20181461 Ver 1_B56 Site Mitigation Plan_DRAFT_REV4 -05-27-2022_20220527

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20181461 Version* 1
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 05/27/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 5/27/2022
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Tara Allden [e-mail]
Project Information
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20181461 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS • Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Middle Neuse UMBI-Beaufort 56
County: Beaufort
Document Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: B56 Site Mitigation Plan DRAFT REV4-05-27-
40.3MB
2022.pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Tara Allden
Signature:*

THE MIDDLE NEUSE STREAM AND
WETLAND UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT (Rev. 4)
Middle Neuse River Basin — HUC 03020202
Beaufort County, North Carolina
USACE ACTION ID NUMBER:
SAW-2017-02019
fir,. ..
a'r i•
SPONSOR: PREPARED BY:
Weyerhaeuser NR Company Kimley-Ham Coggin Asset Management,LLC
Attn:Doug Hughes Attn:Tara Allden and Jason Claudio-Diaz Attn:Daniel S.Coggin
406 Cole Road 200 South Tryon Street,Suite 200 P.O.Box 476
Hattiesburg,MS 39402 Charlotte,NC 28202 Amory,MS 38821
601 341 6054 704 319 7699 662 825 0058
This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33 Navigation and Navigable
Waters Volume 3,Chapter 2,Section§332-8paragraphs(c)(2)through(c)(14).

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Project Introduction 5
1.1 Project Description 5
1.2 Site Selection 6
1.3 Mitigation Site Location. Size, and Service Area 6
1.4 ❑wnership 7
2.0 Watershed Approach 8
2.1 Watershed Environmental Concerns and Mitigation Needs 8
2.2 Goals and ❑bjectives 8
2.3 Assurance of Sufficient Water Rights, Control of Minerals, and Access 9
2.4 Site Protection 9
3.0 Site Baseline 10
3.1 Existing Watershed Conditions 10
3.2 Existing Site Conditions 10
3.3 Endangered/Threatened species 12
3.4 Cultural Resources 13
3.5 Regulated Floodplains 13
3.6 Existing Site Constraints 13
4.0 Functional Uplift Potential 14
5.0 Mitigation Plan 16
5.1 Reference Site and Design Parameters 16
5.2 Mitigation Work Plan 19
6.0 ❑etermination of Credits 25
6.1 Stream Mitigation Credit Calculations 25
6.2 Wetland Mitigation Credit Calculations 25
7.0 Credit Release Schedule 26
8.0 Monitoring Plan 27
8.1 Stream Monitoring Requirements 27
8.2 Wetland Monitoring Requirements 28
IIII
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan -DRAFT
May 2022

8.3 Performance Standards 28
8.4 Adaptive Management Plan 30
8.5 Post-Construction Documentation 32
8.6 Long-Term Management Plan 32
8.7 Financial Assurances 33
9.0 References 34
TABLES
Table 1 — Proposed Stream Mitigation Summary 5
Table 2— Proposed Wetland Mitigation Summary 5
Table 3—Watershed Overview 10
Table 4— Beaufort County Protected Species 12
Table 5—Stream Mitigation Work Plan 14
Table 6—Distribution of Intermittent and Perennial Origin Contributing Watershed(acre) 18
Table 7—Stream Mitigation Approach Summary 19
Table 8—Wetland Mitigation Approach Summary 22
Table 9— Proposed Buffer Widths 24
Table 10—Zone 1 Planting Summary 24
Table 11 —Zone 2 Planting Summary 25
Table 12—Proposed Stream Mitigation Credits 25
Table 13—Proposed Wetland Mitigation Credits 26
Table 14—Credit Release Schedule—Streams 26
Table 15—Credit Release Schedule—Wetlands 27
Table 16—Vegetative Monitoring Plots 27
Table 17—Wetland Hydrology Performance Standards 30
Table 18—Estimated Amount Required for Performance Bond 33
Table 19—Performance Bond Reduction Schedule 33
.111 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan —DRAFT
I May 2022

APPENDICES
Appendix A—Figures
Appendix B—Photo Pages
Appendix C—Geomorphic Cross-Sections
Appendix D—Geomorphology
Appendix E—Buffer Credit Calculations
Appendix F—Mitigation Plan Sheets
Appendix G—NCSAM Forms
Appendix H—Wetland and Stream Data Forms
Appendix I—Conservation Easement Documents
Appendix J—Performance Bond
FIGURES
Figure 1 —Service Area Map
Figure 2—Vicinity Map
Figure 3—USGS Topographic Map
Figure 4—Historic Aerials
Figure 5—NRCS Soils
Figure 6—Hydric Soils
Figure 7—Watershed
Figure 8—Existing Conditions
Figure 9—LiDAR
Figure 10—Proposed Mitigation
Figure 11 —Monitoring Plan
Figure 12—Additional Stream Buffer Credit
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT 4
May 2022

1 .0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
1 .1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Beaufort 56 Mitigation Site("B56 Site"or"Site')is an initial site in the Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland
Umbrella Mitigation Bank(the"Middle Neuse UMB"or"Bank").The Site is identified as having potential to help meet
the compensatory mitigation requirement for permitted stream and freshwater wetland impacts in Hydrologic Unit
Code("HUC")03020202 of the Neuse River Basin (Figure 7—Service Area Map).The Site was selected based on its
ability to provide improvements to aquatic resources within the Middle Neuse 8-digit HUC through restoration as
described further within this Mitigation Plan.
The Site is in Beaufort County, NC(Figure 7—Service Area Map)and consists of one(1)stream system within the
Creeping Swamp watershed(HUC 030202020403)that includes headwater restoration and stream and wetland
restoration.This Mitigation Plan is a holistic approach that encompasses the valley and riparian wetlands adjacent to
the stream channels.The stream system described here as Pollard Swamp("PS")is a tributary to Creeping Swamp,
which joins Clayroot Swamp upstream of the confluence with Swift Creek.
On-site streams that are proposed for restoration were historically impacted by extensive ditching and currently have
diminished functionality within the functional categories identified in the stream functional pyramid(Harman, Starr,
Tweedy, Clemmon, Suggs, Miller.2012). Based on these areas of impacted functionality and potential for functional
uplift,this Mitigation Plan has been produced identifying the proposed mitigation activities and associated credit
generation shown in Table 7 and Table 2.
All mitigation areas within the Site will be protected in perpetuity by a conservation easement totaling 110.1 acres.
The Conservation Easement document will be in the form described in Section X of the Middle Neuse Umbrella
Mitigation Baking Instrument("UMBI").
Table 1 -Proposed Stream Mitigation Summary
Existing Length(ft.) Proposed Length(ft.)fCredit Ratio Credit
PS—R1 Headwater Restoration 968 968 1:1 968
PS—R2 Restoration 2,217 2,448 1:1 2,448
PS—R3 Restoration 1,205 1,318 1:1 1,318
I T2 Headwater Restoration 1017 1,017 1:1 1,017
UT3 Headwater Restoration 980 980 1.1 980
Total stream lengths and sub-total Credits 6,543 6,897 6,924
BUFFER ADJUSTMENT TO STREAM CREDITS(SEE'WILMINGTON DISTRICT STREAM BUFFER CREDIT
3799
CALCULATOR"WORKSHEETS IN Appendix E—Buffer Credit Calculations)
TOTAL STREAM CREDITS 7,267
Table 2 -Proposed Wetland Mitigation Summary
[Mitigation Approach Mitigation Area lac.) Wetland Mitigation Ratio Credits
Restoration 51.4 1:1 51.4
TOTAL WETLAND CREDITS 5L4
5 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT
I May 2022

1 .2 SITE SELECTION
As part of the Middle Neuse UMB,the B56 Site is proposed to provide compensatory mitigation for
permitted impacts within the Middle Neuse Watershed (HUC 03020202). The larger Neuse River Basin
has been a focal point for water quality concerns for almost three decades due to sediment disturbances
in upstream rural development and nutrient loading from upstream agricultural land use. Development
within this basin is predicted to increase—especially with the proposed Kinston Bypass construction,
which will likely increase development around the proposed interchanges. As such, the B56 Site aims to
provide protection and the potential for significant water quality and aquatic habitat improvements in this
sensitive region. The B56 Site was identified as a strong candidate for mitigation based on its potential for
uplift as well as the following criteria (as originally documented in the prospectus phase):
• Access—Potential sites must have permanent, deeded access.
• Proximity to Impacts—Potential sites must be within the 8-digit HUC in which impacts are
anticipated to occur.
• Watershed Impact—Restoring, enhancing, and protecting a potential site must contribute to the
overall improvement of the watershed in which it is found.
• Restoration Potential—Potential sites must have a combination of wetland and stream
restoration. Sites with historical alterations, such as silviculture, will generally be given priority
for development.
• Habitat Connectivity—Potential sites must contribute to creating larger, contiguous conservation
properties to help support habitat diversity, quality, and stability.
• Sufficient Water Rights/Resources—Potential sites must have sufficient water rights/resources to
sustain restored and/or protected wetlands and streams.
• Mineral Rights—The Bank Sponsor must own/control the surface mineral rights, including gravel,
sand, salt, and coal.
1 .3 MITIGATION SITE LOCATION, SIZE, AND SERVICE AREA
The B56 Site is in southwest Beaufort County, North Carolina, about 23 miles north of New Bern. It can
be accessed from Pollard Road off State Road 102, approximately 3 miles east of U.S. Highway 17. The
Site is located at 35.4126° North and-77.1526° East(Figure 1—Service Area Map). Overall, the Site includes
the restoration of multiple tributaries and riparian wetlands, some of which currently are within narrow
bands of hardwood forest near active timber production.
The Site is in the Creeping Swamp sub-basin of the Middle Neuse River Basin (HUC 030202020403)and
the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Level III Ecoregion. The Site sits in the Department of Water Resources
("DWR") Sub-basin 03-04-09. HUC 03020202 is situated downstream of HUC 03020201 (which contains
Raleigh and Durham)and HUC 03020203 (which includes Smithfield, Goldsboro, Farmville, and other
heavily agricultural areas). The local Creeping Swamp sub-basin is predominantly used for timber
production, with some agriculture and very little existing commercial, industrial, or residential
development.
The B56 Site, as a mitigation site under the framework of the Middle Neuse UMB, is proposed to produce
stream and wetland credits that will be used to offset permitted impacts to aquatic resources within the
Bank's service area. The service area associated with the B56 Site is defined as the United States
Geological Survey(USGS) 8-digit HUC within which the Site is located-the Middle Neuse 02 HUC (HUC
03020202) (Figure 7—Service Area Map).
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 6
May 2022

1 .4 OWNERSHIP
BANK OWNER, SPONSOR, AND LONG-TERM STEWARD
Weyerhaeuser NR Company
Contact: Doug Hughes
Address: 406 Cole Road
Hattiesburg, MS 39402
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
As the landowner, Weyerhaeuser NR Company will provide access to the property for establishment
(including granting the conservation easement), operation, management of the Site, and long-term
management of the property within the framework of the Middle Neuse UMBI.The owner will retain all
rights and responsibilities of ownership subject to the terms of the Conservation Easement(included as
Appendix 1—Conservation Easement Documents),which shall be placed on the property prior to the first release
of mitigation credits.
As the Bank Sponsor, Weyerhaeuser NR Company maintains the rights to permit, develop, maintain, and
operate the Middle Neuse UMB and its associated sites, including The B56 Site, in accordance with the
terms of the Middle Neuse UMBI and this Mitigation Plan and subject to the terms and conditions of the
conservation easement that will be established over the property.
Weyerhaeuser NR Company will be responsible for maintenance of the Site's aquatic resources as
described in the Long-Term Management Plan, in Section 8.6 of this document. Long-term management
responsibilities will begin at the end of the bank's monitoring phase (and continue in perpetuity.
CONSERVATION EASEMENT HOLDER
The Conservation Easement will be held by Unique Places To Save
(httIDS://www.uniqueolacestosave.orci), a 501 (c)(3)nonprofit conservation organization located in Chapel
Hill, North Carolina. Founded in 2014, Unique Places To Save was founded to"move beyond barriers to
address unmet needs in the fields of natural and cultural heritage, farming, community, and technology."
Unique Places To Save is an entrepreneurial nonprofit organization that invests in, and enhances the
places that make communities unique. To date, the organization holds fifteen (15)conservation
easements.
A copy of the Conservation Easement document is included as Appendix 1—Conservation Easement Documents.
7 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan -DRAFT
I May 2022

2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH
2.1 WATERSHED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS AND MITIGATION NEEDS
The Middle Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020202) has been significantly impacted by agricultural land
uses, extensive ditching, and lack of riparian buffer. Development within this basin is predicted to
increase, especially with construction of the Kinston Bypass. This bypass will increase mobility in the area
and spur development around proposed interchanges, likely creating additional impacts to the area. The
Middle Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020202)consists of 1,008 square miles with more than 340 miles of
stream and is primed for significant local growth. Among the five (5)counties that make up the watershed
(Beaufort, Craven, Lenoir, Pitt, and Wayne Counties), Pitt County is forecasted to grow the most rapidly,
with 5.8% by 2030".The B56 Site represents a valuable opportunity to restore natural streams and
headwater systems to offer long-term protection to essential habitat and aquatic resources as growth and
development comes to the area.
This Site's goals and objectives described below are consistent in addressing the major stressors
identified in the 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities ("RBRP")document produced by the North
Carolina Department of Mitigation Services("NCDMS").
**https:llwww.osbm.nc.govlmedia/2247/download?attachment (accessed April 7, 2022).
2.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
I WATERSHED SCALE GOALS
The Neuse RBRP 2010 document produced by the NCDMS spells out the Middle Neuse Basin
restoration and protection goals. Applicable goals stated are as follows:
• Promote nutrient and sediment reduction in agricultural areas by restoring and preserving
wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers.
• Continue targeted implementation of projects under the Nutrient Offset and Buffer programs, as
well as focusing Department of Transportation ("DOT")sponsored restoration in areas where they
will provide the ecosystem's most functional improvement.
Mitigation proposed as part of the B56 Site addresses these specific RBRP goals.A significant length of
stream mitigation,wetland mitigation, and riparian corridor enhancement and preservation will improve
water quality within the Middle Neuse Basin. Additionally,these projects are being implemented now to
offset future impacts that could occur as part of the Kinston Bypass construction and future development
that may occur because of the roadway improvements.
SITE-SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
• Fill ditches that currently are draining headwater valley systems and reestablish the historic
headwater valley system to accomplish the following:
o Restore hydrology to the headwater valley system to restore wetland systems within
the headwaters.
o Restore original headwater stream system to provide more frequent flooding of the adjacent
headwater wetlands and valley.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 8
May 2022

o Supplement existing trees and roots in headwater systems with appropriate vegetation to
encourage stabilized flow paths through restored headwater systems.
o Restore native riparian buffers.
o Restore native wetland vegetation.
• Restore intermittent and perennial streams with a Priority 1 restoration approach to:
o Reestablish the restored channel to the center of its valley and restore appropriate pattern,
dimension, and profile.
o Because of elevating the stream through a Priority 1 approach, restore adjacent riparian
wetland hydrology. This also will address the cross-sectional dimensions of the channel to
return it to a stream hydraulically connected to its floodplain versus its current ditched and
disconnected/incised state.
o Restore profile and habitat diversity by reestablishing riffle/ripple and pool sequences(i.e.,
habitat transitions)throughout the restored stream systems to provide depth variability.
o Establish a 150-foot-wide vegetated buffer to each site of the Priority 1 restoration and
transition reaches.
o Establish and/or protect a minimum 50-foot-wide vegetated buffer to each side of the
headwater reaches.
o Provide additional buffer, outside the required 50 feet along restored headwater systems,to
protect restored wetlands.
• Where possible, preserve channel reaches to provide a contiguous riparian corridor throughout
the site.
• Reestablish natural overland flow patterns within the adjacent buffers and riparian wetlands by
removing planting rows and disrupting the drainage effect of ditches within the buffer.
• Restore natural topography in the floodplains, including minor depression and mounds that
promote diversity of hydrologic conditions and habitats.
• Restore site wetland hydrology by promoting storage of surface water, increasing surface
ponding and infiltration, decreasing drainage capacity, and imposing a higher water table across
the floodplain and wetlands.
2.3 ASSURANCE OF SUFFICIENT WATER RIGHTS, CONTROL OF
MINERALS, AND ACCESS
Sufficient water rights exist to support the long-term sustainability of the Site.There are no severed rights
on the property.
2.4 SITE PROTECTION
In accordance with Section X(Site Protection)found in the Middle Neuse UMBI, the Bank Sponsor,
Weyerhaeuser NR Company, plans to protect the site by applying a conservation easement.A copy of
the Conservation Easement document is included as Appendix I—Conservation Easement Documents.
9 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
I May 2022

3.0 SITE BASELINE
3.1 EXISTING WATERSHED CONDITIONS
The stream system proposed for mitigation consists of the Pollard Swamp stream channel and two (2)
unnamed tributaries. The headwaters for this system occur onsite and are included in the mitigation area.
Silviculture is the primary land use within the headwater system. In some reaches, a hardwood buffer has
been left intact where the adjacent floodplain typically is too inundated for pine harvesting. In these
reaches, the center of the valley typically has been ditched, draining the headwater system.Watershed
summary information for the system is provided in the table below.
Table 3 — Watershed Overview
Level IV Ecoregion 63e Mid-Atlantic Flatwoods
River Basin Neuse
USGS 8-digit Hydrologic Unit 03020202
USGS 12-digit Hydrologic Unit 030202020403
DWR Sub-Basin 03-04-09
Project Watershed 1 Percent Impervious
Beaufort 56 807 Ac 0.11%
The watershed sits within the Carolina Flatwoods ecoregion (Level IV), which occur in the nearly level
coastal plain with frequently high-water tables and large areas of poorly drained soil.While the watershed
currently is occupied by significant commercial loblolly pine plantations, the large areas of loamy, organic
soils historically were home to significant biological diversity compared to the Mid-Atlantic Flatwood region
to the north. Restoring and preserving headwater systems is especially valuable to the health and water
quality of the watershed because of its shallow topography.
3.2 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION
All reaches identified on-site, including each unnamed tributary and named swamp system (Pollard
Swamp), are identified as Class C waters with additional designations of nutrient sensitive waters
("NSW")and swamp waters("SW"). The system joins Clayroot Swamp, which is listed as impaired and
drains to an impaired segment of Swift Creek.
SITE SOILS
The on-site soils are derived from deposits on marine terraces within the coastal plain.These soils were
deposited between the Pliocene and Pleistocene epochs, where ocean levels were high enough to form
flat terraces across the coast of North America and deposit marine sands,silts, and clays.The on-site
soils are described by site section and soil type below.The soils that occur on-site are presented in Figure
5-NRCS 5offs and Figure 6-Hydric Soils.The soils further described below occur in areas planned for wetland
restoration.These areas currently do not meet wetland hydrology parameters due to past ditching and
stream incision.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT 10
May 2022

Leon Sand
Leon Sand ("Lo") is a sandy soil that forms on flats in marine terraces created from sandy fluvio-marine
deposits during prehistoric periods of high sea levels. The profile consists of medium sand from 0 to 15
inches and fine sand from 15 to at least 80 inches (end of profile).The soil is highly conductive, with
hydraulic conductivity values in the most confining layers (fine sand) of as high as 1.98 inches per hour.
The Leon soil occurs on-site adjacent to the stream corridors of Pantego loam. The water table is
consistently at 0 to 12 inches in depth and the soil has a hydric rating of 80.
Pantego Loam
Pantego Loam ("Pa")forms in broad interstream divides on marine terraces and consists of mostly loam
and sandy loam. The soil profile consists of loam from 0 to 18 inches and a sandy clay loam from 18 to 80
inches(end of profile).The soil is poorly drained with high available water storage and a hydric rating of
90. Fitting with its description, the Pantego soils occur within the tributary corridors.
Tomotley Fine Sandy Loam
Tomotley Fine Sandy Loam ("To")forms in depressions on terraces along the coastal plain and consists
of medium-to-fine sandy loam.The soil profile is made up of fine sandy loam from 0 to 12 inches, sandy
clay loam from 12 to 42 inches, sandy loam from 42 to 50 inches, and loamy sand from 50 to 80 inches
(end of profile).The soil profile is poorly drained but has a high hydraulic conductivity rating and a hydric
rating of 91.Tomotley soils occur in the western edge of the Site.
BASELINE STREAM CONDITIONS
Descriptions of each existing reach condition are outlined below. Figure 7—watershed provides watershed
acreages for each reach and Table 1 provides existing lengths. Additionally, representative photos are
included in Appendix B—Photo Pages.Figure 8 shows existing Site conditions.
Pollard Swamp ("PS") Reach 'I, UT2, and UT3
Historically, Pollard Swamp Reach 1, UT2, and UT3 are headwater systems that have been ditched and
disconnected from the adjacent floodplain to drain adjacent areas. North Carolina Stream Assessment
Method ("NC SAM")scores for each reach are low, due to the incised and disconnected nature of the
existing conditions, and bank ratios for each reach range from 2.5 to 4.0. NCSAM forms for the stream in
Appendix G—NCSAM Forms.
Pollard Swamp ("PS")- Reaches 2 and 3
The lower portion of Pollard Swamp is an incised channel that has been ditched and currently acts as a
roadside ditch. Historically, reaches 2 and 3 were shallow E-type stream channel that formed at the
downstream extent of the PS headwater system. Currently, due to the incised and ditched nature of the
channel, it is disconnected from the floodplain and lacks natural pattern and bedform diversity. The NC
SAM rating of the lower reach of PS is low, primarily due to its entrenched condition and inability to
frequently access its historic floodplain.
I BASELINE WETLAND CONDITIONS
All areas within the Beaufort 56 site boundary have been field reviewed (Figure S—Existing Conditions).While
large portions of riparian areas along each system have hydric soils and, historically, have been
11 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank ` Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
I May 2022

headwater and riparian wetlands, there are currently no existing wetlands on-site.A request for a
preliminary jurisdictional determination is being submitted concurrently with this mitigation plan.
3.3 ENDANGERED/THREATENED SPECIES
Table 4 includes a full list of state and federally protected species known to occur in Beaufort County.
Current Site conditions do not provide suitable habitat for the listed species.Also, none of the listed
species have been observed during on-site reconnaissance. The restoration of the Site's streams and
wetlands, however, may result in potentially suitable aquatic and forest habitat for the species noted.
Table 4—Beaufort County Protected Species
(NC Natural Herit Pr ram,htt J/wwwnmh .or data's eries-communi -search,u dated Februa 9,2019).
Taxonomic
Group Scientific Name Common Na Habitat•
_ site
Neuse River rivers and large streams in Neuse
Amphibian Necturus lewisi Waterdog SC PT and Tar drainages[endemic to North No
Carolina)
Amphibian Pseudacris ornata Ornate Chorus Frog E swamps,savannas,wooded ponds No
and pools
Rana capita(syn. Carolina Gopher breeds in temporary fish free pools;
Amphibian E forages in sandy woods,especially No
Rana capita capita) Frog
pine-oak sandhills
Bird Ammodramus Henslow s Sparrow E clearcut pocosins and other damp No
henslowii weedy fields[breeding season only]
mature forests near large bodies of
Bird Naliaeetus Bald Eagle T BGPA water[nesting};rivers,lakes,and No
leucocepholus sounds[foraging][breeding evidence
only]
Bird lxobrychus exilis Least Bittern fresh or brackish marshes[breeding No
evidence only]
Red-cockaded mature open pine forests,mainly in
Bird Picoides borealis Woodpecker E E longleaf pine[breeding evidence No
only]
Wayne's Black- nonriverine wetland forests,
Bird Setophogo Wrens especiallyGreen E especially where white cedar or No
waynei cypress are mixed with hardwoods
Warbler [breeding evidence only]
Roanoke,Tar,Neuse,Cape Fear,
Freshwater Yadkin-Pee Dee drainages.Prefers
Bivalve Fusconala masoni Atlantic Pigtoe E PT No
medium to large streams with large
substrate.
Freshwater Acipenser brackish water of large rivers and
Fish brevirostrum Short nose Sturgeon E E estuaries;spawns in freshwater No
areas
Freshwater Acipenser
Fish oxyrinchus Atlantic Sturgeon E E coastal waters,estuaries,large rivers No
oxyrinchus
Mammal Canis nlfus Red Wolf T EXP swamps,pocosins,extensive forests Potential
Corynorhinus Eastern Big-eared roosts in hollow trees,old buildings,
Mammal ro fnesquii macrons Bat SC and beneath bridges,usually near No
IF water
Mammal Trichechus manatus West Indian warm waters of estuaries and river
T T No
Manatee mouths
Alligator I fresh to slightly brackish lakesL ,
Reptile mississippiensis American Alligator I T TES/A} ponds,rivers,and marshes No
Reptile I Crotalus horridus Timber Rattlesnake wetland forests in the Coastal Plain; Potential
rocky,upland forests elsewhere
Reptile ll?alaclemys Diamondback SC I salt or brackish marshes,estuaries No
terrapin Terrapin
The Middle Neuse Steam and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 12
May 2022 I

Re the Nerodia sipedon Carolina salt or brackish marshes(endemic to No
p williomengelsi Watersnake North Carolina)
Sistrurus millarius Carolina Pigmy pine fiatwoods,pine/oak sandhills,
Potential
miliarius Rattlesnake other pine/oak forests
Vascular Aeschynomene freshwater to slightly brackish tidal
Plant virginico SensitiveJointvetch No T T marshes and wet ditches i
Vascular brackish marshes
Eleochoris cellufosa Gulfcoast Spikerush E interdune ponds, No
Plant &tidal freshwater marshes
Vascular Lysimachia Rough-leaf
E E pocosin/savanna ecotones,pocosins No
Plant osperulifolio _ Loosest rife
Vascular Plotonthera niveo Snowy Orchid T wet savannas No
Plant
Vascular Polygonum Seabeach Knotweed E ocean and sound beaches No
Plant — gloucum
Vascular Ponthievo blackwater forests and swamps,
Shadow-witch T No
Plant _ rocemosa _ especially over marl
Vascular Sagittorio Grassleaf E fresh to slightly brackish marshes, No
Plant I weatherbiono _ Arrowhead streams,swamps,and pond margins
Vascular Spironthes eatonli Eaton's Ladies'- E pine savannas and pine-oak sandhills No
Plant tresses
3.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES
A search of the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources-State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO)GIS Web Service (http://ciis.ncdcr.ciov/hpoweb/, accessed January 3, 2019)showed no known
significant historic or archeological resources on site or immediately adjacent to the site. Na impacts to
such resources if they do occur are anticipated.
3.5 REGULATED FLOODPLAINS
The site is located in an Area of Minimal Flood Hazard(Zone X-FIRM panel 3720564000L). No FEMA
coordination is required to work in this area.
3.6 EXISTING SITE CONSTRAINTS
There are no known constraints that are not being addressed through design. The only known design
constraints are:
■ An existing dirt road that crosses the site along the PS Reach 2 section of channel.
o The existing culvert under this road is to be upsized with a wider/larger culvert to
improve the hydraulic connection from the upstream side of the road to the downstream
side.
o The new culvert will be elevated to match the higher stream invert that was designed to
provide a Priority 1 restoration and thus promote floodplain connectivity.
o The new culvert invert will also be installed 1.0 foot below the stream invert in order to
better allow for fish passage.
o The conservation easement will have a break to accommodate the road; no mitigation
credits will be generated from the break in the road.
• Reach 3 will tie into the existing channel as it leaves the site.
o The lower 550 feet of PS-Reach 3 will transition from the Priority 1 restoration down to
tie into the lower existing invert of the channel as the stream channel leaves the site.
13 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
I May2022

