20210755 Ver 2_Final Draft MP_2022_20220610

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20210755 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 06/11/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/10/2022
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Company/Owner:* NC DMS
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Lin Xu [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Type: DMS • Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Chappels Creek Full Delivery Mitigation Site
County: Person
Document Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: ChappelsCreek_100179_FinalDraftMP_Combined... 52.03MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Lin Xu
Signature:*
1,

360o Glenwood Avenue,Suite too
6 r es
Raleigh,NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 7740t
Main:713.520.5400
June 3, 2022
Lin Xu
Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Subject:Task 3 Draft Mitigation Plan Comments—Chappels Creek Mitigation Project (DMS#100179)
Neuse River 03020201; Person County
Mr.Xu:
On behalf of Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX), a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental Solutions
(RES), I am pleased to submit the Final Draft of the Chappels Creek Buffer Mitigation Plan (DMS Project#100179) along with
a response to all of your comments provided on April 27, 2022.
Thank you for your time and consideration and we look forward to continuing to work with you all as this Project progresses.
Please contact me at 919-770-5573 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any additional information.
Thank you,
I%
I ,,
Matt Butler, Project Manager
[e-mail] 1919.770.5573
res.us

_..,;;;STATE Os',.,
� �, ��'
ROY COOPER 4 9.
Governor
ELIZABETH S.BISER `. Lm,,,6 ' �_=`
Secretary ' ,' tQQAMY °' ='
MARC RECKTENWALD NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
April 27, 2022
Matt Butler
Resource Environmental Solutions,LLC
3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100
Raleigh,NC 27612
Subject: Task 3 Draft Mitigation Plan Comments—Chappels Creek Mitigation Project(DMS#100179)
Neuse River 03020201;Wayne County,NC
Contract No. 0402-06
Dear Mr. Butler:
On April 13,2022,DMS received the Draft Mitigation Plan for the Chappels Creek Buffer Mitigation
Project from Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC(RES). DMS has completed our review of the
Draft Mitigation Plan and has the following comments:
1. On the title,please list nutrient offset rule under the buffer rule,since DMS wants the nutrient offset
option.
2. On page 4 of Table 1—The table 1 and the text above the table indicated that the project would
provide up to 1,009,091.298 buffer mitigation credit. Please be mindful that the project is contracted
to provide 1,007,259.354 buffer mitigation credit
3. On page 4 of Table 1—Please change HU code to 8-digit instead of 14-digit.
4. On page 8 of Section 1.3.4b—Per DWR's recent comments of buffer mitigation plans,please add
language that speaks to land use conditions that may have changed since the viability letter
was issued(crop changes,fallow land,mowing,etc). If no changes have occurred, speak to
that. Provide time-stamped photos that support this and are more current that those that are
currently included since they predate the site viability letter.
5. On page 15 of Section 3.3—Per DWR's recent comments of buffer mitigation plans,please a
sentence "The suite of bare root stems will be thoroughly mixed prior to planting to ensure
maximum diversity throughout the planted areas."in this section.
6. On page 16 of Section 3.3—Please add a proposed seed mix list table after Table 5.
7. As required by contract and in Section 4.7 of RFP 16-007703,RES must submit the required
Performance Bond as part of the final mitigation plan. This must be approved prior to invoice
submittal.
D E Q North C Department Environmental Quality I is ion of Mittv
��� 217 West Jonesarolina Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I RaleighDiv,North Carolinaiga 27699-1652ionSerices
NORTH CAROLINA
Department a Environmental Quality 919.707.8976

8. This is a reminder that Task 2 has not been completed and will not be complete until the Conservation
Easement is recorded for this project and all required deliverables have been submitted to the DMS
Project Manager and State Property Office.
Please make the requested revisions and provide one(1)pdf copy of the revised mitigation plan,the
required digital data and a response to comments letter for DMS review. Once DMS verifies all revisions
have been made and the required digital files have been submitted,RES will be instructed when to submit
the final copies of the Task 3 deliverable. If you have any questions,please contact me at any time. I can
be reached at(919)219-8476 or email me at lin.xu(a,ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
L i.+ti X w
Lin Xu
Project Manager
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
Attachment
cc: file
D E Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
tf:!:::::
�.// 217 West]ones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699 1652
NORTH CAROLINA
Dev�eMaEn•ironme�iaueil � 919.707.8976

MEMORANDUM ;Zres
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 919.770.5573 tel. [phone] fax
TO: NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
FROM: Matt Butler— RES
DATE: June 3, 2022
RE: Response to Draft Mitigation Plan Comments— Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
(DMS #100179) Neuse River 03020201; Person County, NC; Contract No. 0402-06
Lin Xu - NCDMS:
1. On the title, please list nutrient offset rule under the buffer rule, since DMS wants the nutrient
offset option.
The nutrient offset credit trading rule has been added to the footer of the title page.
2. On page 4 of Table 1 — The table 1 and the text above the table indicated that the project
would provide up to 1,009,091.298 buffer mitigation credit. Please be mindful that the project
is contracted to provide 1,007,259.354 buffer mitigation credit.
RES appreciates the reminder and is aware of the contracted buffer mitigation credits. As
proposed, the project will generate surplus credits.
3. On page 4 of Table 1 — Please change HU code to 8-digit instead of 14-digit.
This change has been made.
4. On page 8 of Section 1.3.4b — Per DWR's recent comments of buffer mitigation plans, please
add language that speaks to land use conditions that may have changed since the viability
letter was issued (crop changes, fallow land, mowing, etc). If no changes have occurred, speak
to that. Provide time-stamped photos that support this and are more current that those that
are currently included since they predate the site viability letter.
The existing landscape section has been updated to reflect changes to the riparian
vegetation and adjacent row crops since the submittal of the Draft Buffer Mitigation Plan.
RES staff took updated photos at the Chappels Creek site on June 1, 2022. These photos
have been added to the document and the Digital Submission files.
5. On page 15 of Section 3.3 — Per DWR's recent comments of buffer mitigation plans, please
add a sentence "The suite of bare root stems will be thoroughly mixed prior to planting to
ensure maximum diversity throughout the planted areas." in this section.
This sentence has been added to Section 3.3.

6. On page 16 of Section 3.3 — Please add a proposed seed mix list table after Table 5.
A proposed seed mix has been added as Table 6.
7. As required by contract and in Section 4.7 of RFP 16-007703, RES must submit the required
Performance Bond as part of the final mitigation plan. This must be approved prior to invoice
submittal.
RES will submit the Performance Bond as part of the final mitigation plan.
8. This is a reminder that Task 2 has not been completed and will not be complete until the
Conservation Easement is recorded for this project and all required deliverables have been
submitted to the DMS Project Manager and State Property Office.
Thank you. RES will complete the required steps to finish Task 2.

S
S 2 ✓
ri
j , A. t ail Sn,
k3 r b
�-�� k� Y bt 5 '
• mt �
4 .'. � 3, y
4f � `S'# k Y 5� l� �yZ. . s
' .".''- -' -a*,;.-1":,1 r'''''Y'.'.'",: 3,,.",,,t4."7.-,:,.,-..,_,•-.. ..." ' \'''':',,,'!.., "..k.' ' :',4-' -- ''t
oikt
.i::.:..5.17,.w:,,,,,,,i„.0:0,1.,...-al„.2„:.24,2„,:t,.;v1r.....„.A,11,,..k.,,viii.,.,..,.,, ,...::::.,...?. ,.. .,,,. ,. •, .. . „.
:,:.i..,:ir.:,:w,..,z,,,4-1.1,......;„, ..*:,3,..,,...tev--.6i.,1, -,...1.e....1„;,.,...::::„.,,,.,,...,. - , , ,. .;. ... .
-t „sue•.vtt s� y, '�.- +.TV., �,, ;
M ,,vt, R; i �Z t x`S.,N to I ro� �a ,
'*:°''''''4N:
` " '
,' r w r Y1 rt V.,' t �4a arne A,%
.._a .rr a
.,: a
nag
,'
'q a•,:,., a. Y.
e. ,
, -
Final Draft Buffer Mitigation Plan
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
June 2022
DM5 Project#: 100179 I Contract#:0402-06 I RFP: 16-20200402 I DWR#: Unassigned I Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Person County, North Carolina
Prepared For: Prepared By:
NC Department of Environmental Quality Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
Division of Water Resources For Environmental Banc& Exchange (EBX)
1652 Mail Service Center 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Raleigh, NC 27612
919-209-1052
This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• The Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule, 15A NCAC 02B.0295, effective November 1,2015
• Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule, 15A NCAC 02B.0703, effective April 1,2020
These documents govern NCDMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation.

Table of Contents
1 MITIGATION PROJECT SUMMARY 3
1.1 Project Overview 3
1.1.1 Parcel Ownership 5
1.2 Project Location 5
1.3 Existing Conditions 6
1.3.1 Surface Water Classification 6
1.3.2 Physiography and Soils 6
1.3.3 Wetlands 7
1.3.4 Landscape Communities 7
1.3.5 Existing Conditions Photos 9
2 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS 11
2.1 Determination of Credits 11
2.2 Other regulatory considerations 12
2.2.1 Environmental Screening and Documentation 12
2.2.2 Threatened and Endangered Species 12
2.2.3 Cultural Resources 13
2.2.4 Project Constraints 13
3 RIPARIAN RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND PRESERVATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 14
3.1 Site Preparation 14
3.2 Methods 14
3.2.1 Riparian Restoration Activities 14
3.2.2 Riparian Enhancement Activities 14
3.2.3 Riparian Preservation Activities 15
3.3 Planting Plan 15
3.4 Easement Boundaries 16
4 MONITORING PLAN 18
4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria 18
4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Project Maintenance 19
5 STEWARDSHIP 20
6 REFERENCES 21
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 i June 2022

FIGURES
Figure 1 — Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Service Area
Figure 2— Existing Conditions
Figure 3a & 3b— Historic Imagery
Figure 4— Project Vicinity
Figure 5— Buffer Conceptual Design
Figure 6a — USGS Quadrangle
Figure 6b— USGS—The National Map
Figure 7— NRCS Soil Survey
Figure 8— Nutrient Offset Conceptual Design
Figure 9— Riparian Zones
Figure 10a & 10b— Monitoring Plan
APPENDIX
A— Project Buffer Mitigation Credits
B— Buffer Viability & Stream Determination
C— Site Protection Easement
D—Approved FHWA Categorical Exclusion
E— Invasive Species
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 ii June 2022

>L MITIGATION PROJECT SUMMARY
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental
Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide the Chappels Creek Mitigation Project (Project), a full-delivery buffer
mitigation project for the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) (DMS Project#100179).This buffer project
is designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to development
within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Cataloguing Unit 03020201
(Neuse 01), within the Upper Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 1). This Buffer Mitigation Plan is in accordance
with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Li Project Overview
The Chappels Creek Project consists of a 49.27-acre conservation easement, accompanied by a 0.75-acre
access easement, which altogether are broken into seven sections. The Project includes a portion of
riparian area of Chappels Creek along with five of its unnamed stream tributaries. Chappels Creek is a
USGS-named stream that eventually drains to the North Flat River. Current land use within the Project is
primarily crop production and disturbed riparian forest (Figure 2).The southern portion of the Project area
has been used for agricultural purposes for at least 70 years, and the remaining Project area has been used
extensively for agricultural purposes since at least 1977 (Figure 3a and 3b). Currently, the Project reaches
and adjacent areas are in either active crop production or forest.Water quality stressors currently affecting
the Project include heavily manipulated/relocated and maintained stream channels, active crop
production, lack of forested riparian buffers and presence of invasive plant species. Current buffer
conditions demonstrate significant degradation with the loss of stabilizing vegetation because of
continued crop production and in some areas, historic livestock use.
The goal of the Project is to restore, enhance, and preserve ecological function to the existing streams and
their associated riparian buffer areas by establishing appropriate plant communities while minimizing
temporal and land disturbing impacts. Buffer and surrounding riparian area improvements will filter runoff
from agricultural fields, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to Project channels and provide
water quality benefit to the overall watershed.
The Project easement can be accessed about two miles off US 501, to the north of Antioch Church Road
and to the west of Kermit Duncan Road (Figure 4). Chappels Creek Project is composed of two perennial
streams: Chappels Creek and JM1; four intermittent stream channels: JM2, EN1, EN2, and TH1; and two
impoundments: Pond A and Pond B (Figure 2). Most of the streams have been straightened and
manipulated for agricultural purposes. Furthermore, the fifty-foot riparian buffers of all but one stream
channel and one pond were determined to be subject to the Neuse buffer protection rules. EN2 and Pond
B are not subject to the Neuse buffer protection rules ("Non-Subject"). Stream determinations were
verified by the DWR site visit on April 29, 2021. Correspondence regarding this determination is in
Appendix B.
Buffer and riparian area mitigation efforts along the Project streams will be accomplished through the
planting, establishment, and protection of a native hardwood forest community. The result will be a
riparian area that functions to mitigate nutrient and sediment inputs from the surrounding uplands. The
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 3 June 2022

buffer mitigation plan proposed is being submitted for review under the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703. In addition to
traditional riparian restoration and enhancement, the Project will also incorporate the alternative buffer
mitigation options: Restoration on Non-Subject streams, as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3);
Preservation of Buffers on Subject Streams, as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5); and Preservation of
Buffers on Non-subject Streams, as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4). DWR staff performed an onsite
stream determination on April 29, 2021 and a buffer viability assessment for buffer mitigation on August
12, 2021. The corresponding buffer viability letter was completed, settling a dispute with the viability of
Pond B,and received on January 20,2022.These correspondences are provided in Appendix B.The Project
will provide significant functional uplift to the watershed and will assist DMS with achieving its mitigation
goals in the Neuse 01 watershed, specifically the Upper Falls Lake Watershed. The Project presents the
opportunity to provide up to 1,009,091.298 of riparian buffer mitigation credits.These will be derived from
restoration (both subject and non-subject),enhancement,and preservation(both subject and non-subject)
of the riparian buffer and surrounding riparian areas. Project attributes are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Project Attributes
Parameter Attribute
Project Name Chappels Creek
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201 (8-digit)
River Basin Neuse River(Upper Falls Lake Watershed)
Geographic Location (Lat, Long) 36.322, -78.945
David White: 1050, 631-636
Site Protection Instrument (DB, TFF Holdings, LLC: 1041, 169-174
PG) EBX, LLC: 995, 364
EBX Neuse I: 952, 705
Total Credits (BMU) 1,009,091.298
Riparian Buffer(with flexibility to convert to Nutrient Offset if
Types of Credits
needed)
Mitigation Plan Date April 2022
Initial Planting Date March 2023
Baseline Report Date May 2023
MY1 Report Date December 2023
MY2 Report Date December 2024
MY3 Report Date December 2025
MY4 Report Date December 2026
MY5 Report Date December 2027
The riparian buffer mitigation credits will be produced by establishing a native forested and herbaceous
riparian plant community and protecting buffers in perpetuity with a conservation easement. For stream
channels and their associated ponds, buffers will have a minimum width of 50 feet (preservation areas with
no less than 30-foot buffers) and a maximum of up to 200 feet from the edge of the channels or ponds.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 4 June 2022

In total, these will be derived from 786,555 ft2 (18.06 acres)from the top of bank to 100 feet of Restoration
(both subject and non-subject); 443,962 ft2 (10.19 acres) of 101 to 200 feet of Restoration (both subject
and non-subject); 58,217 ft2 (1.34 acres) from the top of bank to 100 feet of Enhancement; 2,599 ft2 (0.06
acres) of 101 to 200 feet of Enhancement; 432,621 ft2 (9.93 acres) from the top of bank to 100 feet of
Preservation (both subject and non-subject); and 81,856 ft2 (1.88 acres) from 101 to 200 feet of
Preservation (both subject and non-subject). As outlined in 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295
(o)(4) "the area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25
percent (25%) of the total area of buffer mitigation;"therefore 430,444 ft2(9.88 acres) of subject and non-
subject preservation from the top of bank to 100 feet will be eligible for crediting. A small area along the
left bank of Chappels Creek was impacted by clearing sometime between 2013 and 2017 (Figure 3b), and
therefore will not generate buffer mitigation credits within 50 feet from the top of bank (0.15 acres), per
the Neuse Buffer Rules; however, this area of cleared field will be planted with the rest of the Project as if
it were generating restoration credit(Figure 5).A few small,forested areas along the left bank of TH1 have
a narrow buffer, less than 30 feet from the top of bank to the easement boundary, and therefore will not
generate preservation credit. The new plant community will be established in conjunction with the
treatment of any existing exotic or undesirable plant species. Figure 5 shows the Conceptual Design Plan
for Buffer and Credit Determination Map and Section 2.1 provides details of the mitigation determination
on the Chappels Creek Project.
1.1.1 Parcel Ownership
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this Project includes the parcels
listed in Table 2. EBX will obtain the properties, in fee simple and easement, and will then record a
conservation easement for Project area within the properties. The easement deed and survey plat will be
submitted to DMS and the State Property Office (SPO) for approval and will be held by the State of North
Carolina. The easement deed will follow the DMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template dated
May 5th, 2017, and is included in Appendix C. The recorded easement will allow EBX to proceed with the
Project development and protect the mitigation assets in perpetuity.A finalized copy of the land protection
instrument will be included in Appendix C.
Table 2. Parcel and Landowner Information
Landowner Pin or Tax Parcel ID Agreement Type County
EBX LLC 0913-00-58-9674 Fee Simple Person
David White 0913-00-67-1985 Easement Person
EBX Neuse I LLC 0913-02-65-8429 Fee Simple Person
TFF Holdings LLC 0913-04-54-8152 Easement Person
1.2 Project Location
The Chappels Creek Project is within the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit HUC 03020201, 14-digit HUC
03020201010010 and DWR Sub-basin Number 03-04-01.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 5 June 2022

The Project is located in Person County approximately four miles southeast of Somerset, NC (Figure 1).To
access the Project from Raleigh, take US-70 West to US-501 North. From US-501 North, take a right onto
Antioch Church Road and travel east until the intersection of Kermit Duncan Road; the parcel can be
accessed via a gravel road about a half mile south from the intersection, on the right side of the road.The
coordinates are 36.322, -78.945.
1.3 Existing Conditions
1.3.1 Surface Water Classification
The current State water quality classifications for Chappels Creek is Class WS-III and NSW. Water Supply-
III (WS-III) waters are protected for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes where WS-I or II
classification is not feasible. These waters are also protected for Class C uses. Nutrient Sensitive Waters
(NSW) are intended for waters needing additional nutrient management due to being subject to excessive
growth of microscopic and macroscopic vegetation (NCDWQ 2011).
1.3.2 Physiography and Soils
The Project is located within the Carolina Slate Belt Level IV ecoregion within the Piedmont Level III
ecoregion. The geology of the area is comprised of "mineral rich metavolcanic and metasedimentary
rocks," which is finer grained and less metamorphosed than other ecoregions within the Piedmont.
Because of this, the rocks within the region are somewhat less resistant to erosion, leading to lower
elevations and wider valleys. This region is described as also having dissected irregular plains, small hills,
linear ridges, and low to moderate gradient streams with mostly boulder and cobble substrates (Figure
6a and 6b). Quaternary or Tertiary-age silts and clays are characteristic of this ecoregion. Soils within this
region tend to have higher silt compositions due to deeply weathered volcanic slates and include fine,
kaolinitic, thermic Typic Hapludults such as Georgeville and Herndon soil types. Within and surrounding
the Project area are a few impoundments that seep into the stream channel. Typical land use throughout
this ecoregion include pine plantations, row crop, pasture, cattle, hay, and poultry production.
The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) depicts seven soil mapping units across the Project
(Figure 7). The Project has Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded,
Georgeville loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, Georgeville loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, Herndon loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes, Herndon loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, Iredell gravelly loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, and
Lignum loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes.The soil characteristics of these map units are summarized in Table 3.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 6 June 2022

Table 3. Project Mapped Soil Series
Map Unit Percent Hydrologic Landscape
Map Unit Name Drainage Class
Symbol Hydric Soil Group Setting
Chewacla and Wehadkee Poorly- Floodplains and
ChA soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, 40% somewhat B/D depressions on
frequently flooded poorly drained floodplains
GeB Georgeville loam,2 to 6 0% Well drained B Interfluves
percent slopes
GeC Georgeville loam, 6 to 0% Hillslopes on
Well drained B
10 percent slopes ridges
HrB Herndon loam, 2 to 6 0%° Well drained B Interfluves
percent slopes
HrC Herndon loam, 6 to 10 0% Hillslopes on
Well drained B
percent slopes ridges
Iredell gravelly loam, 2 3% Moderately
C/D Interfluves
IrB to 6 percent slopes well drained
Lignum loam, 2 to 6 1% Moderately
D Interfluves
Lg B percent slopes well drained
1.3.3 Wetlands
National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping depicts three, non-riverine wetlands within the Project
boundaries (Figure 2).Two small freshwater ponds (PUBHh) are located along the northern reaches of the
Project and have been unofficially named Pond A and Pond B. The wetland to the west, along JM1 (Pond
A), is the result of beaver damming and feeds into the connecting channel below; to the east, along JM2
(Pond B), is a man-made impoundment, which filters into the stream below via a six-inch metal pipe. The
floodplain of Chappels Creek features a stream/wetland complex toward the southeastern portion of the
Project and is classified as palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous, temporarily flooded (PFO1A). The
jurisdictional boundaries are not confirmed since this Project will not require a Jurisdictional
Determination.
1.3.4 Landscape Communities
A. Existing Vegetation Communities
Currently, the vegetative cover of the Project is primarily comprised of active row crop mixed with
piedmont alluvial forest. Common species within the Project include river birch (Betula nigra), shagbark
hickory/other hickory species (Carya ovata/sp.), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer
rubrum), eastern red cedar(Juniperus virginiana), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), American beech (Fagus
grandifolia), black walnut (Juglans nigra), white oak (Quercus alba), willow oak (Quercus phellos), winged
elm (Ulmus alata), tulip poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), box elder(Acer
negundo), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis). Exotic
invasive species such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and tree-of-
heaven (Ailanthus altissima) are dense in some areas.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 7 June 2022

