Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130739 Ver 1_Mitigation Closeout Report_20220606Mitigation Project Information Upload ID#* 20130739 Version* 1 Select Reviewer: * Katie Merritt Initial Review Completed Date 06/06/2022 Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/6/2022 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No Type of Mitigation Project:* Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name: * Melonie Beth Allen Project Information ID#:* 20130739 Existing ID# Project Type: Project Name: County: Email Address: * melonie.allen@ncdenr.gov Version:* 1 • DMS Mitigation Bank St Clair Creek Restoration Site EEP # 95015 Beaufort Document Information Mitigation Document Type: * Mitigation Closeout Report File Upload: Signature ............................................ Print Name: * Signature:* St. Clair Closeout.pdf Existing Version 2.84MB Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted... Melonie Beth Allen Weeewee Off/Ay NC DMS Closeout Report Project Type: Buffer 2022 Project Name St. Clair DMS Project ID 95015 Full Delivery Contract # 003986 DWR ID 13-0739 Institution/Contract Date 7/18/2011 Basin Pamlico 8-digit CU 03020104 County Beaufort Applicable Buffer Rule (s) 15A NCAC 02B.0295 — o,2 Non -Diffuse Flow Area Removed: Memo or W.S. calculation Yes - Ditch included in original project footprint memo method applied Date Planted 4/2014 Date of Supplemental Plant 2/2019 — upper Ut 2 Protection mechanism Property Portfolio Easement Acreage 17.43 Stewards NC SP Encroachments & Resolution NA Accepted for transfer to stewardship Y Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits St. Clair Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 95015 Mitigation Credits Stream Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetland Buffer Nitrogen Nutrient Offset Phosphorus Nutrient Offset Type R R RE Totals 2,946.6 SMU / 327.4 SMU* 2.8 WMU 0 363,577 BMU Project Components Project Component or Reach ID Stationing/ Location Existing Footage/ Acreage Approach Restoration/ Restoration Equivalent Restoration Footage or Acreage Mitigation Ratio UT2 Stream 12+64 — 34+00 2,660 LF Headwater Restoration 1,805.6 SMU / 327.4 SMU* 2,133 LF 1:1 UT3 Stream 10+66 — 22+82 1,075 LF Headwater Restoration 1,141 SMU 1,141 LF 1:1 UT2 Wetland See plan sheets 0.0 AC Restoration 1.1 WMU 1.1 WMU 1:1 UT3 Wetland See plan sheets 0.0 AC Restoration 1.7 WMU 1.7 WMU 1:1 UT2 Buffer 12+64 — 34+00 NA Restoration 363,577 BMU 8.3 AC 1:1 Component Summation Restoration Level Stream (LF) Riparian Wetland (AC) Non -riparian Wetland (AC) Buffer (ft2) / (AC) Upland (AC) Riverine Non-Riverine Restoration 3,274 2.8 Enhancement I Enhancement II Creation Preservation High Quality Preservation Buffer Zone A: 0-50 ft 226002 / 5.2 Buffer Zone B: 51-100 ft 137575 / 3.1 BMP Elements Element Location Purpose/Function Notes BMP Elements: BR= Bioretention Cell; SF= Sand Filter, SW= Stormwater Wetland; WDP= Wet Detention Pond; DDP= Dry Detention Pond; FS= Filter Strip; S= Grassed Swale; LS= Level Spreader, NI=Natural Infiltration Area *The SMU credits shown here differ from those presented in previous monitoring reports. They have been reduced by 327.4 SMU that have been deemed potentially at -risk in the uppermost section of Reach UT2. MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. YEAR 7 MONITORING REPORT ST. CLAIR CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 95015) Success Criterion Project Component Success Criteria per Success Criteria Met Approved Mitigation Plan Riparian Buffer — *Coastal 260 stems per acre, 4 native Plots 1— 6 located in Buffer Headwater o,2 hardwood species, no species Mitigation Zone, all 6 plots greater than 50% met 260 stems per acre and • 6 fixed plots in buffer species diversity clause with zone planted vegetation. *AII success criteria specified in the approval of the stream mitigation site by the Division shall be met. The area of the buffer shall be measured perpendicular to the length of the valley being restored. The area within the proposed buffer mitigation site shall not also be used as wetland mitigation. 