20140500 Ver 1_401 Application_20140514

2 0
4 0 5 0 0
Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Tyler Crumbley
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, NC 28403
From: Deborah Edwards Shirley
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Ste. 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Re: West Hampton-Phase 11
Cumberland County, NC
May 19, 2014
S&EC Project #1 1775-P1
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building _ 9th Floor
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
U5
OWL
MAY ?014
-'JALITy
On behalf of the applicant, GHM Group, LLC (Attn: Lorraine Mohler), please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) that the activities
proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality Certification 3890. Please
contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
West Hampton-Phase 11
Project Type
Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant
GHM Group, LLC
County
Cumberland
Nearest Town
Hope Mills
Waterbody Name
LIT to Rockfish Creek
Index Number
18-31-(23)
Class
C
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0.038
Wetland Impact (acres):
0.302
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact'to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.34
Total Stream impact (linear feet):
149
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application
Agent Authorization
USGS Vicinity Map & NRCS Soil Survey
USACE Site Meeting Notes-09-14-11
NCEEP Acceptance letter
Existing Conditions Map
Overall Site Plan
Impact Exhibits
DWR ONLY
NCDENR SMP Approval-SW6140302
NCDENR App form
Drainagd Area Caics
O&Ms, Deed Restrictions
Supplement Forms & CaIcs
Site Plans and Details
$240 DWR Application Fee

0� INVO A
0
PAPOffice Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applirant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: N/A
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes
No
I d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
Z 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
rl,401 Water Quality Certification — Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
0 Yes 0 No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
Yes [0 No
1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
[0 Yes
No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
0 Yes
No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
[:1 Yes
No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
West Hampton-Phase 11
2b. County:
Cumbetland
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Hope Mills
2d. Subdivision name:
West Hampton
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
NIA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
GHM Group, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
D. B. 7799; 8124; 8020; 8465, Pg. 613; 153, 446, 180
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Loffaine Mohler
3d. Street address:
7670 Raeford Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Fayetteville, NC 28304
3f. Telephone no.:
910-221-9901
3g. Fax no.:
910-826-4546
3h. Email address:
NIA
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
0 Agent S Other, specify: Owner-please send correspondence to Agent and
copy both owner and applicant
4b. Name:
Lorraine Mohler
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
GHM Group, LLC
4d. Street address:
7670 Raeford Road
4e. City, state, zip:
Fayetteville, NC 28304
4f. Telephone no.:
910-221-9901
4g. Fax no.:
910-826-4546
4h. Email address:
NIA
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Deborah Edwards Shirley
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c. Street address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Ste. 104
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC -2 7615
5e. Telephone no.:
919-846-5900
5f. Fax no.:
919-846-9467
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Parcel ID: 0404 -31 -3069, 0404 -32 -4489, 0404 -32 -6039,
0404 -31 -8623 & 0404 -41 -9355
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): IMPACT AREA #3
Latitude: 35.9617 Longitude: - 78.9871
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
± 87
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Rockfish Creek & UT to Rockfish Creek; 18- 31 -(23)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear 03- 06 -15; Hydrologic Unit Code 03030004
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The existing conditions on site consist of a forested land with a CP &L and NCNG gas easement bisecting the
property and some dirt roads cutting through the property. The general land use in the vicinity of the project is residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 21 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 1, 784 linear feet.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access to the uplands and utilities for a residential subdivision.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of the construction of infrastructure (i.e. roads, sanitary sewer, stormwater piping and
stormwater devices) for a residential subdivision. Equipment such as bull dozers; bucket loaders, excavators and
other typical equipment used for land disturbance and construction will be utilized for this project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Comments: We do not have record of a JD for this project,
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
however a Jurisdictional Determination package was
submitted concurrently with this PCN application.
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental
Name (if known): Steven Ball of S &EC
Consultants, PA Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE -a site visit was conducted with a different consultant back on September 14, 2011 with Mickey Sugg, notes
provided by Crystal Amschler (see attached).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information, and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 13

