20210348 Ver 3_BPDP for PN_20220525

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20210348
Version* 3
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 05/26/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 5/25/2022
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
ID#:*
20210348
Existing ID#
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Version:* 3
DMS • Mitigation Bank
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Site
Wayne
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Existing Version
20210348v3 RES PickleCreekPhasell BPDP FI... 30.23MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
Jamey McEachran
1 llefileitha

MEMORANDUM
Ores
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 919.770.5573 tel. [phone] fax
TO: Katie Merritt, Department of Water Resources
FROM: JAMEY MCEACHRAN — RES
DATE: MAY 24, 2022
RE: Response to Draft Mitigation Plan Comments - Pickle Creek Phase II Mitigation
Project (DWR 2021-0348v3) Neuse River 03020201; Wayne County, NC
Katie Merritt - NCDWR:
1. Add a DWR ID # on the title page. The number is 2021-0348v3.
The title page has been updated with the DWR ID#.
2. Photos provided in Section 2 are dated August 2020 and do not adequately represent "existing"
conditions upon submittal of the mitigation plan. Provided more current photos of the riparian
areas and features.
Updated photos have been added to this section.
3. Modify Figure 3 to show areas where the land application of animal waste is currently permitted.
Then, reference Figure 3 where appropriate.
A Figure 3b was created to show the areas within the project easement that were permitted for land
application, prior to the updating of the Waste Utilization Plan. Figure 3b is now referenced where
appropriate.
4. In Section 1.2, ephemeral channels are not considered to be 'unnamed tributaries" just Intermittent
and Perennial channels get this classification. Make sure to use stream, ephemeral channel and
ditch when describing the features within the project boundary or that are draining into the project
boundary such as D2.
Section 1.2 has been updated to state "one unnamed stream tributary, two ephemeral channels,
and one ditch" are within the project boundary. Additionally, "stream, ephemeral channel and ditch"
are used when describing the features throughout the plan.
5. RES needs to reference the site viability letter issued by DWR and that the letter indicated certain
criteria that would need to be addressed prior to using this land as a mitigation site. What were
those criteria, and then add a reference to Section 4.2.3 where it appears those criteria are further
explained. I have provided further comments in 4.2.3 as well.
Section 3.5 has been updated to include the constraints referenced within the site viability letter.
References to section 4.2.3 are now also present.

6. Add language to this section that describes what documentation will be submitted with the As -
built Report confirming full compliance with the criteria indicated in the site viability letter. This
documentation should be any and all approvals from DWR related to permits affiliated with the
project and Waste plans. There are two permits affiliated with this land proposed for the DMS
project (AWS960127 and AW1960127). Add that the provider will consult with DWR staff within the
Certified Animal Feeding Operation Branch of the Water Quality Permitting Section.
Language has been added to Section 3.5 that describes the constraints around the Project and the
necessary documentation required with the As -Built Report. A paragraph was added to this section
to describe constraints with the two permits associated with the project and the process to remove
the easement area from the Waste Utilization Plan.
7. It needs to be noted in this section, that site preparation also includes activities related to activities
described in 4.2.3 considering many of these activities are required to be done prior to riparian
restoration activities as indicated in the Site Viability Letter. Site preparation for this site doesn't just
include land prep for planting...but also includes hydrant removals, infrastructure capping and
deadheading, etc. However, if these things will be done as part of the DMS project, then speak to
that hear. If there are still things that need to be done within the project boundary specific to this
bank, then speak to that as well.
Language has been added to section 4.1, that these activities are required to be completed prior to
riparian restoration activities. Language was also added to clarify what activities are part of the DMS
project versus the bank project.
8. Change "Streams" to "Streams & Ephemerals". Ephemeral channels and "streams" are referred to
differently in our buffer mitigation rule (and buffer protection rule 0714), therefore it is important
to use correct terminology of features within the project boundary throughout the Plan.
Language was changed to say "Streams and Ephemerals" to use the correct terminology of features.
9. Modify sentence to read..."riparian restoration activities as defined and described in the
Consolidated....". Remove reference to 0703 in this sentence. Modify next sentence to
read..."Nutrient offset credits generated from riparian restoration activities will comply with the
Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule...."
These sentences were modified per the comments.
10. Add more description here that the riparian restoration activities actually don't start at top of bank
for the whole project. There is a DMS project that includes Top of bank along many features
proposed in this BPDP, so please be specific here as to where the riparian restoration will start on
J1, D2, for the Bank.
Language was added to indicate the restoration activities start at 100' from the top of bank on J1
and D4. Other language was added to indicate that riparian restoration activities will start at the
top of bank along D2 and extend out a maximum of 200'.
11. 0703 is used incorrectly here. 0703 does not include anything about ephemerals.
The Nutrient Offset Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02b .0703 was removed.
12. Modify sentence to read..."the entire area proposed for riparian restoration to generate nutrient
offset credit" along reach D4.
Sentence was modified to be "the entire area proposed for riparian restoration to generate nutrient
offset credit".

13. should this be Figure 8 instead of 7?
Figure reference was changed to 8 instead of 7.
14. Add, "and is generating nutrient offset credit in accordance with the Nutrient Offset " Note:
riparian restoration is not mentioned in the Nutrient Offset Trading rule, only in the Buffer 0295
rule. So, we have to reword that sentence as to make sure there aren't incorrect references to rules.
Language was added to reference how nutrient offset credit is generated.
15. Add a note that most of these activities will done during the Site Preparation stage.
Language added to indicate that these activities will be done during the Stie Preparation stage.
16. Where are the two small ditches referenced in this sentence?
Callouts were added to Figures 3a and Figure 7 to show where these ditches are located.
17. Reference Figure 3 here and modify Figure 3 to show all the land areas that are in the waste
utilization plan as of the date of this BPDP submittal.
A Figure 3b was created to show all land areas that were in the original waste utilization plan but
have since been removed as found in the newly added Appendix E. Figure 3b was then referenced
here.
18. Make sure to explain the planting plan as the Planted Area represented in supporting figure 10.
not all planting will begin from TOB.
Language was added to explain that the planting plan is represented in Figure 10. And more
descriptions were included to explain that not all planting will begin at the TOB.
19. What performance standards outlined in Rule 0703 are you referring to?
This sentence removed the Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703, as there are
no performance standards in this rule and replaced it with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule.
20. Add language to this section stating that the easement boundaries will be marked before the DWR
site visit for Task 2.
Language was added to state that easement boundaries will be marked prior to the DWR site visit
for Task 2.
21. Add a new section titled 4.5 Additional Documentation. In this new section add language that
describes what documentation will be submitted with the As -built Report confirming full
compliance with the criteria indicated in the site viability letter. This documentation should be any
and all approvals from DWR related to permits affiliated with the project and Waste plans. There
are two permits affiliated with this land proposed for the DMS project (AWS960127 and
AW1960127). Add that the provider will consult with DWR staff within the Certified Animal Feeding
Operation Branch of the Water Quality Permitting Section when securing the necessary
documentation.
A new section, 4.5, was added to discuss additional documentation that will be submitted with the
As -Built Report. Language was also added that RES will consult with DWR staff within the Certified
Animal Feeding Operation Branch of the Water Quality Permitting Section for necessary
documentation.

22. Remove "riparian buffer mitigation credits" from the first sentence.
Removed "riparian buffer mitigation credits" and changed to "nutrient offset credits".
23. Include language noting that EBX will have a backup if stewardship falls through.
Language indicating that EBX, LLC will have a backup land steward has been added.
24. Revise second sentence to read as follows: "All nutrient offset credits will be derived from riparian
restoration activities.
Second sentence was revised to suggested sentence.
25. The description of where the nutrient offset credits will be generated adjacent to J1, D2 and D4 are
not accurate, in that these credits are not all being generated within 0-200'. Correct this to match
the supporting figures.
The descriptions of how nutrient offset credits are being generated was changed to match
supporting figures.
26. Add language that speaks to the fact that these nutrient offset credits are neither convertible nor
transferrable to riparian buffer credits. This is a nutrient offset only bank with a nutrient offset only
MBI.
Language has been added to indicate that this is a nutrient offset only bank with a nutrient offset
only MBI.
27. Remove fields in these cells.
These cells have been edited to remove any values
28. This column needs to be corrected to show "NO" in all rows. This Bank is not being proposed as a
buffer credit bank.
All rows have been changed to say "NO".
29. Remove fields in these cells.
These cells have been edited to remove any values.
30. Depict land areas that are used for land -application up to the submittal of this BPDP on Figure 3
and Figure 6.
A Figure 3b has been created to show any land areas being used for land -application.
31. On Figure 3, Where are these two ditches along D2 according to Section 4.2.3?
Callouts have been created to show where these two ditches are located along D2.
32. On Figure 6, Depict land areas that are used for land -application up to the submittal of this BPDP.
Show the two hydrants referenced in 4.2.3 that will be removed?
A Figure 3b has been created to show any land areas being used for land -application. The two
hydrants being removed are now shown as a different symbols on Figure 6.
33. Show existing infrastructure that is staying vs being removed.
Any existing infrastructure is shown as different symbols if staying or being removed.

Bank Parcel Development Package
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project
May 2022
DWR #: 2021-0348v3I Neuse River Basin I HUC 03020201 I Wayne County, North Carolina
Prepared For:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared By:
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
For Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLX (EBX, LLC)
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-209-1052

Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION 3
1.1 Parcel Location 3
1.2 Parcel Overview 3
2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 5
3 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS 8
3.1 Threatened and Endangered Species 8
3.2 Cultural Resources 8
3.3 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/ Hydrologic Trespass 8
3.4 Clean Water Act - Section 401/404 8
3.5 Constraints 8
3.6 Additional Environmental Consideration 9
4 RIPARIAN RESTORATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9
4.1 Parcel Preparation 9
4.2 Methods 10
4.3 Planting Plan 11
4.4 Easement Boundaries 13
4.5 Additional Documentation 13
5 MONITORING PLAN 13
5.1 Monitoring Protocol and Performance Standards 13
5.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Project Maintenance 15
6 LONG TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN 16
7 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 16
8 PROJECT'S CREDIT POTENTIAL 17
9 REFERENCES 19
FIGURES
Figure 1 — Nutrient Offset Service Area
Figure 2 — Project Vicinity
Figure 3a — Existing Conditions
Figure 3b — Permitted Areas for Land Application (Pre-2022)
Figure 4 — Historical Imagery
Figure 5 — NRCS Mapped Soils
Figure 6 — Project Constraints
Figure 7 — Nutrient Offset Conceptual Design Plan
Figure 8 — USGS Quadrangle
Figure 9 — Riparian Zones
Figure 10 — Monitoring Plan
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
May 2022

APPENDICES
Appendix A — Site Viability & Stream Determination
Appendix B — Conservation Easement Template
Appendix C — Agency Correspondence
Appendix D — Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Appendix E — Waste Utilization Plan and supporting material
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
ii May 2022

>L INTRODUCTION
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX, LLC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental
Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide this Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP) for Pickle Creek Phase
II Nutrient Offset Project (Project) under the RES Pickle Creek Phase 11 Nutrient Offset Banking Instrument.
This project is designed to provide nutrient offset credits for unavoidable impacts due to development
within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Cataloguing Unit 03020201
(Neuse 01), excluding Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 1). This Nutrient Offset Plan is in accordance with the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0703. The Project is being codeveloped with the proposed Pickle Creek Buffer Mitigation
Project that is contracted with the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and will extend riparian areas
associated with the DMS project.
Li Parcel Location
The Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project is within the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit HUC
03020201, 14-digit HUC 030202011170030 and DWR Sub -basin Number 03-04-12.
The Project is in Mount Olive in Wayne County, NC (Figure 1). To access the Project from the town of
Mount Olive, travel north on Highway 117 for about a mile, then turn left on NC-55 W for 2.5 miles, then
right on Thunder Swamp Rd, after 2 miles the destination will be on the left (Figure 2). The coordinates
are 35.23175 -78.10784.
1.2 Parcel Overview
The Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project consists of a conservation easement that will total
approximately 10.59 acres that includes riparian area that is between 101-200 feet off of one unnamed
stream tributary (J1) and one ephemeral channel (D4) and the riparian area off of one ditch (D2) from 0-
100 feet that drains into Thunder Swamp. Thunder Swamp is a USGS-named stream that eventually drains
to the Neuse River. Current land use within the Project is strictly crop production which is irrigated with
permitted land application of animal waste, (Figure 3a and 3b). Much of the Project area has been used
extensively for agricultural purposes for at least 40 years (Figure 4). Water quality stressors currently
affecting the Project include heavily manipulated/relocated and maintained stream channels, nutrient
loadings from active crop production and use of animal waste land application for irrigation, and lack of
forested and vegetated riparian areas. Current riparian area conditions demonstrate significant
degradation with the loss of stabilizing vegetation because of continued crop production.
The goal of the Project is to restore riparian areas by establishing appropriate plant communities while
minimizing temporal and land disturbing impacts. Riparian area improvements will filter runoff from
agricultural fields, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to nearby channels and provide water
quality benefit to the overall watershed.
The Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project is composed of the riparian area of one
intermittent/perennial stream, J1, one ephemeral reach, D4, and one ditch feature, D2 (Figure 3a). All
streams have been straightened and are incised. Furthermore, only the fifty -foot riparian buffer of J1 was
determined to be subject to the Neuse buffer protection rule, whereas D4 was determined to be an
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
3 May 2022

ephemeral stream and therefore not subject to the Neuse buffer protection rules ("non -subject"). D2
was determined to be a ditch. Stream determinations were verified by the DWR during a site visit on
March 10th, 2021. The DWR Stream Determination Letter is provided in Appendix A.
Riparian restoration efforts along the Project stream, ephemeral channel, and ditch will be accomplished
through the planting, establishment, and protection of a hardwood forest community. The result will be a
riparian area that functions to mitigate nutrient and sediment inputs from the surrounding uplands. This
BPDP is being submitted for review under the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295)
and Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0703). DWR performed a site viability assessment
for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset on April 17th, 2021. This correspondence is provided in Appendix
A. The Project will provide significant functional uplift to the project watershed. The Project presents the
opportunity to provide Nutrient Offset credits. These will be derived from restoration of the riparian areas.
The nutrient offset credits will be produced by establishing a native forested and herbaceous riparian plant
community and protecting these riparian areas in perpetuity with a conservation easement. The new plant
community will be established in conjunction with the treatment of existing exotic or undesirable plant
species.
1.2.1 Parcel Ownership
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes
a portion of the parcel listed below in Table 1. EBX, LLC (an entity of RES) will record a conservation
easement from the current landowner for the project area. The Wilmington District Conservation Easement
model template will be utilized to draft the site protection instrument. Once recorded, the secured
easement will allow EBX, LLC to proceed with the Project development and protect the nutrient offset
assets in perpetuity. Once finalized, a copy of the land protection instrument(s) will be included in
Appendix B.
Table 1. Parcel and Landowner Information
Landowner
Pin or Tax Parcel ID Agreement Type County
Douglas Allen Jernigan
2564319379
Conservation
Easement
Wayne
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
4 May 2022

