Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout430020_Routine_20220509Facility Number Lk3 a.o Division of Water Resources Nri) 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Agency (z 0 Other Ag Y rr /�(�,-v "✓ J d` Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 04 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Farm Name: Owner Name: 6.c122 Arrival Time: Ir-I prag €rn. ic Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Departure Time: so Owner Email: Phone: Count .Toegion: LASERFICHE Pro MAY Y DEC/DWR WQROS FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE �am�s iamb Onsite Representative: same Title: Certified Operator: d I l j tI1'JU»" Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Design Current Capacity Pop. Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Ft8c4V 16H4�O Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Design Current Dr Poultr Ca o acit Po s . Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes %.1;No 0 NA 0 NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Design Current Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes ELNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes "ELNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 1SZNo ❑ NA 0 NE Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: I '3 - Date of Inspection: 0- 9 a� Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): Structure 1 ?-69 d k ,sec ;to Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes .RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 5 Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes'o ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ YesQo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes \,No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes lEaL\lo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): CQDttI 13. Soil Type(s): Sib 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE' 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes ❑ •No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes'No ❑ NA 0 NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes N1R No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NR No ❑ NA ❑ NE ['Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: -v Date of Inspection: • �j b 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. n Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: Yes No 0NA fNE 111 Yes nNo 0NA 0NE 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. n Application Field 7 Lagoon/Storage Pond T. Other: ❑ Yes 11 Yes 1--N No No n Yes No n Y• es1\- No n Y• es 4No n Y• es No 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes N No 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 17 Yes ill No 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? [ Y• es in No ❑ NA 0 NE NA 0NE El NA 0NE [1]NA ElNE O NA 111NE O NA 0NE [I]NA 0NE El NA [1]NE Li NA 0NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). remove, Did hol bo,ieS -1-1-0sh (NI ragovN '5. (9170`8��� Oveitcee4 his imprnve IQSi a(r, hQflVr t-h oxl-S gig r; n SoDN ;o Gov ddn4t iNfr Noicte sampter ti or aa, go-j3 Reviewer/Inspector Name: Katie �onr�nor Reviewer/Inspector Signafi cC°U-J9(0-010t eve 4 \)\ Phone: Date: 919-69o-61-w Page 3of3 5/12/2020