20081123 Ver 3_401 Application_20140521

WITHERS & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
1410 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE 1o1
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 28403
(910) 256 -9277
FAX [phone]
TO: NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street; 9`h Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Copy of Letter
® Attached
❑ Prints
❑ Change order
DATE 5/19/14
JOB NO 02130241.00
ATTENTION Ms. Karen Higgins
PHONE #
919-807-6363
RE
Brook Manor — Lot 11— Holly Springs, Wake Co.
After the Fact NWP 18 PCN Submittal
02130241.00
After the Fact NWP 19 PCN
1
5/19/14
021302 1.00
❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Diskette ❑
the following items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
5
5/19/14
02130241.00
After the Fact NWP 19 PCN
1
5/19/14
021302 1.00
Check for $24o Application Fee
1
5/19/14
02130241.00
CD of PCN
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
® For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
❑ Resubmit
❑ Submit
❑ Return
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
REMARKS:
COPYTO: File
SIGNED: Troy Beasley
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

WITHERS RAVENEL
May 19, 2014
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Mr. James Lastinger
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite soy
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
NC- Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Brook Manor — Lot 11
After the Fact NWP 18 PCN Submittal
Corps AID: SAW -2oo8 -01748
W &R Project #02130063.00
Dear Mr. Lastinger and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of K. Hovnanian Homes at Brook Manor, LLC, we are requesting After - the -Fact
authorization from the USACE to use NWP 18 for 0.03 acres of permanent wetland impacts
for construction of Lot 11 within the Brook Manor Subdivision. We are also requesting an
After - the -Fact 401 WQC from NCDWR for the above referenced impacts. Please note that
there were no impacts to Neuse River Riparian Buffers.
Lot 11 is 0.33 acres in size and is located at 141 Ulverston Drive in the Brook Manor
Subdivison in Holly Springs, Wake County (Latitude: 35.6483 1N; Longitude: - 78.8125 °W).
The project is located in the Neuse River basin and onsite waters drain to Sunset
Lake /Middle Creek. The Water Quality Classification for Middle Creek is C;NSW and the
Stream Index Number is: 27-43-1541)• The cataloging unit for the site is 03020201.
Proiect Histo
The Brook Manor subdivision was issued a statutory NWP 29 (SAW - 2oo8 - 01748) for 20 if of
temporary stream impacts for construction of a sewer line to service the subdivision. A copy
of the Corps' email, dated 6/5/09, confirming the statutory status of the NWP 29 has been
provided as an Appendix. The Jurisdictional Determination for onsite wetlands and streams
was approved in conjunction with the statutory NWP 29.
The Brook Manor subdivision was foreclosed on by the bank during the recent recession. K.
Hovnanian Homes at Brook Manor, LLC purchased Lot 11 from the bank, and began
construction. Lot 11 has a significant drop in elevation from the front to back (so' +), and
requires a large amount of fill to level the lot for construction of the house. The original
design for Lot 11 proposed very steep back slopes to return lot fill to natural grade. The
steep back slopes would result in erosion of the back slopes and sedimentation of the
adjacent wetlands and stream. The design of Lot 11 was modified to push the fill slope
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravenet.com I License No. C -0832

