20140477 Ver 1_401 Application_20140514

o�oF wAr�goG
o <
20 1 40 4,717 ;1
F WT
a °y F; (
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no SAW- 2014 -00440
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
w- . wAmA ouArK I MAY - 3 2014
vu.� 3�weo.r &er�an
Page 1of11 1?e ���
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 °Versidn
6
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
FEISection 404 Permit ®Section 10 Permit
lb
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ® Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
❑ Yes ® No
1 g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1h
below
❑ Yes ® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Sketch Design Daniels & Daniels Development of Goldsboro, LLC
2b
County
Wayne
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Goldsboro
2d
Subdivision name
Sketch Design Daniels & Daniels Development of Goldsboro, LLC
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
n/a
—
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
J &J Daniels Farming Enterprises, LLC t 1"A' i
3b
Deed Book and Page No
Deed Book 2817, Pages 843 -844 tiZZ 74 2014
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Jeff Daniels
3d
Street address
PO Box 10337`
3e
City, state, zip
Goldsboro, NC 27532 -0337
3f
Telephone no
919 - 778 -4525
3g
Fax no
919- 778 -6850
3h
Email address
jeffd @danddcc com
w- . wAmA ouArK I MAY - 3 2014
vu.� 3�weo.r &er�an
Page 1of11 1?e ���
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 °Versidn
6

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
® Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
Richard "Mike" Benton
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Benton & Associates Land Surveying and Mapping, P A
4d
Street address
119 E Walnut Street
4e
City, state, zip
Goldsboro, NC 27530
4f
Telephone no
919 - 735 -0440
4g
Fax no
919 - 735 -0840
4h
Email address
mbenton @bentonandassociatesnc com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Richard "Mike" Benton
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Benton & Associates Land Surveying and Mapping, P A
5c
Street address
119 E Walnut Street
5d
City, state, zip
Goldsboro, NC 27530
5e
Telephone no
919 - 735 -0440
5f
Fax no
919- 735 -0840
5g
Email address
mbenton @bentonandassociatesnc com
Page 2 of 11

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
043527273569
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 331372 Longitude - 77 918486
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c
Property size
24 73 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
Fellows Branch
proposed project
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C,NSW
2c
River basin map is available at
Middle Neuse
http //h2o enr state nc us /adman /maps/
3.
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The property is currently a mix of agricultural and woodsland
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
03022
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
None
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Proposed single family subdivision
3e
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
This proposed residential development will be a subdivision of land into lots for single family dwellings This
development includes roads, in ground water lines, in ground sanitary sewer, in ground and above ground storm water
structures Site conditions are typical of this type of development and we could expect standard construction methods and
equipment Construction plans, including erosion and sedimentation control, will be submitted and approved prior to the
start of construction
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Yes ❑ No Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company US Corps of Engineers
Name (if known) Emily C Greer
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
March 11, 2013
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b
If yes, explain
This project is proposed to be divided into four phases consisting of approximately 10 lots in each phase
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Corps
® DWQ
03022
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h Comments
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments
Page 5 of 11

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P [IT
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar- Pamlico El Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required
El Yes
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
F1 Yes
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
F-1 Yes
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
Page 6 of 11

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
la
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
b
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a
Name of Mitigation Bank
3b
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b
Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e
Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h
Comments
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information
[:1 Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Washington Regional Office
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
E:1 No
letter )
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Sewer will be handled by community (public) wasterwater
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur In or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Impacts?
❑ Yes ® No
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a WIII this project occur In or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes ® No
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a WIII this project occur In a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Sig to
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authoriza n etter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 11 of 11

