NC0005126_Wasteload Allocation_19940517

NPDES DOCUHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0005126
Harmony Rendering Plant
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
May 17, 1994
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the reirerse side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0005126
PERMITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Tyson Foods Inc.
Harmony Division
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 1.7 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): ,
Industrial (% of Flow):
7770
Comments:
Formerly Holly Farms Inc.
Based on40 CFR 432.107 Subpart J. + ‘i3a, f°3
Outran 002 has been eliminated.
RECEIVING STREAM: Hunting Creek
Class: WS-III
Sub -Basin: 03-07-06
Reference USGS Quad: D16NW
County: Iredell
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
kVA; IA)
z z\ a�
1'13o
Drainage Area (mi2 ) /76 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): / 75
7Q10 (cfs) 3 ,4 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 7/ 30Q2 (cfs) 9,?. 3
Toxicity Limits: IWC 7 % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring: 0800 : r D5 , :a
Parameters
Upstream N
Downstream I V
Location
Location
Effluent
Recommended Limits
Wasteflow (mgd):
BOD5 (b/day):
TSS (lb/day):
pH (SU):
Fecal Coliform(#/100m1):
Ammonia (lb/day):
Oil and Grease (lb/day):
T.R. Chlorine (lb/day):
(please attach, MBAS (Ib/day):
Total Nitrogen (lb/day):
Total Phosphorus (1b/day):
Temperature (C):
Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/94 Treatment Plant Class: II
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by: Jay Lucas
1/-711-N-
Reviewed by: 0
qq 1C1A
lvk--11•.o�f-14l3 vekaut
/t�-�-
Prepared by:
Daily Max.
1.7
360
440
6-9
400
280
200
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Monthly Average WQ or EL
1.7
180
220
6-9
200
140
100 ��--
E-lfluenl- f'lonrjp+s�
E "
E ""
E ►�
EL
EL
EL
EL
EL
I I I
Instream monitoring requirements for D.O., Temp. , Fecal Coli., Conductivity, BOD5 and ammonia were dropped
because they are not water quality limited and review of the existing data indicate that a significant amount of
degradation to the stream is not anticipated.
Date: 2/ 1 /94
Date: S
Date: Jul 13 i d
Comments:
BoT h I ‘ S 9110 $o __
,6 yL,LJ
Fl.

NC0005126 3/29/94
Tyson Foods - Harmony Division
Effluent Guidelin
Effluent Parameter
EPA Limitations in 40 CFR
(Ibs/1000 lbs of product)
Effluent Limits'
(Ibs/day)
Comments
Daily Max
30 day avg.
Daily Max
30 day avg.
BODS
0.18
0.09
360.000
180.000
BCT
TSS
0.22
0.11
440.000
220.000
BCT
Oil & Grease
0.10
0.05
200.000
100.000
BCT
Fecal Coliforms
400 mpn/100 ml (maximum)
BCT
pH
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
BCT
Ammonia
0.14
0.07
280.000
140.000
BAT
Type of Product Produced
1000 Ibs/day produced- max
Effluent Guideline Reference
Poultry Offal Rendering
2,000
40 CFR 432.103 & .107 (Subpart J)
Renderer
SODS

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Tyson Foods Inc.
NC0005126
Industrial - 99%
Existing
Renewal
Hunting Creek
WS-III
030706
Iredell to
Moores e
Jay Lucas
2/1/94
D 16NW
Domestic- 1%
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
In 9/89 Facility requested that there instream monitoring requirements be dropped. EHNR
honored their request in a return letter. Theffore, I dropped all instream monitoring. Limits
changed based on a change in production load. I ran a model using weiglled flows @ the
discharge point and calculated flows @ the ending point.. Discussed CBOD:BODS ratio with
H.Bryant I decided to use 4.6 based on an average from similiar facility ratios. Staff report
comments on fact that facility is only using 1/5 of its permitted flow and suggests flow reduction in
the permit. If facility reduced permitted flow to 0.5 MGD the effluent limits would not change;
however, the IWC would change to 1.8% instead of 6%.�
C
Special Schedule Requirements
and additional comments from Reviewers: y _7/
CR�. o/ i .i„4%(4 .� t t -f" tilt._t.-1-J �'''• u� (, 'G'NW/L�l u -v
REQUEST # 7730
N.C. DEPT. OP
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
NATURAL RESOURCES
APR 14 1994
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
211855284
1989
175
43.4
71
175
92.3
/67
weighed flo,
USGS# 19f
If
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: (r/1 LL & .
Regional Supervisor ft D/16 ') �izer-g-gx
Permits & Engineering:
Date: S/9,3
Date:
✓1 Date: /4- Yh
Date:C1f
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: m �l [ °I q L

2
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit
Monitoring Schedule:
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Chronic (Ceriodaphnia) P/F @ 6%
@7%
@ 6% nl % t_t i f9 i �j l-i rye
ARP, JUL, OCT, JAN
Existing Limits
i. Gtrl C� J In4,�= /,7 y�� c/ Daily Max.
BOD5 (lb/ y): 412.8
TSS (Ib/day): 467.8
pH (SU): 6-9
Fecal Coliform (#//100m1): 200
Ammonia (Ib/day): 267
Oil and Grease (lb/day): 275.2
Dissolved Oxygen: monitor
T.R. Chlorine: monitor
Conductivity: monitor
MB AS: monitor
Total Nitrogen: monitor
Temperature: monitor
Total Phosphorus: monitor
Recommended Limits
,) = /. 7 "YI G� L,/ Daily Max.
BODS (Ib/day): 360
TSS (Ib/day): 440
pH (SU): 6-9
Fecal Coliform(#/100m1): 400
Ammonia (lb/day): 280
Oil and Grease (1b/day): 200
T.R. Chlorine (lb/day): monitor
MBAS (lb/day): monitor
Total Nitrogen (lb/day): monitor
Total Phosphorus (lb/day): monitor
Temperature (C): monitor
D u f} t-cti,, I c• _
All limit changes due to new production load under effluent
J) Renderer
Mon. Avg Monitor Frequency
206.4
233.9
6-9
400
134
137.6
U,D Weekly
E Daily
U,D Monthly
E Monthly
E Monthly
E,U,D Weekly
E Monthly
Monthly Average
180
220
6-9
200
140
100
WQ or EL
EL
EL
EL
EL
EL
EL _
E
E
E
E
E
dtvl4- flldn/kr,
guideline Limitations 40 CFR 432.103 & .107 (Subpart
Instream monitoring requirements for D.O., Temp. , Fecal Coli., Conductivity, BODS and ammonia were dropped
because they are not water quality limited and review of the existing data indicate that a significant amount of
degradation to the stream is not anticipated.
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
There is no instream monitoring requirements
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes X No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) Y (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name l / Soh hondf j1. 4J rmo n /4 h/ Permit # M( 0 00 5) ,)6 Pipe # QQ/
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The ffluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
V quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
CeP pert rmed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
�f?�� , 0�, , Tah . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
vli phrl permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
bi itaAll toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
°t )v Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
OW1° `•
04,1,0,22,06
\U1
0.
0'41 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
7Q10 43, 4 cfs
Permitted Flow /, 7 MGD
IwC y 7 %
Basin & Sub -basin Yar/kin 430766
Receiving Stream fiver 7hf Lv- e k
County j ,,(.e //
Recommendedby:
70-f--4/1
Date
QCL P/F Version 9/91