Brook Manor — Lot 11
further north to decrease the slope of the back slopes. During the clearing of Lot 11, the
contractor inadvertently cleared approximately 15 if into the wetlands at the northern lot
line, resulting in unauthorized wetland impacts. Once the unauthorized wetland impacts
were realized, K. Hovnanian Homes contact NCDWR and a Notice of Violation was issued.
Withers & Ravenel conducted a site visit on April 16, 2014 to review the unauthorized
impacts. In conversations with James Lastinger with the Corps and Sarah Knies with
NCDWR, it was determined that the best course of action to resolve the Violation would be
to permit the unauthorized wetland impacts under an After- the -Fact NWP 18.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.03 acres of permanent wetland impacts to allow for the
fill limits to be pushed further north to allow for less steep back slopes to return lot fill to
natural grade. The less steep back slopes will prevent erosion of the back slopes and
prevent sedimentation of adjacent wetlands and stream.
Avoidance and Minimization
The Brook Manor Subdivision has only had temporary stream impacts from construction of
utility lines to service the subdivision.
The proposed 0.03 acres of permanent wetland impacts are necessary to reduce the grade
of the back slopes on Lot 11 in order to prevent erosion and sedimentation of adjacent
wetlands and stream.
Mitigation
Stream Mitigation
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 269 if of permanent stream impacts at 2:1 ratio
by purchasing a total of 538 if of stream mitigation credits. W &R contacted mitigation
banks within the Cape Fear 0303002 basin, and Restoration Systems, LLC was the only
mitigation bank with stream credits available. However, Restoration Systems, LLC only had
448 if of stream credits available within the Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation
Bank. Therefore, the applicant will provide the 538 if of stream mitigation through the
purchase of a combination of 487 if of stream credits from Restoration Systems, LLC and 51
If of stream credits from EEP. Copies of the Letters of Availability from Restoration Systems,
LLC and EEP have been provided as an Appendix.
W &R acknowledges that NCDWR considers the 30 if of temporary stream impacts from the
rip -rap dissipaters (Impacts #4 & #8) to be permanent stream impacts, bringing the total
permanent stream impacts to 299 If. However, NCDWR requires stream mitigation at a 1:1
ratio, and therefore the proposed 538 if of stream mitigation satisfies the NCDWR mitigation
requirements and no additional stream mitigation is proposed for the 30 if of stream
impacts associated Impacts #4 & #8.
WITHERS , RAVENEL Page 2 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

Brook Manor — Lot 11
Wetland Mitigation
Since the proposed permanent wetland impacts are less than o.10 acres, no mitigation is
proposed.
The current request is for 0.03 acres of permanent wetland impacts for construction of Lot 11
in the Brook Manor Subdivision (see the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information to complete
your review.
Sincerely,
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Aerial Photos
• USGS Quad
• Wake County Soil Survey
• Corps Email Documenting Statutory Status of NWP 29 (6/5/09)
• Impact Exhibit
WITHERS , RAVENEL Page 3 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