2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1.1 Surface Water Classification
The primary stream feature of the Project, J1, eventually drains to Thunder Swamp just downstream of the
project easement. Thunder Swamp has been assigned class C and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW). Class
C waters are protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic
life including propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture. Secondary
recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with water where such
activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner. NSW designation is intended for
waters needing additional nutrient management due to being subject to excessive growth of microscopic
or macroscopic vegetation (NCDWQ 2011).
2.1.2 Physiography and Soils
The Project is located within the Rolling Coastal Plain Level IV ecoregion within the Southeastern Plains
Level III ecoregion and is characterized by greater relief, elevation, and stream gradients compared to the
Mid -Atlantic Coastal Plain to the east. This ecoregion contains both dissected irregular and smooth plains,
and low to moderate gradient sandy -bottomed streams that branch from broad interstream divides with
steep to moderately gentle side slopes. The ecoregion also contains better drained soils and a slightly
cooler and shorter growing season than the Mid -Atlantic Coastal Plain; however, it is still a productive
agricultural region with typical crops of corn, soybeans, tobacco, cotton, sweet potatoes, peanuts, and
wheat (Griffith et al., 2002).
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) County Soil Mapping depicts four soil series across
the Project (Figure 5). All soils on -site are formed in loamy or loamy and sandy marine deposits. All soil
series are mapped adjacent together. The project is dominated by Kenansville loamy sand, with the three
other soils about equal in area. Rains sandy loam and Torhunta loam are considered hydric by the NRCS,
while Lynchburg sandy loam have minor hydric inclusions. The specific soil map units are detailed in Table
2.
Table 2. Project Mapped Soil Series
Map
Unit Map Unit Name
Symbol
Percent Drainage Hydrologic Landscape
Hydric Class Soil Group Setting
Ke
Kenansville loamy
sand
0%
Well drained
A
Stream Terraces
Ly Lynchburg sandy 8% Somewhat B/D Broad interstream divides on
loam, 0 to 2 poorly well marine terraces, flats on marine
percent slopes drained terraces
Ra
Rains sandy loam,
0 to 2 percent
90% Poorly drained A/D
Flats on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine
terraces, Carolina bays on marine
terraces
To Torhunta loam 90%
Very poorly
drained
Depressions on stream terraces,
A/D Carolina bays on marine terraces,
flats on marine terraces
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
5 May 2022

2.1.3 Wetlands
The Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset project area does not contain any wetlands according to
preliminary site visits. National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping depicts one wetland within the Project
area. This wetland, off the left bank of D2 (Figure 6). However, field observations indicate the depicted
wetland does not exist.
2.1.4 Landscape Communities
A. Existing Vegetation Communities
Currently, the vegetative cover of the Project is primarily comprised of active cropland. Current crops onsite
consist of corn and Miscanthus giganteus. However, the crop fields not in Miscanthus giganteus are
regularly rotated between soybeans and corn. The forested areas adjacent to J1 and downstream of the
Project are classified as mixed-mesic hardwood forest (Coastal Plain subtype). Common species within the
adjacent forest include sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum), water oak (Quercus
nigra), willow oak (Quercus phellos), and some scattered loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Invasive species were
not observed within the Project at this time, however with the adjacency of the mixed hardwood forest
and agricultural operations it can be assumed there are invasive species seed sources.
B. Riparian Vegetation
The current crop production around the Project is corn and about an 800-foot stretch of Miscanthus
giganteus. Current conditions demonstrate significant habitat and water quality degradation with a loss of
stabilizing vegetation as a result of impacts from ongoing crop production. There is no riparian buffer on
the right bank of J1, but there is a mixed hardwood forest on the left bank, out of the Project area. Reach
D4 has Miscanthus giganteus planted on the opposite bank as the project area. D2 has corn as its primary
crop production around its banks.
2.1.5 Existing Conditions Photos
Culvert Crossing on 11
March 17, 2022
Buffer Condition along D4
March 17, 2022
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
6 May 2022

Origin of D2
March 17, 2022
Plastic Culvert Crossing on J1
March 17, 2022
Confluence of J1 and D1
March 17, 2022
Looking Upstream on D4
March 17, 2022
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
7 May 2022

3 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
3.1 Threatened and Endangered Species
Plants and animals with a federal classification of endangered or threatened are protected under provisions
of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. According to the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPAC) database review tool
(accessed August 20, 2020) and the self -certification process conducted by RES and submitted to the
USFWS on March 15, 2021, the list of threatened, endangered, species includes the Red -cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), and the Carolina Madtom
(Noturus furiousus). The Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project does not contain any suitable habitat
for the Red -cockaded woodpecker, the Neuse River Waterdog, or the Carolina Madtom. A self -certification
letter was sent to USFWS (on March 15, 2021). No response was received by USFWS. This consultation was
conducted as part of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) process and supporting documentation and
correspondence can be found in Appendix C.
The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act requires consultation with state fish and wildlife agencies when
"waters of any stream or other body of water are proposed or authorized, permitted or licensed to be
impounded, diverted, or otherwise controlled or modified. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) was consulted during the CE process and the NCWRC did not comment on any
state or federally listed species; however, they did recommend the use of biodegradable and wildlife -
friendly sediment and erosion control devices and to treat invasive species as part of the Project.
Documentation is included in Appendix C.
3.2 Cultural Resources
A review of North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS Web Service (accessed 20 August
2020) database did not reveal any registered occurrences within the Project area; however, there were two
other occurrences within in the 0.5-mile radius; (Vernon and Baker Presbyterian). RES consulted with the
SHPO during the CE process and the SHPO had "conducted a review of the project and are aware of no
historic resources which would be affected by the project." Documentation is included in Appendix C.
3.3 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/ Hydrologic Trespass
No portion of the Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project area is in FEMA flood zones (Figure 6).
Therefore, no FEMA permitting is required.
3.4 Clean Water Act - Section 401/404
This project will not impact/fill any Waters of the US; therefore, there will be no 401/404 permit required.
3.5 Constraints
The Pickle Creek Phase II Project has a number of constraints that will be accounted for prior to project
construction, however a majority of the constraints are found in the co -located DMS Project. The DWR site
viability letter dated May 18, 2021, specifically mentioned three main constraints that would need to be
addressed for the site to be viable. These constraints include 1) existing utilities, 2) existing permits (Figure
3a and Figure 3b), and 3) existing infrastructure associated with the application of animal waste. These
criteria will be further explained in Section 4.2.3 and will be adequately addressed prior to construction.
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
8 May 2022

The landowner has two existing permits (AWS960127 and AW1960127) associated with the land application
of animal waste within the proposed mitigation area. EBX, LLC worked with a Certified Technician from
Agriments Services, Inc to understand the current permits and associated infrastructure that is in place to
manage the land application of animal waste within the proposed mitigation area (Figure 3b). It was
determined that 3.05 acres of Wettable Acres are within the proposed conservation easement and that
there are two hydrants within the proposed easement area and some associated underground pipes that
connect them to the main irrigation line. The Certified Technician then updated the Nutrient Management
Plan and the Wettable Acres Determination for Jernigan Farms, AWS960127, to reflect the removal of the
acreage and infrastructure within the proposed Pickle Creek Phase 11 Nutrient Offset Project (along with
the adjacent DMS Project). RES consulted with the Engineer in the Certified Animal Feeding Operation
Branch of the Water Quality Permitting Section to ensure that these updates were adequate. The updated
Waste Utilization Plan and email correspondence with the Engineer in the Animal Feeding Operations
Program are provided in Appendix E. Documentation of DWR approval of these permit updates and
renewals will be provided in the as -built report to confirm full compliance with the criteria listed in the site
viability letter. Additionally, EBX, LLC will provide photographic documentation of the pipe removal within
the easement and confirm with DWR staff within the Certified Animal Feeding Operation Branch of the
Water Quality Permitting Section that all criteria are being met.
3.6 Additional Environmental Consideration
A limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was completed for the Parcel by acquiring an
Environmental Date Resources (EDR) report in February 2021. The report can be found in Appendix D.
Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were listed in any of the Federal, State, or Tribal
environmental databases searched by EDR. There are no known or potentially hazardous waste sites
identified within or immediately adjacent to the project area. There were two environmental record
mapped sites found within an 1/8 mile of the Project property. These are associated with the hog farm
operations nearby and across the road which forms a ridge and therefore if an incident occurred, waste
would flow in the opposite direction of the project.
4 RIPARIAN RESTORATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Riparian restoration areas adjacent to the unnamed tributary, one ephemeral channel, and one ditch are
shown in Figure 7 and mitigation type determinations and nutrient offset viability was approved by DWR
in the Site Viability Letter dated May 18, 2021 (Appendix A).
4.1 Parcel Preparation
Preparation at the Project will involve spraying crops and exotic invasive species, applying soil
amendments, seeding native plants, and planting trees. The areas of specific focus for site preparation for
this Project will be ensuring that the areas that currently have Miscanthus giganteus are treated and
removed from within the project area. Soil amendments will be provided across the entire planted area
based on the results of soil fertility tests. The soils fertility tests will be based on soil samples collected
within proposed riparian restoration areas across the site. A seed mix will be chosen to maximize successful
herbaceous growth in all riparian areas while also incorporating valuable pollinator species. Temporary
and permanent riparian seeding, and bare root plantings shall be planted according to the planting plan
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
9 May 2022

(Section 4.3). Along with the planting site preparation at the Project, the constraints mentioned in the site
viability letter and discussed in Section 3.5 and Section 4.2.3 will be addressed prior to planting. This
includes the update to the Waste Utilization Plan. The removal of two irrigation hydrants along J1 and the
deadheading and capping of the underground pipes to ensure that no land application will be permitted
within the easement area will be part of the site preparation of the DMS project preparation work.
The limits of the riparian restoration areas will be surveyed post -planting and seeding, and the information
will be provided in the As -Built report and plat.
4.2 Methods
Riparian restoration activities along stream, ephemeral channel, and a viable ditch will be implemented to
generate nutrient offset credits. All applicable areas were determined by the site viability assessment by
DWR (Appendix A).
4.2.1 Riparian Restoration Activities — Streams and Ephemeras
Riparian restoration activities will occur on stream and ephemeral channels as defined and described in
the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n). Nutrient offset credits generated from
riparian restoration activities will comply with the Nutrient Offset Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02b .0703.
Restoration activities will include the planting of bare root plantings as described in Section 4.3. These
restoration activities will begin along the boundary of the DMS project which ends at about 100 feet from
the top of the proposed stream (J1) and ephemeral channel (D4) and extend outward to a maximum of
200 feet perpendicular to the stream channel. Restoration will occur where cropland is currently present
(Figure 7)
One of the reach, D4, is an ephemeral stream. As per the rule, ephemeral streams are natural channels with
discernable banks observable within crenulations on a USGS 7.5-minute topographic map (Figure 8). The
entire area proposed for riparian restoration to generate nutrient offset credit along D4 is located within
the contributing drainage area to the ephemeral channel and is directly connected to a perennial reach
downstream (Figure 3a and Figure 8). The channel will be contiguously contained within the conservation
easement areas of the DMS Pickle Creek Project and the Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project.
4.2.2 Riparian Restoration Activities — Ditches
The eastern easement section of the Project includes one ditch D2 (Figure 7). Ditch D2 is generating
nutrient offset credit in accordance with the Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703, and
the DWR site viability assessment (Appendix A). Riparian restoration activities will occur as defined and
described in the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n). The riparian restoration
activities will include the planting of bare root trees as described in Section 4.3 and the other activities
mentioned in 4.2.3. These restoration activities will begin from the tops of the ditch banks and extend
outward to a maximum of 200 feet perpendicular to the ditch channel. All these riparian areas are currently
cropland (Figure 3a and Figure 3b).
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
10 May 2022

4.2.3 Other Activities
Other activities involved with the nutrient offset component of the Project include protecting the riparian
areas through a permanent conservation easement, plugging and filling two small ditches that flow into
D2 (Figure 7), removal of the most upstream culvert crossing on J1, removing localized areas of
concentrated flow, stabilizing any banks that show instability, updating the Waste Utilization Plan to ensure
removal of any area in conservation easement will not have any land application of waste, and removing
two hydrants and the associated pipes that are used for land application for irrigation and fertilization
(Figure 7). These activities will be completed during the Site Preparation stage.
Upon approval of this project and finalization of the conservation easement, application of animal waste
will not be permitted within a conservation easement or within riparian areas where nutrient offset credits
are proposed to be generated (Figure 3b). All riparian areas proposed to be placed in a conservation
easement will be removed from the Waste Utilization Plan. Written approval by DWR of any modification
to the existing Waste Utilization will be received. Additionally, no infrastructure or impervious areas will
remain above the ground within the riparian areas where nutrient offset is proposed. If any infrastructure
is to remain in the ground, it will be capped and deadheaded so that there will be no possibility of any
underground leakage if they are damaged by tree roots or other activities.
This Project will be co -developed with a DMS buffer mitigation that will be contiguous with the boundaries
of this project and includes some of the same features as this project. Therefore, riparian planting and site
preparation activities will extend beyond the limits of this Project's boundaries to include the limits of the
DMS full -delivery project.
4.3 Planting Plan
All riparian restoration areas will be planted according to the planted area as shown on Figure 10. The
planted area begins where the DMS easement ends along J1 and D4 and extends out to a maximum of
200 feet. D2 will be planted from the top of bank to a maximum of 200 feet. Bare root tree seedlings will
be planted on a nine by six-foot spacing to achieve an initial density of approximately 800 trees per acre.
Planting will occur in all areas proposed for nutrient offset and will meet the performance standards
outlined in the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n). This includes planting at least
four species of native hardwood bare root trees. The suite of bare root stems will be thoroughly mixed
prior to planting to ensure maximum diversity throughout the planted areas.
A Mixed-Mesic Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain subtype) (Schafale 2012) will be the target community type
and will be used for all areas within the Project. This community composition is highly diverse and is
suitable given the Project's soil and landscape characteristics and will provide water quality and ecological
benefits. The initial planting of bare root trees will occur before Spring 2023. The list of bare root tree
species to be planted and their percentage of total species composition can be found in Table 3. Please
note that the real compositions of planted trees may differ from this proposed list due to availability;
however, the procured trees will ideally be comprised of species from the list. With that said, the minimum
number of unique species to be planted across the Project will be seven. Some areas in vicinity of forested
areas may require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Acer
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
11 May 2022

rubrum) and sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua). Additionally, where needed for bank stabilization, banks
will be live staked with black willow (Salix nigra), and silky dogwood (Corpus amomum).
Planting areas will also be seeded with an herbaceous seed mix to provide rapid herbaceous cover and
promote immediate buffer effectiveness as well as habitat for pollinators and other wildlife. The seed blend
will contain both temporary and permanent seed and will include taproot species. See Table 4 for the
proposed herbaceous seed mix composition. The seed will be sown utilizing a no -till drill or broadcasted
and disced depending on the seasonal conditions at the time of seeding.
Table 3. Tree Planting List
Bare Root Planting Tree Species
Species Common Name Spacing Unit Type
Canopy or
Sub -canopy
% Of Total
Species
Composition
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore
9X6 Bare Root Canopy
10
Betula nigra
River birch
9X6 Bare Root Canopy
10
Quercus phellos
Willow oak 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 10
Quercus michauxii
Swamp chestnut
oak
9X6 Bare Root Canopy 10
Quercus nigra Water oak 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 10
Quercus rubra
Northern red oak 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 10
Quercus shumardii Shumard's oak 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 10
Quercus lyrata Overcup oak 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 10
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 9X6 Bare Root Sub -canopy 10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash 9X6 Bare Root Canopy 5
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
Buttonbush
9X6 Bare Root Sub -canopy 5
Table 4. Proposed Riparian Seed Mix
Scientific Name Common Name
Percent Composition
Elymus virginicus
Virgina Wild Rye
25%
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
25%
Andropogon gerardii
Big Bluestem
10%
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project
Bank Parcel Development Package
12 May 2022

Coreopsis lanceolata
Lanceleaf Coreopsis 10%
Schizachyrium scoparium
Little Bluestem 10%
Echinacea purpurea
Purple Coneflower 7%
Heliopsis helianthoides
Oxeye Sunflower 7%
Asclepias tuberosa
Butterfly Milkweed 3%
Helianthus angustifolius
Narrowleaf Sunflower 3%
4.4 Easement Boundaries
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Project and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by marker, bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means
as allowed by Project conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundaries will be marked with signs
identifying the property as a mitigation project and will include the name of the long-term steward and a
contact number. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on
an as needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities and
the conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to
DWR. The easement boundary will be marked before the DWR site visit for the Task 2 credit release.
This Project will be codeveloped with a DMS full -delivery buffer mitigation project as mentioned
throughout this document and shown in figures. There will be a DMS conservation easement nested
adjacent the boundaries of this Project that will also be marked appropriately.
4.5 Additional Documentation
The landowner has two existing permits (AWS960127 and AW1960127) associated with the land application
of animal waste within the proposed mitigation area. It was determined that 3.05 acres of Wettable Acres
are within the proposed conservation easement and that there are two hydrants within the proposed
easement area and some associated underground pipes that connect them to the main irrigation line. The
Nutrient Management Plan and the Wettable Acres Determination for Jernigan Farms, AWS960127, was
changed to reflect the removal of the acreage and infrastructure within the proposed Pickle Creek Phase
11 Nutrient Offset Project (along with the adjacent DMS Project). EBX consulted with the Engineer in the
Certified Animal Feeding Operation Branch of the Water Quality Permitting Section to ensure that these
updates were adequate. The updated Waste Utilization Plan and email correspondence with the Engineer
in the Animal Feeding Operations Program are provided in Appendix E. Documentation of DWR approval
of these permit updates and renewals will be provided in the as -built report to confirm full compliance
with the criteria listed in the site viability letter. EBX will confirm with DWR staff within the Certified Animal
Feeding Operation Branch of the Water Quality Permitting Section to make sure all criteria are being met.
5 MONITORING PLAN
5.1 Monitoring Protocol and Performance Standards
Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments will be conducted. Riparian vegetation monitoring
where nutrient offset credits are being generated will be based on the "Carolina Vegetation Survey -
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Protocol for Recording Vegetation: Level 1-2 Plot Sampling Only Version
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
13 May 2022