4.0 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL
Based on data and observations collected from the watershed analysis, site visits, and reference material,
Table 5 outlines areas of potential uplift and a work plan associated with the uplift of each design
consideration. These parameters, and their associated design considerations, have been developed to fit
under the framework of the Harman Stream Functions Pyramid. Maximum practical uplift potential for
each functional level, including stream hydrology, hydraulics, geomorphology, physical chemistry, and
biology, were scrutinized based on the existing conditions and limitations associated with adjacent land
use, watershed condition, and landscape variables. The content of this Mitigation Plan was guided by
these observed functional uplift areas to best serve the project and improve overall site conditions.
Table 5 -Stream Mitigation Work Plan
Design Consideration Work Plan(if not functioning or functioning at-risky
Hydrologic Function
Restore multi-zone hardwood and vegetative buffer to slow overland
Overland Flow flow and reduce sedimentation.Identify areas of concentrated flow
Surface Flow and such as lateral ditches that enter the proposed conservation
Watershed Contribution easement and fill these ditches and locations of concentrated flow.
Vegetative Buffer Also,implement floodplain depressions to dissipate energy and slow
water entering the conservation easement.
Hydraulic Function
Bank Height Ratios Restore natural bankfull dimensions and reestablish hydrologic
(BHR) access to the floodplain by raising existing channel bottoms or
designing new channel with appropriate base width and bankfull
Entrenchment Ratio dimensions based on regional curves and reference reach data.The
Floodplain Connectivity (ER) primary approach throughout all reaches is to reconnect the channel
• to its historic floodplain by filling in ditches through headwater
Dimensionless Rating systems and implementing Priority 1 restoration where feasible.
Curve Floodplains and adjacent wetlands will be restored to promote the
storage and infiltration of surface water.
Bankfull Velocity Reduce channel erosion and stabilize sediment transport within the
channel by selecting bankfull dimensions and channel
Bankfull Shear Stress geomorphology to optimize stream power and velocity and minimize
Flow Dynamics negative impacts from excess shear stress.Changes to the
dimensions of the channels will include construction of a channel
Bankfull Stream Power with appropriate bank height ratios(1.0)and appropriate bedform
diversity to dissipate energy across the floodplain and channel.
Reestablish channel pattern and profile,removing existing ditches
Meander Width Ratios that drain surrounding groundwater areas. Raised groundwater
conditions along the stream banks restore hyporheic zones and allow
Groundwater/Surface
for groundwater and surface water exchange. Floodplains and
Water Exchange
adjacent wetlands will be restored to promote surface water storage
Bedform diversity and infiltration.Priority 1 combined with decreasing floodplain
drainage capacity will impose a higher water table across the site.
Geomorphic Function
Large Woody Debris Reestablish hardwood buffer along riparian zone to provide shade,
Large Woody Debris
Index(LWDI)compared detritus,and large and small woody debris to supplement habitat
Transport and Storage
to reference provided by in-stream structures in the channel and buffer area.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 14
May 2022

Rosgen Stream Channel
Succession Scenarios
Design new channel with intentional P-P spacing,radius of curvature,
(2010)
Channel Evolution — - riffle slopes,and bankfull dimensions to regulate channel type and
Simon Channel
development.
Evolution Model Stages
(1989)
Meander Width Ratios Design channels with appropriate width-to-depth ratios and
Bank Migration/
Bank Erosion Hazard meander widths,as well as radius of curvature,to prevent unnatural
_
Index(BEHI) bank erosion and excess sedimentation.Plant stabilizing vegetation
Lateral Stability
and live stakes on the banks to reduce bank recession and
Width-to-Depth Ratios
sedimentation.
Varying widths of vegetative buffers will provide valuable hydrologic
and hydraulic benefits to the overbank and transitional areas of the
Riparian Vegetation Vegetative Buffer
stream reaches and headwater systems,including stabilization,
energy dissipation,and natural habitat.
Percent Riffle Provide mechanism for channel bedform revitalization through
Bed-form Diversity Pool-to-Pool Spacing appropriate channel profile and dimensions that will subsequently
Depth Variabilityalter sediment deposition,transport,and channel stability.
Introducing proper pool-to-pool spacing and riffle/ripple grades will
support deposition of sediment and establishment of stable natural
Bed Material channel bed material.Additionally,wood structures such as log
Bed Material
Composition Relative to vanes,log cross vanes,brush and roll riffles,and toe wood will be
Characterization
Reference used to provide immediate bedform diversity creating habitat
transitions like references
Physicochemical Function
Establish vegetative buffer to decrease sediment erosion from
riparian areas and from incoming surface flow from outside of the
Vegetative Buffer and conservation easement.The buffer also will reduce runoff velocities
Water Quality
Bank Stability which will decrease the potential for channel bank erosion.
Regrading and planting channel banks(where applicable)will reduce
the potential for bank erosion and further reduce sediment loading.
Establish riparian buffer along headwater systems,as well as
Establish Riparian ephemeral,intermittent,and perennial streams within the
Water Temperature
Buffer conservation easement.Narrowing low flow when channel is
overwide will further reduce temperature.
In-Stream Riffle Reestablish appropriate channel dimensions and pool-to-pool
Structures spacing to restore groundwater to surface water exchange in the
Nutrients channel banks and revitalize hyporheic zones where micro bacteria
Profile and Bankfull
breakdown and consume complex nutrients from fertilizers,like
Dimensions
nitrates into atmospheric Nitrogen.
Biological Function
Aquatic Habitat Revitalize riparian buffer conditions,install instream structures for
stability and habitat(brush and roll rifles,brush toe,log vanes,and
Wetland Habitat
Aquatic organism log cross vanes),and raise channel bed to reconnect flow to the
communities Groundwater and floodplain and enhance hyporheic activity.The installation of riffle
Surface Water structures provides areas for aquatic habitat,as well as areas for
Connectivity turbulence that oxygenates water.
15 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT
I May 2022

5.0 MITIGATION PLAN
5.1 REFERENCE SITE AND DESIGN PARAMETERS
Design of the proposed restoration reaches within the B56 Site were based on multiple considerations
and sources of design parameters. The following were used for the stream and wetland design:
• Four(4) reference stream sites located within the Carolina Flatwoods level-IV ecoregion.
• On-site relic channels and relic wetland systems.
• Multiple coastal plain regional curves and accompanying data.
• Current U.S.Army Corps of Engineers ("USACE")and NCDMS guidelines/design parameters.
Searches were conducted upstream/downstream of the Site and into surrounding watersheds to find
suitable references that contained similarities to the Site streams including level IV physiographic
ecoregion, watershed, valley slope, and morphology. No reference reaches were identified immediately
upstream or downstream of the site or in the surrounding watershed. Four(4) reference reaches from
multiple reference databases (NCDOT and SweetlGeratz)were selected outside of the watershed but
within the Carolina Flatwoods level-IV physiographic eco-region. The reference reaches were selected to
represent the probable configurations for the proposed streams. The data shown in Table 6 helped to
provide a basis for evaluating the project site and determining the stream systems that may have been
present historically and/or how they may have been influenced by changes within the watershed. A
description of each reference reach is included below. Geomorphic parameters for these reference
reaches are summarized in Appendix D-Geomorphology.
Reference streams provide geomorphic parameters of a stable system, which can be used to inform
design of stable channels of similar stream types in similar landscapes and watersheds.While reference
reach data can be a useful aid in designing channel dimension, pattern, and profile, there are limitations
in smaller stream systems. The flow patterns and channel formation for most reference reach quality
streams is often controlled by slope, watersheds,groundwater inputs and larger trees and/or other deep-
rooted vegetation. Some meander geometry parameters, such as radius of curvature, are particularly
affected by vegetation control. Pattern ratios observed in reference reaches may not be applicable or are
often adjusted in the design criteria to create designs that are less likely to erode after construction before
the permanent vegetation is established.
REFERENCE STREAM REACHES
Beaverdam Branch
The Beaverdam Branch reference reach is located approximately 1,000 feet downstream of SR 1119
outside Trenton, North Carolina in Jones County. Beaverdam Branch is classified as a Rosgen E5 stream
type.The stream flows through a wide wooded swamp floodplain with a valley slope of 0.1%-0.4% and
sinuosity of 1.9. Most of floodplain would be considered wetland with numerous seeps and side
tributaries. The 3.0 square mile watershed is mostly agricultural (70.4% cultivated)with the remainder
being bottomland forest/hardwood swamps, shrublands, mixed upland hardwoods, and some single-
family residences.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 16
May 2022

Black Branch
Black Branch is in Craven County just north-west of New Bern off SR 1101, within Croatan National
Forest.This site was classified as a blackwater E stream type and has a watershed of 1.2 square miles.
The reach has a valley slope of 0.6% and channel slope of 0.4%giving it a sinuosity of 1.7. The stream
maintains an entrenchment ratio of 15-25. The watershed of the reference reach lies almost entirely
within the National Forest boundaries made up of predominantly silviculture southern yellow pine with
some bottomland forest, mixed upland hardwoods, and mixed shrubland.
Tributary to Town Creek
The unnamed tributary("UT")to Town Creek is located north of SR 1413(Town Creek Rd NE) near
Belville, NC in Brunswick County.The stream was classified as a blackwater E stream type with a
watershed of 0.6 square miles. This reach flows through a semi mature bottomland forest and has an
average valley slope of 0.72% and an average channel slope of 0.35%. The channel has a width-to-depth
ratio of 8.9, an entrenchment ratio of over 20, and a sinuosity of 2.0.The watershed for this reference
reach is mostly used for cultivated silviculture with some forested land and shrubland.
Tributary to Hunters Creek
The UT to Hunters Creek is in Jones County,south of Great Lake Road, Croatan National Forest.The
watershed is 0.7 square miles and the land use within the watershed is comprised of cultivated
silviculture, semi mature-mature bottomland forest/hardwood swamps, shrublands, and mixed upland
hardwoods. The UT to Hunters Creek reference site was classified as a C6 stream type with a sinuosity of
1.5. The channel has a width to depth ratio of 19 and an entrenchment ratio of 16. The reach has a valley
slope of 0.4%while the channel slope is 0.2%.
HYBRID ECOREGION-SPECIFIC REGIONAL CURVE
The published Rural NC Coastal Plain regional curve (Doll, et al.,2003)along with an additional NC
Coastal Plain regional curve(Sweet and Geratz, 2003)was used to check hydraulic geometry based on
watershed using regional relationships. A hybrid level IV ecoregion-specific curve was developed for the
Carolina Flatwoods ecoregion using data from the two published regional curves and supplementary data
from Kimley-Horn's internal reference reach database.Analytical review of applicable streams from
multiple stream reference databases and developing a hybrid regional curve, provided the most pertinent
background information to determine the appropriate design parameters given the existing conditions and
overall site functional uplift potential. Additionally, reference parameters from Kimley-Horn's internal
database based on successful past projects were consulted and analyzed.Appendix D-Geomorphology
illustrates the NC Coastal Plain curves along with other data used for these analyses.
I HEADWATER REFERENCE
In addition to design criteria reference data(mentioned above), design and placement of the headwater
restoration reach systems required consideration of the valley slope, contributing watershed, ground
water inputs, curvature, soils, precipitation and ecoregion. Research provided in "Mapping Headwater
Streams: Intermittent and Perennial Headwater Stream Model Development and Spatial Application" by
17 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan -DRAFT
I May 2022

Russell (2008) shows that contributing watershed is the usually the dominating factor in predicting
intermittent and perennial stream points of origin. For the Coastal Plain it was found that the mean
contributing watershed at the point of origin of intermittent streams is about 40 acres. For perennial
streams that value is about 100 acres.
Table 6-Distribution of Intermittent and Perennial Origin Contributing Watershed(acre)
Carolina Slate Carolina Slate stern Blue Northern Outer Rolling Coastal
Belt-A - Ridge Foothills Piedmont Plain Triassic Basin
kJ-
int per int per int per int per int per int per
Min 0.20 0.72 0.05 2.04 0.23 0.24 1.55 2.54 0.16 7.16 0.10 0.13
10% 1.47 7.53 0.77 2.39 2.17 1.02 1.80 4.07 7.52 10.76 1.24 1.89
25% 2.85 11.58 4.89 9.52 3.72 2.91 4.48 10.05 11.15 28.82 1.95 3.27
50% 7.36 15.99 23.80 37.50 4.60 4.98 8.82 16.18 25.67 84.00 3.70 6.85
Mean 11.20 23.74 50.86 60.85 5.16 5.27 12.72 20.52 40.66 95.59 5.11 10.40
75% 14.47 35.40 69.96 68.16 6.34 7.04 15.06 27.11 55.15 122.00 7.16 15.79
9096 27.39 43.33 142.41 187.26 8.16 9.81 22.99 41.31 101.33 217.34 11.87 27.80
Max 74.63 107.00 322.27 328.28 14.60 15.85 115.95 64.81 173.65 343.66 16.51 32.49
(Russell,2008)
I REFERENCE SITE WETLANDS
Wetland restoration adjacent to the headwater systems will be based on hydrology restored through the
process of restoring headwater stream systems and implementing Priority 1 stream restoration. Relic
wetlands within the headwater systems are primarily impacted by extensive ditching through the middle of
the valley, which has drained the systems.The relic hydric soils and valley features are already in place.
The system uplift will be based on the headwater channel and Priority 1 channel design which will raise
the groundwater table. Any wetland restoration that results from the stream restoration work will be
monitored and tracked. On-site reference wetland systems (upper 56B) in similar landscape positions
(i.e., headwater or riparian) and mapped soils will provide design and monitoring success criteria for
hydrology and vegetative community reference(see Figure 6-Hydric Soils for hydric soils and Figure 77-
Monitoring Plan for monitoring locations).
I DESIGN PARAMETER DEVELOPMENT
Design parameters were first based on the existing valley shape and slope, on-site relic stream systems,
the reference stream dimensionless parameters, and finally checked and confirmed using multiple
regional curves for North Carolina's Coastal Plain region.Appendix D-Geomorphology outlines these
developed parameters.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 18
May 2022

5.2 MITIGATION WORK PLAN
STREAM MITIGATION WORK PLAN
A summary of the mitigation approach and lengths for each reach is provided in the table below.
Table 7-Stream Mitigation Approach Summary
ANTImilliMmilk_Existing Length(ft.) Proposed Length(ft.)
PS-R1 Headwater 968 968
PS-R2 Restoration 2,217 2,448
PS-R3 Restoration 1,205 1,318
1172 Headwater 980 980
UT3 Headwater 1,173 1,173
Overall Stream Channel Mitigation Approach Description
The 656 site has historically been extensively ditched,which has altered the wetland and stream systems
that used to be located within the headwater valleys of the systems. The overall approach to the system
is to reverse the damage created through ditching. More detailed and reach-specific approaches are
outlined below for restoration reaches, but the overall goal of these approaches is to reconnect the
channel flow with its adjacent riparian floodplain and wetlands and restore native vegetation communities
to restore lost functions of the system.
The design process began with a thorough analysis of existing and historic conditions and functions
within the catchment area for each reach and analysis of hydrologic, hydraulic, and geomorphic functional
impairments within each reach, wetland, and floodplain. From this data, reference systems(e.g., streams,
headwaters, wetlands, and riparian buffers)were selected that represented a stable, healthy system that
manages the same or similar baseline conditions. Through a comparison of existing conditions and relic
performance, as well as historic conditions, major areas of concern and potential uplift were identified.
The concerns include, but are not limited to, bank instability, disconnection from the natural floodplain due
to significant ditching, incision, over-widening of existing channels, and wetland and floodplain drainage.
Site analysis also identified a significant loss of in-stream and riparian wetland habitat (including sources
of shade, woody detritus, and large woody debris for future habitat development).
These issues will be addressed with a watershed-based approach. Starting at the top of the watershed,
the ditches within the valley reaches that show potential for headwater system restoration will be filled.
Downstream of these headwater systems, a Priority 1 approach will be used to continue a reconnection of
the stream hydrology to the adjacent floodplain through the valley;thus, raising the water table. This is a
valley restoration approach that will benefit adjacent wetland areas and the channel instead of only
providing uplift to the channel itself. In addition to raising the invert of the channel back to its historic
elevation, the channel will be returned to its original location along the lower portion of its valley and
appropriate pattern and bedform diversity(profile)will be restored.
Headwater Restoration Approach Description
The on-site headwater systems have been ditched to accelerate drainage, damaging the hydrologic and
ecological functions of these systems. When functioning properly, with gradual progression from linear
wetland systems to channelized stream-wetland system, headwaters offer a vital ecological resource and
19 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank ` Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
I May 2022

mitigate against non point source pollution from the contributing watershed, as well as critical habitat for
aquatic and terrestrial species. Species diversity and frequency benefit from enhanced habitat in the
headwater and buffer areas within the entire B56 Site.As such, special focus has been given to addressing
major deficiencies in on-site headwater resources and the transitions from upland to headwater and
headwater to stream-wetland-floodplain.
Pollard Swamp—Reach 1, UT2, and UT3 within the B56 area each represent headwater mitigation and
aim to remove ditching and enhance riparian/wetland vegetation for a buffering mechanism. They also
aim to provide stabilized flow pathways for overland flow that will reduce sediment contributions from off-
site runoff and dissipate energy from potential sources of concentrated flow. Where relevant, new planted
vegetation will be selected based on its uplift potential for stability and erosion reduction, as well as its
functional value as wetland wildlife habitat. Headwater restoration is proposed to begin on each reach
where the cumulative watershed becomes 40 acres. Research has documented that 40 acres is the
average watershed size in the Coastal Plain Region that can support the formation of an intermittent
channel. (Russell, 2008)The headwater restoration will continue until the watershed size reaches 100
acres, at which point the work will transition to traditional Priority 1 stream restoration.
In general, the headwater restoration approach applied to the reaches listed above will include
the following:
• Fill the existing ditch (use adjacent spoil piles from original ditching activity).
• Fill lateral ditches that tie-in to the existing centerline ditch (using adjacent spoil pile material).
• Ensure appropriate organic topsoil exists (site investigations confirmed plenty of organic topsoil
material on-site).
• Rip and disk (if needed)the freshly placed soil and areas of construction to help ensure soil is
not compacted.
• Reestablish natural overland flow patterns within the adjacent buffers by removing berms and
planted rows and disrupting the drainage effect of ditches within the buffer.
• Restore natural topography in the wetland-floodplain, including minor depression and small
mounds that promote diversity of hydrologic conditions and habitats.
• Restore or enhance site hydrology by promoting surface water storage, increasing surface
ponding and infiltration, decreasing drainage capacity, and imposing a higher water table across
the valley.
• Plant appropriate headwater system vegetation.
• Install woody debris structures to provide immediate stabilization to the freshly filled portions of
the ditch footprint(e.g., log sills or brush mattresses).
• Install coir fiber matting (as necessary) in some locations where concentrated flow is anticipated.
• Plant native vegetation within all restored areas as the contractor works their way out of the
headwater restoration area and down to the lower stream restoration reaches
Stream Restoration Approach Description
Priority 1 restoration is proposed for Pollard Swamp-Reaches 2 and 3. Restoration activities aim to
reconnect flow to the floodplain and provide stable, natural bankfull dimensions, pattern, and profile.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 20
May 2022

These goals are accomplished by filling the existing ditched, incised, and eroding channel and redirecting
flow into a newly constructed natural channel that has been sized and aligned based on the following:
• Relic stream location.
• Valley topography/centerline location.
• Consideration of dimensionless ratios from reference reach conditions.
• Regional curve data.
The following specific improvements are incorporated into the restoration reaches on the Site:
• Dimension—The channel will be reconnected to its historic valley and floodplain by raising the
stream back up from its incised/ditched condition and the channel will have an appropriate
bankfull depth. This will restore the groundwater depths in areas directly adjacent to the channel
and will allow for more frequent floodplain access for storm flows.
• Pattern The channel will be returned to its historic location within its valley as opposed to its
current straight/ditched location.Within the confines and boundary of its historic valley center, the
channel's pattern will be returned based on on-site relic channel patterns, reference reach
dimensionless ratios, and regional curve data.
• Profile—With a restored dimension and pattern,the profile also will be designed to incorporate
bedform diversity with well-defined pools and shallow riffle reaches. In-stream structures will be
installed to provide scour for pools and initial grade control until the new riparian vegetation has
time to establish the root system necessary to hold the restored system in place. In addition,
woody structures—such as the proposed brush and roll riffles and toe-wood—will provide
immediate habitat and stabilization for the newly constructed channel.
• Riparian Buffer—Beyond restoring the natural channel, the stream restoration approach also
reestablishes a native riparian buffer protected with a permanent conservation easement that
provides uplift to site hydrology, channel stability, and availability of natural habitat.
• Flow Patterns—Within the adjacent buffers, natural overland flow patterns will be reestablished
by removing berms, planted rows, etc. and disrupting the drainage effect of ditches within
the buffer.
• Natural Topography—Natural topography in the flood plains, including minor depression and
mounds that promote diversity of hydrologic conditions and habitats, will be restored.
• Site Hydrology—Site hydrology will be restored or enhanced by promoting surface water storage,
increasing surface ponding and infiltration, decreasing drainage capacity, and imposing a higher
water table across the floodplain and wetlands.
Mitigation Approach for Individual Reaches
Mitigation approaches for each reach in the B56 Site have been outlined below. Table 7 provides an
overview of the suggested mitigation activities that will be employed to achieve the targeted objectives
within each reach.
Pollard Swamp—Reach 1
Headwater Restoration-Mitigation activities will aim to restore headwater stream-wetland-floodplain
system functionality by filling in the existing ditched channel and restoring appropriate grade, hydrology,
and vegetative communities. Existing buffer hardwoods will be preserved as much as possible and will
21 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
I May 2022

continue to provide a stabilized flow path for restored stream and riparian wetlands, and a 100-foot buffer
will be added to each side of the valley centerline to protect the restored system and regulate incoming
surface flow from outside the conservation easement.
Pollard Swamp—Reach 2 and 3
Priority I Restoration—Mitigation activities include raising and re-meandering the channel with
appropriate dimensions to reconnect hydrology with the floodplain and restore/enhance riparian wetlands
adjacent to the stream.Within the channel, in-stream structures will be installed, including log cross
vanes, toe wood, and other woody debris to protect restored banks, maintain channel grade in riffles, and
enhance natural habitat within the restored profile.A 150-foot buffer will be added on either side of the
stream valley along Reach 2 and along the East side of Reach 3. A 50-foot buffer will be added along the
West bank of Reach 3.
As Reach 3 reaches its tie in location at the southern end of the Site, the stream will need to be
transitioned from a Priority 1 restoration back down to tie into the existing channel before flowing off-site.
This transition is gradual over the last 430 feet of the reach and is shown on Sheet 13 of the attached
Draft Mitigation Plan Drawings.
UT2 and UT3
Headwater Restoration—Mitigation activities will restore headwater stream systems by filling in existing
ditched channel and restoring gradual grade and hydrology. Existing trees and roots will be supplemented
by tree, shrub, and herbaceous plantings to provide a stabilized flow path for the restored system valley,
and a 100-foot buffer will be planted on either side of the valley.
WETLAND MITIGATION WORK PLAN
Through restoration of the headwater stream systems and Priority 1 restoration of the downstream
systems, riparian and headwater wetlands will be restored throughout the system. Based on
topography/LIDAR and presence of hydric soils,there are wetlands that are anticipated to be restored
through filling of the ditches and restoration of the headwater systems (hydrology and vegetation). These
areas will be monitored after restoration to determine the extent of restoration achieved.A summary of
the mitigation approach and areas for each system is provided in the table below.
Table 8 — Wetland Mitigation Approach Summary
Wetland Unit itigation Credits
WA-1 8.6 Restoration 8.6
WA-2 30.3 Restoration 30.3
WA-3 7.2 Restoration 7 2
WA-4 5.3 Restoration 5.3
Total 51.4 51.4
Wetland Restoration Approach Description
Wetland restoration activities aim to uplift site hydrology, surface and subsurface hydrologic connectivity,
vegetation diversity/density/composition/vigor, and to provide improvements that benefit downstream
waters. On site wetland hydrology will be restored as part of the headwater stream restoration activities,
plugging lateral ditches, and by converting vegetation from commercial pine plantation to bottomland
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 22
May 2022

hardwood forest species. These new plantings will provide flow velocity control, soil stability, habitat, and
additional essential ecosystem functions that will provide essential, permanent habitat for local fauna in
areas where loblolly pine plantations make habitat variable and less diverse. Proposed wetland mitigation
areas are shown in Figure 10.
Included below is a bulleted list of the proposed activities to be completed to accomplish wetland
restoration on the site. Activities to restore these wetland systems include:
• Fill existing ditch as part of the headwater stream restoration approach.
• Fill any lateral ditches that currently drain the wetland restoration areas to the primary ditch.
• Remove berms and spoil piles that exist along ditches.
• Remove pine planting beds within the wetland restoration areas (as applicable) because they
adversely affect drainage.
• Disk (if needed)the disturbed areas prior to planting.
• Re-establish native wetland vegetation within areas currently in pine production and within
disturbed areas.
• Monitor the restored wetland areas for invasive species and treat as necessary to comply with the
success criteria outlined in this document.
The rationale for each wetland restoration unit is provided below:
• WA-1 (8.6 AC)Wetland restoration area is comprised of hydric soils (Lo and Pa), adjacent to
headwater restoration and at an elevation lower than 55.5 feet. Restoration of the headwater area
will limit lateral drainage, restoring wetland hydrology. Areas of planted pine will be cleared and
planted with appropriate hardwood species. Hardwood areas will remain with replanting in any
areas disturbed by stream restoration.
• WA-2 (30.3 AC)Wetland restoration area is comprised of hydric soils (Lo,To and Pa), adjacent to
headwater and priority 1 restoration, and at an elevation lower than 54 feet. Headwater and
stream restoration and plugging of lateral ditches will restore wetland hydrology.Areas of planted
pine will be cleared and planted with appropriate hardwood species. Hardwood areas will remain
with replanting in any areas disturbed by stream restoration. The mitigation area has been offset
by 75-feet to enable the roadside ditch in the southern area to continue to function.
• WA-3 (7.2 AC)Wetland restoration area is comprised of hydric soils (Lo and Pa), adjacent to
headwater restoration, and at an elevation lower than 52 feet. Priority 1 restoration of Reach 2 will
limit lateral drainage and provide overbank flow to restore wetland hydrology. The planted pine
will be cleared and planted with appropriate hardwood species. Cleared fields will be prepped and
planted. Hardwood areas will remain with replanting in any areas disturbed by stream restoration.
The mitigation area has been offset by 75-feet to enable the roadside ditch in the southeastern
area and within the timber area to continue to function.
• WA-4 (5.3 AC)Wetland restoration area is contained within the 50-foot stream buffer area along
Pollard Swamp Reach 2. This area is wholly within Pa soils. Hydrology will be restored through
the Priority 1 restoration of the stream reach. Appropriate riparian wetland planting will be done.
23 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
May 2022