W40051,2(4,
i(i rkns clisctioy
Coa can--e_
Sov1 IG'olf �&C.
%/ l`ms
any 1,0,1
r
t#»& CouNT-y
OSGs* al(i'SSaS 3121187
(9 - -0 'Flow 0 , r
(-19v& = Y)rR X Di_
S 7Q[o = a 15
0 r(2 0_f _-34 4 _x _Q. av&
CCuk o lc.i-oJ )o w.s - --
i9 V-6- = (75 c1.01
S 7a_ I () _= 0.155 x 17 S =
7Q10 - 0,05a x 17
a 8. 5/ _c.
5O0 2_ = 0 x /75 = 60.a cis_
USC=S Mows
2 Jj
3g c r
7 cff
92 cf
Us,edt 14 U) v0o v Es t e e +o co] cu
�o peldtaiy, a i,n e► llie _ Q In�,t_�
%o w_S ,CDT ki5(11a
70 I o = -3. 37 _cif
w-70_�
/Y 2.= 9 2, 2 7 cifs
C� = 175c{3
�rf

w) LSGS #I1g r,a
- 1 '7
S'76?1Q ;. ('`}4,L5 -4
In17QW
Se evi f) % r a �, , :F_ a v
�� + 1,ss)/. _ r. 7g —�
s'76110 _(o, 939 + o, ao)/a = o, 3a c /R;
P0.1,07Q10 = %.36/ 0,3_0/= - D, 35/01
20 (ig - /P, _ 1, 85 c Fs
S7010._ (4s,a-f4,65 ,7 = 0•Q0 c 7,„;1-J
\do I U = (75,7 - 741. 7 = 0.35
5rm. les
4, a (� tier.'
+'i by -4146
ha ut
vo fees
—v sor, on a Xlvi
Leve 1 8-i►'1od_a,Q o h1 ' V U)
5,55
W7QKJ a,54 c2FS
3062 45cFs
pA.= /841»,2-
sr &J4. - 9R10 c fr
sriolo
w7au= 73,c1c4s
30G10 = c , / ck
Q14N Model L) iy GB00:18005 0-0/Jo = 4,6
GvJPINN3 Ia'k CF1/UPIr! 61//411;L _, !1;v
NR160 = �,5 x (147' = 44.¢ / g D5 = 1,.7 x 4,6 = CBob= 5g.4

t_
1_11
v
nn_i_da__k__4s_1) le_ _p_4,
rk
slo_p
6) ()
•
c.1 0
(
__naf4ie
SILL, 1 4, (c
Di-a.shat__

USA
G. W e t )_n 44 R01,0
wer /114uci LICS
� Z
D. � , 175 ,yi
S 7QU) = 45,37
1n1761.0 = '?a •5S
30QZ. — �a•a�
HOW RawS. Wevt c4kci4l ° '_ it 9130
sh 1 eJ ma Wei gs- _.-,., /es ri";mitl,f/re'a
4 - cr.veil 2 /9/9 r�T eh)/ tr.
pi-o p c alto, ,7,o1 �r� 07 (4
(2' i ex' 'io eJ 4 / k 5 6-5 , /iet ki 'ram_
(id chit- Ck-eider ijt I' 6.-) Mys. ra ojeJ sX'Pen-
e yrs (AP, i / e W/, h /we rPQ/anr,
krn��� �� . ,t10 c.,-)s Q- d , scAa_v s/Leo Z use Z / . eOaks-4
delevrri,'td ;n /GS f- tJJLr} • D.A. =
L �npu+ this DIP . aion,' w/ ltl9- LD / P /9/ ; .ci- -
Dq -4-- C.10 vo m uS GS.__it 19g 3 ciahlri 7_ perlorh,
2X d 2 -e k m kvtl Pio y Q_ *tit, N 199/l -f9 /(l , n brie -ior
2.SS k7rI dowt2,5h'-ea.i dj 1 e/7'J dUYe71LQ.
�] a io ac ad _.
D,n . _c-royfr, +')rs pi- iv -Wiz d•sc(1c
i -1 a -Fe- D i S c I a v ci Dog.,
i4,h H6 ►0__= 5.94 ± r`75 t go. 910 / [
Flow calf , &hir ovf -�

1 Liipui
DA . --__11) rh; z MiliZ=L} , s 7_10_, / F-PR "e 37eIT
j
Dig — LF PR,15 3 plc. z- iiii/O ,
_74;
aLeLjhed -PILLNAL oria lvis -Hi; l e di ,,,-. „i USGS */78Y
r
1 rh i 2'
______
S7010 -= ii- . 695 di
trv10 W -=. W."'
30 d
2. st /11.(ig 15 cc6-
eh dt
ter kY,;_l___sc_./_aa ii____amile I ed Aid-. I Iviegsdeci:
_Iti
ID, 1. -e- -e eii 1- •• bity_ 6A)
_yr1
10 iirt)ta_M-6_9_ ihoi vi .a 7 n- kr ci/of,4'settfi\--
D. 4,_7_,____Aideci jlur J/J A /04.
we/ern-14Q
e b, 4 4,7 1. /V = / II' 5 7 /i4
1p, -z
ii-ap . --
a..___/LS6_S_ -46'. 9 i Vier r)e/s/ (Q, --41,5 4141 /.---
iNja,s cie yrnij:\f -1-7) L..k_ 0 u /okdPi 0 io s -itto ii--e
SfraMkt ' / k J-7 Y. -11\12- Chiikg
1 osuiD,O. =- 4, '7 la e7 -z--- 110 irktiM '1- i 1
i _Re ,
ifekL_Azia.L2siL4 .---- 0
.
71;9 -t- 41 9 4,,; 1 ---', 5 mi 2-
Q P VG ----- 4, ri C-S
37400 z. 0,46 cf-s
Vi 7Q10 = Ot`Q cfc
i , 14 c
a lutS /vPs rielerkrikt-.9
_.- __C4161_tP--k .vsk_.
-1--0_v vri (kit, -(1.0‘..)$' ja_ithode, f e wi .
rif
I< i cou/d Pat iii-c- U-S-6-"-; \'41-iL"
Snt0 = 1/5“; 4f-Viel (,)11,(1:-, ss la cc i itd 41) -0%-0.,-
i
\&)-7640, 73,9p---. s'7Q10 Q. -4) is jot r, t s less gicth
(.)62 _ (.16,.! frov), jole_ it t9g (A)1„c, is , 5 ri-OP.1
-er,
I di,-“I
7010
up S4- eitt ir),

Ro&&
41- tt p C-51
10 = (A r.65 -43.�4 - a•
��o = 1r13 -1) ; a,�� = 0.34 I
al)r.ar
(I k6 - LPL' =
v = C_Va _44,65) ; 7 p, a c.WInr,
r2D vv'7 to (73.9 - 73) 0, 7 - 0, 3
-�__gAd t "iv'l ,eo 6 4' v- ,',q/)
yAri
R_Q1A17 /�LO 0 , 3 /
Zev
IP
ey
r o d _SQ_v e __ -rySo f'J 4 r a d g_hico_id
mirk)
G /3802) 5 r a Wb -4 4

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
FacilitylTyson Foods, Inc. NPDES # LNC0005126 1 Stream [Huntin9 Creel
Region HA10 I NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HA5,
DA_LFPR 155 sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
s7Q10_LFPR 39 !cfs
DA_new 1 181 isq mile
MAR i-..-.._.._1_..-..-icfs/sq mile
QA_eq 181.00 cfs
STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio
Hi lc
RATIO = new drainage area
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
OK, do STEP 2 now!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1 B. RATIO > 1
weight ratio weight ratio
0 1 0 1
#VALUE! I see B I
STEP 3
HA3
HA5
HA9
HA10
STEP 4
0.25
weight =
0.94
1.17
1 4
calculate 7Q10_EQ using regional equation
44.04
3.08
3.08
29.55
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
7Q10 EQ =
calculate 7010 yield using weighted equation
29.55
7Q10yield = [weight_LFPR * 7Q10_LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 7Q10_EQ]
cfs
DA_LFPR DA_new
yield = 0.24
STEP 5 calculate s7Q10
7Q10 = 7Q10yield * DA_new
summer 7Q10 =l 44.65 cfs
1.16774194
0.01 = ( 0.25 cfs/sq mile

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
Facility[T1son Foods, Inc. NPDES # INC0005126,J Stream1Huntin9.Creel
Region ,._ HA10 i NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HA5,
DA LFPR 155 !sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
w7Q10 LFPR 64 ;cfs
DA new
MAR
QA eq
STEP 1
181 isq mile
._..__ icfs/sq mile
181.00 cfs
calculate drainage area ratio
RATIO = new drainage area
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
OK, do STEP 2 now!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1
weight
0 1
#VALUED see B 1
1 0.25
STEP 3
HA3
HA5
HA9
HA10
STEP 4
weight =
B. RATIO > 1
weight
0 __
I 0.94
0.94
calculate 7010_EQ using regional equation
84.92
16.40
16.40
43.30
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
7010_EQ =
calculate 7010 yield using weighted equation
43.30
= LIJEZ11211
cfs/sq mile
7Q10yield = [weight_LFPR * 7010 LFPR] + [weight EQ * 7010_EQ]
DA LFPR DA_new
yield = 0.39
STEP 5 calculate w7Q10
7010 = 7Q10yield * DA new
winter 7010 = 72.98 cfs
+ 0.01 = 0.40 cfs/mile

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
Facility[Txson Foods, Inc. NPDES # [N00005126. StreamiHuntin9.reel
Region
DA LFPR
3002_LFPR
HA10
NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HA5;
155 ;sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
83 =cfs
DA new 181 isq mile
MAR 1 icfs/sq mile
QA eq 181.00 cfs
STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio
RATIO = new drainage area
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
OK, do STEP 2 now!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1 B. RATIO > 1
weight ratio weight ratio
0 1 _ 0 __ 1
#VALUE! r see B I �� ��0.94 �� 1.17
1 4
1
STEP 3
HA3
HA5
HA9
HA10
0.25
weight =
0.94
calculate 3002_EQ using regional equation
96.36
23.64
23.64
62.26
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
30Q2_EQ =
STEP 4 calculate 3002 yield using weighted equation
62.26
=
cfs/sq mile
3002yield = [weight_LFPR * 3002 LFPR] + [weight EQ * 3002 EQ]
DA LFPR DA new
yield = 0.51
STEP 5 calculate 30Q2
3002 = 30Q2yield * DA new
3002 = 94.98 cfs
+ 0.02 = 0.52 cfs/sq mile

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
FacilityLTyson Foods, Inc
Region
DA_LFPR
s7Q10_LFPR
DA_new
MAR
QA_eq
STEP 1
HA9
0
NPDES # INC0005126 1 Stream!Hunting. Creel
NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HA5,
sq mile
0 cfs
_.._.. 4.7.._.._..
1
4.70
sq mile
cfs/sq mile
cfs
calculate drainage area ratio
HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
RATIO = new drainage area
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
#DIV/0!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1 B. RATIO > 1
weight ratio weight ratio
0 1 0 1
#DIV/0! 1 #DIV/0!
1 0.25 1 4
#0I\00! #DIV/0! I
weight =
#DIV/0!
STEP 3 calculate 7Q10_EQ using regional equation
HA3
HA5
HA9
HA10
1.71
0.45
0.45
0.74
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
7Q10 EQ=
STEP 4 calculate 7010 yield using weighted equation
0.45
7Q10yield = [weight_LFPR * 7010_LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 7Q10_EQ]
cfs
DA_LFPR DA_new
yield = #DIV/0! + #DIV/0!
STEP 5 calculate s7Q10
7010 = 7Q10yield * DA_new
summer 7Q10 =
#DIV/0!
cfs
#DIV/0!
#DIV/O!
cfs/sq mile

