20080902 Ver 2_401 Application_20220525

1a. Name of project:
Laurel Ridge Phase 28
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?
Camden Brunick
lb. Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.810607
A. Processing Information
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Longitude:
-79.211797
1c. Primary Contact Phone:
[phone]
Pm -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
4/19/2022
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Chatham
Nearest Body of Water
Is this a NCDMS Project*
Yes • No
Is this project a public transportation project?
Yes • No
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
• Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
u No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
o Nationwide Permit (NWP)
O Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
C Yes • No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
• 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
• Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
O Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
0 Yes ® No

For the record only for Corps Permit:
0 Yes ® No
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
O Yes * No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes ® No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes o No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes O No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
o Owner 0 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
® Yes 0 No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Laurel Ridge Development Inc
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB: 2195 DP: 0759 & DB: 1367 DP: 1144
2c. Contact Person:
Hadley Kirkland
2d. Address
Street Address
P.O. Box 5689
Address Line 2
City
Cary
Postal / Zip Code
27312
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Camden Brunick
4b. Business Name:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4c. Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27615
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
1. Project Information

lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Laurel Ridge
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Pittsboro
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
9734-00-79-7836, 9735-00-70-0002, 9734-00-
69-9618, 9734-00-69-7480, 9735-00-70-6110,
9735-00-80-4073, 9734-00-89-6601, 9734-00-
79-8632, 9734-00-89-2232, 9734-00-88-1652
& 9734-00-88-6970
2c. Project Address
Street Address
406 Blufftonwood Drive
Address Line 2
City
Pittsboro
Postal I Zip Code
27312
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Dry Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-IV;NSW
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300020701
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
+/- 70 acres
State / Province I Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of undisturbed forested land. There is an existing 50' utility easement located near the northwestern portion of the property. Blufftonwood Drive
bisects the parcels north to south. Specifically, there is two (2) intermittent streams (SB & SC) and one (1) perennial stream (SA) located on the property. General land use in the vicinity of
the project consists of forested land with a few rural single-family homes. Dry Creek is located south of the project. Rock Rest Road bounds the property to the north and Old Graham
Road bounds the property to the west.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
® Yes O No O Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
USACE: NWP 12 & NWP 29 issued by Monte Matthews on July 22, 2008 (SAW-2008-01696).
NCDWR: 401 approval issued by Coleen Sullins on July 14, 2008 (DWQ Project #08-0902).
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Approximately 2,095 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of this project is to construct a single-family residential development and its necessary infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The overall project consists of the construction of a single-family residential development including but not limited to roadway infrastructure and residential lots. Specifically, there are two
(2) road/driveway crossings that impact streams. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for
this project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
G Yes O No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
O Preliminary 0 Approved 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown 0 N/A
O Unknown

Corps AID Number:
SAW-2008-01696
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Steven Ball
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USAGE: Site visit and jurisdictional determination issued on October 23, 2019 by Andrew Williams.
Chatham County: Site visit on December 11, 2019 and determination issued on December 20, 2019 by Drew Blake of the Chatham County Watershed Protection Department.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes n No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Ri Streams -tributaries
❑ Open Waters o Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
L. Buffers
3a. Reason for impact* (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
length*
Si
Impact 1 - Road Crossing -
Culvert
Permanent
Culvert
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
5
Average (feet)
39
(linear feet)
S2
Impact 1 - Road Crossing -
Rip Rap (Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
Permanent
Other
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
16
(linear feet)
S3
Impact 1 - Road Crossing -
Temporary Construction
Access
Temporary
Other
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
6
Average (feet)
15
(linear feet)
S4
Impact 2 - Road Crossing -
Culvert
Permanent
Other
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S5
Impact 2 - Road Crossing -
Rip Rap (Permanent -No
Permanent Loss)
Permanent
Other
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
22
(linear feet)
S6
Impact 2 - Road Crossing -
Temporary Construction
Access
Temporary
Other
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
15
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
107
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
137
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
30
3j. Comments:
Total permanent stream impacts = 69 LF (291 SF/0.006 acres); total permanent -no permanent loss impacts = 38 LF (109 SF/0.002 acres); total
temporary impacts = 30 LF (146 SF/0.003 acres)
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization

la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
S&EC completed a wetland delineation and buffer evaluation for the entire property so that natural resources could be identified, and impact minimized
to the maximum extent practicable. Impact 1 is proposed permanent, permanent -no permanent, and temporary stream impacts for a driveway crossing.
The crossing will occur at a near perpendicular angle and is necessary to access lots 34R and 35R shown on the plan. Headwalls will be utilized as well
as a riprap dissipater that will reduce flow velocities and minimize stream degradation. A temporary diversion pump, coffer dams, dewatering pump, and
discharge hose will be utilized during construction to divert stream flows and minimize the release of sediments during construction activities. Impact 2 is
proposed permanent, permanent -no permanent, and temporary stream impacts for a driveway crossing. The crossing will occur at a near perpendicular
angle and is necessary to access lot 35R as well as to the pasture for their horses, chickens and goats. Headwalls will be utilized as well as a riprap
dissipater that will reduce flow velocities and minimize stream degradation. A temporary diversion pump, coffer dams, dewatering pump, and discharge
hose will be utilized during construction to divert stream flows and minimize the release of sediments during construction activities.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fencing will be utilized as well as temporary dewatering measures to be used during the dry.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes o No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
There are no permanent wetland impacts proposed and all permanent stream impacts are less than 0.02 acres.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
❑ Level Spreader
O Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
11 Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
! Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
O Yes O No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
o Yes 0 No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
O Yes • No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
o Yes o No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
0 Yes • No

3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and
silvicultural operations. The Laurel Ridge Phase 2B project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the town of Pittsboro
ETJ, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Water
Supply, Watershed Protection Program which limits development densities as well as requires protective riparian buffers; 2) the Jordan Watershed
Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these regulations require limited development within the riparian buffer area in addition to "diffuse flow"
requirements and could require Best Management Practices that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved; 3) the Phase II NPDES Stormwater
Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -construction
stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes o No ' N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Non -discharge wastewater will be generated.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
o Yes 0No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
o Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
O Yes O No
0 No ® Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
O Yes 0 No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
O Yes O No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?"
O Yes ® No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
O Yes o No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?*
S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), a
query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. A formal request was sent to the USFWS on
February 25, 2022. The USFWS has 30 days to respond from the date of the sent request. S&EC received no response from USFWS within the 30 days
meaning that they concurred with the determinations made by S&EC that the proposed actions is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed
endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). Please see attached S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
o Yes o No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential
Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
o Yes ® No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on February 2, 2022, no historic listings or study list
entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no structures exist within the property boundaries.

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
None of the proposed impacts are located within the 100-year floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Laurel Ridge PCN Attachments.pdf 10.34MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Please note that the pre -filing meeting request is included in the attachments, page 5.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Camden M. Brunick
Signature
Date
5/18/2022

Camden Brunick
From: Camden Brunick
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 1:52 PM
To: Cohn, Colleen M
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Laurel Ridge Phase 2B - Pre -filing Request
Attachments: 1 Overall Impact Map.pdf
Colleen,
I saw the new changes regarding a pre -filing be done again before a PCN submittal. I am planning on submitting the PCN
in the near future and since there is no current pre -filing application form, I am providing a summary of the project
below. I know DWR is still trying to figure things out, but for now I hope this information will suffice as a Pre -Filing
Request.
This project is Laurel Ridge Phase 2B located at 406 Blufftonwood Drive in Pittsboro, Chatham County, NC. The project is
approximately 70 acres and is a proposed single-family residential development. The project applicant is Laurel Ridge
Development Inc (Attn: Hadley Kirkland). The overall project consists of the construction of a single-family residential
development including but not limited to roadway infrastructure, residential lots, utilities, and SCMs. Specifically, there
are three (3) road crossings that impact streams. Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of undisturbed forested
land. There is an existing 50' utility easement located near the northwestern portion of the property. Blufftonwood
Drive bisects the parcels north to south. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of forested land with a
few rural single-family homes. Dry Creek is located south of the project. Rock Rest Road bounds the property to the
north and Old Graham Road bounds the property to the west. Please see the attached site plan and note that this may
change as we are working with the engineers to minimize impacts.
Thank you,
CAMDEN BRUNICK
Environmental Consultant
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone](cell)
1

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Laurel Ridge Phase 2B
Date: 2/2/22
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
S&EC Project # 7185
Attn: James Lastinger Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9734-00-79-7836, 9735-00-70-0002, 9734-00-69-9618, 9734-00-69-
7480, 9735-00-70-6110, 9735-00-80-4073, 9734-00-89-6601, 9734-00-79-8632, 9734-00-89-2232, 9734-
00-88-1652 & 9734-00-88-6970
Site Address: 406 Blufftonwood Drive
City, County, State: Pittsboro, Chatham County, NC
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: Hadley Kirkland - Laurel Ridge Development INC
Mailing Address: PO Box 5689 Cary NC 27312
Telephone Number: 919.417.2990
Email: [e-mail]
Hadley Kirkland - Laurel F
Applicant (please print) Date
Applicant"Signature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Project Number:
7185.W1
Project Manager:
SB
Scale: 1" 1000'
Date:
07/22/2019
500
ROCK•REST RD
Map Title:
Figure 1 - USGS Map
Laurel Ridge Bluffs
Chatham County, NC
Source: 2016 NC
Bynum Quad
„y"
OO 1
NC.CentQc r) ograp hie-I:nforrnation-&Analysis
0 1,000 2,000
I 1 1 I I I I I
Feet
S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
X412 ]calk W'Nem.: Read, X.n. IW, Raleigh. NC 2161.5 - Vhwe:49191 8.44. - Fag: (919)> 9167
saga.:OM

Project Number:
7185.W1
Project Manager:
SB
07/22/2019
Map Title:
Figure 2 - Soil Survey
Laurel Ridge Bluffs
Chatham County, NC
Source:Chatham County Soil
Survey Sheet 04
An. lysis
0 1,000 2,000
I I I I I
412 F.Ik a Xa., Road, Sun, 10.1. R.4ig11 NC 37613 • Pbi.!w I9191846.3906 • Flo,(919)84(.9461
.,n .. en

