550001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211025

. vision of Water Resources . °
Facility Number, - / t 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ,_
0 Other Agency t y -
Type of Visit: mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: GYI utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: it)-7,f'24 Arrival Time: 'f f Departure Time: 7 a...):::.) County: Region:
Farm Name: 6✓11 J � �C Sf'7e/- rM Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
&Jo 5 s.-- _ 1
" Design _"Current . Design Current . Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. ° Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity - Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow 'AIL?) L S .
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D " Poultry Ca i aci Po I; Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish M . ° Beef Stocker
Gilts II Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
M e
Other •Turke Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts � ,�''
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes UJAt ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is-the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
•2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 • 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: s-c - J Date of Inspection: (0 _T Z
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ELK ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): 349
Observed Freeboard(in): r124
4.
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ( ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ['To ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes lik o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [l4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EKIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13.Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [l e o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [( Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®" o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? •❑ Yes 1114\lO ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps El Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code 1
❑Rainfall El Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1[ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: .S 3 - / Date of Inspection: /Q 2i - ,1
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No 1114 ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Io ❑ N ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0410 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 114
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 2/90 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(referto question#):Explain'any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.-
Use drawingsof facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
r. eb'
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,T j cliel / /7 a`yer-- Phone: 9 79q-Q/79
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: (0 - Z S 20 2 I
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2q15