Version 1 4
January 9, 2009
401 Oversight/Express Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist
[� The application fee (Checks may be made out to "N C Division of Water Resources"
- $240 00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with minor impacts
- $570 00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with major impacts
- Express Review Fee (Amount requested on Acceptance Letter)
❑ Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application and supporting
documentation (instead of providing 5 copies of the full size plans you may provide two
copies of full size plans along with three copies of 11 X 17 plans)
❑ Stormwater Management Plan (if applicable — see PCN Form Help File Section E)
1) Please provide three (3) copies of the stormwater management plans along with all
supporting information pertaining to this project including the following
a Entire site development/layout plans delineating all drainage areas,
b Design calculation sheets for all proposed BMP(s) sized for both on -site and
off -site drainage,
c BMP supplements for each proposed BMP and Required Items Check List
(http / /portal ncdenr orq /web /Ir /bmp- manual) along with all required items,
d A Notarized Operation & Maintenance Agreement for each stormwater
management facility,
e Detailed construction drawing sheets shall include
(i) Erosion and sediment control plans,
(ii) Installation and planting schedules for the proposed BMPs,
(iii) Appropriately scaled plan views and cross sectional details of all
BMPs and associated components — inlet and outlet structures,
forebay, respective zones and pertinent elevations
❑ If your project is located within a State implemented Riparian Buffer Rule Area, submit the
following along with site plans and PCN form
1) Three (3) copies of the details for on -site diffuse flow provisions, (refer to
http / /portal ncdenr orq /web /Ir /bmp- manual)
v❑� DWR Stream Determination Fo ams on property and DWR determination
letter for wetlands or strea s (if applica
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide The quality and
detail of the information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review The following is
a checklist of the types of pertinent information required at a minimum
Maps and Plans:
Q� The most recent version of the 1 24,000 USGS Topographic Map - Please cleanly draw or
delineate the site boundaries on the topographic map
2/The most recent version of the bound and published County NRCS Soil Survey Map -
(required for projects within the Neuse River Basin, Tar - Pamlico River Basin, Randleman
Lake Watershed and the Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) -
Please clearly delineate the site boundaries, etc on the map If the delineation obscures
any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided Copies of the

Version 1 4
January 9, 2009
current soil survey and /or soil survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS
County Office (http//www nc nres usda gov /) GIS soil layers are not acceptable
1/Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the property
and project on the map Please indicate north arrow and scale Please include applicable
road names or State Road numbers
[The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan You must provide full
sized plans The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed
VPre- construction /Pre- existing conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include
• All Jurisdictional and non - jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Topographic contours with elevations
• Any existing structures and impervious areas
• Existing utility lines and easements
• Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features
• North arrow and the scale (1" 50' scale is recommended)
❑ Proposed conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include
• All Jurisdictional and non - Jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Lot layout (if a subdivision or commercial development is proposed) - lots must be
developable without further impacts to jurisdictional and non - jurisdictional wetlands,
streams, water features, and State regulated buffers Building envelopes must be
provided when streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, or water features exist on a lot
• All built -out structures and impervious cover
• Final grading contours with elevations
• All utilities and easements (including septic fields on all lots within 100 feet of stream,
wetland, or water features - if applicable)
• Impacted areas — these should correspond with the Impact numbers listed on your PCN
form
❑ Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must include the following
• Locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the stormwater collection system and
drainage ways
• All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations (All outlets to
wetlands must be at a non - erosive velocity, generally less than 2 ft /sec during the peak
flow from the 10 -yr storm)
• Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWR rules and policies
• In certain cases (see Section E of PCN form), final stormwater management plans must
also be provided (see Stormwater Management Plan Checklist)
❑ Proposed Impacts - All impacts to Jurisdictional and non - Jurisdictional wetland, stream,
water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on the site plans at
a scale no smaller than 1" = 50' All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts
that will be conducted in or near Jurisdictional and non - Jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated Please provide cross sectional
details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage (burial of culvert 20% for culverts <_ 48
inches, and 1 -foot for culverts > 48 inches)