4.2". Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five years and will be conducted
during the fall season with the first year occurring at least 6 months from initial planting. Monitoring plots
will be installed a minimum of 100 meters squared in size and will cover at least two percent of the planted
mitigation area. The planted area is 10.23 acres, and there will be 9 vegetation plots measuring
performance standards in all riparian restoration areas. These plots will be randomly placed throughout
the planted riparian restoration area and will be representative of the riparian community (Figure 10). The
following data will be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and
grid location. All stems in plots will be flagged with flagging tape.
The measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree
species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of stems, at a density of at least 260 stems per
acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards
upon written approval by DWR. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none
become dominant or alter the desired community structure of the site.
Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. Visual
inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that applicable areas are being maintained and compliant.
A visual assessment of the conservation easement will also be performed each year to confirm:
• Easement markers are in good condition throughout the site;
• no encroachment has occurred;
• no invasive species occur in areas were invasive species were treated,
• diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement areas; and
• there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
A summary of project monitoring and maintenance activities can be found in Table 5.
Table 5. Summary of Project Monitoring and Maintenance Activities
Component/
Feature
Monitoring Maintenance through project close-out
Vegetation
Annual
vegetation
monitoring
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the
targeted plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair
activities may include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and
fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species shall be treated by mechanical
and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation requiring herbicide
application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. Vegetation maintenance
activities will be documented and reported in annual monitoring
reports. Vegetation maintenance will continue through the monitoring
period.
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
14 May 2022

Component/
Feature
Monitoring Maintenance through project close-out
Invasive and
Nuisance
Vegetation
Visual
Assessment
Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none
become dominant or alter the desired community structure of the
Project. Locations of invasive and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
Project Boundary Visual Project boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear
Assessment distinction between the mitigation project and adjacent properties.
Boundaries will be marked with signs identifying the property as a
mitigation project and will include the name of the long-term steward
and a contact number. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by Project
conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed,
damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as -
needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/ signage maintenance
will continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
5.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Project Maintenance
Adaptive measures will be developed, or appropriate remedial actions taken if in the event that the project,
or a specific component of the project, fails to achieve the defined success criteria.
Remedial actions will be designed to achieve the success criteria specified in this Plan, and will include
identification of the causes of failure, remedial design approach, work schedule, and monitoring criteria
that will consider physical and climatic conditions.
Initial plant maintenance may include a one-time mowing, prior to initial planting to remove
undesirable species. If mowing is deemed necessary by EBX during the monitoring period, EBX must
first receive approval by DWR prior to any mowing activities to ensure that no buffer violations will
be committed. Failure to receive approval to mow within the Neuse River buffer, as defined in 15A
NCAC 02B .0714 by DWR, could result in Neuse River buffer violations and violations of the
conservation easement. If necessary, RES will develop a species -specific control plan.
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
15 May 2022

6 LONG TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
The long-term stewardship plan for the site entails that the Project would be transferred to an approved
conservation easement holder. EBX intends to assign this conservation easement to the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Stewardship program. The NCDEQ Stewardship program
currently holds conservation easements for many North Carolina Division of Mitigation Service projects
(like the paired project for Pickle Creek Phase II Project "Pickle Creek Buffer Mitigation Project (2021-
0348v2") and is working to get approved as a conservation easement holder for DWR. The adjacent nature
of these projects makes NCDEQ a good fit to manage both easements. In the unexpected situation that
they are not approved, EBX will transfer the conservation easement to another approved easement holder.
Once approved, NCDEQ Stewardship Program would serve as the conservation easement holder and entity
responsible for long term stewardship of the Project. This party would conduct periodic inspection of the
Project to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld. The NCDEQ
Stewardship Program is developing an endowment system within the non -reverting, interest -bearing
Conservation Lands Conservation Fund Account. The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be
governed by North Carolina General Statute GS 113A-232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund
may be used for the purpose of stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction
costs, if applicable. EBX, LLC will have a backup, in case stewardship with NCDEQ falls through. An
engagement letter is being prepared and will be included in Appendix C once it is obtained. The
Stewardship Program will periodically install signage to identify boundary markings as needed. Any
livestock or associated fencing or permanent crossings will be the responsibility of the owner of the
underlying fee to maintain.
7 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
The Sponsor will provide financial assurances in the form of Performance Bonds sufficient to assure one
hundred percent (100%) completion of all mitigation work, required reporting and monitoring, and any
remedial work required. Financial assurances will be payable at the direction of the DWR to its designee
or to a standby trust. Financial assurances structured to provide funds to the DWR in the event of default
by the Bank Sponsor are not acceptable. The initial performance bond will be in the amount of at least
$150,000 and shall be able to cover 100% of the costs associated with construction of the riparian
restoration areas. The monitoring bond shall be in the amount of at least $100,000 and shall be able to
cover 100% of the costs associated with the monitoring and maintenance of the riparian restoration areas
for five years.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed to cover the next years monitoring period, with
confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when applicable. DWR
reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of
bond renewals when applicable.
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
16 May 2022

8 PROJECT'S CREDIT POTENTIAL
This Project has the potential to generate up to 23,215.900 lbs. of N of nutrient offset mitigation credits
within a 10.59-acre conservation easement as depicted in Figure 7. All nutrient offset credits will be derived
from riparian restoration activities. The credits generated will service the Neuse 01 watershed, excluding
the Falls Lake Watershed. Nutrient offset credits will be generated within the 100-200' riparian zones of
features J1, and D4. The nutrient offset credits will be generated within the 0-200' riparian zones of D2.
The total potential nutrient offset credits that the Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project will generate
were calculated using the DWR "Project Credit Table Template (Updated October 2020)" and are presented
in Table 6. Furthermore, Figure 9 depicts riparian zones of 50, 100, and 200 feet from stream and ditch
tops of banks to demonstrate width requirements for crediting. These nutrient offset credits are neither
convertible nor transferrable to riparian buffer credits. This is a nutrient offset only bank with a nutrient
offset only MBI. There will be one credit ledger for the project: Nitrogen.
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
17 May 2022

Table 6. Pickle Creek Phase 11 Nutrient Offset Project Credit Table
Table 6. Pickle Creek Phase II, Project Credits
Neu se 03020201 • Outside Falls Lake
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft'/pound(
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft'/poun
)
19.16394
N/A
Credit Type
Location
Subject? center
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch 'I
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (k)
Feature Name
Total Arm(ft2)Area
Total (Creditable)
of Buffer
Mitigation (k')
Initial Credit
Ratio(x:1)
%Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (.1)Buffer?
Convertible to
Riparian
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient Off set:
N(Ihs)
Delivered
Nutrient
offset: P(Ihs(
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
IJP
Restoration
0-100
11
3,697
1
100%
No
—
Yes
192.908
NutrientUffset
Nural
Yes
I I P
N25toran on
101-200
11
120,850
1
33%
No
—
Yes
11,524.162
—
NutrientOffset
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
0-100
D4
689
1
100%
No
—
Yes
35.964
—
NutrientOffset
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
101-200
D4
40,840
1
33%
No
—
Yes
2,131.079
—
NutrientOffset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
D2
165,717
1
100%
No
—
Yes
8,647.338
—
NutrientOffset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
161-200
D2
13,115
1
33%
No
—
Yes
684.349
—
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer (ft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
444,908
0
0.000
23,215.900
0.000
0
0
444,908
N/A
Enter Preservation Credits Below
Total Ephemeral Area (ft') for Credit:
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft'):
Total Eligible for Preservation (ft'):
Credit Type Location subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Restoration:
0
0.000
Enhancement:
0
0.000
Preservation:
0
0.000
Total Riparian Buffer:
0
D.000
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nitrogen:
444 908
23,215.900
Nutrient Offset.
Phosphorus:
0.000
Min.Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
Preservation Area Subtotals (ft'):
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 0213.0250 (5)0).
last updated 08/03/2020
0
0
0
AOfv/0!
0
0.0%
Total (Creditable)
Total Area (sf)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (k')
0
0
Ephemeral Reaches as %TABM
Preservation as %TABM
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio(x:1)
Riparian
Buffer Credits
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
18 May 2022

9 REFERENCES
Endangered Species Act of 1973. Public Law 93-205, 87 Stat. 884. 16 USC 1531-1543,
Environmental Laboratory. (1987). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical
Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2018. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. North Carolina
Panel 2602; map number 3720260200K, effective 6/20/2018.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934. Public Law 85-72, 79 Stat. 216. 16 USC 661-667(d).
Lee, T.L, Peet, R.K., Roberts, S.D., and Wentworth, T.R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-Iev1-2.pdf.
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended Section 106). 16 USC 470. 36 CFR 800, 23 CFR 771,
36 CFR 60, 36 CFR 63.
NCDENR. 2010. "N.C. Wetland Assessment Method User Manual Version 4.1." N.C. Wetland Functional
Assessment Team.
NCDWQ (North Carolina Division of Water Quality). 2011. A Guide to Surface Freshwater Classifications in
North Carolina. Raleigh. http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/
get file?p I id=1169848&folderld=2209568&name=DLFE-35732.pdf; accessed April 2021.
NCDWQ. (North Carolina Division of Water Quality). 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent
and Perennial Streams and Their Origins. Version 4.11. Raleigh.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 — Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703 — Nutrient Offset Credit
Trading Rule
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2020. Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0714 — Neuse River Basin:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian
Buffers.
NCNHP (North Carolina Natural Heritage Program). 2019. Natural Heritage Element Occurrences. April
2021
Resource Environmental Solutions. 2021 Pickle Creek Buffer Mitigation Plan. September 2021.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
19 May 2022

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W.
Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) - Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 1994.
Soil Survey of Wayne County, North Carolina.
USDA-NRCS. 2014. Web Soil Survey GIS Data. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm;
accessed April 2021.
USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2015. Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPAC)
Online Screening Tool. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/; accessed April 2021.
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Bank Parcel Development Package
20 May 2022

Figures
Figure 1. Nutrient Offset Service Area
Figure 2. Project Vicinity
Figure 3a. Existing Conditions
Figure 3b. Permitted Areas for Land Application
Figure 4. Historical Imagery
Figure 5. NRCS Mapped Soils
Figure 6. Project Constraints
Figure 7. Nutrient Offset Conceptual Design Plan
Figure 8. USGS Quadrangle
Figure 9. Riparian Zones
Figure 10. Monitoring Plan

F..lner
Cre drnccr
Gorman
orrisville
Fuquay-Va
Duncan
Anderson
Creek
Angier
Buies Creek
L ngton
ac,
Bunnlevel
Linden
Wilton
Grissom
Millbrook
Raleigh
Erwin
Franklir'cn
ke Forest
Rolesville
Knightdale
se,
Louisburg
Wendell
Auburn Archer Lodge
White Oak
Powhatan
42 Kenly
Wilsons Mills ( )
White Level
Castalia
Justice
( Margaret
Bunn Momeyer
Spring Hope
Daddysville
C
Middlesex
Bailey
Sims
Willow
Springs
McGee
Crossroads
Plain View
Four Oaks
Peacocks
Crossroads
Spiveys
r nrnar
Legend
Proposed Easement
Neuse River Basin - 03020201 (Excluding Falls Lake Watershed)
Draw JI M��s�►v�,fi/1
r�r
0 4 3
Mile
Selma
Smithfield
Princeton
Pickle Creek Phase II
Mitigation Project
Bentonville
Grantham
wton Grove
1n
oads
.3
Faison
Keener
Figure 1
Nutrient Offset Service Area
Pickle Creek Phase II
Nutrient Offset Project
Wayne County, North Carolina
Date: 5/2/2022
Drawn by: GDS
Checked by: MDE
Rosewood
Hilliardston
Nashville
eville
Golds
Mar -Mac
Brog der
1 inch = 8 mile
Wilson
New 1
Williams (5,1
res
Restoring a resilient eor

go
G
5r
Legend
Proposed Bank Easement
Proposed DMS Easement
Shaav G`o.jeRd
shed`I G(oVepd
deo 4,0,
Shady Grove9
Missionary Baptist
MEI
1
Sutton's Radio9
& TV Services
n
a
e
ti
Baker Chi
500 1,000
Figure 2 - Project Vicinity
Pickle Creek Phase II
Nutrient Offset Project
Date: 5/2/2022
Drawn by: GDS
Checked by: MDE
,fires
Feet
Wayne County, North Carolina
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world

ti
,. Croplar
••
Q Existing Culverted ' ?C
� 0, Crossing
0
x Ditch being filled
Y
ir'
♦
..iii
. s
N 1
1.,
tit
Pipeline for Irrigation
Legend
Proposed Bank Easement 10.59 ac „ t� ° i h- , �
Proposed DMS Easement- 18.07 ac :x, - g' #," �r r r' ,
k i pw' d'ap �: Y 1
J{ f� 7 t4
Surveyed Project Parcel , ,",`<' Y, ^ E �
ka ifsi
'� �
Existing Treeline 7, r ° ,, lin; , ' r
Stream Determination gha+.
P$ . .! ,
Perennial /i ,� , "."'"
-- Intermittent
�: �
Ephemeral " ' ...,i
/
Ditch y t F �`
P- Irrigation Pipe 1
Surveyed Powerline
® DWR Stream Origin K
0 Irrigation Hydrant
1 Figure 3a- Existing Conditions Date: 5/24/2022
��1„�I:�711L I��i�� 1` Drawn b GDS
��*!0k 4;�.01� 01,, �'i Pickle Creek Phase II y res
�r1i�t.11L�
r��w� 0 250 Nutrient Offset Project Checked by: MDE
Feet Wayne County,North Carolina 1 inch=500 feet

Legend
Proposed Bank Easement - 10.59 ac
Proposed DMS Easement - 18.07 ac
Surveyed Project Parcel
0 250 500
Feet
Figure 3b - Permitted Areas for Land Application (Pre-2022)
Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project
Wayne County, North Carolina
Date: 5/2/2022
Drawn by: GDS
Checked by: JRM
1 inch = 500 feet
tf
Y
d
Rood '; local;
le
res
Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world

500 1,000
Feet
Figure 4 - Historical Imagery
Pickle Creek Phase II
Nutrient Offset Project
Wayne County, North Carolina
Date: 5/2/2022
Drawn by: GDS
Checked by: MDE
1 inch = 1,000 feet
,fires
Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world

250 500
Feet
Figure 5 - NRCS Soil Survey (1974)
Pickle Creek Phase II
Nutrient Offset Project
Wayne County, North Carolina
1 inch = 500 feet
A —
,fires
Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world

