20220813 Ver 1_401 Application_20220615

Jennifer Robertson
From: Jennifer Robertson
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 10:14 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Beacon Rhyne Road NWP 39/WQC 4263
This email serves at the 30 day pre-application notice for Beacon Rhyne Road in Mecklenburg County. The project
involves an industrial warehouse park.
Thank you,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
www.atlasenvi.com
Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
�i�'"olO 4
..J+ As
��
_ __, ONMENTAL
RECEIVED
JUN 1 5 2022
DEO-WATER RESOURCES
4,01 &BUFFER PERMITT1Nu
1

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - 202200318
Prepare file folder ❑
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Assign Action ID Number in ORM n
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Beacon -Rhyne Road
2. Work Type: Private n Institutional ❑ Government El Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Construction of industrial and associated infrastructure including utilities and storm water control.
z
4. Property owner /Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: See attached Parcel Reports / Beacon Partners
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental, Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: SAW-2022-00318
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
35.289579° /-80.970509°
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 05326105, 05326101, and 05325115
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Long Creek, WS-IV
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Upper Catawba, 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 n Section 404 n Section 10 & 404 n
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit # 27
n Regional General Permit #
EI Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
n Compliance
n No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

A
VIRONMENTAL
April 21, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Steve Kichefski Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611 1617 Mail Service Center
Charlotte, North Carolina 28261 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: Beacon-Rhyne Road - +/- 109.56 Acres
240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
NWP 27 / GC 4255 and GC 4263
Steve and Paul:
The applicant, Mr. Matt Lucarelli of Beacon Partners, is requesting approval of the enclosed
nationwide permit 27 verification and water quality certifications 4255 and 4263. An approved
jurisdictional determination was submitted on February 02, 2022. Approval from NC DWR for
unavoidable impacts to isolated intermittent channel CH 400 is being requested under GC 4263
in the amount of 593 linear feet. A man-made isolated pond, identified as Pond 1, is being
proposed to be drained as part of the construction. An isolated wetland is located along the
bank of the pond and is identified as wetland WL 1000.
The earthen dam of the pond will be breached by pumping down the pond using a skimmer on
a suction hose and a silt bag on the outlet hose until the dam can be breached without
releasing turbid water. Once the dam is breached and the area is dry and accessible a stream
restoration will be carried out through the bottom of the pond to channel CH 600. The
restoration will provide hydraulic connectivity from isolated channel CH 700 to non-isolated
features. This dam breach/stream restoration is being requested under a NWP 27 / water
quality certification 4255. At the time of this permit application a 30% design of the stream
restoration has been prepared and is attached to this application. The restoration will restore
approximately 819 linear feet of channel. The channel will have an average bankfull slope of
0.024 ft/ft with a sinuosity of approximately 1.1 and total relief of 20 feet. The proposed cross
section consists of a tiered channel with a low flow section, inner berm, and bankfull areas.
Due to the site restraints the final design of the channel will likely consist of constructed
floodplain wetlands along the right bank to prevent channel migration and remove stress from
flow events on the fill slope of the construction.
Best regards,
geAtit+
olCv
Jennifer L Robertson, President
[e-mail]
AT , S Environmental, Inc.
338 S.Sharon Amity Road#411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206(o)/828-712-9205(m)
www.atlasenvi.com/Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