~ 3 1.:_.. *' 1 r +� j _- _- ice, • k 31 _ r - _r__�r rr } � fir r 7 y __r_ � rrr
k� ~..ti a 1 7 r i. r InrfI. ROCK REST '_ �I+ �: r� r� � �� � _ f r r rf f � f
1 • ti ''r t' 1 ••.117# S�i� _r- •L ' d �ti _ — {'� r Ir t y f�
I r f I r f �T- 1 t ~-- f f
,k 3 rk * t j ti +2. IT I , '1 1 .I r I I _ �+ I r ]ti_•r-__ r i• �., I I 1 1 f
..1. � ti t}•� - '�ti I• ,I 1 r - 1 I I I 1 11• r 1 +i • T-- , •5 5 ..I - r�r I r '
r •
F x • •` _ ' I I I I x_{- I I t I 15 �' r r - ' k �_ -- r
y 7�. I r I t 55 r I I
' 5 1t } r r , 1 r+ ,� ,+ rr r I r� r f_� �� � I 5 , ' 5ti titer � r �r I I r � 5 _te r sr� f 'I '
ti r -f' f r I fi - ti _ { �k ' +ter •
- •5 •• ' r t _ _ at T; } r I r { frr I t I 5 �y ~�` f r J. r rrr� 1 �-sr r•
r I +1•r I - f r � � 4 5 ' �� me..-
.-. rf
1 I I -� .. rr ti ti • 1 I 1 r
�. t I I .1 .1� �4 • f r1 �r r f, f r . I ' t I 5 �r f r r r r Lrr r r
14
1 �r •
r t I I r �r _ =ti f.•�� ��r fir j I 5 i k y 5ti5 ~k~��ti1 ---�� 1 r r I
i - •:r ' i. r � 5 t err ��r -• r r �yt 5 5� �--- � rr � r r � -1�-� 1 � r r I
r f •y 5 fr r r �ti 5 k k_ .� �_ • r r f r
{ 4 +
��' r • 1. I, �y �y • {� { rr r ti •• � ti��� rf 'rJ r -�--i ti �r f r
' •f{ Jrr , 5 5 y { �r f� ti y �ti 5 r • r' f r rf ti-
j -1 r r r
i• O k k r �f fir. 5 15 r 5 k � 'ti rf { • 1 �r - _f r r r
r r + r ,�+r • y k_ r 5 t I .} 5 ` ~ ram fr I r �� • ? r r f - : -r r r .
f � '-� k, p � x t L ..I k k ~x X t �1 rrr r �' rr--� �' r r •f r•r 1
_ rr Gl _ r '� r rrr -r t -� ti k 5 i f _.
j� +f rr rr ~ `y k �I 5f rr} f r r f f .' r. 1
' 4 y k f r r�-� X rr � r-� t
f. r 5 •- y -~ r r s ti I:r rtiti ti 't ti ~�- _{ r � f 1f � r r r 5 y 1 1
{ e f - J 5 •y yy y x 1 r err} y L I r _ 5 -� � r 1 {1 rr 1r�-_ x %5 ti ' I
�� f f. f 1''I 5 'y r ' 1'4. r r �r 1. r' fr• . . . y ••� ‘ k-.-r • •' • � rr • • ff f r r' _-'•-� { 1 't 1 1
r f • , y — y 5 ti 4r r f x - ~� yk5 �— r • • f rr 'f f — •• �I. t I I r 5 1
• J fr rr — Ikk k ti �L~r f � - rrf+ �rh ti k 4 y I r
-fir f y • 5 y 4 r � f fr •
� •-._
rr Ir 1 I• 1�r titi ti 1 I I L I r r
1 k.5 _ •
�� J -- r r. - I 1 r
_ 5 k ff ��-�ti � ff FI_ I I �-� � ti - r f r _{ j r r1 I r r I t ' . y . I r . r
�� rr � 1 ... I r 5 ' r• a j
r - i ~._r 'tip 1-_• . f. A. -.......2,:-._ ' S01 Start '"f r- '' r ' �rlI r I r r, r.• ' ti i It 1 .r
rr r _� k . r }r Kr . r I ~~" 5 t i. I 1
r + 4 titi � r r- 1 r_ f S 5 - f �r I r t 7
rf f � { ~ r. �{ y-� 5 I I , , 5 11 I I r I I 1 •
f f f ••f\ • % � ... tit { ' ti k~ .1 L-�rlY{n.
r • 1 -- 1 I I I __{ _ ti r- '' tii �r � y 5 � r I I I y4
f Nf�f - 'fir t '1. ` ( i• ti� -- -•-=f{ rr} ee r r• •
_k �+ f • • + 5 C (±95 If) rr x ' S �� r ' L t S 1.
f l i ''t t i ; • �-- �__�� •— ', ., ' � ram •' - (Jurisdictional; but NOT Subject to buffers) r' ' � I x
f, r�ti �_ 5 5 5 '5 1 . - r + ti� • r • ti .4 , _ s Y 4 r r r y r k k y,
r • , 1 ' • {+ •r-- 3� r r �. 'r __ r.• r I t x � f II l' i _ r fl r' ' k { 5 • • ti
f �' {-- 1 ~'., I I t 11I _ L I -, r r }+ - - • ' S ri ~��—r ,:ref---:. rr I •, ' r • i I : r•� kti
f 1 ---rr ,-ter I +r - x ti 5}� .• \ _ . 'T �I .1 rr.� I 5 1 1- f r I' j-• ..� _
_ I I 1 I !: II { ' t *�I �rr. 1 �1 ,�t 'S. v ��--� r •�ff �e r � -�
r Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US I. _ f r ~�" ' I '¢' 0 �k r F�rr r rr +ed 1• rrr r j ter' �r 1
•
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only -err - j I ' - — -.'• - r 1. 5 _ J_ 1 t I I , I r f f r 4
t �e f I
S&EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork, �• •� r IS I
II
' r y _I ` ` .1 I! t k ~ '56�1 r1 •' r •j r r r - 5 r r r r{• ~ • I.
I
and any other additional information.Approximations were mapped using I .. � f y k f• �-- --r �/ - r 1 1 I r r I• 1 err t�t 5
•• topographic ma s,airphotos and round truthin If the site is going
- f• approved • err'
I.r '� y 1 r err r� _" ~ r I t t �' fr r f r r 1' • rr' - •• 11 I.x t
this work desires an accurate mapof the regulated features flagged b .4 r �r '. • I _ I7•41.-k r== - I t r r rx ` I 5 } } r 11-- --- 1, �,
S&EC,they should retain a NC Rgistered Professional Land Surveyor to •� � '+�*,� -f - 1.• •- •• r ' r~ i-- • V
le .•.1 r j•1 i I r rrI r •r( : ' • •k 1� •
�
locate S&EC's flagging. �" - �titi.� ti �ti~• }., •-1_ f ` 1 r r ' C-•J r I I I t •' r rr— i�--k 'k' y �'
I � •' 7" 1 � �+ Lib 1 t
r 1 x {{r y A_-- 1 1 . 1. . I 5 't _�_ t rrr
, .k y 1 •I k•• y 5 , L 1 ‘ .. B (±1750 If)1:, I ) I ., ' ice y -�_ - . 'rP r .-_ { I
•
- I f kyk 5 �- 5 k �•_ I { .�r` tir{r rti
• ram+ 4 k y y f• 1 -...1,'5 k • • kk ti 1. r'- f ,--it- . 1
Per site visit with Andy Williams of the USAGE on 9/24/2019. I ''--, \' ) •'} � �5 5 � - -~y �t �-���� � -�.fr r f' f • 5
S tir fr - 5ti • S 5 x45 4. t�•tt + r 1 5 "' kt � tik • - r rY i • r - _`4� I�'� MI 1
1
r _ • t 5 1 5 1 t 1t� ti-5- {ti" - k -L� r' _� r �_'F' -�• I 1r I
Jordan Lake Buffers confirmed byDrew Blake of Chatham Co -- - - r P. 't� I 1• f �- �� --�� • {� _� I •r,�t
on 12/11/19 {r�• �rl � rf e• r' • ' . . .I. 1 .i 1 1 ty 45 '�t III I •. , � _ _� Zr :k�- �� �I.I•i 'rill tie'
�. • + 1 r VI 5 i \ --- -�ti ti_ L I 5 •• tix 5 55
r- ', .•.. _ r • 5�5 �_ �5 •�1 0 r -} -:��:_- •- , ti i ; 4 • • k I%
�r } .-4 .• f }- F.J ) r t 5. II 4 0 Lr r - - �-. -� 5,. Ott ik
Legend •f__ ' y ., r I t + i � _ �� � �, t� �y �5 i1
g • L 1. r r �r f r� - A , 't a 'i 5 '� frF;' `'xk�t,5t - .
- 1 r F r ; A(_250 If) r � r t ti t
r r' � I r rr � "� 1 55 xy�
r
Property Boundary• �' I • y r rf e _1 y o {�. i.. -- � 5yk ._� ti
o Potentially Jurisdictional Perennial Stream 1� {ram .ir��r e+ I II r - �k5 Sx
.I•. 1,'r ... ..r, t I \ it 5 - ii,
c oo Potentially Jurisdicitonal Intermittent Stream 1.11
_r_ r r r L r •
,ICI ' '. k ' l
50 Jordan Lake Buffers r � � S I S OD am 0 r
t; • � yl'� 115
2' Chatham CountyContours �• r f ' :t ' :-�L�� {� 1� '�rr r tit •
rr .. + • _ • :: yak I'11'I
rr {r ': � r tit ' ` ' ' �: f •
ti } 1�I '• �ti ti ��y
r r Source: Esri, DigitalGlobl, Eo kG etC�3CCgt.phi- ,WEai� oQ;S, Q a ,G'etmapping,Aerogrid,Ohao[Kqe, o 00 4 s 1 I
1.---
- r CCommunity 5 • r e•' .' 1 he
r . rr y r t ti ~�-. f _ x ti k r Ie G ? titi •;
Project No. N Wetland Sketch Map
7185.W12 W.4/_ E
Project Mgr.: ���✓•• Laurel Ridge BluffsS&
SB S Chatham County, NC Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
EC 8412 fall+IICNeulc Road,Suite I11.1,Ralcikh,NC 227615•Phone:(919)1 IG-59DD• Fox:('919)S I6-9.4G7
Scale: 0 250 500 1 ,000 AIndec.culn
1"=250' Source:
Aerials from NC One Map
12/12/19 Feet