PF01A
) ,
f .
tea'
-
.a,s
t4AWfF
i
j,'Itk'! PFO4Ad
,a.` i,
,, 1)11' ...
; 1
Legend
Proposed Bank Easement- 10.59 ac +
Proposed DMS Easement- 18.07 ac
Surveyed Project Parcel . , ,.
�� f ,�, 0 9 J r °
NWI Wetland, USFWS 12/01/2021 � � �w;� ' "
FEMA Zone AE(None) d " #
t�P Irrigation Pipe - �� ,, .,, 1 s, , �
,.. , a:, PT,.;4
E
�T Surveyed Powerline � ,a?
'd 9 G�.-
Stream Determination �:": k�i � , 1-27 ,,„, , &g
Perennial �` � ° =
y
Intermittent
o
Ephemeral ? : 1 A '. E
r
°� Pl,�� ' �R'�Ditch x w � � �, 'I s paEa r i ''0 Irrigation Hydrant %0° ,, ."' "";fr _ -'''..--1"' ..',''''.1.' ''''' t
® Irrigation Hydrant to be Removed1 ill
r
" Figure 6- Project Constraints
g Date: 5/16/2022
ra:".I�'71�L =t4V Drawn b: GDS res
t��!,��; ��� � �1 Pickle Creek Phase II y
�r���t��1"L.I
r��w� 0 250 see Nutrient Offset Project Checked by: MDE
Feet Wayne County,North Carolina 1 inch=500 feet

tip
' ^s ' -
- s%'`'-
- .
m k' +
4.i Removing Two Irrigation Hydrants
�.Via.
:".
� Ditch being filled
x � a
Remo: *E
/ x s; /A �pj:l� b� .
ii!
Legend
•
Proposed Bank Easement- 10.59 ac
Proposed DMS Easement- 18.07 ac
iin
Surveyed Project Parcel , %r<,
+ a;;, r�r a• , �� 2i r -�+ s '.; ' ,, ° + ��
Mitigation Approach
ii. a ', '
,
Riparian Restoration for Nutrient Offset " + �;e f ;,,
i
(0 100') :, a :1�,,
�j Ri arian Restoration for Nutrient Offset fY
(101-200') je R°
i,4.
Stream Type , \`---. .----'r
gv°
Perennial ,iX' r�"1,, { AJ
i 7..7 s'
77
Intermittent ` a '
£ `f Bank stabilization will occur
- Ephemeral $ ti f wherever is necessawry!
ry during
g r construction,via minor grading and
Ditch ., + G,o, ` live staking
z ' dye
y.
Figure 7- Nutrient Offset Conceptual Date: 5/24/2022
** 7 ".N\ _ Design Plan
`*'� ��►��r���i4`"r ` Pickle Creek Phase II Drawn by: GDS res
r��w� 0 250 Nutrient Offset Project Checked by: MDE
Feet Wayne County,North Carolina 1 inch=500 feet

Proposed Easement
J1 (123.61 ac)
D2 (15.63 ac)
D4 (7.66 ac)
1,000 2,000
Feet
Figure 8 - USGS Quadrangle
Mount Olive (1977)
Pickle Creek Phase II
Nutrient Offset Project
Wayne County, North Carolina
Date: 5/2/2022
Drawn by: GDS
Checked by: MDE
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Restoring a resilient earth for a modern world

f` �k
�`
,
; i
„_
,1
T
,a
r
' r ..
P3
N• a
as c,,,g* . I N a '"
�-- 3 7.,
F,S 1 " r3
..
a
b
Legend
Proposed Easement- 10.59 ac
Surveyed Project Parcel
Stream Type
Perennial ' 'r
Intermittent
- Ephemeral •
a
.! Ditch /� / / r
Riparian Zone �.
50
..
100 ik6
200i 'ry
N Figure 9- Riparian Zones Date: 5/2/2022
+�„��.*��.,,.r��� w Drawn b: GDS res
vi,„A �;�.41� � .� Pickle Creek Phase II y0"''�tirk 5 Nutrient Offset Project Checked by: MDE
Vile 0 250 500
Wayne County, 1 inch=500 feet aesro, eo.rnr.omode,�wo,m
Feet Y

if, ' ° .
gg
4 a
a* .it
=
^rf
.
rt
-- .: , - - fir,
�`4 I..'v
�� ♦
F ,
Legend �`- �,'' .* �:
Proposed Easement- 10.59 ac
Surveyed Project Parcel
Planted Area - 10.23 ac �R `+ p
I
Fixed Plot 4,:d'' r r _i;o ff�afi,itia '
Mitigation Approach ;
i
Nutrient Offset, (0-100') �; "'
Nutrient Offset, (101 200') ,
L
Stream Type ' � �� k ," '
Perennial 1 ���f`
Intermittent �" " "t4 ,.a,i .
Ephemeral Rom' � ,�; <<
Ditch ! , iti
Figure 10- Monitoring Plan Date: 5/2/2022
f *�*�'71�L 1/��ii ::YDE
���
Nutrient Offset Project
Feet
11
Wayne County,North Carolina 1 inch=soo feet

Appendix A
• Pickle Creek Phase II Project Site Viability Letter for Nutrient Offset

DocuSign Envelope ID: CF670CCO-1118-42C8-BF12-228F046E185B
ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLI-GATTI
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 10, 2021
DWR Project # 20210348
Wayne County
Douglas Allen Jernigan
781 Thunder Swamp Road
Mount Olive, NC 28365
(via email to [e-mail])
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
Project Name: Pickle Creek Mitigation Project
Address / Location: North of Mount Olive, NC at approximately 35.2333 -78.1132
Determination Date: March 10, 2021 Staff: Rick Trone
Mr. Jernigan,
On March 10, 2021, Rick Trone of the Division of Water Resources conducted an on -site review of
features located on the subject property at the request of Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to determine
the applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714).
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated. This information is also summarized in the
table below. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most recently
published NRCS Soil Survey of Wayne County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic
(at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess characteristics
that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not Subject"
have been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property or not
depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features
located on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features
on the site may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
subject to the Clean Water Act.
The following table addresses the features rated during the DWR site visit:
£ D_E
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Wali�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: CF670CCO-1118-42C8-BF12-228F046E185B
DWR # 20210348 Ver 1 Pickle Creek Mitigation Project
Wayne County
Page 2
Feature
ID
Type'
Subject
Start @
Stop @
Depicted
on
Soil Survey
Depicted on
USGS Togo
J1
I/P
X
Approximately 35.230299
-78.104213
Outside project
boundary
X
D1
D
Approximately 35.231806
-78.103053
Feature J1
D2
D
Approximately 35.233227
-78.105692
Feature J1
D3
E
Approximately 35.232930
-78.109073
Feature J1
X
D4
E
Approximately 35.230988
-78.112210
Feature J1
X
D5
D
Approximately 35.233670
-78.109181
Feature J1
(1) E = Ephemeral, I = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP = Not Present, NE=Not Evaluated, D = Ditch
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this
letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Supervisor Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) calendar days.
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and within the proposed project
easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Rick Trone at (919)
707-3631 or [e-mail]. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles
3 & 4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
,—DocuSigned by:
P 1O0/10d
`-949D91 BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Enclosures: USGS Topographical Map, NRCS Soil Survey, Site Map

DocuSign Envelope ID: CF670CCO-1118-42C8-BF12-228F046E185B
DWR # 20210348 Ver 1 Pickle Creek Mitigation Project
Wayne County
Page 3
cc: Jamey McEachran, Resource Environmental Solutions (via email)
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files

DocuSign Envelope ID: CF670CCO-1118-42C8-BF12-228F046E185B
Map Provided by RES
Exlatlng Crx Ing
Legend
Proposed DIIS Easement
Proposed Bank Easement
Powerirne
Cross Section Location
Stream Determination
\_i Perennial
Intermittent
Dkch
• DWR SrreamAssessment Location
DWR # 20210348 Ver 1 Pickle Creek Mitigation Project
Wayne County
Page 4
Figure 3b - Existing Conditions
Pickle Creek
Mitigation Project
Wayne County, North Carolina
Det: 11132021
Gown by. GES
Cracked h
1 Inch - 500 reel
res

DocuSign Envelope ID: CF670CCO-1118-42C8-BF12-228F046E185B
Pickle Creek Mitigation Project
Wayne County, NC-DWR Project # 20210348
J1: Subject
D4: Not Subject
D3: Not Subject
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 36
Wayne Co NC 1974
Legend:
-project boundary
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
r

DocuSign Envelope ID: CF670CCO-1118-42C8-BF12-228F046E185B
Pickle Creek Mitigation Project
Wayne County, NC-DWR Project # 20210348
USGS Topographical Map
Mount Olive Quadrangle
Legend:
-project boundary
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
t

DocuSign Envelope ID:218FA635-9EC4-4B08-A71 D-E99353DD98D3
__-tic STAT£ ,'",,
�pP--oE
h
ROY COOPER 4'° a I
Governor s�, li i Or
DIONNE DELLI-GATTI ` ,z. , a=
Secretory ' *E4tQ m�v ''
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
May 18,2021
Jamey McEachran
Environmental Banc& Exchange, LLC
(via electronic mail:[e-mail])
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset—Pickle Creek Site
Near 35.2333, -78.1132 off Thunder Swamp Rd,Mt. Olive NC
Neuse 03020201
Wayne County
Dear Ms. McEachran,
On March 15, 2021, Katie Merritt,with the Division of Water Resources (DWR),received a request
from you on behalf of Environmental Banc&Exchange, LLC (EBX) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary,which is more accurately shown in the attached maps labeled"Figure
3b-Existing Conditions" (Figure 1),prepared by EBX. On April 17, 2021,Ms. Merritt performed a
site assessment of the subject site and staff with EBX were also present. The site visit revealed the
following site constraints:
• UTILITIES: An overhead powerline was observed along feature J1. The utility line
shall not be within a conservation easement or within riparian areas where buffer
mitigation or nutrient offset credits are proposed to be generated.
• PERMITS: An Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)permit is associated with this property.
The permit associated with this property is#AWS960127 and allows for some or all the
property to be used for the land application of animal waste per an approved Waste
Utilization Plan issued by the DWR.
o Application of animal waste will not be permitted within a conservation easement
or within riparian areas where buffer mitigation or nutrient offset credits are
proposed to be generated.
o All riparian areas proposed to be placed in a conservation easement must be
removed from the Waste Utilization Plan.
o Written approval by DWR of any modification to the existing Waste Utilization
Plan and/or the applicable permit will be required,to generate buffer mitigation
or nutrient offset credits within these riparian areas.
• EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE: Existing underground and above ground
infrastructure is present and is likely for purposes of irrigating the property for the land
application of animal waste associated with permit#AWS960127.
DE Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
_ 512 North Salisbury Street 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699 1617
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality � 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: 218FA635-9EC4-4B08-A71 D-E99353DD98D3
Pickle Creek Site
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
May 18, 2021
o No infrastructure or impervious areas below or above the ground will be allowed
to be within a conservation easement or within riparian areas where buffer
mitigation or nutrient offset credits are proposed to be generated.
o Proof of the removal of all infrastructure within riparian areas proposed to be
placed in a conservation easement will be required, to generate buffer mitigation
or nutrient offset credits.
o Changes to any infrastructure associated with permit # AW 1960127 will require
prior approval from DWR if they result in a change in the irrigation system
design for land application.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature
Classification
1Subject
7Riparian Land uses
Buffer
'Nutrient
4'5Mitiigatiion Type Determination w/in
onsite
to
Buffer
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
riparian areas
(0-200')
Viable
Viable
Rule
Jl
Stream
Yes
A combination of non-
forested agricultural fields
and mature forest. (see
map)
There is a compromised
culvert downstream below
the confluence with D5 that
needs to be repaired.
2Yes
Yes (non-
forested
areas only)
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Forested Areas — Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
D1
Ditch
<3' depth
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
*see note
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(8)
*Buffer Mitigation Note — Assessment
concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More
information is required to be provided in a
mitigation plan for complete assessment.
See rule.
D2
Ditch
>3' depth
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
No
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
D3
Ephemeral
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
6Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(7)
Must submit supporting documentation of
additional requirements under .0295
(o)(7) to be viable for buffer mitigation
D4
Ephemeral
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
6Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(7)
Must submit supporting documentation of
additional requirements under .0295
(o)(7) to be viable for buffer mitigation
Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 218FA635-9EC4-4B08-A71 D-E99353DD98D3
Pickle Creek Site
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
May 18, 2021
Feature
Classification
'Subject
'Riparian Land uses
Buffer
'Nutrient
4'5Mitiigatiion Type Determination w/in
onsite
to
Buffer
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
riparian areas
(0-200')
Viable
Viable
Rule
D5
Ditch
>3' depth
No
non -forested agricultural
fields
No
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated March 10, 2021 (DWR# 2021-0348) using the
1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by
the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7Landuses may also include the application of animal waste associated with an AFO permit
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. The map representing the proposal for the site are
attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms. Merritt on May 18, 2021. Substantial changes to the
proposed easement boundary as well as site constraints identified on page 1 of this letter could affect
the Site's potential to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on May 18, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan by
the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset, buffer,
stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 218FA635-9EC4-4B08-A71 D-E99353DD98D3
Pickle Creek Site
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
May 18, 2021
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
—DDocuSSiigned by:
rR tt G 1O010
® \-949D91 BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
P W/kym
Attachments: Figure 3b - Existing Conditions (Figure 1)
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
DWR Animal Feeding Operations Branch — Ramesh Ravella [e-mail]
DWR WaRO — David May
Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 218FA635-9EC4-4B08-A71 D-E99353DD98D3
35.233670
-78.109181
Existing Crossing
LJ
Forested durin
baseline
35.230988
-78.112210
Proposed Easement
Powerline
Cross Section Location
Stream Determination
Perennial os
Intermittent
Ephemeral 5/18/2021
Ditch
• DWR Stream ID Assessment Location
DWR Determined Feature Origin Location
Hog Waste Irrigation Equipment
s
250 500
Feet
Figure 3b - Existing Conditions
Pickle Creek
Mitigation Project
Wayne County, North Carolina
35.231806
-78.103053
35.230299
-78.104213
res
Date: 3/18/2021
Drawn by: GDS
Checked by: MDE
1 inch = 500 feet

Appendix B
• Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Site Protection Instrument

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this
day of , 201_ by and between_
("Grantor") and ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine,
feminine or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not -for -profit or educational corporation,
association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue
Code, and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq., the purposes or powers of which include
one or more of the purposes (a) — (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of real

property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational,
or open -space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following
natural communities: add or delete as appropriate: wetlands, streams, and riparian
buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands
and riparian resources and other natural values of approximately acres, more or
less, and being more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated fully herein by reference (the "Conservation Easement Area"), and
prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area for any purpose
or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument
(MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the Mitigation Bank, Department of the
Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW- , entitled "Agreement to Establish
the Mitigation Bank in the River Basin within the State of
North Carolina", to be made and entered into by and between acting as
the Bank Sponsor and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in
consultation with the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The
Mitigation Site has been approved by the Corps for use as a mitigation bank to
compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is also a condition of the approval of the Riparian Buffer
and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) and Bank Parcel Development
Package (BPDP) for the Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
Bank, North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Project ID#
which was approved by the NCDWR, and will be made and entered into by and
between , acting as the Bank Sponsor, and the NCDWR. The
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Site is intended to be used to
compensate for riparian buffer and nutrient impacts to surface waters.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement
shall be held by the NCDWR and the Corps (to include any successor agencies) ("Third -
Parties"), and may be exercised through the appropriate enforcement agencies of the
United States and the State of North Carolina, and that these rights are in addition to,
and do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the NC DWR Project ID# _
and the Department of the Army instrument number SAW -
("Mitigation Banking Instrument"), or any permit or certification issued by the Third -
Parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the

receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby
unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors
and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area
described on Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation
values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I.
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is
an easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,
Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with
the purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation
Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any
development that would impair or interfere with the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and
uses are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any
introduction of non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building,
mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising
display,_antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other
temporary or permanent structure or facility on or above the Conservation
Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are
prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming,
cutting or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement
Area except as provided in the Mitigation Plan and Bank Parcel Development Plan.
Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or

volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation Plan and BPDP is allowable once
a year for no more than five consecutive years from the date on page 1 of this
Conservation Easement, except where mowing will negatively impact vegetation or
disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by and shall not
violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways
on the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing
roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement
Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation
values of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules
and regulations for the use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying
the Grantor as owner of the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage,
waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or
other materials on the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any
manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or
drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and wetlands
within the Conservation Easement Area, is allowed to perform grading,
filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by
Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or
alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition,
diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is
prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered
or extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for
temporary or occasional access by the Enter Sponsor Name, the Grantee, its

employees and agents, successors, assigns, NCDWR, and the Corps for purposes of
constructing, maintaining and monitoring the restoration, enhancement and
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area..
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation
Easement Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant,
the preservation of the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural
condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area
for all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not
limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area, the rights
of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement
Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement
Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to
the terms of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, including acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area in accordance with the approved Mitigation Plan, the
Bank Parcel Development Package, and the two Mitigation Banking
Instruments described in the Recitals of this Conservation Easement.
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, the Corps
and NCDWR, shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area
at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to
determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns,
is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantee, Enter Sponsor Name, and its authorized representatives,
successors and assigns, the Corps and NCDWR shall also have the right to enter and go
upon the Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational
observations and studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do
not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, the Corps, and

NCDWR are allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement
Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the
restoration of such areas or features of the Conservation Easement Area thatmay be
damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation
Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall
notify the Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after
receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach
remains uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement
by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without
notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if
the breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances
damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate.
The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to,
and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection
with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or restoration,
including the Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by
Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps
and the NCDWR shall have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to
enforce the terms and conditions of this Conservation easement..
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition,
or provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of
a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to
entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control,
including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except
Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor
under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life,
damage to property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such
causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property
which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor
further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and
defend title to the Property against the claims of all persons._

B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any
interest in all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to
provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the
transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement
shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation
Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or
terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the
Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this
Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified
holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 501 (c)(3)
and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and
agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or
assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes
described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The combined Mitigation Banking
Instruments: MBI with corresponding Mitigation Plan, and MBI with corresponding
BPDP, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire agreement of the parties
with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions,
negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If
any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction,
the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the
Property free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor.
Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as
expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to
comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the
exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Management. Grantor is responsible for all long-term
management activities associated with fencing. These activities include the
maintenance and/or replacement of fence structures to ensure the aquatic resource
functions within the boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial
proceeding.

