NC0000078_Wasteload Allocation_19930426

NPDES DOCIMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0000078
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File
- Historical
Report
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
April 26, 1993
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the reirerse side

NPDES WAS1t. LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0000078
PERMITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Ecusta Division of P. H. Glatefelter Company
Ecusta Division
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Minor
Design Capacity: 27.5 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM: the French Broad River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 04-03-01
Reference USGS Quad: F8SW (please attach)
County: Transylvania
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 6/1/93 Treatment Plant Class: class IV
Classification changes within three miles:
No change within three miles
Requested by:
Prepared by: Vie
Reviewed by: I'"
okk
Randy Kepler (24 Date: 3- ( - 9_3
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
--jvk0
3(t1Q3
134-1
Drainage Area (mil) '2 ( Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 7 V )
7Q10 (cfs) /5/7 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) / 8 `j 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC a / % Acu, Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters .To eit p, (Ong
✓ Location - Q
Upstream
e
e.rl. �ccr) M t9a.1 - -3+445e.
Downstream ✓ Location ire.1ctBtletCRIB IMF- wait
y 3
8 e-
/wl� Jul -C) # _ 2
,
-Y- WeeklAir-June
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
ao (YSX7 )l 1d)
Yo (v?y 144
D.O. (mg/1)
y
7
TSS (m-gflj-
/f SAS I L 57cj
11 SBS \ (c(
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
6 - 1
l - i
7? (-9// )
\Ai-b.-la
,nen, N
r� C g`t)
o.,:
.146 ,-
Div Ion
✓ 4
vYt oi,t:e2,rc-
Cb u-C-- v -.1 ,
, -. -
-N-o-�-
6.
Comments: SGtnri- �►. fwu� 3a5.01 renew..( :s (9c15-
PLOTTED

a 4,
FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS. LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
•
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Comments
• 50b_ ,
9903. / 1 /d
/844/. g / /4
Co�,a� 4DCF243D5v z,
ss
I1 5S� ,5 r��d
22 95i ,.el!�s/�,
5-Q39PM'
rpN
5.0 — 9,0 Svc
m
SLR; PA
,Rocass wAsr-.•A pc: E Ft_ o�
ti- 26.6 rN etA (E6 PPP L°\-)
S G NEB (a-� 1
.
C
N0 eA4Loto PIA 6NO-Acs
L, mN -4N iNcc
v '36 cAvSc- ,,,,
1
WPL\Lrtm.47-
S� AC+ �:� T44AT
% )0 Ct4Lolt•OTO- oc,kL tt...r--ApvING.
.
3,DC_ I
E k,s. ,Use—
Q5Z w \\-1- EvLl'.
S. ,4,- J•se- .
Type of Product Produced
N.-r. CI NC ►�ACc
� . 1 1-1 G 44Tu.NC ?A?eRS
Lim/Day Produced
342,365
430,)8I
(093 )0D
Effluent Guideline Reference
40 CFI 430.9 o sozpper
40 C-Fg 430.181 som a 'R
4o CFR 4 30, 2-40 5,.,Wp; ><

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #7347
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
Ecusta
NC0000078
Industrial
Existing
Renewal
French Broad River
C
04-03-01
Transylvania
Asheville
Randy Kepler
3/1/93
F8SW
D
sur-mAR 2 4 1993
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date: 1993 estimate
Drainage Area (mi2): 221
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 154
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 189
Average Flow (cfs): 740
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%): 22%
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Short term permit renewal. Renewal under basin schedule is August 1995. Permit -will
xewed-as i 't-based-erg-the-state standard. New
model will be run for the next renewal. No known instream water quality problems.
Facility has requested a reduction in toxicity testing frequency. Due to magnitude of
discharge, the existing frequency should be retained. Facility has requested a reduction
in instream monitoring, however, the monitoring per the regs is more stringent than the
existing monitoring. Keep existing sites and frequencies.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
//yam
a 01ls t k t 141 1327s1/ J6 LA/ Sin c/ar i al
X/;J /44 • ) /Ai; �/ /4 / fE cY
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regioip�rvisor:
Lit k_
Date: 3/ 9/93
Date: 311 C(1 Ci‘3
Date: [fArt3
Permits & Engineering: Date:
APR 1 7 1993
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:

l 7
Pee e 444. `
&Veep / iliz----(-- 5 46-4, a
Le_ , e- npaec/ as Is .
arm% 1 a. -—
;„XCITis . ieu51-et- clAndi
lit d p k ,1, lI Viv i.`1-'v J

