820011_Routine Inspection_20220520

5 10.3/a�-
Facility Number
1/
cDivision of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:.Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
;.6/d- Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region:
•
4111/114), Title:
e�'
Integrator:
Phone:
l� Certification Number: ig
G/cy
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
y
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
QtL
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Wet Poultry
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Aft -No ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: ?A
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection• d4.7
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
G
42,
Structure 2
❑ Yes I o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
y(.5
/g
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes iJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes /El No El NA ❑ NE
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? y4 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZI No ❑ NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
/ Ze) /eye- C-17-)-17,
477; / /
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2"Yes : % �4,' 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes elEeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
❑ Yes .❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes .❑rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Elallo ❑ NA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ,rJYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ,,,Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: - /(
Date of Inspection: j1/0�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes , No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [p-,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes p,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes -E---No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes in -No 0 NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ['INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes El -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 0' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
7- te,,rzm -e 2-eec4-2/-2 w2'4Y Ce-nic o„ ateee.,
5'- Q�a.e cramp crrO.Q74 167 Lteeoi,
ka n Zy./4.0 w ee-,< 41e)(e")
.avt4 117:ieee"‘ef7467
C(P'fri/aLk
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: Qiv
Date: 6 ad /mil
5/12/2020

FACILITY #: - ' -14 FARM NAME:
PERMIT (#19)
LAGOON LEVEL
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
27
EXPERIATION DATE 9/�/' NUMBER OF ANIMALS e'
CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
OIC CARD ES R NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CH
Irrigation Plan Map
OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER /bq lY.)61gDATE // `/ NITROGEN LEVEL /-9;
f 02, ? S / ; v /
DATE 1327W(9-INITROGEN LEVEL / , <•`97, 213, % / 2-d?
l/ / _
DATE P/I < M1d- / NITROGEN LEVEL � f /3)/i/ / / / y �.6-3
EVERY 3 YEARS:
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Note if 4 or less)
SOIL REPORT (#21)
DATE J/3 6/g 6
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
Not over PAN
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES
"--111
ZN
IRR2 (#21)
CROP TYPES
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (#24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATW EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION CCfi //
FLOW RATES ,�
flc
gs
j / 9 RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT __
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
tot pU
O:4.0 '�
O: 2
Y YEAR: y TE
P:
P:
0/04gSLUDGE (#21 &25)
% RATIO OF SLUDGE
% RATIO OF SLUDGE
P:
RAIN BREAKER FORM
% RATIO OF SLUDGE
RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
CROP YEILDS / MORTALITY /�
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st - Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15th- Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1st - Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1st - Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st - Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st