H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area
is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the
Restrictions imposed by this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in
appropriate actions at the time of such taking to recover the full value of the taking,
and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation
Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an
extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair
market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time of the
extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication
required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter
specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Saonsor:
To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
To NCDEQ -DWR:
NCDEQ— Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's
interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an
appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in
a writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not
affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee
under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this

grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic,
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation
Easement Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section
of the Mitigation Plan,_prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor
and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and
Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any
future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with
the terms of this Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to
preclude the use of other evidence to establish the present condition of the
Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
[Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form]

Appendix C
• Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Categorical Exclusion

Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Form for Division of Mitigation Services Projects
Version 2
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the environmental
document.
Part
Project Name:
1: General Project Information
Pickle Creek Buffer Mitigation Project
County Name:
Wayne County
DMS Number:
100184
Project Sponsor:
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Project Contact Name:
Jamey McEachran
Project Contact Address:
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Project Contact E-mail:
[e-mail]
DMS Project Mana • er:
Lin Xu
Project Description
The Pickle Creek Buffer Mitigation Project encompasses 17.39 acres of a proposed
conservation easement on one parcel in Wayne County, North Carolina. The Project
will involve the restoration of 648,707 square feet of riparian buffer in the Neuse River
watershed.
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
5/7/2021 L i vv X w
Date DMS Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
5-/0 —2 / Z4)-1-az lit/. U?24.u-
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA

Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question Response
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Does the project involve ground -disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
Program?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
1. Is this a "full -delivery" project?
• Yes
❑ No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
designated as commercial or industrial?
❑ Yes
• No
❑ N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
❑ Yes
• No
❑ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
waste sites within the project area?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
Historic Places in the project area?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform
Act)
1. Is this a "full -delivery" project?
• Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate?
• Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds?
❑ Yes
• No
❑ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
* what the fair market value is believed to be?
• Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A

Part 3: Ground -Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA)
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of
Cherokee Indians?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
Places?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Antiquities Act (AA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
of antiquity?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA)
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat
listed for the county?
• Yes
❑ No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species?
❑ Yes
• No
❑ N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
Habitat?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
4. Is the project "likely to adversely affect" the specie and/or "likely to adversely modify"
Designated Critical Habitat?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A

Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory"
by the EBCI?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
project?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
sites?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired?
• Yes
❑ No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally
important farmland?
• Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS?
• Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA)
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any
water body?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted?
• Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6(fl)
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
outdoor recreation?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Essential Fish
Habitat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the
project on EFH?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area?
❑ Yes
• No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining
federal agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
• N/A

United States Department of the Interior
Project Name
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 03/15/2021
Self -Certification Letter
Pickle Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
n"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Pickle Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project
Date: 03-15-2021
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Picoides borealis
No suitable habitat present
No Effect
Impacts to this species are not considered, as
there will be no impact to existing vegetation.
Neuse River Waterdog
Necturus lewisi
No suitable habitat
present
No Effect
None observed during site visits to
project area.
Carolina Madtom
Noturus furiousus
No suitable habitat
present
No Effect
None were observed during site
visits to project area
Critical Habitat
no critical habitat
present
No effect
Bald Eagle
unlikely to disturb
nesting bald eagles
No Eagle Act Permit Required
Northern long-eared
bat
Suitable habitat
present
No Effect
Impacts to this species are not considered, as
there will be no impact to existing vegeation
Acknowledgement: 1 agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Grayson Sanner, Ecologist I
Signature /Title
03/15/2021
Date

x
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0719
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01553
Project Name: Pickle Creek
February 19, 2021
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

02/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01553 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

02/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01553 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

02/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01553 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

02/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01553 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0719
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01553
Project Name: Pickle Creek
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: 17.48 acre easement in wayne county
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.2330625,-78.11418590666123,14z
clickzo .1.2.
4
Counties: Wayne County, North Carolina

02/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01553 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Endangered
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not Endangered
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

■•■u■
•• • NC DEPARTMENT OF
•
Eamon NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■■■■■
February 19, 2021
Matthew DeAngelo
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE: Pickle Creek
Dear Matthew DeAngelo:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of Land and WaterSlewardship
NCNHDE-14006
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
C1 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH, NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
1 OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Pickle Creek
February 19, 2021
NCNH DE-14006
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last sr Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group servation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank
A Date Rank
Freshwater Fish36884 Notropis chalybaeus Ironcolor Shiner
1961-06-12 H 4-Low
Significantly G4 S2S3
Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on February 19, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

February 19, 2021
▪ Project Boundary
▪ Buffered Project Boundary
NCNHDE-14006: Pickle Creek
1:22,743
O 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
ti
O 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, Increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 3 of 3

fires
March 18, 2021
Renee Gledhill -Earley
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-4617
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
Subject: Project Scoping for Pickle Creek Mitigation Project in Wayne County
Dear Renee Gledhill -Earley,
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES) requests review and comment on any possible issues that
might emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with a potential riparian buffer
mitigation project named the Pickle Creek Mitigation Project. The Pickle Creek Project is comprised of a
NC Division of Mitigation Services full -delivery project and a retail bank, as depicted in the attached
figures. The projects have been identified by RES to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable
riparian buffer impacts. The proposed projects present the opportunity to restore and protect in perpetuity,
up to 17.39 acres (plus a potential add -on 5.38 acres) of riparian buffer in the Neuse River Basin.
Restoration activies will involve removing one culvert crossing and planting native hardwood trees.
Coordinates for the site are as follows: 35.2333, -78.1132.
A review of the N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service database
(http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/; accessed August 20, 2020) was performed as part of the site due diligence
evaluation to reveal any listed or potential eligible historic or archeological resources.The database revealed
one listing within a 0.5-mile radius of the project area but should not be affected by construction activities.
Land use around the project is row crop fields, confined animal feeding operations, and bottomland
hardwood forest.
We ask that you review this site based on the attached information to determine the presence of any historic
properties and provide a comment response of your findings. We thank you in advance for your timely
response and cooperation. You may return the comment to my attention at the address in the letterhead, or
via email at [e-mail]. Please feel free to contact me with any questions that you may have concerning
the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
Grayson Sanner l Ecologist I
Attachments: Project Description, .KMZ file of project boundaries, Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS
Topographic Map (Figure 2), Existing Conditions Map (Figure 3), Conceptual Plan Map (Figure 4)
res.us

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson
April 29, 2021
Grayson Sanner
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
[e-mail]
Re: Pickle Creek Mitigation Site, 35.2333, -78.1132, Wayne County, ER 21-0803
Dear Mr. Sanner:
Thank you for your email of March 19, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

fires
March 18, 2021
Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Coordinator
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Sandhills Depot
PO Box 149
Hoffman, NC 28347
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
Subject: Project Scoping for Pickle Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project in Wayne County
Dear Gabriela Garrison,
The purpose of this letter is to request your review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge
with respect to your office's purview for fish and wildlife associated with a potential buffer restoration
project (figures with approximate property lines and areas of potential ground disturbance are enclosed).
The Pickle Creek Project is comprised of a NC Division of Mitigation Services full -delivery project and a
retail bank, as depicted in the attached figures. The Pickle Creek Project has been identified by Resource
Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES) to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable riparian buffer
impacts. The proposed project presents the opportunity to restore and protect in perpetuity, up to 17.39
acres (plus a potential 5.38 acres) of riparian buffer in the Neuse River Basin. Coordinates for the site are
as follows: 35.2333, -78.1132. The Project watershed is primarily a mix of row crop fields, confined animal
feeding operations, and disturbed forest.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. You may return the comment to my
attention at the address in the letterhead, or via email to [e-mail]. Please feel free to contact me
with any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this
project.
Sincerely,
Grayson Sanner l Ecologist I
Attachments: Project Description, .KMZ of proposed project boundaries, Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS
Topographic Map (Figure 2), Existing Conditions Map (Figure 3), Conceptual Plan Map (Figure 4)
res.us

NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION
Cameron Ingram, Executive Director
April 8, 2021
Mr. Grayson Sanner
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject: Request for Environmental Information for the Pickle Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Project, Wayne County, North Carolina.
Mr. Sanner,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
proposed project description. Comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions of the Clean
Water Act of 1977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
In conjunction with the NC Division of Mitigation Services, Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC has
identified and developed the Pickle Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project. The 17.39-acre site will
restore and preserve riparian buffers in perpetuity. The project watershed consists of agriculture and
forested lands, as well confined animal feeding operations. This site is located northwest of the
intersection of Shady Grove and Thunder Swamp Roads, northwest of Mount Olive.
The project area drains to Thunder Swamp in the Neuse River basin. Stream restoration projects often
improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Establishing native, forested buffers in riparian areas will
improve both aquatic and terrestrial habitats and provide a travel corridor for wildlife species.
In addition to stringent best management practices for erosion and sediment control during construction,
the NCWRC recommends the use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control
devices. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose -weave netting that is made of
natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing and
similar products that have been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should be avoided as they impede
the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have detrimental
effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs and clogging
of gills. Only native vegetation should be installed onsite and any invasive plant species found in or near
the project area should be removed and destroyed.
Mailing Address: N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission • 1701 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1701
Telephone: [phone] • ncwildlife.org

Page 2
April 8, 2021
Scoping — Pickle Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If I can be of further assistance,
please contact me at [phone] or gabriela.garrisongncwildlife.org.
Sincerely,
Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

Appendix D
• Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Limited Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment

Pickle Creek
793 State Road 1117
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Inquiry Number: 6368113.2s
February 16, 2021
The EDR Radius Map TM Report with GeoCheck®
CE DR®
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary _ ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary_ 10
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum_ A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6368113.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
793 STATE ROAD 1117
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 35.2338300 - 35° 14' 1.78"
Longitude (West): 78.1147830 - 78° 6' 53.21"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X (Meters): 762573.2
UTM Y (Meters): 3902592.0
Elevation: 145 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5947432 MOUNT OLIVE, NC
Version Date: 2013
Northeast Map: 5948626 SOUTHWEST GOLDSBORO, NC
Version Date: 2013
Southwest Map: 5947406 DOBBERSVILLE, NC
Version Date: 2013
Northwest Map: 5947410 GRANTHAM, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from:
Source:
20141018
USDA
TC6368113.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
793 STATE ROAD 1117
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS
Al DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS 781 THUNDER SWAMP RD AOP
A2 DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS 781 THUNDER SWAMP RD AOP
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
Higher 1 ft.
Higher 1 ft.
6368113.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
TC6368113.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS . Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC6368113.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_ Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA_ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
TC6368113.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
PCSRP Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6368113.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Other Ascertainable Records
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
A review of the AOP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2020 has revealed that there are 2 AOP
sites within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS
DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS
Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
781 THUNDER SWAMP RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) Al 8
781 THUNDER SWAMP RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A2 8
TC6368113.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6368113.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW MAP - 6368113.2S
Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
VA
0
1/4
1/2
1 Miles
Indian Reservations BIA
Power transmission lines
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
0.20 Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
Hazardous Substance
Disposal Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Pickle Creek
ADDRESS: 793 State Road 1117
Mount Olive NC 28365
LAT/LONG: 35.23383 / 78.114783
CLIENT: Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
CONTACT: Grayson Sanner
INQUIRY #: 6368113.2s
DATE: February 16, 2021 9:05 am
Copyrigh
,.g) 2021 EDR, Inc. (g? 2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6368113.2S
Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
Manufactured Gas Plants
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
VA
0
1/4
1/2
1 Miles
Indian Reservations BIA
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
0.20 Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
Hazardous Substance
Disposal Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Pickle Creek
ADDRESS: 793 State Road 1117
Mount Olive NC 28365
LAT/LONG: 35.23383 / 78.114783
CLIENT: Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
CONTACT: Grayson Sanner
INQUIRY #: 6368113.2s
DATE: February 16, 2021 9:06 am
Copyright 2021 EDR, Inc. (g? 2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LCID 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6368113.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
HIST LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
US CDL
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6368113.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 80 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PRP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOCKET HWC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ECHO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ASBESTOS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
NPDES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
AOP 0.001 2 NR NR NR NR 2
MINES MRDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CCB 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6368113.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
SEPT HAULERS
PCSRP
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
- Totals -- 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6368113.2s Page 7

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
Al
< 1/8
1 ft.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
163 ft.
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS
781 THUNDER SWAMP RD
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
Site 1 of 2 in cluster A
AOP:
Permit Number:
Name:
Address:
Address 2:
City,State,Zip:
Regional Office:
Combined Owner:
Regulated Operation:
Permit Type:
Regulated Activity:
Allowable Count:
Number Of Lagoons:
Issued Date:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Permit Number:
Name:
Address:
Address 2:
City,State,Zip:
Regional Office:
Combined Owner:
Regulated Operation:
Permit Type:
Regulated Activity:
Allowable Count:
Number Of Lagoons:
Issued Date:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Latitude:
Longitude:
AW1960127
DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS
781 THUNDER SWAMP RD
Not reported
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
Washington
Douglas Jernigan
Swine
Animal Individual State
Swine - Feeder to Finish
20906
2
02/06/2015
02/06/2015
01/31/2020
35.230148
-78.098348
AW1960127
DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS
781 THUNDER SWAMP RD
Not reported
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
Washington
Douglas Jernigan
Swine
Animal Individual State
Swine - Wean to Feeder
4000
2
02/06/2015
02/06/2015
01/31/2020
35.230148
-78.098348
A2 DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS
781 THUNDER SWAMP RD
< 1/8 MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
1 ft.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
163 ft.
Site 2 of 2 in cluster A
AOP:
Permit Number:
Name:
Address:
Address 2:
City,State,Zip:
Regional Office:
Combined Owner:
Regulated Operation:
Permit Type:
Regulated Activity:
AWS960127
DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS
781 THUNDER SWAMP RD
Not reported
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
Washington
Douglas Jernigan
Swine
Swine State COC
Swine - Feeder to Finish
AOP S125964848
N/A
AOP S125965055
N/A
TC6368113.2s Page 8

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS (Continued)
Allowable Count:
Number Of Lagoons:
Issued Date:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Permit Number:
Name:
Address:
Address 2:
City,State,Zip:
Regional Office:
Combined Owner:
Regulated Operation:
Permit Type:
Regulated Activity:
Allowable Count:
Number Of Lagoons:
Issued Date:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Latitude:
Longitude:
20906
2
10/01/2019
10/01/2019
09/30/2024
35.230148
-78.098348
AWS960127
DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS
781 THUNDER SWAMP RD
Not reported
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
Washington
Douglas Jernigan
Swine
Swine State COC
Swine - Wean to Feeder
4000
2
10/01/2019
10/01/2019
09/30/2024
35.230148
-78.098348
S125965055
TC6368113.2s Page 9

