20220689 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220518

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
OO Yes
0 No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
OYes 0No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
4/14/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20220689 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
0 No payment required
O Fee received
® Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-
9800
Information for Initial Review
What amout is owed?*
O $240.00
0 $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
la. Name of project:
Hanging Rock SP Culvert Replacement
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Christine Farrell
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
5/18/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Vade Mecum Creek
Basin
Roanoke
Water Classification
B
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
36.4021
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-80.2899
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Stokes
Is this a NCDMS Project
0Yes ONo
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0Yes @No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
EI Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
EI Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0 Yes
O No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
O Nationwide Permit (NWP)
0 Regional General Permit (RGP)
0 Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
OYes 0No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
EO 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
03 - Maintenance
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
O Yes O No
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
0 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes O No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes O No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
OYes 0No
B. Applicant Information
0Yes ®No
OYes 0No
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
O Owner OJ Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
0 Yes ® No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
State of North Carolina
2b. Deed book and page no.:
bk 646 pg 2067
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
116 W Jones St
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27603
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
Of appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Moore's Spring
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
6926727217
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Hooker Farm Rd
Address Line 2
City
Westfield
Postal / Zip Code
27053
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Vade Mecum Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
B
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Roanoke
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030101030108
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
6354
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The project is located within Hanging Rock State Park near the Moore's Wall Climbing Parking Lot and the Park Superintendent's residence. Land use in park proper is recreation and
conservation. This project will replace a culvert under the state -maintained (NC DPR) gravel road, Hooker Farm Rd.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
O Yes O No O Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of this project is to replace a culvert that has been continuously blocked with concrete and debris by an adjacent landowner for years. The culvert is meant to keep water from
ponding in a DWR-designated unique wetland = Hanging Rock Hillside Seepage Bog UWL. Existing culvert is too damaged to repair again, so Park staff will replace with 48" 60 ft long
galvanized CMP. Site visit with Sue Homewood 4/14/22.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Park staff will use pumps to pump water level down so that there is no accumulated water. Prior to excavation beginning, park staff will set up sandbags to create temporary small dam
area between the existing culvert and the water flow source. Park staff will pump nonstop to keep water from accumulating beyond temporary dam. Park staff will use 4" pump and hoses
along with 2 smaller trash pumps to keep/maintain water level down.
Excavators will load and haul away any earthen soil & debris from above culvert, remove rusted and broken existing culvert pipe and lodged concrete. Bottom of trench will be embedded
with size 57 Stone. 60' 48" CMP galvanized culvert pipe will be installed in the trench and buried/settled into stream bed. Road will then be backfilled and compacted around new culvert
pipe. Previously excavated soil will be used if suitable.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
0 Yes No
Unknown

Comments:
UWL boundary delineated by DWR-construction will not impact
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
0 Preliminary 0 Approved 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown O N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
0 Yes O No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
0 Wetlands O Streams -tributaries
0 Open Waters 0 Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
0 Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
Culvert install
Temporary
Culvert
UT to Rocky Branch
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
60
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
60
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
60
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Water will be distributed downstream onto wooded land to a minimum of two different locations to keep existing creek channel from eroding. Dewatering
hose exit areas will also have straw bales staked into ground to prevent erosion. Will install temporary straw bales and erosion fabric along existing
creek channel below the dam/road to prevent accidental soil and sedimentation from entering creek.
Ib. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Previously excavated soil will be used if suitable. Inlet/Outlet protection of Class 2 Rip Rap will be installed around new culvert. Will install Erosion
Control Blanket on all disturbed slope. Excavators and grader machinery will not enter exclusionary area (UWL) on map.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes C No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan

1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes • No
If no, explain why:
not a buffered basin
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
0 Yes • No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
OYes 0No
Comments:
n/a
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
• Yes No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes • No
Comments: *
under threshold
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes • No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
culvert replacement only
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
0Yes 0No®N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes • No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes • No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
0Yes ®No
• No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
0 Yes • No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
0 Yes • No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
OYes 0No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
0 Yes 4 No

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS iPAC, field visits with DPR Biologists
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes • No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
0 Yes O No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC SHPO HPOWEB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
O Yes J No
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC FRIS
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or dreg and drop files here to attach document
HARO PCN.pdf 17.53MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
Y! By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Christine Farrell
Signature
Date
5/18/2022

L Mail-Riddlebarger,Robin-Out X 9 GoogleMaps X + — 0 X
F -) C I google.com/maps/@36.4013827,-80.2894218,17.16z G d * r * 0 0
Search Google Maps O • R Groceries irki Restaurants $Takeout W Hotels a Gas 8 Pharmacies g Coffee iii Q
y-a
oP g
a
rn
0� 411P"°°
Farm Rd Ho.,
a��
QHo
p Ra
0
N°°„e,farm Rci 4i5.
e
4°
e�
0,4Q,m Rd
ef
Moores wall
climbing parking •
4
fi }
d _
O
t Layers a° Go:..g1e a —MS
sn..t......,.a
p Map data®2G22 Google United States Terms Privacy Send feedback MID R-
Red tube indicates location of culvert.