0 Conservation Easement Drainage Modification Installed 2016 (10 ft wide, 1 ft deep, length to scale) Drainages Filled (March 2016) Drainage Not Filled Photo Points Groundwater Monitoring Wells (All Passed) Vegetation Plot Meeting Criteria (with MY5 Stem Densities) Temporary Vegetation Transects (with Stem Densities) Wetland Restoration Areas (2.87 acres total) Potential New Wetland Restoration Areas (1.05 acres total) Veg Plot 1: 567 stems/ac Gauge Veg Transect: 653 stems/ac Veg Transect: 653 stems/ac Veg Transect: 435 stems/ac Gauge #7 Veg Plot 2: 647 stems/ac The potential wetland areas shown here are not being requested for credits at this time and were not originally provided in the mitigation plan. Baker is conducting exploratory monitoring in these areas only. Survey / Monitoring Data Collected: Dec 2018 & Jan 2019 Aerial Photo Date: 2016 Ihk O Flow Gauge Meeting Criteria • Flow Gauge Not Meeting Criteria As -Built Streams Restoration: Headwater Valley No Credit Buffer Zone A: 0-50 ft (226,002 ft2 or 5.2 ac, 1:1 ratio = 226,002 BMUs) Buffer Zone B: 51-100 ft (137,575 ft2 or 3.1 ac, 1:1 ratio = 137,575 BMUs) Veg Plot 3: 688 stems/ac O PP6 SCAW2 Veg Plot 5: 567 stems/ac SCAW1 SCAVV5 0.26 acres Veg Plot 9: 688 stems/ac Veg Plot 4: 647 stems/ac SCAW9 NC Centers • G ograaphie Informatio and AnalysispNC-91.1 BB Veg Plot 7: 890 stems/ac Veg Plot 6: 364 stems/ac SCAW7 Veg Transect: 580 stems/ac Gauge; #5 0.13 acres Veg Plot 8: 486 stems/ac Veg Transect: 471 stems/ac 0.66 acres O SCAW10 PP17 G° tiv—; aC�Oadan.p, f•:oreix•LaTait2 iit•iflontdon Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL 0 250 500 Feet NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services Project # 95015 a N Figure 2 Current Conditions Plan View: MY5 St. Clair Creek Site Beaufort County, NC Rev 4Jan2019 St. Clair Revised Asset Map: 327.4 SMUs removed from Ut 2 32,078 sq. ft, buffer removed from zone A 17,871 sq. ft. buffer removed from zone B Legend 0 StClair_95015_MY8_FlowGauges 0 StClair_95015_MY8_MonitoringWells StClair Reaches rce: Esri, Ma'.ar GeoEye,, E-artthstar the GIS User Community Vegetation Data: T.ble9t. YeErIFDewittPer P7or Si. Glee Creek litrsiaratiaaPrajert:DAIS PsajrrtIDNo. #5015 Cu rearnotDarn(I['ff2p14) 5[ien[ilit Hama [amnan Naar SpeCrrs Tem. 9GR15•Lt1•1100i 9IAS-14-0082 9511 5-02-0L1128 95015 01{ra1-0 55u13-01-01105. 9501541.00H P ',r T P 7 p 4f T P V T F T V T 4cr.•r_g.•:-. nod maple Tres 1 . Ora^'a 3o_'ittiti• Rid Cralrebtrry Drub - 4 i'Aai.a.:,••shaL'rritsfin tastam6atdurls Shrub 1 - - 4 8 Combas oorods.lmwr Arrerksn hornbeam Tree OM ea alti fin masts! avedipe ppertrie. Shrub Enemas faem Pro alit daf ndd Shrub Tree ... a .•ransLrtanJlm waif. ash Tree - . rrei4laeR Tree 4 - = . A.:ma wa. myrtle shr : - : ] f.y-ia_r'rar.im dadj/Yn Tree Fences pulls reE swamp Wy. tree Pallas toe is MINN. pne Tree - - 7 F - Qeerau Jloarnnoda Nt.r.1 oak Tree - _ _ Q61ertLL. Mote a.ercup oak Tree -• - _ Qeurau mldarr.P swamp r estr.. oak Tree - - - - - - • Passau PAgrdo eta rrybark oak Tree Passau p'x,llrs odor aak Tree Parma ribbon. northern red oak Tree eThas oopudNum. Mondial sumac Win& Sar:g ngro Mai *I Om Tree Tarrwribm akstfdrwn bald ayErr: Trey - - = - - emnus elate slums] elm Trey thTui anwritana Arne rIcam elm Trey - - Uni.noe» mbar Trte Yaer.1th_o+ terkrntor ^, Irighburh blueberry 'Drub '..lbrro..no- amt.] rum southern a rra,.wmod Snub . Seem mrrx sane lards!. Sae IACPESI Special mrert Seems per ACME - . - - - S 14 2h. • _ a02 • . 