Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0039913_Report_20220523Average Daily Flow Calculations Stirrup Iron Creek Pump Station Prepared For: Durham County May 2022 : NC License #F-0102 ADF Calculations May 2022│Draft ii This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn. ADF Calculations May 2022│Draft iii ABBREVIATIONS ADF Average Daily Flow ARV Air Release Valve AVV Air Vacuum Valve DIPS Ductile Iron Pipe Size EPA Environmental Protection Agency FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GIS Geographic Information System GPAD Gallons Per Acre Per Day GPCD Gallons Per Capital Per Day GPD Gallons Per Day GPH Gallons Per Hour GPM Gallons Per Minute HDPE High Density Polyethylene HGL Hydraulic Grade Line HP Horsepower I/I Inflow and Infiltration KWH Killo-Watt Hours LF Linear Feet MDF Maximum Daily Flow MFWWTP Mason Farms Wastewater Treatment Plant MG Million Gallons MGD Million Gallons Per Day NCDEQ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality NFPA National Fire Protection Association NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NSF National Sanitation Foundation NWI National Wetlands Index O&M Operation and Maintenance OWASA Orange Water and Sewer Authority OPCC Opinion of Probable Construction Costs PHF Peak Hour Flow PS Pump Station PVC Polyvinyl Chloride PWS Public Water System SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition SD-ADF Speed Distribution – Average Daily Flow SF Square Feet TDH Total Dynamic Head USGS United States Geological Survey VFD Variable Frequency Drive WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant Δ Delta (Change) ADF Calculations May 2022│Draft iv 1 ADF Flow Calculations Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION The Stirrup Iron Creek (SIC) Pump Station is anticipated to have significant growth in the near future and has limited sewer capacity. The County is planning to build a new sewer pump station on Chin Page Road that will intercept a portion of the flow tributary to Stirrup Iron Creek. This work will take some time to complete, and developments are anticipated before the Chin Page Road Pump Station and associated infrastructure can be constructed. As a result, Durham County retained the services of Kimley-Horn to study the Stirrup Iron Creek Pump Station to determine its capacity and make recommendations for increasing capacity. This document summarizes the process in which the existing dry weather ADF (DWADF) was determined. Stirrup Iron Creek Pump Station is located in Durham County on Page Road north of the I-40 and I-540 intersection, as shown on Figure 1.1 - Site Location Map. The SIC Pump Station and tributary sewer shed is in the Stirrup Iron Creek drainage basin, which is part of the Neuse River basin. The SIC tributary sewer shed is approximately 4,874 acres of largely industrial and residential land. The station delivers flow to the Triangle Wastewater Treatment Plant in Durham County through a 9,900-LF, 18-inch DIP force main that discharges into a manhole near the intersection of Hopson Road and Keystone Park Drive. Figure 1.1 - Site Location Map The station was constructed circa 1986, and the firm capacity is currently 6.5 MGD. The pump station is a large, submersible sewage pump station with three existing pumps and both piping and MCCs for a fourth pump. The wet well is 34.91 feet in diameter. Design operating points include 3,270 GPM at 160 Ft TDH. The pumps are 200 HP, 1750 RPM, 3-phase Yeomans submersible pumps. 2 ADF Flow Calculations Dry Weather ADF Calculation 2 DRY WEATHER ADF CALCULATION Verification of flows at the SIC Pump Station required a unique approach because there is no way to directly measure the inflow or outflow of the station using existing, onsite instrumentation. The pumps also operate on VFDs at a reduced speed the majority of the time. The SIC pump station has a magnetic flow meter on the discharge header that does not provide accurate results, so it was ignored for purposes of this study. There are reliable pump run time meters on each pump’s control circuits, however, the pumps operate at a reduced speed. This made direct usage of the run time meters to calculate station output impossible without a detailed analysis of the speeds. The only time the station operates at full speed is when it is operated in hand, which is only done to confirm operation, or in extenuating circumstances. The station operates this way intentionally to match flow into the station as much as possible and to limit the pressure in the force main. Additionally, there is not a flow-based need to operate the station at full speed under ADF conditions. For this study, we utilized specialized data loggers, detailed pump performance tests, rainfall data, and historical run-time data to approximate the ADF over a 12-month period. Each dataset is described below. 