20220714 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220523

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
O No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
4/21/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20220714 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
® No payment required
0 Fee received
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Doug Perez:eads\djperez
Information for Initial Review
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
la. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY Cross Charlotte Trail - Matheson to Craighead (XCLT M2C)
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Stephen Tosco
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
5/23/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Little Sugar Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.249286
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-80.810208
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0 Yes ® No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
21 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
OYes 0No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
O 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
O Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
O Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
14 - Linear transportation
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
OYes 0No
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
O Owner O Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Charlotte and Right of Entry Agreements
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Stephen Tosco
2d. Address
Street Address
600 E Fourth Street
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28202
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
United States

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
Stephen.Tosco@charlottenc. gov
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
BP Trail LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Dan Fitzpatrick
2d. Address
Street Address
3328 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 100
Address Line 2
City
Atlanta
Postal / Zip Code
30326
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
4b. Business Name:
Kimley-Horn and Associates
4c. Address
Street Address
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28202
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
GA
Country
United States
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
United States
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
'lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
tc. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size:
08303151
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Postal / Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters

3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Little Sugar Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUG in which the project is located.
030501030102
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The project corridor is located along Cullman Avenue in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC. The site is comprised of undeveloped forest land, a railroad and associated easement, the
northern ROW of Cullman Avenue, and vacant land. One wetland is present on -site. The site is bound by vacant land, a sanitary sewer easement, and a powerline easement to the north,
multifamily residential development to the west, multifamily residential and industrial developments to the south, and E 36th Street to the east.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes O No 0 Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.35
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of this project is to construct an approximately 0.36-mile-long multi -use trail. The project improvements involve the construction of a 0.36-mile-long, 12' wide greenway. The
project also includes five (5) piers to support the greenway bridge structure.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project proposes the construction of a greenway segment. Temporary impacts include 0.35-ac of wetland impacts for construction activities necessary to construct the greenway
bridge structure. General construction equipment includes, but are not limited to, bulldozers, excavators, front-end loaders, etc. used for construction purposes.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
*Yes ONo
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
O Preliminary 0 Approved 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown O N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2018-01201
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Kimley-Horn and Associates
0 Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
3/17/2019
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes O No
6b. If yes, explain.
When complete, the Cross Charlotte Trail will include 30+ miles of trail and connectors. Currently, half of the overall trail is in design or under construction. Per coordination with USACE
and NCDWR, any impacts associated with future phases of the project require compensatory mitigation. The City of Charlotte will continue to address future phases of the project and
mitigation requirements associated with those phases with USACE and NCDWR when necessary.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary

la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
O Wetlands
O Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
O Streams -tributaries
O Pond Construction
O Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
Impact 1
Construction access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W1
Yes
DWR
0.340
(acres)
Impact 2
Pier -support
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W1
Yes
DWR
0.006
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.346
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.346
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000
2i. Comments:
The overall project includes the construction of a 0.36-mile-long, 12' wide greenway bridge structure on the site. The proposed development seeks
authorization under NWP14 and Individual 401 WQC for temporary wetland impacts associated with construction activities and equipment access
necessary to perform the construction activities. The proposed impact (Impact 1) will result in 0.34-acre of temporary impacts to Wetland 1 (W1).
Authorization is also requested for temporary wetland impacts associated with the installation of five (5) piers to support the greenway bridge structure
over W1. Each pier is 13' long and 4' wide, for a combined temporary impact area of 0.006-ac (Impact 2).
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the greatest extent practicable in order to reduce the
overall impacts on the aquatic environment. The rationale to support avoidance and minimization efforts include the following:
• Wetland 1 — Impacts 1 and 2
- Permanent impacts to W1 have been avoided through the design of a pier -supported structure, in lieu of permanent grading and fill within W1.
- All disturbed areas will be returned to preconstruction contours following completion of construction.
- Forested wetland areas that are cleared during construction activities will be revegetated. Coir fiber matting will be installed, as needed, and a native
temporary seed mix will be applied immediately following construction activities. A planting plan including the application of a native permanent wetland
seed mix and the installation of native wetland live stakes and/or bare roots will be conducted to reestablish forested wetland conditions.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Temporary erosion control measures, including but not limited to silt fencing, will be implemented to minimize sediment laden runoff from exiting the site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes O No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Project impacts do not exceed wetland mitigation thresholds (0.1-acre permanent wetland impact), therefore wetland mitigation is not proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes ) No
If no, explain why:
The project does not include nor is adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
0Yes ®No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
® Yes 0 No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
0• Yes No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes • No
Comments: *
The project will utilize local funds only, and does not require preparation of a NEPA/SEPA.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes • No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is designed to construct a greenway segment. No additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated due to the construction of the proposed
project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0Yes 0No®N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
O Yes 0 No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes 0 No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes • No
• No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S
OYes 0No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0Yes ®No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes • No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes 0 No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on February 25, 2022, did not indicate known occurrences of threatened or
endangered species within the project boundary. Potentially suitable habitat for threatened and endangered species on -site was assessed. A
concurrence request letter was submitted to the USFWS on March 14, 2022. A response from USFWS was received on April 13, 2022. A copy of the
request and USFWS's response are attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes • No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes v No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service on March 4, 2022. No historical,
archeological, or cultural resources were identified within the site boundary. A request letter was submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of
archeological, cultural, or historic resources on March 7, 2022. A response from SHPO was received on March 29, 2022. A copy of the request and
SHPO's response are attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
O Yes O. No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A flood impact analysis report, no -impact certification, and individual floodplain development permit will be submitted to Mecklenburg County for review
and approval prior to construction/restoration activities. The results of the flood impact analysis show that there is no net increase in base flood
elevations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FIRM Panels 3710455500L and 3710456500K
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
_20220418 XCLT M2C PCN Final Optimized.pdf 14.31MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Chris Tinklenberg
Signature
Date
5/23/2022

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: XCLT Matheson to Craighead
2. Work Type: Private ❑Institutional ❑Government
Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The City of Charlotte proposes to construct a greenway segment on an approximately 2.77-acre property along Cullman Avenue in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
(1) BP Trail LLC (POC: Dan Fitzpatrick)
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: (2) City of Charlotte and Right of Entry Agreements
(POC: Stephen Tosco)
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS (Kimley-Horn)
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
The project is located along Cullman Avenue in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Project Coordinates (decimal degrees): 35.249286, -80.810208
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B 1 a] : 08303151
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Little Sugar Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Catawba 03050103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #14
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 fl
❑Pre -Application Request
F7 Unauthorized Activity
F7 Compliance
FINo Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Kimley>»Horn
April 18, 2022
Mr. Paul Wojoski
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Wilminton District, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Re: Pre -Construction Notification (NWP #14, Individual 401 WQC)
Cross Charlotte Trail — Matheson to Craighead (XCLT M2C)
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Wojoski and Mr. Roden -Reynolds:
On behalf of our client, the City of Charlotte, Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting the enclosed Pre -construction
Notification for the above -referenced project for your review pursuant to Nationwide Permit #14 (NWP14) and
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC). The proposed project seeks to construct a 0.36-mile-long, 12'
wide greenway bridge structure. Authorization is requested under NWP14 and Individual 401 WQC to temporarily
impact 0.35-acre of wetland necessary to install five (5) cast -in -place concrete piers as well as for construction
activities and equipment access. The center of the project area is located at 35.249286°,-80.810208°. The following
information is included as part of this application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Agent Authorization
• Project Site Figures
• Figure 1 — Vicinity
• Figure 2 — USGS 7.5' Topo (Charlotte East, Derita Quadrangles)
• Figure 3 — NRCS SSURGO Soils (2022 Nearmap Aerial)
• Figure 4 — Existing Conditions (2022 Nearmap Aerial)
• Figure 5 — Proposed Conditions (2022 Nearmap Aerial)
• Permit Drawings
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
• Agency Correspondence
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The Cross Charlotte Trail (XCLT) is a proposed 30+ mile -long trail and greenway facility stretching from the North -
South Carolina state line in Pineville to the Cabarrus County line. Through a partnership between the City of
Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, this trail will connect parks, landmarks, and major employment centers, and will
serve both passive and active recreational opportunities for greenway users, while maintaining and preserving the
natural aspects of the corridor. To the extents practicable, the 30+-mile corridor will utilize existing and maintained
sanitary sewer easement corridors in order to reduce clearing impacts.
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley>>>Horn
Page 2
XCLT Matheson to Craighead is a proposed 0.36-mile-long, 12' wide section of the XCLT greenway located in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC. The project proposes the development of a pier -supported greenway bridge
structure.
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service on
March 4, 2022. No historical, archeological, or cultural resources were identified within the site boundary. A request
letter was submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of archeological, cultural, or historic resources on March
7, 2022. A response from SHPO was received on March 29, 2022. A copy of the request and SHPO's response are
attached.
PROTECTED SPECIES
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on February 25, 2022, did not indicate
known occurrences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary. Potentially suitable habitat
for threatened and endangered species on -site was assessed. A concurrence request letter was submitted to the
USFWS on March 14, 2022. A response from USFWS was received on April 13, 2022. A copy of the request and
USFWS's response are attached.
PROPOSED IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
The overall project includes the construction of a 0.36-mile-long, 12' wide greenway bridge structure on the site.
The proposed development seeks authorization under NWP14 and Individual 401 WQC for temporary wetland
impacts associated with construction activities and equipment access necessary to perform the construction
activities. The proposed impact (Impact 1) will result in 0.34-acre of temporary impacts to Wetland 1 (W1).
Authorization is also requested for temporary wetland impacts associated with the installation of five (5) piers to
support the greenway bridge structure over W1. Each pier is 13' long and 4' wide, for a combined temporary impact
area of 0.006-ac (Impact 2).
Overall, impacts associated with the proposed development will result in 0.35-acre of temporary impacts
to wetland -waters of the US.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the greatest
extent practicable in order to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment. The rationale to support
avoidance and minimization efforts include the following:
• Wetland 1 — Impacts 1 and 2
o Permanent impacts to W1 have been avoided through the design of a pier -supported structure, in
lieu of permanent grading and fill within W1.
o All disturbed areas will be returned to preconstruction contours following completion of construction.
o Forested wetland areas that are cleared during construction activities will be revegetated. Coir fiber
matting will be installed, as needed, and a native temporary seed mix will be applied immediately
following construction activities. A planting plan including the application of a native permanent
wetland seed mix and the installation of native wetland live stakes and/or bare roots will be
conducted to reestablish forested wetland conditions.
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley>>>Horn
Page 3
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Project impacts do not exceed wetland mitigation thresholds (0.1-acre permanent wetland impact), therefore
wetland mitigation is not proposed.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
V TI 4` Cyr`
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley>>>Horn
Project Summary Sheet
Project Name: Cross Charlotte Trail — Matheson to Craighead (XCLT M2C)
Applicant Name and Address: The City of Charlotte (POC: Stephen Tosco)
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 980-293-0992
Type of Request:
Included Attachments:
Check if applicable:
® Nationwide PCN (NWP #14)
❑ Jurisdictional Determination
® Project Plans
® Agent Authorization
❑ Data Forms (Up & Wet)
❑ NCDMS Confirmation
® Agency Correspondence
❑ CAMA County
❑ Section 7, ESA
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑
County: Mecklenburg
Waterway: Little Sugar Creek
H.U.C.: 03050103
Property Size (acres): 2.77 acres
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees):
❑ Individual Permit Application
® Other: Individua1 401 Water Quality
Certification
® USGS Map
❑ Delineation Sketch
❑ NCDWR Stream Forms
® Aerial Photo
❑ Other:
® NRCS Soil Survey
® Delineation Survey
❑ USACE Stream Forms
❑ Site Photos
❑ Other:
❑ Trout County ❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Section 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
NC EEP ❑ On -Site ❑ Off -Site ❑ Other)
Nearest City/Town: Charlotte
River Basin: Catawba
USGS Quad Name: Charlotte E and Derita
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 0.35 ac
35.249286 °N-80.810208 °W
Project Location: The project corridor is located along Cullman Avenue in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC.
Site Description: The proposed project includes the construction of an approximately 0.36-mile multi -use trail on new
location.
Impact Summary (if applicable): Authorization is requested under NWP 14 and Individual 401 Water Quality
Certification for temporary impacts associated with the proposed development. Construction activities and the construction
of five (5) 13' by 4' piers will result in 0.35-acre of temporary impacts to wetland -waters of the US.
NWP
#
Open Water
(acres)
Wetland
(acres)
Stream Channel
Intermittent and/or Unimportant
Aquatic Function
Perennial and/or Important
Aquatic Function
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
if
ac
if
ac
if
ac
if
Ac
14
0.35
Total
0.35
Total Permanent (Loss) Impact to Wetland Waters of the U.S.
0
Total Permanent (Loss) Impact to Non -Wetland Waters of the U.S.
0
Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinldenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
kimley-hom.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
10 Permit
0 Section 404 Permit ❑ Section
lb. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
0 Yes ❑ No
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
El 401 Water Quality Certification — Individual ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter
fee program.
program proposed for mitigation
from mitigation bank or in -lieu
❑ Yes 0 No
lg. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer
lh below.
❑ Yes 0 No
lh. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Cross Charlotte Trail — Matheson to Craighead (XCLT M2C)
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
(1) BP Trail LLC (POC: Dan Fitzpatrick)
(2) City of Charlotte and Right of Entry Agreements (POC: Stephen Tosco)
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
(1) 3328 Peachtree Road NE Suite 100
(2) 600 East Fourth Street
3e. City, state, zip:
(1) Atlanta, GA 30326
(2) Charlotte, NC 28202
3f. Telephone no.:
(1) 770 822 2090
(2) 980-293-0992
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
(1) [e-mail]
(2) [e-mail]
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn and Associates
5c. Street address:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
5e. Telephone no.:
704-409-1802
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
08303151
lb. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.249286 Longitude: -80.810208
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
lc. Property size:
2.77 acres (Limits of Disturbance)
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed
project:
Little Sugar Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Catawba (HUC 03050103)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project corridor is located along Cullman Avenue in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC. The site is comprised of
undeveloped forest land, a railroad and associated easement, the northern ROW of Cullman Avenue, and vacant land. One
wetland is present on -site. The site is bound by vacant land, a sanitary sewer easement, and a powerline easement to the
north, multifamily residential development to the west, multifamily residential and industrial developments to the south, and
E 36' Street to the east.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.35 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
0 linear feet.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to construct an approximately 0.36-mile-long multi -use trail. The project improvements involve
the construction of a 0.36-mile-long, 12' wide greenway. The project also includes five (5) piers to support the greenway
bridge structure.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project proposes the construction of a greenway segment. Temporary impacts include 0.35-ac of wetland impacts for
construction activities necessary to construct the greenway bridge structure. General construction equipment includes, but
are not limited to, bulldozers, excavators, front-end loaders, etc. used for construction purposes.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps
or State been requested or obtained for this property / project
(including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: SAW-2018-01201
a Yes ❑ No Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of
determination was made?
a Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
3/7/2019
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes // No ❑Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
a Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
When complete, the Cross Charlotte Trail will include 30+ miles of trail and connectors. Currently, half of the overall trail is in
design or under construction. Per coordination with USACE and NCDWR, any impacts associated with future phases of the
project require compensatory mitigation. The City of Charlotte will continue to address future phases of the project and mitigation
requirements associated with those phases with USACE and NCDWR when necessary.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la.
0
❑
Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of
jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ - non-
404, other)
2f.
Area of impact (acres)
Impact 1
❑ P
-
0
W1
T
Construction access
PFO
Y
❑
0DWQ
Corps
0.34
Impact
❑ P
2 -
0
W1
T
Pier -support
PFO
Y
❑
0DWQ
Corps
0.006
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.35
2h. Comments:
The overall project includes the construction of a 0.36-mile-long, 12' wide greenway bridge structure on the site. The proposed
development seeks authorization under NWP14 and Individual 401 WQC for temporary wetland impacts associated with
construction activities and equipment access necessary to perform the construction activities. The proposed impact (Impact 1)
will result in 0.34-acre of temporary impacts to Wetland 1 (W1).
Authorization is also requested for temporary wetland impacts associated with the installation of five (5) piers to support the
greenway bridge structure over W1. Each pier is 13' long and 4' wide, for a combined temporary impact area of 0.006-ac (Impact
2).
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ - non-
404, other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
- Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact
(acres)
❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
p and
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Exeadvat
Flooded
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
6c.
Reason
for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The proposed project will not impact protected riparian buffers.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the greatest extent
practicable in order to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment. The rationale to support avoidance and
minimization efforts include the following:
• Wetland 1 — Impacts 1 and 2
- Permanent impacts to W1 have been avoided through the design of a pier -supported structure, in lieu of permanent
grading and fill within W1.
- All disturbed areas will be returned to preconstruction contours following completion of construction.
- Forested wetland areas that are cleared during construction activities will be revegetated. Coir fiber matting will be
installed, as needed, and a native temporary seed mix will be applied immediately following construction activities. A
planting plan including the application of a native permanent wetland seed mix and the installation of native wetland
live stakes and/or bare roots will be conducted to reestablish forested wetland conditions.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Temporary erosion control measures, including but not limited to silt fencing, will be implemented to minimize sediment laden
runoff from exiting the site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes 0 No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes // No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.657%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Linear public transportation projects are required to treat stormwater runoff to the Maximum Extent Practicable in
accordance with the practices described in the NCDOT Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual. Diffuse flow will be
implemented to provide proper drainage and water treatment.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
N/A
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase II
NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
0 Yes ❑ No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑ Yes 0 No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments: N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes // No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is designed to construct a greenway segment. No additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated due to the
construction of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility:
N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ No
0 Yes
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ No
0 Yes
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Raleigh
0 Asheville
Page llof12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on February 25, 2022, did not indicate known
occurrences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary. Potentially suitable habitat for threatened
and endangered species on -site was assessed. A concurrence request letter was submitted to the USFWS on March 14,
2022. A response from USFWS was received on April 13, 2022. A copy of the request and USFWS's response are attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes //
No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service on March 4,
2022. No historical, archeological, or cultural resources were identified within the site boundary. A request letter was
submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of archeological, cultural, or historic resources on March 7, 2022. A response
from SHPO was received on March 29, 2022. A copy of the request and SHPO's response are attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
No
0 Yes ❑
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A flood impact analysis report, no -impact certification, and individual floodplain development permit will be submitted to
Mecklenburg County for review and approval prior to construction/restoration activities. The results of the flood impact
analysis show that there is no net increase in base flood elevations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panels 3710455500L and 3710456500K
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
7c.��-
4/18/2022
���
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Date
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: City of Charlotte (Stephen Tosco)
Address: 600 East 4t1i Street, Charlotte NC 28202
Phone: [phone]
Email: Stephen.Tosco(acharlottenc.gov
Project Name/Description: Cross Charlotte Trail — Matheson to Craighead
Date: 03/25/2022
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
Attention: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
The City of Charlotte . hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates,
Inc. to act in my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional
Determinations, Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications and
to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day
forward until successful completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, under contract to purchase the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the 25th day of March, 2022.
Stephen Tosco
Authorized Representative Authorized Representative
(Print Name) (Signature)

