20220241 Ver 1_MMM NCDWR Response_20220610

AkMartin
Marietta
May 13, 2022
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
450 W. Hanes mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem, NC 27105
Dear Ms. Homewood:
Thomas Brown
East Division Wetland Specialist
Please reference the Request for Additional Information from your office, received by email on March 23,
2022, associated with SWR#20220241. A response to the request can be found below, with the
questions/comments from the request underlined.
1. If the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requests a response to any comments received as a result of the
Public Notice, please provide the Division with a copy of your response to the USACE. [15A NCAC 02H
.0502(c)1
Martin Marietta received comments from the Corps of Engineers on 5/11/2022. The Division will
be copied on our response to these comments.
2. Please provide a copy of the most current DEMLR approved mine map with the proposed pit expansion
areas and haul roads located on the map. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(1) and .0502(a)(9)]
Please see attached current approved mine map associated with Permit 67-01. The Mine permit
will be modified once 404/401 permits have been issued.
3. Please clarify whether the "pit" limits shown throughout the application materials depicts just the limits
of the pits or the limits of the outer most proposed disturbed area necessary to mine within the pit area,
such as disturbances for associated activities such as access roads, berms, sediment/erosion control
measures, safety features, etc. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(1) and .0502(a)(9)1
Martin Marietta East Division
2235 Gateway Access Point, STE 400, Raleigh, NC 27607
m. [phone] e. [e-mail]
www.martinmarietta.com

Page 2
The Pit limits shown in the application depicts the limits of all disturbance. There will be no
additional impacts to wetlands and waters associated with roads, berms, sediment/erosion
control measures, safety features or any other activity not described in the application.
4. Please provide a site plan that shows the entirety of the proposed haul roads for the Bender Pit. The
Division is unable to evaluate the project for avoidance and minimization without a complete
understanding of the entirety of the proposed haul roads, including how the various pieces connect and
where they terminate/begin within the pit and connect to other roads within the facility. [15A NCAC 02H
.0502(a)(9)1
Please see attached map (MMM Belgrade Bender Haul Road Map). Roads in high ground may be
slightly re -aligned due to other permitting requirements, safety requirements, or construction
requirements.
5. Please provide detailed plans for the stream relocation around the North Pit. The plans must include
plan and profile details, accurate dimensions (including proposed side slopes and floodplain access), any
proposed buffers, proposed bed and bank materials and construction sequence/details. Please provide
specific information regarding tie in locations with the existing stream. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)]
MMM is providing the attached plans for relocating the stream around the north pit. The
designed channel will mimic the bottom width of the existing stream. Side slopes on the proposed
channel will be constructed at no more than a 2:1 slope. Where the existing stream connects to
the created channel, the existing stream will be plugged with clay or other suitable material and
the bank in this area may be armored with rip -rap. The created channel banks will be stabilized
and vegetated with a riparian seed mix.
MMM is providing four cross sections of the existing stream profile, along with photos of each
cross section. These cross sections were taken as follows: Site 1 was taken upstream of the
proposed relocated channel tie in. Site 2 was taken just downstream of the proposed upstream
channel tie in. Site 3 was taken upstream of where the proposed channel will tie back into the
original channel. Site 4 was taken downstream of where the proposed channel will tie back in to
the original channel. Spoil piles exist on the south side of the stream where it was excavated
before MMM controlled the property. A photo of the feature upstream of the road culvert is also
provided to show active agricultural impacts to the system.
6. Please provide detailed plans and profiles for the proposed haul roads, as well as detailed construction
sequences for each site. Please ensure that the plans clearly document that the proposed culverts will be
installed to ensure equilibrium between the unimpacted portions of the wetlands and provide aquatic life
passage. The plans should also include a detailed construction sequence demonstrating that the
construction will be conducted "in the dry" and showing limits of all erosion control measures necessary
to protect the adjacent wetlands. Please also clarify if any additional vegetation clearing will be needed
adjacent to the proposed road for construction access. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)1

