Pre Application Form - 5/23/2022 1:53 PM

Action History (UTC-05:00)Eastern Time(US&Canada)
Submit by Anonymous User 5/23/2022 1:53:59 PM(Message Start Event)
Reject by Montalvo,Sheri A 5/23/2022 2:10:08 PM(Pre-App-NON-DOT Project)
*The Division has developed a Pre-Filing Meeting Request email address:[e-mail] to
accept the federally required pre-filing meeting request. The email address will provide an auto
confirmation email receipt of submittal to the applicant. Please be sure to fill out all the requested
information in the body of the email link and cc yourself to save a copy for your records.
On Thursday April 7,2022 the Environmental Protection Agency's"Clean Water Act Section 401
Certification Rule"("Federal Rule")was reinstated to its previous version which originally became
effective on September 11,2020. In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a)"At least 30 days
prior to submitting a certification request,the project proponent shall request a pre-filing meeting with
the certifying agency". In accordance with 40 C.F.R Section 121.5(b)(7),and(c)(5)all certification
requests shall include documentation that a pre-filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying
authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request. Please refer to the Federal Rule
for more information.To send a pre-filing request please send an email to [e-mail]
• The task was assigned to Montalvo,Sheri A.The due date is: May 26,2022 5:00 PM
5/23/2022 1:54 PM

Q J
Staff Review Form 2 ' `
NORTH CAROLINA
Ertrlmnmertlrtl QOeaflly
Updated September 4,2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
Comments: The Division has developed a Pre-Filing Meeting Request email address:
[e-mail] to accept the federally required pre-filing meeting request.
The email address will provide an auto confirmation email receipt of submittal to the
applicant. Please be sure to fill out all the requested information in the body of the
email link and cc yourself to save a copy for your records.
On Thursday April 7,2022 the Environmental Protection Agency's"Clean Water Act
Section 401 Certification Rule"("Federal Rule")was reinstated to its previous
version which originally became effective on September 11,2020. In accordance
with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a)"At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification
request,the project proponent shall request a pre-filing meeting with the certifying
agency". In accordance with 40 C.F.R Section 121.5(b)(7),and (c)(5)all certification
requests shall include documentation that a pre-filing meeting request was
submitted to the certifying authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the
certification request. Please refer to the Federal Rule for more information.To send
a pre-filing request please send an email to [e-mail]
Please type in reason why this project can not be reviewed.

Project Submittal Form
Please note:fields marked with a red asterisk *below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type:* For the Record Only(Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre-Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre-Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
5/23/2022
Project Contact Information
Name: Samuel Adam Carter
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Fire Tower Rd
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
County(ies)
Lee

Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
DMS ILF Mitigation Request Form.pdf 495.34KB
Fire Tower Rd PJD Update_2021_10_15.pdf 150.59KB
Fire Tower Rd_Pre-Construction Notification(PCN)
332.44KB
Form Signed.pdf
Fire Tower Road_IPAC report.pdf 200.74KB
Fire Tower Road_JD Request Signed.pdf 252.47KB
Fire Tower Road_Parcel details.pdf 215.92KB
Fire Tower Road_SHPO map.pdf 49.05KB
Fire Tower Road_Site plan.pdf 716.16KB
Fire Tower
447.26KB
Road_Upland_Datasheets Atlantic_and_Gulf Coa...
Fire Tower
471.4KB
Road Wetland Datasheets Atlantic and Gulf Co...
Fire_Tower_Rd Fig 2-Wetlands
1.35MB
Update_20191123.pdf
Fire_Tower_Rd Fig 3-Topo.pdf 1.31MB
Fire_Tower_Rd Fig 4-Soils.pdf 1.13MB
Fire_Tower_Rd Fig 5-NWI.pdf 1.28MB
Fire_Tower_Rd Fig 6-Flood.pdf 946.26KB
Fre Tower Rd Soil_Report.pdf 495.05KB
Nash Rd South Park Acceptance Letter.pdf 393.96KB
Pre-Construction Notification(PCN)Form.pdf 406.04KB
Signed AA for Firetower Rd.pdf 216.83KB
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
Commercial development open water and wetland impacts associated with project.
Sign and Submit
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I,the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true,accurate,and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
• I,the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a"transaction"subject to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature;AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
g5'rarrAer.l rx.
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

Print Form
DMS ILF Mitigation Request Statement of Compliance with §143-214.11 & 143-214.20
(link to G.S. 143-214.11)
Prior to accessing the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), all applicants must demonstrate compliance
with G.S. § 143-214.11 and 143-214.20. All requests MUST include this form signed and dated by the
permit applicant or an authorized agent. Please refer to DENR's Implementation Policy for more details.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand G.S. § 143-214.11 and 214.20 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with the requirements. I understand that participation in the DMS is
voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
▪ Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local government
meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143-214.11 and is not required to
purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
O There are no listed mitigation banks with the credit type I need located in the
hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWR list)
▪ Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have been
contacted and credits are not currently available.
▪ The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a mitigation
bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
▪ This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review. Bank
credits were not available at the time the application was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private mitigation
banks regarding credit availability.
SAC
I have read and understand the DMS refund policies (attached)
initial here
cS'amtue Samuel Adam Carter
Signature of Applicant or Agent Printed Name
10_15_2021
Date
Fire Tower Rd Fire Tower Rd Sanford, Lee County
Project Name Location

DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES (DMS)
IN-LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM Revised 4/23/2015
Complete requested information, sign and date, email to [e-mail] . Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes(location map, address or lat long is required). Information submitted is subject to NC Public Records Law and may be
requested by third parties. Review meetings are held on Tuesday afternoons.
CONTACT INFORMATION APPLICANT'S AGENT APPLICANT
1. Business/Company Name Wetland Solutions, LLC Forge Investment Group, LLC
Adam Carter Mark 2. Contact PersonLyczkowski
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
3. Street Address or P 0 Box P.O. Box 244 3107 S Horner BLVD
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. City, State,Zip Bunnlevel, NC 28323 Sanford, NC 27332
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Telephone Number 910 890 2779 919-842-0334
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
6. E-Mail Address [e-mail] mark@fig.11c
PROJECT INFORMATION
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
7. Project Name Nash Rd South Park
8. Project Location (nearest town, city) Sanford, NC
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
9. Lat-Long Coordinates or attach a map 135.439807 -79186583
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. County Lee
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
11. River Basin & Cataloging Unit(8-digit) 1Cape Fear River
(See Note 1)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
12. Project Type **indicate owner type and Owner Type: 0 Government e Private
write in project type (e.g. school, church, retail,
residential, apartments, road, utilities, military, Project Type: Commercial
etc.)**
13. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
14. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) .47ac
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
15. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
16. Stream Impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234) Warm Cool Cold..................................
17. Riparian Buffer Impact (sq. ft.)
Include subwatershed if Jordan or Falls Lake: Zone 1: Zone 2:
18. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts
NCDWR:
USACE: Chris Hopper Other:
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Check (�) below if this request is for a: By signing below, the applicant is confirming they have
revision to a current acceptance read and understand the DMS refund policy posted at
nceep.net and attached to this form.
renewal of an expired acceptance Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent:
5'aM1-64.2 4 (�^
extension of unexpired acceptance 10-15-2021
Date:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Note 1: For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, visit:www.nceep.net or contact DMS
Direct questions to Kelly Williams at 919-707-8915 or [e-mail] or to the front desk at 919-707-8976

