Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130472 Ver 4_Modifications_20140523 SNC TATE OF ORTH AROLINA DT EPARTMENTOFRANSPORTATION PL.MCAJ.T ATCRORYNTHONY ATA GS OVERNORECRETARY May 21, 2014 Wilmington Regulatory Field OfficeN.C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources US Army Corp. of EngineersDivision of Coastal Management 69 Darlington Avenue400 Commerce Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403Morehead City, NC 28557 ATTN:Brad ShaverATTN: Stephen Lane NCDOT CoordinatorNCDOT Coordinator Dear Sirs’: Modification RequestforSection 404 Nationwide Permit 23,Section 10 Subject: Permit, CAMA Major Development Permit, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for proposed widening ofthe US 17-74-76/NC 133 from the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchange, Brunswick County.Federal Aid Project No. NHS-0017(68); TIP No. R-3601. Debit $240.00 from WBS Element 38868.1.1 References:R-3601 404/401/CAMA permit application dated April 26, 2013 R-3601 Nationwide Permit 23and 5,issued August 19, 2013 (SAW-2007- 03461-010) R-3601 Major CAMA permit, issuedAugust 2, 2013 (#89-13) R-3601 401 Water Quality Certification, issuedMay 16, 2013 (DWR# 13- 0472) The purpose of this letter is to request modification of the issued permits on this project to account for design changes and approved moratorium in-water work methods. Please find enclosedrevised permit drawings, sturgeon concurrence letter from theNational Marine Fisheries Service, and agency correspondence regarding construction methods for the above referenced project. Please replace permit drawings from the original submittal with the full set included with this modification request. As you are aware, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposesto widen US 17-74-76/NC 133 from the NC 133/SR 1472 Interchange to the US 421/NC 133 Interchangeby adding one auxiliary lane in each direction. This project involves the T: 919-707-6000 MAILING ADDRESS:LOCATION: ELEPHONE FAX: 919-212-5785 DOTCBB NCC EPARTMENT FRANSPORTATIONENTURY ENTER UILDING PDEA1020BRD. ROJECT EVELOPMENT AND NVIRONMENTAL NALYSISIRCH IDGE R W:.. EBSITEWWWNCDOTORG 1548MSCR,NC 27610 AIL ERVICE ENTERALEIGH RNC 27699-1548 ALEIGH replacementof two bridges over the Brunswick River with one bridge carrying both travel directions. Additionally, the northbound bridge over Alligator Creek will be replaced and the southbound structure will be widened. To further alleviate congestion problems, a second auxiliary lane in the northbounddirectionwill be added. There will be 0.41acre of permanent impacts to riparian wetlands resulting from fill, excavation, and mechanized clearing resulting from project construction, of which 0.03acre are impacts to CAMA wetlands. This is a decrease from the previous permit which allowed for 0.44 acre of permanent impacts to wetlands of which 0.04 were impacts to CAMA wetlands. A total of 105linear feetof permanent stream impacts are also anticipated; this is a decrease from the 185 linear feet that were previously permitted.A revised EEP acceptance letter showing the decrease in impacts will be forwarded to you upon receipt. The permanent impact area due to bridge bents will be 0.03 acrewhich isa0.01 acreincrease from the previous permit. The design bridges will have fewer columns than previously