\14A
oa ¢G Office Use Only:
y r Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps: x❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP)number: 27 or General Permit(GP) number: DWR 4255 and 4263
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? 0 Yes x❑ No
1 d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ(check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 401 Water Quality Certification—Express 0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑Yes x❑ No
lf. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ❑ Yes ® No
or in-lieu fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer lh 0 Yes 0 No
below.
lh. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? 0 Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Beacon Rhyne Road
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality/town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: Not a subdivision
2e. NCDOT only,T.I.P. or state project no: Not a NC DOT project
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: Three parcels with different owners. See attached parcel reports.
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 09020/868, 03112/019, and 05106/439
3c. Responsible Party(for LLC if There is one LLC owner. Steven Trammell is responsible party.
applicable):
3d. Street address: See parcel reports.
3e. City, state,zip: See parcel reports.
3f. Telephone no.: Unknown
3g. Fax no.: Unknown
3h. Email address: Unknown
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
• Agent © Other, specify: Developer, Buyer
4b Name:
Mr. Matt Lucarelli
4c. Business name
(if applicable).
Beacon Partners
4d. Street address.
500 East Morehead Street, Suite 200
4e City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g. Fax no.:
No Fax
4h Email address.
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a Name•
Jennifer Robertson
5b Business name
(if applicable):
Atlas Environmental Inc.
5c. Street address:
338 S. Sharon Amity Rd #411
5d City, state, zip.
Charlotte NC 28211
5e. Telephone no :
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
No Fax
5g. Email address.
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
05326105, 05326101, and 05325115
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees). Latitude. 35.289579 Longitude: -80.970509
1 c. Property size.
109.56 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Long Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV
2c. River basin:
Upper Catawba 03050101
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The property is currently mostly forested with a history of previous timbering activities. The surrounding land use includes commercial to the North
and East and residential to the West.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.019
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 4,402
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is for the construction of industrial warehouse space and associated infrastructure including stormwater treatment, parking, and utilities.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The project will require the use of land clearing and grubbing using heavy equipment to prepare the land surface for construction and to carry out the
proposed construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
p Yes • No • Unknown
Comments: AJD submitted
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑Preliminary ©Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Atlas Environmental Staff
Agency/Consultant Company: Atlas Environmental
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
No JD has been issued yet
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
• Yes ■ No ©Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
None Known
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
• Yes © No
6b. If yes, explain.
Not a phased project
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check
all that apply):
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
• Wetlands © Streams — tributaries • Buffers
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill
CH 400
INT
DWQ
3
593
S2 P
Restoration
CH 700
PER
Corps
5
819
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
593
3i. Comments:
The dam of pond 1 will be breached draining isolated pond 1 and isolated wetland WL 1000. A stream restoration will be conducted to restore
hydraulic connectivity from isolated channel CH 700 to channel CH 600. A 30% design plan of the stream restoration is attached. CH 400 will be
permitted under DWR GC 2463 and the draining of the pond and stream restoration will be permitted under NWP 27/GC 4255
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
•
Yes
•
No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
•
Neuse •
Tar -Pamlico
•
Catawba •
Randleman
•
Other
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The positioning and orientation of the buildings have been engineered and designed to provide the least amount of impacts while fulfilling the project
goals. The stream restoration through the bottom of the drained pond and below will re-establish stream flow between CH 700 and CH 600
increasing the ecological value of the resources
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques to avoid and minimize impacts include varying the steepness of side slopes from 3:1 to 2:1 to avoid streams. Additionally, a
retaining wall is being constructed to avoid impacts to CH 500.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
No
• Yes p
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
• DWQ • Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
fee program
Mitigation
• Mitigation bank
■Payment to in -lieu
• Permittee Responsible
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank.
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
• Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)•
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested•
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes • No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e_
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
• Yes p No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
not applicable
• Yes • No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>24 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
p Yes • No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater management includes the construction of four stormwater control measures for treatment of runoff.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Charlotte
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
p Phase II
■NSW
■ USMP
p Water Supply Watershed
• Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes p No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
■ Coastal counties
■ HQW
• ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
• Other.
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
• Yes p No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
© Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
p Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
• Yes ©No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑ Yes ■ No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
not applicable
Comments:
❑ Yes • No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
■ Yes © No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
• Yes © No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
not applicable
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
• Yes ©No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage will be transported and treated by municipal sanitary sewer
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
• Yes ©No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
Yes
©No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
IPAC and NHP. Atlas Environmental did not identify suitable habitat within the review area
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
■ Yes © No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA essential fish habitat mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
• Yes p No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC HPO buffer map See attached NC HPO no comment letter.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
■ Yes © No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
not applicable
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA NFHL kml.
Jennifer Robertson
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
d� L�i�
04-21-2022
Date
Applica Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

