NC0004375_Wasteload Allocation_19780307

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0004375
Clariant Corporation
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wastelo d Allocation `'
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Additional Information Received
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
March 7, 1978
This document is printed on reuse paper - igriore any
content on the reverse side

FOR DATA MANAGEMENT USE ONLY:
FACILITY NO.
/p Actual Facility
/r/ Proposed Facility
WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION REQUEST
Date of Request
/3a
TO: Mike McGhee, Technical Services Date Needed / /
FROM:
s/p? — of AD, /A S
SUBJECT: Effluent Limits for NPDES Permit No.(001 )
Permit Application Received (802 )
Pipe • No. (003 )
Draft to Public Notice (805 )
Discharger Name (103 )
.,5d3 J %'e0
County (104 )
nCC/cc C-Ai6 . err
TYPe (400 )
/`7 Mu /Id
Equiv. Population Served (202 )
Latitude (115 )
N3.Si7'Va'
Longitude (116 )
6/P°aa13o'r
201 Area (263 )
208 Area (264 )
Subbasin(112
Stream Classification (269 )
Receiving Stream (109 )
Drain. Area(287 )
Z v 0 ,.3 hl :. -
7/10 Flow(270)
9s of ---,
Ratio Waste 7/10 (303 )
1043 pl., 1Si s h.N.„. D.fT. ,..4.
Design Capacity (207 )
Design Temperature (NKP)
Elevation (NKP)
Location Discharger (NKP)
N L ,2i .t e4i7 c_i.3.1 /c) / ✓crL
Principal Product (NKP)
7 G X,776-- J %6 y
Sample No.
BOD5(mg/Z)
310
Fecal Caliform
/100ml 31616
Temperature
o F 11
DO (mg/1)
300
41 -
I - Mo. Average Concentration 01
,.
20.6 *
-
/.0
- Wk. Average Concentration 02
J - Minimwn Concentration 03
K - Maximwn Concentration 04
-
M - Monthly Average Loading 05
- Weekly Average Loading 06
P - Minimum Loading 07
-
Q - Maximum Loading 08
T - Frequency of Analysis 09
-
W - Sample Type 10
Total, Res due
''
NH -N
3
(mg/Z) 600
pft (units)
400
S�.Ii�dt ehw�ols
, 'L nil
w'.!
I - Mo. Average Concentration 21
153,8
3. 3 z *
L - i
A.0, 0,017
- Wk. Average Concentration 22
J - Minimwn Concentration 23
K - Maximum Concentration 24
M - Monthly Average Loading 25
- Weekly Average Loading 26
P - Minimwn Loading 27
Q - Maximwn Loading 28
T - Frequency of Analysis 29
W - Sample Type 30
•
UOD (NKP) 1 1/
�101e1 j �cEiL)E 1Z rylo4e� yef 6b�stth!t-'d -- F

P. O. BOX 2178
DUIKE POWER COMPANY
GENERAL OFFICES
422 SOUTH CHURCH STREET
CHARLOTTE, N. C. 28242
Au fist 16, 1977
Mr. W. E. Knight, Director
Division of Environmental Management
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Re: Request for Reevaluation of Minimum Flow Releases
Dear Mr. Knight:
TELEPHONE: AREA 704
373-4011
RECEIVED
AUG 17 1377
Div. of Environmental Mgt.
Ral&igh, N. C.
I have received your letter of June 21, 1977. Pursuant to your request contain-
ed therein, Duke Power Company agrees to maintain the minimum daily average flow
of 314 cfs at Mountain Island dam until July 1, 1985, by operating one hydro unit
for an adequate length of time between the hours of 6 a.m. and 8 p.m. In regard
to your other request, we have reviewed our other operations on the Catawba River
and agree that Duke can make changes to maintain minimum average daily flows as
follows:
Development Minimum Average Daily Flow-cfs
Bridgewater 66
Rhodhiss 225
Oxford 261
Lookout Shoals 278
Cowans Ford 311
RECEIVED
J U L 27 1991
If you will let us know when a need develops for such releases, we itALJTVtCri
operating the appropriate hydro plant between the hours of 6 a.m. and 8 p.m. to
achieve the flows shown above.
It should be pointed out that the operation of these hydro plants as described
above will result in a loss of energy which otherwise would be available at peak
periods. The result is a significant economic impact to the Company which will
ultimately be borne by the public. During the recent power shortage, all of the
subject hydro plants were operated at capacity to help meet the extremely high
load requirements. The operating changes which are proposed would, as you can
see, reduce our energy potential for peak and emergency periods.
Additionally, Article 31 of our FPC license for the Catawba-Wateree project ex-
empts Duke from meeting minimum average daily flows in cases of emergency and
during periods required for necessary repairs to the project works. If these
events occur, Duke will resume these releases as soon as possible.