I VEGETATION AND PLANTING PLAN
Planting within the Conservation Easement has been separated into three (3)zones to reflect differences
in purpose and location, as well as differences in vegetation. Zone 1 is located along the stream bank and
serves to provide bank stability and in-stream habitat along the channel. Zone 2 makes up the upland
riparian buffer of each reach, providing a wide range of benefits including physicochemical and
hydrological uplift to the channel as well as overbank habitat and erosion prevention. Zone 3 includes
wetland plantings within the riparian buffer. Buffer widths for either side of each reach are provided in
Table 9. The plant species proposed for zones 1 and 3 were selected based on reference vegetative
conditions and various resources providing guidance on healthy North Carolina Coastal Plain bottomland
hardwood communities. Planting ratios were identified based on relevant guidance to restore natural
bottomland hardwood conditions that were impacted historically by land use and site manipulations. Tree
seedlings will be planted at a density of 500 stems per acre.
Due to the differences in hydrologic purpose and ecological benefit, different planting profiles are
proposed for Headwater and stream mitigation areas.Typical planting sections are provided in the project
plan set,Appendix F—Mitigation Plan Sheets.
Table 9 —Proposed Buffer Widths
Reach Proposed Length Left Buffer width(ft) Right Buffer width(ft]
PS—R1 968 50 50
PS—R2 2,448 150 150
PS—R3 1,318 150 50
UT2 980 50 50
UT3 1,173 50 50
Zone 1 —Stream Bank
Channel stability and geomorphology are dependent in large part on the health and strength of stream bank
vegetation. As such, live stakes selected for Zone 1 have been identified for their rapid growth rate and
high success rates in channel bank conditions. Long term, stream bank vegetative conditions will evolve
through natural secondary succession,eventually transitioning to shade tolerant hardwoods like the riparian
buffer conditions.The table below provides Zone 1 species for live stake planting within these buffer areas.
Table 10—Zone 7 Planting Summary
Stream Bank Live Stake Planting
Wetland Indicator
Common Name Scientific Name
Status
Silky Dogwood (Corn us amomum) FACW
Black Willow (Salixnigra) OBL
Cottonwood (Populus deitoides) FACW
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) OBL
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 24
May 2022

Zone 2- Riparian Buffer and Wetland
Riparian wetland conditions suffer in absence of a stable vegetative stream buffer. Tabe 9 outlines
proposed buffer widths along either side of each reach.Table 11 below provides Zone 2 species for
planting within these buffer and wetland areas.The wetland delineation for each site is shown in Figure 8-
Existing Conditions.
Table 11 -Zone 2 Panting Summary
Upland Zone Planting
Wetland Indicator
Common Name Scientific Name Percent Planted
Status
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda) FACW 20%
(Platanus
American Sycamore FACW 20%
occidentalis)
Green Ash (Fraxirrus FACW 5% —
pennsyivanica)
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos) FACW 20%
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii) FACW 15%
Blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica) FAC 20%
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
6.1 STREAM MITIGATION CREDIT CALCULATIONS
Proposed stream mitigation ratios and credits are included in the table below. These credits are based on
the lengths and approaches as included in the draft Mitigation Plan Sheets. These numbers are subject to
change based on the final design plan drawings that will be produced for construction and based on the
actual constructed project and as-built survey.
Table 12-Proposed Stream Mitigation Credits
Read Mitigation Approach IL Existing Length(ft.) Proposed Length(ft.) Credits
PS—R1 Headwater Restoration 968 968 1:1 968
PS—R2 Restoration 2,217 2,448 1:1 2,448
PS—R3 Restoration 1,205 1,318 1:1 1,318
UT2 Headwater Restoration 980 980 1:1 980
UT3 Headwater Restoration 1,173 1,173 1:1 1,173
Total stream lengths and sub-total Credits 6,543 6,887 6,887
BUFFER ADJUSTMENT TO STREAM CREDITS(SEE"WILMINGTON DISTRICT STREAM BUFFER CREDIT
379.9
CALCULATOR"WORKSHEETS IN Appendix E-Buffer Credit Calculations)
TOTAL STREAM CREDITS 7,267
6.2 WETLAND MITIGATION CREDIT CALCULATIONS
Proposed wetland mitigation ratios and credits are included in the table below. These credits are based
on the delineated areas and restoration approaches as included in the draft Mitigation Plan Sheets.
25 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
I May 2022

These values are subject to change based on the final design plan drawings that will be produced for
construction and based on the actual constructed project and as-built survey.
Table 13 -Proposed Wetland Mitigation Credits
Mitigation Approach(Acres)
Total Wetland
Site Restoration Enhancement Preservation Total Acres
Credits
B56
WA-1 8.6 0.0 0.0 8.6
WA-2 30.3 0.0 0.0 30.3
WA-3 7.2 0.0 0.0 7.2
WA-4 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.3
Total 51.4 0.0 0.0 51.4 51.4
7.0 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
Mitigation credits shall be released and added to the mitigation site ledger in accordance with the
milestones and percentages shown in Table 744 and Table 755.
Table 14-Credit Release Schedule—Streams
Credit Release Schedule and Mi
Credit Release Interim Total
Release Activity
Milestone Release Released
1 Site Establishment 15% 15%
2 Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made pursuant to the 15% 30%
Mitigation Plan
3 Year I monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and interim 10% 4096
performance standards have been met
4 Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and interim ( 10% 5096
performance standards have been met
5 Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and interim 10% 60%
performance standards have been met
6 Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and interim 5% 65%
performance standards have been met
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and interim 10% 75%
performance standards have been met
8 Year b monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and interim 5% 8076
performance standards have been met
9 Year monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and performance 10% 9s
standards have been met
*NOTE:10%reserve credits will be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 26
May 2022

Table 15-Credit Release Schedule—Wetlands
Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Forested Weiland
Credit Release Interim Total
Milestone Release Activity Release Released
1 Site Establishment 15% 15%
2 Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made pursuant to the Mitigation 15% 30%
Plan
3 Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance standards haw been met 10% 40%
4 Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance standards have been met 10% 50%
5 Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance standards haw been met 15% 65%
6 Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance standards have been met 5% 70%
7 Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance standards have been met 15% 65%
8 Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance standards have been met 5% 90%
9 Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that performance standards have been met 10% 100%
8.0 MONITORING PLAN
The Site will be monitored based on the performance standards and monitoring requirements provided
below. Annual monitoring reports will be provided using the IRT monitoring template for the duration of
the 7-year monitoring window. The monitoring plan is outlined in Figure 11-Monitoring Plan.
8.1 STREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Vegetative Monitoring (Streams and Wetlands)
Vegetative monitoring will be conducted per the October 24, 2016"Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" ("NCIRT guidance")with the exception that the sites are
relatively small, and the Sponsor will increase the percent monitored to obtain an accurate measurement
of survival, species variability, and trees per acre. Five (5) percent of the total planted portion of the site
will be monitored with vegetation plots. The NCIRT guidance states that this area requirement can be
adjusted on a case-by-case basis for these types of sites. A combination of fixed(50%)and random
(50%)0.05-acre plots will cover five(5) percent of the planted area on site. Planted area acreage was
determined based on anticipated supplemental planting to expand existing hardwood areas and replace
absent buffers.Tree seedlings will be planted at a density of 500 stems per acre. Planted acreages and
monitoring plot counts are provided in the table below. Locations are shown in Figure 71-Monitoring Plan.
Invasive species will be monitored visually during field visits to ensure that no species threatens the
growth of the planted and native community vegetation. The native community vegetation may include the
presence of some pine species so long as the vegetative performance standards are met as described in
Section 8.3.
Table 16- Vegetative Monitoring Plots
Permanent Random
74.9 37,450 37 37
27 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
I May 2022

Headwater Stream Monitoring
Headwater monitoring will be conducted every year for seven (7)years. Surface flow will be documented
using gauges or photo(s) (i.e., time lapse/game cameras)and will be monitored in accordance with the
2016 guidance.
Stream Channel Stability and Stream Hydrology Monitoring
Channel stability and hydrology monitoring will be conducted, per the 2016 guidance. Due to the narrow
width of the channels in the B56 Site,the Bank Sponsor will place two (2)cross sections per 1,000 feet of
stream. Crest gauges will be installed to monitor channel hydrology and will be capable of monitoring
frequency and duration of overbank events.
Visual Monitoring
Monitoring will be conducted with a walkthrough of the entire project area, looking to identify areas of low
stem density, poor plant vigor, prolonged inundation, native and exotic invasive species, beaver activity,
herbivory, encroachments, indicators of livestock access, or other areas of concern. Results of both
monitoring walkthroughs each year will be reported in the annual monitoring report, where-in
recommended courses of action shall be identified where necessary.Any areas of concern will be
reevaluated on all subsequent visual assessments.
8.2 WETLAND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
MONITORING HYDROLOGY AND REPORTING HYDROLOGIC DATA
Monitoring of areas of wetland restoration will be conducted per the 2016 guidance. Installation of
groundwater equipment will be in accordance with techniques and standards described in the USACE
Technical Standard for Water Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites.Wells will be installed in
wetland mitigation areas, and the location of these wells is shown in Figure 17—Monitoring Plan. Hydrologic
success of wetlands will be determined based on published guidance (IRT 2016)or through comparison
to measured reference condition. Well data will be collected continuously for hydrology measurement
within the wetland restoration areas as shown in Figure 11.
8.3 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
I VEGETATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Success will be identified based on interim stem density criteria provided in the 2016 NCIRT guidance:
• Survival of at least 320 stems per acre at the end of year 3, 260 stems per acre by the end of
year 5, and 210 stems per acre at the end of year 7.
• Per IRT guidance, coastal plain projects must maintain vegetation that averages seven (7)feet in
height at year 5 and ten (10)feet in height at year 7.
• No one species may comprise more than fifty(50) percent of the total composition within any plot.
• Na more than five(5) percent invasive species may occur be present.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 28
May 2022

STREAM CHANNEL STABILITY AND STREAM HYDROLOGY
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Stream Channel Flow(Perennial and Intermittent Channels)
All perennial channels shall receive sufficient flow throughout the monitoring period to maintain an
ordinary high-water mark. Surface flow within intermittent tributaries must be documented to occur every
year for at least thirty(30)consecutive days during the prescribed monitoring period, per the 2016 NCIRT
guidance. Perennial streams must have continuous surface flow. See the"Headwater Stream Flow
Performance Standards" section that follows for headwater systems.
Channel Stability
Bank Height Ratios and Entrenchment Ratios shall meet minimum/maximum requirements as provided in
the 2016 NCIRT guidance, and not differ by more than ten (10) percent from baseline conditions. Bank
Height Ratios shall not exceed 1.2. Entrenchment Ratios shall not be less than 2.2.
Bankfull Events
The project shall remain stable during four(4)separate bankfull events occurring in separate years during
monitoring years 1 through 7.
Headwater Stream Flow Performance Standards
Success will be based on the standards outlined in the 2016 NCIRT guidance for Headwater Stream
Performance Standards. Continuous surface water flow must be documented to occur every year for at
least thirty(30) consecutive days for monitoring years 1 through 7. The extensive ditch drainage system
that will be filled during restoration activities will require a large amount of material to be moved and
placed in the existing ditches.To reduce disturbance within the headwater system existing spoil material
from on-site will be used to fill the ditches and some small portions of the ditches will be graded to act as
vernal pools. It will take a few seasons for an appropriate number of fines to wash into the system
naturally to fill the voids of the newly placed material therefore sealing it up. During years 1 through 3
these fines will work their way into the system and return baseflow to the flow path of the headwater
valley system.Visual identification of natural channel formation indicators will be performed in accordance
with the schedule provided in the 2016 NCIRT monitoring guidance.
WETLAND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Wetland Hydrologic Performance Criteria
All areas of wetland restoration must be monitored to determine whether the restored areas meet the
established percent saturation/hydroperiod thresholds as described in the"Wilmington District Stream
and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update, North Carolina Interagency Review Team"dated October
24, 2016. The areas of proposed wetland restoration adjacent to the project reach contain Pantego (Pa),
Tomotley(To), and Leon (Lo), which require 12-16%, 10-12%, and 7-9%wetland saturation ranges
respectively per"Table 1 -Wetland Saturation Threshold Table"of the above referenced document.
Wetland hydrology will be measured each year with the percentage of saturation based on continuous
days within the growing season.WETS data for New Bern was used to determine the growing season of
29 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
I May 2022

March 23 through November 16 (238 days).' Because the Site has been significantly disturbed through
decades of timber production, it is appropriate to have a lower expected saturation period during the first
two years following Site implementation.
Site wetland hydrology performance standards are shown in the table below.
Table 17 -Wetland Hydrology Performance Standards
Soil Series Years 1-2 Years 3-7 Years 1-2 Years 3-7
Pantego(Pa) 1096 12% 24 29
Tomotley(To) 8% 10% 19 24
Leon(Le) 5% 7% 12 17
8.4 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
An integral part of a successful compensatory mitigation project is early detection of problems during
implementation, determining the cause(s)of those problems, and attempting to correct those problems
so that the compensatory mitigation project achieves its objectives and ecological performance
standards. Interim performance standards are crucial to ensuring compensatory mitigation performance
follows a trajectory to attain final compensatory mitigation success.
In the event the Site or a specific component of the Site fails to achieve the necessary performance
standards as specified in Section 8.3,the Sponsor shall notify the members of the IRT and work with the
IRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions. Large scale corrective measures may require
an Adaptive Management Plan. Large scale corrective measures may include, but are not limited to, re-
grading part of the mitigation site, replanting more than twenty (20) percent of the Site to improve
composition or species diversity, or the addition of stabilization structures.
The Adaptive Management Plan review will follow Section 332.8(o)(9)of the 2008 Mitigation Rule, part
of the streamlined review process,which requires an IRT review period of 15 calendar days.
Once the Adaptive Management plan is prepared, the Sponsor will:
• Notify the USACE as required by the Nationwide Permit 27 general conditions.
• Notify NCDWR if necessary for 401 conditions.
• Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements
as necessary.
• Obtain other permits as necessary.
• Submit the Adaptive Management Plan for IRT review and approval.
• Implement the Adaptive Management Plan.
• Provide the IRT a Record Drawing/As-Built of corrective actions.The Final
1 hap:flaeacis.rcc-acis.or l?figs=37049,April 11.2022.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT 30
May 2022

Listed below are identified project risks and uncertainties that have been evaluated in the development
of design plans for the Site, along with methods that have been/will be used to address these concerns.
Methods to address may be presented as adaptive management.
1. Land use development: There is potential for increased land development around the site in
the future that could lead to additional runoff and changes to watershed hydrology.
• Methods to Address: The project area has seen little development in recent years and it is
unlikely that development will threaten the site in the foreseeable future. Restoration of the
site to reconnect streams to their floodplains will reduce the likelihood of future degradation
from watershed changes, as increased flows will spread over a wider foodplain. Grade
control (in the form of constructed in-stream structures and natural bedrock outcrops)will
decrease the chances of future channel incision.
2. Easement Encroachment: Any encroachment to the conservation easement. (Including road
widening, culvert maintenance, utility easements, etc.)
• Methods to Address: To ensure that there are no encroachment issues within the
easement boundary, the Sponsor will clearly mark the easement boundary with appropriate
signage. The Sponsor will also work in conjunction with the conservation easement holder
to routinely monitor the Site for encroachment issues.Any encroachments that do occur will
be remedied by the sponsor to address any damage and provide any other corrections
required by the IRT.
3. Drought and Floods: There is potential for extreme climatic conditions during the monitoring
period of the project.
• Methods to Address: The Sponsor will apply adaptive management techniques as
necessary to meet the site performance criteria. Such adaptive management may include
replanting, channel damage repair, irrigation, or other methods. If adaptive management
activities are significant, additional monitoring may be required by the IRT.
4. Beavers: While there was no evidence of recent beaver activity during recent assessments,
there is potential for beavers to colonize the site during the monitoring period of the project.
• Methods to Address: If beaver colonization does occur, the sponsor will take steps to trap
and remove beaver if they colonize the Site during the monitoring period.
5. Hydrologic Trespass: Since the Sponsor owns the lands surrounding the Site, there is little
or no potential for hydrologic trespass onto any other adjacent landowners.
• Methods to Address: The project has been designed and will be constructed utilizing
methodologies which will greatly reduce the potential of hydrologic trespass outside of the
conservation easement boundary. Based off this information, the possibility of hydrologic
trespass is extremely unlikely and is not expected to be an issue.
6. Invasive/Nuisance Species: No significant number of invasive/nuisance vegetation currently exist
in the conservation easement area. However,there is the potential for such species to have a
negative impact of the restored vegetation within the easement area.
• Methods to Address: The sponsor will be diligent is monitoring for any invasive
vegetation and if any is found, will visually assess, photograph, and map the areas
affected.These areas will be treated by mechanical or chemical methods, so that the
invasive species are no more than five (5)percent of the easement acreage, and zero
31 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
May 2022

tolerance for kudzu.Any vegetation requiring herbicide application will be performed in
accordance with the NC Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
8.5 POST-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION
An as-built survey will be conducted following construction to document channel condition and provide
baseline data for comparison to future monitoring reports. Information included in the as-built will be in
accordance with USACE guidance and has been identified in the monitoring requirements and
performance standards sections.
Monitoring reports will be provided to the Wilmington District USACE for review no later than April 1'of
the year following the monitoring activity.
8.6 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Land use and property boundaries along with the proposed mitigation plan were designed to minimize
long-term management conflicts.As a result,the potential for hydrologic and boundary conflicts have
been minimized. The Sponsor has identified Unique Places to Save (a 501 (c)(3)entity)as the grantee of
the conservation easement deed.The recorded Conservation Easement deed will ensure the protection
of the project in perpetuity. The site-protection instrument is provided in Appendix r—Conservation Easement
Documents.
The overall purpose of the Site is to establish a self-sustaining, natural ecological resource. Proposed
restoration and enhancement activities should not require maintenance beyond the proposed monitoring
period to provide aquatic resource functions in perpetuity.The Bank Sponsor will serve as long-term
manager of the Site. Because Weyerhaeuser has been the landowner and established a practice of
managing the land over many decades, it is appropriate that Weyerhaeuser NR continues in this role,
subject to the restrictions of the Conservation Easement.Weyerhaeuser maintains the human and capital
resources to accomplish this role.
Ownership of the Mitigation Site
It is anticipated that Weyerhaeuser NR will remain the owner of the Site. The Site will be protected by a
conservation easement held by Unique Places to Save.
Identification of Long-Term Management Activities
Na long-term management activities are proposed except those that are related to the general
maintenance of the Site. These general activities will include removal of significant woody impediments
(such as downed trees)to road passage, maintenance of access roads and gates,and periodic visual
inspections to identify the same.
Long-Term Maintenance and Protection Account
Since no long-term management activities are proposed for this Site, a long-term maintenance and
protection account is not being established for the Site.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 32
May 2022

8.7 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
In accordance to Section IX(Financial Assurances)found in the Middle Neuse UMBI, the Bank Sponsor
shall provide financial assurances in the form of a Performance Bond to the IRT sufficient to assure
completion of all mitigation work, required reporting and monitoring, and any remedial work required. The
Sponsor plans to retain twenty (20) percent of the total construction costs to help pay for any remedial
work that might be required during the monitoring period. Financial assurances shall be payable at the
direction of the USACE to its designee or to a standby trust. Financial assurances structured to provide
funds to the USACE in the event of default by the Bank Sponsor are not acceptable.A financial
assurance must be in the form that ensures that the USACE receives notification at least 120 days in
advance of any termination or revocation.
The amount of the Performance Bond shall be based on costs to implement the Site through monitoring
and any remedial work that may be required. The Performance Bond shall be in place prior to the first
credit release. The costs that are detailed in the table below include the construction and monitoring costs
for the Site.
Table 18 —Estimated Amount Required for Performance Bond
Activity Cost
Site Prep Mechanical Shear(within wetland and riparian buffers) $11,508.01
Site Prep Mechanical Rake(within wetland and riparian buffers) $7,672.01
Site Prep Chemical Application(If needed within wetland and riparian buffers) $6,521.21
Site Prep Prescribed Burn(if needed within wetland and riparian buffers) $3,836.00
Planting Labor and Seedlings(wetland and riparian buffers) $17,268.91
Stream Construction Work(in-stream and riparian buffer work) $486,401.88
As-built Report $24,835.91
Annual Monitoring $167,981.07
Total Estimated Amount of Performance Bond $726,025.00
The USACE will review the as-built and annual monitoring reports to evaluate the success of the
ecological restoration. Success will be evaluated based on the Site's adherence to performance
standards specified in Section 8.3.As performance standards are met, the Bank Sponsor will request a
reduction in the amount of the performance bond based on the reduction schedule provided below. The
reduction schedule assumes that the Site will meet all performance standards on an annual basis.
Table 19—Performance Bond Reduction S
Year Activity Reduction Amount(%)I Reduction Amount($) Bond Amount
1 Establishment of Performance Bond N/A N/A $726,025.00
- 2 USACE approval of As-Built Report 61.49% $446,435.15 $279,589.85
- 3 USACE approval of Year 1 Monitoring 3.31% $23,997.29 $255,592.56
4 USACE approval of Year 2 Monitoring 3.31% $23,997.29 $231,595.26
- 5 USACE approval of Year 3 Monitoring 3.31% $23,997.29 $207,597.97
- 6 USACE approval of Year 4 Monitoring 3.31% $23,997.29 $183,600.67
7 USACE approval of Year 5 Monitoring 3.31% $23,997.29 $159,603.38
- 8 USACE approval of Year 6 Monitoring 3.31% $23,997.29 $135,606.08
- 9 USACE approval ofYear7 Monitoring 18.68% $135,606.08 $0.00
Total 100% $726,025.00
33 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT
I May 2022

9.0 REFERENCES
Sweet, W.V. &Geratz, J.W. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships and Recurrence Intervals for
North Carolinas Coastal Plain. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39, 861-
871 (2003).
Doll, Barbara A.,A.D. Dobbins, J. Spooner, D.R. Clinton and D.A. Bidelspach, Hydraulic Geometry
Relationships for Rural North Carolina Coastal Plain Streams, NC Stream Restoration Institute,
Report to N.C. Division of Water Quality for 319 Grant Project No. EW20011, www.ncsu.edulsri.
11 pp. (2003).
Russell, Periann 2008. Mapping Headwater Streams: intermittent and Perennial Headwater Stream
Model Development and Spatial Application. Final Report for Federal Highway Administration
Contract Feasibility Study WBS: 36486.4.2. January 28, 2008.
US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District(2003), Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services(NCDMS). 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring
Guidelines. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.A. O'Hara,A. Jessup, R. Everhart. 1999.
Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams. N.C. State University,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
Harmon, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K.Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. (2012)A Function-Based
Framework for Stream Assessments and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006. .
North Carolina Division of Water Resources(NCDWR). 2016a. River Basin Classification Schedule
(online). Available: https:lldeq.nc.govlriver-basin-classification-schedule [August 01, 2018]. North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh.
North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality(NCDEQ). Surface Water Classifications.
http://portal.ncdenr.orglweblwglpslcsulclassifications Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team. (NC SFAT 2015). N.C. Stream Assessment Method
(NC SAM) User Manual. Version 2.1.
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). N.C. Wetland Assessment
Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs, Colorado
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program. Floodplain Mapping Information System.
http://floodmaps.nc.gov/FMIS/Default.aspx Raleigh, NC.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2018.Web Soil Survey(online). Available:
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan-DRAFT 34
May 2022

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1960. Soil Survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Soil Conservation Service.
The Stream Stats web program for North Carolina. Available online at:
https://water.usgs.gov/osw/streamstats/north_carolina.html
National Land Cover Database 2011. [Online WWW].Available URL: https:llwww.mrlc.gov/nlcd2011.php
United States Geological Survey(USGS) National Land Cover Dataset 1992. [Online WWW].Available
URL: https://www.mrlc.govinlcd1992.php
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 6-8-2015. Endangered Species, Threatened Species,
Federal Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Beaufort County, NC. Available online at:
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/speciesicntylist/beaufort.html
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate,A.G. Jessup, J.R. Everhart, and
R.E. Smith. 1999. Bankfull hydraulic geometry relationships for North Carolina streams. Wildland
Hydrology. AWRA Symposium Proceedings. D.S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy, eds.American Water
Resources Association. June 30-July 2, 1999. Bozeman, MT.
Gridded Soil Survey Geographic (gSSURGO) Database for North Carolina. United States Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.Available online at
https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/. (FY2016 release date).
North Carolina Department of Transportation. 2003. Reference Reach Database. In publication.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities. NC
Department of Environmental Quality. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities. NC
Department of Environmental Quality. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2009. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Beaufort County, NC.
35 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan -DRAFT
I May 2022

Appendix A —
Figures
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT 36
May 2022 I

03020.101
@Irrili
/eN
03020201
(HtOlive
— • 03020102
Rnrky Mount ,.!'•• i
f r
l , boro t
C
t_ r
03020203
r
.y
n 03030007
Re a Hill
Legend
QConservation Easement
I 8-Digit HUC
Snow Hill
81
Farnville
B eil, er
03020103
Greenville
03020302
,lacksonville
•
w1030,10.1,07
03020104
New Barn
03020204
03020301
1pij
f5
r ;
Haverock
Morel
0
10
20 Miles
Prepared For
Beaufort 56
Figure 1
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley>>) Horn Service Area Map
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Prepared By:

Pot
1% Track Rd
Legend
County Boundary
QConservation Easement
Prepared For
Beaufort 56
Figure 2
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley>>) Horn Vicinity Map
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Prepared By:

Legend
Conservation Easement
0
1,000
2,000 Feet
Prepared For
Prepared By: Beaufort 56
Figure 3
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley>>) Horn USGS Topographic Map
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

1958 Aerial 1993 Aerial
rF
y'ea:y
1 '1977 Aerial - 2010 Aerial
Legend Feet
Conservation Easement 0 1,000 2,000
Prepared For. Prepared By Beaufort 56
Figure 4
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley}?>Horn Historic Aerials
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

Prepared For
Beaufort 56
Figure 5
A Weyerhaeuser Kim{ey}?>Horn NRCS Soil Survey - Beaufort County
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Prepared By:

Map unit
symbol
BoB
Map unit name
Bonneau loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent
slopes
Goldsboro File sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
Leaf silt loam
Leon sand
Lynchburg fine sandy loam
Pantego loam
Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, Atlantic Coast Flatwoods
Tomotley Fine sandy loam
Legend
Conservation Easement
Prepared For.
Hydric
Rating
5
Beaufort 56
Figure 6
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley}»Horn Hydric Soils Map
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Prepared By:

•V ' �.i r
-. .-, -. • . . '',., , . • .•...- '. .. .Noli.-
. .., .....
., . . ., .
...... ..z . . _.,.
•,.. ,.,...... „. .. L . . ,
. . „.......„,:_., ..-?....., _._..„
, .: . ..
. , _,
.: .. ,,..,,,,,,.... ".,... ,,,...• .....„ . . :. . ...... ,.4.- ...-4-4-
"•AAA '••''.. 4' •. .. •x,,'•. '...: "N r.
4,70
•
j , 'Y ;' ..h is-.r{y:4114i•. - I J .Lr. - .•.''.‘,\:"",4'..L..:..''''',',',..,7,','.'t'4{1 .;,e,LI?'..41--,1...4,g,:,:...4-...-;,::,,,;-7.....,_ /
"ae ..i; � •
.i � .,
.•.
' •1. rig • �y`,. r, I' `� t •t,, ' `~
• � is, o�i ;;^Imo;' ;•,• i , .. •'�..
,.1:;,!...s.
yi:4;.W ...,-
r' -
L.
Ia:. .. , ,...,.„4',.7,..t:.,•..,
S z• .•
I.
� � '..
'
,'�1. •:f;. •. .:,•ft ..----___ -c:' ` „. F'- `t.'.''•',. 4. ��... ,
' 1 . '" ,• • ,jr. . r ' ,,_ ` yf- � ',.. . a ,'
y
, . ...,r,„, . ,. ,. .. \r '.:;;5 ' fit'
../ j `\. ,• 41�4
• 4'•..j 14 / ''l
.. . _ • '
y +r A. -.....Tr... ••'r ..; 114•_� " •_ /
SV
/ ' )
-
r N.
. ;- f
..,
_._„..=..._ ... . .._ . .
r
nd .•
,� . , .,,, . .. .;: • / ._ „..J.
Number Name Historic Drainage Current Drainage Proposed Drainage
Conservation Easement Area Ac Area Ac Area Ac •
---- 1 Pollard Swam.-R1-US 136 88 88
•• LJ Current Contributing Drainage Area • 2 Pollard Swam.-R2-D5 455 307 307
Drainage Area Points 3 Pollard Swam.-R2-DS 914 807 807 .`
ti ' 4 Ur2-US 68 42 42
Mitigation Approach 5 lfT3-Us 49 41 al
— — Headwater Restoration 0 1,500 3,000 Feet
Restoration(Priority 1)
kt_�S�?a'.°. L
Prepared For Prepared By Beaufort 56
Figure 7
A Weyerhaeuser Kimiey>>>Horn Watershed Map
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

