20220725 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220524

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
5/24/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20220725 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
O No payment required
O Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
Information for Initial Review
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
la. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY Monterey
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jessica Tisdale
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
5/24/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Marsh Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.822823
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-78.585921
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes ONo

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
O Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0Yes CNo
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
OYes 0No
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
O Owner O Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Whit Wheeler, PE
2d. Address
Street Address
222 W. Hargett St.
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone] [phone]
2g. Email Address:*
wh it.wheeler@raleigh nc. gov
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Jessica Tisdale
4b. Business Name:
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
4c. Address
Street Address
555 Fayetteville Street
Address Line 2
Suite 900
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
Of appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
3201 Monterey Street
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27604
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Marsh Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010804
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The site is located within a City of Raleigh sewer easement. The gravity sewer pipe underneath the streambed has a defective joint and requires replacement.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes OO No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
none (study area in easement)
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
20
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
CCTV has indicated that a clay sewer line has a defective joint under a stream bed. The purpose of this project is to replace the clay sewer pipe with ductile iron pipe. The project will
temporarily impact a total of approximately 400 square feet of streambank on an unnamed tributary to Marsh Creek near Monterey Street at 35.822823°,-78.585921 ° decimal degrees.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Work will entail creating a dry work area, replacing clay pipe with ductile iron pipe, establishing a stable toe, constructing a stable bank using rock/geotextile, coir matting or a combination
and establishing a stable segment of stream bed at the base of the bank. The site will be accessed by obtaining access agreement from Monterey Street resident. The temporary
disturbance will occur inside the maintained easement. Erosion control measures will be installed prior to work.
A "pump around" will be established to create a dry work area. Disturbed areas will be reseeded and mulched when work is complete. It is expected that a tire or track -mounted excavator
and a dump truck will be used to place the boulders, reconstruct the streambank, and stabilize the streambank. Please see the six attached details; "pump around", temporary silt fence,
temporary construction entrance, bank stabilization, gabion retaining wall, and seeding details.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
OYes ONo
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
O Preliminary O Approved 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown O N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
0 Yes o No
0 Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
10 Wetlands O Streams -tributaries
O Open Waters O Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
0 Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
Stream bank stabilization
Temporary
Stabilization
Marsh
Perennial
Corps
20
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
20
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
20

3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
See project description in Section C.4.i.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
See attached details reference in Section C.4.i.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes • No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes O No
What type of SCM are you providing?
O Level Spreader
O Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
O Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
O Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
O Yes i:• No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
• Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
• Yes O No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes O No
Comments: *
n/a
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
O Yes @ No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes O No

3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0Yes ®No0N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes J No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes •, No
5d. 15 another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0 Yes 0 No
• No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
0Yes ®No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0 Yes 0 No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
0Yes ®No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0Yes ®No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
An NHP and IPAC report were ran for the project. We assume a biological determination of "No Effect" on all species due to the small scale, and short
duration of the project. No habitat exists for Dwarfwedge mussel, Atlantic pigtoe, Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Michaux's sumac or Red -
cockaded woodpecker in the stream and the project area. There were no federally listed species noted within one mile of the project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes • No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Fish Map
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes • No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. We anticipate only stream stabilization for a small area and archaeological resources were not reviewed.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes • No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Floodplain GIS Map
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
IPaC_ Explore Location resources_Monterey.pdf 14.74MB
project_report_cor_sewer_repair_monterey_s_36928_36928.pdf 1MB
COR_AgentAuthorization .pdf 207.43KB
Monterey_Attachment A.pdf 5.91 MB
File must be PDF or KMZ

Comments
Supporting information is provided in Attachment A.
Agent authorization is attached.
NHP report is attached.
IPAC report is attached.
Signature
L By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jessica Tisdale
Signature
P
Date
5/24/2022

Roy Cooper, Governor
• ■■■
■■ • NC DEPARTMENT OF
tt ■
■ ■W.. NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■■■
May 5, 2022
Jessica Tisdale
HDR
555 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: COR sewer repair (Monterey St.)
Dear Jessica Tisdale:
D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-17889
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
C) 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH, NC 27603 • 1051 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
COR sewer repair (Monterey St.)
May 5, 2022
N CN H D E-17889
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last sr Element
servation Occurrence
liDate' Rank
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
Damselfly
2004-Pre H?
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Accuracy Federal
Status
5-Very
Low
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner er Type
City of Raleigh Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Brentwood Trail City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Brentwood Trail City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Brentwood Park City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Hill Street Park City of Raleigh Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Marsh Creek Park City of Raleigh Local Government
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - Raleigh NC DPS, Division of Emergency State
Management
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - Raleigh NC DPS, Division of Emergency State
Management
State
status
Significantly
Rare
Global State
Rank Rank
G5 S2?
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on May 5, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q1, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-17889: COR sewer repair (Monterey St.)
�\b
at-
N
E
S
New Hope Church
0
m
0
0
Pa
B entwood
State
iversity
rowwood Dr
Starmount0r
Tratvick Rd
Skycrest
Village
Oe
Rd
Donna Rd
Starmount
4
m °
0
4
335 ft
367 ft
Wedgewood Or
o 354ft
0
co
0
0.25 0.5 1 Miles
Ce I I I I I I I
308
May 5, 2022
Managed Area (MAREA)
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
❑ Project Boundary
Sources: Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS,
NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA,
Intermap and the GIS user community
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, m OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User Community
Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: CD1 E3F04-A347-437F-8ADE-D6FFA5EDF5A1
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
I, Acting Director of Public Utilities, Whit Wheeler, representing the City of Raleigh hereby certify that I have authorized Jessica
Tisdale, representing HDR (HDR) of the Carolinas, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing and
issuance of the Section 404/401 permits and associated regulatory forms for Sanitary Sewer Repair projects located in Wake
County, North Carolina.
We hereby certify that the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Whit Wheeler, PE Jessica Tisdale
Applicant's Name Agent's Name
,—DocuSigned by:
L if VMIulil Y
`-63607D23CE4C474...
Applicant's Signature Agent's Signature
1 / 10/2022 1/6/2022
Date Date
hdrinc.com
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900, Raleigh NC 27601
T 919.232.6654 F 919.785.1187