PwD
RpE
w
HeD
HeD
HeE
Br
SOIL SURVEY OF STOKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 14
RpE RpE (Joins sheet 10) PcD2 RpE MaC2 66 RpE RpE PwD PcD2 RpE D RpE RtA PcD2 SaE HeD PwC
r.
na
SuD
B.E ..
( Iornx thee/ 18)
SuC 1-ten
BrE
SuE
SLID
HaD
RuE
PcD2 O PcC2 PcC2 PCB2 PcC2
3/4 1/2 1/4 0
"HaC
BrD\ 1 BrE
BUD 0
RuE
Sao.
Sot,
/ RUE`
0.5 0
SCALE 1:24 000
HeE
S110
Moores
Knob
f NG
Br D
— Sr II.
/ f f'' J 1
L__.-1 Hu ,r �0� ) uF
L D E \ `; HeE
____..-----/—
_..-----BrD .
-- - - - {j SuE
SuE
SuC
HeE [Tutu I
HeD
9rD HeC
RpE
STOKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA NO.

Hanging Rock State Park Boggy Springhead
Visited August 31, 2020
Mike Schafale, Brenda Wichmann, and Robin Riddlebarger (park superintendent)
Background: This site was first surveyed by the Natural Heritage Program (Mike Schafale) in 2003, at the
request of Eric Nygard, the park superintendent at the time. A relatively brief report was written
describing the drained pond, a boggy wetland upstream of it, and bog plants in the pond bed.
This visit was prompted by trespass and legal disputes by a neighboring landowner. Though the wetland
area is on land owned by the State Park, the neighbor blocked a culvert that drained the old pond,
causing it to refill. He also cut trees and shrubs in the pond bed. He has been charged with several
offenses. He also has been advised that he can apply to the Department of Environmental Quality for a
dam permit, and Sue Homewood of Division of Water Resources inquired about the nature of the site.
The site is classified as a Unique Wetland, giving it additional regulatory protection but the case
potentially will test untried legal ground.
Observations: The pond bed is now drained except for a small area of shallow water at the lowest part.
The bed has a significant slope. Much of it on the north and west side is not wet. There is a distinct
stream channel through it, with a brisk flow. The stream enters the pond near its northeast corner,
flowing from the east and going west across its northern portion. Along that stream above the open
pond bed is a densely forested wetland with saturated soil, seepage areas, and both sand -bedded and
mucky rivulets. Where it enters the pond bed is an area of mucky, very wet soil.
A substantial area of seepage and small rivulets also occurs on the southeast side of the pond. There is a
kind of terrace on this edge of the pond — nearly flat, distinctly higher than the rest of the pond bed, and
thoroughly saturated by seepage from a short distance above. Parts are mucky, but rivulets have some
gravel in their beds. Most of the seepage emerges from the forested slope just above the terrace. It was
previously assumed that the terrace had been flooded by the pond because it was non forested, but this
now appears unclear. Its vegetation does not appear affected by the recent impoundment.
The forested wetland east and southeast of the pond has a somewhat open canopy of Acer rubrum and
Pinus rigida with some Nyssa sylvatica. Trees up to 14" dbh were seen. The shrub layer is dense, with
Rhododendron maximum, Vaccinium fuscatum, and Viburnum cassinoides abundant. Some Kalmia
latifolia, Gaylussacia baccata, Ilex laevigata (?), and Eubotrys racemosa are also present. Smilax
laurifolia is scattered in it, along with Smilax rotundifolia. Herb cover is low, but patches are dominated
by Galax urceolata, Mitchella repens, and Anchistea virginica. Scattered Sphagnum clumps are present.
We viewed the location of the Carolina Vegetation Survey plot, 114-01-0055. It is representative of the
community as a whole. This is the area now classified as Low Elevation Seep (Piedmont/Mountain
Boggy Springhead).
The saturated terrace has dense herbaceous vegetation. A few trees and shrubs had been cut out of its
edge, but it appears not to have supported as many woody plants as the rest of the open area.
Sphagnum is patchy in this area but fairly extensive. The diverse herb layer includes Xyris ambigua,
Andropogon glaucopsis or glomeratus, Dichanthelium ensifolium (?), Scleria triglomerata, Cinna
arundinacea, Carex leptalea, Solidago patula, Osmunda spectabilis, Osmundastrum cinnamomeum,
Anchistea virginica, Lorinseria areolata, Juncus sp., Rhynchospora sp., Drosera rotundifolia,
Symphyotrichum sp., Sericocarpus linifolius, Utricularia subulata, Platanthera clavellata, Lycopodiella