Count: 0 records.
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address
NO SITES FOUND
Zip Database(s)
TC6368113.2s Page 10

GEOCHECK
- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
PICKLE CREEK
793 STATE ROAD 1117
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
Northeast Map:
Version Date:
35.23383 - 35° 14' 1.79"
78.114783 - 78° 6' 53.22"
Zone 17
762573.2
3902592.0
145 ft. above sea level
5947432 MOUNT OLIVE, NC
2013
5948626 SOUTHWEST GOLDSBORO, NC
2013
Southwest Map: 5947406 DOBBERSVILLE, NC
Version Date: 2013
Northwest Map: 5947410 GRANTHAM, NC
Version Date: 2013
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6368113.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General WNW
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
0
w
0
w
CA CA CA
0 — G— • ea— W V CAA OAi CA ▪ • V — A Vco —a
North
South
TP
. ro- W
. - . - .
co
co
N W W
✓ CA
CO
West
Target Property Elevation: 145 ft.
TP
0
1/2
East
1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6368113.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
3720256400J FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type
3720255400J FEMA FIRM Flood data
3720255300J FEMA FIRM Flood data
3720256300J FEMA FIRM Flood data
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
MOUNT OLIVE
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
MAP ID
Not Reported
LOCATION
FROM TP
GENERAL DIRECTION
GROUNDWATER FLOW
TC6368113.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Mesozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Cretaceous
Series: Washita Group
Code: IK3 (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name: NORFOLK
Soil Surface Texture: loamy sand
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: MODERATE
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches
TC6368113.2s Page A-4

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
Permeability
Rate (in/hr)
Soil Reaction
(pH)
1
0 inches
14 inches
loamy sand
Granular
materials (35
pct. or less
passing No.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
COARSE -GRAINED
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
Max: 20.00
Min: 6.00
Max: 6.00
Min: 3.60
2
14 inches
38 inches
sandy loam
Granular
materials (35
pct. or less
passing No.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
COARSE -GRAINED
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Clayey sand.
Max: 2.00
Min: 0.60
Max: 5.50
Min: 3.60
3
38 inches
70 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
COARSE -GRAINED
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Clayey sand.
Max: 2.00
Min: 0.60
Max: 5.50
Min: 3.60
4
70 inches
99 inches
variable
Not reported
Not reported
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures:
Surficial Soil Types:
Shallow Soil Types:
Deeper Soil Types:
sandy loam
loam
mucky - loam
sandy loam
loam
mucky - loam
fine sandy loam
sandy clay loam
clay loam
sandy clay loam
stratified
sandy clay
TC6368113.2s Page A-5

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS
Federal FRDS PWS
State Database
1.000
Nearest PWS within 1 mile
1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
MAP ID WELL ID
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
MAP ID WELL ID
1
LOCATION
FROM TP
LOCATION
FROM TP
NC0496493 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
MAP ID WELL ID
No Wells Found
LOCATION
FROM TP
TC6368113.2s Page A-6

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6368113.2s
®o®OZZ�
County Boundary
Major Roads
Contour Lines
Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
Water Wells
Public Water Supply Wells
Cluster of Multiple Icons
0
1/4
1/2
1 Miles
f Groundwater Flow Direction
—) Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location
(—) Groundwater Flow Varies at Location
/1
Wildlife Areas
Natural Areas
Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: Pickle Creek
ADDRESS: 793 State Road 1117
Mount Olive NC 28365
LAT/LONG: 35.23383 / 78.114783
CLIENT: Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
CONTACT: Grayson Sanner
INQUIRY #: 6368113.2s
DATE: February 16, 2021 9:07 am
Copyrigh
,.g) 2021 EDR, Inc. (g? 2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
1
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
FRDS PWS NC0496493
Epa region: 04 State: NC
Pwsid: NC0496493 Pwsname: ROUSES GRILL
Cityserved: Not Reported Stateserved: NC
Zipserved: Not Reported Fipscounty: 37191
Status: Closed Retpopsrvd: 50
Pwssvcconn: 1 Psource longname: Groundwater
Pwstype: TNCWS Owner: Private
Contact: LONNIE ROUSE OR MGR Contactorgname: Not Reported
Contactphone: Not Reported Contactaddressl: Not Reported
Contactaddress2: Not Reported Contactcity: SEVEN SPRINGS
Contactstate: NC Contactzip: 27530
Pwsactivitycode: I
PWS ID: NC0496493 PWS type: System Owner/Responsible Party
PWS name: LONNIE ROUSE OR MGR PWS address: Not Reported
PWS city: SEVEN SPRINGS PWS state: NC
PWS zip: 27530 PWS ID: NC0496493
PWS type: System Owner/Responsible Party
PWS name: LONNIE ROUSE PWS address: Not Reported
PWS city: SEVEN SPRINGS PWS state: NC
PWS zip: 27530 PWS ID: NC0496493
Activity status: Active Date system activated: 8206
Date system deactivated: Not Reported Retail population: 00000050
System name: ROUSES GRILL System address: Not Reported
System city: SEVEN SPRINGS System state: NC
System zip: 27530
County FIPS: 096 City served: SEVEN SPRINGS
Population served: Under 101 Persons Treatment: Untreated
Latitude: 351337 Longitude: 0775049
Latitude: 351422 Longitude: 0780615
TC6368113.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
1 0.30 0.3 0.3
Federal EPA Radon Zone for WAYNE County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for WAYNE COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 2
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1st Floor 0.300 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
TC6368113.2s Page A-9

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6368113.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6368113.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6368113.2s Page PSGR-3

Appendix E
• Pickle Creek Phase II Nutrient Offset Project Waste Utilization Plan and Supporting
Material

Nutrient iliinagem t t i:,yin For Animal Waste Utilization
09-27-2021
This plan has been prepared for:
.Ier)liguu Fcrr,ri.,
Dotrg.1Crl7i an
-7157 7lrturderstramp Ruud
.11r,rrr]t Olirc. NC 28365
9/9-6.5Ps' \"2+9
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. liennech'.Ir.
.d gr•imc'nt Services. lac.
PO Box 1096
fletrhaville , ( 28518
2577568r . .Y
Devclopr :fit, ta*r [are
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
1 (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that arc included with
this plan
ttu•e (own
Signature (manager or producer)
727
Date .
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water C - 'c n Commission.
Plan Approved By:
040162
Technical Spc
Database abase Version 4.1
Date Printcd: 09-17_1011
Cover Page I

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 764,000 gals/year by a 4,000 animal
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1377
Incorporated
1653
Injected
1653
Irrigated
1377
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs)*
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
1,377
10036
-8,659
5,567,624
-4,803,624
Year 2
1,377
10539
-9,162
5,846,545
-5,082,545
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 19,379,860 gals/year by a 20,906
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
34933
Incorporated
41919
Injected
41919
Irrigated
34933
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs)*
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
34,933
43519
-8,586
24,207,399
-4,827,539
Year 2
34,933
46355
-11,422
25,742,704
-6,362,844
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Source Page I of 1

Narrative
9/27/202 I
This plan is to update wettable acres to reflect the recalculation of pulls due to the addition of easements
for the Pickle Creek Mitigation Project.
1/22/2013
This combination swine plan is based on historical yields established by Max Safley in 1997, Ronnie
Kennedy in 2008, and Glenn Clifton plan done 1/30/2006. This plan should act as an emergency back-up
conventional type plan in case of failure from the innovative waste system currently operating at the
Jernigan Farm. This plan should act as basis and back up for combining 96-158 and 96-127. Due to the
deficit noted in year two of this plan it is permissible for Mr. Jernigan too have cotton replace corn in that
year on 1/4 of the total cropland in this plan. When used cotton will have an agronomic rate of 70
pounds/nitrogen/per/acre and the application windows will be March 15th - August 1. Oats may replace
the wheat crop at the owner's discretion and keep the same agronomic rate however the application
window will be reduced by 15 days and end at April I5th. Pulls 1 and 2 on Tract 1240 have been
eliminated due to innovative waste system. Field ALT has been added as a backup field the agronomic
rate shalll be 108 pounds per/acre and may be an energy grass crop or other summer annual as needed if
waste management system returns to conventional agronomic and hydraulic rates.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Narrative Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1240
1
3.55
3.55
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Ovcrseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
1240
10
4.57
4.57
N/A
Kcnansvillc
Corn, Grain
80 bu.
Wheat, Grain
35 hu.
Soybcans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
1240
11-24
40.02
40.02
N/A
Kenansville
Small Grain Ovcrseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1240
25
4.95
4.95
N/A
Kenansville
Corn, Grain
80 bu.
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
1240
26
4.96
4.96
N/A
Kcnansvillc
Corn, Grain
80 bu.
Wheat, Grain
35 hit.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
1240
27
4.48
4.48
N/A
Rains
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
1240
28
2.26
2.26
N/A
Kenansville
Com, Grain
80 bu.
'
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
1240
29-33
15.74
15.74
N/A
Kenansville
Com, Grain
80 bu.
Wheal, Grain
35 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
1240
34-35
6.36
6.36
N/A
Rains
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
Wheat, Grain
55 hu.
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
37 bu.
1240
36
2.63
2.63
N/A
Rains
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
1240
37
1.85
1.85
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
940162 Database Version 4.1
Date Printed 9/27/2021
PCS Page 1 of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1240
38-39
6.51
6.51
N/A
Lynchburg
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 hu.
1240
4
4.97
4.97
N/A
Wagram
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
23 bu.
1240
42-45
15.28
15.28
N/A
Wagram
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
23 bu.
1240
46-51
25.77
25.77
N/A
Goldsboro
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
38 bu.
1240
5
4.71
4.71
N/A
Wagram
Corn, Grain
75 hu.
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
23 bu.
1240
52-57
18.64
18.64
N/A
Wagram
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bcrmudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1240
6
4.70
4.70
N/A
Norfolk
Com, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1240
7
4.67
4.67
N/A
Norfolk
Com, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1240
8
3.23
3.23
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
35 bu.
1240
9
4.30
4.30
N/A
Kenansville
Corn, Grain
80 bu.
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
Soybeans, Manurcd. Double Crop
25 bu.
1829
1
1.26
1.26
N/A
Kenansville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1829
2
17.10
17.10
N/A
Kenansville
Com, Grain
80 bu.
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
1829
3
4.52
4.52
N/A
Rains
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
940162 Database Version 4.1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Date Printed 9/27/2021
PCS Page 2 of 3

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Wheat, Grain
55 hu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
1829
4
12.71
12.71
N/A
Kenansville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1835
IA
5.97
5.97
N/A
Kcnansvillc
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1835
I B
3.32
3.32
N/A
Kcnansvillc
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bcrmudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1835
2A
4.52
4.52
N/A
Kenansville
Small Grain Oversced
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1835
2B
2.83
2.83
N/A
Kenansville
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1835
3
4.13
4.13
N/A
Kenansville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
SA
Alternate
45.00
45.00
N/A
Kenansville
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.4 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 285.51 285.51
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
2
Low potential to contribute to soluble
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
None
>= 2 &
<= 10
Moderate potential to contribute to
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zone.
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
> 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients. Sod -Based Rotations
(328). Long -Term No -Till (778). and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
940162 Database Version 4.1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Date Printed 9/27/202I
PCS Page 3 of 3

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields ofthe crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Usc.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rogd
(lbs/A)
Cum.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrienLA
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureP
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid Manur
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
10(10
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1240
1
S7
Norfolk
3.55
3.55
Small Grain Owl -seed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
98.47
0.00
1240
1
S7
Norfolk
3.55
3.55
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
222
0
0
Irrig.
222
123.16
0.00
437.22
0.00
1240
10
S7
Kenansvillc
4.57
4.57
Corn, Grain
80 bu.
2/15-6/30
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
43.27
0.00
197.76
0.00
1240
10
S7
Kenansville
4.57
4.57
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
brig.
41
22.47
0.00
102.68
0.00
1240
11-24
S7
Kenansvillc
40.02
40.02
Small Grain Ovcrsccd
I.0Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
1,110.11
0.00
1240
11-24
S7
Kenansvillc
40.02
40.02
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
4,484.86
0.00
1240
25
S7
Kenansvillc
4.95
4.95
Corn, Grain
80 bu.
2/15-6/30
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
43.27
0.00
214.20
0.00
1240
25
S7
Kenansville
4.95
4.95
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
111.22
0.00
1240
26
S7
Kenansvillc
4.96
4.96
Corn. Grain
80 bu.
2/15-6/30
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
43.27
0.00
214.63
0.00
1240
26
S7
Kcnansville
4.96
4.96
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
lrrig.
41
22.47
0.00
111.44
0.00
1240
27
S7
Rains
4.48
4.48
Com, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
20
Irrig.
115
63.80
0.00
285.82
0.00
1240
27
S7
Rains
4.48
4.48
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
131.73
0.00
1240
28
S7
Kenansville
2.26
2.26
Com, Grain
80 bu. r
2/15-6/30
98
0
20
Irrig.
78,
43.27
0.00,
97.80
0.00,
1240
28
S7
Kenansvillc
2.26
2.26
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/14/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
50.78
0.00
1240
29-33
S7
Kenansvillc
15.74
15.74
Corn, Grain
80 bu.
r
2/15-6/30
98
0
20
lrrig.
78
43.27
0.00
681.11
0.00
1240
29-33
S7
Kenansville
15.74
15.74
Wheat. Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
353.66
0.00
940162 Database Version 4.1
Date Printed: 9/27/2021
WUT Page 1 of 7

Year 1
Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Cam
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureP
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid Mania -
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
IOW
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1240
34-35
S7
Rains
6.36
6.36
Com, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
20
Irrig.
115
63.80
0.00
405.77
0.00
1240
-
34-35
S7
Rains
6.36
6.36
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
187.01
0.00
1240
36
S7
Rains
2.63
2.63
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
20
Irrig.
115
63.80
0.00
167.79
0.00
1240
36
S7
Rains
2.63
2.63
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/14/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
77.33
0.00
1240
37
S7
Norfolk
1.85
1.85
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
61.58
0.00
113.92
0.00
1240
37
S7
Norfolk
1.85
1.85
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
64.15
0.00
1240
38-39
S7
Lynchburg
6.51
6.51
Com, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
20
Irrig.
115
63.80
0.00
415.34
0.00
1240
38-39
S7
Lynchburg
6.51
6.51
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
191.42
0.00
1240
4
S7
Wagram
4.97
4.97
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
2/15-6/30
92
0
20
Irrig.
72
39.94
0.00
198.52
0.00
1240
4
S7
Wagram
4.97
4.97
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
47
38.70
0.00
192.32
0.00
1240
42-45
S7
Wagram
15.28
15.28
Com, Grain
75 bu.
2/15-6/30
92
0
20
Irrig.
72
39.94
0.00
610.35
0.00
1240
42-45
S7
Wagram
15.28
15.28
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
47
25.80
0.00
394.18
0.00
1240
46-51
S7
Goldsboro
25.77
25.77
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
2/15-6/30
148
0
20
Irrig.
128
71.01
0.00
1,829.97
0.00
1240
46-51
S7
Goldsboro
25.77
25.77
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
136
0
0
brig.
68
37.73
0.00
972.17
0.00
1240
5
S7
Wagram
4.71
4.71
Corn, Grain
75 bu.
2/15-6/30
92
0
20
]trig.
72
39.94
0.00
188.14
0.00
1240
5
S7
Wagram
4.71
4.71
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
47
25.80
0.00
121.51
0.00
1240
52-57
S7
Wagram
18.64
18.64
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
517.05
0.00
1240
52-57
S7
Wagram
18.64
18.64
Hybrid Bcrmudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
2,088.90
0.00
1240
6
S7
Norfolk
4.70
4.70
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
1 1 I
61.58
0.00
289.43
0.00
1240
6
S7
Norfolk
4.70
4.70
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
162.97
0.00
1240
7
S7
Norfolk
4.67
4.67
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
61.58
0.00
287.58
0.00
1240
7
S7
Norfolk
4.67
4.67
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
161.93
0.00
940162
Database Version 4.1
Date Printed: 9/27/2021
WUT Page 2 of 7