. .
•-=.-,:, ' '''
. .-
- . ...
...,_ ' • .
_ - •
-„,
• - ,-4:7-•14-....,
_-
-•.. •.<- t ,,J. vt- . 4.
., • •,.I L
...
. 1
••,,
tr l'Ityr.:^'-. .-•••...,,,•_72,, ,., ,, .4644—
. j a' . fr 1 L4....• ,e,-1,:... 1 .'' 1 ..4
\, ' ' --_. , qiii,•:-, 'Ag-,'=.-. _ '......:--•••••-• :.:7,,,,,..y4s
\ , •-,:fil".--..--. 7 . ,, • •
-.."••.. -q '
*4-•‘' •- ',.',,i, .t. v •
lf,,-,'"t, 74 1.,-0 . • 4,14: 'k.-:
\ ''
.. ;4-.L., t:. •:, `, -'7k1.` : 4
' / '• ',Tr. * :.- ' ''''''. •"N.
;-f 4 . , • -ic••.,,3-%
r., ,:. ''.•4 j \ .r' 4.11t, 1
( „
I
:11
44 Pollard Swamp-
Reach 1
)
i E„"ti,;_Z,Ir-,,`',..;,....,...:,-,...-:•••••
i A)•..: ..N.V..
0174,' • ...-,•,-4, . r
, jt' • .,'OM , ,.A-
-1 . •
1-..10._..„,.:',4E..•-.• ,.. ,.
41'cr* - r'ltk'• .....-"r ....--"
.,. '1 .A.1)14-:-..-'.' •,....-, ..,'''\to' •. :.'41.Z.N '1 ..„."...
• - •41116*". .-tii 1:'NJ'-,Atk•.c.,-..!.-',',:!'
1 ,eag1/4.7.,.'..:'.•'4,.;-.,,,,''_,._yo4=k-_.f;.,..••7,
, ,-V), ' ••-'''',"'-';'•••.r.:S",i': alc...IV',s•."A: '-' '7
' \6.% - i „.44,'er: ', .i,','A' .',7'.',.„ ;.::::M§.X.''V, ;-_.'• tr. ,
, .
f.,-.--..4:1_1_,_ ,
"..'6"N.."\ ,.e:;;; ;,:. .2-:'::::5'- V.- -:-544Zki•I`lq°:46;•••-<S'Y:!''';'''','
.4.A
4dP::,':.',‘:, e•k.•t• 4 '',
e,-- 'Avt•Wk:,- •-'-- Pollard Swamp-Reach 2 ',','•,::.
6,4' . ' ;4:1;r
nvikn4 ...„.,. , . •_....„,, - r. :.,.V,3',14:\C".
i
,r4',''''.'2",. ,4'i.:'Iff, . ; • t.. •.,:3,....: ,•„„,,,,,-- orkAtv•ii.,..__,,,,,. ,- ..,1,....<-1, -..,f4°., :').
,'i 4''!“1,P41+"tr 1,, 4 ' '''•.....,.
!'r
Vh.0,,,,4,,,?::'.4„.. . -:, .,4:‘!.''' .,1,1L'N4.14•4V', ..4.,••'' ,''',:''.. ,..,'4',V*4, ; le't
.
, ' - -.;•••,, ,,..., -4. •
. iv.r)..AW;1', ''
. 1
Atk't.-.:"Q`::-"'-':-?, :. ,F.•:"':‘;A•,.-'4''*
`,','1'.Vr; .",•i., '4,1'.''j I
''''4;•1/4. --,,''''-t-
,•••:-
:.•:e'Cl' o'li.,;',• 'q'"IL -- . • - - --.' '"---rr-r- '"' -- ....A M1
_,, •__ _ _ ___
E.
- -4••• , ... _... • .
Pollard Swamp- Reach 3
• l '.
/ n .
/
7 • ' - ' ' -i''',-;-:.;:- '.' - .• .,' ' , v'. I
,= /
! - . /
. , i 1
• —
/ •t,', '
. , /
Legend 'A.,
•
.„,.
M Conservation Easement
:. .
f ,
Delineated Feature(Jurisdictional) I
•N elk. - / r
Perennial Stream t..- -"-• 4''''?..S41.1.;,:. h,
--'
.„ _4 -,•::a
Intermittent Stream . C .., ..
,..- ,..4. 0
1,000 2,000 Feet
,6 ,,%4„,;.; ..f Jurisdictional Ditch
,
. . .:,..-"Altsk.,.,,...filw, es . I iiiino.
Prepared For Prepared By Beaufort 56
Figure 8
A Weyerhaeuser KimleyHorn Existing Conditions
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

' . : I I i N
A......„'t'''
f. 5 rA:r.
'i
1
,,
f •� r '•
C' !
r• :,1.
•
DT ., 7„.. , -, _
...
. .
, _ _ „,
...$„ .,.. ; . , ..,....,,• ...
, . .
. . . ,
. ... ., .... ..... . ,,.. •, _ : V:
4, ,-. r„ _ __
. , .
,.. .. .. .. • •"
. .,
, .._. . ..
__ .,._ ....E.,.- ... ,-.-
, _ ,
Elevation (ft) -
- High:65
Low:40 _ - 444404.0w. _ -
-
Legend 0 _ 1,000 2,000 Feet
Conservation EasementII
Prepared For Prepar ed By Beaufort 56
Figure 9
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley>>)Horn LiDAR Elevations
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

• N.
. s`•
N
z ram.. Pollard Swamp-Reach 2(2,448 LF) •
,, Priority 1 restoration approach.Elevate WA-1(8.6 AC)Wetland restoration area is
Yi.. Lam,` l invert of channel to reconnect with historic comprised of hydric soils(Le and Pa},adjacent
ii �k�,• '1'1 flood plain to the extent feasible- to headwater restoration and at an elevation i
• -'...y•"•'�5.3~•,••.. •• • ti44.•
+j Re-meander channelwith appropriate lower than 55-5 feet Restoration of the
1. •
dimensions,restore riparian wetlands 1 headwater area will limitlateral drainage,restoring
" t, adjacent to the channel,and install 4 wetland hydrology-Areas of planted pinewill be
in-stream log cross vanes,toe-wood • cleared and planted with appropriate hardwood species-
4 .• and other woody debris to help maintain .111
•Y Hardwood areas will remain with replanting in
`:lc. pools/restored profile.Proposed buffer any areas disturbed by stream restoration.
and conservation easement will exend
UT2(980 LF)Restore headwater out to150'wide on both sides
stream system by filling in existing channel of the channel. . . -••
and establishing a miniumum 50'buffer to each =
. side of the valley centerline-Existing trees •
and roots will be supplemetned by tree, >• �•
shrub and herbaceous plantings to provide 't; a —4
a stabilized flow path for the restored system. -
I
,• UT3(1,173 LF)Restore headwater / `
stream system by filling in existing channel l // :__,i-Is"-va::,I-I-_as,i--ie 1_: I Acres
and establishing a minimum 50'buffer to each
side of the valley centerline-Existing trees / /
and roots will be supplemented by tree, / /
shrub and herbaceous plantings to provide .) // _
a stabilized flow path for the restored
system. Pollard Swamp-Reach 1 (968 LF)Restore
headwater stream system by filling in existing channel 'i•
, ' • • /. / and establishing a 50'buffer to each
• 1 side of the valley centerline.Existing trees i
). - and roots will be supplemented by tree,
fir)• ,' • shrub and herbaceous plantings to provide
'•/A , a stabilized flow path for the restored system.
'',//.
:: • // ,.,
-.../�'J-✓� . - WA-4(5.3 AC)Wetland restoration area is
K. - y, / comprised of hydric soils(Le and Pa),adjacent to Priority 1 Lir
_/ restoration and within the 50 foot stream buffer-
- Priority 1 restoration of Reach 2 will limit lateral drainage
• and provide overbank flow to restore wetland
.; ^'' . hydrology.The planted pine will be cleared and :'".. .
_ planted with appropriate hardwood species.Cleared
- '' - - fields will be prepped and planted-Hardwood areas
aaq ^2•�. will remain with replanting in any areas disturbed by
`4 .. �, -r . stream restoration-
WA-2(30.3 AC)Wetland restoration area - -
' is comprised of hydric soils(Le,To and Pa), \
adjacent to headwater and priority 1 restoration, i• \ ..:+•-
' and at an elevation lower than 54 feet.Headwater Y
• and stream restoration and plugging of lateral SI '/A WA-3(72AC)Wetland restoration area is
!�` ditches will restore wetland hydrology-Areas of Y comprised of hydric soils(Le and Pa),adjacent to headwater
planted pine will be cleared and planted with /'� restoration,and at an elevation lower than 52 feet.Priority 1
appropriate hardwood species.Hardwood areas f, restoration of Reach 2 will limit lateral drainage
will remain with replanting in any areas disturbed and provide overbank flow to restore wetland
by stream restoration.The mitigation area has _ FN hydrology.The planted pine will be cleared and
been offset by 75-feet to enable the roadside • - - planted with appropriate hardwood species-Cleared
-i ditch in the southern area to continue to function. - " AI - • • • fields will be prepped and planted.Hardwood areas t.
will remain with replanting in any areas disturbed by
Legend stream restoration.The mitigation area has been
offset by 75-feet to enable the roadside ditch in
the southeastern area and within the timber area
Conservation Easement
to continue to function. � ,�'
Mitigation Approach
•
a Headwater Restoration - `
Pollard Swamp-Reach 3[1,318 LF}Priority 1 restoration
��Restoration[Priority 1} approach.Elevate invert of channel to reconnect with historic
—I Proposed Butler Area floodplain to the extent feasible.Re-meander channel x
with appropriate dimensions-Install in-stream log cross
VA Minimum Buffer Area vanes,toe-wood and other woody debris to help maintain
Wetland Restoration pools/restored profile.Proposed buffers exceed 50'on both sides
of the channel,and extend out to 150'along the entire left bank-
` 1 WA-1 f
1WA2 1
WA-3 0 750 1,500 Feet
WA-4
-.-, .L.:--,,.2, ::-,i-.t��-. i'i ram. ,:
r
Prepared For. Prepared By: Beaufort 56
A Weyerhaeuser Kimle 7>>Horn Figuren
Y Y Proposed Mitigation Plan
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

..\ / N
/ , .,•
\ . \.„ i
9j.'
7 - .. •
I
( • ...., .
f ;
■
' . ,, Pollard Swamp - Reach 1
, + •-•-„:,,' - �- \pit ..y� V,•„,,•
�: �'o•
_',: 11
C240., , - . , IV 1..
Pollard Swamp-Reach 211
a
.tee imi: /•
:,
F.
,.,:' .________ , _f---,,,,
Legend ,
M Conservation Easement
Actual Buffer 150ft
Permanent Vegetation Plot . --
= Crest Gauge -
Pollard Swamp-Reach 3
■ Groundwater Monitoring Well I.
■ Rain Gauge •
Cross Section w �; .may w.` �
Stream Mitigation Approach - : 1,--x �- °'" = ='- ;
0 . • Headwater Restoration Y' .� --
�_�--�=��•F..;�:;,;_=' . NOTE: Vegetative Monitoring will cover
'� Restoration (Priority 1) - ,�.. = 5% of planted areas on site. Permanent
Mitigation Type - f= �- monitoring plots will makeup 50 Ia.
:-te- _ : F_ - �_ � _ The remaining 50%will be made up of
•
WA-1 Wetland Restoration x� '�
- :0•,;. ; . �:. randomper the 2016 guidance. /
�'y,.e: . plots,
WA-2 Wetland Restoration „,,.� I$4,, • '� ,3.,;,.' " '� � >
WA-3 Wetland Restoration w,t-a,;;�:rs;. . T
0 750 1,500 Feet
WA-4 Wetland Restoration •
g` 1•-- I
Prepared For Prepared By: Beaufort 56
11
A Weyerhaeuser Kimle 7>>Horn Figure
y y Monitoring Plan
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

Proposed Creditable Stream Length N
Elligible for Additional Credit Credit Loss in Credit Gain for Net Change in Total Credit
Required Buffer Additional Buffer Credit from Buffers
(Total Baseline Credit)
3766.0 -209.00 588.85 379.85 4145.85
r
I
Pollard Swamp - Reach 1
UT2 104.4 Zi
tiliv -
044
//./. ... ,, '
Allriato
1.
•� Pollard Swamp - Reach 2
. 0(lA frfd
�..3 UT3
+*�— IAr+
er
L
!,,,.)
0 Pollard Swamp Reach 3
0
kir
Legend
=Conservation Easement
Actual Stream Buffer<50ft
Actual Stream Buffer>50ft(Additional Credit)
r//f Ideal Buffer<501t
Ideal Buffer>50ft
Mitigation Approach
�, Headwater Restoration 0 600 1,200 Feet
.....I Restoration(Priority 1)
-- r
Prepared For: Prepared By: Beaufort 56
A Weyerhaeuser Kimle >>)Horn Figure it
Y Y Additional Stream Buffer Credit
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

Appendix B —
Photo Pages
37 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan —DRAFT
I May 2022

•
•
1,t7 dry :� •I/-y .n ��Gu, fr � . .�` �. � _ "!- -n'r�� :,d, �Y:•;
•1_. / ''.CJ. I� `` � f ••�s � '1� \fi e1W��:. ,R� •arc- � '�. .f�'
Al
14
•
°y�- _. `��... • � �,�f - fir �q .�.• �y -S�: *f+S-��C 1 i��- Fl.'/::
1 ��. 4,�` _ x-ts: [y1i ,.�^t•� ...a• �+ 1 ti --Ya��.-� .�Y• `•:i F:
`0,, '..:- ,0 •-'fi r':` - .. -
lit
.. - .�. '.r•'ti.' :N!�' �� [.� ,%:�� •��� `�;'�'�-. ,.��li- `4_• fir t N
04
.8� s;:' �:•• - .?3f�-r�=="-:s. ! L ;
"+��x, 04,,.r.;e _,'fj�. •,:.4.:.- r: l ':c,''
,ti.\-0.__0\
..-r:•-,ei„,-,-,j l.k,7.4_.-,'•
,-••„
.--.
-t'•,..-..-•..VA..,.-,.-•e'
N.'4;.:.-6 P:,-,,-."--.•,.e.
I.
� e r- f ie .,a ;� -.. ate .+k} wlq° T is }'dd:
, ": .i�:;•.. `: _ - _ - r ti,.• 'rep •w t 4 i. `- -,, .0,
4 .. .. '•r N'Nas '.A . :s.,.I64. .[•'\ . ,y.... s'j,.• A' r3...r .
•
iie# .ra.e o•s�,s!'iJ. 'l. •
�, , a rwr; � f l �.•` f
• L fir► I . ✓'-r •• >
Amailkih.
Photo 1-Beaufort 56-UT1 Reach 1 Photo 2 Beauf�rt56 UT1 Reach 1
Y�,'•-C 'jtE^ 'Y= _•.•�` 'Vic"L"•i 1 - • •-•Y.t' j
��
'il !r,y'! Si i'fir .F:
.. J•—' _ ..Y -:.'Se=
'_ - ':`w Y. Y... ti'' may: y" ' .,r -1.. .C- -'.1.
' _
i.A ¢! b :•{ -f _ _ • 5: - .. + a -� - '� T
i.
_ .. r- fir:
i- �`++ .1.,,,--',. .. "`ia' �: j<<._:- --..: r -.. - ems•:.. .- - �•'t.- - `?'r•`-. - ,mot � ..
-- : .1:- -'err. ._;" ....'-. ,4- - • st ::Jli.. __ r
Z �iW RYA. - `'EFi"` 4 :'A ^Eris'-_'' „ ',.� r'�.„ "•`.t.�: F
R 4— y. '_: ''f. ax e' ' a Fr :r - %,�. , 9►•3•3 4. r= _'' .� s .
s.raiti, . it ..� .A;ii,.
•
%
r il
}F� r • `Ws " ' ,e,.0 M • T ��r
.'• r + � Srr l { k'tia
� . _J
.0'1
Photo 3-Beaufort 56-UT1 Reach 2 Photo 4-Beaufort 56-UT1 Reach 2

.va ti'' r �' 4...•':91-` .. • :ems' .
Y . ikk ti:..e `.
�' • 4� - • 'w�_'. _.• _ ..• CS = .(f
- •
Fes' :• v r :
1"�
7i I.'
•
.Li
•
•
•
7,Y • ``- `r x�'k a ;am'• :Y . ry•i-,• .,�.-
•
� r - k _.• .:� --_ - - . 'f _�.'. . 4
•
4
4 R's�.
ry ti ,yam•
- `li ram„�• - 1•
•
fa_ Yam►:: i -i J�w _ 4 .KWM�-:; oL +
Photo 5-Beaufort 56-UT1 Reach 3 Photo 6 Beaufort 56 UT1 Reach 3
•
p! i 1111 yy,ii 11,• .1'-:i i.! I,,1.
, 4° JJJ
:c "l ' Pei`
•
. - :1 t fir„ s' _ 4
7ti-. • , •- _• r_ _. .. •
• fir,
',. '.. .:it , . • a
..•
,y :• . Y
•
TA ' '' • i�l yis■ +fitr t _ . - , ' `� i•
i
x
Photo 7-Beaufort 56-UT2 Photo 8 Beaufort 56 UT2

.„114
•
+fr �." *' no .Itt., Y
. -rSy /• . .x
L.
..
• f
.. .. ..yY.' X S -r - I' .y
it - - }! - T s." wieR¢" •'�
Photo 9-Beaufort 56-UT3 Photo IO Beaufort 5& UT3

Appendix C —
Geomorph io Cross-Sections
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT 38
May 2022 I

BEAUFORT 56A
XS1 -UT1 Reach 1
OcwrdPoirs •BaodtilIn ■W erSurf Pciis
Hhkf= ➢bkf= .76 Abkf=3.17
9�
93-
B1- 7.
GO
7� a
W
.
B7 �.
95
zo as ao ea im
Horizontal Distance(ft)
XS2-UT1 Reach 2
o GrouldPoells •B I d,o o 1111Naker s,.r rails
3335=E.2 Chkf=1.17 Abkf=6.31
a
m
a
2 r,
0
fl I!) 443
80 80 109
Horizontal Distance(ft)

BEAUFORT 56A
XS3-UT1 Reach 2
Grand Pairs ♦Bank. ndcatas ■war&.fare Pmk
Hhkf=9.89 :k:-== Abkf=6.55
97
95-
B3-
G
a
m
w
91-
Be-
al
a9 Bo 96 129
Horizontal Distance(ft)
XS4-UT2
0 Guam Points •B.th iI Ftdcamrs ■water Surface Pci6
xbkf=4.92 Dbkf= .26 Abkf= .'12
93-
Bl-
G
a
B9—
B7
20 40 69 8[I
Horizontal Distance(ft)

BEAUFORT 56A
XS5-UT3
0c.trails 46 Bankfullk,dczinrs ',Water S weronis
Fbk`=4.c_ Ihk[= .55 Abk`=2.2
93-
g. 91_D _ , L
4.4
3
�p fi
B9—
B7
B5
zB as m sal
1m
Honzonlal Distance(ft)

Appendix D —
Geomorphology
39 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan —DRAFT
I May 2022

REFERENCE REACH MORPHOLOGICAL DATA
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Beaufort County,North Carolina
VARIABLES Beaverdam Black Branch Tributary to Tributary to Averaged Ratios
{All units are in Feet) Branch Town Creek Hunters
Min I Max Min I Max Min I Max Min I Max Min I Avg I Max
1 Stream Type(Rosgen) E5 E E C6 --
2 Drainage Area(square miles) 3.20 1.20 0.60 0.70 --
3 Bankfull Width(W ) 11.6 19.8 8.1 14.9 TO 13.2 17.0 --
4 Bankfull Mean Depth(dud) 1.2 1.7 1.0 1.5 0.9 1.3 0.9 --
5 Width/Depth Ratio(W/dud) 9.7 11.6 8.1 9.9 7.8 10.2 18.9 8.5 10.9 10.6
6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(A ) 17.1 28.8 10.1 21.7 7.4 11.9 15.0 --
7 Bankfull Mean Velocity,ftls(Val) 0.6 1.0 0.8 1.3 - 2.8 --
8 Bankfull Discharge,cfs(QIN) 16.9 18.4 13.1 - 42.) --
9 Bankfull Maximum Depth(d,,,a) 2.1 2.8 1.4 2.6 1.7 2.1 1.8 --
10 Max d,,,a,./dbu ratio 1.6 1.8 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.9 2.0 1.6 1.7 1.8
11 Low Bank Height to Max Bankfull dud ratio 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.4 1.5
12 Width of Flood Prone Area(W{pa} 164.6 216.3 200.0 225.0 175.0 180.0 278.5 --
13 Entrenchment Ratio(W Wud) 10.4 34.5 13.4 27.8 13.3 25.7 164 12.4I 20.2I 29.3
14 Meander Length(L,,,) 92.0 125.0 - - 120.0 --
15 Ratio of Meander Length to Bankfull Width(L,r f Wbu) 4.9 6.7 - - 7.1 4.9 16.2 16.7
16 Radius of Curvature(Rc) 30.0 40.0 - - 31.0 --
17 Ratio of Radius of Curvature to Bankfull Width(R,../Ww) 1.6 2.1 - - 1.8 1.6 11.8 12.1
18 Belt Width(W ) 49.0 105.0 -- - 40.0 --
19 Belt Width Ratio(Wu,/Wud) 2.6 5.6 - - 2.4 2.6 3.5 5.6
20 Sinuosity(k)(Stream Length)Valley Length) 1.70 2.10 1.60 1.70 2.00 1.50 1.7 1.8 1.9
21 Valley Slope(Sme,)(ftI t) 0.0007 0.0044 0.0017 0.0048 0.0072 0.0040 --
22 Average Stream Slope(Sa,,,)=(Smi1k) 0.0004 0.0021 0.0011 0.0028 0.0036 0.0027 --
23 Riffle Slope(S, } - - MEI - --
24 Ratio of Riffle Slope to Avg. Slope(S, ISa,,g) -- - - - --
25 Pool Slope(Six,) - - - - --
26 Ratio of Pool Slope to Avg.Slope{SISa,;y} -- - -- - --
27 Maximum Pool Depth(D,d) 2.9 4.1 1.3 3.1 2.2 3.0 3.0 --
28 Ratio of Pool Depth to Bkf Depth(DIdyki) 0.9 1.5 to 2.2 2.0 2.7 3.4 1.3 12.0 12.1
29 Pool Width(W,d) 13.4 18.1 9.2 17.0 9.7 12.5 11.5 --
30 Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull Width(WpANVya) 0.8 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.1 1 A `?.7 1.0 11.1 11.3
31 Pool Area(A,. ) 20.3 34.8 8.8 30.5 10.4 15.8 - --
32 Ratio of Pool Area to Bankfull Area(A.IA6u) 0.8 1.3 0.8 1.5 1.1 1.7 - 0.9 11.2 11.5
33 Pool to Pool Spacing(p-p) 100.0 - - 51.0 --
34 Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing to Bankfull Width(p-pNVyu) 5.4 - - 3.0 14.2 I

Beaufort 56 Site Design Bankfull Area Plot
moo
r—, — I I I I I I I
•
1ao -
��* NC Coastal Plain Regional Curve-Doll
co
Q R2=0.88
Hybrid Carolina Flatwoods Regional Curve
rz
m X y=12.004x°-7118
R2=0.94
10 —
NC Coastal Plain Regional Curve-Sweet/Geratz —_
• • i y=9.43x°-74
• — R2=0.96
I I I
••
0.1 1 10 100
Drainage Area (square miles)
NC Coastal Plain Regional Curve-Doll NC Coastal Plain Regional Curve-sweet/Geratz Hybrid Carolina Flatwoods Regional Curve
• Hybrid Carolina Flatwoods Data • Existing Conditions x Reference Reaches
• Design Values

BEAUFORT 56 SITE MORPHOLOGICAL DATA
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Beaufort County,North Carolina
Pollard Swamp-Reach 2 Pollard Swamp-Reach 3
VARIABLES
(All units are in Feet) Existing Regional Curve& Design Existing Regional Curve& Design
Reference Reaches Reference Reaches
Min I Max Min I Avg I Max Min I Max Min I Max Min I Avg 1 Max Min I Max
1 Stream Type(Rosgen) B E C B E C
2 Drainage Area(square miles) 0.48 0.48 0.48 1.26 1.26 1.26
3 Bankfull Width( bkf) 6.6 9.2 10.2 6.6 12.9 15.4
4 Bankfull Mean Depth WO 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.0
5 Width/Depth Ratio(W ldyu) 11 6.2 8.5 10.9 10.6 13.1 6.2 8.5 10.9 110.6 16.2
6 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(Abkf) 6.2 7.1 7.9 6.2 14.2 14.7
7 Bankfull Mean Velocity,ftfs(Vbu) - 1.2 1.0 - 1.1 1.0
8 Bankfull Discharge,cfs(Qbe) - 8.3 8.3 - 15.0 15.0
9 Bankfull Maximum Depth(dmax) 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.4
10 Max d,,,a,ldy1 ratio 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.5
11 Low Bank Height to Max Bankfull dbu ratio 3.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.0 1.0
12 Width of Flood Prone Area(Wfa) 13.6 113.9 186.2 270.2 102.0 306.0 13.6 159.5 260.8 378.4 154.0 462.0
13 Entrenchment Ratio(Wfp,IW ) 2.1 12.4 202 29.3 10.0 30.0 2.1 124 20.2 29.3 10.0 30.0
14 Meander Length(L,) - 45.1 57.4 61.7 51.0 71.4 - 63.2 80.4 86.4 77.0 107.8
15 Ratio of Meander Length to Bankfull Width(L IW6u) - 4.9 6.2 6.7 5.0 7.0 - 4.9 6.2 6.7 5.0 7.0
16 Radius of Curvature(Rc) - 14.7 16.9 19.3 16.3 25.5 - 20.6 23.7 27.1 24.6 38.5
17 Ratio of Radius of Curvature to Bankfull Width(RJWbki) - 1.6 1.8 2.1 1.6 2.5 - 1.6 1.0 21 1.6 25
18 Belt Width(Wbi,) - 24.0 32.6 51.6 25.5 56.1 - 33.5 45.6 72.2 38.5 84.7
19 Belt Width Ratio(WaWyu) - 2.6 3.5 5.6 2.5 5.5 - 2.6 3.5 5.6 2.5 5.5
20 Sinuosity(k)(Stream Length f Valley Length) 1.04 1.65 1.77 1.90 1.11 1.04 1.65 1.77 1.90 1.11
21 Valley Slope(S,Jy)(ft/ft) 0.0031 - 0.0031 0.0031 - 0.0031
22 Average Stream Slope(Sang)=(S„aji,./k) 0.0030 - 0.0028 0.0030 - 0.0028
23 Riffle Slope(S,;x) - - 0.0042 0.0113 - - 0.0042 0.0113
24 Ratio of Riffle Slope to Avg. Slope(S ISavg) - - 1.5 4.0 - - 1.5 4.0
25 Pool Slope(S ) - - 0.0000 0.0003 - - 0.0000 0.0003
26 Ratio of Pool Slope to Avg.Slope(S113aJg) - - 0.0 0.1 - - 0.0 0.1
27 Maximum Pool Depth(D ) - 1.0 1.5 1.7 1.6 - 1.4 22 2A 1.9
28 Ratio of Pool Depth to Bkf Depth(D1Id ) - 1.3 2.0 2.1 2.0 - 1.3 2.0 2.1 2.0
29 Pool Width(W ) - 8.9 10.0 12.3 11.2 - 12.5 14.0 17.2 16.9
30 Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull Width(WfWhu) - 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.1 - 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.1
31 Pool Area(A ) - 6.4 8.5 10.7 9.5 - 12.7 17.0 21.2 17.6
32 Ratio of Pool Area to Bankfull Area(AIAhu) - 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.2 - 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.2
33 Pool to Pool Spacing(p-p) - 38.7 30.6 71.4 - 54.2 46.2 107.8
34 Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing to Bankfull Width(p-p/Wbe) - 4.2 3.0 TO - 4.2 3.0 7.0

