20220388 Ver 1_More Information Received_20220609

Strickland, Bev
From: Michelle Savage-Measday, PWS <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 5:26 PM
To: Cohn, Colleen M
Cc: [e-mail]; Mark Mayhew
Subject: [External] RE: Pines at Wake Crossing DWR#20220388
Attachments: 22VAR03 PARLIER DRIVE Staff Report.docx; 220516.typical stream xsection showing
proposed excavation.pdf; 49-14384 Pines at Wake Crossing - Stream Photos.pdf;
2202.Parlier Dr Crossing - Impact Exhibits.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Colleen,
Thank you for your comments. See below for responses.
Thank you,
Michelle
MICHELLE SAVAGE-MEASDAY, PWS I Environmental Senior Project Manager
T 919.861.9910 I D 919.861.9821 I C 919.441.2437
5260 Greens Dairy Road I Raleigh I NC 127616
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
www.ecslimited.com
THE NEW ASTM PHASE I STANDARD IS HERE - Contact us to find out more.
Instagram I Linkedln I Facebook I Twitter
Confidential/proprietary message/attachments. Delete message/attachments if not intended recipient.
From: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2022 4:10 PM
To: Michelle Savage-Measday, PWS <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Pines at Wake Crossing DWR#20220388
Good afternoon,
I am reviewing the above referenced project, and in order to complete the review, some additional information is
required:
1) Please provide additional information on avoidance and minimization of wetlands impacts. Based on the
included FEMA letter dated December 21, 2020, there are two other options available, including removing a
culvert or adding a culvert. Option 1, removing the culvert, was stated as the best option. [15A NCAC 02H
.0502(c)]
The two other options were discussed at length with FEMA and subsequent to FEMA's letter of 21 December
2020 it was agreed Option 3 would be the best scenario to proceed with. As was explained to FEMA, Option 1,
Remove existing culvert, is not a viable option given the safety issues it would create to the public and impact to
first responders due to the creation of two dead-end roads. Removing the culvert would require removing and
i

relaying the existing public utilities such as water, power and communications from under the roadway to
UNDER the stream bed. Removing the culvert would disconnect the roadway stormwater management system
and prevent stormwater from reaching the detention basin on the north side and hence from being treated
prior to stream discharge.
Option 2, Add an additional culvert would disturb approximately the same amount of wetlands and buffer due
to the need to regrade (lower) the flood fringe to direct water into and out of the culvert, add appropriate riprap
and to provide construction access to the upstream and downstream areas.
2) Please provide additional information on how the proposed excavation of wetland will not cause a violation of
water quality standards. [15A NCAC .0506(b)(2)]
The construction techniques shall be conducted in accordance with NCDENR standards. Temporary and
additional erosion control measures shall be maintained throughout the construction process. Silt fencing will be
placed at the bottom of the slopes to deter sediment and control erosion during excavation activities.
Temporary erosion, sedimentation, and pollution controls will be installed prior to and maintained during the
entire construction duration and until final stabilization is established. Refer to Sheet 5 of the impact exhibits for
the grading and erosion control plan. Refer to Sheet 4 for the revegetation plan to stabilize the disturbed area.
No excavation is proposed below the OHWM. See attached stream section showing limits of excavation and
stream photos.
3) Please provide additional details on the buffer impacts. This area appears to be under the Town of Apex's
jurisdiction, but it is unclear what item in the Table of Uses you are proposing the activities fall under. [15A
NCAC .02B .0267]
The Town of Apex has reviewed and will be issuing a variance for the riparian buffer impacts. Upon receipt of the
variance, a copy will be sent to you. The variance is expected to be approved at the next Apex Board of Adjustment
Meeting in June. Attached is the Town of Apex Staff Report on the variance request. If the variance request is granted
by Apex, the applicant will then move to the NC EMC for approval for the Zone 1 impacts.
4) If the US Army Corps of Engineers requests any additional information, please provide the Division with a copy
of your response to the USACE. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)]
Will comply.
Thanks,
Colleen Cohn
Environmental Specialist II
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
380o Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Office: 919-791-4258
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
2