Page 3
Please see attached plans and profiles for the proposed haul roads. All Roads will be constructed
in the Dry. Culverts will be field located in the lowest points to ensure equilibrium of the reach
and flow of waters. The culvert in the stream crossing associated with the overburden road will
be buried 1ft to allow aquatic life movement. Erosion control measures will be installed prior to
construction. These measures will be designed and approved in the NC Mining Permit process.
7. Please provide additional detailed information regarding the need for the second haul road, the
"Overburden Road," which is proposed to cross a large wetland complex between the existing mine facility
and the proposed Bender Pit. While the Division recognizes that this road has been located in the
narrowest portion of the wetland system, the direct impacts are still substantial and indirect impacts do
not appear to have been considered. It is stated that "having a direct path" would reduce each trip, please
provide maps with alternative road locations that were considered and the associated distances for each
alternative to further justify this statement. Please provide further explanation of "necessary for
operation efficiency and safety under the circumstances" and "substantial savings". [15A NCAC 02H
.0506(b)]
Please see combined response to 7 and 8 below.
8. The Division needs to understand the projected volume of traffic that will use the Overburden Road in
order to further evaluate Avoidance and Minimization. How many estimated trips will trucks and/or other
machinery take per day over the proposed Overburden Road during: 1.) initial site development and 2.)
mining operations. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)1
During a normal operating day at the site, approximately 4,500 cubic yards of overburden material
per day will be hauled from the Bender Pit, using 3 trucks, for a total of approximately 130 truck
trips per day. At the same time, approximately 4,000 tons of product will be hauled to the plant
from the Bender Pit, using 3 additional trucks, for a total of approximately 80 truck trips per day.
The road as proposed and designed will allow a direct path from the proposed Bender Pit to the
southern end of the existing pit, where we are planning to deposit overburden material. As shown
on the attached "Haul Road Map" without this road, overburden trucks would need to travel north
on the same road as the product haul trucks, and then loop back south on the existing road.
Measuring this distance, trucks would travel approximately 0.7 miles farther each way, or 1.4
miles farther each trip, resulting in an additional 182 miles traveled each day. These additional
miles are costly in fuel, truck maintenance, and time. Additional travel distances also equate to
more emissions. Furthermore, using the product haul road to transport overburden material
would place 6 off road trucks traveling the same road, along with the numerous passenger trucks
carrying employees, not to mention loaders, drills, mechanic trucks or other equipment that travel
to and from the pit at various times during the day. MMM therefore believes that a single road
to the pit would create an unsafe condition and is not a practicable alternative due to these
reasons.
The proposed overburden road is located in the narrowest portion of the wetland system in order
to minimize impacts to wetlands. MMM considered placing the road in other areas of the
wetlands, and even considered constructing two one lane roads which would allow overburden
trucks to work in a one-way loop traffic pattern, but we did not consider this to be the least
environmentally damaging alternative because of the additional wetland impacts and therefore

Page 4
did not propose it. An example of the one-way loop road system is shown on the attached map
(MMM Belgrade Bender Overburden Road Alternatives).
9. Please explain why a narrower road with traffic controls (e.g. the use of a flagger or remote light to
control traffic) are not a practical alternative to the proposed designed with two travel lanes. (15A NCAC
02H .0506(b)1
The proposed overburden road must be designed to MHSA standards. For the trucks currently in
use at the Belgrade Quarry, the requirements are as follows: A safety Berm that is taller than half
the tire height, a minimum 10ft distance between passing trucks and a minimum 10ft distance
between trucks and the safety berm. Proposed impacts with a two-lane road are 100ft wide.
Using the same required safety standards, a one -lane road would still need to be approximately
70ft wide and would only impact approximately 0.25 acres of wetland less than a two-lane road.
MMM believes that the use of a one lane road would not only cause a hazardous condition, but
would also cause trucks to sit and wait for another truck to pass, reducing the load count per day
and increasing emissions and fuel use while idling. Because of these reasons listed above, in this
situation a single lane road it is not practicable nor is it the least environmentally damaging
practicable alternative.
10. Please explain how the roadway runoff will be captured/treated. Will any stormwater from the roads
discharge into or adjacent to any wetlands or streams. (15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)1
Stormwater runoff from the roadways will be captured at each end of the road by appropriate
BMPs or directed to flow into the mine pit. These BMPs will be designed and approved during
the mine permit process.
11. Please provide an analysis of expected indirect impacts to the section of stream between the road and
the portion to be rerouted around the North Pit. This section of channel will be further removed from
downstream waters and be located between two impacted sections of channel which has the potential
to further degrade the functions within the channel. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)]
There are no expected indirect impacts. The stream originates as low energy ditches in farm fields
across the road from the site. Flow rates in this section of stream will not be restricted or
increased by this project. As such no negative morphological effects are expected. Moreover,
the section of this stream in question was altered in the past by channelizing for agricultural
purposes and the existing NCDOT Culvert. For the reasons listed above, re-routing the stream
around the pit is not expected to cause any negative impact to the section of stream between the
road and the proposed channel.
12. Please provide a mitigation plan which will meet the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0506(c). Please
note Item (c)(7) indicating that no more than 25% of the mitigation requirements may be satisfied through
preservation. (15A NCAC 02H .0506(c)1