Camden Brunick
From: Camden Brunick
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 1:52 PM
To: Cohn, Colleen M
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Laurel Ridge Phase 2B - Pre -filing Request
Attachments: 1 Overall Impact Map.pdf
Colleen,
I saw the new changes regarding a pre -filing be done again before a PCN submittal. I am planning on submitting the PCN
in the near future and since there is no current pre -filing application form, I am providing a summary of the project
below. I know DWR is still trying to figure things out, but for now I hope this information will suffice as a Pre -Filing
Request.
This project is Laurel Ridge Phase 2B located at 406 Blufftonwood Drive in Pittsboro, Chatham County, NC. The project is
approximately 70 acres and is a proposed single-family residential development. The project applicant is Laurel Ridge
Development Inc (Attn: Hadley Kirkland). The overall project consists of the construction of a single-family residential
development including but not limited to roadway infrastructure, residential lots, utilities, and SCMs. Specifically, there
are three (3) road crossings that impact streams. Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of undisturbed forested
land. There is an existing 50' utility easement located near the northwestern portion of the property. Blufftonwood
Drive bisects the parcels north to south. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of forested land with a
few rural single-family homes. Dry Creek is located south of the project. Rock Rest Road bounds the property to the
north and Old Graham Road bounds the property to the west. Please see the attached site plan and note that this may
change as we are working with the engineers to minimize impacts.
Thank you,
CAMDEN BRUNICK
Environmental Consultant
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone](cell)
1

Camden Brunick
From: Williams, Andrew E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 1:31 PM
To: Steven Ball
Cc: Williams, Andrew E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject: SAW-2008-01696 (Laurel Ridge Bluffs) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Attachments: SAW-2008-01696_PJDletterl.pdf; SAW-2019-01696_PJDform1.pdf
Steven:
Attached to this message is your requested Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination for the following project:
SAW-2008-01696 (Laurel Ridge Bluffs) Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Also attached is the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form and an appeals form.
Please sign and return the completed JD form within fifteen (15) days.
This electronic copy is your official Department of the Army Notification; no paper copy will be mailed, unless specifically
requested.
Thank you. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information regarding this
determination.
Andrew Williams
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
919-554-4884 ext. 26
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
to complete the survey online.
i

WATERSHED PROTECTION DEPARTMENT
CHATHAM COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
P.O. Box 548
Pittsboro, NC 27312
PHONE: [phone]
Fax: [phone] • E-mail: [e-mail] • Website: www.chathamnc.org
December 20, 2019
Steven Ball
Soil & Environmental Consultants
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Project Name: Jordan Lake Buffer Confirmation — Laurel Ridge Bluffs
Subdivision Parcel # 86169
Location: 7118 Old Graham Road
Subject
Features:
Date of December 11, 2019
Determination:
One (1) Intermittent Stream and one (1) Perennial Stream
Explanation:
The site visit was completed on December 11, 2019 by Drew Blake with the Chatham County Watershed
Protection Department and Steven Ball of Soil & Environmental Consultants (S&EC), on Parcel # 86169
that is located within the Jordan Lake watershed. The Laurel Ridge Bluffs Subdivision was originally
proposed prior to 2008 and is not currently subject to the 2012 Subdivision Regulations that are enforced by
the Chatham County Planning Department. As such, the property is only subject to the 1994 Chatham
County Watershed Protection Ordinance and the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules, at this time. The 1994 Chatham
County Watershed Protection Ordinance places a 50-ft buffer on all streams mapped on the USGS
topographic map and a 100-ft buffer on all "rivers" and along all perennial and intermittent streams within
2,500-ft thereof. The Jordan Lake Buffer Rules place a 50-ft buffer on all intermittent and perennial streams
that are shown on either the USGS topographic or NRCS Soil Survey maps. The USGS topographic map
depicts two (2) mapped streams and the NRCS depicts three (3) streams.
S&EC personnel completed a previous site visit which resulted in the identification of two (2) intermittent
streams and one (1) perennial stream on the property. All features identified by S&EC were reviewed by
Andy Williams of the USACE on September 24, 2019. The USACE claimed jurisdiction over the features as
depicted on the attached Wetland Sketch Map completed by S&EC after confirming the presence of an
Ordinary High Water Mark. S&EC submitted a request for Chatham County to complete a formal review to
determine if the features would be subject to riparian buffers. All points of origin and stream type transitions
were reviewed in the field by all parties in attendance. One (1) intermittent stream segment was downgraded
to an ephemeral stream and doesn't require a buffer at this time.
Required Riparian Buffers:
Stream Feature A (Dry Creek) was confirmed as a perennial stream and will receive a 50-ft buffer on both
sides from the top of bank in accordance with the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules. Stream Feature B was
confirmed as an intermittent stream and will receive a 50-ft buffer on both sides from the top of bank in
accordance with the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules. Stream Feature C was downgraded from an intermittent
stream to an ephemeral stream and will not receive a buffer at this time.
Any future modifications to the property boundaries (i.e. Subdivision) will require additional reviews
from the Chatham County Watershed Protection Department. These reviews may result in the

WATERSHED PROTECTION DEPARTMENT
CHATHAM COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
P.O. Box 548
Pittsboro, NC 27312
PHONE: [phone]
Fax: [phone] • E-mail: [e-mail] • Website: www.chathamnc.org
identification of additional features that require buffers or an increase in the buffer width of features
found during this review.
Proposed Buffer Impacts:
Submittal of a No Practical Alternatives Authorization Application, in accordance with Section 304 (I) of the
Chatham County Watershed Protection Ordinance, must occur if this project results in impacts to riparian
buffers. No Practical Alternatives Authorization Applications must be submitted prior to or at the same time
as the projects Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans. All approvals for the No Practical Alternatives
Authorization must be received prior to submitting the for Construction Plan approval from the Chatham
County Planning Department.
Conclusion:
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by Chatham County, on parcels outside of the Jordan Lake
watershed, may submit a request for appeal in writing to the Watershed Review Board. A request for a
determination by the Watershed Review Board shall be made in accordance with Section 304 of the Chatham
County Watershed Protection Ordinance. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made
by Chatham County, on parcels inside the Jordan Lake watershed, shall submit a request for appeal in writing
to NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27669-1650 attention of
the Director of the NC Division of Water Quality.
In cases when disconnected stream features and/or isolated wetlands were identified, the areas upstream and
downstream were assessed for hydrologic connectivity to other identified features. Staff determines in the
field if such a connection exists and to what the extent. Connections to other nearby features and subsequent
buffers are applied accordingly.
Should this project result in any direct impacts to surface water features (i.e., crossing and/or filling streams
or wetlands) additional reviews may be necessary. Additionally, a Section 404/401 Permit may be required.
Any inquiries regarding Section 404/401 permitting should be directed to the Division of Water Resources
(Central Office) at (919)-807-6364 and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at
(919)-554-4884.
Respectfully,
Drew Blake
Senior Watershed Specialist, CESSWI
Enclosures: Wetland Sketch Map dated 12/12/19, completed by S&EC
Stream Forms, completed by S&EC
Stream Form, Completed by Drew Blake
Site Photographs, taken by Drew Blake on 12/11/19
NRCS Soil Survey Map and USGS Topographic Map, Completed by S&EC
Major Subdivision Riparian Buffer Application Packet
cc:
Rachael Thorn, Chatham County Watershed Protection Director
Kimberly Tyson, Planner II/Subdivision Administrator
Jason Sullivan, Chatham County Planning Department Director