Version 1 4
January 9, 2009
Wetland Impacts:
❑ Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided Existing
vegetation and any clearing must be specified
❑ All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti -seep collars
Construction detail for anti -seep collars must be provided
❑ Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions
❑ Plans should show that the hydrology of remaining wetlands on the site will be
maintained
Stream Impacts:
❑ Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans The centerline as well as
the banks of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of
the stream to be impacted
❑ The inlet and the outlet of all culverts should be aligned with the stream as
much as possible Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should
be indicated Any inlet or outlet protection must be shown and enumerated on
the impact map(s)
❑ For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be
provided that shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank,
the stream cross section, the height of the span above the stream and the
minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank
Additionally, please provide a signed and sealed geotechnical report of
subsurface soils at the proposed bottomless culvert location The report must
comply with the Division of Highways — Guidelines for Drainage Studies and
Hydraulic Design, prepared by A L Hankins, Jr, State Hydraulics Engineer -
1999
❑ Multiple culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills, off-
setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order
to maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage) A vertical cross
section of the culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream
stream cross section including the stream flood -prone area
❑ Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill
associated with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank
stabilization The length of stream impounded must also be indicated and
enumerated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id SAW -2014 -00440 County Wayne U S G S Quad NC- SOUTHEAST GOLDSBORO
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Mr. Jeff Daniels
J & J Daniels Farmins Enterprises, LLC
Address: P.O. Box 10337
Goldsboro, NC, 27532 -0337
Telephone Number: (919) 778 -4525
Size (acres) 0.3022 Nearest Town Goldsboro
Nearest Waterway Fellows Branch River Basin Middle Neuse. North Carolina.
USGS HUC 3020202 Coordinates Latitude 35.331372
Longitude - 77.918486
Location description The property is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection between Highway 11 i and
Ditchbank Road (SR 1726), south of the community of Elroy, which is southeast of Goldsboro in Wayne County, North
Carolina The proposed project is a residential subdivision The Corps has only assessed the area of the isolated wetland and
the immediate surrounding area (24 73 acres) A determination for any other properties has not been requested Project plans
have not been submitted to the Corps for a review
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331) If you wish, you may request
an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also, you may provide
new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
There are waters of the U S including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of your property and /or oui
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps
_ The waters of the U S including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
The waters of the U S including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
X There are no waters of the U S , to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

published regulations, this determin ation may be ieIied upon for a pei iod not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA) You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Moiehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808 to
determine their requirements
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and /or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 131 1) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and /or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Emily Greer at 910- 251 -4567 or
Emily.C.Greer(a,usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland
Delineation Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetland Delineation
Manual, but there is no existing connection between the wetland and a Jurisdictional water.
D. Remarks: None
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delmeation /determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Actjurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request The del meation /determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 if you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form if you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
in order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331 5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by June 2 , 2014
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence **
D gaalty signed by GREER EMILY C 1 38 53 2 53 00
GREER.EMILY.0 1385325300 °GREER EMILY C 1385325300 a =DOD OU =PKI OU =USA
Corps Regulatory Official Date 201403 25 0926 26 0400
Date March 11, 2014 Expiration Date March 11, 2019
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http HreiWlatory usacesurvey corn/

FICA IQ_N, —0F V ®ISq_SF0 W_:PR4CFSS�NI) v
��� -�2 <_ ° w.�°y' `%N y c <��+. °:.i #"e.�$ =9�:<� ?.�." � TiS "..• sE_ .s: AL- _'s"�.,.'@\'v�iiit�'.�Y < '^'�.- <$� ;'<
Applicant Mr. Jeff Daniels
File Number SAW - 2014 -00440 Date March 11, 2014
Attached is
See Section below
F1
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
nj
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of emission
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
ZI
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
F11
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
�'A°'�' .. IYs d' ` ��Zai yo-.- .He. _„= .�_'r R<�s �Nx �' $& _
SECT>®N Ithefallowngclenties y_oiira rtghtseandoptton "s re garclingan�adiniiiisfrative appeal of the abvve'deoisioi
Ai c pi nal�infarina lop gratnandPermas :ash or;r
Cod sire' uiatto_ns at 33GFRPart 331, f(. ue= a ;.
} = Q" y „w
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT- You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved Jurisdictional determinations associated with the
per►nit
• OBJECT If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below
B PROFFERED PERMIT You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization if you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit
• APPEAL if you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice
C PERMIT DENIAL You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice
D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information
• ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
• APPEAL If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice

E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which maybe appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction Also you may provide new information foi further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD
i E roe "s
SECTION,R 'REO[ TESTT OR• APPEAA =I,bf�OBJECTIONS.TOANINITIAL =P ROF'FEREDrPERMIT,
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record
If you have questions regarding this decision and /or the
appeal process you may contact
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: Emily Greer
2407 West 5`h Street
Washington, NC 27889
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact
Mr Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD -PDO
U S Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room l OM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunitX to participate in all site investigations
Date I Telephone number
re of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Emily Greer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room l OM 15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the ID Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) March 11, 2014
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER Wilmington District, Daniels, Jeff/ Subdnision Development / Isolated
JD, SAW- 2014 -00440
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
State North Carolina County /parish /borough Wayne City Goldsboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lai 35 331372 °, Long -77 9184861
Universal Transverse Mercator 18 234723 13 3913701 11
Narne of nearest waterbody Fellows Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) into which the aquatic resource Flows Fellows Branch
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) Middle Neuse North Carolina , 3020202
® Check if map /diagram of review area and /or potential Jurisdictional areas is /are available upon icquest
❑ Check if other sites (e g , offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different
JD form
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date
® Field Determination Date(s) 5 March 2014
SECTION I1: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There w!6;1 `navigable waters of the US" within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and Flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There {S q "waters ofthe US 'within Clean Water Act (CWA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
1. Waters of the U S
a. Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) i
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not dnectly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly of induectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area-
Non-wetland waters linear feet, wide and /or acres
Wetlands acres
c Limits (boundaries) ofjurisdiction based on Pick List
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2 Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) 3
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not Jurisdictional
Explain A depressional feature approximately 0 3 acres in size exhibits the three wetland parameters but is not
connected to any lurisdicitional features It appears the top few inches of soil were removed for the purposes of
constructing a berm used for target practice It also appears that some fill material was brought in at one time to
help construct a dirt pathway from the edge of the adjacent field to the berm
SECTION 111 CWA ANALYSIS
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
For purposes ofthis form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous tlo�� at least "seasonally"
(e g , typically 3 months)
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section 111 A I and Section III D 1 only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections 111 A I and 2
and Section 111 D I , otherwise, see Section 111 B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting deteimunation
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for Jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert Jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i e tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g, typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also Jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, slip to Section III D 2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III DA.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III B l for
the tributary, Section HIM 2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section 111 B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsnte
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section 111 C below
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size PieklAst
Drainage area Pick List
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(n) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tributary flows through P WEE t tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are Pick.Lts't river miles from TNW
Project waters aie Pick List rivet miles from RPW
Project wateis are pick tisf aerial (straight) miles fiom TNW
Project waters are Pick bast aerial (straight) miles fiorn RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW`
Tributary stream order, if known
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tributary is ❑ Natural
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional intonnauon regarding swales ditches washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e g tributary a which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, winch then tlows into TNW

3-
❑ Aiti icial (man -made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man - altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estunate)
Average width feet
Average depth feet
Average side slopes Yiok' , st
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
❑ Silts ❑ Sands
❑ Cobbles ❑ Giavel
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type /% cover
❑ Other Explain
❑ Conciete
❑ Muck
Tiibutary condition /stability [e g, highly eroding, sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of rUndritfle /pool complexes Explain
Tributary geometry Pick'sT'ist
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for Pick Lsi
Estimate average number of flow events in review aiea /year Picki,is
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is 1Pick,List. Characteristics
Subsurface flow Pic
kT�(st Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ shelving
❑ vegetation matted down, bent or absent
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM ' Explain
❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ desti uction of tei iestrial vegetation
❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ sediment sorting
❑ scour
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foieshore) ❑ physical markings,
❑ physical markings /characteristics ❑ vegetation Imes /changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(in) Chemical Characteristics.
Characterize tributary (e g , watercolor is clear, discolored, oily film, water quality, general watershed characteristics, etc )
Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known
(tv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian corridor Characteristics (type aveiage width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish /spawn areas Explain findings
°A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e g , flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid

-4-
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquahc/wildlite diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that Flow directly or indirectly into TNNY
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explam
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relahonshrp with Non -TN W
Flow is rj!Q ist Explain
Surface flow is PiekE1 ist
Characteristics
Subsurface flow P gk l iA Explam findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non - FNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm /barrier Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles horn TNW
Project wateis are Pic L "kt aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from Pick-List.
x,A
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the kick List tloodplain
(n) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g, water color is clear, biown, oil film on surface, water quality general watershed
characteristics, etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known
(in) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics (type, average width)
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish /spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis Pick'Lst
Approximately acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis
For each wetland, specify the following
Directly abuts9 (YIN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts" (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION

- 5 -
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow character istmcs and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Smulai ly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include, for example.
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to cant' pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants of flood waters ieachmg a TNW9
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting spawning or rearing young for species that aie present in the TNW9
• Does the tnbutaiy, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to tiansler nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream f6odwebs9
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW9
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence of absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the h ibutary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
❑ TNWs linear feet, wide, Or acres
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow' seasonally' (e g , typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111 B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet wide
❑ Other non- wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
3 Non -RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is Jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet wide
❑ Other non- wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
"See Footnote # 3

-6-
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus ate jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year -round Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where ti ibutat ies typically flow 'seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TN W are jut isidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acies
6 Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section I I I C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U S or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonsti ate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
ISOLATED (INTERSTATE OR INTRA - STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) "
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
❑ Interstate isolated waters Explain
❑ Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet, wide
❑ Other non - wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
NON- JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY).
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and /or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC,' the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule' (MBR)
® Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain This is a
depressional feature that does meet the criteria for a wetland but does not have any connection to a jurisdictional water
❑ Other (explain, if not covered above)
'To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
O1 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps /EPA Menrorandunr Regarding CWA Act Juitsncction Following Rapanos

- 7 -
Provide acreage estimates foi non -jm isdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i e , presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water foi a ngated agi lculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply)
❑ Non - wetland waters (i e rivers streams) (meat feet wide
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the 'Significant News' standard, where such
a finding is required for.junsdiction (check all that apply)
❑ Non - wetland waters (i e , rivers, streams) linear fcet, wide
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
® Wetlands 0 3022 acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be Included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant Survey plat
❑ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
® Data sheets prepared by the Coi ps
❑ Corps navigable waters' study
® U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 1 24K, NC- SOUTHEAST GOLDSBORO
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation NRCS web sod survey websoilsurvey nt es.usda gov
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name USFWS wetlands mapper www fws gov
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA /FIRM maps
❑ 100 -year Floodplam Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date) Google Earth 1993, 1998, 2007, 2008, 2013
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable/supporting case law
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature
❑ Other information (please specify)
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD

� 1
I
rr \
III �EIR�-
S 59 17
rlo
1I £
� r o
i � 9
III
�o
L£D£ND
CIP [[v15t IxD IRax P�Pf
xrDIGCIS DND VOIxi r5E1
— . rxE
�GxTOY i xE
RM
Q PRMERir ZINC
11 TE DATA
/oi /i3 /10 lirvlra
I xXnuGiSntCmr CnS FiEto iOUIEO air /IT I
11TIL ncRCncI rx PRao05El DEraoPxfxl 31 11 ,fl1lll
] DrA+CRS Jkl Onx r ECS INeur rvc Fxi[RRPrS[S tCc
Golos Oq0 Ji 31533
SR 1726 DITCHBANK ROAD __ ( oo __Ip R/W 20 _PVMr _)
_— ___________ 9 s9 - .E ____— ___—_
s>] 91
Ell f I.E. R3 IC
T -R
1
arvrwPa�ED 1
1
D 9 .aa5 PD 5J.
1 D 9 m Pa 305
SEE Of.— 1
54 DD a A 1
Ell 1
1 EIR
+l.
+4
J <al +mf.xEn'fD "a
SCALE I = M
Ell D B J5J Pc 5]5
IT
r mWE
Em
M
MU
®
® ©���
smilclEnl �
® ��
UMEZEIBIMM �
� ®�
o no zLn ADD caD 800
SCALE 1 - 100
WETLAND AREA DETAIL SKETCH
DANIELS & DANIELS
DEVELOPMENT OF GOLDSBORO, LLC
BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND AS
DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOT! 2611 PAGE BIJ
WAYNE COUNTY REGISTRY
NEW HOPE TDWVSHIP WAYNE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
BENTON k ASSOCIATES W.nom RMB arc os,
LAM SOIV & AAnO CI'ATG ✓HL Gevrt
qui (sei o wnsr Nc
IJ -OAbf
wm.w alga rrn S�n,A,
aCIU�lElO �4LY Li 25L nMSJ AS
Iu I IK 6gMME3 NJ! 9FKVED AK CifAIM1 r
IED AS 9I✓f ADO rKFE RoTTEO lAMI
���¢'I�FAICV
S. \111
CA Illll /I
R /
RAItl �Bd[� 4lOY
1f I5 Mf60FM5 WAS
6
� �14n5
il5
QOC
(31 KAC S6 16m) lIF4 4n I4/L MD SEK
- f 54
SlateIA
o-.11
mnw ¢.vm
"TNIINIIIII \1�V\\
C*ZPnTS l0to 151E mMlna+.9mtm.
r mWE
Em
M
MU
®
® ©���
smilclEnl �
® ��
UMEZEIBIMM �
� ®�
o no zLn ADD caD 800
SCALE 1 - 100
WETLAND AREA DETAIL SKETCH
DANIELS & DANIELS
DEVELOPMENT OF GOLDSBORO, LLC
BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND AS
DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOT! 2611 PAGE BIJ
WAYNE COUNTY REGISTRY
NEW HOPE TDWVSHIP WAYNE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
BENTON k ASSOCIATES W.nom RMB arc os,
LAM SOIV & AAnO CI'ATG ✓HL Gevrt
qui (sei o wnsr Nc
IJ -OAbf

