HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2822B__Concurrence Point 2A_4B_Packet - June 2022_Final-CombinedCombined Concurrence
Point 2A (Revisited) and 4B Meeting
NC 143 Improvements
From West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business, west of Robbinsville
Graham County
WBS No. 34508.1.1
STIP Project No. R-2822B
June 15, 2022, at 1:00 pm
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Prepared By
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27606
919-851-6866
STIP Project R-2822B (NC 143 Improvements): Combined CP 2A (Revisited) & 4B Meeting
1 | Page
1.0 Meeting Purpose
• Revisit Concurrence Point 2A (Bridging Decisions) – Hooper Branch Crossing
• Conduct Concurrence Point 4B (30% Hydraulic Review)
2.0 Project Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to make safety
improvements along NC 143 from West Buffalo Creek to NC 143 Business, west of
Robbinsville in Graham County. The project corridor is approximately 4.5 miles long. The
project location is shown below in Figure 1. This project is included in the 2020 - 2029 State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) as Project R-2822B.
The proposed improvements include upgrading NC 143 to ensure that all vertical and
horizontal curves have a minimal design speed of 35-mph. The project will widen the
lanes to 11feet and widen the shoulders to 6feet (4-foot paved), which is consistent with
the minimal recommendations for a Rural Collector in the NCDOT 3-R guidance.
Figure 1: Build Alternative
PROPOSED HOOPER
BRANCH CROSSING
STIP Project R-2822B (NC 143 Improvements): Combined CP 2A (Revisited) & 4B Meeting
2 | Page
3.0 Concurrence Point 2 Recap
• During the March 22, 2018, Combined Concurrence Point 1, 2, and 2A Meeting, it was
concurred that a 115-foot long, 8x8 reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) would
be constructed at the new Hooper Branch crossing along each of the Alternatives
Carried Forward.
• The replacement of Bridge #13 over Snowbird Creek was added to the scope of the
LEDPA (Alternative 4A) during the Concurrence Point 3 Meeting, which was
conducted on March 20, 2019. Staged construction would be the method of
reconstruction for Bridge #13 due to no feasible off-site detours.
o Due to the staged construction, the modified alignment would require a new
approximately 60-foot long hydraulic structure at Hooper Branch instead of the
previously recommended 115-foot long 8x8 RCBC. This would also allow for the
removal of the 48-inch Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) along existing NC 143.
o During the meeting, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the US Forest
Service (USFS) requested a bottomless hydraulic structure be evaluated at this
location. The following commitment was developed and included in the draft
MCDC:
“NCDOT will evaluate the feasibility of a bottomless hydraulic structure at the Hooper
Branch crossing. Geotechnical information is required to make a final determination.
NCDOT will provide the Merger Team with final hydraulic recommendations once
information is available.
o NCDOT committed to revisiting CP2A if the geology prohibited the construction of
a bottomless culvert and necessitated the need for a standard box culvert at
Hooper Branch.
4.0 Concurrence Point 2A Update
• NCDOT Hydraulics Unit design guidelines dictate that three-sided culverts must be
founded on shallow rock (<3-feet deep).
o Geotechnical investigations found that bedrock was approximately 13feet deep
at the proposed location of the Hooper Branch crossing.
o Based on NCDOT Hydraulic Unit guidelines, a three-sided culvert is not at viable
at the proposed location.
• It is recommended that a double 8-foot x 7-foot, 82-foot long RCBC, with low and
high flow barrels buried one foot in the ground be constructed at Hooper Branch.
The low flow culvert will have a 1-foot sill at each end and the high flow culvert will
have a 2-foot sill at each end. Figure 2 shows the location of the Hooper Branch
Crossing.
STIP Project R-2822B (NC 143 Improvements): Combined CP 2A (Revisited) & 4B Meeting
3 | Page
• The existing culvert is proposed to be removed and a ditch will be graded from the
proposed culvert to the main channel of Snowbird Creek.
o During the April 18, 2022, Field Meeting, USFS noted “the final look [of the graded
portion of Hooper Branch] should not be a ditch but restored in cohesion with
the natural surroundings that exist. “
• Impacts to the EBCI cultural wash site must be coordinated with the US Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE). The site is identified as the area bordered by existing NC 143,
Snowbird Creek, and Hooper Branch including the picnic area.
o USACE noted “impacts [to Hooper Branch] should not exceed what is shown in
the current plans as this was the design used during tribal consultation.”
PROPOSED HOOPER
BRANCH CROSSING
Figure 2: Hooper Branch Crossing Plan Sheet Excerpt
STIP Project R-2822B (NC 143 Improvements): Combined CP 2A (Revisited) & 4B Meeting
4 | Page
• Figure 3 shows the Recommended Hydraulics Design in the vicinity of the Hooper
Branch crossing.