•
. ti — + I + r i :k_ ROCK REST • r �i �y _ _r-r_ r'_ { '' 7 � rr • I
i.
williiiiiil
• A i
1•r .1 ) .1' •11 - - 1 ' " l'..'r . ,, ! .,
r 1' - r
1 � rovircop 4 i.
it f :4
r 'ti r1 r r j
• •� f �� •--'--i11 i I 1• .1r i_ e �� r I f •�-�1t]�� I I I `. 5 % _��' f r + J� {L kv s i - � �i_ s • s� 'r� it
r t •: r' f• f rr�•- f .1 rf I —F S r 'x I 1 '4 �1=�_ f r it �� 1 i - le' 56 . r+ '
r I _ 1 I 1 • •
• _'�r �• •f f r r . I
F t�h5 • r r �, tit.• r
� ' �r_ f Jti ' '� �t r • • r 1 •.• ti 5 titi t •1 •�k_-•�_ - f f�' J 'r -.�: 1== _ , 4 f' 1.r
•
• _ f� I. * rt ti ti r + r r • + � { {_r ?f } ti• ti tik�• _ �k•�— ti -1.- r r f �r +— — • r �1 • f'' rj
�'i11 t r _ I 4• �' 7 ti 1. �� t 1 - I r r �ti� 5xkti'„-titi -� �r ff • r F ,� • • • _ f •fr •• 4:14 ',, f �,r
r� I , • •�,' •• O � + � . - 1 + •��� 'i s r % •yi p K+�� 1 5 .r _---- r ��- rr x • r
1 Q 5 x k . ri. i.- :. F 5 1 1, '1 r ' 41 rs 1� f r- yr r r f f - -----r • ti r f ��
�� • h =� fj9 • • - — _ h } 5 5 r r tik ti - { � r � r r { � r - �ti — • I 1. 1 1
it 5 _ • y +
+� y9 ti xti '•i' L _ rr ' •�� ti. 1 ' rl r— y' �- -.rf { 1rrr1 y ff f � ' S , I I • .
r f � . 1 r I �' • y 2i 'ti .� ... _ r. I �i� k 5i` �r r � r f ti F 1 f r: { Jrh�_ ' 1 S
-- - •_di r •I rtif k• w ` _ {4 � � _fir{ I
f er l• r rr ��� tix •, I r r,
•
{ '{ i _ • 1 {; kY. 1{ f ���- rr�r• { -ti 1 .f? ' .i' P11 1 1 I.J .• +ti~- }f rr_: r ---•. r0f � • i I�_ r� it r� •ti 5�7,�I ; III '�
•
f r f r ��� # x � . 1 r r� .- {` { — ti..1 ~4 1. 1 - -..- � _ l k • _01 Start f ��r '' �•s j i L 1 r . :+ r „ I. �'
• ti r d
f � f• T ��k' � I ti— f } r r _+ _ 1. ����j�_- ?1Sr�i 4�1 r • .'S 5 L I_ I' �-
r y , f•' _ ry •ti' - -f f C (_95 If) '�• x1 L 2;¼ i
� •{_ _�—+ 5 't ,; � Ft--'�_ - _ {f• {: — ~~te r 1_ I ti ram'? _- (Jurisdictional; but NOT Subject to buffers) ',' LII :_ _Y
• •' • _ • i' ' 5 -. � f, -•
r N.
• •F 1111 �� ti5
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only ti r j 1 Fri • — f I�I •5 , • -.
S&EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork, 'k f r I 1. 11 f �• - - r f - 1 j '`SB01• � ' r r - r _�__1 + r 1�
r r f I r1 'ti Y {{ 1 ��
and any other additional information.Approximations were mapped using �_ - �{' p �� •I I —~ —1' Ff • 'r • �/ r ' I I •— r•' r r r •+ i rs f —- �•� •—_•_-'
topographic ma s,air photos and round truthin If the site is going
1 • 1 �1 }�' • + r 1 I I , ;f 1 �'� •' r '• f =� I
p p g g g g 1 .— —ram 1 I I r �' •'� r ti i,. t { Jr�t-- ' 1
' to be disturbed,5&EC's detailed delineation should be approved and � ...•� •y 4 r�� •— _ram , -- \ R • 1 I f r ' f iI I 1. + - • •l'�• }•--• ——� 5�I; I i i
permitted by the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers as required.If the user of i I — yAlb" .`I • r 1 f I . L r r r r I r 11 ' r• 1 {��-�tiL� I I1.
this work desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by •k r t k -. —— f I 1 1 r • r r r .1. I
S&EC,they should retain a NC Registered Professional Land Surveyor to I r~L- , rf �' 1 • 1 x r k � '� �� r-f• r�• ---—_ � '�
• locate S&EC's flagging. Y - Op X
w ' I I ti •• .. - v • •
ti ti • + y -1 '-� i . F - L '�: ' B (±1750 If)i'. I ' I '-,:•-....:-.,_• �1 �. — �r',r " —• r 1 _
a 1 r •_ �., . r rgi- ti �'�. ti •ti 1 1 f•titi ti• ' - '
Per site visit with Andy Williams of the USACE on 9/24/2019. 4_ • _. - ' k L'14 li I il '', * '-,=C--�= . rr _ :•r-.f' ' •• {" ,f _� •{ '
ti 5 � r am•. �_ _ 1 _ e' r •rrf - ..,_
ti} 5 ti r.r ,�_r;� �.__ _ ,•tit
rf Tr i
i r .- 1 141 It� i • '� \ LI ----:•-.:,k 1 '' - r f ••I +sxi"-1 'I� i'
Jordan Lake Buffers confirmed byDrew Blake of Chatham Co x ` s j i % -�— —'•—_ •r ' __••' *_ 1:rI 1 jr
on 12/11/19 r - •
f r rr I �5 5 ' '1� a �'�} ems. , - f lil i.� . i r* c
- _ 1 11 �4} _ \ 1 �_ T r k� 4'
r_ �n �� ••rr - - •
�_�� . 1 ' le S el • • 11I 45; �5 '' la o r t } � � �+ •r y_�`r I. 4 I.
� y y
x • i' _rY !' r•f tit+ e o L. - _- - � r •• 2:Vk - _IItti iI t
Legend f� t _ . r t 1 '. f. •• f - r 1 \,, _ • ' - � 'I. i.''55L�. - : 11 ��
'�' I • T J. * �� r I I rue A(±250 If) A•; •• �: 1•1� ' - l
r•
Property Boundary • ) ' � . , - 1 # 'r r r #T _ o� — • •
_ f. •.- - , � '_ �
c2o Potentially Jurisdictional Perennial Stream 1 - • �'• r�. rr '� �k ti45k•4�
%
���� Potentially Jurisdicitonal Intermittent Stream •
FFTT III
r' + , • ' • _ • r Pi . 1 • .� y ti•
~ 1 M - F ) ,fir 1 ' N.
i/ - - ` �,
o
50 Jordan Lake Buffers � � • S., , . , _ a• o -• , • , I4 II:
2' Chatham CountyContours : - -{ ,,.. ,,,,
- �--- f �� '� 1- • r •
11kill - _ '_ I.11
II III
r r �� _� 1 • I .. ' k I ti • R ti '1 ti
• - �� Source: Esri• , DigitalGl'obe Ir`eoCCoCor.phic•{Ce`t(sM ( 9Noet`mappin.g, o0 o y0p[IIC�Gp wisstopo, an' N '} �I.SI
• . � {-.-- .gmmunity •-- I ._ •f . f • .�•rffr �'+� k 51 I 1 .Iti1 'SI
Project No. N Wetland Sketch Map
7185.W12 w /�/� E
Project Mgr.: \_✓, Laurel Ridge Bluffs S&
SB S Chatham County, NC Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Scale: 0 250 500 1 ,000 ECN41 2 FAIN,IC Ne...e Road,suite 1114,Ralcikh,NC 227615•Ilium(919)140-5990• pox:(919)8-14r9.4,7
Aar,dec.culn
1"=250' Source:
Aerials from NC One Map
12/12/19 Feet

l f �' rr,
-Si.�Jr 1a* l re- ;.,,,,9'
(..,---:?)-- n
NC Division of Water Quality-Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: i ((c4�/0 Project/Site: /34 it: Latitude:
Evaluator: rr „e) County: e �_�_ z, 4� Longitude:
Total Points: • Str:,-.4 Determination(circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if 19 or perennial if?30" l• 6 "phe al Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
la.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 j 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 a 2 3
3. In-channel structure:ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 a 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain CD 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 a 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits ilp 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 1 2 3
9.Grade control 6) 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 CI j 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel Noe) Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated:see discussigpe in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=_ 1 ' 5 }
12. Presence of Baseflow 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria CA) 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter _ 1.5 1 6 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No(0') Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 CD 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 a) 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fish g 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish LV 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 9/ 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae P 0,5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
^Notes:
Sketch:
41

- LW66,) ,c) (
NC Division of Water Quality-Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v.4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: / -1647( Project/Site: /5/4 f/) _Latitude:
Evaluator: `i�� County: C/,,� + Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Dote (circle one) Other
Stream Isat least intermittent
(1----)-‘'
' Ephemeral ntermitt Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if '19 or perennial if a 3Q'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= (. ) ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 [D 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 6 2 3
3. In-channel structure:ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 eAl
2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
8. Headcuts V 0 2 3
9.Grade control 0 _ 0.5 P 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 0)
11. Second or greater order channel No(j Yes =3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 7r )
12. Presence of Baseflow 1 2 3
t.
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 t,,13 0.5 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 0. 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 1,5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No( ) Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal= 41. )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fish 110 0.5 1 1.5 _
23. Crayfish I 0.5' 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 a 1 1.5
25.Algae p) 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Othet
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 16
Date: I f 1( f/ �{ Project/Site: tg (�4A Latitude:
Evaluator: [ 1; y County: 6 L_ Longitude:
Total Points: etermination(circle one) Other
Stream is at leas[intermittent f 3 Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial e.
'fa T9 or perennial if?3Q' ( p g Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= g ) Absent Weak Mod ate Strong
^1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 [� 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. rife-pool, step-pool, n 2 3
ripple-pool sequence (J
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 ill 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0illi2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0 5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=❑ _ Yes=3
a arliricial ditches are not rated:see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= I )
, ,
12. Presence of Basefiow 0 r 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1 5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0) Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal= el )
15. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 Q 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 9 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) i
1 2 3
_21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fishp.51 1.5
23. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
24_Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0,5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.50 er
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: ❑•.5. O.7.5° 0 Q F riLlyl_cJ-- Oc_.op-uk, ajell-6 i,skj c ad,a 1%4 4 f, weorAi.�CJ
trl ar ko FG�7ir_�r' - No vi5%�,te Ekov4.3 G4 5iv 0 C fccr a,-v 0,71rrc�
Sketch: � -
SL{� dk``ra ' 1 v *d, O

Project Number:
7185.W1
Project Manager:
SB
07/22/2019
Map Title:
Figure 2 - Soil Survey
Laurel Ridge Bluffs
Chatham County, NC
Source:Chatham County Soil
Survey Sheet 04
An. lysis
0 1,000 2,000
I I I I I
412 F.Ik a Xa., Road, Sun, 10.1. R.4ig11 NC 37613 • Pbi.!w I9191846.3906 • Flo,(919)84(.9461
.,n .. en