Attachment A
Proposed Bank Stabilization
Monterey, Raleigh
CCTV has indicated that a clay sewer line has a defective joint under a stream bed. The purpose of this
project is to replace the clay sewer pipe with ductile iron pipe. The project will temporarily impact a
total of approximately 400 square feet of streambank on an unnamed tributary to Marsh Creek near
Monterey Street at 35.822823°,-78.585921° decimal degrees.
Work will entail creating a dry work area, replacing clay pipe with ductile iron pipe, establishing a stable
toe, constructing a stable bank using rock/geotextile, coir matting or a combination and establishing a
stable segment of stream bed at the base of the bank. The site will be accessed by obtaining access
agreement from Monterey Street resident. The temporary disturbance will occur inside the maintained
easement. Erosion control measures will be installed prior to work.
A "pump around" will be established to create a dry work area. Disturbed areas will be reseeded and
mulched when work is complete. It is expected that a tire or track -mounted excavator and a dump truck
will be used to place the boulders, reconstruct the streambank, and stabilize the streambank. Please
see the six attached details; "pump around", temporary silt fence, temporary construction entrance,
bank stabilization, gabion retaining wall, and seeding details.

W11:51110,11M111011.1K
SafralAilg-16.211 11J. -P ill 'Mit
LEGEND
Stream (UT to Marsh Creek)
DATA SOURCE: USA TOPO MAPS
0 Feet 2,000
FY
fi
PIVV,;:i
05/1041ii".„,,
1 WzArdi k
4444 it(sC4
MIK&
UttoMarshCreek
Monterey Street
35.822823, -78.585921
,•-•1411!-W-4.11214-77.11:r
IL
ovip lae,aracSGijubed
.
MONTEREY ST. SANITARY SEWER REPAIR
RALEIGH EAST 24K QUADRANGLE
FIGURE 1
EPCN NOTIFICATION ONLY

760000 FEET
750000 FEET
2120000 FEET
35°50'0"N
35°49'30"N
35°49'0"N
78°35'30"W
78°35'0"W
78°34'30"W
78°34'0"W
2130000 FEET
Neu'' Hope Tri but,a
Marsh Creek (Basin
.Orkney PI 18, Stream l'8)
28:0-
Marlin Ct
Lancelot Ct
ZONE AE?:
EZ2.521
�.' Old Trawick Ln
\\\
ZONE AE
eit
N Raleigh -
Marsh
Creek eek (Basin
111 18 Stream 17)
2120000 FEET
Gz
3ounslnane
O �o,
Oshanter PI
�'' '� _ New NoPe C\Rd
Tulane Dr
78°35'30"W
cascade
??9";
McadramssDr,
CITY OF
RALEIGH
370243
=EZ2520
Foy stun
Scott Dv
E Annaley;.D:;
—s
Derbyshire PI.
*KW OF
RALEIGH
3370243
78°35'0"W
E Jameson Dr
SITE
LOCATION
ench"Lake D
Ellen,0
DOA a"Rd
RALEIC
78°34'30"W
CITY OF
RALEIGH ETJ
370243
lit uverl y Ln
(Jlantua
t Forest Way
Dinwiddie
.
L1IGH
370243
Kincaid Dr
Ct
a>
Old Coach
l Tee y�°idl.l i;:1:1-il 1.� ,1.
ill �_�:n■ J.:.,I� ill:
m
es cca h, Co '°4 ,a`_: •
78°34'0"W
COF
I1 A EMI
37020
Wedgewood Dr
35'50'0"N
endue;RangeP
35°49'30"N
35°49'0"N
CITY OF
RALEIGH ETJ
370243
Tollington Dr
0
0
0
2130000 FEET
c:-tROIJi.I "T
'PI' Cooperating'!'eeheica! State
FE A'S COOPERATING rECHHICALPARTNEA
760000 FEET
750000 FEET
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach to floodplain management to decrease the
costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated by the State's commitment
to map flood hazard areas at the local level. As a part of this effort, the State of
North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement with
FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTP://FRIS.NC.GOV/FRIS
SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A,V, A99
With BFE or Depth zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
Regulatory Floodway
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
OTHER
AREAS
GENERAL
STRUCTURES
OTHER
FEATURES
1
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% Annual Chance Flood with Average
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile zone x
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
See Notes zone x
Areas Determined to be Outside the
0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain zone x
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Accredited or Provisionally Accredited
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
I I I Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
BM5510 X
BM5510®
BM5510<8>
4112> 1.872—
North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark
National Geodetic Survey bench mark
Contractor Est. NCFMP Survey bench mark
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
Coastal Transect
Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
NOTES TO USERS
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmaps.com
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1-percent-annual-chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
protection provided (which may exceed the 1-percent-annual-chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
levee system(s) shown as providing protection. To maintain accreditation, the levee owner or community is
required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations.
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nflp/index.shtm.
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone
category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate
landward limit of the 1.5-foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA
(or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to, but less
severe than those in the VE Zone.
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE
This map may include approximate boundaries of the CBRS for informational purposes only. Flood insurance is not
available within CBRS areas for structures that are newly built or substantially improved on or after the date(s)
indicated on the map. For more information see http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal_barrier.html, the
FIS Report, or call the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Customer Service Center at 1-800-344-WILD.
CBRS Area ; ; Otherwise Protected Area
SCALE
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1 inch = 500 feet
1:6,000
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Meters
0 75 150 300
PANEL LOCATOR
DURHAM COUNTY
GRANVILLE COUNTY
0874 0884 0894
1804
0873 0883 0893
0872 0882 0892
1803
1824823
1802
1812
1822
1832-1842
1852
08810891
0,880 0890
1801
1811
1821
1831
1841
1851'
18.61
FRANKLIN COUNTY
1800
1810
1820
1830
1840
1850
1860
1870
0759
r
0769
07-79 789 0799
1709
1719
1729
1739
1749
1759
1769
1779-1789
-1799
07:58
0768
0778 0788 0798
1708
1718
1728
1738
1748
1758
1768
1778
1788
0727
-r
0726
0737
0736
0747
0746
0757
0756
0767
0766
0777 0787 0797
0776 0786 0796
1707
1706
1717
1716
1727
1726
1737
1736
1747
1746
1757
1756
1766
1787
1798 2708
1797 2707
2717
1786
1796
2706
2716
0704
07/25
10724
0735
0734
0745
0744
0755
0754
0765
0764
0775 0785 0795
0774 0784 0794
1705
1704
1715
1714
fl�F1
1724
1735
1734
1745
1744
1755
1754
1765
1764
1775
1774
1785
1784
0713
0723
0733
0743
0753
0763
0773 0783 0793
1703
1713
1723
1733
1743
1753
1763
1773
1783
1795
1794
2705
2704
1793
2703
0712
0722
0732
0742
0752
0762
0772 0782 0792
1702
1712
1722
1732
1742
1752
1762
0711
0721
0731
0741
0751
0761
0771 0781 0791
1701
1711
1721
1731
1741
17511761
1772-
1771
0700
/
0710
,0608
0606--
0720
0730
0628
0740
0649
0750
0659
0760
0669
0770 0780 0790
0679 0689 0699
1700
1609
1710
1619
1720
1629
1730
1639
0648
0647
0626
0646
0658
0657
0668
0667
0678 0688 0698
0677 0687 0697
1608
1607
1618
1628
/
161,7/1627
/
1740
/
1649
11750
'1638
0656
0666
0645 0655 0665
0676 06860696
0675
0684'
0674
HARNETT COUNTY
1606/616
i
/1605
1782
JOHNSTON COUNTY
2715
/
2714
2725
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FL0Or INSURANCE RATE MAr
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 1725
Panel Contains:
COMMUNITY
RALEIGH, CITY OF
CID PANEL SUFFIX
370243 1725 J
MAP NUMBER
3720172500J
MAP REVISED
05/02/06