Appendix E —
Buffer Credit Calculations
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT 40
May 2022 I

Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator
Site Hanle: Beaufort 56
USACE Action 10: SAW-2017-02019
NCOW R Project Number:
Sponsor. W eyerhauser NR Corn pony
County: Beaufort
Minimum Required Buffer Widths 50
Mitigation Ratio Creditable Stream
Mitigation Type Multiplier' Length' Baseline Stream Credit
Restoration{1:1) 1 3766 3766.00
Enhancement 111.5:1[1 1.5
Enhancement■{25:1] 2.5
Preservation{5:1] 5
Other{75:1] 7.5
Other{10t1} 10
Custom Ratio 1
Custom Ratio 2
Custom Ratio 3
Custom Ratio 4
Custom Ratio 5
Totals 3766.00 3766.00
Buffer Width Zone[feet from Ordinary High Water Mark]
Buffer Zones less than 15feet ass to 20 feet a20 to 25 feet a25 to30 feet a3O to 35 feet AS toil°feet >60 to 45feet AS to 50 feet >SOtn 75 feet >75 to 100 feet cl0O to 125 feet >125 to 150 feet
Max Possible Buffer[square feel' 112920 37660 37660 37660 37660 37660 37660 37660 188300 188300 188300 188300
Ideal Buffer[square feet)° 1155562825 38817.73489 38937.96249 3884838093 38683.781 38506.23421 38328.5212 381819266 189729.777 190102.3619 192152.1363 1948922492
Actual Buffer{squarefeet[° 111938.108 36888.98031 36412.64926 35764.65715 35187.73331 3471L51013 34257.74363 33834.12661 1632860044 143935.5142 140099A646 141756.6211
Zone Multiplier 50% 10% 10% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 5% 4% 4%
Buffer Credit Equivalent 1883.00 376.60 376.60 376.60 188.30 181130 18830 188.30 263.62 18830 150.64 15064
Percent of Ideal Buffer 97% 95% 94% 92% 91% 90% 1k9% 89% 86% 76% 73% 73%
Credit Adjustment -58.96 -18.71 -24.42 -29.89 -1702 -18.56 -20AO -21.44 226.88 14257 109.83 10957
Total Baseline Credit Credit Loss in Required Credit Gain for Net Change in Total Credit
Buffer Additional Buffer Credit from Buffers
3766.00 -209.00 589.85 379.85 4145.85
'Mininum standard buffer width measured from the top of bank(50feet in piedmont and coastal plain counties or30 feet in mountain counties)
'Rise the Custom Ratio fields to enter nonstandard ratios,whidh are equal to the number of feet in the Feet-to-credit mitigation ratio(e.g.,fora perservation ratio of 8 feet to 1 credit,the multiplier would be 81.
"Equal to the number of feet of stream in each Mitigation Type.Hstream readies are not creditable,they should be excluded from this measurement,even it they fall within the easement.
his amount is the maxinum buffer area possible based on the linear footage of stream length it channel were perfectly straight with full buffer width.This number is not used in calculations,but is provided as a reference.
'Maxin m potential size{Xi square feet}of each buffer zone measured around all creditable stream readies,calculated usng G1S,including areas outside of the easement The inner zone{0-15'}should be measured from the top of the OHWM or the edge of the average stream width if OHWM is not known.Non-creditable stream
readies wither the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtii GIB.
°Square feet it eadi buffer zone,as measured by GIS,excludiig non-forested areas,all other credit type{e.g.,wetland,nutrient offset,buffer[,easement exceptions,open water,areas failing to meet the vegetation performance standard,etc.Additional credit is given to 150 feet it buffer width,so areas wither the easement that are
more than 150 feet from creditable streams should not be iiduded in this measurement.Non-creditable stream readies withii the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtili GIS.

Appendix F —
Mitigation Plan Sheets
41 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT
I May 2022

JD
J
H
DRAFT MITIGATION PLANS
for
BEA UFORT 56 SITE
MIDDLE NEUSE STREAM AND WETLAND UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
WEYERHAEUSER NR COMPANY
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEER:
KI MLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
200 SOUTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 200
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28202
[phone]
JASON CLAUDIO-DIAZ, P.E.
OWNER:
WEYERHAEUSER NR COMPANY
406 COLE ROAD
HATTI ESBU RG, MS 39402
[phone]
DOUG HUGHES
SURVEY:
BASE MAPPING PROVIDED BY:
= 2014 QL2 LIDAR
METADATA CONTACT:
NC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
4105 REEDY CREEK DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27607
[phone]
SITE BOUNDARY
US-17N TO CHOCOWINITY
BEAUFORT
56A
US-17S TO VANCEBORO
VICINITY MAP
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 1500 3000 6000
Sheet List Table
Sheet
Number
Sheet Title
01
COVE SHEET
02
GENERAL NOTES
03
LEGENDS AND SYMBOLS
04
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
05
TYPICAL SECTIONS
06
OVERALL PLAN A\D KEY SHEET
07-08
PLA\ AND PROFILE — POLLARD SWAMP EACH 1
09
PLAN A\D PROFILE — POLLAD SWAMP EACH 18c2
10-11
PLA\ AND PROFILE — POLLARD SWAMP REACH 2
12
PLAN A\D PROFILE — POLLAD SWAN P REACH 28c3
13
PLA\ AND PROFILE — POLLARD SWAMP REACH 3
14
PLAN AND PROFILE 3EAUFORT 56A — UT2
15
PLAN A\D PROFILE 3EAUFORT 56A — UT3
16
WETLAND PLAN
17
DITCH PLUG PLAN
18-21
STREAV DETAILS
22-23
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
24
VEGETATION NOTES AND DETAILS
25
PLANTING PLAN
J
TRYON STREET,
E
CHARLOTTE, NC
WWW.KI'JLEY-HORN. COM
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
0
0
OLD
cL0
=a
N
C
0
LLJ.C..N1
Qcc
n 0
0
AS SHOWN
J
J
❑ESIGNED 3Y
❑RAWN BY
COVER SHEET
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUM Er'
01

W
CP
a
E
a
00
r'7
a
a
02 GENERAL NOTES
7,
6
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
❑
C
❑
z
ID
Cs
❑
C
7,
T
S PAC
NT
=NT
0\ALLY L
-FT BLAN•C
REVISIONS
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
0
—3.0
0 LO
IX0
a �
N
N
0
LLJ N
QCO
n
0
AS SHOWN
DESIGNED BY
0
CHECKED BY
GENERAL NOTES
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
00
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
02

7—
wD
w
EXISTING PLAN LEGEND
m
a
a
N
0
Lf7
a
03 LEGENDS AND SYMBOLS
7,
6
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH
EXISTING MINOR COUNTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING GRAVEL/DIRT ROAD
EXISTING CULVERT/PIPE
PROPOSED PLAN LEGEND
1035+00
B
CE
a
j�llL.!!L l III
=II9 IA:. lll!
/ A
- + + +
+ + +
- + + +
C
n
PROPOSED STREAM CENTERLINE
PROPOSED STREAM TOE
PROPOSED STREAM BANKFULL
PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED LOG CROSS VANE
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE
PROPOSED BRUSH AND ROLL RIFFLE
PROPOSED FILL
PROPOSED CHANNEL BLOCK
PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN DEPRESSION
PROPOSED HEADWATER FILL
PROPOSED WETLAND RESTORATION
PROPOSED CULVERT/PIPE
PROPOSED PROFILE LEGEND
WSF
EXISTING GRADE AT PROPOSED CENTERLINE
EXISTING GRADE AT EXISTING CENTERLINE
EXISTING WATER SURFACE AT EXISTING CENTERLINE
PROPOSED CHANNEL BOTTOM
PROPOSED BANKFULL
z
w
431)
E
U
z
to
w
0
0
z
z
0
i
w
J
N
0
0
w
D
0
w
w
0)
z
0
D
0
0
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: 7O4-333-5131
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
0
�0
oLO
0
a
o
N
(NJ
0
LJ N
QCO
n a
0
AS SHOWN
❑ESIGNED BY
0
>-
m
m
0
CHECKED BY
0
Z Ci)
J
(00
0 co
z
W>-
0 co
W
J
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
n
L)
Q)
SHEET NUMBER
03

7—
w
-o
1
z
CD
H
U
w
U7
J
U
0_
7—
U)
N
C
a
a
04 TYPICAL PLAN AND PROFILE
T
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
0
z
0
N
Cs
0
C
7,
NOTES:
TYPICAL SECTIONS ARE PROVIDED TO GIVE THE GENERAL DIMENSIONS
OF THE CHANNEL.
FINAL GRADING WILL GIVE THE CHANNEL A MORE "NATURAL"
APPEARANCE AND ALLOW A SMOOTH TRANSITION FROM EXISTING
CHANNEL TO NEW CHANNEL AND BETWEEN RIFFLE AND POOL
SECTIONS.
RIFFLE FLOODPLAIN WIDTH VARIES BASED ON THE TYPICAL
POOL DIMENSIONS AND THE VALLEY WIDTH SHOWN ON THE
PLAN SHEETS.
THE CURVE BETWEEN THE PC AND PT SHOULD BE ROUNDED.
LEGEND:
VERIFY BASED ON TYPICAL BANKFULL
VERTICAL CONTROL FROM PROFILE
RIFFLE
TYP. CROSS—SECTION
RIFFLE
MEANDERING POOL
TYP. CROSS—SECTION
RIFFLE
MAX POOL
DEPTH
MEANDERING
POOL
TAIL OF RIFFLE
(TOR)
HEAD OF RIFFLE
(HO)
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW SCHEMATIC
POOL
NOT TO SCALE
STREAM FLOW
TOP DEAN IgNKFULL
) SLOPE PER PROFILE
RIFFLE SLOPE (SEE PROFILE)
LENGTH PER PROFILE
IW
W
0
C/1
W EL
p o
< W O
Cl
_gym
W W
Z
D D 0
00<
Cn Cn W
3A\KFULL
DEPTH
RIFFLE
Also; ORE
TD
RUN
LENGTH PE
PROFILE
STRAIGHT POOL
TYP. CROSS—SECTION
STREAM FLOW
POOL
LENGTH PER
PROFILE
DEPTH VARIES
BASED ON PROFILE
oPE E\-c-\1 P
00, ?0\\_c_
GLIDE
LENGTH PER
PROFILE
TYPICAL PROFILE OF RIFFLE/POOL SEQUENCE
NOT TO SCALE
BANKFULL
DEPTH
LENGTH PER PROFILE
RIFFLE
W
W
W
W
0
W O
00
POOL
REVISIONS
U
z
0
T..
,/k
E
0
0
w
D
J
J
0
z
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
N
U
z
w
Q
J
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
0 0
DO
0 Co
o
a Ln
o
N
N
LLJ
N
Qco
n
0
AS SHOWN
w
J
U
C1)
DESIGNED BY
0
r
m
0
n
CHECKED BY
0
z
J
L
W
O ❑
LL Z
D Q
Q 2
w <
CO W
V
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
04

7-
w
CP
a
E
a
D_
05 TYPICAL SECTIONS
7,
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
0
z
0
0
C
Cs
7,
TIE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
BB
5.0'
EXISTING BERM/SPOIL
TO BE REMOVED AND
USED AS CHANNEL FILL
TIE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
20: 1
EXISTING
CHANNEL WIDTH
VARIES
20:1
1
PROPOSED RESTORED
VALLEY GRADE
POLLARD SWAMP -REACH 1 (HEADWATER STREAM RESTORATION)
9 0'
0
12 8'
5.0'
3.0'
NOT TO SCAL
EXISTING BERM/SPOIL
TO BE REMOVED AND
USED AS CHANNEL FILL
EXISTING CHANNEL
TO BE FILLED
EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND—\\\\\\
`
5.0'
POLLARD SWAMP -REACH 2
BB
NOT TO SCA_
EXISTING BERM/SPOIL
TO BE REMOVED AND
USED AS CHANNEL FILL
/
J
EXISTING EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND —\\\\\
r
/
/
1
POLLARD SWAMP - REACH 3
NOT TO SCAL
20: 1
EXISTING
CHANNEL WIDTH
VARIES
20:1
UT2 and UT3 (HEADWATER STREAM RESTORATION)
NOT TO SCA_
1
J
/
z
w
C
C5115U
Z
yi
= <
O
(i]
cn
¢
1%lk o
�1 z
z
0
w
J
Ei
2 .
0
J
D
J
J
0
z
0
D
0
0
0
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
N
L_LJO
N
¢co
n
Q
AS SHOWN
w
J
U
U7
❑ESIGNED BY
d
r
m
0
CHECKED BY
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
05

E
a
a
N
0)
0
N
N
0
a
06 OVERALL PLAN AND KEY SHEET
0
0
T
0
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
O
N
Cs
0
C
7,
❑
0
0
•
•
\
.z
7
7
1
1
cyR�S To
LA L
1
N.
4
r
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 200 400 800
1
•
w
H
200 SOIJ 1
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
WWW.KIVLEY—HORN.COM
7O4-333-5131
W
Z
0
0_
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
AS SHOWN
DESIGNED 3Y
0
❑RAWN BY
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUMBER
06

75
75
7-
CC,
w
0
4-
0
CD
0_
L
0
0
c
s-
N
CD
L
N
T
a)
[p
Ln
0
0_
J
0
E
m
LIi
0
N
0
Lf]
07 PLAN AND PROFILE POLLAR❑ SWAMP REACH
T
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
0
z
0
0
0
0
0
70
70
65
65
60
60
EXISTING
GRADE
55
55
\
11
/
I \
/-
-
-
-/
\\;
.ter
-
---
_-
��
\�
/
\\
�/
\L
`f--.�-�-
50
r
50
45
45
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTAT ON OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE REACH.
DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE TARGET
ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEE
SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE —POOL SEQUENCING.
40
40
u01
r
00 cc!oo
L{J
co
�!
L[7
to
CV N
L[7
to
CV o
L(]
c.,
0 N
in
L[7
T.
r a).00
i•
1-0
nin
i�
1-0
inL{J
dip
r
L!7 M
r
M
L[7
cq
r
Zs-0n
L[7 Ln
r
f7
in
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00
PROFILE - REACH 1
Nor. Scale:l "=40' I Vert. Scale:l "=4'
6+00
7+00
8+00
9+00
10+00
LJ
C
(5115 z
Z
ui
= <
0
U]
V]
,Alk¢
w❑
- Z
z
I
0
4:11) I
i
W
J
Ei
■' p
0
0
W
D
L17
IW
W
cc
z
0
200 SOUTH
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
WWW.KIVLEY—HORN.COM
704-333-5131
W
Z
0
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
ce
0 1 ' n 1 �� I \,
a
a za /, ` ICJ �/ �r i ).sue / 1�1'l.
o II 1 r 1 ` l�l
\ ; r / f r + S r f r 1
a � ( ,-/
� I � � r �/ .. c r �' Z � J 1 2. ' �j / F ' � ^ � � / � � ill � C 'i/J� '
/
•
_
��' / �� f � \ '� �-� �C,� /-,--- �7�--� �, 0 Y } j % -1 r ' I \- fir � � r-r V` � \�-� f a I/ � - —�ry p ,' ,I r ��I11� � i t
� - --, � 1 / `. � / \.., 1 �) � � _�. f � '� I+ 1. f `-- f / �� � �- ` \ +r � rr' �• � / ✓ r � � � �-� r 7 � / J _' - +_ /_ �, J � s' \ J r -, � i r{ � ,+ � �, l
/
AI
L.
L , 11� 1 �vr /y 1 / -i C� '� 1 %_ / I J l 1 r r
ill
EL
o
5.
/
r.
�j I :.. G% j' /f t =i/ /' - �\� 1r- r��� IBC " �� 1 \~ f� I �- �1 ��. \ _� �( �!rj i
/ \ _ y /���' • r� \ Jr'7. , 1 (ti\�\ \ L r, ' `/ '� n`�"� ` / �� I �/� � �� d J P\ % �� / �� �J ]]]�,�i% ` �\C -
s v°i �r� \ I \ ` J� �-�� � /� ��J �� ��^ ` �� �� �� ;`i� 1 -� �:r` �� 11 �i ����}t 1 CE
U.
_1 , 1 rr CE
/ r/ JI \ \ r r f•/ 1 �� <� �\� .r i��-
�� �Jr �� �llL} i \� �\ V �j1 �I 1 �� n 1 -.0 --\ -� /\� ram/ ��- v /�IjrI�JJ 4}a tl r�
r-, , / z _./,.. / - / l % c-LJ1J\- _� `, `t r--, J .- / rVr / '� ,' ,.. C +rl }ri( J �-� I� r�
_, -- r -,1 % .- I / � . - 1 ' r Z \ \ ` -, t `1 _ � L J 1 / / �i �1 � t . 1�� / 7 4 \
_ ]��� / f
:.., / J r % ' ° \ / --� � - -/ / r( ' y I , { S I .--, e .-� �( ] itL }} f I , `�
� ` , 'i -v , ,. l ,\ •..� ', +/ / / / / / 1 " _ r. ' ; - �- ✓!� / r 1- J -r ^ ' , /- - � %) 'l N. - -\ l` J 7 _ \ 2 ) � JI) f ) / — C L t ' L
/ = ) \ �. J s r \ ram, 4 1� / S 1 i D a
fry � � Y. ,� _ � �� '.,�/ i-�� ti• _ � / //� �= ` �� [�� ��/ �" ���... _J \\ ��►']�IE / �l r~,\ /+' - r, � _\ �Ir �' ) I 17 V/� ]\ �� 4 rj J.r"`• � � 1 ti �'_ \J �+'1j�-Jr' t� ����, � �� r �
J ti it III r J
• \ �` r ,� _iI �r - \ ' C! / /l J � r1 , s �� - 1���s � \� ��f `` ' _/
{ r `+ ��rL �� `�` } -1 / r I� (` I -.� f ��1 } 11 J 1 H � �J}q 41r
ii
lr I _ 1° v ) ] II / I
/-_,..
f[ —, I • / I / �- ---
/-
,--
-J C IL r ``-~ __ _ r p ✓ l �i 1 1 �,I.
- N r I f l _� '
/
\ r� ` r � i \ ii'•'°�f �' c '�. ---
/ � 1 rr ,� 1 I _ / J � / � ? /l�1I1w � �Ir-' )`L---L`'/ �� � � " — i ` r` I`' -� r-;,�., � 1��•�)�_n` r]p�� �_ + ` /I] IJ N.
li 1 /_ / ! -f rf,, 1r- uvl- -� f1� — L r-, I''�V r % S /f'N-_'r r_ IS '� ) 1 L 1` /,i� i �A `� Its` _ �J �/ /1 11/�l _/�� ::- 1 car ) �� } J I °tea , ` :\--)
Ufa _ f` � l�I �} j \ i \ �1{ J'y ,' ,f J\ ` ' (r
_ ✓ % / ;,1,,_:_,
/ �,`-In I/� ) �� \J J,I�`�,� �J/ 1; f \1� 1 1I/ ~ �� -•r/` �� \ G ?%'-■ - I� � r�9 1 ',-�]r— _- '� - i// ' `f ,t �I J�prJf� "�'
1i `'���'�` �' 1 iI//�����\.s�J�_\-ti\I l 1\ �I �� \(�r7\�[n �L�<r��I�] ( arr r�1� �I / lJr'I \ /'J �' 1I ° n % 1 `y l J ' t +- I,� r.o ' / ,) 1 ti _ti -L�,, :%i /' �. �,. _^. �_ 1 \ 9'rr�I) 4 ,I/ Ly J/ `t C/ ' 1 �r J 1 %` 1, c/ + r J 1+� {�� 1 )\r \ 1 1 s 1 �� f
/ / f / . / 1 I ( / �� 7 / ? >~' r ! tp L \Jr7 \� �J I r �J L> i f
V J / ` / r _ tr ��1, I -_i I �t �,1 I �t �J f J1 J[ J 1f� �` r i {
❑ f y 5 K"' i a t C7 1 / I�i / l wr�� �� �_ S ] IL. '' /
r 5 i % - Z I ! rj --- -TC -' , - -/ I f ) l r \ / 1 �_ - i ! ` • /� L1 i , j -Jr-r, ✓+ / J �\ _�
/ l _- _ ( / / _ _ - _ _. J( _ j - .r / J 1 ) E . j —_ r �_ 1 ../ �' I IC r S ri '\
/ ;ti 1 J J _" % '/ ! ! \. > J 1 - _ `�y �/ 'I r I J e \ 1 �� r� �, ` ° )� \ __�� 1 I J r� r _ r
f �� �� i I �7 / r �-��// //-' �I.•1 ,' ^_" s`J y'� / ) 1�� ��/ �/ //-�r �, �Y�, `=� `� ] .5; \ 'r lI ��`✓^} ��= '\J -, r �r --
.7 �- '�) �1 J�v�; •
v l\ F `/ _ l`��J/
J V, °r
% = l j
. ` 1 r rf ` ) o i \ `- ~lam l 1 / 1 1 1 �� i f
/ !` ter) _ r l i I \ �_
z 1� ` I` �� / /"r / j �' y \ _/ C v !] J_ \! r �� tv 1 Y� �d Iv— \
' , r/ r �' I/�� I O.
`- L Cu�/ `l ' 1 , ' �~: r�} 1 �� IY��J I `
� �� ' -r �Y r _-_ ` Q�' t_ - ry '%� \ J /
f' 1 / I -; / ,- J ; j C / f f �� r _\ f \lr '---
,_/ ` -� / ` J _ / 7 1' J \ �� �� j tj /--.
- r J \ / / } - � � 0 W ? f� J
as.
•
v ` t r'•
r— 7/ 1 a )ram �{ 1 ��- / / �i _� (�r
) r� ' \ 11.1 = ��firLLI -Z I' s J -- l� -, -• 7 l~ -� a �� l r _ _ J 1 ] I� \ J 1 f �� +
-;l f 1 y �/ 1 ~ �// ° _ ^_ I 3i \f / 1 \ y 1 / �1 L� r r` �, �J l ; ` DI�� 11 V� -
71 \ � �J \ ° / �\ / r. r \ I r art 5\ r L �\r^� J� r� �/�3� �' J —�
- , ��� J r �) Io7i� 1 ` 1 l•' IB- 1 ❑ / / •r ' ✓ v �� �, `j\ , ,1 = liJ \ �\ %-1.--.....F.Tif ��
? \ / _�� Ii . f ��? �- I. t-� .� `t\�� -=� +/ .-.� �� I- )\ / 14i ■�`�,,---5 J v �i `� {`✓/ I1����, Ct /
44
J ----,-/
= ] - - r ' r J / (
J - s- J J 1 r cJ �, _ If '1 l - f - r - y i �, 7 \ l' r r' _ 7 r`. I` �' '�\ f % ° 7 `- / ! f, U V L .J {
' / /� /� \ i / �_ / `� l �: / 4 __ / �\ 1 / C L. J� �/ 'i �. ! _4 Yam. .
— C 41 / N ) • Illr
r. ' �- - � ---1'-',
l� � \ \ \ ., = - I / � �' � ^ r � ram- 1 � \ -I � iy - n ,/,_ 1,-- � r - � �. ., L � `, 1[ / � 1' \ , � � % � ^ i � � \'+ �• � � --� , � \ � r I
- � J r-- r --J �� I� } \ � � �� / 1"°' � �L �_� �' `1 � ��, /-' � S J - � _i >�� '� `1 rv� � �`'I -- __ - J -' L _
r rI. f5. r ��� 1 7 r 1 l 1 a
> \ % I/
\L1I! 1 \ �� ,� r V I V �/ / 1�+,, ' / �1 ✓ ✓ v / \ rr r• v t \ t ]`/
\ 1
' I
intended
of service, i
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
N
N
0
N
¢ pp
n
0
AS SHOWN
W
J
U
cn
DESIGNED 3Y
❑RAWN BY
0
0
w
L)
w
Z
CO J
V
uJ
0 ❑
LL Z
D Q
W
Ea rAUJ
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUMBER
07

75
75
wD
w
a
LO
al
0
0
N
D
a)
a.)
a
—
0
D
0
C
a.)
❑
_c
U)
a
LO
0
Lf]
b
f1
J
_
U
a
Lf]
Cri
D
N
0
08 PLAN AND PROFILE POLLAR❑ SWAMP REACH
T
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
0
z
0
❑
C
❑
0
0_
N
a)
m
CC
0
a
_c
tll
-0
c
0
a)
0
❑
This document, together with the concepts and desians presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended ❑nly for
70
70
65
65
60
60
STA: 16+35.0
ELEV: 52.7
BEGIN HEADWATER
RESTORATION
55
EXISTING
GRADE
PROPOSED
GRADE
50
�
— �
—
n�
/ \
r
I
1�\
50
/ /1
1\
/\ ��`
Jl
IM1`
r
•r
^�JJ�
t
4 J1
�r �/\
i
\
���1
__
�ti—�ti/'�tl��11,r
11
-7
\
„n
1
/
/\,, I\
/\
\
.\
�/
\r
„
f���
1
,/�
\
L
1 1
45
45
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE REACH.
40
40
DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE TARGET
ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEE
SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE —POOL SEQUENCING.
1:
10
p N
L
()
00
1- �0�r�`7!J
L L�'1
r
(71 M
r
r 1�
UN7
L
ro
00 H
•
to lC]
r,
1- a0
to lC]
00
r n
to Lr)
a)
00 •?
L) Lr)
a)
10
•
10+00
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+00
15+00
PROFILE - REACH 1
Nor. Scale:1 "=40' I Vert. Scale:1 "=4'
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
20+00
w
,/k
431)
E
U
z
u-i
w
0
0
z
z
0
w
J
N
0
0
w
D
fJ7
LLJ
w
z
0
7-
fL
200 SOUTH
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
WWW.KIVLEY—HORN.COM
704-333-5131
w
z
0
0_
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
-, 2
r
/
\-[ f Jj
1, � i l l,lf
,/ i ; J L L "] / •
.
r �
J
/
/
9+Q
.i
L'
(r)
W
U
/ \
J
I
Sj
( )J\
P
LrE
CECE a 1 V- J a `�^ t\ ) 1' (1
r } 1 / �,� J /
❑ _•5 0 r, S/
\ o -1 1"--
..--- �� t 7 / / / r /
�. 1 _ 11^ i j(
/ � c�Lf ZJ` �5 l _1 k �/ \ r Cr/
' _ \ i\�� /�\( � ��0 r
\' ❑ ( i e r ?\ ff2 \r_--
1, I r
J LI
-f _1� \./it l II v
P
rl ` L' v s� 2\,
l r Q.L I` 1 1
] f -,, Ls \I S } -1'/ \ D
P
r r\ r 1 f t �- �— \ i � �f `, 1
n 7 \ .--1 / 04, a
i —i , 5 .7, ,0.-.__
`I
/ I` �I - I /
1 Jr
J \
� J r- u_ __ _ /
.A 1_..NOMMENIWairr011fr AllWr , AidEt
NEM N 0 'V NV — --"`"—i-krii-r- --.'"--". lir --,F.Amiamme=milIZEIM'AIMIIMAIr
1 +0
1 (L . ) I`.
--.- - /
/1 1 C/- --'
. - __ � f `I
L_ s.
-
1\
s tf �,-\
J I
\ N/
J
•
{
�.1
/ 7 c7
7
--Il
}� a
1
fj
MENEM
MEI
■�..ir
I■■d■■s
111111
i•■•■i
11111
OMNI
/
r
— I .
r- r-)�� /\ �) J �? �
n 7
-• w-1 [� I /` A L
\r/ ..)\ � - j
r\ /\�2 L `- is \1 \_ 1--- ' 1
���/ J is 11 �' �� ��� -� �`� 1` iJ
�\ .
7 I'� `—� l-\ r- �� — s ' r r \ ��1 l
1 �I 1
��, 1 1/ z� `' \ . �� �"� �[��� l
\ v I_ r \-
7\} / {�` v\�_I-'c
/-.i I \ ( r\
2
r)
Q
1'
-r
�I ;1r C J l
�J ;f
i
STA: 16+35
BEGIN POLLARD SWAMP — HEADWATERS
BEGIN HEADWATER RESTORATION
POLLARD SWAMP - REACH 1
17: 00 18+00
AIIMMEW
AMINEIIMIII
moommy
Jailor
Amour
AMMIFAMMEr
APIONWAW
All MOW IF 7r
ANNIE
ANNISINIEF
AMINNIIP
ANFAW
AZIWAMOr
1 MMITAMW I A I I Is ol r ;
4411,
7
4r.
HEADWATER RESTORATION — REGRADE
EXISTING DITCH AND SPOIL PILES TO
RESTORE VALLEY. SOME SECTIONS OF
CHANNEL WILL CONTAIN FLOODPLAIN
•
44.' 4F+
• +
410,
,41J
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
iry
21+
•
2
Lij
EC 0
Ln
CD
AS SHOWN
LLJ
cn
DESIGNED 3Y
❑RAWN BY
0
0
LLJ 0_
0
LO
Z
Ea U-I
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUMBER
08