FIGURES

Pr
orerPr s° s
Tryon, Hills
0 4
py` iLe ki,4r
e 4 s.
r3 air
Sf
$
ff
n)Il.fin 1
�Yrlri r,
N&. ham rlu
fordJn Al
F
Pgi
¢alL�t�
Frew RA
rin I,bnd
FisrI'.Jarnr
e
rn
a" a ^P°
k
F Vy J
r S� o- you A"v o° F 'nr
#g �a
P
t°}yo 1
5•
I-ISrntrnK mill
+-I•1I ile: ri
E Inri n nra i .
4» aw .. -ice
A
s lcN G3,,,rf a,Yd�
% z
64
t'
a6Y s
dc' F3
G 0k :: •
Mecklenburg
County
Kimley>»Horn
Legend
Limits of Disturbance
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
April 2022

Kimley>»Horn
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Charlotte East, Derita) Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
April 2022

U Limits of Disturbance
NWI Wetlands
SSURGO Soils
Hydric Rating
Not Hydric (0%)
neat uar r
rw.enn. 1 f:l•yLT'Yy
I aaalr.Nrlalw man.rl K L•����ro
Kimley»>Horn
Figure 3
SSURGO Soils Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
April 2022

Limits of Disturbance
Existing Contours
Wetlands
Kimley»>Horn
Figure 4
Existing Conditions Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
April 2022

Legend
Limits of Disturbance
eZ Temporary Wetland Impacts
Proposed Greenway
Tree Save
Proposed Greenway Bridge Piers
Proposed Greenway Bridge Piers Temporary Impact
Impact2 (W1)
0.006-ac - Temporary
Five (5) 13' by 4' Pilings
Impact 1 (W1)
0.34-ac - Temporary
0
200
Feet
400
Kimley»>Horn
Figure 5
Proposed Conditions Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
April 2022

PERMIT DRAWINGS

INDEX OF SHEETS
COVER SHEET
1
GENERAL NOTES 2
DETAILS 2A TO 2B
TYPICAL SECTIONS 3
PLAN & PROFILE 4 TO 9
TRAFFIC CONTROL TCP-1
CROSS SECTIONS XS-1 TO XS-3
STRUCTURAL PLANS S-1 TO S-6
BEGIN
PROJECT
r
TOTAL SHEET 21 1
VICINITY MAP
NTS
END PROJECT
Begin Project
Sta. 1+61.21 -Ll-
SURVEY PREPARED BY: ESP
HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL WAS PROVIDED
BY STV RAPLH WHITEHEAD ASSOCIATES INC. AND CES
GROUP AS PART OF THE LYNX BLUE LINE EXTENSION
NORTHEAST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT (SHEETS
CIV-A-1103 THRU CIV-A-1107) DATED 9/30/13
SURVEY PREPARED BY: LYNX BLUE LINE
eN
0
0
6
XCLT M2C
Plotted By
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR
THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE
COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY OTHERS FROM
MONUMENT "GPS 8" WITH NAD 1983/95 STATE PLANE
GRID. COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 558137.267 (ft)
EASTING: 1472481.022 (ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID
FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS:
0.99984137.
THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED
HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "GPS 8" TO
-NSRNB- STATION 14+85.06 IS S 58° 08' 52.57" W, 16,157.19'
THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED
HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "GPS 8" TO
-NSRSB- STATION 9+15.28 IS S 58° 05' 52.96" W, 16,725.99
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL
DISTANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS BASED ON "GPS
8": ELEV. 800.21 (ft), NAVD 88
PLANS PREPARED BY:
Kimley» Horn©2022
NC LICENSE #F-0102
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Phone: [phone]
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
•
(CD)
CHARLOTTE..
GENERAL SERVICES
Construction Plans of Proposed
Cross Charlotte Trail - Matheson to Craighead
Project No. 171504
Project Features:
CONCRETE MULTI -USE PATH WITH CONCRETE GIRDER APPROACH STRUCTURES,
PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, AND SEGMENTED MSE RETAINING WALLS
LOCATION MAP
1" = 250'
PROJECT LENGTH = 0.34 MILES
2018 NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
stasitittir
PE SEAL
Record Drawings
End Project
Sta. 21+21.42 -Ll-
GRAPHIC SCALES
RECOMMENDED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
CDOT - Design
CDOT - Implementation
CLT Water
Construction Administration
Contract Administration
Engineering Services
Landscape Management
Planning, Design & Development
Storm Water Services
Utility Coordination
,iii
Plan View
Horz. Profile
Vert. Profile
Cross Section
20
— -
- -
20
— -
- —
4
— —
5
40
■
40
■
■
8
■
10
60
■
60
■
■
12
■
15
— -
- —
cmi
CHARLOTTE.
GENERAL SERVICES
APPROVED
Bid Set No.
FOR CITY ENGINEER
DATE
{
J
50% PLANS
a4
W
c•
U
CA
w
w
U
CA
CA
cJ
a4
"o
AO