F�2
City of Raleigh, Monterey, Stream Stabilization
Photograph 1, View of defective clay pipe under streambed, Facing South (Dated April, 2022).
Photograph 2, View of downstream manhole, Facing North (Dated April, 2022).

F�2
City of Raleigh, Monterey, Stream Stabilization
Photograph 3, View of upstream manhole, Facing West (Dated April, 2022).
Photograph 4, View of upstream area adjacent to pipe crossing, Facing North
(Dated April, 2022).

Property
Raleigh Sewer
Sewer Manhole
PUMP AROUND
DETAIL
Gravity Sewer
Lateral
USGS Blue Line Streams
ACCESS
ROUTE
Monterey Street
0 100 200
Disclaimer
400 ft iMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
i i i I i i i However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied
1 inch equals 200 feet ,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

EXISTING ROADWAY
x
50' MIN.
AND SUFFICIENT TO KEEP
X X SEDIMENT ON SITE
Q°000 000 �0000 0 000 0 00000 00 00 0
000 00 0 00 00000000Q 0000 QOO 0o o
000 0 0 0 00000000 00 0000p000oO
0000 00 000 0 0 0 0
00 OOO o00 00000
0 000 0 0 0 00
p00pp00 00
3"-4"STONE TO BE USED o0
o0 oo 0 00 ( SURGE STONE OR
000 0000 o RAILROAD BALAST )
ooc o0o00 0
00
00
0 0 0
00 00
000
0 0,000p 0 000 0
00°0000 0 000000 0 0 000 0 Q O 000 00 000
000 00000 00 0 0000 000000 00 00 0000
6O'0Z-MS
c-)
m 0
zz
70 xj
D
z
0 c7
m0
z
OZOZl9:31V0
3lVOS 0110N
HOITIVHI 30 AIIJ
PLAN
SILT FENCE (SEE NOTE 1)
EXISTING ROADWAY
6" MIN.
25' OR FULL WIDTH
OF PROPOSED STREET
OR ENTRANCE,
WHICHEVER IS
GREATER.
35' MIN.
NOTES:
1. SILT FENCE SHOULD BE INSTALLED TO ENSURE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS USED.
2. IF MUD IS NOT REMOVED FROM THE VEHICLE TRAVELING
OVER THE STONE, THEN THE TIRES OF THE
VEHICLE MUST BE WASHED BEFORE ENTERING THE
PUBLIC ROAD OR THE LENGTH OF THE CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE EXTENDED.
15' MIN.
NEW CONSTRUCTION
160 0 0 0 00 0Q O 0000o0
0 00 o0 000 o0
0000000 00000 0 00 0 00000000 0 000000000 00 12"MIN.
o00000 000000op0o0oo0og000000000000000000 0000 000000IIII
:offa° _ _ _o 00000 00000 0 0 00—
III III —III I—III—III-11 7111EWEWE11HE
11=III=III- 111E111E1117 111E111E11E11E11
-III- FABRIC UNDER STONE - I1
CROSS SECTION
MAINTENANCE:
ADD ADDITIONAL STONE AND "FLUFF" TOP
DRESSING WITH 2" STONE.
SEE N.C. DEQ EROSION and SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLANNING and DESIGN MANUAL
FOR CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES;
PLANNING CONSIDERATION & DESIGN CRITERIA.