Mr. W. E. Knight
August 16, 1977
Page 2
Please let us know if any increased releases will be required other than
Mountain Island, when they should commence, and the duration of the same.
•
Very truly yours,
L. P. J ian
Vice President -Operation
LPJ:cdb
RECEIVED
JULz(1991
CENTRAL FILE COPY

P. O. BOX 2178
D HE POWER COMPANY
GENERAL OFFICES
422 SOUTH CHURCH STREET
('Ir.1I.1.(rrrE. N. C. 2S`242
Apil 26, 1977
Mr. W. E. Knight, Director
Division of Environmental Management
Department of Natural and Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
,:car to (:;lro 1. ina
TELEPHONE: AREA 704
373-4011
Ado
WATER QUALITY D
!V
Re: Request for Reevaluation of Minimum Flow Releases
from Mountain Island Dam
Dear Mr. Knight:
Your letter of March 28, 1977 to Mr. William L. Porter,
Counsel, has been referred to me for reply.
t(t-C°653
CE1410E Ea CO
Associate General
The Federal Power Commission license for the Catawba-Wateree Project speci-
fies in Article 31 both a Minimum Continuous Flow and a Minimum Average Daily
Flow for discharges from the Mountain Island Dam. These discharge requirements
below Mountain Island Dam are 80 cfs and 314 cfs, respectively. Upon review
of our records, we find that there were relatively few days in which the
Minimum Average Daily Flow was not met. We are, therefore, willing to maintain
the Minimum Average Daily Flow from Mountain Island at 314 cfs during -the per-
iod required to maintain water quality as specified in the.Project License by
operating one hydro unit for an adequate length of time between the hours of
6:00 A. M. and 8:00 P. M.
I am sure you are aware that hydroelectric generating plants such'as Mountain
Island play a vital role in supplying electricity to our customers. The stor-
age of water behind the dam represents potential energy which can readily be
converted into electrical power. During times of peak demand when other methods
of generation are operating at full capacity, the use of hydro plants can im-
mediately be activated to meet the public's demand. These attributes make
hydro plants, with their attendant water storage, of immense importance to
both Duke and the public. Their availability for peak time use reduces the
need for construction of additional steam generating plants and thereby helps
to keep customer costs to a minimum. Although Duke will agree to maintain
the Minimum Average Daily Flow at 314 cfs when required for reasons of water
quality, this release of water does represent a small loss in power potential.
Duke has some further concerns, however, regarding your request. We believe
that it was the intent of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments
of 1972 to stop the discharge of pollutants rather than depending on dilution
to solve the pollution problem. In addition, we find that State law requires

:Ir. W. E. Knight
April 26, 19.77
Page 2
the more stringent of either effluent limitations or water quality standards
be riet. Duke does not believe chat additional releases of water should be
required in order to permit high discharges of pollutants into downstream
waters.
We will comply with our FPC license and are glad to cooperate with you to
the extent practicable. We are concerned about deliberately releasing water
from our hydro plants for other than conditions in our FPC license.
If you have further questions, please let us know.
Very truly yours,
L. P. Jian
Vice President -Operation
LPJ:cdh
cc: Mr. W. L. Porter
Mr. A. C. Thies