4. - - S S It - 141 - fidt 1,25s .. .. .- •• - PAT MCCRORY Governor DONAL❑ R. VAN DER VAART secrentrl' Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY January 7, 2016 Kristin Miguez DWR#2013-0739 DEQ-Division of Mitigation Services 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 (via electronic mail) Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation—St. Clair Creek Headwater Stream Site off Peoples Road, Bath, NC Beaufort County Dear Ms. Miguez, On October 5, 2015, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources(DWR), received a request from Jake Byers with Michael Baker Engineering, for a site visit at the St. Clair Creek Restoration Site located off Peoples Road in Bath,NC to determine the potential for Tar-Pamlico Neuse riparian buffer mitigation. On December 3, 2015, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Karen Higgins and Mac Haupt with the DWR along with you and Mr. Byers were also present. If approved,mitigating this site could provide riparian buffer mitigation credits within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020104 of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin and as allowed under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (f). Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the site as an alternative buffer mitigation option for buffer mitigation pursuant to Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (1) and(2) (effective November 1, 2015) is provided below: UT2 • UT2 was approved as part of a Coastal Headwater Stream Mitigation Site(DWR#2013- (1739)by the IRT in 2013 and is in its second year of monitoring. A copy of the approved mitigation plan has been provided to the DWR. • Preliminary site conditions along with the onsite visit in December 2015 suggests that the entire area along UT2 (0-100')is viable for riparian restoration and suitable for buffer mitigation credit at 1:1. Preliminary photos and documentation have been provided to the DWR. • The buffer must be measured perpendicular to the length of the valley being restored. Approximately 8.35 acres (363,577 112)have been planted and restored. A copy of the proposed restoration site has been provided to DWR. • An agricultural ditch is present within the proposed riparian restoration and isn't planned to be removed. The presence of this ditch does not comply with the diffuse flow requirement of Rule .0295. However, DMS can apply Clarification Memo #2008-019 to State of North Carolina Environmental ronmental Quality I Water Reaaarces I 617 Mail service Comer Rateigh.North Carolina 2 7699-1 61 7 919 807 6300 St. Clair Creek Restoration Project Buffer Mitigation Viability January 7, 2015 Page 2 of 2 this project in order to calculate the deduction of buffer credit where diffuse flow cannot be attained. • According to the St. Clair Creek Restoration Project Year 1 Monitoring Report submitted in April 2015, all 6 vegetative monitoring plots within the riparian areas are meeting the success criteria identified in Rule .0295. A copy of the Year 1 Monitoring Report has been provided to the DWR. • A conservation easement of the proposed area, dated June 24`11, 2013 has been provided to the DWR and is more accurately described as CE-1 and containing 11.55 acres, more or less. The easement document is located in the Beaufort County Register of Deeds, Book 1821, Pages 53-64. A map showing the project site and the buffer mitigation areas assessed is provided and signed by Ms. Merritt on January 6, 2016. DWR did not assess this site for viability of