EXISTING GROUND
TIE TO GRADE
�{ T MIN
'11 R�11%�1-- T
71;18
It��% ' .CII11!►1.11i1�� .LARGER
lAtApw` �i���•
itAT
E�I'Z�
'11 ��1i �Gl�: i i11%11�G1i11`%
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC=�1�1,'1i1�i ��,C1�
�11.J1 11•
COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL !� Qj1�o1!1� „1
NOTES:
1. RIP RAP AND GEOTEXTILE ALONE SHOULD NOT BE USED ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 2H:1V.
1.5 T MIN
2. ON SLOPES BETWEEN 2H:1V AND 1.5H:1V RIP RAP MAY BE BEDED IN 6" OF #57 STONE. CONSULT ENGINEER PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION.
3. THICKNESS OF RIP RAP (T) SHOULD BE NO LESS THAN 1.5 X D50 (APPROXIMATELY 21" FOR CLASS II).
4. DEPTH OF THE TOE SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 1.5 X THICKNESS (APPROXIMATELY 30" FOR CLASS II).
5. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION IS MODIFIED FROM VDH&T AND NCDENR LAND QUALITY SECTION EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL DESIGN MANUAL.
STREAM BANK STABALIZATION

MAINTENANCE: CLEAN OUT AT 50% CAPACITY
LIFE OF FENCING: 6-9 MONTHS
10'0Z-MS
30N3d (l1ISI1N3W1a3S)
l�JV OdW31 ab`dONV±S
OZOZl9:31V0
TWOS 0110N
HOITIVHI 30 AIIJ
MIN. 10 GA.
LINE WIRES
1
MIN =1
STEEL POST
5"
MIN
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
FILL SLOPE
GRADE
11EI I I -III-
1E1 I-111E11'
111E111E1'
EWE!'
III I-
1T1=11 1 11=
MIN SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SIDE VIEW
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
1
r
•iiiii
tOiO�i�iO�i
♦������•
���������
��`
SILT FENCE FABRIC
INSTALLED TOSECOND
1�������♦
di�����������������
• ���OON
WIRE FROMTOP
'.�♦:.�:e••�.�,•
III
II
11 1111 111 111 111-III
III-III-III-III-IIIIII-111-11
FRONT VIEW
11 11 11
11 111 11
I
El
11
III III
1;1
III
11
NOTES:
1. FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE.
2. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
3. SEE NC DEQ SEDIMENT DESIGN MANUAL FOR CONSTRUCTION
SPECIFICATIONS, WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES AND PLANNING
CONSIDERATIONS.
4. SILT FENCE SHOULD NOT BE USED ALONE BELOW GRADED
SLOPES GREATER THAN 10' IN HEIGHT.
PLASTIC OR
WIRE TIES
MIN. 12-1/2 GA.
INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
GRADE

PROVIDE HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED J
TYPE SEAMS
HEAVY DUTY
DIRTBAG 55
OR EQUAL
SEWN IN SPOUT
HIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING
FOR HOLDING HOSE IN PLACE
WATER FLOW
FROM PUMP
OPENING TO ACCOMMODATE
UP TO 4" DISCHARGE HOSE
i
AGGREGATE UNDERLAYMENT
(3" THICK NCDOT NO, 57 STONE)
Ati
OA PA
i
f
SEDIMENT DIKE
ACCEPTED DEWATERING DEVICE (SILT BAG) PROVIDE
POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM SILT BAG TO STREAM
FLOW
DISCHARGE HOSES
INTAKE HOSE
CLEAN WATER
DIKE
STREAM
DIVERSION PUMPS
INTAKE HOSE
FLOW
SUMP -HOLE OR POOL
(12"TO 18" DEEP, 2'
DIA.)
DEWATERING BAG NOTES:
1. THE DEWATERING BAG SHALL BE MADE OF NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE WITH
A MIN. SURFACE AREA OF 225 SQUARE FEET.
2. ALL STRUCTURAL SEAMS SHALL BE SEWN WITH A DOUBLE STITCH USING
A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE WITH HIGH STRENGTH THREAD.
3. THE SEAM STRENGTH SHALL WITHSTAND 100 LB/IN USING ASTM D-4884
TEST METHOD.
4. THE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE A 10 OZ NON -WOVEN FABRIC.
5. DISCHARGE FROM THE DEWATERING BAG SHALL BE DIRECTED SUCH THAT
PRE -DISTURBANCE HYDROLOGY IS NOT CHANGED.
DEWATERING BAG
WORK AREA
LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED
THAT WHICH CAN BE
COMPLETED IN ONE DAY
PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
1. SANDBAG DIKES SHALL BE SITUATED AT THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM ENDS OF THE
WORK AREA AND STREAM FLOW SHALL BE PUMPED AROUND THE WORK AREA. THE PUMP
SHOULD DISCHARGE INTO A STABLE VELOCITY DISSIPATER CONSTRUCTED OF RIP RAP OR
SANDBAGS.
2. WATER FROM THE WORK AREA SHALL BE PUMPED TO A SEDIMENT FILTERING MEASURE
SUCH AS A DEWATERING BASIN, SEDIMENT BAG, OR OTHER ACCEPTED DEVICE. THE
MEASURE SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THE WATER DRAINS BACK INTO THE CHANNEL
BELOW THE DOWNSTREAM SANDBAG DIKE WITHOUT CAUSING OUTLET EROSION BETWEEN
THE SILT BAG AND CHANNEL.
3. AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, THE DISTURBED CHANNEL SHALL BE MATTED.
4. WHEN REPLACING CULVERTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE SAND BAGS ACROSS THE
ENTIRE DOWNSTREAM FACE OF EACH PIPE TO PREVENT BACKFLOW DURING PUMP AROUND
ACTIVITIES.
PUMP AROUND DETAIL