Refund Policy for Fees Paid to DMS In-Lieu Fee Programs (9/21/2009)
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to make clear the circumstances and process under which a
permittee can obtain a refund while simultaneously balancing customer service and responsible
business practices. This policy applies to all refund requests made on or after the publication date of
this policy.
Policy Statement: The policy of DMS is to allow for refunds under certain conditions.
1. All refund requests must be made in writing to the DMS In-Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
[e-mail].
2. All refund requests are subject to fund availability. DMS does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended overpayments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In-Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under the incremental payment procedure are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to DMS will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requests not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to DMS Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood DMS can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W-9 form to the
DMS In-Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:Adam Carter,Wetland Solutions,LLC PO Box 244
Bunnlevel,NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME,AND NUMBER: Wilmington,#FOLDER_NAME#,
#FOLDER DA NUMBER#
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 2200 Tramway Rd.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:NC County/parish/borough:Lee City: Sanford
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.439584°Long.:-79.187138°
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody:UT to Skunk Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude(decimal Longitude Estimated amount of Type of aquatic Geographic authority to
Number degrees) (decimal degrees) aquatic resources in resources(i.e., which the aquatic resource
review area(acreage wetland vs.non- "may be" subject(i.e.,
and linear feet,if wetland waters) Section 404 or Section
applicable 10/404)
W 1 35.439479 -79.186883 0.25 acre Wetland Section 404
W2 35.439792 -79.186549 0.22 acre Wetland Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD,which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2)the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3)the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5)undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD,the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD fmds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
▪Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters'study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data.
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
®U.S.Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name: 24K; Sanford Quad
®Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO
®National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS,May 2019
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
®FEMA/FIRM maps: FIRM Panel 3710964100
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑Photographs: ❑Aerial(Name & Date):
or❑Other(Name&Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information(please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
c ,a-0 4da,m, rJa4_, ./)„ 10/15/2021
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person
staff member completing PJD requesting PJD(REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to fmalizing
an action.

of wArE�
qG Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
1 m, a Y DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
lb. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP) number: 39 or General Permit(GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification—Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ❑X Yes ❑ No
or in-lieu fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ❑X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: South Park
2b. County: Lee
2c. Nearest municipality/town: Tramway/Sanford
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Madport, LLC Mark Lyczkowski
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 1581/130
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Madport, LLC
applicable):
3d. Street address: 2504 Brighton Point
3e. City, state, zip: Sanford, NC 27330
3f. Telephone no.: 919 842-0334
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: mark©fig.IIc
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Samuel Adam Carter
5b. Business name Wetland Solutions, LLC
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: P.O.Box 244
5d. City, state, zip: Bunnlevel, NC 28323
5e. Telephone no.: 910 890 2779
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 9641-44-2824-00
lb. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.439721 Longitude: -79.18666
lc. Property size: 6.13 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Skunk Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The current conditions on site are cleared and graded uplands with the exception of wetland area and open water pond. The land use in the
surrounding area are commercial and residential use with farmland surrounding developments.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.47
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial)on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a commercial base with parking are in the proposed parcel at the intersection of Firetower RD and Tramway
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Fill and grading of.25ac open water pond and .22ac wetland seep. Excavator and bulldozer will be utilized for the construction and grading of the site
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the 0 Yes ❑X No 0 Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project(including all prior phases) in the past? Comments.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:Wetland Solutions, LLC
Name (if known):Samuel Adam Carter Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ['Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project(including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? 0 Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project(check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams—tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑X Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10)or impact
Permanent(P)or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 P Fill Seep Yes Corps 0.25
W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.25
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER)or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent(INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent(P)or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 - Choose one - -
S2 - Choose one - -
S3 - Choose one - -
S4 - Choose one - -
S5 - Choose one - -
S6 - Choose one - -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact(acres)
Permanent(P) or type
Temporary (T)
01 P Worths Pond Fill Pond 0.22
02 - Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number- mitigation impact impact
Permanent(P) or required? (square (square
Temporary (T) feet) feet)
B1 - Yes/No
B2 - Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
B5 - Yes/No
B6 - Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The design has been altered several time to avoid impacts,but impacts are unavoidable because of size and location of building and parking spaces
required.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
We will be managing the site for sedimentation transport. Not to effect wetland and streams offsite. BMPs will be utilized during and after the
construction phase of the project.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑X DWQ ❑X Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes,which mitigation option will be used for this ❑X Payment to in lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.47 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal)wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requiresEl Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
0 Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0/0
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑X Yes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? State
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
0 Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs El NSW
apply (check all that apply): El USMP
❑Water Supply Watershed
❑X Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been Oyes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW
(check all that apply): ['Session Law 2006-246
['Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑yes ❑X No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑X Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the ❑Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes"to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State Dyes 0 No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
lc. If you answered "yes"to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑Yes 0 No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑yes 0 No
2c. If you answered "yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in Yes El No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes"to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All waste water will be treated by sewer.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS IPAC web site
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA's Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑X Yes ❑No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO web mapping application shows 3 sites.Two structures one pond.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Lee County GIS website and the/msc.fema.gov/portal/search website.
Samuel Adam Carter 5 is e�a�1 tQit 12/3/2021
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Mil s ,alum.
a- 1411
r4 N.IX
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE . :
4lit'ff 3 '/'% Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: January 03, 2022
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0523
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01158
Project Name: Fire Tower Road
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

01/03/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01158 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect(i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect(i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

01/03/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01158 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

01/03/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01158 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

01/03/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01158 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0523
Event Code: Some(04EN2000-2022-E-01158)
Project Name: Fire Tower Road
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: Proposed residential and commercial development.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.4392964,-79.18728136673579,14z
•
Counties: Lee County, North Carolina

