840016_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211221

fivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 44 - /6- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 7
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: &Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: u®Qs Arrival Time: 10 0 Departure Time:_ // ?0 County: Region:
Farm Name: Bl l id101741 CO-,6<< Farm Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Man mo. Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
710,1 Ro-c... 6 Li- -( G � Pk it,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow 0 0
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •Layers Beef Stocker 1
Gilts •Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
•
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 12/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE,
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [i�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 114 ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: &II-- - /6- Date of Inspection: 7270/7�
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Vo ❑NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): !</
Observed Freeboard(in): `f' U
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1YNo ❑ NA ❑NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE,
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? , ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1;14 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 'o ❑NA ❑NE,
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑ NEB
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Clio ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 12/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes n<o ❑ NA ❑
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 12/No ❑NA ❑
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes t�No ❑ NA ❑ N
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? R Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑N
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 134 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 12/NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: g14 - (6" Date of Inspection: /?/Zj jL l
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q No ❑NA ❑NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes I "No ❑NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No a<A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes EA ❑ NA ❑NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA [L]/NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes LNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 0 Yes [ 4 0 NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA 0 NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
tots p Ic wl 1,1 - 2ets%eo
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 717/14I ei�i � — Phone: W/i`--,70 0/7;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I a/e1/ZQ 2-I
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020