/ NI,
7":/..--sl \\., -----:t-)
iiijofili:1
OLD-,GRgh'q
M 411 Q ; *r744' -
41
500
ROCK•REST RD s� �_
0,4
k
0 r
i DI lgrafj,.\ 1/4:4L‘.$0 <
.... 4.A •B i min I w k it 1 L :N..._k_.____,......A.-4 I"\-4 1 111, ,n A...4
"Tv �t 0 �o
g�00K G J,
.4, Is,,, , bhp h i �� 1
11-- _, virlow...._ ,i‘_ ,
5-;
. .r
, sTirk kh\,\Alli): 1 L__-zi
�, iro,,ak -�` p 50.
ar , ,, .0(-, N6 C ne teqorigwgraphic Inforrnatiom&Analysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
7185.W1 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: Figure 1 - USGS Map I I I I I I I I I
SB Laurel Ridge Bluffs Feet
Scale: Chatham County, NC
1 = 1000' S& Soil 8c Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Source: 2016 NC
E� R512I.�hd'�e-.au.4 Xune 10.1,R.k���C1�i3•Pbm.e:[919184499W•F.x:[9i91w16•�+
07/22/2019 Bynum Quad .en

CHATHAM COUNTY Watershed Protection Department
NORTH C A ROL 1 N A Website:www.chathamnc.org
—1 Date Received: PL#
Riparian Buffer Review Application
Surface Water Identification Request
Will this project result in the review of less than or equal to 25 acres? Yes es It
Will this project result in the review of greater than 25 acres? Ye CO No ❑
If your project will result in a review of greater than 25 acres please contact a private consulting firm to
complete the surface water determination. For stream determinations the consultant must have
successfully completed the NCDWQ/NC State University Surface Waters Classification, For wetland
delineations the consultant must demonstrate at least 2 years of experience delineating jurisdictional
wetlands in accordance with the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement to the 1987 US
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Please visit the Watershed Protection Department
.vebsite for a list of consultants that regularly complete work within Chatham County,
Review Type: Subdivisions(excluding Majors) ❑ Jordan Reviews Er-----
Tract Information
-n ,
�� �
Parcel#: (g Watershed District(and name of creek if known): Pi 17 ,
Property Owner: Zor a r e ( ll271.)9 -C__ he Ua il L-cj' ?Lt L
Location/Physical Address of Tract: 7/# Dec) G rr,tt —, cA
Driving Directions from Pittsboro: FP c —7 A! (1,, tr vm l ir4
s .eI( CG`f'(� 1.4 A151Ll- c7►n dims dh��.,G'f , S",r Girt l
he ob.., rt5 v4 c V'-e p6�k, 0,5 3r- Rd ,
Subdivision Name(if applicable):
Owner's/Agent Contact Information(Agent: Consultant or individual(s)receiving lot(s))
Name: 61'-�.--('ii Sc./( ` j04-L'C
Contact Phone Numbers:(h) (w) (c) Ct 0G t,q7 ?t/e/
E-mail: i 4ell L �atieiec. C10,4i- -,
Mailing Address: py z I~4(ij 611 : /61e'4i-e pc,( 5k ioti !?A/ ,,/ /vL 776(5
Do you wish to be contacted prior to Chatham County staff visiting the property? es ❑No
How much notice is required prior to arrival onsite? q 1e4 ur e ilk Li,a t p ylr;V

rL
etN
J}'"tk.
HAM Corn Watershed Protection Department
Website: www.chathamnc.org
Riparian Buffer Review Application
Surface Water Identification Request
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region,digital photographs,notes,sketches,etc.
7rNRCS map with property boundary depicted
(IUSGS map with property boundary depicted
❑Statement of Credentials(Training Certificate for NCDWQ/NC State University Surface
Waters Classification course,2 years of jurisdictional wetland delineation according to
the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement to the 1987 US Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual)
,�El-lived Right to Enter Property Form
In' Owner's Agent Designation Form
El Fee(make checks payable to Chatham County)5100 Der feature confirmed onsite
Feature is defined as any surface water that is subject to Chatham County Riparian Buffers(streams,
wetlands,ponds) 3
Total Number of Features: Total Paid:S
I have read and understand the regulations f the Waters Protection Ordinance,Section 304,and I
agree to adhere to these associatedporici s d li herein.
Owner/Agent Signature: Date: r'r1 i)//

yft3
CHATHAM CUuwn u Z
•fll In , alail• J
a Iasi .Pram.
CHATHAM COUNTY
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PARCEL ID(PIN) Cc), 1 PARCEL SIZE 7O
STREET ADDRESS: C3)(6P 6 r--r/f ,r,r.,
Please print: f
Property Owner: L?v c.f [ (Ci' U e(fl f frt. I f
ti C
Property Owner: 10vC.) / r� � �C��Pfr Ai(_ 60`/
The undersigned owner(s)of the above described property,do hereby authorize
14-&U(L\ i1( ,of 6ii
(Contractor/Agent) (Name of consulting firm if applicable)
to act on my/our behalf and take all actions,llwe could have taken ifpresent,necessary for the processing,issuance
and acceptance of reviews,inspections,or permits and any and all standard and special conditions attached to
these approvals.The activities authorized include the following(Check all that apply):
n Check here for all of the below options.
Building Permit
Zoning Compliance Permits
n Floodplain Determination
n Soil Erosion&Sedimentation Control Permit
1`-7 Permits to install,repair,evaluate,or expand onsite wastewater system(s)
Evaluation/inspection/permitting of a private drinking water wells).
Riparian Buffer Review pursuant to§304 of the ctham Co. Watershed Protection Ordinance,
[H Other: 6Pel 1--/it-`P y`
Property Owner's Address(if different than property above):
Telephone: E-mail:
We hereby certify t ove information submitted in this application is true accurate to the best of our
knowled
Owner Au o zed e Ag n6 t Ruth zed Signature
Date: I Date: c/j/'/1
Revised 10/2017

Watershed Protection Department
CIIAINAM COUNTY
n4*H a �r♦nieti.� P.O.Box 548
Pittsboro,NC 27312
Website:www.ebsthemoc.org
Authorization to Enter Property Form
Dare: 111141 r
PARCEL,No.(AKPAR) q�°{
I,(print name) S r' I* 13e(// ,as owner of the property described above,
or as a representative of the owner(s) do hereby convey permission to Chatham County staff to enter the property at
their convenience to conduct a surface water identification(SWID)necessary to determine whether or not water features
on my property are subject to the riparian buffer regulations desaihed in Section 304 of the Chatham County Watershed
Protection Ordinance. The SWID will be public record and on file at the PIanning and Watershed Protection
Departments,and may be requested in the future for review by interested parties.
I understand that stream delineations for the property listed above will be made by County staff only once and that if
future subdivisions are proposed within this property boundary,it will require a surface water identification by a private
consultant at the property owner's expense. /
F.f)06 fir D et.,4
(Print Owner's Name) (Signature o 7041FirMEW"—
(Date) ).
)
ft�
(Print Authorized Agent Name) (Signature of A r orized Agent]
(Date) /„IIr41

JORDAN LAKE
RIPARIAN BUFFER
STREAM C
\\
EXISITING \
"5Q' COLONIAL 1\
EAS€MENT
OVERALL IMPACT TOTALS
ZONE 1 ROAD IMPACT
5,689 SF
ZONE 2 ROAD IMPACT
2,809 SF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
291 SF
69 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT NO LOSS
109 SF
38 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
146 SF
30 LF
NOTE: IMPACT REQUIRED FOR RESIDENTIAL LOT
ACCESS.
SHEET 1
CE GROUP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
400'
NORTH
0 400'
SCALE: 1" = 400'
800'
REVISIONS:
LAUREL RIDGE PHASE 2B
OVERALL KEY MAP
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

l� ((li//rrl(ll`I�J��\\�uA
J
• JJI
`'���/�J rl /f//Jlky/((l
iii //��j/)/h
\\
SHEET 2
CE GROLP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
400'
NORTH
0 400'
SCALE: 1" = 400'
800'
REVISIONS:
LAUREL RIDGE PHASE 2B
EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

ZONE 2 ROAD IM
844 SF
PROpOSFp pR/VFw
qy
PROPOSED LIMIT
OF DISTURBANCE
(TYP.)
\
\
\
\
\
LOT LINE
TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT 71 SF
ZONE 1 ROAD
IMPACT 1,574 SF
(1) CP
(1) .." RCP WITH 1' BURIED
F i R AQUATIC PASSAGE
V IN = 427.0 (30" RCP)
INV IN = 426.0 (36" RCP)
INV OUT = 426.0 (30" RCP)
INV OUT = 425.0 (36" R2P)TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT /
16 SF
VISOOSOOSOft-
MOOMONVIOOMIMOONO
W �uuO■■traui ��i�� n
1■■ruvu■ri■per a1sti=_�ia����
�■uur�■■r■■uel► j
IMISSOMTIMOVOSOO
lti
■■.■M■■■►■■■■■.w■�
■■:Ar:w■■■A■■■■����� mil
II
`\■■■■■■►O•10 %ram —_
.■
■■■■■■.•■■ru-411•••••:47:47. 4i..._,......
I
I
I
TOP OF BANK
\
\\ /
PERMANENT STREAM
IMPACT 199 SF
ZONE 1 ROAD I
IMPACT
1,600 SF
PERMANENT STREAM/
IMPACT NO LOSS
(RIPRAP) 71 SF /
8'(W)x21.3'(L) /
22.5" THICK CLASS 1
STONE RIPRAP /
/
20 Zo
BUFF �F2
PROPOSED MIT
OF DISTURB NCE
(TYP.)
\
\
\
IMPACT TOTALS
ZONE 1 ROAD IMPACT
3,174 SF
ZONE 2 ROAD IMPACT
1,725 SF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
199 SF
39 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT NO LOSS
71 SF
16 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
87 SF
15 LF
•
.-•-•-•-•-•-
••••••
• • • • •
• • • • • •
• • • • • • •
•
MMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
# # # # # # MMMM # #
MMMM
k # # # # # # # # # #
xx
ZONE 1 ROAD IMPACT
ZONE 2 ROAD IMPACT
STREAM IMPACT
STREAM IMPACT NO LOSS (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
NOTE: UPSTREAM IMPACT INCLUDES TEMPORARY
CLEAN WATER DIKE FOR BYPASS PUMPING PER
DETAIL.
NORTH
SHEET 3
CE GROLP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
20'
0
SCALE: 1" = 20'
20' 40'
REVISIONS:
LAUREL RIDGE PHASE 2B - LOT 34R/35R
DRIVEWAY CROSSING #1
COMBINED DRIVEWAY CROSSING
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