Q
co
rn
N
rn
0
N
February 04,
Set: XCLT M2C
Plotted By
Thr
GENERAL NOTES
PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET AND ADJUST PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS AS NECESSARY TO
ENSURE PROPER LONGITUDINAL GRADE FOR DRAINAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN
EXISTING PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS:
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXPANSION JOINT TO EXPANSION
JOINT. MATCH REPLACEMENT MATERIALS TO THE EXISTING SURFACE ACCORDINGLY:
o CONCRETE — SIX INCH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (3600 PSI).
o ASPHALT — (COMMERCIAL) TWO INCH S9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH I19.00
INTERMEDIATE COURSE.
(RESIDENTAL) TWO INCH S9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH AGGREGATE
BASE (ABC) COURSE.
o GRAVEL — SIX INCH INCIDENTAL STONE
SIDEWALK SHALL BE FOUR INCHES THICK, AND SIX INCHES THICK AT DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS,
PER CITY STD. NO. 10.22.
CROSS SLOPES ON SIDEWALKS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.75%.
RUNNING SLOPES ALONG SIDEWALKS SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.0%, OR THE ADJACENT
ROADWAY SLOPE AS MEASURED AT THE GUTTER PAN, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
A TURNING SPACE (LANDING) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE A
PEDESTRIAN MIGHT TURN TO CHANGE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE LANDING SHALL BE A
MINIMUM OF 4 FEET BY 4 FEET, UNLESS NOTED BY THE ENGINEER. TYPICALLY LANDING
DIMENSIONS WILL MATCH SIDEWALK WIDTH. THE LANDING ALSO SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%
SLOPE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO THE ROADWAY. THE LANDING ALSO SHALL NOT
EXCEED 2.0% OR ADJACENT ROADWAY SLOPE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, MEASURED
PARALLEL TO THE ROADWAY.
A CROSS SLOPE TRANSITION PANEL MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PROPOSED SIDEWALK MEETS
EXISTING SIDEWALK WITH A CROSS SLOPE GREATER THEN 2.0%. THE TRANSITION PANEL
SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% ON THE SIDE OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND/OR RAMP, AND
SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE ON THE SIDE OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALK.
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES:
GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER, THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS,
OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION
BOXES, AND THE MIDPOINT OF THE LIP FOR CATCH BASINS. PIPE AND BOX CULVERT LENGTHS
ARE REPORTED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER
OF STRUCTURE, INCLUDING TRANSITIONS, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL BENDS. ALL PIPES SHALL
BE RCP CLASS III, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
WEEP HOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. IF REQUIRED, WEEP
HOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE BOTTOM 4 OF THE STRUCTURE. ATTACH HARDWARE
CLOTH (ALUMINUM OR GALVANIZED STEEL NO. 4 WIRE REINFORCEMENT) TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE
STRUCTURE WITH HEAVY DUTY CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE OVER THE WEEP HOLE. PLACE A
POROUS FABRIC BAG FILLED WITH ONE CUBIC FOOT OF NO. 78M STONE AT EACH WEEP HOLE
AGAINST THE HARDWARE CLOTH. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK.
UTILITIES:
UTILITIES ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE CITY WILL NOT BE
HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF UTILITY LOCATIONS. SIZES. DEPTHS. OR FOR
COMPLETENESS OF UTILITY INFORMATION.
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND VIA THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR,
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND MEET WITH ALL UTILITIES AFFECTED TO DETERMINE
UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED
BY HIS OPERATIONS OR THOSE OF HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE CITY
HARMLESS FOR ANY THIRD —PARTY INCONVENIENCE CREATED BY WORK OF HIS OWN FORCES
OR THAT OF HIS AGENTS. ANY DAMAGES INCURRED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS FINANCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY.
AS NEEDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST/RELOCATE THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER
LINES ONLY. ALL OTHER ADJUSTMENTS/RELOCATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE VARIOUS
UTILITY OWNERS. VIA THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH UTILITY OWNERS SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY
AFFECT THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
DELAYS OR DISRUPTIONS TO THE WORK SCHEDULE OF OTHER UTILITY OWNERS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL STAY A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET AWAY FROM ALL UTILITY POLES.
o FOR UTILITY LOCATES CALL NORTH CAROLINA ONE —CALL ® 1-800-632-4949.
o WARNING: OVERHEAD UTILITIES. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED FOR RELOCATION, THE
CONTRACTOR IS TO WORK UNDER ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL WATER VALVES, WATER METER BOXES AND WATER
VAULTS TO FINISHED GRADE. WATER METERS LOCATED IN SIDEWALKS OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS
SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN CONCRETE BOXES.
GAS LINES WILL BE ADJUSTED/RELOCATED AS NEEDED BY PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. VIA THE
CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PIEDMONT
NATURAL GAS AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE:
PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY WATER AND/OR SANITARY SEWER WORK, CONTACT THE
CHARLOTTE WATER PROJECT MANAGER, AND AN INSPECTOR WILL BE PROVIDED FOR WORK
OVERSIGHT.
WHERE SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER LINES ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
USE CARE IN WORKING AROUND OR NEAR THEM. IF AN EXISTING SEWER OR WATER LINE IS
DAMAGED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT THE PROBLEM TO CHARMECK 311
AND THE CHARLOTTE WATER PROJECT MANAGER AND INSPECTOR, AND REPLACE THE SEWER
OR WATER LINE WITH CLASS 350 DUCTILE IRON PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE A
MINIMUM OF 18 FEET OF SANITARY SEWER AND/OR WATER LINE WITH CLASS 350 DUCTILE
IRON PIPE WHEN ANY OF THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCES OUTLINED IN THE SPECIAL
PROVISIONS FOR THIS PROJECT ARE NOT MET. ALL WATER VALVES, WATER METER BOXES,
AND WATER VAULTS AFFECTED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE ADJUSTED TO THE
FINISHED GRADE BY THE CONTRACTOR.
WATER AND SEWER MAINS ARE TO REMAIN ACTIVE DURING CONSTRUCTION. IF THIS IS NOT
POSSIBLE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW CHARLOTTE WATER PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED IN
THE DESIGN MANUAL AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS REGARDING OUTAGES, TEMPORARY WATER
SERVICE AND BYPASS SEWER PUMPING. ALL PLANNED OUTAGES ARE TO BE COORDINATED
WITH CHARLOTTE WATER, WITH A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS NOTICES TO THE AFFECTED
RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES.
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICE LATERALS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AND
WILL BE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
COORDINATION WITH CHARLOTTE WATER PERSONNEL TO ENSURE THAT ALL EXISTING SERVICES
ARE RELOCATED AND KEPT IN SERVICE. THIS WORK IS INCIDENTAL TO ALL CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES.
SUBSURFACE PLANS:
NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MAY MAKE
HIS OWN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.
MAIL BOXES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL MAIL BOXES AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 107-11 OF THE
NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES. COORDINATE THIS WORK WITH
THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
GENERAL NOTES
FENCES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND/OR AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES:
THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES WITHIN THE
EASEMENT LINES UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO BE PROTECTED. WHEN ROOT PRUNING
IS NECESSARY, CUT ROOTS CLEANLY USING A DISC TRENCHER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
01000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. PRUNING SHALL
BE PER THE LATEST STANDARD OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL
(TYP.) USE PLYWOOD FORMS WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CURB &
GUTTER OR SIDEWALK. USE CLD STD. 40.11 FOR BRIDGING TREE ROOTS. TREES SPECIFIED BY
THE PLANS TO HAVE ASPHALT CURBING MUST USE CLD STD. 40.13. TREE PROTECTION SHALL
BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLD STD. 40.02. WHEN THE TREE IS CLOSE TO THE WORK AREA
TREE PROTECTION CLD STD. 40.12 SHALL BE USED.
SIDE SLOPES:
LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD
DRAWINGS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3:1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)
UNLESS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. A CUT SLOPE OF 2:1 MAXIMUM WILL BE USED ONLY
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND DEPRESSED CURB:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 6—INCH THICK CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS AT
INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS
DETAILS, "PROPOSED ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC
RIGHT—OF—WAY" (PROWAG), CONSTRUCTION PLANS & NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS.
RUNNING SLOPES ALONG CURB RAMPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 8.3%, BUT SHALL NOT REQUIRE
THE RAMP LENGTH TO EXCEED 15 FEET, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
ALL PANELS OF THE RAMP MUST EQUAL THE SAME PERCENTAGE.
FLARES SHALL BE 10.0% MAXIMUM SLOPE (WHERE APPLICABLE), UNLESS OTHERWISE
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
RAMP CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.75%, OR THE ADJACENT ROADWAY SLOPE AS
MEASURED AT THE GUTTER PAN, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
A TURNING SPACE (LANDING) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE A PEDESTRIAN
MIGHT TURN TO CHANGE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE LANDING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4
FEET BY 4 FEET, UNLESS NOTED BY THE ENGINEER. TYPICALLY LANDING DIMENSIONS WILL
MATCH SIDEWALK WIDTH. THE LANDING SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.75% SLOPE MEASURED
PERPENDICULAR TO THE ROADWAY. THE LANDING ALSO SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.75% OR
ADJACENT ROADWAY SLOPE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE
ROADWAY.
SAWCUTS:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT AND/OR CONCRETE SURFACES PRIOR
TO REMOVAL UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SAW CUT WIDTH SHALL BE
1 FOOT MINIMUM FROM THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SAW CUT PAVEMENT SHALL BE
REPLACED AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT REQUIRED TO TIE—IN TO FACE OF
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER.
Y
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE "WORK
AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK" (WATCH) AND THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ON SHEET
TCP-1.
STANDARDS
THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND THE LATEST REVISION THERETO ARE APPLICABLE
TO THIS PROJECT AND BY REFERENCE ARE CONSIDERED A PART OF THESE PLANS.
NCDOT STANDARDS SHALL BE USED. CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MAY BE USED IF THERE IS NOT AN APPLICABLE NCDOT STANDARD.
NCDOT:
STD. NO.:
200.02
300.01
654.01
840.14
840.31
1101.01
1101.02
1101.04
1101.11
1110.02
1135.01
1150.01
1205.01
1205.08
TITLE:
METHOD OF CLEARING - METHOD II
METHOD OF PIPE INSTALLATION
PAVEMENT REPAIRS
CONCRETE DROP INLET
CONCRETE JUNCTION BOX
WORK ZONE ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS
TEMPORARY LANE CLOSURES
TEMPORARY SHOULDER CLOSURES
TRAFFIC CONTROL DESIGN TABLES
PORTABLE WORK ZONE SIGNS
CONES
FLAGGING DEVICES
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
PAVEMENT MARKINGS - SYMBOLS AND WORD MESSAGES
CITY OF CHARLOTTE:
STD. NO.:
10.17A
10.17B
10.31A
10.31B
10.33
10.35B
20.03
50.04B
50.09B
TITLE:
STANDARD CURB AND GUTTER
CURB AND GUTTER
PERPENDICULAR CURB RAMP WITH 2'-6" CURB AND GUTTER
PERPENDICULAR CURB RAMP WITH 2'-6" CURB AND GUTTER
PERPENDICULAR CURB RAMP WITH 2'-0" VALLEY GUTTER
TRUNCATED DOMES PLAN AND CROSS-SECTION
BRICK DOUBLE CATCH BASIN
SAFETY RAIL WARRANT
ACCESSIBLE ON -STREET PARALLEL PARKING
ABBREVIATIONS
ABAND ABANDONED
A.D ALGEBRAIC DIFFERENCE
ASPH ASPHALT
APPROX APPROXIMATELY
BOC BACK OF CURB
BIT BITUMINOUS
BM BENCH MARK
BRG BEARING
CB CATCH BASIN
C&G CURB AND GUTTER
CL CLEARANCE
C/L FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE
CMP CORRUGATED MTL PIPE
CONC CONCRETE
CONST CONSTRUCTION
DB DEED BOOK
DCB DOUBLE CB
DI DROP INLET
DIA DIAMETER
DW DRIVEWAY
DIM DIMENSION
E EAST/EASTING
EA EACH
ELEV ELEVATION
EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ESMT EASEMENT
EXIST EXISTING
F/C FACE OF CURB
FES FLARED END SECTION
FH FIRE HYDRANT
FOC FIBER OPTIC CABLE
GV GAS VALVE
HORIZ HORIZONTAL
INT INTERSECTION
INV INVERT
IP IRON PIN SET
L LENGTH
LF LINEAR FOOTAGE
LT LEFT
lb POUND
LP LIGHT POLE
MAX MAXIMUM
MIN MINIMUM
MONO MONOLITHIC
mph MILES PER HOUR
MTL METAL
N NORTH/NORTHING
NTS NOT TO SCALE
0/H OVER HEAD
OC ON CENTER
PAVT PAVEMENT
PC POINT OF CURVATURE
PERM PERMANENT
PG PAGE
PI POINT OF INT
PK PK NAIL SET
PP POWER POLE
PROP PROPOSED
PSE PERM SW ESMT
PT POINT OF TANGENCY
PVI POINT OF VERT INT
r RADIUS
RT RIGHT
RCP REINFORCED CONC PIPE
RELOC RELOCATE
R/W RIGHT OF WAY
S SOUTH
SD STORM DRAIN
SF SQUARE FOOT
S/R FENCE SPLIT RAIL FENCE
SS SANITARY SEWER
STA STATION
STD STANDARD
SW SIDEWALK
TAN TANGENT
TCE TEMP CONST ESMT
TEMP TEMPORARY
TP TRAVERSE POINT
T/W TEST WIRE
TYP TYPICAL
U/G UNDER GROUND
UTE PERM UTILITY ESMT
VC VERTICAL CURVE
VERT VERTICAL
W WEST
W/ WITH
WM WATER METER
W VAULT WATER VAULT
WV WATER VALVE
60p SIXTY PENNY NAIL SET
FOOT
INCH
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
Proposed Property Line
Existing Property Line
Maintained as R/W Line
Slope Stake Cut line
Slope Stake Fill line
Conservation Easement
Temporary Construction Easement
Sidewalk/Utility Easement
Storm Drainage Easement
Utility Easement
Post Construction Controls Easement
Existing Easement
Existing Gas Line
Proposed Gas Line
Existing Water Line
Proposed Water Line
Existing Sanitary Sewer ----------------
Proposed Sanitary Sewer
Existing Underground Telecommunications---------------------------
Existing Underground Electric
Existing Overhead Utilities
Existing Overhead Electric
Existing Overhead Telephone
Existing Underground Cable TV
Existing Underground Fiber Optic
Existing Overhead Fiber Optic
Proposed Underground
Proposed Overhead
Existing Storm Drainage
Proposed Storm Drainage
Existing Guardrail
Proposed Guardrail
Existing Fence
Proposed Fence
Silt Fence
Proposed Safety Rail
Creek/Ditch
Railroad Tracks
Accessible Ramp Domes
Tree Protection
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Conc. Drive, Sidewalk
Proposed Asphalt Pavement
Proposed Rip Rap Ditch
Proposed Gravel
Proposed Pavement Removal
Proposed Sidewalk Bridging Tree Roots
Sidewalk Cross Slope Transition
Asphalt Milling
EI
WON
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
Existing Tree
0
WM
Existing Water Meter ❑
wv
Existing Water Valve >a
Proposed Water Valve
GV
Existing Gas Valve >a
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Existing Storm Drain Manhole
Proposed Storm Drain Manhole
Existing Telephone Manhole
Proposed Telephone Manhole
Existing Electric Manhole
Proposed Electric Manhole
Existing Catch Basin
•
O
E�
Proposed Catch Basin
Existing Light Pole
Proposed Light Pole
Existing Utility Pole a
Guy Wire
Proposed Utility Pole Alk
Iron Pin 0
Existing Fire Hydrant
Proposed Fire Hydrant
Existing Drop Inlet L 1
•
J
Proposed Drop Inlet
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
Plans Prepared By:
E
NC License #F-0102
0
0
1.0
GOO
4.0 N
U
zz
E-
"AS
U
z
0
0
DESCRI PTI ON
0
z
PROGRESS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CHECKED BY
N
N
015016234
0
m
0
c)
z
PREPARED BY
APPROVED BY
GENERAL NOTES
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

N
0
N
February 04,
Set: XCLT M2C
Plotted By
3'-6"
SCH 40
AT 5" O.C.
(TYP.)
1'-0"
6'-0" (MAX. - EQUAL PANELS)
4"
1'-0"
R=4%z"
(TYP.)
1%4" RAIL
4"
(TYP.)
11/4" RAIL
9"
2"
NOTES:
1%4" RAIL
CONCRETE GREENWAY
SAFETY RAIL
1. PIPE RAILING & POST: SCHEDULE 40 GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A53.
2. BASE PLATE: BASE PLATE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM B209.
3. JOINTS: ALL FIXED JOINTS ARE TO BE EITHER WELDED ALL AROUND AND
GROUND SMOOTH OR COMMERCIALLY DESIGNED FIXED JOINT SYSTEMS
(SOLDERED, BRAZED, FUSED, BONDED OR SHRINK FITTED).
4. WELDING: ALL WELDING BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICAN
WELDING SOCIETY STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE.
5. RAIL ANCHORS SHOWN IN THIS DETAIL REFER TO ATTACHMENT TO CONCRETE
GREENWAY WITH FOOTINGS. IN LOCATIONS WHERE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IS ON
TOP OF OR ADJACENT TO RETAINING WALLS, THE SAFETY RAIL SHALL
BE INSTALLED TO THE RETAINING WALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
FINISHED
GRADE
CONCRETE FOOTING
CLASS AA CONCRETE
POST (1%4"
SCH. 40 STEEL
TUBING)
BASE MOUNT
GALVANIZED HEX
NUT & SQUARE
WASHER
3"
5/" BOLT EPDXIED
INTO CONCRETE
(MIN.)
24"
3"
(MIN.
•
18"
10"
HANDRAIL ANCHOR OUTSIDE OF CONCRETE GREENWAY
SAFETY RAIL
2
POST (1/4"
SCH. 40 STEEL
TUBING)
BASE MOUNT
GALVANIZED HEX
NUT & SQUARE
WASHER
%" BOLT EPDXIED
INTO CONCRETE
•
1) " RAIL
(4VYP. )
SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS
FOR FOOTING DETAILS
•
3"
(MIN.)
6"
3"
(MIN.)
HANDRAIL ANCHOR ON CONCRETE GREENWAY
/
VERTICAL RAIL
/" V
s
TOP RAIL
BOTTOM RAIL
9
RAIL CONNECTION
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
LJ
H
1
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
DETAILS
HAttG
o
II
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

N
00
N
N
0
0
February 04,
00
00
H
W
0
0
ID
0
00
0
Set: XCLT M2C
0
z
0
0
0
Plotted By
I
BACKFILL
MATERIAL
6" MIN
LIMITS OF
REINFORCED ZONE
SEPARATION GEOTEXTILE
(OMIT FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENT,
FULL DEPTH ASPHALT
OR CEMENT TREATED BASE)
o
GRADE
ELEVATION
FINISHED GRADE*
PAVEMENT
SECTION
3"MIN
SEPARATION GEOTEXTILE,
IF REQUIRED
(SEE NOTE FOR GEOTEXTILE)
AGGREGATE
COARSE
AGGREGATE
CONCRETE COPING
(SEE COPING DETAILS)
TOP OF WALL
18" MIN
— REINFORCEMENT LENGTHS (TYP)
(TYP)
POLYESTER TYPE (PET)OR HDPE GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT (TYP)
AGGREGATE SHOULDER DRAIN IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ROADWAY STANDARD
DRAWING NO. 816.02, IF REQUIRED
(SEE NOTE FOR DRAIN)
IV
TOP OF
LEVELING PAD
CAST —IN —PLACE UNREINFORCED
CONCRETE LEVELING PAD
(SEE SRW UNITS LEVELING PAD STEP DETAIL)
FOUNDATION
MATERIAL
BOTTOM
OF WALL
o $;o
9 5"b9 12c,
EXTENSION
6"MIN
WALL FACE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING
WALL (SRW) UNIT (TYP)
GAP BETWEEN BARRIER
AND WALL FILLED WITH
NO.78 STONE OR BACKER
ROD AND SILICONE SEALANT
FINISHED GRADE
6:1 (H:V) OR FLATTER
(FRONT SLOPE)
BENCH
4' MIN
2Z
FINISHED GRADE
2:1 (H:V) OR FLATTER
(FRONT SLOPE)
EMBEDMENT
H
6" MIN
6" MIN
(TYP)
SE WALL WITH SRW UNITS - TYPICAL SECTION
*SEE ROADWAY PLANS FOR FINISHED GRADE DETAILS.
4e16EE MSE RETAINING WALLS PROVISION AND IF APPLICABLE, MSE WALL NOTES FOR EMBEDMENT AND REINFORCEMENT LENGTH REQUIREMENTS.
GRADE
ELEVATION
FINISHED GRADE*
MSE RETAINING WALL
w + OVERHANG
CAST —IN —PLACE
REINFORCED
CONCRETE COPING
DOWEL
SRW UNIT WIDTH (w)
GRADE
ELEVATION
FINISHED GRADE*
COPING DETAILS
PAVEMENT 4"MIN
SECTION
AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION, CONNECT COPING TO SRW UNITS
WITH DOWELS OR EXTEND COPING DOWN BACK OF SRW UNITS.
*SEE ROADWAY PLANS FOR FINISHED GRADE DETAILS.
2B
w + OVERHANG
CAST —IN —PLACE
REINFORCED
CONCRETE COPING
SRW UNIT WIDTH (w)
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
F-
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
DETAILS
e-
SHEET
2B
4-1
°
Il
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

h
Ln
rn
N
0
Set: XCLT M2C
a)
Plotted By
EXISTING
GROUND
EXISTING
GROUND
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
1'
1
2.5'
EXISTING
PAVEMENT
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
12' WIDE CONCRETE GREENWAY
NOT TO SCALE
ALIGNMENT
L1
L1
L1
L1
SAFETY RAIL
•
EXISTING
GROUND
BEGIN STATION
1+61
18+59
6'
PGL
SLOPE VARIES
SLOPE VARIES
_■ I ■=
=mot .... " '. •.. � ••.:$::. • ....•...:.,,• Iram
ea a
14' -
at)
FOR SAWCUT DETAILS SEE
SAWCUT DETAIL THIS SHEET
END STATION
1+95
21+13
SAFETY RAIL
EXISTING
GROUND
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
12' CONCRETE GREENWAY TRAIL WITH WALL
NOT TO SCALE
ALIGNMENT
L1
L1
L1
L1
e3"
ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE (S9.5C) AT AN AVERAGE
RATE OF 336 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
la
PROPOSED APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONC. INTERMEDIATE COURSE TYPE
119.0C, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS PER SQ. YD.
a6"
ASPHALT CONC. BASE COURSE TYPE B25.0C, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF
684 LBS PER SQ. YD.
es
6" FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE
0
6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
faEARTH
MATERIAL
goMSE
RETAINING WALL
II
2'-6" CONCRETE CURB
BEGIN STATION
1+95
17+72
END STATION
2+37
18+58
SEE STRUCTURE PLANS
SHEETS S-2 TO S-6
C ALIGNMENT
L1
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
12' CONCRETE BOARDWALK
NOT TO SCALE
BEGIN STATION
SEE STRUCTURE PLANS
SHEETS S-2 TO S-6
9+87
END STATION
17+62
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4
12' WIDE PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
NOT TO SCALE
C ALIGNMENT
BEGIN STATION
END STATION 1
L1
8+50
9+87 J
SEE STRUCTURE PLANS
SHEETS S-2 TO S-6
12[0' -
PGL
14'-5" -
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 5
12' WIDE PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
C ALIGNMENT
L1
NOT TO SCALE
BEGIN STATION
2+37
END STATION
8+50
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
E-
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
TYPICAL SECTIONS
H
M
0
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