01/03/2022 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01158 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3739
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C,D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency,please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 2200 Tramway Road
City, State: Sanford, NC
County: Lee
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9641-44-2824-00
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 244
Bunnlevel NC 28323
Telephone Number: 910 890 2779
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
riInterested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Mark Lyczkowski, Madport LLC
Mailing Address: 2504 Brighton Point
Sanford, NC 27330
Telephone Number: 919-842-0334
Electronic Mail Address: mark@fig.11c
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District,U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps)to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Samuel Adam Carter
Print Name
Capacity: fl Owner fl Authorized Agents
11_3_2021
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
nI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
nI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
ElI am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
171
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
r l Size of Property or Review Area 6.13 acres.
nThe property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.43957894405612
Longitude: -79.1 868747252702C
InA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l lx 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water,relatively permanent water,pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters,waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States,wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
I , l Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
El Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
✓ Soil Survey Map
n Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g.National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps,FEMA floodplain maps)
❑✓ Landscape Photos (if taken)
nNCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
n NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
L Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02AppA Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations
Please note that the approval and signature of survey plats will only be done in association with
an Approved Jurisdictional Determination. The Corps accepts both electronic and hardcopy
plats for signature,however this will be at the discretion of the project manager. If a hard copy
is submitted,the Corps requires that all hard-copy submittals include at least one original Plat
(to scale)that is no larger than 11"x17". Submitted plats must be legible, including labeling (the
use of match lines for larger tracts are encouraged). Additional copies of a plat, including those
larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. Prior to final
production of a plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the surveyor electronically
submit a draft of the survey to the Corps project manager for review.
PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be signed and sealed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include an accurate graphic scale and verbal
scale)
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s)used as reference (e.g.
property corner,USGS monument)
Jurisdictional wetlands depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands,wetlands, etc.
• Include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Jurisdictional non-wetland waters (non-wetland tidal/navigable waters,
tributaries, impoundments, ditches, etc.) depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water,relatively permanent waters (RPW),pond, etc.
• Mark the centerline of linear waters (tributaries),with
approximate widths to the Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHMW) OR a surveyed OHWM boundary of the tributary.
• List the linear footage of linear features and area (using
approximate widths)
• Mark the extent of OHMW for non-linear waters such as lakes,
ponds, etc.
• List the acreage of non-linear features
• Identify each feature using an alphanumeric system
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as non jurisdictional. Please
include the acreage and/or linear length of these features as appropriate.
1=1 Must include a legible Waters of the United States (wetlands and other
waters)Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and bounds/GPS
coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must ensure that all depicted wetlands or other waters intersect or tie-to
surveyed project/property boundaries
CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of the Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section
404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this date. The
undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to
the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328
and other U.S.Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: May 2017 Page 2

nPlats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328 and other U.S.Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
GPS SURVEYS
For surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the survey must include all of
the above, as well as:
be at sub-meter accuracy at each survey point.
0 include an accuracy verification. One of more of the known points (property
corner, monument) shall be located with the GPS and cross referenced with the
existing traditional property survey (metes and bounds).
sE include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: May 2017 Page 3

000N NECTGIS m2
Printed July Sz1
WEB HOSTING See Below for Disclaimer
• ^ Parcels
\/y ' •. . . \ . 0
` ' • . Al,'• ` greets
. } 6 • \ • \ ` \ . !
� \\ Railroad
.\ ; ;^ � ' `
\ . a '
lo d '' y ' y ^ � Lee Coup
1 , . .
!
Ap../ ' •irr.•
- . Sanford City Limits
\ • / \ \ : . »: \
o -
°•
\ - \ �/ / \ BroadwayTown Lim#
I , .
c. 2 \
i «2` d : \` .
\ \ \ . . . . .
: I
• . • ., ..
. z / \ .• ` \
.\ \ \ . •.. - � » \
- . •�®
\/d - z = . . . zz ,
¥
. . •
•
® � `
. . . . w\ ` \ .
■ . -
. y _ / • ` ^ � •
.
• max
< . q' � `\ ot~
t .
. � � ( &m\�-
' . .
»` . c \
4 � \\- . . \ \ - ?- - -
c . 400,
a .
—.
.� - , — %� ' -•
x s , - _
~ \ ¢� ~ y
2}%%. 2 ,< / . 1 ' ` d
` N .«
•
.W: E
_
.
' i
. K AO '.
/ - —', 1 : 181 Feet
� �s . 1

PIN Acres Parcel Address
9641-44-2824-00 6.13 2200 TRAMWAY RD
PARID Appraised Land Appraised Building
964144282400 57300 2100
Book Page Tax District
1581 130 FTW
Subdivision Legal 1 Legal 2
TRACT 2 PLAT 2020/85
Legal 3 Owner Owner2
MADPORT LLC
Mail Address Mail Suffix Mail Street Dir
2504
Mail Street MailADRSUF Mail City.
BRIGHTON POINT SANFORD
Mail State Mail Zip Out BLDG Description
NC 27330
Out BLDG YRBLT Dwelling Style Dwelling DESCR
0 C CONVENTIONAL
Dwelling YRBLT Shape Length Appraised Total
1940 2380.093676889 59400
Out BLDG Area Dwelling SFLA OBJECTID 1
0 1130 27160
TaxCard
http://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/
Datalets/Datalet.aspx?
mode=&UseSearch=no&pin=964144
282400&j u r=000&taxyr=2021
This site is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction and is compiled from recorded deeds,plats and other public records and data.Users
of this site are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this site.
The County of Lee and Dude Solutions,Inc.assume no legal responsibility for the information contained on this site.Please be advised that you must contact the Lee
County Tax Office for accurate tax values.Please contact the Lee County Appraisal Department if any building information is incorrect.The map,layer,data and website
(collectively known as a€cethe layers€0) are for graphical and illustration purposes only. The Lee County Strategic Services Department (hereinafter a€cethe
Departments€0) provides the layer and the information contained within to the general public and has not customized the information for any specific or general
purpose. Such information was generated from data maintained by different sources and agencies and as such,some limitations may apply based upon restrictions
imposed by other sources or agencies supplying data to Lee County(hereinafter a€cethe Countya€0).While the Department strives to make the information on the GIS
website as timely,reliable and accurate as possible,neither the Department nor the County local governments make any claims, promises,or guarantees about the
accuracy,completeness or adequacy of the contents of the layer.Areas depicted are approximate and are not necessarily accurate to mapping,surveying or engineering
standards.The County expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site and layer. No warranty of any type,implied,expressed,statutory,
UCC or otherwise,including,but not limited to,the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights,title,accuracy of data,merchantability,or fitness for a particular
purpose,is given with respect to the substantive content of this layer or its use in private or commercial financial transactions.The fact of distribution of the layer does
not constitute any warranty,express,implied or otherwise.The user assumes the entire risk related to the use of this data. If the user intends to make any legal or
financial decision based on this data, the user should independently verify the accuracy of the same. The Strategic Services Department and the Lee County local
governments are providing this data"as is.a€0 In no event will any of the foregoing local governments or their officers and employees be liable to you or to any third
party for any direct,indirect,incidental,consequential,special or exemplary damages or lost profit resulting from any use or misuse of this data.Unless otherwise noted
on an individual document,files,documents,and information contained in this layer may be copied and distributed for non-commercial use,provided they are copied
and distributed without alteration.

a
o4
0
LE0861 Lanelia Gray
Pettus House
LE08G3 Lida Mae Sloan
Pettus House
LLE0613 Jarthy's Pond
EE
LE0860 Robert.4lorthy LE0864 Makepeace House
Service Station
LE0614 Stephen B.Wortl-ry
LE0862 Dignus Gomm �ity House
u
dub
11.
LE0647 Raymond R. Knight
Farm
•
LE0649 Kennet) d!'Yr'oithy
* House
II
•
II
II •
_ I +
II
• I i i