1
,h 11 6 /1 / /( / /'h 1�A hn tll lul V<F i�
i
/
D1A'1F1 c D4V/0I` ..
Of hIO/VFAl Of l0111,11Ok0 III
'I

r
�. -v ,.�
� 1 i t� ,w � r 1 l - a -z c -.}
't f.. �� �
Z •: �
,.ti; �µX ``� _�..V fit. -.F. ���
F
' y" �L< , t
'- k Y ' � -
Y 1
^(�, y M �
_' S. A ... . � ... _

wa15.(s aleu!p�om ewloje0 43JoN a43 uo Paseq P ue al —Ixoid de aye sMOR Pue 1 o0 1-000'5 ; o slueaoR!lM!sVo'd 1' A4'*da e^,x2Fl ologdd NOL6i wmI . goloyd
ff. gt
uo vase adtl kd�
wass(s aseui pro 0 euilo�e0 yl�oN aye q puealewix a aye sy01 p!�e 300; -000'5 ;o suoil! sod '.(ytle,eoloyd ljae 0161 wary as egoloyd
Q
L
00002. I- aleDs 3
18 000 S 0 0001 0002 000 E 000 b 0009
N Z� —_ al!W 1 0 34

USDA United States
= Department of
Agriculture
NRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wayne County,
North Carolina
April 29, 2014

2
2
rvt M
OOTbT6E OOObT6E 006£T6E 00806£ OOLE16E 009ET6£ 005£T6E OOb£T6£ OOE£T6£ DOZ£T6£ OOTET6E
M..6Z.bS dU O M.6Z .b5 oLL
52
r
O
Q
N�
LL
U
7 d
O m
V
N _
rr_ O
O
CO
F-
0
M
U
M „T£ SS .0
OOT4T6E OOObT6E 006ET6£ OOSET6E OOLET6£ 009£T6£ 00S£T6E ODb£T6E 00££16£ OOZET6E
z z
a �
n E,
r"S
N
8
N
�M
ry
8
OD
8
06 N 3
v C
EQQ
7
0 8
N O
CC 10
n
8
3
.12
n a
3 zQ
M.TE 55 oU

