixsericea (Silky
Willow), Sombucus canadensis (Elderberry), Physocorpos opulifohus (Ninebark)