II
I [ /
/
'<) A,
� '
/1//// /
�o 0
/ /
I ,
I
U
(A
I C
I cc) O
W U
I z �
H
/ I
Cn
Q '.
I I 0 U ce N
I < LL o z
/ I uJOoc„n O_
o_ = '—' cp I-
i C7 a, p, 0
z � cno' U
x
Q W
II ce
� � 1
0 0
u, n z
GI
/ I 'L , V/
o CO 1-1
1-1
0
I —la,• --I
Ln C
cc
J
/ I
I W
I
I I Ln
I
/ ___ _ __________ ___ ___
I
il D_
1..9
I
0
ce
I
/
I > w
T._
I w H
U 0
a
I _ _ w
z
0
I J DATE
Ice08/31/2021
D
I1 i } DRAWN BY
331
DESIGNED BY
7../ il 1
• 331
RUBY & EARNEST
MCS
WAIN-WORTHY LAND TRUST • CHECKED BY
DB 1199 PG 940 I M.ZACCARDO
41-25-0146-00 PARCEL TO BE RECOMBINED
PIN: 967 0
SCALE
• AS SHOWN
7 —
•
' I 6
•
I
I I D• 0
— CIL— ao
ry
7 °
0
/� \\...... - - -D -1-,
v w
s o
co
-� / _D C
C (1)
I I 0 N o c
L.1 / p °
I LEGEND o_ C
I TYPS'RADIUS THE ACCESSIBLEPARKING PROPERTY LINE Q C
/ I UNLESS NOTE SPACES AND MAX.2 .77i
-_ TI
C SHALLHAVE AISLES
2% EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY z
OTHERL
SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE ' < Z O 3
INCLUDING THE DIAGONAL ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE U N to
/ CONVENIENCE I PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY o a)
l J y PROPOSEDCENTERLINE— — C I VAC — — — — PROPOSED EOP • N"...' ISTORE —__— 11.1
WITH GAS BUILDING SETBACK7I PROPOSED LOT LINE' RETAIL 12,730 SF �+ rn
TPERIMETER BUFFERNI 4 800 SF — = VAC — — DRAINAGE EASEMENT
I SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT U O O
1 24 STALL tilPHASE LINE 7 z �� Q
I I I ^:1 O7 NOTES: PROPOSED 100 YR FLOODPLAIN L Z ...
11
I I \, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB. EXISTING WETLANDS
w /` (.0
INSTALL HC-VAN ACCORDING TO NC ACCESSIBILITY CODE. \�����\ NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER ( \ a)
/ 1 �®N i I i C I TYPICAL PARKING DIMENSIONS r////////1 CIVIC SPACE v" z
0 I I 4... 0
�] �- - TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES J W o <
J 6,950 SF I —� Q U Q o i�C I — ' C111. ALL SITE SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM VANUZ '- 0l3 I J I� `ACCESSIBLED
U r — n I I TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES(MUTCD)AND NCDOT STANDARDS. J J 5 6• O
I I lul I SIGN MUTCD STD. SIZE PESERVED
ARK PARKINS O `� 0_ 00
T 1\ \
ACCESSIBLE PARKING R7-1 12"x18" 11
J 0- p
0
STOP R1-1 30"x30" ® 1� O O L
D
I MAXIMUM O I I I 0\
N ^ I 2. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE MOUNTED WITH 5-FT MIN.VERTICAL CLEARANCE TO THE PENALTY " ` 0 IJJ
BOTTOM OF THE SIGN ON 2-LB.GALV.STEEL U-CHANNEL POST SET IN 18-IN $250 v m ��// cn c
O I DEEP x 8-IN DIA.CONCRETE FOOTING. SIGNS MOUNTED ADJACENT TO U) L^L ZO 0
0- I cr 1 I ,�2I I I SIDEWALKS MUST BE MOUNTED WITH 7-FT MIN.VERTICAL CLEARANCE I LLI C
3 1 13 I /� TO THE BOTTOM OF SIGN. F-� .c
15
'O I iy 3. ALL PAVMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MUTCD AND LL ,O 3
1- ® 1 I ——— — — NCDOT STANDARDS AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. O T c
I --___—_ EX. 20' SANITARY SEWER 0 Z
MARKING NCDOT STD. SIZE COLOR O
j , PARCEL TO BE RECOMBINED PARKING SPACE 4-IN WHT.
cn EASEMENT NO PARKING-FIRE LANE* 4-IN YEL. O
I CROSSWALK 1205.07 4-IN WHT. Q
U) — O
co _ _ *NO PARKING-FIRE LANE MARKING SHALL CONSIST OF ALSGOLIDYELLOW j p1 - - STRIPE AND 8"HIGH YELLOW TEXT"NO PARKING-FIRE L "AT 40'INTERVALS. •0O0 STRIPING SHALL BE PLACED AS INDICATED BY THE FOLLO LINETYPE -————- E cn
U O
-\
__ \
-—__ z 4. ALL PAVMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE RESIN TYPE PAINT AS REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY. a)
—LLI ----- ▪ •E
— — TRAMWAY RD - HWY 78 _—__ —
0�, _ � - - - - - 100'PUBLICR/W —W- - 60
— —- SCALE 1"=40'
c9 — --- — —W— — — - C
O ----- C D
6
-- i _w— _ o• In
----- _ - -w— — E -0 0
C — — —w— — o
O —W- - - _ — 81,1 •0 0)
_—-—-— p >
O W� _— — — 0 0
to — —
w� — — - ® JOB NO. o
C
w- - - I ir
49165 ° ;
i o0
I KNOW WHAT'S BELOW. SHEET NO. 0_CALL 811 BEFORE YOU DIG. T
U) s C
� o
L_