Year 1
Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutricnLP
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
Manure/5
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid Maw
Applied
(Fiell)
N
N
N
N
I000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1240
8
S7
Norfolk
3.23
3.23
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
I 1 I
61.58
0.00
198.91
0.00
1240
8
S7
Norfolk
3.23
3.23
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
112.00
0.00
1240
9
S7
Kcnansville
4.30
4.30
Corn, Grain
80 bu.
2/15-6/30
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
43.27
0.00
186.07
0.00
1240
9
S7
Kenansville
4.30
4.30
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
96.62
0.00
1829
1
S5
Kenansvillc
1.26
1.26
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
34.95
0.00
1829
1
S5
Kcnansville
1.26
1.26
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
141.20
0.00
1829
2
S5
Kcnansville
17.10
17.10
Corn, Grain
80 bu.
2/15-6/30
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
43.27
0.00
739.96
0.00
1829
2
S5
Kcnansville
17.10
17.10
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
384.21
0.00
1829
3
S5
Rains
4.52
4.52
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
135
0
20
Irrig.
115
63.80
0.00
288.37
0.00
1829
3
S5
Rains
4.52
4.52
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
132.90
0.00
1829
4
S5
Kenansvillc
12.71
12.71
Small Grain Ovcrsced
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
352.56
0.00
1829
4
S5
Kenansville
12.71
12.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
1,424.35
0.00
1835
IA
S5
Kenansville
5.97
5.97
Small Grain Ovcrsccd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1835
IA
S5
Kcnansvillc
5.97
5.97
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1835
I B
S5
Kenansville
3.32
3.32
Small Grain Ovcrseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
92.09
0.00
1835
1B
S5
Kcnansville
3.32
3.32
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
372.06
0.00
1835
2A
S5
Kenansvillc
4.52
4.52
Small Grain Ovcrseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
125.38
0.00
1835
2A
S5
Kenansvillc
4.52
4.52
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
506.54
0.00
1835
2B
S5
Kenansville
2.83
2.83
Small Grain Oversced
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
78.50
0.00
1835
2B
S5
Kenansvillc
2.83
2.83
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07,
0.00
317.15
0.00
1835
3
S5
Kenansville
4.13
4.13
Small Grain Ovcrsced
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
114.56
0.00
1835
3
S5
Kcnansville
4.13
4.13
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
462.83
0.00
940162
Database Version 4.1
Date Printed: 9/27/2021
WUT Page 3 of 7

Year 1
Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Pericd
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(Ibs/A)
Cantu
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
Manure
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid Manur
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
SA
Alternate
S7
Kenansville
45.00
45.00
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.4 Tons
3/15-8/31
237
0
25
Irrig.
212
117.61
0.00
5,292.59
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
29,775.02
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
20,143.86
Balance, 1000 gallons
-9,631.16
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
940162
Database Version 4.1
Date Printed: 9/27/2021 WUT Page 4 of 7

Year 2
Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Carnal
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Manure,
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid Manur
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1240
I
S7
Norfolk
3.55
3.55
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
I0/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
98.47
0.00
1240
1
S7
Norfolk
3.55
3.55
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
222
0
0
Irrig.
222
123.16
0.00
437.22
0.00
1240
10
S7
Kenansvillc
4.57
4.57
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
102.68
0.00
1240
10
S7
Kenansvillc
4.57
4.57
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
55.48
0.00
253.53
0.00
1240
11-24
S7
Kenansville
40.02
40.02
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
1,110.11
0.00
1240
11-24
S7
Kenansville
40.02
40.02
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
4,484.86
0.00
1240
25
S7
Kenansville
4.95
4.95
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
111.22
0.00
1240
25
S7
Kenansville
4.95
4.95
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
55.48
0.00
274.62
0.00
1240
26
S7
Kenansville
4.96
4.96
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
111.44
0.00
1240
26
S7
Kenansville
4.96
4.96
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
55.48
0.00
275.17
0.00
1240
27
S7
Rains
4.48
4.48
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
131.73
0.00
1240
27
S7
Rains
4.48
4.48
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
143
0
0
Irrig.
143
79.33
0.00
355.41
0.00
1240
28
S7
Kenansvillc
2.26
2.26
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
50.78
0.00
1240
28
S7
Kenansville
2.26
2.26
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
55.48
0.00
125.38
0.00
1240
29-33
S7
Kenansville
15.74
15.74
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
353.66
0.00
1240
29-33
S7
Kenansville
15.74
15.74
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
55.48
0.00
873.22
0.00
1240
34-35
S7
Rains
6.36
6.36
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
187.01
0.00
1240
34-35
S7
Rains
6.36
6.36
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
143
0
0
Irrig.
143
79.33
0.00
504.56
0.00
1240
36
S7
Rains
2.63
2.63
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
77.33
0.00
1240
36
S7
Rains
2.63
2.63
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
143
0
0
Irrig.
143
79.33
0.00
208.65
0.00
1240
37
S7
Norfolk
1.85
1.85
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
64.15
0.00
1240
37
S7
Norfolk
1.85
1.85
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
76.01
0.00
140.61
0.00
940162
Database Version 4.1
Date Printed: 9/27/2021
WUT Page 5 of 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen)
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(lbs/A)
Canm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient?.
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid Mantr
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1240
38-39
S7
Lynchburg
6.51
6.51
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
191.42
0.00
1240
38-39
S7
Lynchburg
6.51
6.51
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
151
0
0
Irrig.
151
83.77
0.00
545.35
0.00
1240
4
S7
Wagram
4.97
4.97
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
47
30.96
0.00
153.85
0.00
1240
4
S7
Wagram
4.97
4.97
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
23 bu.
4/1-9/15
92
0
0
Irrig.
92
51.04
0.00
253.67
0.00
1240
42-45
S7
Wagram
15.28
15.28
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
47
25.80
0.00
394.18
0.00
1240
42-45
S7
Wagram
15.28
15.28
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
23 bu.
4/1-9/15
92
0
0
Irrig.
92
51.04
0.00
779.89
0.00
1240
46-51
S7
Goldsboro
25.77
25.77
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/14/30
136
0
0
Irrig.
68
37.73
0.00
972.17
0.00
1240
46-51
S7
Goldsboro
25.77
25.77
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
149
0
0
Irrig.
149
82.66
0.00
2,130.20
0.00
1240
5
S7
Wagram
4.71
4.71
Wheat, Grain
40 bu.
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
47
25.80
0.00
121.51
0.00
1240
5
S7
Wagram
4.71
4.71
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
23 bu.
4/1-9/15
92
0
0
Irrig.
92
51.04
0.00
240.40
0.00
1240
52-57
S7
Wagram
18.64
18.64
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
517.05
0.00
1240
52-57
S7
Wagram
18.64
18.64
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
2,088.90
0.00
1240
6
S7
Norfolk
4.70
4.70
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
162.97
0.00
1240
6
S7
Norfolk
4.70
4.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
lrrig.
137
76.01
0.00
357.22
0.00
1240
7
S7
Norfolk
4.67
4.67
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
161.93
0.00
1240
7
S7
Norfolk
4.67
4.67
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
76.01
0.00
354.94
0.00
1240
8
S7
Norfolk
3.23
3.23
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
112.00
0.00
1240
8
S7
Norfolk
3.23
3.23
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
76.01
0.00
245.50
0.00
1240
9
S7
Kenansville
4.30
4.30
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/1-4/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
96.62
0.00
1240
9
S7
Kenansville
4.30
4.30
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
lrrig.
100
55.48
0.00
238.56
0.00
1829
1
S5
Kcnansville
1.26
1.26
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
34.95
0.00
1829
1
S5
Kenansvillc
1.26
1.26
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
141.20
0.00
940162 Database Version 4.1
Date Printed: 9/27/2021
WUT Page 6 of 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Peried
Nitrcgen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(Ibs/A)
Canm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient/1
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
Manure/.
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
SolidManur
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1829
2
S5
Kcnansvillc
17.10
17.10
Wheat, Grain
35 bu.
9/14/30
81
0
0
Irrig.
41
22.47
0.00
384.21
0.00
1829
2
S5
Kenansville
17.10
17.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
25 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
55.48
0.00
948.67
0.00
1829
3
S5
Rains
4.52
4.52
Wheat, Grain
55 bu.
9/1-4/30
106
0
0
Irrig.
53
29.40
0.00
132.90
0.00
1829
3
S5
Rains
4.52
4.52
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
143
0
0
Irrig.
143
79.33
0.00
358.59
0.00
1829
4
S5
Kenansville
12.71
12.71
Small Grain Overseer'
I.0Tons
I0/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
352.56
0.00
1829
4
S5
Kenansville
12.71
12.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
1,424.35
0.00
1835
IA
S5
Kenansville
5.97
5.97
Small Grain Ovcrsccd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/3I
50
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1835
IA
S5
Kenansville
5.97
5.97
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1835
lB
S5
Kenansville
3.32
3.32
Small Grain Oversccd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
92.09
0.00
1835
IB
S5
Kcnansvillc
3.32
3.32
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
372.06
0.00
1835
2A
S5
Kenansville
4.52
4.52
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
125.38
0.00
1835
2A
S5
Kenansville
4.52
4.52
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
506.54
0.00
1835
2B
S5
Kenansville
2.83
2.83
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
78.50
0.00
1835
2B
S5
Kenansville
2.83
2.83
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
317.15
0.00
1835
3
S5
Kenansville
4.13
4.13
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
I0/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
27.74
0.00
114.56
0.00
1835
3
S5
Kenansville
4.13
4.13
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
112.07
0.00
462.83
0.00
SA
Alternate
S7
Kenansville
45.00
45.00
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.4 Tons
3/15-8/31
237
0
25
Irrig.
212
117.61
0.00
5,292.59,
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
31,589.25
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
20,143.86
Balance, 1000 gallons
-11,445.39
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: I. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
940162 Database Version 4.1
Date Printed: 9/27/2021
WUT Page 7 of 7

The irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1240
1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1240
10
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1240
11-24
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1240
25
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1240
26
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1240
27
Rains
0.40
1.0
1240
28
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1240
29-33
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1240
34-35
Rains
0.40
1.0
1240
36
Rains
0.40
1.0
1240
37
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1240
38-39
Lynchburg
0.50
1.0
1240
4
Wagram
0.60
1.0
1240
42-45
Wagram
0.60
1.0
1240
46-51
Goldsboro
0.50
1.0
1240
5
Wagram
0.60
1.0
1240
52-57
Wagram
0.60
1.0
1240
6
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1240
7
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1240
8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1240
9
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1829
1
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1829
2
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1829
3
Rains
0.40
1.0
1829
4
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1835
IA
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1835
1B
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1835
2A
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1835
2B
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1835
3
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
SA
Alternate
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 9/27/2021
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
IAF Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate ofthe number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application ofthe effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
14.69
9.12
18.25
27.37
Hay 6ton R.Y.E.
300
29.38
4.56
9.12
13.68
Soybean 40 bu
160
15.67
8.55
17.11
25.66
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
14.69
234.84
469.68
704.53
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
29.38
117.42
234.84
352.26
Soybean 40 bu
160
15.67
220.16
440.33
660.49
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Sludge Page I of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and Tess than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days) *
1
1
51
1
2
54
1
3
80
1
4
110
I
5
144
1
6
180
I
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
I77
1
10
169
1
II
I59
1
12
154
2
1
143
2
2
141
2
3
155
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
179
2
I0
151
2
11
128
2
12
104
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Capacity Page 1 of 2

v
Source Name
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days) *
1
I
180
1
2
180
1
3
I80
1
4
180
I
5
180
I
6
180
I
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
180
1I
180
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
180
2
11
180
2
12
180
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Capacity Page 2 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/27/2021 Specification Page 1

Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/27/2021 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/27/2021 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/27/2021 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 27, 3, 34-35, 36
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 Ibs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 38-39
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 Ibs/acre N and 20-30 Ibs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Crop Note Page 1 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 46-51
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 Ibs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 37, 6, 7, 8
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 2, 25, 26, 28, 29-33, 4, 42-45, 5, 9
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Crop Note Page 2 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 11-24, IA, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3, 4, 52-57
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Crop Note Page 3 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
Ib/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 11-24, 1 A, IB, 2A, 2B, 3, 4, 52-57
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
Ib/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Crop Note Page 4 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 27, 3, 34-35, 36
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 38-39
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 46-51
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Crop Note Page 5 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 37, 6, 7, 8
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 2, 25, 26, 28, 29-33, 4, 42-45, 5, 9
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 27, 3, 34-35, 36
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be I - 11/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Crop Note Page 6 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 38-39
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 46-51
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Crop Note Page 7 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 37, 6, 7, 8
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 2, 25, 26, 28, 29-33, 4, 42-45, 5, 9
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
Sorghum -Sudan: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): Alternate
940162 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-27-2021 Crop Note Page 8 of 8

Sheetl
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Doug Jemigan - Doug Jernigan Farms; AWS960127
Address: Thunder Swamp Road
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Telephone: [phone]
Wetted Acres Revision -Pickle Creek Mitigation
Table 1 - Field Specifications
Field
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
of Field
(acres) Soil Type Slope % Crop(s)
County: Wayne
Date: 5/1/2003
Revised: 9/25/2003
Project 9/22/2021
Maximum
Maximum Application
Application per Irrigation
Rate Cycle
(In/hr) (inches)
Comments
Pulls 1-57
184.15
Ke
<5
Bermuda, Cotton, Sm Grain
0.5
(Predominantly)

Sheet2
TABLE 2 - Travelling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment Cadman 3250 traveler w/ 3.25"x975' hose w/Nelson 150
Field No.
and
Travel Application TRAVEL LANE Wetted Nozzle Operating Operating
Speed Rate Effective Effective Diameter Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
(ft/min) (in/hr.) Width(ft.) Length(ft) (feet) (Inches) at Gun(psi) at reel(psi) Pattem Comments - Acres per pull
,

Sheet2
31
8_03/8.03
.92/.92
143/228
633/75
301.5
1.26
80
95
180/180
2.96
32
4.01 /4.82
.55/.75
228/195
190/542
301.5
1.26
80
95
300/220
4.12
33
4.01
0.55
220
686
301.5
1.26
60
95
300
4.35
34
4.01
0.55
220
525
301.5
1.26
60 _
95
300
3.54
35
8.03/4.01
.92/.55
156/228
407/89
301.5
1.26
60
95
180/300
2.82
36
4.82
0.75
187
476
301.5
1.26
60
95
220
2.63
37
4.82
0.75
235
211
301.5 _
1.28
60
95
220
1.85
38
3.68
0.55
271
87
301.5
1.28 _
60
95
300
1.96
39
4.01/4.82
.55/.75
235/215
536/176
301.5
1.26
60
95
300/220
4.55
42
8.83
0.92
117
497
301.5
1.26
60
95
180
1.79
43
4.41
0.55
200
662
301.5
1.28
60
95
300
3.87
44
4.41
0.55
200
825
301.5
1.26
60
95
300
4.62
45
4.41
0.55
218
825
301.5
1.26
60
95
300
5.00
46
3.68
0.55
240
323
301.5
1.26
60
95
300
3.12
47
3.68
0.55
240
4.11
301.5
_ 1.26
60
95
300
3.60
48
3.88
0.55
240
535
301.5
1.28
60
95
300
4.29
49
3.68
0.55
240
578
301.5
1.26
60
95
300
4.52
50
3.68
0.55
240
593
301.5
1.26
60
95
300
4.61
51
3.68
0.55
271
677
301.5
1.26
60
95
300
5.63
52
4.41/5.30
.55/.75
251/174
70/650
301.5
1.26
60
95
300/220
4.03
53
4.41
0.55
251
975
301.5
1.28
60
95
300
6.95
54
8.83/4.41
.92/.55
100/251
227/60
301.5
1.28
60
95
180
1.74
55
4.41
0.55
200
266
301.5
1.26
60
95
300
2.05
56
8.83
0.92
162
208
301.5
1.28
60
95
300
1.25
57
8.83
0.92
136
680
301.5
1.26
60
95
180
2.62
TOTAL
184.15

Sheet3
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment N/A
Field No Wetted Hydrant Spacing(ft)
and Number of Diameter Along Between
Line No. Hydrants (feet) Pipelines Pipelines
Operating Parameters
Application Nozzle Operating Operating
Rate Diameter Pressure Time
(in/hr) (inches) at Gun(psil at Hydrant(hr.)
Comments Acres per zone
TOTAL
0.00

Sheet4
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Solid Set
Irrigation Gun
275
Irrigation
0
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
123.7
6.9
Design Precipitation Rate (in/hr)
0.46
0.00
Hose Length (feet)
975
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
Engine
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Engine
Engine
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
44.1
0.0
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications
6"
4"
2"
THRUST BLOCK
THRUST BLOCK
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION
AREA (sq. ft.)
AREA (sq. ft.)
AREA (sq. ft.)
90 degree bend
8.8
4.3
1.1
Dead End
6.2
3.0
0.8
Tee
4.4
2.1
0.5
Gate Valve
6.2
3.0
0.8
45 degree bend
4.7
2.3
0.6
Page 1

Sheet5
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: Micah Kevin Weston, CID
Company: Private
Address: 237 A.I. Taylor Road, Richlands, NC 28574
Phone: [phone]
Required Documentation
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
t. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, pipelines, thrust block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4, Sources andlor calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe andlor USDA-NRCS standard for IRRIGATION WATER CONVEYANCE.
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider ail relevant factors at a particular site and
address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed In lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip of 25' or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all
perennial streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.

