NCS000431_Conover MASTER ASA Template_20220615

NCS000431_CONOVER ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(Jan 1 -
Dec 31)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
1 1 1
Did Conover submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to
February 28?
2 2 1
Did Conover submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to
February 28?
3 3 1
Did Conover submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to
February 28?
4 4 1
Did Conover submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to
February 28?
5 4 2.B.1.
Did Conover participate in an NPDES MS4 Permit Compliance Audit, as
scheduled and performed by EPA or NCDEQ?
6 5 2.B.2.
Did Conover submit a self-audit of any stormwater program components
not audited by EPA or NCDEQ?
7 5 2.B.3.
Did Conover submit a stormwater permit renewal application at least 180
days prior to permit expiration?
8 5 2.B.3.
If so, what was the date the permit renewal application submittal was
received by DEQ?
9 1 3.B.1.Did Conover develop and distribute stormwater awareness fliers?
10 1 3.B.1.Number of stormwater awareness fliers distributed?
11 2 3.B.2.Did Conover develop and distribute illicit discharge fliers?
12 2 3.B.2.Number of illicit discharge fliers distributed?
13 3 3.B.3.Did Conover develop and distribute illegal dumping fliers?
14 3 3.B.3.Number of illegal dumping fliers distributed?
15 4 3.B.4.Did Conover develop and distribute chemical awareness fliers?
16 4 3.B.4.Number of chemical awareness fliers distributed?
17 5 3.B.5.Did Conover develop and distribute proper waste disposal fliers?
18 5 3.B.5.Number of proper waste disposal fliers distributed?
19 1 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
20 1 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
21 2 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
22 2 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
23 3 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
24 3 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
25 4 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
26 4 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
27 5 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
28 5 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
29 1 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
30 1 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
31 1 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
32 2 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
33 2 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
34 2 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
35 3 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
36 3 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
37 3 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
38 4 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
39 4 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
40 4 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
41 5 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
42 5 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
43 5 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
44 1 4.B.3.
Did Conover host alternative or supplemental education / outreach
opportunities?
45 1 4.B.3.Number of interactions at alternative education / outreach events?
46 1 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
47 1 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
Page 1 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
48 2 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
School?
49 2 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
50 3 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
School?
51 3 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
52 4 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
School?
53 4 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
54 5 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
School?
55 5 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
56 1 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
57 1 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
58 2 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
59 2 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
60 3 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
61 3 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
62 4 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
63 4 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
64 5 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
65 5 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
66 1 6.B.1.
Did Conover create printed material for local government distribution
addressing stormwater best practices?
67 1 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and
on the WPCOG website?
68 2 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and
on the WPCOG website?
69 3 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and
on the WPCOG website?
70 4 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and
on the WPCOG website?
71 5 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and
on the WPCOG website?
72 1 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES
Minimum Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
73 1 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
74 2 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES
Minimum Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
75 2 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
76 3 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES
Minimum Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
77 3 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
78 4 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES
Minimum Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
79 4 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
80 5 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES
Minimum Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
81 5 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
82 1 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper
disposal of waste?
83 1 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants or audiences?
84 2 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper
disposal of waste?
85 2 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants or audiences?
Page 2 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
86 3 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper
disposal of waste?
87 3 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants or audiences?
88 4 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper
disposal of waste?
89 4 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants or audiences?
90 5 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper
disposal of waste?
91 5 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants?
92 1 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents,
businesses, schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial,
development community, general public and municipal employees?
93 1 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
94 2 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents,
businesses, schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial,
development community, general public and municipal employees?
95 2 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
96 3 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents,
businesses, schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial,
development community, general public and municipal employees?
97 3 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
98 4 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents,
businesses, schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial,
development community, general public and municipal employees?
99 4 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
100 5 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents,
businesses, schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial,
development community, general public and municipal employees?
101 5 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
102 1 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
103 2 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
104 3 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
105 4 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
106 5 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
107 1 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
108 1 10.B.2.
Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater
website?
109 2 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
110 2 10.B.2.
Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater
website?
111 3 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
112 3 10.B.2.
Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater
website?
113 4 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
114 4 10.B.2.
Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater
website?
115 5 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
116 5 10.B.2.
Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater
website?
117 1 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
118 2 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
119 3 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
120 4 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
121 5 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
122 1 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
123 1 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
124 2 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
125 2 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
126 3 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
127 3 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
Page 3 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
128 4 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
129 4 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
130 5 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
131 5 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
132 1 12.B.1.
Did Conover identify a staff member to serve as the stormwater hotline
contact?
133 1 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
134 1 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
135 1 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
136 1 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
137 2 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
138 2 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
139 2 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
140 2 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
141 3 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
142 3 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
143 3 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
144 3 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
145 4 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
146 4 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
147 4 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
148 4 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
149 5 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
150 5 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
151 5 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
152 5 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
153 1 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
154 1 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater
reporting to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
155 1 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
156 2 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
157 2 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater
reporting to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
158 2 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
159 3 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
160 3 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater
reporting to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
161 3 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
162 4 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
163 4 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater
reporting to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
164 4 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
165 5 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
166 5 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater
reporting to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
167 5 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
168 1 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
169 1 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
170 2 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
171 2 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
172 3 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
173 3 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
Page 4 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
174 4 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
175 4 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
176 5 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
177 5 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
178 1 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings,
which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality issues within
the region?
179 1 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
180 2 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings,
which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality issues within
the region?
181 2 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
182 3 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings,
which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality issues within
the region?
183 3 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
184 4 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings,
which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality issues within
the region?
185 4 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
186 5 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings,
which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality issues within
the region?
187 5 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
188 1 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
189 1 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
190 2 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
191 2 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
192 3 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
193 3 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
194 4 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
195 4 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
196 5 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
197 5 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
198 1 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
199 1 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
200 1 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
201 1 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
202 2 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
203 2 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
204 2 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
205 2 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
206 3 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
207 3 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
208 3 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
209 3 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
210 4 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
211 4 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
212 4 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
213 4 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
214 5 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
215 5 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
216 5 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
217 5 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
218 1 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
219 2 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
220 3 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
Page 5 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
221 4 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
222 5 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
223 1 18.B.3.
Did Conover publicize stream cleanup events to the public to gather
volunteers for stream cleanup efforts to assist in public awareness and
involvement?
224 1 19.B.1.
Did Conover add an MS4 map layer identifying/separating major outfalls
from all outfalls?
225 1 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
226 2 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
227 3 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
228 4 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
229 5 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
230 1 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
231 2 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
232 3 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
233 4 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
234 5 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
235 1 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
236 2 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
237 3 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
238 4 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
239 5 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
240 1 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
241 2 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
242 3 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
243 4 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
244 5 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
245 1 20.B.1.Did Conover update the existing IDDE ordinance?
246 2 20.B.2.Did Conover review / update the existing IDDE ordinance?