70
70
D
J
0
0_
❑
CD
J
C
CO
0
_o
0
0
N
C
E
N
L)
Lt7
N)
0
1_
N
k_
09 PLAN AND PROFILE POLLAR❑ SWAMP REACH 1 &2
O
T
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
U
C
z
O
V
C
0
, c
65
65
60
60
N
r =
aw+
c LLI
c I II
55
55
_zw1-�
wmu)w
EXISTING
GRADE
PROPOSED
GRADE
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
50
50
��\
�i�
�
\�
BANKFULL
l//
\
7' \ /
'-- --✓
-^ � /r\
/ter
IL /\
/---
/r
��
���
0 20%SLOPE
1
-I
�'
/
��\
�/
v
-/
\r�
J
\f
\�r
�,
-
\�
`'
� ~'
\/�\1
�L
y
45
45
40
40
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE 'EACH.
DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE TARGET
35
35
ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEE
SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE —POOL SEQUENCING.
a
6]
co cc!
7"
1-
1- (7[•7
u7
0 co
7.),
co
O
LC]
0)
N-
u7
0
1- c7
tr) co
T
,— N
i[7
co
L[7 [p
R
u7
,r2
Tr
N-
N c7
Tr
CV
R
20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
PROFILE - REACH 1 AND REACH 2
Hor. Scale:l "=40' I Vert. Scale:l "=4'
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
REVISIONS
0
T..
,/k
E
U
z
Vf
W
U
0
U]
(f]
z
z
0
w
J
N
N
0
0
J
D
J
J
z
0
7-
D
0
V)
0
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
G
ij
L
/ I
S _ �
•
ri
\�
c-.
/7
♦
� \ I', 1 C
1
/
STA: 26+03
END POLLARD SWAMP — REACH 1
END HEADWATER RESTORATION
BEGIN POLLARD SWAMP — REACH 2
BEGIN PRIORITY .I RESTORATION
•
PROPOSED LOG SILL (TYP.)
SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 19
IL
-. I ot:c ,l z r,
; i
i ,_. 1
...._ )
t- il ♦��f f ; ti .
, 21 08 . , -7' 22+00 t. 4.0... 4 • . '4 00 —
POLLARD SWAMP - REACH 11. _.,L ,- , / r - � __ 1 ,,
1 + ►�♦
I 1 c ♦�♦
( J �• •
V r
/
PROPOSED LOG VANE (TYP.)
SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 19
•
POLLARp SlAjAr1:1/11;r-RE'ACH 2
PROPOSED BRUSH AND ROLL RIFFLE (TYP.)
SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 18
co
uj
CI CI)
•
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
L.
EC 0
0
AS SHOWN
LJ
DESIGNED BY
0
CHECKED BY
0
0
LO
Z
CO U-I
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUMBER
09

70
70
7-
J
a
—
0
D
0
C
❑
U)
>,
LO
0
Lc)
t-
b
0_
J
❑
N
0
N
1ri
L
U
J
0_
J
J
0
0
J
J
J
0
OC
a
❑
Z
z
J
a
b
0
T
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
0
z
0
❑
❑
N
a)
m
CC
65
65
60
60
55
55
EXISTING
GRADE
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
50
50
_/\
PROPOSED
GRADE
/
r�
/
��
\
\�J�
1
'./._
.�
\
J1_
.�
��
\
8ANKFUL
L SLOPE
_\
0.20%
`.-` -
' --
�\
r
/ \
Irk
\
-,___/'-'
-'
f
r\
— J \
�r�
. N.
I \
.
__ \v
\
1�.�
45
v
1�
/
v
/
r
l�
j
l
-.
4 • _
- ,
\/
I
45
1
' J
-
l�
_.
40
40
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
35
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE REACH.
DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE TARGET
35
-
ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEE
SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE -POOL SEQUENCING.
I
r'�
N
,- r7
Ln
�] a
Tr
N-O
v
Tr
(.p n
Tr
N
r7
Tr
ld7
N o
Tr
N.
p co.
Tr
O
— —.
Tr
N
N- oo
Tr
to
•-
Tr
00
rTr
Tr
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00
PROFILE - REACH 2
Nor. Scale:1 "=40' I Vert. Scale:1 "=4'
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
40+00
REVISIONS
U
z
0
T..
E
0
0
J
D
IJ
LLJ
z
0
7-
D
0
V)
0
0
O
N
CO
U
z
uJ
0
J
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
. r
J
N.
l
A
�f(
J \ r
Aolliglas
z j
n �
N
41rf
1
,` ,j � 1 i ( ' j ? / r
y
t-.
\.V1r\ (J
PROPOSED LOG CROSS VANE (TYP.)
SEE DETAIL 4, SHEET 20
J h
A
•
I'
11
r) \
•11 / \ , J 7
� v
b
'" / 1 \ tiles
i { r i„,,)•
/ I V f {"
1\
1 11 I3
\ I/
r7-
t —\
J 1
/ / _�
- J I
c \ L-
/ ,_
peer,',/ ,...ii-r ' ..'.7- ?
\
f .�-1 r
'i
l r 1 � ,� C ._ r
4- •,.
►+�A±�� /_.\ \, t s---- 1•\
L�� 7(`S `r-
▪ L1l
1
Q
i
1F
r1
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
� r
C ti I
/— /
[i p
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + + + +
+ . + + + + + + + +
+ -+ -- + _ _-+ = + + + + 100410
+.. --+ + + � ^�.�.44 .
+ + +
+ +--_-
1-1 I'
r \ / \ \ _-1 s:''
Ce a
P
a
L J
i I•
I.,
j 7
Ce
�� z 171/\)
•
/L
0
LLJ
ix 0
AS SHOWN
LLJ
DESIGNED BY
0
CHECKED BY
LJ-
z <
0
CO U-I
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUMBER
10
0
0

65
65
7-
LC,
a
E
N
N)
0
0
N
a
0
J
Ct
Ca
(n
❑
OC
J
J
0
J
J
J
0_
z
z
J
0_
0
T
0
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
0
z
0
N
1)
C
7,
60
60
55
55
STA: 44+25.1
ELE: 47.9
50
EXISTING
GRADE
50
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
—
PROPOSED
GRADE
45
� �
�� ,-
� �
`
�- `
` �
� �
.- -- �-"BANKFULL
l
�
—,
r
/
45
"----\
'
_
--
f
�
� \
SLOPE"=
Q.20?�
i iI
v
__`"
1 -
-
BANKFULL
SLOPE
= Q: t 5�
o
r-- r
--
-
��
- ' .
— -- —.
_- -
\
___C
—
_ , -
-_
— —�.
�.
_
l
\r
_
I
I
-
-
40
40
35
35
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
30
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE REACH.
30
DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE TARGET
ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEE
SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE SEQUENCING.
—POOL
r-
ai
.0
( r'�
ai
.0
N )
ai
Tr
c) c)
ai
Tr
O c0
co
Tr
(0
u7 in
co
Tr
.0
r�
-
Tr
a)
cc!
-
Tr
0
N
-
Tr
0)
u�
-
Tr
CVCV
CO
—
• rTr
Tr
["]
Tr
40+00
41+00
42+00
43+00
44+00
45+00
PROFILE - REACH 2
Nor. Scale:l "=40' I Vert. Scale:l "=4'
46+00
47+00
48+00
49+00
50+00
REVISIONS
U
z
431)
E
0
0
J
D
G7
J
J
z
0
7-
D
0
V7
0
0
N
0
N
CO
U
z
ui
0
J
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
IJ
/ n
J / .Z f.
<1 -----/ u C
r
C)
J
- , —� `1 `
\_ -
o
(n \
i fir.
r
+ + +
+ + +
4� + +
\4 F ` + + +
.......+\ +s + +
+ • +� + +
+ +`�`.... + +
..+.. +� +..+
+1 +
•
a r� j-j l�47 e
r -1 ) f - �S
/
r�s- 7
l
C
� 4/
FJ 44
Ca
48.1
� r
7 "
>4 J 7
I
/ >4
/
r
t 7 7
8
___ I-�]
I f_
J �7 7f
1/\
l)
B
'u''
r
1 1
L 1
17 `
7 -•--
CONTRACTOR TO GRADE SMOOTH
TRANSITION AT CONFLUENCE
STA: 43+67
POLLARD SWAMP - REACH 2
STA: 110+17
END UT2
42)
-J
7
4)
r�
« /7
9n
1 _
-.-
9°
(
r
+ + +..
+ _ +� /- ___+' +
+.r` + :+ — _=
+ +_ + +
4 __ - - - - —+ +
. + ---
STA: 45+76
POLLARD SWAMP - REACH 2
STA: 211+73
END UT3
17.
A
l)
r
t.
/
f
7
C
•
or)
lz
•
—
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
f
o
0
AS SHOWN
LJ
DESIGNED BY
0
CHECKED BY
LLJ 0_
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
ct
SHEET NUMBER
0
0

65
65
wD
w
0_
•
CO
Lrs
❑
0
Q
N
C
•
❑9: 35: 34om
N
N
0_
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
>
0
0
z
0
0
1 anly for the specific purpose and client for
60
0
0
0
60
0
6
:6 o
a
�co-,
+0
,-00
6
0 co
+
h$z
N
55
Q::
55
vnEz
,¢
0nEz
50
50
EXISTING
GRADE
PROPOSED
GRADE
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
45
45
BANKFULL
SLOPE
-- = 0.15%
- J
/
\V
- rl
•
BANKFULL
`
\
BANKFULL
J
\�
s
� J
v -
_
\ �
v
1
ram_,
� ^
._ t
-_ / `- --
SLOPE/
- = 0.12%
\
��
1 1
/ \ r `-
z _
/
/
1
-
SLOPE
'
r --
„,
r
Lr__
/
r-\
❑155:,�
-
�-
��
f
.�\
_ - r'
40
11
\
__/
/
,_
N.
40
v
3& LF
OF
_
—
48 RCP
0 1.00%
J
35
35
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
30
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE REACH.
DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE TARGET
30
ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEE
SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE —POOL SEQUENCING.
I
N
0
0)
0N-
r
0
0)
00
Ln
00
N.Tr
50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00
PROFILE - REACH 2 and REACH 3
Nor. Scale:1 "=40' I Vert. Scale:1 "=4'
56+00
57+00
58+00
59+00
60+00
REVISIONS
0
T..
"D.
E
U
z
Vf
w
U
0
U)
z
z
Q
i
w
J
N
N
0
0
w
D
fJ7
LLI
w
z
0
7-
D
0
V7
0
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
•
r
PROPOSED 36 LF OF 48" CMP
\
:darraltreirrtoperAgo), A
.A4117:ArAff- AVAVAX4671"4,40717,0
41
�J
I
N
r
\-_2 _--
-- 9
•
CE
I�]
7 /
1 L'
I r
CE
STA: 51+25
END POLLARD SWAMP — REACH 2
BEGIN POLLARD SWAMP — REACH 3
B
- --ts` -7 ---�C_I_ J\ _ 4/
r. G I
�, rJ
EXISTING GRAVEL F3OAD TO R� AIIN. /
/ L
r
r -7
C
}
i.
2
49,
/
N. 1
r -
r li
�'
CE
I'
CE
POLLARD SWAMP - REACH 2
6
•
I r
L_
L
r°
r.
I
2.
h 1 A
r •,
4l.
! �`;
/
1 C J
BB
{ + S { r
t1 v
r7
l�
C
��
BB
19
BB
cri
cv
ct
Lu
LLJ
/
BB
(
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
.10
•
•
LLJ
EC 0
CD
AS SHOWN
LLJ
DESIGNED BY
0
CHECKED BY
CI
0 0
Z
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
ct
(3)
SHEET NUMBER
0
0

65
65
7-
CD
w
Lv
0
Li
0
z
Z
J
0
r7
0
a
a
E
rn
[D
rr]
0
N
N
0
N
Iri
0_
r7
0
w
0_
J
J
0
a
W
J
L�
D
OC
o_
❑
Z
z
J
0
rr]
0
T
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
z
❑
❑
C
❑
ce
0
a
0
_C
a
C
V
Q
a
U
❑
o
c
N
Q)
2
a
m
E
C
0
0
_C
❑
1)
D_
0
m
U
V
L
m
C
E
0
0
L
60
60
55
55
50
64+91.6
=V: 42.1
7 RESTORATION
PROPOSED
GRADE
50
STA: 64+42.8
ELEV: 42.2
45
EXISTING
GRADE
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
BANKFULL
SLOPE
���-
=
0.15�
BAN�CFU�
45
�,r.
r�
_ .
40
\ /
\ J
-_ /
.775z
COPE
BANKFULL
SLOPE
l- -/ '
J-�
1 \, �\
I
.
\/
✓ \./v
J
J \---..._
40
35
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
35
30
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE REACH.
DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE TARGET
ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEE
SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE -POOL SEQUENCING.
30
[*'3
r
N
co,
-
to
NLn
60+00
61+00
62+00
63+00
PROFILE - REACH 3
Nor. Scale:1 "=40' I Vert. Scale:1 "=4'
64+00
65+00
66+00
REVISIONS
0
T..
,/k
E
U
z
u-i
w
0
0
cn
z
z
0
i
w
J
N
N
0
0
w
D
fJ7
w
IJ
z
0
7-
D
0
V7
0
0
O
N
CO
U
z
W
0
J
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
./
ti
i
LI
\
f
N
2 \
1
f ` LI
1--', J TA
L }\ 1\� C 9 �� �_ 1� f �,
\ — ,
1��`T \t 1 ram r) .. 4�
N
a ' 1 ` \\ \ -_� :
a r G r -\ \� L d 1 I
� �` '_� 1 cl �t �—I q` ,.. .,
1, J J ( .� 1
rJ sL . aL
\) \--r `/-N._,,
BS
CE
J
}
k.
)
_C \
' � I
cE
CE G l
BB
( 7
-
•
BB
7()
•
BB
POLLP4RD REPf" 3 7 • .
fTh
END POLLARD SWAMP - REACH 3
END PRIORITY I RESTORATION
,____-1 -------:
_4-:- -
11
6616.4,
10
'--;\ \\---:: \\\ \---/'7 -7ILN
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
CJ
Lo
LLJ
AS SHOWN
DESIGNED BY
0
CHECKED BY
LLJ 0_
CI
LO
Z
CO U-I
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUMBER
13
0

65
65
J
a
E
0
N)
0
N
0_
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
z
0
0
C
7,
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein
-. -4,- ,-
-��
�����6
�I
��
/1 / i
.iJ 1 1
•
2 - v
74r
60
60
I I I I
5TA: 100+35.0
ELE: 51.9
0
N
STA: 103+88.3
ELE: 50.4
n
+ ,�it
CO
55
55
0 roi
r Ln
COl
J
;TA: 108+51J
LE: 48.6
I-
V)w
0 ai
r�
N
w
H J
r.
+
vy
w
50
r V
50
Q J
Cii
rn w
1
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GRADE
,I
1.
IL
/
II
1
/
/
-
-
45
1\v1,
1
r ����-�'
1
/
\�
1111�
r-/
/��/
\\
'1
�1
1�.1
45
-'�
\`
\Jl
/I
lr
//
l�/
Ir
���1
_J
�`
II'1
11
N.__�
/
,1
I`JI-�a
r/'
��
\
1
r/�1
f���
-_
til 11
\����_�-�`;
\_
/
1
_/�1
I
/ \
\
\./\-
11
-
�r7�/r
\
\ 1`
/,
l
_ r
/ � J
1�
1. � •_-
- --,� i /--
� `
v �I
v
1 �
� _ --i
_ �
v
40
40
35
35
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTAT ON OF BANKFULL
30
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE REACH.
30
DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE TARGET
ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEE
SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE —POOL SEQUENCING.
ao
a) a
0 -
0 03
a) m
in r)
�7
a
0) `-
0 a
0)
100+00
101+00
102+00
103+00
104+00
105+00
PROFILE - UT2
Hor. Scale:1 =40' I Vert. Scale:1 "=4'
106+00
107+00
108+00
109+00
110+00
110+50
IJ
U
z
E
0
0
N
J
D
(11
0-
LLI
IJ
cc
z
0
200 SOUTH
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
WWW.KIVLEY—HORN.COM
704-333-5131
w
z
0
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
_ _ a
1. , �f
7
84]LI r' 1
/
r
1_ j 9
1, r J�
r
11
-
L/
�f2
r3
\--„ \-J V
J �
7
L. '
r
n
n
1
• /1
STA:100+35
BEGIN UT2
l
7-
I'7
\ l 1
}(7
BEGIN HEADWATER RESTORATIONS d
L
r r-
v
7
sJ A
-,`
(
1
-\
\ /
V
n
-•
4 /
`.
v-
r
? f
/7
1
r
1
J
1�4
f
-
T171
\ _. -1'..'- ---irwer- ,.17----_ ---jrnearier~glivrapirinnimarmitiv,wirsiodratilip_werjoirdraffer---
9
C.
71
•
•
N7,
kr
STA: 110+15
END UT2
END HEADDWATER RESTORATION
STA: 43+67
POLLARD SWAMP - REACH 2
u1-3
•
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
0
EC 0
CD
0
LLJ
0
AS SHOWN
DESIGNED 3Y
DRAWN BY
LLJ
Lil
0
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUMBER
14

E
1)
0
LCi
U
z
C
N
a)
15
o 65 65
CC.,
LLI
imley—Horn and P
TEVISICNS
60
co
60
_o
Q
>,
0
N
+
(0
IraN
N
a)
+
0)
N d')
V3W
N
Q'Lj
fn hi55 1- _1
55
t
� J
V7W
��
-
I ,i
V}W
ument without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley—Horn and Associates,
PROPOSED
GRADE
50
K. ))H
© 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
200 SOUTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 200
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
PHONE: [phone] WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
-
1
�/ �/�.f
n
/
_�
P
v
' /
,!
~n
`
\
-\-
1\—~1
r-
'
`~
-.—.-_--
Jr
/:-- 1
v%
\
—/
'/
'
v
4•
1
-
J
v
r
-.-
\-.,,-Lf
vim/
�I,_
\i__.-- ,,,
„_,f,-.w—,
I ../ r^_I,f'J_.
„,,
-I
r
I\y r
1
J
1
/
45
N,f
.__.�
--,_,\ /f
.,;
t 2.-�J\1„
\I
\'
//
45
-,
40
40
35
35
3a
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR
DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
30
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
o
o
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD
DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS,
ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED
OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE REACH.
RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE TARGET
IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SEE
r�
°'
4
°
co
r�
co
'"
4
co
1-0
"'
Lo 4
"'
ao
2C
SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL
PROFILE RIFFLE —POOL SEQUENCING.
204+00
205+00
206+00 207+00
208+00
209+00 210+00 211+00
212+00
o
PROFILE - UT3
Q
E
ES
6
Nor. Scale:1'=40' I Vert. Scale:1"=4'
0
N
m
�,
j
+
❑
r
�1
C' _�
\
\
, `, \
l
\�
�`
ry ` I ����
-J
-J
1
`
r
U
o
-
1
\
�. '
p
_
-,
-- ..1
--
l
+
/
r
-
._
aC.
�ll .
+
a
C
o
�r
r
...,r
I
"
`
'
--
J
:II �. �O��i1i
r �.�
.'��iv
`�1►rII�Pill
�.',
Q
-
r
-� 2
1
[
',
„
v
''
--\,
-
_'
2
v
} 1
fSI
\
}
�\
J
r
l 7,
r --
;
}
(7 r ►e8ii�►
Cr)
i�iiiii���i�C�►��.
441
•'i1.
•
�r--
L
to
'--
" --'
J
�-
-�
/N
--
1
03
1
1
•
,_,
�t
,-
41
rj
}
�1
--.
/i'
/ems^
1
4014
04►♦4
KHA PROJECT
017506004
DATE
04/08/2022
SCALE AS SHOWN
DESIGNED BY KJH
❑RAWN BY MDK
CHECKED BY ❑MP
r NO
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
�► ❑ 20 40 80
'
\
-
,
-f ''
'1
'
r
-o
,I
!
I
1
.-
\
1
'N
`--
/
---
/
\
- --
-
-
,.''
_
-'\
�
-
Y
_
\
-_
-
\_.'.�/.
a, �_
�.
;
,
\
e
t
;
l'
''
STA: 110+15
1
®%
II
,000�
\'i'
_
END UT2
"
c.
\
`
��
J
►
PO
7
�I
!
i
J
�l
��
_
/
\
.�
�.
\
In
IJ
,
ii
I
~`
f
\
/
a
_
ICJ
,�
��
END
HEADDWATER RESTORATION
STA: 43+57
•►'i
{
�_ '
��►`I.��.i1
�iijj�
•'.
_
_o
�4�.
,-
��
r
\ J
-
;`
f-
�,�
/'
T
.)
L,
.
-
N
,
S
7
c
)
`1
-'.
:
(
` I
-
J Ir
I
I
POLLARD
I
SWAMP - REACH 2
`=
\.
►���U►.el
'00.►,��
_ e�
�i
,
PLAN AND PROFILE -
UT3
\
1
I�
- t
s
r
n
-
•�
.
!' _-
1
`
` -'r
�1`
]
..,-
'�
_
ice
�,.
W'�!�
►O'►ill
' a '
0
-�
-
,�
---
ir
I``'
/
-al,
"
/
r
s
.y�
,
1
c
_
_
f
.,
�'
}v
1
r
n
''i
a +.irs
-
\
( 1
r f
/- i /-
}
�r �4
.
1
r
) /;
j }\
~�
,r
cli
'�/�1�►�
f j
-
_
/
,.
,,
-
��
-
1
_
J
}
/
��
`-. /
-
J
\
r
��.
r�j�r
1
��
r
{ 1 �_ �l��*
= —/
-1
�,
-
L ��
,iii'i�
Uj
f l -, `f ti -
ill 1
r�
/
r-
1.
`
- m
-
-
L
--.-
g
\--.-��1'4'
+
{ o
�' .-
irarmitatigtsir.
r'-
i=
�.i�
0
-'
l
y
J
'
'
���`
,;
�
-
r
~
- +4111
�i��;�i
jj
//
`�4
—
r_
�
1
`'
_•.•
�
/�
Y
_ -
'��t
-'\
/ J
c
`
\
#������iire
� �
/ !�
7--,
\'
''y �1�'L��. u~ �'•
'!'°
7 1 ��
r]
J
-
L
r-
o
l_s
`r~
`
i`
a
`�
`�\
:sr go
J
r�
�y
■
J
1
, i
_ -
�;
r
L�
y
r
_
`
`
r
(r
,
j
C�
J` �1
;��� '
®
'�
, }C J
Li)
-')
•
-"L.,
-. 3,
i
/ ----5,
\ lle
...I
. j y
-
-',.
, _.,
,
..j
.---:--7-
\ l
.--,
j
\
.}
I
(
o
-
,�
1.
I
,
f
r
C `r
c
a
1
�y
f
{ �V
- r� •�AV
- f
J
,F
/
n
U
C
�
l�
-,
��
-
r-
��_�
5
I
..
{,---`_.--
1
r�
��
L
/
` �~ � 'O�
1;��
5TA +
L11 7L
END UT3
'
C
+ r
T�p��-�°�
�'
\
f _
C
i
pOO�i►00� {
. --- �i0♦ 1 .
!�'�
END HEADWATER RESTORATION
BEAU FORT 56
STREAM AND WETLAND
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
A Weyerhaeuser
/
`� '
J
-1-
''�..;
`
N
poimirmi�.
�?
c
t
-
t
��
\�
'
I
/
}
r _.
J ,-1 \
4 '_ ►iiiii0�
-
�f
"
S
STA: 45+76
�'���
��
y
S
/
/
_
_
,,
r 7 ;'
POLLARD SWAMP - REACH 2
"er�,
Afj"
AketoF,,se-w-
_,
,
_,
—
----,
1.
-\
i ,
P
i P
P-rr
/...-
1
.(
EM--ijlj
..
-
- -t:3
..../=---_,
,\---.
,
- -
\,-
,-,
II
A,
-
IS
.'_.. ,
xN
.
''
/
0/
.,)
\r.f
\
.
-.-
' .
i.,,
,
I-c.01S0,.
_G
.boo
0
_-_,
-,
r
\
3
-
1-
`
_
, ',-I
Jr1.,.-.r.\\i
-mac
.. + +
_ ,
A'
;;;
,f
_
146-_"
,___.;--
.7---1
M.-
,__-
('
---. •
I
II
c'
0+' .--\k.+ 1- +
l - .-_-_.
.
:)"
..../)
,,
•
STA:24
1 +D
1
r�
ram.
®
I
1
1,
■
EH
I L +�
1
\
o
"_
`
UT3
.
-
,�
^` \-
�___
/
/\7
_ -
\'
��
[/
f
_
`�
j
I
_
,
•I
t �.�
2
_ + +
/i + +
i
,
r'
i
JI
_BEGIN
BEGIN
HEADWATER
RESTORATION
__
y
\
°
- _
7 ��
-
/
is
__
i,�
,�,
-
-
C
~1
��
I
r J
�.
-
--
_,
./'
/
t
!
�:
7
J
f
>��
ti
Ir,
,
,
N
•
t
.2
...111E=ZEE
JJJIII
j--
J
�.__
Jay`;'
�r
r-
�l--\
�
M
fir-_
��}�.,•�
u
~
-
- _
�_
-�
— r
.:..
_ _
__ __
�®
`_ .
I
—
-
'\
_
('JI►
�. - -
1�,
\__--t,
'f�
\
+1ill■rQJ
/1
.
,
_!
_
,9•
r
�
;L''�
a
[
%
"--•
'-
..
\
'-.
Li
SHEET NUMBER
❑ -
,
.7
///
.-
.
❑
)
_
I`
L

N
0
Q
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
4-
0
0
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 100 200 400
1 f r
7-
CC,
LLJ
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
WWW.KIVLEY—HORN.COM
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
CN
LLJ
Q 00
0 0
0
AS SHOWN
W
J
D
DESIGNED 3Y
0
❑RAWN BY
0
0
WETLAN D
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUMBER
16