E
03
N
N
0
February 04,
0
T
0
Set: XCLT M2C
z
Plotted By: Doro,
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
boundary
follows centerline
•♦ v-
IL
v_
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C1
60.00'
66.63'
N38'57'19"E
63.26'
63'37'24"
37.22'
C2
60.00'
134.69'
N57'10'04"W
108.14'
128'37'22"
124.73'
C3
60.00'
181.95'
S28'21'15"E
119.82'
173'44'59"
1098.96'
V-
V-
BEGIN PROJECT
L1- STA:1+61.21
on.Ov ing
ells
5+00
70.29' —
IS58'31'15
APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF TREE
PROTECTION
SWIM/PCCO Buffer
EXISTING WALL TO
REMOVED S-T-) _1t95_11O 2+57
N 70'46'00"E
75.73'
'TAPER
END RETAINING WALL #1,*
-L1- STA:2+36.94
REMOVE AND RESET
EXISTING SAFETY RAIL STA. 1+95 TO 2+57
17 LF OF SAFETY RAIL SEE
DETAIL 1 SHEET 2A
SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS,
SHEETS S-3 TO S-6
EXISTING POLE TO BE
RELOCATED BY OTHERS
N64'46'16"E
441.24'
i
MATCHLINE -L1- STA 10+00 - SEE SHEET 7
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
CD)
41
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
u]
H
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
-L1- PLAN
t
LH
=
4-1
o
Il
N
71.
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

E
0
0
M
N
N
0
February 04,
LO
0
T
0
Set: XCLT M2C
z
Plotted By: Doro,
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
O
00
N
co
PVI STA:2+33.22
PVI ELEV:694.56
AD:3.42%
K:8.78
PROPOSED
GROUND
30.00' VC
NCO
•
V
NN-
N
CO
+
°
•4
Cfl
N
Cn
CO
W
N CO
(n W
EXISTING GROUND
AT DEVELOPMENT
>
a
w BEGIN
STA:
CONSTRUCTION
1+61.21
m
m
w w
/-
0.64%
SEE STRUCTURAL
SHEETS S-3 TO
PLANS
S-6
-
_
--
EXISTING
GROUND
1
O
00
N
co
O
00
N
f0
O
00
f0
0 O
00
O N
CO co
M O
00
O N
co
O
00
O N
co
N O
00
O N
O CO
N O
00
O N
O CO
N O
ri 00
O N
CO
N
06 00
O n
co co
0 O
Q) 00
O N
co
M 00
O 00
O N
^ f0
M
O
O n
^ co
M CA
CV 00
O N
^ t0
M N
p7 00
O N
^ f0
p j M
00
0 N
N co
1 +00
1 +50
2+00
2+50
3+00
PROFILE -L1-
Hor. Scale:1"=20'
Vert. Scale: 1 "=4'
3+50
4+00
4+50
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
CI)
M
1)
O
N
5+00
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
CD)
41
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
m
H
c
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
-L1- PROFILE
H
L t in
X
v)
4.
11
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

E
0
rr)
r0
0
February 04,
0
T
0
Set: XCLT M2C
z
Plotted By: Doro,
728
724
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
M
ad
N
co
HIGH POINT
ELEV:
STA: S
STA:10+12.
ELEV:719.:
AD:5.00%
K:10.00
50.00' VC
PVI STA:8+20.49
VC
HIGH POINT
PVI
PVI
PVI ELEV:718.40
AD:3.56%
K:14.05
50.00'
co
V
LcjM
O)
N
00
r
W
o
U)
m
N
Oi
—
w
CO
N-
V
1cjU
I�r
0
>
mm
0
>
cor
0
>
ww
0
>
>>
PROPOSED
GROUND
0.50%
I
A
4.06%
SEE STRUCTURAL
SHEETS S-3
PLANS
TO S-6
/
\
\
—
EXISTING
—
\
GROUND
/
i i
/
/
/
/
\
\
/
/
/
\
\
\
/
\,
/
/
�``i
/
/
/
J
— — —
r
—
— — —
—
—
/
/
O)
M
tri
O
N.
N.
CD
N.
O^
O
co
0
Oi
N
O^
N
^
O
O
Oi
N.
O^
M
05
0
O
CD
N.
O^
0
of
0
O
CD
N.
O^
O
O
0
CD
N-
O^
0
O
CD
N.
O^
O
N
O
CD
N.
co^
prj
O
OD
N.
co^
N
•
F.
O
OD
N.
O^
•OD
0
0
N.
co^
0
•
O
OD
N.
O^
O
^
O^
OD
N.
O^
N N
•of
N.
O^
O
it).CO
•
N.
rM
O
co^
^
•
M
of
O
O^
O
00
O
01
CO^
N
co•
O
It)
O
co
n
O
ao
co^
co
co
5+00
5+50
6+00
6+50
7+00
7+50
PROFILE -L1-
Hor. Scale:1"=20'
Vert. Scale: 1 "=4'
8+00
8+50
9+00
9+50
19.24
�92.18
18
6
724
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
N
co
N
10+00
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
CD)
41
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
m
H
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
-L1- PROFILE
tj
LH
=
4-1
o
Il
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

0
a
K: \CHL PR o 50 6
E
0
0
0
February 0
0
T
0
XCLT M2C
0
0
0
m
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
R#S
--
D� 00
0
_r
2
m
724
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
674
co
co
— SS
LO
=0
OE
•
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
NOW OR FORMERLY
PATRICK SPECKMAN
TAX PARCEL # 08303113
P.B. 10&11 PG. U/M
D.B. 8541 PG. 692 3110
CULLMAN AVE.
EDGE OFF E�T
MUM
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303116
D.B. 26804 PG. 565
CULLMAN AVE.
SE
11+00
STRUCTURAL PLANS,
SHE(TS S-3 TO S-6
Mw
O
J
\ CULLMAN AVE (VARIABLE PUBLIC RAN)
i
QE-
OE
N LINK
FENCE
R#S
OE
OE
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303117
D.B. 24079 PG. 50
CULLMAN AVE.
OE
tOyy OR FORMERLY
TREX O4DERTIES, LLC
TAX PAirtC44/0303112
P.B. 9&10 P U/M
D.B. 28452 PG. 53C4
CULLMAN�A
co
FI
SS
OE
0
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303118
PB 13&14 U/M
D.B. 22916 PG. 914 3125
CULLMAN AVE.
2+00
EXI
I I
XII
III
`'1I-
EXISTING POLE TO BE
6
cqT
C 6
cRN
"11q
omo NV 00754. 2 so
sQ (,S„
• (IS Cp)
Rc
RETAIN EXISTING
CATCH BASIN
RELOCATED BY OTHERS
I I
93
OE
PROPOSED 18" GUY
OE
44, G WIRE AND CURB BY OTHERS
S q `+ „41W OR FORMERLY
pw T'f PROPERTIES, LLC
TAXI'AtCEL # 08303111
P.B. 9a0QPG. U/M
D.B. 28452 PG. 596 3124
CUL€'N AVE.
A
x% xRkiNc
- SS
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303119
PB 14&15 U/M
D.B. 21704 PG. 343
CULLMAN AVE.
EXISTING POLE TO BE
RELOCATED BY OTHERS
SS
13+00
v
0 0
rn
SS
OE
SS
PROPOSED 18" GUY
WIRE AND CURB BY OTHERS
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303120
PB 15 U/M
D.B. 21704 PG. 310
CULLMAN AVE.
14+0
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C4
1550.00'
329.84'
N70°09'56"E
329.22'
12°11'33"
165.55'
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303121
PB 16 U/M
A 3jj7CUNAVa
lik
_
it:
OE OESSOE Ss EXISTING POLE TO BE
SS RELOCATED BY OTHERSss
Ss
�
SS
NOW OR FORMERLY
NEXUS CHURCH
TAX PARCEL # 08303110
P.B. 7&8 PG. U/M
D.B. 26607 PG. 256 3144 0 o '
CULLMAN AVE.
OE
RFe#S WIRE PROPOSED
AND CURB BY OTHERS
Mw
O
nF-
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303109
D.B. 15530 PG. 916 3154
CULLMAN AVE.
co
Li
Lu
co
Lu
Lu
co
Lo
co
U
PROPOSED
GROUND
PVI STA:10+12
PVI ELEV:719.36
cos
18
0
AD:5.00% u)
K:10.00 >
50.00' VC w
w
0
w
-4.50 %
PVI : 11 +78.44
EL: 711.88
PVI: 12+38.44
EL: 710.98
-1.50%
1
-4.46%
SEE STRUCTURAL
SHEETS S-3 TO
PLANS
S-6
EXISTING
GROUND
/
— —
— ___ — — —
15"
INV:
RCP
675.084
j N^
of 4
03
N co
O
OD
403
N co
O I�
t0
ri M
03
F. co
M to
p
co M
03
F. to
M
co
F. co
O N
N
03 M
F. co
N
M M
OD
F. co
M o
O
(V M
OD
F. co
co
N
OD
F. co
O)
OD
•N
03p
N co
tD CO
O N
R co
O OD
M
of N
co
N co
M
N
ap N
p co
^ t0
N M
I� N
p co
^ co
p M
O
tp N
p co
N co
O N
co
N
p co
^ co
O
I�
M N
p co
^ t0
p O
to
N N
p
N. t0
p)
•
p O
^ t0
M oe
O
p O
N t0
10+00
10+50
11+00
11+50
12+00
12+50
PROFILE -L1-
Hor. Scale:1"=20'
Vert. Scale: 1 "=4'
13+00
13+50
14+00
14+50
724
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
674
N
Oi
W
co
15+00
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
CD)
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
u]
H
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
-L1- PLAN & PROFILE
L c 1 )XE — 1
4-1
o
Il
N
D.B. 2
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

E
N
N
0
February 04,
o
0
T
0
Set: XCLT M2C
Plotted By: Doro,
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
0
2
_
2
m
(/)
01
m
m
(/)
m
m
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
674
c0
co
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303122
PB 17 U/M
D.B. 21619 PG. 958
CULLMAN AVE.
NOW OR FORMERLY
DAVID W. WATSON JR.
TAX PARCEL # 08303108
P.B 6 PG. U/M
D.B. 5931 PG. 60 3162
CULLMAN AVE.
6' CHAIN LINK
FENCE
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303123
PB 18 U/M
D.B. 15530 PG. 930
CULLMAN AVE.
SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS,
SHEETS S-3 TO S-6
SAL T
NOW OR FORMERL
MECKLENBURG COUN Y
TAX PARCEL # 083031 4
PB 19 U/M cn
D.B. 21525 PG. 274 32 9
CULLMAN AVE.
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303125
D.B. 28115 PG. 339
CULLMAN AVE.
BEGIN RETAINING WALL #2
STA:17+71.76
It£RETE
CULLMAN AVE (VARIABLE PUBLIC R/W)
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303107
P.B 5 PG. U/M
D.B. 19804 PG. 782
CULLMAN AVE.
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303106
P.B 4 PG. U/M
D.B. 19804 PG. 782
CULLMAN AVE.
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL #I 08303126
PB 20 PG U/M
D.B. 27823 PG. 598
CULLMAN AVE.
GRAVEL gREq
— 86 LF OF SAFETY RAIL SEE
DETAIL 1 SHEET 2A
END RETAINING WALL #2
STA:18+57.79
2'-6" C8
86 LF OF SAFETY RAIL SEE
DETAIL 1 SHEET 2A
NOW OR FORMERLY
CAROLINA FOODS, INC.
TAX PARCEL # 08303105
P.B 4 PG. U/M
D.B. 19804 PG. 782 3214
CULLMAN AVE.
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENURG COUNTY
TAX PAR EL # 08303127
D.B. 27823 PG. 604
CULLMAN AVE.
NOW QR FORMERLY
W. LOGAN JACKSON JR. AND
ELLEN PARRISH JACKSON
TAX PARCEL # 08303104
o P.B 1 &2 PG. U/M
"' D.B. 32572 PG. 576
CO
N
W
(0
CO
N
(0
O)
CO
N
W
N
CO
M
In
O)
- 4.4g
+
CC)
>
d
(0
J
W
+
(0
..
>
d
CO
W
-1.50%
PROPOSED
GROUND
LOW
LOW
POINT ELEV: 684.80
POINT STA: 18+96.12
PVI STA:18+85.03
PVI ELEV:684.50
AD:5.87%
K:8.52
-4.23%
50.00' VC
PVI: 19+45.65
EL: 685.49
1 I
PVI: 19+92.07
EL: 686.60
o
0
1
+
cri
,—m
cii
v
co
di
+
co
,—m
cii
ui
co
di
mm
ww
2.38%
2.24%
__ _AA _
1.63%
-----
SEE STRUCTURAL
SHEETSS-3TOS-6
PLANS
---
-----------
_
__--
-------
--
— — — — — —
--------
— — — — —
— — — — —
11\
72" STEEL
DEPTH UNKNOWN
EXISTING
GROUND
8"
IN V:
CLAY
676.848
36" RCP
INV:675.276
8" CLAY
INV: 677.702
i
M ^
of o
CO00
co
N cO
c0 0
g co
O
I
cp co
CO
co o
c0
0 ^
6 o
0 co
CO
c0
6 a
0 co
t0
c0
o
f0
?
rM N 03
t0
M M
N N
CO
N �
N
coCO
N ^
O N
CD
t0
co
M
N
M
O
n M oo
t0
co M
CD
O
cDCO
*
co CO
to0 ^
0
03 co
t0
M
as cc;
co
co co
15+00
15+50
16+00
16+50
17+00
17+50
PROFILE -L1-
Hor. Scale:1"=20'
Vert. Scale: 1 "=4'
18+00
18+50
19+00
19+50
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
674
co
n
(0
co
t0
20+00
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
CD)
41
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
m
H
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
-L1- PLAN & PROFILE
L X-LE — 1
o
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

N
N
0
February 04,
0
T
0
Set: XCLT M2C
z
Plotted By: Doro,
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
m
m
m
m
03
NOW OR FORMERLY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX PARCEL # 08303127
D.B. 27823 PG. 604
CULLMAN AVE.
CRUSHED ASPHALT
2'-6" C&G
SS
CULLMAN AVE (VARIABLE PUBLIC R/W)
182.40'
NOW OR FORMERLY
W. LOGAN JACKSON JR. AND
ELLEN PARRISH JACKSON
TAX PARCEL # 08303104
P.B 1&2 PG. U/M
D.B. 32572 PG. 576
696
692
688
684
680
676
N)
t0
co
c0
TIE TO EXI4TI G
STA:21 +18.0
END ICO
TIE Tb E)
STA:2I1 +2
STRUCTION AND
ISTING
.42�
I TO ISTIN6 C. G
T :21+ 3.67 1
NOW OR FORMERLY
HERRIN BROTHERS COALNG
yEBIp '�W��gBi29
OI2
D.B. 02210 PG. 026
315 E. 36TH STREET
BLOCK
WALL
- ---1r _<
J O 03
0..\
73
NOW 6 FORI fcLY
CITY F CHARLobTTE
TAX PARCEL # 094'0253
D.B. 28026 PG.1(f§
36TH STREET
END CONSTRUCTION
AND
-
1
TIE TO EXISTING
STA: 21+21.42
PROPOSED
GROUND
EXISTING GROUND
P2
co
co
rn
co
M
0
co
co
8
03
M
cco cd
c0
n
ad
co
CD
6
CO
CC0
M
COC
20+00
20+50
21+00
PROFILE -L1-
Hor. Scale:1"=20'
Vert. Scale: 1 "=4'
21+50
696
692
688
684
680
676
21+73.36
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
CD)
41
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
u]
H
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
-L1- PLAN & PROFILE
L C 1 )XE — 1
4-1
o
Il
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