247 3 20.B.2.Did Conover review / update the existing IDDE ordinance?
248 4 20.B.2.Did Conover review / update the existing IDDE ordinance?
249 5 20.B.2.Did Conover review / update the existing IDDE ordinance?
250 1 21.B.1.
Did Conover develop a written IDDE Plan to define the procedures of
identifying, tracking and processing illicit discharges, illegal dumping and
significant contributors of pollutants to the MS4?
251 1 21.B.1.Did Conover submit the written IDDE Plan to DEQ for review ad comment?
252 1 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
253 1 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
254 2 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
255 2 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
256 3 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
257 3 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
258 4 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
259 4 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
260 5 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
Page 6 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
261 5 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
262 2 21.B.3.Did Conover implement / enforce the IDDE Plan and IDDE Ordinance?
263 3 21.B.3.Did Conover implement / enforce the IDDE Plan and IDDE Ordinance?
264 4 21.B.3.Did Conover implement / enforce the IDDE Plan and IDDE Ordinance?
265 5 21.B.3.Did Conover implement / enforce the IDDE Plan and IDDE Ordinance?
266 1 22.B.1.
Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk
areas?
267 2 22.B.1.
Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk
areas?
268 3 22.B.1.
Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk
areas?
269 4 22.B.1.
Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk
areas?
270 5 22.B.1.
Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk
areas?
271 1 23.B.1.
Did Conover establish a procedure to divide the City and create a schedule
for dry weather inspections for known outfalls?
272 2 23.B.2.
Did Conover perform regular dry weather (no rain in previous 72 hours)
outfall inspections of at least one section (20%) to proactively identify
illicit discharges and illicit connections?
273 3 23.B.2.
Did Conover perform regular dry weather (no rain in previous 72 hours)
outfall inspections of at least one section (20%) to proactively identify
illicit discharges and illicit connections?
274 4 23.B.2.
Did Conover perform regular dry weather (no rain in previous 72 hours)
outfall inspections of at least one section (20%) to proactively identify
illicit discharges and illicit connections?
275 5 23.B.2.
Did Conover perform regular dry weather (no rain in previous 72 hours)
outfall inspections of at least one section (20%) to proactively identify
illicit discharges and illicit connections?
276 2 23.B.2.Number of dry weather outfall inspections performed?
277 2 23.B.2.
Number of potential illicit discharges identified during dry weather outfall
inspections?
278 3 23.B.2.Number of dry weather outfall inspections performed?
279 3 23.B.2.
Number of potential illicit discharges identified during dry weather outfall
inspections?
280 4 23.B.2.Number of dry weather outfall inspections performed?
281 4 23.B.2.
Number of potential illicit discharges identified during dry weather outfall
inspections?
282 5 23.B.2.Number of dry weather outfall inspections performed?
283 5 23.B.2.
Number of potential illicit discharges identified during dry weather outfall
inspections?
284 1 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
285 1 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
286 2 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
287 2 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
288 3 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
289 3 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
290 4 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
291 4 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
292 5 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
293 5 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
294 1 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
295 2 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
296 3 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
297 4 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
298 5 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
299 1 26.B.1.
Did Conover develop and Utilize an online GIS map layer for tracking IDDE
violations, recording who made the complaint, location of complaint, note
prior IDDE violations, status of the investigation and actions taken?
Page 7 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
300 1 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
301 2 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
302 3 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
303 4 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
304 5 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
305 1 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
306 2 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
307 3 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
308 4 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
309 5 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
310 1 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
311 2 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
312 3 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
313 4 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
314 5 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
315 1 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
316 2 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
317 3 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
318 4 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
319 5 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
320 1 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as
applicable, and updated on a semi-annual basis?
321 1 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
322 2 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as
applicable, and updated on a semi-annual basis?
323 2 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
324 3 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as
applicable, and updated on a semi-annual basis?
325 3 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
326 4 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as
applicable, and updated on a semi-annual basis?
327 4 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
328 5 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as
applicable, and updated on a semi-annual basis?
329 5 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
330 1 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
331 2 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
332 3 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
333 4 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
334 5 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
335 1 34.B.1.Did Conover adopt a construction waste management ordinance?
336 2 34.B.4.Did Conover maintain a construction waste management ordinance?
337 3 34.B.4.Did Conover maintain a construction waste management ordinance?
338 4 34.B.4.Did Conover maintain a construction waste management ordinance?
339 5 34.B.4.Did Conover maintain a construction waste management ordinance?
340 1 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
341 1 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
342 2 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
343 2 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
344 3 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
345 3 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
346 4 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
347 4 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
348 5 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
349 5 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
350 1 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan
reviews performed?
351 1 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
352 1 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
353 1 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
354 1 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
355 2 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan
reviews performed?
356 2 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
357 2 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
358 2 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
359 2 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
Page 8 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT MASTER
360 3 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan
reviews performed?
361 3 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
362 3 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
363 3 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
364 3 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
365 4 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan
reviews performed?
366 4 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
367 4 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
368 4 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
369 4 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
370 5 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan
reviews performed?
371 5 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
372 5 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
373 5 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
374 5 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
375 1 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location,
last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
376 2 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location,
last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
377 3 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location,
last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
378 4 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location,
last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
379 5 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location,
last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
380 1 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
381 2 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
382 3 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
383 4 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
384 5 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
385 1 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
386 2 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
387 3 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
388 4 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
389 5 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
390 1 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
391 2 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
392 3 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
393 4 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
394 5 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
395 5 37.B.1.Did Conover update the stormwater ordinance?
396 1 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
397 2 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
398 3 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
399 4 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
400 5 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
Page 9 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(Jan 1 -
Dec 31)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
1 1 1
Did Conover submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to
February 28?
9 1 3.B.1.Did Conover develop and distribute stormwater awareness fliers?
10 1 3.B.1.Number of stormwater awareness fliers distributed?
19 1 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
20 1 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
29 1 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
30 1 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
31 1 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
44 1 4.B.3.
Did Conover host alternative or supplemental education / outreach
opportunities?
45 1 4.B.3.Number of interactions at alternative education / outreach events?
46 1 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
47 1 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
56 1 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
57 1 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
66 1 6.B.1.
Did Conover create printed material for local government distribution
addressing stormwater best practices?
67 1 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and
on the WPCOG website?
72 1 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES
Minimum Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
73 1 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
82 1 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper
disposal of waste?
83 1 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants or audiences?
92 1 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents,
businesses, schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial,
development community, general public and municipal employees?
93 1 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
102 1 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
107 1 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
108 1 10.B.2.
Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater
website?
117 1 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
122 1 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
123 1 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
132 1 12.B.1.
Did Conover identify a staff member to serve as the stormwater hotline
contact?
133 1 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
134 1 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
135 1 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
136 1 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
153 1 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
154 1 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater reporting
to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
155 1 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
168 1 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
169 1 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
178 1 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings,
which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality issues within
the region?