North Carolina Department of
Natural & Economic Resources
JAMES B. HUNT, J R., GOVERNOR HOWARD N. LEE, SECRETARY
March litS , 1977
Mr. W. L. Porter, Associate General
Counsel
Duke Power Company
422 South Church Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
Dear Mr. Porter:
LL,L
_ DIVISION OF Iyl `jt1
ENVIRONMENTAL ""
MANAGEMENT
80X 276147, RALEIGH 27611
TELEP1-IONE919 /V1-4740
SUBJECT: Request for Reevaluation of
Minimum Flow Releases from
Mountain Island Dam
This will confirm the discussion between representatives of Duke Power
and the Division of Environmental Management at a meeting in Raleigh on March
16, 1977. The Division is in the process of issuing a State NPDES Permit to
Martin Marietta Chemicals, Sodyeco Division at Mount Holly. The Catawba River
below Mountain Island Dam is assigned a classification of A —II, Public Water
Supply, which means that a stream standard of .001 mg/1 for phenols must be
met.
Article 31 of the license issued Duke Power Company by the Federal Power
Commission requires that Duke release a minimum continuous flow of 80 cfs from
Mountain Island Dam. Based on this flow plus flows from tributary streams
between Mountain Island Dam and Sodyeco's discharge, the staff has determined
that Sodyeco would have to meet a phenols effluent limitation of 0.55 pounds
per day to maintain water quality standards. The estimated phenols limitation
specified for best practical treatment (BPT) would allow Sodyeco 34 pounds per
day. Thus, Sodyeco's phenol discharge is water quality limitetici..mED
Article 31 of the license also provides that the: V
JUL 27 1991
(ii) Licensee shall increase the discharge from each dever...fome nt�.q. if and
when additional water is required and only for the period'
to maintain the quality standards prescribed by the State Stream
Sanitation Committee of North Carolina, as may -be prescribed by the
Commission upon the reconmen_dation of the appropriate State agency,
in an amount sufficient to maintain an average daily flow below each
development.
(v) Licensee shall cooperate with the various State agencies concerned,
to develop and establish by mutual agreement, after adequate study,
operational patterns or a combination of minimum discharges together
with operational patterns, that will provide benefits equivalent to
those which would accrue from the maintenance of minimum discharges
specified under (ii) above.

-2—
In Article 31, . the minimum based average daily flow below Mountain Island
Darn was 314. cfs. Using this flow, the phenols limitation would be 1.73 pounds
per day..
The staff has evaluated flow data submitted by Duke and found that there
were approximately 64 days during 1976 when power was not generated at Mountain
Island Dam and downstream flows were approximately 80 cfs.
The Division requests that Duke Power Company review its operating scheme
and advise us of the extent to which average daily flows below Mountain Island
Dam could be increased by mutual agreement.
The Division recognizes the precedence of this request, the interrelationship
between the various impoundments and that discharges downstream of Duke's other
impoundments are already operating under water quality limited permits. There—
fore, the Division is also requesting that Duke reevaluate the minimum flow
releases from all of its impoundments in the Catawba River Basin and advise us
of the extent to which the minimum flows could be increased.
Please direct any technical questions to Mr. R. F. McGhee at telephone
number 733-4966. Also, feel free to discuss any of the above with me.
M P:bf
bcc: David
A. F.
L. P.
Sincerely,
Original Stoned by
W L.. Kr• ic;HT
W. E. Knight
Director
Adams
Puette
McRorie-R. W. Van Tilburg-R. F. McGhee
Benton-R. A. Carter -Central Files
NEGEIVED
JUL 27 1991
CENTRAL FILE COPY