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Fire Tower Rd city/county. Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 10-4-2021
Applicant/Owner: MADPORT LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W1 A15
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section,Township,Range: Sanford
Hillslo a Convex a 3%
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): p Local relief(concave,convex,none]: Slope{/o):
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat: 35.439643 Long: -79.186863 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: GhD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland Forest
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances'present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes lI No.
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 1
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) []Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
[]Surface Water(Al) []Aquatic Fauna(B13) []Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
[]High Water Table(A2) []Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) []Drainage Patterns(B10)
[]Saturation(A3) n Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) []Mass Trim Lines(B15)
[]Water Marks(B1) []Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) []Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
[]Sediment Deposits(B2) []Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) []Crayfish Burrows(C8)
[]Drift Deposits(B3) []Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) []Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
[]Algal Mat or Crust(B4) []Thin Muck Surface(C7) []Geomorphic Position(D2)
[]Iron Deposits(B5) []Other(Explain in Remarks) hallow Aquitard(D3)
n Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) []FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
n Water-Stained Leaves(B9) I 'Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes II I No 0 Depth(inches):
I
Water Table Present? Yes I Non Depth(inches): I�
Saturation Present? Yes n �
No I Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I I No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata)—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W1 A15
25ft x 25ft Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
ioe strafinm (Plrt ci,e. 1 %Cover ..eciec? _Status_
Number of Dominant Species 1
1. - - - That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
3. - Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
4. -
Percent of Dominant Species
5. - That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (NB)
6. - -
0 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0
Total%Cover of- Multtly12Y—
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft 1 OBL species x 1 = 0
1 - _ FACW species x 2= 0
2 - - FAC species x 3= 0
3 _ _ FACU species x 4= 0
4 _ UPL species x 5= 0
5 _ - Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 ,_ (B)
6. - - Prevalence Index =B(A= NaN
0 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. - 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
2. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.- -
4. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5. - _ be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
-
6. - I Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
0 =Total Cover Tree-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
1 Wiregrass, Pinelawn Three Awn(Aristida stricta) FAC- Sapling-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. - - _ approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
3..- -
4..- - Shrub-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5._ -
approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
6..- - Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, including
7 - _ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,an woody
- — plants,except woody vines, less than approximately
8. .- - 3 ft(1 m)in height.
9..- -
Woody vine-All woody vines,regardless of height.
10.- -
11.- -
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1.Cat Greenbrier(Smilax glauca) - 1% FAC
2.- -
3.- -
4.- _ -
5. Hydrophytic
1 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 0.5 20%of total cover: 0.2 Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
Site has been cleared and graded. no veg with the exception of Wire grass and a few sprigs of Smilax.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1 A15
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-24 10YR 4/6 100Q` LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1l Histosol(A1) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) ❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
n Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
❑Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) El Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
0 Stratified Layers(A5) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
0 Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P, T, U) 1E1 Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
I--I
❑5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P, T, U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) I I Red Parent Material(TF2)
0 Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) 0 Redox Depressions(FS) []I Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
0 I 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) ❑ Marl(F10)(LRR U) I Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
n Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0, P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
n Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR 0, S) ❑ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
0 Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P, S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks: Soil profile is all fill material.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Fire Tower Rd city/county. Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 10/4/2021
Applicant/Owner: Mad port, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W1 A15
Investigator(s): Adam Carter Section,Township,Range: Sanford
Hillslo a Caoncave a 8%
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): p Local relief(concave,convex,none]: slope{/o):
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat: 35.439609 Long: -79.186862 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: GhD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes NCWAM> NWI classification: Hillside Seep
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances'present? Yes I No
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes If No. ✓
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ . No •
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) []Surface Soil Cracks(136)
[]Surface Water(Al) []Aquatic Fauna(B13) []Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
[]High Water Table(A2) []Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) []Drainage Patterns(B10)
[]Saturation(A3) []Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) []Mass Trim Lines(B16)
[]Water Marks(B1) []Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) []Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
[]Sediment Deposits(B2) []Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) []Crayfish Burrows(C8)
[]Drift Deposits(B3) []Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) []Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
[]Algal Mat or Crust(B4) []Thin Muck Surface(C7) []Geomorphic Position(D2)
[]Iron Deposits(B5) []Other(Explain in Remarks) niShallow Aquitard(D3)
n Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) []FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
[]Water-Stained Leaves(B9) I 'Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? YesI II No 0 Depth(inches):
I
Water Table Present? Yes I Non Depth(inches): 5inches
Saturation Present? Yes n No I—I Depth(inches): 1 inch Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No I I
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W1 A15
25ft x 25ft Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
aee Stratum (Pint ci,e 1 %Cover . eciec? _Status_
Black gum(Nyssa sylvatica) 5% Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 12
1. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A)
2 Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 5% Yes FAC1.
Total Number of Dominant
3. - - Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
4. - -
Percent of Dominant Species
5. - That Are OBL, FACW, a-FAC: 100 (NB)
6. - -
10 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Total°!°Cover of MultinlyJlY_
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft OBL species x 1 = 0
1 Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 8`)/0Yes FACUid FACW species x 2= 0
2 Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 4% Yes FAC/Fd FAC species x 3= 0
3. Black Willow(Salix nigra) 4% Yes OBL FACU species x 4= 0
4 _ _ UPL species x 5= 0
5. - _ Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 _ (B)
6. - Prevalence Index =BJA= NaN
16 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 8 20%of total cover: 3.2 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) 1-72-Dominance Test is>50%
1.Wax Myrtle(Morella cerifera) 5% Yes FACW 1
3-Prevalence Index is_3.0
2.Chinese Privet(Ligustrum sinese) 5% Yes FAC
PP ( 3% Yes FACW Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
3 Sweet Pepperbush Clethre alnifolia)
4.Fetterbush(Lyonia lucida) 2% No FACW 1
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.- - be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
6._ - Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
15 =Total Cover
Tree-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover: 7.5 20%of total cover: 3 approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
1 False nettle(Boehmeria cylindrica) 2% No FACY6 Sapling-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 Microstegium vimineum 5% Yes FAC approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
3..Rush(Juncus spp.) 10% Yes FACV1+ than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
- Shrub-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5 _ approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
-
- Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, including
7 _ _ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,an woody
- plants,except woody vines, less than approximately
8.- - 3 ft(1 m)in height.
9.. -
Woody vine-All woody vines,regardless of height.
10.- -
11.- -
17 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 8.5 20%of total cover: 3.4
uy.o.ody vine stratum, (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1.Yellow Jasmine(Gelsemium sempervirens) _ 3% yes FAC
2.Laurel-leaved Greenbrier,Bamboo Vine(Smilax lauirfolia) - 1% No FAC
3 Cat Greenbrier(Smilax glauca) 1% No FAC
4.Poison Ivy(Toxicodendron radicans) - 2% Yes FAC
5 Grape(Vitis spp.) 1% No FACVki
Hydrophytic
8 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 4 20%of total cover: 1.6 Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1 A15
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3-2 100 LS
4-10 10YR 5-2 97% 10YR6/8 3% C M LS
10-24 10YR 6-1 90 10YR6/8 10% C M LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1l Histosol(A1) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) ❑1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
n Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
❑Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) El Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
0 Stratified Layers(A5) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
0 Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P, T, U) 1E1 Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
I--I
❑5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P, T, U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) I I Red Parent Material(TF2)
0 Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) 0 Redox Depressions(FS) []I Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
0 I 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) ❑ Marl(F10)(LRR U) I Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
n Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0, P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
n Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T,U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR 0, S) ❑ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A, 150B)
0 Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
•Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
0 Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P, S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

, A1
\ v ,
,
...f.,. .
,ce.tx
A ,
0 4:
.-2,.
-
--, ,
, 1
i
. P 1 i , .
. I '
. . .
• ,
• .e • t •. '
i i - •
7 ,
. , • ,.1* _
t / f
co _ ••• ,
ili\11
t „)' t . •
r , i i
r ' *
j
ir ' "Y it
, 1
1 j . MD •
AA. .1_ - 0)•
-- .:. ,
'I' -, '
oe W1 ,-•
illfr .
, • .:, j .,r . *it ,
4 •
CL
. .
- ii: ..,‘,Illo ,
• '1° 40; 44. 71 , - TAO(
• A ; .. — tilL .1
litlitIkte 44.91(ic
- .
- • 0.- °
•
. ,
*2- -' It- • ' i\'
. __. t'_,___.'"
i i ' ; . 4. '.' -?N • t- .„....--..--. --.,....K. Parcel Boundary
'/ / ; ' '-"' -: ' --, -
, 0 Delineation Flags P1-P35
: 1 `," .
--* -___-, - * . Preliminary Sec. 404 Wetlands - 0.47 acre
. r7at, wi - 0.25 acre 1
•, 4/0,.. .4......` .„,,.„--- .-....-- $ - 4. -
- DA l
W2 (Open Water) - 0.22 acre
-. let,, sou -•
-444- Project Name: Pettus Property , - \ Figure: 2
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC
Ni-rwi
_AUTIONS LLO 1 inch = 150 feet
Property ID: 9641-44-2926-00 s
0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet
PO Box 244 23 Nov 2019
I I I I I I
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