A
VIRONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams-Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Project Name: °fq— gKYtiE �4-D
Property Owner of Record: .519,1 ►6STet tIV//VG,S7om6
•
Contact Name: P4P(T1 t.UC MLA(
Address: s17�(7 E. M°06N6Ao Sw 240
Address: C " � i(1'i/ NG aVo
Phone/Fax Number: 10'— Uv-(3g(D
Email Address: Mir L BafArco )o o MFMT- cM
Project Address: Z yD ice, i2oAi9
Project Address: GM4 i_o 27:, NC- 282-/c/
Tax PIN: 05;2(o/O/ 05.32(a/0S., 05325//r
piSignature: xic
Date:
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road,#411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206(o)/828-712-9205(m)
[e-mail]
www.atlasenvi.com

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed: 01/05/2022
Identity
Parcel ID
GIS ID
05326105
05326105
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
26.28 AC
Fire District
WEST MECKLENBURG
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer
Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710451600J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
MOUNT HOLLY RD UNINC
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
C/O STEVEN TRAMMELL
4002 WINTERBERRY PL
SHUMAKER,LOOP &
KENDRICK LLP
CHARLOTTE NC 28210
CHARBECK PROPERTIES
LLC
4002 WINTERBERRY PL
SHUMAKER,LOOP &
KENDRICK LLP
CHARLOTTE NC 28210
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
09020-868
04/21/1997
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
60.05
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction
Charlotte
District
Western Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name
LONG
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name
LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class
PA
Built -Upon Area Restriction
Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area
Yes

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Pnnted: 01/05/2022
Identity
Parcel ID
GIS ID
05326101
05326101
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
20.12 AC
Fire District
WEST MECKLENBURG
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer
No
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710451600J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
240 RHYNE RD UNINC
240 RHYNE RD UNINC
240 RHYNE RD UNINC
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
LIVINGSTONE COATING
CORP
PO BOX 7
MOUNT HOLLY NC 28120
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
03112-019
01/01/1975
$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
60.05
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction
Charlotte
District
Western Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name
LONG
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name
LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class
PA
Built -Upon Area Restriction
Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area
Yes

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed: 01/05/2022
Identity
Parcel ID
GIS ID
05325115
05325115
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
63.158 AC
Fire District
WEST MECKLENBURG
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type
INDIVIDUAL
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
FOREST - COMMERCIAL
PRODUCTION
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer
Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710451600J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
RHYNE RD UNINC
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
JOHN K SPRINGSTEED
5000 PARK RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28209
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
05106-439
10/11/1985
$102,500.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
60.05
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction
Charlotte
District
Western Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name
LONG
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name
LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class
PA
Built -Upon Area Restriction
Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area
Yes

Detail 3: Page 5
Legend
Review Area
I 1 Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
2 Ft Contours
Delineation
® Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
® Culvert
Detail 1: Page 3
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Sketch Map provided for illustrative purposes and
preliminary planning only. Not intended to be
relied upon for exact location, dimension, or
orientation. All findings and assessments are
subject to verification from the Army Corps of
Engineers, NC Division of Water Resources,
and/or other appropriate local authorities. Do not
reproduce map set except in its entirety.
250 500 750 1000 Ft
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Page 1 of 6
Figure:
Date: January 10, 2022

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Legend
Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
MO Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
MIN Culvert
FAO
0 250 500 750 1000 Ft
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: January 10, 2022
Page 2 of 6
Figure:

Perennial RPW
CH 100: - 2477 LF, 0.430 Ac
Legend
Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
® Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
® Culvert
I I
Aquatic Resource Sketch M
Notes
1: CH 100 length and area includes culvert
2: CH 100 generally follows West
boundary of review area and includes
many channel segments
Intermittent RPW
CH 300: - 106 LF, 0.007 Ac
Perennial RPW
CH 200: - 656 LF, 0.061 Al
e
50 100 150 200 Ft
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Page 3 of 6
Detail 1
Figure:
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: January 10, 2022

Legend
Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
Ell Culvert
I 1
ONMENTAL
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Page 4 of 6
Detail 2 Figure:
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: January 10, 2022

Intermittent RPW
CH 500: - 199 LF, 0.016 Ac
CH 100 Continued
Legend
® Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
® Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
Culvert
I I
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Isolated Intermittent RPW
CH 400: - 698 LF, 0.051 Ac
50 100 150 200 Ft
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Page 5 of 6
Detail 3 Figure:
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: January 10, 2022