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
FacilitylTyson Foods, Inc NPDES # NC0005126_1 Stream Huntin1 Creel
Region
DA LFPR
w7Q10 LFPR
DA_new
MAR
QA_eq
STEP 1
1. •.�._. HA9.._..
0 sq mile
0 cfs
4_7
1
4.70
sq mile
cfs/sq mile
cfs
calculate drainage area ratio
NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HA5,
HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
RATIO = new drainage area
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
#DIV/0!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1 B. RATIO > 1
weight weight ratio
0 1 • 0 1
[#D//0I1 #DIV/0! I [#DiV/0i 1 #DIV/0!
1 0.25 1 4
weight =
#DIV/0!
STEP 3 calculate 7010_EQ using regional equation
HA3
HA5
HA9
HA10
STEP 4
3.18
0.92
0.92
1.17
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
7010_EQ =
calculate 7010 yield using weighted equation
0.92
cfs/sq mile
7Q10yield = [weight_LFPR * 7Q10 LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 7010_EQ]
DA LFPR DA_new
L..!PJYLQLJ
yield = #DIV/0! + #DIV/01 = #DIV/01 cfs/mile
STEP 5 calculate w7010
7010 = 7010yie1d * DA new
winter 7010 = #DIV/0! cfs

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
FacilityLTyson Foods, Inc NPDES #
NC0005126
Stream Hunting Creel
Region HA9.._.._. NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HAS,
DA LFPR 0sq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
3002_LFPR 0 cfs
DA new
MAR
QA eq
STEP 1
.._.._.. 4.7 .._.._..,
1
4.70
sq mile
cfs/sq mile
cfs
calculate drainage area ratio
RATIO = new drainage area
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
#DIV/O!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1 B. RATIO > 1
weight Mk wed Ida
0 1 0 1
i57i5V #1._. I #DIV/0! 1 #DIV/0!
1 0.25 1 4
weight =
#DIV/0!
STEP 3 calculate 3002_EQ using regional equation
HA3
HA5
HA9
HA10
3.48
1.14
1.14
1.62
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
3002_EQ =
STEP 4 calculate 3002 yield using weighted equation
1.14
cfs/sq mile
30Q2yield = [weight LFPR * 3002 LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 3002 EQ]
DA LFPR DA new
yield = #DIV/01 + #DIV/01
STEP 5 calculate 3002
3002 = 3002yield * DA_new
L1?1L!?i....J
#DIV/0!
cfs/sq mile
3002 = #DIV/0! cfs

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
diSchav f)o;n-C.
FacilityiTyson Foods, Inc. NPDES #NC0005126 StreamLHuntiN.Creel
Region
DA_LFPR
s7Q10_LFPR
DA_new
MAR
QA_eq
STEP 1
HA10 NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HA5,
155 Isq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
39 'cfs
175 isq mile I yl
icfs/sq mile
cfs ► I
calculate drainage area ratio
RATIO = new drainage area = 1.12903226 ! , 1 (07 719
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
OK, do STEP 2 now!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1
weight ratio
0
1
#VALUE!
1 see B I
1
STEP 3
HA3
HA5
HA9
HA10
STEP 4
0.25
weight =
B. RATIO > 1
weight ratio
0 1
1.13
1 4
0.96
calculate 7Q10_EQ using regional equation
42.73
3.03
3.03
28.56
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
7Q10 EQ =
calculate 7Q10 yield using weighted equation
28.56
7Q10yield = [weight_LFPR * 7Q10_LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 7Q10_EQ]
cfs
DA_LFPR DA_new
yield = 0.24 + 0.01
STEP 5 calculate s7Q10
7Q10 = 7Q10yield * DA_new
summer 7Q10 =
43.37
cfs 41,105
0.25
cfs/sq mile

USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
Facility[Tyson Foods, Inc. NPDES # [N90005126• j
Region
DA LFPR
w7Q10 LFPR
HA10
155 isq mile
64 •cfs
DA new 175 �sq mile
MAR • • 1 icfs/sq mile
QA eq 175.00 cfs
STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio
StreamLHuntin Creel
NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HA5,
HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
RATIO = new drainage area
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
OK, do STEP 2 now!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage (weight_LFPR)
A. RATIO < 1
weight
0
#VALUEI
1
1
0.25
weight =
0.96
B. RATIO > 1
weight 1.6112
0 1
0.96 I 1.13
1 4
o,y4
STEP 3 calculate 7010_EQ using regional equation
HA3
HA5
HA9
HA10
STEP 4
82.38
15.97
15.97
41.88
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
7Q10_EQ =
calculate 7010 yield using weighted equation
41.88
1.1,2223azgl
cfs/sq mile 4 3 .3
7010yield = [weight_LFPR * 7Q10 LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 7010_EQ]
DA_LFPR DA new
yield = 0.40 + 0.01
0, .:;1
STEP 5 calculate w7Q10
7010 = 7Q10yield * DA new
winter 7Q10 = 70.95 cfs 1701, 9 g
0.41
cfs/mile 0,10