GENERAL NOTES
A) ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MOST CURRENT EDITIONS
OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION(CDOT) WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL
HANDBOOK(W.A.T.C.H.), THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES(M.U.T.C.D.), THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(NCDOT) SUPPLEMENT TO THE M.U.T.C.D., THE NCDOT ROADWAY
STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS
AND STRUCTURES.
B) THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY CDOT IN WRITING 10 WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF ANY ROAD CLOSURE
OR 5 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSING ONE OR MORE TRAVEL LANES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 3 OF
THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK.
C) ALL SIGNAL REVISIONS OR SHIFTS OF SIGNAL HEADS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CDOT; PRIOR TO
REVISING TRAFFIC LANES WHICH REQUIRE SIGNAL REVISIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CDOT
IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER (GUS JORDI / 336-7086) A MINIMUM OF 30 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE.
TRAFFIC LANES SHALL NOT BE SHIFTED UNTIL THE REQUIRED SIGNAL REVISION / SHIFT IS COMPLETE AND
READY FOR ACTIVATION. FOR NOTICES RELATED TO SIGNAL WORK REQUIRING NEW UTILITIES, REFER TO
PROJECT NOTES.
D) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH, INSTALL, RELOCATE, AND MAINTAIN ALL TRAFFIC
CONTROL DEVICES, SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES FOR WORK SITES AND
DETOUR ROUTES AS SHOWN IN TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER.
E) CONSTRUCTION PHASING MAY DICTATE THAT TWO OR MORE TYPICAL W.A.T.C.H. DIAGRAMS OR STANDARDS
BE USED IN ONE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. CHANNELIZING DEVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THESE TYPICALS SHALL
BE MOVED, SUPPLEMENTED, CHANGED, OR REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
PHASING OF THE PLANS. THE LOCATION AND POSITIONING OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE MOTORIST DOES NOT RECEIVE FALSE INFORMATION WHEN TWO OR MORE
TYPICALS AND/OR ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS OVERLAP.
F) CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE AWARE THAT WHEN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA IS IN OR NEAR
A VERTICAL CREST OR HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE WORK AREA SHALL BE EXTENDED SO THAT LANE CLOSURE
BEGINS IN ADVANCE OF THE CURVE AND MINIMUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE IS MET.
ui G) OFF -DUTY POLICE OFFICERS MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TO BE PRESENT FOR
H CONTROLLING TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION HOURS.
0
z
H) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK ALL HAZARDS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT WITH WELL -MAINTAINED
° SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES. ON CONNECTING ROADS, ALL BARRICADES,
SIGNS, WARNING, AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES SHALL BE MOVED, SUPPLEMENTED, CHANGED, OR
8 REMOVED AS REQUIRED DURING THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
0
E I) WORK ON THE PROJECT OR ANY SEPARATE ACTIVITY THEREIN SHALL NOT START UNTIL ALL OF THE
Q REQUIRED SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING, AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES ARE INSTALLED AND APPROVED
F4 BY THE ENGINEER.
Q J) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER (704-336-7086) WITH THE CITY OF
E CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK THAT
j WILL REQUIRE THE RELOCATION OR PLACEMENT OF SIGNS OR OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES BY THE
GO
Q)
CITY.
H K. THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN DURING ALL PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THE ABILITY TO FLAG
° TRAFFIC USING QUALIFIED FLAGGERS WHEN NECESSARY OR REQUIRED
E
o L. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND ADDRESS CONFLICTING
PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 17 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK OR AS DIRECTED BY
. 1 THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE
j DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
M) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TWO WAY TRAFFIC ON ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT UNLESS
o OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, PROJECT NOTES, OR BY THE ENGINEER,
0
• N) CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PROPERTY OWNERS AND TENANTS ACCESS TO THEIR
J PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT LIMITS, INCLUDING REASONABLE INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR
X BUSINESSES. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO FIRE HYDRANTS.
N 0) THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY (BY MAIL) ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS WHO HAVE DIRECT
ACCESS TO THE ROADWAY WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS A MINIMUM OF 5 AND A MAXIMUM OF 10 WORKING
• DAYS PRIOR TO INSTALLING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN FRONT OF THOSE PROPERTIES. NOTIFICATIONS
0
SHOULD INCLUDE CONTACT PERSONS NAME, TELEPHONE NUMBER, EMAIL ADDRESS, AND MAILING ADDRESS.
P) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATROL THE WORK SITE AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF EACH WORK DAY (AT A
o MINIMUM) TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING AT ALL
O TIMES DURING PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY.
L Q) DURING PERIODS OF INACTIVITY OR AT NIGHT, EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PARKED IN SUCH A MANNER AS
o TO BLOCK SIDEWALKS, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, OR THE MOTORISTS' VIEW OF TRAFFIC. EQUIPMENT SHALL
BE AT LEAST 10 FEET AWAY FROM THE TRAVEL LANE.
R) WHENEVER TRAFFIC MUST BE ROUTED ACROSS THE CENTERLINE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE
cE TWO OPPOSING DIRECTIONS MUST BE PHYSICALLY SEPARATED. TRAFFIC CONES CAN BE USED FOR THIS
PURPOSE DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS; REFLECTORIZED CONES OR DRUMS MUST BE USED AT NIGHT. TRAFFIC
SHALL NOT BE ROUTED ACROSS THE CENTERLINE DURING CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY UNLESS PAVEMENT
MARKING CONFLICTS ARE APPROPRIATELY ADDRESSED AND AGREEMENT ON REMOVAL OR NOT IS WORKED
Q OUT WITH THE ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 16 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK. IF THE ENGINEER
N APPROVES TRAFFIC TO CROSS THE CENTER LINE DURING CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY, ONLY REFLECTORIZED
H DRUMS MUST BE USED.
S) THE CITY ENGINEER OR DIRECTOR OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OR THEIR
APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVES ARE AUTHORIZED TO STOP ANY WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THAT
o DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN OR REQUIREMENTS OF THE W.A.T.C.H. AND THE M.U.T.C.D.
N UNTIL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
• T) ADJACENT LANES TO CONSTRUCTION ZONES MAY REMAIN OPEN IF LATERAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN EDGE OF
' TRAVEL LANE AND EQUIPMENT IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 2 FEET (INCLUDING WIDTH OF DRUM). IF A
DROPOFF EXISTS WITHIN THE WORK ZONE, CONTRACTOR SHOULD FOLLOW SECTION 10 OF THE W.A.T.C.H.
HANDBOOK PERTAINING TO ADJACENT LANE CLOSURES DUE TO DROPOFFS.
U) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE PHASING AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
E COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH CONSTRUCTION PHASE IN SEQUENCE. WHEN A CONSTRUCTION
PHASE IS DIVIDED INTO STEPS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH STEP IN
o SEQUENCE. (EXAMPLE: THE REQUIREMENTS OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO
PHASE II; THE REQUIREMENTS OF STEP 1 OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO STEP 2
J OF PHASE I). ALL WORK DESCRIBED IN THE PROJECT PHASING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR,
EXCEPT WHERE IT IS SPECIFIED FOR CERTAIN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS.
1_ • V) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO STOP TRAFFIC FOR MORE THAN 5 MINUTES AT A TIME IN ANY
E ONE DIRECTION.
x
W) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO WORK ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD SIMULTANEOUSLY WITHIN
THE SAME AREA EXCEPT WHERE THE ROADWAY IS DIVIDED BY A RAISED MEDIAN. IT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE TO
E CONSTRUCT BORE PITS ON EACH SIDE OF A ROADWAY FOR BORING UTILITIES UNDER THE ROADWAY UNLESS
SUPERCEDED BY ENGINEER TO COMPLY WITH PEDESTRIAN REQUIREMENTS OR LATERAL CLEARANCE FROM
TRAVEL LANES.
0
z X) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO SECTION VII (PEDESTRIAN CONSIDERATIONS) OF THE
0 W.A.T.C.H.
0
Plotted B
J
PROJECT NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL FINAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS. CDOT SHALL PROVIDE AND
INSTALL ALL FINAL SIGNAGE. (E&PM PM VERIFY WITH CDOT PM ON EVERY PROJECT)
2. DURING THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM-9:00 AM AND 4:30 PM-6:30 PM MONDAY THRU FRIDAY CONSTRUCTION OR
MAINTENANCE WORK WHICH INVOLVES CLOSURE OF A TRAVEL LANE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED ON
THOROUGHFARE STREETS EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OR WITH APPROVAL FROM CDOT.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
1' MIN. FROM
EDGE OF THE
TRAVEL LANE
:3o
4
MIN.
4'
40
2 ? \\
PORTABLE SIGN IN SIDEWALK
ACCEPTABLE
1' MIN. FROM
EDGE OF THEN
TRAVEL LANE
PORTABLE SIGN BLOCKING SIDEWALK
UNACCEPTABLE
ALTERNATIVE OPTION IS TO PLACE SIGN BEHIND SIDEWALK WHEN POSSIBLE,
OTHERWISE, MAY NEED TO POST MOUNT SIGN WITH 7' MINIMUM VERTICAL
CLEARENCE FROM SIDEWALK SURFACE
TRAVELWAY
WORK ZONE
1 INCH
1 SLOPE MAX
w•w•w•w•w•w•WWWWWWW
• • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••
DETAIL A
N.T.S.
WORK ZONE
J
•
•
SIDEWALK
CLOSED
C39
24"xl 2"
(R9-9)
• •
SIDEWALK CLOSED
AHEAD
.411
CROSS
C41
24"x12"
(R9-11)
SIDEWALK
•
•
SIDEWALK
PED SIGNAGE DETAIL
N.T.S.
CONSTRUCTION PHASING
CONSTRUCTION PHASING - CULLMAN AVENUE
PHASE I: FOR WORK WITHIN NSRR RIGHT OF WAY, COORDINATE WITH NSRR. CROSSING
PANELS TO BE PLACED IN ONE WORKING DAY AND WORK SHOULD BE COORDINATED
WITH NSRR DURING NON -OPERATIVE HOURS.
PHASE II: FOR WORK BETWEEN NSRR RIGHT OF WAY AND E. 36TH ST. CLOSE WESTBOUND
LANE ON EXISTING CULLMAN AVENUE USING WATCH DIAGRAM #9. MAINTAIN ACCESS
TO ALL BUSINESSES ALONG CULLMAN AVENUE.
REMOVE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES UPON COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION.
STANDARDS
WATCH DIAGRAMS
#1 SIDEWALK CLOSURE
#2 SIDEWALK DETOUR/DIVERSION
#9 2 WAY, ONE LANE TRAFFIC (FLAGGER CONTROL)
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
1
Plans Prepared By:
aN
�
�
LP o
0 N
1.0
Z el
AZ' cc
'11)1kk � N
At C-)
CA
>'u
CUa g 7.©
Z ▪ • U
0
0
N
E
NC
DESCRI PTI ON
0
z
a
PROGRESS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CHECKED BY
N
H
015016234
0
m
0
c)
z
PREPARED BY
APPROVED BY
TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES
° -
J
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

E
Q
N
N
0
N
February 04,
15
0
T
0
XCLT M2C
z
0
0
0
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
N
N
J
W
co
N
N
N
N
J
W
N
N
2+00
II
611
N
I
0
0
I
—1.07%
—1.07%
I
o
co
N
N
to
LO
0 4
(ID
1-
a)
0
coO)
Ln in
N rr)
Li
W
Ln
Li(p
0
0
co.W J J
W W
i�
O
O
I
0a0
0
i�
LL
O
.
is
O
6
0•00
i<
1.50%
I 1.50% _
—1.50%
I
I
—
/
I
1
— 50
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
— 40
N
co
r')
N
J
W
— 30
N
0
CO
r7
1
N
J
W
— 20
— 10
0
1+61.44
10
20
30
40
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
50
L
O
0
r<
N
.4-
I
Iis
I
0
1
-3.05%
0
1
r
1
0
°)
4
a)
0
o
co
Li
0
co(
Li
O
O
I
W
0
O
LJ-
0
cc;LI_ LI_
W
1.50%
—1.50%
I
— 50
— 40
— 30
— 20
— 10
0
10
-L1-
20
30
40
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
50
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
F-
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
CROSS SECTION SHEETS
SHEET
XS-1
o-
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

E
Q
50
50
N
N
0
N
February 04,
0
T
0
XCLT M2C
z
0
0
0
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
18+00
rn
M o
00
N rn
in
�00
J J
Li W
up
(fl
J J
W W
oo•0
I
�•0
r
00
Li_L
o•11:
1
•
L
o•O
CL
0.52%
—30
—20
—10
0
10
20
720 720
716 716
712 712
708 708
704 704
700 700
696
692
688
684
696
692
688
684
680 680
30
CROSS SECTIONS NOT SHOWN THROUGH
STRUCTURE STA: 2+50 TO 17+50.
SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS SHEETS S-3 TO
S-6
19+00
00
co
00
oo
xi
00
co
a)
4
00
CO
W
o
0
Li
1
I
0
0
o
0
13'3•• 11
1.50%
— 30
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
— 20
— 10
0
18+50
10
20
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
30
too
oo vj
co �Lri
ro�
Li00
W L J
6
CO (0
Li J
W
00
00•�
1
0
0
W
0•0
0
O•�
1
LL
N
iL
Li-
c
CL
e
1.50%
i:±iL
- 30
-L1-
— 20
— 10
0
10
20
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
30
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
F-
0
0
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
CROSS SECTION SHEETS
SHEET
XS-2
o-
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

E
Q
0)
LD
N
N
0
0
February 04,
u)
0
0
0
0
XCLT M2C
0
0
z
0
0
0
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
20+00
r7
co
N
r7
oo
N
oo
0
J
a
oo
co
W
O
O
J
Lis
0
(O
I
LL
0
cfl
LL
o
I
L`
0
1.50%
I
------- -------------
•00..1_
--------1--
19+50
N
O
oo
N
O
Lri
co
J
W
oo
(O
Li
o
0
(O
W
0
0
I
LL
L_
0
L:
LJ-
0
..\
I 1.50%
I
-------
------
720 720
716 716
712 712
708 708
704 704
700 700
696
692
688
696
692
688
684 684
680 680
720 720
716 716
712 712
708 708
704 704
700 700
696 696
692
688
684
680
692
688
684
680
21+00
rn
rn
o
O
a))Qi
rn
a,
co
J
W
coco
Li
0
(fl
Lis
0
0
L-
csi
W
0
I
1.50%
I
00.1
— _____
_
20+50
to
0
to
c0 cid
co
cO
d-
cid
co
J
Lis
(0
Li
Lis
O
cc:;O
I
0
co
L_
0
L:
0
I 1.50%
I
------
00.E
-L1-
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
720
716
712
708
704
700
696
692
688
684
680
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
F-
0
0
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
VGG
CHECKED BY
2/4/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
NGD
PREPARED BY
JCD
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
CROSS SECTION SHEETS
SHEET
XS-3
o-
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

E
0
ID
0
T
0
Set: XCLT M2C
z
0
0
0
Plotted By
v.
v.
v.v.v.
Q NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD
I
I
PREFABRICATED TRUSS BRIDGE
v.
v
v.7+00
v.
v.
v.
BEGIN BRIDGE
/
MSE RETAINING WALL
SEE SHEETS S-3 AND S-4
/
tis O0-
/ Afr I 4I
INDEX OF SHEETS:
S1 KEY PLAN
S2 TYPICAL SECTIONS
S3—S6 PLAN AND PROFILE
0
0
m
0
m
ED • OF PAVE
E
E
3
BRIDGE KEY PLAN
Littje Suga_rCreek
_3
3
3
Q L1
3
ZONE AE
3
I
II
II
II
II
II
II I
II
II
II I
II
II
II
II
SS
MSE RETAINING WALL
FEMAFLOODWAY bv��.....�•
0)
0
I
SS
I
I
END BRIDGE
SS
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
H
0
O
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
KMJ
CHECKED BY
02/04/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
ADB
PREPARED BY
NRW
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
KEY PLAN
SHEET
S-1
4-1
o
Il
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