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND
MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, SPECIFICALLY
THE SEDIMENT POLLUTION CONTROL ACT OF 1973, AS AMENDED, AND THE LOCAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL ORDINANCES.
THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE OF EVENTS AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROJECT AND SHALL APPLY TO ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN
PROJECT LIMITS:
1. INSTALL SILT FENCE, CHECK DAMS, AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AS DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE EROSION CONTROL REVIEW AND INSPECTION WILL BE ADDRESSED BY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES (NCDENR) LAND QUALITY SECTION, NOT THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
3. AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED BY FENCING, FLAGS, SIGNS, ETC.
4. UPON ACCEPTANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, COMMENCE EXCAVATION AND/OR
GRADING ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESTRICTED TO A 25 FOOT WIDE AREA FOR EXCAVATION,
EQUIPMENT STAGING ACTIVITIES AND TEMPORARY STOCKPILING OF EXCAVATED SOIL ALONG THE LENGTH OF
PIPELINES 4-INCH THROUGH 8-INCH AND 30-FOOT WIDE ALONG THE LENGTH OF PIPELINES 12-INCH
THROUGH 20-INCH. TEMPORARILY STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UPSLOPE OF THE EXCAVATION.
FOR ANY DEMOLITION OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DESIRED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, INTERIM MEASURES ACCEPTABLE TO AND PRE-APPROVED BY ENGINEER,
AND NCDENR DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL LAND RESOURCES, LAND QUALITY SECTION MUST BE PROVIDED.
5. LIMIT CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE TRENCH TO THE AMOUNT OF PIPE THAT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED IN
ONE DAY. LIMIT TRENCH EXCAVATION TO THE AMOUNT OF PIPE THAT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED AND
BACKFILLED IN ONE DAY, OR 50 LINEAL FEET, WHICHEVER IS LESS. EXCAVATED TRENCH MATERIAL MUST BE
STOCKPILED UPSLOPE OF THE TRENCH. OPEN TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND STABILIZED AT THE
CESSATION OF EACH WORK DAY. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES MUST RECEIVE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT
THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. PROVIDE PUMP FILTER BAGS OR OTHER APPROVED DEWATERING DEVICES
FOR DEWATERING OF TRENCH EXCAVATION AS NEEDED. SOIL SUPPLEMENTS, SEED AND MULCH, IF
APPLICABLE, SHOULD BE APPLIED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE PIPELINE/UTILITY LINE IS CONSTRUCTED.
ANY TEMPORARY ACCESS CONSTRUCTED FOR PIPELINE WORK MUST BE STABILIZED WITH A NON-GRADE
AGGREGATE.
6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TEMPORARY PROTECTION AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF
ALL SOIL STOCKPILES ON SITE AS WELL AS SOIL INTENTIONALLY TRANSPORTED FROM THE PROJECT SITE.
INSPECT ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ONCE PER SEVEN DAYS, AND IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING ANY RAINFALL OF 0.5" OR MORE IN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS ALONG
SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED. THE PROJECT
SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES.
7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL WILL BE CHECKED REGULARLY FOR UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION AND
BUILDUP OR CLOGGING WITH SEDIMENT. CORRECTIVE ACTION WILL BE TAKEN IMMEDIATELY.
8. ANY AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE FURTHER GRADED WITHIN A 14-DAY PERIOD, OR WHICH HAVE NOT
BEEN GRADED WITHIN 14 DAYS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
SITE DESCRIPTON STABILIZATION TIME TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, 7 DAYS NONE
DITCHES, AND SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW) 7 DAYS NONE
ZONES
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS LENGTH AND ARE NOT STEEPER
THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER 14 DAYS 7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN
50' IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES 14 DAYS NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND
FLATTER THAN 4:1 ZONES
Fn E&SC Notes

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONTINUED:
9. PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS BY SEEDING AND MULCHING PER THE
STANDARD DETAILS.
10. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO ENSURE THAT A GOOD STAND OF GRASS IS
MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. UPON FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF
COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF THE SITE BY THE ENGINEER AND NCDENR, REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REMOVED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES TO BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER MEASURES ARE NO
LONGER NEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE LOCAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR.
11. UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT, THE SELF-INSPECTION/SELF-MONITORING FORMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO
THE ENGINEER FOR CONVEYANCE TO THE OWNER FOR REGULATORY RECORD MAINTENANCE TIME PERIOD.
12. WHERE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS ROUTES INTERSECT WITH PAVED PUBLIC ROADS, PROVISIONS SHALL
BE MADE TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT ONTO THE PAVED SURFACE. WHERE SEDIMENT IS
TRANSPORTED ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD SURFACE, THE ROAD SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END
OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING, AND
TRANSPORTED TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL DISPOSAL AREA (STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER
SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER).
13. SITES UTILIZED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF STORING EQUIPMENT, EXCESS EXCAVATED
MATERIALS, STRIPPED TOPSOIL, ETC, SHALL BE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE FOR SUCH PURPOSES AND
SHALL BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE OWNER. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE SITES SHALL BE LEVEL,
DEVOID OF MATURE STANDS OF TREES, AND ISOLATED FROM DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND FEATURES, WETLANDS
STREAMS, AND STREAM CORRIDORS. SITES SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF CARY.
14. THE CLEANUP AND DISPOSAL OF EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIALS SHALL BE DONE AS SOON AS PRACTICAL
AND AS THE OWNER MAY DIRECT.
15. CHECK DAMS, SILT FENCE, OR OTHER FILTERING DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT AREAS OF STOCKPILED
MATERIALS, EXCAVATED AREAS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER STORM WATER INLET STRUCTURES IN
CONSTRUCTION AREAS TO CONTROL SILT RUNOFF.
16. ALL DEWATERING FLOWS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SILT, SEDIMENT, DEBRIS, AND OTHER POLLUTANTS
THROUGH APPROPRIATE MEANS (SETTLING BASINS, FILTER, ETC.). FOLLOWING THIS, THE FLOWS SHALL ONLY
BE RELEASED DIRECTLY INTO STORM SEWERS, STREAM CHANNELS, TO OTHER STABILIZED DRAINAGE
COURSES AND NOT INTO EXPOSED SOILS, STEEP SLOPES, OR ANY OTHER SITE WHERE FLOWS COULD
CAUSE FURTHER DAMAGE.
17. CUT AND FILL SLOPES ARE TO BE VERTICALLY TRACKED, HORIZONTALLY SCARIFIED, MATTED, OR OTHERWISE
CONSTRUCTED TO ENHANCE VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND EXPEDITE STABILIZATION. SEEDING SHALL BE
INSTALLED AS PORTIONS OF THESE SLOPES ARE COMPLETED.
18. THE EXISTING EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SUCH AS ROCK CHECK DAMS AND RIP RAP ALONG THE NEW
RECLAIMED WATERLINE ROUTE MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED TO FACILITATE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW
RECLAIMED WATERLINE AS SHOWN.
19. IF AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF THE CONTRACT BOND ANY PART OF THE SEEDED AREA IS NOT
IN GOOD CONDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FERTILIZE AND RESEED AS OFTEN AS NECESSARY TO GET A
GOOD STAND OF GRASS.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CROSS ANY DITCH WHEN FLOWING WATER IS PRESENT OR DURING WET WEATHER
UNLESS A PUMP AROUND SYSTEM IS PROVIDED DURING INSTALLATION OF PIPELINE (SEE DETAIL).
PRIOR TO CROSSING A DITCH, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP OR CHECK
DAM EXISTS DOWNSTREAM OF CROSSING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PIPELINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER
BACKFILLING OF PIPELINE, DITCH SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL GRADE AND STABILIZED. USE EXCELSIOR
MATTING OR RIP RAP AS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE DITCH. INSPECT DITCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER WET
WEATHER EVENT FOR STABILIZATION.
21. WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION CAUSES LAND DISTURBANCE OF ANY KIND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A DITCH, THE
CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL EXCELSIOR MATTING OR RIP RAP AS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE DITCH.
22. ALL OPEN CUT CROSSINGS OF DITCHES SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ONE WORK DAY.
23. ALL CHECK DAMS SHOULD APPROPRIATELY FILL THE DITCH THEY ARE PLACED IN, SO THAT DRAINAGE IS
FORCED THROUGH THE STRUCTURE. THE ENGINEER WILL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR IN WRITING IF ANY
CHECK DAM IS INSUFFICIENTLY SIZED BASED ON THE ENGINEER'S JUDGEMENT. CONTRACTOR WILL REMEDY
THE PROBLEM WITHIN 3 DAYS.
Fn E&SC Notes