179 1 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
188 1 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
189 1 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
198 1 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
199 1 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
200 1 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
201 1 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
218 1 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
223 1 18.B.3.
Did Conover publicize stream cleanup events to the public to gather
volunteers for stream cleanup efforts to assist in public awareness and
involvement?
224 1 19.B.1.
Did Conover add an MS4 map layer identifying/separating major outfalls
from all outfalls?
225 1 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
230 1 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
235 1 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
240 1 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
245 1 20.B.1.Did Conover update the existing IDDE ordinance?
250 1 21.B.1.
Did Conover develop a written IDDE Plan to define the procedures of
identifying, tracking and processing illicit discharges, illegal dumping and
significant contributors of pollutants to the MS4?
251 1 21.B.1.Did Conover submit the written IDDE Plan to DEQ for review ad comment?
252 1 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and what
is required by the IDDE ordinance?
253 1 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
266 1 22.B.1.
Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk
areas?
271 1 23.B.1.
Did Conover establish a procedure to divide the City and create a schedule
for dry weather inspections for known outfalls?
284 1 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
285 1 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
294 1 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
299 1 26.B.1.
Did Conover develop and Utilize an online GIS map layer for tracking IDDE
violations, recording who made the complaint, location of complaint, note
prior IDDE violations, status of the investigation and actions taken?
300 1 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
305 1 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
310 1 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
315 1 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
320 1 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as applicable,
and updated on a semi-annual basis?
321 1 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
330 1 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
335 1 34.B.1.Did Conover adopt a construction waste management ordinance?
340 1 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
NCS000431_CONOVER 2022 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
341 1 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
350 1 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan
reviews performed?
351 1 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
352 1 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
353 1 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
354 1 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
375 1 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location,
last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
380 1 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
385 1 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
390 1 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
396 1 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
401 1 39.B.1.
Did Conover ensure that each project has an approved O&M Agreement
and O&M Plan prior to CO?
402 1 39.B.1.Number of permitted projects with O&M plans that received their CO?
411 1 41.B.1.
Did a qualified City representative perform an SCM inspection on all
project SCMs to ensure compliance?
412 1 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM inspections completed?
413 1 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM re-inspections completed?
426 1 41.B.2.Did Conover inspect all SCMs annually?
427 1 41.B.2.Number of annual SCM inspections completed?
436 1 41.B.2.Number of failed SCM inspections?
441 1 41.B.3.
Number of qualified licensed professional SCM inspections completed with
documentation received?
442 1 41.B.3.Number of SCMs under annual inspection enforcement.?
451 1 42.B.3.
Did Conover provide educational material to the general public about low
density developments: during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed
through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events?
452 1 42.B.3.Number of low density educational materials distributed?
453 1 43.B.2.
Did Conover provide educational material to developers about high
density development?
454 1 43.B.2.Number of high density informational materials distributed?
471 1 43.B.3.
Did Conover establish / maintain links to all ordinances, manuals, policies,
checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the website?
476 1 44.B.1.
Did Conover revise the stormwater ordinance to include the authority to
enforce pet waste violations?
477 1 44.B.2.
Did Conover develop / distribute educational materials on the impacts of
unmaintained wastewater systems have on water quality?
478 1 44.B.2.Number of wastewater educational materials distributed?
487 1 45.B.2.
Did Conover develop a facility specific O&M plan for each municipal facility
with the potential to generate stormwater pollution?
488 1 45.B.2.Number of facility O&M plans developed?
489 1 45.B.3.Did Conover implement municipal facility O&M plans?
494 1 46.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current municipal facility inventory?
499 1 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater
pollution potential facilities?
500 1 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform once per permit term inspections for low potential
facilities?
501 1 46.B.3.
Number of annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution
potential facilities performed?
502 1 46.B.3.
Number of once per permit term inspections for low potential facilities
performed?
519 1 47.B.1.Did Conover review /maintain / update spill response procedures?
524 1 47.B.3.Number of non-reportable spills?
525 1 47.B.3.Number of spills reported to DEQ?
534 1 49.B.1.
Did Conover provide staff and contractor training on illicit discharges,
pollution prevention, outreach, how to respond to IDDE or post
construction issues, spill prevention and response procedures, municipal
facility requirements, construction runoff, Post construction ordinance and
procedures, pesticide and fertilizer management, IDDE Plan procedures
and requirements, IDDE ordinance, and good housekeeping procedures?
535 1 49.B.1.
Number trained on illicit discharges, pollution prevention, outreach, how
to respond to IDDE or post construction issues, spill prevention and
response procedures, municipal facility requirements, construction runoff,
Post construction ordinance and procedures, pesticide and fertilizer
management, IDDE Plan procedures and requirements, IDDE ordinance,
and good housekeeping procedures?
544 1 50.B.1.
Did Conover inspect the MS4 infrastructure (pipes, major outfalls,
stormwater conveyances, and basins) to ensure functionality?
545 1 50.B.1.Number of MS4 inspections performed?
546 1 50.B.1.Number of MS4 issues identified during MS4 inspections?
559 1 51.B.2.Number of MS4 maintenance activities performd?
564 1 52.B.2.
Did Conover develop and maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans
for each municipally-owned SCM?
565 1 52.B.2.Number of municipal SCMs?
574 1 53.B.1.
Did Conover verify the existing list of municipal SCMs is correct by visiting
the sites to determine type and condition?
575 1 53.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current inventory of municipally owned SCMs?
580 1 53.B.3.Number of municipal SCMs inspections performed?
585 1 53.B.4.Number ofmunicipal SCM issues identified/recorded?
586 1 53.B.4.Number of municipal SCM corrective actions/repairs taken?
595 1 55.B.1.
Did Conover maintain copies of current licenses/certifications of all staff
and contractors who use landscaping chemicals?
596 1 55.B.1.Number of certified applicator municipal personnel?
605 1 56.B.2.
Did Conover ensure all municipal light vehicles, City emergency vehicles,
and equipment are using thewash method written in their facilities O&M
plan?
610 1 57.B.1.
Did Conover ensure the City has obtained a NPDES industrial permit for all
subject municipal facilities/operations?
611 1 57.B.1.Number of permitted municipal industrial facilities
612 1 58.B.1.
Did Conover perform street/curb and gutter sweeping weekly to reduce
road pollutants in runoff?
613 1 58.B.1.Total lane miles swept?
622 1 59.B.1.
Did Conover empty City owned trash receptacles twice a week, or on an as
needed basis?
627 1 59.B.2.
Did Conover host its annual "litter sweep day" to both collect litter and
encourage public participation?
628 1 59.B.2.Number of litter sweep event participants?
637 1 60.B.1.
Did Conover collect leaves with vacuum-style equipment from October 15
through January 15, with each street collected twice during this period?
638 1 60.B.1.Volume of leave collected (cubic yards)?
647 1 61.B.1.
Did Conover train first responders for minimizing, collecting and disposing
of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
648 1 61.B.1.