B. Riparian Vegetation
Entering the Project from the east as a forested, palustrine stream/wetland complex, Chappels Creek runs
through the Project, flowing north to south, and has three tributaries branching from it (JM1, EN2, and
TH1). A narrow, yet intact riparian buffer of mature hardwoods exists along the right bank at the top of
Chappels Creek before meeting JM1. At this point, the riparian buffer becomes more disjointed, impacted
by ongoing crop production, which has led to significant habitat and water quality degradation with a loss
of stabilizing vegetation. Rye is the current primary row crop growing adjacent to this reach. The stream is
sparsely forested on either bank until it reaches the bottom of the Project where it regains its riparian
buffer on the left bank,while the right bank remains exposed to row crops.As stated earlier,a small portion
of the left bank, upstream of its confluence with JM1, was cleared for row crop sometime between 2013
and 2017 (Figure 3b).The presence of invasive plant species such as Chinese privet and tree-of-heaven is
evident throughout portions of the riparian area.
JM1,a headwater tributary of Chappels Creek enters the Project from the north,flowing under an overhead
powerline and through a series of in-line beaver impoundments (collectively, Pond A), towards Antioch
Church Road. Most of the right bank at the northern portion of JM1 is densely forested with mature
hardwoods, while the left bank is exposed to row crops and lacks a riparian buffer. The southern portion
ofJM1 is sparsely forested and the presence of invasive species, specifically Chinese privet, multiflora rose,
and tree-of-heaven, is evident. A fallow field runs along the left bank of JM1, offering little to no woody
vegetation and a poorly defined riparian buffer, while the right bank is mostly exposed to row crops with
little to no riparian buffer. Rye is the current primary row crop growing adjacent to this reach.
JM2 is an intermittent channel beginning at the base of the dam for Pond B where it is fed via a six-inch
metal buried pipe. There is little to no riparian buffer along JM2, and the stream banks contain mostly
weedy, herbaceous vegetation, lacking any woody vegetation. Further downstream, red maple and box
elder create a very narrow buffer along the banks. Rye is the primary row crop growing adjacent to the
channel.
Pond B is a man-made impoundment, most likely used for agricultural purposes, created sometime after
1977 (Figure 3a). The areas to the east and southwest of the pond are in active row crop, while the
northwest portion is buffered by forest. Rye is the primary row crop surrounding the pond.The dam at the
south end of the pond will be protected for use as an access easement to the riparian area surrounding
the pond.
EN1 meets the Project from the west and briefly flows east intermittently before coming to a confluence
with JM1. The exposed right bank runs along a field of rye, while the left bank has a more developed
riparian buffer of mature hardwoods.
On the eastern side of the Project, EN2, a non-subject intermittent channel fed by a linear wetland,
originates just above where Chappels Creek enters in. The stream is mostly unbuffered on both its right
and left banks, sitting within a fallow field historically manipulated by row crops and livestock.Some weedy
vegetation and trees are sparsely scattered along the banks, including box elder, eastern red cedar, and
sweet gum.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 8 June 2022

The final stream flowing within the southernmost Project boundaries is TH1, a small intermittent channel
originating from an offsite beaver pond to the east. It has a fully forested riparian buffer of mature
hardwoods. The area surrounding the channel has been heavily impacted by beaver activity.
1.3.5 Existing Conditions Photos ¢r
• 1.4
I. �
I
e
M�
71�, y, . t —k,, �Y1 tit��l I.I ,{ ,
r s eta 6 r �� iL,i
Top of Beaver Pond A Lower Beaver Pond A
June 1,2022 June 1,2022
"„ aam" 1
" ' -, -.' 7444-:„",—iii .,, - 4 :.,' • ,r-414C--!: ,,'„
r
14:
P f
q 9"
Looking Downstream along JM1 Left Bank of JM2
June 1,2022 June 1,2022
i .
ga
•
wir .: '�
� 4WNW
' ° '.jA 1,L,•' .r S 1� y} 'i 1l. 4I
t k �.r�^t Y r _ 11 _ M
5 a"MT. � 'g fi , d^' f .r.` ,.d >
t 44nr .a 4,z fig ,u 4i; 4o a l \ ;�--Wi
Pond B Buffer Condition along JM2
June 1,2022 June 1,2022
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 9 June 2022

s 4 ? . -Ire:?fY •Le. t
Y • .1
� ��.� hA 5- � � i5i t./�° f � 7+, '�� des d'
.may g •',,p y -,",.i , 11"`'a,, '� _S�� 3g, „.
•
Buffer Condition Downstream JM1 Buffer Condition Downstream EN1
June 1,2022 June 1,2022
T._ kE A
'
•
2i y
' i S'�
}'{'� 'F_ kS
Buffer Condition along EN2 Buffer Condition along Righ:Bark of EN2
June 1,2022 June 1,2022
ALP47P11111111 ,
y
s aY !
s
y
' S 4
Fallow
it �Whafy-Kf y{ 3 $ A r 1
T Yo
Field Adjacent to EN2/Chappels Creek Chappels Creek Left Bank
June 1,2022 June 1,2022
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 10 June 2022

/ f 4, d 4 k P'
.: �, ,. ;✓r, ' It s'._Ne 4'^ - r`
PT�° :�y
"3 y = u k 7 ?S.
•; � -a 4
Looking Downstream Chappels Creek Looking Upstream Chappels Creek
June 1,2022 June 1,2022
ira
ki ..t « s "go-
";:,-;iic:' ram i 1 -.Nil.'-f .f.' -.. :--.i
,a .a' y, ,r Via : r j:- ''m, w l
x� Ye
y
,•„'t .. Rt - ct.
Buffer Condition along TH1 Buffer Condition along TH1
June 1,2022 June 1,2022
2 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
2.1 Determination of Credits
This Project has the potential to generate up to 1,009,091.298 riparian buffer mitigation credits within a
49.27-acre conservation easement (not including a 0.75 acre access easement) as depicted in Figure 5.
These will be derived from buffer restoration, buffer enhancement, and buffer preservation, on subject and
non-subject streams.The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated will service the Neuse 01 watershed,
specifically the Upper Falls Lake Watershed. Also, some of these buffer mitigation credits, where viable,
can be converted to nutrient offset credit in accordance with the Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule, 15A
NCAC 02B .0703. The total potential buffer mitigation credits that the Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
will generate are summarized in Table 4.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 11 June 2022

Table 4. Chappels Creek Project(DMS#: 100179) Riparian Buffer Mitigation Summary
Total Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Restoration 1,230,517 933,062.607
Enhancement 60,815 29,537.335
Preservation* 430,444 46,491.356
Total Riparian Buffer 1,721,777 1,009,091.298
*The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer mitigation per
15A NCAC 0295(o)(5)and 15A NCAC 0295(o)(4).
The detailed Project credit breakdown utilizing the DWR "Project Credit Table Template" (Updated
February 2022), including buffer credits that are convertible to nutrient offset credit, is provided in
Appendix A. Where viable, buffer mitigation credits can be converted to nutrient offset credit in
accordance with the Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule, 15A NCAC 02B .0703. Figure 8 depicts buffer
restoration areas that are convertible to nutrient offset credit.This total area that is convertible to nutrient
offset amounts to 1,218,812 ft2 which would deliver 63,599.239 lbs of Nitrogen and 4,096.281 lbs of
phosphorus offset. Furthermore, Figure 9 depicts riparian zones of 50, 100, and 200 feet from stream top
of banks to demonstrate width requirements for crediting.
2.2 Other regulatory considerations
2.2.1 Environmental Screening and Documentation
Because DMS mitigation projects are considered to be a category of activities that do not individually or
cumulatively have an impact on the human environment, they do not require preparation of an
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. To ensure that a project meets the
"Categorical Exclusion"criteria,the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) and NCDMS have developed
a categorical exclusion (CE) checklist that is included as part of each mitigation project's Environmental
Screening process. The CE Approval Form for the Chappels Creek Project is included in Appendix D and
was approved by DMS and FHWA in May 2021.
2.2.2 Threatened and Endangered Species
Plants and animals with a federal classification of endangered or threatened are protected under provisions
of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. According to the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPAC) database review tool
(accessed August 6th, 2020) and the self-certification process conducted by RES and submitted to the
USFWS on March 29th, 2021, the list of proposed threatened and endangered species includes the Neuse
River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus), and Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia
masoni).The Chappels Creek Mitigation Project does not contain any suitable habitat for the Neuse River
Waterdog, the Carolina Madtom, nor the Atlantic Pigtoe. A self-certification letter sent to USFWS (on
March 29th, 2021). This consultation was conducted as part of the CE process and supporting
documentation and correspondence can be found in Appendix D.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 12 June 2022

The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act requires consultation with state fish and wildlife agencies when
"waters of any stream or other body of water are proposed or authorized, permitted or licensed to be
impounded, diverted...or otherwise controlled or modified." The North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) was consulted during the CE process and the NCWRC did not comment on any
state or federally listed species; however, they did recommend the use of biodegradable and wildlife-
friendly sediment and erosion control devices and to treat invasive species as part of the Project.
Documentation is included in Appendix D.
2.2.3 Cultural Resources
A review of North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS Web Service (accessed August 6th,
2020) database did not reveal any registered occurrences within the Project area. There were also no
occurrences within a half-mile radius. RES consulted with the SHPO during the CE process and the SHPO
had "conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project." Cultural Resources screening met the Categorical Exclusion Criteria for FHWA and DMS
projects and documentation is included in Appendix D.
2.2.4 Project Constraints
There are no significant constraints to the Project. The Project is not within a FEMA Zone AE or FEMA
Regulatory Floodway; therefore, FEMA permitting will not be required. An overhead powerline runs
through the northern portion of the Project, creating an easement break through at JM1 and Pond A. A
second overhead powerline adjacent to the bottom of the northern portion of the Project runs along
Antioch Church Road, outside of the easement boundaries; therefore, an easement break is not needed
(Figure 2). The Project is located within five miles of one air transport facility, Raleigh Regional Airport at
Person County (Figure 1). An easement break near the confluence of JM1 and JM2-B has been included
for landowner access, as well as access to the western side of the Project boundary.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 13 June 2022

3 RIPARIAN RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND
PRESERVATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation areas adjacent to streams are shown in Figure 5 and
were determined viable by the DWR in the letter dated January 20, 2022 (Appendix B).
3.1 Site Preparation
Preparation at the Project will involve spraying crops and exotic invasive species, applying soil
amendments, seeding native plants,and planting trees. Soil amendments will be provided across the entire
planted area based on the results of soil fertility tests. The soils fertility tests will be based on soil samples
collected within proposed riparian restoration areas across the site. A seed mix will be chosen to maximize
successful herbaceous growth in all riparian areas while also incorporating valuable pollinator species. All
riparian planting areas will be seeded using a no-till drill prior to tree planting.Temporary and permanent
riparian seeding and bare root plantings shall be planted according to the planting plan (Section 3.3).
The limits of the riparian restoration and enhancement areas will be surveyed post-planting and seeding,
and the information will be provided in the As-Built report and plat.
3.2 Methods
Riparian buffer mitigation activities will include restoration, enhancement, and preservation along streams.
All restoration, enhancement, and preservation areas were determined by the mitigation determination
performed during the viability assessment by DWR (Appendix B).
3.2.1 Riparian Restoration Activities
For intermittent and perennial stream channels and in-line ponds, the Project will provide riparian buffer
and surrounding area restoration in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (n) and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3). Restoration activities will include the planting of bare root
plantings as described in Section 3.3.These restoration activities will begin from the tops of the proposed
stream banks and extend a minimum of 50 feet from the stream outward to a maximum of 200 feet
perpendicular to the stream channel. Restoration will occur where cropland and fallow pasture are
currently present. Specifically, JM1 (including Pond A), Pond B, JM2, EN1, EN2, and Chappels Creek will
include riparian buffer restoration (Figure 5). The cropland buffer surrounding Pond B will be viable for
non-subject buffer restoration mitigation credits, to the north of the powerline right-of-way, as long as
the controlled access easement on top of the dam is secured, providing connection to JM2.
3.2.2 Riparian Enhancement Activities
Enhancement will occur in forested areas within the Project, found in small patches along EN1 and
Chappels Creek where the riparian areas are disturbed by non-native and nuisance species, leaving the
riparian areas functioning less than their highest potential.These areas will be treated for unwanted species
and planted with bareroot species to enhance existing forest in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer
Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n).
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 14 June 2022

3.2.3 Riparian Preservation Activities
Preservation will take place in limited forested areas within the Project where existing tree growth was
determined adequate, and in accordance with the alternative mitigation option of Consolidated Buffer
Mitigation Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4) and (5) and the DWR buffer viability assessment (Appendix
B). Specifically, portions of JM1 (including Pond A), Pond B, EN1, EN2, Chappels Creek, and TH1 contain
forested areas that will be preserved (Figure 5). The forested buffer surrounding Pond B will be viable for
non-subject buffer preservation mitigation credits, to the north of the powerline right-of-way, as long as
the controlled access easement on top of the dam is secured, providing connection to JM2. In addition,
preservation activities will include treating exotic invasive species, specifically Chinese privet and tree-of-
heaven. Furthermore, preservation will entail the permanent protection of the riparian area from cutting,
clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer through a
conservation easement that will have clearly visible easement markers and signs (see Section 3.4 for
further description of the easement boundaries).
3.3 Planting Plan
All riparian restoration and enhancement areas will be planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet from
streams with bare root tree seedlings on a nine by six-foot spacing to achieve an initial density of
approximately 800 trees per acre. In addition, these areas will be seeded with an herbaceous seed mix to
provide rapid herbaceous cover and promote immediate buffer effectiveness as well as habitat for
pollinators and other wildlife. The seed blend will contain both temporary and permanent seed and will
include taproot species. The list of seed species to be sown and a proposed composition percentage of
the mix can be found in Table 6.The seed will be sown utilizing a no-till drill. Planting will occur in all areas
proposed for riparian buffer restoration and enhancement and will meet the performance standards
outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295.This includes treating invasive species and planting at least four
species of native hardwood bare root trees.The Project most similarly represents a dry-mesic oak-hickory
forest (Schafale 2012); this natural community type helps guide the creation of a planting list for all areas
throughout the Project. This community composition is highly diverse and is suitable given the Project's
soil and landscape characteristics and will provide water quality and ecological benefits.The initial planting
of bare root trees will occur before Spring 2023. The suite of bare root stems will be thoroughly mixed
prior to planting to ensure maximum diversity throughout the planted areas The list of bare root tree
species to be planted and their percentage of total species composition can be found in Table 5.Wherever
possible, mature vegetation will be preserved and incorporated into the buffer. Some areas adjacent to
the forested areas may require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red
maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Additionally, the livestake plantings
mentioned above in Section 3.2.4 will consist of black willow (Salix nigra) and silky dogwood (Corpus
amomum).
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 15 June 2022

Table 5. Tree Planting List
Bare Root Planting Tree Species
%of Total
Spacing Canopy or
Species Common Name Unit Type Species
(ft) Sub-canopy
Composition
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 15
Betula nigra River birch 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 15
Quercus phellos Willow oak 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 15
Quercus rubra Northern red oak 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 15
Quercus alba White oak 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 10
Quercus lyrata Overcup oak 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 10
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip poplar 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9x6 Bare Root Canopy 5
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 9X6 Bare Root Sub-canopy 5
Corn us florida Flowering dogwood 9x6 Bare Root Sub-canopy 5
Table 6. Proposed Seed Mix List
Scientific Name Common Name Percent
Composition
Elymus virginicus Virgina Wild Rye 25%
Panicum virgatum Switchgrass 25%
Andropogon gerardii Big Bluestem 10%
Coreopsis lanceolata Lanceleaf Coreopsis 10%
Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestem 10%
Echinacea purpurea Purple Coneflower 7%
Heliopsis helianthoides Oxeye Sunflower 7%
Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly Milkweed 3%
Helianthus angustifolius Narrowleaf Sunflower 3%
3.4 Easement Boundaries
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Project and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by marker, bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means
as allowed by Project conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundaries will be marked with signs
identifying the property as a mitigation project and will include the name of the long-term steward and a
contact number. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on
an as needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities and
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 16 June 2022

the conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to
DWR.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 17 June 2022

4 MONITORING PLAN
4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments will be conducted. Riparian vegetation monitoring
where riparian buffer mitigation credits are being generated will be based on the "Carolina Vegetation
Survey-Ecosystem Enhancement Program Protocol for Recording Vegetation: Level 1-2 Plot Sampling Only
Version 4.2". Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five years and will be
conducted during the fall season with the first year occurring at least six months from initial planting.
Monitoring plots will be installed a minimum of 100 meters squared in size and will cover at least two
percent of the planted mitigation area. The planted area is 29.79 acres, and there will be 25 vegetation
plots measuring riparian buffer mitigation success. These plots will be randomly placed throughout the
planted riparian restoration area and will be representative of the riparian community (Figure 10a and
lob). The following data will be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or
volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots will be flagged with flagging tape.
The measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree
species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of stems, at a density of at least 260 stems per
acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards
upon approval by DWR. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become
dominant or alter the desired community structure of the site.
Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports.Visual
inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that applicable areas are being maintained and compliant.
A visual assessment of the conservation easement will also be performed each year to confirm:
• Easement markers are in good condition throughout the site;
• no encroachment has occurred;
• no invasive species occur in areas were invasive species were treated,
• diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement areas; and
• there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
A summary of project monitoring and maintenance activities can be found in Table 7.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 18 June 2022

Table 7. Summary of Project Monitoring and Maintenance Activities
Component/
Monitoring Maintenance through project close-out
Feature
Vegetation Annual Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the
vegetation targeted plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair
monitoring activities may include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and
fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species shall be treated by mechanical
and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation requiring herbicide
application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. Vegetation maintenance
activities will be documented and reported in annual monitoring
reports. Vegetation maintenance will continue through the monitoring
period.
Invasive and Visual Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none
Nuisance Assessment become dominant or alter the desired community structure of the
Vegetation Project. Locations of invasive and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
Also, see Appendix E for more details.
Project Boundary Visual Project boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear
Assessment distinction between the mitigation project and adjacent properties.
Boundaries will be marked with signs identifying the property as a
mitigation project and will include the name of the long-term steward
and a contact number. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as allowed by Project
conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed,
damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as-
needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/signage maintenance
will continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Project Maintenance
Adaptive measures will be developed,or appropriate remedial actions taken if in the event that the project,
or a specific component of the project, fails to achieve the defined success criteria. DMS must approve all
adaptive management plans prior to submittal to DWR.
Remedial actions will be designed to achieve the success criteria specified in this Mitigation Plan, and will
include identification of the causes of failure, remedial design approach, work schedule, and monitoring
criteria that will consider physical and climatic conditions.
Initial plant maintenance may include a one-time mowing, prior to initial planting to remove undesirable
species. If mowing is deemed necessary by RES during the monitoring period, RES must first receive
approval by DMS and then by DWR prior to any mowing activities to ensure that no buffer violations will
be committed. Failure to receive approval to mow within the Neuse River buffer, as defined in 15A NCAC
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 19 June 2022

02B .0714 by DWR, could result in Neuse River buffer violations and violations of the conservation
easement. If necessary, RES will develop a species-specific control plan.
5 STEWARDSHIP
The Project will be transferred to the NCDEQ Stewardship Program. NCDEQ Stewardship Program shall
serve as the conservation easement holder and entity responsible for long term stewardship of the Project.
This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-term steward for the property and will
conduct periodic inspection of the Project to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation
easement are upheld. The NCDEQ Stewardship Program is developing an endowment system within the
non-reverting, interest-bearing Conservation Lands Conservation Fund Account.The use of funds from the
Endowment Account will be governed by North Carolina General Statute GS 113A-232(d)(3). Interest
gained by the endowment fund may be used for the purpose of stewardship, monitoring, stewardship
administration, and land transaction costs, if applicable.
The Stewardship Program will periodically install signage to identify boundary markings as needed. Any
livestock or associated fencing or permanent crossings will be the responsibility of the owner of the
underlying fee to maintain.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 20 June 2022

6 REFERENCES
Endangered Species Act of 1973. Public Law 93-205, 87 Stat. 884. 16 USC 1531-1543,
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2018. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. North Carolina
Panel 2602; map number 3720260200K, effective 6/20/2018.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934. Public Law 85-72, 79 Stat. 216. 16 USC 661-667(d).
Lee, T.L, Peet, R.K., Roberts, S.D., and Wentworth, T.R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-Iev1-2.pdf.
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended Section 106). 16 USC 470. 36 CFR 800, 23 CFR 771,
36 CFR 60, 36 CFR 63.
NCDWQ (North Carolina Division of Water Quality). 2011. A Guide to Surface Freshwater Classifications in
North Carolina. Raleigh. http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/
get file?p I id=1169848&folderld=2209568&name=DLFE-35732.pdf; accessed January 2022.
NCDWQ. (North Carolina Division of Water Quality). 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent
and Perennial Streams and Their Origins. Version 4.11. Raleigh.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 — Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
NC Environmental Management Commission.2020. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0714—Neuse River Basin: Nutrient
Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers.
NCNHP (North Carolina Natural Heritage Program). 2019. Natural Heritage Element Occurrences. 2020.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) - Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 1994.
Soil Survey of Person County, North Carolina.
USDA-NRCS.2014.Web Soil Survey GIS Data .http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm;
accessed March 2022.
USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2015. Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPAC)
Online Screening Tool. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/; accessed 2020.
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Buffer Mitigation Plan
DMS Project#: 100179 21 June 2022