2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (lbs/day):
Fecal Co1. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (pg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended:
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Co1. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (pg/l):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
Summer
Winter
WO or EL
20 (4587 lbs/day)
40 (9174 lbs/day)
WQ
monitor
monitor
WQ
4
_
4
_ WQ
11585
11585
EL
_
6-9
6-9
EL
monitor
monitor
,
monitor
monitor
Summer
Winter
WO or EL
20 (4587 lbs/day)
40 (9174 lbs/day)
WQ
monitor
monitor
WQ
4
4
WQ
11585
11585
EL
6-9
6-9
EL
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
TOXICS/METALS
Chronic, quarterly
21%
21%
January, April, July, October
Pentachlorophenols (lbs/day):
Trichlorophenols): (lbs/day):
Dioxin (ng/1):
Daily max WO or EL
4.02
EL
4.23
_EL
monitor

3
v
Recommended Limits
Dioxin (ng/1):
TOXICS & METALS
Dail max W
monitor WQ
or EL
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Failing toxicity test
Other (pollutant scan)
Note: phenols limits dropped since these compounds are not used by Ecusta.
_x_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the
available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed.
This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect
future allocations.
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: French Broad at RM 192.1, Barnett Bridge
Downstream Location: French Broad at RM 180.8, Etowah Bridge
Parameters: DO, Temp, Cond
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
weekly Apr - Jun, 3/week Jul - Oct, monthly Nov - Mar
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with
existing treatment facilities? Yes x No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No

4
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not
modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits
into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with
attachments.

Facility Name CcLs ?L./L.
Permit # 414°oaoo 78 Pipe # L
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effiuent concentration ax which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is L96 (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shallperform
quarte monitoring using this prooeduu establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed gfter thirty days from a date of this permit diming the months of
J A N , APR , J uL. t o c-T , . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well'as all doseresponse data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limitsi then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 15-e cfs
Permitted Flow' MGD
1wc ' w
Basin & Sub -basin n 6 3 -- 01
Receiving Stream Penh Riz"Ply e•-
County 'Tian s y leant ee...
Mk : ►'s • /eve.: s I ,.eS
c -20/0s • �eep i� /esf- a/
1-e`43e4'( in yeaes t
QCL PIF Version 9191
Recommended by:
(d.e4.?
3//Y/93
ie s' X aa, 14 a. S'�� I'� N Sti+'i i r►
�l % �v,. .?o.0 haw a v'.0 . // •fy ke.

MEMO
TO: SUBJECT:
O _S6-/oxi
t2� . g Zs
-71-1 3
DATE•
//
4-/iRU��o/�✓ EG �f 5
72viS7/t/e'i/�
:hoc7 yes
From
x 4.0 6 `�
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources © punted. Recycledpaper

Ecusta a division of P. H. GLATFELTER CO.
P.O. BOX 200 • PISGAH FOREST. NORTH CAROLINA 28768 • TELEPHONE [phone]
December 24, 1991
Withdrawal and Transfer Registrations
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Sir:
As required by Senate Bill 943, enclosed are the necessary registration
forms and fees for the two surface water intakes used by the
P. H. Glatfelter Company's Ecusta Division at Pisgah Forest, North
Carolina.
0ur primary water intake is located on the Davidson River, while our
secondary intake is located on the French Broad River. The primary
purpose of the latter is to supply water during short periods of time
when conditions on the Davidson River such as icing, leaf buildup, etc.
result in low flow at the primary intake. Extended usage of the
secondary intake only occurs during extended low flow conditions in the
Davidson River. Both intakes supply water for industrial usage and a
non -community, non -transient public water supply.
If you have any questions or if further information is needed, please.
call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
ECUSTA DIVISION
P. H „ Glatfelter Company
R. J. Gussman, Director
Environmental Affairs
RJG:mh
Attachments
Copy to: C. N. Carter
E. B. Hina
D. W. Monk