Legend
O Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
o Streets
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
Ell Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
11111 Culvert
CH 100 Continued
CH 100 Continued
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Isolated Perennial RPW
CH 700: - 197 LF, 0.025 Ac
Isolated Impoundment
Pond 1: - 1.473 Ac
Intermittent RPW
CH 600: - 69 LF, 0.007 Ac
Isolated Wetland
WL 1000: - 0.019 Ac
e
0 50 100 150 200 Ft
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Page 6 of 6
Detail 4
Figure:
Date: January 10, 2022

' qa (ft 41 l i \411
- "1
4
l-011„! i
off° y'•kA
7J "eucAVM,
(,_,\.kktt!',
IVA
� nI
RHYNE ROAD LOGISTICS PARK
CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 7, 2022

I5;J-
\\4„.0 ti t 4�L�
,
s
WSJ_„) r� tti�\ 0\10* �;\����I �/J r ` ,t,
tiro 11�5),ii��1\�\ ter,\ (s �i� \
/ 5 1S[J)%f)l/!%�Z\I
i
//
/C \//1/

Steepened slope
2:1 instead of 3:1 10 minimize im
Impact S1
CH 400: - 596 LF, 0.047 Ac
Isolated Intermittent Channel
To be permitted under DWR 4263
- -- I-,
\ � ,�` >,�rfr � 4 sir
COI ILOMION AYMIS. MR i1
OMAOIILIICnin
AInEJMim
•
Headwall to avoid impacts to
CH 500
,I'103
r'/
/�"
• ;;;;1121-5 /1K-/
r=
r—�� � — l
c6 Aati111
1
�I 11li },
IM1.
J" 11� 1 1
��� 1 �i
111.111!1-
0,0
AL4
uARHYN 4.AUSt
-NEa �\HORbim,rrnE)
RHYNE ROAD LOGISTICS PARK
CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 7, 2022
Re-establish connectivity to
downstream waters
Dam to be breached for
stream restoration
1 and WL 1000 drained
for stream restoration.
To be permitted under NWP
27/GC 4255
See Detail for 30% conceptual
stream restoration Elan
GRAPHIC SCALE
4

Steepened slope
(2:1 instead of 3:1 to minimize impacts)
Impact S1
CH 400: - 596 LF, 0.047 Ac
Isolated Intermittent Channel
To be permitted under DWR 4263
/r7S'f I (°t\
�- \l�1ll,il;
\\\ v y l�
\\ \
i7_%//A!
(`6 h
ice,
1/
(II7'
r%-/// /(
'l\,\ f 15
,,s/ 1i111
1 tf/1
• i%/l
i-� a
l /�/// 4,%A O' -
�%// 4e1
-E /0,-'
1i-i—/ff� ��
Headwall to avoid impacts to
CH 500
/ 1 S'
_ �(l1r//yid
�,/ (/ /( ,; 00;,:i
/, /�%,/r i%cr' , %,P/!(rill l� �f
L� � 4
/ f/1) �/
\ems \\Z
•
\\fit\t
pL r < \ t
ti 1111\ \\mt* /Alt /15/ 1
( ram— „
!)0).1-1151\\(( f�\\r
/l / y 2<i�//�^�z�} !�1�rd��lg� I //r�� ti 1h1
r�511h.�-.111LF 79 110.97\mot
_ 1
ti680�
PROPpn cra,
�- ,15- R
\ 2 •

/ J//'/
JSrfJJ
-`=
_�..�67 __-
gl/S f
\l\\1\�1``�
t:rti \1\ \\
t
1 r -,,' �>, flu
lllll /yjif80 �:��
_ �� � /�t r� 1 im.— U.., �
f�) r �\tiTs4v4//f��\� {� r::;—. —` i.-,__���542- P !1{Sio�-i1111`�\\(`(t-`--\ �%(s ���� �ti�:
l� / h �})67,4/, �7. \t\4 1\4 rdu, e, ,., % iir\`� -, $ ��^
�t 1 7 l��(�ir�lll..i 4,,,/�✓ I ��� J
I\ 7 f
\Zit < 2 f PROPP .020,o;` 1 k
Re-establish connectivity to
downstream waters
Dam to be breached for
stream restoration
Pond 1 and WL 1000 drained
for stream restoration.
To be permitted under NWP
27/GC 4255
See Detail for 30% conceptual
stream restoration plan