permitted however the diameter is greater. This change was necessary in order to construct the structures and comply with the in-water work moratorium.Temporary work bridges will also be necessary to construct and improve bridges on this project. The existing clearances will be maintained on both the Alligator and Brunswick Rivers. A primary nursery area in-water work moratorium will be observed from January 1 to June 30 for Alligator Creek and from January 1 to September 30 for the Brunswick River. Limited in- water construction methods to be used during the in-water moratorium include working inside of casings, static pile extraction, spudding associated withbarges, removal of piles using a vibratory hammer, and installation of casings using the screwing in method (see attached memo and correspondence). Regulatory Approvals CAMA: NCDOTrequests that the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major Development permit (#89-13)issued on August 2, 2013be modified to account for adecrease in impactsand change in approved in-water work methods during the moratorium asnoted above. Section 404 Permit:All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a “Categorical Exclusion” in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be re-issued under the existing Nationwide Permit 23 (refer to NWP 23 issued on August 19, 2013 SAW-2007-03641-010). Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3891will apply to this projectas it was previously permitted (refer to 401 Water Quality Certification issued on May 16, 2013 DWQ#: 13-0472).All general conditions of the Water Quality Certification will continue tobe met. NCDOT is providing this application to the NCDWR for their review and approval. Memo To:AmyJamesFrom:MelissaRuiz NCDOT,NaturalEnvironmentSection801JonesFranklinRd. Raleigh,NC27606 File:Date:March7,2014 Reference:NCDOTR-3601BrunswickRiverandAlligatorCreekBridgeReplacementsand WideningConstructionMethods Thismemoistofollow-upontheconstructionmethodsdiscussionthattookplaceduringtheEnvironmental Pre-constructionmeetingonMarch3,2014.Constructabilityoftheprojecthasbeenanissueespecially consideringthein-waterworkmoratoriuminplaceonAlligatorCreek(1/1–6/30)andtheBrunswickRiver (1/1–9/30).Inanefforttoimproveconstructability,andprotecttheenvironmentaroundtheseprojectsites, ourteamisrequestingpermissiontousecertainconstructionmethodsforin-waterworkthatarecurrently prohibitedduringin-waterworkmoratoriumperiods.Theuseofsomeofthesemethodsduringmoratoriums havealreadybeenapprovedandincludedinpermits(Item2onpermit#89-13fromDENR/CRC)orthe EnvironmentalScopeofWorkfromNCDOT(Items1-3)whileotherswerediscussedduringourmeetingon March3.SothatwemayfacilitatethepermitapplicationapprovalprocessinApril/May2014,weare presentingacomprehensivelistoftheconstructionmethodsinorderofimportancethatourteamwouldlike toutilizeforin-waterworkduringthemoratoriumperiods: ᶢ 1.WorkinginsideofcasingsyearroundUseofthismethodisconsideredanexceptionfromthe moratoriumaccordingtotheDesign-BuildcontractwithNCDOT. 2.Staticpileextraction–Useofthismethodwasconsideredanexceptionfromthemoratorium accordingtotheDesign-BuildcontractwithNCDOT.Thismethodofextractionisusefulforsome activitiessuchasspudding.However,duetothecharacteristicsofthesubstrateandsedimentlocated inthewaterways,usingthismethodtoremoveexistingpilesandtemporaryworkbridgeswilllikely leadtopilefracturesastheyarepulled. 