P. 0. BOX 2178
DUKE POWER COMPANY
GENERAL OFFICES
422 SOUTH CHURCH STREET
CHARLOTTE, N. C. 28242
November
Mr. W. E. Knight, Director
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources & Community Development
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Knight:
RLEPHONE19-11
: AREA 704
3.4011
Water Quay Y
Management Branch
Y 'lr^c
28, 1977 _f d EIVED
DEC 5 1977
Di1& of ta)i ; •,r ,.:,;;,_! Mgt
ita r.1 <., N. C.
In reply to your letter of August 26, 1977, with respect to the Subject:
Request for Re-evaluation of Flow Releases, we respond to your three ques-
tions as follows:
Question No. 1. Will you please quantify the loss of energy that would
result from the increased releases (or better quantify
the economic impact).
Answer:
There is no energy loss in operating our hydro facili-
ties to supply the proposed daily average flow require-
ments. Instead we are simply allocating a portion of
hydro energy which is normally used to replace higher
cost thermal generation during peak hours to Saturday
and Sunday operation. A conservative estimate of the
penalty incurred is $150,000 per year.
Question No. 2. If the additional releases will have a significant
effect on lake levels, can you give us an estimate of
the difference in lake level drawdowns.
Answer:
There will be no difference in lake drawdowns since the
total generation will not change, only the pattern of
usage will vary.
Question No. 3. Although related to item two above, what impacts will
the releases have on uses of the lakes for recreational
and other uses.
Answer:
There should be no impact on uses of the lakes for
recreational and other uses.
We trust that this is responsive to your questions. If we can be of further
service in this matter, please advise.
Yours very truly,���• ::TRAC:
L271991L. P. Ju anFILE COPY
Vice President - Operation
LPJ/fs
cc: B. B. Parker
W. 0. Parker, Jr.
A. C. Thies W. S. Lee
J. E. Lanche
Y. W. Campbell

FOR DATA MANAGEMENT USE ONLY:
FACILITY NO.
WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION REQUEST
/-7 Actual Facility
./J Proposed Facility
TO: Mike McGhee, Te.chnical Services
FROM: 24(1E- gbKIN S 6PF0
SUBJECT: Effluent Limits for NPDES Permit
Date of Request _/_/_
11°,n1
Date Needed / / 1/5
No.(001 )
Pipe No.(003
'Permit Application Received (802 )
•
Draft to Public Notice (805 )
Discharger Name (103 ,
50DYC-6 -
County (104 )
Type (400 )
1-7 Mu f-7Id
Equiv. Population Served (202 )
. , .
Latitude (115
Longitude (116 )
201 Area (263
.
•
208 Area (264 )
.
Subbasin(112 )
03 -0? 33
Stream Classification (269 )
/9 -Z-
Receiving Stream (109 )
Drain. Area(2-67 )
7/10 Flow(270)
qS"
Ratio Waste 7/10 (303 )
Design Capacity (207 ).
. .,
:, ,, • . .
Design Temperature (NKP)
. .
Elevation (NKP)
LocationDischarge (NKP)
. ••
. ,
Principal Product (NKP)
So:mple No. . . ,
SOD5(mg/7,)
310
r'eca.1 Ca7.7:f3rm
700mi 31676
Temperature
° P 11 •
P.O (mg/1)
300 .
‘. •
41
I - Mo. Averciqe Concentration 01
q3-5- tarPian_, ,
.57 •
- Wk. Averczqe Conc..--,nt-ratior 02
- Msnumzn Concentration 03
0.1 , 1,1112111.
K - Martr777.1177 Concentration 04
M ,- Monthl Avera_ e Loadina 0,,
- Weekl Avera e Loadina 06
'
P - Minimun Loadin 0/
Q - Max-tmurn" Loadin3 0'1
T - Fre uenc o Anan s s 09
W - Ss,.le .e 20
.
,
-otal ...... e
(r7,74/L) 502
11H3-N
(m7/7,) 600
PR (units)
400
, 4j,
, •,
SO Aes
- Mo. Avera e Cancent;iiation .':',"'
5002. s 4.
.
,
0. 5
I
- wk . Average Concentra.-tior, 2
ir3.8 • ,
. if
A i
0 - Or
cf. — Minimurn Concentration
.K. --Maximur? Concenr...-7.*,..,:”-. •-• :•
... •
14 — 140n hly .4oera1,3 Loa.n7
.-
- Weekly_ .4veraae !...r:''':',:ff-n'.7
P - Mini,nrup7 Tioadf,r,7 :-.
i
Q - Maximm Loadin : _ - 1
T - Frequency of Ana77i?::::: V._ . . 4
W ''" 5p1e Type ."--.*):: 1
•
UOD (11K.P)
&1,1i;it;r:-Ni7