nutrient offset and therefore only buffer mitigation is approved. DMS shall provide an annual monitoring report to Ms. Merritt for review and approval each year for four more years and until the performance standards have been met. The performance standards for buffer mitigation under Rule.0295 are the following: (n) (2) (B) -A minimum of four native hardwood tree species or,four native hardwood tree and native shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of the stems. (o) (2)—All success criteria specified in the approval of the stream mitigation site by the Division shall be met. Please provide an As-Built survey verifying the acreage proposed for buffer mitigation credit and a buffer credit ledger for this site to Ms_ Merritt within 30 days from receipt of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence contact Katie Merritt at(919)-807-6371. Sincerely, Karen Higgins, Supervisor 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit KAHIkm Attachments: Site Aerial Map, DWR Clarification Memo #2008-019 cc:File Copy (Katie Merritt) Conservation Easement ■ Vegetation Plots 113/4►/ Coastal Headwater Stream Design Buffer Zone A: 0-50 ft 1(226,002 ft2 or 5.2 ac, 1:1 ratio =226,002 BMUs) Buffer Zone B: 51-100 ft (137,575 ft2 or 3.1 ac, 1:1 ratio =137,575 BMUs) • Aerial Photo Date: 2012 Michael Baker Wetland Area 1.1 acres Not for buffer credit Ditchlnon-diffuse flow 01,:',..441: 4. ` .i TP tti NJC OneMap, NC Center tor'Geogr p,hie 11nformatiorrrand rialysis NC 9,11 f nd ar, Buffer Asset Map St, Clair Creek Site Beaufort County, NC t!i r ` �' y William G Russ. Jr.. Sr aeon 1 �11�_A r U41,11rtfl,Cni or l'nrunnnson and NUMMI Rt'SPnrCO Al i r I t:il l r mvenna ^� i't'lcen. N Sullins• 1Jirxi i l)i isx,n of Wnier t7t,;,h!> August It).2_008. liul1�i Inrerpretation'CIarifrcation »2008-019 11f-1MOR ANOt!M ki i he { so, kin kit Water Wilily 's { I]WQ's) stance on whether diffuse flow of stormwater through the newly restored buffers on ,iir'Yt+i+n sites sliould he a requirement. Diffuse flo is a requirement rnr buffer restoration or enhancement in the Neuse River I;aeili I3i+ller Rule f SA NCAC 02l.0242(9)(d)(iii). the Tar -Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rule 15A NCAC 02E1.0260(9)Id1(iiiL and the ,-:li,ti1%ha River Basin Buffer Rule l5A NCAC 02B.0244 efltdjt.iiiy. f )itluse flow is a requirement For all sites in a buffered basin for bulTer miligaliun and for for sites providing nutrient offset credit as hell. Lup-rent Policy According to the Mitigation rules in the Neuse- Tar -Pamlico and Catawba buffer rules. a grading plan must be provided For huller mitigation sites. In addition, those rules sate Char The site shall be graded in a manner to ensure diffuse flu llirouwh the riparian buffer". I'rtihlem, i he tfu+.'slion has been raised as to whether sturnluater carried by lateral ditches Thai enter buffered streams sh utd provide tl+Ili,sc llm+ poor to that stonmvaler entering the restored buffers. tiultnion. The Neuse. Tar -Pamlico and Catawba buffer rules with respect to huller mitigation sites contain a very clear requirerntnl iliai states that diffuse Bow afstarmwater must he maintained through the buffer. Unless utltetnvise approved by, DWQ. all duffer mitiialrnn sites must provide diffuse ileac of slurtnwater Ion diirhes and similar conveyances through the restored huller. 'here siren diflse flow cannot he attained and where DWQ agrees that such treatment is not possible. deduction of bailer uredii ,4i1l ale Tared a4 1011(11vs: SCENARIO 1 I lLtitl;an i, i rruricailan I U+ I ,0;+ \I•,il So,,,; r ; nrrl 4tslcrzir. tit+nli t .imbue27r''+- I .' • i,ihrrrr Ik4114:N a .'