4�0' \N AT F'
o � �
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page l of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
N No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
N No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Brook Manor — Lot 11
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Holly Springs
2d.
Subdivision name:
Brook Manor
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
K. Hovnanian Homes at Brook Manor, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book: 015503; Page: 02002
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Ryan Foley
3d.
Street address:
3333 Regency Parkway
3e.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27518
3f.
Telephone no.:
919 - 264 -4817
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
rfoley @khov.com
Page l of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e.
Telephone no.:
910 - 256 -9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910 - 256 -2584
5g.
Email address:
tbeasley @withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN 0659506983
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.6483 Longitude: - 78.8125
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
0.33 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Sunset Lake /Middle Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of a cleared lot within a residential subdivision which is currently under construction. The general land
use in the vicinity consists of a mixture of residential and commercial development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.08 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
N/A
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to install lot fill for required grades to construct a residential dwelling on Lot 11.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of the installation of fill on Lot 11 sufficient for required grades necessary to construct a residential
dwelling on Lot 11. Standard commercial construction equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The Corps issued a Jurisdictional Determination for the onsite wetlands in conjunction with issuance of a NWP 29 for
temporary wetland stream impacts for installation of a sewer line to service the Brook Manor Subdivision (SAW 2008-
01748)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The Corps issued a NWP 29 in 2008 via email dated 6/5/09 for the Brook Manor subdivision for temporary stream
impacts for installation of a sewer line to service the subdivision (SAW 2008 - 01748). A copy of the Corps email has been
provided as an Appendix. There have been no permanent impacts associated with the Brook Manor subdivision, and
there have been no other permits requested or issued specifically for Lot 11.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T
Impact #1
Fill
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
0.03 acres
El El
Forest
El No
® DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.03 acres
2h. Comments: Proposed wetland impacts will occur as a result of the back slopes needed to return lot fill to natural grade at a
slope that will not result in erosion of the slope and sedimentation of the downstream wetlands and stream.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse F-1 Tar-Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary (T)
impact
required?
B1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The unauthorized wetland clearing did not result in impacts to Neuse River buffers.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts within the Brook Manor subdivision were previously minimized to temporary impacts for utility lines and there have
been no permanent impacts.
Lot 11 has a significant change in elevation from the front to back (10' +), and requires a large amount of fill to level the lot for
construction of a house. The original design for Lot 11 had extremely steep back slopes to return lot fill to existing grade
which would result in heavy erosion of the back of the lot and sedimentation of adjacent wetlands and offsite stream. In order
to reduce the severe back slope on Lot 11, the contractor planned on reducing the grade of the back slopes by pushing the
edge of fill further north. The proposed 0.03 acres of wetland impact proposed in the application will allow the lot fill to be
returned to grade with a less steep back slope, thereby preventing erosion of the back slope and sedimentation of the
adjacent wetlands and stream.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fencing has been installed around the disturbed areas, including the cleared wetlands, to prevent sediment from escaping
into the adjacent wetlands and stream.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non- riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Lot 11 was included in the overall Stormwater Management Plan for the
❑ Yes ® No
Brook Manor Subdivision, and diffuse flow is not specifically required on Lot 11.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Lot 11 is included in the overall Stormwater Management Permit for the Brook Manor
subdivision, and specific
stormwater management is not required on Lot 11.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
A Stormwater Management Permit was previously issued for the Brook Manor
❑ Yes ® No
subdivision and stormwater management approval specific to Lot 11 is not required.
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
® Yes ❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): During the clearing
of Lot 11, the site contractor inadvertently cleared approximately 15 If into the wetland adjacent to the northern lot line to allow
for additional area to return lot fill to natural grade at a more gentle slope. Once the unauthorized wetland impacts were
realized, K. Hovnanian Homes self reported to NCDWR. Through coordination with James Lastinger with the Corps and
Sarah Knies with NCDWR, it was determined that the best course of action of resolution of the violation would be to permit the
unauthorized wetland impacts under an After - the -Face NWP 18.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project consists of a lot within an existing subdivision and is not anticipated to be a catalyst for future development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Holly Springs Sanitary Sewer
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W &R reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http: / /www.ncnhp.org /web /nhp /database- search, to
identify if there were any known occurrences of endangered species within the Apex Quadrangle Map. The review of the
NHP database did not identify any known occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical
habitat within the Apex Quadrangle. During the site review, there was no potential habitat for federally listed species
observed within or adjacent to Lot 11.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH in Wake County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
W &R reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley — Withers & Ravenel
--75-1 �
Authorized Agent
5/19/14
Applicant /Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION

WIT ENEL
EN(,IItFIN'. 1 >i!ANttFP',
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner KHovnanian Homes (Client) does hereby appoint Withers & I
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state ant
environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review and approv
jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface waters, riparian
etc ") and/or, b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental
applications /requests for the Brook Manor Violation Resolu ot# ,
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required suppler
materials,
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environm
review by appropriate regulatory agencies
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or terrain
the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
Troy Beasley / Withers & Ravenel, Inc-
1410 Commonwealth Drive Suite 101
Wilmington NQ 28 403
Tel [phone]
Date: Y/J///)
Sig_ nature of Client:
(Name Print) (Title)
C ignature)
Mailing Addre
city State Zip
Phone: 9 /� —6�6c1 —L /lj�1 7
Email: C_ C� k .-.1_. c_c:_
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, INC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] V www.withersravenel.com I, License No. C-0832
1414 Commonwealth Drive I 'Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: 910.256,92771 fax: [phone]
7411 Albert pick Road I Suite G 1 Greensboro, SIC 274091 tel: [phone] !Fax: [phone]
0'

AERIAL PHOTOS

Pty r;gkF 040
• .3
Y
t . T
BROOK MANOR - LOT 11 AERIAL PHOTO - OVERALL WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

WETLANDS
%l
�[ "� •v w -� v w w/
ev
1 •v •v •v .v •.�
50' N RB
I sy e.
LOT 1
BOUNDARY
d
1 f'
T -
BROOK MANOR - LOT 11 WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
HOLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

USGS QUAD &
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY

GRAPHIC SCALE
o ioo zoo
1 inch = 200 ft.
r w.
OF
w
• +M !► 46
s,* 11
Am
BROOK MANOR -LOT 11 USGS QUAD -APEX WllTHERS &— IRAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNING 1 SURYIYORS
1.160 LY WRINGS WAKE COUNIy NOR H CAN( It I %.

r GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
inch = 200 Ft,
r - ,
d
y
—AWL,
a
11
BROOK MANOR - LOT 11
CINGS A'Aa tCa LiNfY ti'URI }t
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY
SHEETS 83 &90
LUD4
�w
WITHERS RAVENEL
INGINIIII 1 PLANNERS I fUIYITOIl

CORPS EMAIL DOCUMENTING
STATUTORY NWP 29

Kendall, Trina
From: Kendall, Trina
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 1:55 PM
To: Canfield, Jim
Subject: FW: Brook Manor Subdivision 2008 -01748
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Todd Preuninger
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 1:22 PM
To: Jim Canfield
Subject: FW: Brook Manor Subdivision 2008 -01748
You're good to go on brook manor - we've got approval from DWQ and USACE
todd
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Amschler, Crystal C SAW [mailto: Crystal .C.Amschler @usace.army.mil]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 1:20 PM
To: Todd Preuninger
Subject: FW: Brook Manor Subdivision 2008 -01748
Todd,
On July 18, 2008, we received the PCN for the Brook Manor Subdivision
project. Due to workload and staffing constraints, we were unable to
provide timely formal written verification for impacts proposed in your
preconstruction notification application (PCN). Nation Wide Permit General
Condition 27, which lists the notification requirements for nationwide permits, states
that the prospective permittee shall not begin the activity until either: "(1) He or she
is notified in writing by the district engineer that the activity may proceed under the
NWP with any special conditions imposed by the district or division engineer; or (2)
Forty -five calendar days have passed from the district engineer's receipt of the complete
PCN and the prospective permittee has not received written notice from the district or
division engineer." Accordingly, on September 1, 2008, the Bass Lake Estates, LLC was
authorized to conduct the work associated with construction of the residential
subdivision, under nationwide permit number 29, and as proposed in the Preconstruction
Notification, received July 18, 2008. The authorized work involves the construction of a
utility line that results in temporary impacts to 20 if of perennial stream channel. I
have attached a copy of the applicable permit conditions. The expiration date for the
permit authorization is September 1, 2010.
Please note that your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the permit conditions and your submitted plans. Any
violation of the conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and /or appropriate legal action.
Also note that your work is authorized until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked.
All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March
18, 2012. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will
issue a public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are
under contract to commence this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide
permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the
modification or revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and
conditions of this nationwide permit. If, prior to the expiration date identified below,
the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and /or modified, this verification will
remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new
and /or modified terms and conditions. The District Engineer may, at any time, exercise his
discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's
authorization under any NWP.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this verification, or any of the
conditions of the permit.
Thank you,
Crystal C. Amschler
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
(919)- 554 -4884 ex. 27