0
Uzi
320-
315-
310-
305-
300-
295-
2,44A9
ri;
2c),5:0
.15- —+— .05 + .15
V11r.
OHWM 292.3+/-
290-
500 600
2202 Remediation Plan: 2202 Remediation 100yr Future 12/30/2021
Sta 6315.7
k
700
Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) shown per
observations by Michelle Savage-Measday, PWS,
ECS Southeast, LLP, 13 May 2022.
.ufer--
LS
1,A 1-M•t&L. -T-7) 4cc
Station (ft)
800
900 10100
Legend
WS Future 100-Yr
WS Existing 100-Yr
Ground
A
ineff
•
Bank Sta
1 in Horiz. = 40 ft 1 in Vert. = 4 ft

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT
#22VAR03
May 17, 2022
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Application: #22VAR03
Location: 0 Parlier Drive
Applicant/Owner: Ted Pease, Toll NC II LP./Green Level Crossing Community Assc. Inc.
PINs: 0733133605 & 0733049008
Current Zoning: LD SF-CU (#05RZ22)
Current Use: FROM UDO SECTION 4.3.1(N), Single -Family Residential
Town Limits: Corporate Limits
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Application
3. Master Subdivision Plan
4. Final Subdivision Plat
5. Riparian Buffer Map
BACKGROUND:
p,P
`Jiffy
TrAWAWAWRIIMIMP
Ty =•
�o
The subject properties include portions of the platted Open Space surrounding Parlier Drive for the Pines
at Wake Crossing Phase 2 Subdivision. This subdivision sits south of Roberts Road, east of Green Level
Church Road, north of Greenmoor Subdivision, and west of Interstate 540. The Construction Drawings
for the Master Subdivision Plan, then known as The Hunt at Green Level Crossing, were approved in 2007
and platted, as The Pines at Wake Crossing in 2017. A significant portion of the subject properties lie
within the 100' Riparian Buffer required by the Watershed Protection Overlay District.
• July 16, 2007 - Master Subdivision Plan approval
• July 23, 2007 — Property sold to Toll Brothers, LLC
• August 23, 2017 - Final Subdivision Plat recorded
• August 1, 2000 - UDO Adopted
• March 23, 2021 - UDO Amendments to Section 6.1.13.E.2 Watershed Protection Overlay Districts,
Modifications by Variance, Standards
• February 8, 2022 — Property deeded to Green Level Crossing Community Association, Inc.
• April 11, 2022 - Applicant submitted variance application
VARIANCE REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 6.1.11.G Uses Permitted Within the Riparian Buffer
to allow for improvements to provide corrective action to address the FEMA floodplain violation
associated with the culvert construction. The corrective action involves the removal of approximately
Page 1 of 4

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT
#22VAR03
P�.
�!;4 I111111 w
1,200 cy (cubic yard) from the floodplain. The excavation will lower the base flood elevation rise created
by the previously constructed road crossing over Clark Branch. The proposed remedy will create
additional flood storage adjacent to Clark Branch, which is the preferred alternative, supported by FEMA.
The FEMA violation must be remedied to meet requirements for participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP), in which Apex is a participant. A major component of the NFIP is regulating
development in the Special Flood Hazard Area and more particularly regulating encroachments in the
floodway and non -encroachment areas.
The excavation impact will result in the temporary disturbance to approximately 0.17 acre of forested
wetland. No impervious surfaces will be introduced into Zone 1 or Zone 2. Following the excavation
activities, the disturbed area will be graded to create a reasonably smooth and uniform surface and
reseeded with the NC Piedmont Riparian Mix (Ernst Seed Mix — ERNMX-307). The construction of the
project will not necessitate the use of any specialized construction techniques. Standard construction
equipment such as cranes, excavators, dump trucks, and similar vehicles would be used for the project.
Proper erosion and sedimentation control measures would be employed throughout the project. Typical
materials and machinery will be used on -site during the construction process.
The applicant proposes to minimize impacts through construction techniques. The construction
techniques shall be conducted in accordance with NCDENR standards. Temporary and additional erosion
control measures shall be maintained throughout the construction process. Silt fencing will be placed at
the bottom of the slopes to deter sediment and control erosion during excavation activities. Temporary
erosion, sedimentation, and pollution controls will be installed prior to and maintained during the entire
construction duration and until final stabilization is established. The floodplain seed mix will allow the
area to re-establish itself. Zones 1 and 2 shall remain vegetated.
Section 6.1.11.G of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) reads:
6.1.11.G Uses Permitted Within the Riparian Buffer. This Section shall apply to activities
conducted within, or outside of with hydrologic impacts in violation of the diffuse flow
requirements set out in Sec. 6.1.11.E upon, a riparian buffer regulated by this Section. The
Town shall issue an approval for new development only if the proposed development will
avoid impacts to riparian buffers regulated by this Section or, if an impact to any such buffer
is proposed, in accordance with the requirements in Sec. 6.1.11.G.1 or 2 below, as applicable,
the applicant has demonstrated that: (i) the proposed activity is exempt, (ii) the proposed
activity is allowable or allowable with mitigation, and the requirements of this Section for
proceeding such designated use have been met, or (iii) a variance authorizing the proposed
activity has been obtained.
An amendment to Sec. 6.1.13.E.2-3 Watershed Protection Overlay Districts, Modifications by Variance,
Standards was approved in order to allow property owners to request a variance from the standards of
the Watershed Protection Overlay Districts regardless of when the property was purchased. The
previous standard required the Board of Adjustment to find that the property owner did not purchase
Page 2 of 4