:- f'I Jam'p
�' `� -,2- LAA.c... ,,7 V.; .. .. L_' nr abdrMck
,,.)f , ........' --L--;:c ' ..)
€p Ai:,-/0,0
481 I r , i"...\fr / k„ . '1/4t,71/4.......... • , *--..
/\\f\,o‘c((\rf:*))t 1----'"/ :1:'::( • . -‘-t:•''..:%;":•\-- ( , i.. '
- i 400 ) ? .''.. , 'N, c ci _..rjioj4_.„0.?ie::,44.:
ri/ \)/t217:1 ‘--: ' ''":' .--- "7. I 1'i
i c'---- -'' IS. ''' , i ( '''' ' ;C:°=z1 s's,‘- '--
7(' ‘../f) ij .., vt, ...\
, \ `(.....:::-._ ....‘,"..-----__ ,. - 0\ ipzes:.......,
1 ! . ..\‘4,4,', *C., --\-. ,...../e,
2.41 )
1/ .4)1.
'k tit• # '' �, •
4 i.,./1 .•
..„4/.----, / / ._ ,,,,,....:::,,- ..• ,...v..‘ _.N., , ,:...,,,,:-. cris__..... i i!...----,, ..ft• .• .,,,/
li ,, %. . _ . ''''N
' I' ql. )1 •
•
•
) l I:,\ ,r,-.1-
._..ive----. C. .e'' s,'':. \-,,,,i j . /1, e il 1 •.... „. . ____,,,„fs,• ......., ., _
_.__., ,
.. . sz-,,,,-- . _______,,. 1
__ •
_ . , i .
) i, .4' 7,..\,7•• :.•__-..... %\..\ .• ..: 1 ' ' . "445•,
_,.. . ....
. . ,-- , . i , /
_. . ... . ., .
..
/---. .... • • . 7..•
/ c . . -- )._i -- .,.. . ... \.
..„
_______ ,..•
..„_ .„ . •
•
. . .
, .
i .1 Ill -.,I. -----_ „,....) d (44 N. 4, ! 444...,--N 0
l
oak `j /-• * :�mi 4 40 , ._ .01:__.. ,..-. /•\ • ei, s II ---. At,0:4 \''', -) * 1
..."} It SD)
I \I___- k
\, : 4-- i),...\.
\. _ 7 1 2/„. a , 0,i
1 I /..,,,7,, 1 . --e-? f.,,it...„ •/.,\.,,.,6, .. , A•a - unt �.-
;Q r-- 1, ' `"� . • ;,`• 4 Brick A geld y ', Cem
'' / '.. I ,.-0
/ 409.
,. ,
o • , ( : " ' 1 i. ,:,. , 1
4%,..„‘.... 1v4t, 1)
l-.: • i
` •M •11 rp :1 /9\ r '
. / . .' • \.. .... ‘
0 71
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet) /`1 O </ •/;, r I Parcel Boundary
1 I I I I I
- f __Copyright©2013 Nate vial Geographic Society-i.c_ubed_
Project Name: Pettus Property N• Figure. 3
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC w 'E
`�SO'UTIONSLLC Property ID: 9641-44-2926-00 -�.- 1 inch = 1,000 feet
USGS 7.5-Minute Topo: Sanford Quadrangle S
P.O. Box 244 21 Sep 2019
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

•
ice
-% / OL
0
ice . i, .. .
DoA �1
/ O
i
, ,, , ,,,,...." .
•
ys, �'f GhB W'
r if �
A*
• "
1 ,
..
akiD
i if „ 7 ,./ / _
7 , ; ,
,.. .:./. . , z 1 ,.
iiiiii ,o, oio„-----.:„ -,
. „ Jo
, ,
, „, 7 , , . ,..,
.
,, / , .. // . 1 r ..) --;-:
" .(-'
it i, '„r .� {: ."'
i ` DoA .
r' fe �.
' r ` �. NC OneMap 24K Hydrology
itifili
p
, Parcel Boundary
,• �' { Soil Map Units
\ I DoA—Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
!dot ' [ GhB—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
,
.i4
100 200 300 400 500 Feet 1 GhD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
1 I I I I I 6,
we. J lgrArtlx@WATo@IM,RN,z o.the GIS User Community
Project Name: Pettus Property N Figure. 4
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC w ' E
60'IJTIONS LLC Property ID: 9641-44-2926-00 -�.- 1 inch = 150 feet
NRCS Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) s
P.O. Box 244 21 Sep 2019
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

1,1
.�• .` ♦ .
us
•
= N - .:.,
, 4
i TT
PF01A �t , 1,4 ,� • I ‘
..
PUBHh e6
4 _ .
sial,
r . '
, .
y.
., ,
,, .
. ,
k _
,.
, .
•
r
.,
PFO1A
A
.4 • ,j,..s5
• '
�I It\.
NP
PUBHh -(�' a,yr`b1' - .
•
•
'�,;ice • O`
.
I' \
7 0. ' , .4141.4.
� . x
.. . .
�i0�, �� `
. .
„.41
__.
. .
, I 7
! f,, /� r.
. or
Q �. '� lri., . ' _ - - ,
MI. ''z ' F ilk. A\ II Parcel Boundary
0 4.4.0R5UBH 04 V% NWI Wetland Type
0 * f ��s! \'� \ ,1 Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
�� PUBHh ,,
Y ��' w'� Freshwater Pond
0 100 200 300 400 "500 Feet .' Riverine
I I I I I I {�� tau c o 0 0
blia
I - y . `ate'• . _ R4SBC SDA, UG6 o Rll oo I ffilr- - CILS User C#- uin_lik ', •
Project Name: Pettus Property N Figure. 5
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC w � \ E
`�SO'UTIONSLLO Property ID: 9641-44-2926-00 - .- 1 inch = 300 feet
USFWS National Wetland Inventory (May 2019) S
P.O. Box 244 21 Sep 2019
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

