490019_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20220302

,_ '. '7 a._:' _ =?-i,.,_a' — --
- `- _ _<'". U'llisio n=of WaterReso t re es .. - _ ia
. _s t a,, a
Y . -. ; -
�Facli ;Nirtier'- `Q� 3ivisipnof.Soil and Corservatio ; , e
• - �e - . f-�` -.�'' _ OthrAenc `; =� x _ o ."Yf .,.J =„a �_- - " gfiAV•
` •. a: . e
•
Type of Visit: 0-Ciim Hance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3- z -Z74 Arrival Time:I q 50 Departure Time: (000 County: Region:
Farm Name: /a U Y/) TLI.S Owner Email:
Owner Name: ✓ Phone:
•
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:Facility Contact: pi 0 k fallej Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: '
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
i
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
•
%-t'l - -
_ Desi zCu ent���• �: • �_� - -Desi= ''Gurrerit� - °:Desi n�° C e} t�`sA�_
Swine= z.14" Ca'ac4 'Pq Wet`Poultr` Ca` •ap 7, Cattle -°Ca aci ©°
= 9 .,P t3'a�_ ,�'P�� _ °� Y�� p . t3'n - P�= - _ �A.,, �4t ;A:: p _ ti3''�°`��,kp`�
��o•''• _.. ": q r _1 ._.-,. _ �� . �" -a ,_-r � ems= -- -__, ?s�'1 a_ ' - __ -=a w€f.� r'�T=..,,� "`
Wean to Finish Layer _ -'-4 t/15airy Cow 33S 37� ;_
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer -__ Dairy Calf - -_
tF Feeder to Finish :; `q E.`,`^ -� - ° _ °7 -` - -. ..:._ '`:,.L - Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean ::- _`°,','` to 1 Design 'Curr :a-_ent Dry Cow -
Farrow to Feeder 'a _-° £D ` Pout& _- Cea`i aci .:Po:' =_;= Non-Dairy v:_!
Farrow to Finish �,,;, --§$'_Beef Stocker -2,i
Gilts v Non-La ers ��°. Beef Feeder
. _,_ Boars `.•Pullets �� ��; Beef Brood Cow
• Otheirl: :__-_ -=_ _---�° ,;°. -__IIII Turke Poults - c_ i .- _____ __ : __
Other _
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? -
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Il'1Ve ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - /9. Date of Inspection: 3—I - ZZ
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes EvC ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): 3
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ To ❑ NA ❑ NE
• (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ 3�0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [L'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes lErNO ❑ NA ❑ NE
,-❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes []-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [To ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [To ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes El/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes aKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EKN-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Di NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 3
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No al(A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [E/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [1, A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ''To ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [J4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes El' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [ iE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ATo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 04o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
F r& I k 5
d' 929 ' �-a7$
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �Z. X ni Qn�+c�/ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3 Z — ?�ZZ-•-
Page 3of3 2/4/2015