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT
#22VAR03
May 17, 2022
p,PE
the property after Sec. 6.1 was codified with the adoption the Unified Development Ordinance in 2000.
Below are the March 23, 2021 amendments to Sec. 6.1.13.E.2-3:
6.1.13 Watershed Protection Overlay Districts, Modifications by Variance
E) Standards
2) In order to approve an application for a variance permit, the Board of Adjustment
shall make a finding of fact as to whether the standards of Sec. 2.3.8D.1-3 Variance
permit, Standards are met.
3) The Board of Adjustment shall make a finding of fact as to:
a) whether the variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of
the Town's Watershed Protection Overlay Districts and preserves its spirit;
and
b) whether in granting the variance the public safety and welfare have been
assured, water quality has been protected and substantial justice has been
done.
STANDARDS FOR VARIANCE REQUESTS:
To approve a variance permit, the Board of Adjustment must find that all the following standards as
listed in Sec. 2.3.8(D) are being met. In the alternative, to deny the variance permit, the Board of
Adjustment must find that any of the following standards are not being met:
1) Unnecessary Hardship. Unnecessary hardship would result from the strict application
of the ordinance. It shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the
variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property.
2) Hardship Results from Peculiar Conditions. The hardship results from conditions that
are peculiar to the property, such as location, size, or topography. Hardships resulting
from personal circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from conditions that are
common to the neighborhood or the general public, may not be the basis for granting a
variance.
3) Not Result of Action by Applicant. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the
applicant or the property owner. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that
circumstances exist that may justify the granting of a variance shall not be regarded as a
self-created hardship.
4) Consistency with the UDO. The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose,
and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is
achieved.
Page 3 of 4

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT
#22VAR03
PEx
Z Ji..y°'°�1`�L Q
May 17, 2022
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The Final Subdivision Plat for The Pines at Wake Crossing Phase 2 was recorded on August 23, 2017. The
existing structure has remained since its original construction serving residential development. The
property was deeded to applicant February 8, 2022. The applicant purchased property subject to the
Watershed Protection Overlay District. The Watershed Protection Overlay District has been in place
since the adoption of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) August 1, 2000. The UDO was
amended by Town Council on March 23, 2021 to allow for owners of property located within riparian
buffers to apply for a variance. The applicant filed the variance petition on April 11, 2022 in an effort to
remedy the FEMA violation. Should no improvements be permitted on the subject site then it will
remain in violation of FEMA regulations, Town of Apex Floodplain regulations, and may not meet
requirements for participation within the NFIP. According to Water Resources staff, the proposed
improvements are the overall least impactful solution for mitigating the violation of FEMA regulations.
If the variance is granted, the applicant will then move to the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission (NCEMC) for further approval for Zone 1 impacts.
Page 4 of 4

May 16, 2022
ECS Southeast, LLP
1 - Downstream view
2 - Upstream view
ECS Project # 49:14384