Sheet6
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
This design is for an addition to an existing facility. The acres were calculated based on the equipment
specified and the charts created by NCSU for calculating Area Allowances for Hard Hose Traveler Systems.
This irrigation system is designed with six inch, Class 200 PVC and schedule 80 fitttings. The system is
designed to accommodate the flow velocities, flow rates and pressure requirements associated with a
Cadman 3250 traveler. Air vents and thrust blocks are to be installed as indicated on the drawings. The thrust
block areas have been calculated and are listed in Table 4 of this design. The design of the traveler system
requires the use of a 1.26" ring nozzle in the gun. Each pull has a specific arc setting and travel speed which
must be used to achieve the desired application. This information is given in Table 2 of this design. A detail of
the hydrant layout is also included. All pipe shall be installed with a minimum of 30" of cover and shall be
backfilled in no less than three passes, leaving enough soil material above original grade to allow for settling.
The suction assembly for the pump to be used should be a minimum of 6" aluminum. A pressure gauge
should be installed on the discharge side of the pump where It can be seen during start up of the system.
Refer to owner's manual and irrigation dealer for information on maintenance, winterization, and operation of
system.
This revision done 9/22/2021 to reflect the recalculation of pulls due to the addition of easements for the Pickle
Creek Mitigation Project.

Sprinkler Specifications
Sprinkler Type:
Nozzle Size:
Sprinkler Pressure:
Flowrate(GPM):
Wetted Diameter:
Lane Spacings
Desired Spacing (%):
Design Spacing(feet):
Actual Spacing (feet):
Actual Spacing (%):
Application Rate
Application Rate =(96.3xFlowrate)/(3.1415x(.9xradius)squared)
Sheet?
CALCULATIONS
Nelson 150
1.26 inches
60 psi
275 gpm
301.5 feet * Reflects a 10% reduction from chart
Design App. Rate =
300 degree arc =
220 degree arc =
180 degree arc =
Traveller Speed
70 %
211.05 *PVC irrigation pipe normally comes in 20' pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
240 feet
80 %
0.46 in/hr
0.55 in/hr
0.75 in/hr
0.92 in/hr
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate / Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) =
300 degree arc
220 degree arc =
180 degree arc =
Mainline Velocity
0.5 inches
3.68 ft/min
4.41 ft/min
7.36 ft/min
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate / pipe diameter squared feet/sec.
**For buried pipelines, velocity should be below 5 feet per second
Pipe size: 6 inches
Velocity=
3.12 ft/sec.
Page 1

Sheet?
Maximum Mainline Friction Loss
Most distant hydrant: 28
Total distance: 7185 feet
Friction Loss is figured using Hazen!William's Equation
Friction Loss= 0.52 feet/100 feet
Max. Mainline Loss = 37.5 feet or 16.2 psi
Total Dynamic Head
Sprinkler Pressure:
Loss through traveller:
Elevation head:
Mainline loss:
Suction head and lift:
5% fitting loss:
TOTAL(TDH) =
60 psi
35 psi
4.3 psi
16.2 psi
2.3 psi
5.9 psi
123.7 psi or
Horsepower Required
Horsepower = Flowrate x TDH(feet) / 3960 / Pump effeciency
Pump Description: Comet! 3HA-EM16-3
Pump Efficiency. 45 %
Horsepower Required: 44.1 Hp
Thrust Blocking
Thrust Block Area = Thrust / Soil Bearing Strength
Thrust: 7460 feet
Soil Bearing Strength: 1200 feet
End Cap: 6.2 ft2
90 degree elbow: 8.8 ft2
Tee: 4.4 ft2
45 degree elbow: 4.7 ft2
Pipe Pressure Rating Check
Pressure Rating of Pipe to be Used:
Max. Pressure on system when running:
70% of Pressure Rating:
200 psi
123.7 psi
140 psi
285.8 feet
If Max. Pressure on system is less than 70% of Pressure Rating, OK
Page 2

Net Positive Suction Head Check
NPSHA: 19.1
NPSHR: 6 *from pump curve
If NPSHA>NPSHR OK
Sheet?
Page 3

Sprinkler Specifications
Sprinkler Type:
Nozzle Size:
Sprinkler Pressure:
Flowrate(GPM):
Wetted Diameter.
Lane Spacings
Desired Spacing (%):
Design Spacing(feet):
Actual Spacing (feet):
Actual Spacing (%):
Appiicatlon Rate
Application Rate =(96.3xFlowrate)/(3.1415x(.9xradius)squared)
Sheet7
CALCULATIONS
Nelson 150
1.26 inches
60 psi
275 gpm
301.5 feet * Reflects a 10% reduction from chart
Design App. Rate =
300 degree arc =
220 degree arc =
180 degree arc =
Traveller Speed
70 %
211.05 `PVC Irrigation pipe normally comes in 20' pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
220 feet
73%
0.46 in/hr
0.55 in/hr
0.75 in/hr
0.92 in/hr
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate / Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) =
300 degree arc =
220 degree arc =
180 degree arc =
Mainline Velocity
0.5 inches
4.01 ft/min
4.82 ft/min
8.03 ft/min
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate / pipe diameter squared feet/sec.**
"For buried pipelines, velocity should be below 5 feet per second
Pipe size: 6 inches
Velocity=
3.12 ft/sec.
Page 1

Sprinkler Specifications
Sprinkler Type:
Nozzle Size:
Sprinkler Pressure:
Fiowrate(GPM):
Wetted Diameter:
Lane Spacings
Desired Spacing (%):
Design Spacing(feet):
Actual Spacing (feet):
Actual Spacing (%):
Application Rate
Application Rate =(96.3xFlowrate)I(3.1415x(.9xradius)squared)
Nelson 150
1.26 inches
60 psi
275 gpm
301.5 feet
Sheet?
CALCULATIONS
* Reflects a 10% reduction from chart
Design App. Rate =
300 degree arc =
220 degree arc =
180 degree arc =
Traveller Speed
70 %
211.05 *PVC irrigation pipe normally comes in 20' pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
200 feet
66 %
0.46 inihr
0.55 in/hr
0.75 in/hr
0.92 in/hr
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate / Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) =
300 degree arc =
220 degree arc =
180 degree arc =
Mainline Velocity
0.5 inches
4.41 ft/min
5.30 ft/min
8.83 ft/min
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate / pipe diameter squared feet/sec.**
**For buried pipelines, velocity should be below 5 feet per second
Pipe size: 6 inches
Velocity=
3.12 ft/sec.
Page 1

Sheet8 (2)
Doug Jernigan Farms; AWS960127
Acreage Calculations
9/22/2021 - Recalculated due to Pickle Creek Miti
ation Project
Width
Length
Acres
Total Acres
Start End
Stop End
' Total
PuII #
(ft.)
j
(midsection)
(midsection)
Jac.)
(ac.)
Pull Acres
1
271
420
2.61
2.61
0.660
0.275
3.55
4
271
331
2.06
3.55
0.780
0.640
4.97
227
285
1.49
0.00
0.78
0.64
0.00
5
240
612
3.37
3.37
0.74
0.6
4.71
6
240
610
3.36
3.36
0.74
0.6
4.70
7
240
604
3.33
3.33
0.74
0.6
4.67
8
219
461
2.32
2.32
0.590
0.320
3.23
9
230
642
3.39
3.39
0.590
0.320
4.30
10
230
654
3.45
3.45
0.620
0.500
4.57,
11
110
229
0.58
0.63
0.490
0.400
1.52
220
10
0.05
0.00
0.490
0.400
0.00
12
220
49
0.25
0.25
0.490
0.400
1.14
13
220
94
0.47
0.47
0.490
0.400
1.36
14
220
115
0.58
0.58
0.490
0.400
1.47
15
220
175
0.88
0.88
0.490
0.400
1.77
16
220
250
1.26
1.26
0.490
0.200
1.95
17
220
193
0.97
0.97
0.490
0.400
1.86
18
220 439
2.22
2.22
0.490
0.200
2.91
19
220 542
2.74
2.74
0.490
0.400
3.63
20
220 674
3.40
3.40
0.490
0.400
4.29
21
220 692
3.49
3.49
0.490
0.400
4.38
22
220 710
3.59
3.59
0.490
0.400
4.48
23
220 729
3.68
3.68
0.490
0.400
4.57
24
220
752
3.80
3.80
0.490
0.400
4.69
25
228
774
4.05
4.05
0.490
0.410
4.95
26
228
775
4.06
4.06
0.490
0.410
4.96
27
228
562
2.94
3.78
0.490
0.210
4.48
140
262
0.84
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.00
28
197
362
1.64
1.64
0.419
0.205
2.26
29
228
95
0.50
0.50
0.490
0.000
0.99
30
211
364
1.76
2.43
0.490
0.400
3.32
220
133 ,
0.67
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.00
31
143
633
2.08
2.47
0.490
0.000
2.96
228
75
0.39
0.00
0.490
0.410
0.00
32
228
190
0.99
3.42
0.490
0.210
4.12
195
542
2.43
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.00
33
220
686
3.46
3.46
0.490
0.400
4.35
34
220
525
2.65
2.65
0.490
0.400
3.54
35
156
407
1.46
1.92
0.490
0.410
2.82
228
89
0.47
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.00
36
187
476
2.04
2.04
0.380
0.210
2.63
37
235
211
1.14
1.14
0.500
0.210
1.85
38
271
87
0.54
0.54
0.780
0.640
1.96
39
235
536
2.89
3.84
0.500
0.210
4.55
235
176
0.95
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.00
42
117
497
1.33
1.33
0.258
0.195
1.79
43
200
662
3.04
3.04
0.460
0.370
3.87
Page 1

Sheet8 (2)
44
200
825
3.79 3.79
0.460
0.370
4.62
45
218
825
4.13 4.13
0.480
0.390
5.00
46
240
323
1.78 1.78
0.740
0.600
3.12
47
240
411
2.26 2.26
0.740
0.600
3.60
48 240
535
2.95
2.95
0.740
0.600
4.29
49
240 578
3.18
3.18
0.740
0.600
4.52
50
240
593
3.27
3.27
0.740
0.600
4.61
51
271
677
4.21
4.21
0.780
0.640
5.63
52
251
70
0.40
3.00
0.730
0.300
4.03
174
650
2.60
0.00
0.730
0.600
0.00
53
251
975
5.62
5.62
0.730
0.600
6.95
54
100
227
0.52
0.87
0.480
0.390
1.74
251
60
0.35 0.00
0.480
0.390
0.00
55
200
266
1.22
1.22
0.460
0.370
2.05
56
162
208
0.77
0.77
0.240
0.240
1.25
57
136
680
2.12
2.12
0.250
0.250
2.62
Total Acres
184.15
Page 2

200' Saocha (fw)
(Pulls 52-57)
Ar.0 or
trio O.b•fr
NOTE.'
Pull 25 may be used when building debris and lot
is cleaned up and returned to farming condition
Pull 51 may be used when the tree debris is cleaned
up and area returned to farming condition
GRAPHIC SCALE
500 0 250 Sao 1000
r
(INFEST)
I Inch = 500 ft.
Mot,
/100.
Offset
240' Spoch, (J)p)
(P w0 .-rq in 15-51)
DOUG JERNIGAN FARMS
AW59B0127
Wetted Acreage
wee
,./roO
afnot
220' spurt', (7)P)
(P.N. fir-JS)
fkillattypn
17
� �O
\'r
2.20. $.+'Y (TW)
(Pugs 20»45)
DM5 Easement - (18.06 Ac.)
®Bonk Easement - Option C (10.s8 Ac.)
9/2021.-P111. r.cdalel.d to r.o.ct addit.6n or .er.rn.nlr for PidA bed Wll,otbi Props!
Specifications: Pulls
Cadman 3250 Traveler w/Nelson 150
w/1.26" Nuzzle 0 60 PS,
275 GPM; 301.5' WO
(335' x .9 d 301.5)
Lane Spacings: 2001 220' & 240'
Let tint Argo of
fluidity Debris
RINK=
1

-
1 of easements tor Pickle Creek Mitigation Project

is cleaned
L
m
0
9/202t—Pulls recalculated to reflect addition

Pickle Creek Mitigation Project

-01
•
•
{
- -;lam• "Yr
.44
Itzr
dr
eri
•
..- " i 1 `5
`i ce Yti) — s i
" ` yr 9 ' y:�.746 .. I!' m�`;��y..{)1 ' C
-7/ z , l q.aa - r
4• /
•
•
f•
�ictit >
•
•
;,,_ . •. y.7 -,/
7 v f""''
F.•
yyy/.. '
��� �'''l
L' -
r JJ
•
Ifs c.I•
1 v
•

{�:��1Tl���a����j����=
_

/1 I
'‘..1••#a
,
-7
, -
lez
1 ,
' --- • .
•
• ,
• I
f

Printed:Jan 22, 2013

1
Printed:Jan 22, 2013

From: Lawson, Christine
To: Geno Kennedy; Jamey Mceachran
Cc: Jernigan Doug; Jonathan Miller; Merritt. Katie; Salyer. Marlene
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Doug Jernigan Farm Waste Plan Update
Date: Friday, October 8, 2021 5:14:31 PM
Geno and Mr. Jernigan —
Thank you for submitting the updates to the Nutrient Management Plan and to the Wettable Acres
Determination for Jernigan Farms, AWS960127 and AW1960127, to reflect the Pickle Creek
Mitigation Project. Everything appears to be in order. 1 thank you for providing such clear
documentation and maps to show the mitigation areas as they relate to the remaining land
application areas.
I emailed Geno a little earlier this afternoon with the information regarding renewal of the AWI
permit. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding that renewal.
Christine B. Lawson
Engineer
Animal Feeding Operations Program
Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 3664 office
984 232 1223 mobile
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Geno Kennedy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 2:39 PM
To: Jamey Mceachran <[e-mail]>
Cc: Lawson, Christine <[e-mail]>; Jernigan Doug
<[e-mail]>; Jonathan Miller <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Doug Jernigan Farm Waste Plan Update
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.
Jamey,
all work on our end is complete. This is the irrigation design
and waste utilization plan for the project. We have copied the
regulatory agency so they also have a copy as required along
with the owner so they will have a copy for their records.
Thank You!
With Kind Regards,
Ronnie "Geno" Kennedy Jr.
President of Operations
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096 Beulaville, NC 28518

Office [phone] Fax [phone] Mobile [phone]
www.agrimentservices.com
This electronic message contains information generated by
Agriment Services Inc. and is solely for the intended
recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or
the use or disclosure of the information it contains may
violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal
penalties. If you believe you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender and delete the email
immediately.