435
430
425
4'
20'
4'
/
�,
4
DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED
PRECAST
I4EADWALL
WATER
SERVICE
-
1
A
GRADE
SEWER
SERVICE
I
PRECAST
A
`HEADWALL
4
(1)
(1)
BURIED
AEA
30" RCP
36" RCP
1'
PASSA
(32 LF)
(32 LF)
FOR
30"
INV
RCP
IN=427.0
_AQUATIC
N
v
\-------
---,_
30" RCP
INV OUT=426.0
36" RCP
-
1••••••••••,
::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;'
•.=:Z:::=:_:_:_:_:_:_
;:�.
,
EXISTING
S-REAM
INV IN=426.0
36" RCP
LINV OUT=425
0
••••••••••••••••••••
•••••••�•-
..:%:_:_:_:_:tyi:i
D50=10"
DMAx=15"
'.;
8'(W)x21.3'(L)
22.5" THICK
CLASS 1 STONE
RIPRAP
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
435
430
425
120125
NOTE: PROPOSED RIP RAP TO MATCH EXISTING CHANNEL
GEOMETRY
SHEET 4
CE GROLP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
20' 0 20' 40'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
REVISIONS:
LAUREL RIDGE PHASE 2B
DRIVEWAY CROSSING #1 PROFILE
(LOT 34R/35R)
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

(1)30"R P IMPACT92SF
(1) 36" R1• WITH 0.8'
BURIED FoR AQUATI
PASSAGE
INV. IN = 42 80 (30" RCP)
INV IN = 421.' ' (36" RCP)
INV OUT = 420.s0 (30" RCP)
INV OUT = 420. I (36" RCP)
ZONE 2 ROAD IMPACT
560 SF
PROPOSED
DRIVEWAY
L-
\
\ \ STfVAM B
\ \ \
I \
I
I\ • '\C5
\
\
\
TEMPORARY
STREAM
IMPACT 59 SF
PERMANENT STREAM
/.
PERMANENT STREAM
IMPACT NO LOSS
(RIPRAP) 38 SF
ZONE 1 ROA
IMPACT
1,331 SF
/ \ \
PROPOSED
DRIVEWAY
AD IMPACT
/
ZONE 1 ROAD
IMPACT
1,1k1 SF
PROPOSED'
DISTURBED LIMIT
LINE (TYP.)
D50=10" DMAx=15"
8'(W)x21.3'(L)
22 5" THICK CLASS 1
STONE RIPRAP
\
\
\
\
\
IMPACT TOTALS
ZONE 1 ROAD IMPACT
2,515 SF
ZONE 2 ROAD IMPACT
1,084 SF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
92 SF
30 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT NO LOSS
38 SF
22 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
59 SF
15 LF
•••••••.
••••••••••••••
••••••• • • • • • •
•• •• •• •• •• • •
••• •• •• •• •• •
.•••••••••••••
-•••••••••••••
ZONE 1 ROAD IMPACT
ZONE 2 ROAD IMPACT
STREAM IMPACT
STREAM IMPACT NO LOSS (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
NOTE: UPSTREAM IMPACT INCLUDES TEMPORARY
CLEAN WATER DIKE FOR BYPASS PUMPING PER
DETAIL.
NORTH
SHEET 5
CE GROUP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
20' 0 20' 40'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
REVISIONS:
LAUREL RIDGE PHASE 2B - LOT 36R
DRIVEWAY CROSSING #2
(LOT 36R)
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

430
425
420
4'
12'
4'
1
Y
�
PROPOSED
GRADE
/
PRECAST
HEADWALL
30"
INV I
`
GP
=421.80
(T) 3
(1) 36"
BURIED
AQUATIC
" RCP (23
RCP (23
0.8' FOR
PASS
LF)
LF)
GE
`
—��
\�
30" RCP
INV OUT=420.9
EXISTING
STREAM
36" RCP
::`:':':':':':':`:`:':':'
P1V IN-421.
36" RCP
INV OUT=420.10
...... •
.••••••••••••••••••••••••.
.•__•_•_•�•�•004...",
......
D50= 0"
DMnx=15"
8'(W)x21 3'(L)
22.5"
CLASS
RIPRAP
THICK
1 STONE
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
430
425
420
100
NOTE: PROPOSED RIP RAP TO MATCH EXISTING CHANNEL
GEOMETRY
SHEET 6
CE GROLP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
20' 0
SCALE: 1" = 20'
20' 40'
REVISIONS:
LAUREL RIDGE PHASE 2B
DRIVEWAY CROSSING #2 PROFILE
LOT 36R
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

PUIV
Silt Bag as shown
in detail 3.25.
pumps should discharge
onto a stable velocity
dissipator made of rip rap
P-AROUND PRACTICE
PLAN VIEW
discharge hoses
WORK AREA
LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED
THAT WHICH CAN BE
COMPLETED IN ONE DAY
SECTION A -A
i�ous sheeting
work area
442
stream
diversion pumps
sump —hole
or pool
(12" to 18" deep
w/ 2' diameter)
base flow + 1 foot
(2 foot minimum)
cross section of sandbag dike
PUMP —AROUND PRACTICE
DESCRIPTION:
The work should consist of installing a temporary pump around
and supporting measures to divert flow around in —stream construction sites.
IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE:
Sediment control measures, pump —around practices, and associated channel and bank
construction should be completed in the following sequence (refer to Detail 2/SE1):
1 Construction should not begin until all sediment and erosion control measures
have been installed and approved by the engineer and the sediment control inspector.
The contractor should stay within the limits of the disturbance as shown on the plan
and minimize disturbance within the work area whenever possible.
2 Upon installation of all sediment control measures and approval by the sediment
control inspector, the contractor should begin work at the upstream
section and proceed downstream beginning with the establishment of stabilized construction
entrances. In some cases, work may begin downstream if appropriate. The sequence of
construction must be followed unless the contractor gets written approval for deviations
from the engineer or local authority. Work should not be conducted in the channel during
rain events.
3 Sandbag dikes should be situated at the upstream and downstream ends of the work
area as shown on the plans, and stream flow should be pumped around the work area.
The pump should discharge onto a stable velocity dissipater made of riprap.
4 Excavated topsoil and subsoil should be kept separate, placed on the upland side of
the excavation, and replaced in their natural order.
5 All construction should take place during stream low flows. The length of construction
time should be limited to a maximum of 2 days for each crossing.
6 Water from the work area should be pumped to a dewatering bag as shown in detail 3.25.
The measure should be located
such that the water drains back into the channel below the downstream sandbag dike.
7 Traversing a channel reach with equipment within the work area where no work is proposed
should be avoided. If equipment has to traverse such a reach for access to another area,
then timber mats or similar measures should be used to minimize disturbance to the channel.
Temporary stream crossings should be used only when necessary and only where noted on the
plans or specified.
8 All stream restoration measures should be installed as indicated by the plans and all
banks graded in accordance with the grading plans and typical cross —sections. All grading
must be stabilized at the end of each day with seed and mulch or seed and matting as
specified on the plans.
9 After an area is completed and stabilized, the clean water dike should be removed.
After the first sediment flush, a new clean water dike should be established upstream
from the old sediment dike. Finally, upon establishment of a new sediment dike below
the old one, the old sediment dike should be removed.
10 The contractor is responsible for providing access to and maintaining all erosion
and sediment control devices until the sediment control inspector approves their removal.
PUMP AROUND PRACTICE
SHEET 7
CE GROUP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
REVISIONS:
LAUREL RIDGE PHASE 2B
DEWATERING DETAIL
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

Camden Brunick
From: Mason Montgomery
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 1:34 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4
Subject: Laurel Ridge Phase 2B
Attachments: S&EC Laurel Ridge T&E Report Signed.pdf
Hello,
Attached is the threatened and endangered species report for the Laurel Ridge property located in Chatham County, NC.
S&EC is submitting for concurrence. Please let me know if any additional information is needed to make the
determinations.
Thank you,
Mason L. Montgomery
Soil And Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office [phone]
Direct [phone]
Mobile [phone]
[e-mail]
Visit us at sandec.com
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify
the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.
1

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 2763 6-3 726
February 22, 2022
S&EC Project No: 7185.W17
Re: Online Project Review Request, Laurel Ridge Phase 2B, Pittsboro - Chatham County,
North Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We completed
our review February 22, 2022 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the
instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of: A planned residential development that is proposing a stream crossing.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
Laurel Ridge Phase 2B (35.809706, -78.209213). The site is located at 406 Blufftonwood Dr, Pittsboro —
Chatham County, North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 15, 2026.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 29.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Enclosures:
1. Project Request Review Package
2. S&EC T&E Species Report
3. Vicinity Maps
4. S&EC Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS Official Species List
7. NHP Report
8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
9. FWS Self -Certification Letter

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.corn
February 22, 2022
S&EC Project No.: 7185.W17
To: Laurel Ridge Development
Attn: Hadley Kirkland
PO Box 5689
Cary, NC 27512
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
Laurel Ridge Phase 2B (+/- 67 acres)
406 Blufftonwood Dr, Pittsboro, Chatham County, NC
Dear Mr. Kirkland:
On February 3, 2022, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Laurel Ridge
Phase 2B property shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located
at 406 Blufftonwood Drive in Chatham County, NC. Surface waters on -site flow into Dry Creek in the
Cape Fear River Basin, which has been classified in the "Classification and NC DWQ Standards
Applicable to Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina" as WS-IV; NSW.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the
individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of
the streams, identifying forest types, and looking for evidence of the listed species on -site. This survey
did not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below.
Laurel Ridge Phase 2B - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 4