Project Figures

14,1
Stovall 39 Norline En
Macon
ez Chappels Creek
Mitigation Project Williamsboro - Vaughan Littleton
le LsjeLeasburgboro Middleburg Warrenton
Alle, ville xe 0sz,)
CD Lewis
Rb m C
Airl
Hightowers , 'D Henderson
Oxford South
„9
ee Henderson CDArcola Br
T„,b,,1,k ri
I,trdle NI_ s 3v
Culbreth Hollister
Prospect Hill ® 0 Epsom .T1,
Alert Q
CU � Kittrell
Rocky Ford
Centerville
dar Grove F:,I Al—A
Butner White Level
y, Creedmocr
'.) Franklinton Louisburg
O Hilliardston
Mebane
I. f Castalia
sborcugh Grissom �—'`�
lie ds
Justice
Urr,�ers ty Gorman Red Oa
•u 0 Margaret ()
C
Di am _
ae,sr e Forest Nashville
Oaks Bunn Momeyer
haw Calvander Bet' • r s Spring Hope
Rolesville 0
hitney Chapel Hill Daddysville
Neuse
Dogwood I 0
Acres 0 y_
Mandale C •y Millbrook c)
tw
, 5s orrisville zit Ze Ion
Feamngton CD _ c E
Cary Knightdale Middlesex CP
Bynum Raleigh g Wendell Bailey
V Sims
O c3 WilsonvilleOto A.-x ea 0.) Wilson
Pittsboro
Q Gamer W
Auburn Archer Lodge
New Hill � 0J White Oak
Holl •rings Clayton 0 Lucama
Black Creek
Moncure
w - Powhatan
m Kenly
Fuquay- a ina Wilsons Mills
Cumnock Duncan Willow Fremont
0Springs
Selma
Colon McGee
rat, Angier Crossroads Smithfield -ville
Sanford 4°' ® Princeton 755
Broadway ss
Tramway Four Oaks
0 0
Mamers Buies Creek Rosewood
Lillington n
ea
Jhite Hill ,__, B= son au Golds'.ro Nev
9b
I Legend Bentonville Elrot
Mar-Mac
Peacocks
i in Proposed Easement lunn Crossroads "')
Grantham Brogden
If' Neuse River Basin -03020201 (Riparian Buffer Service Area)
iii
Plain View -wton Grove
1 inFalls Lake Service Area (Nutrient Offset Service Area) •pewell
Upper Falls Lake Watershed s rve s CD xi
Corner Vann O Mt rlive Williams ss
Lower Falls Lake Watershed - Crossroads w
m
5 Mile Aviation Zone (a , Faison
Keener 36.322,-78.945
9 Figure 1 - Nutrient Offset and Buffer Date: 4/4/2022
��+w��� i��i. l\ Mitigation Service Area
��Z�ii aig fr�1�'� uc - - Drawn by: EJUf. Pres
rrsitaio Chappels Creek Checked by:JRM
�,�. 0 5 10 Mitigation Project
1 inch=10 miles
Miles Person County.North Carolina Restoring a resil

4'' ..:
-- --%,. .,_'.. ., -. :;,.„' ,.. :',:.,--.. k,,:..',:'::A2..,,,,,i,A, : r, i* rl ' "--"' 10 I..'
Pon. ts�ir:‘,14": *''
n �,
im Crops ,�p� z !�`
.1 ,
1, •
III
\-. JM • 4, 11
1, I Cn i t I ViAWanra
, ;;.' Allill •
., ria ,,,,..,,,,,:, ArtEs* , 1
Ai sisin..0aisi
,41. e �t�``�I
�l
\4111k, 4Ik :irki
30 maw N -N,
. _
, *air
. , ... ,„ , c- _
, _
__ ,
_ .. A - JIMIUIVS01111r/W *,
,., it's' -4'
•
ter 7�► •D inta y a c
r
E.
ill -,,k _ -:,..:
--- 40014*
'OS', I ..;,..
X
• i::.:,
asfr„ ,
Legend 1y Oh��
g
In Proposed Conservation Easementitikici
44
40
EJProposed Access Easement ) 1118 -
is
Project Parcel Boundary �,A
Parcel
a
NWI Wetlands (USFWS Januar 2021) -•_-�
C y
U i FEMA Zone AE(None) ", ':,
Existing Stream
ff.
Perennial / ,L/
Intermittent
44/**/ *
Pond `
U Powerline Right of Way
:4 DWR Stream Origin ' "
N Figure 2- Existing Conditions Date 4/4/2022
g. ��Z4iiM#�11II1�'� �~ wE Drawn by: EJU
q rcilirr VAll`.t.._9, 4i Chappels Creek res
rrs����rLJ
��y�#o 0 350 700 Mitigation Project Checked by:JRM
1 inch=700 feet
Feet Person County,North Carolina

1950 '`` ` 197
t :411 .. -
,� ,w f
Suit _ .. t ` �{: R g
Tom• f' _ ii
lift
...4 .3 k • . ,;,,,
44
iliellt
:111:.: : ':,
IL N4. a !
4.4. y
Source.USGS Earth Explorer Source.USGS Earth Explorer
1983 - - -` 1993 s, ,
y-
.000
-yr .
r ifik
H ,
4
�
1 .110„
T
1 r
r
�';? I.. elf a
N4,
r
y
k / ,, itr„,
j ; F . er
list:.'„.,,,,,,,,4. ..:1.--'..i. -, - /..4.-1,7-7-,..,.:,),...1_,.:7,4,....:i.
r
Legend I < °
—.
b:ii 5
Proposed Easement Source:USGS Earth E �� Sour USGS Earth Explorer
a -Proposed Access Easement
i in
n 5 , .
N Figure 3a-Historic Imagery Date: 4/8/2022
g Amp wart; V+,
/�ti„r Drawn by: EJU
E �_��wafair akrik`-Ar -i�� Chappels Creek
0 res
4....A`�� S Checked b:JRM
�„�, o Aso Mitigation Project v
15-5
Il 1 inch=1,500 feet
Feet Person Count , North Carolina Restoring a resa(enr earth for a modern world

2 1
. 0 0 }' ' • � ,y� � yr �. � � tar -4 ��� �� �
gip,
e s;q,t ygi '+ ."y'. Via. / ^\ �_
t 3 ��'%^' °�Rta • _ Iwvl ,,,000 r y \ C r t
i 1 a� 3 a i � r." , 4 , r '�
,,,,,i:.,,,..4,,,,H,...,i,,,A,
1 _ 1 w a r� .,yy E r
,..i. „4,,,,,,„ ,, , , , . ,
�`J"� n,r, �" % 1y +�§" - ( t .rehk 1 " ,1a1, r;• °* s+�"..r" 'y . 4 ,4F•hR1 ''.
x. f ri ram.` -
.
" L"''' '— ..- "-- 1. .1 fl$'' ' ' ,„I Y - '! rr '1,0t41,6:::'t •.' , '\#
y i' r s,,;f'¢�., .,.Ry Vic. s,• " r�. r` r,,�^� ^lr
' T pe /ti',:.'.t a AJ& .i Fk a 4,' ty E ` r w - tj - r' :.y:-1 . ��N \ `' - --55 A.
' , ,#• 66 e V S Z "/1r ,p ^r{Fr,:4i._ ,•k'.::.
s E.
ty S �t .i . ,-
'�i�y3 , ` tl"I3?f r r
;$'R{r .F 2 c 2 A , •
. .1 r' � i k, 11 1'
A' .�
a r1 I' "p-` 9 Source:NC OneMap�,,
> ,may. : t 2*. ti °� '•
Al7 - -+ - 021 ...14.4464,460. � �,�
k- �� tit
i it F /� f -. '- a
iq
is — lY tY`yµ{���^r t '` k '' - y, �~.:.
} �{{
-:411:xia"4 r,i ` 4l+W,M.,s5 N1.'i•!,. ^1
: „.//9,11,,,
T . .� fi i CIA ' ,,,, 4 }. ` ,
�:i.-ir'/r r'a}'1.w^1 t,.•OC 1 Y r
,� 1 1 . - # I R 4 J'�.. 1
4 t
rr ,,,
g ' ' ry 0- fir.^ + :`-',. S,M'P r^'�-';.1 4'd ` r r _ Y
, ,
., -, .
� _ o
4,,, , -,,
, ,, ,,,,,,„ ....„
_ .. ,..
, .
.h. t "\,_n
illit -_,
.c.
Legend a /i Pt f „¢o-
Mk
Proposed Easement
p t4 Source:NC OneMapi in .`` Source:NC OneMap .�
I in
Proposed Access Easement • # a
N Figure 3b-Historic Imagery Date: 4/8/2022
/�,r„r Drawn by: EJU
0 res
E de.m�lierAn':.-...irfi�� w+-E
Chappels Creek
��s� ;A`�"� S Checked b:JRM
f„�, 0 Aso lsoo Mitigation Project v
1 inch=1,500 feet
Feet Person Count , North Carolina Restoring oresifient earth for nmodern world

0
11WnEr
o
v crystal View Dr
o:
c
to
I
to
Sweet P's Delights o d�'P;a
B Crystal Lake 9P
A. arks DaY Rd 4, ��
m lc
d
o ,xo cty ‘al Svt
cc
m o
o c
a n ASP pt CiteE'K
m' �P �a t�nOS e�9
V
's tb
o /rP/�i
G` (OGcand0Rp�ncanPlantarnn
YCO t_AKe " 49501happels Creek
z 3,Mitigation Project boro Allensville
J
cn Sorm se
Q) SR
Q
eged <a
L n P
I. ^ U
IrJI Proposed Conservation Easement —flake
v � Hurdle Mills
Proposed Access Easement Hill
4 Neuse River Basin - 03020201 Rougemont
,,.. n
14-Digit HUC (03020201010010) c)
36.322,-78.945
N
Figure 4- Project Vicinity Date: 4/4/2022
`�-`�nb.t+�'��� `" --_F Dra:e 'byM
n b: EJU
q `_ktook covi�e�,���� Chappels Creek Pres
MitigationProject Che
IN 0 350 700
Person County,North Carolina 1 inch=700 feet
Feet y Rester�,g o res<

•
�„ i �� M - i zk { t Y ✓ f r. ,
�„ �!� �. + V'..Wi� JM1 '. Y'�
" JM1 y y I
'�.. i %. �, ate• .,5,.,-,°1�FA�0'? . M 4 i ; �p ;
s," ° Pond B
Pond A
h'...' JM2
Proposed Access Easement
A,, .. ,,,. (Existing Dam&Pipe Outlet)
/ + 1 f
, , 4,„„ , "IP, , f-„,__. 'N.:. ,,I;;.;„4;0..if". : ,1`......':,,,::.
S '
s '¢
IF _
Legend '
If'
Proposed Conservation Easement(49.27 ac.) i
. 'k\ -1,$: \
If'
•
Proposed Access Easement(0.75 ac.) `� '"
"' "
Parcel Boundary 1r
t
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Approach •
i ":EN 1 )'Restoration (0-100') EN2 ''' =
/ Restoration (101-200') . ,
6 •
Non-Subject Restoration (0-100') / :+, )
tf!-M
Non-Subject Restoration (101-200') . a
/ l ' No Credit 0-50'from ' 'f=
Enhancement(0-100') 'Chappell ,,, „
Creek Top of Bank Due to Clearing
Enhancement(101-200') / Between 2013 and 2017
JM1 '
ink Preservation (0-100') 7 ��`
Preservation (101-200')
L
Non-Subject Preservation (0-100') /
r/ Non-Subject Preservation (101-200')
Non-Crediting �,
x u ."t " `y -
r t , 4,
Stream Type � $2 4 Non Crediting Area
iPerennial Due to<30'Buffer from
;4+t. Top of Bank to Easement fr *
x
i di Intermittent )1/1111ki
�' •F r�,`. Pond � tk"
Overhead Powerline ,„, ,
N
��w��� i��i.
1 Figure 5- Buffer Conceptual Design Date: 4/4/2022
��lilieiNi11er4jitiag - `-F Drawn by EJU res
r�dir r ��itiiii o �.. �t Chappell Creek0
rYt����r��� Checked by:JRM
���',► 0 350 700 Mitigation Project
1 inch=700 feet
Feet Person County,North Carolina

, R. J ( Cein ,�s
i �• •
A
. .,. —
� 1 ,\ u ��
: 0 -:,--(3,- __7 • • : ,I7u c. 3 , �. _mil • r �/ t J 9::) ,-
, ----. .
.. V.L.,__.....y— • ' ,.f:r_______e.,/ ,..-/ j./---'\.\\ i(\ ,..._
..-- -..., ., - ow\ 1):. f _-- , , (
,cc--)---9, I/j
Army
PI tom'. _�as r i ;H C:
.).L.;74/
' /- , .11r0 ,....., -.4.,:,-- ._----, ) . , ,( tt‘
..----. , ft _ _ ? ,-.7A-\\ "-Nip-. _.)
•
A.*
•
�� I _ L, ,/ \\, •: � ( II% I ' iTh0 ic '- _
/ -
‘ .
.....- -;,, . ___
( . 1..,,, .
/
r ,;- _ _,,, __.,,,,, 7-.. \.___, .\_,i7._.,
, , . lis_/„.,\K- • . _, , \ ,,, / .
, ,, . i ; - )) - i - ,, --\- --
(C �� —� _
_ ,5-1/ 11
14 i c7.::--. - 1 ,,i, ,.. 2 ) _L:2. .,/ „,,
. / -7 ,....,,..., ,, , .; ______)
. ___ _
, 1 ( ..z,N i „
, , ,...___ , . ,---____, „
, , , (j,..,t ,i 4 • j
ciL ,, , ' A / &.• 4 --',1 /7, • : , , , ,-----.... ...-
..... _ , .,_ , , : „- r'l fr A iii*Ampit ,
lir• -; , . :1111110PP1 flKillir SIVIIIIII .
"--c=,,,,., , 1.!:_-.,';1' (.....t.::,:f1:,.....-____ ,, (.../--- '. _,,,j ( ,..: ' ,,_ , ' :__ : -'4'p /---/..-
II•
i'� 1_,#,_\.."7.0.,
�,
... Li":7. • '
.,-.•••*-- ' ' ) . ;
Lj lib._ ,t,,, C---- ,::„),„ t(:„........,
it)
t Legend
�\ Proposed Easement
- �J ) --- Proposed Access Easement
i. L . V� ) \.. - . Drainage Area
.� I . +Ji�, J Chappels Creek(2,591 ac)
V \- r
JM1 (309 ac)
../ ,, ri JM2(41 ac)
1
�" EN1 (33 ac)
:4-L,_,,---
� � i TH1 (23 ac)
/y l
N Figure 6a-USGS Quadrangle Date: 4/8/2022
1422#11. P IKVAlt1 w F Timberlake(1982)
��`uraa v+.�� � Drawn by: EJU res
q d_����.:��,,�*�t�����*,t�i.� Chappels Creek0
meow S Mitigation Project Checked by:JRM
HIV 0 1,000 2.000
1 inch=2,000 feet
Feet Person County,North Carolina Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world

:� CRYSTAL vlev:r
IP°
F' u
N
3 C
s
,
v
,.�ilF
1 Vc...
t?
L egend
EJProposed Easement
Proposed Access Easement (YNNY'F
N Figure 6b-USGS-The National Map Date: 4/8/2022
��w... i��i.
�,�...:..,..1.,.t:.�, w E Drawn by: EJU 0 res
q imktotr fr ll`•>r449* 1� Chappels Creek
rrs����r+"LJ
IP 1110 0 500 1,000 Mitigation Project Checked by:JRM
1 inch=1,000 feet
E. Feet Person County,North Carolina Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world

IP -1111t7 c
Y
0011111E I!
00401111100. .- .
. v i-hef 11
:4a
rr - 1 � + t+
-. 40
•
s , p lim.P
u.ere •111111
r• VP
11 IN
ill.t. 4
OLT\
� )11: IIore =
1
a
411191. I iiiiillihm. 4E. . ill . ,e, ilk •
tIlibiii rigi 1 ,•n
111
„li
1213 . .
GoEc
. ). "2/1- 41111/1 r
, - :._r o r 1
I . e-B I. t(31.ec
Ivi .
Cie j•-r, )1
,, . NI.\...._
Legend 4'S'i1!,9.,''.,' I,11 ..
Millip
,,,
Proposed Easement -
Proposed Access Easement
{ k OrLii..
N Figure 7- NRCS Soil Survey(1995) Date: 4/8/2022
�,4.442MEN..l.,10 w E Drawn by: EJU ( ) reS
q Arakt r r;gam�`a.airr Nip Chappels Creek
a.m.,.
��y�#� 0 350 700 Mitigation Project Checked by:JRM
1 inch=700 feet
Feet Person County,North Carolina Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world

;4C,i1
t•7--------------,
•.,, . ,
. .
s a 1
, , J
'IV11 ri4.''
....... • ik, 7
,,,,--4., ,,,,,,
, - .,,,,
..4.
-
r• # 7- • ,'..--: . ...v1k-. e -, ,
NY .;. ,-,, , ,',,,!, , :f....`":.," %.: ,• ,' ,-
b41,-;INdt'7,t,:cifsig-4.4
- .,..*
LC fe*.
„
__
,• ...„,;
• „,. , L,
II S
• ,, , ' ',1 .( tkir,i
•
---''
I
..„ ,
r---...
•,',A,..,.
... . .
Legend
If' Proposed Conservation Easement 'Z ,
. .
If' Proposed Access Easement . . ... ., _
P.,
Parcel Boundary , ,...... .
Nutrient Offset(0-100') ., .„
iwW Nutrient Offset(101-200)
',..5. Stream Type
1 A Perennial , •,,„er' '' .- ','''. ,...* fidifialk, V
, f , „, li. wirjr.oaluk—•
Aw
Intermittent ,, .
.
, .r :'. ,
°:',4''''',`
Pond -. , , „
,..' - y* -...s. ,,... ,7 •,., , , 1' 't'. '. ' ' ,, ,
Overhead Powerline
Figure 8- Nutrient Offset Conceptual Design Date: 4/4/2022
i 1\
1 4frilitil 1.1 1 OTIS OA Drawn by: EJU
g AVOIrok-1451001.04-Np t Chappels Creek
..77 ....4,v.„
Pres
, ...... 0 350 700 Mitigation Project Checked by:JRM
1 inch=700 feet
Feet Person County,North Carolina

•
( '� "J
J
r
:M1
i
\ ,
ofx
-\ '' - ' ' ' .. . '-
ti
t w a
�� %;
I
" e .
Y r:
.r
�y 77..
/
'\'''"/:1:1 ' -
Y ; , '. , P
� \ 4
i
i s
i':‘,', ..{;:ii ,,:: , 4i . ,/ .„01,„,,,, . .
I P
Legend
Proposed Easement r' i '
If'
i If'
Proposed Access Easementr, - `` /"'
Project Parcel Boundary ir
.
�i 1 ;Riparian Zones
1� j
050'
, ,, ' —---- --v,:: '''„..„.-,e2i.'',)11,, ',,ZC•ki.. I ,
p,› n0-100' i ' , T'" r;
2.
0 200'
Stream Type `` ' ', y,
Intermittent " * 1 ; f J • � i� fs`
Perennial •
�,''
Pond ' i 'w '
�.,
r
N Figure 9- Riparian Zones Date: 4/8/2022
�.1...fisli�.� pres
`�-`���+�'��� `" ---F :e 'byM
Mitigation Project Che
eat 0 400 800
Person County,North Carolina 1 inch=800 feet
Feet y

. ..
. ' • ' `' *0. - t).\k,'''''f'k.\\Ci,,,,At" ''',,`4,11N, ,”,' ,, ,,,
' ‘ ,\:, ..,,\,,‘-,\‘'\Yst,,,*4,7-:\ ',,,.,,,,,4.4..1ft , ..,,
\ `',,,ti!,t‘.:n"u `\ -t-,'etV'k "-
, i :4,44,--",x%4 \,,-:.. \'-:`k.,.,,, .--',!1: -1,,,vA,,,,\').,‘"f",t,.•..kk.:,"4.,,‘'. `''''‘, ' '','"'N -r.,-.1, r
.,
,....
..,,,-....
„ .
**1"#'
.. 'qiip
• `4 ,
.Wr N,
464, ,# , • ‘
\ y
. •* Pond B
S
Legend
,•
I' * / i
•
. ,
nProposed Conservation Easement(49.27 ac.)
n
•-'
Proposed Access Easement(0.75 ac.)
Planted Area (29.79 ac.)
•.- , , aa' ,er
- Restoration
•j
••
•Z•; Enhancement
1
i ,.:*.. '...0 ri-1 Vegetation Plot(25 Fixed Plots)
1, i ',`.',) h., .•,, ,, , „ ,, , ,‘ t,,,., ,„,,ttf iitm ,,,,,
Riparian Buffer Approach
'- -*. , -,, , , , ' r, '4.;f:.!'-':c'*4';‘''''S',4•.,, - , , , .
: Restoration (0-100')
;,,..3'r,,,'• ','', :;,,,, .„. , , . '.1-.. _ e 4 .
A.,;;1?-,`''-,.. - ' ''' . Restoration (101-200)
,,o , ) • "\ ' rr.tat ,,,, ,, ''.,
Non-Subject Restoration (0-100')
It, 7 Non-Subject Restoration (101-200)
. .".V'' ''', Enhancement(0-100')
, -- Enhancement(101-200)
Preservation (0-100')
' / Preservation (101-200)
' ,.•4!. Non-Subject Preservation (0-100')
...
/ Non-Subject Preservation (101-200)
Non-Crediting
2 ,
f... .
Stream Type
Perennial
. ,
Intermittent
Pond
g r
F.- Figure 10a- Monitoring Plan Date: 4/4/2022
1 41.11141111;441ilfirig&
t Chappels Creek Drawn by EJU
i ..__::,..i.o..,....,.....0..
0
.- arsi 75 350
tato
Mitigation Project Checked by JRM res
.- iyet 1
4? Il 1 inch=350 feet
Feet Person Count ,North Carolina