•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Resources
89.
REGISTRATION FORM FOR THE WITHDRAWAL OR TRANSiLR OF SURFACE WATERS
NON -FARMING OPERATIONS
To be filed by any person who withdraws or transfers one million gallons or more
of surface water in one day. A separate form should be completed for each
facility.
Please read instructions before completing this form 41
Please print or type 1.
m0
1. Name, address, and telephone number of public water system, compa.ny,V
person making the withdrawal.
A.
B.
Name: P. H. Glatfelter Company, Ecusta Division
Mailing address
Street or post office box: P. 0. Box 200
City: Pi .gbh Forest
rn
cn
2
\§4
c
o
w
State: NC Zip code: 28768
2. Contact person
A. Name: R. J. Gussman Title: Director of Environmental Affairs
Telephone No.: ( 704- )- 577 - 2 '7
3. Withdrawal of Surface Water Information.
A.
Location
Source Name:
French Broad River
Description of Location: Downstream of
(Secondary Intake)*
Highway 1540
35° 15' 10" and 82° 41'44"
County: Transylvania
B. Existing withdrawal as of July 16,1991.
(If the withdrawal is planned, omit this section.)
Date of maximum withdrawal:
Maximum known daily withdrawal in MGD: 12
Maximum capacity of the withdrawal facility in MGD:
Amount of surface water transferred in MGD: 0
( _Measured
22
X Estimated)
C. Planned withdrawal (new facility or expansion of existing facility) as of
July 16, 1991.
(If there are no planned.withdrawals, omit this section.)
D.
Planned Date of new or expanded facility withdrawal:
Maximum estimated
Maximum estimated
Amount of surface
Source type:
x Stream/ River
Purchased water
daily withdrawal in MGD: NA
NA
capacity of the withdrawal facility in MGD: NA
water transferred in MGD: NA
Impoundment Dug Pond
--Other (please specify)
E. Type of water use
Golf Course x Industrial
X Public Water Supply --Hydro Electric Power
_other (please specify]
Mining
_Thermal Electric Power
Standard industrial classification number, SIC: 26
P.O_ Box 27687, lw tgh, North Carollers 27611-768-,
form..23nEl(Rav 20Nov91)
A-1
Tolaphona 919-733-4064