February 22, 2022
S&EC Project #7185.W17
RESULTS:
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Endangered
• Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Endangered
• Harperella (Ptilimnium nodosum), Endagered
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did identify a Federally endangered
species within one mile of the project area. The NHP report listed an elemental occurrence for Cape
Fear Shiner from 2007. Other State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the
attached NHP report. The NHP report identified three natural areas and two managed areas within the
project area or within one mile of the project area. These are listed out in the attached NHP Report.
RED -COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat (foraging and cavity trees) and
individual Red -cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) within the project area. We found no individual
RCWs within the project area. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within one mile of the site. We found no ideal suitable habitat (e.g., Long Leaf pine
forests) within the project area. The Loblolly pine stands on -site are too young (± 20 years old) to be
considered suitable habitat. Given the lack of species present, and no presence of suitable habitat we
concluded that the project would have "No effect" on RCWs.
CAPE FEAR SHINER (Notropis mekistocholas)
During the preliminary survey for the Cape Fear Shiner, we looked for any suitable habitat and
evidence of the species being present. The NHP report did list a known elemental occurrence within
one mile of the site from 2007. These species are found in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin. The
suitable habitat these species are found in are streams with rocky substrate with slow flowing water.
While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any evidence of the species
while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable habitat.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist on -site. Dry Creek was
+/-10 feet wide with strong baseflow and had a rocky sandy substrate. Additionally, the other streams
Laurel Ridge Phase 2B - S&EC Threatened Sr Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 4

February 22, 2022
S&EC Project #7185.W17
on -site did not have suitable habitat. There are no proposed impacts to Dry Creek. Due to these
observations, we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Cape Fear Shiner.
HARPERELLA (Ptilimnium nodosum):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat within the project areas. It should
be noted this survey took place outside of the optimal survey window (July through early September).
We found no individual Harperella species within the project area. The NHP report did not list any
known elemental occurrence within the project area or one mile of the project area. We found suitable
habitat within the project area since Dry Creek on -site did have cobble sandy shoals. There are no
proposed impacts to Dry Creek, so we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on
Harperella. We recommend consulting with the USFWS and/or conducting follow up surveys within
the optimal survey window.
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests on -site or within one
mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is "Unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles". We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT (Myotis septentrionalis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Northern Long-
eared Bats (NLEB's) within the project area. During our survey, we found no individual species.
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities." Due to the nature of the project being residential development, we
concluded that the project would "May affect, but not likely to adversely affect" NLEB's.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter". Using language typically used by the FWS
Laurel Ridge Phase 2B - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 4

February 22, 2022
S&EC Project #7185.W17
in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
However, as suitable habitat exists for Harperella the USFWS should be consulted to determine if
surveys need to occur during the optimal survey windows for Harperella to ensure that no plants exist
within the disturbed limits of the project. We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from
the FWS.
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. Official Species List. January 21, 2022.
7. NHP report: January 21, 2022.
8. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. February 22, 2022.
9. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. February 22, 2022.
References:
-North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
-US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Second Revision. Atlanta GA 316 pp.
Laurel Ridge Phase 2B - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 4

/ NI,
7":/..--sl \ -----:t-)
iiijofili:1
-) 411 -
41
M Rp Q
; *r744' -
500
ROCK•REST RD s� �_
0,4
k
0 r
I DI ygitIC4,00•10 <
.... 4.A •1 1 1.fmk.W.4 6.It IL :Ni.tz...__,......i A.-4 I"\-4 1 Ill,'.. ..,/iiilu A...4
�cirii,
0 �
g�00K G J,
oliir ) r"-iy.
bhp k i 1
irlow...._ 1 _1
5-;
ors t o sk kh\,\,\AI-Al
�, iro,,akMII -�` p 50.
ar , ,, 60 N6 C ne teqorigwgraphic Inforrnatiom&Analysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
7185.W17 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: USGS Map I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
DS Laurel Ridge Bluffs Feet
Scale: Chatham County, NC
1" = 1 000' S& Soil 8c Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Source: 2016 NC
E� R5121.hd'\ems.au.il M.n.•w.R+a��C1�is•Pbm.e:[9re184499W•F.:[9i91w16•�+
02/08/2022 Bynum Quad .ben

NaC
'jul12
o Q0 BaE R
yR
\44.44:\
0 (1)
GaB NaC
CmB CkC NaD
NaB
fi W CkC NaD WeD
We
IaB .Ir V* -
Ctr
NO
= Q) PsB
I 1520
0) 0 0
0
Ma G M:3
0 GaC NaD
0 0 11.47
PsB _ C %;,
GaB•. . ,
,� m 0
0
:. m GkE m
0 \d NaD
CD
NaC PsB GaB ��'
PsB
oo
GaB
If NaB
NaD - m GaB o
w 0 •
NaC GkD
. i BaE J•
0 BaE
NaB1(1° '
RvA NaB GaB Cb NaC
NaB , .. I. .
('kfl T N,C Center for Geogriaphic�ln�ormation&An.lysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
7185.W17 0 1,000 2,000
Soil Survey
Project Manager: I I I I I I I I 1
DS Laurel Ridge Bluffs Feet
Scale: Chatham County, NC
1" = 1000' S&
Date: fX� Source:Chatham County Soil
O//� F Soil&Environmental Consultants, PA
L,O V/LOLL y +�� xslx l.�xwtie�.a,vq Xun.•iw.R+4�g11�C x�is•Pbm.e:[91916w99W•F.r:[9i91 w16• '+
Surve Sheet 04 .b.

vs d * L ROCK'REST - j __ _
. 4%.61111 I" 46 116. 444iii 'r. -OP.1° .
t i --
illi
-NT 1:41111114 -I':
• P , ,.. likik 7 • l'iciv;i:' .1%, 14, 00.4. , iitik :,_ ''''::44' IP.,rn A- i
-.. ilk,i, vp,,,,,i
�`� �'' *'
'5-1a•-
a
+.,.).\._--. ..%',I..
.gm%:.-.i'..'..-I'.*:.*_'',k.i.V..b:.,...'.l',4'.b.1,i1"1-y-11.•.•
-,7.,...1..1,,7•......7.',:.„4.'int„,I..-i.11.-'.Is,.a.t,.f*r.,4i,d.k be,ot,.:.4.N.'.1..•4...}1'"L'74r'1 43A 7Fi4t.kLtl.k
f • i c tip. y 1F
.•.1.1'6'.',ii,r lt,I,,'lIkI,. ''1 t4l.42'ft,4••rr.4i.1-1,k..'::!P...-Q4.•el.t.'.•.'
it • - a L t- 4 Z.4* 3-,., 4 VI' *: •., ' *4 *re,a: i 2 t i .
‘.^:4,.:,.'_.i•','jC',p'l'.y-g%':.'.r,'i'l•._.,c...__,';#N..,..a,I.i.-.,'r_.liA#..et.-t)".V.'1.t',•4te',..,.1dNs41i11 11•;,.,.I t.'t,A.e‘.k-i•...i:6i r'„.h7 r'_.*r.,._4.':.,..i.i.it,.iIt r:.ylv,.L,e7..
k'-,-.-.A
'','.2r..i1.%'..4...'•.•'4li0-'k i.,*•
1 1 �V
* ."7 ,4 : x•, i , 1• .; -,y ' { 74 ,`+ . tit { .. 7• 1'4.
5,�� ti r.
ig. •4.11'1/4,r.
• ,,t
-. 1g 41. 1, .1 hill ....tvvd ii.: . ' ‘k,_' . k \ . ' ' '' 4"( 4: gi:w.41.41-0:4*' S. li 1:. 711f:''---.!. C*11..-S t
. -th-ap. ., iiiiiiikiiit.' .. ... .
1417.7: ' .., . ''''' gli‘1,4ekiil,`' '1 '-j'ik' '.- % Iteiri 'A :,_' rd...i..F.11.41 :, ':I: ',',14... ' :, % ,I: 'I... i: ,,' N .-t-v,.# ...-1. --.. t
' ortb' *4711.4 'W IN .r Iiir 14. /1. A,.. V* '4,1 A
.:.._ ...:,:iii::'.11bit: vi:: A: t111410‘. .• \ lit 'I:41-- : ...' :7.1-......:4 'I. 4s"..t'ff ... I' it .'''.111H- 1 ,` •!..)1•7'4,. —,-•• .
Ilitlik. .. 4141,. ‘ \ t-*?t- .A • t. 0 . .. ' , •• ." • ..0..4',.." .• :1k 1.‘ " .: \.Nli ;?-
V 14.'1' t -11.--
. rArriFL * Na *1-"1016 /44
N''''' .
__ , , ,, -1,:,
, ,,,
T 4 • F •. r y 4...+. x
h
•
Per site visit with Andy Williams of the USACE on 9/24/2019. ,, io,,' r
\ • ti
Jordan Lake Buffers confirmed by Drew Blake of Chatham Co •
a, ] ii _ • t • ,
on 12/11/19 _. iL A
—"tit -.PA
tilliii:71611:411h ‘: ..4kiliP, 't . - \ .. '' .- t ... L '.. 1% 1Z...'. .'e-,' #` \ .14:- .'
. - \ IL kik W . -4. if . - o _ ii, .,- . . .... *11. , 41,,- .
- .N. r".41•:. '',: kkttlip, . '‘6.. - yiSit .i.•L'Ir r. 10•
. • It • ....,-it . _ el-
i.
ilikVril.k1:4-- P # - \ . .,—.. '4 -._ -4, .
Legend ''''ti - oO .,:';* Z,, a .. # } " .
Property Boundary �, t ,k 4-+ _
Is
CI) Potentially Jurisdictional Perennial Stream . • N '. ' " yy->� A.
c oQo Potentially Jurisdicitonal Intermittent Stream ..111.i '` ` , ' . r. •
`moo .
50 Jordan Lake Buffers libbs hi ,-, • ; / Lt
•
' * '
• 41-10 4+
- � , a aft,lagi•al l v 0- -a=lfe,,I 'i i &l -0 gl o nfc ,CAS S/Afib ar De,USDA,1180 ,/oroC:IC,IOW,Inc Die Ole UPtir C-tri niUlifI'
Project No. N Aerial Photo Map
7185.W17 4 ..
Project Mgr.: WE
Laurel Ridge Bluffs S
DS s Chatham County, NC Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
EC
84L2 I'11115 off Nc',nc Rend,Suite IN,Raleigh,NC;27615•Phone,(919)546-59O0• FAX:[phone]
Scale: 0 250 500 1 ,000 AWYdcti-corn
1"=250' Source:
Aerials from NC One Map
02/08/2022 Feet