W;o 4 -d ,:- y r ,,,, 0
F' ,
4,,,, % to "41t.-..,' • „.., A . 4,.., le...,_,4
1'- . ilie.' '
V,,, 0,„...i2,..-,k, , sy ,,,,,- ,,...,:4
-.� �j�1A�'►� a.� �-# ,*4 �' ; *
\ ►�� ♦♦i�7��i
��� �i�IV a /��♦�i�• N.,..,
-4\:..,,, ..,,,,,,,„ ,,,,,,, ,.,„ ,,/ . '' ' ' ' ;Lik‘,.'',',','tat 's,'S , :• Legend
�• :!• ... EJ Proposed Conservation Easement(49.27 ac.)
� Ai 0••••7 ♦���� Proposed Access Easement(0.75 ac.)
►�� ,.' / �� Planted Area (29.79 ac.)
0 ��� �♦ /, � Restoration
.I •�•• �/ ;Z• Enhancement
��� 4.. � ri-1 Vegetation Plot(25 Fixed Plots)
��♦e !► 'Ilk Riparian Buffer Approach
* A,, ��♦•A Restoration (0-100')
*
4�vi /i Restoration (101-200')
*�\ Fri Non-Subject Restoration (0-100')
4 , '7 Non-Subject Restoration (101-200')
_ ,����
Enhancement(0 100')
i '. ' ;
Enhancement(101-200')
��♦I `;,.
fr 4 Preservation (0 100')
;♦♦`, 1 ' / Preservation (101-200')
,fit A Non-Subject Preservation (0-100')
� � f
.�t , Non-Subject Preservation (101-200')
4��e Fri Non-Crediting
Stream Type
Perennial
4;; + Intermittent
z Pond
N Figure 10b- Monitoring Plan Date: 4/4/2022
g. ��Z�ii�i#41414t'�ti+~1 w - F :::::e:YbyE:
���350 Mitigation Project
1 inch=350 feet
Feet Person County,North Carolina ePsror�ng �Ps

Appendix A
Project Buffer Mitigation Credits

Table 1.Chappels Creek,100179,Project Credits
Neuse 03020201-Upper Falls Lake Project Area
19.16394 N Credit Conversion Ratio(ft2/pound)
297.54099 P Credit Conversion Ratio(ft2/pound)
Subject?(enter
Total(Creditable) Convertible to Delivered Delivered
NO if Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian Buffer Convertible to
Credit Type Location Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(ftz) Area of Buffer %Full Credit Riparian Nutrient Nutrient
ephemeral or Width(ft) Ratio(.1) Ratio(x:1) Credits Nutrient Offset?
ditch'1 Mitigation(fr) Buffer? Offset:N(Ibs) Offset:P(Ibs)
1M1(including Pond A),
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 1M2,EN1,Chappels 689,004 689,004 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 689,004.000 Yes 35,953.150 2,315.661
Creek,TH1
JM1(including Pond A),
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200 JM2,EN1,Chappels 348,625 348,625 1 33% 3.03030 Yes 115,046.365 Yes 18,191.718 1,171.687
Creek,TH1 PM
Buffer Rural No I/P Restoration 0-100 EN2 59,927 59,927 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 59,927.000 Yes 3,127.071 201.409
Buffer Rural No I/P Restoration 101-200 EN2 60,440 60,440 1 33% 3.03030 Yes 19,945.220 Yes 3,153.840 203.131
Buffer Rural No In-Line Pond Restoration 0-100 Pond B 37,624 37,624 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 37,624.000 No - -
Buffer Rural No In-Line Pond Restoration 101-200 Pond B 34,897 34,897 1 33% 3.03030 Yes 11,516.022 No - -
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Enhancement 0-100 EN1,Chappels Creek 58,217 58,217 2 100% 2.00000 Yes 29,108.500 Yes 3,037.841 195.660
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Enhancement 101-200 Chappels Creek 2,599 2,599 2 33% 6.06061 Yes 428.835 Yes 135.619 8.733
Totals(ft2): 1,291,333 1,291,333 962,599.941 63,599.239 4,096.281
Total Buffer(ft2): 1,291,333 1,291,333
Total Nutrient Offset(ft2): 0 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area(ft2)for Credit: 0 0
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area(ft2): 430,444 0.0% Ephemeral Reaches as%TABM
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation(ft2): 430,444 25.0% Preservation as%TABM
Total(Creditable)
Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(sf) Area for Buffer %Full Credit
Width(ft) Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Buffer Credits
Mitigation(fr)
JM1(including Pond A),
Rural Yes I/P 0-100 EN1,Chappels Creek, 398,152 395,975 10 100% 10.00000 39,597.500
TH1
JM1(including Pond A),
Rural Yes I/P 101-200 Chappels Creek,TH1 68,189 0 10 33% -
Rural No I/P 0-100 EN2 12,341 12,341 5 100% 5.00000 2,468.297
Rural No I/P 101-200 EN2 8,029 0 5 33% -
Rural No In-Line Pond 0-100 Pond B 22,128 22,128 5 100% 5.00000 4,425.560
Rural No In-Line Pond 101-200 Pond B 5,638 0 5 33% -
Preservation Area Subtotals(ft2): 514,478 430,444
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Cre
Restoration: 1,230,517 933,062.607
Enhancement: 60,815 29,537.335
Preservation: 430,444 46,491.356
Total Riparian Buffer: 1,721,777 1,009,091.298
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Cr
Nutrient Offset: Nitrogen: 0 0.000
Phosphorus: 0.000
1.The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 1SA NCAC 02B.0250(5)(a).
last updated 08/03/2020

Appendix B
Buffer Viability & Stream Determination

DocuSign Envelope ID:770B1 CFD-AE9E-4B3A-A4A8-1 2962041 931 7
_=tNc STATE Fti,,
// moo o o nl
ROY COOPER - _, z A
Governor `
JOHN NICHOLSON
Interim Secretary fa'Q,w.,NOENS
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
June 22, 2021
Project 20210755
Person County
Matt Butler
EBX, LLC a Resource Environmental Solutions entity
[e-mail]
Subject: Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0714
Project Name: Chappels Creek Full Delivery Mitigation Site
Address: 1699 Antioch Church Road, Timberlake, Person County, NC 27574
Location: Lat., Long: 36.328390, -78.945578
Dear Mr. Butler:
On April 29, 2021, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) conducted
an on-site review of features located on the Chappels Creek Full Delivery Mitigation Site
at the request of EBX, LLC to determine the applicability of features on the site to the
Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A North Carolina Administrative
Code 02B .0714. The streams on the site include Chappels Creek, Stream Index 27-3-2-1,
classified as Water Supply III; Nutrient Sensitive Waters, and unnamed tributaries to
Chappels Creek.
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated and this information is also
summarized in the table below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral, at least
intermittent, and for subjectivity to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. Streams that
are considered "Subject" have been located on the most recently published NRCS County
Soil Survey and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale)
map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess characteristics that
qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered"Not Subject"
have been determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not
depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules within the
proposed easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within
waters of the state. There may be other streams or features located on the property
that appear or do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features on
the site may be considered jurisdictional according to DWR, the US Army Corps of
Engineers, and subject to the Clean Water Act.
D E Q No Department En Quality I Division
��� 512 NorthrthCarolina Salisbury Street 1 of 1617 Mailvironmental Service Center I Raleigh,NorthofWater CarolinaResources 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA
oep th, coie.iomemsiQ Iity � 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID:770B1CFD-AE9E-4B3A-A4A8-1 2962041 931 7 DWR Project 20210755
Person County
Page 2 of 3
The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit.
Feature Type:
stream(ephemeral, Depicted
Subject
intermittent, Depicted on on
Feature ID perennial),ditch, to Buffer Start @ Stop Soil Survey USGS
swale,wetland, Rules Topo
other
JM1 Start,
at easement
boundary, Easement
Stream-at least I north of boundary north Yes,but
JM1 (Easement north of Yes powerline of Antioch Yes not above
Antioch Church easement Church Road, Pond A
Road) continues
Additional downstream
beaver ponds
observed
Pond A Pondedlttue on Yes Within JM1 Within JM1 Yes Yes
JMJM2A Pond B Start,
above Not Present No Not applicable pond normal Yes No
Pond B pool elevation
Pond B Pond Yes Pond normal Pond B outlet, Yes Yes
pool elevation JM2A Start
JM2B Stream-at least I Yes Pond B Outlet Confluence Yes Yes
below dam with JM1
Stream-at least I Easement
(Easement south of boundary Confluence
JM1 Yes south of with Chappels Yes Yes
Antioch Church Antioch Creek
Road) Church Road
EN Stream-at least I Yes Easement Confluence Yes No
boundary with JM1
Confluence
EN2 Stream-at least I No EN2 Start Flag with Chappels No No
Creek
Upstream of Continues
easement downstream
Chappels Stream-at least I Yes boundary at through and Yes Yes
Creek Kermit beyond
Duncan Road easement
boundary
Upstream of Confluence
TH1 Stream-at least I Yes easement with Chappels Yes Yes
boundary Creek
* E:Ephemeral,I:Intermittent,P:Perennial
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR

DocuSign Envelope ID:770B1 CFD-AE9E-4B3A-A4A8-1 2962041 931 7 DWR Project 20210755
Person County
Page 3 of 3
may request an appeal determination by the Director of Water Resources. An
appeal request must be made in writing within sixty (60) calendar days of the date
of this letter to:
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: If sending via delivery service(UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
See https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-permitting/401-
buffer-authorization/application-forms for more submittal information.
This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested
within sixty(60) calendar days of the date of this letter.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact
Shelton Sullivan at [e-mail] or 919-239-0238. This determination is
subject to review as provided in G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
H
igned byBA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Attachments: Site Map with labels, Photos, NRCS Soil Survey, USGS Topographical Map
cc: 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Laserfiche File
Katie Merritt via email
Filename: 20210755_ChappelsCreek_StreamCalls_PersonCo

Docu Sig n Envelope ID:770B1CFD-AE9E-4B3A-A4A8-129620419317
• Goy - - '11Wirgt.,--•; .; \ k/ 4 ' . ,
- MJ 1 Start
••' ill •-.-,-, ..,i- A- • . - . 1,-^• '.1,--- ......4,__
. JM2A ■ '- . •
--71:-,•-•
_ - v.••• ., I no - resent # 1% ' . . t.
, '
...
,... i,. . ' Pond B
p
- • .9 a v,i. ,--.- .... ' L -......,• . 44 r i, ,,k.
' ' -4,s4 e'.1.-1 Y.:-°.'.-• .11.- - '-' ......+' . . -.1.. 4.= Aft.
, .
.''62:L:'°4171(r-•i- :-. "' . ..
. I - • . 0 4 .— — — • -
JM1 beau
dams '-, .
J*.,....
..-l.,'
. _4/29/21 DWR Locations e•
and Photos ,a . , - ;-
. :,t5• •,'.••''''P ' r de Or ,4 i'•,.,-;.c,. :_ .. ., i•.
• . '
it Shelton IIIN it J 1 . ' --."-• •;01 . -.,
• -. 4.'"'
i.,;, _ ... 'iv •,.e 16 --.. .s ..,:.!.,,,, '' .. Iii . l A,..k;; ..---•%. '1.',. -- • .. A .
. . . . ,,. • . . ,
.. ,,-To • •--.N. . • _ .-..., ir, ',Jo- 01 • :;-X • '-, . --, '
1..d% „.•- .,. •••:' ,
-.1 i'*'•.' '''' , . 1, .•pc:' , : Jr-... ' .- •- 1 4".. 47.
'Cod
• f'- IA. - .--el , k,..4'.' ' .1%,.... , 7: ..!' F. rr,•-,- i "".A.
, ,•-Or Ai . ,-.4.%, , .....
le
: 4 14 .•4-- i. ” :4
, 1 4,.... ; .1 . c --`'- •• ''''' ',." i- '- e 'N..• IP t- 0 1: C:19 410 1.. ' '?‘•i 6 - .. ,
..,,..
LJI ', -* - •
1 -,-. . • ! •• IV '1° -. (q.,` .°4I
$ •LI1,. ., ^A '..... ...P ,.....
.. '4} f t - ...--',2 °...,-'- .,4=.-.',-:.!. „kV' •
'.. - - I
•A„,c,'vq.3iG
la 1 ik.1 ,• . ..., ., od. , I g . ,- , " • , , , r N ..." ' ,4±1 ., ...,...„.1....4,
...., .
1 • 1114-,--/ 116
i;-_•4,1-• ,
14,1 -. r - 01,44 .
15 '44, ,...,-.$ .
VS:4 • ' I
''.
A I ....1. • •1, , .::,1k. off r•,, ',,.?-. ,
' 4'
• I
;4
.r-ri
IN 4 7 iik. \
4-e . ."",..-a 1 •"; .
. k.. .
. . . r I% e•
, t• q •
i •r /60.11 ''' ".41. Oribil"-- s •:‘ r'_:, -,o' .;;;'iP. •‘-rr. , ,1
':: ' _, , •‘,.....'';:\• '4,,,,,,-e -e, IL
. i .t
;. .- - '•i7' ,.4 - c'r- .4 r •
,14. ,.,..-- . -,...N • , -2 4,7. •' -•
- -,4, ' - 7.-.."4.1";;t: '•--. .. - ..14ttiti• 4 l'Ic -Ll',... ' • N'.1i
•
440 4'. ','N. . .• - . r . ' -'
EN
-...4 • .. .,...,w:,,44:.!.3-.)..., d.•i # .., :.;
. t.... _........_ ,..,
... . ., ..• ,f ,
. • ... - -4,:i -..‹. ,- • ,' .:, ,. --e• .'..0-•
•''. ) . ,.., •
Ap"r
. ?
Cf CF 4: ;.-e', 0,,.._ ' 4 ''"1;, '1`-,- i •
k • .4ivog. ,
. „ . .
._ .
JM1 '--4 41
4:4 ir •,a, i .i,„,,.,,. itcr..
Cl
•C -.... '7f•; #,
" l' •4. f.2•Ly ,'. a
'
•
:::, ..1,- ... . •
. ..,.
Ljq f4.1,...• . r
. ...
.3 . .
I -.
-E •"e ei,...
if _......<
i
1,5 Legend ,
-. . ..1; A. 0 :
, . I .
•
Proposed Easement -. f4.... -, k.:. /4 a
' ,'). '.. •,11
._,
-
Existing Stream i'..i t # &
''-ik,li• - '. IL,'.' '''''•
'-..
.11 i'•• .
W.•eq;,..- .. '
-- Intermittent • _
9 ,. ,,g I :•
`.' Perennial
,1 ,r•• • _
N
. ar..g.,1bo1e1z:0aliv1ak4iirarAkw1mt11Sv10.1W1.P.a01..4t/Ateo r-i,fsit„faLi„li,„ w+s E
MCithigaapStpitoelns PC rroejeekc t CDDarhateewc:nk e6bd/y2:b2 y/E2:0JJU2R
1ieMap
0 350 700 M Pres
1 inch=700 feet
Feet Person County, North Carolina

DocuSign Envelope ID:770B1 CFD-AE9E-4B3A-A4A8-1 2962041 931 7
Chappels Creek Full Delivery Mitigation Site, DWR Photos 4/29/21
JM1 Start AI Iroximate Easement Bounda JM1 under p:vr,...1...-'7.4.,
er easement,lookin• u.stream
:',
:•-.•i.%.o
.s , + r fir" v-,t r - k'- t f fit'E
q1: }i t x r
st „ - ,t.-� �,. ' 't-'' �r � + 1 v ?:.
i KA� aM
Y 7 t ' A �S .Jy tl; S ' A AO
py� ' tlf r} , .5 f, ,„, ',' „.t
T .,� ma y. ,+ _ � �. �''k�-��,. k µr. • <-, �- - "1.41i
AA
,i^" via -
a r:
�I.
4411,
JM1 beaver dams
Pond A looking downstream
:.fix '3
i� - -ce 'Psi t :x 9Aa � ` ,% a "u ^?..�r f `
`+ E
^A.
er
'` k�
-;a' , - kte'.='` `�Y -, 4 , r + ,- . .
- wr r, ,i ., r hj , t 5 a:c ker _ x v.v :° ;, Via, : 7,7,a ` " r t,� ,' nz i_- v , � ..',„*_. �i 4 ,, " fi• � ' „�
�4P1- -'
' �, ice"7 � 3 i ,s :a - r Gr r fn il "d 4 t>�" q 1 +4 l sl .t"Ni SA � , µ� y 4i N ,i? /n
i4 ! , 7.,ri r � �C " "# b` yY 4.
1',47,:.:41, t-.,,,,...;,,,, ,,,`,',.
A Km l 1?rq\Y� 1 p+ f =c iAt � 'l+ i i [ x '� "a ,6 a�4C I Y ; "" � ?1. y Y��i� 9T .S 0 Y t ' �j t* r S r / nh « n }€ ,4A f' `, ` a � } ��t f� ✓st'P@d�, , FJ{ t, ,,�: �? � rk C � 1 :r, ,�b� IY A l eG li 1:"`..' '? -'�. ro9.S , . .! ; -
*.244,,',17*,ir l's.k$0 '-.'.'.`,-":,k,f4 : '.1. '',..'frti'')'4''''0_'

DocuSign Envelope ID:770B1 CFD-AE9E-4B3A-A4A8-1 2962041 931 7
Pond B JM2B Start,looking downstream r
7 ti •
• t
rI,i rg -"'A� � :i N ' Yof ram("y-r`
�E lei v � r ih" �,���' ii'� s � •al�tt••••.'••-••
r•� •
3�� .ems-,
�,4jJ s ' li. ?1 � "�r �"d •ri �"ti •?' ,a '
•
,^�p. sir g'u' �fav w� t,(. •• Y ae' •.
�x r 77,' �, i al'W- $0.1
JM2A,?..:.::4'....',..'' , '.'-:. \'..,' .---;':--q"'-k.'H...,- ' ';''.?,,C 7.::,,,A -,. .;,,,P. ,.':,1.,-f-:-,..il, k, •!• -:,-......:p:.
* A .
not 'resent EN1 at easement boundary
f1,1:.� ter" , s� �� - ,
-,� ^*+c;Y YI'. " r�,sy1� a fw P 3„r I. n
r i
A �t Y ' \ IM
v < it .!
Mkt ! ti ® K °( .-!,
f
J/
"- Y ,.
ar
*
•
y ';il r

DocuSign Envelope ID:770B1 CFD-AE9E-4B3A-A4A8-1 2962041 931 7
EN2 Start JM1 after beaver dam removal
t.
\, y 'IAA', �1u ►4•. t t
---- - ',4- -,', ',viii...,-,s v4.70,4,vort .f.itiikt, .".- ,'.'' -, ' . ' , -,-: -'-=
1 fAl s''il � till;,
* _
/';'effliffigit.,111;t1 .1,'
.
Y -. B
( 'F S J� L4. —_�y,
A
Cha i pels Creek downstream TH1 at easement,property boundary
..-„, ...,-4,-,,,;-,,,,,,.,,;_-,,,,r,,,i,.,.i;iit,.;..),,,,.. •,,,:::::::,,:.:;,:i , ,1„,,t,,,,/ _ __.. ,,, . "i!;-014,1.1.-:.:.-1/:.-•::',Itiff.,_::,,:.,.:1':,,.:,,,,,.;10....',,,k.iv:'•::'‘:7-si,e,,,p;''
4'-‘', -''':' '''.-ii ....., • . .,:.- -..,.,.-v... - ...i..-,,,,-4 ke. ' ' '''... ' ' ' ' -4f--7--_' - ---- /ne'4
li`
{�Y v
4
- - Y .f "
- '-. ..,..-'' ' —' '-" g - 1-r , T ../2,Ny —ems �"'eE' 14-
�3
',� ,. ..rat �.:'r. y . .

