The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About130001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211018 .:, .,5, :. C ivision'.¢ofWater"Resources° " -a:''. ': 7n:,. Facia un''ber'` }0,Division of%Soil"and.Water-°`Conservation_, - - ,1, , a' ' City ,'._ - . /�-, d 1. = ":1-A-( ,- - _-- SEW . _ _ a .y..7 =-1 - F nL $ �O'Otlier.A nc � — .. . , �,.,.,. - Type of Visit: (Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: ®'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: /f -/ -7, Arrival Time: )/per Departure Time: I d 1.0 County: Region: / Farm Name: i3 Ar V JR �.g Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: ' Facility Contact: 0t4 n Par}-eAr Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: ` „fie ' _ - -; :N i rr9t e Desi'n'�'3=Carreiit`- _ _ .�_�°'r n Desi Current' - Des n.��C.0 -- mSwin4?- - E Capacity '_Po :Wet Poultr-i" °PCa`aci 'Po ,Cagle: -- -- "Ci' aci Po = _- ,h— ° � = Wean to Finish =- Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf -i'^ Feeder to Finish _,:'<< �=t`",`= =- :�`' `: "' ` - "' ;` Dairy Heifer arrow to Wean 2000 _%i j :filcs -_ N. - :, _ Design ,Current'_ Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder 'D 6P6:ult0.` _° Ca s aci . ---Po+: = _ Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish • _'"_ Beef Stocker Ar,- ,.3 Gilts Non-La ers �� --p Beef Feeder Boars `•Pullets Beef Brood Cow � �-sue = - �-�'�°��, �- -.'�a '�` Other - °r,., __ :*,-:_ TurkeyPoults Other II Other ro ;: Discharges and Stream Impacts 1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field El Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Elm,119 ❑ NA ❑ NE . 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE of the State other than from a discharge? ' Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: /3 - / Date of Inspection: /0-/&-Z1 Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ID/No ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): / 9 Observed Freeboard(in): // 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ %:Io ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 114o ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ["No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes io 0 NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes liVNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M4o ❑ NA ❑ NE . ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes n/No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes E/No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 13/No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �No I] NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Elio ❑ NA 0 NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: / 3 - ( Date of Inspection: /0,, 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes I34o ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes d1/4'o ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes DNo ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [q]%o ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(referato°question##) Explain'any YESlanswers and/or any;additional recommendations or any:other=cominents: Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). - } Reviewer/Inspector Name: / 'l7 4 t e , g (i y et/ Phone: g90-7 9 -0(73 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: (0--0— 2-0 Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015