- t
USGS weighted low flow estimate procedure
Facility[Tyson.Foods, Inc. NPDES # LNC00051.26J Stream1Huntina Creel
Region
DA LFPR
30Q2 LFPR
_«_.H A10! NOTE: procedure applies for regions HA3, HA5,
155 jsq mile HA9, and HA10, else see flow SOP
._«_.�. 83 .._.._.«;cfs
DA new 175 1sq mile
MAR 1 lcfs/sq mile
QA_eq 175.00 cfs
STEP 1 calculate drainage area ratio
RATIO = new drainage area
drainage area at gage
IF 0.25 < RATIO < 4, CONTINUE to STEP 2, ELSE too far from gage
OK, do STEP 2 now!
STEP 2 determine weight of gage {weight LFPR}
A. RATIO < 1
weight
0
FtVKI:an
see B 1
rata
1
1
0.25
weight =
0.96
B. RATIO > 1
weight L.Q
0 1
0.96 I 1.13
1 4
STEP 3 calculate 30Q2 EQ using regional equation
HA3
HA5
HA9
HA10
93.45
22.98
22.98
60.20
cfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
30Q2 EQ =
STEP 4 calculate 3002 yield using weighted equation
60.20
= +.,2903226J
cfs/sq mile 6, 2,
3002yield = [weight_LFPR * 30Q2_LFPR] + [weight_EQ * 3002_EQ]
DA_LFPR DA new
yield = 0.51
STEP 5 calculate 3002
3002 = 30Q2yield * DA new
3002
92.27
+ 0.01 = 0.53 cfs/sq mile 0.5
cfs 94 , 5$

e Park
Tyson Foods, Inc NC0005126
7
Residual Chlorine
7010 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (ug/l)
Focal Limit
Ratio of 16.5 :1
43.4
1.7
2.635
17.0
0
5.7 %
.297
k.7.5tha tkAk6i
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7010 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
Ammonla as NH3
(winter)
43.4
1.7
2.635
1.0
0.22
5.7 %
1a IP
A,
7010 (CFS) 71
2001100m! DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 1.7
DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 2.635
STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L) 0.22
IWC (%) 3.6 %
Allowable Concentration (mgA) 44
tv a41 b d
le
0),(4 in too
t'4

17`1 30
NC0605 TSoh -FocAs ,
qay yyloolDyksIcw, 31„7/?ei
sker-1 19% Eri cius- kt
1.7 1176-I) tele,ek/ f/e/in_cr
07-_06 8144/7 (1,-et!
/frki/b i/e 4v- &Ds 0 .iTS_S; p I/ y- 6-d-e4s_e,
411-71g7 - k a.kt— tie/ a-1-W
e. 1/20 1-"( 17701.0 ch-r /0i-v_itcZ
USGS uks-SQL/V '2 I77464,
Pri) /d 0/ dyel,ded - Mad 47V7Otkr--
[Ai e_ 61, Bo D 5 • g-06, Ai/511): /31 4'i7,/
r.,e.ers_e • /3 Z
.. Were 0 Yi ve w/ re?"10V/wed
affl tieert- • G/
- A I/414 kj M ill • .• 0/ibe /0
Iva( LAja_S preiki/Y-e •ea_Ap.1_ "Aia/
7w-fc)Hie,
/?(./ Te;"/ re_i_f-/ 4 0 I 7/.•
bia ro viy7 eon c.X 14
/cf c / )..1
Repti ,t1 reel 71-0 • - vol i nikep_14-7 1):Lov,191,
1) f-° 1 r i 1Cej--C4/14" - k ? , C0112(eir,/4 1__&0c Pl- 9,147fri--01-1., c. .
eip1-Et).1 e01 MOnl V 11 "-- P,814-S11 T g , eiz,/, .. e , W) II Ye 0/.1611,7 .
u le efflui_nk les)/ i__±_fituikell:,-2/ rt)," i/-e//,

6 'Sort NC a oo6/02
PIN Ohw iet i//ew
MelW
-J4L040,

644.
e '�o = 0,/076-6
BIDS = 18�0 lbs/0/
7
Oeo 0./7) = 7/,
&9/ 5 /2 7 ((Boo : Boas 521
NRoD
19-» 010 n i rti
�40:o '1 r.34= 9(7X+,s=444
flLLei Sa Ved ov, YG AM l eve ( S efi /1?fl(it�
re u ii4 4- [,ecrwe / 1 ,er`iv l/ ed
C W; il /rin^'71' 4((a_cs-L e/ 4
Li) II( veyJ1t Ito fG\a_- 50 Gr Z Un (e S fieQ +i`Cr l -! r
(I,-7 4, 1.55) +- 4
r-00
_ a, (9354c--1= s 7 6 76
96, 033

MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : TYSON FOODS, INC.
Receiving Stream : HUNTING CREEK
SUMMER
CBOD:BOD5 RATIO = 4.6
1/10 DESIGN FLOW
The End D.O. is 7.10 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 4.52 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 2.74 mg/1.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 7.10 4.80 1
Reach 1
584.00 444.00 0.00 0.17000

SUMMER
CBOD:BOD5 RATIO = 4.6
1/10 DESIGN FLOW
I• Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I
1 1 0.00 7.40 5.51 3.67 43.66
1 1 0.40 7.34 5.43 3.59 43.79
1 1 0.80 7.29 5.35 3.51 43.92
1 1 1.20 7.25 5.26 3.43 44.05
1 1 1.60 7.21 5.19 3.36 44.18
1 1 2.00 7.18 5.11 3.28 44.30
1 1 2.40 7.16 5.03 3.21 44.43
1 1 2.80 7.14 4.95 3.14 44.56
1 1 3.20 7.12 4.88 3.07 44.69
1 1 3.60 7.11 4.81 3.00 44.82
1 1 4.00 7.10 4.73 2.93 44.94
1 1 4.40 7.10 4.66 2.87 45.07
1 1 4.80 7.10 4.59 2.81 45.20
1 1 5.20 7.10 4.52 2.74 45.33
I Seg #.I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : TYSON FOODS, INC. Subbasin : 030706
Receiving Stream : HUNTING CREEK Stream Class: WS-III
Summer 7Q10 : 43.4 Winter 7Q10 : 71.0
Design Temperature: 25.0
'LENGTH' SLOPE) VELOCITY I DEPTH' Kd I Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka 1 KN 1
1 mile I ft/mil fps I ft 'design' @201/2 'design' @201/2 'design'
I I 1 I I I I I I I
Segment 1 1 5.551 4.201 0.526 12.38 1 0.29 1 0.23 1 2.17 1 1.941 0.44 I
Reach 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I
1 Flow 1 CBOD 1 NBOD 1 D.O. I
1 cfs 1 mg/1 I mg/1 1 mg/1 I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste I 0.264 1584.000 I444.000 1 0.000
Headwaters) 43.400 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.440
* Runoff 1 0.320 I 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