N
N
0
0
0
Set: XCLT M2C
Plotted By
— 2) "
2
Q BRIDGE AND L1
12'-0" CLEAR
—2y"
2
r"
2
—21"
2
—1"
6'-0"
1'-1"
6'-0"
r"
2
1.5%
PROFILE
GRADE LINE
1.5%
48" MIN. HEIGHT
RAILING
6" CAST —IN —PLACE
CONCRETE CURB
CAST —IN —PLACE
CONCRETE SLAB
SPANS
TOP CHORD
DIAGONAL
VERTICAL
BOTTOM
CHORD -
TOP BRACE
DIAGONAL
Q BRIDGE AND L1
TOP STRUT
■
1i
12'-0"
CLEAR
o
I
ao
—
HANDRAIL
VINYL COATED
CHAIN LINK
FENCE (1" MESH)
p
cV
1.5%
PROFILE
GRADE c\I
LINE 1
ro
1.5%
L_
° °°.--� -..-,
r-k r-. J- J--. �-
..-, �--..-, r, .-; 4/--:. -; /--.°
I
I
�
VALLEY J LFLOOR
GUTTER BEAM
BOTTOM BRACE "-CAST—IN—PLACE
DIAGONAL CONCRETE DECK
TYPICAL SECTION A TYPICAL SECTION B
(CAST —IN —PLACE SLAB
SPANS ON WEST
APPROACH)
Q BRIDGE AND L1
12'-0" CLEAR
— 2y"
2
Of
Y"
2
6'-0"
1'-1"
6'-0"
r"
2
9" CAST —IN —PLACE
CONCRETE DECK
1.5%
PROFILE
GRADE LINE
1.5%
48" MIN. HEIGHT
RAILING
6" CAST —IN —PLACE
CONCRETE CURB
VARIES
VARIES
AASHTO TYPE IV
PRESTRESSED GIRDER
14'-5"
TYPICAL SECTION C
(PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
GIRDER SPANS ON EAST
APPROACH)
APPROX. 5'-6"
(PREFABRICATED METAL
TRUSS OVER RAILROAD)
NOTES:
ALL DIMENSIONS, MEMBER SIZES, PRESTRESSED GIRDER TYPES, ETC. ARE
CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN FINAL DESIGN.
TOP PROTECTIVE FENCING
FOR FULL ENCLOSURE DECK DRAINAGE TO BE DETERMINED IN FINAL DESIGN. NO DECK RUNOFF
TO BE DISCHARGED IN NORFOLK SOUTHERN RIGHT—OF—WAY.
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
E-
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
KMJ
CHECKED BY
02/04/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
ADB
PREPARED BY
NRW
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
TYPICAL SECTIONS
e-
SHEET
S-2
4-1
o
Il
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

L
February 04,
0
0
EL
0
0
0
Set: XCLT M2C
Plotted By
APPROXIMATE SPAN LENGTHS
SPANS
SPAN LENGTH
1-2
36'-9„
±
3
46'-8"
±
4-7
33'-8"
±
8-9
35'-2"
±
10-14
36'-5"
±
15-17
37'-3"
±
1-
GENERAL BRIDGE NOTES:
WETLANDS
v-
DESIGN IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2009 AASHTO SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE DESIGN OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES, INCLUDING CURRENT INTERIMS.
LIVE LOAD = 90 PSF PEDESTRIAN LOAD OR H-10.
THE DESIGN PRESENTED IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO
CHANGE.
FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT DATA, SEE GREENWAY PLANS.
ALL SUBSTRUCTURE UNITS ARE ORIENTED RADIALLY OR PERPENDICULAR
TO ALIGNMENT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
SPANS 1-17 ARE CAST —IN —PLACE CONCRETE SLABS. SEE "TYPICAL
SECTION A" ON SHEET S-2. SPAN 18 IS A PREFABRICATED METAL
TRUSS. SEE "TYPICAL SECTION B" ON SHEET S-2. SPANS 19-27 ARE
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE GIRDER SPANS. SEE "TYPICAL SECTION C" ON
SHEET S-2.
FOUNDATION TYPE TO BE DETERMINED DURING FINAL DESIGN.
Q PIER 11
v-
v-
v-
Q PIER 10
z
N
Q —L1—
v-
v-
. I-
Cn
+
Q PIER 9
v-
BEGIN
APPROACH SLAB
STA. 2+20.03
BEGIN BRIDGE
STA. 2+30.03
-o
U)
Co
rn
SPAN 1
MSE RETAINING WALL
4
/
PIER 1
PIER 17
Q PIER 2
PLAN ALONG STRUCTURE —WEST APPROACH
FOR PROFILE, SEE SHEET S-4
Q PIER 4
/
o
OJ
/
/
137'-0"
1
/ Q
/�_ e- /
/�� <v
/
/ 0 �° /
/ ( QQ,0 —Ts/ ss
Q-
// /A, /
N
/
a
_OE
SS
q/4
/
SS -
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
E-
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
KMJ
CHECKED BY
02/04/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
ADB
PREPARED BY
NRW
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
PLAN & PROFILE (1 OF 4)
SHEET
S-3
4-1
°
Il
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

N
N
0
N
February 04,
0
N
0
0
0
0
0
Set: XCLT M2C
Plotted By
750
740
730
720
710
700
690
680
670
660
650
640
750
740
730
m
0 PVI STA:2+33.22
PVI ELEV:694.56
30.00' VC
G1=0.641%
w G2=4.059%
m
J
rn
0
0
0
0
Z
PROFILE
GRADE
0.641%
N
cd
U
m
M=0.128
N
00
+ O-)
N CO
U
w
w
0
w
1546'-23/4" (OUT TO OUT)
619'-0" ± WEST APPROACH (C.I.P. SLABS)
36'-9" f
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG
SPAN 1
48" MIN.
HEIGHT RAILING
36'-9" f 46'-8" f
SPAN 2
SPAN 3
Q END
BENT 1
APPROACH
SLAB
DENOTES PIER NO. (TYP.)
1546'-23/4" (OUT TO OUT)
619'-0" ± WEST APPROACH (C.I.P. SLABS)
3 6' — 5" f
36'-5" f 36'-5" f
36'-5" f 37'-3" f
rn
L
rn
N
0
m
E
33'-8" f 33'-8" f
SPAN 4
4
F
SPAN 5
--
APPROXIMATE EXISTING
GROUND LINE
PVI STA:8+20.49
PVI ELEV:718.40
50.00' VC
G1=4.059%
G2=0.500%
M=0.222
m
r7
r
N
37'-3' f 37'-3" f
rn
L
0
N
od
N
720
710
700
690
680
670
660
650
640
LINE STA.
F
SPAN 12
PROFILE
GRADE
SPAN 13
SPAN 14
SPAN 15
SPAN 16
SPAN 17
'Illllllllll IIIII
APPROXIMATE
EXISTING GROUND LINE
14
16
m
J
0
PROFILE ALONG STRUCTURE
FOR PLAN, SEE SHEET S-3
"E" DENOTES EXPANSION BENT
"F" DENOTES FIXED BENT
33'-8" f
SPAN 6
33'-8" f
SPAN 7
L
6
35'-2" f
SPAN 8
4.059%
0
O APPROXIMATELY 18'± OF
VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PROVIDED WHERE THE BRIDGE
CROSSES ITSELF.
35'-2" f
SPAN 9
8
36'-5" f
SPAN 10
9
10
MATCH LINE STA.
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
LJ
H
1
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
KMJ
CHECKED BY
02/04/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
ADB
PREPARED BY
NRW
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
PLAN & PROFILE (2 OF 4)
H
o
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

5m19 ]TIL0d ONdTd\sa n}an
\CHLPRJ\015016
N
N
0
N
February 0
w
0
CL
XCLT M2C
021
PVI STA:8+20.49
PVI ELEV:718.40
50.00' VC
G1=4.059%
G2=0.500%
M=0.222
750
740
730
720
710
1
/
10+00
ss SS
137'-0" i
SPAN 18
/
/
May
O
SS
N
NQ
XFce F 0R F
Ne 0
Q e gRcF U7)(., � Y
26 � CO cOC4M'�Ne e3 16
Mw
® --�
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
CL 0
10
— SS
96'-3" f
SPAN 19
4
CULLMAN AVENUE
(UNKNOWN R/W)
SS ss
EDGE OF P AVEMEN? _
OE
1
E
00
r
00
+
Q)
(1)
U
m
00
(ri
0
w
0
137-0" PREFABRICATED TRUSS
1��I J
CONC
HIGH POINT ELEV: 719.24
HIGH POINT STA: 9+92.18
PVI STA:10+12.18
PVI ELEV:719.36
50.00' VC
G1=0.500%
G2=-4.500%
M=0.313
ro
N
W
0
m
00
r
+
O
U
w
SPAN 18
0.500%
700
690
680
670
660
650
640
NNNNNNZZZZZZ
E
RAILROAD
ROW
LINE
65'-6" f
�� QTRACK
F
RAILROAD
ROW
LINE
r
N
cd
N
W
0
w
SS
4
owc_ PIER 19
or —
OE
11 100
x104
cOC�/ Gg
q1/S03,>>
F
!� P1 LR
I
II
II
40'-0"
APPROX. UTILITY
BUFFER
OE
OE
— 7'CHAIN LINK
FOCI FENCE
RFe R#S
— SS
=SPAN 20 °E
pt —
Sp
y,14 A
gRFq 4R/c./4O
PLAN ALONG STRUCTURE
1546'-23/4" (OUT TO OUT)
441,
ss
SS SS
1
1
r Pt ER 24
I
O _
Sp I
I XI
1 nI
O CL
N
9e
OE OE
OE _ OE
CiNO
Fe�R#S
ii7 7
I ss
i
,77
00
0o
N
J
W
+00
Mw
EXIST
CB
fl
II
II
m I I
o N I I
III
5`40' I Off s
APPROX. UTILITY
BUFFER
a
II
II
9�J$1X3 —
/ pF 40k OE
60'-0"
`I
SPAN 21 eqs
•vv5 4 N
,6
�RF see,
49,1000)
'l SA
fir
1
1
o0
M
I+
1
1
I Cq TC
_J cRx1
IN '�� e e,;8z t —L1—
CiT > SO
F4 1.50
-----------
I
OE
s ss SS
00
V)
CE
OE OE
00
+
N
OE
SS
OE
SS
OE
3
3
C�, AMA C / 37
ow Qw Mw
1
c_ PIER 22
1
13+00
SS
109'-11" f
ss
s
OE OE
SS
r
OE OE
0o
rn
0
N
J
W
SPAN 22
RAM
,'NI< F4.,6 SPAN 23
NI, aT 6
F� 3 >4S,
CiFL. 8 s ,
6>• (5"
(8•
OF —
109'-11" f
790'-3" ± EAST APPROACH (PRESTRESSED CONCRETE GIRDERS)
96'-3" f
96'-3" f
60'-0" f
109'-11 "±
111111111111111IIr
48" MIN.
HEIGHT RAILING
SPAN 19
—4.500%
SPAN 20
SPAN 21
PROFILE
GRADE
65'-6" f
CLR.
DENOTES PIER NO. (TYP.)
CLR.
18
19
—1.500%
SPAN 22
0
0
O
ro
PROFILE ALONG STRUCTURE
"E" DENOTES EXPANSION BENT
"F" DENOTES FIXED BENT
20
EXISTING 15" RCP
OA APPROXIMATELY 18't OF
VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PROVIDED WHERE THE BRIDGE
CROSSES ITSELF.
APPROXIMATE
EXISTING GROUND LINE
© 23'-0" MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PROVIDED OVER FULL LIMITS OF
RAILROAD ROW.
LINE STA.
109'-11" f
SPAN 23
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
XI
L.,]
F-
0
d
4
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
KMJ
CHECKED BY
02/04/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
ADB
PREPARED BY
NRW
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
PLAN & PROFILE (3 OF 4)
SHEET
S-5
w
o
-
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

0
1-
N
0
N
February 04,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
z
0
ID
0
0
0
Set: XCLT M2C
0
z
0
0
0
Plotted By
uw OR LENS FORMERL Y
RG
ARCEL COLNTY
217 4M U/303720
CULPG
LMAN Nu10
�tL ..0`-'uNTy
D'g• 27 L/M 303721
31 CLL320
LMAN AVE.
ss
ss
ss
v\
0
ss
_ OE =
— = OE
— OE
OE
— OE _
3. 45'
67. 59,
6j84g(BCLA)-)
750
740
730
Mw
O O
ss
109'-11" ±
SPAN/
23
ss
ss
ss
—L1— c_ PIER 23
ss
ss ss —
—1 BUFFER
r _
OE 1 OE
OE OE
OE OE OE OE
— — 109'-11" f
— OE
0
MW
O
SPAN 24
ss
0+00
SS
0
SED/MEN T POND
----------F
0'
1I
o
'ss
APPROX. UTILITY
0
SSMH
Rim EL
ss
ASPHALT
ss
—
OE OE V /
INV IN EL 6�
INN OUT EL 67730 (B ,CLAY)
22 (B „CL A �)
ASpHA
PgRK No qRl vEL
c_ PIER 24
I\
p V`` # 08V""'1Y
D.B. Co-18 L/M 303j23
S30
PG
LLMAN930
6' CHAIN LINK
FENCE
c_ PIER 25
ASPHALT
—L— I — —
I—=_=
rt6�00=�-+---- T---
-F E4EIOF PAVEMENT
1 I
•
ss A-- ss ss sf
40'—O"
1 +i 0 1
Os �
RIMM
T �
APPROX. UTILITY EL682.,3 >>
BUFFER53 1 (8 GLAY)
——
OE „OE
4
OE
G AATcH �BA
SI peg ±
ARE S` SPAN 25
°U BAGGED) t
0
Ep.r0j1
(1NV's EL-6871
ARE S
AND 6gAGGED) 97 I
m
I
DR T T
AT INLE
0
PLAN ALONG STRUCTURE
1546'-23/4" (OUT TO OUT)
00
00
CO
+
0
720
710
700
690
680
670
660
650
640
790'-3" ± EAST APPROACH (PRESTRESSED CONCRETE GIRDERS)
109'-11 "±
109'-11" f
00
N
J
W
00
00
+
0
60'-0" f
OE OE
0
0
PIER 26
III
2
1-00
CULL 01\ O :NUE
(UNI.- VJ v k /W)
OE
OE
OE OE OE
74'-0" f
NOW OR
TAX KL NBURGRCORL Y
UNTY
D g CEL # 0V3.03
2
CULMANPG 12S
N
Iri
N
N
ss 5= t
SSMH
65'-0" NV EL.;F82 r
APPROX. UTILTY v IN EL 68 V8
BUFFER 6j8. 62 CLgY) — — -
OOE OE OE °Em— 01
E
C'ETE
0OE
SPAN 26
00
co
MW
O
MW
0
74'-0" ±
SPAN 27
FEMPF\_OOO\NPY BOUNDARY
COMMUNITY NDARY
ENCROACHMENT
BOU
74'-0" f
74'-0" f
—4.456%
SPAN 23
APPROXIMATE
EXISTING GROUND LINE
DENOTES PIER NO. (TYP.
II
SPAN 24
SPAN 25
—1.500%
23
EXISTING 8" CLAY PIPE
H
SPAN 26
PROFILE
GRADE
F F
t
24
E F E b F
EXISTING 36" RCP
PROFILE ALONG STRUCTURE
"E" DENOTES EXPANSION BENT
"F" DENOTES FIXED BENT
-----------------------------------
26
PROPOSED 72" PIPE
SPAN 27
48" MIN.
HEIGHT RAILING
—4.234%
EXISTING 8" CLAY PIPE
c_ END
BENT 2
END BRIDGE
MSE RETAIN
INC WALL
END APPROACH SLAB
STA. 17+86.26
18+00
— ss
END BRIDGE
STA. 17+76.26
ss
ss
SSMH
Rim INV EL
IN OU
OE- OE OE
m OE „ m m m
APPROACH
SLAB
FGLJN
REgBR#S
END APPROACH SLAB
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
•
Iev»>I-1
DESCRI PTI ON
m
m
F-
0
d
0
PROGRESS PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AS NOTED
SCALE
KMJ
CHECKED BY
02/04/2022
DATE
015016234
JOB NO.
ADB
PREPARED BY
NRW
APPROVED BY
CROSSCHARLOTTE TRAIL
MATHESON TO
CRAIGHEAD
PLAN & PROFILE (4 OF 4)
e-
SHEET
S-6
4.
o
-
N
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