Number of first responders trained for minimizing, collecting and
disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
657 1 61.B.2.
Did Conover equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material
containment tools.?
662 1 61.B.3.
Did Conover include information about vehicle leaks in distributed
materials and other educational resources?
667 1 61.B.4.
Did Conover perform Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle
leaks from parked cars?
668 1 61.B.4.
Number of Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle leaks from
parked cars?
NCS000431_CONOVER 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(Jan 1 -
Dec 31)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
2 2 1
Did Conover submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to February
28?
11 2 3.B.2.Did Conover develop and distribute illicit discharge fliers?
12 2 3.B.2.Number of illicit discharge fliers distributed?
21 2 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
22 2 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
32 2 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
33 2 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
34 2 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
48 2 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
School?
49 2 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
58 2 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
59 2 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
68 2 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and on
the WPCOG website?
74 2 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum
Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
75 2 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
84 2 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper
disposal of waste?
85 2 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants or audiences?
94 2 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents, businesses,
schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial, development
community, general public and municipal employees?
95 2 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
103 2 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
109 2 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
110 2 10.B.2.Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater website?
118 2 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
124 2 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
125 2 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
137 2 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
138 2 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
139 2 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
140 2 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
156 2 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
157 2 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater reporting
to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
158 2 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
170 2 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
171 2 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
180 2 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings,
which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality issues within
the region?
181 2 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
190 2 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
191 2 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
202 2 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
203 2 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
204 2 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
205 2 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
219 2 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
226 2 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
231 2 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
236 2 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
241 2 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
246 2 20.B.2.Did Conover review / update the existing IDDE ordinance?
254 2 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and what
is required by the IDDE ordinance?
255 2 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and what
is required by the IDDE ordinance?
262 2 21.B.3.Did Conover implement / enforce the IDDE Plan and IDDE Ordinance?
267 2 22.B.1.Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk areas?
272 2 23.B.2.
Did Conover perform regular dry weather (no rain in previous 72 hours)
outfall inspections of at least one section (20%) to proactively identify illicit
discharges and illicit connections?
276 2 23.B.2.Number of dry weather outfall inspections performed?
277 2 23.B.2.
Number of potential illicit discharges identified during dry weather outfall
inspections?
286 2 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
287 2 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
295 2 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
301 2 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
306 2 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
311 2 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
316 2 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
322 2 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as applicable,
and updated on a semi-annual basis?
323 2 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
331 2 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
336 2 34.B.4.Did Conover maintain a construction waste management ordinance?
342 2 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
343 2 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
Page 12 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
355 2 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
356 2 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
357 2 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
358 2 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
359 2 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
376 2 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
381 2 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
386 2 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
391 2 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
397 2 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
403 2 39.B.1.
Did Conover ensure that each project has an approved O&M Agreement
and O&M Plan prior to CO?
404 2 39.B.1.Number of permitted projects with O&M plans that received their CO?
414 2 41.B.1.
Did a qualified City representative perform an SCM inspection on all project
SCMs to ensure compliance?
415 2 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM inspections completed?
416 2 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM re-inspections completed?
428 2 41.B.2.Did Conover inspect all SCMs annually?
429 2 41.B.2.Number of annual SCM inspections completed?
437 2 41.B.2.Number of failed SCM inspections?
443 2 41.B.3.
Number of qualified licensed professional SCM inspections completed with
documentation received?
444 2 41.B.3.Number of SCMs under annual inspection enforcement.?
455 2 42.B.3.
Did Conover provide educational material to the general public about low
density developments: during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed
through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events?
456 2 42.B.3.Number of low density educational materials distributed?
457 2 43.B.2.
Did Conover provide educational material to developers about high density
development?
458 2 43.B.2.Number of high density informational materials distributed?
472 2 43.B.3.
Did Conover establish / maintain links to all ordinances, manuals, policies,
checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the website?
479 2 44.B.2.
Did Conover develop / distribute educational materials on the impacts of
unmaintained wastewater systems have on water quality?
480 2 44.B.2.Number of wastewater educational materials distributed?
490 2 45.B.3.Did Conover implement facility O&M plans?
495 2 46.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current municipal facility inventory?
503 2 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater
pollution potential facilities?
504 2 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform once per permit term inspections for low potential
facilities?
505 2 46.B.3.
Number of annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution
potential facilities performed?
506 2 46.B.3.
Number of once per permit term inspections for low potential facilities
performed?
520 2 47.B.1.Did Conover review /maintain / update spill response procedures?
526 2 47.B.3.Number of non-reportable spills?
527 2 47.B.3.Number of spills reported to DEQ?
536 2 49.B.1.
Did Conover provide staff and contractor training on illicit discharges,
pollution prevention, outreach, how to respond to IDDE or post
construction issues, spill prevention and response procedures, municipal
facility requirements, construction runoff, Post construction ordinance and
procedures, pesticide and fertilizer management, IDDE Plan procedures and
requirements, IDDE ordinance, and good housekeeping procedures?
537 2 49.B.1.
Number trained on illicit discharges, pollution prevention, outreach, how to
respond to IDDE or post construction issues, spill prevention and response
procedures, municipal facility requirements, construction runoff, Post
construction ordinance and procedures, pesticide and fertilizer
management, IDDE Plan procedures and requirements, IDDE ordinance, and
good housekeeping procedures?
547 2 50.B.1.
Did Conover inspect the MS4 infrastructure (pipes, major outfalls,
stormwater conveyances, and basins) to ensure functionality?
548 2 50.B.1.Number of MS4 inspections performed?
549 2 50.B.1.Number of MS4 issues identified during MS4 inspections?
560 2 51.B.2.Number of MS4 maintenance activities performd?
566 2 52.B.2.
Did Conover develop and maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans
for each municipally-owned SCM?
567 2 52.B.2.Number of municipal SCMs?
576 2 53.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current inventory of municipally owned SCMs?
581 2 53.B.3.Number of municipal SCMs inspections performed?
587 2 53.B.4.Number ofmunicipal SCM issues identified/recorded?
588 2 53.B.4.Number of municipal SCM corrective actions/repairs taken?
597 2 55.B.1.
Did Conover maintain copies of current licenses/certifications of all staff
and contractors who use landscaping chemicals?
598 2 55.B.1.Number of certified applicator municipal personnel?
606 2 56.B.2.
Did Conover ensure all municipal light vehicles, City emergency vehicles,
and equipment are using thewash method written in their facilities O&M
plan?
614 2 58.B.1.
Did Conover perform street/curb and gutter sweeping weekly to reduce
road pollutants in runoff?
615 2 58.B.1.Total lane miles swept?
623 2 59.B.1.
Did Conover empty City owned trash receptacles twice a week, or on an as
needed basis?
629 2 59.B.2.
Did Conover host its annual "litter sweep day" to both collect litter and
encourage public participation?
630 2 59.B.2.Number of litter sweep event participants?
639 2 60.B.1.