. iiw 21.0. I{;iingl$. Not-th i'tui+lmi+ :7Gu4 I •,, h+ ; i-17:0, I AN, 9-73144ir1 +ttviertiel lilip.11h20.enr }iarc nr:.u,rnctsc11:n1ds Uric NorthCarolina Naturally I" 11 i ilgn•;iuulh 1(IiiNairV, l,iian I nipluper !Or.... {1.0. ie�i l+ra t'u+i t;nitiulsi,l Page 2 of 4 A. B and C are angles. a, b, and c are distances (lengths) OWQ believes that using an immediate drainage area extending at a 60-degree angle from the point of discharge to the stream is a reasonable approach to the issue of determining the area which is not draining through the restored buffer. To calculate the area of buffer being "short-circuited" by the ditch, the area of the right triangles shown in the figure above must be determined. a = 50' A= 13=60 b = a cot A b=50(].732) b = 86.6' (87') The area to be excluded from credit would be the area of the two right triangles: Area = (a x b)/2 Area - (50 feet x 87feet)/2 Area = 2,175 SF Total deducted area = 2,175 x 2 = 4,350 SF or 0,1 acres. The example shown above assumes a buffer width of 50 feet from the top of bank (riparian buffer mitigation site). For nutrient offset sites, credit can be generated out to 200 feet from the top of bank. The policy applies to sites with larger buffers as follows: SCENARIO 2 CREPII MUM (Imo f■ 0.1 Ac •-.•=1.•• • ••• • • 401 Wetlands Cenification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 2321 Crabtree Boulevard. Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 9I9-733-1786 / FAX 919-733.6893 / Internet: littp://112o,cor.slatc.m.us/nmetlapds NorthCaroliiia Naturarllji An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 51)°•1, Recycled/I0% Post Consumer Paper Page 3 of 4 II a ditch leading to a buffered stream is buffered. then no credit is deducted from the stream buffer. lithe upstream origin of the ditch 1:- N Il Ii lli the buffer. no credit is deductrd. lithe upstream origin of the ditch is not buffered (e.g. if the ditch begins upstream ++fTsits: f, 111r cp'edil Jedoc:Ion is applied to the most upstream portion of the ditch on Ilse propert}. SCENARIO 3 caw o e .I fiL•tmii L of Interconnecting ditches occurs on a site. and all of the ditches are hul'fered. the only credit deductilm \wild b4. di l,r I+r+1nl ++,hers art unbuffered ditch enters the project: SCENARIO 4 Matt 3)04 33f•&iAt • N 1111 ti1Ll00.r. �'iilli1.:;l 110rl I nil I,.. 11,111 0110 IZ;IILIt. %,rlill r tli1111+11 lfll J It'ru1r+i J, ?UIIC 25I1, Iduleltal ',oral t anrtmll '_7604 r_' • OM. 11Vr IN. T+;400)1 'wane! l .;/hZ enr �iJ�.114.15�If1c sL'i11114}� {}III North C'tit-t}iitt;t A'alu1'rlllr1 l ,11 r •I hunuf1111 IltirlllumAcslun I'ulphltef =n liac}ckd Iri°, I'n t [ I IhunlCr I'npel Page 4 of 4 Where a natural stream enters the pmjt:ct site, no deduction of credit will occur. Also, when a natural stream or a modified naturltl stream flow into a buffered stream, no deduction of credit will occur. The modified natural stream must be subject to She buffer rules. and must be verified to be a modified natural stream (as apposed to a ditch) through an on -site determination by DWQ personnel. SCENARIO 5 For any additional questions or clarifications on this issue, please contact Eric Kulz or Amy Chapman al (919) 733-17156. Signature /tit c Date'3i 1�u Signature: Date: cr /5 loci C� ales Wetra„ds Certifcalion Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650 2321 Crabtree Bowlcverd, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Caroline 27604 Ph wit 'JI9-r33.1 ? 4 r FAX 919.733.6893 1 Internet. http /b3o.cn•.jlatc nc.uVacwetlands 4n !