May 16, 2022
ECS Southeast, LLP
3 - Evidence of slight undercutting of channel at approx. 3.5 to 4.0 feet bl TOB
4 - North facing view of stream bank
ECS Project # 49:14384

May 16, 2022
ECS Southeast, LLP
5 - Streambank
6 - Closer to Culvert
ECS Project # 49:14384

?‘
N \\
EXIST. STREAM
(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
SS f` \
sar
SS
/
/
133 �!
/
N
/ `
\ \\ SS
\ \ \ SS
\\ SS\SS\ \\
\ \\, \
SS
\ \ SS \
SS
\ SS
-_ ///1j$11,/.2/;///
/� I\\\\y
l
\\\\A"(
\ �o 1)
;Kk\\\ -
N 7. . 411:11:
\\3 \ "
\/
\\\\
N\\
• • o'c'-'27.
EXIST TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
co
M
4*
32
/
4.2 /
/
/
/ S
/ S /
/
/' �� 12f� ••� 1� • �ti '
SS
/
/
/
129
/
SS \ \
SS
SS \ \ \
SS \ \ \
SS
ss
SS � S \
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
n_ \
Tn r
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE
N
40.
1"=40'
N
F-
Z
F-
J
VI
Z
0
V
w
N
w
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
1/21/22 11"=40'
BMM JKNB
2202
1
1 6

EXIST. STREAM
(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
fi
EXIST TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
+ + +
+ + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + +_
+ + + +
+ + + + +
\ \\
\ \ \ N \, N\-- ......
3B \ - _
1"=40'
Z
J
J
N
Z
0
V
w
w
J
t
rra
Z
Q
O "
O 0
Wz
Q z
>0
I- U
Q
w
Z_ >-
L 0
U
DATE: SCALE:
1/21/22 1"=40'
SHEET
NO.:
2 OF 6

a�
I
\ \I \ 140)
EXIST STREAM
(1,285 LF ON PROPERTY)
1
WETLAND IMPACT AREA
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE
Vl
Z
J
J
N
Z
0
V
w
w
1/4
1
SHEET
NO.:
J
0
Z
Q
0"
00
Wz
Q>z
0
I-U
<
w -
Z_
L Q
U
3 OF 6