1. Pump Performance Test Data – Pump performance data was obtained by KH on three different dates utilizing Kimley-Horn’s proprietary Xak-Pack, a pump performance measurement tool. Pump performance was measured on 7/22/2021, 4/13/2022, and 5/13/2022. A graphical representation of this data can be found as Exhibit 1 – Pump and System Curves. 2. VFD Speed Data – This data was obtained by KH directly from each pump’s VFD output recorded in Hertz (Hz) at 22 second intervals from 4/13/2022 to 5/12/2022 (29 days). This data is very high resolution and recorded to the one hundredth of a Hz precision with similar accuracy. A graph of this data can be found in Exhibit 2 – VFD Speed Data. 3. Daily Run-Time Data – This data was provided by the County and collected by their SCADA system from 12/1/2022 to 5/13/2022 (166 days). This data includes the number of pump cycles and the hours of pump run time for each pump. This data is included in Exhibit 3 – Run-Time Data. 4. 12-Month Weekly Run-Time Data – This data was provided by the County based on operator logs spanning from 4/5/2021 to 5/3/2022 (393 days). This data includes the hours of run time for each pump. This data is in included in Exhibit 3 – Run-Time Data. 5. NOAA Rainfall Data – This data was obtained from the USGS website on daily intervals for the period of 4/5/2022 to 5/3/2022. This data includes the number of inches of rain measured at the Third Creek Woodcroft Parkway NR Blands Rain Gauge approximately 5.81 miles from the SIC Pump Station Basin. This data in included in Exhibit 3 – Run Time Data. Dry Weather ADF Calculation Method The general procedure for calculating the DWADF is listed below in the general sequence each step was completed. 1. Define Pressurized System Hydraulics –A verified system curve was developed (see Exhibit 1 – Pump and System Curves) based on field testing under multiple hydraulic conditions and measured pump performance. The system curve was developed based on a wide range of flows to ensure it fully represents the operating characteristics of the force main. The pump performance was measured on multiple occasions and under various speeds to determine the output throughout each pump’s operating range. 3 ADF Flow Calculations Dry Weather ADF Calculation 2. Monitor Speed –Data loggers were installed to monitor speed directly from the VFDs. Once the data was collected, KH analyzed it to determine the system response to diurnal curves. Based on the speed data, this system runs very predictably and responds very uniformly to dry weather flows. This was the anticipated outcome due to the fixed control levels and VFD PID loop algorithm.Figure 2.1 - Pump Speed Distribution shows the percent of time each pump runs at each speed. As shown, the pumps are usually off or running at very low speed. Figure 2.1 - Pump Speed Distribution 3. Affinity Curves – Pump reduced-speed affinity curves were calculated for both pumps at 1 Hz intervals and verified through field testing for 50, 55, and 60 Hz.Exhibit 1 – Pump and System Curves shows the output of the pumps at various speeds. The lower limit of pump operation is 45 Hz and could not be verified at the time of testing due of the high inflow at that time of day. 4. Calculate Total Flow – The VFD speed data was utilized in conjunction with the affinity curves to calculate the instantaneous flow rates for each speed data point and the total volume pumped over that period. Most of the speed data included fractional speeds which required straight line interpolation between the one Hz affinity curves shown on Exhibit 1 – Pump and System Curves. The flows were totaled for each day and for the 29-day monitoring period. 5. Define Dry Weather – By reviewing the system’s response to rain events, it was determined that rainfall events less than 0.3 inches had little to no influence on the system for that period of time in our data. As seen in Exhibit 5 – Pump Testing One Month Summary, any rain events exceeding 0.3 inches were considered wet weather events and were not included in the DWADF. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%60-5859-5858-5757-5656-5555-5454-5353-5252-5151-5050-4949-4848-4747-4646-4545-4444-4343-42%0f1-MonthRunTimeSpeed (Hz) P1 P2 4 ADF Flow Calculations Dry Weather ADF Calculation 6. Establish DWADF to Run-Time Ratio – A ratio was established to correlate the run-time readings to dry weather flows during the one month of VFD speed data. This ratio describes the control systems response to the DWADF. The average DWADF to Run-Time ratio was calculated to be 15.29 Hours per MGD. 7. Calculate the 6-Month ADF – The 6-month ADF was calculated using the run-time ratio. A summary of both the one-month and six-month data sets is provided in Table 2.1 - ADF Summary. Parameter Units One-Month VFD Speed Data Six-Month Daily RT Data Total ADF MGD 1.185 1.15 Maximum ADF MGD 1.473 1.53 Minimum ADF MGD 0.986 0.83 Avg DW Run Time Hrs 17.78 17.48 Dry Weather ADF MGD 1.163 1.14 Table 2.1 - ADF Summary 5 ADF Flow Calculations Conclusion 3 CONCLUSION The DWADF is 1.14 MGD for the last six months. See Exhibit 4 – Dry Weather Average Daily flows for a graphical representation of all DWADF calculations. Considering this flow calculation method is not a direct measurement, there is some error involved in the calculations. Accordingly, we are recommending adding a 5% buffer to account for error. Adding 5% to the One-Month ADF results in an ADF of 1.197 MGD. The SIC Pump Station Wet Well is 34.91-Ft in diameter resulting in a very large amount of storage relative to the inflow rate. Between the pump off and the invert in there is approximately 80,000 gallons or 1.62 hours of storage before the system begins to surcharge. As a result, there is ample peaking factor and storage to account for any short-term spikes in flow. Exhibit 1 Pump and System Curves 59 5755 53 51 49 47 45 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019002000210022002300240025002600270028002900300031003200330034003500360037003800Head(Ft)Flow (GPM) 60 Hz 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 System Curve Exhibit 2 VFD Speed Data 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 4/9/220:004/14/220:004/19/220:004/24/220:004/29/220:005/4/220:005/9/220:005/14/220:00Speed(Hz)Pump 1 Pump 2 Exhibit - 3 Run Time Data 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2/23/2021 4/14/2021 6/3/2021 7/23/2021 9/11/2021 10/31/2021 12/20/2021 2/8/2022 3/30/2022 5/19/2022 7/8/2022 Rainfall(in./day)RunTime(hrs.)1 Month Run Time 6 Month Run Time 12 Month Run Time 12 Month Rainfall Exhibit - 4 Dry Weather Average Daily Flows 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 11/20/2021 12/10/2021 12/30/2021 1/19/2022 2/8/2022 2/28/2022 3/20/2022 4/9/2022 4/29/2022 5/19/2022 6/8/2022 Rainfall(in./day)ADF(MGD)1 Month Dry Weather ADF 6 Month Dry Weather ADF Rainfall Exhibit - 5 Pump Testing One Month Summary Date Pump 1 Pump 2 ADF Runtime Dry ADF/RT Ratio Rainfall Summary Values MGD MGD MGD Hours Inches 1.185 4/13/2022 0.000 0.271 0.272 5.08 18.72 0 1.473 4/14/2022 0.896 0.281 1.177 18.53 15.75 0 0.986 4/15/2022 0.864 0.335 1.199 17.99 15.00 0 1.163 4/16/2022 0.844 0.331 1.175 17.47 14.86 0 17.78 4/17/2022 0.602 0.554 1.157 18.07 15.62 0 15.29 Dry Weather ADF/RT Ratio 4/18/2022 0.195 1.278 1.473 19.20 13.03 1.29 4/19/2022 1.145 0.232 1.377 19.43 14.11 0 4/20/2022 0.919 0.346 1.264 18.88 14.93 0.1 4/21/2022 0.704 0.282 0.986 13.48 13.67 0 4/22/2022 0.680 0.444 1.124 18.27 16.26 0 4/23/2022 0.796 0.392 1.188 17.04 14.35 0 4/24/2022 0.877 0.284 1.161 18.17 15.66 0 4/25/2022 0.964 0.237 1.201 18.99 15.82 0 4/26/2022 0.962 0.185 1.147 18.53 16.15 0.23 4/27/2022 0.678 0.526 1.204 17.94 14.90 0.01 4/28/2022 0.703 0.421 1.124 18.06 16.06 0 4/29/2022 0.584 0.531 1.115 17.45 15.64 0 4/30/2022 0.759 0.453 1.212 15.81 13.04 0 5/1/2022 0.535 0.622 1.158 17.47 15.09 0.13 5/2/2022 0.979 0.258 1.237 18.93 15.30 0.01 5/3/2022 0.959 0.178 1.138 19.54 17.18 0 5/4/2022 0.675 0.480 1.155 17.69 15.31 0 5/5/2022 0.866 0.312 1.178 18.43 15.65 0 5/6/2022 0.930 0.290 1.220 18.79 15.39 0.2 5/7/2022 0.786 0.444 1.230 16.95 13.79 0.58 5/8/2022 0.770 0.408 1.178 17.00 14.43 0 5/9/2022 0.937 0.238 1.175 18.50 15.75 0 *Excludes start and end dates 5/10/2022 0.631 0.500 1.131 17.35 15.34 0 5/11/2022 0.822 0.350 1.172 17.37 14.82 0 5/12/2022 0.412 0.523 0.935 13.95 14.92 0.07 ADF Max ADF Min ADF* Dry Weather ADF Included in Dry ADF/RT ratio Data collection/set-up days Avg. Dry Weather Run Time (RT)