_iitr:d Oprwnunnythrrirmalive Action Employer — MP% Rccycltdl10% Post Consumer Paper N°nhCarol na aturallj Mitigation Project Name St Clair Creek Restoration Project USACE Action ID 2008-02655 DMS ID 95015 DWR Permit 2013-0739 River Basin Tar -Pamlico Date Project Instituted 7/18/2011 Cataloging Unit 03020104 Date Prepared 2/9/2022 County Beaufort Stream/Wet. Service Area Tar -Pamlico 03020104 Signature of Official Approving Credit Release 1 - For NCDMS, no credits are released during the first milestone 2 - For NCDMS projects, the initial credit release milestone occurs automatically when the as -built report (baseline monitoring report) has been made available to the IRT by posting it to the DMS portal, provided the following have been met: 1) Approved of Final Mitigation Plan 2) Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE covering the property. 3) Completion of all physical and biological improvements to the mitigation site pursuant to the mitigation plan. 4) Receipt of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for projects where DA permit issuance is not required. 3 - A 10% reserve of credits is to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met. Credit Release Milestone Warm Stream Credits Project Credits Scheduled Releases % Estimated Scheduled Release # Proposed Released # Not Approved # Releases Approved Credits Anticipated Release Year Actual Release Date 1 - Site Establishment N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 - Year 0 / As -Built 30.00% 982.200 982.200 0.000 982.200 2014 7/21/2014 3 - Year 1 Monitoring 10.00% 327.400 327.400 0.000 327.400 2015 4/23/2015 4 - Year 2 Monitoring 10.00% 327.400 327.400 163.700 163.700 2016 7/8/2016 5 - Year 3 Monitoring 10.00% 327.400 327.400 0.000 491.100 2017 4/3/2017 6 - Year 4 Monitoring 5.00% 163.700 163.700 0.000 163.700 2018 4/25/2018 7 - Year 5 Monitoring 10.00% 327.400 327.400 327.400 0.000 2019 6/24/2019 8 - Year 6 Monitoring 5.00% 163.700 491.100 0.000 491.100 2020 4/23/2020 9 - Year 7 Monitoring 10.00% 327.400 327.400 327.400 0.000 2021 5/11/2021 10 - Year 8 Monitoring 0.00% 0.000 327.400 327.400 0.000 2022 2/9/2022 Stream Bankfull Standard 10.00% 327.400 327.400 0.000 327.400 2018 4/25/2018 Totals 2,946.600 Total Gross Credits 3,274.000 Total Unrealized Credits to Date 327.400 Total Released Credits to Date 2,946.600 Total Percentage Released 90.00% Remaining Unreleased Credits 0.000 Credit Release Milestone Riparian Credits Project Credits Scheduled Releases % Estimated Scheduled Release # Proposed Released # Not Approved # Releases Approved Credits Anticipated Release Year Actual Release Date 1 - Site Establishment N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 - Year 0 / As -Built 30.00% 0.840 0.840 0.000 0.840 2014 7/21/2014 3 - Year 1 Monitoring 10.00% 0.280 0.280 0.000 0.280 2015 4/23/2015 4 - Year 2 Monitoring 10.00% 0.280 0.280 0.000 0.280 2016 7/8/2016 5 - Year 3 Monitoring 15.00% 0.420 0.420 0.420 0.000 2017 4/3/2017 6 - Year 4 Monitoring 5.00% 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.000 2018 4/25/2018 7 - Year 5 Monitoring 15.00% 0.420 0.980 0.000 0.980 2019 6/24/2019 8 - Year 6 Monitoring 5.00% 0.140 0.140 0.000 0.140 2020 4/23/2020 9 - Year 7 Monitoring 10.00% 0.280 0.280 0.140 0.140 2021 5/11/2021 10 - Year 8 Monitoring 0.00% 0.000 0.140 0.140 0.000 2022 2/9/2022 Stream Bankfull Standard N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Totals 2.660 Total Gross Credits 2.800 Total Unrealized Credits to Date 0.140 Total Released Credits to Date 2.660 Page 1 of 3 Mitigation Project Name DMS ID River Basin Cataloging Unit County St Clair Creek Restoration Project 95015 Tar -Pamlico 03020104 Beaufort USACE Action ID 2008-02655 DWR Permit 2013-0739 Date Project Instituted 7/18/2011 Date Prepared 2/9/2022 Stream/Wet. Service Area Tar -Pamlico 03020104 Total Percentage Released 95.00% Remaining Unreleased Credits 0.000 Notes 7/8/2016: IRT approved the release of half of the potential stream credits (scheduled release was 10% of the total stream credits) for Monitoring Year 2. 