230009_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220202

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 2 3 - -( 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: V ' outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: VA1`j Arrival Time: 26 Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 6/0 v-e./t/' fZl4 ,e Q(,e r�/` Owner Email:
�
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: /
Facility Contact: 3&1/ (i''�'ty�r,�� / Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow 2-2-5— 17 d
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE,
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ (No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 23 - Date of Inspection: Z/Z Z/Z Z
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes DTo El NA El NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: (c71.Lee - (/�51� / 7/
Spillway?: t,
Designed Freeboard(in): 2 5, Z ZO.
Observed Freeboard(in): 33 i-i
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes "No El NA ❑NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes T‘No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑NE j
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes V�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ' o El NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [t 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [To ❑NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes To ❑NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Do ❑ NA ❑NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps El Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes a‹-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 • 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 2 3 - f Date of Inspection:2/2,T7$,?
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No [lA ❑NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No 12 NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'o ❑NA ❑NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1114 ❑ NA n NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 12 NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Q ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 'No ❑NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
CO A..1--; 4-0 5 irn ,M Ar o:,s 1 D1 u s e
w\A
Reviewer/Inspector Name: gic,4aei Phone: em9 761 -0( 73
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 62/22/001,21
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020