MAIN
engineers
BOSTON, MASS.
C HA S. T. MAIN, INC.
TWO FAIRVIEW PLAZA, 5950 FAIRVIEW RD., P. O. BOX 15236, CHARLOTTE, N. C. 28210, TEL. [phone]
FIR 1 11977
QLANNINQ 8y MANAGEME$1
Subject: Martin Marietta Chemicals
Sodyeco Division
Mt. Holly, North Carolina
Wastewater Discharge Permit
Mr. A. F. McRorie, Chief
Planning & Management Section
Division of Environmental Management
N. C. Department of Natural &
Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. McRorie:
February 10, 1977
3182-1-1
0'41
11'C-
FEb 1% jt,r,
-' 1 �.Lc•i�'f 11.iL�
In your letter to me dated December 28, 1976, you indicated
that your Division has raised the design flow of the Catawba
River to 95 cfs for the segment effecting the subject waste-
water allocation. This in turn raised the proposed phenol
limit to 0.55 lbs/day for Sodyeco. Please be advised that
my client is still not happy with this figure based on the
following information:
1. The original NPDES Permit, which is now several years
old, included a phenol value of 1.7 lbs/day. This was
based on the average daily flow from the Mt. Island' Lake
of 314 cfs.
2. It is our understanding that the 80 cfs from Mt. Island
Dam represents an "instantaneous low flow" whereas the
314 cfs from this source is the "average daily low flow".
We are still at a loss to understand why your Division
continues to base wastewater allocations on an instanta-
neous low flow as opposed to the average daily low since
we have discharge parameters based on a 24-hour daily
basis.
In your December 28th letter you indicated that the questions
concerning Article 31 of the FPC license had been referred to
your legal staff. We would certainly appreciate having this
I ECEI VED
CENTRAL A�J JUL 2 7 1991
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA •DEN ER, COLORDO V ORTLAND, OREGON

Mr. A. F. McRorie - 2 - February 10, 1977
matter cleared up as soon as possible since we are in the process
of renegotiating our NPDES Permit with both your Division and EPA.
One of the conditions of our existing NPDES Permit is that certain
modifications be made to the Sodyeco wastewater treatment facili-
ties in accordance with the July 1, 1977 target date. Again, we
are anxious to finalize all discharge parameters so that engineer-
ing activities can proceed toward developing a sound plan for
modifications to the waste treatment facilities. Your early re-
sponse to our request will be appreciated.
CHDjr:mww
cc: E. J. Eccles
Wilton Rankin
R. Gleason
R. F. McGhee
H. B. DuHart
T. F. Armstrong
Yours very truly,
CHAS. T. MAIN, INC.
C. H. Davis, Jr., Maner
Industrial & Environmental
Department
RECEIVED
JUL 27 1991
CENTRAL FILE COPY