Did Conover collect leaves with vacuum-style equipment from October 15
through January 15, with each street collected twice during this period?
640 2 60.B.1.Volume of leave collected (cubic yards)?
649 2 61.B.1.
Did Conover train first responders for minimizing, collecting and disposing
of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
650 2 61.B.1.
Number of first responders trained for minimizing, collecting and disposing
of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
658 2 61.B.2.
Did Conover equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material
containment tools.?
663 2 61.B.3.
Did Conover include information about vehicle leaks in distributed materials
and other educational resources?
669 2 61.B.4.
Did Conover perform Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle
leaks from parked cars?
670 2 61.B.4.
Number of Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle leaks from
parked cars?
Page 13 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(Jan 1 -
Dec 31)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
3 3 1
Did Conover submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to February
28?
13 3 3.B.3.Did Conover develop and distribute illegal dumping fliers?
14 3 3.B.3.Number of illegal dumping fliers distributed?
23 3 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
24 3 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
35 3 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
36 3 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
37 3 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
50 3 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
School?
51 3 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
60 3 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
61 3 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
69 3 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and on
the WPCOG website?
76 3 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum
Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
77 3 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
86 3 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper
disposal of waste?
87 3 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants or audiences?
96 3 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents, businesses,
schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial, development
community, general public and municipal employees?
97 3 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
104 3 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
111 3 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
112 3 10.B.2.Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater website?
119 3 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
126 3 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
127 3 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
141 3 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
142 3 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
143 3 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
144 3 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
159 3 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
160 3 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater reporting
to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
161 3 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
172 3 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
173 3 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
182 3 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings,
which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality issues within
the region?
183 3 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
192 3 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
193 3 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
206 3 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
207 3 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
208 3 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
209 3 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
220 3 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
227 3 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
232 3 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
237 3 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
242 3 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
247 3 20.B.2.Did Conover review / update the existing IDDE ordinance?
256 3 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and what
is required by the IDDE ordinance?
257 3 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and what
is required by the IDDE ordinance?
263 3 21.B.3.Did Conover implement / enforce the IDDE Plan and IDDE Ordinance?
268 3 22.B.1.Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk areas?
273 3 23.B.2.
Did Conover perform regular dry weather (no rain in previous 72 hours)
outfall inspections of at least one section (20%) to proactively identify illicit
discharges and illicit connections?
278 3 23.B.2.Number of dry weather outfall inspections performed?
279 3 23.B.2.
Number of potential illicit discharges identified during dry weather outfall
inspections?
288 3 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
289 3 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
296 3 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
302 3 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
307 3 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
312 3 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
317 3 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
324 3 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as applicable,
and updated on a semi-annual basis?
325 3 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
332 3 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
337 3 34.B.4.Did Conover maintain a construction waste management ordinance?
344 3 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
345 3 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
Page 14 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER 2024 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
360 3 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
361 3 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
362 3 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
363 3 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
364 3 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
377 3 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
382 3 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
387 3 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
392 3 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
398 3 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
405 3 39.B.1.
Did Conover ensure that each project has an approved O&M Agreement
and O&M Plan prior to CO?
406 3 39.B.1.Number of permitted projects with O&M plans that received their CO?
417 3 41.B.1.
Did a qualified City representative perform an SCM inspection on all project
SCMs to ensure compliance?
418 3 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM inspections completed?
419 3 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM re-inspections completed?
430 3 41.B.2.Did Conover inspect all SCMs annually?
431 3 41.B.2.Number of annual SCM inspections completed?
438 3 41.B.2.Number of failed SCM inspections?
445 3 41.B.3.
Number of qualified licensed professional SCM inspections completed with
documentation received?
446 3 41.B.3.Number of SCMs under annual inspection enforcement.?
459 3 42.B.3.
Did Conover provide educational material to the general public about low
density developments: during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed
through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events?
460 3 42.B.3.Number of low density educational materials distributed?
461 3 43.B.2.
Did Conover provide educational material to developers about high density
development?
462 3 43.B.2.Number of high density informational materials distributed?
473 3 43.B.3.
Did Conover establish / maintain links to all ordinances, manuals, policies,
checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the website?
481 3 44.B.2.
Did Conover develop / distribute educational materials on the impacts of
unmaintained wastewater systems have on water quality?
482 3 44.B.2.Number of wastewater educational materials distributed?
491 3 45.B.3.Did Conover implement facility O&M plans?
496 3 46.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current municipal facility inventory?
507 3 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater
pollution potential facilities?
508 3 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform once per permit term inspections for low potential
facilities?
509 3 46.B.3.
Number of annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution
potential facilities performed?
510 3 46.B.3.
Number of once per permit term inspections for low potential facilities
performed?
521 3 47.B.1.Did Conover review /maintain / update spill response procedures?
528 3 47.B.3.Number of non-reportable spills?
529 3 47.B.3.Number of spills reported to DEQ?
538 3 49.B.1.
Did Conover provide staff and contractor training on illicit discharges,
pollution prevention, outreach, how to respond to IDDE or post
construction issues, spill prevention and response procedures, municipal
facility requirements, construction runoff, Post construction ordinance and
procedures, pesticide and fertilizer management, IDDE Plan procedures and
requirements, IDDE ordinance, and good housekeeping procedures?
539 3 49.B.1.
Number trained on illicit discharges, pollution prevention, outreach, how to
respond to IDDE or post construction issues, spill prevention and response
procedures, municipal facility requirements, construction runoff, Post
construction ordinance and procedures, pesticide and fertilizer
management, IDDE Plan procedures and requirements, IDDE ordinance, and
good housekeeping procedures?
550 3 50.B.1.
Did Conover inspect the MS4 infrastructure (pipes, major outfalls,
stormwater conveyances, and basins) to ensure functionality?
551 3 50.B.1.Number of MS4 inspections performed?
552 3 50.B.1.Number of MS4 issues identified during MS4 inspections?
561 3 51.B.2.Number of MS4 maintenance activities performd?
568 3 52.B.2.
Did Conover develop and maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans
for each municipally-owned SCM?
569 3 52.B.2.Number of municipal SCMs?
577 3 53.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current inventory of municipally owned SCMs?
582 3 53.B.3.Number of municipal SCMs inspections performed?
589 3 53.B.4.Number ofmunicipal SCM issues identified/recorded?
590 3 53.B.4.Number of municipal SCM corrective actions/repairs taken?
599 3 55.B.1.
Did Conover maintain copies of current licenses/certifications of all staff
and contractors who use landscaping chemicals?
600 3 55.B.1.Number of certified applicator municipal personnel?
607 3 56.B.2.
Did Conover ensure all municipal light vehicles, City emergency vehicles,
and equipment are using thewash method written in their facilities O&M
plan?
616 3 58.B.1.
Did Conover perform street/curb and gutter sweeping weekly to reduce
road pollutants in runoff?
617 3 58.B.1.Total lane miles swept?
624 3 59.B.1.