/
/
� CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
SIRRRRRAAR$$$$$$$$ �8$5S5TR5S515185tdbS$bTbS61SSbS
O .•Nh VbmAmm�w�w .�.w.�.wm�WWWWNNNNNNq%dJq��q
N
I
I
C
0
I
g
N
Q
o ;
0
i-
s
OWN
E! � 1i
,_ _ I
•'11111 .�; ' ,� , _ -A
.
ttll� i � I
I�
.10
II1 /.�..
Vill ifi
II I Ian
P�
i� IIi
r 'n
_ - -y\- 51 0'R/N. 70 PVM7 )
�� -- - -- NC HIGHWAY 111 \ .
A \
°�
lei
A
I w
x
a
1
3
----I
ww��511-1 iGill IIIS--
W
a,$
Ww
It
>5
0
a
o ad
yom ZC N�-
Ce J GL� �K2 g g
A
tit
.'9
Ilyg€
o
k,
��
qqgg
�o 61N�
IN
$
i% �J<
N �i ♦
M d
1� C a
/
/
� CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
SIRRRRRAAR$$$$$$$$ �8$5S5TR5S515185tdbS$bTbS61SSbS
O .•Nh VbmAmm�w�w .�.w.�.wm�WWWWNNNNNNq%dJq��q
N
I
I
C
0
I
g
N
Q
o ;
0
i-
s
OWN
E! � 1i
,_ _ I
•'11111 .�; ' ,� , _ -A
.
ttll� i � I
I�
.10
II1 /.�..
Vill ifi
II I Ian
P�
i� IIi
r 'n
_ - -y\- 51 0'R/N. 70 PVM7 )
�� -- - -- NC HIGHWAY 111 \ .
A \
°�
lei
A
I w
x
a
1
3
----I
ww��511-1 iGill IIIS--
W
a,$
Ww
It
>5
0
a
o ad

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U S G S U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
science fora changing wadd
78*00*
35*2
if
2
1E
550
F
57'30"
The fiational map
US Top o
SOUTHEAST GOLDSBORO QUADRANGLE
16
15
14
20'
13
E
11
10
17'30"
)9
)7
)6
UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH kL,., L" FEET
........ ........ .......... NAIP, June 2012 DECLINATION AT CENT=ROF SHEET
Roads..............................................®2006-2012 TOmTom
Names .......................................................... GNIS, 2012 U.S. NationallGrid CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
Hydrography ....................National Hydrograpfiy Dataset, 2012 100,00D -m Sqw,m ID NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
Contours............................National Etevation Dataset, 2008
Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012
TE This map was produced to conform with the
National Geospatia( Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.
A meEadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.11
Grid 7— D-g—j-
las
Northwest
X '%PINE6RANCH LN
<
<
p
........... f 4- N .
W.�
.. ...
05010-N
3'05
35*15
A'.f.
2 300 000 FEET 229
12 1111 1
4&
PET
'32 '33 1
J k
• �J
-J-
'34
Mount
William
78'00'
OR-
57"301,
55, '35 '36 1 '37 2 380DO-E
77*52'30"
Produced by the United States Geological Survey
SCALE 1:24 000
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WG584). Projection and
MN..
1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1
2 Expressway Local Connector
000 -meter grid: Universal, Transverse Mercator; Zone 185
9,26
- - - - - -
1000 500 0
CAROLINA e� Secondary Hwy Local Road
0 000 -foot ticks: North Carolina Coordinate System of 1983
1000
2000
V 4V
0.5
Ramp 4WD
............ ..
30 Miff--
-
V-C/ WS
1000 0 10 f7z�VV3093 4000 5000 1000 7000
Interstate R... 0 US Route 0
8000 9000 10000
State Route
UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH kL,., L" FEET
........ ........ .......... NAIP, June 2012 DECLINATION AT CENT=ROF SHEET
Roads..............................................®2006-2012 TOmTom
Names .......................................................... GNIS, 2012 U.S. NationallGrid CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
Hydrography ....................National Hydrograpfiy Dataset, 2012 100,00D -m Sqw,m ID NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
Contours............................National Etevation Dataset, 2008
Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012
TE This map was produced to conform with the
National Geospatia( Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.
A meEadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.11
Grid 7— D-g—j-
las
Northwest
N..h..
Jason
G.I&b..
G.I&...
Southwest
Southeast
L.
G.Iftb..
G.1d.b..
Grange
Mount
William
Seven
OR-
Spri.gs
SOUTHEAST GOLDSBORO, NC
2013