4. Discharge of surface water information.
A. x Existing discharge as of July 16,1991
Planned discharge as of July 16,1991.
B. Location
Name of Receiving Water Body: French Broad River
County: Transylvania
C. Receiving waters type:
xStream/River Sold to another system Field irrigation
—Impoundment wand Application Septic= Tank
_bug Pond Other p(please specify)
Description of Location: Downstream of Confluence of Davidson River,
35° 15'16" and 82° 41'30" (001)
*******************************************************************************
* Attach an NCDOT county highway map with all withdrawal and discharge points *
* marked and numbered.
*******************************************************************************
R. J. Gussman
PRINT 'TYPE Nam- ot Person Registering
ot Registrant
Director of Environmental Affairs
Title
December 24, 1991
Date Registration Signed
Total Amount of Registration Processing Fee Enclosed:$ 50.00
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
lQ P- OVAPZOdt1b$?
&Ai MIZ k '.97
e.k.rr Eze �• 1 �. Lbj f3
Water Withdrawal.
Registration Rec.
Aunt: orod,Da
JAN ti 1592
Ler - t'.t.s .
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Frt.
Division of Water Resources
REGISTRATION FORM FOR THE WITHDRAWAL OR TRANSFER OF SURFACE WATERS
NON -FARMING OPERATIONS
To be filed by any person who withdraws or transfers one million gallons or more
of surface water in one day. A separate form should be completed for each
facility.
Please read instructions before completing this form
Please print or typern
1. Name, address, and telephone number of public water system, company
person making the withdrawal. min
O
A. Name: P. H. Glatfelter Company, Ecusta Division O z
B. Mailing address
rn
Street or post office box: P. 0. Box 200
City: Pisgah Forest
2. Contact person
A. Name:
R.J. Gussman
State: NC Zip code: 28768
Telephone No.:(704 )- 877-2347
3. Withdrawal of Surface Water Information.
A.
Location
Source Name: Davidson River
Title: Director of Environmental Affairs
(Primary
Intake)
Description of Location: Downstream of Confluence cA ll vidson. River= Can1
and Davidson River, 35° 16'8" and 82° 42'06"
County: Transylvania
E. Existing withdrawal as of July 16,1991.
(If the withdrawal is planned, omit this section.)
Date of maximum Withdrawal: August, 1976
Maximum known daily withdrawal in MGD: 31.5 (x Measured _Estimated)
Maximum capacity of the withdrawal facility in MGD: 35
Amount of surface water transferred in MGD: 0
C. Planned withdrawal (new facility or expansion of existing facility) as of
July 16, 1991.
(If there are no planned withdrawals, omit this section.)
Planned Date of new or expanded facility withdrawal: NA
Maximum estimated
Maximum estimated
Amount of surface
daily withdrawal in MGD: NA
capacity of the withdrawal facility in MGD:
water transferred in MGD:
NA
NA
D. Source type:
xStream// River Impoundment Dug Pond
Purchased water . . --Other (please specify)
E. Type of water use
Golf Course • xIndustrial
XPublic Water Supply Hydro Electric Power
_Other (please specify]
Mining
Thermal Electric Power
Standard industrial classification number, SIC:
26
P.O. Sux 27667, Rnlwigh, North Casoiinm 27611-7667
Tol.ophone 919-733-4064

4.•Discharge of surface water information.
' A. x Existing discharge as of July 16,1991
Planned discharge as of July 16,1991.
B. Location
Name of Receiving Water Body: French Broad River
Description of Location:
County: Transylvania
Downstream of Confluence of Davidson River,
35° 15'16" and 82° 41'30" (001)
C. Receiving waters type:
Stream/River Sold to another system Field irrigation
Impoundment sand A plication _Septic Tank
mug Pond _Other Application
specify)
*******************************************************************************
* Attach an NCDOT county highway map with all withdrawal and discharge points *
* marked and numbered. *
*******************************************************************************
R. J. Gussman
PRINT/TYPE Nam g of Person Registering
Director of Environmental Affairs
Title
December 24, 1991
Registrant Date Registration Signed
Total Amount of Registration Processing Fee Enclosed:$50.00
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
t Ol0L09708$
2'WLO'U2- 1rs-92
EIU`TE1lL D
Water Withdrawal
Registration Rec.
Amount:
By:
JAN 6 l992
P.Q. Da< 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
A-2
form:943nr (Rest/ 2ONov91 )

11;e0IctL fj%n%LI
- Extt77 v is �n�cr�v c c ,� y P '4, t7' � u 49-c.
/FGLIN. is T/9.
� l 3/S/? 3
AI-03 -oi
P eri A)
c"rt 5 774- c ` 444.-6e."
4)441so. y1 i� ✓e.- / j .w�[: -[�_ .k/./4"T ' i s 0, /
if" C-2ca9 - C/ii5ci.ezle . & S /z.._ _7D JI
** �%G. eit Sc'— A ,' e! nCE. oLe .Se w l s /. 5 /11c t0 hez.., 4. flu.
.iCISP;...- ! ,-e•z as /'1c-e0w4..cf_ cet) /.:',7_ w il-.6- - q.-1 cf ,2 7 s Are -JD
as. p.s ixe S S c,.v ec.S- e c✓4 &it 4 _ -7 Utz i'li°-rt 6,G._.
,t
2? ✓1'I6-43
1,49
1
a'fe.til PC/ . Roe, deI r=i 7 - / `Z.a
44. se_cf _ 7 _. up ete 6 � wh
ha( oc474-A)„--. /' note%&.s dzetni ut 244; _ "1";
l..Ms et4stt? 14424 '14elt= /f' /.4.e1
wasWaa/.
..l / S�vvie( 2e ca4ck€( SSoo�.
Pk? .).
o`,e
�ds 47�? - "14f� F-
t<1 ?a 154 c
Mt -7 Oa" = 151 t, (w�
J1
1 we . 2 r 02. - ker . ,
u.L-e
.-7
(no T lti1Gi�rctc�'aX /
tL .5k,-, „-
sot
ucs4c/ Q t A773nr�
riy l•tlic( “see(/74,e.ZeP
‘V a rid/6 4// l !75
73405- ;2-v .0 l e . o
,rr � ck 7 4%/qf `' 17'-( / Cd
✓�f7� .-N sYju .c 02
1)0 41/ M5/r
m5 I/5;y_14/cl
Fir
fLi,y�Q�Cilc..v�t!ne/s `/V.L 4i�4 Y4-T
4-y;-d. ekv r� ,, . ! s . 4/. 2 3 mid