Page 5
In order to meet these requirements, MMM proposes to purchase mitigation credits at a 0.75:1
ratio along with preserving the Woods Property as described in the application. MMM is currently
working with a Bachelor's Delight Mitigation Bank to secure 674 stream credits and 6.72 wetland
credits. A copy of this Credit Reservation will be forwarded to the Division once it is received.
Preserving the Woods Property will provide wetland preservation mitigation at a ratio of 11.6:1.
Furthermore this proposal would also preserve a buffer on one side of approximately 4100 linear
feet of the White Oak River. This combined mitigation plan far exceeds the DWR required 1:1
mitigation ratio.
13. Please provide information to include a map showing any residential wells within 500 feet of the new
pit boundaries. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)]
There are no residential wells within 500ft of the Bender Pit. Martin Marietta is currently unaware
of any wells within 500ft of the Northern Expansion area. The attached current mine map includes
known offsite wells. All groundwater concerns will be addressed with DWR's Groundwater
Management Branch via the Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area Permit (NCG02005) during
the Mine Permit Process.
14. The Division is concerned that indirect hydrologic impacts will occur in adjacent wetlands as a result
of mining activities. Please provide a detailed hydrologic analysis/modeling of mining activities, including
pit dewatering, on the adjacent wetlands. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)1
MMM appreciates the conversation with Sue Homewood to talk through this issue on 5/6/2022.
As explained in the call, the cone of depression normally shown in limestone mining is in relation
to deeper ground water and not surface ground water. As seen on maps and NCWAM forms
provided in the application, high functioning wetlands exist approximately 70ft from our current
pit area. These wetlands are separated from the pit by a perimeter road and berm. Similar
conditions will exist in the proposed Bender Pit. A perimeter road and berm will be constructed
within the proposed limits of disturbance, before the overburden slopes down to the actual mine
pit. Outside of the limits of disturbance, a minimum 50ft buffer will be maintained around the
existing wetlands. Due to the shape of the wetland boundary, in many places this buffer is as
much as 70 to 100 ft.
Furthermore, the wetlands surrounding the Bender Pit receive much of their hydrology from
backwater of the White Oak River. MMM believes that due to this reason and the fact that the
pit face will be separated from the wetlands by a distance of approximately 100ft or more, there
will be no negative effects on the hydrology of the nearby wetland systems.

Page 6
We appreciate the opportunity to respond to this request. Please feel free to contact me by phone or
email at any time for any additional information or clarification.
Sincerely,
Thomas Brown
East Division Wetland Specialist
Attachments by email:
20.02.05. Begrade. Mine. Map.APPROVE D
MMM Belgrade Bender Haul Road Map
MMM Belgrade Bender Overburden Road Alternatives Map
MMM Belgrade Bender Road Culvert Design
MMM Belgrade Proposed Channel Design and Existing Conditions