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact number
Type of jurisdiction
- Permanent (P) or
Type of
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Temporary T
impact
if known
DWQ - non -404, other
acres
Open -cut
W1 ( #1) ❑ POT
Stormwater
Bottomland
Hardwood
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
E] DWQ
0.09
piping
connection
W3 (#3) ® P ❑ T
Road
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.18
Crossing
Hardwood
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 (#4) ❑ P ® T
Open -cut
Sanitary
Bottomland
Hardwood
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.02
Sewer
W5 ( #5) ❑ P ® T
Open -cut
Sanitary
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.003
Sewer
W6 (#6) ❑ P ® T
Aerial
Sanitary
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.004
Sewer
W7 ( #7) ❑ P ® T
Aerial
Sanitary
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.005
Sewer
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.302
2h. Comments: The temporary wetland impacts will be brought back to pre - construction contours and allowed to re-
vegetate.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact number -
Type of
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Temporary (T)
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ( 0) ❑ P ® T
Open -Cut
Sanitary
UT to Rockfish
® PER
® Corps
4
24
Sewer
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 (#3),® P ❑ T
Road
UT to Rockfish
® PER
® Corps
8.5
105
Crossing
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Open -Cut
® PER
® Corps
S3 ( #7) ❑ P ® T
Sanitary
Rockfish Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
37
20
Sewer
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
1 149
3i. Comments: For all stream impacts, the bed & bank will be re- established and brought back to pre - construction
grades.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individ ally list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water impact
Name of
number—
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P [IT
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar- Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
required?
131 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B4 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 13

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
S &EC completed a stream & wetland delineation for the entire property in order to identify natural resource. The
overall proposed impacts consist of permanent impacts associated with a road crossing and temporary impacts
associated with utilities (i.e. stormwater piping and sanitary sewer). Specifically, impact Areas 4, 5, 6 & 7 are
proposed temporary impacts to wetlands andl or a stream for sanitary sewer. Impact Areas 6 & 7 are proposed
aerial crossings to Rockfish Creek and two wetland areas but temporary impacts will be necessary for construction.
impact Areas 4 & 5 are proposed to be open -cut. Impact Area #1 is a proposed temporary impact to a wetland and
stream for an underground stromwater piping system. Jack & bore and directionally drilling to avoidlminimize these
impacts were reviewed for these sanitary sewer impacts. Previous Impact #2 has been eliminated from the plan
and will be jack & bored, however it was determined to be cost prohibitive to construct the other four (4) sanitary
sewer impacts with this method. Please note that Impact Area #1 was minimized by directly connecting from the
edge to edge of the wetland area vs. originally running along the lot lines. Impact Area #3 is the only proposed
permanent impact which is a road crossing necessary for access to the western portion of the property. Impact Area
#3 includes impacts to a perennial stream and a jurisdictional wetland. The road crossing was proposed within a
narrow section of the wetland area to minimize total impacts. Two RCP's are proposed at stream crossing location
to preserve the hydrologic connectivity.
Furthermore, the applicant is aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permits 29. With
respect to residential development conditions (NWP 29- Regional Conditions section 4.0) the applicant does not
anticipate any impacts to perennial streams associated with stormwater facilities, there are no impacts associated
with single- family recreation facilities, there are no permanent wetland or stream fills proposed within the
floodwaylfloodplain and the stream classification for this project is C (i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters, High
Quality Waters, Coastal Wetlands or wetland adjacent to these waters). Please note however that there is a
proposed wetland impact (i.e. #1) associated with a stormwater piping system, this impact will be temporary,
additionally, the proposed sanitary sewer adjacent Rockfish Creek will be within the floodplainlfloodway however no
permanent fill is proposed within a jurisdictional areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Erosion & Sediment Control plan will require measures to protect water quality during construction activities.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
® Yes ❑ No
The proposed permanent impact to streams is below 150
linear feet, as such the applicant is not proposing
compensatory mitigation in the form of a mitigation
payment but has avoided and minimized impacts to the
maximum extent practicable. The proposed permanent
and temporary wetland impacts are greater than 0.10 acre
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
and therefore as per the Corps NWP will require
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
compensatory mitigation. The proposed temporary
wetland impacts will result in a change of wetland function
(i.e. forested to herbaceous) but not a permanent loss of
wetlands. The applicant is proposing a 1:1 mitigation ratio
for these areas that will not result in a permanent loss
however a 2:1 mitigation ratio for the permanent wetland
impacts that will result in a permanent loss.
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.48 acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 13