11 1 1 !v V_... I\
1.
c
0
d
>-
c)
tr eQm a gUo,
"ck;n Gm pCanCit
nape Calcu lion S
to = 4, ? l
9
4,f'
to = 3,13
3.a
cum
eIcv disc
0
70
___1()r�
4.3
7,S
44
3,I3
(000►
0
-T

Page 1
Note for Michelle Wilson
From: Carla Sanderson
Date: Mon, Apr 4, 1994 9:43 AM
Subject: RE BOD Multiplier
To: Michelle Wilson
That average may be a good number to use for now - but I would consider it conservative
given the lack of further information. Since this may just show the worst case of loading and
I do not think it will change the allocation - 4.6 may be good enough for now.
From: Michelle Wilson on Mon, Apr 4, 1994 9:35 AM
Subject: RE: BOD Multiplier
To: Carla Sanderson
Cc: Dave Goodrich
H called back just now and he said Carolina Foods used 3.53 and Prudue used somewhere in
the range of 3.84 to 5.75. I thought if we can't find a facility which is closely related to
Tyson Foods; then we could use an average between the highest and lowest values. (3.53 +
5.75)/2 =4.64. If you have any objection to me using 4.6 let me know.
From: Carla Sanderson on Mon, Apr 4, 1994 9:29 AM
Subject RE: BOD Multiplier
To: Dave Goodrich; Michelle Wilson
Dave - I will try to dig up some numbers from WLA files we have. Do you still have Golden
Poultry? Do you remember what was used for the ratio in that WLA? It seems like we could
at least get a range and use the bottom end of the range for now.
From: Michelle Wilson on Mon, Apr 4, 1994 8:58 AM
Subject RE: BOD Multiplier
To: Dave Goodrich
Cc: Carla Sanderson
Dave I called H. and he said he doesn't have a typical CBOD:BODS ratio he could give me.
He also said he never got a list of requests from us. He is almost done with the Cape Fear
river basin and he would appreciate if we could get a list of longterm BOD5 test we would
like hun to run.
From: Dave Goodrich on Sun, Apr 3,1994 6:23 PM
Subject BOD Multiplier
To: Michelle Wilson
Well, I finally got time to look into this and guess what (!?) -- I don't have an answer. The
database is sorely out of date. I could call H. Bryant next week (at 733-6510) but it may be a
few days before I can get the time. My suggestion: Call H (that's right he goes by the
"name" H) and tell him you wanted to know what some typical CBOD:BOD5 ratios for meat
processors. He may have data for Smithfield Foods (Cape Fear), Carolina Byproducts
(Crowders Creek — may also be called Southern Byproducts), and/or Rose Hill Poultry (aka
House of Raeford).
Oh, I guess you want to know who H is. He and I worked together at the lab. He runs ALL

Page 2
of the state's long-term BOD tests and is one of the smartest guys we have working out
there. Let me know if you want me to talk with him.
Sony I came up empty -- Dave

Page 1
Note for Michelle Wilson
From: Dave Goodrich
Date: Thu, Apr 7, 1994 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: BOD Multiplier
To: Carla Sanderson; Michelle Wilson
1,SO
ioO roc) .5 O(
4.6 is reasonable. There was no multiplier used in the Golden Poultry permit since limits
were given in pounds per day.
From: Michelle Wilson on Mon, Apr 4, 1994 9:35 AM
Subject: RE: BOD Multiplier
To: Carla Sanderson
Cc: Dave Goodrich
H called back just now and he said Carolina Foods used 3.53 and Prudue used somewhere in
the range of 3.84 to 5.75. I thought if we can't find a facility which is closely related to
Tyson Foods; then we could use an average between the highest and lowest values. (3.53 +
5.75)/2 =4.64. If you have any objection to me using 4.6 let me know.
From: Carla Sanderson on Mon, Apr 4, 1994 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: BOD Multiplier
To: Dave Goodrich; Michelle Wilson
Dave - I will try to dig up some numbers from WLA files we have. Do you still have Golden
Poultry? Do you remember what was used for the ratio in that WLA? It seems like we could
at least get a range and use the bottom end of the range for now.
From: Michelle Wilson on Mon, Apr 4, 1994 8:58 AM
Subject: RE: BOD Multiplier
To: Dave Goodrich
Cc: Carla Sanderson
Dave I called H. and he said he doesn't have a typical CBOD:BODS ratio he could give me.
He also said he never got a list of requests from us. He is almost done with the Cape Fear
river basin and he would appreciate if we could get a list of longterm BOD5 test we would
like him to run.
From: Dave Goodrich on Sun, Apr 3, 1994 6:23 PM
Subject: BOD Multiplier
To: Michelle Wilson
Well, I finally got time to look into this and guess what (!?) -- I don't have an answer. The
database is sorely out of date. I could call H. Bryant next week (at 733-6510) but it may be a
few days before I can get the time. My suggestion: Call H (that's right he goes by the
"name" H) and tell him you wanted to know what some typical CBOD:BODS ratios for meat
processors. He may have data for Smithfield Foods (Cape Fear), Carolina Byproducts
(Crowders Creek -- may also be called Southern Byproducts), and/or Rose Hill Poultry (aka
House of Raeford).
Oh, I guess you want to know who H is. He and I worked together at the lab. He runs ALL
of the state's long-term BOD tests and is one of the smartest guys we have working out-ti,,e,-.c.;
LeF nee know i4" lock Wok,- Mc -lo faik <�/ h,Y►�.
.Sor.,/, ca.nic‘.r/J e�v — - Dave .