DocuSign Envelope ID:770B1 CFD-AE9E-4B3A-A4A8-1 2962041 931 7
Soil Survey
1,, (' 41111114 r
"Ik\hip mylar.
44(411111 .A-
re
4.11:0\
Ilia. 1 ifr
ti .
• • 4 ir.k.0000
i re . peiiik. ,1
* PM Gel
I
All P
lir • .
"114" . G - — .-.-,
Ilimb : :B flilli Ill • T
IOD
4
. 49? : V. _ 1130011,,,,,rts_...41,°r B
, .s, . tr .lor 11111/4. . _ .....r...._.._12:314igi
-.. IF ePi'l ' a.
3115d . . G*9
•
G @ a i// . - -
rr - .•'B itli >. . 1$11 .. ''-Of ..
3
• Chwecla and Wohadkov 59i18,(PIQ 2 parr r1 514[ a.
r {' GhA rrequenlly fletr d
:.ailATC
•' IN it CAB Geargwrille kern,2 to$m•_rrrl mlupws
C. Geargc.illy Irmrn,6 d)70 prmrnI xk�pen
_e„efid r rhB H rr nn ksem,2 r $prs',cCnl stirs
e
Hr�, WCntiPn kmrn.B Iq 1fS prnrnl Snprs
Frpp4sed EBsemarrk K. IrA?II gnwplFy Ipam, 1p prGgr1 SIPpC�
ii Lg9 Liglnurnkern.2 to 6 percentsbpw
FlgurC4.NRCS Soil Suruey f1g951 Dim 1.7'2°21
VABOWIr:•....era. ■iq` rc�l Mitigation�Lr a �} ��J Sr RPres
o...br Ey
Y M Project Ch.d.AdLr-AM
O .
1--.o--r-r.i-ri
Person County,North Carolina

DocuSign Envelope ID:770B1 CFD-AE9E-4B3A-A4A8-1 2962041 931 7
USGS Topo Map
•
•
L/1
Legend
•
Proposed Easement •
•
•
Flgure 21s -USGS Quadrangle cAn 1. 1
.�_T�1 Trmbsriake fr9B21 ��
rt yV Y — • Linen
n�n hr E
ate= '' '. Chappell Creek
r. vun -..M' Mitigation Project Chac�aot -AM
IF
{
F� Person County,North CiIr ILa53 '"�"{A4V4te

DocuSign Envelope ID:70C28B94-0994-4104-B1 CF-92A8079D0328
:_;-,STATE aoti,
7-?'1)
'-? 115
ROY COOPER - a
Governor '6 O
ELIZABETH S.BISER ` t,ztE -=
Secretary �f
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
January 20, 2022
Matt Butler
Environmental Banc&Exchange, LLC
(via electronic mail: [e-mail])
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset—Chappels Creek Site
Near 36.322, -78.945 off Antioch Church Rd in Timberlake,NC
Neuse 03020201,Upper Falls WS
Person County
Dear Mr. Butler,
On June 29 2021,Katie Merritt,with the Division of Water Resources (DWR),received a request
from you on behalf of Environmental Banc& Exchange, LLC (EBX), a RES company, for a site
visit near the above-referenced site in the Upper Falls Watershed of the Neuse River Basin within the
8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site visit was to determine the potential for riparian
buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a proposed conservation easement boundary,which is
more accurately depicted in the attached map labeled Figure 1 and prepared by EBX. The proposed
easement boundary in Figure 1, includes all riparian areas intended to be proposed as part of a
mitigation site. On August 12, 2021,Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site.
Staff with Wildlands were also present.
Ms.Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank(TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature Classificatio 1Subject Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4'3Mitigation Type Determination w/in
n to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
onsite Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
JM1 upstream Stream Yes Combination of forested 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
(includes areas and non-forested forested 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n)
in-line agricultural fields fields only)
impoundment Forested Areas-Preservation Site per
A) Left banks are non-forested 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(4)
E Q O00 512 NorNorthth CarolinaSalisb DepartmenturyStreet of1617 EnMailvironmentalServiceCenter Raleigh
Quality I Division of WaterNorthCarolina Resou27rces6991617
NORTH CAROLINA
,
Department of Environmental uuarry 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID:70C28B94-0994-4104-B1 CF-92A8079D0328 Chappels Creek Site
EBX
January 20,2022
Feature Classification 1Subject Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4'3Mitiigation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
JM2 Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
fields .0295(n)
Pond B In-line Pond Yes, but Combination of forested No No Note:Proposed conservation easement is
likely ag. areas and non-forested *see note *see note shown to include the entire perimeter of
Exempt agricultural fields the pond with a controlled access
and"not easement shown along the dam and farm
subject') path which includes the pipe connected
pond to JM2 stream.This pond will not
be designated as an in-line pond and will
not be viable for credit without the
connection to feature JM2 secured.
If able to comply with requirements,then
the perimeter around the pond will
qualify as follows:
Non-forested fields-Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(3)
Forested Areas-Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(4)
EN1 Stream Yes Combination of partially 2Yes Yes(only Non-Forested Areas-Restoration site
forested areas,fully in non- per 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n)
forested areas and non- forested ag
forested agricultural fields fields) Partially Forested Areas—Enhancement
Site per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
See Figure 1
Forested Areas-Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(5)
JMl Stream Yes Combination of fully 2Yes Yes(only Non-Forested Areas-Restoration site
downstream forested areas and non- in non- per 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n)
forested agricultural fields forested ag
fields) Forested Areas-Preservation Site per
See Figure 1 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(5)
EN2 Stream No Combination of fully 2Yes Yes(only Non-Forested Areas-Restoration site
forested areas and non- in non- per 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(3)
forested agricultural fields forested ag
fields) Forested Areas-Preservation Site per
See Figure 1 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(4)
TH1 Stream Yes Combination of fully 2Yes Yes(only Non-Forested Areas-Restoration site
forested areas and non- in non- per 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n)
forested agricultural fields forested ag
fields) Forested Areas-Preservation Site per
See Figure 1 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(5)
Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:70C28B94-0994-4104-B1 CF-92A8079D0328
Feature Classification 'Subject Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4,3Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
Chappels Stream Yes Combination of partially 2Yes Yes(only Non-Forested Areas-Restoration site
Creek forested areas,fully in non- per 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n)
forested areas and non- forested ag
forested agricultural fields. fields) Partially Forested Areas—Enhancement
Site per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
An area along the left bank
within the 0-50'Neuse Forested Areas-Preservation Site per
buffer was impacted from 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(5)
clearing between 2013 and
2017 Cleared areas within 0-50'—not viable
for credit(see Figure 1)
See Figure 1
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated June 22,2021 (DWR#2021-0755)using the
1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by
the NRCS.
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295(o)(5)and 15A NCAC 0295(o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request and
assessed according to the defmitions in 15A NCAC 02B.0295(b).
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset,must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks,even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7).
7The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. The maps representing the proposal for the site are
attached to this letter and initialed by Ms. Merritt on January 20, 2022. Substantial changes to the
proposed easement boundary as well as any site constraints identified in this letter, could affect the
Site's potential to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings,performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:70C28B94-0994-4104-B1CF-92A8079D0328 Chappels Creek Site
EBX
January 20,2022
This viability assessment will expire on January 20, 2024 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR,whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at(919) 707-3637 if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
,-DocuSigned by:
Pa. Si 10 L
949D91 BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: Figure 1
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:70C28B94-0994-4104-B1 CF-92A8079D0328
JM1Pond P`-,tm
/ D '411111411 -
i G
Proposed Access Easement
(Existing Dam)
. - - • w _ -
c
1 am-:1111 , - r' i. ti ' ^� �C� 1,....teffirS7
.. � 4 '���� life-e�n��� -t�. .,.
4 \ l `.
:, ,,-of. Rd SO x t3�' •'1 } •1 �' ^:
9AI
V -
i
.rla� r .h' 1,
EN1
EN2
Legend `' ~
g Chappell
If' Proposed Conservation Easement(53.75 ac) Creek -. •
I
.,..
EJ Proposed Access Easement(0.41 ac)
Parcel Boundary
Existing Top of Bank
g
r Existing Pond
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Approach
No Credit 0-50'from
21 I Restoration (0-100') Top of Bank Due to Clearing
l Between 2013 and 2017
Restoration (101-200')
Enhancement(0-100')
I ri-
Preservation (0-100')
fZ6aa
`/ Preservation (101 200') y� ` li-::�'x, :
Non Crediting (0 50')
�, �°
a
Overhead Powerline mac
u
Buffer Mitigation Conceptual Design Date: 1/4/2022 FIGURE 1
i Airs.�eZeakiii1���1�'� a Drawn by: EJU 0 res
f. ..It at ra avic-�,0-,, Chappell Creek
rrs����r+"L,�
�,.... 0 400 800 Mitigation Project Checked by:BPB
1 inch=800 feet
Feet Person County,North Carolina ReStOl Inaarest

Appendix C
Site Protection Instrument

PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Excise Tax: $
Parcel Identifier No.:
Prepared by and return after recording to:
Brief description for the Index: (+/-) acre Conservation Easement in
County, NC
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT("Conservation Easement") made this
day of , 2022 by and between , whose
mailing address is ("Grantor") and ,
whose mailing address is ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine,
feminine or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in Wayne County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation,
association, or trust qualified under§ 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue
Code, and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq., the purposes or powers of which include
one or more of the purposes (a)— (d) listed below;

retaining or protecting natural,scenic, or open-space aspects of real property;
(a) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational,
or open-space use;
(b) protecting natural resources;
(c) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS,Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following
natural communities: add or delete as appropriate: wetlands, streams, and riparian
buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands
and riparian resources and other natural values of approximately , more or
less, and being more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated fully herein by reference (the "Conservation Easement Area"), and
prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area for any purpose
or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is also a condition of the approval of the Riparian Buffer
and Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument ("UMBI"), North Carolina
Division of Water Resources ("NCDWR") Project ID# , and Bank Parcel
DevelopmentPackage ("BPDP")for the Riparian Buffer and Nutrient
Offset Mitigation Bank, NCDWR Project ID# , which was approved by
the NCDWR, and will be made and entered into by and between , acting
as the Bank Sponsor ("Bank Sponsor"), and the NCDWR. The
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Site is intended to be used to
compensate for riparian buffer and nutrient impacts to surface waters.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third-party rights of enforcement
shall be held by the Bank Sponsor and the NCDWR ("Third-Parties") and may be
exercised through the appropriate enforcement agency of the State of North Carolina,
and that these rights are in addition to, and do not limit,the rights of enforcement
under the NCDWR Project ID# or any permit or certification issued by the
Third-Parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and legal
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and
irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, forever
and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the
extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area described on Exhibit
B,together with the right to preserve and protect the conservationvalues thereof, as
follows:
ARTICLE I.
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is
an easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,

Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of,the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with
the purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation
Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any
development that would impair or interfere with the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,the following activities and
uses are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features.Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any
introduction of non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction.There shall be no constructing or placing of any building,
mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising
display, antenna, utility pole,tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other
temporary or permanent structure or facility on or above the Conservation
Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are
prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming,
cutting or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation
EasementArea except as provided in the BPDP. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous
vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved
in the BPDP is allowable oncea year for no more than five consecutive years from the date
on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will negatively impact
vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by the Bank Sponsor
and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails.There shall be no construction of roads,trails or walkways
on the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing
roads,trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement
Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation
values of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules

and regulations for the use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying
the Grantor as owner of the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage,
waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or
other materials on the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation,dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil,sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any
manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or
drainage patterns.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or
alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition,
diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is
prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered
or extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all-terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for
temporary or occasional access by the Grantee and the Third-Parties, and their
employees and agents, successors, and assigns for purposes of constructing,
maintaining, and monitoring the restoration, enhancement and preservation of riparian
areas within the Conservation Easement Area.
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation
Easement Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant,
the preservation of the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural
condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns,the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area
for all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not
limited to,the right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area,the rights
of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement

Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement
Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to
the terms of, and shall specifically reference,this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, including acting as the Bank Sponsor,the right
toconstruct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area in
accordance with the approved BPDP, and the UMBI described in the Recitals of this
Conservation Easement.
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns and the
Third-Parties, shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area
at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to
determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns,
is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantee and its authorized representatives, successors and assigns and
the Third-Parties shall also have the right to enter and go upon the Conservation
Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and
studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public
access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Third-
Parties are allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement
Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the
restoration of such areas or features of the Conservation Easement Area that may be
damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation
Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall
notify the Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after
receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach
remains uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement
by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without
notice,to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if
the breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances
damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate.
The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to,
and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection
with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or restoration,
including the Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by

Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Third-
Parties shall have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the
terms and conditions of this Conservation easement.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition,
or provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of
a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to
entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control,
including, without limitation,fire,flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except
Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor
under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life,
damage to property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such
causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property
which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor
further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and
defend title to the Property against the claims of all persons. _
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any
interest in all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to
provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the
transfer.The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement
shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation
Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or
terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the NCDWR.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the
Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this
Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified
holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen.Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and §501(c)(3)
and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and
agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or
assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes
described in this document.

D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The UMBI with corresponding BPDP,
and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with
respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions,
negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If
any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction,
the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the
Property free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor.
Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as
expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to
comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the
exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long-Term Management. If livestock operations will be maintained on the
property, Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated
with fencing, if and where applicable, to ensure livestock do not have access to the
Conservation Easement Area. These activities include the maintenance and/or
replacement of fence structures, as deemednecessary by the Grantee, to ensure the
aquatic resource functions within the boundaries of the Protected Property are
sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial
proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area
is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the
Restrictions imposed by this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in
appropriate actions at the time of such taking to recover the full value of the taking,
and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation
Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an
extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair
market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time of the
extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication
required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter
specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph):

To Grantor:
[Name, address, and fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name address, and fax number]
To Sponsor:
[Name address, and fax number]
To NCDEQ-DWR:
NCDEQ—Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement,or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's
interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an
appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment.This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in
a writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not
affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee
under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this
grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area.The wetlands,scenic,
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation
Easement Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section
of the BPDP, prepared by Bank Sponsor and acknowledged by the Grantor and
Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and
Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any
future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with
the terms of this Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to
preclude the use of other evidence to establish the present condition of the
Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
[SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW]

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal,the
dayand year first above written.
GRANTOR:
(SEAL)
Grantor name
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do
hereby certify that , Grantor, personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the day of
, 2022.
Signature of Notary Public
[SEAL]
Printed Name of Notary Public
My commission expires:

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantee has hereunto set his hand and seal, the
day and year first above written.
GRANTEE:
Grantee name
By:
Name:
Title:
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged that he/she is the
of , and that by authority duly given, and as the act of the
Grantee, he/she signed the foregoing instrument in its name, on its behalf and as its act
and deed for the purposes stated herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the day of
, 2022.
Signature of Notary Public
[SEAL]
Printed Name of Notary Public
My commission expires:

EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of the Property

EXHIBIT B
Conservation Easement Area

Appendix D
Approved FHWA Categorical Exclusion
Form

Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Form for Division of Mitigation Services Projects
Version 2
Note:Only Appendix A should to be submitted(along with any supporting documentation)as the environmental
document.
Part 1: General Project Information
Project Name: Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
County Name: Person County
DMS Number: 100179
Project Sponsor: Environmental Banc&Exchange,LLC
Project Contact Name: Matt Butler
Project Contact Address: 3600 Glenwood Avenue,Suite 100,Raleigh,NC 27612
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
DMS Pro'ect Mana•er: Lin Xu
Project Description
The Chappels Creek Project encompasses 48.13 acres proposed conservation easement on four parcels in Person
County, North Carolina.The Project will involve buffer restoration,enhancement,and preservation of a network of
unnamed tributaries/ponds that drain to Chappels Creek. Riparian areas of streams that are currently used for crop
production will be converted to forest by planting trees,whereas existing areas of forest will be treated for invasive
species and preserved. Ultimately,the Project will protect approximately 1,888,464 square feet of riparian buffer area.
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
5/19/2021 Li,+ti Xw
Date DMS Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
S Z©?1 Z7BPLa ai W 52Q.�(it-
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA

Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question Response
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county? ❑ Yes
• No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of ❑ Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ No
• N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management ❑ Yes
Program? ❑ No
❑■ N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA)
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ❑■ Yes
❑ No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been ❑ Yes
designated as commercial or industrial? ❑■ No
❑ N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential ❑ Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ❑■ No
❑ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ❑ Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ❑ No
• N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ❑ Yes
waste sites within the project area? ❑ No
• N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
National Historic Preservation Act(Section 106)
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of ❑ Yes
Historic Places in the project area? • No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑■ N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act(Uniform Act)
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ❑■ Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? ❑■ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? ❑ Yes
❑■ No
❑ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed: ❑■ Yes
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and ❑ No
*what the fair market value is believed to be? ❑ N/A

Part 3: Ground-Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act(AIRFA)
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of ❑ Yes
Cherokee Indians? • No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑■ N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic ❑ Yes
Places? ❑ No
❑■ N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑■ N/A
Antiquities Act (AA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? ❑ Yes
❑■ No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects ❑ Yes
of antiquity? ❑ No
❑■ N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act(ARPA)
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? ❑ Yes
• No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑■ N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑■ N/A
Endangered Species Act(ESA)
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat ❑■ Yes
listed for the county? ❑ No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? ❑ Yes
❑■ No
❑ N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical ❑ Yes
Habitat? ❑ No
❑■ N/A
4. Is the project"likely to adversely affect"the specie and/or"likely to adversely modify" ❑ Yes
Designated Critical Habitat? ❑ No
❑■ N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A

Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory" ❑ Yes
by the EBCI? ❑■ No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed ❑ Yes
project? ❑ No
❑■ N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred ❑ Yes
sites? ❑ No
• N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act(FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired? ❑■ Yes
❑ No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally • Yes
important farmland? ❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? • Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(FWCA)
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any ❑ Yes
water body? • No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act(Section 6(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public, ❑ Yes
outdoor recreation? • No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act(Essential Fish Habitat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? ❑ Yes
❑■ No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑■ N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the ❑ Yes
project on EFH? ❑ No
❑■ N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? ❑ Yes
• No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? ❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? ❑ Yes
• No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining ❑ Yes
federal agency? ❑ No
• N/A

Categorical Exclusion CERCLA Summary
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act(CERCLA)
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), commonly
known as Superfund, created a tax on the chemical and petroleum industries to clean up abandoned or
uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
As a part of the environmental screening and CERCLA compliance, an EDR Radius Map Report with
Geocheck was ordered for the Chappels Creek Mitigation Project through Environmental Data Resources,
Inc (EDR) on February 23'd, 2021. According to the EDR report, there are no reported environmental
contamination incidents or hazardous waste sites within one mile of the project property. The summary of
the EDR report is enclosed.
There is one environmental record mapped site found within an 1/8 mile of the project property.The finding
was found within the Petroleum Underground Storage Tank(UST)permit database and are associated with
several removed and current underground storage tanks to the west of the project site, maintained by L J
Martin and Sons Inc. The permit accounts for two removed diesel tanks, removed in 1998, one removed
gasoline/gas mix tank, removed in 1994, and two current diesel tanks with auto shutoff devices, installed
in 1998. The tanks are not within the proposed project conservation easement.Furthermore, as mentioned
above,the EDR report did not identify any incidents associated with any of the surrounding areas.
In addition to the EDR search, during routine site visits conducted by RES staff at the Chappels Creek
Project, visual inspections were conducted to assess the potential for the occurrence of recognized
environmental conditions on the property that might not have been revealed in the EDR report. The
inspection was conducted to locate and identify any obvious use, storage, or generation of hazardous
materials.No hazardous storage containers or substances were observed during the visual inspection.

EXHIBITS

540f1 N Hiiensvuie
49 /
Walmaritercenter �� EMI o
s
01521 ® 501
0
tsa 73
111491 •1 ii EEO
1579
tsn
Somerset
11,421 111441
I
v
•
13211
4
,n44 AI I-'-"1
0Y ..........„........
.......,..5. .....
.L...,.. .
MB
rn71
Raleigh
Regional
Airport at
erslsh County '`16 Chappels Creek
Mitigation Project
Legend erlake
Igto: a ham Rocky N
Proposed Easement o
o
5 Mile Aviation Zone �; ,-— Chapel Hill Raleigh
a- 0 26a Wilson
•1 If' 14-Digit HUC 03020201010010 -,"'ob, p. ph4 °
4 w ti. s. . .� •
Ap x
8-Digit HUC 03020201 -mm `' J
y%., NC NHP Element Occurrence (NC NHP July 2018) '----' - ',A21
i Other Managed Area (NC NHP July 2019)
© Airport ^ W
rat
t" r / ) j 3§.322,-78.945 pelt 40
N Figure 1 -Project Vicinity Date: 9/10/2020
0 i� b ��M PArili l W 111 t F Drawn by: EJU res
��va it eloi �titii� ., Chappels Creek
4/10401040 Mitigation Project Checked by: JLS
for 0 0.5
Miles
Person County, North Carolina 1 inch=1 miles

t ,,. \..... ,
-* ' 2,:''', ' . . t ''" --, ''it. ,
AZ) V",.k.,,t,A,4 . A, / - ,
,witiNre ,...
13,,,‘ ,I
s' , Vilialgrw tit , ..,
.. � •'9 '. ,w` � era
r
,. ........._„. . ftitittillb iv,, ,_1112
lir
► , : - 'a 414.:1&400 ,
• " •,, MARTIN JO ANNH �i _ . Pr-
. .., nyQ► '• 5�1111. ®
'"""7• /` 0913'-00-58=9674�000 ?• ,''`'. 61 '" ',
, : . 4® �rrr
0,O ystalliViewlDr 1111111.
WHITE DAVID .€„ ' �
0913 00167'1985 000 --------
a .
iii e
e
° -. , .• imft ettr tormiciwk
' - _.., i$,, , Ahk, .Ar: _. _ , ,,,,,,„,s 04116.
n --
10.- Ill..
yy 5 r r.� ^\ vrp S
Aillw
44
114 •
1 �1Pd ri Ism No , AILW 44
ti g a n
z ?' v n• r,
n
iti
Ori V 0,000°.""
tli lit
4 t„,
"Le
iiti
�
.... .11/4•Ai‘4,4), 41, ' ..4
7 Dut�nPeti6rirB �^ ' « o* py lj
L ,,:;.viii, 44
* E EUSE I LLC
_8 -z, 09 .65.8429.000 t � ' j1
0; '
; a TFFyHOLDINGS LLC i
'Y 0913--04L54--8152.000
`
ir,-,,,f_ii,„, ., IV
A r
O
v
v
0
Legend
4
‘‘ '"'., , ' ir, ,,, "4, '''''''. 11.
Proposed Easement �.
�,, : eJ( •yt
- Project Parcel ! i4
, 4""�, h� .: �s ,� A>r� �` ® °'��
n Parcel .. '� # 'it,
o -
♦ ♦.. Access Route Y. a ''
e*_
rc
Parking Spot h� �".,?,
94 /......(:"4(
if
" Figure 2-Parcel Access Date: 9/10/2020
Orps
r��I*�l.��w;�L,�J�� �� Drawn by: EJU
w+E
Chappels Creek
rr'+;#�1i Mitigation Project Checked by: JLS
'a' 0 450 900
11 Person County, North Carolina 1 inch=900 feet
Feet

a 7 o .—, � • • �� 11, ',J . lye; / (j �/
1Di , (---401‘7' l'i -‘`' ("---931.....--, ...„,
1,
,,:‘,. g rti,_.
0040
-----J - . __ 4, 4 ........._......>_... .._„:„
.. . 0..-://--- c ......
A .i,-------Th.___:, -__D----)i
= .__\. 1--- , __/., - ')) ...p.,,,,,....% ___4.----,-,',:/f (..( (., -----,
_ ,,. _..d .m. ,,,f_ i ______ . v -:--) _ . h.. (..._..).. )
11
_j ,,,. c--,. ,\, P m
ri‘ ,,__",,,,,
r_,,., ,..,,1/_r.7,:.,_._N,....,_..._..
._.i\ 1iiti r.\ .
,_____.0,
_ - -10 f/...-.,::'„_.v.1,.
---,.).,"
64•...:c...17A..7.7/*-
4or1fe
1 / �i / % • (.,..
-.._"_.
/ s r l
/ i �_/ .Cam', 6 ` �. /• \
i_,.
.0. 0w
__,..i.
\.,4(,,1/44(4 k
6,:.
.... ______,
• ' W. 1 gal
IIP‘‘ 11 ' 'WM
.7>(,-,...-:\-) ,
- . _______2 t , , , .---...._(---. v____, pil,....
J_____ \ loili i • -
VPI
N f,.. , '.A (........* r;,... - ., ...1;4'dik'N-\\ 1.., )(--.> ry7 .. ,_,,, , .
--)is'-'`\>---,-, - --7/ --- I, 11/4.\ oi IP
_---• <. I /e..„__....1 7 I 1. .
r,....___J,,t - -1,
!/ci (( i I' . ,
rs
—•••• iwl ` 1k1 .111.111-,_ -- . 2 1_ .; . Mgr oriiimistimr..,T
1• s4/�
lita7=-.
. „of.,- 4, _0 d , ---/ _
())\- --- /I :r/ 11116
illi
L r, p �LTim.berIake:., _ .. lir,
J/�Jj
(( (%''. 4 .. - _?\'i' . 1 ) ° '
r
•
,. lb j ...`sz.).` ,%, ,---
'I J: ^ .-.,.:.__.....i) '16.-- --c--\.-ia
• + -v p, f/.I `C� � ,,i:<!. , Legend
r� •
6 ,41 \ '\',, _-�� •o n Proposed Easement
Q ,iii• ��; \ �,` ' ii Drainage Area
r f-, .-) '‘) .k. (
�� �` r�� 1' _ �-.., , ffi Chappels Creek(2,591 ac)
\,� �. -
IAA
JM1 (309 ac)
6'' / T.It0 .*
al" JM2-A(34 ac)
. 11
�o " • .i r l 0 R - ra JM2-B(41 ac)
14, ,
4. i ` , _✓ A•
4. �'\ i EEE
�: )
N Figure 3a -USGS Quadrangle Date: 9/10/2020
■ . 1�■� ��� w — E Timberlake(1982)
y.-*0f•"4 43.t. 4 Drawn by: EJU i Pres
Y)�+�#`1� S Chapels Creek Checked by: JLS
rr 0 1,000 2,000 Mitigation Project
ii
Feet Person County,North Carolina 1inch=2,000 feet