3.Spuddingassociatedwithbarges–Useofthismethodwasconsideredanexceptionfromthe moratoriumaccordingtotheDesign-BuildcontractwithNCDOT. 4.Removalofpilesusingvibratoryhammer–AccordingtotheNMFSconcurrenceletter(receivedby NCDOT11/6/2013andprovidedasanattachmenttothismemo)intheProjectEffectssection,the extractionofexistingpilesbyvibratoryhammershallbeconsideredanexceptiontothein-water moratorium. 5.Installationofcasingsusingthescrewinginmethod–Specificinformationregardingthismethodwas providedtoregulatoryagencies.Inresponsetotheinformation,NMFSindicated“routeofpotential adverseeffectsfromthedesignmodification(i.e.,theaugering)proposedtobeimplementedduring thein-watermoratoriumperiod”(communicationwithEricHawk,NMFS,2/19/2014andprovidedas anattachmenttothismemo). 6.Installationofpilesusingvibratoryhammer–AccordingtotheNMFSconcurrenceletter(receivedby NCDOT11/6/2013andprovidedasanattachmenttothismemo),“vibratorydrivingofpilesorbridge March7,2014 AmyJames Page2of2 Reference:NCDOTR-3601BrunswickRiverandAlligatorCreekBridgeReplacementsandWidening ConstructionMethods supportstructures,orremovalofoldbridgestructures,generatesacontinuousbutlow-levelnoise andisunlikelytocausemorethannoninjurious,insignificantbehavioraleffectstosturgeon.” 7.Installationofcasingsusingvibratoryhammer–ThismethodisverysimilartoItem6withthe exceptionthatitwilltakeslightlymoretimeasthecasingsforthebridgesmustpenetrateintothe PeeDeesubstratewhilepilesfortemporaryworkbridgesmaynotbeinstalledtothesamedepth. OneoftheprincipalobjectivesofthebridgedesignsadoptedbyourTeamforthisprojecthasbeento minimizetheamountofallin-waterwork.Resultsofoureffortshaveledtoareductioninthetotalnumberof piercolumnsthatwillbeinthewater.ProjectR-3601waspermittedundertheDepartment’sdesignwith45 columnsinwateratBrunswickRiverand28columnsinwateratAlligatorCreek.Underourdesign,we proposetoplace26columnsatBrunswickRiverand18columnsatAlligatorCreekwithinthebanksofthese waterways,yieldingatotalnetreductionof29columnsthatwillbeconstructedinthewater. OurTeamwouldalsoliketosharethattheactualtimeofcasingandpileconstructioninthewaterwill representafractionofthetimethatthecontractor’sforceswillbeatworkonplacementofthesebridge foundationelements.Whilethisisanapproximatepercentage,weestimate25%ofthetotaltimethe contractorisinstallingcasingsandpileswillactuallyinvolvevibratingorscrewingthesestructuresintoplace. Themajorityofthetimerequiredtoperformthisworkwillbedevotedtomovingequipment,splicingcasings andpilesegments,andsettingupforeachinstallation. Asafinalbenefittotheenvironment,theabilitytousesomeoralloftheseconstructionmethodsduring moratoriumperiodsshouldservetodecreasethelengthoftimethatthetemporarybridgeswillremainin placeduringthecourseoftheproject. Withlowlevelsofnoiseandvibration,minimaldisturbanceofbedmaterials,andnopiledrivingorcasing installationswithimpacthammersatanytimewhileinthewater,ourTeambelievesthattheflexibility offeredthroughtheuseoftheseconstructionmethodsdescribedinthismemorandumwillenable constructionworkforbridgefoundationsintheleastamountoftime.Weappreciatehavingthisopportunity todescribeourproposedconstructionproceduresingreaterdetail.Ifyouoranyoneoftheindividualagencies wouldliketobringspecificquestionstous,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme. STANTECCONSULTINGSERVICESINC. MelissaRuiz