Did Conover empty City owned trash receptacles twice a week, or on an as
needed basis?
631 3 59.B.2.
Did Conover host its annual "litter sweep day" to both collect litter and
encourage public participation?
632 3 59.B.2.Number of litter sweep event participants?
641 3 60.B.1.
Did Conover collect leaves with vacuum-style equipment from October 15
through January 15, with each street collected twice during this period?
642 3 60.B.1.Volume of leave collected (cubic yards)?
651 3 61.B.1.
Did Conover train first responders for minimizing, collecting and disposing
of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
652 3 61.B.1.
Number of first responders trained for minimizing, collecting and disposing
of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
659 3 61.B.2.
Did Conover equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material
containment tools.?
664 3 61.B.3.
Did Conover include information about vehicle leaks in distributed materials
and other educational resources?
671 3 61.B.4.
Did Conover perform Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle
leaks from parked cars?
672 3 61.B.4.
Number of Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle leaks from
parked cars?
Page 15 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(Jan 1 -
Dec 31)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
4 4 1
Did Conover submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to
February 28?
5 4 2.B.1.
Did Conover participate in an NPDES MS4 Permit Compliance Audit, as
scheduled and performed by EPA or NCDEQ?
15 4 3.B.4.Did Conover develop and distribute chemical awareness fliers?
16 4 3.B.4.Number of chemical awareness fliers distributed?
25 4 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
26 4 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
38 4 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
39 4 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
40 4 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
52 4 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
School?
53 4 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
62 4 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
63 4 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
70 4 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and
on the WPCOG website?
78 4 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum
Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
79 4 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
88 4 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper
disposal of waste?
89 4 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants or audiences?
98 4 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents, businesses,
schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial, development
community, general public and municipal employees?
99 4 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
105 4 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
113 4 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
114 4 10.B.2.
Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater
website?
120 4 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
128 4 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
129 4 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
145 4 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
146 4 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
147 4 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
148 4 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
162 4 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
163 4 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater reporting
to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
164 4 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
174 4 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
175 4 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
184 4 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings,
which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality issues within
the region?
185 4 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
194 4 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
195 4 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
210 4 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
211 4 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
212 4 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
213 4 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
221 4 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
Page 16 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
228 4 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
233 4 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
238 4 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
243 4 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
248 4 20.B.2.Did Conover review / update the existing IDDE ordinance?
258 4 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and what
is required by the IDDE ordinance?
259 4 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
264 4 21.B.3.Did Conover implement / enforce the IDDE Plan and IDDE Ordinance?
269 4 22.B.1.Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk areas?
274 4 23.B.2.
Did Conover perform regular dry weather (no rain in previous 72 hours)
outfall inspections of at least one section (20%) to proactively identify illicit
discharges and illicit connections?
280 4 23.B.2.Number of dry weather outfall inspections performed?
281 4 23.B.2.
Number of potential illicit discharges identified during dry weather outfall
inspections?
290 4 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
291 4 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
297 4 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
303 4 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
308 4 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
313 4 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
318 4 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
326 4 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as applicable,
and updated on a semi-annual basis?
327 4 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
333 4 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
338 4 34.B.4.Did Conover maintain a construction waste management ordinance?
346 4 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
347 4 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
365 4 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan reviews
performed?
366 4 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
367 4 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
368 4 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
369 4 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
378 4 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, last
inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
383 4 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
388 4 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
393 4 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
399 4 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
407 4 39.B.1.
Did Conover ensure that each project has an approved O&M Agreement
and O&M Plan prior to CO?
408 4 39.B.1.Number of permitted projects with O&M plans that received their CO?
420 4 41.B.1.
Did a qualified City representative perform an SCM inspection on all project
SCMs to ensure compliance?
421 4 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM inspections completed?
422 4 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM re-inspections completed?
432 4 41.B.2.Did Conover inspect all SCMs annually?
433 4 41.B.2.Number of annual SCM inspections completed?
439 4 41.B.2.Number of failed SCM inspections?
447 4 41.B.3.
Number of qualified licensed professional SCM inspections completed with
documentation received?
448 4 41.B.3.Number of SCMs under annual inspection enforcement.?
463 4 42.B.3.
Did Conover provide educational material to the general public about low
density developments: during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed
through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events?
464 4 42.B.3.Number of low density educational materials distributed?
465 4 43.B.2.
Did Conover provide educational material to developers about high density
development?
466 4 43.B.2.Number of high density informational materials distributed?
Page 17 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER 2025 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
474 4 43.B.3.
Did Conover establish / maintain links to all ordinances, manuals, policies,
checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the website?
483 4 44.B.2.
Did Conover develop / distribute educational materials on the impacts of
unmaintained wastewater systems have on water quality?
484 4 44.B.2.Number of wastewater educational materials distributed?
492 4 45.B.3.Did Conover implement facility O&M plans?
497 4 46.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current municipal facility inventory?
511 4 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater
pollution potential facilities?
512 4 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform once per permit term inspections for low potential
facilities?
513 4 46.B.3.
Number of annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution
potential facilities performed?
514 4 46.B.3.
Number of once per permit term inspections for low potential facilities
performed?
522 4 47.B.1.Did Conover review /maintain / update spill response procedures?
530 4 47.B.3.Number of non-reportable spills?
531 4 47.B.3.Number of spills reported to DEQ?
540 4 49.B.1.
Did Conover provide staff and contractor training on illicit discharges,
pollution prevention, outreach, how to respond to IDDE or post
construction issues, spill prevention and response procedures, municipal
facility requirements, construction runoff, Post construction ordinance and
procedures, pesticide and fertilizer management, IDDE Plan procedures
and requirements, IDDE ordinance, and good housekeeping procedures?
541 4 49.B.1.
Number trained on illicit discharges, pollution prevention, outreach, how
to respond to IDDE or post construction issues, spill prevention and
response procedures, municipal facility requirements, construction runoff,
Post construction ordinance and procedures, pesticide and fertilizer
management, IDDE Plan procedures and requirements, IDDE ordinance,
and good housekeeping procedures?
553 4 50.B.1.
Did Conover inspect the MS4 infrastructure (pipes, major outfalls,
stormwater conveyances, and basins) to ensure functionality?
554 4 50.B.1.Number of MS4 inspections performed?
555 4 50.B.1.Number of MS4 issues identified during MS4 inspections?
562 4 51.B.2.Number of MS4 maintenance activities performd?
570 4 52.B.2.
Did Conover develop and maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans
for each municipally-owned SCM?
571 4 52.B.2.Number of municipal SCMs?
578 4 53.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current inventory of municipally owned SCMs?
583 4 53.B.3.Number of municipal SCMs inspections performed?
591 4 53.B.4.Number ofmunicipal SCM issues identified/recorded?
592 4 53.B.4.Number of municipal SCM corrective actions/repairs taken?
601 4 55.B.1.