, , 7eli:(1 ). .\ N,N0, .... :I \ % 1\ NNitel Liti ...........y."*.-700/ ..........es, • • r
.,.
• r r .. 4:0 \ i
. .
-.....\ . •
\j:(.4` ----.. _.... ,
.7.
, \............, - - ::-.
fri ?„:".....1 00 - . •
.....s. ___. _ _
--_s.n 1 •
, __,--...:) ,
_ ,_____,
� � (-----
...—_,.,_ ,,
,---- i,
.... ,
--- . ci;
-, \\,,,,_,.....:.
. _
, ,\ ,._...—.. i �; I
! / r illip:,,,. , ii st?.. ,...>•,1- "...z.../":44ret.e./,
,(1 \,(2 tit).,.._.41‘.4 .:-:: . " 11/4. / /11667,,,
N * 11' . . %1 i Illii%."."—s#1
"' L
d . Y .:- ' —
ty
1-7
/ / ,/
•
Itt
- ' N1. ' , '.' '
1rIake tr
�a ti� ���r--
11'. , \Wilii \ i----..--
1-
r t t7 4/-
,I
JJJ Jcc,.J . 1 I t �,j �, 1
) .‘. 1• , II ) / .
.„„
fedi :yid ..
„,r_
e 1
• \
li, _1 )..\?-1-( . ., r, . .. . ...4-1.: :,05-..." 9(1
g ,) ) 1 4 ,
../2 ''..... .,) 2:_\*`. ,. ,_ !,,,,,1 ,,,/,. , , •
fg • ) ,
F,4! \ \
I ' . i r
_......... -N ,
,,
_ .,,
7 r
Legend 1 j Proposed Easement ' — _-- — ����g "�
N Figure 3b -USGS Quadrangle Date: 9/10/2020
gz
■ ..���� ��� w E Timberlake(1982)
yPfatit'��u�/44111 Drawn by: EJU Pres
..>.,+�#ot� S Chappels Creek Checked by: JLS
IPA" 0 500 1,000 Mitigation Project
ii
Feet Person County, North Carolina 1 inch=1,000 feet

`
. �
, Cropland — • w'
J € "
Pond B �tx *L ; ?:e
Y
40
411 t
,.,.., „ * , ,.*�.I,....,,,„,,,00 _.„. ....,,„4C t
/1 �f q 0� t � ..!r
' ....' : "
n
�d • �iy f/'
inkoit
t. ' 4 1. NAAi U
4
4.
.'
pso
g 40 ,
.1
W
` %0♦ t�F it . ^ fa. - '.,of• ,
vt , it"` a
41;,... 44.4 A i ':4',"-‘-k r4 'S i: 4 .''I' ,..,,, ''':-
.t P• ix...)\
t Y1° PUBHh ie` - A
° , , ter :
it
' ;4
f
xrri
PFO1A kiiA
ry
€"
Y
.0 i,
PUBHh th 1
t"
C:', WSt4Y1 r AA ffh'z ti1\ Y y %ut
1,r NA , M
").strik *A 1: ,-*') ,,,e'•'4';.„'",,,',' . • '
r
QQ 1 �tit
Legend ,`
E litif
_ �
Proposed Easement a ``7f
,,
NW Wetlands(USFWS October 2019) p, a;: _ y��`j°, � "
Existing Stream cropland .— j
Ephemeral �° �'
t,PUBHh i,
Intermittent
Perennial t` � rA "
U Powerline
. tr.
N Figure 4-Existing Conditions Date: 9/10/2020
ys 0,411"�IU 1/1 4.1, ` Drawn by: EJU
,4_10.0 -sz.,.�s,.., Chappels Creek 0 res
iY)�+ #`tJ 0 350 700 Checked by: JLS
vo Mitigation Project
Feet Person County, North Carolina 1 inch=700 feet

•
1.
.. I pi ' 4
191
1110 jr.P— wri
!kJ -.1
1‘11111".31111:ih.1..11111111111111
Ili
eg5.:,itig ..
'iRip
,
• H r1�
Ili
14..iv.... . ,..:..„ riripe, .. . I: I .
•
lhp!.
rc
fi is !drIlhe
Ger;
.1% .r.\... .;Th 1
.
hooti
1.. \-• I I 101 A 4 2 •
i "Qriii. 1 _
r _y
1341 .I 1
milaiL : lc. 4 I _ i lit .0
' ilk
Air
'.C Bia, _. ,
„,„.....„ .. ..
_ ,
h j 1-11:172 .
. , „0
•
_ ,
iii
1
iwzmr-
Gle8 ,piii,„ ii, ,
1 111161115.14. . .
. iti.
Gala
-1).-..
ill\
M 0-
IOC
bl •1•r r
_ ( Map Unit Map Unit Name
'I Chewacla and Wehadkee soils,0 to 2percent slopes,
. r. • ChA frequently flooded
$74.---:Pahl, ' li GeB Georgeville loam,2 to 6 percent slopes
GeC Georgeville loam,6 to 10 percent slopes
Le-send HrB Herndon loam,2 to 6 percent slopes
HrC Herndon loam,6 to 10 percent slopes
cJProposed Easement IrB Iredell gravelly loam,2 to 6 percent slopes
__ -.- I� LgB Lignum loam,2 to 6 percent slopes
N Figure 5-NRCS Soil Survey(1995) Date: 9/10/2020
,roo ivAay.,,i-..�1 Chappels Creek w+E
Drawn by: EJU
Pres
i...,tJ 0 400 800 Checked by: JLS
Mitigation Project
11 1 inch=800 feet
Feet Person County, North Carolina

1950 1977441A4.1,k, t
}r614.:::*) t*
i -- Ml•
+^ '',
S ypp4
40
om. -
•
'. : ' ' - .1411V
Source:USGS EarthExplorer ': • Source:USGS Earth Explorer
1983 .- FI ( - 1993
y �` w, .
, .
r '4114 e,_ -.ili:40
iittpiatip
..� �� � A.
% w-
., rrtilf .' allibi___. _
v ,1I
I. . :JIFF
4.
ei y•
tj
a.�
E
I, a 1,
4 d
ts'll.'-' 1,'.� _ �" '
'.. ' 41111-H';' -::'' ''''' --.....''''. '.: 1'. '''.
"Pr
.
Legend !w� ' . ;'
Source:USGS EarthExplorer 1 �
AJ11J 'Source:USGS EarthExplorer
_ Proposed Easement ¢{; l' bill.1
" Figure 6-Historical Imagery Date: 9/10/2020
i .0.21 6.110.41/4 t.hNN w+
�_�,��* ��•;�,��;!.;�,+� Chappe O.' .te.'; g,i,, ..,.
ls Creek Drawn by: EJUres
"''+ #�t—� 0 �So 1,500 Mitigation Project Checked by: JLS
Feet Person County, North Carolina 1 inch=1,500 feet

GIe-a,•i "'''''.` ',A,.v'•. F::
,.__,.,:,•'...,....,.,,.....,,.._„_.,..-.„.,.
. t. .....4....:::.
,
• /.- .. ,,,,
-.-
fit.,.Ii6 so ,,,,,,, ,,,.., ..::
. •
glir .
'• '..,, '. -
...:*
4
, --
so ...,- '',,,, IA ',,i,o„.'' ..:•7-4 -=i.' — ,,i 1'
.-..
,
, 1
, . .
• ''' '
4' "-
t
. . • ,,,
• „.... -
, !
/
..Olib
,A *
4 •,,...‘ -***, ••—,
-..
.t'1;1:i.,'' 801.70''''- t' ''Nt. •
, , A .1j4.6.:,, , ...
. _
i‘.....
.....ikcP a, 4 ,
; I ...4.. , ,,,,,'.4",'4, ,,,,, ) . • . i .4."
' ,r
I:- '''
i
..
...
, .44,4 ,., ,, $ A ''.
4 ,,t!ic,,ZQ'", ,'. '
t iit"i # ,t "--;....,...-:.", ... .t
.:0%.,
.‘.
1. rf .44.;' .' '"'"'.-
, ., , .
..
i " '\t
..1 4.., • „
a Ai,
..... :.,44 .1-‘40*:.'t. ' - ..,., , "4., , , . ,,,, .,.•1.1 - A.
, . ..." 4.6, "..'•' „ "
, k
. ,
' . ' ..•.1
, , ,, •
"tt
444 . r'44,?.1 44 * - • 7 ''..1, '''TT:
A i __ _ , .0 ,,,
....,
.te5
,4 ,-'' ,%. ,...1,.
ARE:CP-AM-4"IN"' I NA'Ar:A.- 0 ' z...°,' t. -.; , *, ,-,- , •-.,
.,,, - ..
HAz'Al*R*B4t,: '''',' -'4. `.'''',,,,,:t;-::10*---\:,
4._ . .\ „.. 0,
A-.. -..4, :,-0-
•.7...--....,...;,,,
'•."" .4—
•:1',11'-
4'' /-+ ../,•- -, '. /
''t''' -• --''/--
s** 't 47'1'14'' . . ' ' ' ' ' 'it'''.- .">411•041.4.-1'„ :,,,,, , ,,,,,.
pr4;.4:40fir CP - i f' 'ii... ',g., '•-•,,,, •- '
• /
..$
'-,,i,' " ':-','1. '/e.-,1. Ar , • -V.-',-,/, i''',"":11V ., -",/'',
/1. , 14-'.". t-'' -.- ft- . . P''',/,'".-- -'4'/,'.. /•
--- .,-.C-• *3•i„,•,
,,,, , .., • .. „, ,,,,,ipr„, -. dir .' ' el. 8
Iv,
,, ,,,,.4,:, %, .4,- 7',' ."44,,,4 • .,`It ' t .„,,,... 141," ' '„,,,. , „...,'!, 't6
...
,_.
.:
','79
er'1401*
.. ,
,.. ,
,.
•
,4
...,e-
i'
Legend
n
g 'C,.,!1'' '•''. ';',..'' ','1:i ' k' 0
Proposed Easement
. 4f1
„ ,,
,
,„•,... , : . • „„ ,; • ,. _r,
FEMA Zone AE
,.,,,,.., .,••••4 ,',-,-,.i.' ,--,,if, , uu*, .
- '''' ''''' • -.' --;V •,..',*• .4-0.4 4 1..,." -•.:...;,. , ,
FEMA Regulatory Floodway
' 1:V.:.c'',.'• ''•('',1.2.;:::7.)-:.'i:.4',..:.,r
''?It .1-P.%4 "
i 11 .2(Y0 Chance Annual Flood i,
Powerline :',11,•:, -;',,' ,. : ." 4:.•-..1.. 14'.1'''''..',1*•,i,".. -
•-'°,- .
.
,..
'‘...'^
N
..„..,, Figure 7-Project Constraints Date: 9/10/2020
0
Drawn by: EJU
w E
700 Checked by: JLS rs
Chappels Creek
1 vrearo........4701.1
1 ??-441 .417/1.1:1';1.141r4, s
44K111°
350 Mitigation Project
1 inch=700 feet
..7
11
Feet Person County, North Carolina

I' ".4 '
• f, ,`
` +,,,]l�jt _ 1y • Mkt : ., " A� •`v` l �. •�\ _ -- _ N
irair
. co.4
/4,.
,, ._., s
r. ` / i rr r- 0 350 700
r _ .,
, , - . .,
,,,...,e.. 4 . ,.44. .).. i. .
.. , . . / ;
11
`'1d .� 4' -., �L'�i , '� . Feet
vt:
i:.4:t:...
,Lr.. f ,, `�' IN ` 71:
�' �� r�. f .., } .: I Figure 8-Concept Design
�� ' �A" . . �' - ~. Chappels Creek
1 . l' i i. . t . , , , r: `�" �.'� •� •^. ► 1 I. Mitigation Project
e%' ► ti f A • isk Person County, North Carolina
uk
,.�1� i k!►� " f F '' ..I.'' .# \ ,� `! Date: 5/10/2021 Drawn by: EJu
\ � � f. ,•,.
t 1140 r• +" 'W . y mod•�. ' .4. 1� . _ �' ` Checked by:BPB 1 inch=700 feet
s • �� '. `a. '; ! "��i� ii
rk: 1.j }• LEGEND
' ,,r, N ii . . %. ' G, Proposed Easement
;1� 1 ,. ( . t1 •
rr .. • Project Parcel
;. Buffer Mitigation
,� w+ �' i,. 1.
e , Restoration (0 100')
4' • •
� , * , .,r : Restoration (101 200')
' 1 r 4 k4.ti 1 F Enhancement(0-100')
1 .0+' \,7 F ,tip �,` En:::r:: 1i0o00)
• ^ `, //
_ i ' ')
4., try' �' / Preserv
ation (101 200')
' Ilk s\' r►'• )e , Existing Pond (Non Crediting;
i . ' t4 ' g ' i ; ,� Project Stream
fin/ i
l .., 4� i----"rj.., — Intermittent
1� y i .r ` t —Perennial
Y 1' K, t
•
tti r -
1
4' . 'rah„,,. A� ��`( �'',..C.:'
41 8,41;i4.1", 4. qh lik ,
1 .''a 4
-,eloadi—imikompr. iris.*
• R4R, tines. ~'"i'it� ` .1 - abl���#`."S
REFERENCE • `ems ,, , ♦�1
1.)Aerial imagery source:NC OneMap. t, ' *' r 4 _
44r)2.)NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina ,'4 3 4 ;,;? .� . T
FIPS 3200 Feet 'r4.A)Y, + ` i, '" l. *`, 1 ;•, !

USDA FORM AD-1006

U.S. Department of Agriculture
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
PART I (To be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request 3/29/2021
Name of ProjectChappels Creek Riparian Buffer Project Federal Agency Involved Federal highway Admin (FHWA)
Proposed Land Use Conservation Easement County and State person County, NC
PART II (To be completed by NRCS) Date Request Received By Person C n-pleting Form:
NRCS 4/2/2021 Kristin Way
Does the site contain Prime, Unique, Statewide or Local Important Farmland? YES NO Acres Irrigated Average Farm Size
(If no, the FPPA does not apply-do not complete additional parts of this form) 0 ❑ None 209
Major Crop(s) Farmable Land In Govt.Jurisdiction Amount of Farmland As Defined in FPPA
Corn Acres:85.48 % 221,115 Acres: 85.48 % 221,115
Name of Land Evaluation System Used Name of State or Local Site Assessment System Date Land Evaluation Returned by NRCS
Person Co. LESA NA 5/5/2021
PART III (To be completed by Federal Agency) Alternative Site Rating
Site A Site B Site C Site D
A.Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 48.13
B.Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly
C.Total Acres In Site 48.13
PART IV(To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Information
A.Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland 2.8
B.Total Acres Statewide Important or Local Important Farmland 22.2
C. Percentage Of Farmland in County Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted
D. Percentage Of Farmland in Govt.Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value 44.1
PART V(To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Criterion 72
Relative Value of Farmland To Be Converted(Scale of 0 to 100 Points)
PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Site Assessment Criteria Maximum Site A Site B Site C Site D
(Criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5 b. For Corridor project use form NRCS-CPA-106) Points
1. Area In Non-urban Use (15) 13
2. Perimeter In Non-urban Use (10) 9
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed (20) 20
4. Protection Provided By State and Local Government (20) 0
5. Distance From Urban Built-up Area (15) 15
6. Distance To Urban Support Services (15) 10
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average (10) 5
8. Creation Of Non-farmable Farmland (10) 0
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services (5) 5
10.On-Farm Investments (20) 1 1
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services (10) 0
12.Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use (10) 0
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 88 0 0 0
PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100 72 0 0 0
Total Site Assessment(From Part VI above or local site assessment) 160 88 0 0 0
TOTAL POINTS(Total of above 2 lines) 260 160 0 0 0
Was A Local Site Assessment Used?
Site Selected: Date Of Selection YES pi NO n
Reason For Selection:
Name of Federal agency representative completing this form: Date:
(See Instructions on reverse side) Form AD-1006(03-02)

STEPS IN THE PROCESSING THE FARMLAND AND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING FORM
Step 1-Federal agencies(or Federally funded projects)involved in proposed projects that may convert farmland,as defined in the Farmland Protection Policy Act(FPPA)
to nonagricultural uses,will initially complete Parts I and III of the form.For Corridor type projects,the Federal agency shall use form NRCS-CPA-106 in place
of form AD-1006.The Land Evaluation and Site Assessment(LESA)process may also be accessed by visiting the FPPA website,http://fppa.nres.usda.gov/lesa/.
Step 2-Originator(Federal Agency)will send one original copy of the form together with appropriate scaled maps indicating location(s)of project site(s),to the Natural
Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)local Field Office or USDA Service Center and retain a copy for their files.(NRCS has offices in most counties in the
U.S.The USDA Office Information Locator may be found at http://oftices.usda.gov/scripts/ndISAPI.dll/oip_public/USAmap,or the offices can usually be
found in the Phone Book under U.S.Government,Department of Agriculture.A list of field offices is available from the NRCS State Conservationist and State
Office in each State.)
Step 3-NRCS will,within 10 working days after receipt of the completed form,make a determination as to whether the site(s)of the proposed project contains prime,
unique,statewide or local important farmland.(When a site visit or land evaluation system design is needed,NRCS will respond within 30 working days.
Step 4-For sites where farmland covered by the FPPA will be converted by the proposed project,NRCS will complete Parts II,IV and V of the form.
Step 5-NRCS will return the original copy of the form to the Federal agency involved in the project,and retain a file copy for NRCS records.
Step 6-The Federal agency involved in the proposed project will complete Parts VI and VII of the form and return the form with the final selected site to the servicing
NRCS office.
Step 7-The Federal agency providing financial or technical assistance to the proposed project will make a determination as to whether the proposed conversion is consistent
with the FPPA.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING FORM
(For Federal Agency)
Part I: When completing the "County and State" questions, list all the local governments that are responsible for local land
use controls where site(s) are to be evaluated.
Part III: When completing item B (Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly), include the following:
1. Acres not being directly converted but that would no longer be capable of being farmed after the conversion, because the
conversion would restrict access to them or other major change in the ability to use the land for agriculture.
2. Acres planned to receive services from an infrastructure project as indicated in the project justification (e.g. highways,
utilities planned build out capacity)that will cause a direct conversion.
Part VI:Do not complete Part VI using the standard format if a State or Local site assessment is used. With local and NRCS
assistance, use the local Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA).
1. Assign the maximum points for each site assessment criterion as shown in § 658.5(b)of CFR. In cases of corridor-type
project such as transportation, power line and flood control, criteria#5 and #6 will not apply and will, be weighted zero,
however, criterion #8 will be weighed a maximum of 25 points and criterion #11 a maximum of 25 points.
2. Federal agencies may assign relative weights among the 12 site assessment criteria other than those shown on the
FPPA rule after submitting individual agency FPPA policy for review and comment to NRCS. In all cases where other
weights are assigned, relative adjustments must be made to maintain the maximum total points at 160. For project sites
where the total points equal or exceed 160, consider alternative actions, as appropriate, that could reduce adverse
impacts (e.g. Alternative Sites, Modifications or Mitigation).
Part VII: In computing the "Total Site Assessment Points"where a State or local site assessment is used and the total
maximum number of points is other than 160, convert the site assessment points to a base of 160.
Example: if the Site Assessment maximum is 200 points, and the alternative Site "A" is rated 180 points:
Total points assigned Site A 180 X 160 = 144 points for Site A
Maximum points possible = 200
For assistance in completing this form or FPPA process, contact the local NRCS Field Office or USDA Service Center.
NRCS employees, consult the FPPA Manual and/or policy for additional instructions to complete the AD-1006 form.