4...,:e-\ .
•
3710963200 ' t O 3710964201 371096 ,20'
BRITTON
` I '\ cry •
1".z F o
Q Cr
O
Cr
• O �'rt V •
i -441
=V
= VQ
• O I
. P F a
SP��O o 0
; NI
o
v
3710963100 10964100 371096 ,100
O l O
44/
0 0 ,.3
9
�Go a
��'
co d
0
0 Q
c�
• Parcel Boundary
FIRM Panel
r'
r Flood Zone
3710963000 3710964000 0.2 Percent Annual (500 year) li
AE - 100-year
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet - X - Low risk
I I I I I I i Soar6a.Err,etrtilialta'b=,GI
.mi
Project Name: Pettus Property Figure. 6
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC �, E
60'IJTIONSLLC Property ID. 9641-44-2926-00 1 inch = 1,500 feet
NC Flood Risk Information System
P.O. Box 244 21 Sep 2019
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
\ RCS
States Department of
Agriculture and other Lee County
Federal agencies, State
Natural agencies including the
Resources Agricultural Experiment North Ca ro I i n a
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants
Pettus Property
♦ _
S
. ,5'S
'
rt
&V' n7.rt ' S 'i -I- I
OW
' r
''r
_ 1
J,•
- '\ 6
:tIW _
I] 51)0 ft / ill • __. 5
September 22, 2019

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 5
Soil Map 8
Soil Map 9
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 11
Map Unit Descriptions 11
Lee County, North Carolina 13
DoA—Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 13
GhB—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes 14
GhD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes 15
References 18
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
664390 664440 664490 664540 664590 664640 664690
35°26'31"N I I I I _ .Fsl s_ 35°26'31"N
1r
N
1
•
1.
DoA
• t
...\\.
•
•
GhD •
01 .
0.
i . .
j., , ,tagigil
N . , -Alr111111111H
E DoA
d ,
14
2,1
g000 Hap) 1n 7_in at to aril tlhilo amOQ° f
- '
35°26'16"N - 35°26'16"N
664390 664440 664490 664540 664590 664640 664690
b
Map Scale:1:2,190 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet. -
Meters k
R N 0 30 60 120 180
A
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection:Web Mercator Feet
Comerwordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zane 17N WGS84
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
n Area of Interest(AOI) Sy Y Sot 1:24,000.
p
Soils Very Stony Spot
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other misunderstandingof the detail of mapping and accuracyof soil
CI Soil Map Unit Points pp 9
.0- Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Lw Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
14 Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
• Clay Spot Rails measurements.
• Closed Depression Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
• Gravel Pit US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
Major Roads
• Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
A. Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
jda Marsh or swamp am Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
▪ Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Lee County, North Carolina
• Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 10,2018
Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
• Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Aug 13,2014—Feb
Slide or Slip 4,2017
oa Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
DoA Dothan loamy sand,0 to 2 1.9 23.9%
percent slopes
GhB Gilead loamy sand,2 to 8 3.8 46.5%
percent slopes
GhD Gilead loamy sand,8 to 15 2.4 29.6%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 8.1 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Lee County, North Carolina
DoA—Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2wb8x
Elevation: 50 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 69 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 310 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dothan and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dothan
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 7 inches: loamy sand
E- 7 to 13 inches: loamy sand
Bt- 13 to 40 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv-40 to 79 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 36 to 59 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0
mmhos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Loamy and clayey soils on rises and knolls of mesic
uplands (G133AA321 FL)
Hydric soil rating: No
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Fuquay
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
GhB—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t62
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Gilead and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gilead
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 5 inches: loamy sand
Bt1 - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt2- 8 to 42 inches: sandy clay
Bt3-42 to 52 inches: sandy clay loam
Cl -52 to 76 inches: clay
C2- 76 to 80 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
GhD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t63
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Gilead and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gilead
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 5 inches: loamy sand
Bt1 - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt2- 8 to 42 inches: sandy clay
Bt3-42 to 52 inches: sandy clay loam
Cl -52 to 76 inches: clay
C2- 76 to 80 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
17

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/deta i l/so i is/scie ntists/?cid=nres 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/I nternet/FSE_DOCU M ENTS/n res142p2_052290.pdf
19

ROY COOPER x
Governor to +;
Y .r
ELiZABETH S.BISER w ' n
Scretary ► .
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 28, 2021
Mark Lyczkowski
Forge Investment Group, LLC
3107 S. Horner Blvd
Sanford, NC 27332 Expiration of Acceptance: 4/28/2022
Project: Nash Rd South Park County: Lee
This is a conditional acceptance letter.
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services(DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in-
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DM5 will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S_ § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s)an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DM5 website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8-digit HUC)
Cape Fear 03030003 Non-Riparian Wetland* 0.47
*Non-riparian wetland credit is not available in this service area. In accordance with the directive
from the February 8, 2011 MT meeting, non-riparian wetland impacts located in the mountain and
piedmont areas of North Carolina can be accepted as requested, but mitigated utilizing riparian
wetland mitigation credits. Upon receipt of payment. DMS will take responsibility for providing the
compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program
instrument dated July 28, 2010. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Adam Carter, agent
4 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street I
Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
V S�...Jy'JLi
EVimil a Emlial PaiNdil 919.707.8976

DWR
• Division of Water Resources
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6,2021 Ver 4.2
Please note:fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also,if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN,all you need to do is right-click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.govNVaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN%20Help%20File%202018-1-30.pdf
A. Processing Information
County(or Counties)where the project is located:*
Lee
Is this a NCDMS Project*
O Yes 0No
Click Yes,only if NCDMS is the applicant or co-applicant.
Is this project a public transportation project?*
O Yes 0No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road,rail,airport transportation project.
la.Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps:*
❑O Section 404 Permit(wetlands,streams and waters,Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit(navigable waters,tidal waters,Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
O Yes
❑ No
1 b.What type(s)of permit(s)do you wish to seek authorization?*
❑Q Nationwide Permit(NWP)
❑ Regional General Permit(RGP)
❑ Standard(IP)
1c.Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
O Yes 0No
Nationwide Permit(NWP)Number: 39-Commercial/Institutional Developments
NWP Numbers(for multiple NWPS):
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1 d.Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR:*
check all that apply
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification-Regular ❑O 401 Water Quality Certification-Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le.Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Q Yes 0 No
For the record only for Corps Permit: O Yes 0 No
If.Is this an after-the-fact permit application?*
uYes O No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so,attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program.
0Yes 0 No

Acceptance Letter Attachment
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Nash Rd South Park Acceptance Letter.pdf 393.96KB
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
1 h.Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?*
O Yes v No
1j.Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
O Yes 0No
Link to trout information:http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
1a.Who is the Primary Contact?*
Adam Carter
1c.Primary Contact Phone:*
1 b.Primary Contact Email:* (xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail] [phone]
Id.Who is applying for the permit?*
U Owner OO Applicant(other than owner)
(Check all that apply)
le.Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2.Owner Information
2a.Name(s)on recorded deed:*
Mark Lyczkowski,Madport LLC
2b.Deed book and page no.:
1581/130
2c.Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
Mark Lyczkowski
2d.Address*
Street Address
2504 Brighton Point
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Sanford NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27330 US
2e.Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f.Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g.Email Address:*
mark@fig.11c
3.Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a.Name:*
Mark Lyczkowski
3b.Business Name:
Of applicable)
Madport LLC
3c.Address*
Street Address
2504 Brighton Point
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Sanford NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27330 USA