SeniorEnvironmentalScientist Phone:(919)865-7529 Fax:(919)851-7024 melissa.ruiz@stantec.com Attachment:NMFSConcurrenceLetter Ruiz, Melissa From:Baker, Jessi E <jessi.baker@ncdenr.gov> Sent:Friday, March 28, 2014 4:06 PM To:Wilson, Travis W.; James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc:Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject:RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in-water work during moratorium IconcurwithWRCthatIdonotsupportinstallationusingvibratoryhammerduringthemoratorium. Jessi Baker, Fisheries Resource Specialist NC Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, NC 28557 (252) 808-2808 ext. 213 jessi.baker@ncdenr.gov Please visit www.nccoastalmanagement.net to subscribe to Coastal Management’s quarterly newsletter, the CAMAgram. 9▓Ă╜▄ľ◘ʼnʼnśℓ♫◘■ŕś■ľśĊ◘Ă■ŕźʼn◘▓Ċ╙╜ℓĂŕŕʼnśℓℓ▓ĂŦĽśℓĵĽ╨śľĊĊ◘Ċ╙ś b◘ʼnĊ╙/Ăʼn◘▄╜■ĂtĵĽ▄╜ľwśľ◘ʼnŕℓ\[ĂŎĂ■ŕ▓ĂŦĽśŕ╜ℓľ▄◘ℓśŕĊ◘Ċ╙╜ʼnŕ♫ĂʼnĊ╜śℓ From: Wilson, Travis W. Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 3:47 PM To: James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in-water work during moratorium WRCdoesnotsupportpileorcasinginstallationbyvibratoryhammerduringthemoratorium.WRCwasnotsupportive ofallowingvibratoryextraction,butwewereamenableduetoconcernsraisedregardingthesafetyandabilitytostatic pull.Beingsympathetictotheneedforsomereliefonthetimerestrictionswefeltlikethatwasareasonable compromise.Also,wehaveagreedtoallowcasingstobeinstalledduringthemoratoriumbyscrewingthemin,under anassumptionthattheeffectswillbeminimalbecausetheyshouldbesimilartowhatoccursinsidethe casing.Althoughthisisnotanunreasonableassumption,itdoesconstituteinwaterworkofwhichtheaffectsonfish migrationhavenotbeenstudied.Thiswasthesecondconcessiontotheinwaterworkmoratorium.Allowingthe additionalinwaterworkwouldfurtherunderminetheremainingconservationmeasuresinplacetoprotectfish migrationthroughthisarea.WithoutreasonablejustificationIcannotagreetotheuseofvibratoryinstallationduring theinwaterworkmoratorium. NOTE:NEWPHONENUMBERANDMAILINGADDRESS TravisW.Wilson EasternRegionHighwayProjectCoordinator HabitatConservationProgram NCWildlifeResourcesCommission 1718Hwy56West Creedmoor,NC27522 1 Phone:9197070370 Fax:9195282524 Travis.Wilson@ncwildlife.org From: James, Amy E Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 10:20 AM To: Wilson, Travis W.; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in-water work during moratorium Hiall, L?▓forwardingthememofromourdesignbuildcontractorthatIsentoutabouttwoweeksagodiscussingproposedin waterworkallowedduringthemoratoriumsinceL?ōśonlyheardfromTravissincethen.Ireallyneedyourinputbefore thecontractorcommitstocertainconstruction▓śĊ╙◘ŕℓ?Ċ╜▓ś▄╜■śℓ?Ċ╙śmaintakeawaysfromthismemoarethus: Thefirstfourproposedexceptionstoworkinwaterduringthemoratoriumwereinformallyagreeduponduring thedesignbuildbid/concurrenceprocess(workinsidecasings,staticandvibratorypileextraction,and spudding); Thefifthproposal(casing?ℓľʼnśŎ╜■??hasbeendiscussedrecentlyandwasapprovedbysome(butnotall) parties,pendingotherissues(acousticmonitoring); Thesixthproposal(pileinstallationbyvibratoryhammer)hasnotreallybeendiscussedbeforenow(andhence, isnotapproved)andismainlyanissueforinstallingpilesfortemporaryworkbridges; Theseventhproposal(casinginstallationbyvibratoryhammer)hasalsonotbeenproposedbeforenow,though L?