EDR REPORT

Chappels Creek
340-444 Kermit Duncan Road
Timberlake, NC 27583
Inquiry Number: 6377926.2s
February 23, 2021
The EDR Radius Map TM Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road,4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
CE DR® Toll Free:800.352.0050
www.edmet.com
FORM-LBD-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary _ ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary_ 11
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum_ A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched_ PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any analyses,estimates,ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property.Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc.All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format,in whole
or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.or its affiliates.All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6377926.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc(EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence:Transaction Screen Process(E 1528-14)or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
340-444 KERMIT DUNCAN ROAD
TIMBERLAKE, NC 27583
COORDINATES
Latitude(North): 36.3234210-36° 19'24.31"
Longitude(West): 78.9447450-78° 56'41.08"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X(Meters): 684492.2
UTM Y(Meters): 4021580.8
Elevation: 567 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5945057 TIMBERLAKE, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140619
Source: USDA
TC6377926.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
340-444 KERMIT DUNCAN ROAD
TIMBERLAKE, NC 27583
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST(ft. &mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
1 L J MARTIN &SONS IN 222 KISER MARTIN RD UST, Financial Assurance Higher 73,0.014,WSW
6377926.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA-Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA-Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators(Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
TC6377926.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID)Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
TC6377926.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR RCRA- Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_ Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA_ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA)Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
TC6377926.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO Enforcement&Compliance History Information
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP .Animal Operation Permits Listing
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS . Mineral Resources Data System
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB) Listing
PCSRP Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES:SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable(orphan)sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6377926.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under
Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).The data come from the Department of
Environment&Natural Resources' Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database.
A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/30/2020 has revealed that there is 1 UST
site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
L J MARTIN&SONS IN 222 KISER MARTIN RD WSW 0-1/8(0.014 mi.) 1 8
Tank Status: Removed
Tank Status:Current
Facility Id:00-0-0000027763
TC6377926.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6377926.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW MAP - 6377926.2S
n 4 r '- A
ii
isorasir 11
LO
liar
ILO— ,
r'
411:41111
Target Property 0 1i4 1/2 1 naves
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property '- Indian Reservations BIA \y Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than Disposal Sites
the target property Power transmission lines
A Manufactured Gas Plants \ Special Flood Hazard Area(1%)
National Priority List Sites
V\ 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
Dept.Defense Sites
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Chappels Creek CLIENT: Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
ADDRESS: 340-444 Kermit Duncan Road CONTACT: Grayson Sanner
Timberlake NC 27583 INQUIRY#: 6377926.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.323421 /78.944745 DATE: February 23,2021 11:59 am
Copyright g 2021 EDR,Inc.i?2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6377926.2S
1.1111P-
i, tp
C.,
s
Gr eel
a ea '
o�
01116 l
... '-' , ,,oni''''A,
e.
e.
co
a r R i dg e !
9a,,; •111
9 s
c.
� I
0111. C C
A
'° )11:
s
o
/ s
h a
O
c
111, i
3 /
°" eda�f o
'(7/
til
� �� e k Rd o� �
N
o
AfTarget Property o 1/a 1/2 1 naves
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property - Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than Disposal Sites
the target property Power transmission lines
A Manufactured Gas Plants / Special Flood Hazard Area(1%)
VA0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
i Sensitive Receptors
t,; National Priority List Sites National Wetland Inventory
Dept.Defense Sites State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Chappels Creek CLIENT: Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
ADDRESS: 340-444 Kermit Duncan Road CONTACT: Grayson Sanner
Timberlake NC 27583 INQUIRY#: 6377926.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.323421 /78.944745 DATE: February 23,2021 12:00 pm
Copyright g 2021 EDR,Inc.(g?2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

I
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Federal institutional controls/
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LCID 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6377926.2s Page 4

I
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
State and tribal institutional
control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal Brown fields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6377926.2s Page 5

I
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 80 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen /NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PRP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ECHO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOCKET HWC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ASBESTOS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
NPDES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
AOP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SEPT HAULERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MINES MRDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TC6377926.2s Page 6

I
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
CCB 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCSRP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
-Totals-- 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
NOTES:
TP=Target Property
NR= Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6377926.2s Page 7

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
1 L J MARTIN &SONS INC UST 0003146446
WSW 222 KISER MARTIN RD Financial Assurance N/A
< 1/8 TIMBERLAKE, NC 27583
0.014 mi.
73 ft.
Relative: UST:
Higher Name: L J MARTIN&SONS INC
Actual: Address: 222 KISER MARTIN RD
605 ft. City,State,Zip: TIMBERLAKE,NC 27583
Facility Id: 00-0-0000027763
Contact: L.J.MARTIN&SONS, INC.
Contact Addressl: 222 KISER MARTIN RD
Contact Address2: Not reported
Contact City/State/Zip: TIMBERLAKE,NC 27583-9316
FIPS County Desc: Person
Latitude: 36.32163
Longitude: -78.94856
Tank Id: 1
Tank Status: Removed
Installed Date: 01/01/1987
Perm Close Date: 02/10/1998
Product Name: Diesel
Tank Capacity: 10000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: Not reported
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Ball Float Valve
Spill Protection Name: Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name: Unknown
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id: 2
Tank Status: Removed
Installed Date: 01/01/1987
Perm Close Date: 02/10/1998
Product Name: Diesel
Tank Capacity: 10000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: Not reported
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Ball Float Valve
Spill Protection Name: Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name: Unknown
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
TC6377926.2s Page 8

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
L J MARTIN &SONS INC (Continued) 0003146446
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id: 3
Tank Status: Removed
Installed Date: 01/01/1964
Perm Close Date: 01/06/1994
Product Name: Gasoline,Gas Mix
Tank Capacity: 10000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: Not reported
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Unknown
Spill Protection Name: Unknown
Leak Detection Name: Unknown
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall Steel
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall Steel
Decode for PSYS KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id: Al
Tank Status: Current
Installed Date: 02/10/1998
Perm Close Date: Not reported
Product Name: Diesel
Tank Capacity: 8000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: 0
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name: Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name: Not reported
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id: A2
Tank Status: Current
Installed Date: 02/10/1998
Perm Close Date: Not reported
Product Name: Diesel
TC6377926.2s Page 9

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
L J MARTIN&SONS INC (Continued) 0003146446
Tank Capacity: 8000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: 0
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name: Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name: Not reported
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
NC Financial Assurance 1:
Name: L J MARTIN&SONS INC
Address: 222 KISER MARTIN RD
City,State,Zip: TIMBERLAKE,NC 27583
Facility ID: 00-0-0000027763
Region: 1
Financial Responsibility Desc: Insurance&Risk Retension
Financial Responsibility Name:Colony Insurance Company
Started Date: Not reported
Ended Date: Not reported
TC6377926.2s Page 10

Count:0 records. ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
NO SITES FOUND
TC6377926.2s Page 11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis,as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List(Superfund).The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program.NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas.As such,EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC)and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center(EPIC)
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register.EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments,and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens.Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980,the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability.USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6377926.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/1994 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/30/1994 Last EDR Contact:08/15/2011
Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan(NCP)establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e),sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List(NPL)and Base Realignment and Closure(BRAG)sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,Compensation and Liability Information System(CERCLIS)Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version:04/03/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/05/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/14/2019 Last EDR Contact:12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS(Superfund Enterprise Management System)tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States.The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS,renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015.The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states,municipalities,private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Act(CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List(NPL)and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6377926.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE(Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive)tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information.The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015.EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available.Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites.Archived status indicates that,to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List(NPL),unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site;it only means that.based upon available information,the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA-Treatment,Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle,treat,store,or dispose of the
waste.TSDFs treat,store,or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRA-Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Large quantity generators(LQGs)generate
over 1,000 kilograms(kg)of hazardous waste,or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6377926.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Small quantity generators(SQGs)generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators(Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Very small quantity generators(VSQGs)generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 11/11/2020 Source: Department of the Navy
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/24/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place.Engineering controls include various forms of caps,building
foundations,liners,and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:11/05/2020
Number of Days to Update:13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions,construction restrictions,property use restrictions,and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site.Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:11/05/2020
Number of Days to Update:13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6377926.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System.ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/15/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/15/2020
Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites.The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version:08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites.State hazardous waste site records are the states'equivalent to CERCLIS.These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list.Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund)are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties.Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version:09/04/2020 Source: Department of Environment,Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites.SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state.Depending on the state,these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version:09/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site(TDDSS)Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency..Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version:09/02/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/16/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6377926.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information.(Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version:09/11/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LCID: Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notification facilities(under 2 acres in
size)in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:04/30/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/22/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites,as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database.Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho,Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida,Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6377926.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan,Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA, Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas,and Nebraska
Date of Government Version:04/15/2020 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version:04/29/2020 Source: EPA Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado,Montana, North Dakota,South Dakota,Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona,California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/06/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6377926.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version:07/21/2020 Source: FEMA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act(RCRA)and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program.Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/04/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:57 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version:08/12/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10(Alaska, Idaho,Oregon,Washington,and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/15/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6(Louisiana,Arkansas,Oklahoma,New Mexico,Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7(Iowa,Kansas, Missouri,Nebraska,and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/03/2020 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6377926.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine,Massachusetts, New Hampshire,Rhode Island,Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/29/2020 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8(Colorado, Montana,North Dakota,South Dakota, Utah,Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9(Arizona,California,Hawaii, Nevada,the Pacific Islands,and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: EPA Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4(Alabama,Florida, Georgia,Kentucky,Mississippi,North Carolina,South Carolina,Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5(Michigan,Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible,practical,or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version:09/04/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/11/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6377926.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version:03/20/2008 Source: EPA, Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/22/2008 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/19/2008 Last EDR Contact:04/20/2009
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version:07/27/2015 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/29/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2016 Last EDR Contact:12/15/2020
Number of Days to Update:142 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version:09/04/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled,or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment.All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update:1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property,the expansion,redevelopment,or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant,or contaminant.Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped,open land,and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment,Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System(ACRES)stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions.A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community.Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA,as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version:09/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/11/2020
Number of Days to Update:86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
TC6377926.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment& Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update:17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version:09/16/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/03/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/24/2008 Last EDR Contact:01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update:52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County,California.
Date of Government Version:01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version:06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact:06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version:04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health&Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact:01/29/2021
Number of Days to Update:176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
TC6377926.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version:03/18/2020 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/22/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations.The U.S.Department of Justice("the Department")provides this
web site as a public service.It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases,the source of the entries is not the Department,and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy.Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by,for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version:03/18/2020 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/22/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA('Superfund')lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies.These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System.HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version:09/20/2020 Source: U.S.Department of Transportation
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills,hazardous material releases,sanitary sewer overflows,wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets,citizen complaints,and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/14/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/11/2021
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC6377926.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/21/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases.Typically,
they may include chemical,oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990.Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version:09/27/2012 Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:03/06/2013 Last EDR Contact:01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990.Typically,
they may include chemical,oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990.Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version:06/14/2001 Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:03/06/2013 Last EDR Contact:01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR: RCRA-Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version:09/29/2020 Source: U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/17/2021
Number of Days to Update:69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands,administered by the Department of Defense,that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States,Puerto Rico,and the U.S.Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/10/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact:01/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
TC6377926.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States.Lands included are administrated by:Army Corps
of Engineers,Bureau of Reclamation,National Wild and Scenic River,National Wildlife Refuge,Public Domain Land,
Wilderness,Wilderness Study Area,Wildlife Management Area,Bureau of Indian Affairs,Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service,Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version:04/02/2018 Source: U.S.Geological Survey
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/11/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019 Last EDR Contact:01/07/2021
Number of Days to Update:574 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998,with support from the U.S.EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs.Currently the member states are Alabama,Connecticut,Florida, Illinois,Kansas,
Minnesota,Missouri, North Carolina,Oregon,South Carolina,Tennessee,Texas,and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version:01/01/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/03/2017 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/07/2017 Last EDR Contact:02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update:63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/24/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up,closure,and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version:09/21/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a"Watch List'to facilitate dialogue between EPA,state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority.Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred.Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA,state and
local agencies-primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version:08/30/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/21/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/17/2014 Last EDR Contact:02/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe.This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action.The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites.Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up.Still others have not been fully investigated yet,and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version:09/30/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/20/2018 Last EDR Contact:02/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6377926.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act.TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/18/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency:Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System.TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air,water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/14/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide,Fungicide and Rodenticide Act,as amended(92 Stat.829)requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year.Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides,active ingredients and devices
being produced,and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/04/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/21/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision.ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL(Superfund)site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC6377926.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances.The Risk Management Program
Rule(RMP Rule)was written to implement Section 112(r)of these amendments.The rule,which built upon existing
industry codes and standards,requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program,which includes a(n):Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release,an accident history of the last five years,and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance,monitoring,and employee
training measures;and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care,employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies(e.g the fire department)should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/12/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA.For administration
actions after September 30, 1995,data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued.EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version:04/17/1995 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/03/1995 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/07/1995 Last EDR Contact:06/02/2008
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version:04/27/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/06/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database.PADS Identifies generators,transporters,commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2019 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/11/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2019 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS)supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/23/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/10/2017 Last EDR Contact:12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6377926.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA(Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act).To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version:04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention,Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version:04/09/2009 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements.To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version:08/05/2020 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/10/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:59 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/01/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:12/01/2020
Number of Days to Update:70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version:01/12/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019 Last EDR Contact:11/30/2020
Number of Days to Update:251 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version:09/13/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/06/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:96 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database(RADINFO)contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6377926.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:07/01/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2019 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA regions.The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB).NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act).Some EPA regions
are now closing out records.Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2007
Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection&Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA
regions.The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB).NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA(Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act).Some
EPA regions are now closing out records.Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records,it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact:12/17/2008
Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation,Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version:01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation,Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/27/2021
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund(CERCLA)Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL(Superfund)sites.Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version:09/30/2020 Source: Department of Justice,Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/08/2020 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports:01/04/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste.BRS captures detailed data from two groups:Large Quantity Generators(LQG)
and Treatment,Storage,and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Source: EPA/NTIS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:151 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Biennially
TC6377926.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/14/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/10/2017 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:546 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program(FUSRAP)in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S.Atomic Energy Commission(AEC)operations.
Date of Government Version:08/08/2017 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/11/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:02/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs.When the mills
shut down,large piles of the sand-like material(mill tailings)remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low;however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version:08/30/2019 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/15/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/28/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update:74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S.where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964.These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version:04/05/2001 Source: American Journal of Public Health
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/27/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Last EDR Contact:12/02/2009
Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
US AIRS(AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem(AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System(AIRS).AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S.EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies.This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution,such as electric power plants,
steel mills,factories,and universities,and provides information about the air pollutants they produce.Action,
air program,air program pollutant,and general level plant data.It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6377926.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/26/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update:100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency:Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/26/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update:100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency:Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information.Department of Labor,Mine Safety&Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020 Source: DOL,Mine Safety&Health Admi
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/30/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:11/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971.The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:11/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous(ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals,such as iron
ore or molybdenum)and nonferrous(Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals,such
as gold,silver,copper,zinc,and lead)metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version:05/06/2020 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/27/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact:11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines&Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2011 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/13/2011 Last EDR Contact:11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:97 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining(primarily coal mining)is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977(SMCRA).The inventory
contains information on the location,type,and extent of AML impacts,as well as,information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems.The inventory is based upon field surveys by State,Tribal,and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6377926.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:09/16/2020 Source: Department of Interior
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/10/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System.FINDS contains both facility information and'pointers'to other sources that contain more
detail.EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report:PCS(Permit Compliance System),AIRS(Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET(Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS(Federal Underground Injection Control),C-DOCKET(Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes),FFIS(Federal Facilities
Information System),STATE(State Environmental Laws and Statutes),and PADS(PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/01/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:12/01/2020
Number of Days to Update:55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact:11/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ECHO: Enforcement&Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 10/03/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/06/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/04/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Defense
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/02/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80(Code of Federal Regulations)EPA Fuels
Programs.All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 11/13/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/13/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact:02/17/2021
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
TC6377926.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:09/08/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Health&Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/08/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment,storage,
transportation,use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version:09/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites,active and abandoned,that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version:09/08/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/16/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/18/2020
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities.Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure,post-closure care,and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/04/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:57 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities.Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure,post-closure care,and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact:12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6377926.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:12/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact:12/02/2020
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System)permits.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/27/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/15/2021 Last EDR Contact:01/27/2021
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/30/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact:11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version:04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/27/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/11/2020
Number of Days to Update:1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)in North
Carolina, in point data form.The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version:02/27/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version:04/06/2018 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/21/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019 Last EDR Contact:11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site(SLAS)and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility(SDTF)sites in North Carolina.The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version:05/13/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6377926.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PCSRP: Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum-contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:07/06/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2020 Last EDR Contact:12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/18/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System(NPDES)permit holding facilities.PCS tracks the permit,compliance,and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version:07/14/2011 Source: EPA,Office of Water
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/05/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/29/2011 Last EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update:55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/06/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/06/2015 Last EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update:120 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/05/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/06/2015 Last EDR Contact:12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update:29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants(manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers.Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel.These plants used whale oil,rosin,coal,or a mixture
of coal,oil,and water that also produced a significant amount of waste.Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar(oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals),sludges,oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment.The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly,serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version:N/A Source: EDR,Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR:N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:N/A Last EDR Contact:N/A
Number of Days to Update:N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers.EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might,in EDR's opinion,include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments.The categories reviewed included,but were not limited to gas,gas station,gasoline station,
filling station,auto,automobile repair,auto service station,service station,etc.This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR.EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC6377926.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:N/A Source: EDR,Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR:N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:N/A Last EDR Contact:N/A
Number of Days to Update:N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers.EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might,in EDR's opinion,include dry cleaning establishments.The categories reviewed included,but were
not limited to dry cleaners,cleaners, laundry,laundromat,cleaning/laundry,wash&dry etc.This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR.EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version:N/A Source: EDR,Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR:N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:N/A Last EDR Contact:N/A
Number of Days to Update:N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment,Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:N/A Source: Department of Environment,Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update:176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:N/A Source: Department of Environment,Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update:196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version:N/A Source: Department of Environment,Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update:172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6377926.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report,the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example,the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover,the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data.Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version:08/10/2020 Source: Department of Energy&Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2020 Last EDR Contact:02/12/2021
Number of Days to Update:13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/24/2021
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact:01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version:01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/29/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:01/29/2021
Number of Days to Update:72 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version:06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact:01/11/2021
Number of Days to Update:53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/02/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2019 Last EDR Contact:02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update:69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version:05/31/2018 Source: Department of Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/19/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:09/03/2019 Last EDR Contact:12/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency:Annually
TC6377926.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle(Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals,Gas Liquids(LPG/NGL),and Specialty
Gases(Miscellaneous))N=Natural Gas Bundle(Natural Gas,Gas Liquids(LPG/NGL),and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)).This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media.This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose.Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media.This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose.Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly,the sick,and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined,EDR indicates those buildings and facilities-schools,daycares,hospitals,medical centers,
and nursing homes-where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source:American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone:[phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers:Provider of Services Listing
Source:Centers for Medicare&Medicaid Services
Telephone:[phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare&Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S.Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source:National Institutes of Health
Telephone:[phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source:National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone:[phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics'primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive,annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts,which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source:National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone:[phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics'primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers:Child Care Facility List
Source:Department of Health&Human Services
Telephone:[phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer(NFHL)which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source:FEMA
Telephone:[phone]
Date of Government Version:2003,2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR
in 2002,2005 and 2010 from the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data:Wetland Inventory
Source:US Fish& Wildlife Service
Telephone:[phone]
TC6377926.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source:U.S.Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
©2015 TomTom North America, Inc.All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6377926.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
CHAPPELS CREEK
340-444 KERMIT DUNCAN ROAD
TIMBERLAKE, NC 27583
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude(North): 36.323421 -36° 19' 24.32"
Longitude(West): 78.944745-78° 56' 41.08"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X(Meters): 684492.2
UTM Y(Meters): 4021580.8
Elevation: 567 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map: 5945057 TIMBERLAKE, NC
Version Date: 2013
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6377926.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information(from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General SSE
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
C la, co N N
m — O O
N
. -
North I South
TP
W
0 N t T a'.� O A A O N V V
N T A
West I East
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 567 ft.
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative(not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6377926.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information(major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
3720091300J FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type
3720092400J FEMA FIRM Flood data
3720091400J FEMA FIRM Flood data
37145C0100B FEMA Q3 Flood data
37145C0150B FEMA Q3 Flood data
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage
TIMBERLAKE YES-refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC6377926.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Eugeosynclinal Deposits
System: Cambrian
Series: Cambrian
Code: Ce (decoded above as Era, System&Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E.Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S.at 1:2,500,000 Scale-a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS- 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's(USDA)Soil Conservation Service(SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey(NCSS)and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States.A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name: HERNDON
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B- Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential- Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: >60 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: >60 inches
TC6377926.2s Page A-4

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeabiliy Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 9 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit less than
200),Silty 50%),silt.
Soils.
2 9 inches 48 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Clayey more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
3 48 inches 68 inches silt loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 3.60
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Clayey more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: sandy loam
gravelly-silt loam
stony-silt loam
clay loam
channery-silt loam
loam
Surficial Soil Types: sandy loam
gravelly-silt loam
stony-silt loam
clay loam
channery-silt loam
loam
Shallow Soil Types: silty clay loam
sandy clay
silt loam
loam
clay loam
very channery-silt loam
Deeper Soil Types: silty clay loam
weathered bedrock
unweathered bedrock
sandy clay loam
clay
TC6377926.2s Page A-5

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL/REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE(miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database 1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
1 USGS40000896596 1/2-1 Mile ENE
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
TC6377926.2s Page A-6

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6377926.2s
.77\61111 . Slilr- 11 ''' .411
1
,,, 4, fro,
4
OIsl, ''''
_
_dgi:) ---- 41 ---IIIIIIII-f-1
pl‘r7
_ _____„,....4 ,,„..,
0
11040
liti
650,
1 0 0 O
f
0 ilel/
,,,, ,b ,, ,, 4
sifrom.
iirls
s/001
i /4 I I sji P lin r*41 0:,, 4 r j•re...)06.._
6
\,,,, in. 4
6�
laii)
6Q0 j
Pik '741.1ir 16 Allorl
, Ale 1p 440 - 0 /
I
1 0
i
, ,..
,i 0,,,,,,,,it 4 ,
, o
k • ;I'l.
•
01114 0
o ^
4 Alr
b.
0
41k.ii o 0 4,1
N /IF 4, y
litgb, ,
„ 660 1% o
0
.. 1 4,Veit
o "C‘I 0 0
("44411111
4' ilrf -
J 6
OO " rli A i IP
_
NCounty Boundary 0 va vz 1 M files
N Major Roads
Contour Lines f Groundwater Flow Direction �� Wildlife Areas
,(1—)OO Earthquake epicenter,Richter 5 or greater ) Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
® Water Wells ( —) Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare&Endangered Species
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
SITE NAME: Chappels Creek CLIENT: Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
ADDRESS: 340-444 Kermit Duncan Road CONTACT: Grayson Sanner
Timberlake NC 27583 INQUIRY#: 6377926.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.323421 /78.944745 DATE: February 23,2021 12:00 pm
Copyright g 2021 EDR,Inc.(g?2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