\ \ \ \\\\\.
ss
7 \
N —
\ M
FLOODPLAIN SEED MIX
\\\
/
LoD
<o
d�
r
L, 'off
1
, /
#4410,414.1.,
±/ :::::::$4414:4:$141447:444$71:::::
4414-4* // frotoz
/:\://://
:::::
o 1 - `� r�O.fpI*O��♦IO��♦I�r`
**4141
/ ///4//a4.1/ J-
//, ///7(4?.-
// (\\
31B
•
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE
N
=
=
=
1'=50'
+
NC PIEDMONT RIPARIAN MIX
ERNST SEED MIX - ERNMX-307 (OR APPROVED EQUAL)
Mix Composition
29.9% Sorghastrum nutans, 'Scout' (Indiangrass, 'Scout')
20.0% Elymus virginicus, PA Ecotype (Virginia Wild rye, PA Ecotype)
20.0% Panicum virgatum, 'Carthage', NC Ecotype (Switchgrass, 'Carthage', NC Ecotype)
10.0% Panicum anceps, Eastern Shore MD Ecotype (Beaked Panicgrass, Eastern Shore MD Ecotype)
5.0% Chasmanthium latifolium, WV Ecotype (River Oats, WV Ecotype)
5.0% Panicum rigidulum, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Redtop Panicgrass, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype)
3.0% Chamaecrista fasciculata, FL Ecotype (Partridge Pea, FL Ecotype)
2.0% Carex vulpinoidea, PA Ecotype (Fox Sedge, PA Ecotype)
2.0% Coreopsis lanceolata (Lanceleaf Coreopsis)
2.0% Rudbeckia hirta (Blackeyed Susan)
0.5%Juncus effusus, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Soft Rush, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype)
0.4% Vernonia noveboracensis, PA Ecotype (New York Ironweed, PA Ecotype)
0.2% Helenium autumnale, NJ Ecotype (Common Sneezeweed, NJ Ecotype)
SEEDING RATE: 20 LB PER ACRE (WITH GRAIN RYE COVER CROP AT 30 LBS PER ACRE SEPTEMBER 1 TO APRIL 31).
\, ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN SHALL USE THE
NCDEQ STANDARD PERMANENT SEED MIX:
PERMANENT SEEDING NOTES
SEEDING SCHEDULE
PERMANENT SEEDING
DATE
MAR. 1 - AUG. 31
SEP. 1 - FEB. 28
TYPE
WATER STAR TALL FESCUE
SARAH BERMUDA UNHULLED
PENSACOLA BAHAIGRASS
DURANA CLOVER
RYEGRAIN
WATER STAR TALL FESCUE
SARAH BERMUDA UNHULLED
PENSACOLA BAHAIGRASS
DURANA CLOVER
BROWNTOP OR FOXTAIL MILLET
PLANTING RATE
20 LB/ACRE
50 LB/ACRE
25 LB/ACRE
10 LB/ACRE
10 LB/ACRE
50 LB/ACRE
20 LB/ACRE
10 LB/ACRE
10 LB/ACRE
15 LB/ACRE
CONSULT CONSERVATION ENGINEER OR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CONCERNING OTHER ALTERNATIVES FOR VEGETATION OF DENUDED AREAS. THE ABOVE VEGETATION
RATES ARE THOSE WHICH DO WELL UNDER LOCAL CONDITIONS; OTHER SEEDING RATE COMBINATIONS
ARE POSSIBLE.
"NURSE CROP/TEMPORARY - RESEED ACCORDING TO OPTIMUM SEASON FOR DESIRED PERMANENT
VEGETATION. DO NOT ALLOW TEMPORARY COVER TO GROW OVER 12" IN HEIGHT BEFORE MOWING,
OTHERWISE FESCUE MAY BE SHADED OUT.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
. CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOIL THREE INCHES DEEP OVER ADVERSE SOIL
CONDITIONS, IF AVAILABLE.
. RIP THE ENTIRE AREA TO SIX INCHES DEEP.
. REMOVE ALL LOOSE ROCK, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS LEAVING SURFACE REASONABLY
SMOOTH AND UNIFORM.
. APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIME, FERTILIZER AND SUPERPHOSPHATE UNIFORMLY AND MIX WITH SOIL
(SEE MIXTURE).
. CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL A WELL -PULVERIZED, FIRM REASONABLY UNIFORM SEEDBED IS PREPARED
FOUR TO SIX INCHES DEEP.
. SEED ON A FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER SEED LIGHTLY WITH SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR
CULTIPACK AFTER SEEDING.
• MULCH IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING AND ANCHOR MULCH.
. INSPECT ALL SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR RESEEDINGS WITHIN THE
PLANTING SEASON, IF POSSIBLE. IF STAND SHOULD BE OVER 60% DAMAGED, RE-ESTABLISH
FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEEDING RATES.
REQUIRED GROUND STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
STABILIZE WITHIN THIS MANY
CALENDAR DAYS AFTER
CEASING LAND DISTURBANCE
TIMEFRAME VARIATIONS
(a) PERIMETER DIKES,
SWALES, DITCHES, AND
PERIMETER SLOPES
7
None
(b) HIGH QUALITY WATER
(HQW) ZONES
7
None
(c) SLOPES STEEPER
THAN 3:1
7
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
(d) SLOPES 3:1 TO 4:1
14
-7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50' IN
LENGTH AND WITH SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1
-7 DAYS FOR PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND HQW ZONES
-10 DAYS FOR FALLS LAKE WATERSHED
(e) AREAS WITH SLOPES
FLATTER THAN 4:1
14
-7 DAYS FOR PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND HQW ZONES
-10 DAYS FOR FALLS LAKE WATERSHED UNLESS
THERE IS ZERO SLOPE
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
F—
z
F—
J
J
N
z
0
V
N
W
r
0
0
REVEGETATION PLAN
jl1/21/22 11"=50' j1
IBMM IKNB 1
[2202 I 1
4 6