▓notsurewhetherthecasingswillhavebeen?ℓľʼnśŎśŕ╜■?beforehand. Iknowthelasttwoproposalsareforactivitiesthatgenerallydonotreceivemoratoriumexceptions,butIamdoingdue diligenceandforwardingtherequeststoyouforreview.IfIcangobacktothecontractorwithsomeconcretefeedback, Ithinkitwillhelptheminformulatingtheirpermitapplication/modificationthatisslatedtobesubmittedtowardsthe endofApril. Please?ʼnś♫▄ŦĂ▄▄?sinceIwillbeoutoftheofficeallofnextweek.Thankyouforyourhelpandpatienceduringthis process. Amy From: Wilson, Travis W. Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:40 PM To: James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in-water work during moratorium IdonotrecallWRCagreeingtopileinstallationduringthemoratoriumbyuseofvibratoryhammer. NOTE:NEWPHONENUMBERANDMAILINGADDRESS TravisW.Wilson EasternRegionHighwayProjectCoordinator HabitatConservationProgram NCWildlifeResourcesCommission 1718Hwy56West Creedmoor,NC27522 Phone:9197070370 2 Fax:9195282524 Travis.Wilson@ncwildlife.org From: James, Amy E Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:07 PM To:brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Wilson, Travis W.; Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: R-3601 proposed modifications to in-water work during moratorium HiAll, Attachedtothisemailisamemofromourcontractor,Stantec,thatoutlinesinwaterconstructionmethodsitwouldlike touseduringthesturgeonand/orPNAmoratoriums.OneoftheseisalreadyexplicitlystatedintheCAMApermit(static pull),somehaveonlybeeninformallyapprovedbyresourceagencies(spudding,vibratorypull,etc.)andatleasttwo(#6 and#7)havebeendiscussedintheoryandareonlyproposalsbythecontractoratthispoint.Thismemoisaneffortto reduceany?ℓĵʼn♫ʼn╜ℓśℓ?inthepermitmodificationprocess,soyourcommentsandfeedbackareneeded.Pleaseletme knowifyouhaveanyquestionsandL?▄▄domybesttoanswerthem. Thanks, Amy AmyJames Biologist,ProjectManagement NCDOT,NaturalEnvironmentSection Direct919.7076129 aejames@ncdot.gov Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 3 Ruiz, Melissa From:Lane, Stephen <stephen.lane@ncdenr.gov> Sent:Friday, March 28, 2014 4:48 PM To:James, Amy E; Wilson, Travis W.; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason Cc:Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M; Sollod, Steve Subject:RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in-water work during moratorium HiAmy, Thanksforsendingyouremailsummarizingtheľ◘■ĊʼnĂľĊ◘ʼn?ℓproposal.TheDCMhasreviewedthedraftproposal,and afterconsultationwithourfisheriesresourceagenciesandmuchinternaldiscussion,wehaveconcludedthatwecould agreetothefirstfiveproposedexceptionstothemoratoriaifofficiallyrequestedinapermitmodificationrequest.DCM hasalsoconcludedthatthesixandseventhproposedexceptionsdonotappeartobeappropriateforthisprojectand wouldlikelynotreceivepermitapproval.Ihopeyoufindthisguidancehelpfulinformulatingyouranticipatedpermit modificationrequest.IfImaybeofanyfurtherassistance,pleaseletmeknow. Sincerely, StephenLane CoastalManagementRepresentative From: James, Amy E Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 10:20 AM To: Wilson, Travis W.; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in-water work during moratorium Hiall, L?▓forwardingthememofromourdesignbuildcontractorthatIsentoutabouttwoweeksagodiscussingproposedin waterworkallowedduringthemoratoriumsinceL?