appressa, and the rare species Lycopodiella inundata and Chelone cuthbertii. The Utricularia was
previous reported as possibly cornuta, but that species was not seen. It should be noted that the point
where the Chelone cuthbertii had previously been mapped was visited and it was a dry upland site
unsuitable for the species. The species is thus presumed to have been previously discovered where we
found it, on the open terrace. The Lycopodiella inundata had not previously been known. It was closely
intermixed with Lycopodiella appressa.
The rest of the pond bed has fairly dense herbaceous vegetation that includes Carex mitchelliana, Carex
sp., Cyperus sp., Leersia sp., and Erechtites hieraciifolius. Some Hypericum frondosum are present, and
it is clear that Alnus serrulata was abundant along the south edge around the terrace. Taxodium
distichum and Platanus occidentalis had been noted in the pond bed in the previous visit. Robin
Riddlebarger confirmed that they had been planted by previous park staff as bare root seedlings from a
nursery. This is notable because it had been a concern that other Coastal Plain species in the site may
have been introduced with them.
The upland woods surrounding the pond are primarily Chestnut Oak Forest (Dry Heath Subtype) and are
typical of much of the forest at Hanging Rock.
The pond is formed by road fill on the downstream (west) side. It was previously drained by cutting
through the road and placing a culvert, soon after the park acquired it. It was recently impounded by
plugging the culvert. Robin Riddlebarger said the water had filled up to near the level of the road but
had not overflowed. There is no evidence of a spillway, though there is a high level culvert that may
have regulated pond levels in the past and that limited the recent impoundment. It is unclear what
would have happened in the case of a large rainfall but presumably water would overflow the road and
risk eroding the dam.
We also visited two small former impoundments that are about 100 meters south-southeast of the
pond. Dams had been built on a small seepage -fed headwater stream. At least one dam had a road
across it, and it is possible the impoundment was incidental to filling the road. Neither dam was
obviously breached but water was flowing into holes at the base of the dams, emerging as seepage
below them. The pond beds have dense herbaceous vegetation dominated by Carex leptalea and
Dichanthelium ensifolium (?). There is a little Osmunda spectabilis, Osmundastrum cinnamomeum,
Hypericum mutilum, Xyris ambigua, Platanthera clavellata, and Rhynchospora sp. were also noted.
Besides the large and small ponds, several old road beds run through the woods south of the pond.
There is a ridge on the northeast side of the large pond that appears artificial. Its purpose is unclear, as
it is not continuous for any distance, is not associated with an obvious excavation or a road, and does
not block any drainage.
Interpretation: The forested wetland defied classification for some years. It appears to be natural,
occurring above the pond level and remaining wet when the pond drained, and is notable for its unusual
combination of disjunct species from Mountains and Coastal Plain. It was variously called Hillside
Seepage Bog, Piedmont Boggy Streamhead, and other communities. When the Low Elevation Seep
(Piedmont/Mountain Boggy Springhead Subtype) was defined, it was given that classification, along with
a handful of other sites that shared shared tree canopy and dense shrub layers, and most of which had
disjunct Coastal Plain species. Analysis of plot data by Stephanie Seymour found these sites to be similar
to each other and distinct from all other Piedmont wetlands, and was the basis of defining the subtype.
The abundance of Pinus rigida and presence of Nyssa sylvatica in the forest, however, is typical of

mountain Swamp Forest —Bog Complex and Southern Appalachian Bog communities. This community
remains in apparent good condition. The canopy trees are large and are presumably as mature as the
forests in the surrounding area, if not more so. The possibility remains that it was once more open and
supported plants now found only on the open terrace. No evidence specifically supports this, though
other boggy wetlands show tendencies to develop dense shrub cover under current conditions.
The interpretation of the open wetland on the terrace is more difficult. It was not previously regarded as
a natural community because it was thought to be part of the pond bed. However, it is a persistent
saturated wetland that occurs well above the level of the stream, with obvious substantial seepage
input. The high diversity of bog plants, while the rest of the pond bed supports weedy species and most
is not notably wet, suggests a saturated wetland occurred in this location well before the pond existed.
The large number of species of mountain bogs and Coastal Plain wetlands, not occurring in the forested
areas, suggests an open wetland of long standing, here or in the vicinity. The presence of two rare plant
species not known nearby is also notable. It thus appears more likely that an open wetland akin to a
Southern Appalachian Bog or Hillside Seepage Bog has long been present. The fact that the terrace
appears not to have been flooded by the recent impoundment suggests that it may have been above the
level of the previous pond as well, though it may have previously been more extensive, with part
destroyed by the pond. It likely was altered in some way by the pond. It is also difficult to tell how much
shrub or tree component it had, given the recent cutting and the earlier effects of the pond. While its
appropriate community classification remains uncertain, this area clearly is of high significance as a
natural community as well as being habitat for two rare plant species.
This visit made clear that the natural area boundary needs revision in the vicinity of the pond. It
included a house, while excluding part of the boggy wetland. The boundary has been revised as shown
on the map. The revised boundary includes the terrace and its edge, but it continues to exclude to
more altered part of the pond bed near the dam. None of this area is included in the dedicated area of
the park, but adding it should be considered.
The Unique Wetland designation was drawn to include all of the pond bed, the boggy terrace, and
extending southward to include the smaller drained ponds. Unfortunately, it is narrow enough that it
excludes much of the forested Low Elevation Seep (Piedmont/Mountain Boggy Springhead) community,
both along the creek east of the pond and where the Carolina Vegetation Survey plot is. If possible, it
should be expanded to include these areas. While the lower part of the pond bed is not as ecologically
significant, it is important for protecting the hydrology of the terrace. Refilling of the pond to past levels
would be a persistent alteration of that unique community.

• �p.11Mimmlifill PP -11. Hanging Rock State Park
Boggy wetland and vicinity
+ 2020-09-04 GPS
Peimm
IIMI
Partial track of visit
Q Unique Wetland
0 State Ownership
Revised natural area boundary
ra"Mh .1.rilri .
0101;106
L .
• .
411kiiii.
1....
�. .:' 482
� 1[/V
..1;),4• • ^\
+14:
L.stey' , Iiht.
\II ...t
'Y
•
1, 1
•
1 4'
i. a'
IIIII
1
......._je N 40 elliii
le
N.
> 41 . :dii
Ill
,ipdp 1 p m 7 1,
I 1

Hanging Rock State Park
Boggy wetland and vicinity
• 2020-09-04 GPS
Partial track of visit
Q Unique Wetland
State Ownership
ERevised natural area boundary
C. \
i
.*r , .. N
.Cq /
4 0 !
„.:/,,,„
' r
Y
• ;14'1% '''''''N\
fro .\
f 1, `{�'rke ` �
r I
i f
•
'At"rv.
ortgist
r
I.ifftl •i". . kr .tit - .E ...{ - .:. +fie• .♦ `:'�5L.^ lire-

U.S. DEPARTMENT ERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
science fora changing world
-80.3750°
36.5000' 556000mE
4039000mN
36.3750°
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
57
58
59
60
61
The National Map
US Topo
62
63
64
65
HANGING ROCK QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA - STOKES COUNTY
7.5-MINUTE SERIES
66
-80.2500
67 36.5000°
- - ii
1� ->-,- -
® !1 •• P / 4.
if
°° c
1p
I \
�-�
J \�o
"
-80.3750
57
58
Produced by the United States Geological Survey
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and
1 000-meter grid:Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17S
This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government
reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before
entering private lands.
Imagery NAIP, June 2016 - November 2016
Roads U.S. Census Bureau, 2016
Names GNIS, 1980 - 2016
Hydrography National Hydrography Dataset, 1899 - 2018
Contours National Elevation Dataset, 2008
Boundaries Multiple sources; see metadata file 2017 - 2018
Wetlands FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1980 - 1982
59
8°23"
149 MILS
0°25"
7 MILS
UTM GRID AND 2019 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
100,000 - m Square ID
NA
Grid Zone Designation
17S
60
1
1
61
SCALE 1:24 000
62
0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1
63
2
1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
0.5 0
1
MILES
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
This map was produced to conform with the
National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.
A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.18
64
■
NORTH
CAROLINA
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
2
3
4
6
7
5
8
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES
1 Claudville
2 Stuart SE
3 Nettleridge
4 Pilot Mountain
5 Danbury
6 Pinnacle
7 King
8 Walnut Cove
65
66
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
567000mE
Expressway Local Connector
Secondary Hwy Local Road
Ramp 4WD
• Interstate Route \ US Route O State Route
HANGING ROCK, NC
2019
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
4026000mN
36.3750
-80.2500