`�vXICS
The
9c .
SJ lectrs
dttac ('// )
1 Dc5o
13
61.4 uaj lrVi5k h s5vs�
cn/y / j 44 -e.
17
Via,
1 4t
% Lctle. Ste. ( .
**Z �Z$Sl3
/� relic L 5-'15 s• .?srjE.'� r+2a+—TLi.11tJ JlIe9✓�.'�L.r._
Z) i dat, .. c, 1100 4 0 lIt'S A. Pt) 74, SPnu civlaLJ
�tl�Kl✓� OoJ©ey Y1� i t J1LWv cif A,Li'Gt wx roc w
U.A "re w �M� ^ civGl
C w = iI.5G K t.Kao u,(( ‘2.5/ ),10 G if 2.7"1 xio 115 ( 000aCi N/c (r
bdt
jD 3`Wk J; . —� ��ezkly�.�.
iMbint .t� u.s ...
Nod'' Csa-i aWv.42 IANsi1<<v r; ho access rtva,-d c6es

A .
•
r.
i
l I
of
<<'
fir+) �_�, l+i %mot>. ate" .'': /e'Ctat1!�r.. 1 A _
/• 0
I )), -. V:./V--• wii /r.r w. \ Fe[r..1::.. mi1t,A••: `+t ,
? -I,,'•`-,JIB j--4r_%/i ;.3am. _�1•� \✓);/V•- n
I.
=
-. ;�'=—, ��. -tip - � ._. .�
.•
� r. •\/ y mot/^ \ rvZ� ✓ �.- \ (:; ` -' j,r
� `\,\ 111 t �lJ'�L�1^�ti� V rrtl \ t> i
�' / "r r..- Av 4, - •
J
,r:
1
.cii
�tvr
,
+,4��, -1, f r- 1///i-
V(f. i ✓�`9(v /\k,
\ •�st1P��;,-
fL, )
y ~ma 5—t,
)
'a
^; ;r:t?t;rli:ld
r,
•
^zcCar•fiu:Y� "'
cn;
,; t. V V 11 L F. ++.
;see Valley Authority
>urvey
!A_
mmelric methods using
oy reference to TVA•USGS
hecked by TVA...]
nerican datum. -
roiina
MN
'r5,10 0,'J F E` 344
r
i
.• .• .may ^^%; /� If II
,U \ / ``
• ... I.. --....
42' 30" - 6;7 E iA' !.' mr.
505•.r. +1 a.v
ri
a_
,. II ti.. ,
U. s�.
1.-51�_-��M,15 QTTA-crm"t
• tn.N•
a A va !'c�Gar9ti .�
ski)•
Ii RO Cz':1Y r R ri
':•Tur :., Cr.., •
-
a••
,%
•t
L" MAF' CQI FLIES WITH IJATICNLL F'
r.
- 11
\•
dsori•'r,,-' 'r
\j
•Tier L� , i