Job #: 7185.W17
February 22, 2022
Threatened and Endangered Species Photo Report for the Laurel Ridge Phase 2B
Photo 1: Intermittent stream crossing
Photo 2: Intermittent stream crossing
1

Job#: 7185.W17
February 22, 2022
Photo 3: Intermittent stream crossing
ft
- 4 A 6:01.e.'•;a: I, 1 :,„ ' . Otti 1 .4:•. ': ,•-....;:,., F-',.: '!.. ..:,•,..;•'1''. ''..',.-..,;:••; #0-•-r-,.' ",..-. !
s fir.
s.•4 + r:'' W. 1
• /.. •;; }. a yr
7 •t' 4
.f-...7 4•, • ' .''. .,..'1.-' Al i Y
'4_av�' r. ••T / /
• - :�i t �Sr.�.%-fir �-��. - 'tlr' - >• :." ... •
•
•
-* yam•wy,; • & - -
`i t ... _ -� �•_ ,t- ' r`
y • sr•..= �_ ' -..' :-wa,a ••..r .. fir'._..,,;-:.7.:
•
.:5 • y - ; . ••ems _ ,-_
•
-a
•._. ce *�- �r-. •. :�...• , �:_. -
J� l Y.. • y•
- - _ _. two • __.�_,: •}:'
.. •' y�:.nW _- .r .� �.+_.__�:�►Wises."Jla=��_,.. �_`_'a�+_-.-�Y �'�- `._�-
Photo 4: Intermittent stream :oint into D Creek
r •
- : � _uk.
- -• k
+ f.l y Sr Y, �. �F.:.1 .
• .. 7.fLi+ --': '1 - :
. _ K
v.
••--% .- ''.0t- - -- .'--.;,0J-*-,--.;:._ • 1- .t. - .—A246..- •. -..- •'-. VFW;i'--• - -'47.71110 IPP 00•.• '-II •".!tail
..-- -'_ 1 -- .: :- 1. 4,,, _
3+f _ no „ r y,,r-• f .
„_,.:...k7...,-:••.•.*,.,.-.•..:---.,._.-,,...-,,-'._L‘-=-_.;,1•-...,.,--..!
fry ti 44 . .; .•' 5„�
_ _"',- 7.-i.-- _ - .sue t ,•. ' •: -4 ' ,:: firs4,
Ev,...
1Y: T. :4,7*.r, r` r.+ + • • mil! �,_
2

Job#: 7185.W17
February 22, 2022
i
Photo 5: Dry Creek
iii
g.
lit r ilk 1II'•. V. '. ' •s� y�K# j • ip:
n i �i 'mot
. _-.�¢�:'___ --- - _tit•y •
)
_ - -� -•'.ram
P..Z 0/4-,,," .-;',:i-!,-:-;--A-Ip:1,-; -V`-'2,---7" .',/.."F‘*::7 -1.- . -'''... -.11 '--..'.'
lowiiiik. _ - -. ' , , .
4 _•Ia . _ -
Photo 6: Loblolly pine stand
1 +, ' •
4 L,
a 7 .
yc� 1.
a 41 \ 2
.
ffnr+ii" "4
- =
'M1'Ja:--:aa:--:;:.:, :fix: .- -
'Ir`
o
3

Job#: 7185.W17
February 22, 2022
Photo 7: Utility easement
: . ` 14 v' 4 '° 'f Y •
V.
,
y •
w
-,x
• �- _
_
'
- 1. •-
Photo 8: Lobloll sines
; . q.g?.S.:14' :..41,1(e„k:', 1,•- . - „ , „
.,.,, _.: ...4* ''''' ;;:,:.1'-..;;,:j'4.;:‘,1'. s:"IA 1 4.'
0
y1.: s. r t1 ,` o
i c�4}; • Y
i.
�• � r14
• rs!F. " 'AMC', _
eC•}f-;'a r ita
is
1
' y '
•
4

�.j•---�1)(/1(), �\> IL ✓ J� � ��\`��� r��1`; JI
)p)-•(71
C
lei ,`'.0\
vik
1 (off.*0\\
<�
,
u �-r =141
4')
l/ _� \r .
iJ r ft5 \
\50' COLONIALS
/ \ EASEMENT
\
J
/
f////1
AC
Irk jl ›)
�r- " �c
r
^ 1 \ \ 1\\4\\
)
OVERALL IMPACT TOTALS
ZONE 1 ROAD IMPACT
7,369 SF
ZONE 2 ROAD IMPACT
4,236 SF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
420 SF
88 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT NO LOSS
197SF
65 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
127 SF
28 LF
SHEET 1
CE GROUP
301 GLENWOOD AVE.
SUITE 220
RALEIGH,NC 27603
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
400'
NORTH
0 400'
SCALE: 1" = 400'
800'
REVISIONS:
LAUREL RIDGE PHASE 2B
OVERALL IMPACT MAP
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

FiSei
United States Department of the Interior #�
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: January 21, 2022
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0733
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01679
Project Name: Lauren Ridge Phase 2B
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act(Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

01/21/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01679 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act(16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

01/21/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01679 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

01/21/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01679 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

01/21/2022
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01679 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0733
Event Code: Some(04EN2000-2022-E-01679)
Project Name: Lauren Ridge Phase 2B
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: This project is located in Chatham County, NC and is approximately 67
acres.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.8085997,-79.20769677272646 14z
Counties: Chatham County, North Carolina

01/21/2022
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01679 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3739
Endangered

01/21/2022
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01679 4
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Roy Cooper, Governor
al ■■■
■■ R NC DEPARTMENT OF
■
■ ■■A NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
•
January 21, 2022
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Lauren Ridge Phase 2B; 7185
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Dire ttrr, Natural Heritage Program
N CN H D E-16889
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
1) 1:1 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGI I. NC 27603 1CS1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 0197079120 • FA 919.707.9121

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Lauren Ridge Phase 2B
Project No. 7185
January 21, 2022
NCNHDE-16889
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name ommon Name
Group
ImmL1TEElement Accuracy Federal
Observation Occurrence Status
Date Rank
State Global State
Status Rank Rank
Freshwater Fish28299 Etheostoma collis Carolina Darter
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name
Piedmont Land Conservancy Easement
2004-04-30 E 3-Medium
Piedmont Land Conservancy
Owner Type
Private
Special G3 S3
Concern
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/hela. Data query generated on January 21, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Lauren Ridge Phase 2B
Project No. 7185
January 21, 2022
NCNHDE-16889
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Group Observation
Date
Crustacean 33474 Cambarus davidi Carolina Ladle Crayfish 2006-11-14
Dragonfly or 4051
Damselfly
Freshwater Fish28299
Freshwater Fish23811
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Vascular Plant
39730
39731
39729
25674
39728
27170
Gomphurus septima
Etheostoma collis
Notropis
mekistocholas
Dry-Mesic Basic
Oak --Hickory Forest
(Piedmont Subtype)
Dry Oak --Hickory
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Mixed Moisture
Hardpan Forest
Piedmont Alluvial
Forest
Upland Depression
Swamp Forest
Phacelia covillei
Septima's Clubtail
Carolina Darter
Cape Fear Shiner
Buttercup Phacelia
1999-05-03
2004-04-30
2007-09-20
2020-03-09
2020-03-09
2020-03-09
2006
2020-03-09
2006
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Nam Representational Rating
Terrells Hardpan R3 (High)
Rock Rest Mafic Islands and Shore R5 (General)
CPF/Haw River Aquatic Habitat R2 (Very High)
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy
E 3-Medium
H? 4-Low
E 3-Medium
E 3-Medium
C 2-High
B
B
B
C
E
2-High
2-High
2-High
2-High
3-Medium
Federal State Global State
Status Status Rank Rank
I
Significantly G3 S3
Rare
Significantly G3 S3
Rare
Special G3 S3
Concern
Endangered Endangered G1 S1
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
C5 (General)
C3 (High)
G3G4 S3
G4G5 S4
G2? S2
G4 S4
G2G3 S2S3
Significantly G3 S3
Rare
Throughout
Page 3 of 5

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Na Owner
Piedmont Land Conservancy Easement
Piedmont Land Conservancy Private
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement
Triangle Land Conservancy Private
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/helo. Data query generated on January 21, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

January 21, 2022
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Managed Area (MAREA)
NCNHDE-16889: Lauren Ridge Phase 2B
1:24,286
O 0.2 0.4
0.8 mi
O 0.325 0.65
1.3 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin. Inlermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAQ, MPS, NRCAN, GeoSase, IGN, Nadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, awl japan,
MEYI_ Esri China (Hong Kong). (n) aperSlreelMap contr4ulors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 5 of 5

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Laurel Ridge Phase 2B
Date: February 22, 2022
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Picoides borealis
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on February 3, 2022.
Cape Fear Shiner
Notropis mekistocholas
Suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on February 3, 2022.
Harperella
Ptilimnium nodosum
Suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on February 3, 2022. Please
note this survey was taken place outside of
the optimal survey window (July through
September).
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Unlikely to disturb nesting
Bald Eagles
No Eagle Act permit required
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on February 3, 2022.
Northern Long-eared Bat
Myotis septentrionalis
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by
S&EC staff on February 3, 2022. Relying
upon the findings of the 1/5/2016
Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final
4(d) Rule on the Northern Long -Eared Bat
and Activities Excepted from Take
Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Mason Montgomery / Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department at S&EC, PA
Signature /Title
February 22, 2022
Date

FLEE' I & WILDLIFE
EENV ECI;
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: February 8, 2022
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Laurel Ridge
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package