134
N
ALONG STREAM (TYP.)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
i 1 2857(T+
292
N
LEGEND
// ///
J 11// ��� / //� \\\ / /fC
/ / i f
\\\N`NN,
\\\
\),
\ /
\\N x /////
S\\\\ \NN :
F3\ \ \ PROP. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
\ \F� \
\\\••' \ 30 (SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
PROP. SILT FENCE/TREE �\\\\\\\
PROTECTION FENCE COMBO (TYP.)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
2878
EXIST. TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
z
EXISTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR
PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
SUPER SILT FENCE
SILT/TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
99
_1100
r91
n
+29731
+ 290.2
SF
— SF/TP -
- LoD-
\\ \\\
\\\ /
SS,9\
c;t4
•
8:.
91.66
//
\
\ � = /
J
,_ -
'tip" \ �1
94.0 +SS
293.0
•
291
ear 'L// 295 �
1///,/
-PROP. SUPER SILT FENCE -
/ f /, ALONG STREAM (TYP.)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
\
\ \\ \\\\ \\ \ \/
\\11 \ � ,
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE = 31,954 SF (0.73 AC)
125
4.0\
/ 29819�.
ASS
�291.23J6
2 7+291.2
24
293.3
•241.4.
296•.0```
127
�0a �
I
30640.„
/ \
PROP. STOCKPILE AREA
PROP. LIMITS OF
- DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
PROP. SILT FENCE/TREE
1 PROTECTION FENCE COMBO
(TYP.) (SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)
EXIST. WETLAND (TYP.)
(
�?26
/1- 292 08+ 91.61
\ \ 2.915 o NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE
S
ENGINEERING • PI
J
N
1"=40'
t
DATE: SCALE:
1/21/22 1"=40'
SHEET
NO.:
5 OF 6

NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
ESE CONSULTANTS
ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENVIRONMENTAL
ESE of North Carolina, PC
5400 Trinity Road • Suite 204
Raleigh, NC 27607
T: 919-321-4800
License St C-2973
* ALTERNATIVE SILT FENCE TO BE USED AT LOCATIONS WHERE
STANDARD IS INADEQUATE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
CHAINLINK DIA
* USE #57 WASHED STONE FOR
REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES,
AND FOR ANCHOR WHEN SILT
FENCE IS PROTECTING CATCH
BASIN.
8' MAX
MIN. 10 GA.
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
11
•■
LINE WIRES
NOTES:
II.■■■■■■■■■■■■■"
1. USE SILTAAREE A OEN
DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT
MEM■■■■■■■■TIN\
III ■■■■■■■■, >
IM►MIN. 12i GA.
EXCEED 1q ACRE AND NEVER IN
II
��,
>�a`.■■■■■II•M
INTERMEDIATE
I� WIRES
CONSTRUCTION
FENCE
^!
I 10' MAX
TOP RAIL
I"-2"
GALVANIZED
POSTS
TOP
AREAS OF CONCENTRATED
FLOW.
�■■.I
ate
..M
GRADE
2. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE II,,TI¶II
TURNED UPHILL. 1
3. WRAP THE SILT FENCE AROUND I,
ALL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS SO
THAT THEY ARE FULLY VISIBLE 1"
FROM THE ROADWAY. t
4. ALL SILT FENCE MUST HAVE A
"
SILT
INSTALLED
WIRE
: FRONT
FENCE FABRIC
TO SECOND
FROM TOP
VIEW
'__
- u
n n-T_-7T 1r
jj �I nn
7
m
II
i =.1
RAIL
1Vu�(X a Se - -
4'
POST
MIN
SILT
ASTENERS
6" BETWEEN
(TYP)
r
FENCE
7
EXTENDED
SILT FENCE
MINIMUM OF 5' OF CLEARANCE
FROM THE FIRE HYDRANT.
5. MAINTENANCE SHALL OCCUR
WHEN NECESSARY. SILT FENCE
SHALL BE REPLACED EVERY 6
MONTHS AND POSTS SHALL BE
INSPECTED TO ENSURE 3'
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY. SILT
FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED
WEEKLY AND ALL MAINTENANCE
ISSUES SHALL BE CORRECTED
AT THAT TIME.
6. SILT FENCE SHOULD BE A
MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM THE
TOE OF SLOPE.
2 "
STEEL POST
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE
32" MIN.
FILL SLOPE
'
RApE
" MIN. COVER
OVER SKIRT*
FABRIC
WIDTH
SIDEWALK
— -•
SF
SILT
FENCE
PROPERTY
<'.:�
LINE
HYDRANT
URB AND
GUTTER
2.3
INTO TRENCH
g"
:.
SILT FENCE FASTENERS
IT
OVERLAP FABRIC 6" BETWEEN =
6" MIN AT ENDS (TYP) III
IIII
—
8"
1 "
=1
= 8"X4" TRENC
EXCAVATED UP
SLOPE FROM
POLES, BACKFILL
AND COMPACT
of
DESCRIPTION
SIDE VIEW
ANCHOR SKIRT
DIRECTED BY
AS
ENGINEER*
FH INSTALLATION
TOWN OF APEX
STD. NO.
TOWN OF APEX
STD. NO.
STANDARDS
TEMPORARY SUPER SILT FENCE
400.01
STANDARDS
TEMPORARY
SILT FENCE
400.01
EFFECTIVE: MAY 5,2020
SHEET 2 OF 2
EFFECTIVE: MAY 5, 2020
SHEET 1 OF 2
NOTES:
FILTER OF # 57
WASHED STONE
FLOW DIRECTION
+
+
1
+
PLAN 1. PUT SILT FENCE OR TREE PROTECTION FENCE UP..
TO ENSURE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS USED.
SILT FENCE FABRIC TO
OVERLAP HARDWARE
vh
.., -' •,
`
t Ft
EXISTING ROADWAY
L
2. IF CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITES ARE SUCH THAT
THE MUD IS NOT REMOVED BY THE VEHICLE
1
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
PINES AT WAKE CROSSING
CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLOTH BY 12 INCHES
•
STEEL FENCE POST
Ili
%h;1i%Ii,
tl,THE
x, a '.
ate. 1 �.
TRAVELING OVER THE STONE, THEN THE TIRES OF
VEHICLE MUST BE WASHED BEFORE
ENTERING PUBLIC ROAD (SEE DETAIL 400.06
W SHEET 2 OF 2).
3. IF A PROJECT CONTINUES TO DEPOSIT MUD AND
DEBRIS ONTO THE PUBLIC ROAD, THE TOWN WILL
CLEAN THE AREA AND INVOICE THE FINANCIALLY
RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
WIRE FENCE
PLAN VIEW
STEEL FENCE POST
HARDWARE CLOTH
FILTER OF # 57
WASHED STONE
FLOW DIRECTION,
NOTE:
1. APPLICABLE
2. USE
18" 3. BURY
AS
WIRE
FOR DRAINAGE AREAS NO MORE
A REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES.
FENCE, HARDWARE CLOTH, AND SILT
THAN 1/4 ACRE.
FENCE FABRIC 6 INCHES.
-
ENTRANCE TYPE
L
W
STONE SIZE
I'']IP
-rl= I1
Lµ
� HARDWARE
12" OVERLAP
CLOTH
STEEL FENCE POST
WIRE FENCE
12" OVERLAP
GENERAL
50'
25'
2-3"
RESIDENTIAL*
25'
12'
#57
1
SIDE VIEW 11
-
2' MAX.1
-
* INDIVIDUAL SINGLE FAMILY
CROSS SECTION
U
NEW CONSTRUCTION—
SILT FENCE FABRIC
EXISTING ROADWAY
1 __ f
L
J
GRADE
...
_..
6" MIN.
'FABRIC UNDER STONE
u
1`1
1.1
6"J
1.
U U
FRONT VIEW
U
DATE.
11/21/22
SCALE
INTS 1
TOWN OF APEX
STD. NO.
TOWN OF APEX
STD. NO.
DESIGN:
BMM
DRAWN
KNB
STANDARDS
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
400.06
STANDARDS
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET
400.02
JOB NO.:
2202
FILE NAME:
EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 21, 2010
SHEET 1 OF 1
EFFECTIVE: JANUARY 20, 2015
SHEET 1 OF 2
SHEET 6 OF 6