USACE AUTHORIZATION

Requestor:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail.
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2018-01201 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Charlotte East
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
NoDa Exchange, LLC
Dan FitzPatrick
3328 Peachtree Road Northeast
Atlanta, GA 30326
770-822-2090
dfitzp atrick(db randp roperties.com
Nearest Town Charlotte
River Basin Santee
Coordinates Latitude: 35.2479
Longitude: -80.8126
Location description: The review area is located on the east/northeast side of Matheson Avenue; approximately 0.2 miles
southeast of the intersection of Matheson Avenue and N. Tryon Street. PINs: 08303115 and 08302101. Reference review area
description shown in Jurisdictional Determination Request package entitled "Figure 1, Vicinity Map".
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
16.02
Little Sugar Creek
03050103
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 6/18/2018. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW-2018-01201
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David L. Shaeffer at 704-510-1437 or
d av i d.l. s h aeff a r(d,u s ac e. a rm y. m il.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 3/7/2019.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. * *
Corps Regulatory Official:
Digitally signed by SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DOD, ou=PKI, ou=USA,
cn=SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
D ate: 2019.03.07 12:25:06 -05.00.
Date of JD: 3/7/2019 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2018-01201
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
h tip ://corpsmapu.usace .army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Kimley Horn
Chris Tinklenberg
Address: 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704-409-1802
E-mail. chris.tinklenberg*kimley-horn.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: NoDa Exchange, LLC, Dan FitzPatrick File Number: SAW-2018-01201 Date: 3/7/2019
Attached is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION
Additional
or
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: 1
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David L. Shaeffer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/7/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: NoDa Exchange, LLC, Dan FitzPatrick, 3328 Peachtree
Road Northeast, Atlanta, GA 30326
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, NoDa Sugar Creek, SAW-2018-
01201
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located on the
east/northeast side of Matheson Avenue; approximately 0.2 miles southeast of the intersection of Matheson Avenue and
N. Tryon Street. PINS: 08303115 and 08302101. Reference review area description shown in Jurisdictional
Determination Request package entitled "Figure 1, Vicinity Map".
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.2479 Longitude: -80.8126
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Sugar Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 08/31/2018 by Corps
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
reviewresources
area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
(i.e.,
wetland vs. non
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
Stream SA
35.248089
-80.813236
1,333 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Stream SB
35.247773
-80.814146
661 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Wetland
WA
35.247151
-80.813696
0.002 acre
Wetland
404
Wetland
WB
35.248120
-80.813709
0.88 acre
Wetland
404
Wetland
WC
35.248932
-80.811246
0.45 acre
Wetland
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 1-4
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Figure 2, USGS Topo (1:24,000 Charlotte East, NC)
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 3, SSURGO Soil and NWI (Soil Survey of
Mecklenburg County)
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure 3, SSURGO Soil and NWI (USFWS NWI Mapper)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMAIFIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 1, Vicinity Map and Figure 4, PJD Field Sketch
or ®Other (Name & Date):Photographs 1-14 (Dated
06/15/2018)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): NCDEQ Stream Identification Forms (Version 4.11) Dated 06/06/2018
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government,
ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA,
cn=SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.126075057
3
Date: 2019.03.07 12:25:40 -05'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD Signature and date of person requesting PJD
3/7/2019 (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)'
I Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

Legend
n Project Study Area
s. Stream (Potential Non -Wetland WoUS)
Pz Wetland (Potential Wetland WoUS)
Photo Locations
Feet
0 200 400
Kimley>>>Horn
06/18/2018
Figure 4
PJD Field Sketch
Brand Properties
NoDa Sugar Creek
Mecklenburg County, NC

AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE

Kimley>»Horn
March 7, 2022
Asheville Field Office
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Re: XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Project Review Certification Letter
Dear USFWS Asheville Field Office,
On behalf of our client, the City of Charlotte, Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting this letter requesting
concurrence regarding the results of the pedestrian survey performed for the above -referenced project
in accordance with the methodologies recommended by USFWS. The pedestrian survey for potentially
suitable habitat was conducted by KH staff Gabby Barajas and Doug Fox on March 11, 2022.
Background Information
The subject property is located along Cullman Avenue, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
The subject property is bound by Little Sugar Creek and vacant land to the north, Little Sugar Creek and
multifamily residential development to the west, multifamily residential development and industrial
development to the south, and E 36th Street to the east.
The subject property is comprised of vacant land, a sewage easement, a portion of Cullman Avenue, a
railroad running from north to south, and undeveloped forest land. Vegetation found within the site is
primarily comprised of sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and
American holly (Ilex opaca).
Our client intends to construct a greenway alignment on the subject property which may require future
authorization from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE); therefore, our client contracted with KH to
perform the pedestrian survey within areas of potentially suitable habitat on the subject property to
identify and document occurrences of federally listed threatened and/or endangered species.
Methodology and Findings
As of February 25, 2022, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists four (4) federally
protected species for Mecklenburg County (Table 1). A brief description of each species' habitat
requirements follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the subject
property.
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Table 1: Federally protected listed species for Mecklenburg County
Page 2
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Myotis
septentrionalis
Northern long-
eared bat
T
Potential
MANLAA
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
Potential
MANLAA
Helianthus
schweinitzii
Schweinitz's
sunflower
E
Potential
MANLAA
Echinacea
Iaevigata
Smooth
coneflower
E
Potential
MANLAA
*E = Endangered, T = Threatened
Northern Long-eared Bat
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: June 1—August 15
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in the mountains, with
scattered records in the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western North Carolina, NLEB spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines. Since this species is not known to be a long-distance migrant, and
caves and subterranean mines are extremely rare in eastern North Carolina, it is uncertain whether
or where NLEB hibernate in eastern North Carolina. During the summer, NLEB roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees (typically >_3 inches
dbh). Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This
bat has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds, under eaves of buildings,
behind window shutters, in bridges, and in bat houses. Foraging occurs on forested hillsides and
ridges, and occasionally over forest clearings, over water, and along tree -lined corridors. Mature
forests may be an important habitat type for foraging.
Biological Conclusion: May affect, not likely to adversely affect (MANLAA)
Potentially suitable summer roosting habitat for the NLEB may be present within forested areas in the
project area. The Final 4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of NLEB
associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site, and
greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost tree during the pup season (June 1 —
July 31). Kimley-Horn conducted a review of the most current maps of confirmed/known hibernacula
and maternity sites for the NLEB at
http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html. The action area for this
project is located outside of the highlighted areas/red 12-digit HUCs. There will be no blasting, pile
driving, or other percussive activities associated with the construction of the project; however, tree-
cutting/removal will occur. Based on the review, the proposed activities in the action area occur at a
location where any incidental take that may result from the associated activities is exempt under the
Final 4(d) rule; therefore, the biological conclusion of "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" has
been rendered for NLEB for this project.
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Schweinitz's Sunflower
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: late August -October
Page 3
Habitat Description: Schweinitz's sunflower, endemic to the Piedmont of North and South Carolina. The
few sites where this rhizomatous perennial herb occurs in relatively natural vegetation are found in
Xeric Hardpan Forests. The species is also found along roadside rights -of -way, maintained power lines
and other utility rights -of -way, edges of thickets and old pastures, clearings and edges of upland oak -
pine -hickory woods and Piedmont longleaf pine forests, and other sunny or semi -sunny habitats
where disturbances (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing, blow downs, storms, frequent fire) help create
open or partially open areas for sunlight. It is intolerant of full shade and excessive competition from
other vegetation. Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in a variety of soil series, including Badin, Cecil, Cid,
Enon, Gaston, Georgeville, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Misenheimer, Secrest, Tatum, Uwharrie, and Zion,
among others. It is generally found growing on shallow sandy soils with high gravel content; shallow,
poor, clayey hardpans; or shallow rocky soils, especially those derived from mafic rocks.
Biological Conclusion: MANLAA
Potentially suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present on the subject property in the vacant
areas, along the sewage easement, and along the maintained roadsides and railways; however, many
areas of potentially suitable habitat are maintained by frequent mowing or the application of
herbicides. These areas present only marginally suitable habitat. A review of the NCNHP records,
updated January 20, 2022, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the subject property.
Pedestrian surveys for individuals will be conducted during the optimal survey window. The presence
of potentially marginally suitable habitat on the subject property results in a biological conclusion of
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" (MANLAA).
Michaux's Sumac
USFWS optimal survey window: May -October
Habitat Description: Michaux's sumac, endemic to the inner Coastal Plain and lower Piedmont, grows in
sandy or rocky, open, upland woods on acidic or circumneutral, well -drained sands or sandy loam soils
with low cation exchange capacities. The species is also found on sandy or submesic loamy swales and
depressions in the fall line Sandhills region as well as in openings along the rim of Carolina bays;
maintained railroad, roadside, power line, and utility rights -of -way; areas where forest canopies have
been opened up by blowdowns and/or storm damage; small wildlife food plots; abandoned building
sites; under sparse to moderately dense pine or pine/hardwood canopies; and in and along edges of
other artificially maintained clearings undergoing natural succession. In the central Piedmont, it
occurs on clayey soils derived from mafic rocks. The plant is shade intolerant and, therefore, grows
best where disturbance (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing, periodic fire) maintains its open habitat.
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Page 4
Biological Conclusion: MANLAA
Potentially suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is present on the subject property in the vacant areas,
along the sewage easement, and along the maintained roadsides and railways; however, many of the
areas of potentially suitable habitat in the project area are maintained by frequent mowing or the
application of herbicides. These areas present only marginally suitable habitat. A review of the NCNHP
records, updated January 20, 2022, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the project
area. Pedestrian surveys for individuals will be conducted during the optimal survey window. The
presence of potentially marginally suitable habitat on the subject property results in a biological
conclusion of "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" (MANLAA).
Smooth coneflower
USFWS optimal survey window: late May -October
Habitat Description: Smooth coneflower, a perennial herb, is typically found in meadows, open
woodlands, the ecotonal regions between meadows and woodlands, cedar barrens, dry limestone
bluffs, clear cuts, and roadside and utility rights -of -way. In North Carolina, the species normally grows
in magnesium- and calcium -rich soils associated with gabbro and diabase parent material, and
typically occurs in Iredell, Misenheimer, and Picture soil series. It grows best where there is abundant
sunlight, little competition in the herbaceous layer, and periodic disturbances (e.g., regular fire
regime, well-timed mowing, careful clearing) that prevents encroachment of shade -producing woody
shrubs and trees on site where woody succession is held in check, it is characterized by a number of
species with prairie affinities.
Biological Conclusion: MANLAA
Potentially suitable habitat for smooth coneflower is present on the subject property in the vacant
areas, along the sewage easement, and along the maintained roadsides and railways. A review of the
NCNHP records, updated January 20, 2022, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the
project area. Pedestrian surveys for individuals will be conducted during the optimal survey window.
The presence of potentially marginally suitable habitat on the subject property results in a biological
conclusion of "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" (MANLAA).
Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act
USFWS optimal survey window: November through March
Habitat Description: Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large
bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within
1.0 mile of open water. A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within
a 1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was performed on January 20, 2022
using 2021 color aerials. No large bodies of open water were identified in the 1.13-mile radius. In
addition, a review of the NCNHP database, updated on January 20, 2022, revealed no known
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Due to the lack of known occurrences, and the lack of
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Page 5
observed individuals or nests, it has been determined that the proposed project will not affect this
species.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Statement of Qualifications:
Investigator: Gabby Barajas
Education: B.S. Environmental Sciences, 2021
Experience: Environmental Analyst, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2021-Present
Responsibilities: Natural communities assessments, threatened and endangered species habitat
assessments and surveys, wetland and stream delineations, GPS, GIS, tree surveys
Investigator: Doug Fox
Education: B.S. Environmental Sciences, 2021
Experience: Environmental Analyst, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2022-Present
Responsibilities: Natural communities assessments, threatened and endangered species habitat
assessments and surveys, wetland and stream delineations, GPS, GIS
Please provide concurrence regarding the survey results and biological conclusions as well as any other
possible issues that might emerge with respect to protected species as a result of the proposed project.
Thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please email (Chris.Tinklenberg@Kimley-
Horn.com) a copy of your reply to my attention and/or send an original copy by mail. Please feel free to
contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
C_-
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
fi [phone]
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 1/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Login (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 2/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
NAME
STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Clams
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534
Insects
NAME
Endangered
STAI J SPlilik
ll
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus\SS0
andidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
a.
GO
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
do
Wherever found '
No critical habitat Ali been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
illil
ti
nitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
STATUS
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered
0‘4
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 3/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Vigratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described
k°N\L
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birels/manavment/managed-species/
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 4/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska. 4-
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
IC)
Prothonotary Warble Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 5/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in th%
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 6/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
• probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable (This is
not a Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) in
this area, but
warrants attention
because of the
Eagle Act or for
potential
susceptibilities in
offshore areas
from certain types
of development or
activities.)
Eastern Whip -
poor -will
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
Alaska.)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
++—�
++-�
+�+
-,++ +++! 1111 1111 --1111 It��
+-------
-+-� �+++ ».+ 1111 1111 1111 111�
\44
\3\
++-- —+—+ ++++ +++, I+++ +—+— ---- +--+ ++1+ ++++ +--- ----
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 7/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
+11 1+11 1+ ail 1111 Ii.I 11I+ 1+----
Rusty Blackbird ++—__ +--+ +++1 ++++ ++++ +�+— ---- +--+ ++++ ++++ +--- —
BCC - BCR (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) only
in particular Bird
Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in
the continental
USA)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
-F-F-F 1111 1111
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 8/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
oink
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating o
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
oAr'n
Nappd
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because
of the requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 9/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a
starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to
look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
% C1S'
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 10/11

2/25/22, 8:59 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
RIVERINE
R2UBHx
R2UBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
e_AY4
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/DZKIJU56NRDKBJWSYAMHWQGSM4/resources 11/11