CATEGORY
ACREAGE TO BE
AFFECTED OVER
LIFE OF MINE
Tailings / Sediment Ponds
12
Stockpiles
122
Wastepiles (Berms)
60
Processing Area / Haul Roads
82
Mine Excavation
599
Unexcavated Buffer
46
TOTAL AREA TO BE DISTURBED
921
TOTAL PERMITTED ACREAGE
1531
Notes:
1. Previously mined areas currently used for stockpiles/processing area are not
included in mine excavation area.
2. Topo lines and parcel lines from NC OneMap Downloaded 12/26/19
3. Variations in county line between Jones and Onslow County data sets.
4. No wetlands to be disturbed without proper permits from the US Army Corps of
Engineers, NC DEQ Division of Water Resources, and modification of the mine
permit.
/
I I
I // i I/
I I ,i /1 /
/ ' 1 //
i-- i I / /
/ \ / i ITE 0 RIVER
/^ / �• 1
// yZ' / / 11AAAA
/ J� / 1
i
/ /,/
i
I i i F
l"(ill/
/ I ------1 1
-------1_ I 1 I l
--T----J I
1 1 I---
-; I I I
5—i01 io
1 — 171I
1 1 69 j
I /
I 1 /.. q
i / 68
L_,-`,/
I I 1 67 /
1
i
t/ 661
1 /J0 i_65
1
,��1 // 64
/ of OW 61
\\\� `\ ` ), / / 63 I.gI — 60 I
� --7/ / / 101
1 / / 1m1-
1/ / Iz� —
/ / a------1
/
62
, \ _....\
Permit Boundary
Property Lines (Jones County)
(Onslow County)
Topographic Contour
Pit Limit
Future Pit Limits
Buffer - Undisturbed
Buffer - Unexcavated
Berm (existing)
Berm
(to be built based
on overburden supply)
Body of Water
Tailings / Sediment Ponds
Stockpiles
Processing Area / Haul Roads
Wetlands
Sediment Trap
Energy Dissipater/Outlet Protection
Culvert
Diversion Ditch
Natural Water Feature
Monitoring Well
Offsite Well
Adjacent Parcel Map ID
ST-B
4
41,
•
45
County Parcel
Map ID Number
543244635900
2
543253863100
3
543241084800
5 543241629500
543159186400
543159251800
543159243200
9
Owner Name
MORRIS, GLENDA
BOOTH, MICHAEL G. JR
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, INC.
MARIETTA MATERIALS REAL ESTATE
COLLINS, ELIZABETH BANKS
MYRTLE GROVE CHRISTIAN CHURCH
MYRTLE GROVE CHRISTIAN CHURCH
COLLINS, CARL
HORN, KENJI LEE
HORN, BRIANNA L.
JONES, RONALD 5
DUNN. ANTHONY
COLLINS, CARL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRDATAN DISTRICT RANGER
MEADOWS, DANNY R TRUSTEE, MEADOWS REVDCA3LE LIVING TRUST
543159320100
11
543159314100
la
543271270700
14 543179412800
15 543168617300
16 543166893800
17 543166770000
18 543176269100
19 543176442800
21
543175888000
24
25
543185161300
26
543185256800
27
543185441900
28 543186900100
29
543185762900
30
543185862000
31
543185845800
32
543185931900
33
543195158500
34
543195021900
35 545367214500
36 544102520300
37
543191277600
58
49
48
0C
47
46
75
76
/17
Map ID
County Parcel
Number
Owner Name
41
544008986700
MEADOWS, CHARLIE HEIRS
42
543087330600
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CROATAN DISTRICT RANGER
43
543000683371
DICKERSON GLENN W & GWYNDOLYN
45
543103208999
JONES LUCY G HEIRS & CHARLES A
46
543103136144
CG PARKER FARMS LLC
48
543103146734
BLANCHARD DEBORAH MATTOCKS &
50
543101066111
MCQUILLAN DONALD EDWARD
52
543101069222
BELTRAM SAMUEL ADAM & CALLI RYAN
53
543101160226
ROSSITER THOMAS CODY
54
543101161258
LUNGER JON
57
543101062486
SCHMIDT DALE W & MARIANNE P
59
542112968995
DOVE VELINDA
61
542112975184
HAMM EVELYN L
64
542112971115
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC
67
542108980066
PARKER EDWARD & NANCY
68
542108971902
PARKER EDWARD E & NANCY
69
542108982127
YANCEY LENA C
70
542108982342
MANNING EDWARD GREY HEIRS &
71
542108984226
BELGRADE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
72
542108985005
BELGRADE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
73
543109061100
BANKS, RAYMOND
76
543222736600
TAYLOR, KEVIN
77
543232055000
TAYLOR, KEVIN
77
2
3 /
SERVICE
ENTRANCE
4.6
i 7- - --- --Ts -- —1-7-r-I I I -- ----1 7-iii LI 1___ __T__ ____\ ‘..: 1 ..... \ \ —
I II
‘ :‘ ‘
5
ITE OAK RIVER
•
•
\ 13
424
et lit
l▪ o lit
•
44
-------------
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
•
43
•
A.
•
16
FUTURE PIT
(MAY BE
MINED AS
SEPARATE PIT
OR PART OF
EXIS11NG PIT)
•
•
NTRANCE
UNOFF FROM
DITCH DIVERTED
TO PIT
•
•
APPROVED BY NCDEQ DEMLR
FEBRUARY 5, 2020
BY:
BY:
BY:
BY:
BY:
BY:
BY:
BY:
3
BY:
2
BY:
01/20
Reprinted Without Reclamation Layer On
BY: PNP
22
EXISTING ACCESS
(NOT PERMITTED
FOR MINE ACCESS)
NO MINING ACTIVITY IN
THIS UNEXCAVATED
BUFFER WITHOUT
MODIFICATION OF THE
MINE PERMIT
c7111,
•
42
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
34
•
41
•
33
ao
35
•
37
38
35
36
39
0 250
1500
NkMartin
Marietta
ine IV
3elgrade Quarry
Jones and Onslow Counties, \C
38
39 543190778900
•
•
© 2020 BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED. UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION IS PROHIBITED.
0
01/20
Updating mapping; adding eastern parcels
BY: PNP
DATE
REVISION
BY
FILE NAME: Belgrade.Mine.Map
QUARRY: Belgrade
DWN BY:
PNP
DATE:
JAN. 2020
DESIGN FIRM:
SHEET NO.
DWG.