J
0_
0
0
n
C
0
a)
0
7
a
0
0
7
0
U1
Ul
a
4-
4-
0
0
0
N
(1)
0
U)
>,
U)
0
�[7
0
7
m
J
U
E
a
0)
0
0
Lr)
a
z
J
0_
C7
J
0_
0
0
0
7,
0
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
z
0
0
C
Cs
7,
—
30
G
33
3.
I
1
1
1
3j
n
ti
ti
ti
\
CiN
7
1
\
\
\
\
`9
\
ONTRACTOR TO ENSURE
\ POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO
\
\
\
ROAD (TYP) ,
/
/
/
\
/
/
/
\
\
/
\
\
/
/
\
\
\
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 100 200 400
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
w
REVISIONS
U
z
Vf
0
0
z
z
0
i
J
J
N
0
0
w
D
(1)
LLI
IJ
(n
z
0
D
0
V7
0
0
O
N
CO
0
z
w
0
J
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
0
-Da
0 Co
Et0
a
o
N
0
LLJ N
QCO
n
Q
AS SHOWN
J
J
U
rI7
DESIGNED BY
0
r
m
0
0
CHECKED BY
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
SHEET NUMBER
17

7—
CD
w
CO
LC)
0
0
0
N
0
a)
a)
Q
E
co
0
0
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
z
0
N
Cs
0
C
7,
HEAD OF RIFFLE LOG (TYP.)
BANKFULL
EDGE OF WATER
FLOW
EDGE OF WATER
BANKFULL
HEAD OF RIFFLE LOG (TYP.)
B-
NOTES:
1. PLACE FABRIC ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE
MOST UPSTREAM LOG SILL IN THE CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE.
2. THE LOG SILLS SHALL ALL BE DESIGNED TO BE
SUBMERGED OR COVERED AT LOW FLOWS.
3. LOGS USED IN STRUCTURE FOR LOG SILLS SHALL
BE HARDWOOD SPECIES AND A MINIMUM OF 12"
IN DIAMETER.
4. TAIL OF RIFFLE LOG IS INTERCHANGEABLE WITH
LOG CROSS VANE, LOG VANE, OR LOG SILL PER
PLANS. SEE SEPARATE DETAIL
KEY/PRESS BRUSH INTO TOE OF BANK
TO PROVIDE SCOUR PROTECTION
TAIL OF RIFFLE LOG (TYP.)
INTERCHANGEABLE WITH LOG
CROSS VANE, LOG VANE, OR
LOG SILL PER PLANS. SEE
SEPARATE DETAIL
1.0' DEEP WELL GRADED MIX
OF BRUSH AND NATURAL
CHANNEL MATERIAL
SECTION A -A
BANKFULL
SECTION B-B
WELL GRADED MIX OF BRUSH
AND NATURAL CHANNEL
MATERIAL
SEE PROFILE FOR
SPACING BETWEEN STEPS
PLAN VIEW
TAIL OF RIFFLE LOG (TYP)
INTERCHANGEABLE WITH LOG CROSS
VANE, LOG VANE, OR LOG SILL PER
PLANS. SEE SEPARATE DETAIL
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION WHERE
NORMAL WATER MEETS THE
BANKS
FLOW
BANKFULL
EDGE OF WATER
i
EXCAVATED POOL, TYP.
KEY INTO BANK
MINIMUM OF 5.0'
E'II
BRUSH AND ROLL RIFFLE
Not to Scale
EDGE OF WATER
BANKFULL
REVISIONS
U
Z
0
T..
cu
E
0
0
J
D
J
J
Z
0
f
D
0
0)
0
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
N
LLJ O
N
Qco
n O
0
AS SHOWN
J
J
0
U)
DESIGNED BY
0
r
m
❑
0
CHECKED BY
CI
Z
'DOD _1
W
00
LL Z
D Q
Q 2
W <
CO rUJ
V
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
18

wD
w
a
4-
0
0
c
(1)
L
0]
T
a)
LC
0
0
a
J
_
0
E
LC)
0
0
Lri
N
a
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
z
0
0
C
Cs
7,
}
0
0
--a
cIN
BRUSH LAYER
BELOW LOG
TOE OF SLOPE
ATTACH FABRIC TO
BACK OF LOG
HEADER LOG
■
SECTION A -A
0
i
PLAN VIEW
FLOW
V
STREAM BED
BACKFILL AND BRUSH
}
COMPACTED BRUSH LAYER AND
NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL LAYER.
ALL BRUSH PLACED PERPENDICULAR
TO THE CHANNEL.
NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC, TYP.
BACKFILL WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF
BRUSH AND ON -SITE MATERIAL
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
(2- LOG VANE
Not to Scale
HEADER LOG
END OF LOG BURRIED
INTO STREAM BED
SECTION B-B
FOOTER LOG/CUT OFF SILL
FOOTER LOG
(LOGS MAY BE NOTCHED TO
PROVIDE A BETTER FIT AND
LOCK TOGETHER IF NECESSARY)
BRUSH LAYER
BA
BR
NAIL FABRIC TO LOG
FLOW
V
CKFILL WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF
USH AND ON -SITE MATERIAL
FOOTER LOG
SECTION A -A
EDGE OF WATER
f
2.0'
�A
EDGE OF WATER
SEE PROFILE FOR ELEVATION
HEADER LOG
TOP OF BANK
0
J
w-A
PLAN VIEW
CII
Not to Scale
6ED
EXCAVATED POOL
SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR DEPTH
BACKFILL WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF
BRUSH AND ON -SITE MATERIAL
HEADER LOG (SEE SECTION A -A)
KEY INTO BANK A MINIMUM
OF 5.0'
REVISIONS
U
Z
0
T..
E
0
0
w
D
LLJ
w
z
0
7-
D
0
V7
0
0
O
N
CO
N
U
Z
w
0
J
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
N
LLJ O
N
QCO
n
0
AS SHOWN
w
J
U
C1)
DESIGNED BY
0
r
m
CHECKED BY
0
Z
LO
w
O 0
LL Z
D Q
Q 2
W <
CO rUJ
I..L
V
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
0
SHEET NUMBER
19

7—
a
0
0
c
U)
0
T
U)
0
0
J
0
E
Q
N)
Cri
0)
0
0
a
20 STREAM DETAILS
T
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
z
0
N
Cs
0
C
CROSS LOG
NOTCH LOGS SO THAT THEY LOCK TOGETHER
(LIKE LINCOLN-LOGS)
BACKFILL (TYP)
BACKFILL WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF
BRUSH AND ON —SITE MATERIAL
FLOW
LOG VANE
2.0'
SECTION A -A
EXCAVATED POOL,
SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR DEPTH
FOOTER LOG
NOTES:
1. DEEPEST PART OF POOL TO BE IN LINE WITH WHERE VANE ARM TIES INTO THE BANK.
2. BRUSH AND STICKS TO BE USED TO REDUCE VOIDS BETWEEN LOGS.
3. ALL LOGS TO BE HARDWOOD SPECIES, 8" DIAMETER.
BANKFULL
NAIL LOGS TOGETHER
USING 9" GALVANIZED NAIL
NOTCH LOGS SO THAT THEY FIT TOGETHER
(LIKE LINCOLN—LOGS)
CROSS LOG
LOG VANE
TOE OF SLOPE
POOL EXCAVATED PER PROFILE
OR DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
4
0
J
J
PLAN VIEW
OF SLOPE
LOG CROSS VANE
Not to Scale
BANKFULL
BACKFILL WITH BRUSH, STICKS,
AND ON —SITE ALLUVIUM, (TYP.)
FOOTER LOG
NON —WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
BANKFULL ELEVATION
COIR FABRIC (TYP)
SEE DETAIL
SEE PLAN
BRUSH LAID PERPENDICULAR TO THE
STREAM BED AND COMPACTED IN 6" LIFTS.
BRUSH PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO
FLOW
A
► 01 01 01 -
s�
•
+, .tom 1:4--7
I . i.r -••F ��~• fir,, �, + �
nveS
OIL s�I �� -
INNER BERM ELEVATION
(SEE PLAN, PROFILE, AND TYPICAL SECTIONS)
NOTE: IF TYPICAL SECTION DOES NOT CALL FOR INNER BERM,
BRUSH AND FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED AND
COMPACTED TO THE BANKFULL ELEVATION.
MATCH TYPICAL DIMENSIONS
6" MAX ABOVE "BASE FLOW"
7
18" MIN. —
SECTION A -A
13. MIN. FROM EDG
75% BRUSH (STICKS/LEAVES/BRANCHES)
25% ON —SITE EARTH MATERIAL
Y
mt+fot
PLAN VIEW
STREAM GRADING
PER PLAN
BASE/NORMAL FLOW ELEVATION
EXCAVATED POOL PER PROFILE
dIIVM AO I00I
1
I; / iv ; / /
44
4.444
���
*4*1\446.1
11f1J>tNV8
A
POOL PER PROFILE
SEE PLAN VIEW FOR
EXTENTS OF TOE W@UQ
NOTE:
1. BRUSH SHALL BE A VARIETY OF DIAMETERS AND SHALL
BE LAID GENERALLY PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW AND
COMPACTED BY DIRT.
2. FIRST LAYER OF BRUSH SHALL BE A BED OF 3"
LIMBS/BRUSH SET 18" MIN. BELOW THE BED.
3. LAYERS ABOVE 1st LAYER SHALL BE 75% BRUSH OF A
VARIETY OF SIZES WITH 25% ON SITE MATERIAL FILLING
VOIDS.
4. BRUSH BROUGHT UP IN LIFTS.
5. GRADING ABOVE THE BRUSH TOE PER THE TYPICAL
SECTION AND/OR GRADING PLAN.
/51 BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
JNot o Scale
REVISIONS
U
z
0
T..
E
0
0
w
J
J
z
0
D
0
0
0
0
N
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
(NJ
0
N
Qco
n
0
AS SHOWN
J
J
U
C1)
DESIGNED BY
0
r
m
0
n
CHECKED BY
cf)
0
uJ
uJ
0
Z
COO J
LO
00
LL Z
D Q
Q 2
W <
CO rUJ
I..L
V
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
20

wD
w
L
J_
H
w
C
0
Q
0
LC]
N
a
21 STREAM DETAILS
7,
6
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
z
0
0
C
Cs
7,
NEW STREAMBANK
SHALL BE TREATED
AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS
FLOW
BACKFILL
EXISTING
CHANNEL
EXTEND CHANNEL BLOCK
MIN. OF 6 BEYOND LIMITS
OF EXISTING CHANNEL
6
5'
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
SECTION A -A
3' MIN.
LENGTH
PLAN VIEW
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
UNCOMPACTED
BACKFILL
SECTION B-B
NOTES:
1. BOTTOM OF BLOCK SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 1' BELOW THE INVERT
OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL.
2. COMPACT BACKFILL IN 12" LIFTS TO EXTENT POSSIBLE OR AT THE DIRECTION OF
THE ENGINEER.
CHANNEL BLOCK
Not to Scale
NATURAL
DRAINAGE
FLOW
A
NATURAL
DRAINAGE
0.5' TO 1.0' VARIES
FLOW
FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION
Ak DEEP POOL
1.0' - 1.5'
SECTION A -A
1
10'
DEEP POOL
PRIMARY
WEIR
LOCATION
FLOW
1.0'-1.5'
DEEP POOL
0.5'-1.O'
20'
1.O'-1.5'
DEEP POOL
r 1 FLOODPLAIN DEPRESSION
FLOW
Not to Scale
A
PRIMARY
WEI R
(LOCATION
VARIES)
STREAM CHANNEL
STREAM
CHANNEL
HEVISICNS
U
Z
0
T..
cu
E
0
0
w
D
LLJ
w
0)
0
7-
D
0
0
0
0
N
CO
0
Z
LEI
0
J
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
N
0
LLJ N
QCO
n 0
0
AS SHOWN
w
J
0
U)
DESIGNED BY
0
r
m
0
0
CHECKED BY
0
Z
'DOD _1
W
O 7�
D
Q 2
w <
CO rUJ
I..L
V
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
21

7-
w
Vi
J
H
J
U)
a
up
0
0
cv
0
c
a
a
0
b
0
N
22 EROSION CONTROL ❑ETAILS
7,
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
z
0
0
C
Cs
7,
RIFFLE
CPOOL
COIR FIBER MATTING INSTALLED PER
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH
LIVE STAKING, PERMANENT AND
TEMPORARY SEEDING PER PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS. (TYPICAL BOTH SIDES)
COIR FIBER
MATTING
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
STREAM BED
BACKFILL
18" (TYP.)
EXCAVATE TRENCH AND
KEY INTO GROUND (6" MIN)
PLAN
6" MIN
RIFFLE
FLOODPLAIN/EXISTING
GROUND
ANCHORS ON 1'
CENTERS IN TRENCH
MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN
TRENCH AND BACKFILLED
EXTEND MATTING BELOW TOE
OF SLOPE AND KEY INTO
STREAMBED MIN. 6"
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
KEY INTO STREAMBED
(PER TYPICAL
CROSS-SECTION BELOW)
MATTING IN
TRENCH
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
NEW CHANNEL
SECTION
EXCAVATE TRENCH AND
KEY INTO GROUND (6" MIN)
SEED AND MULCH PER VEGETATION
NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
COIR FIBER MATTING INSTALLED TO EDGE OF CUT/FILL
PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH LIVE
STAKING, PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SEEDING PER
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (TYPICAL BOTH SIDES)
NATURAL CHANNEL BOTTOM
(NO MATTING)
NOTES:
1, IN AREAS TO BE MATTED, ALL
SEEDING, SOIL AMENDMENTS, AND
SOIL PREPARATION MUST BE
COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COIR
FIBER MATTING.
ANCHOR TRENCH
ON 1' CENTERS
ANCHOR OVERLAP
ON 1' CENTERS
6" OVERLAY (MIN.)
PLAN VIEW
INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR EROSION CONTROL MATTING
Not to Scale
2" X 2" (NOMINAL)
WOODEN STAKE
1"
ANCHOR
ANCHORS ON 3' CENTERS
ANCHORS (TYP)
STAKES ON 1'
CENTERS AT
STREAMBED
6' MAX. W/O WIRE
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
SILT FENCE FABRIC
INSTALLED TO SECOND
WIRE FROM TOP
GRADE
FABRIC 8" DOWN AND 4"
FORWARD ALONG TRENCH
FRONT VIEW
* FOR REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES, USE No. 57 STONE
FOR ANCHOR WHEN SILT FENCE IS PROTECTING CATCH BASIN.
3'-0"
8"-24
21_O'1
STEEL POST
SILT FENCE
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
1../-
z_
O
I II
SIDE VIEW
GRADE
8" MIN. COVER
OVER SKIRT*
ANCHOR SKIRT AS
DIRECTED BY ENGINEER*
NOTES:
1. USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN
DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT
EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER
IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED
FLOW.
2. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS
TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
(9)
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
Not to Scale
HEVISICNS
0
T..
,/k
E
U
z
to
J
0
0
cn
z
z
0
i
J
J
N
N
0
0
J
D
J
J
z
0
D
0
0
0
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
0 0
D0
0 CO
a Ln
=o
N
N
0
LLJ N
QCO
n 0
0
AS SHOWN
J
J
U
G7
DESIGNED BY
0
r
m
0
CHECKED BY
O
Z U)
O J
O <
Z
O W
_❑
0
W
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
22

7-
JD
J
10
0
4-
0
a)
0
0
0
c
a
E
a
N)
0
0
N
0
N
Sri
a
23 EROSION CONTROL ❑ETAILS
7,
J
Sheet Set: Beaufort56
T
0
C
z
0
0
C
Cs
7,
A
PUMP 0
AROUND
1 HOSE
0
4 X (D)
A
J
PLAN
FILTER FABRIC
SECTION A -A
ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR PUMP -AROUND HOSE
*CIF CLEAN WATER)
EXISTING TERRAIN
FILTER FABRIC
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
ftr
15.0 FT. TO 20.0 FT.
57 STONE
STREAM BANK
Not to Scale
NOTE: IF SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IS PLACED ON DISTURBED SOIL THEN A STABILIZED
OUTLET/CHANNEL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.
THE STABILIZED OUTLET WILL CONSIST OF A 1"-6" WELL GRADED MIX OF RIP RAP A
MINIMUM OF 1' THICK PER THE DIMENSIONS BELOW. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN
THE RIP RAP AND SOIL FOUNDATION. THE STABILIZED OUTLET WILL EXTEND FROM THE
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN TO THE BANK OF THE CHANNEL BELOW THE WORK AREA.
3:1
FILTER FABRIC
H
0
0
L.�
0
3:1
EXISTING
GROUND
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN WITH ROCK PAD
Not to Scale
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN, UTILIZE A
STABILIZED OUTLET INSTEAD OF A
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IF PUMPING
CLEAN WATER. (SEE NOTES)
(
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE
EDGE OF FLOODPLAIN
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
DEWATERING PUMP
PUMP -AROUND PUMP
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA WHEN WORKING "IN CHANNEL"
1. INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR
HOSE/PIPE OUTLET.
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING
OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS.
DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA. AREA TO BE DEWATERED SHALL BE
EQUAL TO ONE DAY'S WORK.
5. PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF
IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST).
7. PUMP AROUND AREA TO BE STABILIZED WITH MATTING AT THE END OF EACH
WORK DAY. THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET
ONLY SHOW THE UPPER AND LOWER EXTENT OF WORK FOR EACH STREAM
SEGMENT. THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE
LOCATION OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE(S) FOR EACH DAY'S WORK. ALL
GRADING MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF THE DAY.
8. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND OUTLET CHANNEL AND THEN
BACKFILL. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA PER THE PLANS AND SPECS.
NOTES
1) ALL IN -STREAM EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATED
SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2) IMPERVIOUS DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM
STREAM FLOW.
3) GRADED STREAM BANKS SHALL BE STABILIZED, WITH MATTING,
PRIOR TO PREDICTED RAIN FALL EVENTS, UNLESS ALL RAIN
EVENT FLOW CAN BE PUMPED AROUND FOR PREDICTED EVENT.
4) MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL
TO THE WORK. THIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING, DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS AND HOSES.
5) PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE OF SUFFICICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER
THE WORK AREA.
WORK AREA
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
NOTE:
PUMP -AROUND OPERATION MAY
NOT BE REQUIRED IF NO BASE
FLOW
EXAMPLE OF PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
Not to Scale
HEVISICNS
0
T..
,/k
431)
E
U
z
Vf
J
0
0
z
z
0
i
J
J
N
0
0
J
D
J
J
z
0
D
0
0
0
0
O
N
CO
N
U
z
uJ
0
J
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
(NJ
0
LJ N
QCO
n
AS SHOWN
w
J
U
C1)
DESIGNED BY
0
r
m
a
CHECKED BY
0
L.L
Z U)
O J
O <
Z
O 18
w
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
23

m
09: 36: 34am
a
J_
w
0
0
z
w
H
0
0
z
w
0
w
J
Sheet Set: Beoufort56
T
U
O
z
O
0
C
ROPARIAN SEED MIX
COMMOM NAME
SCIENTIFOC NAME
PERCENT PLANTED
RIVER OATS
CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUM
27
VIRGINIA WILDRYE
ELYMUS VIRGINICUS
20
INDIANGRASS
SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
15.5
SWITCHGRASS
PANICUM VIRGATUM
15
REDTOP PA IV
PANICUM RIGIDULUM
8
FOX SEDGE
CAREX VULPINOIDEA
3
WINTER BENTGRASS
AGROSTIS HYEMALIS
2
GREENWHITE SEDGE
CAREX ALBOLUTESCENS
2
SLENDER WOODOATS
CHASMANTHIUM LAXUM
2
PARTRIDGE PEA
CHAMAECRISTA FASCICULATA
1.5
SOFT RUSH
JUNCUS EFFUSUS
1.5
SENSITIVE PEA
CHAMAECRISTA NICTITANS
1
NARROWLEAF SUNFLOWER
HELIANTHUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS
1
NARROWLEAF PRIMROSE
WILLOW
LUDWIGIA LINEARIS
0.5
ZONE
3
VARIES
SECTION VIEW (HEA3WATE ESTOATON
00
ZONE
3
''' • ,•s+• 'Att
ot
+ i
SECTIO
ZONE
2
VARIES
VIEW (ESTOATO
NOT TO SCALE
ZONE
1
VARIES
ZONE
2
VARIES
Lig
ZONE 1 - STREAMSODE PLANTING
COMMOM NAME
SCIENTIFOC NAME
WELAND INDICAOR
S ATUS
PERCENT PLANTED
SILKY DOGWOOD
CORNUS AMOMUM
FACW
20
SILKY WILLOW
SALIX SERICEA
OBL
40
ELDERBERRY
SAMBUCUS
FACW
15
BUTTONBUSH
CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS
OBL
15
BLACK WILLOW*
SALIX NIGRA
OBL
5
TAG ALDER**
ALNUS SERRULATA
OBL
5
LIVE STAKES ARE 1/2" TO 2" IN DIAMETER AND 1'-3' IN LENGTH.
*5% MAX.
**5% MAX. AND TUBELING.
ZONE 2 - RIPARIAN PLANTING
COMMOM NAME
SCIEN-IFIC NAME
WETLAND ONDOCATOR
STATUS
PERCENT PLANED
CHERRYBARK OAK
QUERCUS PAGODA
FACW
10
AMERICAN SYCAMORE
PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
FACW
10
RIVER BIRCH
BETULA NIGRA
FACW
10
WILLOW OAK
QUERCUS PHELLOS
FACW
20
SWAMP CHESNUT OAK
QUERCUS MICHAUXII
FACW
10
BLACKGUM
NYSSA SYLVATICA
FAC
10
AMERICAN HORNBEAM
CARPINUS CAROLINIANA
FAC
10
SPICE BUSH
LINDERA BENZOIN
FACW
10
RED CHOKEBERRY
ARONIA ARBUTIFOLIA
FACW
10
ZONE 3 - UPLAND PLANTING
COMMOM NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
WETLAND ONDOCATOR
STATUS
PERCENT PANTED
CHERRYBARK OAK
QUERCUS PAGODA
FACW
10
AMERICAN SYCAMORE
PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
FACW
10
AMERICAN BEECH
FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA
FACW
10
WILLOW OAK
QUERCUS PHELLOS
FACW
20
RED OAK
QUERCUS RUBRA
FACW
10
BLACKGUM
NYSSA SYLVATICA
FAC
10
AMERICAN HORNBEAM
CARPINUS CAROLINIANA
FAC
10
SPICE BUSH
LINDERA BENZOIN
FACW
10
RED CHOKEBERRY
ARONIA ARBUTIFOLIA
FACW
10
BL) EEE AND WETLA\ D PLANT1 C
B„EEEA\
NOT TO SCALE
ZONE
2
VARIES
9 WETLAN
PLA\TI\C
30" LIVE CUTTING (DORMANT)
INSTALL WOVEN COIR FIBER MAT
OVER SEED OR SOD
ESTABLISHED PLANT SHOWN
FOR INFORMATION ONLY
INSTALL SPLIT 2" X 2" X 12"
DEAD STOUT STAKES PER SPECIFICATIONS
PLANTING TO TOP
OF RIP RAP (TYP)
EXISTING
GROUND
4o,
LIVE STAKE (IN EARTH)
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. IF USING WOVEN COIR FIBER
MAT, INSTALL LONG STRAW
MULCH BENEATH MAT.
2. 3' ON CENTERS
MU
-I AND MAINTENANC
MULCH
APPLY 2,000 LB/ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING, WITH BIODEGRADABLE
NETTING, OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT
CAN BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL.
MAINTENANCE
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE AND MULCH
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE PER SECTION 1.8 OF SCDHEC
BMP HANDBOOK FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DESIGN MANUAL.
GENERAL NOTES
1) ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHOULD BE RAKED/ROUGHENED (A MINIMUM OF 5"), TOP SOIL
ADDED, AMENDED WITH FERTILIZER, SEEDED (PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY), STRAWED,
AND THEN COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING (C700 OR APPROVED
EQUIVALENT) PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. ONCE THE MATTING 15
DOWN INSTALL THE LIVE STAKES THROUGH THE MATTING.
2) 0.C. = ON -CENTER
3) IF DROUGHT CONDITIONS EXIST THE CONTRACTOR WILL WATER THE INSTALLED
VEGETATION WITH WATER FROM THE CREEK TO ENSURE 85% SURVIVAL AT THE END
OF THE 1-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD.
FLAT TOP END
LATERAL BUD
BARK RIDGE
SIDE BRANCH
REMOVED
LOW SEASONAL
WATER TABLE
45' TAPER BUTT END BELOW
LAST REMOVED BRANCH
1 /2" — 2"
J
0
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
GROUND
SURFACE
REVISIONS
c
2
as)
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.CC`1
704-333-5131
w
0
w
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
U 0
�0
0 co
f 0
0_ L]
Q
=0
AS SHOWN
DESIGNED BY
0
>—
m
❑
w
z
0
HE:KED BY
MITIGATION BANK
5,
m
0
SHEET EI:
24

