510050_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220609

Facility Number
sr
Sv
S`Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q C
Reason for Visit:
pliance Inspection C5 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Routine 0 Com i laint 0 Follow-up
0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other
0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time: I i ; OD pyl
Farm Name: p �+41 r A) 61 K.-N1
Owner Name: /1( z- l' o!-01) tc11,J
Mailing Address:
Departure Time: County: o //`/5 ij Region:
Owner Email:
Phone: q to- 3 71 - gl1C)
Rg6
Physical Address: j j 'l rl C 1 I(+ b (AC Ad. N G W ry
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: Phone:
Integrator: 'VI 13
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: 3 S, Z f3d G 10
Longitude: ~ 1 t. "4 1L0 q 4 4
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
4v'
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dr Poultr Ca ' act Po
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
44i
Discharges and Stream Impacts
i . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [] No El/NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: a 1 - '.�D
[Date of Inspection: /7- q - 7-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes IZI/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IZ(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: /3 i it . M A I L
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): Lq 1 y
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
if any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes IZI<To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes LINO ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop 1 Window{ ElEvidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
G /L µ u. 12. Crop Type(s): ., .4 :4 # 'l . l A--u) v d e
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the GAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Yes 121/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2N El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[�El NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
_No ❑NA El NE
El/No ❑NA El NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 7'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: $' ( - �G
Date of inspection: Z y'l-. Z 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [7'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [7'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus Toss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Q N ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA J NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
▪ 5tkp.vEy £2O1-I)A0'4/"P (2-c
'-
--- p , 1, 0
�C
A-Kpl ii)S
N.3I.1
1- 2 3 - 21 - A : 2.1.5
1— 21., 2.31
i, (AC Etrr- A ,i.)�/WbE5 fRc40
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Zal (3 'VKct
Qn� L'c /(` 810 - L6,11
Phone: g % QI — 7 1. - `/2.j
Date: q
5/12/2020