Belgrade Quarry
Haul Road Map
Drawn by: Thomas Brown
5-1-2022
For Permitting Purposes Only
Locations Are Approximate
Axe
Plant Location
Existing Road
Overburden to be
deposited here
AO.
Martin
Marietta
Haul Road ties into
existing road to the plant
at this point.
Legend
Proposed Bender Pit
Road Crossings
Wetland Boundary
Approximate Current Pit Limits
1,000
500
0
1,000 Feet

Belgrade Quarry
Overburden Road Alternatives
Drawn by: Thomas Brown
5-1-2022
For Permitting Purposes Only
Locations Are Approximate
Overburden Road
One lane Entrance
and Exit Alternative
Approximately 3 acres
of Wetland Impacts
htik
Martin
Marietta
•
to
Legend
L. Proposed Bender Pit
Wetland Boundary
I— Approximate Current Pit Limits
r
910
455
0
910 Feet

10' clear distance
between vehicles & barrier
Safety Berm
Exhibit B
10' clear distance between
vehicles
Typical haul truck profile
approx. 20.0' wide
[
7
7
Approx. 80ft top width
Fill (Exceeding Pipe Crush Depth)
Culvert Pipe
O
100'
BY
BY
BY
BY
BY
BY
BY
BY
Martin
rietta
TYPICAL HAUL ROAD CROSSING
BY
BY
BY
BY
ROAD CROSS SECTION
DATE REVISION
QUARRY: Belgrade
© 2020 BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION IS PROHIBITED.
FILE NAME:Belgrade
DE IGN FIRM
DWN BY DATE
PNP JAN 2021
JOB NO
TLB NTS

APi AP AP 411 411 i AP APi AP AP APi APi AP AP AP
itiOzetzeiosdkems' 05' NOrp..0.0.0%
e
e e e e e e e e e e etor-
e e e
DETAIL A
TWO 96" CULVERTS
NTS
DETAIL B
ONE 48" CULVERT
NTS
DETAIL C
ONE 60" CULVERT
NTS
NOTES:
1. ENSURE MINIMUM PIPE COVER MEETS
MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS
2. CULVERTS TO BE FIELD LOCATED FOR
WETLAND EQUILIBRIUM AND AQUATIC
LIFE MOVEMENT.
3. NUMBER OF PIPES AND DIAMETER MAY
BE ADJUSTED DURING INSTALLATION.
HOWEVER, INSTALLED PIPES WILL BE
FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.
4. LOWER CULVERT IN DETAIL A WILL BE
INSTALLED 1' BELOW THE STREAM
CHANNEL GRADE TO ALLOW AQUATIC
LIFE MOVEMENT.
5. CULVERTS WILL BE INSTALLED IN THE
DRY.
10
BY
BY
BY
BY
Martin
rietta
BY
BY
BY
401/404 PERMIT APPLICATION
BY
BY
BY
BY
BY
PROPOSED WETLAND CROSSINGS
CULVERT DETAILS
QUARRY BELGRADE
DATE
REVISION
BY
© 2021 BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION IS PROHIBITED.
FILE NAME:BELGRADE.PROP.CROSSING
DE IGN FIRM
oWN BY PNP DATEJOB
2021 'oa. mo.
SI-rr I NO
PNP
NTS