0
2
J
fl
E
0_
25 FLANTINC FLAN
0
T
0
J
Shoot Sot: Beaufort56
e concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrumer T. of service, is intended Orly for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse a` and improper reliance on
together with
This dacumer
v❑ v•
• ❑vvv ❑
❑vvvvv❑•
❑vvvvvv❑
❑vvvvvv❑
❑❑vvvvv❑
❑vvvvvv❑
❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑
❑vvvv❑❑vvvv•
❑❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑•
❑vvvvv❑❑vvv❑�
vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑
❑vvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvv❑
❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑v
❑ •❑vvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvv❑
•vvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑❑
v❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv
❑vvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑❑
•❑❑❑❑vvvv❑❑❑❑vvvv❑❑❑❑vvvv❑❑❑❑vvvvv❑
vvvvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑vvv❑
❑vvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑
vvvv❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑vvv❑
❑❑vvvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑
•❑vvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑vvv❑
vvvv❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑
v❑vvvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑vvv❑
❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑vvvv ❑ ❑vvvvvv ❑ ❑vvvvvv ❑ ❑vvvvvv ❑ ❑vvvvvv ❑ ❑vvvvvv ❑ ❑
vvv+ --❑vvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvv❑❑❑❑vvvv❑❑❑❑vvvv❑❑❑❑vvv❑
❑❑❑ ❑❑vvvvvayvvvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑
=❑❑V •VVVVVV❑❑VVV v„v❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑VVVvvv❑❑VVVvvv❑❑VVVvvv❑❑VVVVV
❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvvv❑vvv-Vvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑❑
•vv❑❑❑❑❑vvv❑❑❑❑❑vvvv❑d-❑•VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
•❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vv-❑••vvvv •vvv❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑❑
❑
VV
1
1
1
vvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑•-:
❑ ❑vvvvv ❑ ❑ ❑vvvvvv ❑ ❑vvv ❑ • v
❑vv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑❑••❑v❑%
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑v❑,• •vvv•
❑vv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑v,4vv❑+ •vvvvvv❑
❑ ❑vvvv ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑vvvv ❑ v ❑ ❑vvvvvv ❑ ❑ v v ❑ + - . vvvv
❑vvv❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑bvvvvv❑❑vvvvv•
❑•❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vv❑ ❑v❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑
❑•❑vv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvvv ❑vvvvvvv❑vvvvvvv❑vvvvvv
•VVvvvvv❑❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑vvv❑
❑ vvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvv❑ ❑❑vvvv❑❑❑❑vvvv❑❑❑❑vvvv❑❑❑
❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvvv❑❑❑ vvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvv❑
❑-❑v❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvv❑ v❑vvvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑•❑v•=��
❑❑•❑vvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑vvv'vvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvv❑•❑❑�
❑❑ v❑❑vvvvvv❑vvv❑vvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑vvv• vvvv
❑❑•❑vvv❑❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑•
❑•❑❑❑vvvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvv❑•
vv ❑vvv❑❑❑vvvvvvvN❑❑vvvv❑❑v❑vvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑v❑
v❑ ❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvvvv ❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑
❑•❑vvv❑❑❑vvvvvvyvvvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv
❑ ❑ r ❑ ❑vvvvv ❑ ❑ v ❑ v ❑ v v ❑ ❑ ❑vvvvv ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ - ❑ v v ❑ ❑ ❑vvvvv ❑ ❑ ❑vvvvv ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
wv❑• •❑❑vvvvvvvv❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvv❑••-❑vvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvv❑
()vvvv•--vvv❑❑vvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑••❑❑•-•❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑vvv
vvvvv • - ❑ v ❑ ❑ ❑ v v v v v v v ❑ ❑ v v ❑ • ❑ v ❑ ❑ v ❑ • _ ❑ v ❑ ❑vvvvvv ❑ ❑vvvv ❑
❑vvv ❑ • - , ❑vvvv ❑ ❑ ❑vvv ❑ • • • ❑vvvvv ❑ ❑ • ❑vvvv ❑ ❑ ❑vvvvv ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
-•vvv• •vvvvvvv❑❑•vvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvv❑
■•vvvv • ■vvvvv ❑❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑•❑vvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑❑
-vvvvv •-•v❑•vvvvvv❑❑vvv❑•v❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvv
S.v❑❑❑❑ •❑v❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑•❑vvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑'
•❑vvvvvvvvvv❑❑vvvv❑•❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvv❑
• ❑ ❑ v ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ v ❑ ❑ v ❑ v ❑ ❑ v +- v ❑ v ❑ ❑ v ❑ ❑ v ❑ v ❑ ❑
- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ v v ❑ ❑ ❑ •• ❑ ❑ v v ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ v v ❑
vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑❑vvvvvv❑vvv
-❑vvvvvv❑•❑vvvvv❑❑vvvv❑
•vvvvv•--•v❑❑vvvvvv
- - v v ❑ ❑ ❑ • • - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
v �❑ ❑
❑ • v
❑❑❑
❑v ❑
v ❑
❑❑
❑ ❑�� ❑
❑ _❑
v
❑❑
❑ via ❑
❑❑
V •«❑
❑❑
❑ v0n❑
PROPOSED PLANTING PLAN LEGEND
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 3
+ -
•
+ + + +
+ -
❑❑❑�
❑❑❑
vvvv❑❑❑
vvvvv
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
vvvvv
vvvv❑❑
❑vvvvv
vvvv❑❑
❑vvvvv❑
vvvvvv❑
vvvvvvv
❑vvvvv❑
vvvvv❑
❑❑❑❑vvv
vvvvv❑
vvvvvv
vvvvv
vvvvv❑
vvvvv❑
vvvvv
vvvvv
❑❑vvvvv❑
❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvvv❑❑❑vvvv❑
❑❑v❑vv❑❑a❑vvvv❑❑v
❑vvvv❑❑❑vvvv❑
❑❑vvvvvv❑❑❑
❑vv❑❑❑vvvv❑
vvvvvvvvvvvv
vv❑❑vvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvv
vvvv❑❑❑
vvvvvvv
❑ ❑
vvvv
•
❑ • v•❑
❑..• ❑ .
❑❑"❑•❑
vv�� ❑
❑ ' v ❑ ..
❑ ❑.,
❑v -v
❑ ❑v
❑ ❑
❑ •❑
❑ �❑ ❑
❑ ❑❑'
❑•1•❑
• ❑ �v❑
v ❑ v❑,❑v❑
❑+ ❑vvvv'
❑•❑•`•vvvv❑
❑'v vvvv
VV
❑•vv••vv
vvvv ❑•❑'
vvvv ❑••-
❑❑❑❑ ❑..
• •vvvv❑ ❑❑
vvvv. ❑vvvv❑, ❑
❑❑❑vvvvv❑
❑ `vvvv
❑vvvi��vvv❑
•
•❑• . l -
❑❑••vv
❑❑
vvv
vvvv
vvvv
vvvv❑
vvv
❑❑v
VV
❑❑v
vvvv
VVV ' ❑
vvvv +_ '
VVV
❑ ❑ ❑ ' • i
❑❑❑ 1.
❑❑
v❑❑❑❑❑•-•v❑❑
vvvvvv• -❑
VVVV
vvvvvvyvvvv
vvvvvvvv
• vvvv
VV
VVVVVV
VVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV
vvvvvvvpvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvyvvvv
VVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvy
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
vvvv vvvvv vv •vvvvvvvvVvvvvvvvisk,
vvvvvvvvvv
vvvvv v
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvv
vvvvvv
vvvv
vv
vv
vv
vv
VVVVV
VVVVVV
VVVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVVVV
vvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvv
vvvvvvv
vvvvvv
vvv
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV
VVVVVVVV
VVVVVVV
VVVVV
VVVV
VVV
VV
VV
VV
VV
VV
VV
VV
VVVVV
VVV
VVVV
VVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVV
VOOV
VVVV
VVV
VVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVV
VVVV
VVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVVV
VVVV
VVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVV
VVV
VVVV
VVV
VV
VV
VVV
\11\11,
VVVVVV
VV. •VVVVVVV1
vvvv vvvvvvv
vv.,. vvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvv
vvvvv
VVVVV
VVVVV
VVVVVV
VVVVVVV
VVVVV
VVVVV
VVVV
VV
VVVVVV
VVVVVV
VVVVV
VVVVV
VV
VVV
VVV
VV
VVV
VVV
VV
VVV
VV
VV
VVV
VV
VV
VVV
VV
vv
vvvv
vv
vvvv
vvv
vv
vv
VVV
VVVVVVVVVVVV
vvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvy
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvv
vvvvv
VV
VV
VV
VV
VVV
VV
VV
VVVV
VVVV
VVVVV
VVV
VV
VVVV
VVVVV
VV
VVVVVV
VVVVV
VVVVV
vvvvvv
vvvvv
vvvv
VVV
VVVVV
VVVVVVVVV
vvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvv
vvvvvvv
vvvvvvv
vvvvvvv
vvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvv
vvv
vvvvv
VV
vv
vv
vv
VVVV
vvvvYvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvwvvvvvy
PROPOSED WE\TLAND
VVVVYVVVV
vvvvvvvv vvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
ZONE 1 FOLLOWS TI4E STREAM
RESTORATION ALONG \THE
BA\KS ONLY
x
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 100 200 400
7 \
REVISIONS
CI)
uo
ZZ
(20
07-
12
0
LLI
0
0
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PHONE: [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CC 0
ELLn
0
0
AS SHOWN
LLI
DESIGNED BY
0
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
!S
0_
CD
op LIJ
MITIGATION BANK
PREPARED FOR
ct
SHEET NUMBER
25
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvv
vvyvvvvvvvvv
vvvyyvvvvvv
vvvvvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvv

Appendix G —
NCSAM Forms
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT 42
May 2022 I

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Weyerhaeuser-Site B-56-A-UT1-Reach 1 Date of Evaluation June 13,2017
Stream Category lag Assessor Name/Organization J.Hartshorn/Kimley-Hom
Notes of Reid Assessment Form{YIN) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE! NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2)Rood Row LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4)Roodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4)Microtopography LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tdal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality HIGH
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3)In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Weyerhaeuser - Site B56-A - UT1-Reach 2
Stream Category lag
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (YIN)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
Date of Evaluation June 13, 2017
Assessor Name/Organization J. HartshorntKimley-Hom
USACEI
All Streams
YES
YES
YES
Perennial
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Rood Row
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Roodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tdal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
MEDIUM
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In -stream Habitat
(2) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Overall
LOW

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Weyerhaeuser-Site B56-A-UT1 -Reach3 Date of Evaluation June 13,2017
Stream Category la3 Assessor Name/Organization J.Hartshom/Kimley-Ham
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(YIN) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(YIN) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACEI NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2)Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4)Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH
(4)Microtopography LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW
(4)Sediment Transport LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Row NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration MEDIUM
(3)Therrnoregulation MEDIUM
(2)Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW
(3)In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM
(3)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Weyerhaeuser-Site B56-A-UT2 Date of Evaluation June 13,2017
Stream Category la1 Assessor Name/Organization J.Hartshorn/Kimley-Hom
Notes of Reid Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(YIN) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE! NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Rood Row LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4)Roodplain Access LOW LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH HIGH
(4)Microtopography MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tdal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW HIGH
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW MEDIUM
(3)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)In-stream Habitat MEDIUM HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Habitat NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Weyerhaeuser-Site B56-A-UT3 Date of Evaluation June 13,2017
Stream Category la1 Assessor Name/Organization J.Hartshorn/Kimley-Hom
Notes of Field Assessment Form(YIN) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(YIN) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE! NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Rood Row LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4)Roodplain Access LOW LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH HIGH
(4)Microtopography MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tdal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat HIGH HIGH
(2)In-stream Habitat MEDIUM HIGH
(3)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Substrate MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)In-stream Habitat MEDIUM HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Thai Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Habitat NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

Appendix H —
Wetland and stream Data Forms
43 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan —DRAFT
I May 2022

North Carolina Division of Water Quality-Stream Identification Form,Version 4.11
Date: 7/16/2018 Project/Site: Pollard Swamp 51 Latitude: 34.41565
Beaufort 56A
Evaluator: Jason Hartshorn County: Beaufort Longitude: -77.149363
Total Points: 32.5 Stream Determination(circl• sue Other
Stream is at least intermittent Wilmar
if?19 or perennial if?30 Ephemeral Intermitten IICIMII e.g.Quad Name:
A.Geomorphology Subtotal= 16.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool,ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3 3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B.Hydrology Subtotal= 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal= 9.5
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75;OBL=1.5;Other=0 1.5
'perennial streams may also he identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: BKFW 12'
51 is Pollard Swamp in the study area and is a deep,channelized stream that BKFD 6'
intercepts groundwater.Multiple ditches and two intermittent tributaries WW 3'
contribute to S1. WD 1'
Substrate silt/sand
Clarity clear
Flow low/slow

North Carolina Division of Water Quality-Stream Identification Form,Version 4.11
Date: 7/160 018 Project/Site: UT-1 Neuse 02 56A Latitude: 35.414808
Evaluator: Willie Sullivan County: Beaufort Longitude: -77.152939
Total Points: 18 Stream Determination(circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Wilmar
if?19 or perennial if?30 Ephemera ntermitten Perennial e.g.Quad Name:
A.Geomorphology Subtotal= 9 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool,ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B.Hydrology Subtotal= 5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal= 4
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75;OBL=1.5;Other=0 0
'perennial streams may also he identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: BKFW 5'
BKFD 0.5'
UT-1 is a weak intermittent channel within study area.Historically ditched. WW n/a
No waters in channel. WD n/a
Saturation at 6" Substrate sand/silt
Clarity n/a
Flow n/a

North Carolina Division of Water Quality-Stream Identification Form,Version 4.11
Date: 7/16/2018 Project/Site: UT-2 Neuse 02 Beaufort Latitude: 35.413913
56-A
Evaluator: Willie Sullivan County: Beaufort Longitude: -77.153894
Total Points: 37.25 Stream Determ'i. 'on(circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Wilmar
if?19 or perennial if?30 Ephemera - li'erennial e.g.Quad Name:
A.Geomorphology Subtotal= 9 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool,ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B.Hydrology Subtotal= 5.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal= 22.75
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 3
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 3
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 3
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 3
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75;OBL=1.5;Other=0 0.75
'perennial streams may also he identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: BKFW 6'
UT-2 is a weak intermittent channel that has been ditched. BKFD 0.5'
Saturation at 4"under surface. WW n/a
WD n/a
Substrate sand/silt
Clarity n/a
Flow n/a

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710- ,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph S 2a)
Project/Site: Beaufort 56 City/County: Beaufort Sampling Date: 7/16/2018
Applicant/Owner: Weyerhauser NR Company State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigators): Willie 5.,Emma A. Section,Township, Range: N/A
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): <1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR T,MLRA 153A Lat: 35.415218 Long:-77.150345 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Pa-Pantego loam NWI classification: PFO1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
DP-1 was taken in the middle of Pollard Swamp and lateral ditches within a hardwood forest.The Antecedent Precipitation tool produced an output of
normal conditions for 7/16/2018.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al _Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) Other(Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators observed.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) —Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ] %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1_ Rcerruhrum 40 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2_ Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 7 (A)
3_ Persea borbonia 15 Yes FACW Total Number of Dominant
4_ Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5 Percent of Dominant Species
6_ That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (NB)
7_ Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
70 =Total Cover OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 FACW species 70 x 2= 140
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 } FAC species 70 x 3= 210
1_ flex apace 10 No FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
2_ flex glabra 10 No FACW UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3_ Magnolia virginiana 40 Yes FACW Column Totals: 145 (A) 355 (B)
4_ Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.45
5_ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6_ '1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7_ X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8_ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
60 =Total Cover Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50%of total cover 30 209'o of total cover: 12
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Woodwardia areolafa 5 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3_ Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4- Tree—Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5_ more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6 height.
7_
Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8_ than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
9_
10.
Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
5 =Total Cover Woody Vine—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 3 20%of total cover: 1 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2_ Smilax laurifolia 5 Yes FACW
3_
4_
5_
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 316 100 loam
2-18 10YR 211 100 sandy loam
18-24 10YR 4/2 100 sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _Thin Dark Surface(89)(LRR S,T, U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B, 153D) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) (outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers(AS) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Reduced Vertic(F18)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 15DA, 15DB)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,T)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) Marl(F10)(LRR U) Red Parent Material(F21)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0,P,T) (outside MLRA 138,152A in FL,154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(81)(LRR 0,5) Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(84) _Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B,153D)
Sandy Redox(S5) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 15DA,150B) Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T, U) Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T, U) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL,154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes Na X
Remarks:
Uncoated sand grains at surface.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2D18 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

Appendix I —
Conservation Easement Documents
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan—DRAFT 44
May 2022 I

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S
USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this day
of , 2022 by Weyerhaeuser NR Company and between
("Grantor") and Unique Places To Save ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their
heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or
neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in Beaufort County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation,
association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue
Code, and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq., the purposes or powers of which include one
1

or more of the purposes (a) — (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open-space aspects of real
property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational, or
open-space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural
communities: non-riparian wetlands, riparian wetlands, perennial and intermittent streams
and riparian buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams,
wetlands and riparian resources and other natural values of approximately 99.2 acres,
more or less, and being more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated fully herein by reference (the "Conservation Easement Area"), and prevent
the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area for any purpose or in any
manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI)
and Mitigation Plan for the Middle Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank, Department of the
Army (DA)Action ID Number SAW-2017-02019, entitled "Agreement to Establish the
Middle Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank in the Neuse River Basin within the State of North
Carolina", entered into by and between Weyerhaeuser NR Company acting as the Bank
Sponsor and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the
North Carolina Interagency Review Team(IRT). The Beaufort 56 Mitigation Site has
been approved by the Corps for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable
stream and wetland impacts authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third-party rights of enforcement shall
be held by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third-Parties,"t❑ include any successor
agencies), and may be exercised through the appropriate enforcement agencies of the
United States and the State of North Carolina, and that these rights are in addition to, and
do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the NCDWR Project ID #
and Department of the Army instrument number SAW-2017-02019 ("Mitigation Banking
Instrument"), or any permit or certification issued by the Third-Parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and
irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, forever
and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent
hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area described on Exhibit B,
together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
2

ARTICLE I.
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is an
easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,
Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with the
purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation Easement Area
shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any development that would
impair or interfere with the conservation values of the Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are
expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any introduction
of non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile
home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility
pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure
or facility on or above the Conservation Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural. Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or
mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement Area except as
provided in the Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for
purposes of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation
Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five consecutive years from the date on
page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will negatively impact
vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by Weyerhaeuser NR
Company and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on
the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails
or walkways.
3

G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement
Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values
of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules and
regulations for the use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying the
Grantor as owner of the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other
materials on the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation. Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on
the Conservation Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or drainage
patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and wetlands within the
Conservation Easement Area, Weyerhaeuser NR Company is allowed to perform grading,
filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and enhancement
activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by Department of the Army
Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering
or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the
restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or
permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into, within or out of the easement
area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs,
seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable
development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
[Not required, but may be added if Grantor and Grantee agree]
L. Subdivision. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the Conservation Easement
Area currently consists of within separate parcels.
The Grantor may not further subdivide the Conservation Easement Area, except with the
prior written consent of the Grantee. If Grantor elects to further subdivide any portion of the
Conservation Easement Area, Grantor must provide the Grantee the name, address, and
telephone number of new owner(s) of all property within the Conservation Easement Area,
if different from Grantor. No subdivision of the Conservation Easement Area shall limit the
right of ingress and egress over and across the Property for the purposes set forth
herein. Further, in the event of any subdivision of the Property (whether inside or outside of
the Conservation Easement Area) provision shall be made to preserve not only Grantee's
perpetual rights of access to the Conservation Easement Area, as defined herein, but also
Grantee's right of perpetual access to any conservation easements on properties adjacent
to the Property which form a part of or are included in the Mitigation Plan. Creation of a
4

condominium or any de facto division of the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. Lot
line adjustments or lot consolidation without the prior written consent of the Grantee is
prohibited. The Grantor may convey undivided interests in the real property underlying the
Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor shall notify the Grantee immediately of the
name, address, and telephone number of any grantee of an undivided interest in any
property within the Conservation Easement Area.
M. Vehicles.The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all-terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for
temporary or occasional access by the Weyerhaeuser NR Company, the Grantee, its
employees and agents, successors, assigns, NCDWR, and the Corps for purposes of
constructing, maintaining and monitoring the restoration, enhancement and
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area. The use of mechanized vehicles for monitoring purposes is limited to
only existing roads and trails as shown in the approved in the mitigation plan.
N. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation Easement
Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation
of the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of
its environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE ill.
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area for
all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to,
the right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and
egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement Area, the right to
sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement Area, in whole or in part,
provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms of, and shall
specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, including Weyerhaeuser NR Company acting as the Bank
Sponsor, the right to construct and perform activities related to the restoration,
enhancement, and preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the
Conservation Easement Area in accordance with the approved Beaufort 56 Mitigation Plan,
and the Mitigation Banking Instrument described in the Recitals of this Conservation
Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, the following rights in the areas labeled as "Internal Crossing" on
the plat [insert plat name and recorded plat book page number] in the Conservation
Easement Area: vehicular access, livestock access, irrigation piping and piping of livestock
waste. All Internal Crossings that allow livestock access will be bounded by fencing and will
be over a culvert.
5

ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the
Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all
reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to
determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, is
complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantee, Weyerhaeuser NR Company, and its authorized representatives,
successors and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon the
Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational observations
and studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public
access rights.
ARTICLE V.
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, the Corps, and
NCDWR are allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area
that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of
such areas or features of the Conservation Easement Area that may be damaged by such
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor
that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in writing of
such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of such notice to correct the
conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after 30 days, the
Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings
including damages, injunctive and other relief. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee
reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order,
injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the terms of this Conservation
Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived
from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such
circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be
inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition
to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with
this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or restoration, including the
Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by Grantor, provided
Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps and the NCDWR shall
have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and
conditions of this Conservation easement.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or
provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a
subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle
Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Conservation
6

Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without
limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or
invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor under emergency
conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or
harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI.
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the Property
in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which may be
impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no outstanding
mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property which have not been
expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor further warrants that
Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and arising out of this
Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the Property
against the claims of all persons.
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in
all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to provide written
notice of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor
and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger
of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation Easement Area or any portion
thereof and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior written consent
and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the Grantee
hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation
Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder pursuant to 33
CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of
the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to
continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The Mitigation Banking Instrument: MBI
with corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire
agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all
prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation
Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property
free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except those
incurred after the date hereof, which are expressly subject and subordinate to the
7

Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any
kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the
Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of
the obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may
apply to the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long-Term Management. Grantor is responsible for all long-term management
activities associated with fencing. These activities include the maintenance and/or
replacement of fence structures to ensure the aquatic resource functions within the
boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial
proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area is
taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions
imposed by this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate
actions at the time of such taking to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental
and direct damages due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation
Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment
or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this
Conservation Easement as determined at the time of the extinguishment or condemnation.
1. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication required
under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by
notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
Weyerhaeuser NR Company
Attn: Doug Hughes
406 Cole Road
Hattiesburg, MS 39402
To Grantee:
Unique Places To Save
Attn: Michael Scisco
P.C. Box 1183
Chapel Hill, NC 27514-1183
8

To Sponsor:
Weyerhaeuser NR Company
Attn: Doug Hughes
406 Cole Road
Hattiesburg, MS 39402
To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District, Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to make
an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's interest shall
become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an appropriate proceeding
in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a
writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any
applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic,
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation Easement
Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section of the
Mitigation Plan, prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be
complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this
report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any future changes in the use of the
Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this Conservation
Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to
establish the present condition of the Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy
over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee
for the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the
day and year first above written.
[Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form]
9

Appendix J —
Performance Bond
45 The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Beaufort 56 Site Mitigation Plan —DRAFT
I May 2022

Maintenance and Monitoring
Performance Bond
Bond No. Penal Sum: $726.025.00
Know All Men By These Presents,
That we,Weyerhaeuser Company of 220 Occidental Avenue S Seattle,WA 98104-3120
(hereinafter called the Principal),as Principal, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of
America with an office at One Tower Square Hartford, CT 06183, a corporation duly
organised under the laws of the State of CT(hereinafter called the"Surety"), as Surety, are held
and firmly bound unto the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Wilmington District, (hereinafter
called the "USAGE") and the Unique Places to Save with a mailing address of P.O.Box 1183
Chapel Hill,NC 27514-1183 , (hereinafter called the "Obligee"),up to the maximum penal sum
of SEVEN HUNDRED AND TWENTY SIX THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
DOLLARS ($726,025.00) (hereinafter called the "Maximum Penal Sum"), for the payment of
which we, the Principal and the Surety,bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns,jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS,the Principal has entered into the Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella
Mitigation Banking Instrument(hereinafter called the"MBI")with the USACE, dated the
day of which includes the Final Mitigation Plan for
the Beaufort 56 Mitigation Site (the"FMP") to ensure that aquatic resources within the
boundaries of the mitigation site will be restored, enhanced and protected.
WHEREAS, the principal promised to deliver to the USACE and the Obligee a Bond substantially
in the form hereto upon completion and compliance with construction and other criteria of the
UMBI, FMP, and permits.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that this Bond will
not be released in whole or in part until the Principal receives written verification from the
USACE that the conditions for release in the FMP have been fully met. If the above bounden
Principal shall meet the final performance standards as defined in the FMP, then this obligation
shall be null and void; otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. This bond is subject to
the following conditions:
1) This bond shall remain in full force and effect for a period of nine (9)years. The
Maximum Penal Sum of this bond may be reduced by the USACE, by these scheduled amounts:

Year Reduction Revised Penal Sum
1 N/A $726,025.00
2 $446,435.15 $279,589.85
3 $23,997.29 $255,592.56
4 $23,997.29 $231,595.26
5 $23,997.29 $207,597.97
6 $23,997.29 $183,600.67
7 $23,997.29 $159,603.38
8 $23,997.29 $135,606.08
9 $135,606.08 $0.00
Total $726,025.00
2) USACE shall issue a full and fmal release of this Bond when the construction activities are
complete and/or seven year monitoring period is complete; all monitoring reports have been
submitted and have been approved by the USACE; and the success criteria identified in the
FMP have been achieved and approved by the USACE. This Bond shall not be released in
whole until the Principal receives written verification from the USACE that all the conditions for
release have been satisfied.
3) If any payment under this Bond, as set forth in subsection 4(b)below, is made, then the
outstanding penal sum of the Bond shall be reduced by the corresponding amount of such
payment. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the aggregate liability of
the Surety is limited to the Maximum Penal Sum stated above, regardless of the number or
amount of claims brought against this bond and regardless of the number of years this bond
remains in effect. The USACE shall issue a full and fmal release of this Bond and any and all of
Surety's obligations hereunder when Surety has tendered payment in whole, or in parts equal to
the aggregate sum, of the Maximum Penal Sum of this Bond.
4) The Surety's obligation under this Bond shall arise after the USACE has notified the
Principal of their failure to abide by, or cure default conditions related to, the terms and
conditions of the FMP. Upon notice of the Principal's default under the FMP, the Surety, in its
sole discretion and notwithstanding any of the provisions of the above, shall remedy the
Principal's default by taking action under 4) a) or 4)b)below. In the event that the Surety either
fails to respond to USACE's notice of default within thirty(30)business days of receipt of said
notice, or fails to honor Surety's commitments under this bond to the full satisfaction of the
USACE, then Surety shall remedy such default in accordance with subsection 4) c)below:
a) Remedy the default of the Principal to the full satisfaction of the USACE by a reasonable date
determined by the USACE;or
b) Immediately tender to the Obligee, that portion of the Maximum Penal Sum that the
Obligee determines, in their discretion, is due and owing and necessary to remedy the
default. If payment is tendered to the Obligee under this subsection, the Obligee shall
immediately become a Surety or Sureties to this Bond,or
c) In the event that the Surety fails to respond within thirty(30)business days to the
USACE's notice of default, or to honor commitments to the full satisfaction of the
USACE under paragraph a) or b) of this section within a reasonable time to be

determined by the USACE,the remaining portion of the Maximum Penal Sum may, at
the election of the Obligee, immediately become due and owing and paid to the Obligee.
The Obligee under this paragraph shall immediately become a Surety or Sureties under
this bond for the remaining term of the bond.
5) Surety shall have no obligation to the Principal,USACE, the Obligee, or ally other person
or entity for any loss suffered by the Principal,USACE, the Obligee, or any other person or
entity by reason of acts or omissions which are or could be covered by the Principal's
general liability insurance, products liability insurance, completed operations insurance or any
other insurance. Under no circumstance shall the USACE be responsible to arbitrate any
insurance claims made, declined or disputed under this Bond.
6) The Surety hereby waives notification of amendments to the UMBI,permits,applicable
laws, statutes,rules, and regulations, and agrees that no such amendment shall in any way
alleviate its obligation on this Bond.

NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT TO THE
CONTRARY,THE LIABILITY OF THE PRINCIPAL AND SURETY UNDER THIS BOND IS
LIMITED TO THE TERM BEGINNING THE DAY OF , 20 ,AND
ENDING THE DAY OF , 20 . AND
ANY EXTENSIONS OR RENEWALS OF THE REFERENCED AGREEMENT SHALL BE
COVERED UNDER THIS BOND ONLY WHEN CONSENTED TO IN WRITING BY THE
SURETY. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE REFUSAL BY THE SURETY TO EXTEND
THE TERM OF THIS BOND SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A DEFAULT BY THE
PRINCIPAL, AND SHALL NOT GIVE RISE TO A CLAIM OR DEMAND AGAINST THE
SURETY UNDER THIS BOND.
In accordance with 33 C.F.R. § 332.3(n}(5), the Surety shall provide the USACE and the Obligee
written notification at least 120 days in advance of termination,revocation, or modification of
this Bond.
No right of action shall accrue on this bond to or for the use of any person or corporation other
than the USACE or the Obligee named herein, or their successors or assigns.
The above-bounden parties have executed this instrument under their several seals, dated this
day of , 2022, the name and corporate seal of each corporate party being
affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative,pursuant to authority of
its governing body.
Principal: Weyerhaeuser NR Company
By:
Doug Hughes, Mitigation Banking
Manager
Surety: Travelers Causality and Surety
Company of America
By:
Attorney-in-Fact
Obligee: Unique Places to Save
By:
Director or Acting Director