4/3/2017: IRT withheld the release of the wetland credits for Monitoring Year 3. 4/25/2018: IRT withheld the release of the wetland credits for Monitoring Year 4. 6/24/2019: IRT approved release of the wetland credits for Monitoring Year 3, 4 and 5. Due to concerns on the upper section of UT 2, the IRT withheld release of Monitoring Year 5 stream credits. 5/11/2021: IRT required one additional year of monitoring. Even though 5% of the project stream credits was approved for release, DMS has decided to hold the remaining stream mitigation credits for closeout scheduled for 2022. The IRT approved the release of 5% of the remaining wetland credits. The remaining 5% will be proposed for release at the 2022 close out. 2/4/2022: DMS completed one additional year of monitoring for a total of 8 years. DMS is proposing this site for close out and requests the IRT approve the release of the remaining stream and riparian wetland credits. This is a coastal headwater project and there are 327.400 warm stream credits identified as "at risk". DMS is aware of the issues surrounding the unreleased stream credits and acknowledges that some of these credits may not be released. 2/9/2022: Site visit held with IRT for closeout. The IRT agreed no further monitoring was required and to close out the stream and riparian wetland credits but did not agree to release the remaining stream and riparian wetland credits. The headwater stream did not develop a flow path and demonstrate an ordinary high mark which was required. Contingencies (if any) Project Quantities Mitigation Type Restoration Type Physical Quantity Warm Stream Restoration 3,274.000 Riparian Restoration 2.800 Debits Warm Stream Restoration Credits Riparian Restoration Credits Beginning Balance (mitigation credits) 3,274.000 2.800 Released Credits 2,946.600 2.660 Unrealized Credits 327.400 0.140 Converted Credits 0.000 0.000 Owning Program Req. Id TIP # Project Name USACE #Permit DWR Permit # DCM rmit Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF Program REQ-003055 R-2510A DOT US 17 (Washington Bypass) 1999-301143 2005-0785 163.700 Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF Program REQ-003055 R-2510A DOT US 17 (Washington Bypass) 1999-301143 2005-0785 491.100 Page 2 of 3 Mitigation Project Name DMS ID River Basin Cataloging Unit County St Clair Creek Restoration Project 95015 Tar -Pamlico 03020104 Beaufort USACE Action ID 2008-02655 DWR Permit 2013-0739 Date Project Instituted 7/18/2011 Date Prepared 2/9/2022 Stream/Wet. Service Area Tar -Pamlico 03020104 Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF Program REQ-003055 R-2510A DOT US 17 (Washington Bypass) 1999-301143 2005-0785 491.100 Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF Program REQ-003055 R-2510A DOT US 17 (Washington Bypass) 1999-301143 2005-0785 982.200 Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF Program REQ-003055 R-2510A DOT US 17 (Washington Bypass) 1999-301143 2005-0785 327.400 Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF Program REQ-003055 R-2510A DOT US 17 (Washington Bypass) 1999-301143 2005-0785 491.100 Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF Program REQ-006470 Woolard -McCoy Project 2015-01937 2015-0929 17-16 0.250 NCDOT Stream & Wetland ILF Program REQ-007731 B-5302 Replace Bridge 3 over Norfolk Southern RR 2018-02324 0.750 Statewide Stream & Wetland ILF Program REQ-009101 Moss East 2020-01002 2021-0442 vl 115-21 0.264 Remaining Balance (Released credits) 0.000 1.396 Remaining Balance (Unreleased credits) 0.000 0.000 Total Remaining Balance (Released and Unreleased credits) 0.000 1.396 Page 3 of 3