0
1
77,
Date: April 21, 2021
Updated: N/A
For: Beacon Partners
Beacon -Rhyne Road
240 Rhyne Road
Charlotte, NC 28214
Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579,-80,970509
338 S. Sharon Amity Rd, #411
Charlotte NC, 28211

660
Longitudinal Profile
•
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
—II—Ele —1111—BKF

Design Riffle
00
2.0
0.0, 1.74
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0 14.0
16.0 18.0
20.0
22.0 24.0
1.5
$_ 1.0
0.5
>
w 0.0
-0.5
-1.0
Station (ft)
21.2, 1.74
0 0 2.0
2.0 ++
0.0, 1.74
1.5
>
a>
w 0.0
-0.5
-1.0
4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
6.4, 0.87
4.0, 0.94
10.1, 02
10.6 -0.73 11.6, -0.73
14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0
11.9, 0.02
13.6, 0.87
17.2, 0.94
21.2, 1.74
Station (ft)
Design Pool

Design Riffle and Pool Tables
hannel
,x1
Wbkf
6.0
ft XS Area
3.2
Upper Bank Slope L
2.0
1 Depth
0.53
Berm Slope L
10.0
:1 W(=
11.32
Bank Width L
1.00
ft Dmax
0.87
Berm Width L
1.0 -=3ft
Dmax/Dbkf
1.64
2nd Stage L
2.00
ft Wet Per BKF
6.36
Upper Bank Slope R
2.00
:1 Hyd Rad
0.50
Berm Slope R
10.00
:1 Manning's n
0. 04
Bank Width R
1.00
ft Slope
2.40°l,-
Berm Width R
1.00
ft Q
11.30
2nd Stage R
2.00
ft Velocity
3.55
Low Flow Side L
IB Channel
:1
XS Area
2.0
0.4
Low Flow Bottom L
25.0
:1
Depth
0.19
Low Flow Side R
2.00
:1
W/D
10.39
Low Flow Bottom R
25.00
:1
Dmax
0.27
Width Low Flow
'` r:. -� 2.
ft
Wet Per LF
2.12
Half W
1.00
ft
Hyd Rad
0.18
Length Side Slope L
ft
Manning's n
Bottom Width L
0.50
ft
Slope
1.
Side Slope R
0.50
:1
Q LF
0.55
Bottom Width R
0.50
ft
Velocity LF
1.42
12.1
Pool Width Ratio
Pool Width
Pool Depth Ratio
Pool Max Depth
Upper Bank Slope
Lower Bank Slope
Additional TW Depth
TW Position
1.21
7.2
3.0
1.6 ft
2.0
0.2
0.0
33% _;
From Outside Ben:
BKF EL
Valley Width Ratio
FP Width
FP outside one bank
FP Slope
Terrace Slope
100.0
2.2
13.2
3.6
Set El-BKF here
Not ER -- this is valley bottom width
Can be over -ridden
Width of valley at TOB on one side
:1
:1
For RM
Riffle
92.4 100.9
Top FP Channel at 2xdmax@ 5:1
0.0
1.74
96.4 100.1
Edge FP at 50:1
4.0
0.94
100.0 100.0
BKF
7.6
0.87
101.0 99.5
8.6
0.37
102.0 99.4
IB
9.6
0.27
102.5 99.2
Lo Flow
10.1
0.02
103.0 99.1
TW
10.6
0.00
103.5 99.2
Lo Flow
11.1
0.02
104.0 99.4
11.6
0.27
105.0 99.5
12.6
0.37
106.0 100.0
BKF
13.6
0.87
109.6 100.1
Edge FP at 50:1
17.2
0.94
113.6 100.9
Top FP Channel at 2xdmax@ 5:1
21.2
1.74
For RM
Pool
92.4 100.9
Top FP Channel at 2xdmax@ 5:1
0.0
1.74
96.4 100.1
Edge FP at 50:1
4.0
0.94
98.8 100.0
BKF
6.4
0.87
102.5 99.2
Lo Flow
10.1
0.02
103.0 98.4
Bottom L
10.6
-0.73
104.0 98.4
TW
11.6
-0, 73
104.2 98.4
Bottom R
11.8
-0.73
104.3 99.2
Lo Flow
11.9
0.02
106.0 100.0
BKF
13.6
0.87
109.6 100.1
Edge FP at 50:1
17.2
0.94
113.6 100.9
Top FP Channel at 2xdmax@ 5:1
21.2
1.74