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONTINUED:
24. GROUND STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED CONSISTENT WITH NC DENR GENERAL PERMIT NCG010000 EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL
1,2019. WHERE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED,ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE
LAST LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY EXCEPT FOR ALL PERIMETER DIKES,SWALES,DITCHES,PERIMETER SLOPES,AND ALL SLOPES
STEEPER THAN 3:1(H:V),WHICH SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER
WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
25. IF EXCAVATED SOIL IS PLACED ON ANY ROADWAY PAVEMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE SAND OR SCREENING FINES ALONG PAVEMENT SURFACE FOR SUFFICIENT REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT.
26. IN THE EVENT THAT SEEDING IS PERFORMED AFTER EXCELSIOR MATTING IS PLACED AS A STABILIZING
FEATURE, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE MATTING WHEN APPLYING GRASS SEED AND FERTILIZER.
CONTRACTOR MUST REPLACE THE MATTING AT THE END OF EACH DAY TO STABILIZE THE SOILS.
27. SPOIL OR DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 50' OF STORM DRAINS OR STREAMS.
28. PROVIDE PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT SYSTEM. ALL CONCRETE TRUCKS WILL
UTILIZE PORTABLE WASHOUT SYSTEM FOR CLEAN OUT. NO CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT WILL BE ALLOWED
TO REACH GROUND, AND NO CONCRETE WASHOUT DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED ON GROUND.
29. REMOVE DEMOLITION DEBRIS FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS AND DISPOSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS.
30. HYDROSEEDING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON THIS PROJECT. CRIMPING STRAW MULCH SHALL NOT BE
ALLOWED ON THIS PROJECT.
31. SEED SHALL BE UNIFORMLY BROADCAST AND LIGHTLY CULTIVATED PRIOR TO MULCH AND TACKIFER
OPERATIONS.
32. MULCH AND TACKIFIER OPERATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF SEEDING.
33. CONTRACTOR STAGING, TEMPORARY STORAGE, LAY DOWN AREAS, AND DIRT PILES SHALL BE WITHIN LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE.
34. OBTAIN AND PAY FOR EROSION CONTROL PERMITS FOR OFF-SITE STORAGE YARD, BORROW AREA, AND
DISPOSAL AREAS AS REQUIRED. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPROVED PLAN.
35. A LAYER OF SAND, FINES, OR SCREENINGS SHALL BE PLACED ON PAVED SURFACES BEFORE DEPOSITION
OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL. AFTER REMOVAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM PAVED SURFACES, A MECHANICAL
SWEEPER SHALL BE USED TO REMOVE ALL MATERIAL FROM PAVED SURFACES. PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE
SWEPT ON A DAILY BASIS WITH MATERIAL PLACED ON NON-PAVED SURFACES WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
36. ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1, DITCHES, PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILL
AND GRADING.
37. NOTIFICATION OF LAND RESOURCES SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL SELF-INSPECTION PROGRAM:
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN 2006 TO REQUIRE THAT PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT
TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING FOLLOWED.
RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT OCTOBER 1, 2010. THE
INSPECTIONS MUST BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL
PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCGS 113A-54.1 AND 15A NCAC
48.0131. TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF SELF-INSPECTION REPORTS AND NPDES SELF-MONITORING
REPORTS, A COMBINED FORM IS NOW AVAILABLE. THE NEW FORM WAS DEVELOPED TO SATISFY
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AND THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCG010000. BEGINNING AUGUST 1, 2013, THE DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL,
AND LAND RESOURCES IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING BOTH THE SPCA AND THE NPDES STORMWATER
PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCG 010000. THE COMBINED FORM SHOULD MAKE IT EASIER TO
COMPLY WITH SELF-INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. THE COMBINED SELF-MONITORING FORM IS AVAILABLE AS A
PDF AND WORD DOCUMENT FROM THE LAND QUALITY WEB SITE,
HTTP://PORTAL.NCDENR.ORG/WEB/LR/EROSION. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS THE FORM,
PLEASE CONTACT THE LAND QUALITY SECTION OF THE RALEIGH DENR OFFICE AT [phone].
��� E&SC Notes

