780101_Routine Inspection_20220602

bon s Wte (Y)-
Facility Number
7
—0-Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: -etompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: e-Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
-et-40-d7/11,-rjczn
/,?-/,?-34_ Arrival Time:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Departure Time:
tip
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region:
J1
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
/7933
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
p23v
23
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Dr v Poultr
Design Current
Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA 0 NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes --E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: `7k- - !C) /
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: 6
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes
El Yes
Structure 4 Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes U<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes U 1`' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes - No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
OC;) (faii4Geef,)
Gde, 8 Q 0
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes . No
El Yes ,�7 No
❑ Other:
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .V No El NA El NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis E] Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall El Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections n Sludge Survey
1
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ YesNo El NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: - /Q
Date of Inspection: op /al-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes „El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes j21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
0 Yes 40' No
❑ Yes No
n Yes ..4ErNo
O Yes .2 No
❑ Yes ON°
❑ Yes "F1. No
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
O Yes
17I'No
,❑'"No
❑ No
❑ NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
Comments (refer tegvestion
Use -drawings of facility to better expla
'ES answers an
ns (use a ....
'or any additional recoinmendat Otis or any other comments.
pages as necessary).
7; fix „,(--7"2-.
fildifk?v- V K, LIM-7
vr-v7
--144.A3(
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
\L2f a lel/so 13
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: 9:r6) F3 77,5--
Date: Cv/v� �;
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015

FACILITY #:/ 4 J' ®/ FARM NAME: ^=i'seraeLAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
EXPERIATION DATE d % /?- V NUMBER OF ANIMALSeq10 7
CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES 40 U4 K1
CROP TYPES {v
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST'S • R NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR Isla
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER %
NITROGEN LEVEL < ' 2)
DATE (.3 a X )`
DATE %/2 ` ?( NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE 3G/2'/
2c
NITROGEN LEVEL ► l ��
SOIL REPORT (#21)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE %/// 7 Li--(
z
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2 (#21)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES
Not over PAN
FLOW RATES
CROP TYPES
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
003 � n

CALBRIATION (#24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE
DATE OF CALIBRATION
FLOW RATES g
133D
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
7IBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
RAIN FALL (#21)
/$LUDGE (#21 &25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE VY
0:.:£, J P: 3 . ( % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
511zzeit Ree.n
/006/01/
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st - Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1st - Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1st- Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st - Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st