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
March 31, 2022
Austin Baggarley
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 South Sharon Amity Road, Suite 17111
Charlotte, NC 28211
abaggarleyna,atlasenvi.com
Re: Construct industrial development, 240 Rhyne Road, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 22-0424
Dear Mr. Baggarley,
Thank you for your email of February 1, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(a�ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(&,,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
/ ' Ramona Bartos, Deputy
() State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

O Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
ONMENTAL
Figure: 2
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
//WI
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

`
.„--creka-170,1 tom.
\\\t �I ,\ Brazos st m (
Ara I►1 Wa►d \‘‘
Legend
O Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
= Streets
Contours: 2 Ft
ONMENTAL
Figure: 3
800
1200
1600 Ft
Topographic Map
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
400
Date: December 13, 2021

Legend
= Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
USGS Topo
I I
400
'MIIi�
c@ 'w?� crosscut Dr ""�
800
1200
1600 Ft
Figure: 4
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

Legend
Review Area
USGS Topo
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Mi
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021
Figure: 5

Mount Holly
Legend
Review Area
I I Mecklenburg County
USGS Quadrangles
I I
USGS Quadrangles
L. ke Norman South
Mountain Island Lake
Cornelius
Derita
Charlotte West
Charlotte East
Kannapolis
Harrisburg
L
0 1 2 3 4Mi
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Figure: 6
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

Aerial Imagery
Legend
Review Area
O Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
Aerial Imagery
Figure: 7
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

FEitw" 's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer writ' Web AppBuflderfor ArcG15
"4 t[2eic., �ki+72 .. `
Find address or place
ATIT cr6T le
TFUTUREGbN01TlDtSCOFL4:90:NrATES,TITATEr titr
Z "uZC 671:FEI sR i1tillil �- RE
NDI�TI�@,N5
K
f AMU k'e2ol!!11E 's .RFC M1IDT
PVTIMP
�67jf�Lfl 1 "-
car G avR
i nrloni
i. bVe1T14 wmt-
1111941
-4151,,Ez Pr
MitimAC
ij
iio 0101111M0,
0.945 3-
a�
4 Degrees
F;s3rvau" o itI±JN��F
., No rra Tl et
o DiTION5T.lo_ 0iG�tt
(EL 3J
Q170Atr11 E
fl (KV (�9�t2L•l
gardsg
`t.�.��71�4p 2145
�".1Rt'iu3
AT
2nA
ITIONS , PCT FUTURE,
DITION
X j
Approx. Review Area
Figure: 8
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

Legend
O Review Area
l I Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
LiDAR (Ft)
l® 625
650
I- 1 675
700
725
I I
I I
Figure: 9
Digital Elevation Model
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

® Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
Contours: 2 Ft
GIS Waterbodys
GIS Streams
Figure: 10
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

I I
Legend
O Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
o Streets
Contours: 2 Ft
NWI
Emergent Wetland
Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure: 11
1
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

501900 502000
I I
502100
502500
502700
502503
8_
EnB
11VkE
WkE
EnD
EnB
8
� q0G60e4 mar nnis N)c': [ a aG[ sscC[c"
501900
502000
1
502100
1
502200
Map Scale: 1:6,430 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Meters
0 50 100 200 300
EnB
502400
EriiB
502700
8
Feet
0 300 600 1200 1800 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 s� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Figure: 12a
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: Dec. 13, 2021

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
1 ▪ Soil Map Unit Lines
D Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
49 Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
• Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
• Landfill
Lava Flow
4, Marsh or swamp
4 Mine or Quarry
• Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
• Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
• Sinkhole
• Slide or Slip
o, Sodic Spot
gt Spoil Area
t) Stony Spot
63 Very Stony Spot
ti;"
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Transportation
F i F Rails
- Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 20, Sep 2, 2021
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 13, 2019—Apr 4,
2020
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Figure: 12b
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: Dec. 13, 2021

Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AO1
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 56.3
percent slopes
51.9%
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
35.9
Water 0.8
33.0%
WkE Wilkes loam, 15 to 25 percent
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
15.6
0.8%
14.3%
108.6
100.0%
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Figure: 12c
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509 Date: Dec. 13, 2021

240 Rhyne Road Charlotte; X
Show search results for 240 Rh...
0.2ms
�I.
l!y
NC Cass ifis:.-floats Lri7ebait Report
ox
Surface Water Classifications;
e,E:. 11-120-42.5:
Stream Name: Long Creek
Descrpt.on: From a point 0.6 mile
downstream of
Mecklenburg County SR
2074 to a point 0.4 mile
upstream of Mecklenburg
County SR 1606
Classification: WS-iV
Date of Class.: August 2 ':492
Whet does this More info
Claso. mean?
Raver uas Catawba
Zoom to
^rnila gate
Mrkjlo
cfr
7 Degrees;..
mea
1.7
Flow Direction
'Approx. Review Areal
m
Brazos St
Rhyne
Ina Island
EN k
Ln
i4
cka
Coefwoo 4_est
Torn Sacrfc,, bq
PawUe ketl
rlermnioey
"Rd !doom Masai Crr
r? City Of Charlotte, NC, County of Gaston. State of North Carolina I
Figure: 13
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

Legend
Review Area
I I Mecklenburg County
HUC 12 Watersheds
I I
1 Inner tuna
0 1 2 3 4Mi
Figure: 14
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

/ c
HUC 08 Watersheds
03050101
Upper Catawba
✓F`# t+v..+'� �5��� Jk ��%v �P&��
0304010
Rocky
.i.=� �r�� a ,ri
03050103
Lower Catawba
Legend
Review Area
I Mecklenburg County
0 1 2 3 4 Mi
I I HUC 08 Watersheds
.4, < ..
AIM_
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
,..Ai
,.
%
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
v
WAOSY nONMENTAL
Figure: 15
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: December 13, 2021

1: CH 100
2: CH 115
3: CH 135
Site Photographs: January 6, 2021
4: CH 200 at CH 100
5: CH 220
6: CH 300

7: Isolated CH 400
8: Isolated CH 400 at break
9: Isolated CH 400 break
Site Photographs: January 6, 2021
10: CH 500
11: CH 600
12: Isolated Pond 1 at beaver dam

13: Isolated Pond 1
14: WL 1000
15: WL 1000 Soils
Site Photographs: January 6, 2021
16: Isolated CH 700
17: Outlet to isolated Pond 1
18: Below Pond 1 dam

i
Photo 12
Photo 11
Photo 1
Photo 2
Legend
O Review Area
Meck. Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Ell Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
Ell Culvert
Stream Data Form
Photo 3
Photo Map and Data Form Location
Photo 13
Photos 17, 18
Photo 10
Photos 8, 9
Photo 16
Photos 14, 15
Stream Data Form
Photo 7
Photo 6
Photo 5
Photo 4
0 250 500 750 1000 Ft
Figure:
Project Name: Beacon -Rhyne Road
Location: 240 Rhyne Road Charlotte, NC 28214
For: Beacon Partners Attn: Mr. Matt Lucarelli
Coordinates: 35.289579, -80.970509
Date: January 10, 2022

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: January 6, 2022
Beacon -Rhyne Road
Project/Site:perennial
Latitude: 35.28342
Evaluator:J Sinclair J Robertson
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.97479
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 38.0
,f z 19 or perennial if z 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Per"nial
i
Other Mountain Island Lake
e g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2 _
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0 5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = q.
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
9
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
3
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
.5
1
3
3
1
1
0.5
1
3
2
3
1
0
1
1
1
O
0