1
GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
1
ENE FED USGS USGS40000896596
1/2-1 Mile
Higher
Organization ID: USGS-NC
Organization Name: USGS North Carolina Water Science Center
Monitor Location: PS-062 Type: Well
Description: Not Reported HUC: Not Reported
Drainage Area: Not Reported Drainage Area Units: Not Reported
Contrib Drainage Area: Not Reported Contrib Drainage Area Unts: Not Reported
Aquifer: Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers
Formation Type: Epiclastic Metavolcanic Rock
Aquifer Type: Not Reported Construction Date: Not Reported
Well Depth: 100 Well Depth Units: ft
Well Hole Depth: Not Reported Well Hole Depth Units: Not Reported
Ground water Ievels,Number of Measurements: 1 Level reading date: 1966
Feet below surface: 15 Feet to sea level: Not Reported
Note: Not Reported
TC6377926.2s Page A-8

1
GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_SNHA NC10003407
Acres: 192.54 Sitename: FLAT RIVER AQUATIC HABITAT
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: A
Site id: 3407 Edr id: NC10003407
TC6377926.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
Federal EPA Radon Zone for PERSON County: 3
Note:Zone 1 indoor average level>4 pCi/L.
:Zone 2 indoor average level>=2 pCi/L and<=4 pCi/L.
:Zone 3 indoor average level<2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for PERSON COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 1
Area Average Activity %<4 pCi/L %4-20 pCi/L %>20 pCi/L
Living Area-1st Floor 1.200 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area-2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
TC6377926.2s Page A-10

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5'Digital Elevation Model(DEM)
Source:United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5'Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006.The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000-and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps.The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source:U.S.Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer(NFHL)which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source:FEMA
Telephone:[phone]
Date of Government Version:2003,2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR
in 2002,2005 and 2010 from the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data:Wetland Inventory
Source:US Fish& Wildlife Service
Telephone:[phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System(AIS)to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points.EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report,hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source:P.G.Schruben, R.E.Arndt and W.J.Bawiec,Geology of the Conterminous U.S.at 1:2,500,000 Scale-A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B.King and H.M.Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS-11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)
The U.S.Department of Agriculture's(USDA)Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey(NCSS)and is responsible for collecting,storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States.A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape.Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed(SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO:Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture,Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service,mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360.Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic(SSURGO)database.SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps.This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners,townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6377926.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL/REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells,rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System(SDWIS)after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995,the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System(FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System(NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater.The groundwater data includes information on wells,springs,and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites:Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species,occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems(terrestrial or aquatic),and special animal habitats(e.g.,colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas:Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites(terrestrial or aquatic)that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species,rare or high quality natural communities,or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database:NC Radon
Source:Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Telephone:[phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source:USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA)and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986-1992.Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6377926.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307&309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S.with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration,800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters,Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce,National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines,prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
©2015 TomTom North America, Inc.All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6377926.2s Page PSGR-3

CORRESPONDENCE

3600 Glenwood Avenue,Suite 100
r es Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main:713.520.5400
March 29,2021
Kristin May
Natural Resources Conservation Service
4407 Bland Rd., Suite 117
Raleigh,NC 27609
Subject: AD-1006 Request for the Chappels Creek Mitigation Project in Person County
Dear Kristin May,
Resource Enviornmental Solutions(RES)requests review and comment from the Natural Resources Conservation Service
on any possible concerns that may emerge with respect to farmland resources including prime, unique, statewide or local
important farmland associated with the Chappels Creek riparian buffer mitigation project. This project is a NC Division of
Mitigation Services (NCDMS) full-delivery project as depicted in the attached figures. Please note that this request is in
support of the development of the Categorical Exclusion(CE)and an Environmental Screening document for the NCDMS
portion of the Chappels Creek Mitigation Project(Project).
The Project is in the Neuse River Basin within 14-digit Hydrologic Unit(HU)03020201010010 and NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR) Sub-Basin 03-04-01. The proposed project presents the opportunity to restore, enhance, and protect in
perpetuity,up to 48.13 acres of riparian buffer in the Neuse River Basin. Coordinates for the site are as follows: 36.322, -
78.945.
An inventory of soils data was completed by RES utilizing Web Soil Survey to determine prime farmland classifications
for the proposed 48.13 acre conservation easement. Two soil map units in the project area are classified as prime farmland,
making up 5.9%of the site(Georgeville loam,2 to 6 percent slopes and Herndon loam,2 to 6 percent slopes).One soil map
unit is classified as prime farmland if drained and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the
growing season, making up 46.9% of the site (Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded).
Currently,there is open water within the Project,accounting for 1.1%of the site and therefore cannot be used as farmland.
Four soil map units in the project area are classified as farmland of statewide importance, making up 46.1% of the site
(Georgeville loam,6 to 10 percent slopes,Herndon loam,6 to 10 percent slopes,Iredell gravelly loam,2 to 6 percent slopes,
and Lignum loam,2 to 6 percent slopes).
Enclosed is Form AD-1006 with Parts I and III completed and maps of the Chappels Creek Mitigation Project. We ask that
you review the site information and complete Parts II,IV,and V as required by NRCS. Please email(via [e-mail]),
or mail your reply to the our office on 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100,Raleigh,NC 27612.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact me with any questions that
you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
Emily Ulman Ecologist
Attachments: US Department of Agriculture Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Form(AD-1006),Web Soil Survey
Report,Vicinity Map(Figure 1),USGS Topographic Map(Figure 2a&2b),Aerial Map(Figure 3),Conceptual Plan Map
(Figure 4)
res.us

USDA
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources
Conservation Service May 5, 2021
North Carolina Emily Ulman
State Office Ecologist
4407 Bland Rd. Resource Environmental Solutions
Suite 117 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh Raleigh, NC 27612
North Carolina 27609
Voice(704)680-3541 Dear Emily Ulman;
Fax[phone]
The following information is in response to your request soliciting comments regarding the
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project Site in Person County, NC.
Projects are subject to Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) requirements if they may
irreversibly convert farmland (directly or indirectly)to nonagricultural use and are completed
by a Federal agency or with assistance from a Federal agency.
For the purpose of FPPA, farmland includes prime farmland, unique farmland, and land of
statewide or local importance. Farmland subject to FPPA requirements does not have to be
currently used for cropland. It can be forest land, pastureland, cropland, or other land, but
not water or urban built-up land. Farmland means prime or unique farmlands as defined in
section 1540(c)(1) of the Act or farmland that is determined by the appropriate state or unit
of local government agency or agencies with concurrence of the Secretary to be farmland of
statewide of local importance.
"Farmland" does not include land already in or committed to urban development or water
storage. Farmland "already in" urban development or water storage includes all such land
with a density of 30 structures per 40-acre area. Farmland already in urban development
also includes lands identified as "urbanized area" (UA) on the Census Bureau Map, or as
urban area mapped with a "tint overprint" on the USGS topographical maps, or as "urban-
built-up" on the USDA Important Farmland Maps. See over for more information.
The area in question includes land classified as Prime Farmland. In accordance with the
Code of Federal Regulations 7CFR 658, Farmland Protection Policy Act, the CPA-106 was
initiated. NRCS Completed Parts II, IV, V of the form and returned for completion by the
requesting agency.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at [phone] office or(704) 754-
6734 cell.
Sincerely,
Kristin L May
Acting State Soil Scientist
cc:
Brandon King, supervisory soil conservationist, NRCS, Burlington, NC
The Natural Resources Conservation Service
is an agency of the Department of Agriculture's
Farm Production and Conservation(FPAC).
An Equal Opportunity Provider,Employer,and Lender

3600 Glenwood Avenue,Suite 100
r es
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main:713.520.5400
March 29, 2021
Renee Gledhill-Earley
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-4617
Subject: Project Scoping for Chappels Creek Mitigation Project in Person County
Dear Renee Gledhill-Earley,
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES) requests review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge
with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with a potential riparian buffer mitigation project named the
Chappels Creek Mitigation Project.The Chappels Creek Project is comprised of an NC Division of Mitigation Services full-
delivery project, as depicted in the attached figures. The project has been identified by RES to provide compensatory
mitigation for unavoidable riparian buffer impacts. The proposed project presents the opportunity to restore, enhance, and
protect in perpetuity,up to 48.13 acres of riparian buffer in the Neuse River Basin. Coordinates for the site are as follows:
36.322,-78.945.
A review of the N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service database
(http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/;accessed August 6,2020)was performed as part of the site due diligence evaluation to reveal
any listed or potential eligible historic or archeological resources. This search did not reveal any registered occurrences
within the Project area. There were also no occurrences within a half-mile radius. Land use around the project is row crop
fields,residential land,and scattered riparian forest.
We ask that you review this site based on the attached information to determine the presence of any historic properties and
provide a comment response of your findings.We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation.You may
return the comment to my attention at the address in the letterhead,or via email at [e-mail] feel free to contact
me with any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
Emily Ulman 1 Ecologist
Attachments: Project Description,Vicinity Map(Figure 1),USGS Topographic Map(Figure 2a& 2b),Aerial Map
(Figure 3),Conceptual Plan Map(Figure 4)and a KMZ of the project boundaries.
res.us

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D.Reid Wilson
May 6, 2021
Emily Ulman [e-mail]
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh,NC 27612
Re: Chappels Creek Mitigation project, 36.322, -78.945, Person County, ER 21-0923
Dear Ms. Ulman:
Thank you for your email of April 2, 2021,regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore,we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
U
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6898

3600 Glenwood Avenue,Suite 100
Or es
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
March 29,2021
Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Coordinator
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Sandhills Depot
PO Box 149
Hoffman,NC 28347
Subject: Project Scoping for Chappels Creek Mitigation Project in Person County
Dear Ms. Garrison,
The purpose of this letter is to request your review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to
your office's purview for fish and wildlife associated with a potential buffer restoration project on the attached site(figures
with approximate property lines and areas of potential ground disturbance are enclosed). The Chappels Creek Project is an
NC Division of Mitigation Services full-delivery project,as depicted in the attached figures.The project has been identified
by Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES) to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable riparian buffer
impacts. The proposed project presents the opportunity to restore, enhance, and protect in perpetuity,up to 48.13 acres of
riparian buffer in the Neuse River Basin. Coordinates for the site are as follows: 36.322,-78.945. The Project watershed is
primarily managed agricultural land, sparse disturbed forested areas,and residential development.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation.You may return the comment to my attention at the
address in the letterhead,or via email to eulman(ares.us. Please feel free to contact me with any questions that you may
have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
Emily Ulman l Ecologist
Attachments: Project Description, .KMZ of proposed project boundaries,Vicinity Map (Figure 1),USGS Topographic
Map(Figure 2a&2b),Aerial Map(Figure 3),Conceptual Plan Map(Figure 4)
res.us

of A�•
.6
NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION 0
Cameron Ingram,Executive Director
May 3,2021
Ms. Emily Ulman
Resource Environmental Solutions
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh,NC 27612
Subject: Request for Environmental Information for Chappels Creek Mitigation Project,Person
County,North Carolina.
Dear Ms.Ulman,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission(NCWRC)have reviewed the
proposed project description. Comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions of the Clean
Water Act of 1977 (as amended),Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(48 Stat.401,as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667e)and North Carolina General Statutes(G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Contracted by the NC Division of Mitigation Resources,Resource Environmental Solutions has
developed the Chappels Creek Mitigation Project. The 48.13-acre site will restore,enhance and protect
riparian buffer. Land use in the watershed is primarily agricultural,forested and residential. The project
area is located north and south of Antioch Church Road,west of its intersection with Kermit Duncan
Road, south of Roxboro.
The project area drains to Chappels Creek in the Neuse River basin. Stream restoration projects often
improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Establishing native,forested buffers in riparian areas will
improve both aquatic and terrestrial habitats and provide a travel corridor for wildlife species.
In addition to stringent best management practices for erosion and sediment control during construction,
the NCWRC recommends the use of biodegradable and wildlife-friendly sediment and erosion control
devices. Silt fencing,fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose-weave netting that is made of
natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing and
similar products that have been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should be avoided as they impede
the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have detrimental
effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs and clogging
of gills. Any invasive plant species found onsite should be removed and destroyed.
Mailing Address: N.C.Wildlife Resources Commission • 1701 Mail Service Center • Raleigh,NC 27699-1701
Telephone: [phone] • ncwildlife.org

Page 2
May 3,2021
Scoping—Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If I can be of further assistance,
please contact me at(910)409-7350 or gabriela.garrison(a,ncwildlife.org.
Sincerely,
Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

�� NT OFT U.S.
aPP 1� yF �c 'BEIIVIcs.Irr
a United States Department of the Interior p7p,41
Vf O
a9 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICEMt,„
aC71 3
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 03/29/2021
Self-Certification Letter
Chappels Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project
Project Name
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package,you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided,using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act(16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis,mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
n "may affect,not likely to adversely affect"determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
n "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat(Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
n "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore,we concur with the"no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species,proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions,you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures -project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Chappels Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project
Date: 03-29-2021
Species/Resource Name Conclusion ESA Section 7/ Eagle Act Determination Notes/ Documentation
Neuse River Waterdog No suitable habitat present No effect After surveying the site and consulting the USFWS
(Necturus lewisi) species profile,habitat is not present because the
streams throughout the site are narrow,with somewhat
slowly moving water that would not support that
preferred habitat of the Neuse River Waterdog.
Carolina Madtom No suitable habitat present No effect After surveying the site and consulting the USFWS
(Noturus furiosus) species profile,habitat is not present because the
streams throughout the site are narrow,and some are
not guaranteed to be flowing year-round,which is
characteristic of the preferred Carolina Madtom habitat.
Some channels throughout the site have variably sized
gradient,some with a silt substrate, inappropriate for
the species'nesting habitat.
Atlantic Pigtoe No suitable habitat present No effect After surveying the site and consulting the USFWS
(Fusconaia mason') species profile,habitat is not present because all
streams throughout the site are not guaranteed to be
flowing year-round and able to maintain a silt-free
substrate,which is an imperative trait of Atlantic Pigtoe
habitat.
Critical Habitat No critical habitat present No effect N/A
Bald Eagle Unlikely to disturb nesting No Eagle Act Permit required Impacts to this species are not considered,as there
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) bald eagles will be no impact to existing vegetation
Northern Long-Eared Bat NA No effect Impacts to this species are not considered,as there
(Myotis septentrionalis) will be no impact to existing vegetation
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Emily Ulman, Ecologist 03/29/2021
Signature/Title Date

Mil s ,alum.
a- 1411
r4 N.IX
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE . :
4lit'ff 3 '/'% Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: March 03, 2021
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0778
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01701
Project Name: Chappels Creek
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

03/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01701 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect(i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect(i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

03/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01701 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

03/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01701 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

03/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01701 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0778
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01701
Project Name: Chappels Creek
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION/ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: 48.13, Person County
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@36.3284095,-78.94604209708822,14z
Garr
134
k.
�v
Counties: Person County, North Carolina

03/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01701 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not Threatened
available.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not Endangered
available.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not Threatened
available.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Roy Cooper,Governor
■•■.■
•■ ■ NC DEPARTMENT OF D.Reid Wilson,Secretary
■
■ENEE NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
MEN■■ Walter Clark
Director,Division of Land and Waterslewardship
NCNHDE-14116
March 3, 2021
Matthew DeAngelo
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE: Chappels Creek (New)
Dear Matthew DeAngelo:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally-
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
C1 121 W.JONES STREET.RALEIGH,NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER.RALEIGH.NC 27699
1 OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Chappels Creek (New)
March 3, 2021
NCNHDE-14116
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last lir Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group servation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank
j Date Rank
Freshwater 5236 Strophitus undulatus Creeper 2012-05-29 E 3-Medium --- Threatened G5 S3
Bivalve
Natural 37732 Dry-Mesic --- 2017 B 2-High --- --- G4G5 S4
Community Oak--Hickory Forest
(Piedmont Subtype)
Natural 25564 Dry Oak--Hickory --- 2016 C 2-High --- --- G4G5 S4
Community Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Natural 37733 Piedmont Headwater --- 2016 B 2-High --- --- G2 S2
Community Stream Forest
(Hardpan Subtype)
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Chappels Creek Flats R3 (High) C5 (General)
NEU/Flat River Aquatic Habitat R1 (Exceptional) C3 (High)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on March 3, 2021; source: NCNHP,Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-14116: Chappels Creek (New)
L
—- LCy 00, 7/7—
L ��
6�fR �o•
a
Ts
Cr
a 0
CC Cr
C
O
S Lucy Garrett Ra
JC
0- 0001 Rtti
U Q �cr
P�,
-00
G`l. N
C\y O
O GhaQp
5t\ A•
at SPr` a i
ti gnlroch Church , „H ChB ruler
<icror
Ftat River Ra Rry
y-i---!
�a
j ,
= ,9c
p tz6 C
chat\�e Z MO? • (-) E
z
n a
�D �4p Y cCreekRd
0 C ,Cff N D�
t / c,. C
p
N g iiii
o ��
s
W+E a �kc Cam v�L
P
S o`
March 3,2021 1:32,311
0❑ Project Boundary I
+ 0.275 0.55 J1.1 mi
❑ Buffered Project Boundary 0 0.425 0.85 1.7 km
ID NHP Natural Area(NHNA) Sources: Esri,HERE,Garmin,Intermap, increment P Corp.,GEBCO,USGS,
FAO,NPS,NRCAN,GeoBase,IGN,Kadaster NL,Ordnance Survey,Esri Japan,
METI,Esri China(Hong Kong),(c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS
User Community
Page 3 of 3

Uniform Act Compliance Letter

res 3600 Glenwood Avenue,Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
April 28, 2021
TFF Holdings, LLC
8251 Oxford Road
Timberlake,NC 27583
Re: Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
To Whom It May Concern:
As part of the environmental documentation process in preparation for the stream mitigation project
on your property, this letter is to inform you of provisions in the Federal Highway Administration
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended,
referred to as the Uniform Act.
The Uniform Act requires that we inform you in writing that this conservation easement transaction
is voluntary and that the project is being developed by Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC for
the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS).Neither EBX nor NCDMS have the
authority to acquire the property by eminent domain. In addition, EBX believes that the agreed
purchase price for the conservation easement area represents the fair market value.
This letter is for your information, and you do not need to respond. As always, please feel free to
call me at 919-302-2324 with any questions.
Sincerely,
4iM
Kenton Beal
Land Representative

res 3600 Glenwood Avenue,Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
April 28, 2021
David White
1719 Antioch Church Road
Timberlake,NC 27583
Re: Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
Mr. White:
As part of the environmental documentation process in preparation for the stream mitigation project
on your property, this letter is to inform you of provisions in the Federal Highway Administration
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended,
referred to as the Uniform Act.
The Uniform Act requires that we inform you in writing that this conservation easement transaction
is voluntary and that the project is being developed by Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC for
the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS).Neither EBX nor NCDMS have the
authority to acquire the property by eminent domain. In addition, EBX believes that the agreed
purchase price for the conservation easement area represents the fair market value.
This letter is for your information, and you do not need to respond. As always, please feel free to
call me at 919-302-2324 with any questions.
Sincerely,
3/4,44k1 AA
Kenton Beal
Land Representative

res 3600 Glenwood Avenue,Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
April 28, 2021
Jo Ann Martin
97 Annie Bell Lane
Roxboro,NC 27574
Re: Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
Ms. Martin:
As part of the environmental documentation process in preparation for the stream mitigation project
on your property, this letter is to inform you of provisions in the Federal Highway Administration
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended,
referred to as the Uniform Act.
The Uniform Act requires that we inform you in writing that this conservation easement transaction
is voluntary and that the project is being developed by Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC for
the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS).Neither EBX nor NCDMS have the
authority to acquire the property by eminent domain. In addition, EBX believes that the agreed
purchase price for the conservation easement area represents the fair market value.
This letter is for your information, and you do not need to respond. As always, please feel free to
call me at 919-302-2324 with any questions.
Sincerely,
Kenton Beal
Land Representative

res 3600 Glenwood Avenue,Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South,Suite 300
Bellaire,TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
April 28, 2021
EBX Neuse I, LLC
do Ely J. Perry III
P.O. Box 1475
Kinston,NC 28501
Re: Chappels Creek Mitigation Project
Mr. Perry III:
As part of the environmental documentation process in preparation for the stream mitigation project
on your property, this letter is to inform you of provisions in the Federal Highway Administration
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended,
referred to as the Uniform Act.
The Uniform Act requires that we inform you in writing that this conservation easement transaction
is voluntary and that the project is being developed by Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC for
the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). Neither EBX nor NCDMS have the
authority to acquire the property by eminent domain. In addition, EBX believes that the agreed
purchase price for the conservation easement area represents the fair market value.
This letter is for your information, and you do not need to respond. As always, please feel free to
call me at 919-302-2324 with any questions.
Sincerely,3/4/4k Kenton Beal
Land Representative

Appendix E
Invasive Species Plan

INVASIVE SPECIES PLAN
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished
project. These site inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. RES will treat invasive
species vegetation within the project area and provide remedial action on a case by case basis. Common
invasive species vegetation found onsite, such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and tree-of-heaven
(Ailanthus altissima) will be treated to allow native plants to become established within the conservation
easement. Invasive species vegetation will be treated by approved mechanical and/or chemical methods
such that the percent composition of exotic/invasive species is less than 5%of the total riparian buffer area.
Any control methods requiring herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department
of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. Additionally, some stream reaches contain dense thickets of
box elder (Acer negundo) and sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) that have the potential to become a
nuisance; therefore, some of these areas may be thinned and/or removed mechanically if there is a threat
to planted vegetation. If areas of invasive species exist within the easement, they will be monitored yearly
as part of the monitoring protocol and treated if necessary. If required, problem areas will continue to be
treated until the project easement shows overall trending towards meeting all monitoring requirements.