December 28, 1976
Mr. C. H. Davis, Jr.
Chas. T. Main, Inc.
Two Fairview Plaza
5950 Fairview Road
P. 0. Box 15236
(;charlotte, North Carolina 28210
Dear ;+ r. Davis:
Please refer to your letter dated October 20, 1976, concerning our wasteload
allocation for Martin Marietta Chemicals, Sodyeco Division at Mt. Holly. To
summarize the situation, we seem to have reached agreerient on effluent parameters
for Sodyeco except for phenols. Our analysis indicates that all parameters
except for phenols will be limited by EPA issued effluent guidelines.
Tie argument you nave presented in your letter is that 341.2 cfs of flow in
the Catawba River should have been used ratifier than 80 cfs as the design flow
for Sodyeco's effluent evaluation. We have examined your information, had
additional discussion with LJSGS, and concluded that the stream flows which come
in from tributaries between Lake Nor,:uun and the Sodyeco discharge should be used for
Sodyeco's design flow. However, your analysis double counted flaws from
Dutchman's Creek and included flows from Long, Paw, and Fite Creeks which are
downstream of Sodyeco. We have revised the design flow at Sodyeco to 95 cfs
(80 cfs from Mountain Island Dam + 15 cfs from intervening tributaries) . Tliis
change raises the phenols limit from 0.46 lbs/day to 0.55 lbs/day for Sodyeco.
We have referred the questions concerning Article 31 of the FPC license
to our legal staff and will contact you at a later time as to our conclusions.
Sincerely,
Original Signed by
A. F. McRORIE
A. F. 'icRorie, Chief
Planning 6 Management Section
cc: Rex Gleason
R. F. McGhee
H. B. Duflart
T. F. Armstrong
Dave Adkins
ECEIV D
JUi 27 7,97
CENTRAL FILE COPY

MAI N
Engineers
C HAS. T. MAIN, INC.
TWO FAIRVIEW PLAZA, 5950 FAIRVIEW RD., P. O. BOX 15236, CHARLOTTE, N. C. 28210, TEL. [phone]
October 20, 1976
3182-1
Subject: Martin Marietta Chemicals
Sodyeco Division
Mt. Holly, North Carolina
Wastewater Discharge Permit
Mr. R. F. McGhee
Technical Services Branch
Division of Environmental Management
N. C. Department of Natural & Economic Resources
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mr. McGhee:
On September 27, 1976, MAIN and Sodyeco personnel met to
discuss the computer model of the waste load allocations
as submitted by the North Carolina Department of Environ-
mental Management for the Sodyeco discharge. MAIN and
Sodyeco feel that the 80 CFS flow of the Catawba River
which is the basis of the computer model waste load allo-
cations is low and in fact, the flow should be a minimum
of 341.2 CFS. The basis for the higher flows are discussed
hereafter.
1. Upon request Mr. Ralph C. Heath, District
Chief, United States Department of the
Interior, Raleigh, N. C. furnished MAIN
information relative to the lateral inflow
contributed by the drainage area between
Mountain Island Dam and Mount Holly. Based
on the data received MAIN has calculated the
lateral inflow to be 27.2 CFS.
The following table gives a breakdown of
above flow based on the estimates of the
natural stream flow statistics.
RECEIVED
JUL 27 7997
CENTRALFILE COPY
OCT ;.) trie
liCa
Ft��7-[ C
• Lr r:a
BOSTON, MASS.
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA • DENVER,COLORADO • PORTLAND,OREGON