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: January 6, 2022
Beacon -Rhyne Road
Project/Site'Intermittent
28
Latitude: 35 455
Evaluator:J Sinclair J Robertson
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.97458
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 24.5
if >_ 19 or perennial ,f >_ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral InteVittent Perennial
Other Mountain Island Lake
e g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0 5
1
1 5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = 7
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0 5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
0 5
1
1 5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0 5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0 5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75, OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
1
0
0.5
0.5
3
2
2
1
0
0
1
1
0
0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site. Beacon -Rhyne Road
Applicant/Owner: Beacon Partners
City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg
Investigator(s). J Robertson, J Sinclair, A Baggarley
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc) Floodplain
Sampling Date• December 22. 2021
State NC Sampling Point Forested Wetland
Section, Township, Range: Mountain Island lake
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%) —2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 35 29091 Long -80 97667 Datum NAD 83
Sod Map Unit Name: Wilkes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification: None
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydnc Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks.
Climate conditions are drier than normal See attached climate data report (NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Pnmary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Surface Water (A1) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_
X High Water Table (A2) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) X Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table
_ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin
Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants
_Algal _
X Iron Deposits (B5) _Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
_Aquatic Fauna (B13) _FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches). 0
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point. Forested Wetland
Tree Stratum (Plot size
1. Platanus occidental's
30 )
2. Salo( nigra
3 Pinus taeda
4
5
6.
7
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. Acer negundo
Absolute
% Cover
3
1
2
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Yes FACW
No OBL
Yes FAC
6 =Total Cover
50% of total cover 3 20% of total cover: 2
(Plot size. 15 )
2 Acer rubrum
3. Sambucus sp
4. Salix nigra
5
6
7
8.
9.
3
53
1
2
No FAC
Yes FAC
No FACW
No OBL
59 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover 12
Herb Stratum (Plot size• 5 )
1. Juncus effusus
2 Typha dommgensis
3. Carex sp.
4. Polygonum pensylvanicum
5
6.
7
8.
9.
10
11.
8
2
2
2
Yes FACW
No OBL
No FACW
No FACW
14 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron rad:cans 1 No
2. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
3
4
5.
2
No
3 =Total Cover
3
FAC
FACU
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover. 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC• 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata. 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 16 x 2 = 32
FAC species 59 x 3 = 177
FACU species 2 x 4 = 8
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals. 82 (A) 222 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 71
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody Vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks' (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Forested Wetland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0-6 10YR 3/1 80
6-20 7.5YR 3/2 100
5YR 5/6 20 C PUM
Type. C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey
2Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site Beacon -Rhyne Road
Applicant/Owner: Beacon Partners
City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): J Robertson, J Sinclair, A Baggarley
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc ): Floodplain
Sampling Date• December 22,2021
State NC Sampling Point Forested Upland
Section, Township, Range: Mountain Island lake
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%). —2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 35 29093 Long -80 97668 Datum. NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Wilkes
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification None
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks
Climate conditions are drier than normal See attached climate data report (NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_ _ _
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin
Mat or Crust (B4) (Explain in Remarks) or Stressed Plants
_Algal _Other _Stunted
Deposits (B5) Position (D2)
_Iron _Geomorphic
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) 0
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aenal photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point Forested Upland
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species Status
1. Quercus alba 3 Yes FACU
2. Quercus rubra 2 Yes FACU
3. Pinus taeda 1 No FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
6 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover. 2
Saplmq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Comus flonda 3 Yes FACU
2 Acer rubrum 2 Yes FAC
3. Quercus alba 2 Yes FACU
4.
5
6.
7.
8.
9.
7 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size• 5 )
1. Allium allegheniense 5 Yes UPL
2. Fragaria vesca 3 Yes FACU
3.
4
5
6.
7
8.
9.
10
11.
8 =Total Cover
50% of total cover 4 20% of total cover 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1 Toxicodendron radicans 1 Yes FAC
2. Parthenoc ssus quinquefola 2 Yes FACU
3. Lonicera japonica 2 Yes FACU
4.
5
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata. 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 20.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of Multiply by.
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 4 x 3 = 12
FACU species 17 x 4 = 68
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals 26 (A) 105 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 04
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point Forested Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
%
0-3 5YR 6/6 100
3-18 7 5YR 4/4 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
1Type. C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Texture Remarks
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
2Location. PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Depth (inches).
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0