Did Conover maintain copies of current licenses/certifications of all staff
and contractors who use landscaping chemicals?
602 4 55.B.1.Number of certified applicator municipal personnel?
608 4 56.B.2.
Did Conover ensure all municipal light vehicles, City emergency vehicles,
and equipment are using thewash method written in their facilities O&M
plan?
618 4 58.B.1.
Did Conover perform street/curb and gutter sweeping weekly to reduce
road pollutants in runoff?
619 4 58.B.1.Total lane miles swept?
625 4 59.B.1.
Did Conover empty City owned trash receptacles twice a week, or on an as
needed basis?
633 4 59.B.2.
Did Conover host its annual "litter sweep day" to both collect litter and
encourage public participation?
634 4 59.B.2.Number of litter sweep event participants?
643 4 60.B.1.
Did Conover collect leaves with vacuum-style equipment from October 15
through January 15, with each street collected twice during this period?
644 4 60.B.1.Volume of leave collected (cubic yards)?
653 4 61.B.1.
Did Conover train first responders for minimizing, collecting and disposing
of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
654 4 61.B.1.
Number of first responders trained for minimizing, collecting and disposing
of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
660 4 61.B.2.
Did Conover equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material
containment tools.?
665 4 61.B.3.
Did Conover include information about vehicle leaks in distributed
materials and other educational resources?
673 4 61.B.4.
Did Conover perform Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle
leaks from parked cars?
674 4 61.B.4.
Number of Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle leaks from
parked cars?
Page 18 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
Line
No.
Reporting
Year
(Jan 1 -
Dec 31)
BMP
Ref.Measurable Goal Reporting
Metric Comments
6 5 2.B.2.
Did Conover submit a self-audit of any stormwater program components
not audited by EPA or NCDEQ?
7 5 2.B.3.
Did Conover submit a stormwater permit renewal application at least 180
days prior to permit expiration?
8 5 2.B.3.
If so, what was the date the permit renewal application submittal was
received by DEQ?
17 5 3.B.5.Did Conover develop and distribute proper waste disposal fliers?
18 5 3.B.5.Number of proper waste disposal fliers distributed?
27 5 4.B.1.Did Conover have an annual Stormwater Advisory Board meeting?
28 5 4.B.1.Number of Stormwater Advisory Board meeting attendees?
41 5 4.B.2.
Did Conover have a booth at a community event to disperse stormwater
outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive educational
games and activities?
42 5 4.B.2.Number of community events with a stormwater outreach booth?
43 5 4.B.2.Number of stormwater booth interactions?
54 5 5.B.1.
Did Conover staff provide in class instruction and/or storm water
educational activities to students that attend Newton-Conover Middle
School?
55 5 5.B.1.Number of students present at these classes/activities?
64 5 5.B.2.Did Conover conduct stormwater related workshops with teachers?
65 5 5.B.2.Number of teachers attending stormwater related workshops?
71 5 6.B.2.
Did Conover distribute printed materials through events, school
presentations, display for public acquisition in Government buildings and
on the WPCOG website?
80 5 7.B.1.
Did Conover povide one presentation about one of the six NPDES
Minimum Control Measures at each annual Water Quality Conference?
81 5 7.B.1.Number of annual Water Quality Conference attendees?
90 5 8.B.1.
Did Conover evaluate following target pollutants: litter, sediment, gray
water, fats, oils, grease, animal operations, underground storage tanks,
super fund sites, chemicals, illicit discharges, illegal dumping and
improper disposal of waste?
91 5 8.B.1.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target pollutants?
100 5 8.B.2.
Did Conover evaluate the following target audiences: residents,
businesses, schools, construction activity, commercial, farms, industrial,
development community, general public and municipal employees?
101 5 8.B.2.Were SWMP revisions needed to address target audiences?
106 5 10.B.1.Did Conover update and maintain a stormwater web page?
115 5 10.B.2.Was annual seIf- assessment uploaded to the stormwater website?
116 5 10.B.2.
Were new/current educational materials added to the stormwater
website?
121 5 10.B.3.Number of hits / contacts made to stormwater web site?
130 5 11.B.3.
Did Conover provide education during the enforcement process for illicit
discharges, illegal dumping, and improper disposal of waste?
131 5 11.B.3.Number of citizen interactions during enforcement?
149 5 12.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current stormwater hotline?
150 5 12.B.3.Did Conover document stormwater hotline calls?
151 5 12.B.4.
Did Conover train stormwater hotline staff in general stormwater
awareness, complaint call protocols and appropriate contacts for referral
and typical stormwater issues?
152 5 12.B.5.Number of stormwater hotline calls received?
165 5 14.B.1.
Did Conover establish / maintain an online form for public input and
stormwater reporting?
166 5 14.B.2.
Did Conover use the online form for public input and stormwater
reporting to track responses, inputs, issues, and concerns?
167 5 14.B.2.Number of online form stormwater submittals?
176 5 15.B.1.
Did Conover promote public involvement and participation related to
stormwater programs, events, and projects on social media?
177 5 15.B.1.Total number of social media stormwater posts?
186 5 16.B.1.
Did Conover participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee
meetings, which are open to the public, for discussion of water quality
issues within the region?
187 5 16.B.1.Number of attendees at Water Resource Committee meetings?
196 5 17.B.1.
Did Conover provide an annual survey open to feedback for a total of 4
weeks for public input on the stormwater program?
197 5 17.B.1.Number of stormwater program feedback surveys completed?
214 5 18.B.1.
Did Conover hold stream cleanup efforts by engaging groups to conduct
stream cleanup activities in appropriate areas?
215 5 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup events held?
216 5 18.B.1.Number of stream cleanup participants?
217 5 18.B.1.Number of trash bags filled by stream cleanup participants?
222 5 18.B.2.
Did Conover provide all materials for stream cleanup activities (i.e. gloves,
trash bags, and trash pickers)?
229 5 19.B.1.Total number of identified major outfalls?
234 5 19.B.2.
Did Conover map at least 20% of unmapped areas each year until all areas
are included in the MS4 map?
239 5 19.B.3.
Did Conover add flow directions to the MS4 map as other components are
being mapped/created?
244 5 19.B.4.
Did Conover add new infrastructure to the MS4 map as new construction
occurs, updated on an annual basis?
249 5 20.B.2.Did Conover review / update the existing IDDE ordinance?
260 5 21.B.2.
Did Conover train staff on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
261 5 21.B.2.
Number of staff trained on the processes defined in the IDDE Plan and
what is required by the IDDE ordinance?
265 5 21.B.3.Did Conover implement / enforce the IDDE Plan and IDDE Ordinance?
270 5 22.B.1.
Did Conover locate / idenitfy priority outfalls near high pollution risk
areas?
275 5 23.B.2.
Did Conover perform regular dry weather (no rain in previous 72 hours)
outfall inspections of at least one section (20%) to proactively identify
illicit discharges and illicit connections?
282 5 23.B.2.Number of dry weather outfall inspections performed?