MODEL RESULTS
'Discharger : TYSON FOODS, INC.
Receiving Stream : HUNTING CREEK
WINTER
CBOD;BOD5 RATIO = 4.6
SAVED AS WTYSON
The End D.O. is 9.53 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 3.68 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 2.33 mg/l.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 8.95 0.00 1
Reach 1 58.40 44.40 0.00 1.70000

4
I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi
1 1 0.00
1 1 0.40
1 1 0.80
1 1 1.20
1 1 1.60
1 1 2.00
1 1 2.40
1 1 2.80
1 1 3.20
1 1 3.60
1 1 4.00
1 1 4.40
1 1 4.80
1 1 5.20
I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi
1
I
WINTER
CBOD;BOD5 RATIO = 4.6
SAVED AS WTYSON
D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I
8.95 4.02 2.55 73.64
9.02 3.99 2.53 73.78
9.08 3.96 2.52 73.92
9.14 3.94 2.50 74.06
9.19 3.91 2.48 74.20
9.24 3.89 2.46 74.34
9.29 3.86 2.45 74.48
9.33 3.83 2.43 74.62
9.37 3.81 2.41 74.76
9.41 3.78 2.40 74.90
9.44 3.76 2.38 75.04
9.47 3.73 2.36 75.18
9.50 3.71 2.35 75.32
9.53 3.68 2.33 75.46
D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : TYSON FOODS, INC.
Subbasin 030706
Receiving Stream : HUNTING CREEK Stream Class: WS-III
Summer 7Q10 : 43.4 Winter 7Q10 : 71.0
Design Temperature: 14.0
'LENGTH' SLOPE' VELOCITY 1 DEPTH' Kd I Kd I Ka I Ka I KN I
I mile I ft/mil fps 1 ft 'design' @20' 'design' @201/2 (design'
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Segment 1 I 5.551 4.211 0.775 1 2.53 10.18 10.24 12.52 I 2.871 0.19
Reach 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I
I Flow I CBOD I NBOD I D.O. I
I cfs 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 1 mg/1
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 1 2.635 1 58.400 1 44.400 I 0.000
Headwaters) 71.000 I 2.000 1 1.000 I 9.280
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 9.280
* Runoff 1 0.350 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 9.280
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

Discharger
Receiving Stream
MODEL RESULTS
: TYSON FOODS, INC.
: HUNTING CREEK
SUMMER
CBOD;BOD5 RATIO = 4.6
SAVED AS TYSON
The End D.O. is
The End CBOD is
The End NBOD is
7.07 mg/l.
4.33 mg/1.
2.63 mg/l.
Segment 1
Reach 1
DO Min
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach #
7.00 1.20 1
WLA
CBOD
(mg/1)
58.40
WLA
NBOD
(mg/1)
WLA
DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) (mgd)
44.40 0.00 1.70000

I` Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi
1 1 0.00
1 1 0.40
1 1 0.80
1 1 1.20
1 1 1.60
1 1 2.00
1 1 2.40
1 1 2.80
1 1 3.20
1 1 3.60
1 1 4.00
1 1 4.40
1 1 4.80
1 1 5.20
I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi
SUMMER
CBOD;BOD5 RATIO = 4.6
SAVED AS TYSON
D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I
7.01 5.23 3.48 46.03
7.01 5.15 3.41 46.16
7.00 5.08 3.34 46.29
7.00 5.00 3.26 46.42
7.00 4.93 3.20 46.55
7.00 4.86 3.13 46.67
7.01 4.79 3.06 46.80
7.01 4.72 3.00 46.93
7.02 4.65 2.93 47.06
7.03 4.58 2.87 47.19
7.04 4.52 2.81 47.31
7.05 4.45 2.75 47.44
7.06 4.39 2.69 47.57
7.07 4.33 2.63 47.70
D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
L?ischarger : TYSON FOODS, INC. Subbasin : 030706
Receiving Stream : HUNTING CREEK Stream Class: WS-III
Summer 7Q10 : 43.4 Winter 7Q10 : 71.0
Design Temperature: 25.0
'LENGTH' SLOPE' VELOCITY 1 DEPTH' Kd I Kd I Ka I Ka I KN I
I mile I ft/mil fps 1 ft )design) @204 )design' @201/2 'design'
I I I 1 I I I I I
Segment 1 I 5.551 4.201 0.547 1 2.39 10.29 10.23 12.25 I 2.021 0.44 I
Reach 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I
1 Flow 1 CBOD 1 NBOD I D.O. I
1 cfs 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 1 2.635 1 58.400 1 44.400 1 0.000
Headwaters) 43.400 1 2.000 1 1.000 l 7.440
Tributary I 0.000 1 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff 1 0.320 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.440
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

•
( )
\VIIOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTING OISELF-MONITORING SUMMARY] Wed. Mar 16. 1994
r
PA('ll.rrY RimIntEMENT YI(AR JAN MB MAR APR MAY JI IN 1IR, A110 Ste' OCT NOV )ltg`
110I.1)EN OIL COMPANY PERM CIIR I.IM 90% (GRAD) 90 -- --• -- -•- --- •- -- -- - - NI ••-
NC0078247/001 Begin:5/I/92 Frequency: Q P/F A FEB MAY AUG NOV N6nComp:SINGLE 91 N1 FAIL FAILREV PASS Nl - PASS - FAIL PASS
County:GRANVIL).E Region: RRO Suhbnsin:TAR01 92 •-- LATE PASS - FAIL PASS - FAIL PASS FAIL PASS
PF:0.006 Special 93 -- PASS -•- PASS -- FAIL PASS PASS --
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%):100.0 Order: 94
IOL.II)AY INN•] IENDI72SON PERM CIIR LIM:16% (GRAB) 90 --
NC.00342311001 Begin:5/1/92 Frequency: Q I'/F A FED MAY AUG NOV NnnComp:SINGI.E 91 •-- ••- --• -- »- »•
County: UCNDERS.ON Region; AR() Suhbnsin: FRBO2 92 - ••• PASS -- PASS FAIL FAIL
PE:0.025 Special 93 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
7Q10: 0.2 IWC(%): 16 Order: 94 --• PASS
LOLLY FARMS POULTRY PERM CIIR LIM: 7.0%
NC00051261001 Begin:9/1/89 Frequency: Q P/F A MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp:
County:1R1•:D19.1. Region: MRO Subhnsin: YADO6
PI': 1.7000 Special
7Q10: 38.0 IWC(9-):6.47 Order.
90 - - - PASS - NI hl PR PASS
91 - PASS - hR - M. .JAIL _FIIl. PASS
92 -- PASS PASS - PASS •- - PASS
93 -- 19.79 9.8909 4.943 >28.0 9.9
94 ---
1101.1-Y RIDGE WWTP PERM CIIR LIM:90% 90 NONE hR NONE NONE -- 80.9 -
N('0025S95/001 Begin:2/I/93 Frequency: Q P/F A MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp:SINGLE 91 LATE PASS PASS -•- -- FAIL N1 143 FAIL FAIL 14T
County:ONSLOW Region: WIRO Subhnsin: CI'F24 92 LATE PASS - -• FAIL ,PASS -- NI -• - Ng FAIL PASS
PF:0.1 Special 93 --- --- NR/PASS -•- -•- FAIL NR/IJI Dt TAIL PASS --• Ni
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%):100.0 Order: 94 FAIL
HOLLY SPRINGS WWII' PERM CIIR LIM:99%
NC0063096/001 Begin:4/1/91 Frequency: Q P/F A FEB MAY AUG NOV NonComp:
County:WAKE Region: RRO Subhasin:CPF07
PI': 0.25 Special
7 Q 10: 0.0 IWC(%): 100.0 Onler.
90 --
91 ---
92
93 •••
94 --
FAIL 146
PASS
FAIL
FAIL PASS
LATE PASS
FAIL Na
-- PASS
FAIL
PASS
N1
FAIL PASS
PASS
110MIII.1 U I1IX'fltl )N 001 PERM CIIR I.IM:99%
N(6100523IA101 Begin: 10/2/8') Eminency: Q I'Ar A JAN APR It II. O(-r Non('nmp:
County:GASTON Region:MILO 5ubhasin:Crf37
PI':0.40 Special
7Q10: 0.00 1WC(%):I00.00 Order:
90 PASS
91 PASS
92 FAIL
93 PASS
94 Nt
-
-..
PASS
--
•-
...
PASS
---
PASS
PASS
PASS
FAIL
-•-
•••
•-.
PASS
•--
--
---
--
PASS
FAIL
PASS
FAIL
-
FAIT.
---
PASS
--
FAIL
---
---
PASS
FAIL
PASS,PASS
FAIL
--
FAIL
---
PASS(s)
---
PASS
•-•
--•
1lOMELlT3 1 EXTRON 002 PERM CIIR LIM:99% (GRAB)
NC0005231/002 Begin:11/7/89 Frequency: Q 1'/F JAN APR JUL OCT NonComp:
County:GASTON Region: MRO Subhnsin: CI'B37
PF:006 Special
7Q10:0.00 IWC(%):100.00 Order:
90 PASS
91 PASS
92 FAIL
93 PASS
94 hR
--
--
PASS
--
-
-•
PASS
--
PASS
PASS
FAIL
FAIL
---
--
PASS
PASS
--
---
PASS
--
PASS
PASS
PASS
H
-•
--
--
-
--
--
---
--
FAIL
PASS
NI
PASS
LATE
--
NA
-
bt
---
N1
---
I I(JI FMAN FINISHING ' I'IIRM: 4811R LC50 AC MONIT 90%(DAPII OR CLiRIO)
NC0025 I 35/001 Begin:7/1/93 Frequency: Q MAR JUN SEP DEC NonComp:
County:CALDWELL Region: ARO Suhhasin: CI1332
P1):0.250 Special
7Q10: 0.075 IWC(%):84.0 Order.
Y 90 ---
91 -
92 FAIL
93 79.0
94 -
---
FAIL
FAIL
56.0
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
79.0
--
FAIL
FAIL
56.0
---
FAIL
-
•-•
FAIL
FAIL
37.0
56.0,21.0
•-
FAIL
21.0
>90.0'
-
FAIL
37.0
--
F,F
FAIL
37.0
FAIL
-
FAIL
37.0
--
-
--
21.0
-•
FAIL
FAIL
37.0
NFV>90.0'
INGIiRSOI.L-RAND/SCl ILAGII CORP. PERM CI IR I.1M: 90% (GRAB)
NC0079227/001 Begin:10/13/92 Frequency: Q P/F A FEB MAY AUG NOV NonComp:SINGLE
County: NASI I Region: RR() Suhbnsin: TAR02
l'F:01236 Special
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%): 100.0 Order.
90 --
91 ---
92 -
93 --
94 -•-
-
•--
•••
H -
--
---
•••
--
»-
---
-•
-•
•..
--
---
H
--
--
--
--
--
•-
--
PASS
-
--
-
FAIL
-
•--
---
PASS
--
-•
-.
--
-
N
PASS
-
--
IRA D LEE/ DEERCIIASIi I'IIRM CIIR LIM:90%; NO TOX WIIEN >0.05MGD
NC0063746/001 Begin:6/I/93 Frequency: Q PA' A JAN APR JUL OCT NonComp:
County: WAKE. Region: RRO Suhbnsin: NE1102
PF:0.05 Special
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%):90 Order:
90 -
91 PASS
92 PASS
93 PASS
94 PASS
•••
---
--
-
---
---
--
--
-
LATE
PASS
PASS
•-
LATE
--
--
-
LATE?
-
--
-
IR
FAIL
FAIL
-
-
FAIL
PASS
--
PASS
FAIL
-
Ni
FAIL
PASS
PASS
N4
PASS
•••
---
--
•-•
•••
--
0 2 cnpaecutivr failures = signiftr:utl nnnrun,plinttcc Y Pre 1'0)0 1)ntn Available
LIIOIIND:
PERM = Permit Requirement I.PT = Administrative Letter - Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly: M- Monthly; BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually: A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging: D-Discontinued monitoring requirement; IS- Conducting independent study
Beein = 'Ind month nouin•d 701(1= Receiving stream low Bow criterion (Ns) A = quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon single failure Months that testing must occur - no. JAN,APR,JUL,OCr NonComp =Current Compliance Requirnent
1'I' = Permitted flow (MCP) 1WC% = Iry ueu ,. vate rnnerntmtion PA" = Pass/Fail chronic test AC = Acute ('111( = Chronic
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow: • - Ccriodaohnia sn.: my - Mvsid sltrimn: ON • Chmnic value: l' - Morality of stated n:reent:tee at hiehest concentration: at . Performed by DIE An Tnz Group: bt • Bed teat
Reporting Notation: --- = Data not required; NR - Not reported; ( ) - Beginning of Quarter Facility Activity Stains: I - lnactivc, N - Newly Issucd(ro construct):11- Active but not discharging: t-More data ivailable for month in qucalion SIG = ORC signature needed
29

TELEPHONE LOG
TO: Jay Lucas
FROM: Mark Johnson
SUBJECT: NC0005126 Tyson Foods _ Harmony
DATE: February 2, 1994
Mark Johnson called to tell me he was increasing production to
2,000,000 pounds per day at his facility.