./IFitc 7a 2v� ii 3/17/93
f nc . 71.entel - /9747
02 %T-s
,,. inocit/ c(2i4e
7 27A - /5 7 ( ago, 29 A/o4 4`^--
{- //c-iy
6 QvA-L v�tor,G
2 r ?'Z 5 ; 72)7` ti geo - fee-Asi i 470en u-u
re,a ffer, do s 9JS51 6 Cit471- ;i5
r !4-AL*2
ct Eevs cc.-{4„
K444•+-a,f- - -_ g 44 L1C it €t� sLP)4.e 3.3 ,.., (fere ;•G
EZ s . ela — l l `3 .,� �c� S fik- fey t ? (
4 RI Licf
it(e_ 11/ - 46:--01.4-- /6 kik- 444c.Geti
kd c41
5-10.de/ / CLC 'c_z Quo C / / L a.,
54* u /Q 104 A-L't et s /Lb 574-e d dact¢ y"''
c4a7>5- frc4-,...7
ss

ECUSTA.DMR
•
do
cond
up
down
up
down
Oct-92
8.3
8.2
19.7
38
Sep-92
7.5
7.4
20.3
37.4
Aug-92
7
6.9
20.2
47
JuI-92
7.1
6.7
18.1
• 43.8
Jun-92
8.1
7.9
17.8 •
32.8
Oct-91
8.9
8.5
18.8
50.3
Sep-91
7.7
7.4
19
37.8 '
Aug-91
7.4
7.4
20.5
34.3
JuI-91
7.3
7.2
19.8
41.8 •
Jun-91
7.9
7.5
19
37.3 •
up = Barrett Bridge, RM 192.1
.
down = Etowah Brid
e, RM 180.8
. . t
1
Page 1

A Brief History of the Ecusta Permit (according to Technical Support notes) 3/10/93
5/18/77 Level "B" model
limits of BOD5 = 19 mg/1 (s) / 28 mg/1 (w) BPT ?
summer 1977 Intensive Survey of French Broad River from Ecusta (Olin) to HWY 191
1/80 Horn Model calibrated
10/81 Biological survey by DEM
low flow survey of Davidson River and French Broad,Rjver
Davidson River impacted by plant, French Broad little 'change above and below plant
(appears Ecusta was relocated from Davidson to French Broad?)
2/9/83 limits of BOD5 = 20 mg/1 (s) / 40 mg/1 (w)
7/14/88 Ecusta wants chronic toxicity testing reduced to semiannual for one year then dropped
altogether
7/15/88 Ecusta questioning proposed NH3-N limit
7/22/88 Region okays dropping NH3-N limit
8/4/88 WLA notes - monitoring only for NH3-N
8/5/88 WLA renewal
Randy Dodd updated the Level B model based on the Horn Model results
limits were not changed
9/29/88 ARO memo on draft permit
10/3/88 DEM response to Ecusta lettter of 9/16/88
6/26/89 Ecusta letter adjudicating permit's dioxin requirements
9/26/90 Trevor calculated dioxin limit
10/31/90 Official adjudication
1/2/91 Ruth Swanek memo reviewing adjudication
5/28/91 Dioxin Control Plan received
7/17/91 Settlement Agreement requiring dioxin monitoring, control plan,...
DEM may give limit upon renewal if there is a standard
1/23/92 Trevor met with John Hunter (legal counsel)
New settlement agreement
DEM may give limit upon renewal if there is a standard

•
j
Z.S M6 - r-.Z e--r•cl.�
goP 414
mow-- h—
-
'1L .,
44- SC-ur t_a..
, Co C J 1-1vser�
7S5
301re)-eae e
-
f _ r
fe-T7uvz E- s y Gi4.2M
s
icS

g/z5' 771-
-I, .-2_e•Z
5174
e
s.712e-6
as
4,4
3
e:918"--12 *.11'14- a 4 ctovt_a_
2
Ztt„,-+ s
•PA-P-A,d- % tiNet....c.— ,6 c
et.e A,e4 64-
5 .- ?aro
ce..ii,t,a0.5 C2 h ei,4,-) dye
L5-4,)(1 Le vse
s
1.-cre6(
cif
-??...4.—• -/z/e(y
C__S