283 5 23.B.2.
Number of potential illicit discharges identified during dry weather outfall
inspections?
292 5 25.B.1.
Did Conover inspect priority areas likely to have illicit discharges on a semi-
annual basis?
293 5 25.B.1.Number of illicit discharges identified in priority areas?
298 5 25.B.3.Did Conover evaluate / assess / update annually the IDDE plan/program?
304 5 26.B.2.
Did Conover track illicit discharge/connection and illegal dumping
reports/investigations utilizing the IDDE layer on top of the MS4 map?
309 5 26.B.2.Number of verified IDDE issues?
314 5 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions issued?
319 5 26.B.3.Number of IDDE enforcement actions resolved?
328 5 26.B.4.
Did Conover establish and maintain a list of chronic violators, as
applicable, and updated on a semi-annual basis?
329 5 26.B.4.Number of chronic violators identified?
334 5 31.B.2.Did Conover evaluate IDDE response time?
339 5 34.B.4.Did Conover maintain a construction waste management ordinance?
348 5 34.B.5.Did Conover enforce the construction waste management ordinance?
349 5 34.B.5.Number of construction waste enforcement actions?
Page 19 of 20
NCS000431_CONOVER 2026 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT
370 5 35
Did Conover track the number of low-density and high-density plan
reviews performed?
371 5 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed?
372 5 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed?
373 5 35 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved?
374 5 35 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved?
379 5 35
Did Conover maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and
constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location,
last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)?
384 5 35
How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were
performed?
389 5 35 How many low-density inspections were performed?
394 5 35 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued?
395 5 37.B.1.Did Conover update the stormwater ordinance?
400 5 38.B.1.
Did Conover review procedures and submittal documents annually to
determine if items need to be added or modified?
409 5 39.B.1.
Did Conover ensure that each project has an approved O&M Agreement
and O&M Plan prior to CO?
410 5 39.B.1.Number of permitted projects with O&M plans that received their CO?
423 5 41.B.1.
Did a qualified City representative perform an SCM inspection on all
project SCMs to ensure compliance?
424 5 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM inspections completed?
425 5 41.B.1.Number of pre-CO SCM re-inspections completed?
434 5 41.B.2.Did Conover inspect all SCMs annually?
435 5 41.B.2.Number of annual SCM inspections completed?
440 5 41.B.2.Number of failed SCM inspections?
449 5 41.B.3.
Number of qualified licensed professional SCM inspections completed
with documentation received?
450 5 41.B.3.Number of SCMs under annual inspection enforcement.?
467 5 42.B.3.
Did Conover provide educational material to the general public about low
density developments: during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed
through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events?
468 5 42.B.3.Number of low density educational materials distributed?
469 5 43.B.2.
Did Conover provide educational material to developers about high
density development?
470 5 43.B.2.Number of high density informational materials distributed?
475 5 43.B.3.
Did Conover establish / maintain links to all ordinances, manuals, policies,
checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on the website?
485 5 44.B.2.
Did Conover develop / distribute educational materials on the impacts of
unmaintained wastewater systems have on water quality?
486 5 44.B.2.Number of wastewater educational materials distributed?
493 5 45.B.3.Did Conover implement facility O&M plans?
498 5 46.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current municipal facility inventory?
515 5 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform annual facility inspections for high stormwater
pollution potential facilities?
516 5 46.B.3.
Did Conover perform once per permit term inspections for low potential
facilities?
517 5 46.B.3.
Number of annual facility inspections for high stormwater pollution
potential facilities performed?
518 5 46.B.3.
Number of once per permit term inspections for low potential facilities
performed?
523 5 47.B.1.Did Conover review /maintain / update spill response procedures?
532 5 47.B.3.Number of non-reportable spills?
533 5 47.B.3.Number of spills reported to DEQ?
542 5 49.B.1.
Did Conover provide staff and contractor training on illicit discharges,
pollution prevention, outreach, how to respond to IDDE or post
construction issues, spill prevention and response procedures, municipal
facility requirements, construction runoff, Post construction ordinance
and procedures, pesticide and fertilizer management, IDDE Plan
procedures and requirements, IDDE ordinance, and good housekeeping
procedures?
543 5 49.B.1.
Number trained on illicit discharges, pollution prevention, outreach, how
to respond to IDDE or post construction issues, spill prevention and
response procedures, municipal facility requirements, construction runoff,
Post construction ordinance and procedures, pesticide and fertilizer
management, IDDE Plan procedures and requirements, IDDE ordinance,
and good housekeeping procedures?
556 5 50.B.1.
Did Conover inspect the MS4 infrastructure (pipes, major outfalls,
stormwater conveyances, and basins) to ensure functionality?
557 5 50.B.1.Number of MS4 inspections performed?
558 5 50.B.1.Number of MS4 issues identified during MS4 inspections?
563 5 51.B.2.Number of MS4 maintenance activities performd?
572 5 52.B.2.
Did Conover develop and maintain SCM Operation and Maintenance Plans
for each municipally-owned SCM?
573 5 52.B.2.Number of municipal SCMs?
579 5 53.B.2.Did Conover maintain a current inventory of municipally owned SCMs?
584 5 53.B.3.Number of municipal SCMs inspections performed?
593 5 53.B.4.Number ofmunicipal SCM issues identified/recorded?
594 5 53.B.4.Number of municipal SCM corrective actions/repairs taken?
603 5 55.B.1.
Did Conover maintain copies of current licenses/certifications of all staff
and contractors who use landscaping chemicals?
604 5 55.B.1.Number of certified applicator municipal personnel?
609 5 56.B.2.
Did Conover ensure all municipal light vehicles, City emergency vehicles,
and equipment are using thewash method written in their facilities O&M
plan?
620 5 58.B.1.
Did Conover perform street/curb and gutter sweeping weekly to reduce
road pollutants in runoff?
621 5 58.B.1.Total lane miles swept?
626 5 59.B.1.
Did Conover empty City owned trash receptacles twice a week, or on an
as needed basis?
635 5 59.B.2.
Did Conover host its annual "litter sweep day" to both collect litter and
encourage public participation?
636 5 59.B.2.Number of litter sweep event participants?
645 5 60.B.1.
Did Conover collect leaves with vacuum-style equipment from October 15
through January 15, with each street collected twice during this period?
646 5 60.B.1.Volume of leave collected (cubic yards)?
655 5 61.B.1.
Did Conover train first responders for minimizing, collecting and disposing
of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
656 5 61.B.1.
Number of first responders trained for minimizing, collecting and
disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident?
661 5 61.B.2.
Did Conover equip first responder vehicles with spill kits and material
containment tools.?
666 5 61.B.3.
Did Conover include information about vehicle leaks in distributed
materials and other educational resources?
675 5 61.B.4.
Did Conover perform Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle
leaks from parked cars?
676 5 61.B.4.
Number of Illicit Discharge enforcement for significant vehicle leaks from
parked cars?
Page 20 of 20