• Figure 4 is an excerpt from the Culvert Conceptual Design showing the stream profile
and the placement of the proposed new culvert in relation to the existing roadbed and
culvert.
Figure 3: Red Line Hydraulic Plans Sheet Excerpt
STIP Project R-2822B (NC 143 Improvements): Combined CP 2A (Revisited) & 4B Meeting
5 | Page
Table1: Additional Stream Information
Hooper Branch
DWQ Index Number 2-190-9-(15.5)
Best Usage Classification C; Tr
Bank Height (ft) 0.5
Bank full Width (ft) 3
Water Depth (in) 2 – 3
Channel Substrate Cobble, Gravel
Velocity Moderate
Clarity Clear
Classification Perennial
River Basin Buffer Rules Not Subject
Figure 4: Stream Profile and Culvert Placement
50 0 50150 100200 150250 200100 250
w/ FLOOD BENCH
BURIED 1'
2@6'x7' RCBC
120
25yr.50yr.100yr.
FREQUENCY
PROPOSED
?????
?????
?????
NATURAL
500yr.
EXISTING
10yr.
PERFORMANCE TABLE
NCDOTCULVERT SURVEY & HYDRAULIC DESIGN REPORTSITE DATAADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTATIONS? FT. FROM US FACE OF CULVERT
@SECTION ?169+00170+00171+00172+00173+001,9301,9401,9501,9601,9701
7
2
+
0
0
173+00
174
+
00
PROPOSED GRADEELEV = 1957.55SKEW = 120 DEGREES(BURIED 1' w/FLOOD BENCH)2@8'x7' RC BOX CULVERTCENTERLINE STA. -L- 172+16.00EXISTING GRADESNOWBIRD CREEKEXISTING STRUCTURE OVERSLOPE = 0.039 FT/FTC INVERT = 1947.4' (BURIED 1')LTO BE REMOVEDEXISTING 48" CMP50.00'EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
48" CMP18" CMP
MTL36" WDGR/SOILHTR
S
RK WALL
S
GR
ROCK WALL
15" CMP-Y4- POT STA 10+00.00 -L- POC STA 172+64.00 =).DR PAG U I( 8111 RS-4Y-35'R55'R.05.06.06.05.04.03.02.01.00.01.02.03.04.02.02.01.01.00.02.02.0211.02115" CSP15" CSP2GI2GI2GI15" RCP-III SR 1118 I U GAP RD.
18' BST
T
O MASS
E
Y
B
R
A
N
C
H
R
D.
PROPOSED CHANNEL CHANGE T
O
S
ANTE
ETLAH RD.SPECIAL CUT 'V' DITCH
BST
REMOVE 48" CMP
PROPOSED CHANNEL CHANGE
REMOVE 18" CMP
G
R
A
D
E
T
O
D
R
AI
N
GRADE TO DRAIN
EXISTING CULVERT TO BE REMOVED
2:1 (NORMAL)
2:1 (NORMAL)
1935
1940
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1935
1940
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
EXIST. 48" CMP
ELEV = 1957.55
SKEW = 120 DEGREES
(BURIED 1' w/FLOOD BENCH)
2@8'x7' RC BOX CULVERT
CENTERLINE STA. -L- 172+16.00
-L-
SLOPE = 0.039 FT/FT
C INVERT = 1947.4' (BURIED 1')L
EXISTING BED PROFILE
PROPOSED BED PROFILE
Ground
Natural
FROM -L- STA. 172+35 TO -L- STA. 173+35 LT
FROM -Y4- STA. 10+50 TO -Y4- STA. 10+89 RT
TO A THICKNESS OF 18”
EXISTING CHANNEL AND USE TO LINE PROPOSED CHANNEL BOTTOM
NOTE: REMOVE 18” OF NATURAL CHANNEL BOTTOM MATERIAL FROM
NATURAL CHANNEL SUBSTRATE BASE:
Type of Liner=COIR FIBER MATTING SIDE SLOPES
B= 8Ft.
Max. d= 1Ft.
Min. D= 6Ft.
DETAIL 16-4
2:1d
D
( Not to Scale)
B
CHANNEL CHANGE
2:1B Ground
Natural
Fill Slope
Proposed
DDE = 250 CY
SEE DETAIL 16-4
EST. 135 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 90 SY COIR FIBER MATTING
EST. 22 TONS NATURAL CHANNEL SUBSTRATE
WITH 8' BASE & 8' FLOODBENCH
PROPOSED CHANNEL CHANGE