5. HERBACEOUS PLANTS-Seeding recommendations for primary stabilization
s Successful)development depends on planting date(effectiveness goal: 6 mo.-3 yrs.without an ongoing maintenance program) Table 6.11.c(con't)
0
'° NATIVE SPECIES
Optimal Planting Dates
See Table
6.11.d for Fertilization/ Invasive
Botanical Name/ Native/ variety limestone coastal Sun/Shade Riparian Yes or Installation/Maintenance Other information,
Common Name Cultivar Introduced seedling rates lbs/acre Mountains Piedmont Plains tolerant Wetlands Buffers No Considerations commentary
Indiangrass Sorghastrum nutans/ N B By soil test 12/1-4/15 12/1-4/1 12/1-4/1 Sun NR Well No Responds well to controlled Western coastal plain only
Cheyenne drained burns.Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
varieties that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
I ndiangrass Sorghastrum nutans/ N B By soil test NR 12/1-5/1 1/1-5/1 Sun NR Well No Responds well to Only I ndiangrass adaptable to
Lomenta drained controlled burns. Mix with Eastern coastal plain(Zone 8)
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Deertongue Dichanthelium N C By soil test 5/1-4/15 5/1-4/1 NR Sun& Yes Poorly No Responds well to
clandestinum/Tioga Shade drained to controlled burns. Mix with
drought 3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Big Bluestem Andropogon gerardii/ N D By soil test 12/1-4/15 12/1-4/1 NR Sun NR Weill No Responds well to Warm season grass
Rountree drained controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Big Bluestem Andropogon gerardii/ N D By soil test 12/1-4/15 12/1-4/1 NR Sun NR Weill No Responds well to Warm season grass
Kaw drained controlled burns. Mix with I�.i
3 to 5 other seed varieties Z7"
that have similar soil rt
drainage adaptations. i.`.4,
rt
Big Bluestem Andropogon gerardii/ N D By soil test 12/1-4/15 12/1-4/1 12/1-5/1 Sun NR Weill No Responds well to Warm season grass
Earl drained controlled burns. Mix with COn
3 to 5 other seed varieties S
that have similar soil
Z.
drainage adaptations.
Z.
Little Bluestem Schizachyrium N E By soil test 12/1-4/15 NR NR Sun NR Weill No Responds well to Warm season grass Col
scoparium/Aldous drained controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil Z.
drainage adaptations. �G1
Little Bluestem Schizachyrium N E By soil test 12/1-4/15 12/1-4/1 NR Sun NR Weill No Responds well to Warm season grass rt
scoparium/Cimmaron drained controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties rt
that have similar soil rr,
1—, drainage adaptations. 0
J Col

P
1—, HERBACEOUS PLANTS-Seeding recommendations for primary stabilization
~ Successful)development depends on planting date(effectiveness goal: 6 mo.-3 yrs.without an ongoing maintenance program) Table 6.11.c(con't)
oc
NATIVE SPECIES
Optimal Planting Dates
See Table
6.11.d for Fertilization/ Invasive
Botanical Name/ Native/ variety limestone coastal Sun/Shade Riparian Yes or Installation/Maintenance Other information,
Common Name Cultivar Introduced seedling rates lbs/acre Mountains Piedmont Plains tolerant Wetlands Buffers No Considerations commentary
Little Bluestein Schizachyrium N E By soil test NR NR 12/1-4/1 Sun NR Weill No Responds well to Warm season qrass
scoparium/Common drained controlled burns. Mix with CD
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Sweet Woodreed Cinna arundinacea N F By soil test 12/1-4/15 12/1-4/1 12/1-4/1 Sun& Yes Poorly to No Mix with 3 to 5 other seed Warm season grass
mod.Shade well drained varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Rice Cutgrass Leersia oryzoides N G By soil test 12/1-4/15 12/1-4/1 12/1-4/1 Sun Yes Poorly No Mix with 3 to 5 other seed Warm season grass
drained varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Indian Woodoats Chasmanthium latifolium N H By soil test 3/1-5/15 2/15-4/1 2/15-3/20 Sun& NR Well No Mix with 3 to 5 other seed Cool season grass
7/15-8/15 3/15-10/1E9/1-11/1 mod.Shade drained varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Virginia Wild Rye Elymus virginicus N I By soil test 3/1-5/15 2/15-4/1 2/15-3/20 Sun& NR Well No Mix with 3 to 5 other seed Cool season grass
7/15-8/15 3/15-10/1E9/1-11/1 mod.Shade drained varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Eastern Bottlebrush Elymus hystrix N J By soil test 3/1-5/15 2/15-4/1 NR Sun& NR Well No Mix with 3 to 5 other seed Cool season grass
Grass 7/15-8/15 3/15-10/15 mod.Shade drained varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Soft Rush Juncus effusus N K By soil test 12/1-5/15 12/1-5/1 12/1-4/15 Sun Yes Poorly No Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
8/15-10/15 9/1-11/1 drained varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Shallow Sedge Carex/urida N L By soil test 12/1-5/15 12/1-5/1 12/1-4/15 Sun Yes Poorly No Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
8/15-10/15 9/1-11/1 drained varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Fox Sedge Carex vulpinoidea N L By soil test 12/1-5/15 12/1-5/1 12/1-4/15 Sun Yes Poorly No Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
8/15-10/15 9/1-11/1 drained varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
NOTE:
1.Seeding rates are for hulled seed unless otherwise noted.
2.Fertilizer&Limestone-rates to be applied in absense of soils tests. Recommended application rate assumes significantly disturbed site soils with little or no residual value.
3.NR means Species not recommended for this region or application area.
4.Native,warm season grasses require six or more months to germinate under optimum conditions. If they are planted in the summer,then a whole year will have to pass before they germinate.
5.Invasive designation as determined by the N.C.Exotic Pest Pant Council and N.C.Native Plant Society.
6.Sprigging is not recommended for immediate stabilization unless terrain is flat,heavymulch is applied and no other immediate stabilization method is practical.
cil 7.Sodding for immediate stabilization-see primary stabilization charts (other information column)and Section 6.12.
0
oe 8.Long term stabilization can only be accomplished with an adequate,immediate,and primary stabilization program. To achieve long term protective cover with the species listed in
this chart,the approved plan,construction sequence and maintenance schedule must include sufficient detail to assure vegetation will be established and maintained. To assure the
long term protective cover will be established,the reviewing and approving governing body may require a performance/maintenance bond.

Practice Standards and Specifications
Table 6.11.d
Seed Mixes for Native Species (lbs/ac)
When Mixed with 3, 4, or 5 Other Native Species
(See Table 6.11.a for nurse crop species to be added to these mixes)
3 Other 4 Other 5 Other
(total 4 species) (total 5 species) (total 6 species)
Switch Grasses (A) 3.5 lbs. 3.0 lbs. 2.5 lbs.
Ilan Grasses (B) 7.0 lbs. 6.0 lbs. 5.0 lbs.
Deertongue (C) 6.0 lbs. 5.0 lbs. 4.0 lbs.
Big Bluestem (D) 7.0 lbs. 6.0 lbs. 5.0 lbs.
Little Bluestem (E) 7.0 lbs. 6.0 lbs. 5.0 lbs.
Sweet Woodreed (F) 2.5 lbs. 2.0 lbs. 1.5 lbs.
Rice Cutgrass (G) 6.0 lbs. 5.0 lbs. 4.0 lbs.
Indian Woodoats (H) 2.5 lbs. 2.0 lbs. 1.5 lbs.
Virginia Wild Rye (I) 6.0 lbs. 5.0 lbs. 4.0 lbs.
Eastern Bottlebrush Grass (J) 2.5 lbs. 2.0 lbs. 1.5 lbs.
Soft Rush (K) 2.5 lbs. 2.0 lbs. 1.5 lbs.
Sedges (L) 2.5 lbs. 2.0 lbs. 1.5 lbs.
NOTE:
With the native varieties, the seed mix should be in the range of 15 pounds per acre.
Depending on availability of native seeds adaptable to North Carolina, the percentage
of a particular variety used may be reduced or increased accordingly. Although
diversity is desirable, it is imperative that the primary crop develop and become an
effective protective cover. In addition to the native species mix, additional nurse crop
species must be included to provide immediate stabilization and an adequate ground cover.
Rev.5/08 6.11.19

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS)jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section. .+b+ '
414,44\41,0,0 Noe
Location
Wake County, North Carolina Ogielb 0
11?IlliwIL)
i
. 1c4.6
•
fa no-m 7r
. � t
S
}
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
I [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 1/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
1\114
°c\CI
° I).
\41)1\".
CP
OIC
°c
\\IC)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 2/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1 . Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1 . Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 3/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians d'ic \C111\41111\11
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the,
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/6772 0
IIIS44%.,
cooFishes
NAME 911411. STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 4/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants \01‘114\11
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
\884,4i
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
V igratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1 . The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 5/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS
1044111kri INDICATED FORA BIRD ON
YOUR LIST,THE BIRD MAY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH
IS A VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE
OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH
THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS
ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT
THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT
AREA.)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 6/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rik (11.14.111111111\114
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 7/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1 . The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (,)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort —no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 8/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle IIi I I I I I 1 I I I I I I liii 1111 ++++ -1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 + ++++
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
(This is not a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
in this area, but
warrants
attention
because of the
Eagle Act or for
potential
susceptibilities
in offshore
areas from
certain types of
development
or activities.)
101‘4
Kentucky I I I ��� Flo•• NENE mmm
Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ ++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ + + ++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a \11,
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
C \III I I I 1\4 I 11
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.) +
Prairie Warbler 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mii ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ I+++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a�
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
rane in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Prothonotary ++++ ++++ ++++ 14_4
++++ ++++ ++++ +i++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Warbler INN NENE NENE
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 9/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM yy IPaC:Explore Location resources
Red-headed 10-1 I I I I I F+++ +ill I 1'++ +HI+ ++++ ++++ ++++
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Rusty Blackbird ++++ +++I uI++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +11+
BCC-BCR(This
is a Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
only in
particular Bird
Conservation
Regions(BCRs) 1).°C\I°1‘4
in the
continental
USA) yy Wood Thrush ++++ ++++ ++++ +T�� fill + ' +1+i '+++ ++-I-+ ++++
BCC Rangewide
5311
(CON)(This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continentalle 0
USA and Al
Alaska.) r
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area,view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 10/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network(AKN).This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and
citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources:The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All
About Birds Bird Guide, or(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of
Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season
associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If"Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in
your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii,the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC- BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC-Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 11/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list? _
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that overlap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator(a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding(which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject
to the restrictions on federal expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation
requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more
information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 12/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help
determine whether consultation is required and a template to facilitate the consultation
process.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN COASTAL BARRIERS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted
on the official CBRS maps. The boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for
in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary(i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone" that appears as a
hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do
not clearly intersect a unit, you may contact the Service for an official determination by following the
instructions here: https://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-barrier-resources-system-property-documentation
Data exclusions < 1\0
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour(depending on the location
of the unit). The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the
offshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas projects) may be
subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact
[e-mail]. ,
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 13/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or
for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to
view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
0 ‘
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography.A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work.There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory.There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 14/15

5/5/22,3:34 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
111111\111
°c\CI
\60)\°.*
CP
\\IC)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/2WMCPC4ALZEDZDDKGTQOBFC46E/resources 15/15