Mr. R. F. McGhee - 2 - October 20, 1976
No. Name
Estimated Flow in CFS
7-Day, 10-Year Min., 7Q10
Estimate Range
1. Catawba River @ Flow from the in-
NC27 @ Mt. Holly tervening drainage
yy�� area between the dam
s ` �' "��' and this site = 15
' c -fa (excepting Dutchman's
Creek)
5e i1redAA-,-1
2. Dutchman's Creek 11 (7-15)
@ Mt. Holly
0.7 (0.5-0.9)
4. Paw Creek near 0.3 (0.2-0.4)
Charlotte
3. Long Creek @ mouth
opposite Catawba
Heights
5. Fite Creek @ mouth
near Catawba Heights
0.2
Total 27.2
(12-18)
2. Based on the Federal Power Commission's license to
Duke Power Company the use of 80 CFS in the computer
model instead of 314 CFS seems incorrect.
According to the article 31, p. 17, of the license,
the licensee shall discharge a minimum instantaneous
stream flow of 80 CFS below Mountain Island Dam at
,�1v � all times. However, in article 31, subparagraphs
+it'v (ii) and (v), it is also stated that the licensee
30L`1 1991 shall cooperate with various state agencies to de-
Yvelop operational patterns that will provide benefits
CEN��� f0. �0 equivalent to those which would accrue from the main-
tenance of a minimum average daily flow of 314 CFS
below Mountain Island Dam.
In view of this technical backup data we feel that the computer
model should be rerun using a total flow of 341.2 CFS, that is,
314 CFS as a minimum average daily flow in the Catawba River plus
the 7-day, 10-year low flow of 27.2 CFS from the tributary creeks
and the intervening drainage area between the Mountain Island Dam
and Mount Holly as tabulated in paragraph (1) of this letter.

Mr. R. F. McGhee - 3 - October 20, 1976
In addition to these flows the lateral inflow contributed
by the drainage area between Mount Holly and the downstream
end of the river reach under analysis should be considered.
Should you have any questions, please advise the writer at
your convenience.
YC:mw
cc: Edwin J. Eccles
Very truly yours,
CHAS. T. M+`N, INC
C. H. ravis, Jr.,,anager
Industrial & Environmental
Department
RECEIVED
JUL 27 1991
CENTRAL FILE COPY

•
FOR DATA MANAGEMENT USE ONLY:
FACILITY NO.
WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION REQUEST
%7
/ /
Actual Facility
Proposed Facility
Date of Request e / /(J/ %t1
TO: Mike McGhee, Technical Services Date Needed / / ASa
FROM: A J ci- � c� rC S 5 Pc a
SUBJECT: Effluent Limits for NPDES Permit No.(001 )
Pipe No.(003 )
Permit Application Received (802 )
Draft to Public Notice (805 )
Discharger Name (103 )
JOiy/--`CO UI V/j/d ✓
/9,1d17.✓ /9ih?ic:-7nq eo,e,
County (104 )
%! C/CC c t,' i1 u 6'
Type (400 )
/`7 Mu% 7Id
Equiv. Population Served (202 )
Latitude (115 )
Al 3 s- ' 11. 3.o u
Longitude (116 )
,
W 800 0 0 3:0
201 Area (263 )
208 Area (264 )
Subbasin(112 )
' 03 - 05)- 31
Stream Classification (269
A r i
Receiving Stream (109 )
necid, v '12
Drain. Area(267
' oZ Oct 0 Sj :l
)
7/10 Flow(270)
ce,./rea,/,-./ f'1.4),1
Ratio Waste 7/10 (303 )
Design Capacity (207 ) jDesign
<3..902FC
m� �'
Temperature (NKP)
Y -
Elevation (NKP)
i2o /-L.--
/11T1T
Location Discharger (NKP)
/(M::
Sample No.
41
- .'o. Avera e Concentration 01
- Wk. Average Concentration 02
- Minimum Concentration 03
K - Maximum Concentration
M - monthly Avera
- Weekly Average Loading 06
P - Minimum Loadin 07
Q - Maxirnwn Loading
T -. Frequc,ncy of Analysis 09
W - San .7.eT •e 10
e Loading 05
✓ - Mo. Average Concentration 21
- W7. Average Concentration 22
J - Minimum Concentration 2
K - Maximum Concentration 24
M -.Monthly Average Loading 25
- eekl? Avera e Loadin 26
P - Minirmnn Loading 27
Q - Maximum Loading 28
T - F'revenc of Anal sis
29
W - Sample Type 30
rincipal Produc
Temperature
0 F 11
D0 (mg/1)
300
rs
lb c i,f' .t@ 75
-
UOD (NKP)
Vey'