Belgrade Quarry
Culvert Locations
wn
Only
Legend
N
A
Approximate Current Pit Limits
Road Crossings
Proposed Bender Pit
Wetland_Impacts
Wetland Boundary
mow
4-7
htik
Martin
Marietta
DD �o U8DA, LEW, Awot2RE, flatA0 c.31 ©uo ©©ram*j •
600
300
0
600 Feet
Drawn by: Thomas Bro
5/13/2021
For Permitting Purposes
Locations Are Approximate

C26
4
PERMIT BOUNDARY
\ `\\
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK / I
(DASHED LINE)
I.I
PROPOSED CENTERLINE I )/
PROPOSED CHANNEL EDGE
(DOTTED LINE)
©2022 BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPUCAT1ON IS PROHIBITED.
3
Notes:
1. CONTOUR LINES FROM NC OneMap DOWNLOADED
12/26/19
2. ALIGNMENT MAY BE FIELD ADJUSTED DEPENDING
ON SITE CONDITIONS.
EXISTING
FEATURE
jA Marietta
B
I
s
DIE
IFILE NAME: Belgrade.Mine.Map
Br.
int
ey
BY.
QUARRY: Belgrade
DMN BR iE: JOB. ND.
PNP MAY 2022
MEET NO.
1150' 1 of 1
401/404
PROPOSED ALIGNMENT
DE9ON FlPot

0
2
3
4
E 5
a 8
0
7
8
9
10
11
0
5
10
15
20
WIDTH (FT)
25 30 35 40 45
2
—I I I —I I I —I I I —I I I —I I
PROPOSED STREAM CROSS SECTION (TYPICAL).
NOTE:
• CHANNEL DIMENSIONS WILL BE DETERMINED BY TOPOGRAPHY.
• ALL BANKS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT A 2:1 SLOPE.
©2022 BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPUCATION IS PROHIBITED.
IA Marietta
er:
DATE
401 /404
.r:
°r tr. QUARRY: BELGRADE
D°N BR W1E: JOB. BD.
PNP MAY 2022 «a
AS SHOWN 1
PROPOSED
CROSS SECTION
IFILE NAME: BELGRADE.STREAM.CS I
BeB°B rwt

WIDTH (FT)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
STREAM CROSS SECTION SITE 1
WIDTH (FT)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
STREAM CROSS SECTION SITE 2
u
IA Marietta
er:
B
s
DATE
©2022 BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPUCAT1ON IS PROHIBITED.
IFILE NAME: BELGRADE.STREAM.CS
DOTED Mk
ar:
Br.
Ea, 401 /404
. r:
BM
Eas
QUARRY: BELGRADE
DMNNP BR DAlMAt Y 2022 JOB. BD.
5*
AS SHOWN 1
EXISTING UPSTREAM
CROSS SECTIONS

0
1
2
4
5
6
7
WIDTH (FT)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
STREAM CROSS SECTION SITE 3
WIDTH (FT)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
0
1
2
4
5
6
STREAM CROSS SECTION SITE 4
©2022 BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPUCATION IS PROHIBITED.
N
B
0
s
DALE
fl
BY
ar:
ar:
401 /404
.r:
°r ey QUARRY: BELGRADE
DMN BR DAlt JOB. ND.
S PNP MAY 2022 Na
AS HOWN 1�
Marth
rietta
EXISTING DOWNSTREAM
CROSS SECTIONS
IFILE NAME: BELGRADE.STREAM.CS
rwt

Site 1 Photo, Upstream of Proposed Channel
Site 2, Downstream of Upstream Proposed Channel Tie in

Site 3, Upstream of Proposed Downstream Channel Tie in
Site 4, Downstream of proposed Channel

Channel Conditions Across the road from Site