r r SITE DATA
OVERALL AREA 60 0 ACRES
PIN NUMBER 0659.04 -50 -6596
''i /� I �r- • P i ''. �; R PROPOSED ZONING R -10
r
r _
: .
�R ;e "t I r i 1 I '`�••�i i �,` r < 5�cr�r�. '' �• - -�+`` IMPACT KEY
I 102 AC "T FUTURE REC St7E `` F t ZONE 1 NRB IMPACTS - PERMANENT
�•' I . 1t•� s i t 170 AC
e °� -ate/ ! ,� -- ,t° : t•' - �,: -�+.�. f �• +
ZONE 2 NRB IMPACTS - PERMANENT
1��,1fiE � ' " j°"�' t� ''•�` @ l�' j + rx
i� ,
' + �• ! 1 I f '+ 1 k, STREAM IMPACTS - PERMANENT
`� •�. t r° ` . • '� � P -�„ I I I � 1 1 I � 1�' � "' # I I ! f � � •�.
y�•, �+vrL��- •.,.,�_! ! r� � i I k i � f j fk I"-- 1..._. r�`� "'`"- � / �'�e ,� ,
".' a 7 0 [ 1 I I I _ o
} -- i
,� j " •`'•4 r., � � i l asF•s.,e.z rp.s P [ [ � _._._.L.i � I I � `l., !�' �. a� f +
�� T . �a r tf •— -�• .,,� i i i i i � � � s i i .� � i '.--�Y ;f � � ` '�,,,L;''� �c.,�� `: � "_� ,, ��. ,
� :� ' p° � f•- •— ._._._ _ I I I i I I ! �,7 l i 1 ! y 'I � a� I •� / C^� / � ` r � M ��`��; +i ,;
+' `{ li ,yeti. Ir © I
qg
__r- MDTy1n'__� ___�- _- T- __� - - -� fD l t � } t � r � .»._•� ��i / ' � • �r � � ,. 5'`• �
; e �: � , f I ® I 1 I ! I I l' 1 i l I S y ��'' � I � � 1 .�'� ',•.e + r I
' � r ;' e ....._._.� I I I I i I � -� .�. �--�'• 1y �`. �..�• --• y � � � �.��
S 1 ci f
_.� I 1 I 1 t I I �:'.— ,_,— ..1 -•�� , °1 1 ; �� ''• � f - -_.�._ 1 � { � i.,� '�
® j ® I O I ® I d I 0 1 Q I I `(�} [ �" t 1- - .�•�'� f f r' �i ���r�'fi' , _-�J1 ``-.r t
•r e ti I y t � � � /` rr t
-- .• � > -- T - - - -i� i�5-36 _— — _— _�- - - -r -- �� .si_•_ — ` t i i ! i i i rl
~� i I ,_ — l t 1 1 , r
r•_ L,.._._. 7�._._,1._._,_.L._._ °i._._._._. fry_"
� %•':� / ,! ! I I I I I I t
6
/ do,
4.1
A.
,
V
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 1,00 0 100 200 4W
i
1 inch = 200 ft.
x
WITHERS RA.'VENEL
BROOK MANOR SUBDIVISION OVERALL BUFFER IMPACT MAP etaslaeEKS 1 PLANNERS [ it93tVLYk70.5
3 r ea a kiDLLY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA .w.., .........., - 11 1

f
I
r ] 1 L I
EXISTING f
SANITARY !
SEWER f
J I
f
4r
�/ Q` i
awl
a y �i r
i f
r.L
X-0 d
1 I
d f
� 1
� I
f
PROPOSED
SANITARY
SEWER
i
i
..' - 3 BROOK MANOR SUBDIVISION
HOt I_Y SPRINGS WAKL COLiNTY NORTH
I_INA
82
BUFFER IMPACT MAP
IMPACT KEY
ElZONE 1 NRB IMPACTS - PERMANENT
ZONE 2 NRB IMPACTS - PERMANENT
f STREAM IMPACTS - PERMANENT
FIGURE#
PROPOSED BUFFER IMPACTS
r
STREAM
ZONE1
ZONE2
S F) I (AQ
I (S F) I (AC)
(LF)
(S
2
1,219 0.0280
I
20
503
I
..' - 3 BROOK MANOR SUBDIVISION
HOt I_Y SPRINGS WAKL COLiNTY NORTH
I_INA
82
BUFFER IMPACT MAP
IMPACT KEY
ElZONE 1 NRB IMPACTS - PERMANENT
ZONE 2 NRB IMPACTS - PERMANENT
f STREAM IMPACTS - PERMANENT
FIGURE#
PROPOSED BUFFER IMPACTS
BUFFER- PERMANENT
STREAM
ZONE1
ZONE2
S F) I (AQ
I (S F) I (AC)
(LF)
(S
2
1,219 0.0280
52l 0.0120
20
503
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
111 0 15 30 >
yo0i t ir>ch - 30 ft.
WITIAERS &— RAYENEL "
INQIN#[Rf I PLANNaRf 3 fURYEY01E!

IMPACT EXHIBIT

GRAPHIC SCALE IMPACT EXHIBIT A
0 80 160
1 inch = 160 ft. �0
5A;
J�J
PJ
�P
Q
84SS 4qk
R0g0
BROOK MANOR - LOT 11 IMPACT EXHIBIT -OVERALL ENGINEERS WITHERS I 12AVENEL
I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
IOI. LY SPRINGS WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

50' NRB
J •�► �Lw w w w w
,�,�
/ w w
IMPACT #1
0.03 ACRES
WETLAND
LIMITS
L
1
GRAPHIC SCALE
o so loo
1 inch = 100 ft.
BROOK MANOR - LOT 11 IMPACT EXHIBIT A WITHERS &- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS