Pre Application Form - 5/23/2022 2:03 PM

Action History (UTC-05:00)Eastern Time(US&Canada)
Submit by Anonymous User 5/23/2022 2:03:40 PM(Message Start Event)
Reject by Montalvo,Sheri A 5/23/2022 2:09:35 PM(Pre-App-NON-DOT Project)
*The Division has developed a Pre-Filing Meeting Request email address:[e-mail] to
accept the federally required pre-filing meeting request. The email address will provide an auto
confirmation email receipt of submittal to the applicant. Please be sure to fill out all the requested
information in the body of the email link and cc yourself to save a copy for your records.
On Thursday April 7,2022 the Environmental Protection Agency's"Clean Water Act Section 401
Certification Rule"("Federal Rule")was reinstated to its previous version which originally became
effective on September 11,2020. In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a)"At least 30 days
prior to submitting a certification request,the project proponent shall request a pre-filing meeting with
the certifying agency". In accordance with 40 C.F.R Section 121.5(b)(7),and(c)(5)all certification
requests shall include documentation that a pre-filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying
authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request. Please refer to the Federal Rule
for more information.To send a pre-filing request please send an email to [e-mail]
• The task was assigned to Montalvo,Sheri A.The due date is: May 26,2022 5:00 PM
5/23/2022 2:04 PM

Q J
Staff Review Form 2 ' `
NORTH CAROLINA
Ertrlmnmertlrtl QOeaflly
Updated September 4,2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
Comments: The Division has developed a Pre-Filing Meeting Request email address:
[e-mail] to accept the federally required pre-filing meeting request.
The email address will provide an auto confirmation email receipt of submittal to the
applicant. Please be sure to fill out all the requested information in the body of the
email link and cc yourself to save a copy for your records.
On Thursday April 7,2022 the Environmental Protection Agency's"Clean Water Act
Section 401 Certification Rule"("Federal Rule")was reinstated to its previous
version which originally became effective on September 11,2020. In accordance
with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a)"At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification
request,the project proponent shall request a pre-filing meeting with the certifying
agency". In accordance with 40 C.F.R Section 121.5(b)(7),and (c)(5)all certification
requests shall include documentation that a pre-filing meeting request was
submitted to the certifying authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the
certification request. Please refer to the Federal Rule for more information.To send
a pre-filing request please send an email to [e-mail]
Please type in reason why this project can not be reviewed.

Project Submittal Form
Please note:fields marked with a red asterisk *below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type:* For the Record Only(Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre-Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre-Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
5/23/2022
Project Contact Information
..................................................................................................................................
Name: Samuel Adam Carter
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
................................
Project Name: McLambs Pond
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
County(ies)
Harnett

Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Form_JD Request Signed.pdf 292.89KB
Mclamb Pond Upland_Datasheets.pdf 474.91KB
Mclamb Pond Wetland_Datasheets.pdf 476.5KB
McLambs Pond PJD_20200215 Signed.pdf 152.16KB
McLambs Pond Soil_Report_20200223.pdf 721.5KB
McLambs Pond_IPAC Report.pdf 445.19KB
McLambs Pond_SHPO map.pdf 290.29KB
McLambs_Pond Fig 2-Wetlands.pdf 1.45MB
McLambs_Pond Fig 3-Topo.pdf 1.26MB
McLambs_Pond Fig 4-Soil.pdf 1.36MB
McLambs_Pond Fig 5-NWI.pdf 1.63MB
McLambs_Pond Fig 6-Flood.pdf 922.66KB
Preliminary Stream Impact.pdf 1.51MB
McLamb Pond Agent Authorization Letter.pdf 102.61KB
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
Small Rd 48ft culvert impact to RPW between open water and wetlands.
Sign and Submit
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I,the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true,accurate,and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
• I,the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a"transaction"subject to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature;AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
6;'.rowert fete vi,(7a.trot
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination(JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D,E,F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 10975-25-9378
City, State: Dunn, NC
County: Harnett
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 15-26-25-9378
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 244
Bunnlevel NC 28323
Telephone Number: 910 890 2779
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
ElI am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
nInterested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Brian Barefoot
Mailing Address: 10422 Green Path Rd
Dunn, NC 28334
Telephone Number: 919 291 1623
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I,the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Samuel Adam Carter
Print Name
Capacity: n Owner fl Authorized Agents
3/20/2020
Date
ab4c-
Signature -
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
�✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
�✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
Q A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
111 I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
• I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
n I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination(PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary"in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination(AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
n Size of Property or Review Area 56.06 acres.
n The property boundary(or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑� Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.300492
Longitude: -78.587895
nA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water,pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
nCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms
❑ Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
❑� Soil Survey Map
O Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑� Landscape Photos (if taken)
• NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
n NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
▪ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and maybe made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

f .
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations
Please note that the approval and signature of survey plats will only be done in association with
an Approved Jurisdictional Determination. The Corps accepts both electronic and hardcopy
plats for signature, however this will be at the discretion of the project manager. If a hard copy
is submitted, the Corps requires that all hard-copy submittals include at least one original Plat
(to scale)that is no larger than 11"x17". Submitted plats must be legible, including labeling(the
use of match lines for larger tracts are encouraged). Additional copies of a plat, including those
larger than 11"x 17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. Prior to final
production of a plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the surveyor electronically
submit a draft of the survey to the Corps project manager for review.
PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be signed and sealed by a licensed professional land surveyor
171 Must be to scale (all maps must include an accurate graphic scale and verbal
scale)
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
O Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s)used as reference (e.g.
property corner, USGS monument)
171 Jurisdictional wetlands depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, wetlands, etc.
• Include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Jurisdictional non-wetland waters (non-wetland tidal/navigable waters,
tributaries, impoundments, ditches, etc.) depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent waters (RPW),pond, etc.
• Mark the centerline of linear waters (tributaries), with
approximate widths to the Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHMW) OR a surveyed OHWM boundary of the tributary.
• List the linear footage of linear features and area(using
approximate widths)
• Mark the extent of OHMW for non-linear waters such as lakes,
ponds, etc.
• List the acreage of non-linear features
• Identify each feature using an alphanumeric system
Version: May 2017 Page 1

❑ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as non jurisdictional. Please
include the acreage and/or linear length of these features as appropriate.
LMust include a legible Waters of the United States (wetlands and other
waters) Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and bounds/GPS
coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must ensure that all depicted wetlands or other waters intersect or tie-to
surveyed project/property boundaries
CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of the Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section
404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this date. The
undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to
the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328
and other U.S.Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: May 2017 Page 2

nPlats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual,33 C.F.R.part 328 and other U.S.Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
GPS SURVEYS
For surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the survey must include all of
the above, as well as:
✓ be at sub-meter accuracy at each survey point.
it include an accuracy verification. One of more of the known points (property
corner, monument) shall be located with the GPS and cross referenced with the
existing traditional property survey(metes and bounds).
LIinclude a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: May 2017 Page 3

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: McLamb Pond city/County: Dunn/Harnett Sampling Date: 3_16_2020
Applicant/Owner: Brian Barefoot State: NC Sampling Point: D3
Investigator(s]: Adam Carter Section,Township,Range: Dunn
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex.none): Convex Slope(%): 3%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat: 35.303425 Long: -78.589185 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb Bibb soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: Upland Forest
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology II significantly disturbed' Are"Normal Circumstances'present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ]s the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) n Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
[]Surface Water(Al) []Aquatic Fauna(B13) []Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
[]High Water Table(A2) []Mad Deposits(B15)(LRR U) []Drainage Patterns(B10)
[]Saturation(A3) []Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) []Mass Trim Lines(B18)
[]Water Marks(B1) []Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) []Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
[]Sediment Deposits(B2) []Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) []Crayfish Burrows(C8)
[]Drift Deposits(B3) []Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) []Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
[]Algal Mat or Crust(B4) O Thin Muck Surface(C7) []Geomorphic Position(D2)
[]Iron Deposits(B5) []Other(Explain in Remarks) []Shallow Aquitard(D3)
[]Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) []FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
(Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes I 1 No 0 1-1 Depth(inches):
�
Water Table Present? Yes IF No Depth(inches):
1 Saturation Present? Yes I No I—I Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata)—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: D3
Absdute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
20e Stratum (Rd size 25ft x 25ft ) %Cover _ pace,2 Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Loblolly Pine(Pinus taeda) 5% Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 12 (A)
2 Post Oak(Quercus margaretta) 5% . Yes FACU
TBitternut Hickory(Carya cordiformis) 4% No FAC Speciesp Number croso Dominant
12
3 Across All Strata: (B)
q Water Oak(Quercus nigra) 5% Yes _ FAC 5 Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 3% No FACW_ Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A/B)
6. Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 3% No FA(:+
25 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total%Cover of Multip by_
50%of total cover: 12.5 20%of total cover: 5
.Saolina stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft OBL species x 1 = 0
1 Black Cherry(Prunus serotina) 2% No FACU FACW species x 2= 0
2 Bitternut Hickory(Carya cordiformis) 5% Yes FAC FAC species x 3= 0
3 Magnolia(Magnolia grandiflora) 5% Yes _FAC FACU species x 4= 0
4. Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 3% _ No FACU/F UPL species x 5= 0
Persimmon(Diospyros Virginians) 2% Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5. ( pv g� ) No FAC
6. - Prevalence Index —B/A= NaN
17_—Total Cover j rophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 8.5 20%of total cover: 3.4 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation_
Shrill,Stratiim (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1.American Holly(Ilex opaca) 3% Yes FAC
3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
2 Silky dogwood(Cornus amomum) 3% Yes FACW
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
3 Chinese Privet(Ligustrum sinese) 6% . Yes . .FAC
4.- 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.- be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
6.- - Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
12 =Total Cover Tree—Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover: 6 20%of total cover: 2.4 approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
1 Giant Cane(Arundinaria gigantea) 2°o Yes FACW
Sapling—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. - - approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
3 than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
.- -
- Shrub—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5 - - approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
6..- - Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
7 - _ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants, except woody vines,less than approximately
a._- - 3 ft(1 m)in height.
9.. -
Woody vine—All woody vines,regardless of height.
10.-
11.- -
2 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 1 20%of total cover: 0.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1.Grape(Vitis spp.) . 1% Yes FACW.
2.Roundleaf Greenbrier(Smilax rotundafolia) • 1% Yes FAC
3.Poison Ivy(Toxicodendron radicans) 2% Yes FAC
4.- . -
5 Hydrophytic
4 =Total Cover Vegetation
I
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 0.8 Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: D3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 100 SL
3-14 10YR 100 SL
14-24 10YR 100 SCL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) I—I 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) n2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) u Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4)R
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) n Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
Stratified Layers(A5) E Depleted Matrix(F3) InAnomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P, T, U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P, T,U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) n Red Parent Material(TF2)
❑Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) n Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) ❑ Marl(F10)(LRR U) n Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
n Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0, P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) El Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR 0, S) ❑ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) El Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P, S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks: Lots of Cortz rock with soil boring.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site. McLamb Pond city/county: Dunn Harnett Sampling Date: 3_16_2020
Applicant/Owner: Brian Barefoot State: NC Sampling Point: D2
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section,Township,Range: City of Dunn
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Hilislope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 2%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat: 35.302986 Long: -78.588821 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb—Bibb soils, frequently flooded NCWAM NW]classification: Headwater Forest
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology I significantly disturbed' Are"Normal Circumstances'present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts, important features, etc.
HydrOphytic Vegetation Present? Yes ' No ]s the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I No
within a Wetland? Yes '� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) n Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
[]Surface Water(Al) []Aquatic Fauna(B13) []sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
[]High Water Table(A2) []Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) nOrainage Patterns(B1 D)
[]Saturation(A3) []Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) []Moss Trim Lines(B16)
[]Water Marks(B1) []Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) []Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
[]Sediment Deposits(B2) []Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) []Crayfish Burrows(C8)
[]Llrift Deposits(B3) n Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) []Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
[]Algal Mat or Crust(B4) []Thin Muck Surface(C7) []Geomorphic Position(D2)
n Iron Deposits(B5) []Other(Explain in Remarks) []Shallow Aquitard(D3)
[]Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) []FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
I IWater-Stained Leaves(B9) J Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes n No M Depth(inches):
� I
Water Table Present? Yes
� No I I Depth(inches): 6 inches
Saturation Present? Yes[1 No I-1 Depth(inches): 1 inch Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes J No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata)—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:D2
Absdute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
fpe stratum (Pict size'25ft x 25ft ) o/(moor _Speriec, Status_ Number of Dominant Species
1 Black gum(Nyssa sylvatica) 8% Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 1 (A)
2 Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 6% Yes FAC/Fi
3 Loblolly Pine(Pinus taeda) �% FAC Total Number of Dominant 1 1
No Species Across All Strata: (B)
4. - - -
Percent of Dominant Species
5. 7 - That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (NB)
6. - -
16 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 8 20%of total cover: 3.2 Total o/foyer of Mi It(glyhY—
Saolina Stratum. (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft 1 OBL species x 1 = 0
1 American Holly(Ilex opaca) 2% No FAC FACW species x 2= 0
2 Black Willow(Salix nigra) 4% No OBL FAC species x 3= 0
3 Ironwood,American hornbeam,Blue-beech(Carpinus Caroliniana) 20% Yes ,FAC FACU species x 4= 0
4. Loblolly bay(Gordonia lasianthus) 7% _ Yes FACW UPL species x 5= 0
5. - -
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
6. Prevalence Index -B/A- NaN
33 -Total Cover jrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 16.5 20%of total cover: 6.6 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation_
chnih Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1 Highbush blueberry(Vaccinium corymbosum) 3% No FACW l
3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0
2 Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) 5% Y2S FACW _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.Chinese Privet(Ligustrum sinese) 8% .No _ .FAC
4.Wax Myrtle(Myrica cerifera) 3% No FAC+
- Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5 Sweet Pepperbush(Clethra alnifolia) 5% Yes FACW be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
6.- _ - Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
24 =Total Cover Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover: 12 20%of total cover: 4.8 approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Srrahim (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
1 Carex,Sedge(Carex spp.) 3% Yes FAC-0 Sapling-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. Giant Cane(Arundinaria gigantea) 4% Yes FACW approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
3 Rush(Juncus spp.) 5% Yes FACW. than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
- Shrub-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5 - - approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
6..- - Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
7 - _ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants, except woody vines,less than approximately
a.-- - 3 ft(1 m)in height.
9.. -
Woody vine-All woody vines,regardless of height.
10.- -
11.- -
12 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 6 20%of total cover: 2.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1.Laurel-leaved Greenbrier,Bamboo Vine(Smilax lauirfolia) _ 2% Yes FACW
2.Roundleaf Greenbrier(Smilax rotundafolia) _ III_ No FAC
3.Saw Greenbrier,Bullbrier(Smilax bona-nox) 1% No FAC
4.Poison Ivy(Toxicodendron radicans) _ 5% Yes FAC
5.Laurel Greenbrier(Smilax laurifloria) 1% No FACW Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
Present? Yes I No
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: D2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/2 SCL
3-15 10YR 4/1 97% 10YR 6/6 3% C M SCL
15-24 10YR 3/1 90% 10YR 6/6 10% C M SCL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) I—I 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) n2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) u Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4)R
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) n Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) [ ]Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P, T, U) 0 Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P, T,U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) n Red Parent Material(TF2)
❑Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) n Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) ❑ Marl(F10)(LRR U) n Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
n Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0, P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) El Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR 0, S) ❑ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) El Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P, S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes i No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:Adam Carter,Wetland Solutions,LLC PO Box 244
Bunnlevel,NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME,AND NUMBER: Wilmington,#FOLDER_NAME#,
#FOLDER DA NUMBER#
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:NC 55 East
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:NC County/parish/borough:Harnett City: Dunn
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.302607')Long.:-78.588020°
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: Stony Run
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude(decimal Longitude Estimated amount of Type of aquatic Geographic authority to
Number degrees) (decimal degrees) aquatic resources in resources(i.e., which the aquatic resource
review area(acreage wetland vs.non- "may be"subject(i.e.,
and linear feet,if wetland waters) Section 404 or Section
applicable 10/404)
W 1 35.304432 -78.589328 9.1 acres Wetland Section 404
W2 35.300102 -78.586158 0.42 acre Wetland Section 404
P1 35.302263 -78.587147 25.3 acres Non-wetland Section 10/404
(Impoundment)
S 1 35.299855 -78.586885 485 lf Non-wetland Section 10/404
S2 35.299815 -78.588099 298 lf Non-wetland Section 10/404
S3 35.301371 -78.5894 768 lf Non-wetland Section 10/404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD,which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2)the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3)the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5)undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and(7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD,the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area,the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD(check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters'study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data.
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
®U.S.Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name: 24K; Dunn Quadrangle
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO 2019
®National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS May 2019
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
®FEMA/FIRM maps: FIRM Panel: 3720152600
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ❑Aerial(Name & Date): NC CGIA Feb 2017
or❑Other(Name&Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information(please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
azmuza 4 v 2 . 2/15/2020
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person
staff member completing PJD requesting PJD(REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
States Department of
RCS Agriculture and other Harnett County,
Federal agencies, State
Naturalagencies including the North Carolina
Resources Agricultural Experiment
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants McLambs Pond
,..... .. ....-4-..1-13,-t-i -.4. . .
• -- s • _ - J..
— \ it ,.
•
S- \ • . 7:-.F--2-.:E'. .-
f
4 PI .•
/ . 0. — • .' ' \ • 1 ' c• .
+ +w
�k
ti
• )- ......,._-..• ...:' :.Alt• . ..,-
r..i,i,.\\....1..........
f ' •..'c%- 11/4 . . ...
0 \ ,
• ode. 1 \ . *.% .. .
4 e - ,.. Y. -; _ . '.
February 23, 2020

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs)or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice)or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 5
Soil Map 8
Soil Map 9
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 11
Map Unit Descriptions 11
Harnett County, North Carolina 13
Bb—Bibb soils, frequently flooded 13
OrB—Orangeburg loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes 14
VeB—Vaucluse gravelly loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes 15
VeD—Vaucluse gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes 17
W—Water 18
References 19
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
719000 719100 719200 719300 719400 719500 719600
35°1H'26"N ,. -4. _ ;q.I
-..V_ I. ' rar•% // _ 35°18'26"N
••••••Fr,,•ir.i4 .cc,...:• it, Pori:.k.,..i, 40... .
c.- _..' •- v - 414:
.n,... 'X-
'fir. "A# `. lt J'e Rit 0: —th
... .1 14-04 , -
- "
...
s; e. k— .
_ Pi ► T:1
. 4�:
tb
j� ,y �` # C
4t�
-�-�_ Ali 4• � ,
•
q 4 - cc"SS
Bb r "
4.111
t
•
OrB W s y
4
Veb• L
ry \\ p
;
,• Pt
.,:i'4111
4: 4\erB
�
.4:''`'' !�!' \ B b
•
', • "0-. .. -. . J'e •
,ti 4..
' • • C . .
31*'1
oiI o oas KIT f5Q s Uid ati t11o@�c�af]Qo � '
35°17'53"N - - — I' r - --- -� { 35°1T 53"N
719000 719100 719200 719300 719400 719500 719600 719700 z+s
3 3
m Map Scale:1:4,940 if pnnted on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet M
" Meters
m N 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 200 400 m 800 1200
Map projection:Web Mercator Coer coordinates:WG584 Edge tics:UTM Zone 17N WGS84
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) j Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot 1:24,000.
SoilstiTi Very Stony Spot
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
P. 0 Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other misunderstandingof the detail of mapping and accuracyof soil
• Soil Map Unit Points pp 9
Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
14 Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot Rails measurements.
1--1--F
• Closed Depression
O.10 Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
w rap US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
4 Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
•
• Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Marsh or swamp 1. Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
• Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
• Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
• Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Harnett County,North Carolina
▪ Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 16,Sep 16,2019
Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
40, Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Oct 29,2014—Nov
Slide or Slip 28,2017
oa Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Bb Bibb soils,frequently flooded 17.4 31.2%
OrB Orangeburg loamy sand,2 to 6 5.7 10.1%
percent slopes
VeB Vaucluse gravelly loamy sand, 1.0 1.7%
2 to 8 percent slopes
VeD Vaucluse gravelly loamy sand, 7.0 12.5%
8 to 15 percent slopes
W Water 24.9 44.5%
Totals for Area of Interest 55.9 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Harnett County, North Carolina
Bb—Bibb soils, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3snw
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Johnston, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A -0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Cg1 - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Cg2- 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
A -0 to 30 inches: mucky loam
Cg1 -30 to 34 inches: loamy fine sand
Cg2-34 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Ponded
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
OrB—Orangeburg loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sq4
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Orangeburg and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Orangeburg
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 7 inches: loamy sand
BA - 7 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Bt1 - 12 to 54 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2-54 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
VeB—Vaucluse gravelly loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sg1
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Vaucluse and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Vaucluse
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 6 inches: gravelly sandy loam
E- 6 to 14 inches: gravelly sandy loam
Bt- 14 to 29 inches: sandy clay loam
Btx- 29 to 58 inches: sandy clay loam
BC-58 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 15 to 35 inches to fragipan
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low(about 3.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: Loamy Summit Woodland - PROVISIONAL (F137XY002GA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydric soil rating: Yes
VeD—Vaucluse gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sqm
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Vaucluse and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Vaucluse
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 6 inches: gravelly sandy loam
E- 6 to 14 inches: gravelly sandy loam
Bt- 14 to 29 inches: sandy clay loam
Btx- 29 to 58 inches: sandy clay loam
BC-58 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 15 to 35 inches to fragipan
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low(about 3.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: Loamy Backslope Woodland - PROVISIONAL (F137XY006GA)
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
18

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
20

tritpf di'r I lax
x `ter FI WMLIFE'
re) United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
k$% Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: March 24, 2022
Project Code: 2022-0023896
Project Name: McLambs Pond
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species'presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

03/24/2022 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts)that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act(ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act(BGEPA)to
protect native birds from project-related impacts.Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

03/24/2022 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

03/24/2022 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

03/24/2022 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0023896
Event Code: None
Project Name: McLambs Pond
Project Type: New Constr -Above Ground
Project Description: RV Park development
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.302824,-78.58792689113554,14z
5.
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

03/24/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened)
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Rough-leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747

03/24/2022 4
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

03/24/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)only in particular Bird Conservation Aug 31
Regions(SCRs)in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)in this area,but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626

03/24/2022 2
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.)A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort(see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated?The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.

03/24/2022 3
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
•probability of presence breeding season I survey effort —no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
B eri anKestrel ---- ---- ---+ 1111 liii liii liii liii ---- ---- ---- ----
Bald Eagle Non-BCC liii liii liii liii liii liii liii ---- liii "ii "ii ""gyp
Vulnerable
Prothonotary
Warbler ---- ---- ---+ IIII IIII IIII IIII ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/
management/proj ect-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/
management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.

03/24/2022 4
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding,wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and

03/24/2022 5
3. "Non-BCC -Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell

03/24/2022 6
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

03/24/2022 7
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Wetland Solutions LLC
Name: Wesley Johnson
Address: 816 Merry Street
City: Dunn
State: NC
Zip: 28334
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

H @ 3 Houses
ƒ Wils
c ..
#
ir , `
HT 7Ame3 3 c + car Kaos .
Centel) (Gone) 1996' ocitsTo©°
z HT peFear& _
0■: ' Northern RaA Depot - TV
H$e1 nnHAp & y HT 5] HarnettCounty
20& • : pm 6ng School 2014
HTO51 L H1 K4§k//�bra `
ra 4 . raaHgrtW
y
7 H08mWkeg tr
ƒee HoLlse ] ] `, Cm
, •l. HARNE
HT g5 Magnolia Avenue
■ §rammF § m�
i.% � d /
+ A + z ; : NC¥A
, ^ E
#
it 13
c as
qt S t
J fiA Hp34B BIB bcd¥s .
V
• SAMPSON •
ft

•
** ,
/0,43 Upland:9 acres _ _ - '♦
k32 k33 e• p8 pg '? .- 114
aQ� • k 1 `.._.::__. . ICr
Q- k30 . ..::W:1 T`_9:1-acres `. . J fi • ii ♦.,i
fir.:::=:.1 .: _..::...._+ Z ♦i
� 0 2 •' ::. > Flu.:::: : > ♦
O , ,17:',. :::_:•._.. it . .. :_. A ♦
._ 7
,Apir-
/� •k26: .:_:_. ::::::: alCr .:_._. :.d15 4 rI
41
o!k22 .: ':::`-'.vi. jgj12 • o , . ••
k21:_.:. :_:n.gj)i d8 F,
Q9 k17.ti... _J.uj4j7j15 ••j k1'9
•;k116,:=_-_ :•.28 ">
qt ._:1 .. j. , . dd4d6
Q (g3 k1:5�1ir .:_.�
G i_k14.:At. J0k 1 37 d5 -t
0%.•Itk§:•::: `5 34 36..1 i ",bd3
k12 k8r :..1 .�
k5 k2 4;ip:I.-:_.:-:__ _.
k6 k7bolis4 1�b25 yt _.
b22 .
1:;.(.. h W'3 .15.+57 acres
2 b0 . pd4
bi 9+U'pland:'0i p07 ap
• b17 b15 vlbc8 IA MINI K ib8•_+
bi
b4 b5 b9
p_si ' r,ct•c1
o , ps6 - b3 a37
en
ttedg, Upland:9a9 t a31
il4 :ig a30
ii; \ ,
Vg�O3 a28 a29 t
a27
•a25
KO •a24
a3 •a21 e•
n11 . . a18�@ _/ .f 4.
airifr:E 17 ,�'"-sue
0 Delineation Flags cz1�1 �i19• t•i a8 el •a5•' .w1
9 �z10 a15 a7 w 4W2„0.42 acres
Preliminary Waters of the US - 1,551 If 1 U'r, w8 1 s5:s4`ss3 "s2 Si•
Parcel ID ,, Za z5 v5 ,�
1526-25-9378.000 : t*' 1
1526-26-4072.000 A _ I'
LUpland Area — 15.40 acres - `��` . '
Preliminary Wetlands - 34.83 acres -
1 i Open Water
= ' - Wetland 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet
bagno EM,Digital l big,-o C .:C iao I I_ I I I
- • USDA,IMakt,AeroGRlD,IRIM,aititfl me'ram user'ommumty
-alikProject Name: McLamb's Pond N Figure. 2
Location: NC-55 E., Dunn, NC 28334 c' bie
SOUTION8 LLC .. I/ E
: Property ID: 1526-25-9378.000 _y 1 inch = 300 feet
Aerial: NC CGIA Feb 2017 S
P.O.Box 244 20 Feb 2020
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

`��, _ - -S and ~- +a -1 / �;
1,-..:11:..„._
t -e . 'If f (.
3 -------- carlip— -- it gut 4
46/0. i
r ,
N.
,..-A , / . ` •
fiio/ • • /1 I, .., / ,4 \ N
•,-. ,,, - \ 1
�v- ', _ Moi l ._„
A ,
,../. •
I) tilt .
___._
, , .
, \
., ., .. . .,„, „or .../. ,
, ....
, _-4 * / i t 1 44)
'� �� b / / f
N. ► _ /�• '
• thav•n so- -*
,.Memori" I 1 •.. _ -' — `%
• •
i
` Park 1 -
•
6 ..... \if. 0/ Ilt
AO. . \ ' s "/.0 tiptiirol It, .•
i i�
/... • ..
illik fil/ 41 .. ..".-
-..._ ii —.OP-.1 , *N:Vil \--.1%;br--' --1 11 -111P- .46.
. tYl- 74 '''''1/4. • •• • • • 'N.
ate
. 11,-: --41''''' - _
.4 • VII1041.211%*.- _ II
r, a (5) p •
I.. N C •% . � -
I
' ii sp_s _ial ) tin- ...ito." "IIP" — Ally-
• A 421J div - 7
il\4(i.T-
,.
0 . _ _
It
1 II
7" Th.... _ :,...-..--,_ - -e-Ap IL •
• . •@..- i 88 gliiiiiillqr
.. ;rS0
Ail
Parcel ID I I . —ir. O
MD IMP:s I1 1526-25-9378.000 i • 0 —
/ f
Adi-h:
1526-26-4072.000 • -iis 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet
I I I I I I
—" - - , -*:% -.•• •• ' " V'4 /right:©2013 National Geographic Society;-i-cubed
-alikProject Name: McLamb's Pond N Figure. 3
Location: NC-55 E., Dunn, NC 28334 `c'
'/ � E 8 UTION8 LLC VY 0L
Property ID: 1526-25-9378.000 _y 1 inch = 1,000 feet
USGS 7.5-Minute Topo; S
P.O.Box 244 20 Feb 2020
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

f j
♦ N�
a.. .r .
iiit ,. .. .... •
10 , .
4.-."-- .' porP
•
:,
••,:-'' '',,,,
7 pa `�h 1 -< i i. 4:141:,..,,illsi..,... ,
. .- .11
; -
/ '•i ♦ err... �a,r -�-., » r. ._ ►.
' •r 1Y Ttr
44
"t
OS
0 40 .0 ,040111111., ,* ,
0, I ,, . .. _
4- - •, -- 4116104 . ''4,
R
—
Y i.. F_-. _ - -
^- Soil Map Units
Parcel ID
II
0
►• 40
N
W7A�
F.
.SOLUTIONS LLC S•t `
1 1

/ , .
i • . • •
PUBHh
PF01 C Q� ' '�`
SPp , . . • . ,
'0i
. .
�,j . . , . . .
- • • i , .. : . . l / ,
R4SBC
\ ••••• .••
• \\•° • • ..•: ..:• . • '.:., '17., '''// `.-
414111- --4—7 .
I`r1 PF01Ch
E PI
4400y54 -
i s�
HOLLAND AVE Q� `�h '' A.
.'1411V----4-' -- -
ti
L1UBHh' 1
¢- ~� r . J .. .. \
.,,, ,,..,,,,„:„: „..--,..,„,„--„, „,,-,:,,,,..,,..,. ,:.
. . ,
Ps.' yW s.
^0 e _ • `SIT, ':`: &'T*F yy+ �� _ � ' k-h i^ i
•
+' �,44 rip Tr `• I "I
.. ,
s .. „ •it PUBHx
to ! .� '. <..: PUBHx
�•
Parcel ID \ tA.)
1526-25-9378.000
JOY":art. '"'^ r
1526-26-4072.000 i '�'� .
F S
Wetland Type °h''ri, ,`y' • . .
is »� o PF01A
Freshwater Emergent Wetland -. PF01C
y ljait4 ilk
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland 11" ''�
-f. b
Freshwater Pond "f 1. -
•J Lake • _ .1- ;�
R5UU H '.
•• Riverine
. .
`� Gto Digital 0 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 Feet
PF01C USDA, oAero�I...�, . I
.. ,.. I I
F ...... ...,,
N
Project Name: McLamb's Pond AN-- Figure: 5
Location: NC-55 E., Dunn, NC 28334 W��'E
4 UTIONBLLO 1 inch = 500 feet
Property ID: 1526-25-9378.000 s
P.O.Box 244 USFWS National Wetland Inventory (May 2019) 20 Feb 2020
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

Ir. \II v..6949
0
5Q0
-0
S __5--`--
, ‘
COGII ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD
AKE ST ,
EW 1
x
* )1
AE
HOLLAND AVE o-
�����
,sc
oQ�
AE
0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD
I
tt
AE
OLD A, NC 55 E J\�\ ._/ fl
..._(, ,. ,
Parcel ID
1526-25-9378.000
1526-26-4072.000
Flood Hazard
r i 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE
:fix` ).;
AE - 100-YEar •:+" =`=' ! t•`
X- Low Risk 0 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 Feet
Source: Esri, Digital I I I I I
Project Name: McLamb's Pond
w/40*. Figure: 6
18O UTION8LLO Location: NC-55 E., Dunn, NC 28334 Nor
E 1 inch - 500 feet
Property ID: 1526-25-9378.000 S
P.O.Box 244 NC Flood Risk Information System (https://fris.nc.gov/) 20 Feb 2020
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

C ` r
WATER PROJECT NOTES: NOTE:
1. ALL MATERIALS, INSTALLATION,TESTING&INSPECTION OF WATER UTILITIES TO MEET THE LOCATION AND ROUTE OF ELECTRICAL WIRING TO BE LEGEND
CURRENT CITY OF DUNN STANDARDS SPECIFICATIONS. DONE BY THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED
2. FIRE HYDRANT TEES TO BE INSTALLED AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS. BY THE CITY OF DUNN BEFORE WORK IS STARTED.
3. WATERLINE IS TO BE INSTALLED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.WHEN EXISTING PROPOSED
THE PROPOSED LAYOUT OF THE WATERMAIN EXCEEDS THE MANUFACTURER'S ALLOWED
01 I _ ; 'p1 DEFLECTION,APPROPRIATE SIZE AND DEGREE OF MJ ELBOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED. PROJECT BOUNDARY N/A o
Ftj ‘ i EXAMPLES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO SHARP CURVES,CUL-DE-SACS, UNDER STORM
DRAIN, UNDER DRAINAGE WAYS,ETC. BOWED WATERMAINS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 5
F / I ♦I 4. WHERE WATERLINE CROSSES STORM SEWER:WHERE WATERLINE CROSSES ABOVE EASEMENTS
!¢ MAINTAIN 1'VERTICAL SEPARATION,WHERE WATERLINE CROSSES BELOW MAINTAIN 18"
D -���VI I l VERTICAL SEPARATION.ALSO THE WATERLINE SHALL BE CLASS 50 DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR N/A LOT LINE 1- E
i 4 &CI kN F A MINIMUM 10'EACH SIDE OF CROSSING. W cc\I 8
�l�,r • (► 5. IF DISTANCE PERMITS,CONTRACTOR MAY SLOPE WATERLINE ENOUGH ON EACH SIDE OF 12"WL 12" DI WATERLINE �,
A 4"!�' ► • l CULVERT TO MAINTAIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE WITHOUT USING MECHANICAL BENDS. N p M .-
$ c„, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL CONTRACTOR EXCEED MANUFACTURERS 8"WL - 8"WATERLINE z z -ccr) 1"
A� - SPECIFICATION. � c co
U
' 5' HYDRANT ''� 1- O E , 2
i Lt
.• q - "- N/A WATER HOOKUP • co Q 0 a)
"OP' J
•
���' ss N/A VALVE - M U
'`t . • • _' ti N/A REDUCER
rn 41 ���K
•
0 li
.iT t *�,4 N/A BLOWOFF w
1
III
%) `� o `•+
%RI ri SS SEWER PIPE
3,
'� MANHOLE
A. Li. � * N/A CLEANOUT •
40 X-- ?to.
$ STORM PIPE0 A M U
% `'--- A, N/A FLARED END SECTIONCI a
1837 '1 21 -- ----I
I. 6"WATERLINE 6"WL
2"WATERLINE 2"WL 0
VICINITY MAP z
NTS
riii cc
er2 2
11111\ \ I IIII . • -
. y y y y y y W
y y
y
I N I y y y yy y y y /
1 y y y
y y
I J7 N I
y yy y y y yy yy y y yy yy y yy y/
0
11 \1 II \,,,... \ \ .-, y y y
y' y
y y y y y y y y /
y y -y y y y 4
\ I N , y y y yy y y y yy y y y y y y ' �Q / /
y y y y y y\ y y y y y y y a
I , y y y y y y y y •y y y y y y y y ROPESTAR EVENTS LLC y y y y /
y
I , ! y y y y y y y y y y y y y y ' DB 3732 PG.821 y y y/ w
y y y y y y y y y y y y y PROPOSED DOCK y
y y y y y y y y PB 2015 PG. 34 5'BLACK
I y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y 45.12 AC VINYL - /
y y y y y y y y y y y y CHANLINK / /
it-44\ '''' '' ''$ ''$ $ $ ''$ ''$ $ $ $ ' $$ $$ $ 11$ 1$ $ $
y y y y y y y y y y y -
y y y y y y y y APPROXIMATE y MCLAMBS POND FENCE ` y /yy y y y y y y y y y 100 YEAR y y y y ` y .1QIN N I y y y y y y y yy y y y y 'y. y y FLOOD LINE y y yy y y STONY RUN /to y y y y y y y y yy y y y y y y y y y 5' yIy y y y y y y y y y y y y' yyyy y yy y y yyyyy APPROXIMATEWALKINGyy y y y y y y y y y yyy y y y y y y y y y y y y 100 YEAR TRAILyyyyy y y y y yy y yy y yyy y yyyy yy yFLOOD LINE (TYP) y y
I y y y y y yy y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y /
yJ N , y y y y y y y y y y y _ y y y y /
y y y y y y 'y y y I y y y y
yNy% y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y ' �y y WETLANDS y y y y I y y y y y y y y y
I y� y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y = EXISTING 18"STORM y y y y y y y y y / /
y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y DO NOT PIPE SHALL BE USED y y y y y y
L I y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y I AS TEMPORARY y y y y y y y y
y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y DISTURB. ACCESS ACROSS NON y y y y y y y y y
y N y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y - BUFFERED STREAM y y y y • /� y y ' 9 y y y
y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y FOR WATER MAIN y y /� P
y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y INSTALLATION y y y y -/ 41 42/ / �� y y y y y
y y y y y y y y y y
y N y y y y y y y y y y y ay /1 I , / , y l
FMO REAL ESTATE LLC y I
y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y I .'.
�/ �� �� ' ' yyyy y y /yy y y y y y y yy y yy yyy y y yyy y yy y y y 10'MINIMUMAlt �r �j 'WL y y y y Z
DB 3591 PG, 693 -
. y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y SEPARATION I �/ �' If /.S H-3 'y y II
J
y y y y y - ' x y
PB 2017 PG. 157 y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y �/ ' / •/ •
I 50 50' y yo
y y y y y y y 10'MINIMUM y y �/ ' DOG y ` �'
y y y y SEPARATION - �� � Awry/
y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y 50 49 \ y Afilt //�"// ' � ,',� 24f /'/ PARK y y y U
ro 48 4 � �/ / i 4 /` J y / _y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y / 26 / y
y y y y y y y ^ .- /- 4 y
I y N y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y 'ATH S co �/ •/ 1 • 2 L ,r /� 28r a /` / / I / ko H
y y y y y y y y y y y y y y OU •S Al, ' _ ma 'N 40 / 6
y y y y y y y y y y y y y Iiiik� �\ 4• -- 1 29 � / IQ^ y y IOQCSTA VENTS LL(� y y y y y y y y \ % `� MH-1 / , LOWER EXISTING cow I • / Z
L.�♦ y y y y y Y y y y y y y y y y y IL.WWII r:,; ® 30 / 'u)Iyy yy yy yy yy y y y y y y yy yy ® " ri'�"�i ��/ ®� I
, MANHOLE RIM TO I • OFFICE, / �+Jy y D� �7' 2 PG.8�2�' y y y y y y y y y y y / \ti� �]fl / lifit MATCH PROPOSED o�ioo�� /
I y 1 y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y ® • .' ��- 50'x50' / / / GRADE :�9,Io AUNDRYs / Z
11;1
y �B 2�1'9 15G� 38 y y y y y DOG , /
• I y y to y nay y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y / �, > J , L: .1 J , I &BATH
y cny y �O.'IJV Aty y y y y y y y y y y y y y y 44 PARK r VIIIIIIII
I HOUSE / N O
4
� \ y '' y WETLANDS y ` /� - J - no c„N I I� L.L
y
WI y . . yy y y y y UNIMPROVED
y y y y y y yy y y y y y y y DO NOT y y y y y y \liktk
\\�� /�/►� NON `� / / Ha y y yyUNIMPROVED y y y y y y y y y ti 59 • ��� BUFFERED �\ / WDUIy y y WALKING ° y y yyy y DISTURB! + y yrj6 \ ` STREAM FIRE HYDRANT / z
Jy
IoI y y y TRAIL y y y y y y y y y y y rn 11111k11111 �� 19 A / / Z <
y I y y y y y y y y 21 i/H_, ASSEMBLY / �'
iji
toy y y y y y y y cn 20 d/
y y y y y y y y y �� um 6"WL \ `� 1� 70'x10'SIGHT I
Iy Iyy y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y._ y y y y yy y y y y y y y y y 2 N cn 6 � 16 m \,1$ _�� 6„WLN .' TRIANGLE /�/ / Z
y y y y y y • It
�� (TYP.) Z
I y y EXISTING 18"GRAVITY SEWER y y 67 TRASH DUMPSTERS `�_ �� 6„WL /te y yy y y y y y yy y ��$ 66 65 64 63 62 H1"--, DUMP STATION \ \\ \NEI
-�� ���.:. 6"�� � s ®�. �/iEXISTING FIRE HYDRANTQ 0y yN y APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1 \ '� / / f`•JI/ J 87 \ ® � i' MH-N..."-Ile
\ • cn
i y y y EXISTING 12"WATERLINE / E 69 <L_R30' , �/� f , �� \ '� \ 6 ���1� \ --- ' Sc NON BUFFERED STREAM
7 •
MH-4
I EXISTING VARIABLE WIDTH FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY /` •„,
� � o / I-
'`� / li
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS -10 /1_ �/ H-12 86JIMP-
s- d c EX MH U
L
�/ �! 1S �,� � SOUTH -
LJ� I, to �2 ��. ► �;Aj�� �`� / 1�� 6„ /L_MH s 2 �3o SS ����a�\�� _ s
I two
- � _O� EX H 10'MINIMUM -
i\`� \� \�\'- \�• \*\ \� NOR FIRE SEPARATION \` $ E Y
,� • \ \` \78 79 �\81 83 85 ❑9J — - - - _ WA - - _ EBILD NG HYDRANT li► Al 15'La�\74 \75 76 77- �� I. \ • ASSEMBLY - _ _ - ON ��► CAPE pl IFFERPERMIT FROM NC PUBLICANCE i,
�J a ;� �A - _ - _ LJWATER SUPPLY SECTION f—► ell cn \_L7309111L
� - d `� .�� `� \_\ \ \ , , ✓ :/, - - - - - - ■ . �,-_REQUIRED FOR: 6„ 6" L - �4 \f7 . ii:•�►G�►I�1�Yr'� F-� ■ ■ ■'10'LANDSCAPE BUFFERR IR12ED TAPPING - LOWER EXISTING CORE AND BOOT EXISTING z
(1SLEEVE&VALVE - �` � LOWER EXISTING SEPA icy INIMUM
RATION C/ MANHOLE RIM TO MANHOLE FOR NEW CONNECTION p • RREN REALTY C �l
(1) MASTER METER SS MANHOLE RIM TO S\ MATCH PROPOSED 6'OPAQUE VINYL FENCE EXISTING 15'WASTE C� �iI/
(1) RPZ /� MATCH PROPOSED p �/ Cb GRADE ., ■ : 1994 PG. 712 a �ok� I a_
+/- 20'OF 6"MAIN GRADE Q V` / COI- b L I r. NON BUFFERED WATER TREATMENT �„
STREAM EASEMENT MB 2014 J
10'MINIMUM �/ PG 98 <v Q
I
7/V-V. EARL & SEPARATION EXISTING 15'WASTE WATER �/'Q-� C� BLACKMAN
BUCK JONES TREATMENT EASEMENT MB 2014 PG 98 `v / DB 11-E-221
P / DB 243 PG. 129 '� �`�' Q/ 81 LLI
C� v�� D
0
oo
/ Know what's below. w
Call before you dig. ~
REVISED DESIGN
11/23/2021 8:50 AM DCA/EK
DRAWN
8 /ARG
Ob.-4/
NOT RELEASED FOR CHECKEDDS
DCA/EK
CONSTRUCTIONHORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
GRAPHIC SCALE N/A
DATE
80 0 40 80 160 320 11/24/2021
JOB NO.
SHEET
( IN FEET)
1 inch=80ft. DUNN
.J J

r \ - -76
EXISTING o
46 . \ \ UTILITY o N 1J
EASEMENT ti,,,
\ ----, / — EXISTING 18" ( N N ^v
NON CORRUGATED EXISTING 15" fl
BUFERED ) \\ PIPE RCP TO BE 1
y STREAM ? / �\ REMOVED v 'a
' 45 NON Q M8 ,
/os, BUFERED A Z
STREAM 0
\ './ ‘' ST-1/ / 17`1 UI_
ri <
44 4/j// ��— \ Y U
1p / 4 �' 1 5�� R a P
�!` I d_176 177 75 LI
NC 55= J Et o
/ ^'3 - - - > z DL)
s II
, � Z I-
48LFOF PLAN VIEW: ENTRANCE Z z Dcv 30"RCP D O
u) / o F z
oi-175 j \ / 180 CO 180 W
n ; 175__ ,r PROPOSED Z W
im /7 8
j cl r > GRADE rn Q
. O zN. _ (J) W
Z
I z � z
//`�6 ° II' I III �8 W
r / pd, 175 EXISTING _ 175
ti GRADE - 3.07 _ ,
PLAN VIEW: CROSSING .R�@ 4.d15" - 0
4
1 <
PROPOSED W
GRADECK d
170 170 } 2
175 co cci 175 a co mCO ~
Z ilt 6 u-i
_ -1 N- -1 N- 5 g ij
z0 PROFILE VIEW: ENTRANCE 2 2
EXISTING W
GRADE
W
ST-2 48.00 LF
of 30"RCP
170
@ —V
SOURCES OF INFORMATION:
1. EXISTING SURVEY OF SITE PROVIDED BY HAROLD A. SMITH LAND SURVEYING, 1012 ROCK DR., w
RALEIGH, NC, DATED DECEMBER 11, 2019. 0 o
2. EXISTING LIDAR CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF SITE FROM NORTH CAROLINA SPATIAL DATA U v
DOWNLOAD DATED FEBRUARY 16, 2021. I— O a �I
165 165 3. PARCEL INFORMATION OUTSIDE OF SURVEYED BOUNDARY FROM HARNETT COUNTY GIS. W Q
o 4. PRELIMINARY WETLAND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY WETLAND SOLUTIONS LLC, 816 MERRY W I 0o
M o ST., DUNN, NC 28334. c/)
5. STREAM LOCATION PROVIDED BY STOKES SURVEYING & MAPPING, PLLC 1425 ROCK QUARRY
PROFILE VIEW: CROSSING RD., 105-B, RALEIGH, NC 27610, DATED OCTOBER 19, 2021.
J

wiry d'
ter,. OW.
ram '*
Vi.s?..._
LOTIONS LLC
77
Agent Authorization Letter
March 20, 2020
Owner Information
Owner Name : Brian Barefoot
Mailing Address: 10422 Green Path Road
City, State, Zip: Dunn, NC 28334
Phone#: [phone]
Property Description
PIN: 1526-25-9378 and 1526-26-4072
Total Acreage# 56.06
Project: McLamb Pond
Address: 10975 NC-55 Dunn, NC 28334
County: Harnett
I, , as owner/agent of the above referenced
property, authorize the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDWR to enter the subject property
for the purpose of a jurisdictional determination.
I also authorize Mr. Adam Carter of Wetland Solutions, LLC to act in my behalf as my agent in
processing applications for wetland certification and/or permits.
gitallysigned by Bdan Barefoot
Yr^_/'g _/ Uare. :i Barefooto=Blue Wave Deployment
D(�`�/a.�_ mall=brlanmbluewavede�loyment<om,cUS
Signature Title Date
Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244 Bunnlevel,NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.WetlandNC.com