Roy Cooper, Governor
In ■■■
MN a NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ ■thEN NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• MN
February 25, 2022
Gabby Barajas
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: XCLT M2C
Dear Gabby Barajas:
13_.Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Huthanan
Deputy Director, Natural (Heritage Pragam
NCNHDE-17281
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
11) 121 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGH_ NC 27603 - 1631 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
DFC.919.707U120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
XCLT M2C
February 25, 2022
NCNHDE-17281
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
I7agedName
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Little Sugar
Creek Greenway
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property -
Mecklenburg County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property -
Mecklenburg County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property -
Mecklenburg County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property -
Mecklenburg County
Owner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Local Government
NC DPS, Division
Management
NC DPS, Division
Management
NC DPS, Division
Management
NC DPS, Division
Management
of Emergency
of Emergency
of Emergency
of Emergency
State
State
State
State
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on February 25, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
XCLT M2C
February 25, 2022
NCNHDE-17281
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last W Element Accuracy
Group servation Occurrence
i Date Rank
Sawfly, Wasp, 37164 Bombus affinis Rusty -patched Bumble 1969-09-29 H 5-Very
Bee, or Ant Bee Low
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi? 5-Very
Low
Vascular Plant 5560 Desmodium Sessile Tick -trefoil 1971-08-19 H 3-Medium
sessilifolium
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name caner=
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Charles Avenue Mecklenburg County
Park
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Clemson Mecklenburg County
Avenue Park
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Cordelia Park Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Derita Park Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Little Sugar Mecklenburg County
Creek Greenway
Mecklenburg County Open Space - North Charlotte Mecklenburg County
Park
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Tryon Hills
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property -
Mecklenburg County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property -
Mecklenburg County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property -
Mecklenburg County
Park Mecklenburg County
NC DPS, Division of Emergency
Management
NC DPS, Division of Emergency
Management
NC DPS, Division of Emergency
Management
Federal
Status
Endangered
Owner Type
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State
State
State
State
status
Significantly
Rare
Threatened
Special
Concern
Historical
Global State
Rank Rank
G2 S1
G3 S2
G5 SH
Page 3 of 5

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - NC DPS, Division of Emergency State
Mecklenburg County Management
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on February 25, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q4, January 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

1+o lL3rd A..
Ropey Arr
nrl. rr Aye
Druid Hell
Sauer
x ▪ ,r
Lockwood
February 25, 2022
❑ Project Boundary
• Buffered Project Boundary
• Managed Area (MAREA)
Dom/
HO.
iworel my
Isi Park
NCNHDE-17281: XCLT M2C
Aland*
FY Junction
Ow Creak
tell Ave
Reklr o nP
Hgnarar rY,.lm
A ddcmr AY•II
'4• Charlotte
N �1� ale •moral. ll...
g v
� YIlra F',.rr •pf', �
YIIfa Heights
p.
Plain Hrlr6
ra.rprrr A+'
4 fwh.�r� 1r
1:21,459
• 0-175 0-35 0-7 mi
+ r 1 f rl
O 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
FL]n'r I II
w 1rr.Llp
x,M P.rylx
r. nr
• ,.anrq•r H91�
Sources: Esn• HERE, Garcon. Irrtennsp• Increment P Corp- GEBCO• USGS.
FAO. NPS, NRCAN. GeoBase• IGH, I(adasler NL. Ordnance Survey, EMI Japan-
METt. Esri China SHong Kona (ct OpenStreelMap contributors• and the GIS
User Community
Page 5 of 5

Sugaw Creek
1 Ritch Ave
liarydures ❑r
ve
C
Ave c— Mande. Ave kP
hry°�� St
Atari do
Junction
N
v ,Iehr�s9n +4
Crlrr.l f {ill -
477 ysQve Q )
,
a ;r N 3 °c
pc Ra, . °rq. 0 Q
adye `' 1 Ot N try°n St oensbora St
Hills qc �i rrsd p I;'•J F D
a Trya� HIIEs 4'e• pve Cf
Rfs a
7 ''' Trrnn �yL'Ch
zi'�rhKoDD
lr Frra K c�a`d AvC AJe %. BREtlyh SS
0p - '' ek nIN`,g.- ��
.arykr' e'sry pry rsr
ry 1 i' 4
6 3
1 sr S'r
cory a s$sa''' ` p Day ld5ory5t
07
��.^ COFrJi.3 �`7 Q`Cy yt IP
.9r � Ware yl
�Yi„ G iy e� ac '�d, Alt. d -. n 5t r
✓ F r. Gard .]
Z hp 23rh S ?s4$ ? °� Ill •r, �o,‘ett°n N ' Prc�sso
r fi
� •0 t lrhr '�,.I., WI "AD l] fi,t, Fd Sr
Sr4 c, r o, r3 6r. ra~
Sr ate Sr Sr
Sr e\
VJ• 1P_.., *0a 'Zen 46
`
✓ a
r�Y S L �r4 i.,°A') C+s,d�'rdtti
P1a�4 5
PAczla
Pq
�bry` jOraan pi ry4b0 Chafe, Ave North P°e �\
oyro4 ,° ra` ` $�� .p�rh C h aria tte •�6y�� �a�~�` .c.:
ryDd q Qac c5 N� C FSar�th 4''' 0 S• f fi yer 4e�
ye 4_0 asr� '4s ae trrph Ave 'r RfL Fy r`h 4r porn:
�►, s r P n /rs �, rpUc rysf `e
it �sr r tam iti't�QasidAvr r O 3SrhS kRd F1s
era 4 •`c a �G n S
fi Sr ''G ?,S. a ryS r
Optimist nary �yr �'3 `O u c a QUO
d' Corcleha ,s, A c
■n
Park rf CamrrurnKV r `prP•ft pr Viila 9N e n
Pmu ':ilia I+ylii n
• elenrenlara Heights
Rolllny�
ps
1
r7
A
a
rier
Fr
Sr
iiBflL]
c arnrnuniiy ��
natl... HYde pr G 0C'i
h
° a(
m
c,''''�.0 Jiff
Frey, Rd •.:ilnrler
Sugar
I. ltla!v
Hlathnd Non
a'- 71711' iiII
0
1,500
Bear,
sticin„k4f a Sid
QakwOad "e TnEp�a
�ry
p
ae
s,s
Arnie, ..
Feet
3,000
Mecklenburg
County
Kimley>»Horn
Legend
Li Project Boundary
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
March 2022

Kimley>»Horn
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Charlotte East, Derita) Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
March 2022

Legend
Li Project Boundary
Potential Habitat
Michaux's Sumac, Schweinitz's Sunflower, and Smooth Coneflower
NLEB
Kimley»>Horn
Figure 3
Potential Species Habitat Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
March 2022

Photo Pa ' e 1
Photo 1: Potential Myotis septentrionalis habitat in the undeveloped forest land on -site that contains an
abundance of live and dead trees of DBH >3 inches. However, the subject property is not within an area of
confirmed/known hibernacula or maternity sites.
Photo 2: Potential Myotis septentrionalis habitat in the undeveloped forest land on -site that contains an
abundance of live and dead trees of DBH >3 inches. However, the subject property is not within an area of
confirmed/known hibemacula or maternity sites.
Title
Project
Photo Pages
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Date
03/11/2022
Project Number
015016234
Prepared By
Kimley0Horn

Photo Pas e 2
Photo 3: Potential Helianthus schweinitzii, Rhus michauxii, and Echinacea laevigata habitat along Cullman
Avenue. However, this potential habitat is maintained by frequent mowing and potential herbicide application;
therefore, it may be only marginally suitable for these species.
Photo 4: Potential Helianthus schweinitzii, Rhus michauxii, and Echinacea laevigata habitat along Cullman
Avenue. However, this potential habitat is maintained by frequent mowing and potential herbicide application;
therefore, it may be only marginally suitable for these species.
Title
Project
Photo Pages
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Date
03/11/2022
Project Number
015016234
Prepared By
KimleyHorn

Photo Page 3
Photo 5: Potential Helianthus schweinitzii, Rhus michauxii, and Echinacea laevigata habitat along the railroad
easement. However, this potential habitat is maintained by frequent mowing and potential herbicide application;
therefore, it may be only marginally suitable for these species.
Photo 6: Potential Helianthus schweinitzii, Rhus michauxii, and Echinacea laevigata habitat along the railroad
easement. However, this potential habitat is maintained by frequent mowing and potential herbicide application;
therefore, it may be only marginally suitable for these species.
Title
Photo Pages
Project
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Prepared By
Date
Project Number
03/11/2022
015016234
Kimley>>Horn

Photo Page 4
Photo 7: Potential Helianthus schweinitzii, Rhus michauxii, and Echinacea laevigata habitat in the vacant,
maintained area on the slope of this retaining wall. However, this potential habitat is maintained by frequent
mowing and potential herbicide application; therefore, it may be only marginally suitable for these species.
Photo 8: Potential Helianthus schweinitzii, Rhus michauxii, and Echinacea laevigata habitat in the vacant,
maintained area on this slope. However, this potential habitat is maintained by frequent mowing and potential
herbicide application; therefore, it may be only marginally suitable for these species.
Title
Photo Pages
Project
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Prepared By
Date
Project Number
03/11/2022
015016234
KimleyHorn

Photo Pa'e5
Photo 9: Potential Helianthus schweinitzii, Rhus michauxii, and Echinacea laevigata habitat in the maintained
sewage easement.
Title
Photo Pages
Project
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Date
Project Number
03/11/2022
015016234
Prepared By
Kimley>*Horn
THIS SPACE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
April 13, 2022
Gabby Barajas
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
[e-mail]
Subject: Matheson Craighead Greenway; Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Gabby Barajas:
f us. 1
FISH &WILDLIFE
SERVICE
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence received March 14, 2022, wherein you solicit our comments regarding project -
mediated impacts to federally protected species. We submit the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, the Applicant proposes to construct a greenway in
Charlotte, North Carolina. The information provided suggests that the proposed project will
require authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to impact Waters of the United
States. No project design plans or a description of impacts to onsite habitats have been prepared
or provided to our office at this time. Onsite habitats appear to be significantly disturbed by
adjacent development activity.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to the information provided, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the
action area (50CFR 402.02) for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis). Based on the information provided, the project would occur at a location where
any incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule for
this species. We encourage the Applicant to avoid any associated tree clearing activities during
this animal's pup season, maternity roosting season (May 15 — August 15) and/or active season
(April 1 — October 15). Although not required at this time, one or more of these free
clearing moratoria would support our concurrence with a "may affect, not likely to
adversely affect" determination from the action agency for this animal.
Please note that on March 23, 2022, the Service published a proposal to reclassify the northern
long-eared bat (NLEB) as endangered under the Act. The U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia has ordered the Service to complete a new final listing determination for the NLEB by
November 2022 (Case 1:15-cv-00477, March 1, 2021). The bat, currently listed as threatened,

faces extinction due to the range -wide impacts of white -nose syndrome (WNS), a deadly fungal
disease affecting cave -dwelling bats across the continent. The proposed reclassification, if
finalized, would remove the current 4(d) rule for the NLEB, as these rules may be applied only
to threatened species. Depending on the type of effects a project has on NLEB, the change in the
species' status may trigger the need to re -initiate consultation for any actions that are not
completed and for which the Federal action agency retains discretion once the new listing
determination becomes effective (anticipated to occur by December 30, 2022). If your project
may result in incidental take of NLEB after the new listing goes into effect this will need to be
addressed in an updated consultation that includes an Incidental Take Statement. If your project
may require re -initiation of consultation, please contact our office for additional guidance.
Additional information about this animal including its proposed reclassification can be found
here: https://www.fws.gov/species/northern-long-eared-bat-myotis-septentrionalis
The information provided indicates that suitable habitat is present within the action area for the
federally endangered Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), smooth coneflower
(Echinacea laevigata), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). We appreciate project
proponents' commitment to conduct targeted botanical surveys during the appropriate survey
windows for these species. Please submit those findings to our office for review when they are
available. Botanical survey windows can be found here:
https ://www. fws. gov/ashevi ll e/pdfs/Optimal %20 Survey%20 W indows %20 for%201i sted%20pl ant
s%202020.pdf
In accordance with the Act, it is the responsibility of the appropriate federal action agency or its
designated representative to review its activities or programs and to identify any such activities
or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. If it is
determined that the proposed activity may adversely affect any species federally listed as
endangered or threatened, formal consultation with this office must be initiated. Our
concurrence with "no effect" determinations from action agencies is not required.
Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native vegetation as soon as the project is completed. Ground
disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of the
workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at [e-mail] if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-22-507.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
2

Kimley»>Horn
March 7, 2022
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Re: XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Kimley-Horn is writing this letter on behalf of our client, the City of Charlotte, to request a review and comment on
any possible issues that might emerge with respect to cultural resource issues associated with the proposed
project in Charlotte, NC.
The proposed project site is located along Cullman Avenue, east of Matheson Avenue and west of E 36th Street
in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC (Figures 1-3). The proposed project seeks to construct a greenway
alignment.
We request that you review the site based on the attached information to determine the presence of any
archeological, cultural, or historic resources. If a response has not been received within 30 days, we will assume
that you have reviewed the project area and that there are no issues to address at the present time.
Thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please email ([e-mail])
a copy of your reply and/or send an original copy by mail. If you have any questions regarding this request, please
feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Taylor Kiker
Environmental Scientist
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28203
704 333 5131

Sugaw Creek
1 Ritch Ave
liarydures ❑r
ve
C
Ave c— Mande. Ave kP
hry°�� St
Atari do
Junction
N
v ,Iehr�s9n +4
Crlrr.l f {ill -
477 ysQve Q )
,
a ;r N 3 °c
pc Ra, . °rq. 0 Q
adye `' 1 Ot N try°n St oensbora St
Hills qc �i rrsd p I;'•J F D
a Trya� HIIEs 4'e• pve Cf
Rfs a
7 ''' Trrnn �yL'Ch
zi'�rhKoDD
lr Frra K c�a`d AvC AJe %. BREtlyh SS
0p - '' ek nIN`,g.- ��
.arykr' e'sry pry rsr
ry 1 i' 4
6 3
1 sr S'r
cory a s$sa''' ` p Day ld5ory5t
07
��.^ COFrJi.3 �`7 Q`Cy yt IP
.9r � Ware yl
�Yi„ G iy e� ac '�d, Alt. d -. n 5t r
✓ F r. Gard .]
Z hp 23rh S ?s4$ ? °� Ill •r, �o,‘ett°n N ' Prc�sso
r fi
� •0 t lrhr '�,.I., WI "AD l] fi,t, Fd Sr
Sr4 c, r o, r3 6r. ra~
Sr ate Sr Sr
Sr e\
VJ• 1P_.., *0a 'Zen 46
`
✓ a
r�Y S L �r4 i.,°A') C+s,d�'rdtti
P1a�4 5
PAczla
Pq
�bry` jOraan pi ry4b0 Chafe, Ave North P°e �\
oyro4 ,° ra` ` $�� .p�rh C h aria tte •�6y�� �a�~�` .c.:
ryDd q Qac c5 N� C FSar�th 4''' 0 S• f fi yer 4e�
ye 4_0 asr� '4s ae trrph Ave 'r RfL Fy r`h 4r porn:
�►, s r P n /rs �, rpUc rysf `e
it �sr r tam iti't�QasidAvr r O 3SrhS kRd F1s
era 4 •`c a �G n S
fi Sr ''G ?,S. a ryS r
Optimist nary �yr �'3 `O u c a QUO
d' Corcleha ,s, A c
■n
Park rf CamrrurnKV r `prP•ft pr Viila 9N e n
Pmu ':ilia I+ylii n
• elenrenlara Heights
Rolllny�
ps
1
r7
A
a
rier
Fr
Sr
iiBflL]
c arnrnuniiy ��
natl... HYde pr G 0C'i
h
° a(
m
c,''''�.0 Jiff
Frey, Rd •.:ilnrler
Sugar
I. ltla!v
Hlathnd Non
a'- 71711' iiII
0
1,500
Bear,
sticin„k4f a Sid
QakwOad "e TnEp�a
�ry
p
ae
s,s
Arnie, ..
Feet
3,000
Mecklenburg
County
Kimley>»Horn
Legend
Li Project Boundary
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
March 2022

Kimley>»Horn
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Charlotte East, Derita) Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
March 2022

Kimley») Horn
Figure 3
Aerial Map
XCLT Matheson to Craighead
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
March 2022

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
March 29, 2022
Gabby Barajas
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28202
[e-mail]
Re: Construct cross Charlotte (XCLT) greenway alignment, Cullman Avenue, Charlotte, Mecklenburg
County, ER 22-0870
Dear Ms. Barajas:
Thank you for your email of March 7, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
kr/ Ramona Bartos, Deputy
O State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898