ōśonlyheardfromTravissincethen.Ireallyneedyourinputbefore thecontractorcommitstocertainconstruction▓śĊ╙◘ŕℓ?Ċ╜▓ś▄╜■śℓ?Ċ╙śmaintakeawaysfromthismemoarethus: Thefirstfourproposedexceptionstoworkinwaterduringthemoratoriumwereinformallyagreeduponduring thedesignbuildbid/concurrenceprocess(workinsidecasings,staticandvibratorypileextraction,and spudding); Thefifthproposal(casing?ℓľʼnśŎ╜■??hasbeendiscussedrecentlyandwasapprovedbysome(butnotall) parties,pendingotherissues(acousticmonitoring); Thesixthproposal(pileinstallationbyvibratoryhammer)hasnotreallybeendiscussedbeforenow(andhence, isnotapproved)andismainlyanissueforinstallingpilesfortemporaryworkbridges; Theseventhproposal(casinginstallationbyvibratoryhammer)hasalsonotbeenproposedbeforenow,though L?▓notsurewhetherthecasingswillhavebeen?ℓľʼnśŎśŕ╜■?beforehand. Iknowthelasttwoproposalsareforactivitiesthatgenerallydonotreceivemoratoriumexceptions,butIamdoingdue diligenceandforwardingtherequeststoyouforreview.IfIcangobacktothecontractorwithsomeconcretefeedback, Ithinkitwillhelptheminformulatingtheirpermitapplication/modificationthatisslatedtobesubmittedtowardsthe endofApril. 1 Please?ʼnś♫▄ŦĂ▄▄?sinceIwillbeoutoftheofficeallofnextweek.Thankyouforyourhelpandpatienceduringthis process. Amy From: Wilson, Travis W. Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:40 PM To: James, Amy E; brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: RE: R-3601 proposed modifications to in-water work during moratorium IdonotrecallWRCagreeingtopileinstallationduringthemoratoriumbyuseofvibratoryhammer. NOTE:NEWPHONENUMBERANDMAILINGADDRESS TravisW.Wilson EasternRegionHighwayProjectCoordinator HabitatConservationProgram NCWildlifeResourcesCommission 1718Hwy56West Creedmoor,NC27522 Phone:9197070370 Fax:9195282524 Travis.Wilson@ncwildlife.org From: James, Amy E Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:07 PM To:brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil; Herndon, Mason; Lane, Stephen Cc: Wilson, Travis W.; Baker, Jessi E; Eric Hawk - NOAA Federal (eric.hawk@noaa.gov); Rivenbark, Chris; Mccauley, Karen M Subject: R-3601 proposed modifications to in-water work during moratorium HiAll, Attachedtothisemailisamemofromourcontractor,Stantec,thatoutlinesinwaterconstructionmethodsitwouldlike touseduringthesturgeonand/orPNAmoratoriums.OneoftheseisalreadyexplicitlystatedintheCAMApermit(static pull),somehaveonlybeeninformallyapprovedbyresourceagencies(spudding,vibratorypull,etc.)andatleasttwo(#6 and#7)havebeendiscussedintheoryandareonlyproposalsbythecontractoratthispoint.Thismemoisaneffortto reduceany?ℓĵʼn♫ʼn╜ℓśℓ?inthepermitmodificationprocess,soyourcommentsandfeedbackareneeded.Pleaseletme knowifyouhaveanyquestionsandL?▄▄domybesttoanswerthem. Thanks, Amy AmyJames Biologist,ProjectManagement NCDOT,NaturalEnvironmentSection Direct919.7076129 aejames@ncdot.gov Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 2 North Carolina Department of Transportation Highway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 1.2; Released September 2011)FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS Project/TIP No.:R-3601County(ies):Brunswick New Hanover Page 1of 1 General Project Information Project No.:Project Type:Date: R-3601Roadway Widening5/9/2014 NCDOT Contact: Karen McCauley, PEContractor / Designer:Joseph Kelvington, PE Address:Address: Transportation Program - Mngt Unit, NCDOT R-3601 Project Design Manager 1020 Birch Ridge Drive801 Jones Franklin Rd. Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27610Raleigh, NC 27606 Phone:919-707-6611Phone:919-865-7390 Email:Email: kmccauley@ncdot.govjoseph.kelvington@stantec.com City/Town: Belville and LelandCounty(ies):BrunswickNew Hanover River Basin(s): CAMA County?Yes Cape FearYes Primary Receiving Water: Brunswick RiverNCDWQ Stream Index No.:18-77 Primary: Class SC NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water Supplemental: None Other Stream Classification: None 303(d) Impairments: dissolved oxygen (DO)pH Buffer Rules in Effect N/A Project Description rural, tidally influenced coastal Project Length (lin. Miles or feet): 1.67 Mi.Surrounding Land Use: Proposed ProjectExisting Site Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)ac.ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 6 lane divided highway, 10 ft paved shoulders lt/rt, 6 ft paved shoulders median; 4 lane divided highway, approximately 10 ft paved shoulders rt/lt, 3 ft paved shoulders grassed median, varying widthmedian;grassed median variying width Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future:ADT 2035=107,000Existing:ADT 2009=63,000 Minimizing use of shoulder berm gutter and maintaining grass shoulder sheet flow along the causeway to the maximum extent practical. Eliminating deck drains on Bridge 103 General Project Narrative: over the Brunswick River and Bridge 107 over Alligator Creek. At Bridge 108 there will be no direct discharge into the surface waters from deck drains. Utilizing grass ditches, shoulders, and slopes to aid in treatment of runoff. References r3601_rdy_tsh.dgn 5/9/2014 11:13:38 AM r3601_prm_wet_psh_04.dgn 5/9/2014 9:03:34 AM r3601_prm_wet_psh_04.dgn 5/9/2014 9:02:36 AM r3601_prm_wet_psh_s4a.dgn 5/9/2014 9:04:37 AM r3601_prm_wet_psh_s08.dgn 5/9/2014 10:07:29 AM r3601_prm_wet_psh_s09.dgn 5/20/2014 5:13:48 PM r3601_prm_wet_psh_s09.dgn 5/20/2014 5:15:33 PM r3601_prm_wet_psh_s10.dgn 5/20/2014 6:14:26 PM r3601_prm_wet_psh_s10.dgn 5/20/2014 6:16:03 PM r3601_prm_wet_psh_s13.dgn 5/9/2014 10:59:27 AM r3601_prm_wet_psh_s13.dgn 5/9/2014 11:00:10 AM WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTSSURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand CAM404TempExisting Existing A PermanentPermanentTemp. ExcavationExcavationMechanized ClearingPermanent Temp. ChannelChannelNatural SiteStationStructureFill in Fill InFill Inin inClearingin SW SWImpactsImpactsStream No.(From/To)Size / TypeWetlands WetlandsWetlands WetlandsWetlandsin Wetlands WetlandsimpactsimpactsPermanentTemp.Design (ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft) 1-Y2- 13+0548" DRAINAGE PIPE 0.01< 0.014710 -LMED- 54+37 TO 54+75 RT24" DRAINAGE PIPE 2 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 64+43 LT & 'LMED BRIDGE 24" DRAINAGE 65+92 TO 66+26 LTPIPE 30.03< 0.01 < 0.01 0.04 76+31 LT & -LMED- ROADWAY FILL/36" 74+99 TO 75+19 RTDRAINAGE PIPE 4 0.04< 0.01 < 0.01 0.16 -LMED- 83+00 TO EXISTING DRAINAGE 83+21 RTPIPE 5 < 0.01 < 0.01 -LRT- 85+81 TO 87+69 RTROADWAY 6 0.01 -LLT- 90+25 TO 90+74 LT & -LLT- 94+00 TO 94+21 LTROADWAY 7 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 -LLT- 99+60 TO 99+97 LT30" DRAINAGE PIPE 8 < 0.01 0.01 -LRT- 101+06 TO EXISTING DRAINAGE 101+17 RTPIPE 9 < 0.01 -LLT- 111+79 TO 113+14 RT & -LRT- BRIDGE 108 & BRIDGE 112+37 TO 114+59107 10 0.14 0.12 -LRT- 115+52 TO 118+61 RT & -LRT- 121+21 TO 121+77 RTROADWAY 11 0.03 ROADWAY/36" ' -Y2- 20+65DRAINAGE PIPE 12 0.16 0.04 -Y- 34+98 TO 36+55 LT42" DRAINAGE PIPE 13 0.02< 0.014437 -Y- 36+10 LTBANK STABILIZATION 13 < 0.01 14 -Y- 38+30 RTROADWAY 14 < 0.01 TOTALS*:0.030.340.01 0.020.040.410.03< 0.01105470.00 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: 1. Permanent bridge pier surface water impacts = 0.04 acres 2. Temporary bridge pier surface water impacts = 0.02 acres 3. There will be 0.41 acre of hand clearing on this project. Additionally, there will be 0.04 acre of temporary fill in wetlands for erosion control measures in hand clearing areas. There will also be a <0.01 acre (165 sq. ft.) of temporary fill in CAMA wetlands for erosion control measures in hand clearing areas. Revised 2013 10 24 Stantec PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. R-360/ 29 ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER HYDRAULICS ENGINEER 30 20 10___. 0 BEGIN GRADE STA18+20.00 -Y- ELEV. = 26.25' STA./9+23.89 -Y- ST Al2+7614 RPBYLT- (30' RT.) STA. /9+27.19 -Y- = STA.13+76.72-RPCYRT- (27.6' LT.) (+)0.4000 7* r )0.394 '� f-J � �+ 1920 v.g QSI'dV ONN pm d STA.I7.00+00 -Y- = ro' STA10+00.00 -YNBL- (2/' LT.) STAID+00.00 -YSBL- (30' RT.) 17 18 w 19 PI = 19+20.00 EL = 26.65' VC = 100' K = 130 DS = 55 MPH PI = 20+80.00 EL = 26.05' VC = 220' K = 190 DS = 70 MPH (-)0.3750% 20 Y STA.22+29.99 -Y- = ST A.12+52.04-RPBYRT - (26.3' RT.) STA_23+52.16 -Y-__= ((+)07833X PI = 23+20.00 EL = 27.93' VC = 160' K = 148 DS = 55 MPH k S.T. Wooten Corporation BM #5 ON RR SPIKE IN 26" PINE 92.5' RIGHT OF -Y- STA. 26 +70.22 ELEV. = 27.47' N 176813 E 2304196 STA.12+63.58-RPAYLT- (19.8' LT.) STA.24+52.99 -Y- Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Tel. (919) 851-6866 Fax. (919) 851-7024 www.stantec.com License No. F-0672 BM #6 ON VERT. CON. MON. 82'RIGHT OF -Y- STA. 27+51.32 ELEV.= 24.65' N 176770 E 2304266 ST A.12+66.83-RPCYLT- (19.8' RT.) PI = 24+80.00 EL = 27.45' VC = 150' K = 247 DS = 80 MPH STA.24+97.92 -Y- = STA 28+31.69 -Y- = STA.14+08.94 -RPCYRT- (29.6' RT.) ST A.13+8/ 80 -RPDYRT- (34.8' LT.) (+)� 0.78332 A (-10.3w000X (+)0.3U6TX, -Y- CROSSOVER POINT STA20+64.52 = STA.13+74.39 -YNBL- STA.13+62.19 -YSBL- 21 22 23 24 25 EXISTING--GROUND- PROPOSED GRADE -Y- CROSSOVER POINT STA.27+/4.52 = STA20+35.34 -YNBL- = STA 20+23./5 -YSBL- 26 27 h N w 28 PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PI = 29+70.00 EL = 28.95' VC = 170' K = /59 DS = 60 MPH (+10.306/%___ 0 (-10.3033Y, 29 END DITCH -Y- STA.30+00 RT El = '9.98 END DITCH -Y- -ST A30+00-LT El = 19.47 30 0 30 20 10 STA.30+05.28 Y- STA.10+00.00 -Yl- = STA.15+98.49 -Y2A- STA3O+95,42 Y- STA 15+62.74-RPDYLT - (24.5' LT. PI = 3/+25.00 EL = 27.77' VC = 140' K = 14/0 DS = 80 MPH (-)0.8606% PI = 32+90.00 EL = 26.35' VC = 150' K = 319 DS = 75 MPH STA 32+47.6/ -Y- = STA251-73.65 -YNBL- = STA.25+61.68 -YSBL- PROPOSED GRADE Y STA.35+86.02 -Y- = STA.24+46.12 -Y2- EXISTING GROUND P/ = 39+25.00 EL = /7.90' VC = /50' K = 1041 DS = 80 MPH (-)/.3- 07% (-)/J867% END GRADE STA.41+95.23 -Y- ELEV. = __14.34'_ PI = 40+75.00 EL = /6.12' VC = 150' K = 5// DS = 80 MPH 30 20 10 0 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 FOR PLAN VIEW, SEE SHEETS 4 & /3 0 42 43