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
24%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The West Hampton Phase II development is a 158 lot single family residential development with the associated infrastructure. It
is located on the west side of Woodspring Drive. The site meets the qualifications for a low density development. However, the
wetland impacts from the streets and utilities require 85% TSS removal. Therefore, permanent wet ponds have been designed
to treat the storm water from the development.
The storm water generated from the development will be treated through the use of two wet ponds located near the southern
edge of the development. The wet ponds are designed in accordance with the latest NCDENR BMP manual. The storm water is
transported from across the site through underground storm drainage systems. The storm water is released into the forebay of
the wet ponds. The riser (outfall) for the ponds contains a slow release that controls the one year and ten year storms. The
pond reduces the peak flow from the development to less than the predevelopment flows for each of the storm events.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
® Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
El USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed -
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
® Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Page 10 of 13

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.) Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands
Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many
private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential
subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations. The West Hampton -Phase
l/ project is a small residential development that will be located within an already highly developed watershed. Additionally, the
project will soon be incorporated within the Hope Mill ETJ, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development
will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Phase 11 NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this
program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post- construction
stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. This project will connect to the City of Fayetteville's
Sanitary Sewer System. Public Works Commission, the City of Fayetteville's Home Town Utility will ensure that capacity
of their treatment facility will not be exceeded.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
® Yes * ❑ No
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or *Threatened /Endangered Species have
habitat? been identified within the Hope Mills
topographic Quadrangle but not
necessarily in or near this project.
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑Yes No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh ❑ Asheville
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? The NC- Natural Heritage Programs Data Search was used to search for elemental occurrences of federally
protected species listed within the Hope Mills Topographic Quadrangle map. It was determined based on the search that
there are three elemental occurrences that are listed as either federally Threatened or Endangered within the Hope Mills Quad
map. See table below.
Scientific Name
Alligator
mississippiensis
Lysimachia
asperulifolia
American Alligator T T(S /A) Fresh to slightly brackish lakes, ponds, rivers, and
marshes
Rough -leaf pocosin /savanna ecotones, pocosins
Loosestrife E E
Picoides borealis Red - cockaded mature open.pine forests, mainly in longleaf pine
Woodpecker E E [breeding evidence only]
References: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Online Map Viewer [February 26, 2014] Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Office of Land and Water Stewardship, Raleigh, NC. http://www.ncnhp.orp
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?,
Project located in Cumberland County. This project is not near any designated Essential Fish Habitat areas.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Once or the Office of State Archeology were not performed. No
structures > 50 yrs. old were observed during the wetland boundary evaluation.
Page 12 of 13
State
Federal
Common Name
. Protection,
Status
Protection
Status
Habitat Comments
American Alligator T T(S /A) Fresh to slightly brackish lakes, ponds, rivers, and
marshes
Rough -leaf pocosin /savanna ecotones, pocosins
Loosestrife E E
Picoides borealis Red - cockaded mature open.pine forests, mainly in longleaf pine
Woodpecker E E [breeding evidence only]
References: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Online Map Viewer [February 26, 2014] Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Office of Land and Water Stewardship, Raleigh, NC. http://www.ncnhp.orp
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?,
Project located in Cumberland County. This project is not near any designated Essential Fish Habitat areas.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Once or the Office of State Archeology were not performed. No
structures > 50 yrs. old were observed during the wetland boundary evaluation.
Page 12 of 13

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: As per the project engineer, Cumberland County will allow the
stormwater device within the 100 year floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Confirmation from the project engineer and the NC
Flood Risk Information System. httn: / /www.ncfloodmaas.com/ Accessed March 21, 2014
Deborah E. Shirley
c
May 19,
Applicant/AgentsSlgnature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter the applicant is
Date
provided.)
Page 13 of 13

Environmental Consultants,
C =701.5 • Fhonc 0)11 RAG -51X0
r
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Name: GHM Group, LLC
Address: 7670 Raeford Road, Fayetteville, HC 28304
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/ Description: west Hampton phase II S&EC Project # (�
Date: February 12, 2014
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: l_ I Z Ct I Field Office: L I' IM. coz &Ln
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern
I, the current ro owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 12 day of
February 2014
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S &EC staff. You should call S&cEC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
GHM Group, LLC - Lorraine Mohler aa4- —
Print Property Owners Name Property'Owner's Signature
cc: Ms. Karen Higgins cc: Ms. Deborah Edwards Shirley
NCDENR - DWR Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604

Al,
M 0 VA
MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Lorraine Mohler
GHM Group, LLC
7670 Raeford Road
Fayetteville, NC 28304
Project: West Hampton Phase 11
Michael Ellison, Director
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
March 31, 2014
John E. Skvada, III
Secretary
Expiration of Acceptance: September 30, 2014
County: Cumberland
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 -337: An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S.L. 2011 -343.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification /CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.neeep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation
are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to NCEEP for this impact is determined by
pe ' ing agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
Impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer 11
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold .
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non -Ri arian Coastal Marsh
Cape Fear
03030004
0
1 0
0
0.30
0 0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be perfonrted
in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010. Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional
information; please contact Kelly Williams at (919) 707 -8915.
Sincerely,
Jam Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWR Wetlands /401 Unit
Liz Hair, USACE- Wilmington
Deborah Shirley, agent
File
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: [phone] l Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

1"�5
N
r GUhl
WOOD
CRICKET:RD 1 °£ �'c 3 c ,, W. .E
oe 1 m
Stoney Point Z
�
z P,inet Knoll �
POETRY ! N
ROCKFISH fro HUNTING RIDGE RD
Q J
0pGEOR` �. Fairway N/CpLET
Forest,,. '
Timberlake EEXIHGTom OR ,
;
WALLACF IlR
Village Green 00y�'�`
y' YDRKSD Xa f` �o��� golfer A
Eaglewood
TREE 77R DR �
= eALti i�
AMpo u7 % Project Parcels Forest
r r
Mlss� °a
? rstr�. So
Upchurch Boy Scout" Yz"
Camp
•
BAY ORE DR-
`l
V dap 4Y�D i 1
Q oy
<�
Pay
V
L
L�
P
vy
y�f
\ °ti
� sr
Project RA I USGS Vicinity Map I
AA -9-90 uu
FOLK Sr
ri
s
l„ c47
i l C7 �d �pMOR S
_.
� B T�
r ``Y FALLS D¢ ALf EN
HEATHER ST
m BRIDGE ST y0? AHOSKIED
> FOXRIDGE BISCOC DR
vim,,
2,000 4,000
Feet
M
Project Mgr.: West Hampton Ph. 11
sB
Cumberland Co., NC
Scale:
1" = 2,000' 2013 Hope Mills USGS Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Quadrangle (Portion of
9412 Falb. d'!tuix. Nwd. `uNe fOJ. RaleirJi. X('27611 • WIMit: 1919) Mu ?9fN1 • Fay: (19191 W-9467
2014 -02 -25 1 Parkton Quad also Shown) * ft&V.mn

L-%
---------- /
4-