3d.Telephone Number:*
[phone] 3e.Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx (xxx)xxx-xxxx
3f.Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4.Agent/Consultant(if applicable)
4a.Name:*
Adam Carter
4b.Business Name:
(if applicable)
Wetland Solutions,LLC
4c.Address*
Street Address
816 Merry Street Dunn,NC 28334.Please use P.O.Box below for correspondence
Address Line 2
P.O.Box 244
City State/Province/Region
Bunnlevel NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
28323 USA
4d.Telephone Number:*
[phone] 4e.Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx (xxx)xxx-xxxx
4f.Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1a.Name of project:*
Nash Rd South Park
1b.Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1 c.Nearest municipality/town:*
Tramway/Sanford
2. Project Identification lJ
2a.Property Identification Number: 2b.Property size:
(tax PIN or parcel ID) (in acres)
9641-44-2824-00 6.13
2c.Project Address
Street Address
2200 Tramway Rd
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Sanford NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27330 USA
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees.Use between 4-6 digits(unless you are using a survey-grade GPS device)after the decimal place as appropriate,based on how the location was
determined. (For example,most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude:* Longitude:*
35.439721 -79.186660
ex:34.208504 -77.796371
3.Surface Waters
3a.Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Skunk Creek

3b.Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s)is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d.Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.*
030300040201
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a.Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The current conditions on site are cleared and graded uplands with the exception of wetland area and open water pond.The land use in the surrounding area are commercial and
residential use with farmland surrounding developments.
4b.Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project(including all prior phases)in the past?*
O Yes O No Q Unknown
4f.List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
.47
4g.List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and perennial)
0
4h.Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to construct a commercial base in the proposed parcel at the intersection of Firetower RD and Tramway Rd
4i.Describe the overall project in detail,including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project will consist of fill and grading of open water pond with a wetland head.Excavator and bulldozer will be utilized for the construction and grading of the site.See attached map.
5.Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No 0 Unknown
Comments:
5b.If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,what type of determination was made?*
O Preliminary O Approved O• Not Verified 0 Unknown V N/A
Corps AID Number:
Example:SAW-2017-99999
5c.If 5a is yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name(if known): Adam Carter
Agency/Consultant Company: Wetland Solutions,LLC
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a.Is this a phased project?*
Yes • No
Are any other NWP(s),regional general permit(s),or individual permits(s)used,or intended to be used,to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?This includes other
separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre-construction notification.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a.Where are the impacts associated with your project?(check all that apply):
❑� Wetlands O Streams-tributaries Buffers
Open Waters O Pond Construction
2.Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site,then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.

"W."will be used in the table below to represent the word"wetland".
2a.Site#*(?) 2a1 Reason"(?) 2b.Impact type*(?) 2c.Type of W.* 2d.W.name* 2e.Forested* 2f.Type of Jurisdicition* 2g.Impact
(?) area*
1 development P Seep Seep Yes Corps 0.250
(acres)
2g.Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g.Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.250
2g.Total Wetland Impact
0.250
2i.Comments:
Because of building envelope and parking spaces for commercial build.Impact is unavoidable.
The Seep is actually a older pond that has been filled in by sedimentation and is very degraded.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes,ponds,estuaries,tributaries,sounds,the Atlantic Ocean,or any other open water of the U.S.then individually list all open
water impacts below.
4a. Site#*(?) 4a1.Impact Reason 4b.Impact type*(?) 4c.Name of waterbody(?) 4d.Activity type* 4e.Waterbody type* 4f.Impact
area
*
1 Commercial P No name Fill Pond 0.22
Development. (acres)
4g.Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g.Total permanent open water impacts:
0.22
4g.Total open water impacts:
0.22
4h.Comments:
Man made pond in drainage way.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation C^)
1.Avoidance and Minimization
1a.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
The design has been altered several time to avoid impacts,but impacts are unavoidable because of size and location of building and parking spaces
required.
1 b.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:*
We will using BMPs to help minimize and avoid any impacts from sedimentation transport on and off site.
2.Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a.Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c.If yes,mitigation is required by(check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d.If yes,which mitigation option(s)will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a.Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b.Stream mitigation requested: 4c.If using stream mitigation,what is the stream temperature:
(linear feet)
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington Districts RIBITS website.

4d.Buffer mitigation requested(DWR only): 4e.Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(square feet) (acres)
4f.Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) 4g.Coastal(tidal)wetland mitigation requested:
.47ac (acres)
4h.Comments
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWR
6a.Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation?If yes,you must fill out this entire form-please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
***Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section.***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
v Yes s No
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements,click here.
If no,explain why:
Cape Fear does not have a riparian buffer.This project is not subject to riparian buffer rule.
2.Stormwater Management Plan
2a.Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
O Yes 0No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a.Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the use of public(federal/state)land?*
Yes No
2.Violations(DWR Requirement)
2a.Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0500),Isolated Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H.1300),or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a.Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts)result in additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes •• No
3b.If you answered"no,"provide a short narrative description.
This project is not a phased project and will not incur additional impact.
4.Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a.Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No • N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a.Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b.Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No

5c.If yes,indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d.Is another Federal agency involved?*
O Yes No 0 Unknown
5e.Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
O Yes ONo
5f.Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?*
OYes 0No
5g.Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?*
UYes ®• No
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h.Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?**
OYes ®• No
5i.Does this project involve(1)blasting,and/or(2)other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines,such as jackhammers,mechanized pile drivers,etc.?*
OYes ®• No
5j.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?*
USFWS IPAC web site
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes 0• No
6b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA's Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map(does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/h/hpoweb/
7a.Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status(e.g.,National Historic Trust
designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
• Yes No
7b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO web mapping application shows 3 sites.Two structures one pond.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
Yes No
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Lee County GIS website and the/msc.fema.gov/portal/search website.
Miscellaneous
Comments
401 packet is attached with supporting documents.Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review.Documents should be combined into one file when
possible,with a Cover Letter,Table of Contents,and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Portfol io1.pdf 8.58MB
Fire Tower Rd_Pre-Construction Notification(PCN)Form Signed.pdf 332.44KB
Fire Tower Road_JD Request Signed.pdf 252.47KB
Signed AA for Firetower Rd.pdf 216.83KB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature
❑O By checking the box and signing below,I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief';and

• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true,accurate,and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a'transaction"subject to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature;AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Samuel Adam Carter
Signature*
u cr or WC,Mnor G so/.0
Date
1/3/2022

LLC
Agent Authorization Letter
September 9, 2021
Owner Information
Owner Name: Mark Lyczkowski, Madport LLC
Mailing Address: 2504 Brighton Point
City, State, Zip: Sanford, NC 27330
Phone#: [phone]
Property Description
PIN: 9641-44-2824-00
Project: Fire Tower Road
Address: 2200 Tramway Road, Sanford NC
County: Lee
I, iiitatt Vou2ss,L , as owner/agent of the above
referenced property, authorize the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDWR to
enter the subject property for the purpose of a jurisdictional determination.
I also authorize Mr. Adam Carter of Wetland Solutions, LLC to act in my behalf as
my agent in processing applications for wetland certification and/or permits.
(orJcDwA/cr� Jo -
Signature Title Date
Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244 Bunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.WetlandNC.com